UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
______________________________________________________________________________________________
FORM
10-Q
[X]
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
|
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
For
the quarterly period ended
June 30,
2008
|
|
OR
|
|
|
[ ]
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
|
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
_____
to
____
Commission
file number
0
-10068
ICO,
INC.
|
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
TEXAS
|
76-0566682
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
1811
Bering Drive, Suite 200
|
|
Houston,
Texas
|
77057
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
telephone number (713) 351-4100
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
YES
x
NO
o
Indicate
by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions
of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated
filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
x
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES
o
NO
x
There
were 27,723,723 shares of common stock without par value
outstanding
as of July 27, 2008
ICO
, INC.
INDEX
TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
|
Page
|
|
|
|
Item
1. Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAR
T I
― FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ICO,
INC.
C
ONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited
and in thousands, except share data)
|
|
June
30,
2008
|
|
|
September
30, 2007
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
3,909
|
|
|
$
|
8,561
|
|
Trade
receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
$2,936 and $2,714, respectively)
|
|
|
89,438
|
|
|
|
95,142
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
72,302
|
|
|
|
60,420
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
Prepaid
and other current assets
|
|
|
8,868
|
|
|
|
9,924
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
176,657
|
|
|
|
175,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
65,039
|
|
|
|
57,396
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
9,258
|
|
|
|
9,228
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
4,250
|
|
|
|
3,768
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
255,204
|
|
|
$
|
246,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
borrowings under credit facilities
|
|
$
|
13,468
|
|
|
$
|
16,133
|
|
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
17,089
|
|
|
|
11,611
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
54,601
|
|
|
|
66,906
|
|
Accrued
salaries and wages
|
|
|
7,010
|
|
|
|
7,313
|
|
Other
current liabilities
|
|
|
13,517
|
|
|
|
16,004
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
105,685
|
|
|
|
117,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
27,906
|
|
|
|
29,605
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
4,894
|
|
|
|
4,820
|
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
|
3,255
|
|
|
|
2,783
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
141,740
|
|
|
|
155,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
preferred stock, without par value –
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
and 345,000 shares authorized, respectively; 0 and 46,381 shares
issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares
issued and outstanding, respectively, with a liquidation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
preference
of $0 and $5,812, respectively
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Undesignated
preferred stock, without par value –
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
and 155,000 shares authorized, respectively; no shares
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
issued
and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, without par value – 50,000,000 shares authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,725,323
and 26,709,370 shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
54,302
|
|
|
|
47,659
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
72,158
|
|
|
|
74,920
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
10,823
|
|
|
|
5,416
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(23,819
|
)
|
|
|
(36,955
|
)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
113,464
|
|
|
|
91,042
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
255,204
|
|
|
$
|
246,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
ICO,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited
and in thousands, except share data)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
105,494
|
|
|
$
|
102,963
|
|
|
$
|
308,802
|
|
|
$
|
265,443
|
|
Services
|
|
|
10,224
|
|
|
|
10,415
|
|
|
|
29,907
|
|
|
|
28,915
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
|
115,718
|
|
|
|
113,378
|
|
|
|
338,709
|
|
|
|
294,358
|
|
Cost
and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales and services
(exclusive of depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shown below)
|
|
|
97,234
|
|
|
|
92,836
|
|
|
|
281,845
|
|
|
|
241,976
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative
|
|
|
10,441
|
|
|
|
9,727
|
|
|
|
31,431
|
|
|
|
27,440
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
|
1,855
|
|
|
|
5,580
|
|
|
|
5,466
|
|
Impairment, restructuring and
other costs (income)
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,756
|
)
|
|
|
(654
|
)
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
6,467
|
|
|
|
8,960
|
|
|
|
21,609
|
|
|
|
20,130
|
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense,
net
|
|
|
(1,039
|
)
|
|
|
(799
|
)
|
|
|
(3,158
|
)
|
|
|
(2,301
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
Income
from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
|
|
8,032
|
|
|
|
18,415
|
|
|
|
17,533
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
5,263
|
|
|
|
3,819
|
|
Income
from continuing operations
|
|
|
4,633
|
|
|
|
5,632
|
|
|
|
13,152
|
|
|
|
13,714
|
|
Income
