NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 AND 2019
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE
1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
History
and Organization
Generation
Alpha, Inc. (the “Company”) was originally incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on March 2, 2007 as
Cinjet, Inc. (“Cinjet”). Effective September 1, 2015, Cinjet changed its corporate name to Solis Tek Inc. (“Solis
Tek”). Effective September 25, 2018, Solis Tek changed its corporate name to Generation Alpha, Inc. Effective September
25, 2018, Generation Alpha, Inc. (f/k/a Solis Tek Inc.) (the “Company”) entered into an agreement and plan of merger
(the “Merger Agreement”), whereby a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger Sub”) was merged
into the Company (the “Merger”). Upon consummation of the Merger, the separate existence of Merger Sub ceased. On
June 23, 2015, the Company entered into an Agreement of Merger and Plan of Reorganization (the “Agreement”) with Solis
Tek Inc., a California corporation (“STI”), and CJA Acquisition Corp., a California corporation and a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), providing for the merger of Merger Sub with and into STI (the “Merger”),
with STI surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Merger was accounted for as a recapitalization
of the Company with STI being deemed the accounting acquirer.
Overview
of Business
The
Company is focused on the research, design, development, and manufacturing of advanced, energy efficient indoor horticulture lighting,
plant nutrient products, and ancillary equipment.
COVID-19
Considerations
In
the period ended September 30, 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic did not have a material net impact on our operating results. In the
future, the pandemic may cause reduced demand for our products if, for example, the pandemic results in a recessionary economic
environment which negatively effects the consumers who purchase our products.
Our
ability to operate without significant negative operational impact from the COVID-19 pandemic will in part depend on our ability
to protect our employees and our supply chain. The Company has endeavored to follow the recommended actions of government and
health authorities to protect our employees. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, we maintained the consistency of our operations.
However, the uncertainty resulting from the pandemic could result in an unforeseen disruption to our workforce and supply chain
(for example an inability of a key supplier or transportation supplier to source and transport materials) that could negatively
impact our operations.
Through
September 30, 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has not negatively impacted the Company’s liquidity position as of such date.
Through September 30, 2020, the Company continues to generate cash flows to meet its short-term liquidity needs, and it expects
to maintain access to the capital markets. The Company has not observed any material impairments of its assets or a significant
change in the fair value of its assets due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Going
Concern
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization
of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As reflected in the accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements, during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company incurred a net loss
of $651,000 and used cash in operations of $335,000, and had a shareholders’ deficit of $8,992,000 at September 30, 2020.
These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the
date of the financial statements being issued. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the
Company’s ability to raise additional funds and implement its business plan. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. In addition, the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm, in its report on the Company’s December 31, 2019 financial statements, has
raised substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
At
September 30, 2020, the Company had cash on hand in the amount of $549,000. Management estimates that the current funds on hand
will be sufficient to continue operations through March 2021. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent
upon its ability to obtain necessary debt or equity financing to continue operations until it begins generating positive cash
flow. No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are
satisfactory to the Company. Even if the Company is able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on
its operations, in the case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for the Company’s shareholders, in case of equity
financing.
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries: STI; Solis Tek East,
Corporation (“STE”), an entity incorporated under the laws of the State of New Jersey, Zelda Horticulture, Inc. (“Zelda”),
an entity incorporated under the laws of the State of California, and YLK Partners NV, LLC (“YLK”), Generation Alpha
Brands, Inc., Trilogy Dispensaries, Inc., Extracting Point, LLC (“Extracting Point”), and GrowPro Solutions, Inc.,
all entities formed under the laws of Nevada. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Loss
per Share Calculations
Basic
earnings per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number
of common shares available. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income applicable to common stock holders
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding
if all dilutive potential common shares had been issued using the treasury stock method. Potential common shares are excluded
from the computation when their effect is antidilutive. The dilutive effect of potentially dilutive securities is reflected in
diluted net income per share if the exercise prices were lower than the average fair market value of common shares during the
reporting period.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2020, options to acquire 8,079,133 shares of common stock, warrants to acquire 28,283,140
shares of common stock, and 239,274,957 shares to be issued upon conversion of our convertible notes have been excluded from the
calculation of weighted average common shares, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September
30, 2019, options to acquire 8,149,391 shares of common stock, warrants to acquire 12,783,140 shares of common stock, and 3,000,000
shares to be issued upon conversion of our convertible note have been excluded from the calculation of weighted average common
shares, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the financial statement date, and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.
