Securities Registration (foreign Private Issuer) (f-1/a)

4

5

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other information set forth in this prospectus, including the section entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed below when considering an investment in our securities and any risk factors that may be set forth in the applicable prospectus supplement, any related free writing prospectus, as well as the other information contained in this prospectus, any applicable prospectus supplement and any related free writing prospectus. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that case, the market price of our securities could decline and you could lose some or all of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations.

Risks Related to the Industry in Which We Operate

The sports retail industry in our markets is very competitive and our ability to compete depends on a large variety of factors both within and beyond our control.

The sports retail industry is fragmented and characterized by intense competition. Each of our regional brands faces increasing competitive pressure both online and offline and from local and international players, impacting their ability to grow, sustain profitability and retain and grow market share. The diverse group of sports retailers with which we compete includes, but is not limited to:

Some of our current and potential future competitors have longer operating histories, greater financial resources, a larger customer base and wider reach or better economies of scale than we do. New market entrants may appear and some of our current smaller competitors may be acquired by, receive investment from or enter into strategic relationships with well-established and well-funded companies or investors who would enhance their competitive positions, potentially leading to reduced sales, lower profitability, and loss of market share for us. Moreover, as has happened in several of our regions in the past, competitors may significantly discount their prices on merchandise also offered by us. Such intensive price competition could negatively affect our ability to generate revenues as well as our profitability. Additionally, individual, strong competitors could expand their market presence in our current or future geographies and thus create a market controlling position for themselves, which could make it more difficult for us to expand our own market position.

In addition, some of our brand partners and suppliers are producers or distributors of sports products that sell their products directly to end-customers independent of any partnership with us. We could experience additional competitive pressure if such suppliers initiate or successfully expand their own online retail operations, as they have access to their merchandise at lower costs and can therefore sell such merchandise at lower prices while maintaining higher margins on their revenue than we can. We also face competition from the grey market, i.e., sports product imports that have not been authorized by the brand owner. In addition, as a result of the challenges presented by COVID-19, sports retailers and brands that previously have not used e-commerce channels to market their products may establish their own online presence or sell their goods in cooperation with our existing competitors, which may create new or strengthen existing competition.

13

We believe these factors make our industry especially competitive, with the potential for increased competition in the future. As a result, we believe that our ability to compete will depend on factors both within and beyond our control, including, but not limited to:

Any failure to properly address these factors and to successfully compete against current or future competitors could negatively affect our ability to attract and retain customers as well as brand partners and to achieve growth and sustainable profitability, which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Negative developments in global and local economic conditions in our markets, including the COVID-19 pandemic if it continues as well as severe supply chain interruptions, adversely impact and could continue to adversely impact consumer spending in the sports retail industry as well as our results of operations and prospects.

We sell sports products mainly online. Purchases of our customers are discretionary, and therefore dependent upon the level of customer spending, particularly among affluent customers. As a result, our performance depends on global and regional economic conditions, which, however, have shown significant volatility in recent years. For example, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the measures taken by various governments to combat its spread most countries in which we operate fell into recession in 2020. Our home market Germany, which had seen a long period of stable economic growth since the financial and economic crisis of 2008/2009, reported a 5% decline in its gross domestic product (GDP) for 2020 compared to 2019 (source: Destatis (Press release #20 of January 14, 2021)), followed by an increase of 2.7% of GDP for 2021

14

compared to 2020 (source: Destatis (Press release #20 of January 14, 2022)). However, this still represents a 2% decline in GDP in 2021 compared to 2019 (source: Destatis (Press release #20 of January 14, 2022)) and it can be expected that the ongoing pandemic and related counter-measures will at best continue to dampen economic prospects in Europe in the short term. While the COVID-19 crisis contributed to growth in the sports retail industry in 2020, following the end of government support programs a continued economic downturn in one or more of our markets may result in higher levels of unemployment or other negative macro-economic developments that can, as a consequence materially negatively affect consumer confidence and discretionary consumer spending, including purchases of sports products.

In addition, adverse economic developments in the countries in which we generate our revenue could adversely affect the collection of accounts receivable from our customers due to deterioration in credit quality and increase our inventory risk. There is also a risk of increased taxes, for the purpose of addressing the extraordinary levels of public spending and public debt related to the COVID-19 pandemic, in some or all of the European countries in which we sell our merchandise. Tax increases that lead to increases in the sales prices of our products or the prices of services we purchase or offer or reduce the income available for consumption could also weaken demand for our sports products.

Furthermore, there is no guarantee that our markets will continue to grow at rates experienced in the recent past, or at all. In particular, there is no certainty that our growth continues to be supported by an increasing shift from offline to online retail in the markets in which we operate (particularly in our bike vertical). There is no guarantee that the growth in demand, which has been significantly driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, will continue sustainably after the end of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, we have been adversely impacted by the on-going COVID-19 related supply chain disruption, which began in early 2021 and has had a significant negative impact on our ability to service the increased consumer demand for our products, and therefore, our revenues. Although we expect to continue to grow the market for our products at rates experienced in the recent past once the COVID-19 related supply chain disruption normalizes, we cannot predict with certainty if and when the supply chain disruption will resolve and whether demand for our products will increase as currently anticipated. Consequently, we may not be able to recoup the investments made in these markets and may be forced to close, or decide to divest, our operations in selected markets, which could have an adverse material effect on the implementation of our expansion strategy and our results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to Our Business Activities

We have incurred significant operating losses since our inception, and there is no guarantee that we will achieve or maintain profitability in the future.

We have not yet generated any consolidated net profit. In the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, SSU’s group wide loss amounted to €25.6 million and to €46.0 million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021. In the six-month period ended March 31, 2022, SSU’s group wide loss was €201.7 million. These losses are primarily attributable to the costs associated with building and growing SSU’s business such as marketing expenses, geographic expansion and investments to further developing SSU’s platform. Our business plan is premised on our ability to benefit from the expected growth of, and increasing e-commerce penetration in, our regional markets. If our markets experience disruptive political or economic events or otherwise fail to grow, or if local governments restrain us from continuing to do business as SSU has done in the past or at all, our growth prospects may not materialize, which may negatively affect our profitability or may even force us to cease operating in certain regions. Even in a stable political and economic environment, we must invest significant resources into organic growth opportunities such as building relationships with sports brands, enhancing the customer experience, driving market campaigns to gain new and retain existing customers, improving and expanding our technology and fulfillment infrastructure and other areas in order to capitalize on any potential growth opportunities. These investments may prove more expensive than anticipated and may not yield the desired results. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability in the future. Continued losses would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

15

Our management team has limited experience managing a public company, and publicly traded company reporting, control and compliance requirements could divert resources from the day-to-day management of our business.

Our management team has limited experience managing a publicly traded company and complying with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies. Our management team might not successfully or efficiently manage our transition to being a public company subject to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under applicable laws and regulations. These new obligations will require substantial attention from our management team and could divert their attention away from the day-to-day management of our business.

As a public company, we are subject to additional reporting and disclosure requirements. In the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, SSU identified material weaknesses in SSU’s internal controls related to (i) the design and maintenance of effective entity level controls to identify business risks relevant to financial reporting objectives, estimate the significance of the risks, assess the likelihood of their occurrence and determine actions to address those risks, (ii) the adequate number of individuals within its accounting and financial reporting function with sufficient training in IFRS and SEC reporting standards, (iii) the design and maintenance of formal and effective controls over certain general information technology controls for IT systems, (iv) the design and maintenance of effective controls to ensure the completeness of accounts payable and vendor accruals, (v) the design and maintenance of effective controls to ensure that revenue was recorded in the correct accounting period and (vi) the design and maintenance of effective controls to ensure the appropriateness of the estimate of the recoverable amount of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. We have developed and are in the process of implementing a remediation plan to address these control deficiencies, which we believe will address the underlying causes of these material weaknesses. Please also refer to “We are aware of material control and accounting weaknesses in our current finance organization. If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, shareholders could lose confidence in our financial and other public reporting, which is likely to negatively affect our business and the market price of our Ordinary Shares.”

Notwithstanding the actions already taken, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns and we may be required to hire and train additional employees or engage outside consultants to comply with these requirements and additional Sarbanes-Oxley Act requirements applicable to us in the future, which would increase costs and expenses. Any compliance failure could harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Compliance with these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and may make some activities more time-consuming than they were previously. For example, our accounting, controlling, legal or other corporate administrative functions may not be capable of responding to these additional requirements without difficulties and inefficiencies that may cause us to incur significant additional expenditures and/or expose us to legal, regulatory or civil costs or penalties. Any non-compliance could result in significant fines or other penalties. To secure compliance it may become necessary to hire further employees or purchase outside services which may in turn interfere with our lean organizational set-up, increase our costs and expenses, and may therefore have a material adverse effect on the operation of our business as well as on our financial condition.

We regularly pursue acquisitions, any of which could result in significant additional expenses, failure to achieve anticipated benefits, or failure to be properly integrated.

As part of our business strategy, we regularly engage in acquisitions of other companies, businesses or assets. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, any of which could harm our business, including but not limited to:

16

If, in the context of any future acquisition, we fail to properly assess the merits of the acquisition target, incur costs that later prove to be unjustified, fail to integrate the acquisition into our business properly and in a cost-efficient manner, or incur liabilities that prove to be larger than anticipated, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Failure to provide our customers with an inspiring personalized online sports experience and to adapt to the fast-changing landscape (including, but not limited to social media platforms, sports brands, associations and clubs) could limit our growth and prevent us from achieving or maintaining profitability.

We may not be able to maintain or grow our revenue or our business.

SSU experienced significant growth in the past, with revenue increasing from €413.3 million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 to €872.0 million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, corresponding to a compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of 62%. In the six-month period ended March 31, 2022, revenue amounted to €481.4 million. Likewise, the number of site visits increased from 178.7 million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 to 274.7 million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, corresponding to a CAGR of 33%. In the six-month period ended March 31, 2022, the number of website visits was 163.5 million. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to sustain these historic growth levels, or that we will continue to experience significant above-market growth or any growth at all. In addition, we anticipate that our growth rate will decline over time, especially in our first-party e-commerce business, as we achieve higher market penetration rates in all markets in which we operate. To the extent growth rate in the first-party business slows, our business performance will become increasingly dependent on our ability to achieve economies of scale by, among other things, using our operating leverage, increasing our fulfillment efficiencies and reducing marketing costs in relation to our revenue and to expand into adjacent business models and new strategies to maintain growth. We have made and are continuing to make investments in optimizing and localizing our overall customer experience, our fulfillment and technology infrastructure and the development of mobile applications. However, there is no assurance that these efforts will be sufficient to grow our revenue or business in total or in relation to the costs we incur. In particular, there is no certainty that our revenue growth continues to be supported by an increasing shift from offline to online retail in the markets in which we operate (particularly in our bike vertical), which has been significantly driven by the COVID-19 pandemic and that our new services and offerings leveraging our platform capabilities for industry partners and other market participants will be successful and will lead to complementary growth. There is no guarantee that the revenue growth driven by the increase in demand attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic will continue sustainably after the end of the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, our revenue has been adversely impacted by the on-going COVID-19 related supply chain disruption, which began in early 2021 and has had a significant negative impact on our ability to service the increased consumer demand for our products. Although we expect our revenue to increase once the COVID-19 related supply chain disruption normalizes, we cannot predict with certainty if and when the supply

17

chain disruption will resolve and whether demand for our products will increase as currently anticipated. If our efforts and strategies should prove to be unsuccessful, our revenue growth slows or if our revenue declines, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If we are unable to manage our organic growth effectively, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects.

While we have taken steps to further enable the scalability of our business, our underlying businesses continue to operate, to a large degree, as separate entities. A primary operational target of us is to create a more integrated e-commerce and technology platform across our businesses as well as integrated back-office functions to enable us to realize revenue and cost-saving synergies in the context of a rapidly growing market. If we continue to experience organic growth at similar or higher levels than currently envisaged, we may be required to further upscale our technical IT-platform as well as expand and improve our fulfillment infrastructure, enterprise resource planning, logistics, customer service and related functions beyond what is currently planned to further support the growth and harmonize our e-commerce and technology platform. Our existing teams may not be adequately staffed to handle an increase in the workload. In addition, our workforce management may prove insufficient for our expanding business and growth plans. Our continued growth strategy therefore depends on our ability to hire new and qualified personnel in the near future and there is no guarantee that we will be able to hire the required number of employees with the adequate qualifications to expand our business in a timely manner and on acceptable terms.

Continued growth may also require us to expand and improve our operational, IT, financial, accounting, compliance and management controls and reporting systems and to make significant capital expenditures in offline sites and facilities, which may not always be possible or prove lengthy or costly. If we are unable to successfully handle future growth, we may be required to take steps to slow down our growth, which may adversely affect our business and competitive position.

If we experience significant future growth, we may also have to expand our relationships with various suppliers and other third parties we do business with and to expend time and effort to integrate new suppliers and other third parties into our operations. The expansion of our business could exceed the capacities of certain of our suppliers and third parties willing to do business with us and if they are unable to keep up with our growth, our operations could be adversely affected.

In addition, an expansion of our e-commerce and technology platform, in particular our IT-infrastructure, as well as our relationships with a growing number of third parties and a growing workforce will make our operations more complex and challenging. There is no guarantee that we will be able to meet such challenges and the risk of disruptions and compliance violations may increase

An inability to manage future growth efficiently could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects.

Our growth strategy includes entering new geographic markets and pursuing new business opportunities, developing new websites or apps, or offering new products, sales formats or services, and the related investments may not yield the targeted results.

As part of our growth strategy we continuously search for opportunities to expand into new geographic markets, such as recently into the United Kingdom and the United States of America (“United States” or “U.S.”) as a result of the acquisition of Midwest Sports, Wiggle and Tennis Express. While we have experience with entering into new markets, such as entering into the Japanese market in 2020 via a joint venture with AEON Co., Ltd., we need to tailor our offering to the specific circumstances of every new geography which results in significant investments. However, we may not be able to reach our strategic goals for these new markets or these markets may prove less attractive than anticipated. If we launch but fail to generate satisfactory returns from any

18

such initiative, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If we choose to enter into new markets, expand our offering to include other types of products, or develop any new businesses, own sports brands, apps, websites, promotions, sales formats or services we believe would be compatible with, adjacent to, or complementary to our existing business, there can be no guarantee that any such endeavor will succeed. As a result, we may need to terminate, cancel, close, sell or wind-up parts of our business. Any such initiative that is not favorably received by consumers and/or suppliers, especially in the case of a termination, could damage our reputation and brand, and any expansion or alteration of our operations could require significant additional expenses and divert management and other resources, which could in turn negatively affect our results of operations. In addition, the entrance into new markets will result in a more complex regulatory and compliance environment and any failure to comply with such rules may negatively affect our results of operations.

We may be subject to negative publicity, including adverse information and negative publicity related to our affiliates or persons associated with us or any one of our affiliates.

