PART
I
Unless
the context otherwise requires, as used in this annual report, the terms “the Company”, “we”, “us”,
and “our” refer to Indonesia Energy Corporation Limited and any or all of its subsidiaries. References to our “management”
or our “management team” refers to our officers and directors. Unless otherwise noted, all industry and market data
in this annual report on Form 20-F (this “annual report”) is presented in U.S. dollars. Unless otherwise noted,
all financial and other data related to the Company in this annual report is presented in U.S. dollars. All references to “$”
or “US” in this annual report refer to U.S. dollars.
Please
see “Glossary of Terms” for a listing of oil and gas-related and other defined and capitalized terms used throughout
this annual report.
ITEM
1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS
Not
applicable.
ITEM
2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not
applicable.
ITEM
3. KEY INFORMATION
A.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The
following table summarizes our financial data. We have derived the following statements of operations data for the years ended
December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 and balance sheet data as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 from our audited financial
statements included elsewhere in this annual report. The following statements of operations data for the year ended December 31,
2017 and balance sheet data as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 have been derived from our audited financial statements for
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, which are not included in this annual report. Our historical results are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in the future. Numbers in the following tables are in U.S. dollars
except share numbers.
STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS DATA:
|
|
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,980,773
|
|
|
$
|
4,183,354
|
|
|
$
|
5,856,341
|
|
|
$
|
3,703,826
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
|
2,017,856
|
|
|
|
2,474,230
|
|
|
|
2,540,353
|
|
|
|
2,811,006
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
698,851
|
|
|
|
876,676
|
|
|
|
1,156,494
|
|
|
|
1,187,217
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6,533,642
|
|
|
|
2,434,099
|
|
|
|
2,016,110
|
|
|
|
1,258,069
|
|
Other income(expense)
|
|
|
317,878
|
|
|
|
(72,084
|
)
|
|
|
2,396
|
|
|
|
66,574
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(6,951,698
|
)
|
|
|
(1,673,735
|
)
|
|
|
140,988
|
|
|
|
(1,619,040
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income per ordinary share attributable
to the Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
(0.94
|
)
|
|
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
Weighted average ordinary shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
7,395,120
|
|
|
|
6,048,568
|
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
BALANCE
SHEET DATA:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
11,241,389
|
|
|
$
|
15,074,725
|
|
|
$
|
4,000,171
|
|
|
$
|
4,565,571
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
15,575,808
|
|
|
|
21,155,337
|
|
|
|
9,877,486
|
|
|
|
8,670,516
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
1,827,795
|
|
|
|
2,739,068
|
|
|
|
2,672,644
|
|
|
|
3,808,275
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,217,749
|
|
|
|
4,961,412
|
|
|
|
4,803,980
|
|
|
|
28,057,054
|
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
|
19,754
|
|
|
|
19,636
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
Total equity
(deficit)
|
|
$
|
12,358,059
|
|
|
$
|
16,193,925
|
|
|
$
|
5,073,506
|
|
|
$
|
(19,386,538
|
)
|
B.
|
Capitalization
and Indebtedness
|
Not
applicable.
C.
|
Reasons
for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
|
Not
applicable.
Investing
in our ordinary shares involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as the
other information in this report, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and all other disclosures
in this annual report before deciding whether to invest in our ordinary shares. The occurrence of any of the events or developments
described below could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
In such an event, the market price of our ordinary shares could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Additional
risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe are not material may also impair our business,
financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our
lack of asset and geographic diversification increases the risk of an investment in us, and our financial condition and results
of operations may deteriorate if we fail to diversify.
Our
business focus is on oil and gas exploration in limited areas in Indonesia and exploitation of any significant reserves that are
found within our license areas. As a result, we lack diversification, in terms of both the nature and geographic scope of our
business. We will likely be impacted more acutely by factors affecting our industry or the regions in which we operate than we
would if our business were more diversified. If we are unable to diversify our operations, our financial condition and results
of operations could deteriorate.
Decreases
in oil and gas prices have and may continue to adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Our
revenues, cash flow, profitability and future rate of growth are substantially dependent upon prevailing prices for oil and gas.
Our ability to borrow funds and to obtain additional capital on attractive terms is also substantially dependent on oil and gas
prices. Historically and recently, world-wide oil and gas prices and markets have been volatile and are likely to continue to
be volatile in the future.
Prices
for oil and gas are subject to wide fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand for oil and
gas, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. These factors include international political
conditions, the domestic and foreign supply of oil and gas, the level of consumer demand and factors effecting such demand, weather
conditions, domestic and foreign governmental regulations, the price and availability of alternative fuels and overall economic
conditions. In addition, various factors, including the effect of domestic and foreign regulation of production and transportation,
general economic conditions, changes in supply due to drilling by other producers and changes in demand may adversely affect our
ability to market our oil and gas production. Any significant decline in the price of oil or gas would adversely affect our revenues,
operating income, cash flows and borrowing capacity and may require a reduction in the carrying value of our oil and gas properties
and our planned level of capital expenditures. This risk was demonstrated in 2020 with very significant swings in the price of
oil as a result of the global novel coronavirus pandemic, and we may continue to be subject to oil and gas price-related risks
while the pandemic persists and for so long as the global economy remains uncertain.
There
is inherent credit risk in any gas sales arrangements with the Government to which we may become a party in the future.
Natural
gas supply contracts in Indonesia are negotiated on a field-by-field basis among SKK Migas, gas buyers and sellers. The common
clause in gas supply contracts is a “take-or-pay arrangement” in which the buyer is required to either pay the price
corresponding to certain pre-agreed quantities of natural gas and offtake such quantities or pay their corresponding price regardless
of whether it purchases them. Under certain circumstances, such as industrial or economic crisis in Indonesia or globally, the
buyer may be unwilling or unable to make these payments, which could trigger a renegotiation of contracts and become the subject
of legal disputes between parties. When and if we establish natural gas production and enter into related contracts with the Government,
this contract term could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and result of operation by reducing
our net profit or increasing our total liabilities in the future, or both.
We
face credit risk from the Government and the ability of Pertamina to pay our company for the operating costs and profit sharing
split in a timely manner.
Our
current cash inflow is dependent on a “cost recovery” and profit-sharing arrangement with Pertamina, meaning that
all operating costs (expenditures made and obligations incurred in the exploration, development, extraction, production, transportation,
marketing, abandonment and site restoration) are advanced by our company and later repaid by Pertamina plus a share of the profit
from operations. Any delay of payment by Pertamina may adversely affect our operations and delay the schedule of capital investments
which could have otherwise have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Drilling
oil and natural gas wells is a high-risk activity.
Our
growth is materially dependent upon the success of our drilling program. Drilling for natural gas and oil involves numerous risks,
including the risk that no commercially productive natural gas or oil reservoirs will be encountered. The cost of drilling, completing
and operating wells is substantial and uncertain, and drilling operations may be curtailed, delayed or cancelled as a result of
a variety of factors beyond our control, including:
|
●
|
unexpected
drilling conditions, pressure or irregularities in formations;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
equipment
failures or accidents;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
adverse
weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
decreases
in natural gas and oil prices;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
surface
access restrictions;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
loss
of title or other title related issues;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
compliance
with, or changes in, governmental requirements and regulation; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
costs
of shortages or delays in the availability of drilling rigs or crews and the delivery of equipment and materials.
|
Our
future drilling activities may not be successful and, if unsuccessful, such failure will have an adverse effect on our future
results of operations and financial condition. Our overall drilling success rate or our drilling success rate for activity within
a particular geographic area may decline. We may be unable to lease or drill identified or budgeted prospects within our expected
time frame, or at all. We may be unable to lease or drill a particular prospect because, in some cases, we identify a prospect
or drilling location before seeking an option or lease rights in the prospect or location. Similarly, our drilling schedule may
vary from our capital budget. The final determination with respect to the drilling of any scheduled or budgeted wells will be
dependent on a number of factors, including:
|
●
|
the
results of exploration efforts and the acquisition, review and analysis of the seismic data;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
availability of sufficient capital resources to us and the other participants for the drilling of the prospects;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
approval of the prospects by other participants after additional data has been compiled;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
economic
and industry conditions at the time of drilling, including prevailing and anticipated prices for natural gas and oil and the
availability of drilling rigs and crews;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our
financial resources and results; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
availability of leases and permits on reasonable terms for the prospects and any delays in obtaining such permits.
|
These
projects may not be successfully developed and the wells, if drilled, may not encounter reservoirs of commercially productive
natural gas or oil.
Lower
oil and/or gas prices may also reduce the amount of oil and/or gas that we can produce economically.
Sustained
substantial declines in oil and/or gas prices may render a significant portion of our exploration, development and exploitation
projects unviable from an economic perspective, which may result in us having to make significant downward adjustments to our
estimated proved reserves. As a result, a prolonged or substantial decline in oil and/or gas prices, such as we have experienced
since mid-2014 and which was exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic, caused, have caused and would likely in the future cause
a material and adverse effect on our future business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and ability to finance
capital expenditures. Additionally, if we experience significant sustained decreases in oil and gas prices such that the expected
future cash flows from our oil and gas properties falls below the net book value of our properties, we may be required to write
down the value of our oil and gas properties. Any such asset impairments could materially and adversely affect our results of
operations and, in turn, the trading price of our ordinary shares.
The
outbreak of COVID-19 and volatility in the energy markets may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition,
operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.
The
outbreak of COVID-19 and its development into a pandemic in March 2020 have resulted in significant disruption globally.
Actions taken by various governmental authorities, individuals and companies around the world to prevent the spread of COVID-19
have restricted travel, business operations, and the overall level of individual movement and in-person interaction across the
globe, including the United States and Indonesia. Furthermore, the impact of the pandemic, including a resulting reduction in
demand for oil and natural gas, coupled with the sharp decline in commodity prices following the announcement of price reductions
and production increases in March 2020 by members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) has
led to significant global economic contraction generally and in the oil and gas exploration industry in particular. While an agreement
to cut production has since been announced by OPEC and its allies, the situation, coupled with the impact of COVID-19, has continued
to result in a significant downturn in the oil and gas industry, which resulted in lower revenue and cost recovery entitlements
for the year ended December 31, 2020 than in 2019.
The
COVID-19 pandemic has caused us to modify our business practices, including by restricting employee travel, requiring employees
to work remotely and cancelling physical participation in meetings, events and conferences, and we may take further actions as
may be required by government authorities or that we determine are in the best interests of our employees, customers and business
partners. There is no certainty that such measures will be sufficient to mitigate the risks posed by COVID-19 or otherwise be
satisfactory to government authorities. If a number of our employees were to contract COVID-19 at the same time, our operations
could be adversely affected.
A
sustained disruption in the capital markets from the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically with respect to the energy industry, could
negatively impact our ability to raise capital. In the past, we have financed our operations by the issuance of equity securities.
However, we cannot predict when the macro-economic disruption stemming from COVID-19 will ebb or when the economy will return
to pre-COVID-19 levels, if at all. This macro-economic disruption may disrupt our ability to raise additional capital to
finance our operations in the future, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects,
and could ultimately cause our business to fail.
The
extent to which COVID-19 ultimately impacts our business, results of operations and financial condition will depend on future
developments, which are uncertain and cannot be predicted, including, but not limited to, the duration and spread of COVID-19
or variants of COVID-19, its severity, the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact (such as vaccinations), and how quickly
and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume. Even after COVID-19 has subsided, we may continue to experience
materially adverse impacts to our business as a result of its global economic impact, including any recession that has occurred
or may occur in the future, and lasting effects on the price of oil and natural gas.
We
may not be able to fund the capital expenditures that will be required for us to increase reserves and production.
We
must make capital expenditures to develop our existing reserves and to discover new reserves. Historically, we have
financed our capital expenditures primarily through related and non-related party financings and we expect to continue to utilize
these resources (as well as funds from potential equity and debt financings and any future net positive cash flow) in the future. However,
we cannot assure you that we will have sufficient capital resources in the future to finance all of our planned capital expenditures.
This is particularly the case as we raised less funds than we had anticipated in our December 2019 initial public offering,
which could require us to modify our drilling and other operational plans.
Moreover,
volatility in oil and gas prices, the timing of our drilling programs and drilling results will affect our cash flow from operations.
Lower prices and/or lower production could also decrease revenues and cash flow, thus reducing the amount of financial resources
available to meet our capital requirements, including reducing the amount available to pursue our drilling opportunities. If our
cash flow from operations does not increase as a result of capital expenditures, a greater percentage of our cash flow from operations
will be required for debt service and operating expenses and our capital expenditures would, by necessity, be decreased.
Strategic
determinations, including the allocation of capital and other resources to strategic opportunities, are challenging, and our failure
to appropriately allocate capital and resources among our strategic opportunities may adversely affect our financial condition
and reduce our growth rate.
Our
future growth prospects are dependent upon our ability to identify optimal strategies for our business. In developing our business
plan, we have and will continue to consider allocating capital and other resources to various aspects of our businesses, including
well-development (primarily drilling), reserve acquisitions, exploratory activity, corporate items and other alternatives. We
also have and will continue to consider our likely sources of capital. Our ability to fund our current business plan is dependent
on our available capital. As we raised less funds than we had anticipated in our December 2019 initial public offering, we
are faced with challenges relative to the allocation of those funds, which is requiring us to modify our business plan and which
could create challenges for our ability to fully fund our plans.
In
addition, and notwithstanding the determinations made in the development of our business plan, business opportunities not previously
identified periodically come to our attention, including possible acquisitions and dispositions. If we fail to identify optimal
business strategies or fail to optimize our capital investment and capital raising opportunities and the use of our other resources
in furtherance of our business strategies, our financial condition and growth rate may be adversely affected. Moreover, economic
or other circumstances may change from those contemplated by our business plan, and our failure to recognize or respond to those
changes may limit our ability to achieve our objectives.
Our
expectations for future drilling activities will be realized over several years, making them susceptible to uncertainties that
could materially alter the occurrence or timing of such activities.
We
have identified drilling locations and prospects for future drilling opportunities, including development and exploratory drilling
activities. These drilling locations and prospects represent a significant part of our future drilling plans. Our ability to drill
and develop these locations depends on a number of factors, including the availability of capital, regulatory approvals, negotiation
of agreements with third parties, commodity prices, costs, access to and availability of equipment, services, resources and personnel
and drilling results. There can be no assurance that we will drill these locations or that we will be able to produce oil from
these locations or any other potential drilling locations. Changes in the laws or regulations on which we rely in planning and
executing its drilling programs could adversely impact our ability to successfully complete those programs.
Our
estimated oil reserves are based on assumptions that may prove inaccurate.
Oil
engineering is a subjective process of estimating accumulations of oil and gas that cannot be measured in an exact way, and estimates
of other engineers may differ materially from those set out herein. Numerous assumptions and uncertainties are inherent in estimating
quantities of proved oil, including projecting future rates of production, timing and amounts of development expenditures and
prices of oil and gas, many of which are beyond our control. Results of drilling, testing and production after the date of the
estimate may require revisions to be made. Accordingly, reserves estimates are often materially different from the quantities
of oil and gas that are ultimately recovered, and if such recovered quantities are substantially lower that the initial reserves
estimate, this could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We
may not find any commercially productive oil and gas reservoirs in connection with our exploration activities.
Our
business prospects are currently dependent on extracting assets from our Kruh Block and on finding sufficient reserves in our
Citarum Block. Drilling involves numerous risks, including the risk that the new wells we drill will be unproductive or that we
will not recover all or any portion of our capital investment. Drilling for oil and gas may be unprofitable. Wells that
are productive but do not produce sufficient net revenues after drilling, operating and other costs are unprofitable. By their
nature, estimates of undeveloped reserves are less certain. Recovery of such reserves will require significant capital expenditures
and successful drilling and completion operations. In addition, our properties may be susceptible to drainage from production
by other operations on adjacent properties. If the volume of oil and gas we produce decreases, our cash flow from operations
may decrease.
We
may be unable to expand operations by securing rights to additional producing our exploration blocks.
One
of our key business strategies is expand our asset portfolio, which may include producing our exploration blocks. We have currently
identified one such potential block – the Rangkas Area – and our goal will be to secure rights to conduct activities
in Rangkas and other areas in Indonesia, However, due to the competitive tender process and uncertainties around Government contracting,
among other factors, we may be unable to secure rights to conduct exploration or production activities in any additional areas.
In particular, we face competition from other oil and gas companies in the acquisition of new oil blocks through the Indonesian
government’s tender process. Our competitors for these tenders include Pertamina, the Indonesian state-owned national oil
company (who can tender for blocks on its own), and other well-established large international oil and gas companies. Such companies
have substantially greater capital resources and are able to offer more attractive terms when bidding for concessions. If we are
unable to secure rights to additional blocks, we would be left without additional opportunities for revenue and profit and remain
subject to the risks associated with our current lack of asset diversification, all of which would harm our results of operations.
We
may not be able to keep pace with technological developments in our industry.
The
oil and gas industry is characterized by rapid and significant technological advancements and introductions of new products and
services using new technologies. As others use or develop new technologies, we may be placed at a competitive disadvantage, and
competitive pressures may force us to implement those new technologies at substantial cost. In addition, other oil and gas companies
may have greater financial, technical and personnel resources that allow them to enjoy technological advantages and may in the
future allow them to implement new technologies before we can. We may not be able to respond to these competitive pressures and
implement new technologies on a timely basis or at an acceptable cost. If one or more of the technologies we use now or in the
future were to become obsolete or if we are unable to use the most advanced commercially available technology, our business, financial
condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
We
may not adhere to our proposed drilling schedule.
While
we have internally approved plans for development of Kruh Block and have publicly stated our intentions with respect to new drilling
activity for Kruh Block, our final determination of whether and when to drill any scheduled or budgeted wells (whether
in Kruh Block or otherwise) will be dependent on a number of factors, including:
|
●
|
prevailing
and anticipated prices for oil and gas;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
availability and costs of drilling and service equipment and crews;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
economic
and industry conditions at the time of drilling;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
availability of sufficient capital resources;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
results of our exploration efforts;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
acquisition, review and interpretation of seismic data;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our
ability to obtain permits for and to access drilling locations; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
continuous
drilling obligations.
|
Although
we have identified or budgeted for numerous drilling locations, we may not be able to drill those locations within our expected
time frame or at all. In addition, our drilling schedule may vary from our expectations because of future uncertainties.
Seasonal
weather conditions and other factors could adversely affect our ability to conduct drilling activities.
Our
operations could be adversely affected by weather conditions. Severe weather conditions limit and may temporarily halt the ability
to operate during such conditions. These constraints and the resulting shortages or high costs could delay or temporarily halt
our oil and gas operations and materially increase our operating and capital costs, which could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The
lack of availability or high cost of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel and oil field services could adversely affect
our ability to execute our exploitation and development plans on a timely basis and within our budget.
Our
industry is cyclical and, from time to time, there has been a shortage of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies, oil field services
or qualified personnel. During these periods, the costs and delivery times of rigs, equipment and supplies are substantially greater.
In addition, the demand for, and wage rates of, qualified drilling rig crews rise as the number of active rigs in service increases.
During times and in areas of increased activity, the demand for oilfield services will also likely rise, and the costs of these
services will likely increase, while the quality of these services may suffer. If the lack of availability or high cost of drilling
rigs, equipment, supplies, oil field services or qualified personnel were particularly severe in any of our areas of operation,
we could be materially and adversely affected. Delays could also have an adverse effect on our results of operations, including
the timing of the initiation of production from new wells.
Our
drilling operations may be curtailed, delayed or cancelled as a result of a variety of factors that are beyond our control.
Our
drilling operations are subject to a number of risks, including:
|
●
|
unexpected
drilling conditions;
|
|
●
|
facility
or equipment failure or accidents;
|
|
●
|
adverse
weather conditions;
|
|
●
|
unusual
or unexpected geological formations;
|
|
●
|
fires,
blowouts and explosions;
|
|
●
|
uncontrollable
pressures or flows of oil or gas or well fluids; and
|
|
●
|
public
health risks and pandemic outbreaks, such as the recent novel coronavirus pandemic.
|
With
respect to the early 2020 novel coronavirus outbreak in particular, the full effects of this outbreak around the world are presently
unknown and unpredictable and could have a material adverse effect on (i) the demand for our oil and gas in Indonesia, (ii) our
ability to staff our drilling operations and (iii) our supply chain.
Any
of these events could adversely affect our ability to conduct operations or cause substantial losses, including personal injury
or loss of life, damage to or destruction of property, natural resources and equipment, pollution or other environmental contamination,
loss of wells, regulatory penalties, suspension of operations, and attorney’s fees and other expenses incurred in the prosecution
or defense of litigation.
We
do not insure against all potential operating risks. We might incur substantial losses from, and be subject to substantial liability
claims for, uninsured or underinsured risks related to our oil and gas operations.
We
do not insure against all risks. Our oil and gas exploitation and production activities are subject to hazards and risks associated
with drilling for, producing and transporting oil and gas, and any of these risks can cause substantial losses resulting from:
|
●
|
environmental
hazards, such as uncontrollable flows of oil, gas, brine, well fluids, toxic gas or other pollution into the environment,
including groundwater, shoreline contamination, underground migration and surface spills or mishandling of chemical additives;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
abnormally
pressured formations;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
mechanical
difficulties, such as stuck oil field drilling and service tools and casing collapse;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
leaks
of gas, oil, condensate, and other hydrocarbons or losses of these hydrocarbons as a result of accidents during drilling and
completion operations, or in the gathering and transportation of hydrocarbons, malfunctions of pipelines, measurement equipment
or processing or other facilities in our operations or at delivery points to third parties;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
fires
and explosions;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
personal
injuries and death;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
regulatory
investigations and penalties; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
natural
disasters and pandemics.
|
We
have general insurance covering typical industry risks with an insured limit per event of US$35,000,000 with an insured limit
per block of US$100,000,000. However, we do not know the extent of the losses caused by any occurrence and there is a risk that
our insurance may be inadequate to cover all applicable losses, to the extent losses are covered at all. Losses and liabilities
arising from uninsured and underinsured events or in amounts in excess of existing insurance coverage could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our
use of seismic data is subject to interpretation and may not accurately identify the presence of oil and natural gas.
Even
when properly used and interpreted, seismic data and visualization techniques are tools only used to assist geoscientists in identifying
subsurface structures as well as eventual hydrocarbon indicators, and do not enable the interpreter to know whether hydrocarbons
are, in fact, present in those structures. In addition, the use of seismic and other advanced technologies requires greater pre-drilling
expenditures than traditional drilling strategies, and we could incur losses as a result of these expenditures. Because of these
uncertainties associated with our use of seismic data, some of our drilling activities may not be successful or economically viable,
and our overall drilling success rate or our drilling success rate for activities in a particular area could decline, which could
have a material adverse effect on us.
We
may suffer delays or incremental costs due to difficulties in the negotiations with landowners and local communities where our
reserves are located.
Access
to the sites where we operate require agreements (including, for example, assessments, rights of way and access authorizations)
with the landowners and local communities. If we are unable to negotiate agreements with landowners, we may have to go to court
to obtain access to the sites of our operations, which may delay the progress of our operations at such sites. There can
be no assurance that disputes with landowners and local communities will not delay our operations or that any agreements we reach
with such landowners and local communities in the future will not require us to incur additional costs, thereby materially adversely
affecting our business, financial condition and results of operations. Local communities may also protest or take actions that
restrict or cause their elected government to restrict our access to the sites of our operations, which may have a material adverse
effect on our operations at such sites.
Unfavorable
credit and market conditions could negatively impact the Indonesian economy and may negatively affect our ability to access capital,
our business generally and results of operations.
Global
financial crises and related turmoil in the global financial system have and may have a negative impact on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. In particular, if disruptions in international credit markets, exacerbated by the sovereign
debt crises or global pandemics, adversely impact the Indonesian economy (where our oil and gas products are sold by the Government),
our business may suffer and may adversely affect our ability to access the credit or capital markets at a time when we would need
financing, which could have an impact on our flexibility to react to changing economic and business conditions. Any of the foregoing
factors or a combination of these factors, or similar factors not known to us presently, could have an adverse effect on our liquidity,
results of operations and financial condition.
The
marketability of our production depends largely upon the availability, proximity and capacity of oil and gas gathering systems,
pipelines, storage and processing facilities.
The
marketability of our production depends in part upon processing and storage. Transportation space on such gathering
systems and pipelines is occasionally limited and at times unavailable due to repairs or improvements being made to such facilities
or due to such space being utilized by other companies with priority transportation agreements. Our access to transportation
options can also be affected by Indonesian law, regulation of oil and gas production and transportation, general economic conditions
and changes in supply and demand. These factors and the availability of markets are beyond our control. If our access
to these transportation and storage options dramatically changes, the financial impact on us could be substantial and adversely
affect our ability to produce and market our oil and gas.
Cyber-attacks
targeting systems and infrastructure used by the oil and gas industry may adversely impact our operations.
Our
business has become increasingly dependent on digital technologies to conduct certain exploration, development and production
activities. We depend on digital technology to estimate quantities of oil reserves, process and record financial and
operating data, analyze seismic and drilling information, and communicate with our employees and third-party partners. Unauthorized
access to our seismic data, reserves information or other proprietary information could lead to data corruption, communication
interruption, or other operational disruptions in our exploration or production operations. In addition, computer technology
controls nearly all of the oil and gas distribution systems in Indonesia, which are necessary to transport our production to market. A
cyber-attack directed at oil and gas distribution systems could damage critical distribution and storage assets or the environment,
delay or prevent delivery of production to markets and make it difficult or impossible to accurately account for production and
settle transactions.
While
we have not experienced significant cyber-attacks, we may suffer such attacks in the future. Further, as cyber-attacks continue
to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures
or to investigate and remediate any vulnerability to cyber-attacks.
We
rely on independent experts and technical or operational service providers over whom we may have limited control.
We
use independent contractors to provide us with certain technical assistance and services. We rely upon the owners and operators
of rigs and drilling equipment, and upon providers of field services, to drill and develop our prospects to production. We
also rely upon the services of other third parties to explore and/or analyze our prospects to determine a method in which the
prospects may be developed in a cost-effective manner. Our limited control over the activities and business practices of
these service providers, any inability on our part to maintain satisfactory commercial relationships with them or their failure
to provide quality services could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Market
conditions for oil and gas, and particularly volatility of prices for oil and gas, could adversely affect our revenue, cash flows,
profitability and growth.
Our
revenue, cash flows, profitability and future rate of growth depend substantially upon prevailing prices for oil and gas. Prices
also affect the amount of cash flow available for capital expenditures and our ability to borrow money or raise additional capital. Lower
prices may also make it uneconomical for us to increase or even continue current production levels of oil and gas.
Prices
for oil and gas are subject to large fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in the supply and demand for oil and
gas, market uncertainty and a variety of other factors beyond our control, including:
|
●
|
changes
in foreign and domestic supply and demand for oil and gas;
|
|
●
|
political
stability and economic conditions in oil producing countries, particularly in the Middle East;
|
|
●
|
price
and level of foreign imports;
|
|
●
|
availability
of pipeline and other secondary capacity;
|
|
●
|
general
economic conditions;
|
|
●
|
global
risks of a potential coronavirus outbreak, or other global or local public health uncertainties;
|
|
●
|
domestic
and foreign governmental regulation; and
|
|
●
|
the
price and availability of alternative fuel sources.
|
Estimates
of proved reserves and future net revenue are inherently imprecise.
The
process of estimating oil reserves in accordance with SEC requirements is complex and involves decisions and assumptions in evaluating
the available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data. Accordingly, these estimates are imprecise. Actual
future production, oil and gas prices, revenues, taxes, capital expenditures, operating expenses and quantities of recoverable
oil reserves most likely will vary from those estimated. Any significant variance could materially affect the estimated quantities
and present value of our reserves. In addition, we may adjust estimates of proved reserves to reflect production history,
results of exploration and development, prevailing oil and gas prices and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
Unless
we replace our oil reserves, our reserves and production will decline over time. Our business is dependent on our continued successful
identification of productive fields and prospects and the identified locations in which we drill in the future may not yield oil
or natural gas in commercial quantities.
Production
from oil properties declines as reserves are depleted, with the rate of decline depending on reservoir characteristics. Accordingly,
our current proved reserves will decline as these reserves are produced. Our future oil reserves and production, and therefore
our cash flows and income, are highly dependent on our success in efficiently developing our current reserves and economically
finding or acquiring additional recoverable reserves. While we have had success in identifying and developing commercially exploitable
deposits and drilling locations in the past, we may be unable to replicate that success in the future. We may not identify any
more commercially exploitable deposits or successfully drill, complete or produce more oil reserves, and the wells which we have
drilled and currently plan to drill within our blocks or concession areas may not discover or produce any further oil or gas or
may not discover or produce additional commercially viable quantities of oil or gas to enable us to continue to operate profitably.
If we are unable to replace our current and future production, the value of our reserves will decrease, and our business, financial
condition and results of operations will be materially adversely affected.
Our
business requires significant capital investment and maintenance expenses, which we may be unable to finance on satisfactory terms
or at all.
The
oil and natural gas industry is capital intensive and we expect to make substantial capital expenditures in our business and operations
for the exploration and production of oil reserves. The actual amount and timing of our future capital expenditures may differ
materially from our estimates as a result of, among other things, commodity prices, actual drilling results, the availability
of drilling rigs and other equipment and services, and regulatory, technological and competitive developments. In response to
increases in commodity prices, we may increase our actual capital expenditures. We will likely need to raise additional financing
to support our business, and we intend to finance our future capital expenditures through cash generated by our operations and
potential future financing arrangements. However, our financing needs may require us to alter or increase our capitalization substantially
through the issuance of debt or equity securities or the sale of assets. We also face the risk that financing arrangements (including
bank loans or public or private offerings of debt or equity securities) may not be available to us when needed on favorable terms
or at all, which could adversely impact our ability to operate our company.
If
our capital requirements vary materially from our current plans, we will likely require further financing. In addition, we may
incur significant financial indebtedness in the future, which may involve restrictions on other financing and operating activities.
These changes could cause our cost of doing business to increase, limit our ability to pursue acquisition opportunities, reduce
cash flow used for drilling and place us at a competitive disadvantage. A significant reduction in cash flows from operations
or the availability of credit could materially adversely affect our ability to achieve our planned growth and operating results.
Our
estimates regarding our market are based on our research but may prove incorrect.
This
annual report contains certain data and information that we obtained from private publications. Statistical data in these publications
also include projections based on a number of assumptions. Our industry may not grow at the rate projected by market data, or
at all. Failure of this market to grow at the projected rate may have a material and adverse effect on our business and the market
price of our ordinary shares. In addition, the rapidly changing nature of the oil and gas industry results in significant uncertainties
for any projections or estimates relating to the growth prospects or future condition of our market. Furthermore, if any one or
more of the assumptions underlying the market data are later found to be incorrect, actual results may differ from the projections
based on these assumptions. You should not place undue reliance on these or other forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
Risks
Related to Regulation of Our Oil and Gas Business
We
are subject to complex laws common to the oil and natural gas industry, particularly in Indonesia, which can have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The
oil and natural gas industry is subject to extensive regulation and intervention by governments throughout the world, including
extensive Indonesian regulations, in such matters as the award of exploration and production interests, the imposition of specific
exploration and drilling obligations, allocation of and restrictions on production, price controls, required divestments of assets
and foreign currency controls, and the development and nationalization, expropriation or cancellation of contract rights.
We
have been required in the past, and may be required in the future, to make significant expenditures to comply with governmental
laws and regulations, including with respect to the following matters:
|
●
|
licenses,
permits and other authorizations for drilling operations;
|
|
●
|
reports
concerning operations;
|
|
●
|
compliance
with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations;
|
|
●
|
compliance
with the requirements to divest parts of our interest to domestic parties;
|
|
●
|
compliance
with requirements to sell certain portion of our production to domestic market;
|
|
●
|
adjustment
to the split between the contractor and the Government in respect of the production;
|
|
●
|
compliance
with local content requirements;
|
|
●
|
drafting
and implementing emergency planning;
|
|
●
|
plugging
and abandonment costs; and
|
Under
these laws and regulations, we could be liable for, among other things, personal injury, property damage, environmental damage
and other types of damage. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may also result in the suspension or termination
of our operations and subject us to administrative, civil and criminal penalties. Moreover, these laws and regulations could change
in ways that could substantially increase our costs. Any such liabilities, obligations, penalties, suspensions, terminations or
regulatory changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In
addition, the terms and conditions of the agreements under which our oil and gas interests are held generally reflect negotiations
with governmental authorities and can vary significantly. These agreements take the form of special contracts, concessions, licenses,
associations or other types of agreements. Any suspensions, terminations or regulatory changes in respect of these special contracts,
concessions, licenses, associations or other types of agreements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operations.
Our
PSC for Citarum Block requires or may require us to relinquish portions of the subject contract area in certain circumstances,
which would potentially leave us with less area to explore.
Pursuant
to our production sharing contract with SKK Migas for Citarum Block, there are circumstances under which we are required or may
be required to relinquish portions of the contract area back to the Government, with such portions being subject to be agreed
to between us and the Government. Such circumstances include if we are unable to complete the work programs agreed to in our PSC
for Citarum. If we relinquish or are required to relinquish portions of Citarum, we could be left with fewer areas to explore
and a resulting diminishment of potential resources we could capitalize on. See “Business—Our Assets—Citarum
Block” for further information. We may be required to agree to similar provisions in future contracts with the Government.
The
interpretation and application of laws and regulations in Indonesia involves uncertainty.
The
courts in Indonesia may offer less certainty as to the judicial outcome or a more drawn out judicial process than is the case
in more established legal systems. Businesses can become involved in lengthy judicial proceedings over simple issues when rulings
are not clearly defined. Moreover, such problems can be compounded by the poor quality of legal drafting and excessive delays
in the legal process for resolving issues or disputes. These characteristics of the legal system in Indonesia could expose us
to several kinds of risks, including the possibility that effective legal redress may be more difficult to obtain; a higher degree
of discretion on the part of the Government; the lack of judicial or administrative guidance on interpreting the relevant laws
or regulations; inconsistencies and conflicts between and within various laws, regulations, decrees, orders and resolutions; or
the relative inexperience or lack of predictability of the judiciary and courts in such matters.
The
enforcement of laws in Indonesia may depend on and be subject to the interpretation of the relevant local authority. Such authority
may adopt an interpretation of an aspect of local law which differs from the advice given to us by local lawyers or even previous
advice given by the local authority itself. Matters of local autonomy are extremely controversial in Indonesia, adding further
uncertainty to the interpretation and application of the relevant legal and regulatory requirements. Furthermore, there is limited
or no relevant case law providing guidance on how courts would interpret such laws and the application of such laws to its concessions,
join operations, licenses, license applications or other arrangements. Even where such case law exists, it lacks the binding precedential
value found in the U.S. legal system.
For
example, on November 13, 2012, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (Mahkamah Konstitusi Republic Indonesia or
MK) issued Decision 36/PUU-X/2012 (or MK Decision 36/2012). In it, the MK declared several articles in the Oil and Gas Law of
2001 invalid and dissolved Badan Pelaksana Minyak dan Gas Bumi (or BP Migas) for failing to directly manage oil
and gas resources as required by its interpretation of Article 33 of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In response
to MK Decision 36/2012, the Government created SKK Migas and authorized it to take over the functions of BP Migas pursuant to
Presidential Regulation No. 9 of 2013 on the Implementation of Management of Natural oil and Gas Upstream Business Activities.
However, while these arrangements have not been challenged to date, there is a risk that future challenge to the current arrangements,
and changes in Indonesian law generally, could require us to modify our operation and development plans, and could adversely impact
our results of operations.
Increased
regulation by the Government and governmental agencies may increase the cost of regulatory compliance and have an adverse impact
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our
business operations in Indonesia are subject to an expanding system of laws, rules and regulations issued by numerous government
bodies. The evolving roles of SKK Migas and The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of Indonesia (or MEMR), together with
political changes in Indonesia, has allowed other governmental agencies such as the Ministry of Trade, the Ministry of Forestry,
the Ministry for Environment and Bank Indonesia to increase their roles in regulating the oil and gas industry in Indonesia. In
addition, the Indonesian tax authorities have recently initiated additional tax audits and implemented measures to increase tax
revenues from the oil and gas industry.
The
continued expansion of the roles of governmental agencies may result in the adoption of new legislation, regulations and practices
with which we would be required to comply. Such legislation, regulations and practices may be more stringent and may cause the
amount and timing of future legal and regulatory compliance expenditures to vary substantially from their current levels. They
could also require changes to our operations and development plans, which could adversely impact our results of operations.
The
interpretation and application of the Oil and Gas Law of 2001 and the anticipated enactment of a new oil and gas law is uncertain
and may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In
Indonesia, the complexity of the laws and regulations relating to oil and gas activities is compounded by uncertainties in the
legal and regulatory framework. Indonesia’s Oil and Gas Law of 2001 (or the Oil and Gas Law) went into effect on
November 23, 2001. This law sets forth a statutory body of general principles governing oil and gas activities, which are
further developed and implemented in a series of Government regulations, presidential decrees and ministerial decrees. The provisions
of the Oil and Gas Law are generally broad, and few sources of interpretative guidance are available. In addition, not all of
the implementing regulations to the Oil and Gas Law have been issued and some have only recently been enacted. It is uncertain
how these regulations will affect us and our operations without clear instances of their application, while the uncertainty surrounding
the Oil and Gas Law and its implementing regulations has increased the risks, and may result in increases in the costs, of conducting
oil and gas activities in Indonesia.
The
Government may also adopt new laws and/or policies regarding oil and gas exploration, development and production that differ from
the policies currently in place and that adversely impact the cost of doing business in Indonesia. Of particular significance
is the fact that the Government is expected to enact a new oil and gas law in the future. The form, timing and contents of this
new law remain uncertain; several draft amendments to the current Oil and Gas Law have been submitted to the House of Representatives
and were given “priority” listing in the 2017 National Legislation Program (Program Legislasi Nasional). As
a result, there is a possibility that the current Indonesian oil and gas law will be significantly amended or that a new Indonesian
oil and gas law will be issued in the future. The scope of any possible revisions to the Indonesian oil and gas law remains uncertain.
If and to the extent any changes to the current legal and regulatory framework are detrimental to our business and our position,
our business, development plans, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We
and our operations are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations which may result in material
liabilities and costs.
We
and our operations are subject to various international, domestic and foreign local environmental, health and safety laws and
regulations governing, among other things, the emission and discharge of pollutants into the ground, air or water; the generation,
storage, handling, use, transportation and disposal of regulated materials; and human health and safety. Our operations are also
subject to certain environmental risks that are inherent in the oil and gas industry and which may arise unexpectedly and result
in material adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Breach of environmental laws, as well
as impacts on natural resources and unauthorized use of such resources, could result in environmental administrative investigations
and/or lead to the termination of our concessions and contracts. Other potential consequences include fines and/or criminal environmental
actions
We
are required to obtain environmental permits from governmental authorities for our operations, including drilling permits for
our wells. We may not be at all times in complete compliance with these permits and the environmental and health and safety laws
and regulations to which we are subject. If we violate or fail to comply with such requirements, we could be fined or otherwise
sanctioned by regulators, including through the revocation of our permits or the suspension or termination of our operations.