Significant estimates are used in valuing our allowances for doubtful accounts, reserves for inventory obsolescence, valuing derivative
liabilities, valuing equity instruments issued for services, and valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, among others. Actual
results could differ from these estimates.
Segment
Reporting
The
Company operates in one segment for the manufacture and distribution of its products. In accordance with the “Segment Reporting”
Topic of the ASC, the Company’s chief operating decision maker has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer and President,
who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire Company. Existing
guidance, which is based on a management approach to segment reporting, establishes requirements to report selected segment information
quarterly and to report annually entity-wide disclosures about products and services, major customers, and the countries in which
the entity holds material assets and reports revenue. All material operating units qualify for aggregation under “Segment
Reporting” due to their similar customer base and similarities in: economic characteristics; nature of products and services;
and procurement, manufacturing and distribution processes. Since the Company operates in one segment, all financial information
required by “Segment Reporting” can be found in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09. This standard provides
authoritative guidance clarifying the principles for recognizing revenue and developing a common revenue standard for U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer
of promised goods and services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled
in the exchange for those goods or services.
Under
this guidance, revenue is recognized when control of promised goods or services is transferred to the Company’s customers,
in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The
Company reviews its sales transactions to identify contractual rights, performance obligations, and transaction prices, including
the allocation of prices to separate performance obligations, if applicable. Revenue and cost of sales are recognized once products
are delivered to the customer’s control and performance obligations are satisfied.
All
products sold by the Company are distinct individual products and consist of advanced energy efficient indoor horticulture lighting,
plant nutrient products, and ancillary equipment. The products are offered for sale as finished goods only, and there are no performance
obligations required post-shipment for customers to derive the expected value from them. Contracts with customers contain no incentives
or discounts that could cause revenue to be allocated or adjusted over time.
The
Company does not offer a general right of return on any of its sales and considers all sales as final. The Company generally provides
a three-year warranty on its ballasts. However, the Company does not maintain a warranty reserve as the Company is able to chargeback
its vendors for all warranty claims.
In
the following table, revenue is disaggregated by major product line for the three months ended September 30, 2020:
Sales
Channels
|
|
Lighting
|
|
|
Plant
Nutrients
and
Fertilizers
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydroponic resellers/retail
|
|
$
|
173,000
|
|
|
$
|
214,000
|
|
|
$
|
387,000
|
|
Direct to consumer/online
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
183,000
|
|
|
$
|
214,000
|
|
|
$
|
397,000
|
|
In
the following table, revenue is disaggregated by major product line for the three months ended September 30, 2019:
Sales
Channels
|
|
Lighting
|
|
|
Plant
Nutrients and Fertilizers
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydroponic resellers/retail
|
|
$
|
349,000
|
|
|
$
|
126,000
|
|
|
$
|
475,000
|
|
Direct to consumer/online
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
349,000
|
|
|
$
|
126,000
|
|
|
$
|
475,000
|
|
In
the following table, revenue is disaggregated by major product line for the nine months ended September 30, 2020:
Sales
Channels
|
|
Lighting
|
|
|
Plant
Nutrients and Fertilizers
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydroponic resellers/retail
|
|
$
|
357,000
|
|
|
$
|
602,000
|
|
|
$
|
959,000
|
|
Direct to consumer/online
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
378,000
|
|
|
$
|
602,000
|
|
|
$
|
980,000
|
|
In
the following table, revenue is disaggregated by major product line for the nine months ended September 30, 2019:
Sales
Channels
|
|
Lighting
|
|
|
Plant
Nutrients and Fertilizers
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydroponic resellers/retail
|
|
$
|
1,490,000
|
|
|
$
|
405,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,895,000
|
|
Direct to consumer/online
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,490,000
|
|
|
$
|
405,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,895,000
|
|
Concentration
Risks
Cash
includes cash on hand and cash in banks and are reported as “Cash” in the consolidated statements of financial position.
