TARRYTOWN, N.Y., May 8 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Environmental
Power Corporation (NASDAQ:EPG) ("we", "us", or the "Company") today
announced results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2009 and
provided a business update. Business Commentary During the last
quarter, the Company undertook a number of initiatives in its
transformation from a development based company to a sustainable
operating company. These initiatives include the following, which
will be further described later in this press release: -- Huckabay
Ridge improvements complete and facility is reliably producing our
RNG(R) product. -- Closed on $5.0 million of convertible notes, and
are seeking additional financing. -- Hired Marathon Capital, LLC,
to assist us in identifying and managing discussions with entities
interested in investing in our projects. -- Aggressively pursued
the availability of funds under the federal stimulus package and
other federal programs. -- Actively seeking legislation to create
tax-credits for the production of renewable natural gas from waste
products. -- Evaluating options to reduce our project capital costs
and improve project returns. -- Reduced G&A costs by 25% and
maintain reductions for 2009. -- Signed 10 year RNG sales agreement
with Xcel Energy in Colorado for 915,000 MMBtus/yr at a price
reflecting the green attributes of our RNG product. -- Entered into
a new technology agreement with Xergi/DBT better reflecting EPG's
build/own/operate business model. -- Upon closing of Xergi
agreement, Xergi will acquire $3 million of EPG's 14% convertible
notes. We believe these initiatives will ensure that EPC maintains
its leadership position in the RNG(R) market. Market Update We
continue to experience very positive market conditions for our
RNG(R) product as a source of carbon neutral gas for utility and
industrial companies and we anticipate that federal renewable
energy incentives, a national Renewable Electricity Standard, and a
mandatory cap-and-trade program will increase the demand and value
of our RNG product and associated greenhouse gas offset credits.
The announcement of the Xcel RNG(R) sales agreement continues to
reinforce the value of our carbon neutral gas as a long term, cost
effective solution for utilities and industries to meet their
renewable goals. Because our RNG(R) product can be used as a fuel
in existing plant assets, it is available 24/7, does not require
new electric transmission capacity and does not impact food related
crops, demand for our RNG(R) product remains high. While "brown"
natural gas prices remain low, we believe that our principal
competition is not this form of gas but rather the cost of other
renewables such as wind and solar on an equivalent energy basis. As
shown by a recent analysis by the California PUC, biogas at our
green premium pricing is still more competitive than other forms of
renewable energy. It is to this standard that we price our RNG(R)
product as reflected in the Xcel agreement which has just received
Colorado PUC approval. We expect demand for our RNG(R) product to
remain high and even increase as both utilities and industrial
organizations strive to improve environmental stewardship and
voluntarily reduce their carbon footprint. We believe the market
for our unique product which addresses the environmental needs of
the agricultural and food processing sectors while creating a
versatile and renewable energy product with greenhouse gas offset
credits will be a key component in addressing the future energy and
environmental needs of the US. Financial Results The Company had a
net loss applicable to common shareholders of $3.3 million, or loss
per common share of $0.21, for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as
compared to a net income applicable to common shareholders of $2.8
million, or basic income per common share of $0.18 for the quarter
ended March 31, 2008. The results for the three months ended March
31, 2008 include net income of $7.0 million from discontinued
operations which were disposed of during this period. For
comparative purposes an analysis from continuing operations is
discussed below. The net loss from continuing operations was $2.9
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to a
loss of $3.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The
reduction in net loss for 2009 of $.9 million is primarily due to a
reduction in general and administrative expenses in 2009 as a
result of management's cost reduction program and reduced operating
expenses at the Company's Huckabay Ridge facility. Revenues.
Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009 declined to $.7
million from $.9 million in the first three months of 2008. The
primary reason for the decline in revenues was a reduction in the
amount of greenhouse gas sequestration credits in the first quarter
of 2009 when compared to first quarter of 2008. In the first
quarter of 2008 the Company received cash payment for vintage years
2005 through 2007 but in the first quarter of 2009 only recognized
sales associated with a six month period in 2008. Though the
Company continues to generate carbon credits through its normal
operations, it only recognizes carbon credit sales revenue when the
cash is received. Operations and maintenance expenses. These
expenses declined by $0.3 million in the first quarter of 2009 to
$1.0 million from $1.3 million for the first quarter of 2008. The
reduction in expenses principally reflects lower operating expenses
at Huckabay Ridge. General and administrative expenses. General and
administrative expenses were $2.1 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009, as compared to $3.3 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2008, a reduction of $1.2 million. This
reduction reflects lower salary expenses as a result of the
Company's cost reduction program, lower non-cash compensation
expenses in 2009 and reduced development expenses in 2009 as we
slowed development efforts to conserve cash pending our fundraising
initiatives. Excluding the decline in non-cash compensation
expenses, general and administrative expenses declined to $2.0
million in the first quarter of 2009 as compared to $3.0 million
for the first quarter of 2008, a decline of $1.0 million.
