UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
______________________________________________________________________________________________
FORM 10-Q


[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
 
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
 
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
 
OR
   
[   ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
 
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to   ____
Commission file number 0 -10068


ICO, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


TEXAS
76-0566682
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
   
1811 Bering Drive, Suite 200
 
Houston, Texas
77057
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number (713) 351-4100


Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES x     NO     o

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer    o
 
Accelerated filer  x
     
Non-accelerated filer  o
 
Smaller reporting company  o
 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o     NO   x  
There were 27,723,723 shares of common stock without par value
outstanding as of July 27, 2008

 
- 1 -

 

ICO , INC.
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q



Part I.   Financial Information
Page
   
 
Item 1.  Financial Statements
 
     
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 
     
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
     
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
     
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
     
Part II.   Other Information
 
     
 
     
 
     
 


 
- 2 -

 

PAR T  I ― FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ICO, INC.
C ONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited and in thousands, except share data)
   
June 30,
2008
   
September 30, 2007
 
ASSETS
     
             
Current assets:
           
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 3,909     $ 8,561  
Trade receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts
               
of $2,936 and $2,714, respectively)
    89,438       95,142  
Inventories
    72,302       60,420  
Deferred income taxes
    2,140       1,778  
Prepaid and other current assets
    8,868       9,924  
Total current assets
    176,657       175,825  
                 
Property, plant and equipment, net
    65,039       57,396  
Goodwill
    9,258       9,228  
Other assets
    4,250       3,768  
Total assets
  $ 255,204     $ 246,217  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
                 
Current liabilities:
               
Short-term borrowings under credit facilities
  $ 13,468     $ 16,133  
Current portion of long-term debt
    17,089       11,611  
Accounts payable
    54,601       66,906  
Accrued salaries and wages
    7,010       7,313  
Other current liabilities
    13,517       16,004  
Total current liabilities
    105,685       117,967  
                 
Long-term debt, net of current portion
    27,906       29,605  
Deferred income taxes
    4,894       4,820  
Other long-term liabilities
    3,255       2,783  
Total liabilities
    141,740       155,175  
                 
Commitments and contingencies
    -       -  
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Convertible preferred stock, without par value –
               
0 and 345,000 shares authorized, respectively; 0 and 46,381 shares issued
               
shares issued and outstanding, respectively, with a liquidation
               
preference of $0 and $5,812, respectively
    -       2  
Undesignated preferred stock, without par value –
               
500,000 and 155,000 shares authorized, respectively; no shares
    -       -  
issued and outstanding
               
Common stock, without par value – 50,000,000 shares authorized;
               
27,725,323 and 26,709,370 shares issued
               
and outstanding, respectively
    54,302       47,659  
Additional paid-in capital
    72,158       74,920  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    10,823       5,416  
Accumulated deficit
    (23,819 )     (36,955 )
Total stockholders’ equity
    113,464       91,042  
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 255,204     $ 246,217  
                 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


ICO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited and in thousands, except share data)

   
Three Months Ended
June 30,
   
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
Revenues:
                       
Sales
  $ 105,494     $ 102,963     $ 308,802     $ 265,443  
Services
    10,224       10,415       29,907       28,915  
Total revenues
    115,718       113,378       338,709       294,358  
Cost and expenses:
                               
Cost of sales and services (exclusive of depreciation
                               
shown below)
    97,234       92,836       281,845       241,976  
Selling, general and administrative
    10,441       9,727       31,431       27,440  
Depreciation and amortization
    1,932       1,855       5,580       5,466  
Impairment, restructuring and other costs (income)
    (356 )     -       (1,756 )     (654 )
Operating income
    6,467       8,960       21,609       20,130  
Other income (expense):
                               
Interest expense, net
    (1,039 )     (799 )     (3,158 )     (2,301 )
Other
    165       (129 )     (36 )     (296 )
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    5,593       8,032       18,415       17,533  
Provision for income taxes
    960       2,400       5,263       3,819  
Income from continuing operations
    4,633       5,632       13,152       13,714  
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of
                               
 provision (benefit) for income taxes of $0, ($10),
                               
($9) and $765, respectively
    -       (18 )     (16 )     1,421  
Net income
  $ 4,633     $ 5,614     $ 13,136     $ 15,135  
Preferred Stock dividends
    -       (82 )     (1 )     (472 )
Net gain on redemption of Preferred Stock
    -       -       -       6,023  
Net income applicable to Common Stock
  $ 4,633     $ 5,532     $ 13,135     $ 20,686  
                                 
Basic income per share:
                               
Income from continuing operations
  $ .17     $ .21     $ .48     $ .74  
Income from discontinued operations
    .00       .00       .00       .06  
Net income per common share
  $ .17     $ .21     $ .48     $ .80  
                                 
Diluted income per share:
                               
Income from continuing operations
  $ .17     $ .20     $ .47     $ .49  
Income from discontinued operations
    .00       .00       .00       .05  
Net income per common share
  $ .17     $ .20     $ .47     $ .54  
                                 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
    27,433,000       26,056,000       27,202,000       25,934,000  
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
    27,975,000       27,598,000       27,975,000       27,892,000  



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


ICO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited and in thousands )


   
Three Months Ended
June 30,
   
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
                         
Net income
  $ 4,633     $ 5,614     $ 13,136     $ 15,135  
Other comprehensive income (loss)
                               
Foreign currency translation adjustment
    170       1,638       4,594       4,739  
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative transactions
    404       (12 )     813       (281 )
                                 
Comprehensive income
  $ 5,207     $ 7,240     $ 18,543     $ 19,593  

































The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


ICO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited and in thousands )

   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
Cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities:
     
Net income
  $ 13,136     $ 15,135  
(Income) loss from discontinued operations
    16       (1,421 )
Depreciation and amortization
    5,580       5,466  
Gain on sale of fixed assets
    -       (654 )
Gain on involuntary conversion of fixed assets
    (500 )     -  
Changes in assets and liabilities providing/(requiring) cash:
               
Receivables
    10,444       (15,965 )
Inventories
    (8,342 )     1,021  
Other assets
    53       (109 )
Income taxes payable
    (602 )     (2,662 )
Deferred taxes
    (629 )     (806 )
Accounts payable
    (14,847 )     8,507  
Other liabilities
    (422 )     4,010  
Net cash provided by operating activities by continuing operations
    3,887       12,522  
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities by discontinued
operations
    (59 )     1,068  
Net cash provided by operating activities
    3,828       13,590  
                 
Cash flows used for investing activities:
               
Capital expenditures
    (11,026 )     (7,611 )
Proceeds from dispositions of property, plant and equipment
    56       937  
Cash received from involuntary conversion of fixed assets
    2,337       -  
Net cash used for investing activities for continuing operations
    (8,633 )     (6,674 )
                 
Cash flows used for financing activities:
               
Common stock transactions
    2,583       818  
Redemption of Preferred Stock
    (200 )     (28,531 )
Payment of dividend on Preferred Stock
    (1,312 )     (164 )
Decrease in short-term borrowings under credit facilities, net
    (3,437 )     (2,904 )
Proceeds from long-term debt
    8,265       14,895  
Repayments of long-term debt
    (6,001 )     (4,410 )
Debt financing costs
    -       (252 )
Net cash used for financing activities for continuing operations
    (102 )     (20,548 )
                 
Effect of exchange rates on cash
    255       194  
Net decrease in cash and equivalents
    (4,652 )     (13,438 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    8,561       17,427  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 3,909     $ 3,989  











The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

 
NOTE 1 .      BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim period presented and have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.  The fiscal year-end balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  The results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the year ended September 30, 2008.  These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.  The accounting policies for the periods presented are the same as described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007.

NOTE 2.      RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”).  SFAS 157 defines “fair value,” establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, rather, its application will be made pursuant to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.  SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those years.  This standard will be effective for the Company starting with our interim period ending December 31, 2008.  The provisions of SFAS 157 are to be applied prospectively upon adoption, except for limited specified exceptions.  The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“SFAS 159”).  Under SFAS 159, a company may elect to measure eligible financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value at specified election dates.  Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.  SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.  We are currently assessing whether or not we will elect the fair value option.

         In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS 141 (R)”) and No. 160, Noncontrolling interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (“SFAS 160”).  The goal of these standards is to improve, simplify, and converge internationally the accounting for business combinations and the reporting of noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements.  The provisions of SFAS 141 (R) and SFAS 160 are effective for the Company on October 1, 2009.  As SFAS No. 141 will apply to future acquisitions, it is not possible at this time for the Company to determine the impact of adopting this standard.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (“SFAS 161”), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.   This Statement changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.  This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company will be required to adopt this standard in the interim period ending December 31, 2009.  This Statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption.  We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new standard.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets ("FSP FAS 142-3"). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets ("SFAS 142"). The intent of FSP FAS 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141(R) and other applicable accounting literature. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 will have a material impact on its results of operations or financial condition.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities," ("FSP EITF 03-6-1").  This FSP addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in computing earnings per


 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

share under the two-class method  described in SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share."  This FSP will be effective for the Company beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and will be applied retrospectively.  We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new standard.

NOTE 3.      STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

During November 1993, the Company completed its initial offering of the $6.75 Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stock”).  The shares of Preferred Stock were evidenced by and traded as depositary certificates (“Depositary Shares”), each representing 1/4 of a share of Preferred Stock.  A total of 1,290,000 Depositary Shares were sold at a price of $25 per share.  Each share of Preferred Stock was convertible into 10.96 shares of the Company’s common stock (“Common Stock”) (equivalent to 2.74 shares of Common Stock per Depositary Share) at a conversion price of $9.125 per share of Common Stock.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2006, the Company repurchased 1,095,853 Depositary Shares for $26.00 per Depositary Share, for total consideration of $28.5 million.  The dividends that were in arrears on these 1,095,853 Depositary Shares of $7.2 million were extinguished by the repurchase.  This repurchase resulted in a net gain of $6.0 million in the three months ended December 31, 2006.  In September 2007, at the instruction of the holders of the Preferred Stock, 8,624 Depositary Shares were converted into 23,622 shares of Common Stock.  Therefore, as of September 30, 2007, there were 185,523 Depositary Shares outstanding.  Dividends in arrears of $6.33 per Depositary Share on the outstanding 185,523 Depositary Shares as of September 30, 2007 aggregated $1.2 million.  The $1.2 million of dividends in arrears was declared for payment during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 and was paid in October 2007.  In addition, four quarterly dividends aggregating $0.3 million or $1.6875 per Depositary Share were declared in fiscal year 2007 (of which $0.2 million was paid during fiscal year 2007, with the remaining fourth quarterly dividend aggregating $0.1 million recorded as a payable as of September 30, 2007 and paid in October 2007).