Customers value readily available information concerning online retailers and often act on such information without further investigation or authentication or regard to its accuracy. Social media and websites immediately publish posts from users, often without filters or checks on the accuracy of the content posted. Allegations against us may be posted on social media, in internet chat rooms or on blogs or websites or other channels by anyone on an anonymous basis and any negative publicity may be accelerated through social media or other channels due to its immediacy and accessibility as a means of communication. In addition, we may be the target of harassment or other detrimental conduct by third parties, including from our competitors. Our reputation may be negatively affected as a result of the public dissemination of allegations or demeaning statements about our business, the business of our affiliates or persons associated with us or one of our affiliates, even if these allegations or statements are unfounded and we may be required to spend significant time and money to address such allegations. Such negative publicity, even if factually incorrect or based on isolated incidents, could damage our reputation, diminish the value of our brands, undermine the trust and credibility we have established and have a negative impact on our ability to attract new or retain existing customers. Inaccurate adverse information may harm our business and we may not be able to redress or correct inaccurate posts in a timely manner, or at all.

Our business may become the subject of negative media coverage and public attention, including regarding our business, the business of our affiliates or persons associated with us or one of our affiliates, which may develop strong dynamics and adversely affect our business. Third parties may communicate complaints to regulatory agencies and we may be subject to government or regulatory investigation as a result of such complaints. There is no assurance that we will be able to conclusively refute such allegations in a timely manner, or at all.

In addition, since many of our products are supplied by third-party suppliers, we may also receive negative publicity in case of inappropriate actions of our suppliers (e.g., violations of product safety regulation, environmental standards, labor laws or a use of child and slave labor). While we target to delist any products or suppliers who fail to meet our contractually agreed performance standards, there is no guarantee that we will be able to address any such concerns in a timely manner, or at all.

Any negative publicity and complaints could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects.

Our business depends on search engines to attract a substantial portion of the customers who visit our sites. Any increase in the cost of or in our reliance on search engine marketing or any decrease in the effectiveness of our search engine marketing could materially adversely affect our business.

A portion of our business is generated by customers clicking on search results displayed by search engines, such as Google, Yahoo or Bing. These search engines typically provide two types of results: algorithmic and

19

purchased listings. Algorithmic listings cannot be purchased and instead are determined and displayed solely by a set of formulas designed by the search engine provider. Purchased listings can be purchased by companies and other entities in order to attract users to their sites. We rely on both algorithmic and purchased listings to attract a substantial portion of the customers that we serve. The cost of purchased search listing advertising may increase as demand for such advertising channels grows, and further increases may have a negative impact on our ability to maintain or increase profitability. Further, search engines revise their algorithms from time to time in an attempt to optimize their search result listings and to maximize the advertising revenue generated by those listings. Innovations at search engines and online retailers, such as the Google “Buy” button or voice assistance, such as Amazon Alexa, may no longer channel customers to our websites in order to purchase products, which may result in reduced site traffic, fewer repeat customers and lower overall orders. Search engines may also place websites on a “blacklist” or remove them from their indexes for example due to poor search engine optimization. We cannot guarantee that a removal of any of our websites by Google, Yahoo, Bing or another search engine will not happen in the future or that we will be able to adapt to changes in search engine providers’ algorithms in a timely manner.

If the search engines on which we rely for site traffic remove any of our websites from their indices or otherwise modify their algorithms such that our websites have less favorable placement or do not appear among search results, our business would be adversely affected. Such circumstances may result in fewer customers clicking through to our sites, requiring us to resort to other more costly resources to attempt to replace that traffic, and this may reduce our net sales and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects.

In addition, a part of our marketing strategy is to pay for a prominent display on search engines’ results pages. In order to place these listings with a search engine, we frequently place bids on key words at a certain cost per click that we pay to the search engine. Under the bidding system, the order in which websites appear in a search engine’s paid search results is determined by a combination of the price bid by the website and the historical and expected rate at which consumers click through to the website. Bids on generic search terms (such as “bike”) typically cost more than bids on branded search terms (such as “Tennis-Point”). The click-through rate is, in turn, influenced by the strength of the website’s brand and the popularity of the website. As the importance of online advertising increases and competition to be ranked higher in purchased listings intensifies, the cost of search engine marketing generally increases. Any increase in the cost of or in our reliance on search engine marketing, or any decrease in the effectiveness of our search engine marketing, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects.

Our business depends on the continued penetration of the internet and the development and maintenance of internet infrastructure by third parties.

The delivery of our products and services depends on the ability of third-party internet service companies to provide internet access and maintain reliable networks with the necessary speeds, data capacity and security. Changes in access fees to users may materially adversely affect the ability or willingness of users to access our content. A departure from “net neutrality” (the principle that all forms of internet traffic (i.e., video, telephony and text) are subject to equal treatment in transmission speed and quality) in the markets in which we operate, for example, could result in increased costs to our business. These factors are out of our control and the manifestation of any of them could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects.

In addition, increasing traffic or user numbers may result in a decline in internet (including mobile internet) performance or reliability. Internet outages or delays could also materially adversely affect our ability to provide services to our customers, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects.

20

Our investments to increase brand awareness, to generate website and mobile traffic and to build or retain a loyal customer base may not be effective.

Maintaining and enhancing the awareness of our brands, acquiring new customers, and increasing the number of customer visits to our website and apps, the number of orders and the basket size per order is critical to our success and profitability.

We have made significant investments related to brand awareness, customer acquisition and customer loyalty, and we expect to continue to spend significant amounts to attract new and retain existing customers. For example, we have incurred and will continue to incur significant expenses in marketing through a broad range of media to attract website and app traffic, to increase customer loyalty and repeat purchases in order to increase revenue and maintain our brand awareness and recognition. These expenses include cost of marketing relating primarily to search engine advertising (Google), costs for TV commercials and costs for price comparison websites. Our decisions regarding investments in customer acquisition substantially depend upon our analysis of the conversion rates and customer lifetime value to customer acquisition cost ratios as well as first order profitability generated from customers we acquired in earlier periods. There can be no assurance that our assumptions regarding required customer acquisition investment and resulting net revenue from such customers, including those relating to the effectiveness of our marketing expenditures, will prove to be correct or that our marketing efforts and other promotional activities will achieve what we consider to be an optimal mix of advertising and marketing at a cost we consider to be economically viable. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee that certain methods of advertising that we currently utilize will not become less effective, be prohibited or otherwise be unavailable to us in the future. Our online partners might be unable to deliver the anticipated number of customer visits or impressions, or visitors that are attracted to our websites by such campaigns might not make purchases as anticipated by us.

If we are unable to attract sufficient brand awareness, website or app traffic, translate a sufficient number of website visitors or app users into purchasers with sufficiently large basket sizes, build and maintain a loyal customer base, increase repeat purchases from customers, or do any of the foregoing on a cost-effective basis, our future growth could be limited or our revenue could even decline. The occurrence of any of these events, alone or in combination, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business depends on strong brands, which we might not be able to maintain or enhance. Any such inability could harm our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects.

The recognition and reputation of our brands, in particular “Tennis-Point”^TM, “fahrrad.de”^TM, “Bikester”^TM, “Brügelmann”^TM, “Probikeshop”^TM, “Addnature”^TM, “Campz”^TM, “Stylefile” ^TM and “Outfitter”^TM, among customers and suppliers are critical for the growth and continued success of our business as well as for our competitiveness in our target product categories and markets. Maintaining leading brands is particularly important in the multi-brand sports e-commerce industry, and competition among online retailers typically favors the market participants with the strongest brands. While less well-known brands may also be able to operate profitably, the market participant with the strongest brand typically captures a very large market share. In this regard, we depend on our multi-brand strategy, where each individual brand is well known though not necessarily maintaining a leading market position in respect of such brand. Therefore, any developments, such as the legal dispute concerning the use of our brand “Tennis-Point”^TM in the United States, that harm our brands could materially adversely affect our business.

As competition in the sports e-commerce markets intensifies, we anticipate that maintaining and enhancing our brands will become increasingly difficult and expensive, and investments to increase the value of our brands may not be successful. Many factors, some of which are beyond our control, are important for maintaining and enhancing our brands, including our ability to:

21

In addition, we may be required in the future to invest in one specific brand or customer category to the detriment of our other brands or customer categories, which may weaken such brand or category.

Any failure to offer high-quality products, an inspiring and convenient shopping experience and excellent customer service tailored to meet customers’ specific needs could damage our reputation and brands and result in the loss of revenues, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects.

Our business is complemented by our private label brands, which we might not be able to maintain or enhance, and unfavorable customer feedback or negative publicity could adversely affect our private label brands.

Our business is complemented by private label brands, including, Fixie Inc., Red Cycling, Votec, Ortler, Serious, Tennis-Point, Bidi Badu, Axant and Campz. The strong awareness of our private label brands contributes to higher organic traffic on our websites and lower marketing costs, as a high percentage of our website traffic is generated by direct visits or related to customer relationship management, social media or search engine optimization channels. We also typically achieve a higher gross margin when selling our private label brands to consumers vs selling third-party brands. Maintaining and enhancing our private label brands is therefore crucial for the expansion and retention of our base of customers, suppliers and brands as well as for the improvement of our financial results. However, our private label brands may be adversely affected if their public image or reputation is tarnished by customer complaints or negative publicity about product quality, delivery times, return processes, customer support or other services. Any failure to maintain or enhance our private label brands and thus to expend and retain our loyal customer base, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Failure to provide our customers with a customized and an inspiring sports online experience could limit our growth and prevent us from achieving or maintaining sustainable profitability.

We believe that the foundation of our success as a sports online retailer is to provide our customers with a highly inspiring and engaging sports online experience from a wide selection of brands. If we should fail to offer the sports products and brands in demand by our clients, if we are unable to present such products on our websites in an inspiring and attractive way and at competitive prices, if customization of online experience offered by us fails to be inspiring and yet being expensive, or if customers regard our fulfillment capabilities, in particular delivery, returns and payment, as not entirely convenient, we may be unable to win new customers, may lose existing customers or may be faced with reduced volumes of purchases on our websites, any of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects.

22

Any failure to anticipate and respond in a timely manner to sports trends and consumer preferences could result in a loss of customers and business.

Our ability to sell a sufficient number of products at satisfactory price levels depends on our ability to predict and respond to sports trends and changing customer preferences in a timely manner. We operate in the sports retail industry, which is highly sensitive to changes in customer preference, fluctuations in sports trends and seasonal weather patterns. Customer preferences regarding sports design, quality and price tend to change rapidly and new trends, such as focus on sustainability, may continue to gain importance. Thus, accurately forecasting the selection and required quantities of such products is difficult. In addition, we must take into account the time it takes us to respond to changes in trends, as we incur lead times for the delivery of merchandise from our suppliers. As such, a potential increase in lead times, e.g., due to disruptions in the supply chain, may result in us not having the appropriate selection or the required quantities of products in order to satisfy customer demand. While there has been an increase in demand for more sustainable and environmental-friendly sports products due to ever more present public awareness regarding climate change and the environmental impact of sports, this may not result in customers’ willingness to pay higher prices, for example. We typically enter into agreements to purchase our merchandise in advance of the applicable selling season and any failure to anticipate and respond in a timely manner to sports trends and customer preferences could result in lost sales, a loss of customers or unfavorable margin structures when selling lower demanded products, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, write-offs on inventory and results of operation.

We may miss or may not be able to adapt to the latest trends in communication with our customers through social media or other channels.

We heavily rely on social media to communicate with our customers. Changes to the terms and conditions of the relevant providers could limit our ability to communicate through social media. These services may also change their algorithms or interfaces even without notifying us, which may reduce our visibility or increase our costs.

We also use newsletters in the form of emails and other messaging services in order to promote our brands, inform customers of our product offering and/or the status of their transactions. Changes in how webmail services organize and prioritize emails could reduce the number of customers opening our emails. For example, several service providers organize incoming emails into categories. Such tools and features could result in our emails and other messages being shown as “spam” or as lower-priority messages to our customers, which could reduce the likelihood of customers opening or responding positively to them. Actions by third parties to block, impose restrictions on, or charge for the delivery of, emails, app push notifications and other messages, as well as legal or regulatory changes limiting our right to send such messages or imposing additional requirements on our ability to conduct email marketing or send other messages, could impair our ability to communicate with our customers.

If we are unable to communicate through social media, via emails, app push notifications or other messages with our customers, if our messages are delayed, or if customers do not receive or view them, we will no longer be able to use this marketing channel. This could impair our marketing efforts, or make them more expensive if we feel the need to increase spending on paid marketing channels to compensate for the loss of free marketing, and, as a result, our business could be adversely affected.

In addition, any malfunction of our communication services could result in erroneous messages being sent and customers no longer wanting to receive any messages from us. Furthermore, our process to obtain consent from the visitors to our websites to receive newsletters, app push notifications and other messages from us and to allow us to use their data may be seen as insufficient or invalid. As a result, such individuals or third parties may accuse us of sending unsolicited advertisements and other messages which could result in claims against us.

23

The way our customers communicate online is constantly evolving. Keeping up with these developments is key for us to effectively present our brand, labels and products to our customers. However, we may not be able to identify new trends in communication or to adapt to these trends. An inability to communicate through social media, app push notifications, emails or other messaging services could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We are involved in and may pursue strategic relationships. We may have limited control over such relationships, and these relationships may not provide the anticipated benefits.

We have partnered with numerous third parties, inter alia by acquiring shares in their businesses or by entering into cooperation agreements, including komoot and our joint venture with AEON and a number of operative cooperations across our group of companies and may pursue and enter into additional strategic relationships in the future. Current and future strategic relationships involve risks, including but not limited to maintaining good working relationships with the other party, inconsistency of economic or business interests, the other party’s failure to fund its share of capital for operations or to fulfill its other commitments – including providing accurate and timely accounting and financial information to us – loss of key personnel, actions taken by our strategic partners that may not be compliant with applicable rules, regulations and laws, reputational concerns regarding our partners or our leadership that may be imputed to us, bankruptcy and related bankruptcy proceedings requiring us to assume all risks and capital requirements related to the relationship. Further, these relationships may not deliver the benefits that were originally anticipated, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business strategy and results of operations.

We rely on external financing to support the continued growth of our business and may not be able to raise needed capital on economically acceptable terms, or at all.

Since our inception, we have had negative operating cash flows and relied on external financing. The uncertain and volatile economic environment across our key regions, combined with significant funding needs and a loss-making business, may reduce our options for raising additional capital, be it in the form of equity or debt financing. This uncertain and volatile environment may also negatively impact the accuracy of our budgeting and financial forecasting. As a consequence, we may not be able to correctly anticipate our capital requirements. If we are not able to raise the required capital on economically acceptable terms, or at all, or fail to accurately project and anticipate our capital needs, we might have insufficient funds to meet our obligations and/or may be forced to limit or even scale back our operations, which may adversely affect our growth, business and market share and could ultimately lead to insolvency.

