Goldman Sachs Executive Says Libya Understood Derivatives
June 30 2016 - 12:30PM
Dow Jones News
A Goldman Sachs Group Inc. executive testified that Libya's
sovereign-wealth fund knew what it was doing when it bought
derivatives from the bank that later soured, disputing allegations
that Goldman led an inexperienced buyer into a disastrous
investment.
The Libyan Investment Authority, or LIA, understood the disputed
derivatives it bought from Goldman, Andrea Vella, co-head of Asian
investment banking at Goldman, told the High Court in London on
Thursday.
The transactions were large enough to be described as "elephant
trades," but Goldman didn't do anything wrong in selling them, Mr.
Vella said in court.
The LIA is suing Goldman for $1.2 billion to cover its losses
from nine trades arranged in 2008. Those trades took the form of
equity derivatives and expired worthless in 2011. The LIA alleges
that Goldman executives exerted "undue influence" over its
officials, who didn't understand the trades. Goldman earned about
$222 million from the trades, according to the LIA. Goldman
disputes the amount of profit it made and denies wrongdoing.
"The LIA fully understood the disputed trades and obtained
exactly the exposure which it wanted," Mr. Vella said in his
witness statement. At the time of the Libyan transactions, Mr.
Vella was a London-based leader of Goldman's growth-markets
business. "The underlying shares did not perform as it had
anticipated."
The LIA has said its officials had little understanding of
finance and that the fund managers believed they were buying actual
shares in companies including Citigroup Inc. through the trades.
The cash-based transactions were tied to movements in the share
prices of companies including Citigroup but didn't confer ownership
of the shares.
Mr. Vella said that LIA officials including Mohammed Layas, then
chief of the fund, had experience in finance and understood
markets. Mr. Vella said that Libyan officials including Mr. Layas,
who died last year, understood the difference between purchasing
shares and equity derivatives.
The LIA was interested in buying derivatives instead of shares
partly because it was concerned about the risk of its assets being
frozen by law enforcement authorities in other countries, the
Italian-born banker said. The LIA was created in 2006, after the
country was removed from the U.S. government's list of state
sponsors of terrorism. Its purpose was to invest income from
Libya's oil fields around the world.
"Mr. Layas was wary that any investments made by the LIA could
be affected in the future by any freezing of Libyan assets," Mr.
Vella said in his statement. "He was therefore keen to put in place
appropriate steps to reduce the risk of such an event impacting
investments."
Mr. Vella said a trade to obtain "exposure to Citigroup shares
through a cash-settled forward purchase" met Mr. Layas's objective
of avoiding the risk of asset freezing "because it meant that the
LIA did not own Citigroup shares."
The LIA has said that Goldman tried to exert influence over
Mustafa Zarti, then the LIA's deputy chief, to get him to agree to
the disputed trades by granting an internship to his younger
brother, Haitem Zarti. Mr. Vella said the internship didn't
influence Mr. Zarti's decision to agree to the trades. The banker
said he believed Haitem Zarti would become an LIA employee,
potentially as the head of its London office, and that there was
nothing wrong in awarding him an internship.
A spokesman for Mustafa Zarti said he would not be commenting on
the court case. Haitem Zarti could not be reached for comment.
"The internship was an important way to develop Haitem Zarti's
own education in financial instruments," Mr. Vella said in his
statement. The internship would also "ensure" that Goldman "knew
well a person who would have an important role in the future," he
said.
The LIA has said that Goldman also tried to gain influence by
offering entertainment to its officials, including tickets to a
soccer match in London during a training visit to the bank's
office.
"It is common for firms to seek to cultivate and generate
goodwill," Mr. Vella said in his statement. "There was nothing
unreasonable about the expenses incurred."
Write to Simon Clark at simon.clark@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
June 30, 2016 12:15 ET (16:15 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2016 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Aug 2024 to Sep 2024
Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Sep 2023 to Sep 2024