On October 3, 2007, the Company announced its plan to redeem all outstanding Depositary Shares representing the Preferred Stock at the close of market on November 5, 2007.  During the time period between the referenced announcement and the redemption, at the instruction of the shareholders, 177,518 Depositary Shares were converted into 486,321 shares of Common Stock.  As a result, the Company recorded a decrease to Additional Paid-In Capital of $4.4 million and an increase to Common Stock of $4.4 million.  The remaining 8,005 Depositary Shares outstanding on November 5, 2007 were redeemed by the Company at $25 per Depositary Share for a total consideration of $0.2 million, which was recorded as a reduction to Additional Paid-In Capital.  All of the outstanding Depositary Shares representing the Preferred Stock were canceled by the Company at the time of redemption.  As of the close of business on November 5, 2007, no shares of Preferred Stock or Depositary Shares remain outstanding.

A summary of the changes in the stockholders’ equity accounts for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 is as follows:

                           
Accumulated
             
         
Common
   
Common
   
Additional
   
Other
             
   
Preferred
   
Stock
   
Stock
   
Paid-In
   
Comprehensive
   
Accumulated
       
   
Stock
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Capital
   
Income
   
Deficit
   
Total
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Balance at September 30, 2007
  $ 2       26,709,370     $ 47,659     $ 74,920     $ 5,416     $ (36,955 )   $ 91,042  
Issuance of shares in connection with employee benefit plans
          34,047       479                         479  
Issuance of stock options
                      217                   217  
Issuance of restricted stock
          62,260             480                   480  
Exercise of employee stock options
          433,325       1,726       1,178                   2,904  
Preferred Stock Conversion to Common Stock
    (2 )     486,321       4,438       (4,436 )                  
Preferred Stock redemption
                      (200 )                 (200 )
Preferred Stock dividends
                      (1 )                 (1 )
Translation adjustment
                            4,594             4,594  
Unrealized net gain on foreign currency hedges
                            813             813  
Net income
                                  13,136       13,136  
Balance at June 30, 2008
  $ -       27,725,323     $ 54,302     $ 72,158     $ 10,823     $ (23,819 )   $ 113,464  

NOTE 4.      EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) amounts.  Basic EPS is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.  Diluted EPS assumes the conversion of all dilutive securities.


 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, and 2007 are presented below:

   
Three Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
   
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
Basic income per share:
                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ .17     $ .21     $ .48     $ .74  
Income from discontinued operations
    -       -       -       .06  
Basic net income per common share
  $ .17     $ .21     $ .48     $ .80  
                                 
Diluted income per share :
                               
Income from continuing operations
  $ .17     $ .20     $ .47     $ .49  
Income from discontinued operations
    -       -       -       .05  
Diluted net income per common share
  $ .17     $ .20     $ .47     $ .54  


For the nine months ended June 30, 2007, the Company included the net gain on redemption of 84.9% of the Company’s outstanding Preferred Stock of $6.0 million in computing basic earnings per share, but the gain is excluded in the computation of diluted earnings per share.  Refer to the following tables for a reconciliation of the amounts used in computing basic and diluted earnings per share.

The following presents the reconciliation from net income to net income applicable to Common Stock used in computing basic earnings per share:

   
Three Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
   
June 30,
 
 
 
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Net income
  $ 4,633     $ 5,614     $ 13,136     $ 15,135  
Preferred stock dividends declared
    -       (82 )     (1 )     (472 )
Net gain on redemption of Preferred Stock
    -       -       -       6,023  
Net income applicable to Common Stock
  $ 4,633     $ 5,532     $ 13,135     $ 20,686  


In computing diluted earnings per share, the Company follows the if-converted method, which assumes the conversion of dilutive convertible securities.  For the nine months ended June 30, 2007, the Preferred Stock redeemed was treated as being converted at the beginning of the nine months ended June 30, 2007.  Consequently, the net gain on redemption of Preferred Stock and the undeclared and unpaid Preferred Stock dividends were not included in computing net income applicable to Common Stock.  The following presents the reconciliation from net income to net income applicable to Common Stock used in computing diluted earnings per share:

   
Three Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
   
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Net income
  $ 4,633     $ 5,614     $ 13,136     $ 15,135  
Preferred stock dividends
    -       -       -       -  
Net income applicable to Common Stock
  $ 4,633     $ 5,614     $ 13,136     $ 15,135  

The difference between basic and diluted weighted-average common shares results from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options calculated using the treasury stock method, impact from outstanding restricted stock awards using the treasury stock method and assumed conversion of the Preferred Stock redeemed during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.  The following presents the number of incremental weighted-average shares used in computing diluted per share amounts:

   
Three Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
   
June 30,
 
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
 
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
                         
Basic
    27,433,000       26,056,000       27,202,000       25,934,000  
Incremental shares from Preferred Stock
    -       532,000       44,000       1,013,000  
Incremental shares from stock based compensation
    542,000       1,010,000       729,000       945,000  
Diluted
    27,975,000       27,598,000       27,975,000       27,892,000  



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The total amount of anti-dilutive securities for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
   
Three Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
   
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
Total shares of anti-dilutive securities
    841,000       777,000       682,000       841,000  

NOTE 5.      INVENTORIES

Inventories consisted of the following:
   
June 30,
2008
   
September 30,
2007
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Raw materials
  $ 39,707     $ 36,268  
Finished goods
    31,001       22,621  
Supplies
    1,594       1,531  
Total inventory
  $ 72,302     $ 60,420  

NOTE 6.      INCOME TAXES

The amounts of income before income taxes attributable to domestic and foreign continuing operations are as follows:

   
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
Nine Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Domestic
  $ 2,239     $ 3,453     $ 8,710     $ 8,801  
Foreign
    3,354       4,579       9,705       8,732  
Total
  $ 5,593     $ 8,032     $ 18,415     $ 17,533  


The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following:

   
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
Nine Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Current
  $ 1,253     $ 1,893     $ 5,272     $ 4,594  
Deferred
    (293 )     507       (9 )     (775 )
Total
  $ 960     $ 2,400     $ 5,263     $ 3,819  


A reconciliation of the income tax expense for continuing operations at the federal statutory rate of 35% to the Company's effective rate for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

   
Three Months Ended
June 30,
   
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Tax expense at statutory rate
  $ 1,959     $ 2,811     $ 6,447     $ 6,136  
Disqualifying disposition of stock options
    -       -       (129 )     (18 )
Chargeback Reimbursement
    -       (160 )     (147 )     (189 )
Foreign tax rate differential
    (277 )     (227 )     (304 )     (159 )
Change in the deferred tax assets valuation allowance
    (724 )     50       (699 )     (1,595 )
State taxes, net of federal benefit
    27       21       68       115  
Tax rate change
    12       -       127       -  
Adjustment to tax contingency
    -       -       -       (350 )
Non-deductible expenses and other, net
    (37 )     (95 )     (100 )     (121 )
Income tax provision
  $ 960     $ 2,400     $ 5,263     $ 3,819  
                                 
Effective income tax rate
    17%       30%       29%       22%  




NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company reversed the valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset of its Brazilian subsidiary in the amount of $0.7 million.  This was based on the Company’s analysis of the profitability of the Brazilian subsidiary.  The Brazilian subsidiary has cumulative taxable income from 2004 to 2007 and is projecting taxable income in the future.  In addition to this, net operating losses in Brazil do not expire.

The Company does not provide for U.S. income taxes on foreign subsidiaries’ undistributed earnings intended to be permanently reinvested in foreign operations.  It is not practicable to estimate the amount of additional tax that might be payable should the earnings be remitted or should the Company sell its stock in the subsidiaries.  The Company has unremitted earnings from foreign subsidiaries of approximately $23.8 million.  The Company has determined that the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries, exclusive of those repatriated under the American Jobs Creation Act, will be permanently reinvested.

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”), which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for “uncertain tax positions” (as the term is defined in FIN 48).  FIN 48 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated with certain aspects of the recognition and measurement related to accounting for income taxes.  On October 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48.  The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.  The Company also adopted the accounting policy to classify any interest and penalties on unrecognized tax positions as income tax in the event any arise in the future.  The Company does not anticipate a material change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various states and foreign jurisdictions.  The Company is no longer subject to U.S. income tax examinations for periods preceding 2005.  In our other major tax jurisdictions, the earliest years remaining open to examination are as follows: France - 2005, Australia – 2003, New Zealand - 2003 and the Netherlands – 2002.  In addition, in our other foreign jurisdictions, we are no longer subject to tax examinations for periods preceding 2001.  In April 2008, the Company received a letter from the Internal Revenue Service notifying the Company that the 2006 federal income tax return had been selected for examination.  The Internal Revenue Service review began in June 2008 and is currently ongoing.

NOTE 7.      COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company has letters of credit outstanding in the United States of approximately $1.9 million as of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, and foreign letters of credit outstanding of $1.2 million and $11.8 million as of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, respectively.

Thibodaux Litigation .  Since September 2004, the Company has been a defendant in litigation pending in District Court in the Parish of Orleans, Louisiana (the “Thibodaux Lawsuit”) filed by C.M. Thibodaux Company (“Thibodaux”).  Other defendants in the case include Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc. (“ITCO”), thirty different oil companies (the “Oil Company Defendants”), several insurance companies and four trucking companies.  Thibodaux, the owner of industrial property located in Amelia, Louisiana that has historically been leased to tenants conducting oilfield services businesses, contends that the property has been contaminated with naturally occurring radioactive material (“NORM”).  NORM is found naturally occurring in the earth, and when pipe is removed from the ground it is not uncommon for the corroded rust on the pipe to contain very small amounts of NORM.  The Company’s former Oilfield Services business leased a portion of the subject property from Thibodaux.  Thibodaux contends that the subject property was contaminated with NORM generated during the servicing of oilfield equipment by the Company and other tenants, and further alleges that the Oil Company defendants (customers of Thibodaux’s tenants) and trucking companies (which delivered tubular goods and other oilfield equipment to the subject property) allowed or caused the uncontrolled dispersal of NORM on Thibodaux’s property.  Thibodaux seeks recovery from the Defendants for clean-up costs, diminution or complete loss of property values, and other damages.  Discovery in the Thibodaux Lawsuit is ongoing, and the Company intends to assert a vigorous defense in this litigation.  At this time, the Company does not believe it has any liability in this matter.  In the event the Company is found to have liability, the Company believes it has insurance coverage applicable to this claim subject to a $1.0 million self-insured retention.  An adverse judgment against the Company, combined with a lack of insurance coverage, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows.

