Item
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
IMUNON,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE
SHEETS
See
accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
IMUNON,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE
SHEETS
(Continued)
| |
September
30, 2022 | | |
December 31,
2021 | |
| |
(Unaudited) | | |
| |
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
| | | |
| | |
Current
liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts
payable – trade | |
$ | 3,369,913 | | |
$ | 2,547,251 | |
Other
accrued liabilities | |
| 3,925,561 | | |
| 3,173,537 | |
Operating
lease liability - current portion | |
| 373,525 | | |
| 548,870 | |
Note payable
– current portion, net of deferred financing costs | |
| 670,513 | | |
| - | |
Deferred
revenue - current portion | |
| 125,000 | | |
| 500,000 | |
Total current
liabilities | |
| 8,464,512 | | |
| 6,769,658 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Earn-out milestone liability | |
| 5,396,000 | | |
| 5,396,000 | |
Notes payable – non-current
portion, net of deferred financing costs | |
| 5,319,520 | | |
| 5,854,461 | |
Operating
lease liability - non-current portion | |
| - | | |
| 230,749 | |
Total
liabilities | |
| 19,180,032 | | |
| 18,250,868 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Commitments
and contingencies | |
| - | | |
| – | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Stockholders’
equity: | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Preferred stock - $0.01 par
value (100,000 shares authorized, and no shares issued or outstanding at September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021) | |
| - | | |
| – | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock - $0.01 par value
(112,500,000 shares authorized; 7,098,763 and 5,770,538 shares issued at September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively;
and 7,098,741 and 5,770,516 shares outstanding at September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively) | |
| 70,988 | | |
| 57,705 | |
Additional paid-in capital | |
| 396,825,849 | | |
| 388,600,979 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss | |
| (25,424 | ) | |
| (7,974 | ) |
Accumulated
deficit | |
| (355,435,150 | ) | |
| (332,769,591 | ) |
Total stockholders’
equity before treasury stock | |
| 41,436,263 | | |
| 55,881,119 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Treasury stock, at cost
(22 shares at September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021) | |
| (85,188 | ) | |
| (85,188 | ) |
Total
stockholders’ equity | |
| 41,351,075 | | |
| 55,795,931 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity | |
$ | 60,531,107 | | |
$ | 74,046,799 | |
See
accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
IMUNON,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
See
accompanying notes unaudited to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
IMUNON,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS
OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
See
accompanying notes unaudited to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
IMUNON,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
See
accompanying notes unaudited to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
IMUNON,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
(Unaudited)
| |
| | | |
| | |
| |
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
| |
| | |
| |
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information: | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest
paid | |
$ | (4,742,734 | ) | |
$ | (307,985 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash paid
for amounts included in measurement of lease liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Operating
cash flows for lease payments | |
$ | 450,721 | | |
$ | 418,696 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Realized
and unrealized (losses) gains, net, on investment securities | |
$ | (17,450 | ) | |
$ | 2,139 | |
See
accompanying notes unaudited to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
IMUNON,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS
OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 AND 2021
| |
Common
Stock Outstanding | | |
Additional Paid-in | | |
Treasury
Stock | | |
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive | | |
Accumulated | | |
Total
Stockholders’ | |
| |
Shares | | |
Amount | | |
Capital | | |
Shares | | |
Amount | | |
(Loss)/Income | | |
Deficit | | |
Equity | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Balance at July
1, 2021 | - |
| 5,770,516 | | |
$ | 57,705 | | |
$ | 387,222,506 | | |
| 22 | | |
$ | (85,188 | ) | |
$ | (3,770 | ) | |
$ | (323,137,741 | ) | |
$ | 64,053,512 | |
Net loss | - |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (5,410,544 | ) | |
| (5,410,544 | ) |
Fees incurred from registered
direct offering | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (8,320 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (8,320 | ) |
Realized and unrealized gains
(losses), net, on investments securities | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 5,909 | | |
| - | | |
| 5,909 | |
Stock-based
compensation expense | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 700,624 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 700,624 | |
Balance
at September 30, 2021 | - |
| 5,770,516 | | |
$ | 57,705 | | |
$ | 387,914,810 | | |
| 22 | | |
$ | (85,188 | ) | |
$ | 2,139 | | |
$ | (328,548,285 | ) | |
$ | 59,341,181 | |
See
accompanying notes unaudited to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
IMUNON,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS
OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 AND 2021
| |
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
Series
A & B
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
Stock Outstanding | | |
Additional Paid-in | | |
Treasury Stock | | |
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive | | |
Accumulated | | |
Total Stockholders’ | |
| |
Shares | |
|
| Amount |
|
|
Shares | | |
Amount | | |
Capital | | |
Shares | | |
Amount | | |
Loss | | |
Deficit | | |
Equity | |
| |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Balance at January
1, 2022 | |
| - | |
|
$ | - |
|
|
| 5,770,516 | | |
$ | 57,705 | | |
$ | 388,600,979 | | |
| 22 | | |
$ | (85,188 | ) | |
$ | (7,974 | ) | |
$ | (332,769,591 | ) | |
$ | 55,795,931 | |
Net loss | |
| - | |
|
| |
|
|
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (22,665,559 | ) | |
| (22,665,559 | ) |
Effect of reverse stock split | |
| - | |
|
| - |
|
|
| (49 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Issuance of preferred stock
upon financing | |
| 100,000 | |
|
| 28,500,000 |
|
|
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Redemption of preferred stock | |
| (100,000 | ) |
|
| (28,500,000 |
) |
|
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Sale of equity through equity
financing facilities, net of costs | |
| - | |
|
| - |
|
|
| 1,328,274 | | |
| 13,283 | | |
| 6,262,063 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 6,275,346 | |
Realized and unrealized gains
(losses), net, on investments securities | |
| - | |
|
| - |
|
|
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (17,450 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (17,450 | ) |
Stock-based
compensation expense | |
| - | |
|
| - |
|
|
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 1,962,807 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 1,962,807 | |
Balance
at September 30, 2022 | |
| - | |
|
$ | - |
|
|
| 7,098,741 | | |
$ | 70,988 | | |
$ | 396,825,849 | | |
| 22 | | |
$ | (85,188 | ) | |
$ | (25,424 | ) | |
$ | (355,435,150 | ) | |
$ | 41,351,075 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
Common
Stock Outstanding | | |
Additional Paid-in | | |
Treasury
Stock | | |
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive | | |
Accumulated | | |
Total
Stockholders’ | |
| |
Shares | | |
Amount | | |
Capital | | |
Shares | | |
Amount | | |
Income | | |
Deficit | | |
Equity | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Balance at January
1, 2021 | |
| 2,713,402 | | |
$ | 27,134 | | |
$ | 330,669,476 | | |
| 22 | | |
$ | (85,188 | ) | |
$ | - | | |
$ | (312,000,341 | ) | |
$ | 18,611,081 | |
Net loss | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (16,547,944 | ) | |
| (16,547,944 | ) |
Sale of equity through equity
financing facilities, net of costs | |
| 2,975,503 | | |
| 29,755 | | |
| 52,659,190 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 52,688,945 | |
Shares issued upon exercise
of common stock warrants, net of fees | |
| 81,111 | | |
| 811 | | |
| 1,507,855 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 1,508,666 | |
Shares issued upon exercise
of options to purchase common stock | |
| 500 | | |
| 5 | | |
| 4,720 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 4,725 | |
Realized and unrealized gains
(losses), net, on investments securities | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 2,139 | | |
| - | | |
| 2,139 | |
Stock-based
compensation expense | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 3,073,569 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 3,073,569 | |
Balance
at September 30, 2021 | |
| 5,770,516 | | |
$ | 57,705 | | |
$ | 387,914,810 | | |
| 22 | | |
$ | (85,188 | ) | |
$ | 2,139 | | |
$ | (328,548,285 | ) | |
$ | 59,341,181 | |
See
accompanying notes unaudited to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
IMUNON,
INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
FOR
THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 AND 2021
Note
1. Business Description
On
September 19, 2022, Celsion Corporation announced a corporate name change to Imunon, Inc., reflecting the evolution of the Company’s
business focus and its commitment to developing cutting-edge immunotherapies and next-generation vaccines to treat cancer and infectious
diseases. The Company’s common stock will continue to trade on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the new ticker symbol “IMNN”
effective as of the opening of trading on September 21, 2022. The Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to effect
the new corporate name.
Imunon,
Inc. (“Imunon” and the “Company”) is a fully integrated, clinical stage biotechnology company focused on advancing
a portfolio of innovative treatments that harness the body’s natural mechanisms to generate safe, effective, and durable responses
across a broad array of human diseases, constituting a differentiating approach from conventional therapies. Imunon has two platform
technologies: Our TheraPlas® platform for the development of immunotherapies and other anti-cancer nucleic acid-based therapies,
and our PLACCINE platform for the development of nucleic acid vaccines for infectious diseases and cancer. The Company’s lead clinical
program, GEN-1, is a DNA-based immunotherapy for the localized treatment of advanced ovarian cancer currently in Phase II development.
GEN-1 works by instructing the body to produce safe and durable levels of powerful cancer fighting molecules, such as interleukin-12
and interferon gamma, at the tumor site. Additionally, the Company is conducting preclinical proof-of-concept studies on a nucleic acid
vaccine candidate targeting SARS-CoV-2 virus in order to validate its PLACCINE platform. Imunon’s platform technologies are based
on the delivery of nucleic acids with novel synthetic delivery systems that are independent of viral vectors or devices. We will continue
to leverage these platforms and to advance the technological frontier of plasmid DNA to better serve patients with difficult to treat
conditions.
Note
2. Basis of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries,
have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information
and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation. During the quarter, there have been no changes to the Company’s accounting policies. Certain
information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to such rules and regulations.
In
the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair presentation,
have been included in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. Operating results for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other
interim period(s) or for any full year. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) on March 31, 2022.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect
the amount reported in the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those
estimates. Events and conditions arising subsequent to the most recent balance sheet date have been evaluated for their possible impact
on the financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company continues to monitor the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on its financial
condition and results of operations, along with the valuation of its long-term assets and intangible assets. The effect of this matter
could potentially have an impact on the valuation of such assets in the future.
Acquired
in-process research and development (“IPR&D”) in years prior to 2022 has been reviewed for impairment at least annually
in the third quarter of each year, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets might
not be recoverable. Starting in 2022, the Company will review its IPR&D annually in the fourth quarter of each year, and whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets might not be recoverable (see Note 8).
The
Company has $37.4
million in cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and interest receivable to fund its operations. The Company also has
$6.0 million in
restricted cash to fund its financing activity. This is coupled with approximately $3.5
million of future planned sales of the Company’s State of New Jersey net operating losses. The Company believes it has
sufficient capital resources to fund its operations into 2025.
Note
3. New Accounting Pronouncements
From
time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and are adopted by us as of
the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, we believe that the impact of recently issued accounting pronouncements will
not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows, or
do not apply to our operations.
In
May 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-04, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50),
Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Issuer’s
Accounting for Certain Modifications or Exchanges of Freestanding Equity-Classified Written Call Options (a consensus of the FASB Emerging
Issues Task Force)”. This ASU is intended to clarify and reduce diversity in an issuer’s accounting for modifications or
exchanges of freestanding equity-classified written call options that remain equity classified after modification or exchange. The guidance
clarifies whether an issuer should account for a modification or an exchange of a freestanding equity-classified written call option
that remains equity classified after modification or exchange as: (1) an adjustment to equity and, if so, the related earnings per share
effects, if any, or (2) an expense and, if so, the manner and pattern of recognition. The amendments in this ASU affect all entities
that issue freestanding written call options that are classified in equity. The amendments do not apply to modifications or exchanges
of financial instruments that are within the scope of another Topic and do not affect a holder’s accounting for freestanding call
options. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim
periods within those fiscal years. An entity should apply the amendments prospectively to modifications or exchanges occurring on or
after the effective date of the amendments. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, including adoption in an interim period. The
Company adopted this standard during the first quarter of 2022. The adoption of ASU 2021-04 did not have an impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements since the Company has not modified its freestanding call options.
Note
4. Restricted Cash
As
a condition of the SVB Loan Facility entered into on June 18, 2021 as further discussed in Note 10, the Company is required at all times
to maintain on deposit with SVB as cash collateral in a segregated money market bank account in the name of the Company, unrestricted
and unencumbered cash (other than a lien in favor of SVB) in an amount of at least 100% of the aggregate outstanding amount of the SVB
loan facility. SVB may restrict withdrawals or transfers by or on behalf of the Company that would violate this requirement. The required
reserve totaled $6.0 million as of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021. This amount is presented in part as restricted cash in other
non-current assets on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
The
following table reconciles cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash per the balance sheet to the condensed statements of cash flows:
Schedule of Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
| |
September
30, 2022 | | |
September
30, 2021 | |
Cash and cash
equivalents | |
$ | 26,938,090 | | |
$ | 25,648,849 | |
Money
market investments, restricted | |
| 6,000,000 | | |
| 6,000,000 | |
Total | |
$ | 32,938,090 | | |
$ | 31,648,849 | |
Note
5. Net Loss per Common Share
Basic
loss per share is calculated based upon the net loss available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is calculated after adjusting the denominator of the basic earnings per
share computation for the effects of all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. The dilutive effects of preferred
stock, options and warrants and their equivalents are computed using the treasury stock method.
The
total number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants, stock option grants and equity awards were 1,346,472 and 616,690
shares for the periods ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. For the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
2022 and 2021, diluted loss per common share was the same as basic loss per common share as the other warrants and equity awards that
were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per common share
as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. The Company did not pay any dividends during the first nine months of 2022 or 2021.
Note
6. Investment in Debt Securities-Available for Sale
Investments
in debt securities available for sale with a fair value of $10,414,395 and $29,803,095 as of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021,
respectively, which consisted of U.S. Treasury securities and corporate debt securities. These investments are valued at estimated fair
value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity in accumulated other comprehensive
loss.
Investments
in debt securities available for sale are evaluated periodically to determine whether a decline in their value is other than temporary.
The term “other than temporary” is not intended to indicate a permanent decline in value. Rather, it means that the prospects
for near term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support fair values equal to, or
greater than, the carrying value of the security. Management reviews criteria such as the magnitude and duration of the decline, as well
as the reasons for the decline, to predict whether the loss in value is other than temporary. Once a decline in value is determined to
be other than temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized. A summary of the
cost, fair value and maturities of the Company’s short-term investments is as follows:
Schedule
of Cost, Fair Value and Maturities of Short Term Investments
| |
September
30, 2022 | | |
December
31, 2021 | |
| |
Cost | | |
Fair
Value | | |
Cost | | |
Fair
Value | |
Short-term
investments | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
U.S. Treasury
securities | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 14,786,982 | | |
$ | 14,778,705 | |
Corporate
debt securities | |
| 10,439,820 | | |
| 10,414,395 | | |
| 15,024,087 | | |
| 15,024,390 | |
Total | |
$ | 10,439,820 | | |
$ | 10,414,395 | | |
$ | 29,811,069 | | |
$ | 29,803,095 | |
| |
September
30, 2022 | | |
December
31, 2021 | |
| |
Cost | | |
Fair
Value | | |
Cost | | |
Fair
Value | |
Short-term
investment maturities | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Within 3 months | |
$ | 5,995,105 | | |
$ | 5,985,140 | | |
$ | 19,798,177 | | |
$ | 19,799,835 | |
Between 3-12 months | |
| 4,444,715 | | |
| 4,429,255 | | |
| 10,012,892 | | |
| 10,003,260 | |
Total | |
$ | 10,439,820 | | |
$ | 10,414,395 | | |
$ | 29,811,069 | | |
$ | 29,803,095 | |
The
following table shows the Company’s investment in debt securities available for sale gross unrealized gains (losses) and fair value
by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September
30, 2022 and December 31, 2021. The Company has reviewed individual securities to determine whether a decline in fair value below the
amortizable cost basis is other than temporary.