While we raised significant capital in the Business Combination, we may require additional capital to finance our operations or the future growth of our business. If we choose to raise additional capital by issuing new shares, our ability to place such shares at attractive prices, or at all, depends on the condition of equity capital markets in general and the price of our shares in particular, and such share price may be subject to considerable fluctuation.

A breach of covenants or other contractual obligations contained in external financing agreements, including any arrangements we enter into in the future, could trigger an event of default that may trigger immediate repayment obligations or may lead to the seizure of collateral posted by us, all of which may adversely affect our business. Additional debt financing from independent third parties may not be easily available to us. Even if additional debt financing were available, such financing may require us to grant security in favor of the relevant lenders or impose other restrictions on our business and financial position. Moreover, if we raise additional capital through debt financing on unfavorable terms, this could adversely affect our operational flexibility and profitability. Such restrictions may adversely affect our operations and limit our ability to grow our business as intended.

An inability to obtain capital on economically acceptable terms, or at all, could have a material adverse effect on the implementation of our business strategy, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

24

We rely on third party suppliers for the products we sell and any deterioration in those business relationships or continuing supply chain disruptions may materially and adversely affect our business.

We source the products we sell (including our private brand label products) from a significant number of suppliers. Our continued growth resulting from increased demand for the products we sell will require us to increase our ability to source commercial-quality products on reasonable terms.

Our suppliers (including those manufacturing our private label products) may:

In addition, a considerable reduction in payment terms from our suppliers, which may further decrease in the future, has, inter alia, led to additional short and medium term liquidity needs. Any disruptions in our relationships with suppliers or our failure to resolve disputes with or complaints from our suppliers in a timely manner or a further reduction in payment terms could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects.

In addition, certain of our businesses have a high level of turnover with a select number of suppliers. For instance, a significant portion of our sales in our teamsport and athleisure segments related to products of Adidas and Nike. If any significant supplier chooses not to sell their products to us or limit our access to their products, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects.

Our brands and other suppliers could discontinue selling to us on financially viable terms, fail to supply us with high quality, compliant and sufficient merchandise, or fail to comply with applicable laws or regulations.

We source our proprietary brand products from numerous domestic and international manufacturers, distributors and resellers with whom we typically do not agree on long-term supply agreements. These suppliers are subject to various risks, such as changes in raw material costs, labor disputes, boycotts, natural disasters, trade restrictions or disruptions, currency fluctuations, reductions in available credit from banks, factors or other financial institutions and adverse changes in general economic and political conditions as well as supply chain

25

interruptions caused by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic that could limit their ability to provide us with high-quality and compliant merchandise on a timely basis and in accordance with agreed-upon terms or may fail to re-negotiate new supply agreements with our suppliers on favorable terms. In addition, we face risks in relation to the shortage of supplies in bicycles and bicycle parts due to the overall increased demand for bicycles and bicycle parts due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In this respect, we may be unable to fully pass on price increases for bicycles to our customers which could have a negative impact on our profitability.

We could also become subject to adverse legal or regulatory actions if our suppliers provide us with or have us sell from third-party stock products that do not comply with applicable laws or regulations, including laws and regulations relating to product safety, embargoes, environmental protection, and standards relating to employment and factory conditions. While we have taken steps to prevent noncompliance of our brand partners and suppliers with applicable laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that these steps effectively prevent non-compliance in all circumstances. If sports brand partners or suppliers do not observe these regulations, we may be unable to sell or otherwise handle the relevant products. If we fail to detect any deficiencies in the products sold or handled by us before such products are shipped to customers, we may have to recall such products. In the event of any failure by sports brand partners or suppliers to meet our quality standards or the quality standards of our customers, we could incur additional costs, our brand and reputation may be damaged by negative publicity due to such deficiencies, we or our management may face administrative fines, claims related to product liability or criminal charges and we may lose current or potential customers, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We source our private label brand products from a large number of different manufacturers, including manufacturers across multiple continents (including Asia), where there is a relatively higher risk that agreed-upon working conditions are not respected at all times. In addition, manufacturers may use materials that are not suitable for the relevant products and could potentially even harm consumers of our own private label brand products. While we regularly check the working conditions in most of these factories and the quality of our own private label brand products, there can be no guarantee that our checks effectively uncover all deficiencies. We may also become liable for violation of national or European legislation regarding the monitoring of our supply chains in the future (for further details please refer to “We are subject to various regulations applying to e-commerce and tech businesses generally, including but not limited to regulations governing cyber security, data protection, consumer protection, product safety and trademarks, and future regulations might impose additional requirements and other obligations on our business.”). Any deficiencies may result in negative publicity and may materially harm our reputation and business. In addition, some of our manufacturers require that we prepay orders for merchandise, which exposes us to the risk of fraud. Further, we may lose these prepayments if the relevant manufacturer enters bankruptcy proceedings.

We are subject to standardized contractual terms and conditions imposed by our suppliers that regularly include restrictive clauses, which, for example, prohibit us from selling our products in or into certain regions and markets or on certain platforms.

When we enter into arrangements or contracts with our suppliers, we typically have to agree to their respective standardized contractual terms and conditions, which are generally not further negotiable. Such standardized contracts often include various restrictive clauses, such as, territorially restricting or other similar clauses prohibiting us from selling our products in or into certain regions and markets or on-selling products through channels other than our own websites. At the same time, such standardized contracts typically do not impose comparable restrictions on our suppliers that would prevent those suppliers from selling the relevant products to our competitors or any other third party. Any breach of such restricting clauses, both intentional or inadvertent, might lead to the termination of the respective contract by the supplier concerned, expose us to substantial liability or contractual fines, and could result in material litigation against us. Even if our contractors falsely accuse us of having violated such clauses and assert corresponding claims against us, defending such claims might be expensive and time-consuming and may divert our management’s attention away from the day-to-day management of our business. Besides that, there would be no guarantee that the defense against such claims would ultimately be successful.

26

The agreements concluded with our suppliers typically do not provide for a fixed price for the purchase of products by us. As a result, we may be subject to price fluctuations based on changes in our suppliers’ businesses, cost structures, foreign exchange rates or other factors. Most of these standardized contracts do not incorporate any obligations or standards for our suppliers regarding ethical business conduct, corporate responsibility or legal compliance in general. There is no guarantee that our suppliers conduct their business according to our own ethical business principles or ideas of corporate responsibility and any non-compliance by any of our suppliers with such principles or applicable laws and regulations could significantly damage our reputation, business and/or expose us to claims by third parties. For further details on recent supply chain legislation, please also refer to “We are subject to various regulations applying to e-commerce and tech businesses generally, including but not limited to regulations governing cyber security, data protection, consumer protection, product safety and trademarks, and future regulations might impose additional requirements and other obligations on our business.”

Further, we are already subject to numerous contracts incorporating such restricting or other similar clauses and may enter into additional contracts or may be subjected to similar arrangements in the future involving such or similarly restricting clauses, particularly if and to the extent we geographically expand our business operations. For example, based on such restricting clauses, we are already prohibited from selling certain of our products sourced from selected brand partners or suppliers in or into markets outside of Germany, the European Economic Area or the US. Certain other brand partners impose restrictions or certain requirements for the presentation of their products on our websites or our marketing activities. Any such contractual restriction may significantly limit our ability and potential to conduct or grow our business operations, particularly if we enter into further contracts containing such non-compete, territorially restricting or similar clauses in the future.

Many of our suppliers rely on credit insurance to protect their receivables, and any changes to, or too slow adjustments or withdrawals of, such credit insurance might lead suppliers to seek to reduce their credit exposure to us.

We are aware that many of our third-party suppliers have traditionally obtained credit insurance to protect their receivables against the risk of bad debt, insolvency or protracted default of their buyers, including us. Credit levels available to us from our suppliers remain dependent on the general economic environment and our financial position. Despite a modest improvement of availability of credit insurance to our suppliers during the fiscal year 2021, we experienced a notable decrease in the availability of credit insurance to our suppliers in previous years. If such availability decreases, or if requests concerning an increase in credit levels are not met in a timely manner, and if such suppliers are unwilling or unable to take credit risk themselves or find alternative credit sources, they might choose to reduce their credit exposure to us, which efforts might include attempts to change their credit terms or refusing to contract with us. Any such actions could have a material adverse effect on our cash position, lead to an increase in our indebtedness or have a negative impact on our product offering and, thus, on revenue, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Changes in customer return rates might increase our costs and harm our business.

We have established return policies specific to our various local markets and verticals that permit our customers to return products within designated timeframes ranging from 30 to 100 days following delivery. Granting return rights is an important element for converting app and website visitors into customers, providing our customers with the certainty that they will only be required to pay for those products that they want to keep.

We might experience a significant increase in returns — for example, due to customer dissatisfaction with our products or customer service, changes in customer behavior or the abuse of our liberal return policy by persons not actually willing to purchase our products. In this case there is no guarantee that we will be able to utilize returned goods in a cost-efficient manner — for example, by reselling them on our websites, selling them at third-party outlets or returning them to our suppliers. We incur costs associated with returned goods — for

27

example, costs associated with return processing and delivery — but may not receive revenue from returns or proceeds from sales of returned goods may not cover all costs incurred. Thus, any increase in returns would increase our costs with no corresponding increase in revenue.

Continued growth, in particular in case of an increase in market place sales, is likely to increase the absolute number of returns, which may force us to allocate additional resources to the handling of such returns and may further complicate our operations. Even though products that have not passed through our fulfillment centers, but are delivered via drop-shipping, contain a return label for that drop-shipping partner, we cannot guarantee that some packages are wrongly labeled and returned to us, which may require us to store such products for a certain amount of time and initiate the further return to our partner. Furthermore, any modification of our return policies may result in customer dissatisfaction or an increase in the number of returns, which could adversely affect our business.

We may be unable to manage our own inventory levels effectively and shifting customer preferences may result in overstocking or understocking of products.

We operate in the sports retail industry, which is highly sensitive to changes in consumer preference, fluctuations in sports trends and weather patterns. Consumer preferences regarding sports design, quality, sustainability and price tend to change rapidly and accurately forecasting the selection and required quantities of such products in future periods is difficult. Accelerated through sentiments on social media, the popularity of products can change significantly between the time products are ordered and the date of sale. In addition, the lead times we must incur in taking delivery of merchandise from many of our suppliers pose challenges by increasing, in some cases significantly, the time it takes us to respond to changes in product trends, consumer demand and market prices. As a result, we face the risk of not having the appropriate selection or the required quantities of products in order to satisfy customer demand, in which case our reputation might suffer. A sudden loss of customers may additionally result in increased costs of maintaining inventory and the risk of losses on excess inventory.

In addition, we may misjudge the popularity of our products due to changing customer preferences, which may render us unable to avoid overstocking or understocking. We therefore face the risk of carrying excess inventory which we might be unable to sell during the relevant selling seasons, or only by offering significant discounts. In addition, significant discounting may damage both our relationship with suppliers whose products we sell at discounts as well as our own brand. We generally do not have the right to return unsold products to our brand partners. If we fail to anticipate and respond in a timely manner to changing consumer preferences and adjust our purchases and inventory accordingly, this may result in lost sales, sales at lower than anticipated margins and/or write-offs on inventories, any of which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The broad variety of payment methods we accept exposes us to operational, regulatory and fraud risks.

We currently accept a number of different payment methods tailored to meet our customers’ payment preferences. These payment methods include, among others, invoicing, credit and debit cards, PayPal, direct deposit, online bank transfer, direct debit, checks and gift cards. Due to the complexity of the broad variety of payment methods we accept, we face the risk of operational failures in our checkout process, which could adversely affect our conversion rate (i.e., the percentage of people visiting our websites that actually place an order) and customer satisfaction. There is also the risk that, in connection with the methods of payment we offer, we may become subject to additional regulations, compliance requirements, and various types of fraud or cyber-attacks.

For certain payment methods, including credit and debit cards, we pay bank interchange and other fees. These fees may increase over time, increasing our operating costs and decreasing our profitability. We are also subject to operating rules and certification requirements of payment scheme associations, including the Payment

28

Card Industry Data Security Standard and rules governing electronic funds transfers. Amendments to these rules or the introduction of new laws or requirements regarding any payment method we accept could result in increasing compliance costs, higher transaction fees, and the possible loss of or restrictions to our ability to accept credit or debit cards or other types of payment.

We generally rely on third parties to provide payment processing services. We also rely on third-party payment processors, and encryption and authentication technology licensed from third parties, to securely transmit customers’ personal information. If these companies become unwilling or unable to provide these services, or increase their fees, such as bank and intermediary fees for credit card payments, our operations may be disrupted and our operating costs could increase.

Furthermore, we face risks relating to customer claims that purchases or payments were not properly authorized or were transmitted in error, as well as risks that customers have insufficient funds and the risk of fraud. While fraud risks are mostly covered through our contracts with payment processing services, any failure to avoid or limit losses from fraudulent transactions could damage our reputation and result in increased legal expenses and fees.

The materialization of any of the risks described above could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We largely depend on third-party service providers for the fulfillment and distribution of our products to end customers.

We depend on third-party logistics providers for the fulfillment and distribution of the products that our customers order online. Therefore, we have only limited control over the handling of our goods in the course of the fulfillment process, the timing of deliveries and the security of our products while they are being transported. There may be shipping delays due to, among other things, inclement weather, natural disasters, strikes, terrorism or ongoing restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We also face the risk that our products may be damaged or lost in transit — for example, in the course of sourcing from overseas. If these third-party providers terminate their contracts with us, we may not be able to find suitable alternatives on commercially acceptable terms, which could disrupt our services or increase our costs. Additionally, there can be no assurance that customers will not expect or demand faster delivery times than we can ensure in the future. If the products we sell are not delivered in a timely manner or are damaged or lost in transit, if we are not able to provide adequate customer support, or if our competitors are able to deliver the same or equivalent products faster or more conveniently, our customers could become dissatisfied and cease buying on our websites.

In some of our markets, it may be difficult to replace the logistics providers with whom we cooperate due to a lack of alternative offerings at comparable price and/or service quality and we may not be able to substitute such third-party services with an own last-mile delivery service. Changes in shipping terms and costs, for example due to higher fuel costs, or the inability or refusal of third-party logistics providers to deliver our products in a safe and timely manner could harm our reputation and have an adverse effect on our business. Additionally, any deterioration in the financial condition of any third-party service provider could have an adverse impact on the quality of our logistics processes and distribution costs. If third-party logistics providers were to increase their shipping costs and we continue to offer free delivery and returns, the increased shipping costs could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Any failure to successfully address our changing fulfillment and logistics capacity requirements could severely affect our business and prospects.