Depreciation and amortization expenses. For the first three months
of 2009 depreciation and amortization expense was $.4 million as
compared to $.3 million for the first three months of 2008. The
increase in depreciation is due to the fact that in the 2009 period
there was a full quarter of depreciation expense for the Huckabay
Ridge facility, as compared to the first quarter of 2008, in which
we started recognizing such expense after the Huckabay Ridge
facility was put into commercial service in February 2008.
Operating loss. As a result of the factors described above the
operating loss from continuing operations during the first quarter
of 2009 was $2.8 million as compared to an operating loss of $3.9
million for the first quarter of 2008. Interest income. Interest
income declined to $.02 million in the first three months of 2009,
as compared to $.2 million in the first three months of 2008.
Interest income declined due both to lower invested cash balances
and lower interest rates on such balances. Interest expense.
Interest expense increased by $.1 million to $0.3 million for the
first three months of 2009, as compared to $0.2 million for the
first three months of 2008. The increase in interest expense is due
to the fact that in the 2009 period there was a full quarter of
interest expense recognized in respect of the Huckabay Ridge
facility, as compared to the first quarter of 2008, in which we
started recognizing such expense after the Huckabay Ridge facility
was put into commercial service in February 2008. Prior to that
time, the Company was capitalizing interest expense associated with
the facility. Other income (loss). Other income for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 consists of income of $130,000 to
reflect a decline in the fair value of certain outstanding warrants
due to the adoption of EITF 07-05 as of January 1, 2009. Going
Concern Caturano & Company, P.C., our independent registered
public accounting firm, reported that the Company's audited
financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 contains a paragraph that
indicates that, while the Company's financial statements have been
prepared on a going concern basis, there is substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going concern, and that no adjustments
have been made to the financial statements that might result from
the outcome of this uncertainty. In March 2009, the Company issued
$5,000,000 in 14% convertible notes to support project and other
company related expenses. As of March 31, 2009, the Company's
unrestricted cash and cash equivalents amounted to $4.8 million.
The Company continues to aggressively pursue capital from a number
of sources, and hopes to obtain the financing it requires by the
end of the first half of 2009. Nevertheless, the Company cannot
assure you that all of the necessary additional financing will be
available on reasonable terms or in a timely fashion, particularly
in the current economic environment, in which capital raising
activities are especially challenging. The level of funds the
Company is able to raise will determine the level of development
and construction activity that it can pursue and whether it will be
able to continue as a going concern. A complete presentation of the
Company's financial results for the three months ended March 31,
2009, and management's discussion and analysis thereof, is included
in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, which was filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 8, 2009 and is available on the
Company's web site. Corporate Expenses The Company has undertaken a
prioritization of its activities to focus on the build-out of its
announced projects, while maintaining oversight of the other
projects in its development pipeline. Specifically, our previously
announced plan to reduce cash general and administrative expenses
by 25% has been implemented. Financing Initiatives Convertible Note
Closing The company had previously announced its intention to issue
convertible bonds as a source of capital. On March 13, 2009, the
Company completed an offering of $5.0 million of its 14%
Convertible Notes due January 1, 2014, resulting in net proceeds of
approximately $4.5 million. The conversion price schedule of the
bonds starts at an initial conversion price of $5.40 which
increases to $11.00 by the maturity of the bonds. Our financing
plans include the possibility of future financings on similar
terms. Project Level Investment In addition, we have been
discussing investment at the project level with potential financial
and strategic investors. The Company recently hired Marathon
Capital, LLC to act as our investment advisor to assist us in
managing this process and evaluating various potential investments.
Capital raised through these initiatives will be applied toward the
Company's required equity contribution for each of our projects.