If we fail to obtain, maintain or renew permits in a timely manner or at all (such as due to opposition from partners, community
or environmental interest groups, governmental delays or any other reasons) or if we face additional requirements due to changes
in applicable laws and regulations, our operations could be adversely affected, impeded, or terminated, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
For
example, Law No. 32 of 2009 on Protection and Management of Environment (or the Environmental Law) as amended by Law No. 11 of
2020 on Job Creation (or the Omnibus Law) and its implementing regulation, Government Regulation No. 22 of 2021 on Environment
Protection and Management (or GR 22/2021), require an entity conducting oil and gas business operations have its environmental
impact assessment report (Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan, or AMDAL), as well as an environmental management effort
plan (Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup, or UKL) or an environmental monitoring effort plan (Upaya Pemantauan
Lingkungan Hidup or UPL), approved. Under the Environmental Law, our environmental permit may be revoked should we fail
to meet the obligations contained in the relevant AMDAL or UKL or UPL, which can in turn lead to the nullification of our business
license.
We,
as the owner, shareholder or the operator of certain of our past, current and future discoveries and prospects, could be held
liable for some or all environmental, health and safety costs and liabilities arising out of our actions and omissions as well
as those of our block partners, third-party contractors, predecessors or other operators. To the extent we do not address these
costs and liabilities or if we do not otherwise satisfy our obligations, our operations could be suspended, terminated or otherwise
adversely affected. We have also contracted with and intend to continue to hire third parties to perform services related to our
operations. There is a risk that we may contract with third parties with unsatisfactory environmental, health and safety records
or that our contractors may be unwilling or unable to cover any losses associated with their acts and omissions. Accordingly,
we could be held liable for all costs and liabilities arising out of the acts or omissions of our contractors, which could have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Releases
of regulated substances may occur and can be significant. Under certain environmental laws and regulations applicable to us in
Indonesia, we could be held responsible for all of the costs relating to any contamination at our past and current facilities
and at any third party waste disposal sites used by us or on our behalf. Pollution resulting from waste disposal, emissions and
other operational practices might require us to remediate contamination, or retrofit facilities, at substantial cost. We also
could be held liable for any and all consequences arising out of human exposure to such substances or for other damage resulting
from the release of hazardous substances to the environment, property or to natural resources, or affecting endangered species
or sensitive environmental areas. Environmental laws and regulations also require that wells be plugged and sites be abandoned
and reclaimed to the satisfaction of the relevant regulatory authorities. We are currently required to, and in the future may
need to, plug and abandon sites in certain blocks in each of the countries in which we operate, which could result in substantial
costs.
As
in other areas, the interpretation and application of environmental laws in Indonesia involves a degree of uncertainty. Such changes
in the interpretation and application of existing laws and regulations, or the enactment of new, more stringent requirements,
may have and result in an adverse impact on our business, development plans, financial condition and results of operations.
We
may be unable to obtain or maintain special permits to conduct drilling and seismic activities in forest areas in Indonesia.
Some
of our proposed drilling locations are situated within forestry areas. In order to conduct drilling and seismic activities in
the forest area within Indonesia, we will need to obtain “Borrow-to-use permit of forest area (Izin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan
Hutan, or IPPKH)” from the Indonesian Ministry of Forestry. Borrow-to-use permit of forest area is granted for companies
to use the forest area other than forestry activities. The Indonesian government has provided for such requirements in several
laws and regulations since 1990 concerning conservation of natural resources, natural primary forest and the ecosystem. In 2014,
the Indonesian government further specified that priority of Borrow-to-use permit of forest area would be given to geothermal,
oil and gas production activities.
The
application for a Borrow-to-use permit must satisfy both administrative and the technical requirements. The maximum validity period
for a Borrow-to-use permit for an exploration or production activity is no more than the validity period of the relevant license
for the exploration and the production activities. However, in respect of a follow through exploration during a production period,
the Borrow-to-use permit may be granted for a maximum period of two years and it is non-extendable. Prior to 2018, the application
and process of Borrow-to-use permit of forest area was complex because applicants had to process different requirements at different
offices in the Ministry of Forestry, and between government agencies and local administrations, frequently with no certainty of
processing time and cost.
With
the announcement of “online single submission (OSS)” processing system in 2018 by the Ministry of Forestry, the time
required for processing the permit was changed from 180 work days to 34 work days. However, this new system has yet to be fully
implemented, and numerous documents and other permits (including the local governor’s recommendation and environmental permits)
as well as a work program and maps are required before Borrow-to-use permit of forest area can be submitted to the Ministry of
Forestry. Any delay of in the issuance to us of Borrow-to-use permit of forest area, or our inability to main such permit for
any reason, would cause delays in our ability to conduct drilling and seismic activities in the subject area, which in turn could
adversely impact our business plans and results of operations.
Climate
change and climate change legislation and regulatory initiatives could result in increased operating costs and decreased demand
for the oil and natural gas that we produce.
Climate
change, the costs that may be associated with its effects, and the regulation of greenhouse gas (or GHG) emissions have the potential
to affect our business in many ways, including increasing the costs to provide our products and services, reducing the demand
for and consumption of our products and services (due to change in both costs and weather patterns), and the economic health of
the regions in which we operate, all of which can create financial risks. In addition, legislative and regulatory responses related
to GHG emissions and climate change may increase our operating costs.
Moreover,
experts believe climate change poses potential physical risks, including an increase in sea level and changes in weather conditions,
such as an increase in changes in precipitation and extreme weather events. In addition, warmer winters as a result of global
warming could also decrease demand for natural gas. To the extent that such unfavorable weather conditions are exacerbated by
global climate change or otherwise, our operations may be adversely affected to a greater degree than we have previously experienced,
including increased delays and costs. However, the uncertain nature of changes in extreme weather events (such as increased frequency,
duration, and severity) and the long period of time over which any changes would take place make any estimations of future financial
risk to our operations caused by these potential physical risks of climate change unreliable. Moreover, the regulation of GHGs
and the physical impacts of climate change in the areas in which we, our customers and the end-users of our products operate could
adversely impact our operations and the demand for our products.
Labor
laws and regulations in Indonesia and labor unrest may materially adversely affect our results of operations.
Laws
and regulations which facilitate the forming of labor unions, combined with weak economic conditions, have resulted and may result
in labor unrest and activism in Indonesia. In 2000, the Government issued Law No. 21 of 2000 regarding Labor Unions (or the
Labor Union Law). The Labor Union Law permits employees to form unions without intervention from an employer, the government,
a political party or any other party. On March 25, 2003, President Megawati enacted Law No. 13 of 2003 regarding Employment
(or the Labor Law) which, among other things, increased the amount of severance, pension, medical coverage, service and compensation
payments payable to employees upon termination of employment. The Labor Law requires further implementation of regulations that
may substantively affect labor relations in Indonesia. The Labor Law requires companies with 50 or more employees establish bipartite
forums with participation from employers and employees. The Labor Law also requires a labor union to have participation of more
than half of the employees of a company in order for a collective labor agreement to be negotiated and creates procedures that
are more permissive to the staging of strikes. Following the enactment, several labor unions urged the Indonesian Constitutional
Court to declare certain provisions of the Labor Law unconstitutional and order the Government to revoke those provisions. The
Indonesian Constitutional Court declared the Labor Law valid except for certain provisions, including relating to the right of
an employer to terminate its employee who committed a serious mistake and criminal sanctions against an employee who instigates
or participates in an illegal labor strike.
Labor
unrest and activism in Indonesia could disrupt our operations, our suppliers or contractors and could affect the financial condition
of Indonesian companies in general.
Risks
Related to Doing Business in Indonesia
As
the domestic Indonesian market constitutes the major source of our revenue, the downturn in the rate of economic growth in Indonesia
or other countries due to the unprecedented and challenging global market, economic conditions, whether due to the COVID-19 pandemic
or any other such downturn for any other reason, will be detrimental to our results of operations.
The
performance and growth of our business are necessarily dependent on the health of the overall Indonesian economy. Any downturn
in the rate of economic growth in Indonesia, whether due to political instability or regional conflicts, global health crisis,
economic slowdown elsewhere in the world or otherwise, may have a material adverse effect on demand for the commodities we produce.
The Indonesian economy is also largely driven by the performance of the agriculture sector, which depends on the impact of the
monsoon season, which is difficult to predict. In the past, economic slowdowns have harmed manufacturing industries, including
companies engaged in the oil and gas extraction. During 2020, Indonesian gross domestic product declined for the first time
in several years with a decline of 2.1% according to the International Monetary Fund, and any future slowdown in the Indonesian
economy could have a material adverse effect on the demand for the commodities we produce and, as a result, on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
In
addition, the Indonesian securities market and the Indonesian economy are influenced by economic and market conditions in other
countries. Although economic conditions are different in each country, investors’ reactions to developments in one country
can have adverse effect on the securities of companies in other countries, including Indonesia. A loss of investor confidence
in the financial systems of other emerging markets or developed markets may cause volatility in Indonesian financial markets and,
indirectly, in the Indonesian economy in general. Any worldwide financial instability could also have a negative impact on the
Indonesian economy, including the movement of exchange rates and interest rates in Indonesia. Any slowdown in the Indonesian economy,
or future volatility in global commodity prices, could adversely affect the growth of our business in Indonesia.
The
Indonesian economy and financial markets are also significantly influenced by worldwide economic, financial and market conditions.
Any financial turmoil, especially in the United States, United Kingdom, Europe or China, may have a negative impact on the Indonesian
economy. Although economic conditions differ in each country, investors’ reactions to any significant developments in one
country can have adverse effects on the financial and market conditions in other countries. A loss in investor confidence in the
financial systems, particularly in other emerging markets, may cause increased volatility in Indonesian financial markets.
The
effect and impact of the recently enacted Omnibus Law on job creation in Indonesia are not immediately known and subject to ongoing
review.
On
November 2, 2020, the Government of Indonesia issued the Omnibus Law, which aims to attract investment, create new jobs, and stimulate
the economy by, among other things, simplifying the licensing process and harmonizing various laws and regulations, and making
policy decisions faster for the central government to respond to global or other changes or challenges. The Omnibus Law amended
more than 75 laws (including aspects of the Oil and Gas Law) and up to April 2021, the central government has issued at least
50 implementing regulations making the Omnibus Law one of the most sweeping regulatory reform in Indonesian history. The Omnibus
Law introduces a number of new concepts, including a new risk-based assessment (i.e. low, medium and high risks) in issuing licenses
for businesses, removes foreign ownership restrictions in various industries, simplifies environmental assessment requirements
and licensing procedures, and provides a more flexible manpower regulations. Given the extensive breadth of changes introduced
by the Omnibus Law, the full impact of various regulation and policy changes on our business and operation in Indonesia are presently
unknown and subject to our ongoing review. Therefore, we are subject to the risk that compliance with the Omnibus Law may be challenging
and may distract our management, and may also require us to alter operations, which in turn could impact our results of operations.
Current
political and social events in Indonesia may adversely affect our business.
Since
1998, Indonesia has experienced a process of democratic change, resulting in political and social events that have highlighted
the unpredictable nature of Indonesia’s changing political landscape. In 1999, Indonesia conducted its first free elections
for representatives in parliament. In 2004, 2009 and 2014, elections were held in Indonesia to elect the President, Vice-President
and representatives in parliament. Indonesia also has many political parties, without any one party holding a clear majority.
Due to these factors, Indonesia has, from time to time, experienced political instability, as well as general social and
civil unrest. For example, since 2000, thousands of Indonesians have participated in demonstrations in Jakarta and other Indonesian
cities both for and against former presidents Abdurrahman Wahid, Megawati Soekarnoputri and Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and current
President Joko Widodo as well as in response to specific issues, including fuel subsidy reductions, privatization of state assets,
anti-corruption measures, decentralization and provincial autonomy, and the American-led military campaigns in Afghanistan and
Iraq. Although these demonstrations were generally peaceful, some turned violent.
Indonesia
had a general election in May 2019 and the Indonesian Election Committee (KPU) announced on May 22, 2019 that President
Joko Widodo had won the election. He was then inaugurated on October 20, 2019. President Joko Widodo’s opposing candidate,
Prabowo Subianto, had filed a suit with the Indonesian Constitutional Court challenging the outcome of the election, but he was
appointed by President Joko Widodo to be a member of the cabinet, serving as the Ministry of Defense. This uncertainty in the
political conditions in Indonesia could adversely impact our business.
In
addition, effective January 1, 2015, a fixed diesel subsidy of Rp1,000 per liter was implemented and the gasoline subsidy
was ended. Although the implementation did not result in any significant violence or political instability, the announcement and
implementation also coincided with a period where crude oil prices had dropped very significantly from 2014. With the
purpose to provide stability of the retail sale price of the gasoline and diesel, the Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry issued
on February 28th Ministerial Decree No. 62/2020 that erases a price floor for unsubsidized gasoline and diesel set by
a previous decree, providing flexibility to reduce prices as low as possible. The new decree still maintains a price ceiling for
such fuels pegged to prices in Singapore. The Government reviews and adjusts the price for fuel on monthly basis and implements
the adjusted fuel price in the following month. There can be no assurance that future increases in crude oil and fuel prices will
not result in political and social instability.
Furthermore,
separatist movements and clashes between religious and ethnic groups have also resulted in social and civil unrest in parts of
Indonesia, such as Aceh in the past and in Papua currently, where there have been clashes between supporters of those separatist
movements and the Indonesian military, including continued activity in Papua, by separatist rebels that has led to violent incidents. There
have also been inter-ethnic conflicts, for example in Kalimantan, as well as inter-religious conflict such as in Maluku and Poso.
Also,
labor issues have also come to the fore in Indonesia. In 2003, the Government enacted a new labor law that gave employees greater
protections. Occasional efforts to reduce these protections have prompted an upsurge in public protests as workers responded to
policies that they deemed unfavorable.
As
a result, there can be no assurance that social, political and civil disturbances will not occur in the future and on a wider
scale, or that any such disturbances will not, directly or indirectly, materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects.
Deterioration
of political, economic and security conditions in Indonesia may adversely affect our operations and financial results.
Any
major hostilities involving Indonesia, a substantial decline in the prevailing regional security situation or the interruption
or curtailment of trade between Indonesia and its present trading partners could have a material adverse effect on our operations
and, as a result, our financial results.
Prolonged
and/or widespread regional conflict in the South East Asia could have the following results, among others:
|
●
|
capital
market reassessment of risk and subsequent redeployment of capital to more stable areas making it more difficult for us to
obtain financing for potential development projects;
|
|
●
|
security
concerns in Indonesia, making it more difficult for our personnel or supplies to enter or exit the country;
|
|
●
|
security
concerns leading to evacuation of our personnel;
|
|
●
|
damage
to or destruction of our wells, production facilities, receiving terminals or other operating assets;
|
|
●
|
inability
of our service and equipment providers to deliver items necessary for us to conduct our operations in Indonesia, resulting
in delays; and
|
|
●
|
the
lack of availability of drilling rig and experienced crew, oilfield equipment or services if third party providers decide
to exit the region or for any other reason.
|
Loss
of property and/or interruption of our business plans resulting from hostile acts could have a significant negative impact on
our earnings and cash flow. In addition, we may not have enough insurance to cover any loss of property or other claims resulting
from these risks.
Terrorist
activities in Indonesia could destabilize Indonesia, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations, and the market price of our securities.
There
have been a number of terrorist incidents in Indonesia, including the May 2005 bombing in Central Sulawesi, the Bali bombings
in October 2002 and October 2005 and the bombings at the JW Marriot and Ritz Carlton hotels in Jakarta in July 2009, which
resulted in deaths and injuries. On January 14, 2016, several coordinated bombings and gun shootings occurred in
Jalan Thamrin, a main thoroughfare in Jakarta, resulting in a number of deaths and injuries.
Although
the Government has successfully countered some terrorist activities in recent years and arrested several of those suspected of
being involved in these incidents, terrorist incidents may continue and, if serious or widespread, might have a material adverse
effect on investment and confidence in, and the performance of, the Indonesian economy and may also have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects and the market price of our securities.
Negative
changes in global, regional or Indonesian economic activity could adversely affect our business.
Changes
in the Indonesian, regional and global economies can affect our performance. Two significant events in the past that impacted
Indonesia’s economy were the Asian economic crisis of 1997 and the global economic crisis which started in 2008. The 1997
crisis was characterized in Indonesia by, among others, currency depreciation, a significant decline in real gross domestic product,
high interest rates, social unrest and extraordinary political developments. While the global economic crisis that arose from
the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States did not affect Indonesia’s economy as severely as in 1997, it
still put Indonesia’s economy under pressure. The global financial markets have also experienced volatility as a result
of expectations relating to monetary and interest rate policies of the United States, concerns over the debt crisis in the Eurozone, and
concerns over China’s economic health. Uncertainty over the outcome of the Eurozone governments’ financial support
programs and worries about sovereign finances generally are ongoing. If the crisis becomes protracted, we can provide no assurance
that it will not have a material and adverse effect on Indonesia’s economic growth and consequently on our business.
An
additional significant event that as of the date of this annual report is still unfolding and uncertain is the novel coronavirus
outbreak which began in early 2020 and the related disease, COVID-19, which was declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization
on March 11, 2020. Indonesian government officials called for social distancing and isolation and considered to enforce a
lockdown in affected areas in an attempt to minimize the spread of the virus. The restrictions currently in place, whether mandated
by the Government or implemented locally, or if other COVID-19 related conditions persist in Indonesia, the adverse economic situation
in Indonesia may greatly impact our business and operations.
Adverse
economic conditions in Indonesia could result in less business activity, less disposable income available for consumers to spend
and reduced consumer purchasing power, which may reduce demand for communication services, including our services, which in turn
would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. There is no assurance
that there will not be a recurrence of economic instability in future, or that, should it occur, it will not have an impact on
the performance of our business.
Fluctuations
in the value of the Indonesian Rupiah may materially and adversely affect us.
Whilst
our functional currency is the U.S. Dollar, depreciation and volatility of the Indonesian Rupiah could potentially affect
our business. A sharp depreciation of Indonesian Rupiah may potentially create difficulties in purchasing imported goods and services
which are critical for our operation. As shown during the Asian monetary crisis in 1998, imported goods became scarce as suppliers
often chose to keep their stocks in anticipation of further deterioration of the Indonesian Rupiah.
In
addition, while the Indonesian Rupiah has generally been freely convertible and transferable, from time to time, Bank
Indonesia has intervened in the currency exchange markets in furtherance of its policies, either by selling Indonesian Rupiah
or by using its foreign currency reserves to purchase Indonesian Rupiah. We can give no assurance that the current floating exchange
rate policy of Bank Indonesia will not be modified or that the Government will take additional action to stabilize, maintain or
increase the Indonesian Rupiah’s value, or that any of these actions, if taken, will be successful. Modification of the
current floating exchange rate policy could result in significantly higher domestic interest rates, liquidity shortages, capital
or exchange controls, or the withholding of additional financial assistance by multinational lenders. This could result in
a reduction of economic activity, an economic recession or loan defaults, and as a result, we may also face difficulties in funding
our capital expenditures and in implementing our business strategy. Any of the foregoing consequences could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Downgrades
of credit ratings of the Government or Indonesian companies could adversely affect our business.
As
of the date of this annual report, Indonesia’s sovereign foreign currency long-term debt was rated “Baa2”
by Moody’s, “Negative” by Standard & Poor’s and “BBB” by Fitch Ratings. Indonesia’s
short-term foreign currency debt is rated “A-2” by Standard & Poor’s and “F2” by Fitch
Ratings.
We
can give no assurance that Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch Ratings will not change or downgrade the credit
ratings of Indonesia. Any such downgrade could have an adverse impact on liquidity in the Indonesian financial markets, the ability
of the Government and Indonesian companies, including us, to raise additional financing, and the interest rates and other commercial
terms at which such additional financing is available. Interest rates on our floating rate Rupiah-denominated debt would also
likely increase. Such events could have material adverse effects on our business, financial condition, results of operations,
prospects and/or the market price of our securities.
Indonesia
is vulnerable to natural disasters and events beyond our control, which could adversely affect our business and operating results.
Many
parts of Indonesia, including areas where we operate, are prone to natural disasters such as floods, lightning strikes, cyclonic
or tropical storms, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, droughts, power outages and other events beyond our control. The Indonesian
archipelago is one of the most volcanically active regions in the world as it is located in the convergence zone of three major
lithospheric plates. It is subject to significant seismic activity that can lead to destructive earthquakes, tsunamis or tidal
waves. Flash floods and more widespread flooding also occur regularly during the rainy season from November to April. Cities,
especially Jakarta, are frequently subject to severe localized flooding which can result in major disruption and, occasionally,
fatalities. Landslides regularly occur in rural areas during the wet season. From time to time, natural disasters have killed,
affected or displaced large numbers of people and damaged our equipment. We cannot assure you that future natural disasters, such
as the spread of the novel coronavirus, will not have a significant impact on us, or Indonesia or its economy. A significant earthquake,
other geological disturbance or weather-related natural disaster in any of Indonesia’s more populated cities and financial
centers could severely disrupt the Indonesian economy and undermine investor confidence, thereby materially and adversely affecting
our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We
may be affected by uncertainty in the balance of power between local governments and the central government in Indonesia.
Indonesian
Law No.25 of 1999 regarding Fiscal Decentralization and Law No.22 of 1999 regarding Regional Autonomy were passed by the Indonesian
parliament in 1999 and further implemented by Government Regulation No.38 of 2007. Law No.22 of 1999 has been revoked by and replaced
by the provisions on regional autonomy of Law No.32 of 2004 as amended by Law No.8 of 2005 and Law No.12 of 2008. Law No.32 of
2004 and its amendments were revoked and replaced by Law No.23 of 2014 regarding Regional Autonomy as amended by Government Regulation
in Lieu of Law No.2 of 2014, Law No.2 of 2015 and Law No.9 of 2015. Law No.25 of 1999 has been revoked and replaced by Law No.33
of 2004 regarding the Fiscal Balance between the Central and the Regional Governments respectively. Currently, there is uncertainty
in respect of the balance between the local and the central governments and the procedures for renewing licenses and approvals
and monitoring compliance with environmental regulations. In addition, some local authorities have sought to levy additional taxes
or obtain other contributions. There can be no assurance that a balance between local governments and the central government will
be effectively established or that our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects will not be adversely
affected by dual compliance obligations and further uncertainty as to legal authority to levy taxes or promulgate other regulations
affecting our business.
Failure
to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (or FCPA) could result in fines, criminal penalties, and an adverse
effect on our business.
We
operate in Indonesia, which is a jurisdiction known to be challenged by corruption. As such, we are subject, however, to
the risk that we, our affiliated entities or our or their respective officers, directors, employees and agents may take action
determined to be in violation of such anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA. Any such violation could result in substantial
fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties, curtailment of operations, and might adversely affect our business, results
of operations or financial condition. In addition, actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability
to do business. Furthermore, detecting, investigating, and resolving actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume
significant time and attention of our management.
Risks
Related to Our Corporate Structure
We
are a holding company, and will rely on dividends paid by our subsidiaries for our cash needs. Any limitation on the ability of
our subsidiaries to make dividend payments to us, or any tax implications of making dividend payments to us, could limit our ability
to pay our parent company expenses or pay dividends to holders of our ordinary shares.
We
are a holding company and conduct substantially all of our business through our operating subsidiaries, which are limited liability
companies established in Indonesia. We will rely on dividends paid by our subsidiaries for our cash needs, including the funds
necessary to pay dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders, to service any debt we may incur and to pay our operating
expenses. If applicable laws, rules and regulations in Indonesia in the future limit or preclude our Indonesian subsidiaries
from making dividends to us, our ability to fund our holding company obligations or pay dividends on our ordinary shares could
be materially and adversely affected. We may also enter into debt arrangements in the future which limit our ability to receive
dividends or distributions from our operating subsidiaries or pay dividends to the holders of our ordinary shares. Indonesian
or Cayman Island tax laws, rules and regulations may also limit our future ability to receive dividends or distributions
from our operating subsidiaries or pay dividends to the holders of our ordinary shares.
We
may become subject to taxation in the Cayman Islands which would negatively affect our results of operations.
We
have received an undertaking from the Financial Secretary of the Cayman Islands that, in accordance with section 6 of the Tax
Concessions Act (Revised) of the Cayman Islands, until the date falling 20 years after November 2, 2018, being the
date of such undertaking, no law which is enacted in the Cayman Islands imposing any tax to be levied on profits, income, gains
or appreciations shall apply to us or our operations and, in addition, that no tax to be levied on profits, income, gains or appreciations
or which is in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax shall be payable (i) on or in respect of the shares, debentures
or other obligations of our company or (ii) by way of the withholding in whole or in part of a payment of any “relevant
payment” as defined in section 6(3) of the Tax Concessions Act (Revised). If we otherwise were to become subject
to taxation in the Cayman Islands, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
See “Taxation—Cayman Islands Taxation.”
You
may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through the U.S. Federal courts may
be limited, as a result of our company being incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands.
We
are a Cayman Islands exempted company with limited liability and substantially all of our assets will be located outside the United
States. In addition, most of our directors and officers are nationals or residents of jurisdictions other than the United States
and all or a substantial portion of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors
to effect service of process within the United States upon us or our directors or executive officers, or enforce judgments obtained
in the United States courts against us or our directors or officers.
Further,
mail addressed to us and received at our registered office will be forwarded unopened to the forwarding address supplied by our
directors. Our directors will only receive, open or deal directly with mail which is addressed to them personally (as opposed
to mail which is only addressed to us). We, our directors, officers, advisors or service providers (including the organization
which provides registered office services in the Cayman Islands) will not bear any responsibility for any delay, howsoever caused,
in mail reaching this forwarding address.
Our
corporate affairs are governed by our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, the Companies Act (Revised)
(as the same may be supplemented or amended from time to time) and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders
to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to
us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman
Islands is derived in part from judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English common law, the decisions of
whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not technically binding on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our
shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they
would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has
a less developed body of securities laws as compared to the United States, and certain states, such as Delaware, have more fully
developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law. As a result, there may be significantly less protection for investors
than is available to investors in companies organized in the United States, particularly Delaware. In addition, Cayman Islands
companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a Federal court of the United States.
The
Cayman Islands courts are also unlikely:
|
●
|
to
recognize or enforce against us judgments of courts of the United States based on certain civil liability provisions of United
States securities laws; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
to
impose liabilities against us, in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, based on certain civil liability provisions
of United States securities laws that are penal in nature.
|
There
is no statutory recognition in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, although the courts of the Cayman
Islands will in certain circumstances recognize and enforce a non-penal judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction
without retrial on the merits. The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands may stay proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being
brought elsewhere.
Like
many jurisdictions in the United States, Cayman Islands law permits mergers and consolidations between Cayman Islands companies
and between Cayman Islands companies and non-Cayman Islands companies and any such company may be the surviving entity for the
purposes of mergers or the consolidated company for the purposes of consolidations. For these purposes, (a) “merger”
means the merging of two or more constituent companies and the vesting of their undertaking, property and liabilities in one of
such companies as the surviving company and (b) a “consolidation” means the combination of two or more constituent
companies into a consolidated company and the vesting of the undertaking, property and liabilities of such companies to the consolidated
company. In order to effect such a merger or consolidation, the directors of each constituent company must approve a written plan
of merger or consolidation, which must, in most instances, then be authorized by a special resolution of the shareholders of each
constituent company and such other authorization, if any, as may be specified in such constituent company’s articles of
association. A merger between a Cayman parent company and its Cayman subsidiary or subsidiaries does not require authorization
by a resolution of shareholders. For this purpose, a subsidiary is a company of which at least 90% of the votes cast at its general
meeting are held by the parent company. The consent of each holder of a fixed or floating security interest over a constituent
company is required unless this requirement is waived by a court in the Cayman Islands. The plan of merger or consolidation must
be filed with the Registrar of Companies together with a declaration as to the solvency of the consolidated or surviving company,
a list of the assets and liabilities of each constituent company and an undertaking that a copy of the certificate of merger or
consolidation will be given to the members and creditors of each constituent company and published in the Cayman Islands Gazette.
Dissenting shareholders have the right to be paid the fair value of their shares (which, if not agreed between the parties, will
be determined by the Cayman Islands court) if they follow the required procedures, subject to certain exceptions. Court approval
is not required for a merger or consolidation which is effected in compliance with these statutory procedures.
In
addition, there are statutory provisions that facilitate the reconstruction and amalgamation of companies, provided that the arrangement
is approved by a majority in number of each class of shareholders and creditors with whom the arrangement is to be made, and who
must in addition represent three-fourths in value of each such class of shareholders or creditors, as the case may be, that are
present and voting either in person or by proxy at a meeting, or meetings, convened for that purpose. The convening of the meetings
and subsequently the arrangement must be sanctioned by the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands. While a dissenting shareholder has
the right to express to the court the view that the transaction ought not be approved, the court can be expected to approve the
arrangement if it determines that:
|
●
|
the
statutory provisions as to the required majority vote have been met;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
shareholders have been fairly represented at the meeting in question, the statutory majority are acting bona fide without
coercion of the minority to promote interests adverse to those of the class and that the meeting was properly constituted;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
arrangement is such that it may reasonably be approved by an intelligent and honest man of that share class acting in respect
of his interest; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
arrangement is not one which would be more properly sanctioned under some other provision of the Companies Act.
|
If
the arrangement and reconstruction is approved, the dissenting shareholder would have no rights comparable to appraisal rights,
which would otherwise ordinarily be available to dissenting shareholders of U.S. corporations, providing rights to receive payment
in cash for the judicially determined value of the shares.
In
addition, there are further statutory provisions to the effect that, when a take-over offer is made and approved by holders of
90.0% in value of the shares affected (within four months after the making of the offer), the offeror may, within two months following
the expiry of such period, require the holders of the remaining shares to transfer such shares on the terms of the offer. An objection
can be made to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, but this is unlikely to succeed unless there is evidence of fraud, bad faith,
collusion or inequitable treatment of shareholders.
As
a result of all of the above, public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions
taken by management, members of our board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as public shareholders of a
U.S. company.
Provisions
of our charter documents or Cayman Islands law could delay or prevent an acquisition of our company, even if the acquisition may
be beneficial to our shareholders, could make it more difficult for you to change management, and could have an adverse effect
on the market price of our ordinary shares.
Provisions
in our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other
change in control that shareholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which shareholders might otherwise receive
a premium for their shares. In addition, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempt by our shareholders to replace
or remove our current management by making it more difficult to replace or remove our board of directors. Such provisions may
reduce the price that investors may be willing to pay for our ordinary shares in the future, which could reduce the market price
of our ordinary shares. These provisions include:
|
●
|
a
requirement that extraordinary general meetings of shareholders be called only by the directors or, in limited circumstances,
by the directors upon shareholder requisition;
|
|
●
|
an
advance notice requirement for shareholder proposals and nominations to be brought before an annual general meeting;
|
|
●
|
the
authority of our board of directors to issue preferred shares with such terms as our board of directors may determine; and
|
|
●
|
a
requirement of approval of not less than 66 2/3% of the votes cast by shareholders entitled to vote thereon in order to amend
any provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association.
|
We
may be classified as a passive foreign investment company, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences
to U.S. holders of our ordinary shares.
A
foreign corporation will be treated as a “passive foreign investment company” (or PFIC) for U.S. federal income tax
purposes if either (1) at least 75% of its gross income for any taxable year consists of certain types of “passive
income” or (2) at least 50% of the average value of the corporation’s assets produce or are held for the production
of those types of “passive income”. For purposes of these tests, “passive income” includes dividends,
interest, and gains from the sale or exchange of investment property and rents and royalties other than rents and royalties which
are received from unrelated parties in connection with the active conduct of a trade or business. U.S. shareholders of a PFIC
are subject to a disadvantageous U.S. federal income tax regime with respect to the income derived by the PFIC, the distributions
they receive from the PFIC and the gain, if any, they derive from the sale or other disposition of their shares in the PFIC.
Based
upon our current and anticipated method of operations, we do not believe that we should be a PFIC with respect to our 2020 taxable
year, and we do not expect to become a PFIC in any future taxable year. However, no assurance can be given that the U.S. Internal
Revenue Service (or IRS) or a court of law will accept this position, and there is a risk that the IRS or a court of law could
determine that we are a PFIC. Moreover, no assurance can be given that we would not constitute a PFIC for any future taxable year
if the nature and extent of our operations change.
If
the IRS were to find that we are or have been a PFIC for any taxable year, our U.S. shareholders would face adverse U.S. federal
income tax consequences and certain information reporting requirements. Under the PFIC rules, unless those shareholders make an
election available under the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended (or the Code) (which election could itself
have adverse consequences for such shareholders), such shareholders would be liable to pay U.S. federal income tax at the then
prevailing income tax rates on ordinary income plus interest upon excess distributions and upon any gain from the disposition
of their shares of our ordinary shares, as if the excess distribution or gain had been recognized ratably over the shareholder’s
holding period of the shares of our ordinary shares.
The
future development of national security laws and regulations in Hong Kong could impact our Hong Kong holding subsidiary.
On
May 28, 2020, the National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China approved a proposal to impose a new
national security law for Hong Kong and authorized the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress to proceed to
work out details of the legislation to be implemented in Hong Kong (the “Decision”). While the details of the new
law are still scarce as of the date of this annual report, there is a risk that the Decision may trigger sanctions or other forms
of penalties by foreign governments, which may cause economic and other hardship for Hong Kong, including companies such as WJ
Energy, our holding subsidiary which is incorporated in Hong Kong. As the Decision is new and details of the new law unavailable
as of the date of this annual report, it is difficult to predict the impact, in any, the new law will have on WJ Energy (including,
without limitation, the ability of WJ Energy to pay dividends or make distributions to our company), as such impact will depend
on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.
Risks
Related to Our Ordinary Shares
An
active, liquid and orderly trading market for our ordinary shares may not be maintained in the United States, which could limit
your ability to sell our ordinary shares.
Although
our ordinary are listed on the NYSE American, an active U.S. public market for our ordinary shares may not be sustained. If an
active market is not sustained, you may experience difficulty selling your ordinary shares. Moreover, the price of our publicly-listed
shares has been subject to significant downward fluctuations, which creates the risk of loss of your investment in our ordinary
shares.
Our
ordinary share price has been may in the future be volatile and, as a result, you could lose a significant portion or all of your
investment.
The
market price of the ordinary shares on the NYSE American has been and may in the future fluctuate as a result of several factors,
including the following:
|
●
|
fluctuations
in oil and other commodity prices;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
volatility
in the energy industry, both in Indonesia and internationally;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
variations
in our operating results;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
risks
relating to our business and industry, including those discussed above;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
strategic
actions by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
reputational
damage from accidents or other adverse events related to our company or its operations;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
investor
perception of us, the energy sector in which we operate, the investment opportunity associated with the ordinary shares and
our future performance;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
addition
or departure of our executive officers or directors;
|
|
●
|
changes
in financial estimates or publication of research reports by analysts regarding our ordinary shares, other comparable companies
or our industry generally;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
trading
volume of our ordinary shares;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
future
sales of our ordinary shares by us or our shareholders;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
domestic
and international economic, legal and regulatory factors (such as the global novel coronavirus pandemic) unrelated to our
performance; or
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
release or expiration of lock-up or other transfer restrictions on our outstanding ordinary shares.
|
Furthermore,
the stock markets often experience significant price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market
prices of equity securities of many companies. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating
performance of those companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations, as well as general economic, political and market
conditions such as recessions or interest rate changes may cause the market price of ordinary shares to decline.
Our
auditor’s opinion on our December 31, 2020 financial statements include an explanatory paragraph in respect to there being
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
We
have experienced net losses of $6,951,698 and $1,673,735, and net cash used in operating activities of $5,186,048 and
$439,794 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, we had net current assets of
$9,413,594, however, considering our planned level of capital expenditures expected during the next twelve months, there will
be an expected capital deficit to occur.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, and our auditor’s report on
our December 31, 2020 financial statements includes an explanatory paragraph in respect to there being substantial doubt
about our ability to continue as a going concern. If additional financing is required to alleviate our capital deficit, we
cannot predict whether this additional financing will be in the form of equity, debt, or another form, and we may not be able
to obtain the necessary additional capital on a timely basis, on acceptable terms, or at all, from any source. In the event
that financing sources are not available, or if we are unsuccessful in increasing our gross profit margin and reducing
operating losses, we may be unable to implement our current plans for expansion, repay debt obligations or respond to
competitive pressures, any of which would have a material adverse effect on the our business, prospects, financial condition
and results of operations. If we cannot continue as a viable entity, our shareholders may lose some or all of their
investment in our company.
We
may not be able to maintain the listing of our ordinary on the NYSE American, which could adversely affect our liquidity and the
trading volume and market price of our ordinary shares, and decrease the value of your investment.
Our
ordinary shares are currently traded on the NYSE American. In order to maintain our NYSE
American listing, we must maintain certain share price, financial and share distribution targets, including maintaining a minimum
amount of shareholders’ equity and a minimum number of public shareholders. In addition to these objective standards, the
NYSE American may delist the securities of any issuer (i) if, in its opinion, the issuer’s financial condition and/or operating
results appear unsatisfactory; (ii) if it appears that the extent of public distribution or the aggregate market value of the
security has become so reduced as to make continued listing on the NYSE American inadvisable; (iii) if the issuer sells or disposes
of principal operating assets or ceases to be an operating company; (iv) if an issuer fails to comply with the NYSE American’s
listing requirements; (v) if an issuer’s securities sell at what the NYSE American considers a “low selling price”
and the issuer fails to correct this via a reverse split of shares after notification by the NYSE American; or (vi) if any other
event occurs or any condition exists which makes continued listing on the NYSE American, in its opinion, inadvisable. If the NYSE
American delists either our ordinary shares, investors may face material adverse consequences, including, but not limited to,
a lack of trading market for our securities, reduced liquidity, decreased analyst coverage of our securities, and an inability
for us to obtain additional financing to fund our operations.
We
require significant capital to realize our business plan.
Our
ongoing work program is expensive, and we will require significant additional capital in order to fully realize our business plan.
This is particularly true because we raised less funding than we had anticipated in our December 2019 initial public offering.
We
have no commitments for any financing, and no assurance can be provided that we will be able to raise funds when needed. Further,
we cannot assure you that our actual cash requirements will not exceed our estimates. Even if we were to discover be successful
in our exploration operations, we will require additional financing to bring our interests into commercial operation and pay for
operating expenses until we achieve a positive cash flow. Additional capital also may be required in the event we incur any significant
unanticipated expenses.
Under
the current capital and credit market conditions, we may not be able to obtain additional equity or debt financing on acceptable
terms. Even if financing is available, it may not be available on terms that are favorable to us or in sufficient amounts to satisfy
our requirements.