Environmental Remediation.   The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (“CERCLA”), also known as “Superfund,” and comparable state laws impose liability without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct on certain classes of persons who are considered to be responsible for the release of a “hazardous substance” into the environment.  These persons include the owner or operator of the disposal site or the site where the release occurred, and companies that disposed or arranged for the disposal of the hazardous substances at the site where the release occurred.  Under CERCLA, such persons may be subject to joint and several liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances that have been released into the environment, for damages to natural resources, and for the costs of


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

certain health studies, and it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the release of hazardous substances into the environment.  The Company is identified as one of many potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”) under CERCLA in four claims relating to the following sites: (i) the French Limited site northeast of Houston, Texas; (ii) the Sheridan Disposal Services site near Hempstead, Texas; (iii) the Combe Fill South Landfill site in Morris County, New Jersey; and (iv) the Malone Service Company (MSC) Superfund site in Texas City, Texas.

Active remediation of the French Limited site was concluded in 1996.  If the Company is required to contribute to the costs of additional remediation at that site, such additional costs are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company.  With regard to the three remaining Superfund sites, the Company believes it remains responsible for only de minimus levels of wastes contributed to those sites, and that there are numerous other PRPs identified at each of these sites that contributed significantly larger volumes of wastes to the sites.  The Company expects that its share of any allocated liability for cleanup of the Sheridan Disposal Services site and the Combe Fill South Landfill site will not be significant, and based on the Company’s current understanding of the remedial status of each of these sites, together with its relative position in comparison to the many other PRPs at those sites, the Company does not expect its future environmental liability with respect to those sites to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operation, and/or cash flows.  With regard to the MSC site, in fiscal year 2005 the Company estimated the Company’s exposure and accrued a liability in that amount, based on settlement offers made to PRPs by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) in fiscal year 2005 and the Company’s settlement discussions at that time.  The EPA subsequently withdrew its settlement offers to PRPs, in order to process additional evidence of transactions at the MSC site, and the EPA is expected to issue a new allocation to the PRPs, upon which revised settlement offers are expected.  The Company does not expect the eventual outcome with respect to the MSC site to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows.

Other Legal Proceedings.   The Company is also named as a defendant in certain other lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business.  The outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty, but the Company does not believe they will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.


NOTE 8.      DEBT

Term debt at June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 consisted of the following.

   
June 30,
2008
   
September 30,
2007
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Term loan of ICO, Inc. under the terms of the Company’s domestic Credit Agreement with Key Bank collateralized by assets of the Company’s subsidiaries.  Principal and interest paid quarterly through October 2011.  Interest rate as of June 30, 2008 was 4.4%.
  $ 10,833     $ 13,333  
Term loan of ICO, Inc. under the terms of the Company’s domestic Credit agreement with Key Bank collaterized by assets of the Company’s subsidiaries.  Principal and interest paid quarterly through September 2012.  Interest rate as of June 30, 2008 was 5.7%.
    4,722       -  
Term loan of the Company’s Italian subsidiary, collateralized by a mortgage over the subsidiary’s real estate.  Principal and interest paid quarterly with a fixed interest rate of 5.2% through June 2016.
    6,608       6,408  
Various other U.S. loans of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries collateralized by mortgages on land and buildings and other assets of the subsidiaries.  As of June 30, 2008, these loans had a weighted average interest rate of 6.0% with maturity dates between November 2008 and May 2021.  The interest and principal payments are made monthly.
    8,304       8,780  
Various other loans provided by foreign banks of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries collateralized by mortgages on land and buildings and other assets of the subsidiaries.  As of June 30, 2008, these loans had a weighted average interest rate of 7.2% with maturity dates between August 2008 and March 2015.  The interest and principal payments are made monthly or quarterly.
    14,528       12,695  
Total term debt
    44,995       41,216  
Less current maturities of long-term debt
    17,089       11,611  
Long-term debt less current maturities
  $ 27,906     $ 29,605  


The Company maintains several lines of credit.  The facilities are collateralized by certain assets of the Company.  The following table presents the borrowing capacity, outstanding borrowings and net availability under the various credit facilities in the Company’s domestic and foreign operations.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


   
Domestic
   
Foreign
   
Total
 
   
As of
   
As of
   
As of
 
   
June 30,
 
September 30,
   
June 30,
   
September 30,
   
June 30,
   
September 30,
 
   
2008
 
2007
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
   
(Dollars in Millions)
 
Borrowing Capacity (a)
  $ 22.9     $ 28.1     $ 58.6     $ 58.6     $ 81.5     $ 86.7  
Outstanding Borrowings
    0.4             13.1       16.1       13.5       16.1  
Net availability
  $ 22.5     $ 28.1     $ 45.5     $ 42.5     $ 68.0     $ 70.6  
                                                 
(a) Based on the credit facility limits less outstanding letters of credit.
 

The Company maintains a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with KeyBank National Association and Wells Fargo Bank National Association (collectively referred to herein as “KeyBank”), with a maturity date of October 2012.  The KeyBank Credit Agreement consists of a $30.0 million revolving credit facility, a five year $15.0 million term loan (of which $10.8 million remains outstanding as of June 30, 2008) and through an amendment in May 2008, an additional $5.0 million five year term loan.   The KeyBank Credit Agreement contains a variable interest rate and contains certain financial and nonfinancial covenants.  The borrowing capacity of the $30.0 million revolving credit facility varies based upon the levels of domestic cash, receivables and inventory.  In April 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap on its $10.8 million term loan that essentially fixed the interest rate at 4.32%, subject to changes in the Company’s leverage ratio.  In July 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap on its $4.7 million term loan essentially fixing the interest rate at 5.69%, subject to changes in the Company’s leverage ratio.

The Company has various foreign credit facilities in eight foreign countries.  The available credit under these facilities varies based either on the levels of accounts receivable within the foreign subsidiary, or is a fixed amount.  The foreign credit facilities, which carry various financial covenants, are collateralized by assets owned by the foreign subsidiaries.

At June 30, 2008, the Company’s Australian subsidiary was in violation of a financial debt covenant related to $4.9 million of term debt and $5.1 million of short term borrowings under its credit facility with its lender in Australia.  Of the $45.5 million of total foreign credit availability as of June 30, 2008, $0.7 million related to the Company’s Australian subsidiary.  The Australian covenant not met related to a metric of profitability compared to interest expense.  The Company is in the process of obtaining a waiver from its lender in Australia.  The Company has classified all of the Australian term debt as current as of June 30, 2008.  Because the Company’s Australian subsidiary was in violation of a debt covenant as of June 30, 2008, and the total debt outstanding was over $7.5 million, the Company was in violation of its Credit Agreement with KeyBank.  The Company has obtained a waiver from KeyBank for this violation.

As of June 30, 2007, the Company was in violation of financial debt covenants under credit facilities in Australia, New Zealand and Malaysia.  Because of the violations under credit facilities in Australia and Malaysia, the Company was in violation of its Credit Agreement with KeyBank.  The Company obtained waivers from KeyBank and from its New Zealand lender.

The Company is currently in compliance with all of its credit facilities except for its lender in Australia as discussed above.

NOTE 9.      EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company maintains several defined contribution plans that cover domestic and foreign employees who meet certain eligibility requirements related to age and period of service with the Company.  The plan in which each employee is eligible to participate depends upon the subsidiary for which the employee works.  All plans have a salary deferral feature that enables participating employees to contribute up to a certain percentage of their earnings, subject to governmental regulations.  Many of the foreign plans require the Company to match employees’ contributions in cash.  Employee contributions to the Company’s domestic 401(k) plan have historically been voluntarily matched by the Company with shares of ICO Common Stock.  Both foreign and domestic employees’ interests in Company matching contributions are generally vested immediately upon contribution.

The Company maintains a defined benefit plan for employees of the Company’s Dutch operating subsidiary (the “Dutch Plan”). Participants are responsible for a portion of the cost associated with the Dutch Plan, which provides retirement benefits at the normal retirement age of 65. This Dutch Plan is insured by an insurance contract with Aegon Levensverzekering N.V. ("Aegon"), located in The Hague, The Netherlands.  The Aegon insurance contract guarantees the funding of the Company’s future pension obligations under the Dutch Plan.  Pursuant to the Aegon contract, Aegon is responsible for payment of all future obligations under the provisions of the Dutch Plan, while the Company pays annual insurance premiums to Aegon. Payment of the insurance premiums by the Company constitutes an unconditional and irrevocable transfer of the related pension obligation


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

under the Dutch Plan from the Company to Aegon.  Currently, Aegon’s Standard and Poor’s financial strength rating is AA.  The premiums paid by the Company for the Aegon insurance contracts are included in pension expense.

The Company also maintains several termination plans, usually mandated by law, within certain of its foreign subsidiaries, which plans provide for a one-time payment to a covered employee upon the employee’s termination of employment.

 The amount of defined contribution plan expense for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 was $0.4 million and $1.2 million compared to $0.2 million and $0.8 million for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007.  The amount of defined benefit plan pension expense for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 was $0.1 million and $0.3 million compared to $0.2 million and $0.5 million for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007.

NOTE 10.       IMPAIRMENT, RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER COSTS (INCOME)

On July 2, 2007, the Company’s facility in New Jersey suffered a fire that damaged certain equipment and one of the facility’s buildings.  In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company recorded a receivable for $1.6 million related to its initial claims for recovery from its insurance carrier.  The Company received those funds plus an additional $0.1 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2008.  Additionally, the Company recorded a receivable in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 for $1.8 million for further claims of recovery from its insurance carrier related to damaged equipment as well as reimbursement for business interruption expenses and lost income as a result of the 2007 fire.  The $1.8 million was received in April 2008.  During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded an additional insurance receivable of $0.5 million.  During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company incurred additional costs related to the fire of $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively.  As a result of the above, the Company recorded a net gain of $0.4 million and $1.8 million during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, in impairment, restructuring and other costs (income).