At September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, cash includes cash on hand of $323,000 and $12,000, respectively, and cash in banks
of $226,000 and $92,000, respectively. The balance of cash on hand is not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation. The balance of cash in banks is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for up to $250,000.
The
Company’s products require specific components that currently are available from a limited number of sources. The Company
purchases some of its key products and components from single vendors. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019,
its ballasts, lamps and reflectors, which comprised the clear majority of the Company’s purchases during those periods,
were each only purchased from one and three separate vendors, respectively.
The
Company performs a regular review of customer activity and associated credit risks and does not require collateral or other arrangements.
Two customers accounted for 13% and 12% of the Company’s revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2020, and two
customers accounted for 18% and 12% of the Company’s revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2019. One customer
accounted for 11% of the Company’s revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, and no customer accounted for more
than 10% of the Company’s revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. There were no other customers that accounted
for more than 10% of the Company’s revenue. Shipments to customers outside the United States comprised less than 5% of our
sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019.
As
of September 30, 2020, two customers accounted for 32% and 13% of the Company’s trade accounts receivable balance, and as
of December 31, 2019, two customers accounted for 24% and 10% of the Company’s trade accounts receivable balance.
Fair
Value Measurements
The
Company determines the fair value of its assets and liabilities based on the exchange price in U.S. dollars that would be received
for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability
in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company uses a fair value hierarchy with
three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, to measure fair value:
|
●
|
Level
1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
●
|
Level
2 — Inputs, other than Level 1, that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar
assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated
by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
|
|
●
|
Level
3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value
of the assets or liabilities.
|
The
carrying amounts of financial instruments such as cash, accounts receivable, inventories, accounts payable and accrued liabilities,
and legal settlements payable, approximate the related fair values due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The
carrying values of notes payable approximate their fair values due to the fact that the interest rates on these obligations are
based on prevailing market interest rates.
The
fair value of the derivative liabilities of $3,106,000 and $1,332,000 at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively,
was valued using Level 2 inputs.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
The
Company evaluates its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify
as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument
is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported
in the consolidated statements of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments
should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities
are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument
could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on
Financial Instruments. ASU 2016-13 requires entities to use a forward-looking approach based on current expected credit losses
(“CECL”) to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments, including trade receivables. This may
result in the earlier recognition of allowances for losses. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2023,
and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe the potential impact of the new guidance and related codification
improvements will be material to its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In
August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06 (“ASU 2020-06”) “Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options
(Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible
Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity.” ASU 2020-06 will simplify the accounting for convertible
instruments by reducing the number of accounting models for convertible debt instruments and convertible preferred stock. Limiting
the accounting models will result in fewer embedded conversion features being separately recognized from the host contract as
compared with current GAAP. Convertible instruments that continue to be subject to separation models are (1) those with embedded
conversion features that are not clearly and closely related to the host contract, that meet the definition of a derivative, and
that do not qualify for a scope exception from derivative accounting and (2) convertible debt instruments issued with substantial
premiums for which the premiums are recorded as paid-in capital. ASU 2020-06 also amends the guidance for the derivatives scope
exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity to reduce form-over-substance-based accounting conclusions. ASU 2020-06
will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2024. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than January 1, 2021,
including interim periods within that year. Management is currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of ASU 2020-06 on the
consolidated financial statements, but currently does not believe ASU 2020-06 will have a significant impact on the Company’s
accounting for its convertible debt instruments. The effect will largely depend on the composition and terms of the financial
instruments at the time of adoption.
Other
recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on
the Company’s present or future financial statements.