Summary of Investment Securities Gross Unrealized Gains (Losses)
| |
September
30, 2022 | | |
December
31, 2021 | |
Available
for sale securities (all unrealized holding gains and losses are less than 12 months at date of measurement) | |
Fair
Value | | |
Unrealized
Holding Gains
(Losses) | | |
Fair
Value | | |
Unrealized
Holding Gains
(Losses) | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Investments in
debt securities with unrealized gains | |
$ | 3,991,260 | | |
$ | 1,310 | | |
$ | 8,999,580 | | |
$ | 3,499 | |
Investments
in debt securities with unrealized losses | |
| 6,423,135 | | |
| (26,734 | ) | |
| 20,803,515 | | |
| (11,473 | ) |
Total | |
$ | 10,414,395 | | |
$ | (25,424 | ) | |
$ | 29,803,095 | | |
$ | (7,974 | ) |
Investment
(loss) income, which includes net realized losses on sales of available for sale securities and investment income interest and dividends,
is summarized as follows:
Summary of Investment Income
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
| |
For the Three Months Ended
September 30, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Interest and dividends
accrued and paid | |
$ | 163,670 | | |
$ | 6,288 | |
Realized
losses | |
| (10,369 | ) | |
| (2,736 | ) |
Investment
income, net | |
$ | 153,301 | | |
$ | 3,552 | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
| |
For the Nine Months Ended
September 30, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Interest and dividends
accrued and paid | |
$ | 240,063 | | |
$ | 10,135 | |
Realized
losses | |
| (34,303 | ) | |
| (4,521 | ) |
Investment
income, net | |
$ | 205,760 | | |
$ | 5,614 | |
Note
7. Fair Value Measurements
FASB
ASC Section 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures establishes a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements which
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The
three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level
1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) or identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the
measurement date;
Level
2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices
in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data; and
Level
3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing
an asset or liability.
Cash
and cash equivalents, other current assets, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities are reflected in the condensed consolidated
balance sheets at their approximate estimated fair values primarily due to their short-term nature. The fair values of securities available
for sale is determined by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities and classified its investments
as Level 2 items in both 2022 and 2021. There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 and no transfers
in or out of Level 3 during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2022 or during the year ended December 31, 2021. The change in
Level 3 liabilities in the first quarter of 2022 was the result of a change in the fair value of the earn-out milestone liability which
is included in earnings and in-process R&D. During the third quarter and first nine months of 2022, there was no change in the fair
value of the earn-out milestone liability. The earnout milestone liability is valued using a risk-adjusted assessment of the probability
of payment of each milestone, discounted to present value using an estimated time to achieve the milestone (see Note 13).
Assets
and liabilities measured at fair value are summarized below:
Schedule of Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis
| |
Total
Fair Value | | |
Quoted
Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets/Liabilities (Level 1) | | |
Significant
Other Observable Inputs (Level
2) | | |
Significant
Unobservable Inputs (Level
3) | |
Assets: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Recurring items as of September 30, 2022 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Corporate
debt securities, available for sale | |
$ | 10,414,395 | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | 10,414,395 | | |
$ | – | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Non-recurring items as of September 30, 2022 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
In-process
R&D (Note 8) | |
$ | 13,366,234 | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | 13,366,234 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Recurring items as of December 31, 2021 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Corporate
debt securities, available for sale | |
$ | 29,803,095 | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | 29,803,095 | | |
$ | – | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Non-recurring items as of December 31, 2021 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
In-process
R&D (Note 8) | |
$ | 13,366,234 | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | 13,366,234 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Recurring items as of September 30, 2022 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Earn-out
milestone liability (Note 13) | |
$ | 5,396,000 | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | 5,396,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Recurring items as of December 31, 2021 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Earn-out
milestone liability (Note 13) | |
$ | 5,396,000 | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | 5,396,000 | |
Note
8. Intangible Assets
In
June 2014, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of EGEN, Inc., an Alabama corporation (“EGEN”),
which changed its company name to EGWU, Inc. after the closing of the acquisition (the “EGEN Acquisition”). We acquired all
of EGEN’s right, title and interest in and to substantially all of the assets of EGEN, including cash and cash equivalents, patents,
trademarks and other intellectual property rights, clinical data, certain contracts, licenses and permits, equipment, furniture, office
equipment, furnishings, supplies and other tangible personal property. In addition, CLSN Laboratories assumed certain specified liabilities
of EGEN, including the liabilities arising out of the acquired contracts and other assets relating to periods after the closing date.
Acquired
In-process Research and Development
Acquired
IPR&D consists of EGEN’s drug technology platforms: TheraPlas and TheraSilence. The fair value of the IPR&D drug technology
platforms was estimated to be $24.2 million as of the acquisition date. As of the closing of the acquisition, the IPR&D was considered
indefinite lived intangible assets and will not be amortized. IPR&D has been reviewed for impairment at least annually and whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets might not be recoverable. As a result of the Company’s
review for impairment, the IPR&D was impaired over the past 8 years by $10.8 million to its current stated value of $13.4 million.
Starting in 2022, the Company will review its IPR&D annually in the fourth quarter of each year, and whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets might not be recoverable (see Note 2). The Company’s IPR&D consisted
of three core elements, its RNA delivery system, its glioblastoma multiform cancer (“GBM”) product candidate and its ovarian
cancer indication.
The
Company’s ovarian cancer indication, with an original value of $13.4 million, has not been impaired since its acquisition. At September
30, 2022, the Company evaluated the IPR&D for the ovarian cancer indication. As part of the valuation analysis, the fair value of
the intangible assets was estimated by discounting forecasted risk adjusted cash flows at a rate that approximated the cost of capital
of a market participant. Management’s forecast of future cash flows was based on the income approach. Significant estimates, all
of which are considered Level 3 inputs, were used in the fair value methodology, including the Company’s forecast regarding its
future operations and likeliness of obtaining approval to sell its products, as well as other market conditions. Changes in these estimates
could change the forecasted cash flows attributed to the IPR&D which could have a significant impact on the fair value of these assets.
Based on this valuation analysis, the Company concluded that it is not more than likely that the asset is impaired as of September 30,
2022. As such, no impairment charges for IPR&D related to the ovarian cancer indication were recorded during the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2022 and 2021.
Covenants
Not to Compete
Pursuant
to the EGEN Purchase Agreement, EGEN provided certain covenants (“Covenant Not To Compete”) to the Company whereby EGEN agreed,
during the period ending on the seventh anniversary of the closing date of the acquisition on June 20, 2014, not to enter into any business,
directly or indirectly, which competes with the business of the Company nor would it contact, solicit or approach any of the employees
of the Company for purposes of offering employment. The Covenant Not to Compete which was valued at approximately $1.6 million at the
date of the EGEN Acquisition has a definitive life and is amortized on a straight-line basis over its life of 7 years. The Company recognized
amortization expense of $56,829 during each of the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2021. The carrying value of
the Covenant Not to Compete was fully amortized as of June 30, 2021.
Goodwill
The
purchase price exceeded the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired by approximately $2.0 million which was recorded as Goodwill.
Goodwill represents the difference between the total purchase price for the net assets purchased from EGEN and the aggregate fair values
of tangible and intangible assets acquired, less liabilities assumed. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually as of the
Company’s third quarter ended September 30 or sooner if the Company believes indicators of impairment exist. Due to the continuing
slowdown in investment in 2021 by public capital markets in the biotech industry and its impact on market capitalization rates in this
sector, Goodwill was reviewed for impairment as of December 31, 2021. Based on this assessment, Company concluded that Goodwill was impaired.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company wrote off the $2.0 million carrying value of this asset, thereby recognizing a non-cash charge of
$2.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2021.
Following
is a summary of the net fair value of the assets acquired in the EGEN asset acquisition for the nine-month period ended September 30,
2022:
Schedule of Fair Value of Assets Acquired
| |
IPR&D | |
For the nine months ended
September 30, 2022 | |
| | |
Balance
at January 1, 2022, net | |
$ | 13,366,234 | |
Impairment | |
| - | |
Balance
at September 30, 2022, net | |
$ | 13,366,234 | |
Note
9. Accrued Liabilities
Other
accrued liabilities at September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021 include the following:
Schedule of Other Accrued Liabilities
| |
September
30, 2022 | | |
December
31, 2021 | |
Amounts due to
contract research organizations and other contractual agreements | |
$ | 2,094,811 | | |
$ | 1,401,356 | |
Accrued payroll and related
benefits | |
| 1,276,882 | | |
| 1,636,727 | |
Accrued interest | |
| 28,625 | | |
| 16,792 | |
Accrued professional fees | |
| 505,831 | | |
| 87,250 | |
Other | |
| 19,412 | | |
| 31,412 | |
Total | |
$ | 3,925,561 | | |
$ | 3,173,537 | |
Note
10. Notes Payable
The
SVB Loan Facility
On
June 18, 2021, the Company entered into a $10 million loan facility (the “SVB Loan Facility”) with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”).
The Company immediately used $6 million from the SVB Loan Facility to retire all outstanding indebtedness with Horizon Technology Finance
Corporation as further discussed below. Concurrently with this transaction, the Company used $6.0 million of other available funds to
establish a restricted cash account which serves as security for the SVB Loan Facility.
The
SVB Loan Facility is in the form of money market secured indebtedness bearing interest at a calculated WSJ Prime-based variable rate
(currently 6.25%). A final payment equal to 3% of the total $10 million commitment amount is due upon maturity or prepayment of the SVB
Loan Facility. There was no facility commitment fee and no stock or warrants were issued to SVB. Payments under the loan agreement are
interest only for the first 24 months after loan closing, followed by a 24-month amortization period of principal and interest through
the scheduled maturity date.
In
connection with the SVB Loan Facility, the Company incurred financing fees and expenses totaling $243,370 which is recorded and classified
as debt discount and are being amortized as interest expense using the effective interest method over the life of the loan. Also, in
connection with the SVB Loan Facility, the Company is required to pay an end-of-term fee equal to 3.0% of the original loan amount at
time of maturity. Therefore, these amounts totaling $300,000 are being amortized as interest expense using the effective interest method
over the life of the loan. During the three-month period ended September 30, 2022, the Company incurred interest expense of $82,083
and amortized $44,942 as interest expense for debt discounts and end-of-term fee in connection with the SVB Financing Facility. During
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2022, the Company incurred interest expense of $191,167 and amortized $135,572 as interest
expense for debt discounts and end-of-term fee in connection with the SVB Financing Facility. During the three-month and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2021, the Company incurred interest expense of $49,883 and $56,875, respectively, and amortized $45,687 and $52,144,
respectively, as interest expense for debt discounts and end-of-term fee in connection with the SVB Financing Facility.
Following
is a schedule of future principal payments, net of unamortized debt discounts and amortized end-of-term fee, due on the SVB Loan Facility:
Schedule of Future Principle Payments, Net of Unamortized Debt Discounts
| |
| | |
| |
As
of September 30, | |
2023 | |
$ | 750,000 | |
2024 | |
| 3,000,000 | |
2025 | |
| 2,250,000 | |
2026
and thereafter | |
| – | |
Subtotal of future principal
payments | |
| 6,000,000 | |
Unamortized
debt premium, net | |
| (9,967 | ) |
Total | |
$ | 5,990,033 | |
Horizon
Credit Agreement
On
June 27, 2018, the Company entered into a loan agreement with Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (“Horizon”) that provided
$10 million in new capital (the “Horizon Credit Agreement”). The Company drew down $10 million upon closing of the Horizon
Credit Agreement on June 27, 2018. On August 28, 2020, Horizon and the Company amended the Horizon Credit Agreement (the “Horizon
Amendment”) whereby the Company repaid $5 million of the loan’s principal with $5 million of the loan remaining outstanding.
On
June 18, 2021, as a condition of entering into the SVB Loan Facility, the Company paid the remaining outstanding principal balance, an
early termination fee and the end of term charges in full satisfaction of the Horizon Credit Agreement, as amended.
Following
is a schedule of the amounts paid to Horizon on June 18, 2021:
Schedule of Debt
| |
| | |
Principal balance at June 18, 2021 | |
$ | 5,000,000 | |
Early termination fees | |
| 150,000 | |
End
of term charges | |
| 275,000 | |
Total | |
$ | 5,425,000 | |
As
an initial fee in connection with the Horizon Credit Agreement, the Company issued Horizon warrants exercisable for a total of 12,674
shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Existing Warrants”) at a per share exercise price of $39.45. The Existing
Warrants were immediately exercisable for cash or by net exercise from the date of grant and will expire after ten years from the date
of grant. Pursuant to the Horizon Amendment, one-half of the aggregate Existing Warrants, exercisable for a total of 6,337 shares of
the Company’s common stock, were cancelled, and the Company issued Horizon new warrants exercisable at a per share exercise price
equal to $15.15 for a total of 16,501 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “New Warrants”). The New Warrants were
immediately exercisable for cash or by net exercise from the date of grant and will expire after ten years from the date of grant. The
remaining 6,337 Existing Warrants issued in connection with the Horizon Credit Agreement remain outstanding at a per share exercise price
of $39.45.
The
Company valued the warrants issued to Horizon using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and recorded as of the respective issuance
dates a total of $507,116 for the Existing Warrants and $247,548 for the New Warrants as a direct deduction from the debt liability,
consistent with the presentation of debt discounts, which was amortized as interest expense using the effective interest method over
the life of the loan until the loan was terminated on June 18, 2021.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2021, no interest expense was recognized as the amounts owed under the Horizon Credit agreement
were paid off in June 2021. During the nine month ended September 30, 2021, the Company incurred $225,920 in interest expense and amortized
$139,428 as interest expense for debt discounts and end of term charges in connection with the Horizon Credit Agreement.
Note
11. Stockholders’ Equity
On
March 19, 2021, the Company filed with the SEC a new $100 million shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (the “2021 Registration
Statement”) that allows the Company to issue any combination of common stock, preferred stock or warrants to purchase common stock
or preferred stock. This shelf registration was declared effective on March 30, 2021.
On
September 19, 2022, the Company announced a corporate name change to Imunon, Inc. The Company’s common stock will continue to trade
on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the new ticker symbol “IMNN” effective as of the opening of trading on September 21, 2022,
and its CUSIP number (15117N602) remained unchanged. The Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to effect the new
corporate name.