The functioning of our online business depends to a large extent on our customers receiving the ordered goods in a timely and convenient manner and their ability to return them without any difficulties. To keep our customers satisfied we rely on a multi-national logistics infrastructure, consisting of both own, hybrid and third-

29

party logistics infrastructure set-ups, including inbound receipt of items for sale, storage systems, packaging, outbound freight, and the receipt, screening and handling of returns. These processes are complex and depend on sophisticated know-how and computerized systems. We are therefore constantly monitoring and sourcing our fulfillment services and logistics capacity to keep up with those requirements and match our continued growth. It is, however, not certain that we will be able to find suitable service providers on commercially acceptable terms to support any future expansion plans. We might also need to increase our capital expenditures more than anticipated in order to increase the capacity of our own logistics infrastructure while at the same time, in other regions we may be forced to deal with excess capacities. Any failure in the required sourcing of fulfillment and logistics infrastructure as our business expands could materially impact our growth strategy.

If we continue to add new businesses or categories with different logistical requirements, or change the mix in products that we sell, our logistics capacities will become increasingly complex and operating it will become even more challenging. Operational difficulties could result in shipping delays and customer dissatisfaction or cause our logistics costs to become high and uncompetitive. Any failure to successfully address such challenges in a cost-effective and timely manner could severely disrupt our business and harm our reputation.

Our sourcing and logistics costs are subject to movements in the prices for raw materials and fuel as well as other factors beyond our control, and we may not be able to pass on price increases by our third-party services providers to our customers.

Our sourcing and logistics costs depend on the development of prices for certain raw materials, in particular cotton and other textile raw materials, as well as fuel. In addition, our sourcing costs are also influenced by the capacity utilization rates at our suppliers, quantities demanded from our suppliers, and product specification. As a result, our costs of materials can vary materially in the short-term and, in cases of supply shortages, can increase significantly. We are typically impacted by increases in the prices of raw materials and fuel price as well as carrier-charge increases, as our suppliers and third-party service providers attempt to pass along these increases to us. Although we may attempt to pass on cost increases to our customers by increasing selling prices via regular price reviews, we may not always be able to do so. Moreover, any price increases could adversely affect our sales or reduce our profitability. During periods of declining input or fuel prices, customer demand may also require that we sell our products at lower prices or may restrict our ability to increase prices, in spite of the fact that we may use goods that were purchased at higher prices or that we are forced to incur higher shipping costs, thereby negatively impacting our margins. The volatility in our sourcing and logistics costs and our limited ability to pass them on to customers may adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Dissatisfaction with our customer service could negatively affect our customer retention and the further implementation of our growth strategy.

A satisfied and loyal customer base is crucial to our continued growth. A strong customer service is required to ensure that customer complaints are dealt with in a timely manner and to the customer’s satisfaction. Except with respect to our offline stores, we do not typically have direct face-to-face contact with customers which is afforded through offline retail, the way we directly interact with customers through our customer service team is crucial to maintaining continuous customer relationships. We respond to customer requests and inquiries through e-mail, chat functions, social media and our partly toll-free hotlines. Any actual or perceived failure or unsatisfactory response by our customer service could negatively affect customer satisfaction and loyalty. Our inability to retain customers due to a lack of satisfactory customer service could have a material adverse effect on the further implementation of our growth strategy.

Our business is subject to operational and accident risks which may not be fully covered by our insurance.

We are exposed to risks related to the health and safety of our employees and contractors as well as other workplace safety risks. For example, our distribution activities involve specific risks such as fire, falls from height, objects falling from storage shelving and during movement, or traffic movements which could result in

30

damage to equipment, damage to the property of third parties and personal injury or death. Accidents or other incidents that occur at any of our shops or distribution facilities or involve our personnel or operations could result in claims for damages against us and could damage our reputation. If staff and contractors get injured during the course of their duties we may, among other things, face fines and penalties from regulators as well as damage to our reputation.

We are also exposed to risks due to external factors beyond our control, including, but not limited to, accidents, vandalism, natural hazards, acts of terrorism, damage and loss caused by fire, power failures or other events, that could potentially lead to personal injuries, damage to third-party property or the environment or the interruption of our business operations. Accidents or other incidents that occur at our offices and workshops, or involve our personnel or operations could result in claims for damages against us and could damage our reputation. Although we maintain insurance against such losses to a level and at a cost we deem appropriate, our insurance policies are subject to exclusions and limitations, and we cannot guarantee that all material events of damage or loss will be fully or adequately covered by an applicable insurance policy. As a result, the amount of any costs, including fines or damages that we might incur in such circumstances, could substantially exceed any insurance we have to cover such losses. In addition, our insurance providers could raise their costs or become insolvent. The occurrence of any of these events, alone or in combination, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Any failure to operate, maintain, integrate and scale our network and mobile infrastructure could result in customer dissatisfaction, loss of revenues or subject us to claims for damages.

As an online sports retailer, we are dependent on the smooth functioning of our information technology systems, especially our internet and mobile infrastructure, which are critical to our business and inherently subject to various operating risks. For example, our offering is founded on our marketing platform specifically designed for the sourcing, presentation, curation, marketing and fulfillment of sports products. In addition, a key element of our strategy is to generate a high volume of traffic on, and use of, our websites and mobile domains to analyze a broad range of customer data, tracking individual journeys and ensuring efficient spending of our marketing resources. Our reputation and ability to acquire, retain and serve our customers are dependent upon the reliable performance of our websites, mobile domains and their underlying network infrastructure. As our customer base and the amount of information shared on our websites continue to grow, we will require additional network capacity and computing power. In addition, we need to maintain reliable internet and mobile networks with the necessary speed, data capacity and security, as well as ensuring timely development of complementary products.

The operation of our technology systems is expensive and complex and could result in operational failures. In addition, we are exposed to the risk of our technology systems being undersized and functionally maladjusted. In the event that our customer base or the amount of traffic on our websites grows more quickly than anticipated, we may be required to incur significant additional costs to enhance the underlying network infrastructure. Inadequate performance of our technology systems, whether due to system failures, power outages, lack of firewall protection, denial-of-service and credential stuffing attacks (attempts of which we experience regularly), computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins, undetected errors, design faults or other unexpected events or causes, could affect the security or availability of websites, prevent customers from accessing our websites and result in limited capacity, reduced demand, processing delays and loss of customers. Past internal and external audits have revealed deficiencies in the technology systems of certain of our verticals. There can be no assurance that our remediation measures are effective. Moreover, future audits could reveal similar or other deficiencies in our technology systems. Any actual or perceived failure to maintain the performance, reliability, security and availability of our products and technology systems to the satisfaction of our customers and certain regulators could harm our reputation, disrupt our business or decrease our ability to attract and retain customers.

We use cloud services for storing and maintaining customer data as well as for the provision of our IT-infrastructure. An interruption or breakdown of our technology systems and IT-infrastructure due to power

31

outages, fire, natural disasters, acts of terrorism, vandalism or sabotage, actions of third-party providers or any other unanticipated reason cannot be ruled out completely. If our cloud service partners fail, we may experience downtime on websites which could reduce the attractiveness of our websites to customers. Failure in our IT-infrastructure could also result in unfavorable media coverage, damage our reputation, and/or result in regulatory inquiries or other proceedings.

A failure to adopt and apply technological advances in a timely manner could limit our growth and prevent us from maintaining profitability.

The internet and e-commerce ecosystems are characterized by rapid technological development. New advances in technology can increase competitive pressure. Our success therefore depends, for example, on our ability to improve our current technological capabilities and capacities, including machine learning algorithms and big data infrastructure and to develop new online features and apps for a variety of platforms in a timely manner in order to remain competitive. Any failure to adopt and apply new technological advances in a timely manner could decrease the attractiveness of our websites and mobile domains to customers and thus adversely affect our growth and our revenue.

Customer growth and activity on mobile devices depends upon effective use of mobile operating systems, networks and standards that we do not control.

Purchases using mobile devices by customers generally, and by our customers specifically, have increased significantly, and we expect this trend to continue. In the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, approximately 64.8% of page views were generated via mobile app, tablet and mobile phone. To optimize the mobile shopping experience, we are dependent on our customers’ ability to access our sites from an internet browser on their mobile device. With the continued release of new mobile devices and operating systems, we face difficulties predicting the problems we may encounter in developing apps for these alternative devices and operating systems, and we may need to devote significant resources to the creation, support and maintenance of such applications. In addition, our future growth and our results of operations could suffer if we experience difficulties in the future when offering our merchandise on mobile devices. We are further dependent on the interoperability of our sites with popular mobile operating systems that we do not control, such as iOS and Android, and any changes in such systems that degrade the functionality of our sites or give preferential treatment to competitive products could adversely affect the usage of our sites on mobile devices. In the event that it is more difficult for our customers to access and use our sites on their mobile devices, or if our customers choose not to access or to use our sites on their mobile devices or to use mobile products that do not offer access to our sites, our customer growth could be harmed and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Further, we continually upgrade existing technologies and business applications, and we may be required to implement new technologies or business applications in the future. The implementation of upgrades and changes requires significant investments. The timing, effectiveness and costs associated with the successful implementation of any upgrades or changes to our systems and infrastructure could have adverse effects on our results of operations.

We are exposed to the risk of security breaches, including cyber-attacks, and unauthorized use of one or more of our websites, databases, online security systems or computerized logistics management systems.

We operate apps, websites, networks and other data systems through which we collect, maintain, transmit and store information about our customers, suppliers and others, including credit card or other financial information and personal information, as well as other confidential and proprietary information, including information related to intellectual property. We also employ third-party service providers that store, process and transmit proprietary, personal and confidential information on our behalf. Furthermore, we rely on encryption and authentication technology licensed from third parties in an effort to securely transmit confidential and

32

sensitive information, including credit card details. While we take extensive steps to protect the security, integrity and confidentiality of sensitive and confidential information (e.g., password policies and firewalls), our security practices may be insufficient and third parties may breach our systems (e.g., through Trojans, spyware, ransomware or other malware attacks, or breaches by our employees or third party service providers), which may result in unauthorized use or disclosure of information. Such attacks might lead to blackmailing attempts, forcing us to pay substantial amounts to release our captured data or resulting in the unauthorized release of such data.

Given that techniques used in these attacks change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, it may be impossible to properly secure our systems. In addition, technical advances or a continued expansion and increased complexity of our IT-infrastructure could increase the likelihood of security breaches.

Advances in computer capabilities, new technological discoveries or other developments could increase the frequency or likelihood of security breaches. In addition, security breaches can also occur as a result of non-technical issues, including intentional or inadvertent breaches by our employees or by persons with whom we have commercial relationships. Any compromise or breach of our security measures, or those of our third-party service providers, could violate applicable privacy, data security and other laws, and cause significant legal and financial risks, adverse publicity or a loss of confidence in our security measures. We cannot be certain that our insurance coverage concerning other risks will be adequate for liabilities that we might actually incur or that such insurance will continue to be available to us on economically reasonable terms, or at all. Additionally, we may need to devote significant resources to protect against security breaches or to address problems caused by breaches, which may require us to divert resources from the growth and expansion of our business. The materialization of any of the foregoing risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects as well as our reputation as a software enterprise.

Our business may be harmed if we are unable to secure licenses for third-party technologies on which we rely.

We rely on licenses to utilize certain technology provided by third parties, such as database technology, our e-commerce and technology platform, operating systems for our servers and other computers and components for our servers. These third-party technology licenses may cease to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we are unable to obtain licenses for, or otherwise make use of this technology, we would need to obtain substitute technology, which may not be available. If substitute technology is available, it may be of lower quality or have lower performance standards or may only be available at a greater cost, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects.

Also, because we often depend upon the successful operation of third-party products in conjunction with our software, any errors in these third-party products, which may be outside of our control, may prevent the implementation or impair the functionality of our software and internet-based services, or delay the introduction of new services.

Ineffective protection of confidential information might materially weaken our market position.

Our key employees, directors and officers have access to sensitive confidential information relating to our business, especially relating to the functioning of our websites and apps, our proprietary machine learning algorithms and big data infrastructure. While we have confidentiality agreements and technical measures in place we cannot assure that third parties or the general public never gain access to such information. Any ineffective protection of such information relating to our business might materially weaken our market position and thus adversely affect our business and operations.

33

We may be unable to attract, train, motivate and retain suitably qualified personnel and to maintain good relationships with our workforce.

The competence and commitment of our employees are important factors for our successful development and management of opportunities and risks. Therefore, our success is largely dependent on our ability to attract, train, motivate and retain highly qualified individuals, while building our corporate culture. A lack of qualified and motivated personnel could impair our development and growth, increase our costs and harm our reputation. We face competition for qualified personnel, for example those in information technology positions. Any loss of qualified personnel, high employee turnover, or persistent difficulties in filling job vacancies with suitable applicants could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete effectively in our business and considerable expertise could be lost by us or access thereto gained by our competitors. In addition, to attract or retain qualified personnel, we might have to offer competitive compensation packages and other benefits which could lead to higher personnel costs. Any failure to attract, train, motivate or retain skilled personnel at reasonable costs could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and our reputation.

Personnel expenses represent a significant cost factor for our business. Although none of our own employees, except for some of our employees at our subsidiary Addnature AB, is currently subject to any collective bargaining agreement, there can be no assurance that labor disputes, work stoppages, strikes or similar actions will not occur in the future which might urge us to adopt or negotiate a collective bargaining agreement. Any material disagreements between us and our employees could disrupt our operations, lead to a loss in revenue and customers and increase our operating costs. In addition, there is no guarantee that collective bargaining would be possible on terms that are satisfactory to us. If our operations are affected over a longer period of time by labor disputes or if we are forced to enter into a collective bargaining agreement at unfavorable terms, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and our reputation.

Our business is partly subject to local seasonal revenue fluctuations which may make it difficult to predict our future performance.

Our business has historically been, and will in all likelihood continue to be, seasonal. For example, most sports we sell equipment for are played in spring/summer, leading to significantly lower sales during winter times than during spring/summer. As a result of this seasonality of our business, any factor that negatively affects our business during the warmer months in any given year can have a disproportionate adverse effect on our revenue for such year. These factors include unfavorable economic conditions in the markets in which we operate at the relevant time and adverse weather conditions such as unusually long winters or short summers. In addition, any negative effects of weak seasons or weak sales of seasonal merchandise are likely to be exacerbated by industry-wide price reductions designed to clear out excess merchandise before or at the end of the relevant season. We might be unable to forecast accurately or synchronize our procurement cycles to coincide properly with seasonal variations in sales volumes. If our business growth slows or ceases, these seasonal fluctuations could become more important to our results of operations. Seasonal variations could also cause our inventories, working capital requirements and cash flows to vary from quarter to quarter. In addition, any negative effects of weak seasons or weak sales of seasonal merchandise are likely to be exacerbated by industry-wide price reductions designed to clear out excess merchandise before or at the end of the relevant season. We might be unable to forecast accurately or synchronize our procurement cycles to coincide properly with seasonal variations in sales volumes. If our business growth slows or ceases, these seasonal fluctuations could become more important to our results of operations. Seasonal variations could also cause our inventories, working capital requirements and cash flows to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. Any failure to adapt to these seasonal changes in a timely manner, may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations for the relevant period.