NOTE
3 – CONTRACT OBLIGATION ACQUIRED FROM RELATED PARTIES
In
May 2018, the Company entered into an acquisition agreement with the members, which in the aggregate, owned 100% of the membership
interests in YLK, a related party. The major asset of YLK is a Cultivation Management Services Agreement (the “Management
Agreement”) with an Arizona licensee that was entered into on January 5, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2019,
the Company determined the acquired assets were fully impaired, and recorded an impairment charge accordingly. The Company has
a continuing obligation under the Management Agreement of $799,000 (net of discount of $51,000) as of December 31, 2019. As of
September 30, 2020, the remaining Management Agreement obligation was $811,000 (net of discount of $39,000) and is reflected as
a current liability in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. As of September 30, 2020, the Company is past due
on its installment payments obligations under the Management Agreement.
NOTE
4 – NOTES PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES – PAST DUE
Notes
payable to related parties consists of the following at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019:
|
|
September
30, 2020
|
|
|
December
31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable to former
officers/shareholders – past due (a)
|
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
Notes payable to related party –
past due (b)
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Notes payable
to related parties – past due (c)
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
790,000
|
|
|
$
|
790,000
|
|
|
a.
|
On
May 9, 2016, the Company entered into note payable agreements with Alan Lien and Alvin Hao, each a former officer and director,
to borrow $300,000 under each individual note. Pursuant to the terms of each of these agreements, the Company borrowed $300,000
from each of Alan Lien and Alvin Hao. The notes accrue interest at a rate of 8% per annum, are unsecured and were due on or
before May 31, 2018. The loans are currently past due. A total of $600,000 was due on the combined notes as of September 30,
2020 and December 31, 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
b.
|
On
May 8, 2019, the Company entered into a note agreement with the sister of Alvin Hao, a former officer and director, to borrow
$150,000. The loan accrues interest at 8% per annum (12% on default), is unsecured and was due on November 8, 2019. The note
is currently past due. A total of $150,000 was due on the loan as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
c.
|
The
Company entered into note agreements with the parents of Alan Lien, a former officer and director. The loans accrue interest
at 10% per annum, are unsecured and were due on or before December 31, 2016. The loans are currently past due. A total of
$40,000 was due on the loans as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
|
At
December 31, 2019, accrued interest on the notes payable to related parties balance was $149,000 and included in accrued interest
to related parties on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company added
$53,000 of additional accrued interest, and made interest payments of $25,000, leaving an accrued interest on the notes payable
to related parties balance of $177,000 at September 30, 2020.
NOTE
5 – LEASE PAYABLE
The
Company leases its executive offices and warehouse space. The Company analyzes all leases at inception to determine if a right
of use (“ROU”) asset and lease liability should be recognized. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are
not included on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The lease liability is measured at the present value of future lease
payments as of the lease commencement date.
On
March 6, 2018, the Company entered into a lease for its principal executive offices and warehouse located in Carson, California.
The Company occupies a 17,640 square foot facility pursuant to a five-year lease ending on September 30, 2023, with an unaffiliated
party, pursuant to which it pays $15,000 per month in rental charges. As required by ASC 842, the Company recorded an ROU asset
and lease liability of $659,000 at January 1, 2019 for the net present value of future lease obligations related to the Carson
property. As of December 31, 2019, the balance of the ROU asset amounted to $527,000 and the lease liability amounted to $556,000.
In
January 2020, the Company vacated its office and warehouse in Carson and is currently trying to sublease the said property. The
Company remains obligated under its Carson, California lease, until such time the landlord releases the Company from the lease
agreement. As of December 31, 2019, the Company recorded an impairment charge related to the ROU asset amounting to $100,000,
which reflected management’s best estimate of the cost to sublease the premises. As of the date of this report, the Company
has not been released from the lease agreement, and no lease payments were made during the nine months ended September 30, 2020.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, management revised its estimate and recorded an additional impairment charge
to the ROU asset amounting to $82,000, which was charged to operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for
the nine months ended September 30, 2020.