If
we are unable to obtain additional financing, we may be unable to implement our business plan and our growth strategies, respond
to changing business or economic conditions and withstand adverse operating results. If we are unable to raise further financing
when required, our planned production and exploration activities may have to be scaled down or even ceased, and our ability to
generate revenues in the future would be negatively affected.
Additional
financing could cause your relative interest in our assets and potential earnings to be significantly diluted. Even if we have
success, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenues to offset the cost of our operational plans and administrative expenses.
An
entity controlled by our Chairman owns a substantial majority of our ordinary shares and voting power.
Maderic
Holding Limited, an entity controlled by our Chairman Wirawan Jusuf, owns and exercises voting and investment control of approximately
70.50 % of our ordinary shares as of the date of this report. In addition, HFO Investment Group, an entity controlled by the adult
sister of James J. Huang, our Chief Investment Officer, owns and exercises voting and investment control of approximately 8.72%
of our ordinary shares as of the date of this report. As a result of this concentration of share ownership, investors may be prevented
from affecting matters involving our company, including:
|
●
|
composition
of our Board of Directors and, through it, any determination with respect to our business direction and policies, including
the appointment and removal of officers;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
any
determinations with respect to mergers or other business combinations;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our
acquisition or disposition of assets; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our
corporate financing activities and the approval of equity incentive plans.
|
Furthermore,
this concentration of voting power could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change of control or other business
combination that might otherwise be beneficial to our shareholders. This significant concentration of share ownership may also
adversely affect the trading price for our ordinary shares because investors may perceive disadvantages in owning shares in a
company that is controlled by a company insider. This concentration of ownership could also create conflicts of interests for
Dr. Jusuf that may not be resolved in a manner that all shareholders agree with.
We
have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31,
2020. If we fail to remediate this weakness or otherwise develop and maintain an effective system of internal control
over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud.
We
have identified a “material weakness” and other control deficiencies including significant deficiencies in
our internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2020. As defined in the standards established
by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board of the United States, or PCAOB, a “material weakness” is a deficiency,
or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that
a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
In
connection with the audits of our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the material
weaknesses that have been identified in our internal control over financial reporting as of such dates related to our lack of
sufficient financial reporting and accounting personnel with appropriate knowledge of U.S. GAAP and SEC reporting requirements
to properly address complex U.S. GAAP accounting issues and to prepare and review our consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures to fulfill U.S. GAAP and SEC financial reporting requirements. We have implemented and are continuing to implement
a number of measures to address the material weakness identified. As the remedial measures had not been fully implemented in the
limited time that elapsed since our initial public offering in December 2019, our management concluded that one material
weakness had not been remediated as of December 31, 2020. See “Item. 15 Controls and Procedures—Internal Control over
Financial Reporting.” As a result of the material weakness, our management has concluded that as of December 31, 2020, our
disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by us in this annual
report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported to them for assessment, and that the required disclosure is made within
the time period specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to implement
an effective system of internal control, or that we will not identify material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in the future.
Upon
completion of our initial public offering, we became subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act, or Section 404, requires that we include a report from management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting in our annual reports on Form 20-F beginning with this Report. In addition, once we cease to be an “emerging
growth company” as such term is defined under the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm must attest
to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Our management may conclude that our internal
control over financial reporting is not effective. Moreover, even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial
reporting is effective, our independent registered public accounting firm, after conducting its own independent testing, may issue
a report that it is not satisfied with our internal controls or the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated
or reviewed. In addition, after we become a public company, our reporting obligations may place a significant strain on our management,
operational and financial resources and systems for the foreseeable future. We may be unable to timely complete our evaluation
testing and any required remediation.
During
the course of documenting and testing our internal control procedures, in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404, we
may identify other weaknesses and deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, if we fail to maintain
the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, as these standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time
to time, we may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in
accordance with Section 404. If we fail to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment, we could suffer material
misstatements in our financial statements and fail to meet our reporting obligations, which would likely cause investors to lose
confidence in our reported financial information. This could in turn limit our access to capital markets, harm our results of
operations, and lead to a decline in the trading price of our ordinary shares. Additionally, ineffective internal control over
financial reporting could expose us to increased risk of fraud or misuse of corporate assets and subject us to potential delisting
from the stock exchange on which we list, regulatory investigations and civil or criminal sanctions. We may also be required to
restate our financial statements from prior periods, which would further damage our reputation and likely adversely impact our
share price.
As
a foreign private issuer, we are subject to different U.S. securities laws and NYSE American governance standards than domestic
U.S. issuers. This may afford less protection to holders of our ordinary shares, and you may not receive corporate and company
information and disclosure that you are accustomed to receiving or in a manner in which you are accustomed to receiving it.
As
a “foreign private issuer” for U.S. securities laws purposes, the rules governing the information that we will be
required to disclose differ materially from those governing U.S. corporations pursuant to the Exchange Act. The periodic disclosure
required of foreign private issuers is more limited than that required of domestic U.S. issuers and there may therefore be less
publicly available information about us than is regularly published by or about U.S. public companies. For example, we are not
required to file quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or provide current reports on Form 8-K disclosing significant events within four
days of their occurrence and our quarterly (should we provide them) or current reports may contain less or different information
than required under U.S. filings. In addition, as a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the proxy rules under Section 14
of the Exchange Act, and proxy statements that we distribute are not subject to review by the SEC. Our exemption from Section
16 rules under the Exchange Act regarding sales of ordinary shares by our insiders means that you will have less data in this
regard than shareholders of U.S. companies that are subject to the Exchange Act. As a result, you may not have all the data that
you are accustomed to having when making investment decisions. Also, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt
from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules thereunder
with respect to their purchases and sales of our ordinary shares.
Moreover,
as a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from complying with certain corporate governance requirements of the NYSE American
applicable to a U.S. issuer, including the requirement that a majority of our board of directors consist of independent directors.
For example, we follow Cayman Islands law with respect to the requirements for meetings of our shareholders, which are different
from the requirements of the NYSE American. As the corporate governance standards applicable to us are different than those applicable
to domestic U.S. issuers, you may not have the same protections afforded under U.S. law and the NYSE American rules as shareholders
of companies that do not have such exemptions.
Sales
of a substantial number of our ordinary shares in the public market by our existing shareholders could cause our share price to
fall.
Sales
of a substantial number of our ordinary shares in the public market, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress
the market price of our ordinary shares and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities.
We are unable to predict the effect that sales may have on the prevailing market price of our ordinary shares. All of the ordinary
shares owned by our existing shareholders are subject to lock-up agreements with the underwriters of our initial public offering
that restrict the shareholders’ ability to transfer our ordinary shares for at least six months from the date of the closing
of the offering of the ordinary shares. Substantially all of our outstanding ordinary shares will become eligible for unrestricted
sale upon expiration of the lock-up period. In addition, ordinary shares issued or issuable upon exercise of options and warrants
vested as of the expiration of the lock-up period will be eligible for sale at that time. Sales of ordinary shares by these shareholders
could have a material adverse effect on the trading price of our ordinary shares.
Shares
eligible for future sale may depress our stock price.
As
of the date of this annual report, we had 7,407,955 ordinary shares outstanding, 6,770,455 of which were held by our affiliates
and. In addition, 637,500 ordinary shares were subject to outstanding options granted under certain stock option agreements entered
into with our management team. All of the ordinary shares held by affiliates are restricted or control securities under Rule 144
promulgated under the Securities Act. Sales of ordinary shares under Rule 144 or another exemption under the Securities Act or
pursuant to a registration statement could have a material adverse effect on the price of the ordinary shares and could impair
our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of equity securities.
We
may issue preferred shares with greater rights than our ordinary shares.
Our
amended articles of association authorize our board of directors to issue one or more series of preferred shares and set the terms
of the preferred shares without seeking any further approval from our shareholders. Any preferred shares that are issued may rank
ahead of our ordinary shares, in terms of dividends, liquidation rights and voting rights.
If
securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research reports about us, if they adversely change their recommendations
regarding our ordinary shares or if our operating results do not meet their expectations, the price of our ordinary shares could
decline.
The
trading market for our ordinary shares will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may
publish about us, our business, our market or our competitors. Securities and industry analysts currently publish limited research
on us. If there is limited or no securities or industry analyst coverage of our company, the market price and trading volume of
our ordinary shares would likely be negatively impacted. Moreover, if any of the analysts who may cover us downgrade our ordinary
shares, provide more favorable relative recommendations about our competitors or if our operating results or prospects do not
meet their expectations, the market price of our ordinary shares could decline. If any of the analysts who may cover us were to
cease coverage or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could
cause our share price or trading volume to decline.
As
an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act, we are allowed to postpone the date by which we must comply with
some of the laws and regulations intended to protect investors and to reduce the amount of information we provide in our reports
filed with the SEC, which could undermine investor confidence in our company and adversely affect the market price of our ordinary
shares.
For
so long as we remain an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, we intend to take advantage of certain
exemptions from various requirements that are applicable to public companies that are not “emerging growth companies”
including:
|
●
|
not
being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements for the assessment of our internal control over financial
reporting provided by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
not
being required to comply with any requirements adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board requiring mandatory
audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report in which the auditor would be required to provide additional
information about the audit and our financial statements;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
reduced
disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
not
being required to hold a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation or seek shareholder approval of any golden parachute
payments not previously approved.
|
We
intend to take advantage of these exemptions until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.” We will remain an
emerging growth company until the earlier of: (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion
of our initial public offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion, or (c) in which we
are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our ordinary shares that is held by non-affiliates
exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible
debt during the prior three-year period.
Because
the likelihood of paying cash dividends on our ordinary shares is remote at this time, investors must look solely to appreciation
of our ordinary shares in the market to realize a gain on their investments.
We
do not know when or if we will pay dividends. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to finance the expansion
of our business. Our future dividend policy is within the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon various factors,
including our business, financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and investment opportunities. Accordingly,
investors must look solely to appreciation of our ordinary shares in the market to realize a gain on their investment. This appreciation
may not occur.
ITEM
4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
Overview
and History and Development of the Company
Indonesia
Energy Corporation Limited is an oil and gas exploration and production company focused on Indonesia. Alongside operational excellence,
we believe we have set the highest standards for ethics, safety and corporate social responsibility practices to ensure that we
add value to society. Led by a professional management team with extensive oil and gas experience, we seek to bring forth the
best of our expertise to ensure the sustainable development of a profitable and integrated energy exploration and production business
model.
Our
mission is to efficiently manage targeted profitable energy resources in Indonesia. Our vision is to be a leading company in the
Indonesian oil and gas industry for maximizing hydrocarbon recovery with the minimum environmental and social impact possible.
We
were incorporated on April 24, 2018 as an exempted company with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands and are
a holding company for WJ Energy Group Limited (or WJ Energy), which in turn owns our Indonesian holding and operating subsidiaries.
Indonesia’s
Oil and Gas Industry and Economic Information
The
largest economy in Southeast Asia, Indonesia (located between the Indian and Pacific oceans and bordered by Malaysia, Singapore,
East Timor and Papua New Guinea) has charted impressive economic growth since overcoming the Asian financial crisis of the late
1990s with an average annual GDP growth of above 5% for the past 10 years, according to the World Bank. Today, Indonesia is the
world’s 16th largest economy, a member of the G-20 and the world’s fourth most populous nation with a population of
over 262 million, according to the Central Intelligence Agency’s World Factbook. Indonesia also has a prominent presence
in other commodities markets such as thermal coal, copper, gold and tin, with Indonesia being the world’s second largest
tin producer and largest tin exporter, as well as in the agriculture industry as a producer of rice, palm oil, coffee, medicinal
plants, spices and rubber according to the Indonesia Commodity & Derivatives Exchange and the World Factbook.
The
Indonesian oil and gas industry is among the oldest in the world. Indonesia has been active in the oil and gas sector for over
130 years after its first oil discovery in North Sumatra in 1885. The major international energy companies began their significant
exploration and development operations in the mid-20th century. According to the Special Taskforce for Upstream Oil and Gas Business
Activities (SKK Migas - Satuan Kerja Khusus Pelaksana Kegiatan Usaha Hulu Minyak dan Gas Bumi) Annual Report 2019 and the BP Statistical
Review of World Energy 2020, Indonesia held proven oil reserves of 2.5 billion barrels at the end of 2019.According to its public
filings, Chevron has been very active in Indonesia for over 50 years. Chevron has produced a very large amount of oil —
12 billion barrels — over this period with billions of those barrels having been produced in Sumatra (the location of our
Kruh Block, as described below).
The
following map shows the area in which international major companies operate within Indonesia:
Source:
Indonesia Energy Corporation Limited
Indonesia’s
early entry into the energy industry helped the country become a global pioneer in developing a legal, commercial and financial
framework to support a very stable, growing industry that encouraged the hundreds of billions of dollars made in investment. The
Indonesian energy industry was the model of the global industry, having been the founder of the model form of production sharing
contract which is still used around the world as a preferred contract form; and this is the form of contract under which we operate
our Citarum Block, as described below.
Indonesia’s
oil and gas sector is governed by Law No. 22 of 2001 regarding Oil and Gas (November 22, 2001) (or the Oil and Gas Law). The Government
retains mineral rights throughout Indonesian territory and the government controls the state mining authority. The oil and gas
sector is comprised of upstream (namely exploration and production) and downstream activities (namely refining and processing),
which are separately regulated and organized. The upstream sector is managed and supervised by SKK Migas. Private companies earn
the right to explore and exploit oil and gas resources by entering into cooperation contracts, mainly based upon a production
sharing scheme, with the government through SKK Migas, thus acting as a contractor to SKK Migas. One entity can hold only one
PSC, and a PSC is normally granted for 30 years, typically comprising six plus four years of exploration and 20 years of exploitation.
The
oil and gas industry, however, both in Indonesia and globally, has experienced significant volatility in the last four years.
Global geopolitical and economic considerations play a significant role in driving the sensitivity of oil prices. From its peak
in mid-2014 (US$105.72 per barrel), the Indonesian Crude Price (the “ICP”) for the type of crude oil we produce
collapsed by more than 75% and began 2016 at US$25.83 per barrel. Since 2016, political and economic factors forced the global
crude oil supply and demand to a balance and ICP rose again to reach the average of US$61.89 for the year ended December 31, 2019.
According to Forbes, in the first quarter of 2020, the Covid-19 outbreak had a large impact on oil prices worldwide. As Saudi
Arabia increased oil production and lowered prices beginning of March, despite a lack in demand in the wake of the virus outbreak,
benchmark oil prices collapsed by 25%. The ICP was depressed to an average price of US$ 37.58 per barrel for the year ending December
31, 2020 which, compared to the year ending December 31, 2019, is a decline of 39.28% (although in the first half of 2021,
the average ICP price has risen).
The
problem of a lack of new reserve discoveries and reserve depletion still remains, resulting in a decline in the contribution to
state revenue from the Indonesian oil and gas sector. According to the PWC 2020 Guide, investment in the oil and gas industry
was around US$12.1 billion in 2019, the highest since 2016 due to the rise in oil and gas prices triggering some investment interest.
On a gas reserve basis, as stated in the BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2019 (or the BP 2019 Report), Indonesia ranks
13th in the world and the 2nd in the Asia-Pacific region, following China.
According
to the DGOG, in 2020, investment of US$10.47 billion has been realized in upstream activities in Indonesia. The
SKK Migas Annual Report recorded that at the end of 2019, Indonesia had a total of 199 PSCs, comprising 92
PSCs in production stage and the remaining 107 in the exploration stage. SKK Migas also reported that total investment
in 2019 was US$12.2 billion. Roughly 75% of oil upstream activities are focused in Western Indonesia, where our blocks are
located. SKK MIGAS also recorded that there are 42 main projects in the upstream sector until 2027. With the total investment
amount of US$ 43.3 billion. According to 2020 PWC report, the first half of 2020 investment in upstream oil and gas only reached
USD 5.6 billion from the total full year MoEMR target of USD 14.5 billion. Meanwhile, different to the MoEMR, SKK Migas has projected
oil and gas upstream investment will only reach USD 11.6 billion in 2020 from the previously forecast USD 13.83 billion, since
the COVID-19 pandemic has forced oil and gas companies to cut their capital expenditure. In order to boost oil and gas investment
and production, the Indonesian government changed the PSC system in March 2018 from cost recovery to gross split, and further
revoked 18 regulations and 23 requirements for certifications, recommendations and permits, each in an attempt to reduce duplication
in certification, shorten bureaucracy and simplify the regulatory regime. The gross split scheme allocates oil and gas production
to contracting parties based on gross production, whereas in cost recovery, oil and gas production was shared between the government
and contractors after deducting the production costs. The government remains keen to attract more foreign investment into the
domestic oil and gas industry due to insufficient production against rising demand.
According
to the BP 2019 Report, Indonesia’s oil consumption in 2018 reached 1.78 million barrels per day, 43% of which was met by
domestic production. The MEMR specified that Indonesia exported 74.4 million barrels of oil and imported 113 million barrels of
oil in 2018. SKK Migas recorded Thailand and the United States as the top two countries Indonesia exported oil and condensate
to in 2018, respectively at 13.65 million barrels and 11.03 million barrels.
Further,
we believe that Indonesia’s expanding economy, in combination with the government’s intention to lower reliance on
coal as a source for energy supply in industries, power generation and transportation, will cause Indonesian domestic demand for
gas to rise in the future. Indonesia’s power infrastructure needs substantial investment if it is not to inhibit Indonesia’s
economic growth. According to PWC 2017 Report, generating capacity at the end of 2016 was standing at around 59.6 gigawatts, struggling
to keep up with the electricity demand from Indonesia’s growing middle class population and its manufacturing sector. The
Indonesian Secretariat General of National Energy Council has reported in their Indonesia Energy Outlook 2019 that Indonesia power
plant capacity in 2018 reached 64.5 GW or it increased 3% compared to the capacity in 2017. The Indonesian Secretariat General
of National Energy Council has reported that Indonesia’s gas demand is estimated to rise from 1.67 TCF in 2015 to 2.45 TCF
in 2025 with the bulk of demand originating from Java and Bali, particularly for power stations and fertilizer plants.
According
to Indonesia Energy Outlook 2018 report published by the Indonesian Agency for the Assessment and Application of Technology, from
2016 to 2050, with an average Indonesian GDP growth rate of above 5% per year, together with a population growth of 0.71% per
year, Indonesia’s total energy demand is expected to grow at an average rate of 5.3% per year. For the same period, natural
gas demand average growth rate is estimated at 6.3% per year, industrial sector energy demand average growth rate is expected
at 6.1% per year and total electricity demand is expected to increase 740% by 2050. Also, natural gas demand for electricity generation
is estimated to continue to increase with an average growth rate of 4.9% per year while the transportation energy demand is expected
to grow at an average rate of 4.6% per year.
In
terms of gas distribution, Indonesia still lacks an extensive gas pipeline network because the major gas reserves are located
away from the demand centers due to the particular territorial composition of the archipelagic state of Indonesia. Indonesian
gas pipeline networks have been developed based on business projects; thus, they are composed of a number of fragmented systems.
The developed gas networks are located mostly near consumer centers. The annual growth of gas transmission and distribution pipeline
in 2017 was only 4.7% with 483.57 km of additional pipeline length from 2016. Total gas distribution pipeline infrastructure in
2017 was 10,670.55 km and according to Government plans, by 2030 Indonesia is expected to add a total of 6,989 km of gas pipeline
network.
In
West Java, where the Citarum Block is located, the total natural gas demand is expected to increase significantly from 2,521 MMSCFD
in 2020 to 3,032 MMSCFD by 2035 according to Petromindo, an Indonesian petroleum, mining and energy news outlet. This will
require additional gas supply of 603 MMSCFD in 2020 and 1,836 MMSCFD in 2028 including import. Being relatively low-carbon compared
to coal, as well as being medium-cost, gas is likely to remain a favored fuel for at least the next decade, especially given Indonesia’s
extensive gas reserves. Moreover, energy demand in Indonesia is expected to increase as Indonesia’s economy and population
grow.
Our
Opportunity
Beginning
in 2014, our management team identified a significant opportunity in the Indonesian oil and gas industry through the acquisition
of medium-sized producing and exploration blocks. In general terms, our goal was to identify assets with the highest potential
for profitable oil and gas operations. As described further below, we believe that our two current assets — Kruh and Citarum
— represent just these types of assets.
We
believe these medium-sized blocks were available for two main reasons: (i) a general lack of investment in the industry by smaller
companies such as ours and (ii) the fact that these blocks are overlooked by the major oil and gas exploration companies; many
of which operate within Indonesia.
The
fundamentals for the lack of investment in our target sector are the industry’s intensive capital requirements and high
barriers to entry, including high startup costs, high fixed operating costs, technology, expertise and strict government regulations.
We have and will continue to seek to overcome this through the careful deployment of investor capital as well as cash from our
producing operations.
In
addition, the medium-sized blocks we target are overlooked by the larger competitors because their asset selection is subject
to a higher threshold criterion in terms of reserve size and upside potential to justify the deployment of their human resources
and capital. This means that a very small company is not capable of operating these blocks, a new investor is unlikely to enter
this sector and the major producers are competing for the larger assets.
This
scenario creates our corporate opportunity: the availability of overlooked assets including producing and exploration projects
with untapped potential resources in Indonesia that creates the potential to both generate economic profit and expand our operations
in the years to come.
An
important fact is that, since we started our operations in 2014, the natural resources industry has gone through a dramatic change
due to oil price volatility. The challenges imposed by the recent low oil prices qualified us to operate efficiently by driving
our business to make the most use of the resources available within our organization to lower costs and improve operational productivity.
Asset
Portfolio Management
Our
asset portfolio target is to establish an optimum mix between medium-sized producing blocks and exploration blocks with significant
potential resources. We believe that the implementation of this diversification technique provides our company the ability to
invest in exploration assets with substantial upside potential, while also protecting our investments via cash flow producing
assets.
We
consider a producing block an oil and gas asset that produces cash flow or has the potential to produce positive cash flows in
a short-term period. An exploration block refers to an oil and gas block that requires a discovery to prove the resources and,
once these resources are proven, such project can generate multiple returns on capital.
Our
portfolio management approach requires us to acquire assets with different contracting structures and maturity stage plays. Another
key factor is that we believe the diversification provided by our asset portfolio gives us the ability to better face the challenges
posed by the industry, such as uncertainties in macroeconomic factors, commodity price volatility and the overall future state
of the oil and gas industry.
We
believe this strategy also allows us to maintain a sustainable oil and gas production business (a so-called “upstream”
business) by holding a portfolio of production, development and exploration licenses supported by a targeted production level.
We believe that, in the long-term, this should allow us to generate excess returns on investment along with reducing risk exposure.
Our
Assets
We
currently hold two oil and gas assets through our operating subsidiaries in Indonesia: one producing block (the Kruh Block) and
one exploration block (the Citarum Block). We also have identified a potential third exploration block (the Rangkas Area).
Kruh
Block
We
acquired rights to the Kruh Block in 2014 and started its operations in November 2014 through our Indonesian subsidiary PT Green
World Nusantara (or GWN). Kruh Block operated under a Technical Assistance Contract (or TAC) with Pertamina, Indonesia’s
state-owned oil and natural gas corporation, until May 2020 and the operatorship of Kruh Block shall continue as a Joint
Operation Partnership (KSO) from May 2020 until May 2030. This block covers an area of 258 km2 (63,753 acres) and is located 16
miles northwest of Pendopo, Pali, South Sumatra. This block produced an average of about 6,044 barrels of oil per month in 2020.
Out of the total eight proved and potentially oil bearing structures in the block, three structures (North Kruh, Kruh and West
Kruh fields) have combined proved developed and undeveloped gross crude oil reserves of 4.39 million barrels (net crude oil proved
reserves of 2.63 million barrels) and probable undeveloped gross crude oil reserves of 2.15 million barrels as of December 31,
2020 determined on a May 2030 contract expiration date. Probable reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain
to be recovered than proved reserves but which, together with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered. While proved
undeveloped reserves include locations directly offsetting development spacing areas, probable reserves are locations directly
offsetting proved reserves areas and where data control or interpretations of available data are less certain. There should be
at least a 50% probability that the actual quantities recovered will equal or exceed the proved plus probable reserves estimates.
The estimate of probable reserves is more uncertain than proved reserves and has not been adjusted for risk due to the uncertainty.
Therefore, estimates of proved and probable reserves may not be comparable with each other and should not be summed arithmetically.
The
estimate of the proved reserves for the Kruh Block was prepared by representatives of our company (a team consisting of engineering,
geological and geophysical staff) based on the definitions and disclosure guidelines of the SEC contained in Title 17, Code of
Federal Regulations, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting, Final Rule released January 14, 2009 in the Federal Register. Our
proved oil reserves have not been estimated or reviewed by independent petroleum engineers.
The
following map shows the Kruh Block and its producing fields:
Our
two main objectives in acquiring Kruh Block was to initiate our operations with a cash producing asset and for our legal entity
to earn the required experience to participate in bids and direct tenders with the Government.
We
selected Kruh based on certain criteria according to our strategy: (i) selecting an area with proven hydrocarbons; (ii) finding
a currently producing structure which is not overdeveloped; and (iii) operating an asset located in the western part of Indonesia.
Pursuant
to the Kruh TAC, our subsidiary GWN is a contractor with the rights to operate in the Kruh area with an economic interest in the
development of the petroleum deposits within the block until May 2020. The contract is based on a “cost recovery”
system, meaning that all operating costs (expenditures made and obligations incurred in the exploration, development, extraction,
production, transportation, marketing, abandonment and site restoration) are advanced by GWN and later repaid to GWN by Pertamina.
Pursuant to the Kruh TAC, all the oil produced in Kruh Block is delivered to Pertamina and, subsequently, GWN recovers the operating
costs through the proceeds of the sale of the crude oil produced in the block in a monthly basis, but capped at 65% of such monthly
proceeds. GWN is also entitled to an additional 26.7857% of the remaining proceeds from the sale of the crude oil after monthly
cost recovery repayment as part of the profit sharing. Together with our share split, our net revenue income is around 74% of
the total production times the ICP. On a monthly basis, we submit to Pertamina an Entitlement Calculation Statement (ECS) stating
the amount of money that we are entitled to base on the oil lifting, ICP, cost recovery and profit sharing of the respective month.
In connection with our acquisition (by which we mean our entry into the TAC) of Kruh Block, approximately $15 million of the acquisition
costs were carried to our financial statements from the previous contractor. The cost recovery scheme is illustrated and described
in “—Legal Framework for the Oil and Gas Industry in Indonesia” below. Since our recoverable cost balance will
not be fully recovered up to the expiry of the contract, our net income is not subject to any tax whatsoever.
Historically,
the cooperation agreement between Pertamina and its contractors were established via a TAC, but after the regulatory reform in
the early 2000’s and the reorganization of Pertamina, the contractual relationship between Pertamina and its partners was
changed into KSO.
As
of May 22, 2020, we commenced the continuation of our operatorship of Kruh Block under a KSO contract that has a term until May
2030. In essence, the TAC and KSO are very similar in nature due to its “cost recovery” system, with a few important
differences to note. The main differences between both contracts are that: (1) in the TAC, all oil produced is shareable between
Pertamina and its contractor, while in the KSO, a Non-Shareable Oil (NSO) production is determined and agreed between Pertamina
and its partners so that the baseline production, with an established decline rate, belongs entirely to Pertamina, so that the
partners’ revenue and production sharing portion shall be determined only from the production above the NSO baseline; (2)
in the TAC, the cost recovery was capped at 65% (sixty-five percent) of the proceeds from the sale of the oil produced in the
block, while in the KSO, the cost recovery is capped at 80% of the proceeds from the sale of the oil produced within Kruh Block
for the cost incurred during the term under the KSO plus 80% of the operating cost per bbl multiplying non-shareable oil
(NSO). Also, under the KSO terms, we have committed to a 3 years’ work program to drill additional wells and perform exploration
activities such as 2D and 3D seismic within the Kruh Block. If we fail to fulfill our obligations, including the performance of
the work program commitment, Pertamina will have the right to terminate our KSO contract and our bank guarantee shall be deemed
forfeited.
In
March 2021, we mobilized the drilling rig to drill 3 back-to-back producing wells at our 63,000 acre Kruh Block. Each of the 3
wells are expected to average production of 173 barrels of oil per day over the first year of production. We anticipate that each
well will cost approximately $1.5 million to drill and complete. Based on the terms of our contract with the Indonesian government
and an assumed oil price of $63.50/barrel, each well is expected to generate $3.33 million in net revenue in its first year, which
is more than double the cost to drill each well. Also in March 2021, we received necessary permits that will allow us to move
forward to commence our previously announced drilling plans in 2021 for Kruh Block. In April 2021, we announced that new drilling
for these 3 wells had commenced. A total of 5 wells are planned in 2021, 6 wells in 2022 and 7 wells in 2023, for a total of 18
new wells on Kruh Block expected over three years. No assurances can be given that these new wells will generate the amounts
of oil we estimate, if any at all.
When
we acquired the Kruh Block in 2014, it had seven producing wells in 2014 and produced 200 barrels of oil per day (BOPD) with an
average cost of production per barrel of US$60.25, while 90% of the production relied on only one well, Kruh-20.
Our
development plan for the Kruh Block was to increase the production by drilling proved undeveloped (PUD) wells which we considered
a low risk investment due to the higher probability of these wells to produce commercial levels of oil compared to drilling wells
with unproved reserves. Finding ways to increase the production is particularly important in maturing fields as producing volumes
inevitably decline due to the normal decline rate of production in these fields. In financial terms, our target was to produce
the highest cash inflow within the remaining period of the contract.
With
this target in mind, following execution of Kruh TAC we started to collect data through a passive seismic survey in 80 locations
and by reactivating an old well (Kruh-19) to obtain additional geological information. After seismic data re-interpretation and
modelling, we initiated our drilling campaign for 2 wells, Kruh-21 (K-21) and Kruh-22 (K-22).
In
October 2015, we started drilling K-21 with a targeted depth of 3,418 feet that resulted in a daily production of only 45 BOPD
due to a permeability and tortuosity (a measure of how convoluted a well is) issues.
In
November 2015, we started drilling K-22 with a targeted depth of 4,600 feet which resulted in a 30 BOPD due to the same permeability
and tortuosity issue discovered in K-21.
In
the beginning of 2016, we focused on finding solutions to increase the production in K-21 and K-22. From February to May, we performed
an acidizing and sand fracturing operation to bypass the challenges in production efficiency that affected the wells K-21 and
K-22. This resulted in a multiple production gain in both K-21 and K-22, increasing the production of these wells to 95 BOPD and
98 BOPD, respectively.
During
2016, oil price crisis hit its bottom with an ICP of only $25.83 in the month of January. As a result of this low price, our operations
went through a cost analysis procedure in order to determine the economic limit of each of our producing wells by identifying
their respective direct production cost. Accordingly, we closed a total of 6 wells that were producing less than 10 BOPD that
year. We were required to find solutions to enhance our operating margins in a tough oil price environment, so we discontinued
operations of 6 out of the 9 wells we had at that time.
As
such, 2016 represented our effort to consolidate our operations in terms of efficiency that resulted in the reduction of operating
costs, allowing our company to go through the crude oil price turmoil. The cost reduction and efficiency measures taken include
(i) setting an economic limit for each operating well and closing wells that has exceeded $40 per barrel production cost; (ii)
increased production from the remaining wells through stimulation activities; (iii) renegotiating contracts with service providers;
(iv) establishing a fuel utilization plan that allowed us to use the gas produced from our wells as engine fuel and (v) optimized
surface facilities equipment and system.
In
May 2017, we drilled our third development well (K-23) with a cost of approximately US$ 1.5 million in Kruh Block with total depth
of 3,315 feet that resulted in a production of 30 BOPD due to same issues encountered in K-21 and K-22, permeability and tortuosity
issues.
In
October 2017, a stimulation operation of sand fracturing by Halliburton was performed in two wells, K-21 and K-23, in order to
improve the flow of hydrocarbons into these wells. Following completion, the production of K-23 was increased from 30 BOPD to
170 BOPD and in K-21 from 20 BOPD (production in K-21 declined back to 20 BOPD due to increase in the water cut from 2016 to 2017)
to 95 BOPD. This stimulation resulted in an increase of 3,844 barrels oil per month, resulting on our peak total production of
more than 11,000 barrels oil per month or 380 BOPD during the subsequent month.
One
well service was completed in June 2018 for K-21 to restore the production by cleaning the well from the sand material that filled
the borehole carried by the formation fluid. No development wells were drilled in 2016 and 2018 and no exploratory wells were
drilled by our company up to date.
Other
major activities in the Kruh field during 2018 were well services and necessary work for maintaining production. The work included
well cleaning and production string replacement.
In
December 2018, we initiated a pilot project with the application of electrical stimulation oil recovery method (or ESOR) for an
attempt of increasing the oil production in the Kruh field. The basic function of the ESOR process is to increase the mobility
of the oil by reducing its viscosity, which in turn helps move the oil toward producing wells. By inducing direct current power
through existing oil wells, the electric field drives the oil from the anode to the cathode, a process commonly referred to as
electrokinetics. During the trial period in 2019, we did not observe significant increases of production rate from the 4 producing
wells. Therefore, we terminated the pilot project in February 2020.
During
the period of our operatorship, we have incurred total expenditures of at least $15 million, including drilling costs of three
wells. We were able to produce oil from all three wells drilled during our operatorship, which represents a 100% drilling success
ratio. We also improved our water treatment system, installed a thermal oil heater to increase the speed in which the water is
separated from the oil, as Pertamina allows a maximum of 0.5% of water content in the oil transferred to them, and upgraded our
power generating facilities to gas fueled engines.
Since
2014, we have increased the gross production from 250 BOPD (gross) in early 2014 and reached a peak of 400 BOPD in 2018, which
we achieved by the drilling of three new wells and upgrade of the production facilities. Our production is our primary source
of revenue. At a per barrel crude price of US$61.89 (historical 12-month average price calculated as the average ICP for each
month in 2019) and a production of 7,582 barrels of oil per month, we were able to generate approximately US$470,000 per month
of gross revenue from Kruh. We intend to gradually increase production on the block over the next few years, with an anticipated
nominal amount of additional capital expenditures required.
During
2019, Kruh Block produced an average of about 7,582 barrels per month (gross). This represented an average of 26.9% decline from
the 4 producing wells. The two major producing wells K-22 and K-23 wells, however, only declined at 14.9% rate. During the period
of December 2014 to December 2019, we have produced a total of 497,398 barrels of oil from the Kruh structure.
During
2020, Kruh Block produced an average of about 6,044 barrels per month (gross), slightly less than in 2019 due to an anticipated
decline of 20.3%. As of December 2020, we have produced a total of 72,524 barrels of oil from the Kruh structure.
The production rate is expected to increase given the commencement of new drilling at Kruh Block in April 2021.
Historically,
the average gross initial production of the 29 oil wells drilled in Kruh Block is 191 bopd, with an average gross production of
173 bopd throughout the wells’ first year of production, considering an exponential decline rate per year of 21%. The decline
rate of 21% was estimated based on the decline curve analysis of field-wide production history from 2017 to December 2019. Based
on this data, a well in Kruh Block would be expected to produce, on average, a total gross amount of approximately 63,112 bbls
of crude oil in its first year. Also, due to the successful stimulation and maintenance, wells K-22 and K-23 have significantly
lower decline rate than 21%. Based on the data above, the KSO cost recovery terms and using an average oil price of US$61.89 (the
previous 12-months average monthly ICP as of December 31, 2019), on average, a well would generate US$ 3.24 million net revenue
in its first year (US$ 1.70 million in its first 6 months).
In
October 2017, we formally started negotiations with Pertamina to obtain an extension for the operatorship of the Kruh Block after
the expiry of our term in May 2020 through a KSO contract with Pertamina. Through a performance appraisal, we successfully qualified
to continue the operatorship of Kruh Block. In October 2018, Pertamina has sent us the Direct Offering Invitation of Kruh Block
attached with the contract draft for 10 years continuing operatorship period. In July 2019, we received the award by Pertamina
to operate the Kruh Block for an additional 10 years under an extended KSO. The KSO contract was signed on July 26, 2019. Thus,
the reserve estimation and economic models assumptions, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, consider that we have the operatorship
of the Kruh Block until May 2030, as evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, based on SEC Regulation S-X §210.4-10(a)(22)
that defines proved oil and gas reserves.
As
of December 31, 2020 and 2019, considering the operatorship of Kruh Block ending in May 2030, net proved reserves have a net ratio
of approximately 61.13% and 43.55% of total reserves, respectively. This net ratio calculation is based on our revenue entitlement,
taking into consideration the cost recovery balance estimations and profit sharing portions throughout the Kruh Block operatorship
period. As of December 31, 2017, with the Kruh Block operatorship ending in May 2020, the unrecovered expenditures on TAC operations
of $20,258,361 would remain unrecovered up to the end of the TAC, hence our entitlement to 74.37% of the revenue from the sales
of the crude oil produced until the expiry of the TAC in May 2020 (65% of the proceeds from the sale of the crude oil produced
as cost recovery plus 26.7857% profit sharing portion of the remaining 35% of the proceeds from the sale of the crude oil), which
results in a net proved reserves ratio of 74.37% of total reserves at that point in time. In contrast, as of December 31, 2018,
with an assumed extension of the Kruh Block operatorship to May 2030 and with the cost recovery balance reset to zero in May 2020,
we estimate that we will be entitled to approximately 42.72% of the revenues from the sales of the crude oil produced throughout
the operatorship in Kruh Block until May 2030, considering the cost recovery balance estimations and profit sharing portions throughout
the Kruh Block operatorship period, resulting on a net proved reserves ratio of 42.72% of total reserves.
Following
the confirmation of the Kruh Block extension, our board of directors approved a development plan for a drilling program of 18
Proved Undeveloped Reserves (or PUD) wells at Kruh Block, according to the schedule below:
|
|
UnitYear
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Planned PUD wells
|
|
Gross well
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Future wells costs
(1)
|
|
US$
|
|
|
7,500,000
|
|
|
|
9,000,000
|
|
|
|
10,500,000
|
|
|
|
27,000,000
|
|
Total gross PUD added
|
|
Bbls
|
|
|
1,299,469
|
|
|
|
1,219,638
|
|
|
|
1,551,413
|
|
|
|
4,070,520
|
|
Total net PUD added
|
|
Bbls
|
|
|
794,392
|
|
|
|
745,589
|
|
|
|
948,410
|
|
|
|
2,488,391
|
|
(1)
|
Future
wells costs are the capital expenditures associated with the new wells costs and do not include other capital expenditures
such as production facilities.
|
We
commenced new drilling operations in Kruh Block in March 2021, and new drilling of 3 wells commenced in April 2021. Our originally
anticipated drilling commencement date was delayed due to COVID-19 and the government permitting process.
For
Proved Developed (or PDP) reserves, as a result of more effective reservoir management, we produced 72,524 bbls for the year ended
December 2020, an increase of 2,687 bbls from our June 2020 estimate, and a decrease of 135 bbls from our December 2019 estimate.
Effective oil field maintenance ensures our realization meets production forecast.