For the nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company has received in aggregate $3.5 million from its insurance carrier for reimbursements of costs associated with the July 2007 fire in its New Jersey facility, $2.3 million of which is classified in the statement of cash flows as investing activities.  The remaining $1.2 million received is reflected in the statement of cash flows as operating activities.

NOTE 11.      DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

During fiscal year 2002, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of its Oilfield Services business to National Oilwell Varco, Inc., formerly Varco International, Inc.  The Oilfield Services results of operations are presented as discontinued operations, net of income taxes, in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.  Legal fees and other expenses incurred related to discontinued operations are expensed as incurred to discontinued operations.

The income from discontinued operations during the nine months ended June 30, 2007 relates to the $2.3 million settlement the Company entered into with its insurance carrier related to the indemnity claims asserted by National Oilwell Varco, Inc.

NOTE 12.      QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing business operations, including debt obligations that carry variable interest rates, foreign currency exchange risk, and resin price risk that could impact our financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows. We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through regular operating and financing activities, including the use of derivative financial instruments. Our intention is to use these derivative financial instruments as risk management tools and not for trading purposes or speculation.

As mentioned above, the Company’s revenues and profitability are impacted by changes in resin prices.  The Company uses various resins (primarily polyethylene) to manufacture its products.  As the price of resin increases or decreases, market prices for the Company’s products will also generally increase or decrease.  This will typically lead to higher or lower average selling prices and will impact the Company’s operating income and operating margin.  The impact on operating income is due to a lag in matching the change in raw material cost of goods sold and the change in product sales prices.  As of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, the Company had $39.7 million and $36.3 million of raw material inventory and $31.0 million and $22.6 million of finished goods inventory, respectively.  The Company attempts to minimize its exposure to resin price changes by monitoring and carefully managing the quantity of its inventory on hand and product sales prices.

As of June 30, 2008, the Company had $66.0 million of net investment in foreign wholly-owned subsidiaries.  The Company does not hedge the foreign exchange rate risk inherent with this non-U.S. Dollar denominated investment.



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The Company does enter into forward currency exchange contracts related to both future purchase obligations and other forecasted transactions denominated in non-functional currencies, primarily repayments of foreign currency intercompany transactions. Certain of these forward currency exchange contracts qualify as cash flow hedging instruments and
are highly effective.  In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, as amended and interpreted (“SFAS No. 133”), the Company recognizes the amount of hedge ineffectiveness for these hedging instruments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.  The hedge ineffectiveness on the Company’s designated cash flow hedging instruments was not a significant amount for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.  The Company’s principal foreign currency exposures relate to the Euro, British Pound, Australian Dollar, New Zealand Dollar, Malaysian Ringgit and Brazilian Real.  The Company’s forward contracts have original maturities of one year or less. The following table includes the total value of foreign exchange contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007:

   
As of
   
June 30,
 
September 30,
   
2008
 
2007
     
Notional value
 
$11.4  million
 
$12.6 million
Fair market value
 
$0.5 million
 
$0.7 million
Maturity Dates
 
July 2008
 
October 2007
   
through November 2008
 
through December 2007

When it is determined that a derivative has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, or that forecasted transactions have not occurred as specified in the hedge documentation, hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively.  As a result, these derivatives are marked to market, with the resulting gains and losses recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Foreign Currency Intercompany Accounts and Notes Receivable .  As mentioned above, from time-to-time, the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries provide capital to foreign subsidiaries of the Company through U.S. dollar denominated interest bearing promissory notes.  In addition, certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries also provide access to capital to other foreign subsidiaries of the Company through foreign currency denominated interest bearing promissory notes.  Such funds are generally used by the Company’s foreign subsidiaries to purchase capital assets and/or for general working capital needs.  The Company’s U.S. subsidiaries also sell products to the Company’s foreign subsidiaries in U.S. dollars on trade credit terms.  In addition, the Company’s foreign subsidiaries sell products to other foreign subsidiaries of the Company denominated in foreign currencies that may not be the functional currency of the foreign subsidiaries.  These intercompany debts are accounted for in the local functional currency of the foreign subsidiary, and are eliminated in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.  At June 30, 2008, the Company had the following significant outstanding intercompany amounts as described above:

Country of subsidiary with
 
Country of subsidiary with
 
Amount in US$ as of
 
Currency denomination
intercompany receivable
 
intercompany payable
 
June 30, 2008
 
of receivable
United States
 
Australia
 
$12.7 million
 
United States Dollar
Holland
 
United Kingdom
 
$2.5 million
 
Great Britain Pound
New Zealand
 
Australia
 
$2.4 million
 
New Zealand Dollar
United States
 
Malaysia
 
$1.4 million
 
United States Dollar
New Zealand
 
Malaysia
 
$1.3 million
 
New Zealand Dollar
New Zealand
 
United Arab Emirates
 
$1.1 million
 
New Zealand Dollar

Because these intercompany lending transactions are denominated in various foreign currencies and are subject to financial exposure from foreign exchange rate movement from the date a loan is recorded to the date it is settled or revalued, any appreciation or depreciation of the foreign currencies in which the transactions are denominated could result in a gain or loss, respectively, to the Consolidated Statement of Operations, subject to forward currency exchange contracts that may be entered into. To mitigate this risk, the Company may enter into foreign currency exchange contracts.

Interest Rate Swaps. The Company also enters into interest rate swap agreements that mitigate the exposure to interest rate risk by converting variable-rate debt to a fixed rate. The interest rate swap and instrument being hedged are marked to market in the balance sheet.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company entered into a Pay-Fixed / Receive Variable Interest Rate swap on its term loan in the U.S. with KeyBank/Wells Fargo of $11.7 million.  This swap locks in the Company’s interest rate on $11.7 million at 2.82% plus the credit spread on the debt.   The Company’s risk management objective with respect to this interest rate swap is to hedge the variability to changes in cash flows attributable to interest rate risk caused by changes in the benchmark interest rate (i.e. LIBOR), related to $11.7 million of the Company’s variable-rate debt.


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

As of June 30, 2008, the Company calculated the estimated fair value of the $11.7 million notional swap identified above to be an asset of $0.1 million.  The estimated fair value of the swap was calculated by obtaining a quotation from Wells Fargo at June 30, 2008.  The fair value is an estimate of the net amount that the Company would receive on June 30, 2008 if the agreement was transferred to another party or cancelled by the Company.

NOTE 13.      SEGMENT INFORMATION

Our management structure and reportable segments are organized into five business segments referred to as ICO Polymers North America, ICO Brazil, Bayshore Industrial, ICO Europe and ICO Asia Pacific.  This organization is consistent with the way information is reviewed and decisions are made by executive management.

        ICO Polymers North America, ICO Brazil, ICO Europe and ICO Asia Pacific primarily produce competitively priced engineered polymer powders for the rotational molding industry as well as other specialty markets for powdered polymers, including masterbatch and concentrate producers, users of polymer-based metal coatings, and non-woven textile markets.  Additionally, these segments provide specialty size reduction services on a tolling basis.  “Tolling” refers to processing customer owned material for a service fee.  The Bayshore Industrial segment designs and produces proprietary concentrates, masterbatches and specialty compounds, primarily for the plastic film industry, in North America and in selected export markets.  The Company’s European segment includes operations in France, Holland, Italy and the U.K.  The Company’s Asia Pacific segment includes operations in Australia, Malaysia, New Zealand and the United Arab Emirates.

Nine Months Ended
June 30, 2008
 
Revenue
From
External
Customers
   
Inter-
Segment
Revenues
   
Operating
Income
(Loss)
   
Depreciation
and
Amortization
   
Impairment,
Restructuring and Other
Costs (Income) (a)
 
Expenditures
for Additions
to Long-Lived
Assets
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
ICO Europe
  $ 158,720     $ 241     $ 10,419     $ 1,745     $ 46     $ 831  
Bayshore Industrial
    71,563       251       8,755       1,190       -       1,059  
ICO Asia Pacific
    58,989       346       1,612       1,130       -       2,394  
ICO Polymers North America
    34,971       3,448       5,194       1,205       (1,802 )     6,431  
ICO Brazil
    14,466       -       553       195       -       256  
Total from Reportable Segments
    338,709       4,286       26,533       5,465       (1,756 )     10,971  
Unallocated General Corporate
     Expense
    -       -       (4,924 )     115       -       55  
Total
  $ 338,709     $ 4,286     $ 21,609     $ 5,580     $ (1,756 )   $ 11,026  
 
 
Nine Months Ended
June 30, 2007
 
Revenue
From
External
Customers
   
Inter-
Segment
Revenues
   
Operating
Income
(Loss)
   
Depreciation
and
Amortization
   
Impairment,
Restructuring and Other
Costs (Income) (a)
 
Expenditures
for Additions
to Long-Lived
Assets
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
ICO Europe
  $ 124,178     $ 403     $ 6,559     $ 2,054     $ (625 )   $ 912  
Bayshore Industrial
    69,465       99       9,642       1,117       -       1,219  
ICO Asia Pacific
    59,624       16       4,161       819       (29 )     4,037  
ICO Polymers North America
    31,486       3,153       4,313       1,139       -       1,218  
ICO Brazil
    9,605       -       267       185       -       124  
Total from Reportable Segments
    294,358       3,671       24,942       5,314       (654 )     7,510  
Unallocated General Corporate
     Expense
    -       -       (4,812 )     152       -       101  
Total
  $ 294,358     $ 3,671     $ 20,130     $ 5,466     $ (654 )   $ 7,611  
 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2008
 
Revenue
From
External
Customers
   
Inter-
Segment
Revenues
   
Operating
Income
(Loss) (a)
   
Depreciation
and
Amortization
   
Impairment,
Restructuring and Other
Costs (Income) (a)
 