(loss) from discontinued operations, net of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provision (benefit) for
income taxes of $0, ($10),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($9) and $765,
respectively
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
1,421
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
4,633
|
|
|
$
|
5,614
|
|
|
$
|
13,136
|
|
|
$
|
15,135
|
|
Preferred
Stock dividends
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
Net
gain on redemption of Preferred Stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,023
|
|
Net
income applicable to Common Stock
|
|
$
|
4,633
|
|
|
$
|
5,532
|
|
|
$
|
13,135
|
|
|
$
|
20,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
.17
|
|
|
$
|
.21
|
|
|
$
|
.48
|
|
|
$
|
.74
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
.06
|
|
Net
income per common share
|
|
$
|
.17
|
|
|
$
|
.21
|
|
|
$
|
.48
|
|
|
$
|
.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
.17
|
|
|
$
|
.20
|
|
|
$
|
.47
|
|
|
$
|
.49
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
.00
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
Net
income per common share
|
|
$
|
.17
|
|
|
$
|
.20
|
|
|
$
|
.47
|
|
|
$
|
.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
27,433,000
|
|
|
|
26,056,000
|
|
|
|
27,202,000
|
|
|
|
25,934,000
|
|
Diluted
weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
27,975,000
|
|
|
|
27,598,000
|
|
|
|
27,975,000
|
|
|
|
27,892,000
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
ICO,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
(Unaudited and in
thousands
)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
4,633
|
|
|
$
|
5,614
|
|
|
$
|
13,136
|
|
|
$
|
15,135
|
|
Other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
4,594
|
|
|
|
4,739
|
|
Unrealized
gain (loss) on derivative transactions
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income
|
|
$
|
5,207
|
|
|
$
|
7,240
|
|
|
$
|
18,543
|
|
|
$
|
19,593
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
ICO,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited and in
thousands
)
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Cash
flows provided by (used for) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
13,136
|
|
|
$
|
15,135
|
|
(Income)
loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(1,421
|
)
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
5,580
|
|
|
|
5,466
|
|
Gain
on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(654
|
)
|
Gain
on involuntary conversion of fixed assets
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities providing/(requiring) cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
10,444
|
|
|
|
(15,965
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(8,342
|
)
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
Income
taxes payable
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
(2,662
|
)
|
Deferred
taxes
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
(806
|
)
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
(14,847
|
)
|
|
|
8,507
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
(422
|
)
|
|
|
4,010
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities by continuing
operations
|
|
|
3,887
|
|
|
|
12,522
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used for) operating activities by
discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
3,828
|
|
|
|
13,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows used for investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
(11,026
|
)
|
|
|
(7,611
|
)
|
Proceeds
from dispositions of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
937
|
|
Cash
received from involuntary conversion of fixed assets
|
|
|
2,337
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net
cash used for investing activities for continuing
operations
|
|
|
(8,633
|
)
|
|
|
(6,674
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows used for financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock transactions
|
|
|
2,583
|
|
|
|
818
|
|
Redemption
of Preferred Stock
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
(28,531
|
)
|
Payment
of dividend on Preferred Stock
|
|
|
(1,312
|
)
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
Decrease
in short-term borrowings under credit facilities, net
|
|
|
(3,437
|
)
|
|
|
(2,904
|
)
|
Proceeds
from long-term debt
|
|
|
8,265
|
|
|
|
14,895
|
|
Repayments
of long-term debt
|
|
|
(6,001
|
)
|
|
|
(4,410
|
)
|
Debt
financing costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
Net
cash used for financing activities for continuing
operations
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(20,548
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rates on cash
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Net
decrease in cash and equivalents
|
|
|
(4,652
|
)
|
|
|
(13,438
|
)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
8,561
|
|
|
|
17,427
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
3,909
|
|
|
$
|
3,989
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1
.
BASIS OF FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The
interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments, which are, in
the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of
the interim period presented and have been prepared in accordance with the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”). All such adjustments are of a normal recurring
nature. The fiscal year-end balance sheet data was derived from
audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. The results of operations for the three and nine months
ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for
the year ended September 30, 2008. These interim financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the
notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2007. The accounting policies for the periods
presented are the same as described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial statements contained in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2007.
NOTE
2.