On
January 1, 2020, the Company relocated its principal executive offices and warehouse to 1689-A Arrow Rt., Upland, California,
91786. The Upland, California lease is for a 2,974 square foot facility pursuant to a three-year lease with an independent party
ending on January 31, 2023, pursuant to which it pays $2,800 per month in rental charges. On January 1, 2020, the Company recognized
an operating lease ROU asset and lease liability of $89,000, related to the Upland, California operating lease. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2020, the Company reflected amortization of the ROU assets of $19,000 related to its Upland, California
operating lease, and recorded an impairment charge of $82,000 related to the abandoned Carson, California lease, resulting in
an ROU asset balance of $415,000 as of September 30, 2020.
As
of December 31, 2019, liabilities recorded under operating leases were $556,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020,
the Company added $89,000 in lease liabilities related to its Upland, California operating lease, and made lease payments of $16,000
towards its operating lease liability. As of September 30, 2020, liabilities under operating leases amounted to $629,000, of which
$259,000 were reflected as current due.
As
of September 30, 2020, the weighted average remaining lease terms for operating lease are 2.96 years, and the weighted average
discount rate for operating leases is 10%. Rent expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 was
$8,000 and $26,000, and $62,000 and $340,000, respectively.
NOTE
6 – LEGAL OBLIGATIONS PAYABLE – PAST DUE
As
of December 31, 2019, the Company was obligated to pay $2,550,000, including accrued interest at rates ranging from 12% to 18%
per annum, related to legal judgments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, $7,000 of additional settlement-related
expenses and $224,000 of accrued interest were added, resulting in a legal obligations payable of $2,781,000, which, in September
2020, the Company negotiated the settlement of for total consideration of $411,000, and recorded a gain on the settlement of legal
obligations of $2,370,000. $246,000 of the settlement was paid in September 2020, including $186,000 in cash, and the issuance
of 4,333,333 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $60,000. The balance of $165,000 was paid in cash in October
2020.
On
September 25, 2018, Matthew Geschke (the “Plaintiff”) filed a breach of contract case against the Company in the San
Diego Superior Court of San Diego, California. The Plaintiff claimed damages for breach of an employment contract when the Company
terminated the Plaintiff’s employment agreement on February 22, 2018. On June 26, 2020, the Plaintiff was awarded a default
judgment against the Company in the amount of $448,000.
NOTE
7 – LOANS PAYABLE
Notes
payable consists of the following at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019:
|
|
September
30, 2020
|
|
|
December
31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable to Celtic
Bank – past due (a)
|
|
$
|
24,000
|
|
|
$
|
64,000
|
|
SBA Paycheck Protection Program
loan (b)
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
SBA Economic
Injury Disaster Loan (c)
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total loans payable
|
|
$
|
379,000
|
|
|
$
|
64,000
|
|
Loans payable,
current portion
|
|
|
(24,000
|
)
|
|
|
(64,000
|
)
|
Loans payable,
net of current portion
|
|
|
355,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
a)
|
On
May 21, 2019, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Celtic Bank in the principal amount of $150,000 with interest
at 40.44% per annum and due on May 21, 2020. The loan was guaranteed by Alvin Hao, a former officer of the Company. A total
of $64,000 was owed on the loan as of December 31, 2019. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company made
principal payments of $40,000, leaving a total of $24,000 owed on the loan as of September 30, 2020. The loan is currently
past due.
|
|
|
|
|
b)
|
On
May 7, 2020, the Company was granted a loan (the “PPP loan”) from Wells Fargo Bank in the aggregate amount of
$205,000, pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) under the CARES Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
PPP loan agreement is dated May 8, 2020, matures on May 7, 2022, bears interest at a rate of 1% per annum, with the first
six months of interest deferred, and is unsecured and guaranteed by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”).
The loan term may be extended to May 7, 2025, if mutually agreed to by the Company and lender. The Company applied ASC 470,
Debt, to account for the PPP loan. The PPP loan may be prepaid at any time prior to maturity with no prepayment penalties.