The
gross oil reserves were reduced from 4,619,992 bbls as of December 31, 2019 to 4,393,408 bbls as of December 31, 2020 mostly due
to the production and rescheduling of our drilling plan. As of December 31, 2020, the net reserves were estimated as 2,631,512
bbls using a per barrel crude price of US$37.58 (historical 12-month average price calculated as the average ICP for each month
in 2020). In a “cost recovery” system such as the Kruh KSO contract, the production share and net reserves entitlement
to our company increases in periods of lower oil prices (61.13% net share for ICP, US$37.58 in year 2020) and decreases in periods
of higher oil prices (43.55% net share for ICP, US$66.12 in year 2019). This means that the estimated net proved reserves quantities
are subject to oil price related volatility due to the method in which the revenue is derived throughout the contract period.
Therefore, the net proved reserves are estimated based on the revenue generated by our company according to the KSO economic models.
The
table below summarizes the gross and net crude oil proved reserves as of December 31, 2020 in Kruh Block:
|
|
Crude
Oil
Proved
Reserves at Kruh Block
|
|
Gross Crude Oil Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Crude Oil Proved Developed
Producing Reserves (PDP)
|
|
Bbl
|
322,887
|
|
Gross Crude Oil
Proved Undeveloped Reserves (PUD)
|
|
|
4,070,521
|
|
Total Gross Crude Oil Reserves
|
|
Bbl
|
4,393,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Crude Oil Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
Net Crude Oil Proved Developed Producing
Reserves (PDP)
|
|
Bbl
|
143,120
|
|
Net Crude Oil
Proved Undeveloped Reserves (PUD)
|
|
|
2,488,392
|
|
Total Net Crude Oil Reserves
|
|
Bbl
|
2,631,512
|
|
Our
estimates of the proved reserves are made using available geological and reservoir data as well as production performance data.
These estimates are reviewed annually by internal reservoir engineers, and Pertamina, and revised as warranted by additional data.
The results of infill drilling are treated as positive revisions due to increases to expected recovery. Other revisions are due
to changes in, among other things, development plans, reservoir performance and governmental restrictions.
Our
proved oil reserves have not been estimated or reviewed by independent petroleum engineers. The estimate of the proved reserves
for the Kruh Block was prepared by IEC representatives, a team consisting of engineering, geological and geophysical staff based
on the definitions and disclosure guidelines of the SEC contained in Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Modernization of Oil
and Gas Reporting, Final Rule released January 14, 2009 in the Federal Register.
Kruh
Block’s general manager and our Chief Operating Officer have reviewed the reserves estimate to ensure compliance to SEC
guidelines for (1) the appropriateness of the methodologies employed; (2) the adequacy and quality of the data relied upon; (3)
the depth and thoroughness of the reserves estimation process; (4) the classification of reserves appropriate to the relevant
definitions used; and (5) the reasonableness of the estimated reserve quantities.”
Net
reserves were estimated using a per barrel crude price of US$37.58 (historical 12-month average price calculated as the average
ICP for each month in 2020). In a “cost recovery” system, such as the TAC or KSO, in which Kruh Block operates or
will operate, the production share and net reserves entitlement to our company reduces in periods of higher oil price and increases
in periods of lower oil price. This means that the estimated net proved reserves quantities are subject to oil price related volatility
due to the method in which the revenue is derived throughout the contract period. Therefore, the net proved reserves are estimated
based on the revenue generated by our company according to the TAC and KSO economic models.
As
of December 31, 2020, Kruh Block had 4 oil producing wells (K-20, K-21, K-22 and K-23 in Kruh field) covering 47 acres. There
were 18 proved undeveloped oil locations in Kruh (6), North Kruh (7) and West Kruh (5) field covering 491 acres. In the West Kruh
field, there are additional 9 probable locations covering 279 acres. See details on table below.
PDP,
PUD and Probable Locations and Acreage for the Kruh Block as of December 31, 2020
|
Reserves
Category
|
|
Kruh
Field
|
|
|
North
Kruh Field
|
|
|
West
Kruh Field
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Locations
|
|
|
Acreage
|
|
|
Locations
|
|
|
Acreage
|
|
|
Locations
|
|
|
Acreage
|
|
|
Locations
|
|
|
Acreage
|
|
Proved Dev Producing (PDP)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Proved Undeveloped (PUD)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
Total
Proved
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
Probable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
Total
Proved & Probable
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
828
|
|
The
following table summarizes the gross and net developed and undeveloped acreage of Kruh Block based on our TAC and KSO terms, as
well as our economic model as of December 31, 2020:
Gross
and Net Developed and Undeveloped Acreage of Kruh Block as of December 31, 2020
|
|
|
Developed
Acreage
|
|
|
Undeveloped
Acreage
|
|
|
Total
Acreage
|
|
Kruh
Block
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Kruh Field
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
North Kruh Field
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
West Kruh Field
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
63,204
|
|
|
|
38,638
|
|
|
|
63,204
|
|
|
|
38,638
|
|
Total
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
63,695
|
|
|
|
38,939
|
|
|
|
63,753
|
|
|
|
38,974
|
|
Citarum
Block
Citarum
Block is an exploration block covering an area of 3,924.67 km2 (969,807 acres). The block is located onshore in West Java with
a population of 48.7 million people and only 16 miles south of the capital city of Indonesia, Jakarta, thus placing it within
a short distance to the major gas consumption area in Indonesia – the Greater Jakarta region in West Java. We believe this
significantly mitigates the logistical and geographical challenges posed by Indonesia’s composition and infrastructure,
significantly reducing the commercial risks of our project.
Citarum
Block is located in onshore Northwest Java basin. In terms of geology, a very effective petroleum system has been proved in the
region from the long history of exploration and production efforts since the 1960’s. According to the United States Geological
Survey (USGS) assessment (Bishop, Michele G. “Petroleum Systems of The Northwest Java Province, Java and Offshore Southeast
Sumatra, Indonesia”, Open-File Report 99-50R, 2000), “Northwest Java province may contain more than 2 billion
barrels of oil equivalent in addition to the 10 billion barrels of oil equivalent already identified”. However, little new
reserves have been added to the region during the last 15 years due to the lack of investments in exploration programs. We have
not engaged independent oil and gas reserve engineers to audit and evaluate the accuracy of the reserve data from the USGS research.
Citarum Block also shares its border with the producing gas fields of Subang, Pasirjadi, Jatirarangon and Jatinegara. The combined
oil and gas production from more than 150 oil and gas fields in the onshore and offshore Northwest Java basin, operated by Pertamina,
is 45,000 BOPD and 450 million standard cubic feet gas per day (MMSCFD). The following graphics show the Citarum Block together
with the producing oil and gas fields in the region, as well as the block’s proximity to the West Java gas transmission
network:
Source:
Indonesia Energy Corporation Limited
We
started collecting data regarding the Citarum Block in 2016, when we decided it was time to expand our asset base by adding an
exploration block to our portfolio. Given our strategy, we had to find a cost efficient method to acquire a block with the potential
to add hydrocarbons reserves to our company as part of the process to maximize our company’s value. With the necessary technical
knowledge and regulatory experience from our professionals, we agreed that the best method for us to acquire an exploration block
was via a Joint Study proposal to the Government in a “work area” that had not yet been reserved for the bidding process
by the Government. The Joint Study objective is to determine oil and gas potential within a proposed working area by conducting
geological and geophysical work such as field surveys, magnetic surveys and the reprocessing of existing seismic lines. Upon completion
of the Joint Study, if the Government further decided to conduct a bidding process for the working area, we would have the right
to change our offer (right to match) in the bidding process if the other bidders gave higher offers.
Therefore,
following our plans, our team identified Citarum, an open onshore area in West Java that was available for a Joint Study. In September
2016, after we formally expressed our interest to the government to conduct the Joint Study in Citarum and fulfilled all requirements,
we obtained the approval to initiate our Joint Study program in conjunction with DGOG and LAPI ITB (a third-party consultancy
service provided by Bandung Institute of Technology (or ITB)). The study target was to integrate field geological survey, subsurface
mapping, identify stratigraphy and structural geology, perform a basin analysis and petroleum system assessment. As part of our
proposal, we engaged a surveyor to perform a passive seismic as an alternative method to fill the gap of the existing two-dimensional
seismic survey due to the absence of data on some area on the block. With 111 survey points, the work was completed in two months
and covered approximately one third of the area, as shown in the illustration below. The data produced from the passive seismic
together with the existing two-dimensional seismic data we acquired from the Indonesian National Data Management Company were
the base for the Joint Study.
Between
2009 and 2016, Citarum Block had been operated by Pan Orient Energy Corp. (or POE), a Canadian oil and natural gas company whose
shares are listed on the TSX Venture Exchange. POE carried out various exploration work on the Citarum block, including the drilling
of 4 wells in different locations across the block: Pasundan-1, Geulis-1, Cataka-1 and Jatayu-1. Providentially, all 4 wells discovered
natural gas and gas flow was recorded for the Pasundan-1 and Jatayu-1 wells. The total investment made by POE on Citarum Block
was $40,630,824.
Pasundan-1
encountered gas at a depth between 6,000 feet and 9,000 feet, while the mud log and sidewall cores displayed oil and gas shows.
Cataka-1 well had gas indication from approximately 1,000 feet depth to 2,737 feet when the well was abandoned due to drilling
problems as a result of inexperience operating in the region. Jatayu-1 well flowed high-pressured gas from approximately 6,000
feet depth and had a strong indication of gas-bearing between 5,800 feet and 6,700 feet depth. Geulis-1 well had gas indication
from 1,000 feet to 4,300 feet depth. All 4 wells were suspended and plugged as the equipment and consumables used were not compatible
to the drilling conditions, formation or strong gas flow.
Also,
the gas indication/flowing from the wells would have been much more significant had the formations had not been damaged by high
mud weight during drilling. Proper preparation to avoid drilling issues encountered by the previous operator for the up-coming
drilling program should lead to an efficient delineation of gas discoveries.
The
results from the 4 wells drilled in Citarum and the amount of data available regarding the block are the key factors for us in
selecting Citarum as the block’s risk profile was significantly reduced with the discovery of gas across the block. Likewise,
the fact that gas zones exist at different depths between 1,000 feet and 6,000 feet contributes to the potential of commercially
developing these gas discoveries. As a result of this plus the significant amount of capital expenditures incurred by the previous
operator, who discovered natural gas and gas flows from the 4 drilled wells. We believe this provides us with a unique de-risked
asset to continue exploration on.
In
the region, oil and gas have been producing from sandstone and carbonate reservoirs within 5 geologic formations (from old to
young, Jatibarang, Talangakar, Baturaja, Upper Cibulakan and Parigi). The carbonate buildups in the Baturaja, Upper Cibulakan
and Parigi formations are particularly gas rich. Within the Citarum Block, both sandstone and carbonate reservoirs have been encountered
during drilling. Because of the gas-prone type II Kerogen domination in the Talangakar source rock of deltaic origin in the hydrocarbon
generating “kitchens” (Ciputat, Kepuh, Pasirbungur and Cipunegara), prospects within the Citarum Block are mostly
gas-bearing if discovered. The following illustration shows the northwest java stratigraphy:
The
Joint Study was completed within a 12 month period (8 months plus a 4 month extension period) and the findings summarized in a
report with the following information regarding the area: synopsis of regional geology and petroleum system, play concept, lead
and prospect, volumetric of hydrocarbon prospect and economic prospect valuation. The following diagram illustrates the full Joint
Study process:
In
February 2018, Citarum Block was tendered through a direct offer by the MEMR. Following the tender process, we were awarded the
rights to explore the Citarum Block in May 2018. The exploration period for Citarum block is comprised of a 6-year period that
could be extended for an additional 4 years up to 2028.
In
July 2018, a Production Sharing Contracts (or PSC) was signed with respect to Citarum between MEMR and two of our wholly-owned
subsidiaries, PT Cogen Nusantara Energi (or CNE) and PT Hutama Wiranusa Energi (or HWE), marking the official commencement of
our 30 years operatorship term for the Citarum Block.
The
following timeline illustrates the Citarum Block acquisition process:
As
part of our commitment of conducting a 300 km of seismic survey, we have recently submitted our work program and budget to the
Indonesian Interim Taskforce for Upstream Oil and Gas Business Activities (Satuan Kerja Khusus Pelaksana Kegiatan Usaha Hulu
Minyak dan Gas Bumi, or SKK Migas). Upon its approval, we will start an Environmental Base Assessment for the region in conjunction
with a local university and use the result as a base for any exploration activity in the area. This is part of our exploration
activity in Citarum. When the exploration program is initiated, we plan to conduct more G&G studies and a 300km2
2D seismic within the first year of the exploration program and drill our first exploration well in the Jonggol area in its second
year. If the drilling is successful, we plan on conducting a 100km2 3D seismic within the second year and drill additional 2 delineation
wells in the third year in order to propose a phase 1 development plan for the Citarum Block. If no petroleum in commercial quantities
is discovered in Citarum during the exploration period, our PSC would be automatically terminated.
The
upcoming exploration program for Citarum will begin with the 8 prospects with the lowest risk (38%-48%), 5 in the Jonggol region
and 3 in the Purwakarta region, out of the 28 exploration prospects previously identified and evaluated by the Joint Study. According
to data published by SKK Migas, from 2012 to 2018, there were a total of 338 exploration wells drilled in Indonesia and 238 out
of the 338 resulted in an oil and gas discovery. The most recent complete data is shown in the table below.
Description
Year
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Total Exploration Wells
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
Total Discovery Wells
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
Success Ratio
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
|
71
|
%
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
|
|
82
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
Source: SKK Migas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Considering
the closeness to the oil and gas generating “kitchens”, multiple reservoir horizons, moderate risked faulted anticlinal
traps, and proved hydrocarbons in previous drilling and nearby producing fields, we believe that 23 of the 28 prospects have geological
chance factors of success in the range of 30%-48%. Geological chance factors for the remaining 11 prospects are between 20% and
30% and 12 are between 10% and 20%.
In
2020, further technical work in the Citarum block resulted additional 9 prospects and 9 exploration leads (T series prospects
and leads on the maps below). The 28 prospects identified in 2019 (J and P series prospects) remain to be the primary prospects
for further evaluation by the upcoming new seismic data. The acreage of primary prospects, potential reservoir thickness and net
reservoir volume remain no change at this time.
Prospect
|
|
Drilling
sequence
|
|
Acreage
(acres)
|
|
|
Reservoir
thickness
(feet)
|
|
|
Net
reservoir volume
(acres-feet)
|
|
1
|
|
J-1
|
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
83,867
|
|
2
|
|
J-2
|
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
390,848
|
|
3
|
|
J-3
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
4
|
|
J-4
|
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
26,374
|
|
5
|
|
J-5
|
|
3rd
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
327,861
|
|
6
|
|
J-6
|
|
5th
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
421,131
|
|
7
|
|
J-7
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
7,263
|
|
8
|
|
J-8
|
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
102,026
|
|
9
|
|
J-9
|
|
7th
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
1,479
|
|
|
|
2,492,477
|
|
10
|
|
J-10
|
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
374,265
|
|
11
|
|
J-11
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
8,418
|
|
12
|
|
J-12
|
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
282,175
|
|
13
|
|
J-13
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
41,486
|
|
14
|
|
J-14
|
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
19,701
|
|
15
|
|
J-15
|
|
4th
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
1,233,162
|
|
16
|
|
J-16
|
|
2nd
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
695,267
|
|
17
|
|
J-18
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
18
|
|
J-20
|
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
353,835
|
|
19
|
|
J-21
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
14,083
|
|
20
|
|
P-1
|
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
271,013
|
|
21
|
|
P-2
|
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
250,600
|
|
22
|
|
P-3
|
|
1st
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
1,648,940
|
|
23
|
|
P-4
|
|
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
604,920
|
|
24
|
|
P-5
|
|
6th
|
|
|
2,680
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
1,085,879
|
|
25
|
|
P-6
|
|
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
837,121
|
|
26
|
|
P-7
|
|
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
230,161
|
|
27
|
|
P-8
|
|
8th
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
821,361
|
|
28
|
|
P-9
|
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
408,314
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
26,636
|
|
|
|
10,445
|
|
|
|
13,038,195
|
|
The
following depicts our development plan for Citarum, with the first priority being to confirm the value of the block by proving
reserves and later to monetize the asset through the production and sale of gas:
During
2020, a new geological, geophysical and biostratigraphic study was performed on the Citarum Block. Eighteen additional exploration
prospects were identified. This provides additional opportunities for oil and gas exploration in the future.
Our
Citarum PSC contract is based on the “gross split” regime, in which the production of oil and gas is to be divided
between the contractor and the Indonesian Government based on certain percentages in respect of (a) the crude oil production and
(b) the natural gas production. Our share will be the Base Split share plus a Variable and Progressive component. Our Crude Oil
Base Split share is 43% and our Natural Gas Base Split share is 48%. Our share percentage is determined based on both variable
(such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide content) and progressive (such as crude oil and refined gas prices) components.
Thus,
pursuant to our Citarum PSC contract, once Citarum commences production, we are entitled to at least 65% of the natural gas produced,
calculated as 48% from the Base Split plus a Variable Component of 5% from the first Plan of Development (POD I) in Citarum, a
Variable Component of 2% from the use of Local Content, as the oil and gas onshore services are mostly closed or restricted for
foreign companies (as described below under “—Legal Framework for the Oil and Gas Industry in Indonesia), and a 10%
increase for the first 180 BSCF produced or 30 million barrels of oil equivalent which according to our economic model, the cumulative
production of 180 BSCF will only be achieved in 2025.
The
following table summarizes the gross and net developed and undeveloped acreage of Citarum Block based on our PSC terms and economic
model as of December 31, 2020:
Gross
and Net Developed and Undeveloped Acreage of Citarum Block as of December 31, 2020
|
|
|
Developed
Acreage
|
|
|
Undeveloped
Acreage
|
|
|
Total
Acreage
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Citarum
Block
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
969,807
|
|
|
|
550,317
|
|
|
|
969,807
|
|
|
|
550,317
|
|
Total
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
969,807
|
|
|
|
550,317
|
|
|
|
969,807
|
|
|
|
550,317
|
|
Pursuant
to our PSC for Citarum Block, in order to incentivize and optimize our exploration activities at Citarum, there are circumstances
under which we are required or may be required to relinquish portions of the contract area back to the Government, with such portions
being subject to be agreed to between us and the Government. For example:
|
(i)
|
on
or before the end of the initial three (3) contract years beginning with the date the PSC was approved by the Government,
we are required to relinquish twenty percent (20%) of the original total contract area in Citarum.
|
|
|
|
|
(ii)
|
if
at the end of the third (3rd) contract year, certain agreed to work programs have not been completed, upon consideration
and evaluation of SKK Migas, we would be obliged to relinquish an additional fifteen percent (15%) of the original total contract
area at the end of the third contract year.
|
|
|
|
|
(iii)
|
on
or before the end of the sixth (6th) contract year, we are required relinquish additional portions of contract
area so that the area retained thereafter shall not be in excess of twenty percent (20%) of the original total contract area;
provided, however, that on or before the end of the sixth (6th) contract year, if any part of the contract area
corresponding to the surface area in which petroleum has been discovered, is greater than twenty percent (20%) of the original
contract area, then we will not be obliged to relinquish such excess area.
|
In
advance of the date of any relinquishment, we will advise SKK Migas of the portion to be relinquished. For the purpose of such
relinquishment, we will consult with SKK Migas regarding the shape and size of each individual portion of the areas being relinquished,
provided, however, that so far as reasonably possible, such portion shall each be of sufficient size and convenient shape to enable
petroleum operations to be conducted thereon.
Potential
Additional Block (Rangkas Area)
In
mid-2018, we identified an onshore open area in the province of West Java, adjacent to our Citarum block. We believe that this
area, also known as the Rangkas Area, holds large amounts of crude oil due to its proven petroleum system. To confirm the potential
of Rangkas Area, in July 2018, we formally expressed our interest to the DGOG of MEMR to conduct a Joint Study in the Rangkas
Area and we attained the approval to initiate our Joint Study program in this area on November 5, 2018. The Rangkas Joint Study
covered an area of 3,970 km2 (or 981,008 acres) and was completed in November 2019. The DGOG accepted the completion of the joint
study and inquired IEC’s interest for further process to tender the block. The study result suggested an effective petroleum
system for oil and gas accumulations. Furthermore, with the opportunity to integrate the operation of Citarum and Rangkas together
efficiently, we decided to issue a Statement of Interest Letter in December 2020 to the Ministry of Energy (DGOG) as we intend
to enter into a PSC contract for the Rangkas through a direct tender process. We will have the right to change our offer in order
to match the best offer following the results of the bidding process. The timeline for the tender is contingent upon the DGOG’s
plans and schedule
Source:
Indonesia Energy Corporation Limited
The
Rangkas Joint Study includes field geological surveys, geochemical and passive seismic surveys and the reprocessing of existing
seismic lines was completed in November 2019. The Joint Study evaluated stratigraphy and structural geology of the area, conducted
geochemical techniques to evaluate source rock and oils, performed passive seismic data analysis for identifying hydrocarbon occurrence,
and performed basin analyses for assessing the petroleum system of the area with the objective of determining its oil and gas
potential. Results of the study suggested (1) data from four wells drilled pre-World War II and two wells drilled in 1991 indicated
the presence of hydrocarbon in the area with the discovery of several oil seeps and one gas seep, (2) the petroleum system in
the area is proven with the occurrence of Eocene-Oligocene-Miocene source, reservoir and seal rocks similar to adjacent major
producing hydrocarbon areas in West Java, and (3) twenty-one petroleum prospects and leads with potentially stacked reservoirs
were identified.
Since
the study of Rangkas block suggests high potential of finding hydrocarbons, we plan to continue pursue the PSC contract of the
block which would be available through a direct tender process in which we will have the right to change our offer in order to
match the best offer following the results of the bidding process, which has not taken place as of the date of this report. The
timeline for the tender is contingent upon the DGOG’s plans and schedule.
Our
Competitive Strengths
We
believe we have the following competitive strengths:
|
●
|
Experienced
management.
|
|
○
|
Our management and
technical team are comprised of some of the brightest and most passionate people in the industry, including with expertise
in exploration technology.
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
Our professional
team consistently adopts innovative concepts and technologies to reduce risks in exploring oil and gas, and continually looks
for better ways to effectively manage our exploration and production operations.
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
Our management team
members (Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Business Development Officer and General Manager) collectively
have many years of experience in petroleum exploration, development and production operations. Together they have successfully
operated more than 17 oil and gas blocks and found and developed more than 10 oil and gas fields over the last 16 years. Our
recently added management team located in the United States consists of our President and Chief Financial Officer. Our President
brings 41 years of public energy company experience and was the founder of two energy companies that are or were listed on
the NYSE American. Our Chief Financial Officer brings 38 years of financial business experience, mostly as either a chief
financial officer or controller, including over 16 years working in public companies.
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
Our top management
team members have certification in “Kepala Teknik Tambang” from the Indonesian government, qualifying them for
the implementation and compliance of occupational safety and health legislation in mining and petroleum operations. We are
fully committed to conducting our operations according to the best industry practices to ensure the health, safety and security
of all our stakeholders as well as the protection of the environment and surrounding communities.
|
|
●
|
Established
relationships. Through our management team’s experience in operating blocks in Indonesia, we have established close
relationships with central and local governments, service providers and other petroleum companies in Indonesia. The excellent
relationship between management members and government agencies provides us extraordinary opportunities of accessing low risk
and high potential blocks. In addition, our U.S. management team likewise has established relationships with key participants
in the U.S. capital and energy markets that we believe will be an asset to us as a U.S.-listed public company.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Significant
network. Our company has built solid alliances and a vast knowledge network within the Indonesian oil and gas industry,
which gives us the ability to execute complex projects and traverse Indonesian regulatory and institutional risk.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Niche
market. We look to acquire the rights to operate small to “medium sized blocks” onshore that are most likely
overseen by the larger competitors. Being an independent and efficient oil and gas company in Indonesia, we have the flexibility
and speed necessary to seize opportunities as they arise.
|
|
●
|
Strategically
located assets. Our company has a proven track record in acquiring assets located close to major infrastructure and populous
cities. We believe that being strategically located to major infrastructure will enable higher margins as we scale our business.
|
Our
Business Strategies
We
are an active independent Indonesian exploration and production company with an ultimate goal to generate value for our shareholders.
Our overall growth strategy is to actively develop our current blocks and to acquire new assets to boost our growth. We will also
evaluate available opportunities to expand our business into the oil and gas downstream industry in Indonesia.
The
key elements for achieving our goal are set out below.
|
●
|
Strategic
investment allocation in existing blocks. We are focused on validating the reserves of our blocks by continuing to develop
high impact exploration activities to add reserves, combined with a plan of development in order to increase production.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Commercialization
and monetization of oil and gas discoveries. We are a revenue driven company and we strategically adjust our operations
and development programs in our blocks by evaluating the market and the Indonesian energy demand.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Develop
our “de-risked” 969.807 acres Citarum Block. $40.6 million was invested by the block’s prior owner,
Pan Orient Energy Corp. (TSXV.POE) who drilled 4 wells and successfully discovered natural gas and gas flow from each of the
4 wells. We believe this contribution provides us with a unique de-risked asset to continue exploration on.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Expansion
of our company’s asset portfolio. We actively seek to acquire blocks to increase our company’s value. The
energy demand growth and increase of manufacturing activities in the region could lead us to invest into the downstream oil
and gas sector.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Maintain
balance sheet strength to offset commodity cyclicality. We intend to fund our exploration and production activities with
equity, free cash flow and a moderate use of debt. With the uncertainty within our sector, we believe that maintaining a strong
balance sheet will be critical to our growth.
|
Competition
We
face competition from other oil and gas companies in the acquisition of new oil blocks through the Indonesian government’s
tender process. Our competitors for these tenders include Pertamina, the Indonesian state-owned national oil company (who can
tender for blocks on its own), and other well-established large international oil and gas companies. Such companies have substantially
greater capital resources and are able to offer more attractive terms when bidding for concessions. Therefore, to mitigate the
risk of competition, our corporate strategy is to focus on small to “medium sized blocks” onshore that are most likely
overseen by the larger competitor.
Facilities,
Distribution and Logistics
We
do not own any property or facilities. We lease our corporate headquarters in Jakarta, Indonesia, as well as a field office for
our operations in Kruh Block. In Kruh Block, due to the cost recovery fiscal terms, the facilities, vehicles, machinery and equipment
required for the production of oil and gas are leased by us. The diagram below depicts our current storage, distribution and logistics
of the oil from our wells at Kruh to the delivery point to Pertamina:
Legal
Framework for the Oil and Gas Industry in Indonesia
Background
Under
Article 33(3) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, all natural resources, including all oil and gas resources, in
Indonesia belong to the state and should be used for the greatest benefit of the citizens of Indonesia. As a result, while the
Government controls and manages oil and gas resources by, among other things, granting licenses or concessions to third party
contractors such as our company, it retains ultimate control over all oil and gas activities in Indonesia.
Prior
to the Law No. 22 of 2001 on Oil and Gas (which we refer to herein as the Oil and Gas Law), the Government controlled all oil
and gas undertakings in Indonesia and granted Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara (the predecessor to Pertamina,
as described below) the exclusive right to manage and carry out all operations within the territory of Indonesia. Any other enterprise
seeking to invest in the Indonesian oil and gas sector required the appointment or approval of the MEMR, and any actual investment
would be done through a contractual arrangement with Pertamina. Most of these arrangements took the form of production sharing
arrangements such as PSCs, TACs, and KSOs entered into between Pertamina and the contractors.
Beginning
with the Oil and Gas Law in 2001, the Government adopted a series of measures to introduce market reform into Indonesia’s
oil and gas sector. The Oil and Gas Law remains the primary umbrella legislation governing all oil and gas activities in Indonesia.
It places control over the oil and gas industry in the hands of the MEMR and the DGOG. It also established two new governmental
bodies – the Oil and Gas Upstream Regulatory Body (Badan Pelaksana Minyak dan Gas Bumi, or BP Migas) and the Oil
and Gas Downstream Regulatory Body (Badan Pengatur Hilir Minyak dan Gas Bumi, or BPH Migas) – to regulate activities
in their respective sectoral areas. The Oil and Gas Law also divides and for the first time distinguishes between upstream and
downstream activities. Further regulations elaborate and implement important aspects of the Oil and Gas Law.
Following
the transfer of Pertamina’s control over exploration and production activities in the territory of Indonesia to BP Migas,
Pertamina was converted under Government Regulation No. 31 of 2003 converted Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak dan Gas Bumi Negara
into a for-profit, state-owned company in the form of a limited liability company (known as a Perseroan). Further, Government
Regulation No. 35 of 2004 on Upstream Oil and Gas Business as amended several times, most recently by Government Regulation No.
55 of 2009 on Second Amendment to the Upstream Oil and Gas Business (or GR 35/2004), transferred Pertamina’s responsibility
for managing all production sharing arrangements (except TACs) to BP Migas. These changes have left the reformed Pertamina free
to tender for contracts on an equal basis with other companies. Pertamina also split its upstream and downstream operations by
incorporating subsidiaries which specifically engage in either upstream or downstream activities. Pertamina’s subsidiary
in charge of the upstream activities is PT Pertamina EP (or Pertamina EP) while there are several Pertamina’s subsidiaries
established for the downstream activities.
On
November 13, 2012, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (Mahkamah Konstitusi Republic Indonesia, or MK)
issued Decision 36/PUU-X/2012 (which we refer to as MK Decision 36/2012), which found the transfer of authority to BP Migas under
the Oil and Gas Law unconstitutional, ordering the regulatory body be dissolved and all its authority and responsibilities be
transferred to the Government through the MEMR. Following a series of Presidential and Ministerial regulations, the duties and
functions of BP Migas ultimately were transferred to the Interim Taskforce for Upstream Oil and Gas Business Activities (Satuan
Kerja Khusus Pelaksana Kegiatan Usaha Hulu Minyak dan Gas Bumi, or SKK Migas) in 2013. As a consequence, production sharing
contracts (except TACs) that had previously been transferred to BP Migas from Pertamina were then transferred to SKK Migas. As
for TACs, they remain with Pertamina.
Executing
Agency for Upstream Activities
Indonesian
law currently distinguishes between upstream activities (encompassing the exploration and exploitation of oil and gas resources)
and downstream activities (comprising the processing, transporting, storing, and trading of oil and gas). As described above,
the distinction between the two types of activities was introduced in the Oil and Gas Law in 2001. Prior to this, Indonesian law
did not recognize any market segmentation, and Pertamina was responsible for all aspects of oil and gas operation activities.
The
Oil and Gas Law extends this sectoral division to the regulatory bodies established under such law, with BP Migas assuming responsibility
for regulating upstream activities and BPH Migas assuming responsibility for downstream activities and both reporting to the DGOG.
Furthermore, the Oil and Gas Law and Government Regulation No. 42 of 2002 on Executing Agency for upstream Oil and Gas Business
Activities together required that, once established, BP Migas take over Pertamina’s existing production sharing arrangements
and that BP Migas become the Government party to subsequent arrangements.
MK
Decision 36/2012 dissolved BP Migas and transferred its authority and responsibility back to the MEMR until a new oil and gas
law is adopted. In reaching its decision, the MK found that Article 33(3) of the Indonesian Constitution required the Government
to manage oil and gas resources directly and that the supervisory duties given to BP Migas fell short of that requirement. It
also found that the Government’s monitoring and regulatory activities under BP Migas had deteriorated to the point where
it no longer met its constitutional obligations.
On
the same day as the MK’s decision, both the President and the MEMR responded to MK Decision 36/2012 by issuing, in order,
Presidential Regulation No. 95 of 2012 on the Transfer of Duties and Functions of Upstream Oil and Gas Activities (or PR 95/2012),
which transfers BP Migas’ authority and responsibilities to the MEMR. In addition, PR 95/2012 upholds existing arrangements
by confirming that all PSCs signed by BP Migas would remain valid until their respective expiration dates. MEMR Regulation No.
3135 K/08/MEM/2012 on Transfer of Duties, Functions and Organizations in Execution of Oil and Gas Business (or MEMR Regulation
3135/2012), which transfers those duties to the Interim Task Force for Upstream Oil and Gas Business Activities (Satuan Kerja
Sementara Pelaksana Kegiatan Usaha Hulu Minyak dan Gas Bumi) as the implementation regulation of PR 95/2012. The Interim Task
Force for Upstream Oil and Gas Business Activities is accountable to the MEMR.
Following
the enactment of PR 95/2012 and MEMR Regulation 3135/2012, on January 10, 2013 the President issued Presidential Regulation No.
9 of 2013 on the Implementation of Management of Natural oil and Gas Upstream Business Activities, as amended by the Presidential
Regulation No. 36 of 2018 (or PR 9/2013), which established SKK Migas and transferred the authorities to manage upstream oil and
gas activities which are based on cooperation contracts to the new regulatory body. PR 9/2013 also establishes a Supervisory Commission,
whose membership consists of the MEMR as Chairman, the Vice Minister of Finance, who manages the State Budget as the Vice Chairman,
the Chairman of the Capital Investment Coordinating Board, Minister of Environment and Forestry, Chief of National Police and
the Vice Minister of the MEMR, so that SKK Migas can control, supervise, and evaluate the management of the upstream oil and gas
business activities under its authority. The Supervisory Commission is required to submit a report to the President at least once
every six months.
Foreign
Direct Investment in the Oil and Gas Industry
Private
investment in upstream interests in Indonesia can be made through either a “business entity” or a “permanent
establishment”. The Oil and Gas Law defines “business entity” as a legal entity which is established under the
law of and domiciled in the Republic of Indonesia, which operates in Indonesia, and which undertakes business permanently and
continuously in Indonesia. Such business entities usually take the form of a limited liability company (Perseroan Terbatas).
The Oil and Gas Law defines “permanent establishment” as a legal entity which is established outside of Indonesia
which undertakes activities within the Indonesian territory and complies with the prevailing Indonesian laws. The permanent establishment
allows foreign investors to conduct upstream activities through a branch of a foreign incorporated enterprise.
The
Omnibus Law amended several provisions of the Oil and Gas Law. However, the changes were relatively limited pending the enactment
of the proposed amendments the Oil and Gas Law. The Government has since issued Government Regulation No. 5 of 2021 on Implementation
of Risk-based Licensing, which serves as an implementing regulation to the Omnibus Law and which, among others, extends the requirement
to obtain a Business Registration Number (Nomor Induk Berusaha or NIB) to oil and gas contractors which operate
as “permanent establishments”.
Business
entities and permanent establishments carry out upstream activities as contractors under a cooperation agreement with the representative
of the Government. The Oil and Gas Law stipulates that a contractor may only be awarded one cooperation agreement for one working
area as an implementation of the “ring-fencing” principle where revenues and costs in respect of one working area
under one cooperation agreement cannot be consolidated with and used to relieve the tax obligations of another working area under
a different cooperation agreement.
As
our operating subsidiaries are each a Perseroan domiciled in Indonesia, we operate under the “business entity” regime
of the Oil and Gas Law.
Upstream
Regulations
Upstream
activities are conducted in working areas whose boundaries are determined by the MEMR. Each contractor may only be granted one
working area; as a result, upstream oil and gas companies operating in Indonesia, such as ours, incorporate separate legal entities
for each asset in which they have an interest. Upstream activities are performed through cooperation contracts between either
SKK Migas or Pertamina and contractors. Unlike any other industry in Indonesia, upstream oil and gas activities are open to participation
by foreign business entities that are established and incorporated outside Indonesia.
MEMR
Regulation No. 35 of 2008 on Procedures of Determining and Bidding Oil and Gas Working Areas (or MEMR Regulation 35/2008) regulates
the awards of work areas, which may be granted on the basis of either a competitive tender process or a direct offer. The Director
General of the DGOG may put a working area out to tender and invite bids for an interest in the area after considering the opinion
and inputs of SKK Migas. Direct offers shall be performed based on a contractor’s written proposal for a working area that
has not been reserved for the bidding process; if the Director General of the DGOG approves such proposal, the contractor must
conduct a survey together with the DGOG to locate potential oil and gas fields (which we refer to as a Joint Study).
Joint
Study Agreement
Pursuant
to MEMR Regulation 35/2008, where an area has not already been reserved for the bidding process, a contractor may bid for
such working area directly by providing the Director General of the DGOG with a written proposal. If the Director General approves
the proposal, the contractor must conduct a Joint Study of the proposed area with the DGOG or any other party appointed by the
DGOG. The Joint Study is conducted for the purposes of upgrading the data quality of geological and geophysical work such as field
surveys, magnetic surveys, or the reprocessing of existing seismic lines, and is conducted over an eight-month period with a single
possible extension of up to four months. Contractors are required to deliver a performance bond in the amount of US$1,000,000
from a well-known bank domiciled in Jakarta during the Joint Study, to be submitted 14 days from the date the Director General
approves the direct offer; to bear all the costs, which generally range from US$500,000 to US$700,000, and risks in implementing
the Joint Study; and to maintain the confidentiality of data used and produced in the Joint Study. Upon completion of the Joint
Study, the Director General may choose to announce a bidding process for the working area, in which case the contractors who conducted
the Joint Study will have the right to change their offer (right to match) in the bidding process if the other bidders give higher
offers, but otherwise receive no preferential treatment.
In
May 2018, we were awarded the rights to explore the Citarum Block by the MEMR through a direct tender process after a Joint Study
in the Citarum area was completed.
Cooperation
Contracts
“Cooperation
contract” is a general term used under the Oil & Gas Law to describe the contract between the contractor and the representative
of the Government which can be entered into by the parties in various forms, such as PSCs (Production Sharing Contracts), TACs
(Technical Assistance Contracts), and KSOs (Joint Operation Partnership). Regardless of the form, the cooperation contracts essentially
provide for production sharing arrangements. For example, title over resources in the ground remains with the Government (and
title to the oil and gas lifted for the contractor’s share passes at the point of transfer, usually the point of export),
ultimate management control is with SKK Migas, and capital requirements and risks are to be assumed by the contractors. These
cooperation contracts are to be entered into with SKK Migas and thereafter notified in writing to the Indonesian Parliament. Only
one working area will be given to any legal entity. Cooperation contracts can be made for a maximum term of 30 years and can be
extended for a maximum of 20 years. Cooperation contracts are divided into exploration and exploitation stages. The exploration
stage is for a term of six years, subject to only one extension for a maximum of four years.
The
implementation regulations for the upstream sectors, such as GR35/2004, reiterate the obligation by a contractor to offer a certain
minimum participating interest to domestic parties, such as regional government-owned enterprises, although the procedure for,
and timing of, offering such an interest has been modified. The MEMR has a right to request that a contractor who wishes to sell
its participating interest under a production sharing arrangement grants a right of first offer to national enterprises such as
regional government-owned companies, central government-owned companies, cooperatives, small scale businesses and Indonesian companies
wholly-owned by Indonesians. Under the existing upstream regulations, such an offer must be made on an “arms-length”
basis. These modifications are applicable only to the cooperation contracts entered into after the issuance of the Oil and Gas
Law in 2001.