34

Inability to forecast our business accurately could prevent us from properly planning expenses and process capacity.

We base our current and future expense levels on our forecasts of our business and estimates of future revenue. Such future revenue and results of operations are difficult to forecast because they generally depend on the volume, timing and type of orders we receive, all of which are uncertain. Seasonal variations in our inventories, working capital requirements and cash flows, among other things, also increase the difficulty of our financial forecasting and could adversely affect our ability to accurately predict financial results. For any given season, a substantial portion of our expenses is incurred in advance, and therefore fixed, due to the seasonality of demand for our products and the necessity of purchasing merchandise with significant lead times. As a result, we may be unable to adjust our spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected shortfall in revenue, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Regulatory, Legal and Tax Risks

We are subject to various regulations applying to e-commerce and tech businesses generally, including but not limited to regulations governing cyber security, data protection, consumer protection, product safety and trademarks, and future regulations might impose additional requirements and other obligations on our business.

We are subject to a variety of laws and regulations applicable to e-commerce and tech businesses, as well as laws and regulations of broader application that apply to us and to public companies in general. These laws and regulations include, among other things, cyber security, data protection, consumer protection, product safety, trademarks and internet domains, human rights and environmental topics (including the collection and disposal of electrical waste and electronic equipment), antitrust, pricing, content, copyrights, the design and operation of websites, social media and other communication, advertising practices, electronic contracts, credit card processing procedures, the provision of online payment services, unencumbered internet access to our services, textile labeling, packaging as well as taxation, tariffs and anti-bribery.

These laws and regulations evolve continuously and at a rapid pace and can differ across the jurisdictions in which we operate. Existing and future regulations and laws may particularly impede the growth and availability of the internet and online services which in turn could impede the ability to grow our business, or otherwise adversely affect our business by increasing costs and administrative burdens.

Given the broad variety of rules and their evolving nature, there can be no assurance that we have complied or will comply fully with all applicable laws and regulations. Any actual or alleged failure by us to comply with applicable laws or regulations could damage our reputation, could lead to a loss of revenue and may give rise to civil liability, administrative orders, fines or criminal charges. Legal or enforcement actions brought against us could damage our reputation and result in substantial legal expenses. Changes in laws or regulations could cause us to incur substantial costs, require us to change business practices, and could inhibit the effective implementation of our growth strategy.

In addition, the legislative and regulatory bodies, or self-regulatory organizations in jurisdictions in which we operate, may expand the scope of applicable laws or regulations, enact new laws or regulations in areas that are relevant to our business. For example, the European Commission’s Digital Single Market (DSM) initiative is expected to result in additional rules on e-commerce or data protection, information security and privacy. Furthermore, on June 11, 2021, the German federal parliament (Bundestag) adopted the so-called Supply Chain Act (Lieferkettengesetz), under which companies will have to carefully document their whole value chains, review their suppliers and prove that they are making efforts to comply with applicable standards and will make companies responsible for counteracting human rights violations in the production of their economic goods or economic goods supplied to them. In addition, in January 2021, the Legal Affairs Committee of the European Parliament called on the Commission to present a law that ensures companies are held accountable and liable when they harm or contribute to harming human rights, the environment and good governance. The European

35

Parliament adopted a legislative initiative report in March 2021 calling for the adoption of a binding European law on the same matter. This would oblige companies to identify, address and remedy aspects of their value chains. It would also include a ban on imported products linked to severe human rights violations. Companies could be held liable for their actions and risk fines and legal remedies by victims. The Commission envisages to present its legislative proposal on this matter in early 2022.

In the Netherlands, several legislative proposals with regard to mandatory human rights and environmental due diligence requirements were initiated by the Dutch parliament in the past years. The Dutch government has recently started working on a legislative proposal imposing such due diligence requirements, which is intended to be implemented swiftly. The responsible minister indicated that the legislation will be broader and more stringent than the legislation in neighboring countries (Germany, France, UK). The exact requirements will vary depending on the size of the company and type of sector (high risk or not). For all companies there will be a general duty of care to act with due diligence. For larger companies there will be mandatory due diligence requirements following the 6 step due diligence process as included in the OECD Guidelines.

Any (perceived) compliance failure with existing laws and regulations as well as new or expanded rules could result in damage to our reputation and a loss of revenues as well as liability, fines, charges and other sanctions, remedial measures or consequences.

Non-compliance with data protection laws could result in liability and reputational harm to our business, and adverse changes in the applicable legal framework could increase our costs of operations.

As part of our business we process sensitive customer data (including banking/payment information, names and addresses) and therefore must comply with the applicable data protection and privacy laws. We are currently particularly subject to German and European laws and regulations on privacy, information security and data protection, the most relevant of which relate to the collection, protection and use of personal and business data, including Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of April 27, 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (“General Data Protection Regulation”), but also to other legal frameworks like the UK Data Protection Act or the California Consumer Privacy Act. The costs of complying with the General Data Protection Regulation are high and continue to increase, particularly in the context of ensuring that adequate data protection and data transfer mechanisms are in place. Any failure to comply with privacy, data protection and information security laws could result in potentially significant regulatory and/or governmental investigations and/or actions, litigation, fines, sanctions and damage to our reputation.

Privacy related regulation could interfere with our strategy to collect and use personal information as part of our data driven approach. For example, the use of “cookies” and similar (tracking) technologies, especially for behavioral advertising as well as other tracking and analytics purposes, requires any user’s explicit prior consent. Certain details as to how to validly obtain prior consent of the users are still open and there can be no assurance that further restrictions in obtaining prior consent, if widely adopted, will not result in a significant reduction in the effectiveness of the use of cookies and other methods of online tracking. Currently, there is uncertainty in relation to the exact implementation of future consent requirements and the exact implementation of tighter legislative restrictions may lead to lower opt-in rates for the application of our cookies and other methods of online tracking. Data protection laws and rules also impose certain standards of protection and safeguarding on our ability to collect and use personal information relating to customers and potential customers. This particularly applies to profiling, e.g. any form of automated processing of personal data intended to evaluate certain personal aspects relating to a natural person or to analyze or predict such person’s economic situation, location, health, consumer preferences, or other relevant behavior. Such restrictions may impede our ability to offer more curated and personalized content to our customers.

Any unauthorized access or disclosure of personal data may constitute a personal data breach under the General Data Protection Regulation. Unauthorized data access or disclosure could occur through cyber security

36

breaches as a result of human error, external hacking, malware infection, malicious or accidental user activity, internal security breaches, and physical security breaches due to unauthorized personnel gaining physical access. In the event of such a personal data breach, we could be required to notify applicable government authorities and/or potential victims on very short notice and could face continued governmental investigations, fines and private claims for compensation from individuals whose personal data was involved. Violations of the General Data Protection Regulation may result in monetary penalties in the higher of up to €20.0 million or 4% of our worldwide turnover of the preceding fiscal year.

Furthermore, on July 16, 2020, the European Court of Justice issued its decision in Data Protection Commissioner v. Facebook Ireland Limited and Maximilian Schrems, which invalidated the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield framework for data transfers from countries of the European Union to the United States. This decision has greatly increased the legal requirements imposed on data exporters for transfers of personal data from EU-countries to non-EU countries, which are deemed to have an inadequate data protection level compared to the standards imposed in the European Economic Area (including, amongst others, the United States). Ensuring compliance with changing and/or stricter standards requires resources to continuously review and, as necessary, replace, amend or supplement the international data transfer mechanisms which we currently rely on, including corporate binding rules, standard contractual clauses and adequate data processing agreements with our business partners. The resulting mechanisms and procedures may increase the expenses associated with our overall compliance with personal data protection requirements or even require us to discontinue using certain tools that are relevant to our business. Any non-compliance could result in potentially significant regulatory and/or governmental investigations and/or actions, litigation, fines, sanctions and damage to our reputation.

Changes in the economic or political framework may lead to further changes in these and/or other regulations governing data protection or changed interpretation of existing laws as well as the enactment of stricter laws and regulations governing data protection, which could increase our costs of operations due to increased compliance measures.

We sell products to customers that are located in various jurisdictions and intent to further increase our geographic reach, which requires us to comply with various, and sometimes conflicting legal and regulatory requirements.

As we sell products to customers that are located in various jurisdictions, we are subject to various laws and regulations of the relevant countries. While a certain number of relevant regulations have been harmonized throughout the European Union, currently or main markets, many of these laws and regulations are complex and difficult to interpret, also due to deviating practices and interpretation of local authorities and courts. Moreover, as we plan to further expand our international operations to target customers in additional countries, we will become subject to additional laws and regulatory regimes. The legal and regulatory frameworks governing our business and operations may become increasingly uncertain due to quickly changing laws, contradictory interpretation of laws and regulations, administrative bypassing of legal frameworks or a lack of market precedents upon which we can rely.

Our international business is subject to laws and regulations in many areas, including cyber security, data protection, consumer protection, product safety, trademarks and internet domains, human rights and environmental topics, antitrust, pricing, content, copyrights, the design and operation of websites, social media and other communication, advertising practices, electronic contracts, credit card processing procedures, the provision of online payment services, textile labeling, packaging as well as taxation, tariffs, international sanctions and anti-bribery. These various laws and regulations often evolve and sometimes conflict with each other. Furthermore, operating in foreign jurisdictions entails an inherent risk of misinterpreting and wrongly implementing foreign laws and regulations. While we are not aware of any material breach by us of any applicable laws and regulations, we cannot rule out that we have not been in full compliance with these laws and regulations in the past.

37

Additionally, some of the tax systems into which we sell our products are very complex and there is no guarantee that the relevant tax authorities agree with the positions we have taken or the tax optimization structures and measures we have used to minimize legal risks, administrative burdens and tax rates. In other countries, changes in the political or legal climate may impact our use of local currency and local banking. Similarly, we may be bound by extended waiting periods and complex and costly administrative approval processes and registration.

As these laws continue to evolve and as we expand into new jurisdictions, our compliance efforts will become more complex and expensive and the risk of non-compliance will increase. Violations of applicable laws and regulations may harm our reputation and result in legal action, criminal and civil sanctions, or administrative fines and penalties against us or members of our governing bodies and our employees. Such violations may also result in damage claims by third parties or other adverse legal consequences, including class action lawsuits and enforcement actions by national and international regulators resulting in the limitation or prohibition of business operations. There is no guarantee that we can successfully manage or avoid any of the legal risks to which we are exposed, and non-compliance with the legal and regulatory frameworks that govern our operations, whether intentional or not, may have material adverse effects on our businesses, including causing us to cease our operations entirely.

Product recalls, product liability claims and breaches of corporate social responsibility could harm our reputation and business.

There is a risk that the goods we sell may cause property damage or injury to our customers, particularly in our bike business. While we believe that our operations comply in all material respects with all applicable product safety and consumer protection laws and regulations, the sale of defective products might result in product recalls, product liability claims and/or administrative fines or criminal charges. Even if an event causing a product recall proves to be unfounded or if a product liability claim against us is unsuccessful, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that products sold by us caused injury or damage, or any allegation that the goods sold by us were defective, could adversely affect our reputation with both existing and potential customers as well as our corporate and brand image, particularly with a view to our own brands. We also face risks associated with environmental, animal-rights and sustainability concerns. For example, any negative publicity campaigns concerning low-priced, short-lived sports items may negatively affect our reputation or our sales. Similarly, negative publicity associated with the sale of sports items manufactured using animal-sourced products may negatively affect our reputation or our sales. We are further exposed to risks in relation to possible breaches of corporate social responsibility, including ethical sourcing, working conditions, child labor and responsible recruitment, which may harm our reputation and prospects. For example, if improper working conditions are found or alleged to exist at one or more of the factories in which the sports products we sell are manufactured, or if there is a major injury or loss-of-life incident in such factories, we could face negative publicity that could damage our reputation and the perception of the brands we sell, including our own brands, and we may be required to pay fines, face enhanced scrutiny by regulators or be subjected to other adverse legal consequences. Deficiencies in the area of corporate social responsibility may also negatively affect our recruiting efforts or disrupt our business.

The materialization of any of the foregoing risks, alone or in combination, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our inability to acquire, use or maintain our local trademarks and domain names for our sites could substantially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are the registrant of various trademarks as well as the trademarks of our websites in numerous jurisdictions and have also registered various internet domain names containing e.g., our brand names for our websites combined with the relevant top level domain in those jurisdictions in which we are active, e.g., inter alia but not limited to, “fahrrad.de”, “tennis-point”, “bikester”, “probikeshop”, “campz”, “Outfitter” and

38

“stylefile” for our websites in those jurisdictions in which we are active (for example, “tennis-point.de” in Germany). Domain names are generally regulated by internet regulatory bodies and are also subject to trademark laws and other related laws of each country. If we do not have or cannot obtain or maintain on reasonable terms the ability to use our core trademarks or a major private label brand in a particular country, or to use or register our domain names, we could be forced either to incur significant additional expenses to market our products within that country, including the development of a new brand and the creation of new promotional materials and packaging, or to elect not to sell products in that country.

Any of our trademarks and domain names, from time to time, may become the subject matter of litigation. Currently, our trademark “Tennis-Point” is subject to a dispute for cease-and-desist and deletion in the United States and the opposing party has filed a motion for preliminary injunction to that effect. In case of a negative outcome, we therefore might not be able to use our trademark Tennis-Point, our domain Tennis-Point.com and the respective company name in the US in the future, however we do not believe this will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Furthermore, the regulations governing domain names and laws protecting marks and similar proprietary rights could change in ways that block or interfere with our ability to use relevant domains or our current brands. In addition, we might not be able to prevent third parties from registering, using or retaining domain names that interfere with our consumer communications or infringe or otherwise decrease the value of our marks, domain names and other proprietary rights. Regulatory bodies may establish additional generic or country-code top-level domains or may allow modifications of the requirements for registering, holding or using domain names. As a result, we might not be able to register, use or maintain the domain names that utilize our brand names in all of the countries in which we currently conduct business or intend to conduct business in the future, which, alone or in combination with the above risks, could have a material adverse effect on the further implementation and expansion of our business.

The realization of any of such risks, alone or in combination, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects.

We might be unable to adequately protect other intellectual property rights.

We believe our customer data, copyrights, trade secrets, proprietary technology and similar intellectual property are critical to our success, and we rely on trade secret protection, agreements and other methods with our employees and others to protect our proprietary rights. In addition, we have developed, and we anticipate that we will continue to develop, a substantial number of programs, processes and other know-how on a proprietary basis (but partly based on open source codes) that are of key importance to the successful functioning of our business.

We might be required to spend significant resources to monitor and protect our intellectual property rights. We may not be able to discover or determine the extent of any infringement, misappropriation or other violation of our intellectual property rights and other proprietary rights. We may initiate claims or litigation against others for infringement, misappropriation or violation of our intellectual property rights or proprietary rights or to establish the validity of such rights. Despite our efforts, we may be unable to prevent third parties from infringing upon, misappropriating or otherwise violating our intellectual property rights and other proprietary rights. Any litigation, whether or not it is resolved in our favor, could result in significant expense to us and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Third parties might accuse us of infringing their intellectual property rights.

