NEWS RELEASE | 30 October
2024
Quarterly Report September 2024
Highlights:
·
Commencement of
International Arbitration against Spain
In May 2024, Berkeley Energia
Limited (Berkeley or
Company) advised that its
wholly owned subsidiary, Berkeley
Exploration Limited (BEL),
had filed a Request for Arbitration (Request) for its investments in Spain
through its Spanish subsidiary, Berkeley Minera España SA
(BME), initiating
arbitration proceedings against the Kingdom of Spain (Spain) before the International Centre
for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).
As part of its Request, BEL alleges
that Spain's actions against BME and the Salamanca project have
violated multiple provisions of the Energy Charter Treaty
(ECT), and that BEL is
seeking preliminary compensation in the order of US$1 billion
(US$1,000,000,000) for these violations.
In November 2022, BEL submitted a
written notification of an investment dispute to the Prime Minister
of Spain and the Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the
Demographic Challenge (MITECO) informing them of the nature of
the dispute and the ECT breaches, and that it proposed to seek
prompt negotiations for an amicable solution pursuant to article
26.1 of the ECT. The Spanish government has not engaged in any
discussions related to the dispute to date, and BEL filed its
Request in order to enforce its rights at the Salamanca Project
through international arbitration. The
Request was jointly submitted by specialist teams at Herbert Smith
Freehills Spain LLP and LCS Abogados who will represent BEL in the
arbitration proceedings.
Notwithstanding the investment
dispute, BEL remains committed to the Salamanca Project and
continues to be open to a constructive dialogue with Spain. BEL is
ready to collaborate with the relevant Spanish authorities to find
an amicable resolution to the permitting situation and remains
hopeful discussions can take place in the near term.
BEL has received the Notice of
Registration from ICSID and is currently in the phase of
proceedings in which tribunal members are selected and appointed,
thereby formally establishing the tribunal.
·
Global Nuclear
Power and Uranium Market:
The uranium spot price closed down
for the quarter at US$82 per pound. All three longer term uranium
price indicators strengthened in September as the 3-yr Forward
Price increased to US$94 per pound while the 5-yr Forward Price
reported at US$101 per pound. The Long-Term Price firmed at US$81
per pound.
The outlook for nuclear power and
the uranium market continued to strengthen during and subsequent to
the end of the quarter, with a number of important recent
developments, including:
· Microsoft
o In
September, Microsoft revealed plans that it was turning to nuclear
power to fuel its artificial intelligence (AI) aspirations and power its data
centres with carbon-free energy.
o Constellation Energy announced that it plans to restart a
nuclear reactor at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania and sell the
power to Microsoft for its data centres as part of a 20-year power
deal with the tech company. Constellation Energy plans to invest
US$1.6 billion to restart the reactor that was decommissioned just
five years ago.
· Google
o Google signed a landmark deal to use electricity produced by
small nuclear reactors to power its AI efforts.
o Under the agreement with Kairos Power, Google will back the
construction of seven small nuclear reactors (SMRs) capable of generating 500
megawatts of power with the first reactor schedule to come online
by 2030.
· Amazon
o Amazon announced that it has taken a stake in advanced nuclear
reactor developer, X-energy, with the goal of deploying up to five
gigawatts of its SMRs in the USA by 2039, representing the largest
commercial deployment target of SMRs to date.
o The
deal is designed for growing energy demands in key locations,
through direct project investments and long-term power purchase
agreements, to help power Amazon operations.
· China
o China's State Council approved the construction of 11 nuclear
reactors across five sites located in Jiangsu, Shandong, Guangdong,
Zhejiang and Guangxi.
o Estimated total investment in the 11 reactors amounts to US$31
billion, with construction times expected to be five
years.
· Spain
o The
Nuclear Safety Council (NSC) has approved the renewal of the
operating licence for the single-unit Trillo nuclear power plant in
central Spain for a further ten years. The NSC's report will be
sent to MITECO and be taken into account in the authorisation
process.
· The
Netherlands
o The
European Commission has approved, under EU state aid rules, the
Dutch government's plan to invest €2 billion (US$2.2 billion) in
the construction of the new Pallas research reactor in
Petten.
· Poland
o Poland's government is planning to allocate US$1.2 billion in
its 2025 budget to initiate preparations for the country's first
nuclear power plant in the northern portion of the country. The
project, managed by a U.S. consortium of Westinghouse Electric and
Bechtel, aims to deploy three reactors by the 2030s.
o The
nuclear power project is expected to be the largest investment in
Poland's history, with a total estimated cost of around US$15.6
billion over the 2025-2030 period. The project is part of Poland's
long-term strategy to enhance energy security and reduce reliance
on fossil fuels.