The
following principles provide the basis for all types of production sharing arrangements between the Government and private contractors:
|
●
|
the
contractors are responsible for all investments and production costs (exploration, development, and production), including
provision of capital to implement the agreed work program;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
operational risk in performing upstream activities under the contracts is borne by contractors;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
profits are split between the Government and contractors based on production (the split depends on the fiscal terms adopted
by the PSCs, namely the cost-recovery model or the gross-split model);
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
ownership of all tangible and intangible assets remains with the Government; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
overall management and control remain with SKK Migas (previously BP Migas) on behalf of the Government.
|
PSCs
(Production Sharing Contracts)
The
PSC is the most common type of production sharing arrangement. PSCs have been granted in respect of exploration properties and
are awarded for the exploration for oil and gas reserves and the establishment of commercial production of those resources.
Under
a PSC, the Government, through SKK Migas, allows one or more contractors to explore, develop, and produce oil and gas reserves
and resources in a designated working area. Accordingly, PSCs are entered into with SKK Migas and approved by the co-signature
of the MEMR on behalf of the Government. Each PSC is based on a standard form contract and typically contains provisions such
as:
|
●
|
the
requirement for the contractor to pay to the Government certain signature bonuses, yearly administrative fees, royalty payments,
production-level payments, and the payment of certain bonuses upon the achievement of certain production milestones for the
working area;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
term of the initial exploration and development period, with an option for the parties to agree to extend this period;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
obligations of the contractor to bear the risk and costs of exploration and development activities and/or production operations;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
scope and schedule for the contractor (and any other operators of the working area) to undertake exploration and production
activities;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
save
for the gross-split PSCs (as discussed below), the ability of the contractor, if commercial production is successful, to recover
its exploration, development and production costs out of the oil and gas produced after deduction of the First Tranche Petroleum
or FTP). The percentage of FTP portion is 10 percent of the oil and gas produced if the FTP is allocated entirely to the Government
or 20 percent if it is shared between the Government and the contractor in the same proportion as the percentage for profit
sharing;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
percentage allocation of total oil and gas production between BP Migas (now SKK Migas) and the contractor out of FTP and the
following recovery by the contractor of their costs;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
requirement for the contractor to supply the Indonesian domestic market at a discounted price with a certain percentage, usually
25 percent, of the contractor’s share of total oil and gas produced (this is referred to as the domestic market obligation,
or DMO);
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
requirement that the title to petroleum at all times lies with the Government, except where the title to crude oil or gas
has passed in accordance with the provisions of the PSC;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
obligation of the contractor to pay the Indonesian corporate taxes on its share of profits, including FTP;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
requirements for the contractor to provide financial and performance guarantees to BP Migas (now SKK Migas) to secure the
contractor’s firm commitments;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
requirements for the contractor to market the oil and gas produced; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
requirement (such as exists in our PSC for Citarum Block) for the contractor to relinquish specified percentages of the working
area, which are not required for production and/or in which hydrocarbons have not been discovered by specified times.
|
Pursuant
to GR 35/2004, once the approval of the field development plan for first production from a working area has been received, contractors
are required to offer up to a 10 percent participating interest to a regional government-owned enterprise (Badan Usaha Milik
Daerah). In the event the regional government-owned enterprise does not accept such offer within 60 days after the offer,
the contractor must offer such participating interest to national enterprises such as regional government-owned companies, central
government-owned companies, cooperatives, small scale businesses, and Indonesian companies wholly-owned by Indonesians. If no
such enterprise accepts the offer within 60 days of the offer being made, then the offering is closed.
The
MEMR issued MEMR Regulation No. 37 of 2016 on Terms of Bidding Participating Interest 10.0% in Oil and Gas Working Areas (known
as the MEMR Regulation 37/2016) which operates as the implementation regulations for the offering by the contractors of the 10
percent participating interest in the oil and gas working areas to regional government-owned enterprises. MEMR Regulation 37/2016
restricts the right to bid to regional government-owned enterprises which meet the following requirements (i) the entities must
be incorporated either as a regional company (commonly known as BUMD) with the shares wholly owned by the regional government,
or as a limited liability company where at least 99% of its shares are owned by regional government; (ii) their status of the
regional government-owned enterprise was established through the enactment of a local regulation; and (iii) their businesses are
limited only to engage in participating interest management business. Each regional government-owned enterprise can only hold
participating interest management in one working area.
Where
a PSC involves more than one contractor, the contractors may enter into a joint operating agreement (or JOA) with the other holders
of participating interests under the PSC. Pursuant to this JOA, each participant agrees to participate in proportion to its respective
equity interest in all costs, expenses, and liabilities incurred in conjunction with petroleum operations in the working area
and each participant will own, in the same proportion, the contractual and operating rights in the PSC. One participant is appointed
operator and, subject to the terms of the operating agreement and supervision by the operating committee, which consists of one
representative appointed by each party, the operator is vested with the discretion to manage all petroleum operations in the working
area. In doing so, the operator is obliged to use its best efforts to conduct the petroleum operations in accordance with generally
accepted practices in the petroleum industry and receives an indemnity from the other contractors for acting in the capacity of
operator. An operating agreement generally continues in effect for the term of the PSC.
Extension
of PSCs
Pursuant
to the Oil and Gas Law and GR 35/2004, PSCs may be extended for a period of not more than 20 years for each extension. A contractor
who intends to extend its PSC must submit a request to the MEMR through SKK Migas. Then, SKK Migas evaluates the request and submits
it to the MEMR for consideration. A request for an extension of a PSC may be submitted no sooner than ten years and no later than
two years before the expiry date of the PSC. However, if the contractor has entered into a natural gas sales/purchase contract,
such contractor may request an extension of the PSC earlier than ten years prior to the expiry date of the PSC.
In
granting approval, the MEMR shall consider, among other things, the potential reserves of oil and/or gas from the work area concerned,
the potential or certainty of market/needs, and the technical/economic feasibility of the activities. Based on its consideration,
the MEMR may reject or approve such request.
PSC
Financial Terms
In
January 2017, a new production sharing regime of PSC, called “gross-split”, was introduced, while the previously introduced
“cost recovery” PSCs remain in place until the expiry of the relevant PSCs. Under the gross-split PSCs, the Government
and the contractor are allocated a “base split” of oil or gas production, where the split percentage will be adjusted
by certain components set out in the PSC. In contrast with the gross-split PSCs where production sharing is done at the beginning,
without production being allocated towards recovery of the contractor’s operating costs first, the cost recovery PSCs provide
for production to be shared between the Government and the contractor through a “cost recovery” mechanism. After the
production is reduced by certain costs and deductibles, the remaining oil or gas will then be split between the Government and
the contractor based on the agreed percentage set forth in the PSC.
We
are a party to the gross-split PSC with respect to our operations in Citarum Block. Financial terms of our PSC are described above
under “—Our Assets—Citarum Block.” Further details on the gross-split and cost recovery PSCs are set out
below.
Gross-Split
PSCs
In
January 2017, a new fiscal regime was introduced by MEMR where gross production of oil and gas is to be divided between the contractor
and the Government based on certain percentages in respect of (a) the crude oil production and (b) the natural gas production.
This mechanism is known as “gross split”. Under the gross split sharing concept, the starting point for determining
the relevant percentage of the contractor’s share is the “base split” percentage, which will then be adjusted
upon the plan of development approval according to the “variable components” and “progressive components”.
In short, the contractor’s share equals to the “base split” plus or minus the “variable components”
plus or minus “progressive components”.
The
base split, pursuant to the MEMR Regulation No. 08 of 2017 (MEMR 08/2017) as amended by the MEMR Regulation No. 52 of 2017 and
lastly by the MEMR Regulation No. 20 of 2019 (MEMR 20/2019), is currently set at, for gas, 52% for the Government and 48% for
the contractor and for oil, 57% for the Government and 43% for the contractor. The percentage of variable components is determined
based on, among others, the status of the work area, the field location, reservoir, supporting infrastructure, carbon dioxide
and hydrogen sulfide content and compliance with local content requirements. The latest percentage of each variable component
is detailed in the schedule to the MEMR 20/2019. For the progressive components, the adjustment is made by taking into account
oil price, gas price and the cumulative oil and gas production. Current details on the split adjustment based on the progressive
components are provided for in the MEMR 20/2019.
The
concerns over the new Gross Split PSC introduced in 2017 may be relieved with issuance of Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources
(MoEMR) Regulation No. 12/2020 in July 2020 which opens the door to oil and gas investors to elect to use the previous conventional
cost recovery scheme, that is perceived to provide better investment returns. However, the oil and gas landscape both in Indonesia
and globally has only worsened due to the COVID-19 pandemic which has significantly reduced energy demand and consequently hydrocarbon
prices. With all those negative conditions, SKK Migas in June 2020 launched a comprehensive reforms initiative with a goal to
achieve production of one million barrels of oil per day (BOPD) and 12 billion standard cubic feet per day (Bscfd) of gas production
by 2030.
Depending
upon the particular oil and gas field and related economic considerations, the MEMR may adjust the split in favor of either the
contractor or the Government. The gross split is calculated based on gross production split, without regard to the cost recovery
approach. Contractors who have entered into the PSCs prior to the issuance of MEMR No. 08/2017 may propose to amend the sharing
mechanism under their existing PSCs to the gross split mechanism. The latest iteration of the gross-split PSCs fiscal terms are
provided for in Government Regulation No. 53 of 2017, promulgated on 28 December 2017, regarding the Tax Treatment for the Upstream
Oil and Gas Activities with Gross-Split Production Sharing Contracts (GR 53/2017).
Key
points of GR 53/2017 include:
|
●
|
“taxable
income” is to be the contractor’s “gross income” less “operating costs” but with a 10
year tax loss carry forward entitlement;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
gross split taxing point begins at the “point of transfer” of the relevant hydrocarbon to the contractor;
|
|
●
|
the
value of oil is to be determined using the Indonesian Crude Price and that the value of gas is to be determined via the price
agreed under the relevant gas sales contract;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
income
separately arising from “uplifts” is subject to tax at a final rate of 20% of the uplift amount;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
certain
tax facilities or incentives may be given to the contractors from the exploration and exploitation stages up to the commencement
of commercial production. Such incentives are, amongst other things, the exemption of import duties on the import of goods
used in petroleum activities and the deduction of land and building tax amounting to 100 percent of the land and building
tax payable amount. Further provisions regarding the granting of facilities will be regulated by a ministerial regulation,
which, to date, has not been issued.
|
Cost
Recovery PSCs.
Until
2017, all Indonesian PSCs adopted the “cost-recovery” concept and their fiscal terms reflects such a concept, the
“cost recovery” approach requires the contractor to, among other things, prepare work program and budget which needs
to be approved by SKK Migas and submit a request for approval for expenditure (or AFE) prior to performing a certain activity.
Under this scheme, a waterfall mechanism is used in the sharing of the oil/gas production between the contractor and the Government
– the oil/gas production will be deducted by, first, the FTP and then tax and subsequently, the (approved) cost recovery
amount. The remaining oil/gas will then be split between the Government and the contractor based on the agreed percentage set
forth in the PSC. The following flow chart of the cost-recovery PSC illustrates the sharing of oil and gas production between
the Government and the contractor.
The
latest iteration of the cost-recovery PSCs fiscal terms is found in Government Regulation No. 27 of 2017 on the Amendment of Government
Regulation No. 79 of 2010 on the Operating Costs that May Be Recovered and Income Tax Treatment for Upstream Oil and Gas Activities
(or GR 27/2017, which amended GR 79/2010). GR 27/2017, which came into effect on June 19, 2017, regulates the costs that
cannot be recovered in the calculation of profit sharing and income tax. Such costs include costs incurred for the personal interests
of the participating interest holders, penalties imposed due to violations of any laws by the contractor, depreciation costs,
legal consultant (which is not directly related to the oil and gas operation activities) and tax consultant fees, and bonuses
payable to the Government. GR 27/2017 also regulates the income tax applicable to the transfer of participating interests and
any other activities conducted by PSCs, and requires the contractor to have its own tax identification number.
The
provisions of GR 27/2017 only apply to contracts entered into and extensions of contracts after the issuance of GR 27/2017. Additionally,
for contracts in existence up to the issuance of GR 79/2010 to remain in force until their expiration date, they must be adjusted
to comply with GR 27/2017 in areas not previously or not sufficiently clearly regulated. Such provisions include provisions related
to:
|
●
|
the
Government’s interest in the PSC;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
terms for operating costs which can be recovered and the standard norms for operating costs;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
non-recoverable
operating costs;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
third-party
appointments to conduct financial and technical verification;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
issuance of income tax assessments;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
import
duties and import tax exemptions on the importation of goods for exploration and exploitation activities;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
contractors’
income taxes in the form of oil and/or gas volume from contractor entitlement; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
income
from outside the contract in the form of uplift and/or participating interest transfer, must be adjusted to comply with GR
27/2017.
|
The
implementing regulations for GR 79/2010 and GR 27/2017 cover various subjects, from the method for determining the Indonesian
Crude Price issued by the MEMR, the terms and conditions for indirect head office cost recovery, procedures for withholding and
remitting income tax arising from other income in the form of uplift or other similar compensation and contractor’s income
from participating interest transfer, to subjects such as the maximum remuneration that can be cost recovered by the contractor
issued by the Indonesian Minister of Finance (or MoF).
GR
79/2010, the provisions of which are maintained in GR 27/2017, also stipulates that income arising from a direct or indirect transfer
of a participating interest is subject to a final income tax at 5.0 percent or 7.0 percent of the gross proceeds for the exploration
stage or exploitation stage, respectively. Subject to satisfying certain requirements, a transfer of a risk-sharing participating
interest during the exploration stage is not included as a taxable participating interest transfer.
MoF
Regulation No. 257/PMK.011/2011 dated December 28, 2011 (or MoF 257/2011) further stipulates that taxable income, after deduction
of final income tax on uplift and/or participating interest transfer, is subject to branch profit tax in accordance with the income
tax law. GR 27/2017 has introduced tax facilities that exempt such taxable income, after deduction of final income tax on uplift
and/or participating interest transfer, from branch profit tax. However, it remains unclear whether these tax facilities can be
applied to the participating interest transfer in relation to PSCs entered into or extended prior to the enactment of GR 27/2017.
In addition, although technically GR 27/2017 should override the contents of MoF 257/2011, it is uncertain whether another implementing
regulation is needed to revoke MoF 257/2011.
With
regards to land and building tax, under the Regulation of Director General of Tax No. PER-45/PJ/2013, effective as of January
1, 2014 (or DGT Regulation 45/2013), the land and/or buildings located within and outside (i.e., the supporting area for the oil
and gas mining activity that physically forms an inseparable part of the onshore and offshore area) the working area utilized
for oil and gas mining activities and geothermal was subject to land and building tax. DGT Regulation 45/2013 defines “land”
as both the onshore and offshore areas, including depth measurements. The onshore area which was subject to land and building
tax included the productive, not yet productive, not productive, and emplacement areas while the offshore area which was
subject to land and building tax was defined as offshore waters within and outside (i.e., the supporting area for the
oil and gas mining activity that physically forms an inseparable part of the onshore and offshore area) the working area utilized
for upstream oil and gas business activities, whereby the taxpayer had rights and/or received benefits over such area.
Not all onshore and offshore areas were subject to land and building tax as the regulation exempted land, inland
waters, and offshore waters within the working area which, among other things, did not create a benefit for the taxpayer
in respect of its oil and gas activities. DGT Regulation 45/2013 also provided the formula for calculating the amount of
tax to be paid during the exploration and exploitation periods.
However,
on November 27, 2020, the Directorate General of Tax issued Regulation of Directorate General of Tax No. PER-22/PJ/2020 of 2020
(or DGT Regulation 22/2020), which revokes 10 regulations, including DGT Regulation 45/2013, in an attempt to simplify the regulations.
However, it is not entirely clear how the revocation of DGT Regulation 45 of 2013 would affect the obligations to pay land and
building tax in the oil and gas sectors, including on how the tax is to be assessed.
On
December 31, 2014, the MoF issued Regulation Number 267/PMK.011/2014 on Land and Building Tax Reduction for Oil and Gas Mining
at the Exploration. This regulation, which became applicable in 2015, grants land and building tax incentives for the subsurface
at the exploration stage. The tax reduction incentive can be granted on a yearly basis for a maximum of six years from the signing
of the PSC and can be extended by up to four years and can be obtained if the PSC with the Government is signed after the enactment
of GR 79/2010 (i.e., after December 20, 2010), the Tax Object Notification Form (Surat Pemberitahuan Objek Pajak, or SPOP)
has been submitted to the relevant tax office, and there is a recommendation letter from the MEMR attached to the SPOP stating
that the land and building tax object is still at the exploration stage.
GR
27/2017 also provides for complete exemptions of land and building tax during the exploitation and exploration period. Exemptions
for the land and building tax during exploitation period for the subsurface part can be granted by the MoF upon consideration
of economics of the project. The provisions of GR 27/2017 on tax facilities related to land and building tax are subject to further
regulation by the MoF. GR 27/2017 extended the benefits of the facilities under the regulation to parties to PSCs signed or extended
prior to the application of the regulation if they chose to adjust the existing contract to fully comply with the regulation within
six months after the effective date (i.e., by December 19, 2017).
TACs
(Technical Assistance Contracts)
TACs
are another form of production sharing arrangement created under the regulatory framework that preceded the Oil and Gas Law of
2001. TACs were awarded for fields having prior or existing production and are valid for a specified term. The oil or gas production
is divided into non-shareable and shareable portions. The non-shareable portion represents the production which is expected from
the field (based on historic production) at the time the TAC is signed. Under a TAC, the non-shareable portion declines annually.
The shareable portion corresponds to the additional production resulting from the operator’s investment in the field and
is further split in the same way as a PSC. Pursuant to the Oil and Gas Law of 2001 and GR35/2004, existing TACs shall remain with
Pertamina and are not renewable after the expiry of the initial term. In practice, the contractors may “renew” their
TAC contracts with Pertamina by entering into the KSOs with Pertamina EP.
We
are a party to a TAC with respect to our operations in Kruh Block, under which we are entitled to recover our share of past exploration
and development costs and ongoing production costs of maximum 65% per annum and if those costs exceed the stated 65%, then the
unrecovered surplus shall be recovered in the succeeding years. Together with our share split, our monthly revenue is around 74%
of the total production times Indonesian Crude Price.
JOBs
(Joint Operating Bodies)
JOBs
are another form of production sharing arrangement created under the regulatory framework that preceded the Oil and Gas Law of
2001. In a JOB, operations are conducted by a JOB headed by Pertamina and assisted by one or more private sector energy companies
through their respective secondees to the JOB. In a JOB, Pertamina is entitled to a specified percentage of the working interest
in the project. The balance, after production is applied towards cost recovery and cost bearing as between Pertamina and the private
sector participants, is the shareable portion which is generally split in the same way as for an ordinary PSC. Unlike TACs, GR35/2004
transferred the rights to operations under existing JOBs from Pertamina to SKK MIGAS by law. JOBs are not renewable after the
expiry of their initial term.
We
are not currently a party to any JOBs.
KSOs
(Kerja Sama Operasi or Joint Operation Partnership)
KSOs
are contractual arrangement between Pertamina EP and the contractor on the provision of technical assistance by the contractor
to Pertamina EP for a certain work area. Unlike the cooperation contracts, the KSO does not create a contractual relationship
between the contractor and the authority, i.e. BP Migas or SKK Migas. The contractors will have a contractual relationship with
Pertamina EP instead. Pertamina EP’s authorization to award the KSOs to contractors is stated in the PSC which Pertamina
EP entered into with BP Migas (now SKK Migas) in 2005. The terms of such PSC specify, among other things, that:
|
●
|
the
KSO must first be reviewed by SKK Migas;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
KSO contractor will receive compensation from a portion of the oil and gas entitlement of Pertamina EP under its PSC with
BP Migas (now SKK Migas);
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
compensation given to the KSO contractor shall not exceed the production sharing entitlement of other parties who enter into
a cooperation contract with BP Migas (now SKK Migas) in the surrounding area; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
compensation given to the KSO contractor may be sourced from the proceeds of Pertamina EP’s entitlement which is calculated
at the delivery point pursuant to the terms of the KSO.
|
Environmental
Regulations
Indonesian
law requires companies whose operations have a significant environmental or social impact to create and maintain one of
two documents. Where a company’s operations meet or exceed a specified threshold, that company must obtain an Environmental
Impact Assessment Report (Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan, or AMDAL). Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation
No. P.38/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/7/2019 of 2019 on Types of Business Plan and/or Activities Requiring an Environmental
Impact Assessment requires companies whose operations involve the exploitation of oil and gas; pipelines of oil and gas under
the sea; the construction of oil refineries, LPG refineries, or LNG refineries; the regasification of LNG; lubricating oil refineries;
and coal bed methane field development, and whose operations meet the environmental or social impact threshold, to create and
maintain an AMDAL. Where operations do not reach the threshold required for an AMDAL but still have an appreciable environmental
or social impact the company must prepare an Environmental Management Effort-Environmental Monitoring Effort (Upaya Pengelolaan
Lingkungan Hidup dan Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan Hidup, or UKL-UPL).
There
are a number of other key obligations that companies involved in upstream oil and gas may be required to fulfill in order to monitor
their environmental impact and ensure adequate resources are allocated to cleanup activities. GR 22/2021 requires business actors
to submit reports detailing their disposal of wastewater and compliance with applicable regulations to the Environment Information
System, a newly established system to support environmental protection operations and management.
Government Regulation 101 of 2014 on Management of Hazardous and Toxic Waste Materials and Government Regulation No. 74 of 2001
on Management of Hazardous or Toxic Materials (Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun), require companies using or producing specified hazardous
materials such as flammable, poisonous, or infectious waste to obtain a revocable permit in relation to their activities and subjects
mining operations to controls on the disposal of such materials. Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environment requires the environmental
license holder to create an environmental deposit fund for the restoration of the environment in a state-owned bank appointed
by the MEF, Governor, Regent, or Mayor in accordance with their authority, who also has the authority to appoint a third party
to conduct the restoration of the environment using the environmental deposit fund (this is to be detailed in an implementing
regulation, which to date has not been issued). GR 35/2004 also requires contractors to allocate environmental deposit funds for
the restoration of the environment after decommissioning, the amount of which is to be determined each year in conjunction with
the budgets for operating costs and included in the work program and annual budget.
In
addition to the environmental deposit funds allocated for environmental restoration, on February 23, 2018 the MEMR issued MEMR
Regulation No. 15 of 2018 on the Post-Operation Activities in Upstream Oil and Gas Business Activities (or MEMR Regulation 15/2018),
which requires all contractors who are parties to an unexpired PSC to set aside certain amounts in an abandonment and site restoration
(or ASR) fund deposited in a bank account held jointly with SKK Migas from the start of commercial operations until the expiry
of the PSC. Moreover, on September 12, 2018 SKK Migas issued the Guidance of Abandonment and No. KEP-0087/SKKMA0000/2018/S0
of 2018 and Working Procedure Guidelines No. PTK-040/SKKMA0000/2018/S0 (or the Restoration Guidance) as guidance for the implementation
of ASR activities for upstream oil and gas business activities. Under the Restoration Guidance, the contractor must prepare an
ASR report in relation to existing assets, assets being constructed, and assets that will be constructed in accordance with the
development plan that must contain estimates of ASR costs, and the total amount to be reserved as an ASR fund which is to be established
with a reputable Indonesian bank as a joint account with SKK Migas. The contractor must also submit a report on the results
of the implementation plan as well as the use of the ASR fund after completing its ASR activities to SKK Migas, which will evaluate
the report submitted and issue a statement letter confirming completion of the ASR if the evaluation result is satisfactory.
We
believe we are in compliance in all material respects with all applicable environmental laws, rules and regulations in Indonesia.
Labor
Regulations Applicable to the Indonesian Oil and Gas Sectors
Save
for certain limited exceptions, such as the working hours for the oil and gas sector discussed below, there are currently very
few manpower regulations enacted specifically for the oil and gas industry. While certain operational guidelines, commonly known
as “PTK”, issued by SKK Migas may establish additional requirements, such as age limitation for certain key positions,
the oil and gas industry is subject to the labor regulations that are applicable generally in Indonesia.
Employment
of Expatriates
Indonesian
law generally requires contractors to give preference to local workers, but companies may use foreign manpower to bring in expertise
not available in the local market. While several ministries are involved legally with manpower decisions, in practice SKK Migas
often coordinates these issues, including controls on the number of expatriate positions. It reviews these positions, as well
as contractor training programs for Indonesian workers, annually with a view to assessing the costs and benefits together with
plans to localize expatriate positions. SKK Migas also requires contractors to submit organization charts for both nationals (known
as RPTKs) and expatriates (known as RPTKAs) annually for review and approval.
Until
recently, the employment of foreign manpower in the upstream and downstream sectors of the oil and gas industry was subject to
additional requirements under MEMR Decree No. 31 of 2013 on Expatriate Utilization and the Development of Indonesian Employees
in the Oil and Gas Business (or MEMR Decree 31/2013). MEMR Decree 31/2013 provided stringent regulations on the employment of
expatriates, including a general obligation to prioritize the employment of Indonesian workers and specific prohibitions on hiring
foreign manpower for certain roles such as human resources, legal, quality control, and exploration and exploitation functions
below the level of superintendent. MEMR Decree 31/2013 also permitted the use of foreign manpower in limited circumstances based
on a stringent set of requirements such as age, relevant work experience, and willingness to transfer knowledge to the local workforce.
However,
on February 8, 2018 the MEMR issued MEMR Regulation No. 6 of 2018 on the Revocation of the Regulations of the Minister of Energy
and Mineral Resources, the Regulations of the Minister of Mining and Energy Regulations, and the Decisions of the Minister of
Energy and Mineral Resources (or MEMR 6/2018). MEMR Regulation 6/2018 revokes 11 regulations which were deemed onerous in an attempt
to, among other things, simplify the regulations in order to promote foreign investment in the energy and natural resources sectors.
Among other things, MEMR Regulation 6/2018 revokes MEMR Decree 31/2013 and the Regulation of the Minister of Mining and Energy
No. 02/P/M/Pertamb/1975 regarding the Work Safety on Distribution Pipes and other Facilities for the Transportation of Oil and
Gas Outside of the Oil and Gas Working Area. As a result, expatriates are now subject to the Ministry of Manpower’s more
relaxed requirements and certain positions that were previously restricted for expatriates have been opened for expatriates unless
restricted under the general manpower regulations.
Contract
Period
Law
No. 13 of 2003 on Manpower, as amended by the Omnibus Law (or the Manpower Law), and Government Regulation No. 35 of 2021 on Temporary
Employment Contract, Outsourcing, Working and Resting Time, and Termination of Employment Relationship (or GR 35/2021) stipulate
that an employee can be hired under 2 schemes, either on a contract basis (temporary) or a permanent basis. For temporary employment
contracts, the maximum period for the temporary employment contract is 5 years. Under the Manpower Law, temporary employment contracts
are permitted only for works that are “temporary” in nature, such as seasonal works (e.g. crop harvesters) and project-based
employments, such as construction works. Save for these types of works, workers are required to be employed on a permanent basis.
Statutory
Benefits
Under
Law No. 24 of 2011 on Social Security Administrative Bodies (or BPJS Law), a company is obligated to enroll its employees (including
expatriates with an employment period of 6 months or more) for manpower social security programs with the Manpower Social Security
Administrative Body (or BPJS Ketenagakerjaan) and Health Social Security Administrative Body (or BPJS Kesehatan). The coverage
of BPJS Ketenagakerjaan includes, among other things, insurance for work-related accidents and pension/retirement. The premium
payment arrangement for these programs vary from one program to the other. The insurance premiums for the work-related accidents,
for example, is borne and paid by the employer while the premium payment for retirement insurance is shared between the employers
and the employees.
Working
Hours
The
Manpower Law and the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration Regulation No. 4 of 2014 on Working and Resting Hours for the Oil
and Gas Sector and GR 35/2021 regulate that the maximum working hours for 1 week is 40 hours, which can be divided for 5 or 6
days of work. If the working days in a week is 6, the maximum working hours per day is 7 and if the working days in a week is
5, the maximum working hours per day is 8.
Outsourcing
Pursuant
to the Regulation of the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration No. 19 of 2012 on Requirements for Assignment of Parts of the
Works to be Performed by Other Companies (or MoMT 19/2012), in general, a company may outsource a third party to perform certain
work if such work is not the core activity of the company’s business. MoMT 19/2012 provides for two type of outsourcing
schemes, namely “labor supply” scheme or “sub contract” scheme.
Under
the “labor supply” scheme, works that may be outsourced are limited to menial activities or functions that are supportive
in nature to the company’s operation and businesses or are indirectly related to the company’s production process.
These activities are limited to (i) cleaning services, (ii) catering services, (iii) security services, (iv) supporting services
in the mining and oil sectors, and (v) transportation service for employees (i.e. drivers for company’s cars only for picking
up and delivering employees).
Under
the “sub-contract” scheme or “cooperation” scheme, the outsourced functions must not be the “core”
or the “main” business activities of the company. In addition, to be able to adopt the “cooperation scheme”,
the company is required to prepare and register its business “flow-chart” with the relevant manpower office. Please
note that to register such “flow-chart”, the company must apply and become a member at one of the business associations
(whose members have identical business activities with the company) as the registration would need to be processed through such
business association. Failure to meet any of these requirements will usually result in the issuance an order issued by the Ministry
of Manpower to the violating company instructing such company to employ the “outsourced” personnel as a permanent
employee with a retroactive effect.
Other
Labor Compliance Obligations
Under
Law No. 8 of 1981 on Mandatory Manpower Report, an employer is obligated to submit a mandatory manpower report consisting of among
others the number of employees and the lowest to highest salary. In addition, the Manpower Law also requires a company that employs
at least 10 employees to put in place a company regulation (or an employee handbook), which typically set forth general terms
and conditions of employment such as number of leaves, procedure to take leave, working hours and disciplinary measure. Such company
regulation must be registered with and ratified by the local manpower office. If there is a labor union in the company, the employer
and the labor union may enter into a “collective labor agreement” which contents are often similar with the company
regulation, and register the collective labor agreement with the local Manpower Office. If the employer and the labor union enter
into a collective labor agreement, the preparation of company regulation by the company is not mandatory. We are not a party to
any collective labor agreement.
History
and Corporate Structure
We
were incorporated on April 24, 2018 as a holding company for WJ Energy, which in turn owns our Indonesian holding and operating
subsidiaries. We presently have two major shareholders: Maderic Holdings Limited (or Maderic) and HFO Investment Group (or HFO),
own 70.50% and 8.74%, respectively, of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares. Certain of our officers and directors or their
family members own and control Maderic or HFO (see Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions).
WJ
Energy was incorporated in Hong Kong on June 3, 2014. The initial shareholders of WJ Energy were Maderic and HFO, with each owning
50% of WJ Energy’s shares. On October 20, 2014, HFO received HKD 4,000 from Maderic as consideration for 4,000 shares in
WJ Energy, which resulted in Maderic owning 90% of WJ Energy and HFO owning 10%.
On
February 27, 2015, WJ Energy formed GWN as a vehicle to acquire and thereafter operate the Kruh Block. On March 20, 2017, PT Harvel
Nusantara Energi, an Indonesian limited liability company (or HNE), was formed by WJ Energy as a required vehicle for oil and
gas block acquisitions in compliance with Indonesian law. On June 26, 2017, Maderic sold 500 shares of WJ Energy to HFO in consideration
of HKD 500. Concurrently, Maderic sold 1,500 shares of WJ Energy to Opera Cove International Limited, an unaffiliated third party
(or Opera), in consideration of HKD 1,500. At the end of such transactions, the outstanding shares of WJ Energy were owned 70%
by Maderic, 15% by HFO and 15% by Opera. On June 25, 2017, Maderic and Opera executed an entrustment agreement giving Maderic
legal and beneficial ownership of the shares held by Opera. On December 7, 2017, PT Cogen Nusantara Energi, an Indonesian limited
liability company, was formed under HNE as a required vehicle for the prospective acquisition of a new oil and gas block through
a Joint Study program in consortium with GWN. On May 14, 2018, PT Hutama Wiranusa Energi, was formed under GWN as a requirement
to sign the contract for the acquisition of Citarum Block as part of the consortium that conducted the Joint Study for the Citarum
Block.
On
June 30, 2018, we entered into two agreements with Maderic and HFO (the two then shareholders of WJ Energy): a Sale and Purchase
of Shares and Receivables Agreement and a Debt Conversion Agreement (which we refer to collectively as the Restructuring Agreements).
The intention of the Restructuring Agreements was to restructure our capitalization in anticipation of our initial public offering.
As a result of the transactions contemplated by the Restructuring Agreements: (i) WJ Energy (including its assets and liabilities)
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of our company, (ii) loans amounting to $21,150,000 and $3,150,000 that were owed by WJ Energy
to Maderic and HFO, respectively, were converted for nominal value into ordinary shares of our company and (iii) we issued an
aggregate of 15,999,000 ordinary shares to Maderic and HFO. The above mentioned transaction is accounted for as a nominal share
issuance (which we refer to as the Nominal Share Issuance). All number of shares and per share data presented in this report have
been retroactively restated to reflect the Nominal Share Issuance.
This
series of transactions resulted in the ownership of our company prior to our initial public offering to be set at 87.04% owned
by Maderic (13,925,926 ordinary shares), and 12.96% owned by HFO (2,074,074 ordinary shares), out of a total of 16,000,000 issued
ordinary shares.
On
November 8, 2019, we implemented a one-for-zero point three seven five (1 for 0.375) reverse stock split of our ordinary shares
by way of share consolidation under Cayman Islands law (which we refer to herein as the Reverse Stock Split). As a result of the
Reverse Stock Split, the total of 16,000,000 issued and outstanding ordinary shares prior to the Reverse Stock Split was reduced
to a total of 6,000,000 issued and outstanding ordinary shares. The purpose of the Reverse Stock Split was for us to be able to
achieve a share price for our ordinary shares consistent with the listing requirements of the NYSE American. Any fractional ordinary
share that would have otherwise resulted from the Reverse Stock Split was rounded up to the nearest full share. The Reverse Stock
Split maintained our existing shareholders’ percentage ownership interests in our company at 87.04% owned by Maderic (5,222,222
ordinary shares) and 12.96% owned by HFO (777,778 ordinary shares), out of a total of 6,000,000 issued ordinary shares. The Reverse
Stock Split also increased the par value of our ordinary shares from $0.001 to $0.00267 and decreased the number of authorized
ordinary shares of our company from 100,000,000 to 37,500,000 and authorized preferred shares from 10,000,000 to 3,750,000.
As
of the date of this report, Maderic owns 70.50% of our issued and outstanding shares, while HFO owns approximately 8.74 % of our
issued and outstanding shares. As of the date of this report, we have 7,407,955 ordinary shares issued and outstanding.
The
following diagram illustrates our corporate structure, including our consolidated holding and operating subsidiaries, as of the
date of this report:
Not
reflected in the above is that, for purposes of compliance with Indonesian law related to ownership of Indonesian companies: (i)
WJ Energy owns 99.90% of the outstanding shares of GWN and HNE, and (ii) GWN and HNE each own 0.1% of the outstanding shares of
the other; and (iii) GWN owns 99.50% of the outstanding shares of HWE, and the remaining 0.50% is owned by HNE; and (iv) HNE owns
99.90% of the outstanding shares of CNE, and the remaining 0.10% is owned by GWN.
Corporate
Information
Our
principal executive offices are located at Gedung Graha Anugerah, Jl. Raya Pasar Minggu No. 17A, Kelurahan Pancoran, Kecamatan
Pancoran, Jakarta Selatan 12780 - Indonesia. Our telephone number at this address is +62 21 576 8888. Our registered office in
the Cayman Islands is located at Ogier Global (Cayman) Limited, 89 Nexus Way, Camana Bay, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands. Our web
site is located at www.indo-energy.com. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into
this report, and the reference to our website in this report is an inactive textual reference only.
ITEM
4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM
5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
The
following discussion of the results of our operations and our financial condition should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and the related notes to those statements included in this annual report. This discussion contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in
these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth in “Item 3. Key Information–D.
Risk Factors”.
As
described elsewhere in this annual report, all share amounts and per share amounts set forth below have been presented on a retroactive
basis to reflect a reverse stock split by way of share consolidation of our outstanding ordinary shares at a ratio of one-for-zero
point three seven five (1 for 0.375) shares which was implemented on November 8, 2019.
Business
Overview
We
are an oil and gas exploration and production company focused on the Indonesian market. Alongside operational excellence, we believe
we have set the highest standards for ethics, safety and corporate social responsibility practices to ensure that we add value
to society. Led by a professional management team with extensive oil and gas experience, we seek to bring forth at all times the
best of our expertise to ensure the sustainable development of a profitable and integrated energy exploration and production business
model.
We
produce oil through our subsidiary GWN, which is a party that we acquired in 2014 and operates the Kruh Block, under a Technical
Assistance Contract (or TAC) with PT Pertamina (Persero) (or Pertamina) until May 2020. GWN shall continue the operatorship of
the block from May 2020 until May 2030 under a Joint Operation Partnership (or KSO) with Pertamina. Kruh Block covers an area
of 258 km2 (63,753 acres) and is located onshore 16 miles northwest of Pendopo, Pali, South Sumatra. The TAC contract
is based on a “cost recovery” system, in which all operating costs (expenditures made and obligations incurred in
the exploration, development, extraction, production, transportation, marketing, abandonment and site restoration) are advanced
by GWN upon occurrence and later reimbursed to GWN by Pertamina based on certain agreed conditions, which are described elsewhere
in this annual report.
Our
reserves estimate of 3 fields (Kruh, North Kruh and West Kruh) within the Kruh TAC block was based on two major sources: (i) an
integrated study of geology, geophysics and reservoir including reserve evaluation of Kruh, North Kruh and West Kruh fields by
LEMIGAS (a Government oil and gas research and development center responsible for exploration and production technology development
and assessment of oil and gas fields) in 2005, and (ii) additional reservoir and production data since 2005, particularly from
the addition of 3 new wells since 2013.
The
content and reserves in the LEMIGAS report (2005) was approved by Pertamina. The methods used in updating the proved, probable
and possible reserves of LEMIGAS report with additional reservoir and production data was based on guidelines from the SPE-PRMS
(Society of Petroleum Engineers-Petroleum Resources Management System) and SEC guidelines.
Our
proved oil reserves have not been estimated or reviewed by independent petroleum engineers. The estimate of the proved reserves
for the Kruh Block was prepared by representatives of our company, a team consisting of engineering, geological and geophysical
staff based on the definitions and disclosure guidelines of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (or SEC) contained
in Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting, Final Rule released January 14, 2009 in the
Federal Register.
Our
estimates of the proven reserves are made using available geological and reservoir data as well as production performance data.
These estimates are reviewed annually by internal reservoir engineers, and Pertamina, and revised as warranted by additional data.
Revisions are due to changes in, among other things, development plans, reservoir performance, TAC effective period and governmental
restrictions.
