ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for pro Trade like a pro: Leverage real-time discussions and market-moving ideas to outperform.

Shire Shares Slump 22%

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

The ongoing dramatics involving the potential acquisition of Shire (LSE:SHP) by AbbVie (NYSE:ABBV) has given Shire’s share price a punch in the solar plexus today, making it the FTSE’s biggest loser on the day. Not only has the wind been knocked out of Shire’s sails, but there may be a storm brewing on the horizon.

©

Once AbbVie announced that it was not likely to continue to pursue Shire, Shire shares slumped by as much as 28%, regaining some ground to close down 21.9%

This story has been both dramatic and volatile for Shire over the last several months. Even though Shire originally rejected AbbVie’s overtures as far back as June of this year, speculation drove the stock upwards. After several rounds of courting followed by rebuffs, Shire finally succumbed to shareholder pressure that had been stimulated by AbbVie.

AbbVie’s turnabout cost Shire $13 billion in market capitalization today. What bothers me more (it’s not my $13 billion) is that the reason that AbbVie is walking away is precisely what they denied as being the reason for wanting to make the deal in the first place – the anticipation of a tax advantage gained by moving AbbVie’s corporate headquarters to Ireland.

Back in the summer their proposal was that they were in love with the potential that the two companies would achieve through their synergies. I think we’ve all heard that old pickup line before. I don’t care how many times they said it, I, for one, never believed it. I’m betting that you didn’t either.

Well, it seems that the Obama administration has decided to make it more difficult for U.S. based companies to toddle offshore. As usual with the current administration, they have stood around with their hands in the pockets and their fingers up their…uh…nose, acting just in time to potentially prevent this latest corporate departure. The Obama people have finally realized that the tax gain received by fleeing corporations is a revenue loss for the government.

But not all is lost. Shire should receive as much as $1.6 billion in reparations if AbbVie does, indeed, walk away.

On the other hand, the potential breaking of the deal is leaving another group more than a little upset. The Telegraph is predicting an “Arbageddon” as the arbitragers who had bet on a positive outcome of the proposed merger are threatening litigation should the deal collapse.

Meanwhile, the board that rejected the original AbbVie proposals now says that it “believes that AbbVie should proceed with the recommended offer on the agreed terms in accordance with the cooperation agreement.”

The drama continues.

 

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Plc. ADVFN Plc does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Comments are closed

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com