· Italy
o Italy has reportedly initiated an evaluation of the
reintroduction of nuclear power. Previously, the country operated
four commercial reactors but a national referendum held subsequent
to the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear accident resulted in a total nuclear
phase-out with the last two operating reactors which closed in
1990. Italy's National Integrated Energy and Climate Plan submitted
to the European Commission in early July 2024 sets forth potential
nuclear power goals ranging from 11% of generating capacity up to
as much as 20-22% of total capacity by 2050.
· Azerbaijan
o Azerbaijan news agencies have reported that Eastern European
countries plan to develop at least twelve nuclear reactors with a
total budget of about €130 billion. The principal objectives of the
programmes are to achieve carbon neutrality as well as reduce
dependence on Russian gas imports.
· Switzerland
o The
Swiss government has said it will seek to lift the country's ban on
the construction of new nuclear power plants, which has been in
place since 1 January 2018. It said all clean energy sources will
be needed to meet expected electricity demand while also meeting
climate targets.
· Other
o The
European Commission has selected nine SMR projects - including two
lead-cooled fast reactors - in the initial round of applications to
form project working groups under the European Industrial Alliance
on SMRs.
o The
International Energy Agency (IEA) forecasts continued nuclear
capacity growth to 2050. Global nuclear generating capacity is
expected to increase from 416 GWe in 2023 to 647 Gwe in 2050 in a
scenario based on existing energy policies, according to the latest
World Energy Outlook from the International Energy
Agency.
·
Balance
Sheet
The Company is in a strong financial
position with A$72.3 million in cash reserves and no
debt.
Classification 2.2: This
announcement includes Inside Information
For
further information please contact:
Robert
Behets
Francisco
Bellón
Acting Managing
Director
Chief Operations Officer
+61 8 9322
6322
+34 923 193 903
info@berkeleyenergia.com
Salamanca Project Summary
The Salamanca Project (Salamanca or Project) is being developed in a
historic uranium mining area in Western Spain about three hours
west of Madrid.
The Company has received more than
120 European Union and National level approvals and favorable
reports required for the initial development of the project to
date.
The project has the potential to
generate measurable social and environmental benefits in the form
of jobs and skills training in a depressed rural community. It can
also make a significant contribution to the security of supply of
Europe's zero carbon energy needs.
The Project hosts a Mineral Resource
of 89.3Mlb uranium, with more than two thirds in the Measured and
Indicated categories. In 2016, Berkeley published the results of a
robust Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) for Salamanca confirming that the
Project may be one of the world's lowest cost producers, capable of
generating strong after-tax cash flows.
Figure 1:
Location of the
Salamanca Project, Spain
International Arbitration Dispute
The Company's wholly owned
subsidiary, BEL, has filed a Request for
its investments in Spain through its Spanish subsidiary, BME,
initiating arbitration proceedings against the Kingdom of Spain
before ICSID.
As part of its Request, BEL alleges
that Spain's actions against BME and the Salamanca Project have
violated multiple provisions of the ECT, and that BEL is seeking
preliminary compensation in the order of US$1 billion
(US$1,000,000,000) for these violations.
In November 2022, BEL submitted a
written notification of an investment dispute to the Prime Minister
of Spain and the MITECO informing them of the nature of the dispute
and the ECT breaches, and that it proposed to seek prompt
negotiations for an amicable solution pursuant to article 26.1 of
the ECT. The Spanish government has not engaged in any discussions
related to the dispute to date, and BEL filed its Request in order
to enforce its rights at the Salamanca Project through
international arbitration.
The Request was jointly submitted by
specialist teams at Herbert Smith Freehills Spain LLP and LCS
Abogados who will represent BEL in the arbitration
proceedings.
Notwithstanding the investment
dispute, BEL remains committed to the Salamanca Project and
continues to be open to a constructive dialogue with Spain. BEL is
ready to collaborate with the relevant Spanish authorities to find
an amicable resolution to the permitting situation and remains
hopeful discussions can take place in the near term.
BEL has received the Notice of
Registration from ICSID, and the current phase of proceedings
involves tribunal members being selected and appointed, thereby
formally establishing the tribunal.
Background to Dispute
In April 2021, the Spanish
Government approved an amendment to the draft climate change and
energy transition bill relating to the investigation and
exploitation of radioactive minerals (e.g. uranium). The Government
reviewed and approved the amendment to Article 10 under which: (i)
new applications for exploration, investigation and direct
exploitation concessions for radioactive materials, and their
extensions, would not be accepted following the entry into force of
this law; and (ii) existing concessions, and open proceedings and
applications related to these, would continue as per normal based
on the previous legislation. The new law was published in the
Official Spanish State Gazette and came into effect in May
2021.