Marathon has established an organized process for investors to
propose a financial structure, amount, and other terms in the
Company or its subsidiaries in a manner which minimizes shareholder
dilution. As highlighted in previous announcements, the Company has
five projects in Texas and California that are fully permitted,
debt financed, and ready to begin construction upon our securing
additional financing and meeting draw conditions. The Company
expects to consider any such financing proposals during the second
quarter. Project Status Huckabay Ridge At Huckabay Ridge, we have
completed comprehensive upgrades to process-instrumentation and
controls, the gas conditioning system, and the gas-collection
system. These upgrades bring the facility into conformity with the
third-generation project design that we are utilizing on our next
round of facilities, and we are pleased with the results to date of
those upgrades as Huckabay Ridge is currently operating reliably
and we expect that it will continue to maintain a high availability
factor. Huckabay Ridge produced salable gas 89% of the time during
the month of April and 99% of the time for the first 5 days of May.
Production levels have been trending upward as a result of improved
operational processes designed to maximize RNG(R) output.
Attributes of improved operations include consistency in meeting
specifications for removal of CO2, H2S and H2O, the convergence of
production as predicted by our operating model and actual results,
and, importantly, the ability of the systems to manage fluctuations
in biogas-generation as well as varying ambient conditions. With
enhanced system stability, we have turned our attention to managing
other key aspects of this facility to maximize plant RNG(R) product
output and profitability. While we are achieving expected biogas
production based on substrate concentration being received, we have
witnessed a decline in the level of volatile solids contained in
our suppliers' substrate materials. Volatile solids in substrates
contribute directly to overall biogas production, and hence lower
volatile solid concentrations negatively impact production volumes
of our pipeline-grade finished product. We believe that the decline
in the level of volatile solids is directly related to recessionary
forces, as, for example, facilities from which we have been
receiving highly concentrated glycerin have temporarily suspended
or curtailed operations due to economic forces in their industry
and we are receiving reduced shipments of grease trap waste from
suppliers as restaurant patronage has declined. Our current
facility design at Huckabay Ridge accommodates a certain volume of
substrate, so that if there is a decrease in the level of volatile
solids beyond a threshold limit, aggregate gas production also
declines. We are, therefore, undertaking a number of measures at
Huckabay Ridge to address substrate quality. Obviously, in
cooperation both with existing vendors and with potential new
suppliers, we have expanded our reach for higher-grade materials.
In addition, we are pursuing an expanded environmental licensing
capability to accept a broader scope of substrate materials,
working on material handling designs and capacities that can accept
varying substrate consistencies, and working to develop additional
strategic relationships with larger and potentially long-term
substrate providers that will assist us at Huckabay Ridge and our
other Texas facilities. We believe that all of these efforts will
not only address current market conditions but will also allow us
greater operating flexibility in the future. While we believe that
the reduced availability of highly concentrated substrates is
directly related to recessionary forces, and we fully expect their
availability to improve along with an improved economy, designs at
all future facilities now take into account the ability to handle
lower concentrations of substrate materials. Therefore, should we
experience these same type of market conditions, RNG(R) output from
our facilities will not be affected. On the other hand, should
substrate quality return to the higher volatile solids
concentrations as previously experienced, the resulting output of
RNG(R) will be higher than previously targeted levels. We expect to
meet with the bondholders of our Texas and California tax-exempt
debt over the coming weeks to discuss our progress toward
confirmation that the Huckabay Ridge facility is capable of
achieving its intended performance levels. Other Texas Facilities
The previously announced Rio Leche and Cnossen projects are slated
to resume site construction in the second quarter of 2009, pending
the timing of the financing initiatives presently underway. Both
facilities are fully permitted and have undergone partial site
preparation and other precursor-steps to construction. The
tax-exempt bond financing for these projects has already been
completed, and the Company is in the process of securing the
remaining equity required by the Company to supplement that which
the Company has already invested. We currently expect the
facilities to be operational at the end of the second
quarter/beginning of third quarter of 2010. We expect to benefit
from the decreases in raw material prices, as commodities such as
steel and copper are a significant component of our facilities. In
addition, we are presently analyzing the most appropriate
contracting philosophy and timing of orders as we prepare for our
extensive construction program. California In September 2008,
Microgy Holdings, our subsidiary, completed a $62.4 million dollar
tax-exempt bond financing in support of the new Riverdale and