Kruh
Block’s general manager, Mr. Denny Radjawane, and our Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Charlie Wu, have reviewed the reserves
estimate to ensure compliance to SEC guidelines for (1) the appropriateness of the methodologies employed; (2) the adequacy and
quality of the data relied upon; (3) the depth and thoroughness of the reserves estimation process; (4) the classification of
reserves appropriate to the relevant definitions used; and (5) the reasonableness of the estimated reserve quantities. The estimate
of reserves was also reviewed by our Chief Business Development Officer and our Chief Executive Officer.
The
table below shows the individual qualifications of our internal team that prepares the reserves estimation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve
|
|
University
|
|
|
|
professional
|
|
|
Field
of professional experience (years)
|
|
Estimation
Team*
|
|
degree
major
|
|
Degree
level
|
|
|
experience
(years)
|
|
|
|
Drilling
&
Production
|
|
|
|
Petroleum
Engineering
|
|
|
|
Production
Geology
|
|
|
|
Reserve
Estimation
|
|
Charlie
Wu
|
|
Geosciences
|
|
Ph.D.
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Djoko
Martianto
|
|
Petroleum
Engineering
|
|
B.S.
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Denny
Radjawane
|
|
Geophysics
|
|
M.S.
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Fransiska
Sitinjak
|
|
Petroleum
Engineering
|
|
M.S.
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Yudhi
Setiawan
|
|
Geology
|
|
B.S.
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Oni
Syahrial
|
|
Geology
|
|
B.S.
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Juan
Chandra
|
|
Geology
|
|
B.S.
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
The
individuals from the reserves estimation team are members of at least one of the following professional associations: American
Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG), Indonesian Association of Geophysicist (HAGI), Indonesian Association of Geologists
(IAGI), Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), Society of Indonesian Petroleum Engineers (IATMI) and Indonesian Petroleum Association
(IPA).
Citarum
Block is an exploration block covering an area of 3,924.67 km2 (969,807 acres). This block is located onshore in West Java and
only 16 miles south of the capital city of Indonesia, Jakarta.
Our
Citarum PSC contract, valid until July, 2048, is based on the “gross split” regime, in which the production of oil
and gas is to be divided between the contractor and the Indonesian Government based on certain percentages in respect of (a) the
crude oil production and (b) the natural gas production. Our share will be the Base Split share plus a Variable and Progressive
component. Our Crude Oil Base Split share is 43% and our Natural Gas Base Split share is 48%. Our share percentage is determined
based on both variable (such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide content) and progressive (such as crude oil and refined gas
prices) components.
Thus,
pursuant to our Citarum PSC contract, once Citarum commences production, we are entitled to at least 65% of the natural gas produced,
calculated as 48% from the Base Split plus a Variable Component of 5% from the first Plan of Development (POD I) in Citarum, a
Variable Component of 2% from the use of Local Content, as the oil and gas onshore services are mostly closed or restricted for
foreign companies (as described in “Legal Framework for the Oil and Gas Industry in Indonesia” elsewhere in this annual
report), and a 10% increase for the first 180 BSCF produced or 30 million barrels of oil equivalent which according to our economic
model, the cumulative production of 180 BSCF will only be achieved in 2025, if our exploration efforts succeed.
In
mid-2018, we identified an onshore open area in the province of West Java, adjacent to our Citarum block. We believe that this
area, also known as the Rangkas Area, holds large amounts of crude oil due to its proven petroleum system. To confirm the potential
of Rangkas Area, in July 2018, we formally expressed our interest to the DGOG of MEMR to conduct a Joint Study in the Rangkas
Area and we attained the approval to initiate our Joint Study program in this area on November 5, 2018. The Rangkas Joint Study
covered an area of 3,970 km2 (or 981,008 acres) and was completed on November 2019. The DGOG accepted the completion of the joint
study and inquired IEC’s interest for further process to tender the block. The study result suggested an effective petroleum
system for oil and gas accumulations. Furthermore with the opportunity to integrate the operation of Citarum and Rangkas together
efficiently, we decided to issue a Statement of Interest Letter in December 2019 to the Ministry of Energy (DGOG) as we intend
to enter into a PSC contract for the Rangkas through a direct tender process. We will have the right to change our offer in order
to match the best offer following the results of the bidding process which has not taken place as of the date of this report.
The timeline for the tender is contingent upon the DGOG’s plans and schedule.
We
currently generate revenue from Kruh Block and profit sharing from the sale of the crude oil under our new 10-year Joint Operation
Partnership (or KSO) that commenced in May 2020 by Pertamina. Prior to May 2020, Kruh Block was operated under a TAC agreement.
Under our KSO, we have the operatorship to, but not the ownership of, the extraction and production of oil from the designated
oil deposit location in Indonesia until May 2030. During the operations, our company pays all expenditures and obligations incurred
including but not limited to exploration, development, extraction, production, transportation, abandonment and site restoration.
Under the TAC, revenue is recognized based on the prevailing ICP through GWN from the 65% (sixty-five percent) of monthly
proceeds as monthly cost recovery entitlement plus 26.7857% (twenty six point seven eight five seven percent) of the remaining
proceeds from the sale of the crude oil after monthly cost recovery entitlement as part of the profit sharing. For the KSO,
with an 80% cap on the proceeds of such sale as part of the cost recovery scheme, on a monthly basis, calculated by multiplying
the quantity of crude oil produced by our company and the prevailing ICP published by the Government of Indonesia plus 80% of
the operating cost per bbl multiplying Non-Shareable Oil (“NSO”). In addition, we are also entitled to an additional
23.5294% (twenty-three point five two nine four percent) of the remaining 20% of such sales proceeds as part of the profit sharing.
The main differences between the two contracts are that: (1) in the TAC, all oil produced is shareable between Pertamina and its
contractor, while in the KSO, a NSO production is determined and agreed between Pertamina and its partners so that the baseline
production, with an established decline rate, belongs entirely to Pertamina, so that the partners’ revenue and production
sharing portion shall be determined only from the production above the NSO baseline; (2) in the TAC, the cost recovery was capped
at 65% (sixty-five percent) of the proceeds from the sale of the oil produced in the block, while in the KSO, the cost recovery
is capped at 80% of the proceeds from the sale of the oil produced within Kruh Block for the cost incurred during the term under
the KSO plus 80% of the operating cost per bbl multiplying NSO. Any remaining cost recovery balance from the KSO period of contract
is carried over to the next period, although the cost recovery balance from the TAC contract will not be carried over to the KSO,
meaning that the cost recovery balance were reset to nil with the commencement of the operatorship under the KSO in May 2020.
Our
revenue and potential for profit depend mostly on the level of oil production in Kruh Block and the ICP that is correlated to
international crude oil prices. Therefore, the biggest factor affecting our financial results in 2019 and 2018 was the volatility
in the price of crude oil. For the year ended December 31, 2020, ICP decreased to an average of $37.58 per Bbl., 39.28% lower
when compared to the ICP average of $61.89 per Bbl. for the year ended December 31, 2019, which reduced the financial performance
of our company in 2019.
Since
the commencement of operations in 2014 (then via our now subsidiary WJ Energy), the natural resources industry has gone through
a dramatic change. The downturn in the price of crude oil during this period has impacted our results of operations, cash flows,
capital and exploratory investment program and production outlook. A sustained lower price environment could result in the impairment
or write-down of specific assets in future periods. During 2016, oil price crisis hit its bottom with an ICP of only $25.83 per
Bbl. in the month of January. As a result of this low price, our operations went through a cost analysis procedure in order to
determine the economic limit of each of our producing wells at Kruh by identifying their respective direct production cost. Accordingly,
we closed a total of 6 wells that were producing less than 10 BOPD each that year. We commenced new drilling operations in Kruh
Block in March 2021. Our originally anticipated drilling commencement date was delayed due to COVID-19 and the government
permitting process. The first new well was spudded in March 2021 and new drilling commenced in April 2021. The reserve estimate
will be updated in mid-2021 after new production begins in the second quarter of 2021.
Key
Components of Results of Operations
For
the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019
Financial
and operating results for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019 are as follows:
|
●
|
Total
oil production decreased approximately 20.29%, from 90,989 Bbl. for the year ended December 31, 2019 to 72,524 Bbl. for the
same period in 2020, which resulted in lower revenue and cost recovery entitlements for the year ended December 31, 2020 than
for the same period in 2019. This decrease was due to the decrease of the reservoir pressure which comes naturally in the
primary recovery production phase for our four existing wells.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
ICP
decreased 39.28% from an average price of $61.89 per Bbl. for the year ended December 31, 2019 to $37.58 per Bbl. for the
same period in 2020, reducing our revenue and cost recovery entitlements. The ICP, which correlates to the international
crude oil price, is determined by MEMR. Throughout 2020, increases in U.S. petroleum production put downward pressure on crude
oil prices. In addition, the production increases likely limited the effect on prices from the attack on key energy installations
in Saudi Arabia on September 16, 2019, production cut announcements from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
(OPEC), and U.S. sanctions on Iran and Venezuela that limited crude oil exports from those countries. This production increase
accompanied by weaker demand growth, have led to a large build up in stocks caused the decrease of crude oil price.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Revenue
decreased by $2,202,581, or 52.65%, from $4,183,354 for the year ended December 31, 2019 to $1,980,773 for the same
period in 2020 due to a combination of lower ICP and lower production.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
General
and administrative expenses increased by $4,099,543 or 168.42%, for the year ended December 31, 2020 when compared
to the same period in 2019. Major expenses for the years ended December 31, 2020 were employee salary (including share-based
compensation expense), professional fees, director and officer insurance expense, and travel expenses.
|
|
●
|
The
amount of lease operating expenses decreased by approximately $456,374 or 18.45%, for the year ended December 31, 2020
when compared to the same period in 2019 mainly because of the decline in production in Kruh Block.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We
incurred net loss of $6,951,698 for the year ended December 31, 2020 from a net loss of $1,673,735 for the same period
in 2019 due to a combination of the factors stated above.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
average production cost per barrel of oil for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $27.82 compared to $21.34 for the year
ended December 31, 2019, computed using production costs disclosed pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 932 and only to exclude ad valorem
and severance taxes, an increase of 30% due to a combination of the factors discussed above.
|
For
the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Financial
and operating results for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018 are as follows:
|
●
|
Total
oil production decreased approximately 23.55%, from 119,017 Bbl. for the year ended December 31, 2018 to 90,989 Bbl. for the
same period in 2019, which resulted in lower revenue and cost recovery entitlements for the year ended December 31, 2019 than
for the same period in 2018. This decrease was due to the decrease of the reservoir pressure which comes naturally in the
primary recovery production phase for our four existing wells.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
ICP
decreased 6.40% from an average price of $66.12 per Bbl. for the year ended December 31, 2018 to $61.89 per Bbl. for the same
period in 2019, reducing our revenue and cost recovery entitlements. The ICP, that correlates to the international crude oil
price, is determined by MEMR. Throughout 2019, increases in U.S. petroleum production put downward pressure on crude oil prices.
In addition, the production increases likely limited the effect on prices from the attack on key energy installations in Saudi
Arabia on September 16, 2019, production cut announcements from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC),
and U.S. sanctions on Iran and Venezuela that limited crude oil exports from those countries. This production increase accompanied
by weaker demand growth, have led to a large build up in stocks caused the decrease of crude oil price.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Revenue
decreased by $ 1,672,987, or 28.57%, from $ 5,856,341 for the year ended December 31, 2018 to $ 4,183,354 for the same period
in 2019 due to a combination of lower ICP and production.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
General
and administrative expenses increased by $417,989, or 20.73%, for the year ended December 31, 2019 when compared
to the same period in 2018. Major expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 were $824,780 and $693,332 in legal
and other professional expenses associated with our initial public offering, which was consummated in 2019, $829,577 and $922,377
in salaries and employee benefits, and $247,817 and nil in share-based compensation, respectively.
|
|
●
|
The
amount of lease operating expenses decreased by approximately $66,123 or 2.60%, for the year ended December 31, 2019 when
compared to the same period in 2018 mainly because of the decline in production in Kruh Block.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We
incurred net loss of $1,673,735 for the year ended December 31, 2019 from a net income of $140,988 for the same period in
2018 due to a combination of the factors stated above.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
average production cost per barrel of oil for the year ended December 31, 2019, was $27.19 compared to $21.34 for the year
ended December 31, 2018, computed using production costs disclosed pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 932 and only to exclude ad valorem
and severance taxes, an increase of 27.40% due to a combination of the factors discussed above.
|
Trends
Affecting Future Operations
The
factors that will most significantly affect results of operations will be (i) the selling prices of crude oil and natural gas,
and (ii) the amount of production from oil or gas wells in which we have an interest. Our revenues will also be significantly
impacted by its ability to maintain or increase oil or gas production through exploration and development activities.
It
is expected that the principal source of cash flow will be from the production and sale of crude oil and natural gas capitalized
property which are depleting assets. Cash flow from the sale of oil and gas production depends upon the quantity of production
and the price obtained for the production. An increase in prices will permit us to finance operations to a greater extent with
internally generated funds and may allow us to obtain equity financing more easily or on better terms, and lessens the difficulty
of obtaining financing. However, price increases heighten the competition for oil and gas prospects, increase the costs of exploration
and development, and, because of potential price declines, increase the risks associated with the purchase of producing properties
during times that prices are at higher levels.
A
decline in oil and gas prices (including as was experienced in the first quarter of 2020) (i) will reduce our internally generated
cash flow, which in turn will reduce the funds available for exploring for and replacing oil and gas capitalized property, (ii)
will increase the difficulty of obtaining equity and debt financing and worsen the terms on which such financing may be obtained,
(iii) will reduce the number of oil and gas prospects which have reasonable economic terms, (iv) may cause us to permit leases
to expire based upon the value of potential oil and gas capitalized property in relation to the costs of exploration, (v) may
result in marginally productive oil and gas wells being abandoned as non-commercial, and (vi) may increase the difficulty of obtaining
financing. However, price declines reduce the competition for oil and gas properties and correspondingly reduce the prices paid
for leases and prospects.
The
global outbreak and pandemic of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in 2020, including in Indonesia, has and may continue to impact
our operations, which might affect our total oil production. Since the outbreak, crude oil prices have been negatively impacted
to a significant extent due to low oil demand, increased production and disputes between the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting
Countries (or OPEC) and Russia on production cuts. As a consequence, our revenue and profit is expected to decrease due to the
factors discussed above, and other unforeseen and unpredictable consequences of the COVID-19 outbreak.
Further,
in the first half of 2020 there was a sharp decline in commodity prices following the announcement of price reductions and production
increases in March 2020 by members of OPEC, which has led to significant global economic contraction generally and in the oil
and gas exploration industry in particular. Together with the COVID-19 pandemic, it is unclear and not predictable the long lasting
effects on global energy prices and our results of operations and financial condition. Please see the Risk Factor entitled “The
outbreak of COVID-19 and volatility in the energy markets may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition,
operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.”
We
commenced new drilling operations in Kruh Block in March 2021. Our originally anticipated drilling commencement date was
delayed due to COVID-19 and the government permitting process. The first new well was spudded in March 2021 and new drilling commenced
in April 2021. The reserve estimate will be updated in mid-2021 after new production begins in the second quarter of 2021.
Other
than the foregoing, the management is unaware of any other trends, events or uncertainties that will have, or are reasonably expected
to have, a material impact on sales, revenues or expenses.
Results
of Operations
The
table below sets forth certain line items from our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2020,
2019 and 2018:
|
|
For
The Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,980,773
|
|
|
$
|
4,183,354
|
|
|
$
|
5,856,341
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
|
2,017,856
|
|
|
|
2,474,230
|
|
|
|
2,540,353
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
698,851
|
|
|
|
876,676
|
|
|
|
1,156,494
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6,533,642
|
|
|
|
2,434,099
|
|
|
|
2,016,110
|
|
Exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
132,033
|
|
|
|
(51,584
|
)
|
|
|
42,056
|
|
Other income
(expenses), net
|
|
|
185,845
|
|
|
|
(20,500
|
)
|
|
|
(44,452
|
)
|
(Loss) income before income tax
|
|
|
(6,951,698
|
)
|
|
|
(1,673,735
|
)
|
|
|
140,988
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(6,951,698
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,673,735
|
)
|
|
$
|
140,988
|
|
Year
ended December 31, 2020 compared with year ended December 31, 2019
Revenue
Total
revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020 were $1,980,773 compared to $4,183,354 for the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease
of $2,202,581 due to decrease in production and ICP.
Lease
operating expenses
Lease
operating expenses decreased by $456,374, or 18.45%, for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the same period in
2019 mainly because of the decline in production in Kruh Block.
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization (DD&A)
The
amount of DD&A decreased by $177,825, or 20.28%, for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the same period
in 2019 due to (i) a decline in depletion expense of $162,790 from the reduced production and (ii) the reduced depreciation
of $15,035 coming naturally from the declining balance method.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General
and administrative expenses increased by $4,099,543, or 168.42%, for the year ended December 31, 2020 when compared
to the same period in 2019 due to an increase of employee salary and share-based compensation, professional fees, D&O
insurance expense, and travel expenses.
Exchange
gain
We
had exchange gain of $132,033 for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to exchange loss of $51,584 for the same
periods ended in 2019. The change was primarily due to the fluctuation of the exchange rate.
Other
income (expenses), net
There
was other income, net for the year ended December 31, 2020 when
compared to net other expenses in the same period in 2019 due to the income from the write-off of account payable and
realized actuarial gain, partially offset by the record of non-recoverable expense related to Kruh Block’s operations
in the year ended December 31, 2020.
Net
Loss
We
had net loss for the year ended December 31, 2020 in the amount of $6,951,698 compared to $1,673,735 for the same
periods in 2019, which was due to the combination of the above factors discussed.
Year
ended December 31, 2019 compared with year ended December 31, 2018
Revenue
Total
revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $4,183,354 compared to $5,856,341 for the year ended December 31, 2018, a decrease
of $1,672,987 due to decrease in production and ICP.
Lease
operating expenses
Lease
operating expenses decreased by $66,123, or 2.60%, for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the same period in
2018 mainly because of the decline in production in Kruh Block.
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization (DD&A)
The
amount of DD&A decreased by $279,818, or 24.20%, for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the same period in
2018 due to (i) the reduced depletion expense of $261,251 from the reduced production and (ii) the reduced depreciation of $18,567
coming naturally from the declining balance method.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General
and administrative expenses increased by $417,989, or 20.73%, for the year ended December 31, 2019 when compared to the
same period in 2018 due to an increase of fees incurred for professional parties in relation to our public offering, issuance
of share options to our senior management members and an increase of travel expenditures.
Exchange
(loss) gain
We
had exchange loss of $51,584 for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to exchange gain of $42,056 for the same periods
ended in 2018. The change was primarily because we settled all of the debts owed to our related parties and realized exchange
gain of $55,758 for the year ended December 31, 2018, while no such situation for the same periods ended in 2019.
Other
expenses
Other
expenses decreased by $23,952, or 53.88%, for the year ended December 31, 2019 when compared to the same period in 2018
due to the income from the write-off of account payable, offset by the record of non-recoverable expense related to Kruh Block’s
operations.
Net
(Loss) Income
We
had net loss for the year ended December 31, 2019 in the amount of $1,673,735 compared to net income of $140,988 for the same
periods in 2018, which was due to the combination of the above factors discussed.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We
prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make judgments, estimates and
assumptions. We continually evaluate these estimates and assumptions based on the most recently available information, our own
historical experiences and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Since the use of
estimates is an integral component of the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from our expectations as a
result of changes in our estimates. Some of our accounting policies require a higher degree of judgment than others in their application
and require us to make significant accounting estimates.
The
following descriptions of critical accounting policies, judgments and estimates should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and other disclosures included in this annual report. When reviewing our consolidated financial statements,
you should consider (i) our selection of critical accounting policies, (ii) the judgments and other uncertainties affecting the
application of such policies and (iii) the sensitivity of reported results to changes in conditions and assumptions.
Revenue
recognition– We adopted ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” on January 1, 2019, using
the modified retrospective method applied to contract that was not completed as of January 1, 2019, the TAC with Pertamina. Under
the modified retrospective method, prior period financial positions and results will not be adjusted. The cumulative effect adjustment
recognized in the opening balances included no significant changes as a result of this adoption.
We
recognize revenues from the entitlement of Oil & Gas Property - Kruh Block Proven and profit sharing from the sale of the
crude oil under the TAC with Pertamina, when the Entitlement Calculation Sheets have been submitted to Pertamina after the monthly
ICP has been published by the Government of Indonesia. We deliver the crude oil we produce to Pertamina Jirak Gathering Station
(“Pertamina-Jirak”), located approximately 3 miles away from Kruh Block. After the volume and quality of the crude
oil delivered is accepted and recorded by Pertamina, Pertamina is responsible for the ultimate sales of the crude to the end-users.
The total volume of crude oil sold is confirmed by Pertamina and, combining with the monthly published ICP, we calculate the entire
amount of our entitlement with Pertamina through the Entitlement Calculation Sheets, at which point revenue is recognized.
We
currently generate revenue from Kruh Block and profit sharing from the sale of the crude oil under our new 10-year Joint Operation
Partnership (or KSO) that commenced in May 2020 by Pertamina. Prior to May 2020, Kruh Block was operated under a TAC agreement.
In the KSO contract, revenue is recognized through GWN from the 80% (eighty percent) of monthly proceeds excluding NSO (non-shareable
oil) as monthly cost recovery entitlement plus 23.5294% (twenty-three point five two nine four percent) of the remaining proceeds
from the sale of the crude oil after monthly cost recovery entitlement as part of the profit sharing.
Both
of these two portions are recognized as revenue, net of tax. Accordingly, there were no significant changes to the timing or valuation
of revenue recognized for sales of production from exploration and production activities.
We
do not have any contract assets (unbilled receivables) since revenue is recognized when control of the crude oil is transferred
to the refinery and the payment for the crude oil is not contingent on a future event.
There
were no significant contract liabilities or transaction price allocations to any remaining performance obligations as of December
31, 2020.
Use
of estimates– The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires our management
to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the period. Significant accounting estimates reflected in our consolidated financial statements include but are
not limited to estimates and judgments applied in the allowance for receivables, write down of other assets, estimated useful
lives of property and equipment, oil and gas depletion, impairment of long-lived assets, provision for post-employment benefit
and going concern. Actual results could differ from those estimates and judgments.
Accounts
receivable and other receivables, net– Accounts receivable and other receivables are recorded at net realizable value
consisting of the carrying amount less an allowance for uncollectible accounts as needed. The allowance for doubtful accounts
is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable and other receivables. We determine
the allowance based on aging data, historical collection experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions. Account
balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery
is considered remote. We did not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure relating to our customers, suppliers or others. For
the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we did not record any allowances for doubtful accounts against accounts
receivable and other receivables nor did we charge off any such amounts, respectively.
Impairment
of long-lived assets– We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may no longer be recoverable. When these events occur, we assess the recoverability of the
long-lived assets by comparing the carrying value of the long-lived assets to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected
to result from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition where the fair value is lower than the carrying value, measurement
of an impairment loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the difference
between the fair value, using the expected future discounted cash flows, and the carrying value of the assets.
Oil
and gas property, net, Full cost method – We follow the full-cost method of accounting for the oil and gas property.
Under the full-cost method, all productive and non-productive costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration and development associated
with properties with proven reserves, such as the TAC Kruh Block, are capitalized. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, all capitalized
costs associated with Kruh Block’s reserves were subject to amortization.
Capitalized
costs are subject to a quarterly ceiling test that limits such costs to the aggregate of the present value of estimated future
net cash flows of proved reserves, computed using the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of the-month oil and gas
prices for each month within the 12-month period prior to the end of reporting period, discounted at 10%, and the lower of cost
or fair value of proved properties. If unamortized costs capitalized exceed the ceiling, the excess is charged to expense in the
period the excess occurs. There were no cost ceiling write-downs for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018,
respectively.
Depletion
for each of the reported periods is computed on the units-of-production method. Depletion base is the total capitalized oil and
gas property in the previous period, plus the period capitalization and future development costs. Furthermore, the depletion rate
is calculated as the depletion base divided by the total estimated proved reserves that expected to be extracted during the operatorship.
Then, depletion is calculated as the production of the period times the depletion rate.
For
the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the estimated proved reserves were considered based on the operatorship of the
Kruh Block expiring in May 2030, as we completed all administrative steps of the process to obtain the extension of the operatorship
of the Kruh Block in the last quarter of 2018 and the uncertainty regarding the extension was removed.
The
costs associated with properties with unproved reserves or under development, such as PSC Citarum Block, are not initially included
in the full-cost depletion base. The costs include but are not limited to unproved property acquisition costs, seismic data and
geological and geophysical studies associated with the property. These costs are transferred to the depletion base once the reserve
has been determined as proven.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
A
list of recently issued accounting pronouncements that are relevant to us is included in Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We
generated a net loss of $6,951,698 and net cash used in operating activities of $5,571,947 for the year ended December
31, 2020. In addition, we have an accumulated deficit of $27,734,782 and working capital of $9,413,594 as of December
31, 2020. Our operating results for future periods are subject to numerous uncertainties and it is uncertain if we will be able
to reduce or eliminate our net losses and achieve profitability for the foreseeable future. If we are unable to increase revenue
or manage operating expenses in line with revenue forecasts, we may not be able to achieve profitability.
Moreover,
considering our planned level of capital expenditures expected during the next twelve months, there will be an expected
capital deficit to occur. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability
to continue as a going concern, and our auditor’s report on our December 31, 2020 financial statements includes an
explanatory paragraph in respect to there being substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern.
Our
principal sources of liquidity include cash generated from operating activities, proceeds from our initial public offering which
was completed on December 19, 2019 (the “IPO”), as well as short-term and long-term borrowings from third parties
or related parties. On July 19, 2016, we entered into a loan agreement with Thalesco Eurotronics Pte Ltd. (a third party) and
obtained a loan facility in the amount of $2,000,000 with original maturity date on July 30, 2017, renewed until July 30, 2020
to finance the drilling of one well in Kruh Block.On June 3, 2019, the loan was further extended until May 22, 2023. The loan
bears an interest rate of 1.5% per annum. We also obtained a credit facility in the form of an overdraft loan with a principal
amount not exceeding $1,900,000, an automatically renewable term of 1 year first due on November 14, 2017, and floating interest
rate spread of 1% per annum above the interest rate earned by the collateral account in which we deposited a balance of $2,000,000
for the purpose of pledging this loan. On August 25, 2020 we repaid $1,000,000 towards the loan from Thalesco Eurotronics
Pte Ltd. As of the end of 2020 and 2019, the amount due to Thalesco Eurotronics Pre Ltd. was $1,000,000 and $2,000,000,
respectively.
On
December 23, 2019, we consummated our IPO of 1,363,637 shares of our ordinary shares at a public offering price of $11.00 per
ordinary share for gross proceeds of $15,000,007 before underwriting discounts, commissions and expenses.
As
of the date of the issuance of this annual report, we had approximately $4.6 million of cash and cash equivalents, which
are unrestricted as to withdrawal or use and are placed with financial institutions. In addition, and notwithstanding the going
concern opinion included as part of our auditor’s report on our December 2020 financial statements, we believe we will
have continued access to financial support from our principal shareholder in fulfilling our capital requirements. We expect
to fund any shortfall in cash requirements through bank debt with banks in Indonesia with which we have pre-existing relationships
and through potential public or private issuances of our securities. We will also continue to focus on improving
operational efficiency and cost reductions and developing our core cash-generating business as planned. We intend
to meet our cash requirements for the 12 months following the date of the issuance of this annual report through operations and
the foregoing potential funding opportunities.
Based on our
current liquidity and anticipated funding requirements, we will
likely need additional capital in the future to fund our operations. If we determine that our cash requirements exceed the
amount of cash and cash equivalents we have on hand at the time, we may seek to issue equity or debt securities or obtain
credit facilities. The issuance and sale of additional equity would result in further dilution to our shareholders. The
incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased fixed obligations and could result in operating covenants that might
restrict our operations. We cannot assure you that financing will be available from any source in amounts or on terms
acceptable to us, if at all or, therefore, that we will be able to alleviate our anticipated funding requirements.
In
light of the COVID-19 pandemic and due to the recent volatility in oil prices, we have added flexibility with respect to
our planned capital expenditures by limiting our contractual exposure and commitments to the drilling of only a limited number
of wells at a time throughout our Kruh Block drilling program in order to reduce liquidity risks and risks related
to our ability to continue as a going concern in the event that oil prices remain volatile or become depressed for the
foreseeable future.
Cash
flows
The
following table sets forth certain historical information with respect to our statements of cash flows for the years ended December
31, 2020, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
For
The Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided
by operating activities
|
|
$
|
(5,186,048
|
)
|
|
$
|
(439,794
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,920,219
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(357,333
|
)
|
|
|
(1,045,579
|
)
|
|
|
(853,580
|
)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities
|
|
|
(1,125,289
|
)
|
|
|
13,124,250
|
|
|
|
1,170,287
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
and cash equivalents, and restricted cash
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents,
and restricted cash
|
|
$
|
(6,668,670
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,638,877
|
|
|
$
|
2,236,926
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, and restricted
cash at beginning of year
|
|
|
16,072,169
|
|
|
|
4,433,292
|
|
|
|
2,196,366
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, and restricted
cash at end of year
|
|
$
|
9,403,499
|
|
|
$
|
16,072,169
|
|
|
$
|
4,433,292
|
|
Year
ended December 31, 2020 compared with year ended December 31, 2019
Operating
activities
Operating
activities used $5.19 million in cash for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to $0.44 million for 2019. The
increase of approximately $4.75 million in the amount of net cash used in operating activities is primarily due
to an increase of net loss after adjusting non-cash items of approximately $3.21 million for the year ended
December 31, 2020 compared to $0.49 million for 2019. Furthermore, other contributions for the increase net cash used
in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 comparing to 2019 included approximately $1.05 million
of cash outflow from account receivables and approximately $0.91 million cash outflow from other assets-current, accounts
payable and accrued expenses.
Investing
activities
Net
cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 was approximately $0.36 million, as compared to
approximately $1.05 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease of approximately $0.69 million
of net cash used in investing activities was primarily a result of a decrease of cash paid for deferred charges
of $0.50 million and cash paid for oil and gas property of $0.19 million.
Financing
activities
Cash
used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 amounted to $1.13 million and primarily consisted
of the repayment of long-term loan to a third party and repayment of bank loan of about $0.13 million. Cash provided
by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 amounted to $13.12 million and primarily consisted of the proceeds
from our IPO offering of $13.65 million, partially offset by payment for IPO cost of $0.53 million.
Year
ended December 31, 2019 compared with year ended December 31, 2018
Operating
activities
Operating
activities used approximately $0.44 million in cash for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to net cash provided by
operating activities of $1.92 million for the comparable period in 2018. The decrease of approximately $2.36 million in the amount
of net cash from operating activities is primarily due to a reduction of operational performances as reflected in net loss of
approximately $1.67 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to net income of $0.14 million for the comparable period
in 2018. Furthermore, other contributions for the decrease net cash from operating activities for the year ended December 31,
2019 comparing to 2018 included a decrease of approximately $1.15 million of cash inflow from other receivables, due from related
parties and other assets-current, while offset by a decrease of $0.59 million cash outflow from accounts payable, accrued expenses,
taxes payable and provision of post-employment benefit.
Investing
activities
Net
cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was approximately $1.05 million, as compared to the net
cash used of approximately $0.85 million for comparable period in 2018. The increase of approximately $0.19 million net cash used
in investing activities was primarily a result of an increase of $0.32 million cash paid for oil and gas property, a decrease
of $0.16 million cash collection of a long from a related party, while offset by a decrease of $0.28 million cash paid for deferred
charges.
Financing
activities
Cash
provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 amounted to $13.12 million and primarily consisted of the
proceeds from our IPO offering of $13.65 million, and payment for IPO cost of $0.53 million. Cash provided by financing activities
for the year ended December 31, 2018 amounted to $1.17 million and primarily consisted of the proceeds received from related party
loan of $2.36 million, repayment of bank loan of about $0.75 million and payment for IPO cost of about $0.44 million.
Capital
Expenditures
We
made capital expenditures of $127,167 and negative $1,045,579 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, which
were primarily related to the development and exploration of the oil and gas property, purchases of property and equipment, as
well as the deferred charges related to the acquisition of operatorship contract.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We
do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on its financial
condition, changes in financial condition, and results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.
Contractual
Obligations
The
following table sets forth our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2020:
|
|
|
|
Future
commitments
|
|
|
|
Nature
of
commitments
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2023
and
beyond
|
|
Citarum Block PSC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental Permits
|
|
|
|
|
34,653
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
G&G studies
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
950,000
|
|
2D seismic
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,384,727
|
|
|
|
2,750000
|
|
3D seismic
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,100,000
|
|
Exploratory
Well
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,000,000
|
|
Total
commitments -Citarum PSC
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,653
|
|
|
$
|
3,534,727
|
|
|
$
|
35,800,000
|
|
Kruh Block KSO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease
commitments
|
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
1,364,917
|
|
|
$
|
3,131,019
|
|
|
$
|
21,864,512-
|
|
Pruduction facility
|
|
|
|
|
349,726
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
G&G studies
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
1,300,000-
|
|
2D seismic
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
1,153,163
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
3D seismic
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
1,119,816
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Drilling and sand
fracturing
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
7,500,000
|
|
|
|
9,000,000
|
|
|
|
10,500,000-
|
|
Workover
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
292,376
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Re-opening
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
63,200
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Abandonment and
Site Restoration
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
32,125
|
|
|
|
32,125
|
|
|
|
240,939
|
|
Total
commitments - Kruh KSO
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,875,323
|
|
|
$
|
13,863,144
|
|
|
$
|
36,405,451
|
|
Total Commitments
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,909,976
|
|
|
$
|
17,397,871
|
|
|
$
|
72,205,451
|
|
Nature
of commitments:
(a)
Operating lease commitments are contracts that allow for the use of an asset but does not convey rights of ownership of the asset.
An operating lease presents an off-balance sheet financing of assets, where a leased asset and associated liabilities of future
rent payments are not included on the balance sheet of a company. An operating lease represents a rental agreement for an asset
from a lessor under the terms. Most of the operating leases are related with the equipment and machinery used in oil production.
Rental expenses under operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were $1,167,097,
$1,204,204 and $901,106, respectively.
(b)
Abandonment and site restoration are primarily upstream asset removal costs at the completion of a field life related to or associated
with site clearance, site restoration, and site remediation, based on government rules.
(c)
Firm capital commitments represent legally binding obligations with respect to the KSO of Kruh Block or the PSC of the Citarum
Block in which the contract specifies the minimum exploration or development work to be performed by the Company within the first
three years of the contract. In certain cases where the Company executes contracts requiring commitments to a work scope, those
commitments have been included to the extent that the amounts and timing of payments can be reliably estimated.
(d)
Bank guarantee is a requirement for the assignment and securing of an oil block operatorship contract to guarantee the performance
of the Company with respect to the firm capital commitments.
ITEM
6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
Directors
and Executive Officers
The
following table sets forth information regarding our executive officers and directors as of the date of this annual report.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position/Title
|
Dr.
Wirawan Jusuf
|
|
|
35
|
|
Director,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
Frank
C. Ingriselli
|
|
|
67
|
|
President
|
Chia
Hsin “Charlie” Wu
|
|
|
68
|
|
Chief
Operating Officer
|
Mirza
F. Said
|
|
|
55
|
|
Chief
Business Development Officer and Director
|
James
J. Huang
|
|
|
34
|
|
Chief
Investment Officer and Director
|
Gregory
L. Overholtzer
|
|
|
64
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
Mochtar
Hussein
|
|
|
63
|
|
Independent
Director
|
Benny
Dharmawan
|
|
|
38
|
|
Independent
Director
|
Tamba
P. Hutapea
|
|
|
62
|
|
Independent
Director
|
Michael
Peterson
|
|
|
59
|
|
Independent
Director
|
Dr.
Wirawan Jusuf is a co-founder, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors of our company, and has
served as the Chief Executive Officer of WJ Energy since 2014. Since 2015, Dr. Jusuf has also served as a co-founder and Commissioner
of Pt. Asiabeef Biofarm Indonesia, a fully integrated and sustainable cattle business company in Indonesia. Dr. Jusuf also serves
as the Director of Maderic Holding Limited, a private investment firm and our majority shareholder, which he founded in 2014.
Dr. Jusuf began his professional career when he co-founded and served as the Director of Pt. Wican Indonesia Energi, an oil and
gas services company, from 2012 to 2014. Dr. Jusuf earned his Master’s in Public Health at the Gajah Mada University-Jogjakarta
in Central Java, Indonesia, and his medical degree at the University of Tarumanegara in Jakarta, Indonesia beforehand. We believe
Dr. Jusuf is qualified to serve in his positions with our company due to his strong qualifications in business development, government
relations and strategic planning.
Frank
C. Ingriselli has served as our President since February 2019. With over 40 years of experience in the energy industry,
Mr. Ingriselli is a seasoned leader and entrepreneur with wide-ranging exploration and production experience in diverse geographies,
business climates and political environments. From 2005 to 2018, Mr. Ingriselli was the founder, President, CEO and Chairman of
PEDEVCO Corp. and Pacific Asia Petroleum, Inc., both energy companies which are or were listed on the NYSE American. Prior
to founding these two companies, from 1979 to 2001, Mr. Ingriselli worked at Texaco in diverse senior executive positions involving
exploration and production, power and gas operations, merger and acquisition activities, pipeline operations and corporate development.
The positions Mr. Ingriselli held at Texaco included President of Texaco Technology Ventures, President and CEO of the Timan Pechora
Company (owned by affiliates of Texaco, Exxon, Amoco, Norsk Hydro and Lukoil), and President of Texaco International Operations,
where he directed Texaco’s global initiatives in exploration and development. While at Texaco, Mr. Ingriselli, among other
activities, led Texaco’s initiatives in exploration and development in China, Russia, Australia, India, Venezuela and many
other countries. Mr. Ingriselli has served as an independent member of the Board of Directors of NXT Energy Solutions Inc. (TSX:SFD;
OTC QB:NSFDF) since 2019 and is also on the Board of Trustees of the Eurasia Foundation, and is the founder and Chairman of Brightening
Lives Foundation, Inc., a charitable public foundation. From 2016 through 2018, Mr. Ingriselli founded and was the President and
CEO of Blackhawk Energy Ventures Inc. which endeavored to acquire oil and gas assets in the United States for development purposes.
Mr. Ingriselli graduated from Boston University in 1975 with a B.S. in business administration. He also earned an M.B.A. from
New York University in both finance and international finance in 1977 and a J.D. from Fordham University School of Law in 1979.
Dr.