The Company's wholly owned
subsidiary, BME, currently holds legal, valid and consolidated
rights for the investigation and exploitation of its mining
projects, including the 30-year mining licence (renewable for two
further periods of 30 years) for the Salamanca Project, however any
new proceedings opened by the Company is now not allowed under the
aforementioned new law.
In November 2021, BME received
formal notification from MITECO that it had rejected the
construction of the plant as a radioactive facility (NSC II) at the Company's Salamanca
Project following an unfavourable report for the grant of NSC II
issued by the Board of the NSC in July 2021.
BEL strongly refutes the NSC's
assessment and, in its opinion, the NSC adopted an arbitrary
decision with the technical issues used as justification to issue
the unfavourable report lacking in both technical and legal
support.
BME submitted documentation,
including an 'Improvement Report' to supplement its initial NSC II
application, along with the corresponding arguments that address
all the issues raised by the NSC, and a request for its
reassessment by the NSC, to MITECO in July 2021.
Further documentation was submitted
to MITECO in August 2021, in which BME, with strongly supported
arguments, dismantled all of the technical issues used by the NSC
as justification to issue the unfavourable report. BME again
restated that the project is compliant with all requirements for
NSC II to be awarded and requested its NSC II Application be
reassessed by the NSC.
In addition, BME requested from
MITECO access to the files associated with the Authorisation for
Construction and Authorisation for Dismantling and Closure for the
radioactive facilities at La Haba (Badajoz) and Saelices El Chico
(Salamanca), which are owned by ENUSA Industrias Avandas S.A., in
order to verify and contrast the conditions approved by the
competent administrative and regulatory bodies for other similar
uranium projects in Spain.
Based on a detailed comparison of
the different licensing files undertaken by BME following receipt
of these files, it is clear that BME, in its NSC II submission, has
been required to provide information that does not correspond to:
(i) the regulatory framework, (ii) the scope of the current
procedural stage (i.e., at the NSC II stage), and/or (iii) the
criteria applied in other licensing processes for similar
radioactive facilities). Accordingly, BEL considers that the NSC
has acted in a discriminatory and arbitrary manner when assessing
the NSC II application for the Salamanca Project.
In BEL's strong opinion, MITECO has
rejected BME's NSC II Application without following the legally
established procedure, as the Improvement Report has not been taken
into account and sent to the NSC for its assessment, as requested
on multiple occasions by BME.
In this regard, BEL believes that
MITECO have infringed regulations on administrative procedures in
Spain but also under protection afforded to BEL under the ECT,
which would imply that the decision on the rejection of BME's NSC
II Application is not legal.
In April 2023, BME submitted a
contentious-administrative appeal before the Spanish National Court
in an attempt to overturn the MITECO decision denying NSC
II.
Further, the BME received formal
notifications in December 2023 which upheld appeals submitted by a
non-governmental organisation, Plataforma Stop Uranio, and the city
council of Villavieja de Yeltes (the appellants) to revoke the first
instance judgements related to the Authorisation of Exceptional
Land Use (AEUL) and the
Urbanism License (UL),
which annuled both the AEUL and UL.
The AEUL and the UL were granted to
BME in July 2017 and August 2020 by the Regional Commission of
Environment and Urbanism, and the Municipality of Retortillo
respectively.
The appellants subsequently filed
administrative appeals against the AEUL and the UL at the first
instance courts in Salamanca. The administrative appeals against
the AEUL and UL were dismissed in September 2022 and January 2023
respectively.
One of the appellants subsequently
lodged appeals before the High Court of Justice of Castilla y León
(TSJ), with the TSJ
delivering judgements in December 2023 to revoke the first instance
judgements and declare the AEUL and the UL null.
BME strongly disagrees with the
fundamentals of the TSJ's judgement and having previously submitted
cassation appeals against the TSJ judgements before the Spanish
Supreme Court, BME has withdrawn the appeals to preserve BEL's
rights under international arbitration.
Salamanca Project Update
During the quarter, the Company
continued with its commitment to health, safety and the environment
as a priority.
During the quarter, external audits
of the Company's Environmental Management System according to ISO
14001 Standards and Sustainable Mining Management System according
to UNE 22470/80 Standards were carried out by independent
consultant AENOR. No non-compliance issues were identified during
the audit and the final report noted that BME continues to improve
its climate change and sustainability processes. AENOR concluded
that the Environmental Management System and Sustainable Mining
Management System meet the requirements of the Standards and the
audit criteria.
The Company is also in the process
of certifying it's Health and Safety Management System under the
ISO 45001, and an internal audit was successfully completed during
the quarter. An external audit by AENOR, and further certification,
will be conducted in the December 2024 quarter.