Expenditures
for Additions
to Long-Lived
Assets
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
ICO Europe
  $ 58,226     $ 12     $ 3,901     $ 603     $ 7     $ 235  
Bayshore Industrial
    19,044       107       2,045       405       -       683  
ICO Asia Pacific
    21,417       -       (11 )     408       -       305  
ICO Polymers North America
    12,081       1,361       1,811       411       (363 )     2,565  
ICO Brazil
    4,950       -       224       66       -       132  
Total from Reportable Segments
    115,718       1,480       7,970       1,893       (356 )     3,920  
Unallocated General Corporate
     Expense
    -       -       (1,503 )     39       -       21  
Total
  $ 115,718     $ 1,480     $ 6,467     $ 1,932     $ (356 )   $ 3,941  



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Three Months Ended
June 30, 2007
 
Revenue
From
External
Customers
   
Inter-
Segment
Revenues
   
Operating
Income
(Loss)
   
Depreciation
and
Amortization
   
Impairment,
Restructuring and Other
Costs (Income) (a)
   
Expenditures
for Additions
to Long-Lived
Assets
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
ICO Europe
  $ 47,797     $ 361     $ 3,376     $ 707       -     $ 408  
Bayshore Industrial
    25,684       9       3,329       371       -       432  
ICO Asia Pacific
    25,528       16       2,315       273       -       1,967  
ICO Polymers North America
    11,083       1,061       1,553       387       -       612  
ICO Brazil
    3,286       -       63       66       -       44  
Total from Reportable Segments
    113,378       1,447       10,636       1,804       -       3,463  
Unallocated General Corporate
     Expense
    -       -       (1,676 )     51       -       51  
Total
  $ 113,378     $ 1,447     $ 8,960     $ 1,855       -     $ 3,514  
 
 
Total Assets
 
As of
June 30,
2008 (c)
   
As of
September 30,
2007 (c)
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
ICO Europe
  $ 112,620     $ 99,357  
Bayshore Industrial
    37,071       50,487  
ICO Asia Pacific
    65,981       60,817  
ICO Polymers North America
    28,889       24,478  
ICO Brazil
    8,504       6,563  
Total from Reportable Segments
    253,065       241,702  
Other (b)
    2,139       4,515  
Total
  $ 255,204     $ 246,217  
 
(a) Impairment, restructuring and other costs (income) are included in operating income (loss).
(b) Consists of unallocated Corporate assets.
(c) Includes goodwill of $4.8 million and $4.7 million for ICO Asia Pacific as of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, respectively, and $4.5 million for Bayshore Industrial as of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007.

A reconciliation of total reportable segment operating income to income from continuing operations before income taxes is as follows:


   
Three Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
   
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Reportable segments operating income
  $ 7,970     $ 10,636     $ 26,533     $ 24,942  
Unallocated general corporate expense
    (1,503 )     (1,676 )     (4,924 )     (4,812 )
Consolidated operating income
    6,467       8,960       21,609       20,130  
Other income (expense):
                               
Interest expense, net
    (1,039 )     (799 )     (3,158 )     (2,301 )
Other
    165       (129 )     (36 )     (296 )
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
  $ 5,593     $ 8,032     $ 18,415     $ 17,533  

NOTE 14.      SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 26, 2008, the Company’s facility in the state of New Jersey suffered a fire which caused damage to one of the facility’s buildings.  The Company has been in the process of relocating its production to Pennsylvania, and at the time of this second fire, only one-third of the production lines in New Jersey were operating.  The Company expects to make claims for recovery under its insurance policy which is subject to a deductible of $0.3 million.  Additionally, the Company will make claims under an insurance policy for business interruption to compensate for additional expenses and loss of profit following the fire.  The amount of the claims cannot be estimated at this time.

ITEM 2 .  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Introduction

How We Generate Our Revenues

The Company’s revenues are primarily derived from product sales and toll processing services in the polymer processing industry.



Product sales result from the sale of finished products to the customer such as polymer powders, proprietary concentrates, masterbatches and specialty compounds.  The creation of such products begins with the Company purchasing resin (primarily polyethylene) and other raw materials that are processed by the Company, which may involve size reduction and/or compounding.  Compounding involves melt blending various resins and additives to produce a homogeneous material. Compounding includes the manufacture and sale of concentrates.  Concentrates are polymers loaded with high levels of chemical and organic additives that are melt blended into base resins to give plastic films and other finished products desired physical properties.  After processing, the Company sells the finished products to customers.  The finished products produced by the Company are most often used to manufacture household items (such as toys, household furniture and trash receptacles), agricultural products (such as fertilizer and water tanks), paint, metal and fabric coatings and consumer plastic products such as plastic bags and food packaging.

Toll processing services involve both size reduction and compounding whereby these services are performed on customer owned material for a fee.  We consider our toll processing services to be completed when we have processed the customer owned material and no further services remain to be performed.  Pursuant to the service arrangements with our customers, we are entitled to collect our agreed upon toll processing fee after completion of our toll processing services.  Shipping of the product to and from our facilities is determined by and paid for by the customer.  The revenue we recognize for toll processing services is net of the value of our customer’s product as we do not take ownership of our customer’s material during any stage of the process.

Demand for the Company’s products and services tends to be driven by overall economic factors and, particularly, consumer spending.  The trend of applicable resin prices also impacts customer demand.  As resin prices are falling, customers tend to reduce their inventories and, therefore, reduce their need for the Company’s products and services as customers choose to purchase resin on a just-in-time basis rather than building large levels of inventory.  Conversely, as resin prices are rising, customers often increase their inventories and accelerate their purchases of products and services from the Company to help lower their raw material costs.  Additionally, demand for the Company’s products and services tends to be seasonal, with customer demand historically being weakest during the Company’s first fiscal quarter due to the holiday season.

Cost of Sales and Services

Cost of sales and services is primarily comprised of raw materials (resins and various additives), compensation and benefits to non-administrative employees, electricity, repair and maintenance, occupancy costs and supplies.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and related benefits paid to the sales and marketing, executive management, information technology, accounting, legal, human resources and other administrative employees of the Company, other sales and marketing expenses, communications costs, systems costs, insurance costs, consulting costs and legal and professional accounting fees.

How We Manage Our Operations

The Company’s management structure and reportable segments are organized into five business segments referred to as ICO Polymers North America, ICO Brazil, Bayshore Industrial, ICO Europe and ICO Asia Pacific.  This organization is consistent with the way information is reviewed and decisions are made by executive management.

The ICO Polymers North America, ICO Brazil, ICO Europe and ICO Asia Pacific segments primarily produce competitively priced polymer powders for the rotational molding industry as well as other specialty markets for powdered polymers, including masterbatch and concentrate producers, users of polymer-based metal coatings, and non-woven textile markets.  Masterbatches are concentrates that incorporate all of the additives a customer needs into a single package for a particular product manufacturing process, as opposed to requiring numerous packages.  Additionally, these segments provide specialty size reduction services on a tolling basis.  The Bayshore Industrial segment designs and produces proprietary concentrates, masterbatches and specialty compounds, primarily for the plastic film industry, in North America and in selected export markets.  The Company’s ICO Europe segment includes operations in France, Holland, Italy and the U.K.  The Company’s ICO Asia Pacific segment includes operations in Australia, Malaysia, New Zealand and the United Arab Emirates.

Results of Operations

Three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007



Executive Summary

For the nine months ended June 30, 2008, our revenues grew $44.4 million or 15%.  The growth in revenues along with the benefit from the translation effect of foreign currencies compared to the U.S. Dollar led to a 7% increase in operating income or $1.5 million.  Our European region has performed very well this year producing strong growth in revenues and operating income.  For the third quarter of this fiscal year, we saw our business slow down primarily at our Bayshore Industrial segment and our Australian locations compared to the same quarter of the prior year, when it was strong for both locations.  During the quarter, we also reversed a valuation allowance that was placed on the deferred tax assets of our subsidiary in Brazil in the amount of $0.7 million.  This was due to the continued improvement in earnings for our Brazilian subsidiary.



   
Summary Financial Information
 
   
Three Months Ended
June 30,
               
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
             
   
2008
   
2007
   
Change
   
%
   
2008
   
2007
   
Change
   
%
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Total revenues
  $ 115,718     $ 113,378     $ 2,340       2   %   $ 338,709     $ 294,358     $ 44,351       15  %
SG&A (1)
    10,441       9,727       714       7   %     31,431       27,440       3,991       15  %
Operating income
    6,467       8,960       (2,493 )     (28 %)     21,609       20,130       1,479       7  %
Income from continuing operations
    4,633       5,632       (999 )     (18 %)     13,152       13,714       (562 )     (4 %)
Net income
  $ 4,633     $ 5,614       (981 )     (17 )%   $ 13,136     $ 15,135     $ (1,999 )     (13 %)
                                                                 
Volumes (2)
    80,100       88,150       (8,050 )     (9 %)     245,600       246,150       (550 )     0  %
Gross margin (3)
    16.0   %     18.1   %     (2.1 %)             16.8  %     17.8  %     (1.0 %)        
SG&A as a percentage of revenues
    9.0   %     8.6   %     .4  %             9.3  %     9.3  %     -          
Operating income as a percentage of revenues
    5.6   %     7.9   %     (2.3 %)             6.4  %     6.8  %     (.4 %)        
                                                                 
(1) “SG&A” is defined as selling, general and administrative expense (including stock option compensation expense).
 
(2) “Volumes” refers to total metric tons sold either selling proprietary products or toll processing services.
 
(3) Gross margin is calculated as the difference between revenues and cost of sales and services, divided by revenues.
 


Revenues.   Total revenues increased $2.3 million or 2% to $115.7 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same period of fiscal 2007.  During the nine month period, revenues increased $44.4 million or 15%.  Revenues are impacted by volumes sold by the Company (“volume”), changes in selling prices and mix of finished products sold or services performed (“price/product mix”) and the impact from changes in foreign currencies relative to the U.S. Dollar (“translation effect”).