Hanford facilities in California. All permits are in place for
these projects, and final engineering specifications are being
completed. Construction is anticipated to begin in the third
quarter of 2009, with commercial operations commencing during the
fourth quarter of 2010, pending the release of bond proceeds, which
remains subject to the achievement of performance milestones at
Huckabay Ridge and corporate and subsidiary funding milestones. Bar
20, the third announced facility in California, has received its
tax-exempt bond allocation from the California Debt Limit
Allocation Committee. We expect to pursue this financing as we have
done with the prior projects once there is adequate improvement in
the tax-exempt bond market and pending our other financing
initiatives. Nebraska Construction at Microgy's Grand Island biogas
facility has progressed with major equipment procurement nearly
complete. Operations are expected to commence in 2009. Microgy's
Grand Island biogas facility will consist of two 1.2 million gallon
digesters that will process wastes generated by the Swift Grand
Island processing facility. Swift will be providing all the
necessary feedstock material, both manure and substrate, required
by our process. The plant is expected to produce 235,000 MMBtu per
year of biogas that will be purchased by Swift under a fifteen year
gas purchase agreement to offset natural gas consumption at Swift
Grand Island. Development Opportunity Colorado On March 3, 2009,
the Company, through its subsidiary Microgy, announced a long-term
RNG(R) supply agreement to Xcel Energy (NYSE:XEL). The 10-year
contract, which is renewable for an additional 10 years, is
fixed-price reflecting the value of our green RNG versus other
renewable alternatives. Since the Company's announcement of the
contract last month, the Colorado PUC has approved the agreement.
RNG(R) to satisfy the agreement will come from Microgy's first
Colorado facility, which is expected to begin construction during
the first half of 2010. Microgy estimates that all permits, design
and funding for the project will have been completed by the end of
the first quarter 2010. The project is expected to produce 915,000
MMBtu of RNG(R) per year, enough to generate 125,000 megawatt-hours
of electricity, or the equivalent power use of 17,000 homes in
Colorado on an annual basis. Xcel Energy will use the RNG(R) to
generate carbon-neutral electricity at the company's Fort St. Vrain
Generating Station near Platteville, Colo. The agreement will help
Xcel Energy continue to meet its mandates under the state's
Renewable Energy Standard (RES) and support the company's efforts
to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Xergi On April 23, 2009, the
Company entered into a Cooperation Agreement with Danish Biogas
Technology, A.S. ("DBT") and its parent, Xergi, A.S. ("Xergi"). The
new technology agreement better reflects the Company's build / own
/ operate business model. In addition, Xergi has agreed to acquire,
in a private placement transaction, $3 million of EPG's 14%
convertible notes on the same terms as the $5 million of our
convertible notes issued in March 2009. Upon closing, Xergi's
$3,000,000 payment obligation for the notes will be netted against
Microgy's $3,000,000 payment obligation for technology rights for
certain upcoming projects, and the agreement will replace all other
agreements previously in place between Microgy and DBT. Under the
terms of the new agreement, the Company and its wholly owned
subsidiary, Microgy, Inc., will continue to have exclusive
licensing rights for Xergi's anaerobic digester technology in North
America, while reducing the license fees on Microgy's current and
future projects. In addition, the Company and Xergi will continue
to collaborate on development and use of other technologies and
techniques such as the use of micro-organisms and enzymes, which
enhance the production of biogas from manure and other organic
substrates. Federal Initiatives Update The Company continues to
pursue a number of initiatives at the federal level in order to
secure parity with other biofuel and renewable electricity
producers. Specifically, we are pursuing a renewable gas production
tax credit and seeking stimulus funds and other federal funding
related to our shovel ready projects. Pressure has greatly
increased at the federal level to promote technologies that reduce
carbon emissions and increase the production of renewable
electricity. We anticipate an increase in efforts to pass
legislation that promotes renewable energy such as the national
Renewable Electricity Standard which has been introduced in the
Senate. We continue to have dialogue with policymakers about the
opportunity to include biogas production more broadly in new policy
initiatives. As a reminder, we do not rely on such subsidies in our
project economics but will pursue them where possible. Two bills
have been introduced in Congress, Senate Bill S306 and House Bill
HR1158, which provide for tax credits for renewable gas, manure
based projects such as ours, landfill projects and woody biomass
based projects. The ten year production tax credit for manure based
projects is proposed to be the $4.27 per MMbtu tax credit as we
previously discussed. A broad coalition has been formed including
such firms as Gas Technology Institute, American Gas Association,
Waste Management and utilities such as PG&E and Sempra to
support this initiative. Meetings with Congressional staff have
been on-going. Closing Statement The organization has been focused
and committed to transforming itself from a late stage development
company to a sustainable operating entity and leader in its field.