Exploration
During the quarter, the Company
continued with its exploration program focusing on battery and
critical metals in Spain. The exploration initiative is targeting
lithium, cobalt, tin, tungsten, rare earths, and other battery and
critical metals, within the Company's existing tenements in western
Spain that do not form part of Berkeley's main undertaking being
the development of the Salamanca Project.
Investigation Permit
Conchas
The Investigation Permit
(IP) Conchas is located in
the very western part of the Salamanca province, close to the
Portuguese border (Figure 2). The tenement covers an area of
~31km2 in the western part of the Ciudad Rodrigo Basin
and is largely covered by Cenozoic aged sediments. Only the
north-western part of the tenement is uncovered and dominated by
the Guarda Batholith intrusion. The tenement hosts a number of
sites where small-scale historical tin and tungsten mining was
undertaken. In addition, several mineral occurrences (tin,
tungsten, titanium, lithium) have been identified during historical
mapping and stream sediment sampling programs.
Billiton PLC undertook exploration
on the IP Conchas between 1981 and 1983, with a focus on tin and
tantalum (lithium was not taken into account). Billiton's work
programs comprised regional and detailed geological mapping,
geochemistry, trenching and limited drilling.
Soil sampling programs completed by
Berkeley in the northern and central portions of the tenement
during 2021 (200m by 200m) and 2022 (100m by 100m) defined a
tin-lithium anomaly covering approximately 1.1km by 0.7km which
correlated with a mapped aplo-pegmatitic leucogranite.
Based on the results of the soil
sampling programs and information gleaned from a review of the
available historical data, a small initial drilling program was
implemented in 2022 to test the tin-lithium anomaly. The drill
program comprised five broad spaced reverse circulation
(RC) holes for a total of
282m. Anomalous results for lithium (Li), tin (Sn), rubidium (Rb),
caesium (Cs), niobium (Nb) and tantalum (Ta) obtained from
multi-element analysis of drill samples were reported in the March
2023 quarter, demonstrating IP Conchas' exploration potential for
several critical and strategic raw materials included in the
European Commission's Critical Raw Materials Act.
The occurrence of these six elements
is observed to be largely associated with a sub-horizontal
muscovitic leucogranite unit that locally outcrops at surface. The
muscovitic leucogranite has a mapped extent of approximately 2km
(in a NE-SW orientation) by 0.4km (in a NW-SE orientation) and
varies in thickness from 7m to over 100m in the drill
holes.
A number of mineralogical studies
have been undertaken to determine the mineral species present and
understand their characteristics and properties. Results of these
studies indicate the mineralised muscovitic leucogranite is
composed mainly of plagioclase (average content of 55%) and quartz
(average content of 25%), with potassium feldspar, muscovite mica,
and Li-mica making up remainder of the rock. The samples have an
average Li-mica content of 3%.
A follow-up drilling program focused
on improving confidence in the geology, continuity, and grade
distribution of the zone of multi-element mineralisation was
completed subsequent to the end of the quarter. The drilling
program comprised of 33 RC holes for 1,857m (100m by 100m grid) and
three diamond core holes for 230m (for metallurgical test work
purposes). Drill hole depths ranged from 16m to a maximum of 169m.
The complete suite of assays results from the RC drilling is
anticipated to be received in the coming months.
Figure 2: IP Conchas
Location Plans and Geology / Drill Hole Location
Oliva and La Majada
Projects
These projects comprise three
tenements within two project areas in Spain which are considered
prospective for tungsten, cobalt, antimony, and other
metals.
The Company has designed exploration
programs for both projects, communicated with the relevant
authorities and conducted the required studies e.g. a birdlife
study at the La Majada Project, to progress the pending grant of
the IPs for two of the tenements.
The birdlife study at the La Majada
Project was completed during the quarter and the Exploration
Program is currently being updated to align it to new legislation
recently introduced for the Castilla La Mancha Region. This
documentation will be submitted to the relevant authorities in the
coming quarter.
Additional Information on the Global Nuclear Power and Uranium
Market
The outlook for nuclear power and
the uranium market continued to strengthen during the quarter, with
several other important recent developments in the sector,
including:
· The
Philippines unveiled its Nuclear Energy Roadmap during the quarter.
The Department of Energy described 2024 as a landmark year for the
Philippines with the release of its nuclear roadmap, which outlines
the country's path forward to develop a nuclear programme. "We aim
to have commercially operational nuclear power plants by 2032, with
at least 1200 MW initially entering the country's power mix,
gradually increasing to 4800 MW by 2050," the department said.
Further, the Philippines is actively working to establish an
independent nuclear regulatory authority, which will oversee the
safe and secure development of the country's nuclear energy
programme.