Funds from the PPP loan may only be used for qualifying expenses as described in the CARES Act, including qualifying payroll
costs, qualifying group health care benefits, qualifying rent and debt obligations, and qualifying utilities. The Company
intends to use the entire loan amount for qualifying expenses. Under the terms of the PPP, certain amounts of the loan may
be forgiven if they are used for qualifying expenses. The Company intends to apply for forgiveness of the PPP loan with respect
to these qualifying expenses, however, it cannot assure that such forgiveness of any portion of the PPP loan will occur. As
for the potential loan forgiveness, once the PPP loan is, in part or wholly, forgiven and a legal release is received, the
liability would be reduced by the amount forgiven and a gain on extinguishment would be recorded. The terms of the PPP loan
provide for customary events of default including, among other things, payment defaults, breach of representations and warranties,
and insolvency events. The Company was in compliance with the terms of the PPP loan as of September 30, 2020.
|
|
|
|
|
c)
|
On
June 7, 2020, the Company obtained an Economic Injury Disaster Loan from the SBA in the amount of $150,000. Interest on the
loan is at the rate of 3.75% per year, and all loan payments are deferred for twelve months, at which time the balance is
payable in monthly installments of $731 over a 30-year term. The loan is secured by all the Company’s assets.
|
NOTE
8 – CONVERTIBLE SECURED NOTES PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTY
Secured
notes payable to related party consists of the following as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019:
|
|
September
30, 2020
|
|
|
December
31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YA II PN, Ltd.
|
|
$
|
2,275,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,775,000
|
|
Less debt discount
|
|
|
(435,000
|
)
|
|
|
(178,000
|
)
|
Secured note
payable, net
|
|
$
|
1,840,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,597,000
|
|
On
May 10, 2018 and October 29, 2019, the Company issued convertible secured debentures (“Notes”) to YA II PN Ltd. (“YA
II PN”) in the principal amounts of $1,500,000 and $275,000, respectively, with interest rates of 8% and 10%, respectively,
which matured in June 2020 and April 2020, respectively. The notes are currently past due. The Company is in discussion with YA
II PN to extend the maturity date of the Notes. The Notes provide a conversion right, in which the principal amount of the Note,
together with any accrued but unpaid interest, could be converted into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price
at 75% of the lowest volume weighted average price (VWAP) of the Company’s Common Stock during the 10 trading days immediately
preceding the conversion date. As part of the issuance, the Company also granted YA II PN 5-year warrants, which were modified,
to purchase a total of 13,000,000 shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.05 per share, with expiration dates ranging
from May 2024 to December 2024.
On
February 13, 2020, the Company issued a note (the “2020 Note”) to YAII PN in the amount of $150,000. The 2020 Note
bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum (15% on default) and has a maturity date of August 10, 2021. The Company received net
proceeds of $125,000, net of closing costs of $25,000. The 2020 Note is secured by all the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.
The 2020 Note provides a conversion right, in which any portion of the principal amount of the 2020 Note, together with any accrued
but unpaid interest, may be converted into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to 75% of the lowest VWAP
of the Company’s common stock during the ten (10) trading days immediately preceding the date of conversion, subject to
adjustment. As such, the Company determined that the conversion feature created a derivative with a fair value of $140,000 at
the date of issuance. The Company also granted YA II PN 5-year warrants to purchase a total of 3,000,000 shares of the Company
at an exercise price of $0.05 per common share. The aggregate amount of the closing costs, and the fair value of the derivative
liability, was $165,000, of which $150,000 was recorded as a valuation discount on the 2020 Note to be amortized over the life
of the 2020 Note, and $15,000 was recorded as a financing cost during the nine months ended September 30, 2020.