The e-commerce sports industry, as well as the sports industry in general, is characterized by vigorous protection for and pursuit of intellectual property rights. We might be subject to litigation and disputes related to

39

our intellectual property rights and technology in the future, as well as disputes related to intellectual property and product offerings of third-party suppliers featured by us. The costs of defending against such actions can be high, and there is no guarantee that such defenses will be successful. In addition, as our business expands and the number of competitors in our market increases, infringement claims against us could increase in number and significance. As an example, our trademark “Tennis-Point” is currently subject to a dispute for cease-and-desist and deletion in the United States. In case of a negative outcome, we therefore might not be able to use our trademark Tennis-Point, our domain Tennis-Point.com and the respective company name in the US in the future. We also have received in the past, and we will receive in the future, claims from third parties that certain items posted on, or sold through one of our websites violate third-party marks, copyrights, trade names or other intellectual property rights. Such claims, whether or not successful, could result in significant expenses, redirect management attention and could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Legal claims regarding intellectual property rights are subject to inherent uncertainties due to the complex issues involved, and we cannot be certain that we will be successful in defending ourselves against such claims. Many potential litigants have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources than we do to the enforcement of intellectual property rights and defense of claims that may be brought against them. If successful, a claimant could secure a judgment against us for substantial damages or prevent us from conducting our business as we have historically done so or may desire to do so in the future. We could also be required to seek additional licenses or pay royalties for the use of the intellectual property we need to conduct our business, which might not be available on commercially acceptable terms or at all. Alternatively, we may be forced to develop non-infringing technology or intellectual property on a proprietary basis, which could be expensive and/or unsuccessful.

The control and prevention mechanisms of our compliance structure might not be sufficient to adequately protect us from all legal or financial risks.

To protect us against legal risks and other potential harm, we established several compliance guidelines, including a code of ethics for employees as well as anti-corruption and anti-bribery guidelines and a group-wide guideline on data protection. These codes, guidelines and policies and the oversight of our internal compliance and legal departments might not be sufficient to prevent all unauthorized practices, legal infringements, corruption and fraud — especially regarding purchasing practices — or other adverse consequences of non-compliance within our organization or by or on behalf of our employees. Any compliance failure could harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

As a result, we are exposed to the risk that our employees or other authorized persons could make payments or grant hidden benefits in violation of anti-corruption laws and regulations, especially in response to demands or attempts at extortion. In addition, our current internal controls, prevention (such as our anti-corruption policy) and training programs may prove to be insufficient. Our employees or authorized persons may have been or could be engaged in activities for which we could be held liable.

Some laws and regulations promulgated against corruption and money laundering may require us to implement certain controls, procedures and internal regulations in order to ensure that the operations of a given entity do not involve corruption, illegal payments, extortion or money-laundering. The great diversity and complexity of these local laws and regulations and the expansive nature of the business conducted by us in various countries and markets create a risk that we may be deemed liable for violations of local laws and regulations. Any violation or breach of these laws and regulations could affect our overall reputation and, depending on the case, expose us to administrative or judicial proceedings, which could result in criminal and civil judgments, including a possible prohibition on maintaining business relationships with suppliers, sports brands or customers in certain countries, which could have material adverse effects on the implementation of our business strategy as well as on our financial condition.

40

Changes in tax treatment of companies engaged in e-commerce in the jurisdictions in which we operate could adversely affect the commercial use of our sites and our financial results.

Our business is subject to the general tax environments in the countries in which we operate. Changes in tax legislation or case law, especially with regards to transnational e-commerce activities, — which might be applied retroactively — could increase our tax burden. Since 2017, the G20/OECD Inclusive Framework has been working on addressing the tax challenges arising from the digitalization of the economy and has proposed a two-pillar tax approach with pillar one referring to the re-allocation of taxing rights, addressing issues such as where tax should be paid and on what basis (i.e., where sustained and significant business is conducted, regardless of a physical presence), and pillar two ensuring a minimum tax to be paid by multinational enterprises. An agreement on the approach presented could have material adverse effects for us as a digital and multinational enterprise with regards to our tax obligations.

Changes in tax treatment of companies engaged in e-commerce in the jurisdictions in which we operate could adversely affect the commercial use of our sites and our financial results. For example, some jurisdictions in which we operate our business (e.g., Italy) have introduced new local taxes on transnational e-commerce activities (“digital services taxes” or “DST”). These DST generally aim at securing taxation rights of the jurisdiction for the revenues/profits generated by the transnational e-commerce activities with customers who are resident in this specific jurisdiction. We have established a process to assess on a regular (i.e., quarterly) basis whether or not our revenues/profits are subject to these DST. For 2021, it was concluded that there should be no such DST liability but there is a general risk that new local DST will be introduced or that the existing DST will be applied differently with the result that this could adversely affect our tax liability. We cannot predict the effect of current attempts to impose sales, income or other taxes on e-commerce. New or revised taxes — e.g., sales taxes, value-added tax (“VAT”) and similar taxes — would likely increase the cost of doing business online and decrease the attractiveness of advertising and selling products over the internet. New taxes could also lead to significant increases in internal costs necessary to capture data and collect and remit taxes.

Additionally, tax laws may be interpreted differently by the competent tax authorities and courts, and their interpretations may change at any time, which could lead to an increase of our tax burden. Accordingly, we may face unfounded tax claims in such countries. Moreover, legislators and tax authorities may change territoriality rules or their interpretation for the application of VAT on cross-border services, which may lead to significant additional payments for past and future periods. In addition, court decisions are sometimes ignored by competent tax authorities or overruled by higher courts, which could lead to higher legal and tax advisory costs and create significant uncertainty. New taxes could also result in additional costs necessary to collect the data required to assess these taxes and to remit them to the relevant tax authorities. Besides this, the documentation obligations under applicable VAT and VAT-related laws are considerable. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that we may not fully comply, or, as the case may be, may have not fully complied with applicable VAT regulations throughout all phases of their development.

Taxes actually assessed in future tax audits for periods not yet covered by our last tax audit may exceed the taxes already paid by us. As a result, we may be required to make significant additional tax payments with respect to previous periods. Furthermore, the competent tax authorities could revise their original tax assessments (for example, with respect to the recognition of invoiced value added taxes). Any tax assessments that deviate from our expectations could lead to an increase in our tax burden. In addition, we may be required to pay interest on these additional taxes as well as late filing penalties. Furthermore, we have carried out reorganizations of the Group structure, and there is a risk that any such restructuring could attract additional tax scrutiny or result in unexpected or expected tax leakage despite our best efforts to avoid such negative tax consequences (e.g., obtain tax advisory services by reputable consultants who confirmed the tax neutrality of the group structure reorganizations).

Any of these events occurring could, alone or in combination, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

41

We have no operating or financial history and our results of operations may differ significantly from the unaudited pro forma financial data included in this prospectus.

SIGNA Sports United B.V. was incorporated as a private Dutch private limited liability company (besloten vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid) in May 2021 and was converted into a Dutch public limited liability company (naamloze vennootschap) and renamed SIGNA Sports United N.V. on December 14, 2021. We have no operating history and no revenues. This prospectus includes unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information for SIGNA. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of profit or loss of SIGNA for the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2021 combines the historical unaudited condensed combined statement of operations of Yucaipa for the period June 4, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020, subtracting Yucaipa’s unaudited condensed statement of operations for the period from June 4, 2020 (inception) through September 30, 2020, and adding Yucaipa’s unaudited condensed statement of operations for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2021, with the audited consolidated statement of profit or loss of SSU for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021 and financial data from the Wiggle Group’s audited consolidated income statement for the 52 weeks ended September 26, 2021 and gives pro forma effect to the Business Combination and the Wiggle Acquisition as if it had been consummated as of October 1, 2020.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet of SIGNA assumes that the Business Combination was consummated on September 30, 2021.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are presented for illustrative purposes only, are based on certain assumptions, address a hypothetical situation and reflect limited historical financial data. Therefore, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations and financial position that would have been achieved had the Business Combination and the Wiggle Acquisition been consummated on the dates indicated above, or our future consolidated results of operations or financial position. Accordingly, our business, assets, cash flows, results of operations and financial condition may differ significantly from those indicated by the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements included in this prospectus.

Risks Related to the Acquisition of Wiggle

We may not be successful in integrating Wiggle into our existing business in the manner, or within the time frame, as currently anticipated or only at higher costs

Through the acquisition of Mapil TopCo Limited, a private limited company by shares incorporated in England & Wales (“Wiggle” and, together with its subsidiaries, the “Wiggle Group”), we aim to expand our business into new markets, in particular in the United Kingdom. The integration of the Wiggle business into our business holds special challenges for both parties and exposes us to a number of risks, that could, among others arise from the circumstances described below. The following discussion is not meant to be exhaustive and, in addition, other risks and unexpected issues may arise that we are currently not aware of or unable to assess.

42

If any of the risks discussed were to materialize, this could disrupt our operations and cause the integration of Wiggle to become more onerous, time-consuming and costly than anticipated. In addition, the potential benefits of the acquisition of Wiggle may not be realized to the full extent, in a timely fashion or at all. In particular, we may not be able to capitalize on the expected opportunities for cost and sales synergies.

Warranty claims and claims for damages and indemnification under the Wiggle share purchase agreement are limited in scope and amount and are subject to time limits.

All warranty claims and claims for damages that we may have against the sellers of Wiggle under the share purchase agreement are subject to customary limitations and qualifications. Each seller of Wiggle has given title and capacity warranties to us, with all other commercial and tax warranties being given by the warrantors only (as described in the Wiggle share purchase agreement, as amended). Most of the warranties contained in the share purchase agreement are backed by a warranty and indemnity insurance policy. However, due to the limitations in scope and amount of the warranty claims and claims for damages and indemnification and due to the fact that not all warranties are covered by insurance, for instance warranties for cyber security, legal compliance on data protection which are not covered by the warranty and indemnity insurance policy, there is no certainty that the warranty and indemnity insurance policy or our contractual protections under the Wiggle share purchase agreement will be sufficient to ensure we will be able to recover all claims and claims for damages we may have against the sellers of Wiggle.

43

The pro forma consolidated financial information of SIGNA included in this prospectus describes only a hypothetical situation and thus, due to its nature, the presentation does not reflect our actual combined assets, financial position and results of operations post-closing of the Wiggle Acquisition.

Since the completion of the Business Combination and the Wiggle Acquisition is expected to have a material impact on our assets, financial position and results of operations, pro forma consolidated financial information, consisting of unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of profit or loss for the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2021 and an unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of September 30, 2021, and pro forma notes, was prepared for purposes of this prospectus (the “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information”). The purpose of the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information, among others, is to present the pro forma effects of the Wiggle Acquisition on SIGNA after giving pro forma effect to the Business Combination. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of September 30, 2021, assumes that the Business Combination was consummated on September 30, 2021. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of profit or loss for the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2021 assumes that the Business Combination was consummated on October 1, 2020. Therefore, the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information describes only a hypothetical situation and thus, due to its nature, the presentation does not reflect our actual net assets, financial position and results of operations after completion of the Business Combination and the Wiggle Acquisition. The presentation of the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information of SSU is based on information available, preliminary estimates and certain pro forma assumptions and is intended for illustrative purposes only. In addition, the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information does not represent a forecast of our net assets, financial position and results of operations at any future date or for any future period. The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information neither contains potential synergies or cost savings, nor a normalization of any restructuring or any additional future expenses that could result from the Wiggle Acquisition. Furthermore, the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information is only meaningful in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements of SSU, Yucaipa and Wiggle, included elsewhere in this prospectus.

The historical consolidated financial information of Wiggle contained in the prospectus may not be considered indicative of Wiggle’s future performance as part of our company.

The audited consolidated financial statements for the 52 weeks ended September 26, 2021 of the Wiggle Group have been prepared in accordance with IFRS (the “Wiggle Consolidated Financial Statements”). The Wiggle Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS and British pound sterling (GBP) as its reporting currency. We were not involved in the preparation of the Wiggle Consolidated Financial Statements and therefore did not have the possibility to independently confirm and verify that these financial statements are complete and correct in all material respects as was the case for our own historical financial statements contained herein. The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information gives effect to adjustments required to convert Wiggle’s financial statement presentation (function) to SSU’s presentation (nature) and its reporting currency to Euros.

The Wiggle Acquisition will be accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with IFRS 3 Business Combinations. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed from the Wiggle Group are recorded at the fair value. The accounting of the Wiggle Acquisition will have a significant impact on our future consolidated financial statements.

Therefore, the historical consolidated financial information of Wiggle contained in this prospectus may not be considered indicative of the future performance of Wiggle as part of our company.

44

Potential tariffs or uncertainty surrounding the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union could have a material adverse effect on Wiggle’s business.

On March 29, 2017, the United Kingdom formally notified the European Council of its intention to leave the European Union (“Brexit”). On January 24, 2020, a withdrawal agreement was entered into between the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and the United Kingdom, setting the terms of the withdrawal of the latter from the former two. On December 24, 2020, the United Kingdom and the European Union agreed to a trade and cooperation agreement (the “Trade and Cooperation Agreement”). The Trade and Cooperation Agreement took provisional effect from January 1, 2021 and provided for, among other things, zero-rate tariffs and zero quotas on the movement of goods between the United Kingdom and the European Union.

Due to the size and importance of the economy of the United Kingdom, the uncertainty and unpredictability concerning the United Kingdom’s future laws and regulations (including financial laws and regulations, tax and free trade agreements, immigration laws and employment laws) as well as its legal, political and economic relationships with Europe following its exit of the European Union may continue to be a source of instability in international markets, create significant currency fluctuations or otherwise adversely affect trading agreements or similar cross-border cooperation arrangements (whether economic, tax, fiscal, legal, regulatory or otherwise) for the foreseeable future. The long-term effects of Brexit will depend on the implementation of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement and any future agreements (or lack thereof) between the United Kingdom and the European Union and, in particular, any potential changes in the arrangements for the United Kingdom to retain access to European Union markets. Brexit could result in adverse economic effects across the United Kingdom and Europe, which could have a material adverse effect on Wiggle’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, a portion of Wiggle’s staff in the United Kingdom are from other European countries and there is a risk that Brexit will affect the ability of Wiggle to recruit skilled workers from this wider European labor market for its operations in the United Kingdom.

Risks Related to Ownership of our Ordinary Shares

We are a Dutch public company. The rights of our shareholders and the duties of our directors are governed by (i) Dutch law, (ii) the Articles of Association and (iii) internal rules and policies adopted by the Board, and might differ in some important respects from the rights of shareholders and the duties of members of a board of directors of a U.S. company.