· Indonesia's Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry reported
that nuclear power has been included in the country's 2033 National
Electricity General Plan. The Ministry's Director General of New
Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation, advised that "Our plan
states that nuclear power can be implemented in 2033." A proposed
new government bureau, the Nuclear Energy Program Implementation
Organisation would oversee the development of nuclear power in
Indonesia.
· US
uranium production continues to grow, with 2024's year-to-date
production already more than triple that recorded for the whole of
2023, according to the latest figures from the US Energy
Information Administration. Meanwhile, as press reports suggest US
concern that its ban on Russian uranium might be being
circumvented, the Office of the United States Trade Representative
has announced increased tariffs on Chinese imports including
uranium.
· Westinghouse Electric Company and Bechtel said they welcome
the announcement by the Polish government of its intention to
allocate PLN60 billion (US$15.7 billion) to fund the country's
first nuclear power plant.
· The
Swedish government is proposing investments of over US$97 million
in 2025 to expand fossil-free electricity production. This includes
an expanded investment in pilot and demonstration projects in the
area of nuclear power and in streamlining the permitting process
for new reactors."
· The
annual World Nuclear Performance Report shows an increase in global
nuclear electricity generation and average capacity factors for
2023, highlighting the continuation of excellent performance of the
global nuclear reactor fleet.
· Deliveries of natural uranium and other nuclear services to
the EU, including imports from Russia, increased in 2023 as
utilities continued to diversify their sources of nuclear fuel. But
there are still supply chain challenges to face, according to the
latest annual report from the Euratom Supply Agency.
· The
majority of South Koreans consider nuclear power generation as
necessary, according to a public opinion poll commissioned by the
Korea Energy Information Culture Agency. BusinessKorea reported.
81.9% of respondents said that nuclear power generation was
necessary, compared with 15.5% saying it was not, in the Energy
Perception Survey for the First Half of 2024. In addition, 36.5%
said it was very necessary and 45.4% said it was somewhat
necessary. In the survey, 70.2% agreed that the country's nuclear
power plants are safe, while 26.3% disagreed.
· Global
nuclear generation is on track to reach a new high in 2025,
surpassing its previous record in 2021, the IEA said in its
Electricity Mid-Year Update. It forecasts that nuclear generation
will rise globally by 1.6% in 2024, and by 3.5% in 2025. "This
growth is supported by a steady increase in output by the French
nuclear power fleet as maintenance works are completed, by the
restarting of reactors in Japan, and by new reactors coming online
in various markets, including China, India, Korea and Europe," the
IEA said.
· The
Indian government has announced plans to partner with the private
sector to develop small modular reactors in a 2024-25 budget
announcement which recognises a significant role for nuclear in the
country's future energy mix.
· Serbia
gathers experts to establish nuclear energy programme. The Minister
of Mining and Energy and representatives of five other ministries
and from 20 academic faculties, scientific institutes and energy
companies have signed a memorandum of understanding on the
development of nuclear energy in Serbia.
· The
government of South Africa intends to progress its proposed
expansion of commercial nuclear power. The country's Minister of
Energy and Electricity said that the country plans to pursue
approvals for funding to construct 2,500 MW of nuclear capacity,
which is likely to be located in the Eastern Cape's Nelson Mandela
Bay hub. Separately, government approval has been granted for a
20-year operating life extension for Unit 1 of South Africa's
two-reactor nuclear power plant, Koeberg. The South African
utility, ESKOM, applied for the extension of the initial 40-year
license in 2021.
Forward Looking
Statements
Statements regarding plans with respect to Berkeley's mineral
properties are forward-looking statements. There can be no
assurance that Berkeley's plans for development of its mineral
properties will proceed as currently expected. There can also be no
assurance that Berkeley will be able to confirm the presence of
additional mineral deposits, that any mineralisation will prove to
be economic or that a mine will successfully be developed on any of
Berkeley mineral properties. These forward-looking statements are
based on Berkeley's expectations and beliefs concerning future
events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to
risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside
the control of Berkeley, which could cause actual results to differ
materially from such statements. Berkeley makes no undertaking to
subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made
in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after
the date of that report.
Competent Persons
Statements
The information in this report that relates to Exploration
Results is extracted from the March 2023 Quarterly Report which is
available to view on Berkeley's website at www.berkeleyenergia.com.
Berkeley confirms that: a) it is not aware of any new information
or data that materially affects the information included in the
original announcement; b) all material assumptions and technical
parameters underpinning the Exploration Results in the original
announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and
c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons'
findings are presented in this announcement have not been
materially modified from the original
announcement.