The components of the increase in revenue are:

   
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2008
   
Nine Months Ended
June 30, 2008
 
   
%
     $       %         $    
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
Volume
    (7% )   $ (8,322 )     2%     $ 5,709  
Price/product mix
    1%       1,800       4%       13,569  
Translation effect
    8%       8,862       9%       25,073  
Total increase
    2%     $ 2,340       15%     $ 44,351  

The translation effect of changes in foreign currencies relative to the U.S. Dollar caused an increase in revenues of $8.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and $25.1 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 due primarily to a stronger Euro and Australian Dollar compared to the U.S. Dollar. A decrease in volumes sold for the three months ended June 30, 2008 led to a decrease in revenues of $8.3 million. The volume reduction was primarily a result of reduced customer demand at the Company’s Bayshore Industrial and Australian locations.  Although total volumes declined slightly in the nine month comparative periods caused by a decline in toll service volumes, product sales volumes increased 2%.  The increase in product sales volumes, which has a higher average selling price than toll services due to the raw material component, caused the overall impact from changes in volumes to increase revenue by $5.7 million.

The Company’s revenues are impacted by the change in raw material prices (“resin” prices) as well as product sales mix.  As the price of resin increases or decreases, market prices for our products will generally also increase or decrease.  This will typically lead to higher or lower average selling prices.  Average selling prices were higher in the current year period than the prior year periods for both the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008.  This fact, as well as a change in product sales mix during the nine months ended June 30, 2008, primarily for Bayshore Industrial, caused an increase in revenues of $13.6 million


for the nine months ended June 30, 2008.  During the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007, the impact from higher average selling prices was partially reduced by a less favorable product mix at our Bayshore Industrial segment.  Although the Company participates in numerous markets, the graph below illustrates the trend in our resin prices.



A comparison of revenues by segment and discussion of the significant segment changes is provided below.

Revenues by segment for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007:

   
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
% of Total
   
2007
   
% of Total
   
Change
   
%
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
ICO Europe
  $ 58,226       50%     $ 47,797       42%     $ 10,429       22%  
Bayshore Industrial
    19,044       16%       25,684       23%       (6,640 )     (26% )
ICO Asia Pacific
    21,417       19%       25,528       22%       (4,111 )     (16% )
ICO Polymers North America
    12,081       10%       11,083       10%       998       9%  
ICO Brazil
    4,950       5%       3,286       3%       1,664       51%  
Total
  $ 115,718       100%     $ 113,378       100%     $ 2,340       2%  


Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
Revenues by Segment
Revenues by Segment

                        
                                                                                                                                                          


ICO Europe’s revenues increased $10.4 million or 22% as a result of the translation effect of stronger European currencies compared to the U.S. Dollar which caused an increase in revenues of $5.9 million, and an increase in average selling prices due in part to higher resin costs resulted in an increase of $4.7 million in revenues. This was partially offset by a decrease in volumes, primarily toll service volumes which decreased revenues by $0.2 million.

Bayshore Industrial’s revenues decreased $6.6 million or 26% due to a reduction in customer demand and less favorable product sales mix.

ICO Asia Pacific’s revenues decreased $4.1 million or 16% due primarily to a reduction in volumes sold of 20%, which reduced revenues by $4.8 million.  During the prior year period, sales into the water tank market significantly increased in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2007.  However, the water tank market slowed in fiscal year 2008.  Lower average selling prices and changes in product mix also reduced revenues by $1.5 million.  The translation effect of the stronger foreign currencies compared to the U.S. Dollar increased revenues by $2.2 million.

ICO Polymers North America’s revenues increased $1.0 million or 9% primarily due to higher average selling prices and changes in product sales mix.

ICO Brazil’s revenues increased $1.7 million or 51% due to an increase in product sales volumes (as a result of increased customer demand) which increased revenue by $0.9 million.  Additionally, the translation effect of the stronger Brazilian Real, compared to the U.S. Dollar, caused an increase in revenues of $0.8 million.


Revenues by segment for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2007:

   
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
% of Total
   
2007
   
% of Total
   
Change
   
%
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
ICO Europe
  $ 158,720       47%     $ 124,178       42%     $ 34,542       28%  
Bayshore Industrial
    71,563       21%       69,465       24%       2,098       3%  
ICO Asia Pacific
    58,989       18%       59,624       20%       (635 )     (1% )
ICO Polymers North America
    34,971       10%       31,486       11%       3,485       11%  
ICO Brazil
    14,466       4%       9,605       3%       4,861       51%  
Total
  $ 338,709       100%     $ 294,358       100%     $ 44,351       15%  



Nine Months Ended June 30, 2008
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2007
Revenues by Segment
Revenues by Segment

                                                                                                                           
      
ICO Europe’s revenues increased $34.5 million or 28% as a result of the translation effect of stronger European currencies compared to the U.S. Dollar which caused an increase in revenues of $16.5 million.  Additionally, an increase in average selling prices due in part to higher resin costs resulted in an increase of $11.1 million in revenues.  Finally, an increase in product sales volumes as a result of an increase in customer demand and improved market and economic conditions increased revenues by $7.9 million.  This was partially offset by a decrease in toll processing volumes which decreased revenues by $1.0 million.



Bayshore Industrial’s revenues increased $2.1 million or 3% primarily due to a favorable change in product mix which increased revenues by $2.8 million.  A decline in volumes sold due to a decrease in customer demand decreased revenues by $0.7 million.

ICO Asia Pacific’s revenues decreased by $0.6 million or 1% as a result of a decline in volumes sold due to reduced customer demand which reduced revenues by $4.6 million.  Lower average selling prices due to challenging market conditions and changes in product mix reduced revenues by $2.1 million.  Partially offsetting these declines was the translation effect of the stronger Australian and New Zealand Dollar and Malaysian Ringgit which increased revenues by $6.1 million.

ICO Polymers North America’s revenues increased $3.5 million or 11% as a result of an increase in volumes sold due to an increase in customer demand as well as higher average selling prices and a more favorable product sales mix.

ICO Brazil’s revenues increased $4.9 million or 51% due to the translation effect of the stronger Brazilian Real compared to the U.S. Dollar which caused an increase in revenues of $2.5 million and as a result of an increase in volumes sold (due to higher customer demand) of 26% which increased revenues by $2.4 million.

Gross Margins.   Consolidated gross margins (calculated as the difference between revenues and cost of sales and services, divided by revenues) decreased from 18.1% to 16.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and declined from 17.8% to 16.8% for the nine months ended June 30, 2008.  For the three month comparative periods, gross margins declined as a result of several items.  First, our product sales mix changed.  Revenues increased at our European segment which generally has a lower gross margin than the rest of the Company.  Revenues at our Bayshore Industrial segment, which has a higher gross margin than the rest of the Company, declined.  Also, the increase in resin prices in the current year compared to the prior periods had the effect of increasing our average selling prices and revenue base without a corresponding increase in gross profit by the same percentage, which results in a lower gross margin.  Additionally, higher operating costs per metric ton, including logistics costs and electricity, also contributed to the effect of reducing our gross margins.  Last, a reduction in gross margin in our Asia Pacific segment as a result of a reduction in volumes sold, higher logistics costs and pricing pressures factored into the overall decline in gross margin.

For the nine month comparative period, gross margin declined due to the change in product sales mix discussed above, the effect of higher average selling prices, higher operating costs and the lower margins in Asia Pacific.  However, these items were partially offset by an increase in our feedstock margins (the difference between product sales revenues and related costs of raw materials sold.)

Selling, General and Administrative .  Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased $0.7 million or 7% and $4.0 million or 15% for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008.  The increase in SG&A for the three-month comparative period was due primarily to the translation effect of the stronger foreign currencies which increased SG&A by $0.6 million.  The increase in SG&A of $4.0 million or 15% for the nine-month comparative periods was due primarily to the translation effect of the stronger foreign currencies which increased SG&A by $1.9 million, higher compensation and benefits cost of $1.3 million and higher external professional fees of $0.7 million.  As a percentage of revenues, SG&A was 9.0% and 9.3% of revenues during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to 8.6% and 9.3% for the same periods last year.

Impairment, restructuring and other costs (income) .  On July 2, 2007, the Company’s facility in New Jersey suffered a fire that damaged certain equipment and one of the facility’s buildings.  In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company recorded a receivable for $1.6 million related to its initial claims for recovery from its insurance carrier.  The Company received those funds plus an additional $0.1 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2008.  Additionally, the Company recorded a receivable in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 for $1.8 million for further claims of recovery from its insurance carrier related to damaged equipment as well as reimbursement for business interruption expenses and lost income as a result of the fire.  The $1.8 million was received in April 2008.  During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded an additional insurance receivable of $0.5 million.  During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company incurred additional costs related to the fire of $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively.  As a result of the above, the Company recorded a net gain of $0.4 million and $1.8 million during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, in impairment, restructuring and other costs (income).

During the nine months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded a pre-tax gain of $0.6 million related to the sale of a building in the Company’s Dutch subsidiary.


Operating income (loss) by segment and discussion of significant segment changes for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007 follows.




Operating income (loss)
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
Change
   
%
 
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
ICO Europe
  $ 3,901     $ 3,376     $ 525       16%  
Bayshore Industrial
    2,045       3,329       (1,284 )     (39% )
ICO Asia Pacific
    (11 )     2,315       (2,326 )     (100% )
ICO Polymers North America
    1,811       1,553       258       17%  
ICO Brazil
    224       63       161       256%  
Subtotal
    7,970       10,636       (2,666 )     (25% )
Unallocated General Corporate Expense
    (1,503 )     (1,676 )     173       (10% )
Consolidated
  $ 6,467     $ 8,960     $ (2,493 )     (28% )
 
 
Operating income (loss) as a percentage
of revenues
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
Change
 
ICO Europe
    7%       7%       -  
Bayshore Industrial
    11%       13%       (2% )
ICO Asia Pacific
    -       9%       (9% )
ICO Polymers North America
    15%       14%       1%  
ICO Brazil
    5%       2%       3%  
Consolidated
    6%       8%       (2% )

ICO Europe’s operating income improved $0.5 million or 16% due primarily to the effect of the stronger European currencies compared to the U.S. Dollar which improved operating income by $0.4 million.

Bayshore Industrial’s operating income fell $1.3 million or 39% primarily as a result of a decrease in volumes sold due to reduced customer demand and to a lesser extent an increase in operating costs per metric ton.

ICO Asia Pacific’s operating income decreased $2.3 million or 100% as a result of a decline in customer demand which reduced volumes sold.  Additionally, pricing pressure due to challenging market conditions led to a reduction in feedstock margins.