In spite of these turbulent times, we believe that our RNG(R)
product continues to be one of the most reliable, cost effective
renewable sources of energy that can be used in existing electric
production facilities. The uniqueness of our Company, the
shovel-ready nature of our projects, and our leadership present a
unique opportunity for others to participate in our projects. We
like to thank all the investors who have supported our
organization, especially during these turbulent economic times.
Management Conference Call Mr. Richard Kessel, President and CEO,
and Mr. Michael Thomas, Senior Vice President and CFO, will comment
on these and related items in the conference call scheduled for
Friday, May 8, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. EST. Conference Call details:
Conference Call Details When: 10:00am Eastern Time; May 8, 2009
Dial-in: U.S. Toll Free: 888-299-4099 Canadian Toll Free:
866-682-1172 International Toll: 302-709-8337 Verbal Passcode:
VK10652 Replay Access #: U.S. 800-355-2355 Code 10652# Int. &
Canadian Toll: 402-220-2946 Code 10652# The call will be available
for 3 days by accessing the number above. ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL POWER
CORPORATION Environmental Power Corporation is a developer, owner,
and operator of renewable energy production facilities. Our
principal operating subsidiary, Microgy, Inc., develops and
operates proven large scale, commercial anaerobic digestion based
projects which produce a versatile methane-rich biogas from
livestock waste and other organic sources. For more information
visit the Company's web site at http://www.environmentalpower.com/.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995, referred to as the PSLRA, provides a "safe harbor" for
forward-looking statements. Certain statements contained in this
press release, such as statements concerning financing, our planned
manure-to-energy systems, our sales pipeline, our backlog, our
projected sales and financial performance, statements containing
the words "may," "assumes," "forecasts," "positions," "predicts,"
"strategy," "will," "expects," "estimates," "anticipates,"
"believes," "projects," "intends," "plans," "budgets," "potential,"
"continue," "targets" "proposed," and variations thereof, and other
statements contained in this press release regarding matters that
are not historical facts are forward-looking statements as such
term is defined in the PSLRA. Because such statements involve risks
and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but
are not limited to: uncertainties involving development-stage
companies; uncertainties regarding corporate and project financing
and our ability to continue as a going concern, the lack of binding
commitments and/or the need to negotiate and execute definitive
agreements for the construction and financing of projects, the sale
of project output, the supply of substrate and other requirements
and for other matters; financing and cash flow requirements and
uncertainties; inexperience with the development of multi-digester
projects; risks relating to fluctuations in the price of commodity
fuels like natural gas, and our inexperience with managing such
risks; difficulties involved in developing and executing a business
plan; difficulties and uncertainties regarding acquisitions;
technological uncertainties; including those relating to competing
products and technologies; risks relating to managing and
integrating acquired businesses; unpredictable developments;
including plant outages and repair requirements; the difficulty of
estimating construction, development, repair and maintenance costs
and timeframes; the uncertainties involved in estimating insurance
and implied warranty recoveries, if any; the inability to predict
the course or outcome of any negotiations with parties involved
with our projects; uncertainties relating to general economic and
industry conditions, and the amount and rate of growth in expenses;
uncertainties relating to government and regulatory policies and
the legal environment; uncertainties relating to the availability
of tax credits, deductions, rebates and similar incentives;
intellectual property issues; the competitive environment in which
Environmental Power Corporation and its subsidiaries operate and
other factors, including those described in our most recent Annual
Report on Form 10-K or Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, well as in
other filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date that
they are made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. CONTACT: Company Contact
Public Relations Contact Scott Tetenman, John Abrashkin Manager of
Project Financing and Treasury Ricochet Public Relations
Environmental Power Corporation (212) 679-3300 x121 914 631-1435
x42 DATASOURCE: Environmental Power Corporation CONTACT: Scott
Tetenman, Manager of Project Financing and Treasury of
Environmental Power Corporation, +1-914-631-1435 ext. 42, ; or John
Abrashkin of Ricochet Public Relations for Environmental Power
Corporation, +1-212-679-3300 ext. 121, Web Site:
http://www.environmentalpower.com/
Copyright
Environmental Power (MM) (NASDAQ:EPG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Environmental Power (MM) (NASDAQ:EPG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024