The information in this report that relates to the Mineral
Resource Estimate is extracted from the announcement dated 27
August 2024 entitled 'Annual Report 2024', which is available to
view on Berkeley's website at www.berkeleyenergia.com
and is based on,
and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Enrique Martínez,
a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of
Mining and Metallurgy. Berkeley confirms that: a) it is not aware
of any new information or data that materially affects the
information included in the original announcement; b) all material
assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Mineral
Resource Estimate in the original announcement continue to apply
and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in
which the relevant Competent Persons' findings are presented in
this announcement have not been materially modified from the
original announcement.
The information contained within this announcement is deemed
by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under
the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of
UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act
2018 ('MAR'). Upon the publication of this announcement via
Regulatory Information Service ('RIS'), this inside information is
now considered to be in the public domain.
Appendix 1: Mineral Resource at Salamanca
Deposit
Name
|
Resource Category
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
U3O8
(ppm)
|
U3O8
(Mlbs)
|
Retortillo
|
Measured
|
4.1
|
498
|
4.5
|
|
Indicated
|
11.3
|
395
|
9.8
|
|
Inferred
|
0.2
|
368
|
0.2
|
|
Total
|
15.6
|
422
|
14.5
|
Zona 7
|
Measured
Indicated
|
5.2
10.5
|
674
761
|
7.8
17.6
|
|
Inferred
|
6.0
|
364
|
4.8
|
|
Total
|
21.7
|
631
|
30.2
|
Alameda
|
Indicated
|
20.0
|
455
|
20.1
|
|
Inferred
|
0.7
|
657
|
1.0
|
|
Total
|
20.7
|
462
|
21.1
|
Las Carbas
|
Inferred
|
0.6
|
443
|
0.6
|
Cristina
|
Inferred
|
0.8
|
460
|
0.8
|
Caridad
|
Inferred
|
0.4
|
382
|
0.4
|
Villares
|
Inferred
|
0.7
|
672
|
1.1
|
Villares North
|
Inferred
|
0.3
|
388
|
0.2
|
Total Retortillo
Satellites
|
Total
|
2.8
|
492
|
3.0
|
Villar
|
Inferred
|
5.0
|
446
|
4.9
|
Alameda Nth Zone 2
|
Inferred
|
1.2
|
472
|
1.3
|
Alameda Nth Zone 19
|
Inferred
|
1.1
|
492
|
1.2
|
Alameda Nth Zone 21
|
Inferred
|
1.8
|
531
|
2.1
|
Total Alameda
Satellites
|
Total
|
9.1
|
472
|
9.5
|
Gambuta
|
Inferred
|
12.7
|
394
|
11.1
|
Salamanca Project
Total
|
Measured
|
9.3
|
597
|
12.3
|
Indicated
|
41.8
|
516
|
47.5
|
Inferred
|
31.5
|
395
|
29.6
|
Total (*)
|
82.6
|
514
|
89.3
|
Appendix 2: Summary of Mining Tenements
As at 30 September 2024, the Company
had an interest in the following tenements:
Location
|
Tenement Name
|
Percentage
Interest
|
Status
|
Spain
|
|
|
|
Salamanca
|
D.S.R Salamanca 28
(Alameda)
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
D.S.R Salamanca 29
(Villar)
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
E.C. Retortillo-Santidad
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
E.C. Lucero
|
100%
|
Pending
|
|
I.P. Abedules
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Abetos
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Alcornoques
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Alisos
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Bardal
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Barquilla
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Berzosa
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Campillo
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Castaños 2
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Ciervo
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Conchas
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Dehesa
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. El Águila
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. El
Vaqueril
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Espinera
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Horcajada
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Lis
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Mailleras
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Mimbre
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Pedreras
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
E.P. Herradura*
|
100%
|
Granted
|
Cáceres
|
I.P. Almendro
E.C. Gambuta
|
100%
100%
|
Granted^
Pending^
|
|
I.P. Ibor
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Olmos
|
100%
|
Granted
|
Badajoz
|
I.P. Los Bélicos
|
100%
|
Granted**
|
|
I.P.A. Ampliación Los
Bélicos
|
100%
|
Pending**
|
Ciudad Real
|
I.P.A. La Majada
|
100%
|
Pending**
|
*An application for a 1-year
extension at E.P. Herradura
was previously rejected however this decision has
been appealed and the Company awaits the decision regarding its
appeal.
^The Company has applied for an
Exploitation Concession from the existing IP Almendro.
**Exploracion de Recuros
Minerales S.L.U (ERM), a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, has entered into a Tenement
Sale and Purchase Agreement and Royalty Deed to acquire IP Los
Bélicos, IPA
Ampliación Los Bélicos, and IPA La Majada.
Appendix 3: Related Party Payments
During the quarter ended 30
September 2024, the Company made payments of $71,000 to related
parties and their associates. These payments relate to existing
remuneration arrangements (director and consulting fees plus
statutory superannuation).