Reverse
Stock Split
On
February 28, 2022, the Company effected a 15-for-1 reverse stock split of its common stock which was made effective for trading purposes
as of the commencement of trading on March 1, 2022. As of that date, each 15 shares of issued and outstanding common stock and equivalents
was consolidated into one share of common stock. All shares have been restated to reflect the effects of the 15-for-1 reverse stock split.
In addition, at the market open on March 1, 2022, the Company’s common stock started trading under a new CUSIP number 15117N602
although the Company’s ticker symbol, CLSN, remained unchanged.
The
reverse stock split was previously approved by the Company’s stockholders at the 2022 Special Meeting held on February 24, 2022,
and the Company subsequently filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation to effect the stock consolidation.
Immediately
prior to the reverse stock split, the Company had 86,557,736 shares of common stock outstanding which consolidated into 5,770,467 shares
of the Company’s common stock. No fractional shares were issued in connection with the reverse stock split. Holders of fractional
shares have been paid out in cash for the fractional portion with the Company’s overall exposure for such payouts consisting of
a nominal amount. The amount of the Company’s outstanding convertible preferred stock was not affected by the reverse stock split.
The number of outstanding options, stock awards and warrants were adjusted accordingly, with outstanding options and stock awards being
reduced from approximately 6.6 million to approximately 0.4 million and outstanding warrants being reduced from approximately 2.5 million
to approximately 0.2 million.
At
the Market Offering Agreement
On
May 25, 2022, the Company entered into an At the Market Offering Agreement (the “Agreement”) with H.C. Wainwright & Co.,
LLC, as sales agent (“Wainwright”), pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell, from time to time, through Wainwright,
shares of the Company’s common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $7,500,000.
The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the offering, if any, for general corporate purposes, including research and development
activities, capital expenditures and working capital. The Company did not sell any shares under the Agreement with Wainwright in the
first nine months of 2022. From October 1, 2022 through the date of November 7, 2022, the Company sold 329,511
shares of stock for net proceeds of $494,445.
Capital
on DemandTM Sales Agreement
On
December 4, 2018, the Company entered into the Capital on Demand Agreement with JonesTrading, pursuant to which the Company may offer
and sell, from time to time, through JonesTrading, shares of the Company’s common stock having an aggregate offering price of up
to $16.0 million. During the first nine months of 2021, the Company has sold 477,877 shares under the Capital on Demand Agreement, receiving
approximately $6.9 million in gross proceeds. The Capital on Demand Agreement with JonesTrading was terminated in the first quarter of
2021.
January
2021 Registered Direct Offering
On
January 22, 2021, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “January 2021 Purchase Agreement”) with several
institutional investors, pursuant to which the Company issued and sold, in a registered direct offering (the “January 2021 Offering”),
an aggregate of 1,728,395 shares of the Company’s common stock at an offering price of $20.25 per share for gross proceeds of approximately
$35 million before the deduction of the January 2021 Placement Agents (as defined below) fee and offering expenses. The closing of the
January 2021 Offering occurred on January 26, 2021.
In
connection with the January 2021 Offering, the Company entered into a placement agent agreement with A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners
(“AGP,” and together with Brookline Capital Markets, the “January 2021 Placement Agents”) pursuant to which the
Company agreed to pay the January 2021 Placement Agents a cash fee equal to 7% of the aggregate gross proceeds raised from the sale of
the securities sold in the January 2021 Offering and reimburse the January 2021 Placement Agents for certain of their expenses in an
amount not to exceed $82,500.
March
2021 Registered Direct Offering
On
March 31, 2021, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “March 2021 Purchase Agreement”) with several
institutional investors, pursuant to which the Company issued and sold, in a registered direct offering (the “March 2021 Offering”),
an aggregate of 769,231 shares of the Company’s common stock, at an offering price of $19.50 per share for gross proceeds of approximately
$15 million before the deduction of the placement agents fee and offering expenses. The closing of the offering occurred on April 5,
2021 and was accounted for in the second quarter of 2021.
In
connection with the March 2021 Offering, the Company entered into a placement agent agreement (the “March 2021 Placement Agent
Agreement”) with AGP, as lead placement agent (together with JonesTrading Institutional Services LLC and Brookline Capital Markets,
a division of Arcadia Securities, LLC, serving as co-placement agents, the “March 2021 Placement Agents”), pursuant to which
the Company agreed to pay the March 2021 Placement Agents an aggregate cash fee equal to 7% of the aggregate gross proceeds raised from
the sale of the securities sold in the offering and reimburse the Placement Agents for certain of their expenses in an amount not to
exceed $82,500.
Series
A and Series B Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock Offering
On
January 10, 2022, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement”) with
several institutional investors, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell, in concurrent registered direct offerings (the
“Preferred Offerings”), (i) 50,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value
$0.01 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), and (ii) 50,000 shares of the Company’s Series B Convertible Redeemable
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Series B Preferred Stock” and together with the Series A Preferred Stock,
the “Preferred Stock”), in each case at an offering price of $285 per share, representing a 5% original issue discount to
the stated value of $300 per share, for gross proceeds of each Preferred Offering of $14.25 million, or approximately $28.50 million
in the aggregate for the Preferred Offerings, before the deduction of the Placement Agent’s (as defined below) fee and offering
expenses. The shares of Series A Preferred Stock had a stated value of $300 per share and were convertible, at a conversion price of
$13.65 per share, into 1,098,901 shares of common stock (subject in certain circumstances to adjustments). The shares of Series B Preferred
Stock had a stated value of $300 per share and were convertible, at a conversion price of $15.00 per share, into 1,000,000 shares of
common stock (subject in certain circumstances to adjustments). The closing of the Preferred Offerings occurred on January 13, 2022.
The
Company held a special meeting of stockholders to consider an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Company’s Certificate
of Incorporation, as amended, to effect a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of common stock (“Common Stock”)
by a ratio to be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Reverse Stock Split”). The investors of the Preferred
Stock Purchase Agreement had agreed to not transfer, offer, sell, contract to sell, hypothecate, pledge or otherwise dispose of the shares
of the Preferred Stock until the Reverse Stock Split, to vote the shares of the Series A Preferred Stock purchased in the Preferred Offerings
in favor of such Amendment and to vote the shares of the Series B Preferred Stock purchased in the Preferred Offerings in a manner that
“mirrors” the proportions on which the shares of Common Stock (excluding any shares of Common Stock that are not voted) and
Series A Preferred Stock are voted on the Reverse Stock Split and the Amendment.
Pursuant
to the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, the Company filed two certificates of designation (the “Certificates of Designation”)
with the Secretary of the State of Delaware designating the rights, preferences, and limitations of the shares of Preferred Stock. The
Certificates of Designation provided, in particular, that the Preferred Stock had no voting rights, other than the right to vote as a
class on certain specified matters, except that (i) each share of Series A Preferred Stock had the right to vote, on an as converted
basis, on the Reverse Stock Split (together with the Company’s Common Stock and the Series B Preferred Stock as a single class),
and (ii) each share of Series B Preferred Stock had the right to cast 3,000 votes per share of Series B Preferred Stock on the Reverse
Stock Split.
The
holders of Preferred Stock were entitled to dividends, on an as-if converted basis, equal to dividends actually paid, if any, on shares
of Common Stock. The Preferred Stock was convertible into shares of Common Stock at a rate of $13.65 per share for the Series A Preferred
Stock and $15.00 per share for the Series B Preferred Stock, subject to adjustment. The Preferred Stock was convertible at the option
of the holder at any time after the Company had received stockholder approval for the Reverse Stock Split and filed the requisite Amendment
with the Delaware Secretary of State’s office to effectuate the Reverse Stock Split (the “Reverse Stock Split Date”),
subject to beneficial ownership limitations set forth in the applicable Certificate of Designation. In addition, on or after the Reverse
Stock Split Date, and subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, the Company had the right to cause the holders of the Preferred
Stock to convert their shares of Preferred Stock, subject to such beneficial ownership limitations.
Each
holder of the Preferred Stock had the right to cause the Company to redeem all or part of their shares of the Preferred Stock from the
earlier of receipt of stockholder approval of the Reverse Stock Split or of 90 days following the original issue date until 120 days
following the original issue date, the “Redemption Date,” in cash at a redemption price equal to 105% of the stated value
plus an amount equal to accumulated but unpaid dividends, if any, on such shares (whether or not earned or declared, but excluding interest
on such dividends) up to, but excluding, the Redemption Date. In connection with the Preferred Offerings, the Company entered into a
placement agent agreement (the “Placement Agent Agreement”) with AGP in which the Company paid $1,000,000 as a placement
agent fee and $110,000 to reimburse AGP for certain expenses related to the Preferred Stock offering.
On
March 3, 2022, the Company redeemed for cash at a price equal to 105% of the $300 stated value per share all of its 50,000 outstanding
shares of Series A Preferred Stock and all of its 50,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock. As a result, all shares of the Preferred
Stock have been retired and are no longer outstanding and the Company’s only class of outstanding stock is its common. Each share
of common stock entitles the holder to one vote.
The
Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock were recorded as a liability on the condensed consolidated balance sheet during
the first quarter of 2022 until the preferred shares were redeemed during the same quarter. The Company recognized $4,551,567 as interest
expense for the preferred shares during the first quarter of 2022, which was composed of: (a) $3,000,000 as the difference between the
redemption price for the preferred shares and the net proceeds received from the issuance of the preferred shares, (b) $1,110,000 paid
to AGP as a placement agent fee and reimbursement for certain expenses, and (c) $441,567 in legal fees recognized in the first quarter
that were attributed to the preferred shares.
April
2022 Registered Direct Offering
On
April 6, 2022, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “April 2022 Purchase Agreement”) with several
institutional investors, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell, in a registered direct offering (the “April 2022
Offering”), an aggregate of 1,328,274 shares of the Company’s common stock at an offering price of $5.27 per share for gross
proceeds of $7.0 million before the deduction of the April 2022 Placement Agent (as defined below) fees and offering expenses. The April
2022 Purchase Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and agreements by the Company and customary conditions to closing.
The closing of the April 2022 Offering occurred on April 8, 2022.
In
connection with the April 2022 Offering, the Company entered into a placement agent agreement with A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners (the
“April 2022 Placement Agent”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay the April 2022 Placement Agent a cash fee equal
to 6.5% of the aggregate gross proceeds raised from the sale of the securities sold in the April 2022 Offering and reimburse the April
2022 Placement Agent for certain of their expenses in an amount not to exceed $50,000.
Note
12. Stock-Based Compensation
The
Company has long-term compensation plans that permit the granting of equity-based awards in the form of stock options, restricted stock,
restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, other stock awards, and performance awards.
At
the 2018 Annual Stockholders Meeting of the Company held on May 15, 2018, stockholders approved the 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2018
Plan”). The 2018 Plan, as adopted, permits the granting of 180,000 shares of common stock as equity awards in the form of incentive
stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, other stock awards, performance
awards, or in any combination of the foregoing. At the 2019 Annual Stockholders Meeting of the Company held on May 14, 2019, stockholders
approved an amendment to the 2018 Plan whereby the Company increased the number of common stock shares available by 80,000 to a total
of 260,000 under the 2018 Plan, as amended. Prior to the adoption of the 2018 Plan, the Company had maintained the 2007 Stock Incentive
Plan (the “2007 Plan”). At the 2020 Annual Stockholders Meeting of the Company held on June 15, 2020, stockholders approved
an amendment to the 2018 Plan, as previously amended, whereby the Company increased the number of shares of common stock available by
166,667 to a total of 426,667 under the 2018 Plan, as amended. At the 2021 Annual Stockholders Meeting of the Company held on June 10,
2021, stockholders approved an amendment to the 2018 Plan, as previously amended, whereby the Company increased the number of shares
of common stock available by 513,333 to a total of 940,000 under the 2018 Plan, as amended.
The
Company has issued stock awards to employees and directors in the form of stock options and restricted stock. Options are generally granted
with strike prices equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant. Incentive stock options may be granted
to purchase shares of common stock at a price not less than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant,
provided that the exercise price of any incentive stock option granted to an eligible employee owning more than 10% of the outstanding
stock of the Company must be at least 110% of such fair market value on the date of grant. Only officers and key employees may receive
incentive stock options.
Option
and restricted stock awards vest upon terms determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and are subject to accelerated
vesting in the event of a change of control or certain terminations of employment. The Company issues new shares to satisfy its obligations
from the exercise of options or the grant of restricted stock awards.
On
September 28, 2018, February 19, 2019 and again on July 19, 2022 and September 27, 2022, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
approved the grant of (i) inducement stock options (the “Inducement Option Grants”) to purchase a total of 4,668 shares,
4,668 shares, 177,000 shares, and 8,501 shares of common stock, respectively and (ii) inducement restricted stock awards (the “Inducement
Stock Grants”) totaling 1,266 shares, 8,666 shares, 53,000 shares and 2,250 shares of common stock, respectively to eight new employees.
Each award has a grant date of the date of grant. Each Inducement Option Grant has an exercise price per share equal to $41.55, $32.70,
$1.95, and $1.65 which represents the closing price of the Company’s common stock as reported by Nasdaq on September 28, 2018,
February 19, 2019, July 19, 2022 and September 27, 2022, respectively. Each Inducement Option Grant vests over three to four years, with
one-third or one-fourth vesting on the one-year anniversary of the employee’s first day of employment with the Company and one-third
or one-fourth vesting on the second thru fourth anniversaries thereafter, subject to the new employee’s continued service relationship
with the Company on each such date. Each Inducement Option Grant has a ten-year term and is subject to the terms and conditions of the
applicable stock option agreement. Each of Inducement Stock Grant vested on the one-year anniversary of the employee’s first day
of employment with the Company is subject to the new employee’s continued service relationship with the Company through such date
and is subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable restricted stock agreement. As of September 30, 2022, there were a total
of 194,837 shares of the Company’s common stock subject to outstanding inducement awards.
As
of September 30, 2022, there were a total of 946,454 shares of the Company’s common stock reserved for issuance under the 2018
Plan, which were comprised of 926,085 shares of the Company’s common stock subject to equity awards previously granted under the
2018 Plan and 2007 Plan and 18,088 shares of the Company’s common stock available for future issuance under the 2018 Plan.