Chia Hsin (Charlie) Wu has served as our Chief Operating Officer since 2018. Dr. Wu is a highly qualified and recognized
oil and gas industry veteran with over 40 years of experience. Dr. Wu has been responsible for building and leading the upstream
exploration and production teams for 3 independent oil and gas companies in Indonesia over the last 15 years. Prior to joining
our company, since 2017 Dr. Wu has been acting as the Chief Technology Officer for Pt. Pandawa Prima Lestari, an oil and gas company
operating a PSC block in Kalimantan, as well as an independent oil and gas consultant. Dr. Wu previously served as the Director
of Operations and Chief Operating Officer of Pt. Sugih Energy TBK, an oil and gas exploration and production company with 4 PSC
blocks in Central and South Sumatera from 2013 to 2016. From 2010 to 2013, Dr. Wu was the President Director of Pacific Oil &
Gas Indonesia, an oil and gas company operating 2 PSC blocks in North Sumatra and one KSO block in Aceh. Prior to 2010, Dr. Wu
had transitioned into the senior role of Vice-President and General Manager with Petroselat Ltd., operator of an exploration and
production PSC block in Central Sumatra which he started in 2000, and International Mineral Resources from 2003. From 1999 to
2000, Dr. Wu served as an Exploration Consultant with EMP Kondur Petroleum, an oil company which operated a production PSC in
Central Sumatra. From 1981 to 1999, Dr. Wu worked in a variety of roles internationally with Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO,
now recognized as BP Plc). Dr. Wu worked in the position of Geological Specialist from 1996 to 1999 in Jakarta, Indonesia. From
1990 to 1995, Dr. Wu worked as a New Venture Geologist with the ARCO organization in Plano, Texas, and from 1985 to 1990, Dr.
Wu worked as an Exploration Coordinator of the for ARCO in Jakarta, Indonesia. Dr. Wu began his work with ARCO from 1983 to 1985
as an explorationist in Plano, Texas, during which time he earned ARCO’s “Exploration Excellence Award” on the
Vice-President Level for providing training to worldwide staff in geohistory and basin modelling with subsequent exploration successes.
From 1979 to 1981, Dr. Wu worked as a Petrophysical Supervisor with Core Laboratories Inc. Dr. Wu began his career as a Research
Specialist with the US Department of Energy at the University of Oklahoma in 1979. Dr. Wu completed his Postgraduate Diploma in
Business Administration at DeMontfort University in 2000 and earned his Ph.D. in Geosciences in 1991 at the University of Texas.
He also completed his Masters of Science in Geology at the University of Toledo in 1979. Prior to his graduate studies, Dr. Wu
earned his Bachelors of Science degree in Geology at National Taiwan University in 1975. Dr. Wu has also served as Adjunct Professor
at the University of Texas at Dallas and University of Indonesia where he has taught 8 regular and industrial courses.
Mirza
F. Said has served as Chief Business Development Officer and a Director of our company since 2018 and has served as Chief
Executive Officer of our subsidiary Pt. Green World Nusantara since 2014. From 2012 to 2014, Mr. Said had served as President
Director and Commissioner of Pt. Humpuss Patragas, Pt. Humpuss Trading and Pt. Humpuss Wajo Energi simultaneously. All of these
companies are the subsidiaries of PT. Humpuss, an Indonesian holding company focusing on energy business, including in upstream,
transportation and refining activities. From 2010 to 2012, Mr. Said acted as the Senior Business Development & External Relations
Manager for Pacific Oil & Gas. From 2007 to 2010, Mr. Said Co-Founded Pt. Corpora Hydrocarbon Asian, a private oil and gas
investment company, and served as that organization’s Operational Specialist. Prior to serving as Chief Operating Officer
of Pt. Indelberg Indonesia from 2006 to 2007, Mr. Said served as the Corporate Operations Controller for Akar Golindo Group from
2004 to 2006. From 2001 to 2004, Mr. Said was the Project Cost Controller & Analyst for the Kangean Asset for BP Indonesia,
during which time, as a result of his achievements he was awarded the “Spot Recognition Award of Significant Contribution
in Managing & Placing”. From 1997 to 1999, he served as Operations Manager for JOB Pertamina Western Madura Pty Ltd.,
a joint operation company between Citiview Corporation Ltd (an Australian based oil and gas company) and Pertamina (the Indonesian
state owned oil and gas company) that operated a block in Madura, East Java. Mr. Said began his professional career as Senior
Drilling Engineer with Pt. Humpuss Patragas, an Indonesian private oil and gas company a subsidiary of PT. Humpuss, which operated
Cepu Block, East Java from 1991 to 1997 (he would later return to that organization in 2012 and serve in two senior executive
positions concurrently). Mr. Said earned his Master of Engineering Management at the Curtin University of Technology in Perth,
Australia, and had completed his Bachelor’s degree in Engineering at the Chemical Engineering Institute Technology of Indonesia.
Mr. Said holds professional memberships with the Indonesian Petroleum Association (IPA) and Society of Indonesian Petroleum Engineers
(IATMI) and is fluent in English and Indonesian. We believe Mr. Said is qualified to serve in his positions with our company as
a result of his education and professional experiences, including achievements and expertise within the energy and infrastructure
sector.
James
J. Huang is co-founder and has served as Chief Investment Officer and Director of our company since inception, and has
served as the Chief Investment Officer of WJ Energy since 2014. Mr. Huang co-founded and has served as Director of Asiabeef Group
Limited, a fully integrated and sustainable cattle business company and holding company of Pt. Asiabeef Biofarm Indonesia, since
2015. Mr. Huang founded and is a Director at Pt. HFI International Consulting, an Indonesian based business consulting company,
since 2014. Mr. Huang was previously the Director of Pt. Biofarm Plantation, a cattle trading company, from 2013 until 2015. From
2010 to 2013, Mr. Huang founded and served as a Director at HFI Ind. Imp. e Exp. Ltd., an information technology company providing
integrated security and surveillance solutions in Brazil. Mr. Huang began his professional career in 2008 as an intern practicing
corporate law and tax consulting with Barbosa, Müssnich & Aragão in São Paulo, Brazil. Mr. Huang holds
the Chartered Financial Analyst® (CFA) designation and maintains an Attorney at Law professional license from the
Brazilian Bar Association (OAB/SP). Mr. Huang earned his Bachelor’s degree in law at the Escola de Direito de São
Paulo in Brazil at Fundação Getúlio Vargas and previously participated at a Double Degree Business Management
Program at the Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo also at Fundação Getúlio
Vargas. We believe Mr. Huang is qualified to serve in his positions with our company due to his expertise in finance, legal matters,
business management and strategic planning.
Gregory
L. Overholtzer has served as our Chief Financial Officer since February 2019. Mr. Overholtzer is a seasoned financial
officer for public companies, including in the energy space. Mr. Overholtzer had served as the Chief Financial Officer of PEDEVCO
Corp. from January 2012 to December 2018. From 2011 to 2012, Mr. Overholtzer served as Senior Director and Field Consultant for
Accretive Solutions, where he had consulted for various companies at the chief financial officer and controller levels. Mr. Overholtzer
acted as the Chief Financial Officer of Omni-ID USA Inc. from 2008 to 2011. Mr. Overholtzer was the Corporate Controller of Genitope
Corporation from 2006 to 2008, and Stratex Inc. from 2005 to 2006. Mr. Overholtzer served as the Chief Financial Officer and Vice
President of Finance for Polymer Technology Group from 1998 to 2005. From 1997 to 1998, he was the Chief Financial Officer and
Vice President of Finance at TeleSensory Corporation. Mr. Overholtzer held roles of Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of
Finance and Corporate Secretary with Giga-tronics Inc. from 1994 to 1997. Mr. Overholtzer also held several positions with Airco
Coating Tech., a division of BOC Group London from 1982 to 1994, which included Senior Financial Analyst, General Accounting Manager,
Vice President of Finance and Administration. In the early years of his career, Mr. Overholtzer also was as an MBA course Instructor
in Managerial Accounting at Golden Gate University from 1984 to 1987 and 1989 to 1991. Mr. Overholtzer had received his MBA at
the University of California, Berkeley, concentrating in Finance and Accounting and graduating with Beta Sigma Honors. Prior to
his graduate studies, Mr. Overholtzer earned his B.A. in Zoology at the University of California, Berkeley, graduating with University
Honors.
Mochtar
Hussein has served as a Director of our company since October 2018. From 2013 to 2018, Mr. Hussein acted as Inspector
General of Inspectorate General of the MEMR. From 2014 to 2018, Mr. Hussein also served as Commissioner of Pt. Timah (Persero)
Tbk, an Indonesian state owned enterprise engaged in tin mining and listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange. In 2012, Mr. Hussein served
as Director of Indonesian Government Institution Supervision of Public Welfare and Defence & Security, and from 2009 to 2012,
he served as the Head of the Representative Office of the Indonesian State Finance & Development Surveillance Committee (known
as BPKP) in Central Java Province. From 2005 to 2009, he served as Director of Fiscal and Investment Supervision in the BPKP,
and during 2004, he served as the Head of the Representative Office of BPKP in Lampung Province. From 2000 to 2004, Mr. Hussein
served as Head of Indonesian State & Regionally Owned Enterprises Supervision in Jakarta. From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Hussein concurrently
served as Head of Indonesian State & Regionally Owned Enterprises Supervision in East Nusa Tenggara Province and the Section
Head of Fuel & Non-Fuel Distribution Supervision. Mr. Hussein began his professional career in 1993 as Section Head of Services,
Trading & Financial Institution Supervision in Bengkulu Province and served in a range of senior positions with the BPKP until
2012. Mr. Hussein holds a Forensic Auditor Certification. He earned his Bachelor’s degree in Economics at the Brawijaya
University, Malang in East Java. We believe Mr. Hussein is qualified to serve as a Director of our company his expertise in investigative
auditing, compliance and corporate governance.
Benny
Dharmawan has served as a Director of our company since October 2018. Since 2006, following his previous international
experiences throughout Australia, United Kingdom and the United States, Mr. Dharmawan has served as Director of Pt. Panasia Indo
Resources Tbk., a holding company that primarily engages in yarn manufacturing and synthetic fibres but through its subsidiaries,
it also engages in the mining sector. In addition, since 2015, Mr. Dharmawan has served as Controller of Pt. Sinar Tambang Arthalestari,
a fully integrated cement producer in Central Java, Indonesia. From 2007 and 2015, Mr. Dharmawan acted in several executive positions
(including equity capital markets, regional operations and compliance) with the Macquarie Group, a global provider of banking,
advisory, trading, asset management and retail financial services, in New York, London and Sydney, ultimately rising to the level
of Associate Vice President. Mr. Dharmawan earned his Graduate Certification in Applied Finance and Investments in Kaplan, Australia,
and he completed his Bachelor’s degree in Commerce at the Macquarie University in Australia. Mr. Dharmawan holds the Certified
Anti Money Laundering Specialist (CAMS-ACAMS) credential. We believe Mr. Dharmawan is qualified to serve as a Director of our
company due to his previous international professional accomplishments, particularly his expertise in risk management, compliance,
financial markets, business management and strategic and tactical planning.
Tamba
P. Hutapea has served as a Director of our company since October 2018. Since 2004, Mr. Hutapea has served in several Head
and Directorial roles within Indonesia Investment Coordinating Board (or BKPM). Mr. Hutapea’s enriched experiences within
BKPM contributed greatly to his core competency in investment planning and policy, investment licensing, investment compliance
and corporate governance. From 2011 to August 2018, Mr. Hutapea served as the BKPM’s Deputy Chairman of Investment Planning.
Previously, Mr. Hutapea acted as the Director of Investment Planning for Agriculture and Other Natural Resources from 2010 to
2011. Prior that role, he was the Director of Investment Deregulation from 2007 to 2010. From 2006 to 2007, Mr. Hutapea served
as the Head of Bureau of Planning and Information. Between 2005 and 2006, he acted as the Director of Region III (Sulawesi, DI
Jogyakarta & Central Java). From 2004 to 2005, Mr. Hutapea was the Director of Investment Facility Services. Mr. Hutapea earned
his Master of City Planning at the University of Pennsylvania his Bachelor’s degree in Agronomy at the Bogor Agricultural
University in Bogor, West Java. We believe Mr. Hutapea is qualified to be a Director of our company because of his professional
accomplishments within multiple senior investment management roles within BKPM, as well as his enhanced knowledge and skills in
investment planning and management.
Michael
L. Peterson has served as a Director of our company since January 2021. Since December 2020, he has served as the Chief
Executive Officer of Nevo Motors, Inc., a company that is commercializing low carbon emission trucks. From 2011 to 2018, Mr.
Peterson served in several executive officer positions at PEDEVCO Corp. (NYSE American: PED), a public company engaged
primarily in the acquisition, exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas shale plays in the United States.
These positions included as Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President. Since August
2016, Mr. Peterson has served as an independent director on the board of TrxAde Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: MEDS), a web-based pharmaceutical
market platform headquartered in Florida. From 2006 and 2012, he served in several executive positions at Aemetis, Inc. (formerly
AE Biofuels Inc.), a Cupertino, California-based global advanced biofuels and renewable commodity chemicals company. These positions
included as Interim President, Director and Executive Vice President. From December 2008 to July 2012, Mr. Peterson also served
as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Nevo Energy, Inc. (formerly Solargen Energy, Inc.), a Cupertino, California-based developer
of utility-scale solar farms which he helped form, which is currently operating as Nevo Motors, Inc.). From 2005 to 2006,
Mr. Peterson served as a managing partner of American Institutional Partners, a venture investment fund based in Salt Lake City.
From 2000 to 2004, he served as a First Vice President at Merrill Lynch, where he helped establish a new private client services
division to work exclusively with high-net-worth investors. From September 1989 to January 2000, Mr. Peterson was employed by
Goldman Sachs & Co. in a variety of positions and roles, including as a Vice President with the responsibility for a team
of professionals that advised and managed over $7 billion in assets. Since Mr. Peterson’s retirement from Pedevco in 2018,
he has served as the President of the Taipei Taiwan Mission of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, in Taipei, Taiwan.
Mr. Peterson received his Master degree of Business Administration at the Marriott School of Management and a Bachelor’s
degree in statistics/computer science from Brigham Young University. Mr. Peterson is qualified to be a Director of our company
due to his experience in managing, operating and growing both public and private companies, especially those active in the energy
industry.
Family
Relationships and Conflicts of Interests
There
are no family relationships between any of our officers and directors. We are not aware of any conflicts of interests related
to our officers and directors arising from the management and operations of our business.
Board
of Directors and Committees
General
Our
board of directors consists of seven (7) directors. A majority of our board of directors (namely, Mochtar Hussein, Benny Dharmawan,
Tamba P. Hutapea and Michael L. Peterson) are independent, as such term is defined by the NYSE American. The members of our board
of directors are elected annually at our annual general meeting of shareholders.
We
do not have a lead independent director, and we do not anticipate having a lead independent director. Our board of directors as
a whole play a key role in our risk oversight. Our board of directors makes all decisions relevant to our company. We believe
it is appropriate to have the involvement and input of all of our directors in risk oversight matters.
Board
Committees
Our
board of directors have three standing committees: the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and corporate
governance committee. Each committee has three members, and each member is independent, as such term is defined by the NYSE American.
The
audit committee is responsible for overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of our company and audits of the
financial statements of our company, including the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of our independent auditors.
The
compensation committee reviews and makes recommendations to the board regarding our compensation policies for our officers and
all forms of compensation, and also administers and has authority to make grants under our incentive compensation plans and equity-based
plans.
The
nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for the assessment of the performance of our board of directors,
considering and making recommendations to our board of directors with respect to the nominations or elections of directors and
other governance issues. The nominating and corporate governance committee will consider diversity of opinion and experience when
nominating directors.
The
members of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and corporate governance committee are set forth
below. All such members will qualify as independent under the rules of NYSE American.
Director
|
|
Audit
Committee
|
|
|
Compensation
Committee
|
|
|
Nominating
and
Corporate
Governance
Committee
|
|
Michael L. Peterson (3)
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Tamba P. Hutapea
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Benny Dharmawan
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Mochtar Hussein
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
(1)
|
Committee
member
|
(2)
|
Committee
chair
|
(3)
|
Audit
committee financial expert
|
Duties
of Directors
As
a matter of Cayman Islands law, a director owes three types of duties to the company: (a) statutory duties, (b) fiduciary duties,
and (iii) common law duties. The Companies Act imposes a number of statutory duties on a director. A Cayman Islands director’s
fiduciary duties are not codified, however the courts of the Cayman Islands have held that a director owes the following fiduciary
duties (a) a duty to act in what the director bona fide considers to be in the best interests of the company, (b) a duty to exercise
their powers for the purposes they were conferred, (c) a duty to avoid fettering his or her discretion in the future and (d) a
duty to avoid conflicts of interest and of duty. The common law duties owed by a director are those to act with skill, care and
diligence that may reasonably be expected of a person carrying out the same functions as are carried out by that director in relation
to the company and, also, to act with the skill, care and diligence in keeping with a standard of care commensurate with any particular
skill they have which enables them to meet a higher standard than a director without those skills. In fulfilling their duty of
care to us, our directors must ensure compliance with our amended articles of association, as amended and restated from time to
time (our “Articles of Association”). We have the right to seek damages if a duty owed by any of our directors is
breached. Our board of directors.
Interested
Transactions
A
director may vote, attend a board meeting or, presuming that the director is an officer and that it has been approved, sign a
document on our behalf with respect to any contract or transaction in which he or she is interested. We require directors to promptly
disclose the interest to all other directors after becoming aware of the fact that he or she is interested in a transaction we
have entered into or are to enter into. A general notice or disclosure to the board or otherwise contained in the minutes of a
meeting or a written resolution of the board or any committee of the board that a director is a shareholder, director, officer
or trustee of any specified firm or company and is to be regarded as interested in any transaction with such firm or company will
be sufficient disclosure, and, after such general notice, it will not be necessary to give special notice relating to any particular
transaction.
Remuneration
and Borrowing
Our
directors may receive such remuneration as our board of directors may determine or change from time to time. The compensation
committee will assist the directors in reviewing and approving the compensation structure for the directors.
Our
board of directors may exercise all the powers of the company to borrow money and to mortgage or charge our undertakings and property
and assets both present and future and uncalled capital or any part thereof, to issue debentures and other securities whether
outright or as collateral security for any debt, liability or obligation of our company or its parent undertaking (if any) or
any subsidiary undertaking of our company or of any third party.
Qualification
A
majority of our board of directors is required to be independent. There are no membership qualifications for directors. The shareholding
qualification for directors may be fixed by our shareholders by ordinary resolution and unless and until so fixed no share qualification
shall be required.
Limitation
of Director and Officer Liability
Under
Cayman Islands law, each of our directors and officers, in performing his or her functions, is required to act honestly and in
good faith with a view to our best interests and exercise the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would
exercise in comparable circumstances. Cayman Islands law does not limit the extent to which a company’s Articles of Association
may provide for indemnification of officers and directors and secretaries, except to the extent any such provision may be held
by the Cayman Islands courts to be contrary to public policy, such as to provide indemnification against civil fraud or the consequences
of committing a crime.
The
Articles of Association provide, to the extent permitted by law, for the indemnification of each existing or former director (including
alternate director), secretary and any of our other officers (including an investment adviser or an administrator or liquidator)
and their personal representatives against:
|
(a)
|
all
actions, proceedings, costs, charges, expenses, losses, damages or liabilities incurred or sustained by the existing or former
director (including alternate director), secretary or officer in or about the conduct of our business or affairs or in the
execution or discharge of the existing or former director’s (including alternate director’s), secretary’s
or officer’s duties, powers, authorities or discretions; and
|
|
(b)
|
without
limitation to paragraph (a) above, all costs, expenses, losses or liabilities incurred by the existing or former director
(including alternate director), secretary or officer in defending (whether successfully or otherwise) any civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative proceedings (whether threatened, pending or completed) concerning us or our affairs in any
court or tribunal, whether in the Cayman Islands or elsewhere. To be entitled to indemnification, these persons must have
acted honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interest of the company and, in the case of criminal proceedings,
they must have had no reasonable cause to believe their conduct was unlawful. Such limitation of liability does not affect
the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission. These provisions will not limit the liability
of directors under United States federal securities laws.
|
The
decision of our board of directors as to whether the director acted honestly and in good faith with a view to our best interests
and as to whether the director had no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful, is in the absence of fraud
sufficient for the purposes of indemnification, unless a question of law is involved. The termination of any proceedings by any
judgment, order, settlement, conviction or the entry of no plea does not, by itself, create a presumption that a director did
not act honestly and in good faith and with a view to our best interests or that the director had reasonable cause to believe
that his or her conduct was unlawful. If a director to be indemnified has been successful in defense of any proceedings referred
to above, the director is entitled to be indemnified against all expenses, including legal fees, and against all judgments, fines
and amounts paid in settlement and reasonably incurred by the director or officer in connection with the proceedings.
We
have purchased and currently maintain insurance in relation to any of our directors or officers against any liability asserted
against the directors or officers and incurred by the directors or officers in that capacity, whether or not we have or would
have had the power to indemnify the directors or officers against the liability as provided in our Articles of Association. Insofar
as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted for our directors, officers or persons controlling
our company under the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against
public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Involvement
in Certain Legal Proceedings
To
the best of our knowledge, none of our directors or officers has been convicted in a criminal proceeding, excluding traffic violations
or similar misdemeanors, nor has been a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding during the past five years that resulted
in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal
or state securities laws, or a finding of any violation of federal or state securities laws, except for matters that were dismissed
without sanction or settlement. Except as set forth in our discussion below in “Related Party Transactions,” our directors
and officers have not been involved in any transactions with us or any of our affiliates or associates which are required to be
disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.
Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics
The
board adopted a code of ethics and business conduct applicable to our directors, officers and employees on June 21, 2019.
Executive
Compensation
Summary
Compensation Table
Our
compensation committee, consisting of independent board members determined the compensation to be paid to our executive officers
based on our financial and operating performance and prospects, and contributions made by the officers’ to our success.
Our compensation committee measures each of our officers by a series of performance criteria set established by our board of directors,
or the compensation committee on a yearly basis. Such criteria is based on certain objective parameters such as job characteristics,
required professionalism, management skills, interpersonal skills, related experience, personal performance and overall corporate
performance.
Our
board of directors has not adopted or established a formal policy or procedure for determining the amount of compensation paid
to our executive officers. Our board of directors will make an independent evaluation of appropriate compensation to key employees,
with input from management. Our board of directors has oversight of executive compensation plans, policies and programs.
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following table presents summary information regarding the total compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each of the named
executive officers for services rendered to us for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Name
and principal position
|
|
Fiscal
Year
|
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
Stock
awards
($)
|
|
|
Option
awards
($)(1)
|
|
|
Non-equity
incentive
plan
compensation
($)
|
|
|
Nonqualified
deferred
compensation
earnings
($)
|
|
|
All
other
compensation
($)(2)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Dr. Wirawan Jusuf
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
297,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,069
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
318,069
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
176,100
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21,069
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank C. Ingriselli
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
155,885
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
305,885
|
|
President
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
155,885
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
218,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory L. Overholtzer
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mirza F. Said
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
204,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24,843
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
228,845
|
|
Chief
Business Development Officer
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
137,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24,843
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chia Hsin “Charlie” Wu
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
204,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24,843
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
228,845
|
|
Chief
Operating Officer
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
68,750
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24,843
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
93,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Huang
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24,843
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
264,843
|
|
Chief
Investment Officer
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
144,879
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24,843
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
169,722
|
|
(1)
The options and bonus were granted pursuant to agreement between the executives and our company. The values of the option awards
represent grant-date fair values without regard to forfeitures.
(2)
All other compensation refers to income tax withholding under Indonesian law. Salaries in Indonesia are negotiated on a “take
home pay” basis. Therefore, we pay the income withholding tax on behalf of the employee, which is legally considered part
of the employee’s compensation.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2020 Year-End
The
following table provides information regarding each unexercised stock option held by the named executive officers as of December
31, 2020.
Name
|
|
Grant
date
|
|
|
Vesting
Start
date
|
|
|
Number
of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
vested
(#)
|
|
|
Number
of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
unvested
(#)
|
|
|
Options
exercise
price
($)
|
|
|
Option
Expiration
date
|
|
Dr.
Wirawan Jusuf
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
December
19, 2019
|
|
|
|
December
23, 2020
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.00
|
|
|
|
December
19, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank C. Ingriselli
President
|
|
|
December
19, 2019
|
|
|
|
December
19, 2019
|
|
|
|
18,750
|
|
|
|
18,750
|
|
|
$
|
11.00
|
|
|
|
December
19, 2029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory L. Overholtzer
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chia Hsin “Charlie”
Wu
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
December
19, 2019
|
|
|
|
December
23, 2020
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.00
|
|
|
|
December
19, 2029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Huang
Chief Investment Officer
|
|
|
December
19, 2019
|
|
|
|
December
23, 2020
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.00
|
|
|
|
December
19, 2029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mirza F. Said
Chief Business Development Officer
|
|
|
December
19, 2019
|
|
|
|
December
23, 2020
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
11.00
|
|
|
|
December
19, 2029
|
|
2018
Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan
On
October 31, 2018, our board of directors and shareholders adopted a 2018 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan for our company (which
we refer to as the 2018 Plan).
Purpose
The
purpose of our 2018 Plan is to attract and retain directors, officers, consultants, advisors and employees whose services are
considered valuable, to encourage a sense of proprietorship and to stimulate an active interest of such persons in our development
and financial achievements.
Administration
The
compensation committee of our board of directors (or the Compensation Committee) will have primary responsibility for administering
the 2018 Plan. The Compensation Committee will have the authority to, among other things, the (a) determine terms and conditions
of any option or stock purchase right granted, including the exercise price and the vesting schedule, (b) determine the persons
who are to receive options and stock purchase rights and (c) determine the number of shares to be subject to each option and stock
purchase right, (d) prescribe any limitations, restrictions and conditions upon any awards, including the vesting conditions of
awards, (e) determine if a grant will be an “incentive” options (qualified under section 422 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, which is referred to herein as the Code) to employees of our company or a non-qualified options to directors
and consultants of our company, and (f) make any other determination and take any other action that the Compensation Committee
deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the 2018 Plan. The Compensation Committee will have full discretion to
administer and interpret the 2018 Plan and to adopt such rules, regulations and procedures as it deems necessary or advisable
and to determine, among other things, the time or times at which the awards may be exercised and whether and under what circumstances
an award may be exercised.
Eligibility
Our
employees, directors, officers and consultants (and those of any affiliated companies of ours) are eligible to participate in
the 2018 Plan. The Compensation Committee has the authority to determine who will be granted an award under the 2018 Plan, however,
it may delegate such authority to one or more of our officers under the circumstances set forth in the 2018 Plan; provided, however,
that all awards made to non-employee Directors shall be determined by our board of directors in its sole discretion.
Number
of Shares Authorized
Approximately
1,104,546 ordinary shares are reserved for issuance under our 2018 Plan.
If
an award is forfeited, canceled, or if any option terminates, expires or lapses without being exercised, the ordinary shares subject
to such award will again be made available for future grant. However, shares that are used to pay the exercise price of an option
or that are withheld to satisfy the Participant’s tax withholding obligation will not be available for re-grant under the
2018 Plan.
Awards
Available for Grant
The
Compensation Committee may grant awards of non-qualified share options, incentive share options, share appreciation rights, restricted
share awards, restricted share units, share bonus awards, performance compensation awards (including cash bonus awards) or any
combination of the foregoing, as each type of award is described in the 2018 Plan. Unless accelerated in accordance with the 2018
Plan, unvested awards shall, if so determined by the Compensation Committee, terminate immediately upon the grantee resigning
from or our terminating the grantee’s employment or contractual relationship with us or any related company without cause,
including death or disability.
Options
The
Compensation Committee is authorized to grant options to purchase ordinary shares that are either “qualified,” meaning
they are intended to satisfy the requirements of Code Section 422 for incentive stock options, or “non-qualified,”
meaning they are not intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Code. Options granted under the 2018 Plan will
be subject to the terms and conditions established by the Compensation Committee. Under the terms of the 2018 Plan, unless the
Compensation Committee determines otherwise in the case of an option substituted for another option in connection with a corporate
transaction, the exercise price of the options will not be less than the fair market value (as determined under the 2018 Plan)
of the ordinary shares on the date of grant. Options granted under the 2018 Plan are subject to such terms, including the exercise
price and the conditions and timing of exercise, as may be determined by the Compensation Committee and specified in the applicable
award agreement. The maximum term of an option granted under the 2018 Plan is 10 years from the date of grant (or five years in
the case of an incentive share option granted to a 10% shareholder). Payment in respect of the exercise of an option may be made
in cash or by check, by surrender of unrestricted ordinary shares (at their fair market value on the date of exercise) that have
been held by the participant for any period deemed necessary by our accountants to avoid an additional compensation charge or
have been purchased on the open market, or the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion and to the extent permitted by law,
allow such payment to be made through a broker-assisted cashless exercise mechanism, a net exercise method, or by such other method
as the Compensation Committee may determine to be appropriate.
Share
Appreciation Rights
The
Compensation Committee is authorized to award share appreciation rights (or SARs) under the 2018 Plan. SARs are subject to such
terms and conditions as established by the Compensation Committee. A SAR is a contractual right that allows a participant to receive,
either in the form of cash, shares or any combination of cash and shares, the appreciation, if any, in the value of a share over
a certain period of time. A SAR granted under the 2018 Plan may be granted in tandem with an option and SARs may also be awarded
to a participant independent of the grant of an option. SARs granted in connection with an option shall be subject to terms similar
to the option which corresponds to such SARs. SARs shall be subject to terms established by the Compensation Committee and reflected
in the award agreement.
Restricted
shares
The
Compensation Committee is authorized to award restricted shares under the 2018 Plan. The Compensation Committee will determine
the terms of such restricted shares awards. Restricted shares are ordinary shares that generally are non-transferable and subject
to other restrictions determined by the Compensation Committee for a specified period. Unless the Compensation Committee determines
otherwise or specifies otherwise in an award agreement, if the participant terminates employment or services during the restricted
period, then any unvested restricted shares will be forfeited.
Restricted
share unit Awards
The
Compensation Committee is authorized to award restricted share unit awards. The Compensation Committee will determine the terms
of such restricted share units. Unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise or specifies otherwise in an award agreement,
if the participant terminates employment or services during the period of time over which all or a portion of the units are to
be earned, then any unvested units will be forfeited.
Bonus
Share Awards
The
Compensation Committee is authorized to grant awards of unrestricted ordinary shares or other awards denominated in ordinary shares,
either alone or in tandem with other awards, under such terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee may determine.
Performance
Compensation Awards
The
Compensation Committee is authorized to grant any award under the 2018 Plan in the form of a Performance Compensation Award exempt
from the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code by conditioning the vesting of the Award on the attainment of specific performance
criteria of our company and/or one or more of our affiliates, divisions or operational units, or any combination thereof, as determined
by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will select the performance criteria based on one or more of the following
factors: (i) revenue; (ii) sales; (iii) profit (net profit, gross profit, operating profit, economic profit, profit margins or
other corporate profit measures); (iv) earnings (EBIT, EBITDA, earnings per share, or other corporate profit measures); (v) net
income (before or after taxes, operating income or other income measures); (vi) cash (cash flow, cash generation or other cash
measures); (vii) share price or performance; (viii) total shareholder return (share price appreciation plus reinvested dividends
divided by beginning share price); (ix) economic value added; (x) return measures (including, but not limited to, return on assets,
capital, equity, investments or sales, and cash flow return on assets, capital, equity, or sales); (xi) market share; (xii) improvements
in capital structure; (xiii) expenses (expense management, expense ratio, expense efficiency ratios or other expense measures);
(xiv) business expansion or consolidation (acquisitions and divestitures); (xv) internal rate of return or increase in net present
value; (xvi) working capital targets relating to inventory and/or accounts receivable; (xvii) inventory management; (xviii) service
or product delivery or quality; (xix) customer satisfaction; (xx) employee retention; (xxi) safety standards; (xxii) productivity
measures; (xxiii) cost reduction measures; and/or (xxiv) strategic plan development and implementation.
Transferability
Each
award may be exercised during the participant’s lifetime only by the participant or, if permissible under applicable law,
by the participant’s guardian or legal representative and may not be otherwise transferred or encumbered by a participant
other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. The Compensation Committee, however, may permit options (other
than incentive share options) to be transferred to family members, a trust for the benefit of such family members, a partnership
or limited liability company whose partners or shareholders are the participant and his or her family members or anyone else approved
by it.
Amendment
In
addition, our board of directors may amend, in whole or in part, our 2018 Plan at any time. However, without shareholder approval,
except that (a) any amendment or alteration shall be subject to the approval of the our shareholders if such shareholder approval
is required by any federal or state law or regulation or the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation system on which
the Shares may then be listed or quoted, and (b) our board of directors may otherwise, in its discretion, determine to submit
other such amendments or alterations to shareholders for approval. Awards previously granted under the 2018 Plan may not be impaired
or affected by any amendment of our 2018 Plan, without the consent of the affected grantees.
Change
in Control
The
2018 Plan provides that in the event of a change of control, the Compensation Committee shall, unless an outstanding award is
assumed by the surviving company or replaced with an equivalent award granted by the surviving company in substitution for such
outstanding award cancel any outstanding awards that are not vested and non-forfeitable as of the consummation of such corporate
transaction (unless the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, accelerates the vesting of any such awards). In respect to
any vested and non-forfeitable awards, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, (i) allow all grantees to exercise such
awards within a reasonable period prior to the consummation of the corporate transaction and cancel any outstanding awards that
remain unexercised, or (ii) cancel any or all of such outstanding awards in exchange for a payment (in cash, or in securities
or other property, up to the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee) in an amount equal to the amount that the grantee
would have received if such vested awards were settled or distributed or exercised immediately prior to the consummation of the
corporate transaction.
Director
Compensation
Each
independent director receives annual cash compensation equal to $30,000 per year for such directors’ services to our board
of directors. The Chairman of the Board receives an additional $15,000 per year. In addition to the annual cash compensation for
serving on our board of directors, each independent director that also serves on a committee of our board of directors receives
compensation as follows: each member of the audit committee and compensation committee (not including the chairperson) receives
annual cash compensation of $3,000 per year and each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (not including
the chairperson) receives annual cash compensation of $3,000 per year. The chairperson of our Audit Committee receives annual
compensation of $27,000 and the chairperson of our Compensation Committee receives annual compensation of $6,000 and the chairperson
of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives annual compensation of $3,000.
Employment
Agreements and Other Arrangements with Named Executive Officers
Except
as set forth below, we currently have no written employment agreements with any of our officers, directors, or key employees.
While certain of our officers hold positions with other entities, pursuant to their employment agreements with us, each officer
is required to spend substantially all of his working time, attention and skills to the performance of his duties to our company.
Unless otherwise stated below, all employment agreements listed below with auto-renewal provisions were not terminated by either
us or the employee, and were therefore automatically renewed.
In
connection with the Reverse Stock Split, the number of stock options granted as described below decreased accordingly.
Wirawan
Jusuf
On
February 27, 2019, our board of directors approved an employment agreement with Wirawan Jusuf and we entered into such agreement
(which we refer to as the Jusuf Agreement) with Mr. Jusuf effective February 1, 2019, under which he serves as our Chief Executive
Officer. We also entered into a share option agreement with Mr. Jusuf effective as of February 1, 2019.
The
Jusuf Agreement has an initial term beginning on February 1, 2019, and expiring one (1) year from such date. The Jusuf Agreement
is subject to automatic renewal on a year-to-year renewal basis unless either we or Mr. Jusuf provides written notice not to renew
the Jusuf Agreement no later than 30 days prior to the end of the then current or renewal term.
Pursuant
to the terms and provisions of the Jusuf Agreement, Mr. Jusuf is entitled to an annual base salary of $282,000 (Mr. Jusuf’s
annual base salary prior to the completion of our initial public offering was $189,000), cash bonuses as determined by our board
of directors or its designated committee in its sole discretion, participation in our 2018 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan or similar
equity incentive plans, and other employee benefits as approved by our board of directors.
We
may terminate the Jusuf Agreement without cause upon 30 days’ prior written notice and Mr. Jusuf may resign without cause
upon 30 days’ prior written notice. We may also immediately terminate the Jusuf Agreement for cause (as set forth in the
Jusuf Agreement). Upon the termination of the Jusuf Agreement for any reason, Mr. Jusuf will be entitled to receive payment of
any base salary earned but unpaid through the date of termination and any other payment or benefit to which he is entitled under
the applicable terms of any applicable company arrangements. If Mr. Jusuf is terminated during the term of the employment agreement
other than for cause, Mr. Jusuf is entitled to, upon delivering to us a general release of our company and its affiliates in a
form satisfactory to us, the amount of base salary earned and not paid prior to termination and such severance payments as may
be mandated by Indonesian law (presently one month of base salary for every year worked with us) (the “Jusuf Severance Payment”).
In the event that such termination is upon a Change of Control (as defined in the Jusuf Agreement), Mr. Jusuf shall be entitled
to the Jusuf Severance Payment. In addition, the Jusuf Agreement will terminate prior to its scheduled expiration date in the
event of Mr. Jusuf’s death or disability.
The
Jusuf Agreement also includes confidentiality and non-disclosure covenants as well as a twelve (12) month non-competition and
non-solicitation covenant. The Jusuf Agreement is governed by Cayman Islands law.
Under
Mr. Jusuf’s share option agreement, Mr. Jusuf was granted an option to purchase 150,000 ordinary shares under our 2018 Omnibus
Equity Incentive Plan at an exercise price equal to $11.00 per share. Mr. Jusuf’s option shall vest as follows (assuming,
in each case, that Mr. Jusuf remains employed with us): (a) 50,000 ordinary shares shall vest on the first anniversary of the
closing of our initial public offering, (b) 50,000 ordinary shares shall vest on the second anniversary of the closing of our
initial public offering; and (c) 50,000 ordinary shares shall vest on the third anniversary of the closing of our initial public
offering. The share option agreement is governed by Cayman Islands law.
Frank
Ingriselli
On
February 27, 2019, our board of directors approved an employment agreement with Frank Ingriselli and we entered into such agreement
(which we refer to as the Ingriselli Agreement) with Mr. Ingriselli effective February 1, 2019, under which he serves as our President.
We also entered into a share option agreement with Mr. Ingriselli effective as of February 1, 2019. On January 23, 2020, we entered
into an amendment to the Ingriselli Agreement (the “Ingriselli Amendment”).
The
Ingriselli Agreement had an initial term beginning on February 1, 2019, and expired one (1) year from such date. The Ingriselli
Amendment extends the term of Mr. Ingriselli’s employment as the President of the Company for a two-year term
commencing on February 1, 2020 and terminating on January 31, 2022, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the Ingriselli Agreement.
The Ingriselli Agreement is not subject to automatic renewal.