We are a public limited liability company (naamloze vennootschap) under Dutch law. Our corporate affairs are governed by the Articles of Association, the rules of the Board, our other internal rules and policies and by Dutch law. There can be no assurance that Dutch law will not change in the future or that it will serve to protect shareholders in a similar fashion afforded under corporate law principles in the United States, which could adversely affect the rights of our shareholders.

The rights of shareholders and the responsibilities of our directors may be different from the rights and obligations of shareholders and directors in companies governed by the laws of the United States. In particular, pursuant to Dutch law our directors are required to act in the interest of the company and its business, and should be guided by promoting the sustainable success of its business, with an aim to creating long-term value, taking into account the interests of our employees, clients, shareholders and other stakeholders of the company, such as creditors and suppliers, as a whole and not only those of our shareholders in all cases with due observation of the principles of reasonableness and fairness. It is possible that some of these parties will have interests that are different from, or in addition to, your interests as a shareholder.

We are organized and existing under the laws of the Netherlands, and, as such, the rights of our shareholders and the civil liability of our directors and executive officers will be governed in certain respects by the laws of the Netherlands.

We are organized and existing under the laws of the Netherlands, and, as such, the rights of our shareholders and the civil liability of our directors and executive officers will be governed in certain respects by the laws of

45

the Netherlands. The ability of our shareholders in certain countries other than the Netherlands to bring an action against us, our directors and executive officers may be limited under applicable law. In addition, substantially all of our assets are located outside the United States.

As a result, it may not be possible for shareholders to effect service of process within the United States upon us or our directors and executive officers or to enforce judgments against us or them in U.S. courts, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States. In addition, it is not clear whether a Dutch court would impose civil liability on us or any of our directors and executive officers in an original action based solely upon the federal securities laws of the United States brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in the Netherlands.

As of the date of this prospectus, the United States and the Netherlands do not have a treaty providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments, other than arbitration awards, in civil and commercial matters. With respect to choice of court agreements in civil or commercial matters, the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements has entered into force for the Netherlands, but has not entered into force for the United States. Accordingly, a judgment rendered by a court in the United States, whether or not predicated solely upon U.S. securities laws, would not automatically be recognized and enforced by the competent Dutch courts. However, if a person has obtained a final and conclusive judgment for the payment of money rendered by a court in the United States that is enforceable in the United States and files a claim with the competent Dutch court, the Dutch court will generally give binding effect to such foreign judgment insofar as it finds that (i) the jurisdiction of the U.S. court has been based on a ground of jurisdiction that is generally acceptable according to international standards, (ii) the judgment by the U.S. court was rendered in legal proceedings that comply with the Dutch standards of proper administration of justice including sufficient safeguards (behoorlijke rechtspleging), (iii) binding effect of such foreign judgment is not contrary to Dutch public order (openbare orde) and (iv) the judgment by the U.S. court is not incompatible with a decision rendered between the same parties by a Dutch court, or with a previous decision rendered between the same parties by a foreign court in a dispute that concerns the same subject and is based on the same cause, provided that the previous decision qualifies for acknowledgment in the Netherlands. However, even if such a foreign judgment is given binding effect, a claim based on that foreign judgment may still be rejected if the foreign judgment is not or no longer formally enforceable.

Based on the lack of a treaty as described above, U.S. investors may not be able to enforce against us or our directors, representatives or certain experts named herein who are residents of the Netherlands or countries other than the United States any judgments obtained in U.S. courts in civil and commercial matters, including judgments under the U.S. federal securities laws.

Under the Articles of Association, and certain other contractual arrangements between us and our directors, we indemnify and hold our directors harmless against all claims and suits brought against them, subject to limited exceptions. There is doubt, however, as to whether U.S. courts would enforce such indemnity provisions in an action brought against one of our directors in the United States under U.S. securities laws.

We do not anticipate paying dividends on our Ordinary Shares.

We have never paid or declared any cash dividends in the past, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund the further development and expansion of its business. Under Dutch law, we may only pay dividends and other distributions from its reserves to the extent its shareholders’ equity (eigen vermogen) exceeds the sum of its paid-in and called-up share capital plus the reserves we must maintain under Dutch law or the Articles of Association and (if it concerns a distribution of profits) after adoption of our statutory annual accounts by the General Meeting from which it appears that such dividend distribution is allowed. Subject to those restrictions, any future determination to pay dividends or other distributions from its reserves will be at the discretion of the Board and will depend upon a number of factors, including our results of operations, earnings, cash flow,

46

financial condition, future prospects, contractual restrictions, capital investment requirements, restrictions imposed by applicable law and other factors the Board deems relevant. See “Dividend Policy.”

Under the Articles of Association, the Board may decide that all or part of the profits shown in our adopted statutory annual accounts will be added to our reserves. After reservation of any such profits, any remaining profits will be at the disposal of the General Meeting at the proposal of the Board for distribution on the Ordinary Shares, subject to applicable restrictions of Dutch law. The Board is permitted, subject to certain requirements and applicable restrictions of Dutch law, to declare interim dividends without the approval of the General Meeting. Dividends and other distributions shall be made payable no later than a date determined by the Board. Claims to dividends and other distributions not made within five years from the date that such dividends or distributions became payable will lapse and any such amounts will be considered to have been forfeited to us (verjaring).

We may reclaim any distributions, whether interim or not interim, made in contravention of certain restrictions of Dutch law from shareholders that knew or should have known that such distribution was not permissible. In addition, on the basis of Dutch case law, if after a distribution we are not able to pay its due and collectable debts, then its shareholders or directors who at the time of the distribution knew or reasonably should have foreseen that result may be liable to our creditors.

Since we are a holding company, our ability to pay dividends will be dependent upon the financial condition, liquidity and results of operations of, and our receipt of dividends, loans or other funds from, our subsidiaries, including SSU. Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation to make funds available to us. In addition, there are various statutory, regulatory and contractual limitations and business considerations on the extent, if any, to which our subsidiaries may pay dividends, make loans or otherwise provide funds to us.

SIGNA International Sports Holding GmbH (“SISH”) owns a significant portion of our Ordinary Shares and is represented on the Board. In addition, SISH holds nomination rights for directors of the Board and one of our director nominees was designated by Yucaipa Acquisition Manager, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Yucaipa Sponsor”). Yucaipa Sponsor and SISH may have interests that differ from those of other shareholders.

As of the date of this prospectus, SISH owns approximately 49.72% of our Ordinary Shares, with 47.95% being held directly by SISH and 1.77% being held by SISH Beteiligung GmbH & Co. KG, a German limited liability partnership (Kommanditgesellschaft) wholly owned and controlled by SISH. For as long as SISH, alone or together with its affiliates, holds at least 10% (but less than 20%) of our issued share capital, it will be allowed to make a binding nomination for one Director, for as long as SISH, alone or together with its affiliates, holds at least 20% (but less than 30%) or our issued share capital, it will be allowed to make a binding nomination for two Directors and for as long as SISH, alone or together with its affiliates, holds at least 30% of our issued share capital, it will be allowed to make a binding nomination for three Directors. The incumbent directors on the Board nominated by SISH have been appointed for four years and will serve an initial term as directors of the Board until 2025. In addition, one of our director nominees was designated by Yucaipa Sponsor. As a result, Yucaipa Sponsor and SISH may be able to significantly influence the outcome of matters submitted for director action, subject to obligation of the Board to act in the interest of all of our stakeholders, and for shareholder action, including the designation and appointment of the Board (and committees thereof) and approval of significant corporate transactions, including business combinations, consolidations and mergers. The influence of Yucaipa Sponsor and SISH over our Board could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control or otherwise discouraging a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control of our company, which could cause the market price of our Ordinary Shares to decline or prevent our shareholders from realizing a premium over the market price for our Ordinary Shares. Additionally, Yucaipa Sponsor is controlled by Ronald W. Burkle, who is in the business of making investments in companies and who may from time to time acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us or that supply us with goods and services. Mr. Burkle may

47

also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to (or competitive with) our business, and as a result those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. Prospective investors in our Ordinary Shares should consider that the interests of Yucaipa Sponsor and SISH, as well as the interests of certain other former SSU equity holders who own a significant portion of our Ordinary Shares, may differ from their interests in material respects.

Provisions of the Articles of Association or Dutch corporate law might deter acquisition bids for our company that our shareholders might consider to be favorable and prevent, delay or frustrate any attempt to replace or remove the Board at the time of such acquisition bid.

Under Dutch law, various protective measures are possible and permissible within the boundaries set by Dutch law and Dutch case law.

In this respect, certain provisions of the Articles of Association may make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire control of the Company or effect a change in the composition of the Board. These include:

Dutch law also allows for staggered multi-year terms of the Directors, as a result of which only part of the Directors may be subject to appointment or re-appointment in any given year. Our initial Directors have been appointed with staggered term periods ranging from two to up to four years.

In addition, in accordance with the Dutch Corporate Governance Code (the “DCGC”), shareholders who have the right to put an item on the agenda for the General Meeting or to request the convening of a General Meeting shall not exercise such rights until after they have consulted the Board. If exercising such rights may result in a change in our strategy (for example, through the dismissal of Directors), the Board must be given the opportunity to invoke a reasonable period of up to 180 days to respond to the shareholders’ intentions. If invoked, the Board must use such response period for further deliberation and constructive consultation, in any event with the shareholder(s) concerned and exploring alternatives. At the end of the response time, the Board shall report on this consultation and the exploration of alternatives to the General Meeting. The response period

48

may be invoked only once for any given General Meeting and shall not apply (i) in respect of a matter for which a response period has been previously invoked or (ii) if a shareholder holds at least 75% of our issued share capital as a consequence of a successful public bid. The response period may also be invoked in response to shareholders or others with meeting rights under Dutch law requesting that a general meeting be convened, as described in “Description of Securities.”

Moreover, the Board can invoke a cooling-off period of up to 250 days when shareholders, using their right to have items added to the agenda for a General Meeting or their right to request a general meeting, propose an agenda item for our General Meeting to dismiss, suspend or appoint one or more Directors (or to amend any provision in the Articles of Association dealing with those matters) or when a public offer for our company is made or announced without our support, provided, in each case, that the Board believes that such proposal or offer materially conflicts with the interests of our company and its business. During a cooling-off period, the General Meeting cannot dismiss, suspend or appoint Directors (or amend the provisions in the Articles of Association dealing with those matters) except at the proposal of the Board. During a cooling-off period, the Board must gather all relevant information necessary for a careful decision-making process and at least consult with shareholders representing 3% or more of our issued share capital at the time the cooling-off period was invoked, as well as with our Dutch works council (if we or, under certain circumstances, any of our subsidiaries would have one). Formal statements expressed by these stakeholders during such consultations must be published on our website to the extent these stakeholders have approved that publication. Ultimately one week following the last day of the cooling-off period, the Board must publish a report in respect of its policy and conduct of affairs during the cooling-off period on our website. This report must remain available for inspection by shareholders and others with meeting rights under Dutch law at our office and must be tabled for discussion at the next General Meeting. Shareholders representing at least 3% of our issued share capital may request the Enterprise Chamber of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal (the “Enterprise Chamber” (Ondernemingskamer)), for early termination of the cooling-off period. The Enterprise Chamber must rule in favor of the request if the shareholders can demonstrate that:

We are aware of material control and accounting weaknesses in our current finance organization. If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, shareholders could lose confidence in our financial and other public reporting, which is likely to negatively affect our business and the market price of our Ordinary Shares.

As a public company, we are required to report, among other things, control deficiencies that constitute a “material weakness” or changes in internal controls that, or that are reasonably likely to, materially affect internal controls over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in our implementation could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. In addition, any testing conducted by us, or any testing conducted by our independent registered public accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our

49

internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses or that may require prospective or retroactive changes to our financial statements or identify other areas for further attention or improvement. Inferior internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which is likely to negatively affect our business and the market price of our Ordinary Shares.

In the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, SSU identified material weaknesses in SSU’s internal controls related to (i) the design and maintenance of effective entity level controls to identify business risks relevant to financial reporting objectives, estimate the significance of the risks, assess the likelihood of their occurrence and determine actions to address those risks, (ii) the adequate number of individuals within its accounting and financial reporting function with sufficient training in IFRS and SEC reporting standards, (iii) the design and maintenance of formal and effective controls over certain general information technology controls for IT systems, (iv) the design and maintenance of effective controls to ensure the completeness of accounts payable and vendor accruals, (v) the design and maintenance of effective controls to ensure that revenue was recorded in the correct accounting period and (vi) the design and maintenance of effective controls to ensure the appropriateness of the estimate of the recoverable amount of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. We have taken measures and plan to continue to take measures to remedy such material weaknesses. These remedial measures include hiring additional employees with training in IFRS and SEC reporting standards, taking steps to improve our controls and procedures including incorporating automated and software-based accounting tools, and engaging third parties to support our internal resources related to accounting and internal controls.

Notwithstanding the actions already taken, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns and we may be required to hire and train additional employees or engage outside consultants to comply with these requirements and additional Sarbanes-Oxley Act requirements applicable to us in the future, which would increase costs and expenses. Any compliance failure could harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. For further information please refer to the risk factors entitled “Our management team has limited experience managing a public company, and publicly traded company reporting and compliance requirements could divert resources from the day-to-day management of our business.”

We will be required to disclose changes made in our internal controls and procedures on a quarterly basis and our management will be required to assess the effectiveness of these controls annually. As long as we are an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act, an independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. An independent assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls could detect problems that our management’s assessment might not. Undetected material weaknesses in our internal controls could lead to financial statements restatements and require us to incur the expense of remediation. The Company currently expects that it will no longer qualify as an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act as of the end of the fiscal year 2022 and that the exemptions now applicable to it will then no longer be available.

The market price and trading volume of our Ordinary Shares and Public Warrants may be volatile and could decline significantly.

The markets in which we are trading our Ordinary Shares and Public Warrants under the symbols “SSU” and “SSU WT,” respectively, have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. Even if an active, liquid and orderly trading market develops and is sustained for our Ordinary Shares and Public Warrants, the market price of our Ordinary Shares and Public Warrants may be volatile and could decline significantly. In addition, as of the date of this prospectus, the trading volume in our Ordinary Shares is reduced due to the low free float rate and the trading volume in our Ordinary Shares and Public Warrants may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur in the future. If the market price of our Ordinary Shares and Public Warrants declines significantly, you may be unable to resell your securities at or above the market price. We

50

cannot assure you that the market price of the Ordinary Shares and Public Warrants will not fluctuate widely or decline significantly in the future in response to a number of factors, including, among others, the following:

In the past, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their shares. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

If securities or industry analysts publish inaccurate or unfavorable research or cease publishing research about our company, our share price and trading volume could decline significantly.

The market for our Ordinary Shares will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. In the event securities or industry analysts downgrade their opinions about our Ordinary Shares, publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about us, or cease publishing about us regularly, demand for our Ordinary Shares could decrease, which might cause our share price and trading volume to decline significantly.

