CANBERRA, Australia,
Sept. 8, 2011 /PRNewswire-Asia/
--
1. New Contract Award
Electro Optics Systems Holdings Limited (ASX: "EOS", OTC
"EOPSY") has this week been awarded an AUD7.4 million contract by
an existing long-term customer for the supply of remote weapon
systems. The new contract is for the supply of the EOS R-400
product configuration and will be filled over the next 6 months.
Orders are typically delivered over 12 months or more, and this
delivery has been expedited for customer convenience and to achieve
efficient production.
Although new customers are sought and achieved, EOS receives the
majority of its remote weapon systems business from existing
customers reflecting the company's commitment to quality,
technology, performance and long-term product support.
The new order combines with other orders in production and
contracts under negotiation to create a significant backlog of
orders for future production. The order backlog is a key factor in
planning the efficient work flow in EOS production facilities and
those of its suppliers.
2. US Army Updates CROWS Acquisition Update
In May of 2010, EOS announced it had teamed with Northrop
Grumman Corporation to compete for US Army requirements for remote
weapon systems, including the US Army CROWS program for remote
weapon systems. EOS has issued several updates since then on the
Army's progress towards awarding the next CROWS contract.
On 2 September 2011 the US Army
released further details relating to its acquisition of remote
weapon systems, technology and support under its CROWS program. The
announcement updates key aspects of the CROWS acquisition:
A. Contract Value.
The value of the initial contract award by Army will be
approximately US$970 million. Army
has always had full discretion in setting the value of the initial
CROWS 3 contract, and no contract value had previously been
released.
B. Scope of Work.
The scope of work has been confirmed to include three mandatory
elements:
I.
|
Production of up to 3,000
CROWS and spare parts.
|
|
II
|
Product improvements,
integrations, and testing.
|
|
III
|
Training, overhaul,
depot-level, field maintenance support, recapitalisation/reset of
CROWS, and general engineering support, as required.
|
|
|
|
The restriction of the production quantity to 3,000 units from
the previously-announced requirement for 18,000 units is consistent
with an initial contract value of $970
million. A re-compete for further quantities may be applied
in future by Army. The contract scope is otherwise unchanged from
previous Army updates, and conforms to the scope performed by EOS
and Northrop Grumman Corporation under other programs.
C. Production Risk
Army has clarified how it expects to reduce production risk and
achieve the same product performance risk from a new contractor as
achieved with current CROWS systems. The statement reads in
part:
"The CROWS will be built to a detail specification. The detail
specification includes the performance requirements and technical
drawings. The detail specification states the design requirements,
how the requirements are to be achieved and how the components are
to be fabricated or constructed. The detail specification does not
include technical drawings and assembly procedures for some
sub-assemblies, which are to be made by qualified directed sources
at least until the First Article Testing phase. This approach will
ensure a very high level of commonality between the new CROWS
producer and commonality/interchangeability with existing CROWS
systems."
This is the position anticipated by EOS. Provided the technical
documentation to be released by Army reaches the standard expected,
EOS believes its team's extensive experience in production of
various types of weapon systems will allow it to quickly produce
products that meet the Army's desired level of commonality and
interchangeability.
D. Production Scalability
Army has further clarified consistent earlier [since 2009]
indications that it expects the new producer of CROWS to provide a
scalable production capability that can efficiently produce "from 0
to 50 CROWS per month with the ability to surge to 150 CROWS per
month". This is an extraordinary requirement and essentially means
that EOS must be profitable in this business segment without CROWS
production since it is not otherwise possible to efficiently
provide a wide range of CROWS outputs, based on a minimum monthly
output of zero.
Over the past 2 years EOS has achieved sufficient orders and
backlog to keep its production resources cost-effectively active at
a level that allows the responsive production scalability required
by Army. EOS has also extensively updated and upgraded its US
production plant, originally built for producing CROWS in large
volume in 2005, specifically to allow efficient scaling of output
without burdening smaller orders [including smaller CROWS periodic
orders] with the cost of idle plant capacity.
These plant and process improvements are operational. EOS has
demonstrated in recent years that its business model is sustainable
if CROWS is excluded, even when meeting expenses for CROWS
requirements. This places EOS in a strong position to meet CROWS
requirements, and to grow independently of CROWS.
E. Number of Contractors.
In an earlier public update [10 March
2011] EOS had advised: "The Government's intent is to award
multiple (two or more) Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity
(ID/IQ) contracts, however the Government reserves the right to
make one award."
The Government [Army] has now clarified that its current
intention is to make a single award for one company to perform the
entire scope of work.
F. Schedule
The acquisition schedule is generally unchanged from previous
Army updates, although more specific dates for key events have been
released. Army expects to call for proposals [tenders] by late in
2011. The normal tender response period is around 60 days,
suggesting an award by Q2 2012.
The Army's 2 September 2011 update
makes no change to the procurement that would require significant
change to the competitive approach for CROWS adopted by EOS as part
of the Northrop Grumman Corporation team. The team will compete
vigorously for any award that Army makes for CROWS.
ABOUT US ARMY CROWS
Please visit,
http://procnet.pica.army.mil/FBO/RFP/W15QKN-11-R-f015/0010.htm
ABOUT ELECTRO OPTIC SYSTEMS (ASX: EOS; OTC: EOPSY)
EOS develops, manufactures and sells sophisticated aerospace
technology with a wide range of applications through two business
divisions – military and space.
EOS' remote weapon systems enable a weapon to be fired rapidly
and accurately by a gunner safely relocated away from the weapon.
Typically the technology is applied for mounting weapons on the top
of an armoured vehicle, and the gunner inside the vehicle. EOS
remote weapon systems have been produced in significant numbers for
US Army, NATO forces, Australia,
and other countries around the world.
EOS' space division is as a manufacturer of telescopes and
technology to support space surveillance and space debris
management, including removal. In space surveillance, EOS's laser
tracking systems and computer technology can simultaneously track
tens of thousands of orbiting objects – as small as 2 cm in
diameter – while its space ablation technology and systems can
potentially alter the orbits of objects (e.g. satellites) in
space.
EOS has around 140 employees, based in Canberra (Australia), Tucson (Arizona), Singapore and Deggendorf (Germany). The company also has manufacturing
centres in Queanbeyan and in Tucson,
Arizona.
Information:
|
|
Ben Greene
|
Mark Bornholt
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
EOS
|
Chief Executive Officer Defence
Systems
|
|
Ph: +61-414-365-658
|
Ph: +61-040-404-2528
|
|
www.eos-aus.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOURCE Electro Optics Systems Holdings Limited