directors, and Amgen as defendants. On September 2, 2022, a purported stockholder of ChemoCentryx filed a lawsuit in
Federal court in the Northern District of California, entitled Meinking v. ChemoCentryx, Inc., was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, with
naming ChemoCentryx and the members of the Board named as defendants. On September 16, 2022, a purported stockholder of ChemoCentryx filed a lawsuit in Federal court in
the Southern District of New York, entitled Halberstam v. ChemoCentryx, Inc., naming ChemoCentryx and the members of the Board as defendants. On September 19, 2022, a purported stockholder of ChemoCentryx filed a lawsuit in
Federal court in the Southern District of New York, entitled Stein v. ChemoCentryx, Inc., naming ChemoCentryx and the members of the Board as defendants. On September 21, 2022, a purported stockholder of ChemoCentryx filed a
lawsuit in State court in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Mateo, entitled Drulias v. Schall, naming ChemoCentryx, members of the Board and Amgen as defendants. On October 5, 2022,
a purported stockholder of ChemoCentryx filed a lawsuit in Federal court in the Southern District of New York, entitled Weiss v. ChemoCentryx, Inc., naming ChemoCentryx and the members of the Board as defendants. On October 6, 2022, a purported
stockholder filed a lawsuit in Federal court in the District of Delaware, entitled Kent v. ChemoCentryx, Inc., naming ChemoCentryx and the members of the Board as defendants.
For information regarding the pending litigation, please see the section entitled The MergerLitigation Related to the Merger
beginning on page 76.
On Page 37 of the Definitive Proxy Statement, the first full paragraph is amended as follows:
In accordance with the Boards direction, during the period between April 3, 2020 and June 1, 2020, representatives of Goldman Sachs contacted
13 potential strategic transaction counterparties, including Amgen, to gauge their interest in a potential strategic transaction with ChemoCentryx. Of those 13 parties contacted, five such parties, including Amgen, entered into a non-disclosure agreement with ChemoCentryx and participated in management presentation meetings with members of senior management of ChemoCentryx and representatives of Goldman Sachs (such parties, other than Amgen,
referred to as Party A, Party B, Party C and Party D). Each such non-disclosure agreement was entered into in April 2020 and each such non-disclosure agreement included a standstill provision that prohibited the applicable party, for a period of twelve months from the date of the non-disclosure agreement,
from offering to acquire or acquiring ChemoCentryx, and from taking certain other actions, including soliciting proxies, without the prior consent of ChemoCentryx. The non-disclosure agreements provided for
the termination of the standstill provision upon ChemoCentryxs entry into a definitive agreement with a third party providing for a sale of ChemoCentryx. Any standstill restrictions contained in these non-disclosure agreements expired no later than twelve months following the date of the applicable non-disclosure agreement. Eight of the 13 parties who
were contacted by representatives of Goldman Sachs did not engage in discussions with ChemoCentryx or otherwise to pursue a potential strategic transaction with ChemoCentryx. None of the parties contacted ultimately submitted an indication of
interest with respect to an acquisition of ChemoCentryx.
On Page 43 of the Definitive Proxy Statement, the fourth full paragraph is amended
as follows:
On July 20, 2022, the Board held a telephonic special meeting, which was also attended by representatives of Goldman Sachs
and representatives of Latham & Watkins. At the meeting, Dr. Schall provided the Board an update on recent diligence discussions between representatives of Amgen and representatives of ChemoCentryx. Dr. Schall also provided the
Board an update with respect to Party E, including Dr. Schalls conversation with the Chief Executive Officer of Party E on July 14, 2022 and the revised non-binding indication of interest
received from Party E on July 19, 2022. Following discussion, the Board directed members of senior management of ChemoCentryx and representatives of Goldman Sachs to convey to representatives of Party E the need for Party E to increase its
offer price prior to ChemoCentryx providing Party E with due diligence information. The Board, representatives of Goldman Sachs and representatives of Latham & Watkins then discussed certain other biopharmaceutical companies who would be
considered most likely to have interest in acquiring ChemoCentryx and who would be the most likely to be capable of completing an acquisition of ChemoCentryx. Following such discussion, the Board directed representatives of Goldman Sachs to contact
four other global biopharmaceutical companies (including Party A, Party C, Party D, and one other biopharmaceutical company referred to as Party F) with respect to their potential interest in an acquisition of ChemoCentryx, each
of whom the Board determined were appropriately likely to have interest in acquiring ChemoCentryx and appropriately likely to be capable of completing an acquisition of ChemoCentryx.
On page 45 of the Definitive Proxy Statement, the first and second full paragraphs are amended as follows:
On July 28, 2022, the Board held a telephonic special meeting, which was also attended by representatives of Goldman Sachs and representatives of
Latham & Watkins. At the meeting, Dr. Schall provided the Board an update on recent diligence discussions with Amgen and Dr. Schalls recent discussion with Party Es Chief Executive Officer. Representatives of Goldman
Sachs also provided an update on discussions with Party As representatives. Representatives of Goldman Sachs also provided an update on Party C, Party D, and Party F, noting to the Board that each such party had decided not to engage.
Following discussion, the Board directed members of senior management of ChemoCentryx and representatives of Goldman Sachs to continue engaging with Party E on a limited basis, to