A
summary of stock option awards and restricted stock grants, inclusive of awards granted under the 2018 Stock Plan and Inducement Option
Grants for the nine-months ended September 30, 2022 is presented below:
Summary of Stock Option Awards and Restricted Stock Grants
| |
Stock
Options | | |
Restricted
Stock Awards | | |
Weighted Average | |
| |
Options Outstanding | | |
Weighted Average Exercise Price | | |
Non-vested Restricted Stock Outstanding | | |
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair
Value | | |
Contractual Terms
of Equity Awards (in
years) | |
Equity awards
outstanding at January 1, 2022 | |
| 441,425 | | |
$ | 38.50 | | |
| 1,481 | | |
$ | 12.36 | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Equity awards granted | |
| 697,156 | | |
$ | 2.79 | | |
| 55,650 | | |
$ | 1.96 | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Equity
awards terminated | |
| (17,659 | ) | |
$ | 35.28 | | |
| (100 | ) | |
$ | 9.45 | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Equity
awards outstanding at September 30, 2022 | |
| 1,120,922 | | |
$ | 16.33 | | |
| 57,031 | | |
$ | 2.23 | | |
| 8.1 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Aggregate
intrinsic value of outstanding equity awards at September 30, 2022 | |
$ | 335 | | |
| | | |
$ | - | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Equity
awards exercisable at September 30, 2022 | |
| 521,723 | | |
$ | 27.72 | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| 7.5 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Aggregate
intrinsic value of equity awards exercisable at September 30, 2022 | |
$ | - | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total
compensation cost related to stock options and restricted stock awards amounted to approximately $0.4 million and $0.7 million for the
three-month periods ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Of these amounts, $0.1 million and $0.2 million was charged to research
and development during the three-month periods ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and $0.3 million and $0.5 million was
charged to general and administrative expenses during the three-month periods ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Total
compensation cost related to stock options and restricted stock awards amounted to approximately $2.0 million and $3.1 million for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Of these amounts, $0.7 million and $1.1 million was charged to research
and development during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and $1.3 million and $2.0 million was
charged to general and administrative expenses during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
As
of September 30, 2022, there was $1.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock-based compensation
arrangements. That cost is expected to be recognized over a period of 4 years. The weighted average grant date fair values of the stock
options granted was $2.23 and $1.97 during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
The
fair values of stock options granted were estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes
model was originally developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have different characteristics from the
Company’s stock options. The model is also sensitive to changes in assumptions, which can materially affect the fair value estimate.
The Company used the following assumptions for determining the fair value of options granted under the Black-Scholes option pricing model:
Schedule of Assumptions Used to Determine Fair Value of Options Granted
| |
| For the Nine Months Ended
September 30, | |
| |
| 2022 | | |
| 2021 | |
Risk-free interest
rate | |
| 1.74
to 4.14 | % | |
| 1.54
to 1.74 | % |
Expected volatility | |
| 107.6
to 113.95 | % | |
| 106.8
to 113.2 | % |
Expected life (in years) | |
| 7.5
to 9.0 | | |
| 7.5
to 10.0 | |
Expected dividend yield | |
| - | % | |
| - | % |
Expected
volatilities utilized in the model are based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. The risk-free interest rate
is derived from values assigned to U.S. Treasury bonds with terms that approximate the expected option lives in effect at the time of
grant.
Note
13. Earn-Out Milestone Liability
On
March 28, 2019, the Company and EGWU, Inc. entered into an amendment to its purchase agreement (“Amended Asset Purchase Agreement”),
whereby payment of the earnout milestone liability related to the Ovarian Cancer Indication of $12.4 million had been modified. The Company
has the option to make the payment as follows:
a) |
$7.0
million in cash within 10 business days of achieving the milestone; or |
b) |
$12.4
million in cash, common stock of the Company, or a combination of either, within one year of achieving the milestone. |
As
of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company fair valued the earn-out milestone liability at $5.4 million. In assessing the
fair value of the earnout milestone liability as of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company considered each of the settlement
provisions per the Amended Asset Purchase Agreement and equally weighted the probability of a cash or cash and common stock payment.
Note
14. Warrants
Following
is a summary of all warrant activity for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2022:
Summary of Warrant Activity
Warrants | |
Number
of Warrants Issued | | |
Weighted Average Exercise
Price | |
| |
| | |
| |
Warrants outstanding at December
31, 2021 | |
| 175,792 | | |
$ | 20.96 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Warrants expired during
the nine months ended September 30, 2022 | |
| (7,273 | ) | |
$ | 48.30 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Warrants outstanding
at September 30, 2022 | |
| 168,519 | | |
$ | 19.78 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Aggregate intrinsic value
of outstanding warrants at September 30, 2022 | |
$ | - | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted average remaining contractual terms at September
30, 2022 | |
| 3.3
years | | |
| | |
Note
15. Leases
In
2011, the Company executed a lease (the “Lease”) with Brandywine Operating Partnership, L.P. (“Brandywine”), a Delaware limited
partnership, for a 10,870 square foot premises located in Lawrenceville, New Jersey and relocated its offices to Lawrenceville, New Jersey
from Columbia, Maryland. The Lease had an initial term of 66 months. In late 2015, Lenox Drive Office Park LLC purchased the real estate
and office building and assumed the Lease. This Lease was set to expire on April 30, 2017. In April 2017, the Company and the landlord
amended the Lease effective May 1, 2017. The 1st Lease Amendment extended the term of the agreement for an additional 64 months,
reduced the premises to 7,565 square feet, reduced the monthly rent and provided four months free rent. The monthly rent ranged from
approximately $18,900 in the first year to approximately $20,500 in the final year of the 1st Lease Amendment. Effective January
9, 2019, the Company amended the current terms of the 1st Lease Amendment to increase the size of the premises by 2,285 square
feet to 9,850 square feet and also extended the lease term by one year to September 1, 2023. The monthly rent ranges from approximately
$25,035 in the first year to approximately $27,088 in the final year of the 2nd Lease Amendment.
In
connection with the EGEN Asset Purchase Agreement in June 2014, the Company assumed the existing lease with another landlord for an 11,500
square foot premises located in Huntsville Alabama. In January 2018, the Company and the Huntsville landlord entered into a new 60-month
lease which reduced the premises to 9,049 square feet with rent payments of approximately $18,100 per month. On June 9, 2021 and, as
amended on July 7, 2021, the Company and the Huntsville landlord entered into a 22-month lease for an additional 2,197 square foot premises
with rent payments of approximately $5,500 per month.
The
Company adopted ASC Topic 842 on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective transition method for all lease arrangements at the
beginning of the period of adoption.
Following
is a table of the lease payments and maturity of our operating lease liabilities as of September 30, 2022:
Schedule of Lease Payments and Maturity of Operating Lease Liabilities
| |
| | |
Remainder of 2022 | |
$ | 150,774 | |
2023 | |
| 238,609 | |
and thereafter | |
| – | |
Subtotal future lease payments | |
| 389,383 | |
Less
imputed interest | |
| (15,858 | ) |
Total
lease liabilities | |
$ | 373,525 | |
| |
| | |
Weighted average remaining life | |
| 0.8 | |
| |
| | |
Weighted average discount rate | |
| 9.98 | % |
For
the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2022, operating lease expense was $146,936 and $440,808, respectively, and
cash paid for operating leases included in operating cash flows was $150,774 and $450,721, respectively.
For
the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2021, operating lease expense was $146,936 and $413,577, respectively, and
cash paid for operating leases included in operating cash flows was $149,115 and $418,696, respectively.
Note
16. Technology Development and Licensing Agreements
On
May 7, 2012, the Company entered into a long-term commercial supply agreement with Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (“Hisun”) for
the production of ThermoDox® in the China territory. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, Hisun will be responsible
for providing all of the technical and regulatory support services, including the costs of all technical transfer, registration and bioequivalence
studies, technical transfer costs, the Company’s consultative support costs and the purchase of any necessary equipment and additional
facility costs necessary to support capacity requirements for the manufacture of ThermoDox®. The Company will repay Hisun
for the aggregate amount of these development costs and fees commencing on the successful completion of three registration batches of
ThermoDox®. Hisun is also obligated to certain performance requirements under the agreement. The agreement will initially
be limited to a percentage of the production requirements of ThermoDox® in the China territory with Hisun retaining an
option for additional global supply after local regulatory approval in the China territory. In addition, Hisun will collaborate with
the Company around the regulatory approval activities for ThermoDox® with the China State Food and Drug Administration
(“CHINA FDA”). During the first quarter of 2015, Hisun completed the successful manufacture of three registration batches of ThermoDox®.
On
January 18, 2013, we entered into a technology development contract with Hisun, pursuant to which Hisun paid us a non-refundable research
and development fee of $5 million to support our development of ThermoDox® in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau (the
“China territory”). Following our announcement on January 31, 2013 that the HEAT study failed to meet its primary endpoint, the Company
and Hisun have agreed that the Technology Development Contract entered into on January 18, 2013 will remain in effect while the parties
continue to collaborate and are evaluating the next steps in relation to ThermoDox®, which include the sub-group analysis
of patients in the Phase III HEAT Study for the hepatocellular carcinoma clinical indication and other activities to further the development
of ThermoDox® for the Greater China market. The $5.0 million received as a non-refundable payment from Hisun in the first
quarter 2013 has been recorded to deferred revenue and will continue to be amortized over the 10-year term of the agreement, until such
time as the parties find a mutually acceptable path forward on the development of ThermoDox® based on findings of the
ongoing post-study analysis of the HEAT Study data.
On
July 19, 2013, the Company and Hisun entered into a Memorandum of Understanding to pursue ongoing cooperation for the continued clinical
development of ThermoDox® as well as the technology transfer relating to the commercial manufacture of ThermoDox®
for the China territory. This expanded level of cooperation includes development of the next generation liposomal formulation with
the goal of creating safer, more efficacious versions of marketed cancer chemotherapeutics.
Among
the key provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding are:
|
● |
Hisun
will provide the Company with internal resources necessary to complete the technology transfer of the Company’s proprietary
manufacturing process and the production of registration batches for the China territory; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Hisun
will coordinate with the Company around the clinical and regulatory approval activities for ThermoDox® as well as
other liposomal formations with the CHINA FDA; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
Hisun
will be granted a right of first offer for a commercial license to ThermoDox® for the sale and distribution
of ThermoDox® in the China territory. |
On
August 8, 2016, the Company signed a Technology Transfer, Manufacturing and Commercial Supply Agreement (“GEN-1 Agreement”)
with Hisun to pursue an expanded partnership for the technology transfer relating to the clinical and commercial manufacture and supply
of GEN-1, the Company’s proprietary gene mediated, IL-12 immunotherapy, for the greater China territory, with the option to expand
into other countries in the rest of the world after all necessary regulatory approvals are in effect. The GEN-1 Agreement will help to
support supply for both ongoing and planned clinical studies in the U.S., and for potential future studies of GEN-1 in China. GEN-1 is
currently being evaluated by the Company in first line ovarian cancer patients.
Key
provisions of the GEN-1 Agreement are as follows:
|
● |
The
GEN-1 Agreement has targeted unit costs for clinical supplies of GEN-1 that are substantially competitive with the Company’s
current suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Once
approved, the cost structure for GEN-1 will support rapid market adoption and significant gross margins across global markets; |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
Company will provide Hisun a certain percentage of China’s commercial unit demand, and separately of global commercial unit
demand, subject to regulatory approval; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Hisun
and the Company will commence technology transfer activities relating to the manufacture of GEN-1, including all studies required
by CHINA FDA for site approval; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
Hisun
will collaborate with the Company around the regulatory approval activities for GEN-1 with the CHINA FDA. A local China partner affords
the Company access to accelerated CHINA FDA review and potential regulatory exclusivity for the approved indication. |
The
Company evaluated the Hisun arrangement in accordance with ASC 606 and determined that its performance obligations under the agreement
include the non-exclusive, royalty-free license, research and development services to be provided by the Company, and its obligation
to serve on a joint committee. The Company concluded that the license was not distinct since its value is closely tied to the ongoing
research and development activities. As such, the license and the research and development services are bundled as a single performance
obligation. Since the provision of the license and research and development services are considered a single performance obligation,
the $5,000,000 upfront payment is being recognized as revenue ratably through 2022.
Note
17. Commitments and Contingencies
On
October 29, 2020, a putative securities class action was filed against the Company and certain of its officers and directors (the “Spar
Individual Defendants”) in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, captioned Spar v. Celsion Corporation, et
al., Case No. 1:20-cv-15228. The plaintiff alleges that the Company and Individual Defendants made false and misleading statements
regarding one of the Company’s product candidates, ThermoDox®, and brings claims for damages under Section 10(b) of the Exchange
Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder against all Defendants, and under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934 against the Individual
Defendants. The Company believes that the case is without merit and intends to defend it vigorously. At this stage of the case neither
the likelihood that a loss, if any, will be realized, nor an estimate of possible loss or range of loss, if any, can be determined.
In
February 2021, a derivative shareholder lawsuit was filed against the Company, as the nominal defendant, and certain of its directors
and officers as defendants in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, captioned Fidler v. Michael H. Tardugno, et
al., Case No. 3:21-cv-02662. The plaintiff alleges breach of fiduciary duty and other claims arising out of alleged statements made
by certain of the Company’s directors and/or officers regarding ThermoDox®. The Company believes it has meritorious
defenses to these claims and intends to vigorously contest this suit. At this stage of the case neither the likelihood that a loss, if
any, will be realized, nor an estimate of possible loss or range of loss, if any, can be determined.
In
August 2021, a complaint regarding a corporate books and records demand was filed against the Company in the Court of Chancery of the
State of Delaware, captioned Pacheco v. Celsion Corporation, Case No. 2021-0705. The plaintiff alleges he is entitled to inspect
the Company’s books and records concerning the OPTIMA Study and other materials. The Company believes that the scope of the demand
is without merit and intends to defend it vigorously. At this stage of the case neither the likelihood that a loss, if any, will be realized,
nor an estimate of possible loss or range of loss, if any, can be determined.
In
October 2021, an arbitration was commenced against the Company before the CPR Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution, captioned
Curia New Mexico, LLC v. Celsion Corp., Case No. G-22-85-S. The plaintiff alleges that the Company failed to pay invoices for the manufacture
of ThermoDox®. The Company believes it has a meritorious defense to these claims and is vigorously contesting this allegation. At
this stage of the case neither the likelihood that a loss, if any, will be realized, nor an estimate of possible loss or range of loss,
if any, can be determined.
Item
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The
following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations This discussion contains forward-looking statements
that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements. Factors
that might cause a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed above under “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements,” and in Item 1A. Risk factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
Strategic
and Clinical Overview
On
September 19, 2022, Celsion Corporation announced a corporate name change to Imunon, Inc., reflecting the evolution of the Company’s
business focus and its commitment to developing cutting-edge immunotherapies and next-generation vaccines to treat cancer and infectious
diseases. The Company’s common stock will continue to trade on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the new ticker symbol “IMNN”
effective as of the opening of trading on September 21, 2022. The Company has filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to
effect the new corporate name.
Imunon,
Inc. (“Imunon” and the “Company”) is a fully integrated, clinical stage biotechnology company focused on advancing
a portfolio of innovative treatments that harness the body’s natural mechanisms to generate safe, effective, and durable responses
across a broad array of human diseases, constituting a differentiating approach from conventional therapies. Imunon has two platform
technologies: Our TheraPlas® platform for the development of immunotherapies and other anti-cancer nucleic acid-based therapies,
and our PLACCINE platform for the development of nucleic acid vaccines for infectious diseases and cancer. The Company’s lead clinical
program, GEN-1, is a DNA-based immunotherapy for the localized treatment of advanced ovarian cancer currently in Phase II development.
GEN-1 works by instructing the body to produce safe and durable levels of powerful cancer fighting molecules, such as interleukin-12
and interferon gamma, at the tumor site. Additionally, the Company is conducting preclinical proof-of-concept studies on a nucleic acid
vaccine candidate targeting SARS-CoV-2 virus in order to validate its PLACCINE platform. Imunon’s platform technologies are based
on the delivery of nucleic acids with novel synthetic delivery systems that are independent of viral vectors or devices. We will continue
to leverage these platforms and to advance the technological frontier of plasmid DNA to better serve patients with difficult to treat
conditions.
IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY
Program
On
June 20, 2014, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of EGEN, a private company located in Huntsville,
Alabama. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, CLSN Laboratories acquired all of EGEN’s right, title and interest in substantially
all of the assets of EGEN, including cash and cash equivalents, patents, trademarks and other intellectual property rights, clinical
data, certain contracts, licenses and permits, equipment, furniture, office equipment, furnishings, supplies and other tangible personal
property. A key asset acquired from EGEN was the TheraPlas technology platform. The first drug candidate developed from this technology
platform is GEN-1.
THERAPLAS
Technology Platform
TheraPlas
is a technology platform for the delivery of DNA and mRNA therapeutics via synthetic non-viral carriers and is capable of providing cell
transfection for double-stranded DNA plasmids and large therapeutic RNA segments such as mRNA. There are two components of the TheraPlas
system, a plasmid DNA or mRNA payload encoding a therapeutic protein, and a delivery system. The delivery system is designed to protect
the DNA/mRNA from degradation and promote trafficking into cells and through intracellular compartments. We designed the delivery system
of TheraPlas by chemically modifying the low molecular weight polymer to improve its gene transfer activity without increasing toxicity.
We believe that TheraPlas may be a viable alternative to current approaches to gene delivery due to several distinguishing characteristics,
including enhanced molecular versatility that allows for complex modifications to potentially improve activity and safety.
The
design of the TheraPlas delivery system is based on molecular functionalization of polyethyleneimine (“PEI”), a cationic delivery polymer
with a distinct ability to escape from the endosomes due to heavy protonation. The transfection activity and toxicity of PEI is tightly
coupled to its molecular weight; therefore, the clinical application of PEI is limited. We have used molecular functionalization strategies
to improve the activity of low molecular weight PEIs without augmenting their cytotoxicity. In one instance, chemical conjugation of
a low molecular weight branched BPEI1800 with cholesterol and polyethylene glycol (“PEG”) to form PEG-PEI-Cholesterol (“PPC”) dramatically
improved the transfection activity of BPEI1800 following in vivo delivery. Together, the cholesterol and PEG modifications produced approximately
20-fold enhancement in transfection activity. Biodistribution studies following intraperitoneal or subcutaneous administration of DNA/PPC
nanocomplexes showed DNA delivery localized primarily at the injection site with only small amount escaping into the systemic circulation.
PPC is the delivery component of our lead TheraPlas product, GEN-1, which is in clinical development for the treatment of ovarian cancer.
The PPC manufacturing process has been scaled up from bench scale (1-2 g) to 0.6Kg, and several current Good Manufacturing Practice (“cGMP”)
lots have been produced with reproducible quality.
We
believe that TheraPlas has emerged as a viable alternative to current approaches due to several distinguishing characteristics such as
strong molecular versatility that may allow for complex modifications to potentially improve activity and safety with little difficulty.
The biocompatibility of these polymers reduces the risk of adverse immune response, thus allowing for repeated administration. Compared
to naked DNA or cationic lipids, TheraPlas is generally safer, more efficient, and cost effective. We believe that these advantages place
the Company in a strong position to capitalize on this technology platform.
Ovarian
Cancer Overview
Ovarian
cancer is the most lethal of gynecological malignancies among women with an overall five-year survival rate of 50%. This poor outcome
is due in part to the lack of effective prevention and early detection strategies. There were approximately 20,000 new cases of ovarian
cancer in the U.S. in 2021 with an estimated 13,000 deaths. Mortality rates for ovarian cancer declined very little in the last forty
years due to the unavailability of detection tests and improved treatments. Most women with ovarian cancer are not diagnosed until Stages
III or IV, when the disease has spread outside the pelvis to the abdomen and areas beyond causing swelling and pain. The five-year survival
rates for Stages III and IV are 39% and 17%, respectively. First-line chemotherapy regimens are typically platinum-based combination
therapies. Although this first line of treatment has an approximate 80% response rate, 55% to 75% of women will develop recurrent ovarian
cancer within two years and ultimately will not respond to platinum therapy. Patients whose cancer recurs or progresses after initially
responding to surgery and first-line chemotherapy have been divided into one of the two groups based on the time from completion of platinum
therapy to disease recurrence or progression. This time period is referred to as platinum-free interval. The platinum-sensitive group
has a platinum-free interval of longer than six months. This group generally responds to additional treatment with platinum-based therapies.
The platinum-resistant group has a platinum-free interval of shorter than six months and is resistant to additional platinum-based treatments.
Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, and Avastin are the only approved second-line therapies for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
The overall response rate for these therapies is 10% to 20% with median overall survival (“OS”) of eleven to twelve months.
Immunotherapy is an attractive novel approach for the treatment of ovarian cancer particularly since ovarian cancers are considered immunogenic
tumors. IL-12 is one of the most active cytokines for the induction of potent anti-cancer immunity acting through the induction of T-lymphocyte
and natural killer cell proliferation. The precedence for a therapeutic role of IL-12 in ovarian cancer is based on epidemiologic and
preclinical data.
GEN-1
Immunotherapy
GEN-1
is a DNA-based immunotherapeutic product candidate for the localized treatment of ovarian cancer by intraperitoneally administering an
Interleukin-12 (“IL-12”) plasmid formulated with our proprietary TheraPlas delivery system. In this DNA-based approach, the
immunotherapy is combined with a standard chemotherapy drug, which can potentially achieve better clinical outcomes than with chemotherapy
alone. We believe that increases in IL-12 concentrations at tumor sites for several days after a single administration could create a
potent immune environment against tumor activity and that a direct killing of the tumor with concomitant use of cytotoxic chemotherapy
could result in a more robust and durable antitumor response than chemotherapy alone. We believe the rationale for local therapy with
GEN-1 is based on the following:
|
● |
Loco-regional
production of the potent cytokine IL-12 avoids toxicities and poor pharmacokinetics associated with systemic delivery of recombinant
IL-12; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Persistent
local delivery of IL-12 lasts up to one week and dosing can be repeated; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
Local
therapy is ideal for long-term maintenance therapy. |
OVATION
I Study. In February 2015, we announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) accepted, without objection,
the Phase I dose-escalation clinical trial of GEN-1 in combination with the standard of care in neoadjuvant ovarian cancer (the “OVATION
I Study”). The OVATION I Study was designed to:
|
(i) |
identify
a safe, tolerable, and therapeutically active dose of GEN-1 by recruiting and maximizing an immune response; |
|
|
|
|
(ii) |
enroll
three to six patients per dose level and evaluate safety and efficacy; and |
|
|
|
|
(iii) |
attempt
to define an optimal dose for a follow-on Phase I/II study. |
In
addition, the OVATION I Study established a unique opportunity to assess how cytokine-based compounds such as GEN-1, directly affect
ovarian cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients. The study was designed to characterize
the nature of the immune response triggered by GEN-1 at various levels of the patients’ immune system, including:
|
● |
Infiltration
of cancer fighting T-cell lymphocytes into primary tumor and tumor microenvironment including peritoneal cavity, which is the primary
site of metastasis of ovarian cancer; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Changes
in local and systemic levels of immuno-stimulatory and immunosuppressive cytokines associated with tumor suppression and growth,
respectively; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
Expression
profile of a comprehensive panel of immune related genes in pre-treatment and GEN-1-treated tumor tissue. |
We
initiated the OVATION I Study at four clinical sites at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Oklahoma University Medical Center,
Washington University in St. Louis, and the Medical College of Wisconsin. During 2016 and 2017, we announced data from the first fourteen
patients in the OVATION I Study. On October 3, 2017, we announced positive clinical data from the first fourteen patients who completed
treatment in the OVATION I Study. GEN-1 plus standard chemotherapy produced no dose limiting toxicities and positive dose dependent efficacy
signals which correlate well with positive surgical outcomes as summarized below:
|
● |
Of
the fourteen patients treated in the entire study, two patients demonstrated a complete response, ten patients demonstrated a partial
response and two patients demonstrated stable disease, as measured by RECIST criteria. This translates to a 100% disease control
rate and an 86% objective response rate (“ORR”). Of the five patients treated in the highest dose cohort, there was a
100% ORR with one complete response and four partial responses; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Fourteen
patients had successful resections of their tumors, with nine patients (64%) having a complete tumor resection (“R0”),
which indicates a microscopically margin-negative resection in which no gross or microscopic tumor remains in the tumor bed. Seven
out of eight (88%) patients in the highest two dose cohorts experienced a R0 surgical resection. All five patients treated at the
highest dose cohort experienced a R0 surgical resection; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
All
patients experienced a clinically significant decrease in their CA-125 protein levels as of their most recent study visit. CA-125
is used to monitor certain cancers during and after treatment. CA-125 is present in greater concentrations in ovarian cancer cells
than in other cells. |
Key
translational research findings from all evaluable patients are consistent with the earlier reports from partial analysis of the data
and are summarized below:
|
● |
The
intraperitoneal treatment of GEN-1 in conjunction with NACT resulted in dose dependent increases in IL-12 and Interferon-gamma (“IFN-γ”)
levels that were predominantly in the peritoneal fluid compartment with little to no changes observed in the patients’ systemic
circulation. These and other post-treatment changes including decreases in VEGF levels in peritoneal fluid are consistent with an
IL-12 based immune mechanism; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Consistent
with the previous partial reports, the effects observed in the IHC analysis were pronounced decreases in the density of immunosuppressive
T-cell signals (Foxp3, PD-1, PDL-1, IDO-1) and increases in CD8+ cells in the tumor microenvironment; |
|
|
|
|
● |
The
ratio of CD8+ cells to immunosuppressive cells was increased in approximately 75% of patients suggesting an overall shift in the
tumor microenvironment from immunosuppressive to pro-immune stimulatory following treatment with GEN-1. An increase in CD8+ to immunosuppressive
T-cell populations is a leading indicator and believed to be a good predictor of improved OS; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
Analysis
of peritoneal fluid by cell sorting, not reported before, shows a treatment-related decrease in the percentage of immunosuppressive
T-cell (Foxp3+), which is consistent with the reduction of Foxp3+ T-cells in the primary tumor tissue, and a shift in tumor naïve
CD8+ cell population to more efficient tumor killing memory effector CD8+ cells. |
On
March 26, 2020, the Company announced with Medidata, a Dassault Systèmes company, that examining matched patient data provided
by Medidata in a synthetic control arm (“SCA”) with results from the Company’s completed Phase Ib dose-escalating OVATION
I Study showed positive results in progression-free survival (“PFS”). The hazard ratio (“HR”) was 0.53 in the
ITT group, showing strong signals of efficacy. The Company believes these data may warrant consideration of strategies to accelerate
the clinical development program for GEN-1 in newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer patients by the FDA. In its March 2019 discussion
with the Company, the FDA noted that preliminary findings from the Phase Ib OVATION I Study were exciting but lacked a control group
to evaluate GEN-1’s independent impact on impressive tumor response, surgical results and PFS. The FDA encouraged the Company to
continue its GEN-1 development program and consult with FDA with new findings that may have a bearing on designations such as Fast Track
and Breakthrough Therapy.
SCAs
have the potential to revolutionize clinical trials in certain oncology indications and some other diseases where a randomized control
is not ethical or practical. SCAs are formed by carefully selecting control patients from historical clinical trials to match the demographic
and disease characteristics of the patients treated with the new investigational product. SCAs have been shown to mimic the results of
traditional randomized controls so that the treatment effects of an investigational product can be visible by comparison to the SCA.
SCAs can help advance the scientific validity of single arm trials, and in certain indications, reduce time and cost, and expose fewer
patients to placebos or existing standard-of-care treatments that might not be effective for them.
On
July 29, 2021, the Company announced final progression free survival (“PFS”) results from the OVATION I Study published in
the Journal of Clinical Cancer Research. Median PFS in patients treated per protocol (n=14) was 21 months and was 18.4 months for the
intent-to-treat (“ITT”) population (n=18) for all dose cohorts, including three patients who dropped out of the study after
13 days or less, and two patients who did not receive full NAC and GEN-1 cycles. Under the current standard of care, in women with Stage
III/IV ovarian cancer undergoing NAC, their disease progresses within about 12 months on average. The results from the OVATION I Study
support continued evaluation of GEN-1 based on promising tumor response, as reported in the PFS data, and the ability for surgeons to
completely remove visible tumor at interval debulking surgery. GEN-1 was well tolerated, and no dose-limiting toxicities were detected.
Intraperitoneal administration of GEN-1 was feasible with broad patient acceptance.
OVATION
2 Study. The Company held an Advisory Board Meeting on September 27, 2017 with the clinical investigators and scientific experts
including those from Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical School, and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center to review and
finalize clinical, translational research and safety data from the OVATION I Study to determine the next steps forward for our GEN-1
immunotherapy program. On November 13, 2017, the Company filed its Phase I/II clinical trial protocol with the FDA for GEN-1 for the
localized treatment of ovarian cancer. The protocol is designed with a single dose escalation phase to 100 mg/m² to identify a safe
and tolerable dose of GEN-1 while maximizing an immune response. The Phase I portion of the study will be followed by a continuation
at the selected dose in approximately 110 patients randomized Phase II study.
In
the OVATION 2 Study, patients in the GEN-1 treatment arm will receive GEN-1 plus chemotherapy pre- and post-interval debulking surgery
(“IDS”). The OVATION 2 Study will include up to 110 patients with Stage III/IV ovarian cancer, with 12 to 15 patients in
the Phase I portion and up to 95 patients in Phase II. The study is powered to show a 33% improvement in the primary endpoint, PFS, when
comparing GEN-1 with neoadjuvant + adjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant + adjuvant chemotherapy alone. The PFS primary analysis will
be conducted after at least 80 events have been observed or after all patients have been followed for at least 16 months, whichever is
later.
In
March 2020, the Company announced encouraging initial clinical data from the first 15 patients enrolled in the Phase I portion of the
OVATION 2 Study for patients newly diagnosed with Stage III and IV ovarian cancer. The OVATION 2 Study combines GEN-1, the Company’s
IL-12 gene-mediated immunotherapy, with standard-of-care neoadjuvant chemotherapy (“NACT”). Following NACT, patients undergo interval debulking
surgery (IDS), followed by three additional cycles of chemotherapy.