Our Shareholders may not be able to exercise pre-emption rights and, as a result, may experience substantial dilution upon future issuances of our Ordinary Shares or rights to subscribe for our Ordinary Shares.

In the event of an issue of our Ordinary Shares or a grant of rights to subscribe for our Ordinary Shares, subject to certain exceptions, each holder of our Ordinary Shares will have a pro rata pre-emption right in proportion to the aggregate nominal value of such holder’s Ordinary Shares. These pre-emption rights may be restricted or excluded by a resolution of the General Meeting or by another corporate body designated by the General Meeting. The Board is authorized for a period of five years to issue shares or grant rights to subscribe for shares up to our authorized share capital from time to time (which is approximately five times the currently issued share capital of the Company) and to limit or exclude pre-emption rights in connection therewith. Accordingly, holders of our Ordinary Shares may not have any pre-emptive rights in connection with, and may be diluted by, an issue of new shares and it may be more difficult for a shareholder to obtain control over the General Meeting. This could cause existing shareholders to experience substantial dilution of their interest in us.

51

We are not obligated to, and do not, comply with all best practice provisions of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code.

We are subject to the DCGC. The DCGC contains principles and best practice provisions on corporate governance that regulate relations between the Board and the General Meeting and matters in respect of financial reporting, auditors, disclosure, compliance and enforcement standards. The DCGC is based on a “comply or explain” principle. Accordingly, companies must disclose in their statutory annual reports whether they comply with the provisions of the DCGC. If a company subject to the DCGC does not comply with those provisions, that company would be required to give the reasons for such non-compliance. We will not comply with all best practice provisions of the DCGC. This may affect your rights as a shareholder and you may not have the same level of protection as a shareholder in a Dutch company that fully complies with the DCGC.

The JOBS Act permits “emerging growth companies” like us to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

We currently qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act. As such, we take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies for as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, including the exemption from the auditor attestation requirements with respect to internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to certain information they deem important.

We cannot predict if investors will find our Ordinary Shares less attractive because we rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Ordinary Shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market and share price for our Ordinary Shares may be more volatile. The Company currently expects that it will no longer qualify as an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act as of the end of the fiscal year 2022 and that the exemptions now applicable to it will then no longer be available. The Company might fail to comply with the additional reporting requirements that will apply to the Company upon the lapse of its status as an “emerging growth company.”

As a foreign private issuer and as permitted by the listing requirements of NYSE, we follow certain home country governance practices rather than the corporate governance requirements of NYSE.

We are a foreign private issuer. As a result, in accordance with the listing requirements of NYSE we will rely on home country governance requirements and certain exemptions thereunder rather than relying on the corporate governance requirements of NYSE. In accordance with Dutch law and generally accepted business practices, the Articles of Association do not provide quorum requirements generally applicable to general meetings. To this extent, our practice varies from the requirement of NYSE Listed Company Manual §310.00, which requires an issuer to provide in its bylaws for a generally applicable quorum, and that such quorum required for any meeting of the holders of common stock should be sufficiently high to insure a representative vote. Although we must provide our shareholders with an agenda and other relevant documents for the General Meeting, Dutch law does not have a regulatory regime for the solicitation of proxies and the solicitation of proxies is not a generally accepted business practice in the Netherlands, thus our practice will vary from the requirement of NYSE Listed Company Manual §402.04(A). As permitted by the listing requirements of NYSE, we have also opted out of the requirements of NYSE Listed Company Manual §303A.05(a)), which requires, among other things, an issuer to have a compensation committee that consists entirely of independent directors, NYSE Listed Company Manual §303A.04(a), which requires independent director oversight of director nominations, and NYSE Listed Company Manual §303A.01, which requires an issuer to have a majority of independent directors on its board. We will also rely on the phase-in rules of the SEC and NYSE with respect to the independence of our audit committee. These rules require that a majority of Directors must be independent and all members of our audit committee must meet the independence standard for audit committee members

52

within one year of our listing on NYSE. In addition, we have opted out of shareholder approval requirements, as included in the NYSE Listing Rules, for the issuance of securities in connection with certain events such as the acquisition of shares or assets of another company, the establishment of or amendments to equity-based compensation plans for employees, a change of control of our company and certain private placements. To this extent, our practice varies from the requirements of NYSE Listed Company Manual § 312.03, which generally requires an issuer to obtain shareholder approval for the issuance of securities in connection with such events. Accordingly, you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to these NYSE requirements.

We may fail to meet the NYSE’s listing criteria and the NYSE may not continue to list our securities on its exchange, which could limit the ability of investors to make transactions in our securities and subject us to additional trading restrictions.

If we fail to continue to meet the listing requirements of the NYSE, our securities may be delisted, and we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:

Our and SSU’s tax positions could be adversely affected by the future application and interpretation of applicable tax laws by tax authorities.

The tax treatment of us and our respective affiliates depends in some instances on determinations of fact and interpretations of complex provisions of applicable tax law for which no clear precedent or authority may be available. Relevant tax rules are consistently under review by persons involved in the legislative process and taxing authorities, which may result in revised interpretations of established concepts, statutory changes, new reporting obligations, revisions to regulations and other modifications and interpretations. The present tax treatment of us and our respective affiliates may be modified by administrative, legislative or judicial interpretation at any time, and any such action may apply on a retroactive or retrospective basis. Our and our respective affiliates’ effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in the relevant tax, accounting and other laws, regulations, principles and interpretations. Tax laws are dynamic and subject to change as new laws are passed and new interpretations of the law are issued or applied. We and our respective affiliates continue to assess the impact of such changes in tax laws and interpretations on their businesses and may determine that changes to their structure, practice, tax positions or the manner in which they conduct their businesses are necessary in light of such changes and developments in the tax laws of the jurisdictions in which we and our respective affiliates operate. Such changes may nevertheless be ineffective in avoiding an increase in tax liability, which could adversely affect the financial conditions, results of operations and cash flows.

The original treatment of a tax-relevant matter in a tax return, tax assessment or otherwise could later be found incorrect and as a result, we and our respective affiliates may be subject to additional taxes, interest, penalty payments and/or social security payments. Such reassessment may be due to an interpretation or view of laws and/or facts by tax authorities in a manner that deviates from our and our respective affiliates’ view and may emerge as a result of tax audits or other review actions by the relevant financial or tax authorities. We and our respective affiliates are subject to tax audits by the respective tax authorities on a regular basis. As a result of future tax audits or other reviews by the tax authorities, additional taxes could be imposed that exceed the provisions reflected in previous financial statements. This could lead to an increase in our and/or our respective affiliates tax obligations, either as a result of the relevant tax payment being assessed directly against them or as a result of becoming liable for the relevant tax as a secondary obligor due to the primary obligor’s failure to pay. Consequently, we and/or our respective affiliates may have to engage in tax litigation to defend or achieve results reflected in prior estimates, declarations or assessments which may be time-consuming and expensive.

53

Further, current tax losses and tax loss carry-forwards existing with SSU or its German affiliates forfeit if, within a period of five years, more than 50% of the subscribed capital, membership rights, participation rights or voting rights of the respective company are transferred directly or indirectly to an acquirer or to persons closely associated with such an acquirer or a group of several acquirers with aligned interest, or if a comparable situation exists. By exception, tax losses and tax loss carry-forwards do not forfeit upon a harmful transfer of shares or any other comparable instrument as described, if, inter alia, to the extent such losses and loss carry forwards do not exceed the total taxable hidden reserves of the business assets of SSU or its German affiliates existing in Germany at the time of the harmful event. Various aspects of this loss forfeiture rule are unclear as of today and not yet determined by case law.

As we intend to operate in various countries and taxing jurisdictions, the application of tax laws can be subject to diverging and sometimes conflicting interpretations by taxing authorities of these jurisdictions. Generally, if two or more affiliated companies are located in different countries, the tax laws or regulations of each country will typically require that transfer prices be the same as those between unrelated companies dealing at arms’ length and that appropriate documentation is maintained to support the transfer prices. In addition, existing transfer pricing documentation may be considered to be insufficient by the relevant tax authorities which may also result in penalties and additional tax payments. It is not uncommon for taxing authorities in different countries to have conflicting views, for instance, with respect to, among other things, the manner in which the arm’s length standard is applied for transfer pricing purposes, or with respect to the valuation of intellectual property. If taxing authorities in any of these countries were to successfully challenge SSU’s transfer prices as not reflecting arm’s length transactions, they could require SSU to adjust its transfer prices and thereby reallocate its income to reflect these revised transfer prices, which could result in a higher tax liability to SSU. In addition, if the country from which the income is reallocated does not agree with the reallocation, both countries could tax the same income, potentially resulting in double taxation. If taxing authorities were to allocate income to a higher tax jurisdiction, subject SSU’s income to double taxation or assess interest and penalties, it would increase SSU’s tax liability, which could adversely affect its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, with a view that we are a Dutch corporation with effective place of management in Germany, Dutch and German tax authorities may have deviating views as to their respective entitlement under tax assets and income.

We may become taxable in a jurisdiction other than Germany and this may increase the aggregate tax burden on us.

Since our incorporation we have had, on a continuous basis, our place of “effective management” in Germany. We will therefore qualify as a tax resident of Germany on the basis of German domestic law. As an entity incorporated under Dutch law, however, we also qualify as a tax resident of the Netherlands for Dutch corporate income tax, Dutch dividend withholding tax and Dutch withholding tax purposes on the basis of Dutch domestic law. However, based on our current management structure and the current tax laws of the United States, Germany and the Netherlands, as well as applicable income tax treaties, and current interpretations thereof, we should qualify solely as a tax resident of Germany for the purposes of the 2012 Convention between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Kingdom of the Netherlands for the avoidance of double taxation with respect to taxes on income (the “double tax treaty between Germany and the Netherlands”) due to the “effective management” tie-breaker included in Article 4(3) of the double tax treaty between Germany and the Netherlands and the current reservation made by Germany under the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (the “MLI”), with respect to the tie-breaker provision included in Article 4(3) of the double tax treaty between Germany and the Netherlands (the “MLI tie-breaker reservation”).

The test of “effective management” is largely a question of fact and degree based on all the circumstances, rather than a question of law. Nevertheless, the relevant case law and OECD guidance suggest that we are likely to be regarded as having become a German tax resident from incorporation and remaining so if, as our company intends, (i) most meetings of our executive officers, who manage the day-to-day business of the Company, are prepared and held in Germany (and none will be held in the Netherlands) with a majority of executive officers

54

present in Germany for those meetings; (ii) at those meetings there are full discussions of, and decisions are made regarding, the key strategic issues affecting our company and its subsidiaries; (iii) those meetings are properly minuted; (iv) a majority of our executive officers, together with supporting staff, are based in Germany; and (v) our company has permanent staffed office premises in Germany. We may, however, become subject to limited income tax liability in other countries with regard to the income generated in the respective other country, for example, due to the existence of a permanent establishment or a permanent representative in such other country.

The applicable tax laws or interpretations thereof may change, including the MLI tie-breaker reservation. Furthermore, whether we have our place of effective management in Germany and are as such tax resident in Germany is largely a question of fact and degree based on all the circumstances, rather than a question of law, which facts and degree may also change. Changes to applicable laws or interpretations thereof, changes to applicable facts and circumstances (for example, a change of directors or the place where board meetings take place), or changes to applicable income tax treaties, including a change to the MLI tie-breaker reservation, may result in us becoming (also) a tax resident of the Netherlands or another jurisdiction. As a consequence, our overall effective income tax rate and income tax expense could materially increase, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects, which could cause our share price and trading volume to decline. Furthermore, the tax laws of Germany, in particular, the respective German implementation rules of the Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164 of 12 July 2016 (so-called Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive) may lead to additional German taxes irrespective of whether our place of effective management is in Germany or the Netherlands. In addition, as a consequence, dividends distributed by us, if any, may become subject to dividend withholding tax in more than one jurisdiction. The double taxation of income and the double withholding tax on dividends may be reduced or avoided entirely under the double tax treaty between Germany and the Netherlands or under a double tax treaty between the Netherlands and the respective other country. See also “— If we do pay dividends, we may need to withhold tax on such dividends payable to holders of Ordinary Shares in both Germany and the Netherlands” below.

If we do pay dividends, we may need to withhold tax on such dividends payable to holders of Ordinary Shares in both Germany and the Netherlands.

We do not intend to pay any dividends to holders of Ordinary Shares. See “— We do not anticipate paying dividends on our Ordinary Shares.” However, if we do pay dividends, we may need to withhold tax on such dividends both in Germany and the Netherlands.

As an entity incorporated under Dutch law, any dividends distributed by us are subject to Dutch dividend withholding tax on the basis of Dutch domestic law. However, on the basis of the double tax treaty between Germany and the Netherlands currently in effect, the Netherlands will be restricted in imposing these taxes if we are also a tax resident of Germany and our effective management is located in Germany (the “withholding tax restriction”). See also “— We may become taxable in a jurisdiction other than Germany and this may increase the aggregate tax burden on us” above. The withholding tax restriction does, however, not apply, and Dutch dividend withholding tax is still required to be withheld from dividends, if and when paid to Dutch resident holders of our Ordinary Shares and non-Dutch resident holders of our Ordinary Shares that have a permanent establishment in the Netherlands to which their Ordinary Shares are attributable. As a result, upon a payment of dividends, we will be required to identify our shareholders in order to assess whether there are Dutch residents or non-Dutch residents with a permanent establishment in the Netherlands to which the Ordinary Shares are attributable in respect of which Dutch dividend withholding tax has to be withheld. Such identification may not always be possible in practice. If the identity of our shareholders cannot be determined, withholding of both German and Dutch dividend withholding tax may occur upon a payment of dividends.

Furthermore, the withholding tax restriction referred to above is based on the current MLI tie-breaker reservation. If Germany changes its MLI tie-breaker reservation, we will not be entitled to any benefits of the double tax treaty between Germany and the Netherlands, including the withholding tax restriction, as long as

55

Germany and the Netherlands do not reach an agreement on our tax residency for purposes of the double tax treaty between Germany and the Netherlands, and, as a result, any dividends distributed by us during the period no such agreement has been reached between Germany and the Netherlands, may be subject to dividend withholding tax both in Germany and the Netherlands.

We may be or may become a PFIC, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders.

If we or any of our subsidiaries is a PFIC for any taxable year, or portion thereof, that is included in the holding period of a U.S. Holder (as defined in the section of this registration statement captioned “Taxation”), such U.S. Holder may be subject to certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences and may be subject to additional reporting requirements. We and our subsidiaries are not currently expected to be treated as PFICs for U.S. federal income tax purposes for the taxable year of the Business Combination or for foreseeable future taxable years. However, this conclusion is a factual determination that must be made annually at the close of each taxable year and, thus, is subject to change. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we or any of our subsidiaries will not be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year. Moreover, we do not expect to provide a PFIC annual information statement for 2021 or future taxable years. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the possible application of the PFIC rules to holders of our Ordinary Shares and Public Warrants.

56