Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Ethics Committee is responsible for identifying, reviewing and evaluating candidates to serve as our directors (consistent
with criteria approved by our Board), reviewing and evaluating incumbent directors, recommending to our Board for selection candidates for election to our Board, making recommendations to our Board regarding the membership of the committees of our
Board, assessing the performance of our Board, and developing our corporate governance principles. Our Ethics Committee charter can be found in the Investors-Governance section of our website at www.gladstoneinvestment.com. During the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2024, the Ethics Committee was composed of Messrs. Adelgren (Chairperson), Outland and Wilkinson. Mr. Parker and Ms. English served as alternate members of the Ethics Committee. Alternate members of the
Ethics Committee serve and participate in meetings of the committee only in the event of an absence of a regular member of the committee. Each member and alternate of the Ethics Committee is independent (as independence is currently defined in Rule
5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq listing standards).
Information Regarding the Process for Nominating Director Candidates
The Ethics Committee believes that candidates for director should have certain minimum qualifications, including being able to
read and understand basic financial statements, being over 21 years of age and having the highest personal integrity and ethics. The Ethics Committee also considers such factors as possessing relevant expertise upon which to be able to offer advice
and guidance to management, having sufficient time to devote to our affairs, demonstrated excellence in his or her field, having the ability to exercise sound business judgment and having the commitment to rigorously represent the long-term
interests of our stockholders. However, the Ethics Committee retains the right to modify these qualifications from time to time. Candidates for director nominees are reviewed in the context of the current composition of our Board, our operating
requirements and the long-term interests of our stockholders.
The Ethics Committee and Board believe that diversity is an
important attribute of directors and that our Board should be the culmination of an array of backgrounds and experiences and be capable of articulating a variety of viewpoints. Accordingly, under the Ethics Committee charter, the Ethics Committee
considers and discusses diversity in its annual review of the Board and its review of director nominees. Factors considered by the Board in reviewing the nominees for directors include honesty, loyalty, personal lifestyle, values, disciplines,
ethics, age, experience, gender, race, ethnicity, culture, sexual orientation, expertise, background and skills, all in the context of an assessment of the perceived needs of us and our Board at that point in time in order to create and maintain a
balance of knowledge, experience and capability that will best serve us and our stockholders. Similarly, upon the occurrence of any vacancy on the Board, the Ethics Committee will actively seek out highly qualified candidates (including female
candidates and racially or ethnically diverse candidates) to include in the pool from which an ultimate nominee for director is chosen.
In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the Ethics Committee reviews such directors
overall service to us during their term, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance, and any other relationships and transactions that might impair such directors independence. In the case of new
director candidates, the Ethics Committee also determines whether such new nominee must be independent for Nasdaq purposes, which determination is
21