Appendix 4: Exploration and Mining
Expenditure
During the quarter ended 30
September 2024, the Company made the following payments in relation
to exploration and development activities:
Activity
|
A$000
|
Permitting related expenditure
(including legal costs)
|
361
|
Radiological protection, monitoring
and other assays
|
3
|
Consultants and other
expenditure
|
79
|
Payment/(return) of VAT and other
social taxes in Spain
|
176
|
Total as reported in the Appendix 5B
|
619
|
There were no mining or production
activities and expenses incurred during the quarter ended 30
September 2024.
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration
entity
quarterly cash flow report
Name of entity
|
Berkeley Energia Limited
|
ABN
|
|
Quarter ended ("current
quarter")
|
40 052 468 569
|
|
30 September 2024
|
Consolidated statement of cash flows
|
Current quarter
$A'000
|
Year to date
(3 months)
$A'000
|
1.
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
-
|
-
|
1.1
|
Receipts from customers
|
1.2
|
Payments for
|
(619)
|
(619)
|
|
(a) exploration &
evaluation
|
|
(b)
development
|
-
|
-
|
|
(c)
production
|
-
|
-
|
|
(d) staff
costs
|
(295)
|
(295)
|
|
(e) administration and
corporate costs
|
(254)
|
(254)
|
1.3
|
Dividends received (see
note 3)
|
-
|
-
|
1.4
|
Interest received
|
848
|
848
|
1.5
|
Interest and other costs of finance
paid
|
-
|
-
|
1.6
|
Income taxes paid
|
-
|
-
|
1.7
|
Government grants and tax
incentives
|
-
|
-
|
1.8
|
Other (provide details if
material)
(a) Business
Development
(b) Arbitration related
expenses
|
(85)
(1,298)
|
(85)
(1,298)
|
1.9
|
Net
cash from / (used in) operating activities
|
(1,703)
|
(1,703)
|
|
2.
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
-
|
-
|
2.1
|
Payments to acquire or
for:
|
|
(a) entities
|
|
(b) tenements
|
-
|
-
|
|
(c) property, plant and
equipment
|
-
|
-
|
|
(d) exploration &
evaluation
|
-
|
-
|
|
(e)
investments
|
-
|
-
|
|
(f) other
non-current assets
|
-
|
-
|
2.2
|
Proceeds from the disposal
of:
|
-
|
-
|
|
(a) entities
|
|
(b) tenements
|
-
|
-
|
|
(c) property, plant and
equipment
|
-
|
-
|
|
(d)
investments
|
-
|
-
|
|
(e) other non-current
assets
|
-
|
-
|
2.3
|
Cash flows from loans to other
entities
|
-
|
-
|
2.4
|
Dividends received (see
note 3)
|
-
|
-
|
2.5
|
Other (provide details if
material)
|
-
|
-
|
2.6
|
Net
cash from / (used in) investing activities
|
-
|
-
|
|
3.
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
-
|
-
|
3.1
|
Proceeds from issues of equity
securities (excluding convertible debt securities)
|
3.2
|
Proceeds from issue of convertible
debt securities
|
-
|
-
|
3.3
|
Proceeds from exercise of
options
|
-
|
-
|
3.4
|
Transaction costs related to issues
of equity securities or convertible debt securities
|
-
|
-
|
3.5
|
Proceeds from borrowings
|
-
|
-
|
3.6
|
Repayment of borrowings
|
-
|
-
|
3.7
|
Transaction costs related to loans
and borrowings
|
-
|
-
|
3.8
|
Dividends paid
|
-
|
-
|
3.9
|
Other (provide details if
material)
|
-
|
-
|
3.10
|
Net
cash from / (used in) financing activities
|
-
|
-
|
|
4.
|
Net
increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the
period
|
|
|
4.1
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
77,345
|
77,345
|
4.2
|
Net cash from / (used in) operating
activities (item 1.9 above)
|
(1,703)
|
(1,703)
|
4.3
|
Net cash from / (used in) investing
activities (item 2.6 above)
|
-
|
-
|
4.4
|
Net cash from / (used in) financing
activities (item 3.10 above)
|
-
|
-
|
4.5
|
Effect of movement in exchange rates
on cash held
|
(3,257)
|
(3,257)
|
4.6
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
72,385
|
72,385
|
5.
|
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents
at the end of the quarter (as shown in the
consolidated statement of cash flows) to the related items in the
accounts
|
Current quarter
$A'000
|
Previous quarter
$A'000
|
5.1
|
Bank balances
|
72,335
|
77,345
|
5.2
|
Call deposits
|
50
|
50
|
5.3
|
Bank overdrafts
|
-
|
-
|
5.4
|
Other (provide details)
|
-
|
-
|
5.5
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal
item 4.6 above)
|
72,385
|
77,345
|
6.