Pursuant
to the terms and provisions of the Ingriselli Agreement, as amended by the Ingriselli Amendment, Mr. Ingriselli is entitled
to an annual base salary of $150,000 and a $75,000 cash bonus for services rendered during the year ended December 31, 2019. Cash
bonuses as determined by our board of directors or its designated committee in its sole discretion. Pursuant to the Ingriselli
Amendment, Mr. Ingriselli was also granted 35,000 ordinary shares of the Company as an equity incentive award for his
continued service as President of the Company. The vesting schedule of these shares is as follows: 18,750 vested on December 19,
2019, 9,375 will vest on June 16, 2020, and 9,375 will vest on December 19, 2020. The award also includes a 180-day lock-up period
from the date of vesting. Participation in our 2018 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan or similar equity incentive plans, and other
employee benefits as approved by our board of directors.
We
may terminate the Ingriselli Agreement, as amended without cause upon 30 days’ prior written notice and Mr. Ingriselli may
resign with or without cause upon 30 days’ prior written notice. We may also immediately terminate Ingriselli Agreement,
as amended for cause (as set forth in the Ingriselli Agreement). Upon the termination of the Ingriselli Agreement for any reason,
Mr. Ingriselli will be entitled to receive payment of any base salary earned but unpaid through the date of termination and any
other payment or benefit to which he is entitled under the applicable terms of any applicable company arrangements. If Mr. Ingriselli
is terminated during the term of the employment agreement other than for cause, Mr. Ingriselli is entitled to, upon delivering
to us a general release of our company and its affiliates in a form satisfactory to us, the amount of base salary earned and not
paid prior to termination. In addition, the Ingriselli Agreement, as amended will terminate prior to its scheduled expiration
date in the event of Mr. Ingriselli’s death or disability.
The
Ingriselli Agreement also includes confidentiality and non-disclosure covenants as well as a twelve (12) month non-competition
and non-solicitation covenant. The Ingriselli Agreement is governed by Cayman Islands law.
Under
Mr. Ingriselli’s share option agreement, Mr. Ingriselli was granted an option to purchase 37,500 ordinary shares under our
2018 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan at an exercise price equal to $11.00 per share. Mr. Ingriselli’s option shall vest as
follows (assuming, in each case, that Mr. Ingriselli remains employed with us): (a) 18,750 ordinary shares shall vested on the
date of effectiveness of our initial public offering registration statement, (b) 9,375 ordinary shares shall vest on the 180th
day following the closing of our initial public offering; and (c) 9,375 ordinary shares shall vest on the first anniversary
of the closing of our initial public offering. The share option agreement is governed by Cayman Islands law.
James
Jerry Huang
On
February 27, 2019, our board of directors approved an employment agreement and share option agreement with James Jerry Huang and
we entered into such agreements (which we refer to as the Huang Agreement) with Mr. Huang effective February 1, 2019, under which
he serves as our Chief Investment Officer. We also entered into a share option agreement with Mr. Huang effective as of February
1, 2019.
The
Huang Agreement has an initial term beginning on February 1, 2019, and expiring one (1) year from such date. The Huang Agreement
is subject to automatic renewal on a year-to-year renewal basis unless either we or Mr. Huang provides written notice not to renew
the Huang Agreement no later than 30 days prior to the end of the then current or renewal term.
Pursuant
to the terms and provisions of the Huang Agreement, Mr. Huang is entitled to an annual base salary of $240,000 (Mr. Huang’s
annual base salary prior to the completion of our initial public offering was $150,000), cash bonuses as determined by our board
of directors or its designated committee in its sole discretion, participation in our 2018 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan or similar
equity incentive plans, and other employee benefits as approved by our board of directors.
We
may terminate the Huang Agreement without cause upon 30 days’ prior written notice and Mr. Huang may resign without cause
upon 30 days’ prior written notice. We may also immediately terminate Huang Agreement for cause (as set forth in the Huang
Agreement). Upon the termination of the Huang Agreement for any reason, Mr. Huang will be entitled to receive payment of any base
salary earned but unpaid through the date of termination and any other payment or benefit to which he is entitled under the applicable
terms of any applicable company arrangements. If Mr. Huang is terminated during the term of the employment agreement other than
for cause, Mr. Huang is entitled to, upon delivering to us a general release of our company and its affiliates in a form satisfactory
to us, the amount of base salary earned and not paid prior to termination and such severance payments as may be mandated by Indonesian
law (presently one month of base salary for every year worked with us) (the “Huang Severance Payment”). In the event
that such termination is upon a Change of Control (as defined in the Huang Agreement), Mr. Huang shall be entitled to the Huang
Severance Payment. In addition, the Huang Agreement will terminate prior to its scheduled expiration date in the event of Mr.
Huang’s death or disability.
The
Huang Agreement also includes confidentiality and non-disclosure covenants as well as a twelve (a) month non-competition and non-solicitation
covenant. The Huang Agreement is governed by Cayman Islands law.
Under
Mr. Huang’s share option agreement, Mr. Huang was granted an option to purchase 150,000 ordinary shares under our 2018 Omnibus
Equity Incentive Plan at an exercise price equal to $11.00 per share. Mr. Huang’s option shall vest as follows (assuming,
in each case, that Mr. Huang remains employed with us): (a) 50,000 ordinary shares shall vest on the first anniversary of the
closing of our initial public offering, (b) 50,000 ordinary shares shall vest on the second anniversary of the closing of our
initial public offering; and (c) 50,000 ordinary shares shall vest on the third anniversary of the closing of our initial public
offering. The share option agreement is governed by Cayman Islands law.
Gregory
Overholtzer
On
February 27, 2019, our board of directors approved an employment agreement with Gregory Overholtzer and we entered into such agreement
(which we refer to as the Overholtzer Agreement) with Mr. Overholtzer effective February 1, 2019, under which he serves as our
Chief Financial Officer. On January 29, 2020 the Company and Mr. Overholtzer entered into an amendment to the Overholtzer Agreement
(the “Overholtzer Amendment”).
The
Overholtzer Agreement had an initial term beginning on February 1, 2019, which expiried one (1) year from such date. Pursuant
to the Overholtzer Amendement, Mr. Overholtzer’s employment term was extended for a two-year term commencing on February
1, 2020 and terminating on January 31, 2020, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the Overholtzer Agreement, as amended. The
Overholtzer Agreement, as amended is not subject to automatic renewal.
Pursuant
to the terms and provisions of the Overholtzer Agreement, as amended by the Overholtzer Amendement, Mr. Overholtzer was entitled
to an annual base salary of $40,000 until the effectiveness of our registration statement in connection with our IPO on December
19, 2019, when his annual base salary increased to $80,000. Cash bonuses as determined by our board of directors or its designated
committee in its sole discretion, participation in our 2018 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan or similar equity incentive plans, and
other employee benefits as approved by our board of directors.
We
may terminate the Overholtzer Agreement without cause upon 30 days’ prior written notice and Mr. Overholtzer may resign
with or without cause upon 30 days’ prior written notice. We may also immediately terminate Overholtzer Agreement for Cause
(as set forth in the Overholtzer Agreement). Upon the termination of the Overholtzer Agreement for any reason, Mr. Overholtzer
will be entitled to receive payment of any base salary earned but unpaid through the date of termination and any other payment
or benefit to which he is entitled under the applicable terms of any applicable company arrangements. If Mr. Overholtzer is terminated
during the term of the employment agreement other than for cause, Mr. Overholtzer is entitled to, upon delivering to us a general
release of our company and its affiliates in a form satisfactory to us, the amount of base salary earned and not paid prior to
termination. In addition, the Overholtzer Agreement, as amended will terminate prior to its scheduled expiration date in the event
of Mr. Overholtzer’s death or disability.
The
Overholtzer Agreement also includes confidentiality and non-disclosure covenants as well as a twelve (12) month non-competition
and non-solicitation covenant. The Overholtzer Agreement is governed by Cayman Islands law.
Chia
Hsin “Charlie” Wu
On
February 27, 2019, our board of directors approved an employment agreement with Chia Hsin “Charlie” Wu and we entered
into such agreements (which we refer to as the Wu Agreement) with Mr. Wu effective February 1, 2019, under which he serves as
our Chief Operating Officer. We also entered into a share option agreement with Mr. Wu effective as of February 1, 2019.
The
Wu Agreement has an initial term beginning on February 1, 2019, and expiring one (1) year from such date. The Wu Agreement is
subject to automatic renewal on a year-to-year renewal basis unless either we or Mr. Wu provides written notice not to renew the
Wu Agreement no later than 30 days prior to the end of the then current or renewal term.
Pursuant
to the terms and provisions of the Wu Agreement, Mr. Wu is entitled to an annual base salary of $204,000 following our initial
public offering (Mr. Wu’s annual base salary prior to the completion of our initial public offering was $75,000), cash bonuses
as determined by our board of directors or its designated committee in its sole discretion, participation in our 2018 Omnibus
Equity Incentive Plan or similar equity incentive plans, and other employee benefits as approved by our board of directors.
We
may terminate the Wu Agreement without cause upon 30 days’ prior written notice and Mr. Wu may resign without cause upon
30 days’ prior written notice. We may also immediately terminate Wu Agreement for cause (as set forth in the Wu Agreement).
Upon the termination of the Wu Agreement for any reason, Mr. Wu will be entitled to receive payment of any base salary earned
but unpaid through the date of termination and any other payment or benefit to which he is entitled under the applicable terms
of any applicable company arrangements. If Mr. Wu is terminated during the term of the employment agreement other than for cause,
Mr. Wu is entitled to, upon delivering to us a general release of our company and its affiliates in a form satisfactory to us,
the amount of base salary earned and not paid prior to termination and such severance payments as may be mandated by Indonesian
law (presently one month of base salary for every year worked with us) (the “Wu Severance Payment”). In the event
that such termination is upon a Change of Control (as defined in the Wu Agreement), Mr. Wu shall be entitled to the Wu Severance
Payment. In addition, the Wu Agreement will terminate prior to its scheduled expiration date in the event of Mr. Wu’s death
or disability.
The
Wu Agreement also includes confidentiality and non-disclosure covenants as well as a twelve (12) month non-competition and non-solicitation
covenant. The Wu Agreement is governed by Cayman Islands law.
Under
Mr. Wu’s share option agreement, Mr. Wu was granted an option to purchase 150,000 ordinary shares under our 2018 Omnibus
Equity Incentive Plan at an exercise price equal to $11.00 per share. Mr. Wu’s option shall vest as follows (assuming, in
each case, that Mr. Wu remains employed with us): (a) 50,000 ordinary shares shall vest on the first anniversary of the closing
of our initial public offering, (b) 50,000 ordinary shares shall vest on the second anniversary of the closing of our initial
public offering; and (c) 50,000 ordinary shares shall vest on the third anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering.
The share option agreement is governed by Cayman Islands law.
Mirza
F. Said
On
February 27, 2019, our board of directors approved an employment agreement with Mirza F. Said and we entered into such agreements
(which we refer to as the Said Agreement) with Mr. Said effective February 1, 2019, under which he serves as Chief Business Development
Officer. We also entered into a share option agreement with Mr. Said effective as of February 1, 2019.
The
Said Agreement has an initial term beginning on February 1, 2019, and expiring one (1) year from such date. The Said Agreement
is subject to automatic renewal on a year-to-year renewal basis unless either we or Mr. Said provides written notice not to renew
the Said Agreement no later than 30 days prior to the end of the then current or renewal term.
Pursuant
to the terms and provisions of the Said Agreement, Mr. Said is entitled to an annual base salary of $204,000 following our initial
public offering (Mr. Said’s annual base salary prior to the completion of our initial public offering was $135,000), cash
bonuses as determined by our board of directors or its designated committee in its sole discretion, participation in our 2018
Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan or similar equity incentive plans, and other employee benefits as approved by our board of directors.
We
may terminate the Said Agreement without cause upon 30 days’ prior written notice and Mr. Said may resign without cause
upon 30 days’ prior written notice. We may also immediately terminate Said Agreement for cause (as set forth in the Said
Agreement). Upon the termination of the Said Agreement for any reason, Mr. Said will be entitled to receive payment of any base
salary earned but unpaid through the date of termination and any other payment or benefit to which he is entitled under the applicable
terms of any applicable company arrangements. If Mr. Said is terminated during the term of the employment agreement other than
for cause, Mr. Said is entitled to, upon delivering to us a general release of our company and its affiliates in a form satisfactory
to us, the amount of base salary earned and not paid prior to termination and such severance payments as may be mandated by Indonesian
law (presently one month of base salary for every year worked with us) (the “Said Severance Payment”). In the event
that such termination is upon a Change of Control (as defined in the Said Agreement), Mr. Said shall be entitled to the Said Severance
Payment. In addition, the Said Agreement will terminate prior to its scheduled expiration date in the event of Mr. Said’s
death or disability.
The
Said Agreement also includes confidentiality and non-disclosure covenants as well as a twelve (12) month non-competition and non-solicitation
covenant. The Said Agreement is governed by Cayman Islands law.
Under
Mr. Said’s share option agreement, Mr. Said was granted an option to purchase 150,000 ordinary shares under our 2018 Omnibus
Equity Incentive Plan at an exercise price equal to $11.00 per share. Mr. Said’s option shall vest as follows (assuming,
in each case, that Mr. Said remains employed with us): (a) 50,000 ordinary shares shall vest on the first anniversary of the closing
of our initial public offering, (b) 50,000 ordinary shares shall vest on the second anniversary of the closing of our initial
public offering; and (c) 50,000 ordinary shares shall vest on the third anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering.
The share option agreement is governed by Cayman Islands law.
Non-Employee
Director Compensation
For
the year ended December 31, 2020, none of our non-employee directors received any compensation.
Equity
Awards for Non-Employee Directors
As
of December 31, 2020, none of our non-employee directors were granted any options.
Employees
As
of December 31, 2020, we had 28 permanent employees and 34 contract employees, respectively. Our employees are not represented
by a labor organization or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We have not experienced any work stoppages, and we believe
we maintain good relationships with our employees.
The
table below sets forth the breakdown of our employees by function as of December 31, 2020:
Function
|
|
Number
of
Employees
|
|
|
%
of Total
|
|
Senior Management
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9.68
|
%
|
Subsurface
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4.84
|
%
|
Engineering
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4.84
|
%
|
Operation and Production
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4.84
|
%
|
Finance and Accounting
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9.68
|
%
|
Administration, Procurement and Human
Resources
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8.06
|
%
|
Health, Safety, Security and Environment
(or HSSE)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
%
|
Local Relations
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
%
|
Operation Contract
Employees (production, construction and HSSE)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
54.84
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
We
believe that all of our contract employees for non-specialized job functions are replaceable in the marketplace, thus not representing
a material risk to our business. We believe we are in material compliance with Indonesian labor regulations.
Share
Ownership
Please
see Item 7 Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions for information relating to ownership of our securities by
our directors, officers and certain major shareholders.
ITEM
7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Major
Shareholders
The
following table presents information as to the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares as of the May 17, 2021 by:
|
●
|
each
shareholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our ordinary shares;
|
|
●
|
each
of our directors;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
each
of our named executive officers; and
|
|
●
|
all
of our directors and executive officers as a group.
|
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and thus represents voting or investment power with respect to
our securities. Unless otherwise indicated below, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting
and sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable.
Ordinary shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of May 17, 2021 are deemed
to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding the options for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership
of that person but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Percentage
ownership of our ordinary shares in the following table is based on 7,427,955 ordinary shares outstanding on May 17, 2021.
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each of the individuals and entities named below is c/o Indonesia Energy Corporation
Limited., Gedung Graha Anugerah, Jl. Raya Pasar Minggu No. 17A, Kelurahan Pancoran, Kecamatan Pancoran, Jakarta Selatan 12780
- Indonesia.
|
|
Ordinary
Shares
Beneficially Owned
|
Name
of Beneficial Owners
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
Directors and Executive
Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Wirawan Jusuf (1)
|
|
|
5,222,222
|
|
|
|
70.30
|
%
|
Frank C. Ingriselli (2)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mirza F. Said (3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
James J. Huang (4)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Chia Hsin “Charlie” Wu (5)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gregory L. Overholtzer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mochtar Hussein
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Benny Dharmawan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Tamba P. Hutapea
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Michael L. Peterson
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
All directors and officers as a group
|
|
|
5,242,222
|
|
|
|
70.57
|
%
|
5% shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MADERIC Holding Limited (1)
|
|
|
5,222,222
|
|
|
|
70.30
|
%
|
HFO Investment Group Limited (6)
|
|
|
647,778
|
|
|
|
8.72
|
%
|
(1)
|
Dr.
Wirawan Jusuf holds voting and dispositive control over, and thus beneficial ownership of, the shares held by MADERIC Holding
Limited. Excludes options to purchase 150,000 of our ordinary shares with an exercise price of $11.00 per share which vest
as follows: (a) 50,000 ordinary shares on the first anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering, (b) 50,000
ordinary shares on the second anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering; and (c) 50,000 ordinary shares on
the third anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering (assuming, in each case, that Dr. Jusuf is then still
employed by us).
|
(2)
|
Beneficial
ownership consists of options to purchase 20,000 of our ordinary shares with an exercise price of $11.00 per share which vest
on closing of our initial public offering. Excludes options to purchase 18,750 of our ordinary shares with an exercise price
of $11.00 per share, which vest as follows: (a) 9,375 ordinary shares on the 180th day following the closing of
our initial public offering and (b) 9,375 ordinary shares on the first anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering
(assuming, in each case, that Mr. Ingriselli is then still employed by us).
|
(3)
|
Excludes
options to purchase 150,000 of our ordinary shares with an exercise price of $11.00 per share which vest as follows: (a) 50,000
ordinary shares on the first anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering, (b) 50,000 ordinary shares on the
second anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering; and (c) 50,000 ordinary shares on the third anniversary
of the closing of our initial public offering (assuming, in each case, that Mr. Said is then still employed by us).
|
(4)
|
Excludes
options to purchase 150,000 of our ordinary shares with an exercise price of $11.00 per share, which vest as follows: (a)
50,000 ordinary shares on the first anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering, (b) 50,000 ordinary shares
on the second anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering; and (c) 50,000 ordinary shares on the third anniversary
of the closing of our initial public offering (assuming, in each case, that Mr. Huang is then still employed by us).
|
(5)
|
Excludes
options to purchase 150,000 of our ordinary shares with an exercise price of $11.00 per share, which vest as follows: (a)
50,000 ordinary shares on the first anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering, (b) 50,000 ordinary shares
on the second anniversary of the closing of our initial public offering; and (c) 50,000 ordinary shares on the third anniversary
of the closing of our initial public offering (assuming, in each case, that Mr. Wu is then still employed by us).
|
(6)
|
Wan-Yu
Huang (the adult sister of James J. Huang, our Chief Investment Officer) has voting and dispositive control over the shares
held by HFO Investment Group Limited. The number of ordinary shares held by HFO Investment Group Limited decreased from 777,778
as of June 12, 2020 due to the transfer of an aggregate of 130,000 ordinary shares by HFO Investment Group Limited to Chien-Chia
Chiu and Chien-Ta Chiu in January 2021.
|
Related
Party Transactions
Other
than the executive and director compensation and other arrangements discussed in the “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management
and Employees” of this annual report, we have not entered into any transactions to which we or our subsidiaries have been
or are a party of the type which is required to be disclosed under Item 7.B of the Form 20-F instructions.
Our
audit committee is required to review and approve any related party transaction we propose to enter into. Our audit committee
charter details the policies and procedures relating to transactions that may present actual, potential or perceived conflicts
of interest and may raise questions as to whether such transactions are consistent with the best interest of our company and our
stockholders.
Interests
of Experts and Counsel
Not
applicable.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The
financial statements required by this item can be found at the end of this annual report beginning on page F-1.
Legal
Proceedings
From
time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. As of the date of this annual
report, we are not a party to any litigation or similar proceedings.
Dividend
Policy
Subject
to the provisions of the Companies Act and any rights for the time being attaching to any class or classes of shares, the
directors may declare dividends or distributions out of our funds which are lawfully available for that purpose.
Subject
to the provisions of the Companies Act and any rights for the time being attaching to any class or classes of shares, our
shareholders may, by ordinary resolution, declare dividends but no such dividend shall exceed the amount recommended by the directors.
Subject
to the requirements of the Companies Act regarding the application of a company’s share premium account and with
the sanction of an ordinary resolution, dividends may also be declared and paid out of any share premium account. The directors
when paying dividends to shareholders may make such payment either in cash or in specie.
Unless
provided by the rights attached to a share, no dividend shall bear interest.
Significant
Changes
There
have been no significant changes since the date of the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.
ITEM
9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
The
Company’s ordinary shares are listed on the NYSE American under the symbol “INDO.”
ITEM
10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Not
applicable.
B.
|
Amended
and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company
|
Our
amended and restated memorandum and articles of association have been filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our registration statement
on Form F-1 filed with the SEC on November 12, 2019. Those amended and restated memorandum and articles of association contained
in such filing are incorporated by reference.
Attached
as exhibits to this annual report or incorporated by reference herein are the contracts we consider to be both material and outside
the ordinary course of business during the two-year period immediately preceding the date of this annual report. We refer you
to “Item 4. Information on the Company” and “Related Party Transactions” under “Item
7. Major Shareholders and related party transactions” for a discussion of these contracts. Other than as discussed in
this annual report, we have no material contracts, other than contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business, to which
we are a party.
There
are no exchange control regulations or currency restrictions in the Cayman Islands.
The
following discussion of material Cayman Islands, Indonesia and United States federal income tax consequences of an investment
in our ordinary shares is based upon laws and relevant interpretations thereof in effect as of the date of this annual report,
all of which are subject to change. This discussion does not deal with all possible tax consequences relating to an investment
in our ordinary shares, such as the tax consequences under state, local and other tax laws. To the extent that the discussion
relates to matters of Cayman Islands tax law, it represents the opinion of Ogier, our Cayman Islands counsel.
Cayman
Islands Taxation
The
Cayman Islands currently levies no taxes on individuals or corporations based upon profits, income, gains or appreciation and
there is no taxation in the nature of inheritance tax or estate duty. There are no other taxes likely to be material to us levied
by the Government of the Cayman Islands except for stamp duties which may be applicable on instruments executed in, or after execution
brought within, the jurisdiction of the Cayman Islands. No stamp duty is payable in the Cayman Islands on the issue of shares
by, or any transfers of shares of, Cayman Islands companies (except those which hold interests in land in the Cayman Islands).
The Cayman Islands is not party to any double tax treaties which are applicable to any payments made to or by our company. There
are no exchange control regulations or currency restrictions in the Cayman Islands.
Payments
of dividends and capital in respect of our shares will not be subject to taxation in the Cayman Islands and no withholding will
be required on the payment of dividends or capital to any holder of our shares, nor will gains derived from the disposal of our
shares be subject to Cayman Islands income or corporation tax.
Pursuant
to Section 6 of the Tax Concessions Act (Revised) of the Cayman Islands, we have obtained an undertaking from the Financial
Secretary of the Cayman Islands:
|
(1)
|
that
no law which is enacted in the Cayman Islands imposing any tax to be levied on profits or income or gains or appreciation
shall apply to us or our operations; and
|
|
(2)
|
in
addition, that no tax to be levied on profits, income, gains or appreciations or which is in the nature of estate duty or
inheritance tax shall be payable:
|
|
(i)
|
on
or in respect of the shares, debentures or other obligations of our company; or
|
|
(ii)
|
by
way of the withholding in whole or in part of any “relevant payment” as defined in section 6(3) of the Tax Concessions
Act (Revised).
|
The
undertaking is for a period of twenty years from November 2, 2018.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
Subject
to the qualifications and limitations described below, the following are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of
the purchase, ownership and disposition of ordinary shares to a “U.S. Holder.” Non-U.S. Holders are urged to consult
their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of ordinary
shares to them.
For
purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of ordinary shares that is, for U.S. federal
income tax purposes:
|
●
|
an
individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
|
●
|
a
corporation (or other entity taxed as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under
the laws of the United States or any of its political subdivisions;
|
|
●
|
an
estate, whose income is includible in gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its source; or
|
|
●
|
a
trust if (i) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust
and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (ii) it has a valid
election to be treated as a U.S. person.
|
A
“non-U.S. Holder” is any individual, corporation, trust or estate that is a beneficial owner of ordinary shares and
is not a U.S. Holder.
This
discussion is based on current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, applicable U.S. Treasury
Regulations promulgated thereunder, and administrative and judicial decisions as at the date hereof, all of which are subject
to change, possibly on a retroactive basis, and any change could affect the continuing accuracy of this discussion.
This
summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to each person’s
decision to purchase ordinary shares. This discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be
relevant to any particular U.S. Holder based on such holder’s particular circumstances, including Medicare tax imposed on
certain investment income. In particular, this discussion considers only U.S. Holders that will own ordinary shares as capital
assets within the meaning of section 1221 of the Code and does not address the potential application of U.S. federal alternative
minimum tax or the U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders that are subject to special treatment, including:
|
●
|
broker
dealers or insurance companies;
|
|
●
|
U.S.
Holders who have elected mark-to-market accounting;
|
|
●
|
tax-exempt
organizations or pension funds;
|
|
●
|
regulated
investment companies, real estate investment trusts, insurance companies, financial institutions or “financial services
entities”;
|
|
●
|
U.S.
Holders who hold ordinary shares as part of a “straddle,” “hedge,” “constructive sale”
or “conversion transaction” or other integrated investment;
|
|
●
|
U.S.
Holders who own or owned, directly, indirectly or by attribution, at least 10% of the voting power of our ordinary shares;
|
|
●
|
U.S.
Holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. Dollar;
|
|
●
|
U.S.
Holders who received ordinary shares as compensation;
|
|
●
|
U.S.
Holders who are otherwise subject to UK taxation;
|
|
●
|
persons
holding ordinary shares in connection with a trade or business outside of the United States; and
|
|
●
|
certain
expatriates or former long-term residents of the United States.
|
This
discussion does not consider the tax treatment of holders that are entities treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax
purposes or other pass-through entities or persons who hold ordinary shares through a partnership or other pass-through entity.
In addition, this discussion does not address any aspect of state, local or non-U.S. tax laws, or the possible application of
U.S. federal gift or estate tax.
BECAUSE
OF THE COMPLEXITY OF THE TAX LAWS AND BECAUSE THE TAX CONSEQUENCES TO ANY PARTICULAR HOLDER OF ORDINARY SHARES MAY BE AFFECTED
BY MATTERS NOT DISCUSSED HEREIN, EACH HOLDER OF ORDINARY SHARES IS URGED TO CONSULT WITH ITS TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE SPECIFIC
TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE ACQUISITION AND THE OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF ORDINARY SHARES, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY AND EFFECT
OF STATE, LOCAL AND NON-U.S. TAX LAWS, AS WELL AS U.S. FEDERAL TAX LAWS AND APPLICABLE TAX TREATIES.
Taxation
of Dividends Paid on Ordinary Shares
Subject
to the passive foreign investment company rules discussed below, the gross amount of distributions made by us with respect to
our ordinary shares generally will be includable in the gross income of U.S. Holders as foreign source passive income. Because
we do not determine our earnings and profits for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. Holder will be required to treat any
distribution paid on ordinary shares, including the amount of non-U.S. taxes, if any, withheld from the amount paid, as a dividend
on the date the distribution is received. Such distribution generally will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction
generally allowed to U.S. corporations in respect of dividends received from other U.S. corporations.
Cash
distributions paid in a non-U.S. currency will be included in the income of U.S. Holders at a U.S. Dollar amount equal to the
spot rate of exchange in effect on the date the dividends are includible in the income of the U.S. Holders, regardless of whether
the payment is in fact converted to U.S. Dollars, and U.S. Holders will have a tax basis in such non-U.S. currency for U.S. federal
income tax purposes equal to such U.S. Dollar value. If a U.S. Holder converts a distribution paid in non-U.S. currency into U.S.
Dollars on the day the dividend is includible in the income of the U.S. Holder, the U.S. Holder generally should not be required
to recognize gain or loss arising from exchange rate fluctuations. If a U.S. Holder subsequently converts the non-U.S. currency,
any subsequent gain or loss in respect of such non-U.S. currency arising from exchange rate fluctuations will be U.S.-source ordinary
income or loss.
Dividends
we pay with respect to our ordinary shares to non-corporate U.S. Holders may be “qualified dividend income,” which
is currently taxable at a reduced rate; provided that (i) our ordinary shares are readily tradable on an established securities
market in the United States, (ii) we are not a passive foreign investment company (as discussed below) with respect to the U.S.
Holder for either our taxable year in which the dividend was paid or the preceding taxable year, (iii) the U.S. Holder has held
our ordinary shares for at least 61 days of the 121-day period beginning on the date which is 60 days before the ex-dividend date,
and (v) the U.S. Holder is not under an obligation to make related payments on substantially similar or related property. We believe
our ordinary shares, which are expected to be listed on the NYSE American, will be considered to be readily tradable on an established
securities market in the United States, although there can be no assurance that this will continue to be the case in the future.
Any days during which a U.S. Holder has diminished its risk of loss on our ordinary shares are not counted towards meeting the
61-day holding period. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors on their eligibility for reduced rates of taxation with
respect to any dividends paid by us.
Distributions
paid on ordinary shares generally will be foreign-source passive category income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes and will
not qualify for the dividends received deduction generally available to corporations. Subject to certain conditions and limitations,
non-U.S. taxes, if any, withheld from a distribution may be eligible for credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income
tax liability. In addition, if 50 percent or more of the voting power or value of our shares is owned, or is treated as owned,
by U.S. persons (whether or not we are a “controlled foreign corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes), the
portion of our dividends attributable to income which we derive from sources within the United States (whether or not in connection
with a trade or business) would generally be U.S.-source income. U.S. Holders would not be able directly to utilize foreign tax
credits arising from non U.S. taxes considered to be imposed upon U.S.-source income.
Taxation
of the Sale or Other Disposition of Ordinary Shares
Subject
to the passive foreign investment company rules discussed below, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize a capital gain or loss
on the taxable sale or other disposition of our ordinary shares in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S. Dollar amount
realized on such sale or other disposition (determined in the case of consideration in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar by
reference to the spot exchange rate in effect on the date of the sale or other disposition or, if the ordinary shares are treated
as traded on an established securities market and the U.S. Holder is a cash basis taxpayer or an electing accrual basis taxpayer,
the spot exchange rate in effect on the settlement date) and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in such ordinary shares
determined in U.S. Dollars. The initial tax basis of ordinary shares to a U.S. Holder will be the U.S. Holder’s U.S. Dollar
cost for ordinary shares (determined by reference to the spot exchange rate in effect on the date of the purchase or, if the ordinary
shares are treated as traded on an established securities market and the U.S. Holder is a cash basis taxpayer or an electing accrual
basis taxpayer, the spot exchange rate in effect on the settlement date).
Capital
gain from the sale, exchange or other disposition of ordinary shares held more than one year generally will be treated as long-term
capital gain and is eligible for a reduced rate of taxation for non-corporate holders. Gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder
on a sale or other disposition of ordinary shares generally will be treated as U.S.-source income or loss for U.S. foreign tax
credit purposes. The deductibility of a capital loss recognized on the sale or exchange of ordinary shares is subject to limitations.
A U.S. Holder that receives currencies other than U.S. Dollars upon disposition of the ordinary shares and converts such currencies
into U.S. Dollars subsequent to receipt will have foreign exchange gain or loss based on any appreciation or depreciation in the
value of such currencies against the U.S. Dollar, which generally will be U.S.-source ordinary income or loss.
Passive
Foreign Investment Company
Based
on our current composition of assets and market capitalization (which will fluctuate from time to time), we believe that we are
not and will not become a passive foreign investment company, or a PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, the determination
of whether we are a PFIC is made annually, after the close of the relevant taxable year. Therefore, it is possible that we could
be classified as a PFIC for the current taxable year or in future years due to changes in the composition of our assets or income,
as well as changes to our market capitalization. The market value of our assets may be determined in large part by reference to
the market price of our ordinary shares, which may fluctuate.
In
general, a non-U.S. corporation will be classified as a PFIC for any taxable year if at least (i) 75% of its gross income is classified
as “passive income” or (ii) 50% of its assets (determined on the basis of a quarterly average) produce or are held
for the production of passive income. For these purposes, cash is considered a passive asset. In making this determination, the
non-U.S. corporation is treated as earning its proportionate share of any income and owning its proportionate share of any assets
of any corporation in which it holds 25% or more (by value) of the stock.
Under
the PFIC rules, if we were considered a PFIC at any time that a U.S. Holder holds our shares, we would continue to be treated
as a PFIC with respect to such holder’s investment unless (i) we cease to be a PFIC and (ii) the U.S. Holder has made a
“deemed sale” election under the PFIC rules.
If
we are considered a PFIC at any time that a U.S. Holder holds our shares, any gain recognized by the U.S. Holder on a sale or
other disposition of the shares, as well as the amount of an “excess distribution” (defined below) received by such
holder, would be allocated ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the shares. The amounts allocated to the taxable
year of the sale or other disposition and to any year before we became a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income. The amount allocated
to each other taxable year would be subject to tax at the highest rate in effect for individuals or corporations, as appropriate,
for that taxable year, and an interest charge would be imposed. For purposes of these rules, an excess distribution is the amount
by which any distribution received by a U.S. Holder on its shares exceeds 125% of the average of the annual distributions on the
shares received during the preceding three years or the U.S. Holder’s holding period, whichever is shorter. Certain elections
may be available that would result in alternative treatments (such as mark-to-market treatment) of the shares.
If
we are treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder for any taxable year, the U.S. Holder will be deemed to own shares in any
of our subsidiaries that are also PFICs. However, an election for mark-to-market treatment would likely not be available with
respect to any such subsidiaries. If we are considered a PFIC, a U.S. Holder will also be subject to information reporting requirements
on an annual basis. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors about the potential application of the PFIC rules to an
investment in our shares.
If
we were classified as a PFIC, a U.S. Holder may be able to make a mark-to-market election with respect to our ordinary shares
(but not with respect to the shares of any lower-tier PFICs) if the ordinary shares are “regularly traded” on a “qualified
exchange”. In general, our ordinary shares issued will be treated as “regularly traded” in any calendar year
in which more than a de minimis quantity of ordinary shares are traded on a qualified exchange on at least 15 days during each
calendar quarter. We believe the NYSE American is a qualified exchange. However, we can make no assurance that the ordinary shares
will be listed on a “qualified exchange” or that there will be sufficient trading activity for the ordinary shares
to be treated as “regularly traded”. Accordingly, U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisers as to whether
their ordinary shares would qualify for the mark-to-market election.
If
a U.S. Holder makes the mark-to-market election, for each year in which our company is a PFIC, the holder will generally include
as ordinary income the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the ordinary shares at the end of the taxable year over their
adjusted tax basis, and will be permitted an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of the adjusted tax basis of the
ordinary shares over their fair market value at the end of the taxable year (but only to the extent of the net amount of previously
included income as a result of the mark-to-market election). If a U.S. Holder makes the election, the holder’s tax basis
in our ordinary shares will be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss amounts. Any gain recognized on the sale or other disposition
of our ordinary shares will be treated as ordinary income, and any loss will be treated as an ordinary loss to the extent of any
prior mark-to-market gains.
If
a U.S. Holder makes the mark-to-market election, it will be effective for the taxable year for which the election is made and
all subsequent taxable years unless the ordinary shares are no longer regularly traded on a qualified exchange or the IRS consents
to the revocation of the election.
If
we were classified as a PFIC, U.S. Holders would not be eligible to make an election to treat us as a “qualified electing
fund,” or a QEF election, because we do not anticipate providing U.S. Holders with the information required to permit a
QEF election to be made.
U.S.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
A
U.S. Holder is generally subject to information reporting requirements with respect to dividends paid in the United States on
ordinary shares and proceeds paid from the sale, exchange, redemption or other disposition of ordinary shares. A U.S. Holder is
subject to backup withholding (currently at 24%) on dividends paid in the United States on ordinary shares and proceeds paid from
the sale, exchange, redemption or other disposition of our ordinary shares unless the U.S. Holder is a corporation, provides an
IRS Form W-9 or otherwise establishes a basis for exemption.
Backup
withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be credited against a U.S. Holder’s
U.S. federal income tax liability, and a U.S. Holder may obtain a refund from the IRS of any excess amount withheld under the
backup withholding rules, provided that certain information is timely furnished to the IRS. Holders are urged to consult their
own tax advisors regarding the application of backup withholding and the availability of and procedures for obtaining an exemption
from backup withholding in their particular circumstances.
F.
|
Dividends
and paying agents
|
Not
applicable.
Not
applicable
We
file annual reports and other information with the SEC. You may inspect and copy any report or document we file, including this
annual report and the accompanying exhibits, at the website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov, as well as on our website
at www.indo-energy.com. Information on our website does not constitute a part of this annual report and is not incorporated
by reference.
We
will also provide without charge to each person, including any beneficial owner of our ordinary shares, upon written or oral request
of that person, a copy of any and all of the information that has been incorporated by reference in this annual report. Please
direct such requests to James J. Huang, Chief Investment Officer, Indonesia Energy Corporation Limited, Gedung Graha Anugerah,
Jl. Raya Pasar Minggu No. 17A, Kelurahan Pancoran, Kecamatan Pancoran, Jakarta Selatan 12780 - Indonesia.
I.
|
Subsidiary
information
|
Not
applicable.
ITEM
11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Credit
Risk
As
of December 31, 2020 and 2019, all of the Company’s accounts receivable result from the entitlement of Oil & Gas Property
subject to amortization and profit sharing from the sale of the crude oil under the TAC by Pertamina. This concentration of receivables
from one party may impact the Company’s overall credit risk, either positively or negatively, in that Pertamina may be similarly
affected by changes in economic or other conditions.
For
the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, 100% of the Company’s revenues were generated through the operatorship
of Kruh Block. The Company does not believe that there will be any material adverse change in the operatorship of Kruh Block or
the TAC.
Liquidity
Risk
See
above “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources”.
Interest
Rate Risk
We
do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes and have not used any derivative financial instruments to manage
our interest rate risk exposure.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Risk
The
reporting currency of the Company is United States dollar (“USD”, “dollar”). The currency of the primary
economic environment in which the operations of the Company are conducted is dollar. Therefore, the dollar has been determined
to be the Company’s functional currency.
Non-dollar
transactions and balances have been translated into dollars for financial reporting purposes. Transactions in foreign currency
(primarily in Indonesian Rupiahs – “IDR”) are recorded at the exchange rate as of the transaction date. Monetary
assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are translated on the basis of the representative rates of exchange at
the balance sheet dates. All exchange gains and losses from re-measurement of monetary balance sheet items denominated in non-dollar
currencies are reflected in the statement of operations as they arise.
See
“Risk Factors – Risks Related to Doing Business in Indonesia – Fluctuations in the value of the Indonesian Rupiah
may materially and adversely affect us.”
Inflation
Risk
We
do not consider inflation to be a significant risk to direct expenses in the current and foreseeable future. However, in the event
that inflation becomes a significant factor in the global economy, inflationary pressures would result in increased operating
and financing costs.
ITEM
12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not
applicable.
During the
year ended December 31, 2020 the Company wrote off a payable in the amount of $146,662 due to a vendor as it has
been deemed remote for the vendor to request the Company to pay the balance.