On
September 23, 2020, the Company issued a note (the “September 2020 Note”) to YAII PN in the amount of $350,000. The
September 2020 Note bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum (15% on default) and has a maturity date of March 23, 2021. The
Company received net proceeds of $340,000, net of closing costs of $10,000. The September 2020 Note is secured by all the assets
of the Company and its subsidiaries. The September 2020 Note provides a conversion right, in which any portion of the principal
amount of the 2020 Note, together with any accrued but unpaid interest, may be converted into the Company’s common stock
at a conversion price equal to 75% of the lowest VWAP of the Company’s common stock during the ten (10) trading days immediately
preceding the date of conversion, subject to adjustment. As such, the Company determined that the conversion feature created a
derivative with a fair value of $370,000 at the date of issuance. The Company also granted YA II PN 5-year warrants to purchase
a total of 7,000,000 shares of the Company at an exercise price of $0.05 per common share. The aggregate amount of the closing
costs, and the fair value of the warrants and derivative liability, was $433,000, of which $350,000 was recorded as a valuation
discount on the September 2020 Note to be amortized over the life of the September 2020 Note, and $83,000 was recorded as a financing
cost during the nine months ended September 30, 2020.
The
unamortized balance of the valuation discounts was $178,000 at December 31, 2019. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020,
valuation discounts of $500,000 were added as discussed above, and amortization of valuation discount of $243,000 was recorded
as an interest cost, leaving a $435,000 remaining unamortized balance of the valuation discount at September 30, 2020.
At
December 31, 2019, accrued interest on the convertible secured notes payable to related parties of $202,000 was included in accrued
interest to related parties on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, interest
of $29,000 was converted into common stock (see Note 10), and the Company added $121,000 of additional accrued interest, leaving
an accrued interest to related parties balance of $294,000 at September 30, 2020.
NOTE
9 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITY
The
FASB has issued authoritative guidance whereby instruments which do not have fixed settlement provisions are deemed to be derivative
instruments. The conversion prices and the exercise prices of the warrants described in Note 8 were not a fixed amount because
they were either subject to an adjustment based on the occurrence of future offerings or events or they were variable. Since the
number of shares is not explicitly limited, the Company is unable to conclude that enough authorized and unissued shares are available
to settle the conversion option. In accordance with the FASB authoritative guidance, the conversion features have been characterized
as derivative liabilities to be re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the change in value reported in the statement
of operations.
As
of September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, the derivative liabilities were valued using a Black-Scholes Merton pricing model
with the following assumptions:
|
|
September
30, 2020
|
|
|
Issued
During 2020
|
|
|
December
31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
$
|
0.012
|
|
|
$
|
0.009
- 0.025
|
|
|
$
|
0.050
|
|
Stock
Price
|
|
$
|
0.009
|
|
|
$
|
0.011
- 0.024
|
|
|
$
|
0.010
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
0.110
|
%
|
|
|
0.011
- 1.46
|
%
|
|
|
1.55
– 1.60
|
%
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
|
320
|
%
|
|
|
232-319
|
%
|
|
|
201-203
|
%
|
Expected
life (in years)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
– 1.5
|
|
|
|
0.3-0.5
|
|
Expected
dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value: Conversion Feature
|
|
$
|
3,106,000
|
|
|
$
|
509,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,332,000
|
|
The
risk-free interest rate was based on rates established by the Federal Reserve Bank. The Company uses the historical volatility
of its common stock to estimate the future volatility for its common stock. The expected life of the conversion feature of the
notes was based on the remaining term of the notes. The expected dividend yield was based on the fact that the Company has not
customarily paid dividends in the past and does not expect to pay dividends in the future.
The
balance of the derivative liability at December 31, 2019 was $1,332,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the
Company recognized derivative liabilities of $509,000 upon issuance of a secured convertible notes (see Note 8), and recognized
$1,265,000 as other expense, which represented the change in the fair value of the derivative from the respective prior period.
NOTE
10 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common
Shares Issued on Conversion of Convertible Note Payable
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company was notified by YA II PN (see Note 8) in writing of their election to convert
$29,000 of interest accrued into 2,287,066 shares of the Company’s common at $0.0127 per share.
Common
Shares Issued to Directors
The
Company appointed certain directors and issued shares as part of their director compensation agreements. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2020, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,664,190 shares of common stock, with a fair value of $72,000 at
date of grant, which was recognized as compensation cost.