GEN-1
plus standard NACT produced positive dose-dependent efficacy results, with no dose-limiting toxicities, which correlates well with successful
surgical outcomes as summarized below:
|
● |
Of the 15 patients treated
in the Phase I portion of the OVATION 2 Study, nine patients were treated with GEN-1 at a dose of 100 mg/m² plus NACT and six
patients were treated with NACT only. All 15 patients had successful resections of their tumors, with eight out of nine patients
(88%) in the GEN-1 treatment arm having an R0 resection, which indicates a microscopically margin-negative complete resection in
which no gross or microscopic tumor remains in the tumor bed. Only three out of six patients (50%) in the NACT only treatment arm
had a R0 resection. |
|
● |
When combining these results
with the surgical resection rates observed in the Company’s prior Phase Ib dose-escalation trial (the “OVATION 1 Study”), a population
of patients with inclusion criteria identical to the OVATION 2 Study, the data reflect the strong dose-dependent efficacy of adding
GEN-1 to the current standard of care NACT: |
| |
| |
%
of Patients R0 Resections | |
0, 36, 47 mg/m²
of GEN-1 plus NACT | |
N
=12 | |
| 42 | % |
61, 79, 100 mg/m² of
GEN-1 plus NACT | |
N = 17 | |
| 82 | % |
|
● |
The
ORR as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (“RECIST”) criteria for the 0, 36, 47 mg/m² dose GEN-1 patients
were comparable, as expected, to the higher (61, 79, 100 mg/m²) dose GEN-1 patients, with both groups demonstrating an approximate
80% ORR. |
On
March 23, 2020, the Company announced that the European Medicines Agency (the “EMA”) Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products
(“COMP”) has recommended that GEN-1 be designated as an orphan medicinal product for the treatment of ovarian cancer. GEN-1
is an IL-12 DNA plasmid vector encased in a non-viral nanoparticle delivery system, which enables cell transfection followed by persistent,
local secretion of the IL-12 protein. GEN-1 previously received orphan designation from the FDA.
In
February 2021, the Company announced that it has received Fast Track designation from the FDA for GEN-1, its DNA-mediated IL-12 immunotherapy
currently in Phase II development for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer and also provided an update on the OVATION 2 Study. The
Company reported that approximately one-third, or 34 patients, of the anticipated 110 patients had been enrolled into the OVATION 2 Study,
of which 20 are in the treatment arm and 14 are in the control. Of the 34 patients enrolled in the trial, 27 patients have had their
interval debulking surgery with the following results:
|
● |
80%
of patients treated with GEN-1 had a R0 resection, which indicates a microscopically margin-negative complete resection in which
no gross or microscopic tumor remains in the tumor bed. |
|
|
|
|
● |
58%
of patients in the control arm had an R0 resection. |
|
|
|
|
● |
This
interim data represents a 38% improvement in R0 resection rates for GEN-1 patients compared with control arm patients and is consistent
with the reported improvement in resection scores noted in the encouraging Phase I OVATION I Study, the manuscript of which has been
submitted for peer review publication. |
In
June 2022, the Company announced that following a pre-planned interim safety review of 87 as treated patients (46 patients in the experimental
arm and 41 patients in the control arm) randomized in the OVATION 2 Study, the Data Safety Monitoring Board (“DSMB”) unanimously recommended
that the OVATION 2 Study continue treating patients with the dose of 100 mg/m2. The DSMB also determined that safety is satisfactory
with an acceptable risk/benefit, and that patients tolerate GEN-1 during a course of treatment that lasts up to six months. No dose-limiting
toxicities were reported. Interim clinical data from patients who have undergone interval debulking surgery showed that the GEN-1 treatment
arm is continuing to show improvement in R0 surgical resection rates and CRS 3 chemotherapy response scores over the control arm. A complete
tumor resection (R0) is a microscopically margin-negative resection in which no gross or microscopic tumor remains in the tumor bed.
The chemotherapy response score is a three-tier standardized scoring system for histological tumor regression into complete/near complete
(CRS 3), partial (CRS 2) and no/minimal (CRS 1) response based on omental examination.
In
September 2022, the Company announced that its Phase I/II OVATION 2 Study with GEN-1 in advanced ovarian cancer has completed enrollment
with 110 patients. Topline results are expected in the first half of 2024.
PLACCINE
DNA VACCINE TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM
In
January 2021, the Company announced the filing of a provisional U.S. patent application for a novel DNA-based, investigational vaccine
for preventing or treating infections from a broad range of infectious agents including the coronavirus disease using its PLACCINE DNA
vaccine technology platform (“PLACCINE”). The provisional patent covers a family of novel composition of multi-cistronic
vectors and polymeric nanoparticles that comprise the PLACCINE DNA vaccine platform technology for preventing or treating infectious
agents that have the potential for global pandemics, including the SARS-CoV-2 virus and its variations, using the Company’s TheraPlas
platform technology.
The
Company’s PLACCINE DNA vaccine technology platform is characterized by a single multi-cistronic DNA plasmid vector expressing multiple
pathogen antigens delivered with a synthetic delivery system. We believe it is adaptable to creating vaccines for a multitude of pathogens,
including emerging pathogens leading to pandemics as well as infectious diseases that have yet to be effectively addressed with current
vaccine technologies. This flexible vaccine platform is well supported by an established supply chain to produce any plasmid vector and
its assembly into a respective vaccine formulation.
PLACCINE
is an extension of the Company’s synthetic, non-viral TheraPlas delivery technology currently in a Phase II trial for the treatment
of late-stage ovarian cancer with GEN-1. The Company’s proprietary multifunctional DNA vaccine technology concept is built on the
flexible PLACCINE technology platform that is amenable to rapidly responding to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, as well as possible future mutations
of SARS-CoV-2, other future pandemics, emerging bioterrorism threats, and novel infectious diseases. The Company’s extensive experience
with TheraPlas suggests that the PLACCINE-based nanoparticles are stable at storage temperatures of 4oC to 25oC,
making vaccines developed on this platform easily suitable for broad world-wide distribution.
The
Company’s vaccine approach is designed to optimize the quality of the immune response dictating the efficiency of pathogen clearance
and patient recovery. The Company has taken a multivalent approach in an effort to generate an even more robust immune response that
not only results in a strong neutralizing antibody response, but also a more robust and durable T-cell response. Delivered with the Company’s
synthetic polymeric system, the proprietary DNA plasmid is protected from degradation and its cellular uptake is facilitated.
COVID-19
Vaccine Overview
Emerging
data from the recent literature indicates that the quality of the immune response as opposed to its absolute magnitude is what dictates
SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance and recovery and that an ineffective or non-neutralizing enhanced antibody response might actually exacerbate
disease. The first-generation COVID-19 vaccines were developed for rapid production and deployment and were not optimized for generating
cellular responses that result in effective viral clearance. Though early data has indicated some of these vaccines to be over 95% effective,
these first-generation vaccines were primarily designed to generate a strong antibody response and, while they have been shown to provide
prophylactic protection against disease, the durability of this protection is currently unclear. The vast majority of these vaccines
have been specifically developed to target the SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) protein (antigen), though it is known that restricting a vaccine
to a sole viral antigen creates selection pressure that can serve to facilitate the emergence of viral resistance. Indeed, even prior
to full vaccine rollout, it has been observed that the S protein is a locus for rapid evolutionary and functional change as evidenced
by the D614G, Y453F, 501Y.V2, and VUI-202012/01 mutations/deletions. This propensity for mutation of the S protein leads to future risk
of efficacy reduction over time as these mutations accumulate.
Our
Next Generation Vaccine Initiative
The
Company’s vaccine candidate comprises a single plasmid vector containing the DNA sequence encoding multiple SARS-CoV-2 antigens.
Delivery will be evaluated intramuscularly, intradermally, or subcutaneously with a non-viral synthetic DNA delivery carrier that facilitates
vector delivery into the cells of the injected tissue and has potential immune adjuvant properties. Unique designs and formulations of
the Company’s vaccine candidates may offer several potential key advantages. The synthetic polymeric DNA carrier is an important
component of the vaccine composition as it has the potential to facilitate the vaccine immunogenicity by improving vector delivery and,
due to potential adjuvant properties, attract professional immune cells to the site of vaccine delivery.
Future
vaccine technology will need to address viral mutations and the challenges of efficient manufacturing, distribution, and storage. We
believe an adaptation of our TheraPlas technology, PLACCINE, has the potential to meet these challenges. Our approach is described in
our provisional patent filing and is summarized as a DNA vaccine technology platform characterized by a single plasmid DNA with multiple
coding regions. The plasmid vector is designed to express multiple pathogen antigens. It is delivered via a synthetic delivery system
and has the potential to be easily modified to create vaccines against a multitude of infectious diseases, addressing:
|
● |
Viral
Mutations: PLACCINE may offer broad-spectrum and mutational resistance (variants) by targeting multiple antigens on a single
plasmid vector. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Durable
Efficacy: PLACCINE delivers a DNA plasmid-based antigen that could result in durable antigen exposure and a robust vaccine response
to viral antigens. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Storage
& Distribution: PLACCINE allows for stability that is compatible with manageable vaccine storage and distribution. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Simple
Dosing & Administration: PLACCINE is a synthetic delivery system that should require a simple injection that does not require
viruses or special equipment to deliver its payload. |
We
are conducting preliminary research associated with our recently announced proprietary DNA vaccine platform provisional patent filing.
At the same time, we are redoubling our efforts and R&D resources in our immuno-oncology and next generation vaccine program.
On
September 2, 2021, the Company announced results from preclinical in vivo studies showing production of antibodies and cytotoxic
T-cell response specific to the spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 when immunizing BALB/c mice with the Company’s next-generation PLACCINE
DNA vaccine platform. Moreover, the antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen prevented the infection of cultured cells in a viral neutralization
assay. The production of antibodies predicts the ability of PLACCINE to protect against SARS-CoV-2 exposure, and the elicitation of cytotoxic
T-cell response shows the vaccine’s potential to eradicate cells infected with SARS-CoV-2. These findings demonstrate the potential
immunogenicity of the Company’s PLACCINE DNA vaccine, which is intended to provide broad-spectrum protection and resistance against
variants by incorporating multiple viral antigens, to improve vaccine stability at storage temperatures of 4o C and above,
and to facilitate cheaper and easier manufacturing.
On
January 31, 2022, the Company announced it had engaged BIOQUAL, Inc., a preclinical testing contract research organization, to conduct
a non-human primate (“NHP”) challenge study with the Company’s DNA-based approach for a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The NHP pilot study follows
the generation of encouraging mouse data and will evaluate the Company’s lead vaccine formulations for safety, immunogenicity,
and protection against SARS-CoV-2. In completed preclinical studies, the Company demonstrated safe and efficient immune responses including
IgG response, neutralizing antibodies and T-cell responses that parallel the activity of commercial vaccines following intramuscular
(“IM”) administration of novel vaccine compositions expressing a single viral antigen. In addition, vector development has shown promise
of neutralizing activity against a range of SARS-CoV-2 variants. The Company’s novel DNA-based vaccines have been based on a simple
intramuscular injection that does not require viral encapsulation or special equipment for administration.
In
April 2022, the Company presented its PLACCINE platform technology at the 2022 World Vaccine Congress. In an oral presentation during
a Session on Cancer and Immunotherapy, Dr. Khursheed Anwer, the Company’s Chief Science Officer, highlighted the Company’s
technology platform in his presentation entitled: “Novel DNA Approaches for Cancer Immunotherapies and Multivalent Infectious
Disease Vaccines.” PLACCINE is demonstrating the potential to be a powerful platform that provides for rapid design capability
for targeting two or more different variants of a single virus in one vaccine. There is a clear public health need for vaccines today
that address more than one strain of viruses, like COVID-19, which have fast evolving variant capability to offer the widest possible
protection. Murine model data has thus far been encouraging and suggests that the Company’s approach provides not only flexibility,
but also the potential for efficacy comparable to benchmark COVID-19 commercial vaccines with durability to protect for more than 6 months.
In
September 2022, the Company provided an update on the progress made in the development of a DNA-based vaccine using its PLACCINE platform
technology. The Company reported evidence of IgG, neutralizing antibody, and T-cell responses to its SARS-CoV-2 PLACCINE vaccines in
normal mice. In this murine model, the Company’s multivalent PLACCINE vaccine targeted against two different variants showed to
be immunogenic as determined by the levels of IgG, neutralizing antibodies, and T-cell responses. Additionally, our multivalent vaccine
was equally effective against two different variants of the COVID-19 virus while the commercial mRNA vaccine appeared to have lost some
activity against the newer variant. The murine model data has thus far been encouraging and suggests that the Company’s approach
provides not only flexibility, but also the potential for efficacy comparable to benchmark COVID-19 commercial vaccines with durability
to protect expected to be greater than 6 months.
Final
data from its now completed proof-of-concept mouse challenge study confirmed that a PLACCINE DNA-based vaccine can produce robust levels
of IgG, neutralizing antibodies, and T-cell responses. The data demonstrates the ability of the Company’s PLACCINE vaccine to protect
a SARS-CoV-2 mouse model in a live viral challenge. In the study, mice were vaccinated with a PLACCINE vaccine expressing the SARS-CoV-2
spike antigen from the D614G variant or the Delta variant, or a combination vaccine expressing both the D614G and Delta spike variants.
The vaccination was administered by intramuscular injection on Day 0 and Day 14, followed by challenge with live SARS-CoV-2 virus on
Day 42. All three vaccines, including the single and dual antigen vaccines, were found to be safe and elicited IgG responses and inhibited
the viral load by 90-95%. The dual antigen vaccine was equally effective against both variants of the SARS CoV-2 virus.
In
October 2022, the Company reported partial results from an ongoing non-human primate study designed to examine the immunogenicity of
its proprietary PLACCINE vaccine which supports PLACCINE as a viable alternative to mRNA vaccines. The study examined a single plasmid
DNA vector containing the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant spike antigen formulated with a synthetic DNA delivery system and administered by
intramuscular injection. In the study, Cynomolgus monkeys were vaccinated with the PLACCINE vaccine or a commercial mRNA vaccine on Day
1, 28 and 84. Analysis of blood samples for IgG and neutralizing antibodies showed evidence of immunogenicity both in PLACCINE and mRNA
vaccinated subjects. Analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage for viral load by quantitative PCR showed viral clearance by >90% of the non-vaccinated
controls. Viral clearance from nasal swab followed a similar pattern in a majority of vaccinated animals and a similar clearance profile
was observed when viral load was analyzed by the tissue culture infectious dose method.
Importantly,
in a head-to-head comparison the protection efficiency as measured by viral clearance following challenge with the SARS-CoV-2 virus was
similar between PLACCINE and a commercial mRNA vaccine. In an ongoing stability study, the physio-chemical properties and immunogenicity
of PLACCINE vaccine did not change during storage at 4° C for up to three months.
THERMODOX®
- DIRECTED CHEMOTHERAPY
Liposomes
are manufactured submicroscopic vesicles consisting of a discrete aqueous central compartment surrounded by a membrane bilayer composed
of naturally occurring lipids. Conventional liposomes have been designed and manufactured to carry drugs and increase residence time,
thus allowing the drugs to remain in the bloodstream for extended periods of time before they are removed from the body. However, the
current existing liposomal formulations of cancer drugs and liposomal cancer drugs under development do not provide for the immediate
release of the drug and the direct targeting of organ specific tumors, two important characteristics that are required for improving
the efficacy of cancer drugs such as doxorubicin. A team of research scientists at Duke University developed a heat-sensitive liposome
that rapidly changes its structure when heated to a threshold minimum temperature of 39.5º to 42º Celsius. Heating creates
channels in the liposome bilayer that allow an encapsulated drug to rapidly disperse into the surrounding tissue. This novel, heat-activated
liposomal technology is differentiated from other liposomes through its unique low heat-activated release of encapsulated chemotherapeutic
agents. We are able to use several available focused-heat technologies, such as radiofrequency ablation (“RFA”), microwave
energy and high intensity focused ultrasound (“HIFU”), to activate the release of drugs from our novel heat sensitive liposomes.
