By Aisha Al-Muslim
This article is being republished as part of our daily
reproduction of WSJ.com articles that also appeared in the U.S.
print edition of The Wall Street Journal (December 26, 2018).
Marriott International Inc. and Expedia Group Inc. are in the
final stages of negotiations over how much the world's largest
hotel company will pay the online booking giant, a development that
will have broad implications for other hotel operators, property
owners and millions of guests world-wide.
These commission contract negotiations between online travel
agencies and large hotel chains happen every few years. Typically
hotel brands have limited leverage because they can't afford to be
left off of listing services like Expedia.com or Booking.com,
industry experts say.
But Marriott might have more clout in the wake of its
acquisition of Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide two years
ago. This showdown with Expedia is an early test of its
bigger-is-better strategy.
"When they negotiate with the [online travel agencies], everyone
is paying attention. Then everyone follows suit," said Max Starkov,
founder of digital consulting and marketing firm HEBS Digital,
which helps hoteliers boost direct bookings and lower distribution
costs. He expects that a new contract will be signed in
January.
Since the Expedia-Marriott contract expired in November, the two
companies have been working under an extension agreement that goes
until early next year, a Marriott spokeswoman said.
"We've agreed to general terms and have signed an extension
while we finalize the legal details of the contract," an Expedia
spokesman said. Neither company would comment on the specific
negotiations.
Marriott also might benefit in the talks because, like other
hotel chains, it has been campaigning to get travelers to book
rooms directly with them by providing discounted rates and
incentives, experts say. These efforts, aided by Google's search
engine, may broadly tilt the balance of power toward the hotel
companies.
"I imagine Marriott is playing hardball here," said SunTrust
Robinson Humphrey analyst C. Patrick Scholes. "They realize that
Expedia can't lose Marriott."
After the $13.6 billion Starwood acquisition closed, Marriott
found that its commissions contract with online travel agencies
were better than Starwood's, Marriott executives have said. The
merger created a hotel giant with more than 6,700 properties and
more than 120 million loyalty program members.
Bethesda, Md.-based Marriott has 30 hotel brands including
Sheraton, The Ritz-Carlton, Westin, Le Méridien, Courtyard and
Aloft. Bellevue, Wash.-based Expedia's hotel listing brands include
Hotels.com, Trivago, Orbitz and Travelocity.
Marriott has been looking to reduce its costs to increase the
profit margins of its hotel owners, who pay franchising fees and
own the majority of branded properties. The push comes after the
Starwood merger left some hotel owners competing against brands
from their own company.
"All of these actions are to benefit the owners," Sanford C.
Bernstein analyst Richard J. Clarke said. "If [Marriott] can make
their hotels more profitable, then more people want to open their
kind of hotels."
Commissions that hotels pay to agencies like Expedia have been
declining steadily. Analysts estimate that about six years ago,
Marriott was paying about 18% of each booking as a commission to
Expedia, but now it is paying less than 12%. Marriott will likely
push Expedia to accept 10%, which is much less than the 18% to 30%
independent hotels pay, analysts say.
"Some distribution channels are just too expensive for the value
of the business they deliver," Marriott Chief Executive Arne M.
Sorenson said during an earnings call with analysts on Nov. 6,
sending a strong signal to the agencies.
Expedia may agree to lower commission rates if they can get
access to all room types at all times. Or, Marriott may decide to
exclude from Expedia certain hotels in areas or nights with high
demand, analysts say.
Most of Marriott's bookings come from its websites or apps,
while online agencies contribute about 12%, Marriott executives
have said. In comparison, about 40% of Expedia's revenue is from
hotel reservations, SunTrust analysts estimate.
Online agencies, which market and fill unsold inventory, tend to
serve leisure travelers who want the best deal and aren't loyal to
a brand. Other travelers book directly with a hotel because they
are looking for consistency and getting rewarded for their loyalty,
analysts say.
In the U.S., 29% of travelers typically use an online agency to
book their hotel, compared with 22% who book direct, according to
travel-research company Phocuswright.
Google is also helping hotels boost their direct booking by
showing hotel loyalty rates against the online agency rates through
Google's map-based system, Bernstein analysts said.
Google, where most hotel searches start, has invested in Google
Flights and Hotel Search to help travelers compare costs. It also
offers a feature that allows users to book hotels on a
Google-hosted reservation and payment page without going to a
third-party site.
"We got to make sure that we are customer-centric, that we
create loyal relationships with our customers.... If you don't,
then the risk is that more of your business shifts to Google,"
Expedia Group CEO Mark D. Okerstrom said during an industry
conference in September.
In response, a Google spokeswoman said: "We value our close
relationships with many different partners, including online travel
agencies, and we believe that the better job we do at answering
user queries, the more qualified leads we can provide to our
partners."
Write to Aisha Al-Muslim at aisha.al-muslim@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
December 26, 2018 02:47 ET (07:47 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Expedia (NASDAQ:EXPEV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Expedia (NASDAQ:EXPEV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024