ICO Polymers North America’s operating income increased $0.3 million or 17%.  During the third quarter of Fiscal Year 2008, the Company recorded a net $0.4 million gain from expected insurance recoveries.  The Company’s New Jersey facility was running at only a third of its production lines during the third quarter of fiscal 2008 as a result of the July 2007 fire that occurred in the plant.  On July 26, 2008, the Company had a second fire at its plant in New Jersey.   The Company has been in the process of relocating its production to Pennsylvania and therefore will cease production at its New Jersey facility.

ICO Brazil’s operating income increased $0.2 million or 256% due primarily to a growth in volumes sold and an increase in feedstock margins.

Operating income (loss) by segment and discussion of significant segment changes for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2007 follows.


Operating income (loss)
 
Nine Months Ended
   
   
June 30,
   
   
2008
   
2007
   
Change
   
%
   
(Dollars in Thousands)
   
ICO Europe
  $ 10,419     $ 6,559     $ 3,860       59%  
Bayshore Industrial
    8,755       9,642       (887 )     (9% )
ICO Asia Pacific
    1,612       4,161       (2,549 )     (61% )
ICO Polymers North America
    5,194       4,313       881       20%  
ICO Brazil
    553       267       286       107%  
Subtotal
    26,533       24,942       1,591       6%  
Unallocated General Corporate Expense
    (4,924 )     (4,812 )     (112 )     2%  
Consolidated
  $ 21,609     $ 20,130     $ 1,479       7%  





Operating income as a
 
Nine Months Ended
 
percentage of revenues
 
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
Change
 
ICO Europe
    7%       5%       2%  
Bayshore Industrial
    12%       14%       (2% )
ICO Asia Pacific
    3%       7%       (4% )
ICO Polymers North America
    15%       14%       1%  
ICO Brazil
    4%       3%       1%  
Consolidated
    6%       7%       (1% )

ICO Europe’s operating income improved $3.9 million or 59% due primarily to an improvement in product sales volumes and feedstock margins.  Additionally, the effect of the stronger European currencies compared to the U.S. Dollar improved operating income by $1.1 million.

Bayshore Industrial’s operating income decreased $0.9 million or 9% due primarily from an increase in production costs per metric ton.

ICO Asia Pacific’s operating income decreased $2.5 million or 61% as a result of a decrease in volumes sold, an increase in operating costs and higher SG&A costs.  The higher operating costs were primarily caused by an increase in logistics costs.  The higher SG&A costs were due to an increase in employees to support the expansion of our facility in Malaysia as well as the opening of our facility in the United Arab Emirates.

ICO Polymers North America’s operating income increased $0.9 million or 20% primarily as a result of an increase in product sales volumes due to an increase in customer demand.  Additionally, the Company has recognized a net gain of $1.8 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 due to the reimbursement from the insurance company related to the fire at our New Jersey facility.  A considerable portion of the insurance reimbursement was for business interruption expenses and lost income as a result of the fire.

ICO Brazil’s operating income increased $0.3 million or 107% due to growth in volumes sold due to an increase in customer demand.

Unallocated general corporate expenses increased $0.1 million or 2% due to higher external professional fees of $0.7 million, an increase in compensation costs of $0.2 million and other smaller increases in expenses.  These increases were partially offset by an increase in the allocation of corporate expenses to its business units of $1.1 million.

Interest Expense, Net .  For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, net interest expense increased $0.2 million or 30% and $0.9 million or 37%, respectively, as a result of an increase in borrowings to finance an increase in working capital and the repurchase of Preferred Stock.

Income Taxes (from continuing operations).   The Company’s effective income tax rates were provisions of 17% and 29% during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, compared to the U.S. statutory rate of 35%.  The primary reason for the lower rates was the reversal of the valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset in the company’s Brazilian subsidiary of $0.7 million in the three months ending June 30, 2008.

The Company’s effective income tax rates were provisions of 30% and 22% during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, compared to the U.S. statutory rate of 35%. The Company’s effective income tax rate of 22% during the nine months ended June 30, 2007 was primarily due to the reversal of the valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets in the Company’s Italian subsidiary of $1.4 million in the second quarter.  In addition, the reduction of the tax contingency reserve in the first quarter of 2007 of $0.4 million further reduced the effective tax rate for the nine month period.

Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations.   The income from discontinued operations during the nine months ended June 30, 2007 relates to the settlement the Company entered into with its insurance carrier related to the indemnity claims asserted by National Oilwell Varco, Inc. for $2.3 million.

Net Income.   For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company had net income of $4.6 million and $13.1 million, respectively, compared to net income of $5.6 million and $15.1 million for the comparable periods in fiscal 2007, due to the factors discussed above.

Foreign Currency Translation.   The fluctuations of the U.S. Dollar against the Euro, British Pound, New Zealand Dollar, Brazilian Real, Malaysian Ringgit and the Australian Dollar have impacted the translation of revenues and expenses of our


international operations.  The table below summarizes the impact of changing exchange rates for the above currencies for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008.

 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2008
 
Nine Months Ended
June 30, 2008
   
Net revenues
$8.9 million
 
$25.1 million
Operating income
$0.4 million
 
$1.4 million
Pre-tax income
$0.3 million
 
$1.2 million
Net income
$0.4 million
 
$0.9 million

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”).  SFAS 157 defines “fair value,” establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, rather, its application will be made pursuant to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.  SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those years.  This standard will be effective for the Company starting with our interim period ending December 31, 2008.  The provisions of SFAS 157 are to be applied prospectively upon adoption, except for limited specified exceptions.  The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“SFAS 159”).  Under SFAS 159, a company may elect to measure eligible financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value at specified election dates.  Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.  SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.  We are currently assessing whether or not we will elect the fair value option.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS 141 (R)”) and No. 160, Noncontrolling interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (“SFAS 160”).  The goal of these standards is to improve, simplify, and converge internationally the accounting for business combinations and the reporting of noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements.  The provisions of SFAS 141 (R) and SFAS 160 are effective for the Company on October 1, 2009.  As SFAS No. 141will apply to future acquisitions, it is not possible at this time for the Company to determine the impact of adopting this standard.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (“SFAS 161”), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.   This Statement changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.  This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company will be required to adopt this standard in the interim period ending December 31, 2009.  This Statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption.  We are currently evluating the impact of adopting this new standard.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets ("FSP FAS 142-3"). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets ("SFAS 142"). The intent of FSP FAS 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141(R) and other applicable accounting literature. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 will have a material impact on its results of operations or financial condition.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities," ("FSP EITF 03-6-1").  This FSP addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in computing earnings per share under the two-class method  described in SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share."  This FSP will be effective for the Company beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and will be applied retrospectively.  We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new standard.





Liquidity and Capital Resources

 The following are considered by management as key measures of liquidity applicable to the Company:

 
June 30, 2008
September 30, 2007
Cash and cash equivalents
$3.9 million
 
$8.6 million
 
Working capital
$71.0 million
 
$57.9 million
 

 Cash and cash equivalents declined $4.7 million and working capital increased $13.1 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 due to the factors described below.

Cash Flows

   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
 
   
2008
   
2007
 
Net cash provided by operating activities by continuing operations
  $ 3,887     $ 12,522  
Net cash used for operating activities by discontinued operations
    (59 )     1,068  
Net cash used for investing activities by continuing operations
    (8,633 )     (6,674 )
Net cash used for financing activities by continuing operations
    (102 )     (20,548 )
Effect of exchange rate changes
    255       194  
Net decrease in cash and equivalents
  $ (4,652 )   $ (13,438 )

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

The Company generated $3.9 million of cash from operating activities by continuing operations during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $12.5 million generated in the period ended June 30, 2007.  The main reason for the change was due to changes in working capital.  Inventories were a use of cash in the current year of $8.3 million compared to generating cash of $1.0 million in the prior year period.  This change was primarily due to higher inventory volumes in our Australian location, where we encountered a reduction in demand in the water tank market in the current fiscal year which led to higher inventory volumes.  We expect that our inventory volumes in Australia will continue to decline over the coming months compared to our levels at June 30, 2008.  During the current fiscal year, the Company used $14.8 million of cash for accounts payable compared to generating cash of $8.5 million for accounts payable in the prior year period.  This change was due to the timing of inventory purchases and the higher inventory levels in Australia.  Offsetting those two items were cash inflows from accounts receivable in the current fiscal year of $10.4 million compared to a use of cash for accounts receivable of $16.0 million in the prior year period.  This change is due to a decline in revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the revenues in the three months ended September 30, 2007 of $7.9 million while in the prior year periods, revenues in the three months ended June 30, 2007 were higher than the three months ended September 30, 2006.

Cash provided by discontinued operations was $1.1 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2007 primarily due to the receipt of $2.3 million from the company’s insurance carrier in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 related to the Company’s settlement with National Oilwell Varco, Inc., related to indemnity claims.

Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities

Capital expenditures totaled $11.0 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2008.  These expenditures were related primarily to the Company’s relocation to Pennsylvania from its New Jersey facility and to the expansion of the Company’s production capacity.  The Company leased a facility in Pennsylvania and is incurring capital expenditures related to the build out of the leased facility.  The Company began production in the Pennsylvania facility in the third fiscal quarter of 2008 and anticipates having all equipment relocated from its New Jersey facility to its Pennsylvania facility within the next 6 months.  Approximately 58% of the $11.0 million of capital expenditures was spent at the Company’s ICO Polymers North America segment.  The Company expects capital expenditures to be approximately $3.0 million for the remainder of the fiscal year.  For the nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company received $2.3 million from its insurance carrier for reimbursements of costs associated with the fire in the Company’s New Jersey facility that is classified in the statement of cash flow as investing activities.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company completed the sale of a building at its Dutch subsidiary for net proceeds of $0.9 million and recorded a pre-tax gain of $0.6 million.

Cash Flows Used For Financing Activities

During the nine months ended June 30, 2008, cash used for financing activities was $0.1 million.  In the prior year period, the Company used $20.5 million for financing activities primarily to finance the repurchase of 85% of the Company’s Preferred Stock.



Financing Arrangements

The Company maintains several lines of credit.  The facilities are collateralized by certain assets of the Company.  The following table presents the borrowing capacity, outstanding borrowings and net availability under the various credit facilities in the Company’s domestic and foreign operations.