OPTIMA
Study
The
OPTIMA Study represents an evaluation of ThermoDox® in combination with a first line therapy, RFA, for newly diagnosed,
intermediate stage HCC patients. The OPTIMA Study was designed to enroll up to 550 patients globally at approximately 65 clinical sites
in the U.S., Canada, European Union (“EU”), China and other countries in the Asia-Pacific region and will evaluate ThermoDox®
in combination with standardized RFA, which will require a minimum of 45 minutes across all investigators and clinical sites for
treating lesions three to seven centimeters, versus standardized RFA alone. The primary endpoint for the OPTIMA Study is OS, and the
secondary endpoints are progression free survival and safety. The statistical plan calls for two interim efficacy analyses by an independent
Data Monitoring Committee (“DMC”).
In
August 2018, the Company announced that the OPTIMA Study was fully enrolled. On August 5, 2019, the Company announced that the
prescribed number of OS events had been reached for the first prespecified interim analysis of the OPTIMA Phase III Study. Following
preparation of the data, the first interim analysis was conducted by the DMC. The DMC’s pre-planned interim efficacy review
followed 128 patient events, or deaths, which occurred in August 2019. On November 4, 2019, the Company announced that the DMC
unanimously recommended the OPTIMA Study continue according to protocol. The recommendation was based on a review of blinded safety
and data integrity from 556 patients enrolled in the OPTIMA Study. Data presented demonstrated that PFS and OS data appeared to be
tracking with patient data observed at a similar point in the Company’s subgroup of patients followed prospectively in the
earlier Phase III HEAT Study, upon which the OPTIMA Study was based. On April 15, 2020, the Company announced that the prescribed
minimum number of events of 158 patient deaths had been reached for the second pre-specified interim analysis of the OPTIMA Phase
III Study. The hazard ratio for success at 158 deaths is 0.70, which represents a 30% reduction in the risk of death compared with
RFA alone. On July 13, 2020, the Company announced that it has received a recommendation from the DMC to consider stopping the
global OPTIMA Study. The recommendation was made following the second pre-planned interim safety and efficacy analysis by the DMC on
July 9, 2020. The DMC analysis found that the pre-specified boundary for stopping the trial for futility of 0.900 was crossed with
an actual value of 0.903. However, the 2-sided p-value of 0.524 for this analysis provides uncertainty, subsequently, the DMC left
the final decision of whether or not to stop the OPTIMA Study to the Company. There were no safety concerns noted during the interim
analysis. The Company followed the advice of the DMC considered its options either to stop the study or continue to follow patients
after a thorough review of the data, and an evaluation of our probability of success.
On
August 4, 2020, the Company issued a press release announcing it would continue following patients for OS, noting that the unexpected
and marginally crossed futility boundary, suggested by the Kaplan-Meier analysis at the second interim analysis on July 9, 2020, may
be associated with a data maturity issue. On October 12, 2020, the Company provided an update on the ongoing data analysis from its Phase
III OPTIMA Study with ThermoDox® as well as growing interest among clinical investigators in conducting studies with ThermoDox®
as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies. On February 11, 2021, the Company provided a final update on the Phase
III OPTIMA Study and the decision to stop following patients in the Study. Independent analyses conducted by a global biometrics contract
research organization and the NIH, did not find any evidence of significance or factors that would justify continuing to follow patients
for OS. Therefore, the Company notified all clinical sites to discontinue following patients. The OPTIMA Study database of 556 patients
is now be frozen at 185 patient deaths. While the analyses did identify certain patient subgroups that appear to have had a clinical
benefit, the Company concluded that it would not be in its best interest to pursue these retrospective findings as the regulatory hurdles
supporting further discussion will be significant.
Investigator-Sponsored
Studies with ThermoDox®
The
Company continues working closely and supporting investigations by others to evaluate the use of ThermoDox for the treatment of various
cancer. Following inquiries from the NIH, we renewed our Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (“CRADA”) with the Institute at
a nominal cost, one goal of which is to pursue their interest in a study of ThermoDox® to treat patients with bladder
cancer. Importantly, the Company is developing a business model to support these investigator-sponsored studies in a manner that will
not interfere with its current focus on our GEN-1 program and vaccine development initiative.
Business
Plan
Since
inception, the Company has incurred substantial operating losses, principally from expenses associated with the Company’s
research and development programs, clinical trials conducted in connection with the Company’s product candidates, and
applications and submissions to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The Company has not generated significant revenue and has
incurred significant net losses in each year since our inception. As of September 30, 2022, the Company has incurred approximately
$355 million of cumulative net losses. As of September 30, 2022, the Company had $43.4 million in cash and cash equivalents,
short-term investments, interest receivable and restricted cash. The Company has substantial future capital requirements to continue
its research and development activities and advance its product candidates through various development stages. The Company believes
these expenditures are essential for the commercialization of its technologies.
The
Company expects its operating losses to continue for the foreseeable future as it continues its product development efforts, and when
it undertakes marketing and sales activities. The Company’s ability to achieve profitability is dependent upon its ability to obtain
governmental approvals, manufacture, and market and sell its new product candidates. There can be no assurance that the Company will
be able to commercialize its technology successfully or that profitability will ever be achieved. The operating results of the Company
have fluctuated significantly in the past.
In
January 2020, the World Health Organization declared an outbreak of coronavirus, COVID-19, to be a “Public Health Emergency of
International Concern,” and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services declared a public health emergency to aid the U.S.
healthcare community in responding to COVID-19. This virus continues to evolve and may have an adverse effect on our operations and product
development timelines. Uncertainty with respect to the economic impacts of the pandemic has introduced significant volatility in the
financial markets. While the extent to which COVID-19 impacts the Company’s future results will depend on future developments,
the pandemic and associated economic impacts could result in a material impact to the Company’s future financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows.
The
Company’s ability to raise additional capital may be adversely impacted by potential worsening global economic conditions and the
recent disruptions to, and volatility in, financial markets in the U.S. and worldwide resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and
the geopolitical turmoil caused by the war in Ukraine. These disruptions may have a negative impact on the Company’s clinical trials
process and enrollment of patients. The ongoing geopolitical turmoil caused by the war in Ukraine has contributed to highly volatile
financial markets which may impact our ability to access the capital markets and rising levels of inflation which may impact our expenditures
and supply chain. The Company continues to monitor its operating activities in light of these events, and it is reasonably possible that
these events could have a negative effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. The specific impact,
if any, is not readily determinable as of the date of the Financial Statements.
The
actual amount of funds the Company will need to operate is subject to many factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control.
These factors include the following:
|
● |
the
progress of research activities; |
|
|
|
|
● |
the
number and scope of research programs; |
|
|
|
|
● |
the
progress of preclinical and clinical development activities; |
|
|
|
|
● |
the
progress of the development efforts of parties with whom the Company has entered into research and development agreements; |
|
|
|
|
● |
the
costs associated with additional clinical trials of product candidates; |
|
|
|
|
● |
the
ability to maintain current research and development licensing arrangements and to establish new research and development and licensing
arrangements; |
|
|
|
|
● |
the
ability to achieve milestones under licensing arrangements; |
|
|
|
|
● |
the
costs involved in prosecuting and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
the
costs and timing of regulatory approvals. |
Since
2018, the Company has annually submitted applications to sell a portion of the Company’s State of New Jersey net operating losses
as part of the Technology Business Tax Certificate Program sponsored by The New Jersey Economic Development Authority. Under the program,
emerging biotechnology companies with unused New Jersey NOLs and unused research and development credits are allowed to sell these benefits
to other New Jersey-based companies. In 2018 and 2019, the Company sold cumulative New Jersey NOLs from 2011 to 2018 totaling $13 million
and received net proceeds of $12.2 million. As part of the Technology Business Tax Certificate Program, the Company sold $1.5 million
and $2.0 million of its New Jersey NOLs in 2021 and 2020, respectively. The sale of these net operating losses resulted in net proceeds
to the Company of approximately $1.4 million in 2021 and $1.9 million in 2020. During 2021, the New Jersey State Legislature increased
the maximum lifetime benefit per company from $15 million to $20 million, which will allow the Company to participate in this funding
program in future years for up to an additional $3.5 million in net operating losses under this maximum lifetime benefit. In June 2022,
the Company filed an application with The New Jersey Economic Development Authority to sell $1.7 million of its New Jersey NOL’s
for the tax year 2021 which is expected to generate net proceeds to the Company of approximately $1.6 million.
In
June 2018, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement with Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (“Horizon”) that provided
$10 million in capital (the “Horizon Credit Agreement”). The obligations under the Horizon Credit Agreement are secured by
a first-priority security interest in substantially all assets of the Company other than intellectual property assets. Payments under
the loan agreement are interest only (calculated based on one-month LIBOR plus 7.625%) for the first 24 months through July 2020, followed
by a 21-month amortization period of principal and interest starting on August 1, 2020, and ending through the scheduled maturity date
on April 1, 2023. On August 28, 2020, in connection with an Amendment to the Horizon Credit Agreement, the Company repaid $5 million
of the $10 million loan and $0.2 million in related end of term charges, and the remaining $5 million in obligations were restructured.
As more fully discussed in Note 10 to the Financial Statements, in June 2021, the Company entered into a $10 million loan facility with
Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”). The Company immediately used $6 million from this facility to retire all outstanding indebtedness
with Horizon and deposited $6 million with SVB as restricted cash as discussed in more detail in Note 4. The remaining $4 million under
the SVB loan facility (“SVB Loan Facility”) will be available to be drawn down up to 12 months after closing. Payments under
the loan agreement are interest only for the first 24 months after loan closing, followed by a 24-month amortization period of principal
and interest through the scheduled maturity date.
With
$43.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, interest receivable and restricted cash, coupled with approximately
$3.5 million of future planned sales of the Company’s State of New Jersey net operating losses, the Company believes it has sufficient
capital resources to fund its operations into 2025.
The
Company has based its estimates on assumptions that may prove to be wrong. The Company may need to obtain additional funds sooner or
in greater amounts than it currently anticipates. Potential sources of financing include strategic relationships, public or private sales
of the Company’s shares or debt, the sale of the Company’s New Jersey NOLs and other sources. If the Company raises funds
by selling additional shares of common stock or other securities convertible into common stock, the ownership interest of existing stockholders
may be diluted.
Financing
Overview
Equity,
Debt and Other Forms of Financing
On
March 19, 2021, the Company filed with the SEC a new $100 million shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-254515) (the
“2021 Registration Statement”) that allows the Company to issue any combination of common stock, preferred stock or warrants
to purchase common stock or preferred stock. This shelf registration was declared effective on March 30, 2021.
During
2021 and 2022 through the date of this Quarterly Report filed on Form 10-Q, we issued a total of 4.5 million shares of common stock as
discussed below for an aggregate $65.6 million in gross proceeds.
|
● |
On
December 4, 2018, the Company entered into the Capital on Demand Agreement with JonesTrading, pursuant to which the Company may offer
and sell, from time to time, through JonesTrading shares of Common Stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $16.0 million.
During 2021, the Company sold 0.5 million shares under the Capital on Demand Agreement, receiving approximately $6.9 million in gross
proceeds under the Capital on Demand Agreement. |
|
|
|
|
● |
On
January 22, 2021, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “January 2021 Purchase Agreement”) with
several institutional investors, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell, in a registered direct offering (the “January
2021 Offering”), an aggregate of 1,728,395 shares of the Company’s common stock at an offering price of $20.25 per share
for gross proceeds of approximately $35 million before the deduction of the January 2021 Placement Agents (as defined below) fee
and offering expenses. The closing of the January 2021 Offering occurred on January 26, 2021. In connection with the January 2021
Offering, the Company entered into a placement agent agreement with A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners (“AGP” and together
with Brookline Capital Markets, the “January 2021 Placement Agents”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay the
January 2021 Placement Agents a cash fee equal to 7% of the aggregate gross proceeds raised from the sale of the securities sold
in the January 2021 Offering and reimburse the January 2021 Placement Agents for certain of their expenses in an amount not to exceed
$82,500. |
|
|
|
|
● |
On
March 31, 2021, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “March
2021 Purchase Agreement”) with several institutional investors, pursuant to which the
Company agreed to issue and sell, in a registered direct offering (the “March 2021
Offering”), an aggregate of 769,230 shares of the Company’s common stock, at
an offering price of $19.50 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $15 million before
the deduction of the placement agents fee and offering expenses. The shares were offered
by the Company pursuant to the 2021 Registration Statement. The closing of the offering occurred
on April 5, 2021.
In
connection with the March 2021 Offering, the Company entered into a placement agent agreement with AGP, as lead placement agent (together
with JonesTrading Institutional Services LLC and Brookline Capital Markets, a division of Arcadia Securities, LLC, serving as co-placement
agents, the “March 2021 Placement Agents”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay the March 2021 Placement Agents
an aggregate cash fee equal to 7% of the aggregate gross proceeds raised from the sale of the securities sold in the offering and
reimburse the Placement Agents for certain of their expenses in an amount not to exceed $82,500. |
|
|
|
|
● |
On
January 10, 2022, the Company entered into the Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement with several
institutional investors, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell, in the Preferred
Offerings, (i) 50,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, and (ii) 50,000 shares of Series
B Preferred Stock, in each case at an offering price of $285 per share, representing a 5%
original issue discount to the stated value of $300 per share, for gross proceeds of each
Preferred Offering of $14.25 million, or approximately $28.50 million in the aggregate for
the Preferred Offerings, before the deduction of the Placement Agent’s (as defined
below) fee and offering expenses. The shares of Series A Preferred Stock had a stated value
of $300 per share and were convertible, at a conversion price of $13.65 per share, into 1,098,901
shares of common stock (subject in certain circumstances to adjustments). The shares of Series
B Preferred Stock had a stated value of $300 per share and were convertible, at a conversion
price of $15.00 per share, into 1,000,000 shares of common stock (subject in certain circumstances
to adjustments). The closing of the Preferred Offerings occurred on January 13, 2022.