|
Payments to related parties of the entity and their
associates
|
Current quarter
$A'000
|
6.1
|
Aggregate amount of payments to
related parties and their associates included in
item 1
|
(71)
|
6.2
|
Aggregate amount of payments to
related parties and their associates included in
item 2
|
-
|
Note: if any amounts are shown in items 6.1 or 6.2, your
quarterly activity report must include a description of, and an
explanation for, such payments.
|
7.
|
Financing facilities Note: the term "facility'
includes all forms of financing arrangements available to the
entity.
Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the sources of
finance available to the entity.
|
Total facility amount at
quarter end
$A'000
|
Amount drawn at quarter end
$A'000
|
7.1
|
Loan facilities
|
-
|
-
|
7.2
|
Credit standby
arrangements
|
-
|
-
|
7.3
|
Other (please specify)
|
-
|
-
|
7.4
|
Total financing facilities
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
Unused financing facilities available at quarter
end
|
-
|
7.6
|
Include in the box below a
description of each facility above, including the lender, interest
rate, maturity date and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any
additional financing facilities have been entered into or are
proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include a note
providing details of those facilities as well.
|
Not applicable
|
8.
|
Estimated cash available for future operating
activities
|
$A'000
|
8.1
|
Net cash from / (used in) operating
activities (item 1.9)
|
(1,703)
|
8.2
|
(Payments for exploration & evaluation classified as investing
activities) (item 2.1(d))
|
-
|
8.3
|
Total relevant outgoings
(item 8.1 + item 8.2)
|
(1,703)
|
8.4
|
Cash and cash equivalents at quarter
end (item 4.6)
|
72,385
|
8.5
|
Unused finance facilities available
at quarter end (item 7.5)
|
-
|
8.6
|
Total available funding
(item 8.4 + item 8.5)
|
72,385
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
Estimated quarters of funding available (item 8.6 divided
by item 8.3)
|
>10
|
Note: if the entity has reported positive relevant outgoings
(ie a net cash inflow) in item 8.3, answer item 8.7 as
"N/A". Otherwise, a figure for the estimated quarters of funding
available must be included in item 8.7.
|
8.8
|
If item 8.7 is less than
2 quarters, please provide answers to the following
questions:
|
|
8.8.1 Does
the entity expect that it will continue to have the current level
of net operating cash flows for the time being and, if not, why
not?
|
|
Answer: Not applicable
|
|
8.8.2 Has
the entity taken any steps, or does it propose to take any steps,
to raise further cash to fund its operations and, if so, what are
those steps and how likely does it believe that they will be
successful?
|
|
Answer: Not applicable
|
|
8.8.3 Does
the entity expect to be able to continue its operations and to meet
its business objectives and, if so, on what basis?
|
|
Answer: Not applicable
|
|
Note: where item 8.7 is less than 2 quarters, all of
questions 8.8.1, 8.8.2 and 8.8.3 above must be
answered.
|
Compliance statement
1 This statement has
been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies
which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
2 This statement
gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
Date:
30 October 2024
Authorised by: Company
Secretary
(Name of body or officer authorising
release - see note 4)
Notes
1. This
quarterly cash flow report and the accompanying activity report
provide a basis for informing the market about the entity's
activities for the past quarter, how they have been financed and
the effect this has had on its cash position. An entity that wishes
to disclose additional information over and above the minimum
required under the Listing Rules is encouraged to do so.
2. If
this quarterly cash flow report has been prepared in accordance
with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and
provisions of, AASB 6:
Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and
AASB 107: Statement of Cash
Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly cash flow
report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting
standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the
corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
3.
Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from
operating activities or cash flows from investing activities,
depending on the accounting policy of the entity.
4. If
this report has been authorised for release to the market by your
board of directors, you can insert here: "By the board". If it has
been authorised for release to the market by a committee of your
board of directors, you can insert here: "By the [name of board committee - eg Audit and Risk Committee]". If it
has been authorised for release to the market by a disclosure
committee, you can insert here: "By the Disclosure
Committee".
5. If
this report has been authorised for release to the market by your
board of directors and you wish to hold yourself out as complying
with recommendation 4.2 of the ASX Corporate Governance
Council's Corporate Governance
Principles and Recommendations, the board should have
received a declaration from its CEO and CFO that, in their opinion,
the financial records of the entity have been properly maintained,
that this report complies with the appropriate accounting standards
and gives a true and fair view of the cash flows of the entity, and
that their opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system
of risk management and internal control which is operating
effectively.