   
Domestic
   
Foreign
   
Total
 
   
As of
   
As of
   
As of
 
   
June 30,
 
September 30,
   
June 30,
   
September 30,
   
June 30,
   
September 30,
 
   
2008
 
2007
   
2008
   
2007
   
2008
   
2007
 
   
(Dollars in Millions)
 
Borrowing Capacity (a)
  $ 22.9     $ 28.1     $ 58.6     $ 58.6     $ 81.5     $ 86.7  
Outstanding Borrowings
    0.4       -       13.1       16.1       13.5       16.1  
Net availability
  $ 22.5     $ 28.1     $ 45.5     $ 42.5     $ 68.0     $ 70.6  
                                                 
(a) Based on the credit facility limits less outstanding letters of credit.
 

The Company maintains a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with KeyBank National Association and Wells Fargo Bank National Association (collectively referred to herein as “KeyBank”), with a maturity date of October 2012.  The KeyBank Credit Agreement consists of a $30.0 million revolving credit facility, a five year $15.0 million term loan (of which $10.8 million remains outstanding as of June 30, 2008) and through an amendment in May 2008, an additional $5.0 million five year term loan.   The KeyBank Credit Agreement contains a variable interest rate and contains certain financial and nonfinancial covenants.  The borrowing capacity of the $30.0 million revolving credit facility varies based upon the levels of domestic cash, receivables and inventory.  In April 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap on its $10.8 million term loan that essentially fixed the interest rate at 4.32%, subject to changes in the Company’s leverage ratio.  In July 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap on its $5.0 million term loan essentially fixing the interest rate at 5.69%, subject to changes in the Company’s leverage ratio.

The Company has various foreign credit facilities in eight foreign countries.  The available credit under these facilities varies based either on the levels of accounts receivable within the foreign subsidiary, or is a fixed amount.  The foreign credit facilities, which carry various financial covenants, are collateralized by assets owned by the foreign subsidiaries.

At June 30, 2008, the Company’s Australian subsidiary was in violation of a financial debt covenant related to $4.9 million of term debt and $5.1 million of short term borrowings under its credit facility with its lender in Australia.  Of the $45.5 million of total foreign credit availability as of June 30, 2008, $0.7 million related to the Company’s Australian subsidiary.  The Australian covenant not met related to a metric of profitability compared to interest expense.  The Company is in the process of obtaining a waiver from its lender in Australia.  The Company has classified all of the Australian term debt as current as of June 30, 2008.  Because the Company’s Australian subsidiary was in violation of a debt covenant as of June 30, 2008, and the total debt outstanding was over $7.5 million, the Company was in violation of its Credit Agreement with KeyBank.  The Company obtained a waiver from KeyBank for this violation.

Presently, the Company anticipates that cash flow from operations and availability under credit facilities will be sufficient to meet its short and long-term operational requirements.

As of June 30, 2007, the Company was in violation of financial debt covenants under credit facilities in Australia, New Zealand and Malaysia.  Because of the violations under credit facilities in Australia and Malaysia, the Company was in violation of its Credit Agreement with KeyBank.  The Company obtained waivers from KeyBank and from its New Zealand lender.  The Company is currently in compliance with all of its credit facilities except in Australia as discussed above.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.   The Company does not have any financial instruments classified as off-balance sheet (other than operating leases) as of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing business operations, including debt obligations that carry variable interest rates, foreign currency exchange risk, and resin price risk that could impact our financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows. We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through regular operating and financing activities, including the use of derivative financial instruments. Our intention is to use these derivative financial instruments as risk management tools and not for trading purposes or speculation.

As mentioned above, the Company’s revenues and profitability are impacted by changes in resin prices.  The Company uses various resins (primarily polyethylene) to manufacture its products.  As the price of resin increases or decreases, market prices for the Company’s products will generally also increase or decrease.  This will typically lead to


higher or lower average selling prices and will impact the Company’s operating income and operating margin.  The impact on operating income is due to a lag in matching the change in raw material cost of goods sold and the change in product sales prices.  As of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, the Company had $39.7 million and $36.3 million of raw material inventory and $31.0 million and $22.6 million of finished goods inventory, respectively.  The Company attempts to minimize its exposure to resin price changes by monitoring and carefully managing the quantity of its inventory on hand and product sales prices.

As of June 30, 2008, the Company had $66.0 million of net investment in foreign wholly-owned subsidiaries.  The Company does not hedge the foreign exchange rate risk inherent with this non-U.S. Dollar denominated investment.

The Company does enter into forward currency exchange contracts related to both future purchase obligations and other forecasted transactions denominated in non-functional currencies, primarily repayments of foreign currency intercompany transactions. Certain of these forward currency exchange contracts qualify as cash flow hedging instruments and are highly effective.  In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, as amended and interpreted (“SFAS No. 133”), the Company recognizes the amount of hedge ineffectiveness for these hedging instruments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.  The hedge ineffectiveness on the Company’s designated cash flow hedging instruments was not a significant amount for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.  The Company’s principal foreign currency exposures relate to the Euro, British Pound, Australian Dollar, New Zealand Dollar, Malaysian Ringgit and Brazilian Real.  The Company’s forward contracts have original maturities of one year or less. The following table includes the total value of foreign exchange contracts outstanding as of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007:

   
As of
   
June 30,
 
September 30,
   
2008
 
2007
     
Notional value
 
$11.4  million
 
$12.6 million
Fair market value
 
$0.5 million
 
$0.7 million
Maturity Dates
 
July 2008
 
October 2007
   
through November 2008
 
through December 2007

Because these intercompany lending transactions are denominated in various foreign currencies and are subject to financial exposure from foreign exchange rate movement from the date a loan is recorded to the date it is settled or revalued, any appreciation or depreciation of the foreign currencies in which the transactions are denominated could result in a gain or loss, respectively, to the Consolidated Statement of Operations, subject to forward currency exchange contracts that may be entered into. To mitigate this risk, the Company may enter into foreign currency exchange contracts.

         Interest Rate Swaps. The Company also enters into interest rate swap agreements that mitigate the exposure to interest rate risk by converting variable-rate debt to a fixed rate. The interest rate swap and instrument being hedged are marked to market in the balance sheet.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company entered into a Pay-Fixed / Receive Variable Interest Rate swap on its term loan in the U.S. with KeyBank/Wells Fargo of $11.7 million.  This swap locks in the Company’s interest rate on $11.7 million at 2.82% plus the credit spread on the debt.   The Company’s risk management objective with respect to this interest rate swap is to hedge the variability to changes in cash flows attributable to interest rate risk caused by changes in the benchmark interest rate (i.e. LIBOR), related to $11.7 million of the Company’s variable-rate debt.

As of June 30, 2008, the Company calculates the estimated fair value of the $11.7 million notional swap identified above to be an asset of $0.1 million.  The estimated fair value of the swap was calculated by obtaining a quotation from Wells Fargo at June 30, 2008.   The fair value is an estimate of the net amount that the Company would receive on June 30, 2008 if the agreement was transferred to another party or cancelled by the Company.

The Company’s variable interest rates subject the Company to the risks of increased interest costs associated with any upward movements in market interest rates.  As of June 30, 2008, the Company had $20.7 million of variable interest rate debt.  The Company’s variable interest rates are tied to various bank rates.  At June 30, 2008, based on our current level of borrowings, a 1% increase in interest rates would increase interest expense annually by approximately $0.2 million.

Foreign Currency Intercompany Accounts and Notes Receivable .  From time-to-time, the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries provide capital to foreign subsidiaries of the Company through U.S. dollar denominated interest bearing promissory notes.  In addition, certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries also provide access to capital to other foreign subsidiaries of the Company through foreign currency denominated interest bearing promissory notes.  Such funds are generally used by the Company’s foreign subsidiaries to purchase capital assets and/or for general working capital needs.  In addition, the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries sell products to the Company’s foreign subsidiaries in U.S. dollars on trade credit terms.  The Company’s foreign subsidiaries also sell products to other foreign subsidiaries of the Company denominated in foreign currencies that may not be the


functional currency of the foreign subsidiaries.  Because these intercompany debts are accounted for in the local functional currency of the foreign subsidiary, any appreciation or depreciation of the foreign currencies in which the transactions are denominated could result in a gain or loss, respectively, to the Consolidated Statement of Operations, subject to forward currency exchange contracts that may be entered into.  These intercompany loans are eliminated in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.  At June 30, 2008, the Company had the following significant outstanding intercompany amounts as described above:

Country of subsidiary with
 
Country of subsidiary with
 
Amount in US$ as of
 
Currency denomination
intercompany receivable
 
intercompany payable
 
June 30, 2008
 
of receivable
United States
 
Australia
 
$12.7 million
 
United States Dollar
Holland
 
United Kingdom
 
$2.5 million
 
Great Britain Pound
New Zealand
 
Australia
 
$2.4 million
 
New Zealand Dollar
United States
 
Malaysia
 
$1.4 million
 
United States Dollar
New Zealand
 
Malaysia
 
$1.3 million
 
New Zealand Dollar
New Zealand
 
United Arab Emirates
 
$1.1 million
 
New Zealand Dollar

ITEM 4.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of June 30, 2008, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b).  Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during our third fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
 
PART II    OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 .  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For a description of the Company’s legal proceedings, see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and Part I, Item 3 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed December 10, 2007.

ITEM 1A .  RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 7, under the heading "Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results.  There have been no material changes in our Risk Factors as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company.  Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.




ITEM 6 .  EXHIBITS

 
The following instruments and documents are included as Exhibits to this Form 10-Q:

Exhibit No.
 
Exhibit
31.1*
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and ICO, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241.
31.2*
Certification of Chief Financial Officer and ICO, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241.
  32.1**
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of ICO, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
  32.2**
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of ICO, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
*Filed herewith
**Furnished herewith



SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 
ICO, Inc.
 
(Registrant)
   
   
August  8, 2008
/s/ A. John Knapp, Jr.
 
A. John Knapp, Jr.
 
President, Chief Executive Officer, and
 
Director (Principal Executive Officer)
   
   
 
/s/ Bradley T. Leuschner
 
Bradley T. Leuschner
 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
   


 
- 31 -
Ico (NASDAQ:ICOC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024 Click Here for more Ico Charts.
Ico (NASDAQ:ICOC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024 Click Here for more Ico Charts.