The
Company held a special meeting of stockholders to consider an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Company’s Certificate
of Incorporation, as amended, to effect a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of common stock (“Common Stock”)
by a ratio to be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Reverse Stock Split”). The investors have
agreed in the Purchase Agreement to not transfer, offer, sell, contract to sell, hypothecate, pledge or otherwise dispose of the
shares of the Preferred Stock until the Reverse Stock Split, to vote the shares of the Series A Preferred Stock purchased in the
Preferred Offerings in favor of such Amendment and to vote the shares of the Series B Preferred Stock purchased in the Preferred
Offerings in a manner that “mirrors” the proportions on which the shares of Common Stock (excluding any shares of Common
Stock that are not voted) and Series A Preferred Stock are voted on the Reverse Stock Split and the Amendment.
|
|
|
The
holders of Preferred Stock were entitled to dividends, on an as-if converted basis, equal to dividends actually paid, if any, on
shares of Common Stock. The Preferred Stock was convertible into shares of Common Stock at a rate of $13.65 per share for the Series
A Preferred Stock and $15.00 per share for the Series B Preferred Stock, subject to adjustment. The Preferred Stock was convertible
at the option of the holder at any time after the Company had received stockholder approval for the Reverse Stock Split and filed
the requisite Amendment with the Delaware Secretary of State’s office to effectuate the Reverse Stock Split (the “Reverse
Stock Split Date”), subject to beneficial ownership limitations set forth in the applicable Certificate of Designation. In
addition, on or after the Reverse Stock Split Date, and subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, the Company had the right
to cause the holders of the Preferred Stock to convert their shares of Preferred Stock, subject to such beneficial ownership limitations. |
|
|
|
|
|
Each
holder of the Preferred Stock had the right to cause the Company to redeem all or part of their shares of the Preferred Stock from
the earlier of receipt of stockholder approval of the Reverse Stock Split or of 90 days following the original issue date until 120
days following the original issue date, the “Redemption Date,” in cash at a redemption price equal to 105% of the stated
value plus an amount equal to accumulated but unpaid dividends, if any, on such shares (whether or not earned or declared, but excluding
interest on such dividends) up to, but excluding, the Redemption Date. In connection with the Preferred Offerings, the Company entered
into a placement agent agreement (the “Placement Agent Agreement”) with AGP in which the Company paid $1,000,000 as a
placement agent fee and $110,000 to reimburse AGP for certain expenses related to the Preferred Stock offering. |
|
|
|
|
|
On
March 3, 2022, the Company redeemed for cash at a price equal to 105% of the $300 stated value per share all of its 50,000 outstanding
shares of Series A Preferred Stock and all of its 50,000 shares of outstanding Series B Preferred Stock. As a result, all shares
of the Preferred Stock have been retired and are no longer outstanding and the Company’s only class of outstanding stock is
its common stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock were recorded as a liability on the condensed consolidated balance sheet during
the first quarter of 2022 until the preferred shares were redeemed during the same quarter. The Company recognized $4,551,567 as
interest expense for the preferred shares during the first quarter of 2022, which was composed of: (a) $3,000,000 as the difference
between the redemption price for the preferred shares and the net proceeds received from the issuance of the preferred shares, (b)
$1,110,000 paid to AGP as a placement agent fee and reimbursement for certain expenses, and (c) $441,567 in legal fees recognized
in the first quarter that were attributed to the preferred shares. |
|
|
|
|
● |
On
April 6, 2022, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “April
2022 Purchase Agreement”) with several institutional investors, pursuant to which the
Company agreed to issue and sell, in a registered direct offering (the “April 2022
Offering”), an aggregate of 1,328,274 shares of the Company’s common stock at
an offering price of $5.27 per share for gross proceeds of $7.0 million before the deduction
of the April 2022 Placement Agent (as defined below) fees and offering expenses. The closing
of the April 2022 Offering occurred on April 8, 2022.
In
connection with the April 2022 Offering, the Company entered into a placement agent agreement with A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners
(the “April 2022 Placement Agent”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay the April 2022 Placement Agent a cash
fee equal to 6.5% of the aggregate gross proceeds raised from the sale of the securities sold in the April 2022 Offering and reimburse
the April 2022 Placement Agent for certain of their expenses in an amount not to exceed $50,000. |
Significant
Accounting Policies
Our
significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2021 Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 filed with the SEC on March 31, 2022. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
As
a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company, our business, and our ability to execute our strategy to achieve our corporate goals are
subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. Material risks and uncertainties relating to our business and our industry are described
in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” under “Part II: Other Information” included herein.
FINANCIAL
REVIEW FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 AND 2021
Results
of Operations
For
the three months ended September 30, 2022 our net loss was $6.1 million compared to a net loss of $5.4 million for the same three-month
period of 2021.
With
$43.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, interest receivable and restricted cash, coupled with approximately
$3.5 million of future planned sales of the Company’s State of New Jersey net operating losses, the Company believes it has sufficient
capital resources to fund its operations into 2025.
| |
For
the Three Months Ended September 30, | |
| |
(In
thousands) | | |
Change
Increase (Decrease) | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | | |
| | |
| |
Licensing
Revenue: | |
$ | 125 | | |
$ | 125 | | |
$ | – | | |
| – | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Operating
Expenses: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Clinical
Research | |
| 982 | | |
| 1,036 | | |
| (54 | ) | |
| (5.2 | )% |
Chemistry,
Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) | |
| 1427 | | |
| 1,432 | | |
| (5 | ) | |
| (0.3 | )% |
Research
and development expenses | |
| 2,409 | | |
| 2,468 | | |
| (59 | ) | |
| (2.4 | )% |
General
and administrative expenses | |
| 3,891 | | |
| 2,719 | | |
| 1,172 | | |
| 43.1 | % |
Total
operating expenses | |
| 6,300 | | |
| 5,187 | | |
| 1,113 | | |
| 21.5 | % |
Loss
from operations | |
$ | (6,175 | ) | |
$ | (5,062 | ) | |
$ | 1,113 | | |
| 22.0 | % |
Licensing
Revenue
In
January 2013, we entered into a technology development contract with Hisun, pursuant to which Hisun paid us a non-refundable technology
transfer fee of $5.0 million to support our development of ThermoDox® in the China territory. The $5.0 million received as a non-refundable
payment from Hisun in the first quarter 2013 has been recorded to deferred revenue and will be amortized over the ten-year term of the
agreement; therefore, we recorded deferred revenue of $125,000 in each of the third quarters of 2022 and 2021.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research
and development (“R&D”) expenses were $2.4 million in the third quarter of 2022 compared to $2.5 million in same period
of 2021. Costs associated with the OVATION 2 Study were $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2022 compared to $0.2 million in the same
period of 2021. Costs associated with the OPTIMA Study were $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2022 compared to $0.2 million in the
same period of 2021. In July 2020, the Company unblinded the OPTIMA Study at the recommendation of the DMC to halt the study due to futility.
Other clinical and regulatory costs were $0.5 million the third quarter of 2022 compared to $0.7 million in the same period of 2021.
R&D costs associated with the development of GEN-1 to support the OVATION 2 Study as well as development of the PLACCINE DNA vaccine
technology platform increased to $1.1 million in the third quarter of 2022 compared to $1.1 million in the same period of 2021. CMC costs
increased to $0.3 million in the third quarter of 2022 compared to $0.3 million in the same period of 2021.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General
and administrative expenses were $3.9 million in the third quarter of 2022 compared to $2.7 million in the same period of 2021. The increase
was primarily attributable to costs associated with higher legal fees partially offset by lower stock compensation costs.
Impairment
of IPR&D Liability
Due
to the continuing deterioration of public capital markets in the biotech industry and its impact on market capitalization rates in this
sector, IPR&D related to the ovarian cancer indication was reviewed for impairment during the third quarter of 2022. Based on the
Company’s analysis of the IPR&D, the Company has concluded that it is not more than likely that the asset had been impaired
as of September 30, 2022. As such, no impairment charges for IPR&D related to the ovarian cancer indication were recorded during
the third quarter of 2022.
Change
in Earn-out Milestone Liability
As
of September 30, 2022 and June 30, 2022, the Company fair valued the earn-out milestone liability at $5.4 million with no change recorded
to the fair value of the earn-out milestone during the third quarter of 2022.
Investment
income and interest expense
The
Company recognized interest expense of $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2022 compared to $0.1 million in the same period of 2021.
As more fully discussed in Note 10, in June 2021, the Company entered into a $10 million loan facility with Silicon Valley Bank. The
Company immediately used $6 million from this facility to retire all outstanding indebtedness with Horizon Technology Finance Corporation.
In connection with this Horizon Technology Financing Facility, the Company incurred $0.2 million in interest expense in the third quarter
of 2021. In connection with the termination of the Horizon Technology Financing Facility in the second quarter of 2021, the Company paid
early termination and end of term charges to Horizon and recognized $0.2 million as a loss on debt extinguishment.
Investment
income from its short-term investments was insignificant in the third quarter of 2021 and 2022.
FINANCIAL
REVIEW FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 AND 2021
Results
of Operations
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2022, our net loss was $22.7 million compared to a net loss of $16.5 million for the same nine-month
period of 2021.
| |
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| |
(In
thousands) | | |
Change
Increase (Decrease) | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | | |
| | |
| |
Licensing
Revenue: | |
$ | 375 | | |
$ | 375 | | |
$ | – | | |
| – | % |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Operating
Expenses: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Clinical
Research | |
| 3,808 | | |
| 3,400 | | |
| 408 | | |
| 12.0 | % |
Chemistry,
Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) | |
| 4,922 | | |
| 4,233 | | |
| 689 | | |
| 16.3 | % |
Research
and development expenses | |
| 8,730 | | |
| 7,633 | | |
| 1,097 | | |
| 14.4 | % |
General
and administrative expenses | |
| 9,640 | | |
| 8,258 | | |
| 1,382 | | |
| 16.7 | % |
Total
operating expenses | |
| 18,370 | | |
| 15,891 | | |
| 2,479 | | |
| 15.6 | % |
Loss
from operations | |
$ | (17,995 | ) | |
$ | (15,516 | ) | |
$ | 2,479 | | |
| 16.0 | % |
Licensing
Revenue
In
January 2013, we entered into a technology development contract with Hisun, pursuant to which Hisun paid us a non-refundable technology
transfer fee of $5.0 million to support our development of ThermoDox® in the China territory. The $5.0 million received as a non-refundable
payment from Hisun in the first quarter 2013 has been recorded to deferred revenue and will be amortized over the ten-year term of the
agreement; therefore, we recorded deferred revenue of $375,000 in the first nine months of 2022 and 2021.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research
and development (“R&D”) expenses were $8.7 million in the first nine months of 2022 compared $7.6 million in same period
of 2021. Costs associated with the OVATION 2 Study were $1.2 million in the first nine months of 2022 compared to $1.0 million in the
same period of 2021. Costs associated with the OPTIMA Study were $1.0 million in the first nine months of 2022 compared to $0.6 million
in the same period of 2021. In July 2020, the Company unblinded the OPTIMA Study at the recommendation of the DMC to halt the study due
to futility. Other clinical and regulatory costs were $1.6 million the first nine months of 2022 compared to $1.8 million in the same
period of 2021. R&D costs associated with the development of GEN-1 to support the OVATION 2 Study as well as development of the PLACCINE
DNA vaccine technology platform increased to $4.1 million in the first nine months of 2022 compared to $3.1 million in the same period
of 2021. CMC costs decreased to $0.8 million in the first nine months of 2022 compared to $1.1 million in the same period of 2021.
General
and Administrative Expenses
General
and administrative expenses were $9.6 million in the first nine months of 2022 compared to $8.3 million in the same period of 2021. The
increase was primarily attributable to costs associated with higher professional fees partially offset by lower stock compensation costs.
Impairment
of IPR&D Liability
Due
to the continuing deterioration of public capital markets in the biotech industry and its impact on market capitalization rates in this
sector, IPR&D related to the ovarian cancer indication was reviewed for impairment during the first nine months of 2022. Based on
the Company’s analysis of the IPR&D, the Company has concluded that it is not more than likely that the asset had been impaired
as of September 30, 2022. As such, no impairment charges for IPR&D related to the ovarian cancer indication were recorded during
the first nine months of 2022.
Change
in Earn-out Milestone Liability
As
of September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company fair valued the earn-out milestone liability at $5.4 million with no change
recorded to the fair value of the earn-out milestone liability during the first nine months of 2022.
Investment
income and interest expense
The
Company recognized interest expense of $4.9 million in the first nine months of 2022. As more fully discussed in Notes 10 and 11 of the
financial statements, the Company expensed $0.3 million in interest due to the Silicon Valley Bank loan facility and $4.6 million in
interest attributed to the Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock during the first quarter of 2022.
As
more fully discussed in Note 10, in June 2021, the Company entered into a $10 million loan facility with Silicon Valley Bank. The Company
immediately used $6 million from this facility to retire all outstanding indebtedness with Horizon Technology Finance Corporation. In
connection with this Horizon Technology Financing Facility, the Company incurred $0.5 million in interest expense in the first nine months
of 2021. In connection with the termination of the Horizon Technology Financing Facility in the second quarter of 2021, the Company paid
early termination and end of term charges to Horizon and recognized $0.2 million as a loss on debt extinguishment.
Investment
income from its short-term investments was insignificant in the first nine months of 2021 and 2022.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Since
inception we have incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations. We have financed our operations primarily through
the net proceeds from the sales of equity, credit facilities and amounts received under our product licensing agreement with Yakult and
our technology development agreement with Hisun. The process of developing ThermoDox®, GEN-1 and other product candidates
and technologies requires significant research and development work and clinical trial studies, as well as significant manufacturing
and process development efforts. We expect these activities, together with our general and administrative expenses to result in significant
operating losses for the foreseeable future. Our expenses have significantly and regularly exceeded our revenue, and we had an accumulated
deficit of $355 million as of September 30, 2022.
At
September 30, 2022, we had total current assets of $40.2 million and current liabilities of $8.5 million, resulting in net working capital
of $31.7 million. At September 30, 2022, we had cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, interest receivable on short term
investments and money market investments ($6.0 million of which is included in other assets) of $43.4 million. At December 31, 2021 we
had total current assets of $51.9 million and current liabilities of $6.8 million, resulting in net working capital of $45.1 million.
We have substantial future capital requirements to continue our research and development activities and advance our product candidates
through various development stages. The Company believes these expenditures are essential for the commercialization of its technologies.
Net
cash used in operating activities for the first nine months of 2022 was $18.1 million. Net cash provided by investing activities was
$19.1 million during the first nine months of 2022. Cash provided by financing activities during the first nine months of 2022 totaled
$6.3 million. With $43.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, interest receivable and restricted cash, coupled
with approximately $3.5 million of future planned sales of the Company’s State of New Jersey net operating losses, the Company
believes it has sufficient capital resources to fund its operations into 2025.
We
expect to seek additional capital through further public or private equity offerings, debt financing, additional strategic alliance and
licensing arrangements, collaborative arrangements, potential sales of our net operating losses, or some combination of these financing
alternatives. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity securities, the percentage ownership of our stockholders could
be significantly diluted, and the newly issued equity securities may have rights, preferences, or privileges senior to those of the holders
of our common stock. If we raise funds through the issuance of debt securities, those securities may have rights, preferences, and privileges
senior to those of our common stock. If we seek strategic alliances, licenses, or other alternative arrangements, such as arrangements
with collaborative partners or others, we may need to relinquish rights to certain of our existing or future technologies, product candidates,
or products we would otherwise seek to develop or commercialize on our own, or to license the rights to our technologies, product candidates,
or products on terms that are not favorable to us. The overall status of the economic climate could also result in the terms of any equity
offering, debt financing, or alliance, license, or other arrangement being even less favorable to us and our stockholders than if the
overall economic climate were stronger. We also will continue to look for government sponsored research collaborations and grants to
help offset future anticipated losses from operations and, to a lesser extent, interest income.
If
adequate funds are not available through either the capital markets, strategic alliances, collaborators, or sales of our net operating
losses, we may be required to delay or, reduce the scope of, or terminate our research, development, clinical programs, manufacturing,
or commercialization efforts, or effect additional changes to our facilities or personnel, or obtain funds through other arrangements
that may require us to relinquish some of our assets or rights to certain of our existing or future technologies, product candidates,
or products on terms not favorable to us.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
None.