Common
Shares Issued for Legal Judgments
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,333,333 shares of common stock, with a fair value
of $60,000 at the date of grant, as settlement of certain legal judgments (see Note 6).
Summary
of Stock Options
A
summary of stock options for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Balance outstanding,
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
1,948,300
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
6,145,833
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Options expired
or forfeited
|
|
|
(15,000
|
)
|
|
|
(0.69
|
)
|
Balance outstanding,
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
8,079,133
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
Balance exercisable,
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
8,079,133
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
On
October 31, 2019, the Board of Directors of the Company reappointed Ms. Tiffany Davis as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and as a director, effective immediately. In connection with the appointment of Ms. Davis, Ms. Davis is entitled to receive
stock options equivalent to $25,000 of common shares per quarter at the then closing market price on the last trading
day at the end of each calendar quarter. Accordingly, Ms. Davis was granted 2,500,000 stock options at the closing market price
of $0.01 on March 31, 2020, 1,562,500 stock options at the closing market price of $0.016 on June 30, 2020, and 2,083,333 stock
options at the closing market price of $0.012 on September 30, 2020. The fair value of the 6,145,833 stock options granted was
determined to be $69,000, of which $23,000 and $69,000 was recorded to stock-based compensation expense during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2020, respectively.
Information
relating to outstanding options at September 30, 2020, summarized by exercise price, is as follows:
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Price
Per
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Life
(Years)
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
$
|
0.01
– 0.03
|
|
|
|
6,979,133
|
|
|
|
4.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.014
|
|
|
|
6,979,133
|
|
|
$
|
0.014
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.460
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.460
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.600
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,079,133
|
|
|
|
2.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.092
|
|
|
|
8,079,133
|
|
|
$
|
0.092
|
|
As
of September 30, 2020, the Company has no outstanding unvested options with future compensation costs. In addition, there will
be future compensation related to the options to be awarded to Ms. Davis under her employment agreement discussed above. The weighted-average
remaining contractual life of options outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2020 was 2.70 years. Both the outstanding and
exercisable stock options had an intrinsic value of $5,000 at September 30, 2020.
Summary
of Warrants
A
summary of warrants for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Balance outstanding,
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
18,283,140
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
Warrants granted
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
Warrants exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Warrants expired
or forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance outstanding,
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
28,283,140
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Balance exercisable,
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
28,283,140
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Information
relating to outstanding warrants at September 30, 2020, summarized by exercise price, is as follows:
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Price
Per
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Life
(Years)
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
23,000,000
|
|
|
|
4.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
23,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
283,140
|
|
|
|
2.05
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
283,140
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,283,140
|
|
|
|
3.93
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
28,283,140
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company issued five-year warrants to purchase 10,000,000 shares of common stock
at an exercise price of $0.05 as part of a secured convertible promissory note (see Note 8).
The
weighted-average remaining contractual life of warrants outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2020 was 3.93 years. Both
the outstanding and exercisable warrants had an intrinsic value of $10,000 at September 30, 2020.
NOTE
11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Technology
License Agreement
The
Company entered into a technology license agreement with a third-party vendor for consulting services. Under the agreement, the
Company will pay the vendor a minimum consulting amount of $100,000 per year, plus a royalty of 7% of all net sales of the vendor’s
products above $1,429,000 per calendar year. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 $25,000 and $75,000, respectively,
and for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, $25,000 and $75,000, respectively, was recorded as research
and development expense under the agreement on the condensed consolidated statements of operations related to the minimum annual
fee. For each of nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, no royalty was recorded as cost of goods sold on the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations. A total of $314,000 and $239,000 was owed under the amended agreement at September 30,
2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, and is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
Litigation
On
September 25, 2018, Matthew Geschke (the “Plaintiff”) filed a breach of contract case against the Company in the San
Diego Superior Court of San Diego, California. The Plaintiff claimed damages of $335,000 for breach of an employment contract
when the Company terminated the Plaintiff’s employment agreement on February 22, 2018. On June 26, 2020, the Plaintiff was
awarded a default judgment against the Company in the amount of $448,000 (see Note 6).