RECENTLY ISSUED
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS
No. 157,
Fair Value
Measurements
(“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines “fair value,”
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, rather, its
application will be made pursuant to other accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007,
and interim periods within those years. This standard will be
effective for the Company starting with our interim period ending December 31,
2008. The provisions of SFAS 157 are to be applied prospectively upon
adoption, except for limited specified exceptions. The Company does not
expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on its financial
position or results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 159,
The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115
(“SFAS 159”). Under SFAS 159, a company may
elect to measure eligible financial assets and financial liabilities at fair
value at specified election dates. Unrealized gains and losses on
items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings
at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently assessing
whether or not we will elect the fair value option.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations
(“SFAS
141 (R)”) and No. 160,
Noncontrolling interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements
(“SFAS 160”). The goal of
these standards is to improve, simplify, and converge internationally the
accounting for business combinations and the reporting of noncontrolling
interests in consolidated financial statements. The provisions of
SFAS 141 (R) and SFAS 160 are effective for the Company on October 1,
2009. As SFAS No. 141 will apply to future acquisitions, it is not
possible at this time for the Company to determine the impact of adopting this
standard.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (“SFAS 161”),
Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133.
This Statement changes the disclosure
requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are
required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c)
how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The
Company will be required to adopt this standard in the interim period ending
December 31, 2009. This Statement encourages, but does not require,
comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. We
are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new standard.
In April
2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets
("FSP FAS 142-3"). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors
that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to
determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets ("SFAS 142"). The intent of FSP FAS 142-3
is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible
asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the
fair value of the asset under SFAS 141(R) and other applicable accounting
literature. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company does not anticipate
that the adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 will have a material impact on its results of
operations or financial condition.
In June
2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted
in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities," ("FSP EITF
03-6-1"). This FSP addresses whether instruments granted in
share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting
and, therefore, need to be included in computing earnings per
|
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
share
under the two-class method described in SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per
Share." This FSP will be effective for the Company beginning with the
first quarter of fiscal 2010 and will be applied retrospectively. We
are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new standard.
NOTE
3.
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
During November 1993, the Company
completed its initial offering of the $6.75 Convertible Exchangeable Preferred
Stock (“Preferred Stock”). The shares of Preferred Stock were
evidenced by and traded as depositary certificates (“Depositary Shares”), each
representing 1/4 of a share of Preferred Stock. A total of 1,290,000
Depositary Shares were sold at a price of $25 per share. Each share
of Preferred Stock was convertible into 10.96 shares of the Company’s common
stock (“Common Stock”) (equivalent to 2.74 shares of Common Stock per Depositary
Share) at a conversion price of $9.125 per share of Common Stock.
During the quarter ended December 31,
2006, the Company repurchased 1,095,853 Depositary Shares for $26.00 per
Depositary Share, for total consideration of $28.5 million. The
dividends that were in arrears on these 1,095,853 Depositary Shares of $7.2
million were extinguished by the repurchase. This repurchase resulted
in a net gain of $6.0 million in the three months ended December 31,
2006. In September 2007, at the instruction of the holders of the
Preferred Stock, 8,624 Depositary Shares were converted into 23,622 shares of
Common Stock. Therefore, as of September 30, 2007, there were 185,523
Depositary Shares outstanding. Dividends in arrears of $6.33 per
Depositary Share on the outstanding 185,523 Depositary Shares as of September
30, 2007 aggregated $1.2 million. The $1.2 million of dividends in
arrears was declared for payment during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007
and was paid in October 2007. In addition, four quarterly dividends
aggregating $0.3 million or $1.6875 per Depositary Share were declared in fiscal
year 2007 (of which $0.2 million was paid during fiscal year 2007, with the
remaining fourth quarterly dividend aggregating $0.1 million recorded as a
payable as of September 30, 2007 and paid in October 2007).
On October 3, 2007, the Company
announced its plan to redeem all outstanding Depositary Shares representing the
Preferred Stock at the close of market on November 5, 2007. During
the time period between the referenced announcement and the redemption, at the
instruction of the shareholders, 177,518 Depositary Shares were converted into
486,321 shares of Common Stock. As a result, the Company recorded a
decrease to Additional Paid-In Capital of $4.4 million and an increase to Common
Stock of $4.4 million. The remaining 8,005 Depositary Shares
outstanding on November 5, 2007 were redeemed by the Company at $25 per
Depositary Share for a total consideration of $0.2 million, which was recorded
as a reduction to Additional Paid-In Capital. All of the outstanding
Depositary Shares representing the Preferred Stock were canceled by the Company
at the time of redemption. As of the close of business on November 5,
2007, no shares of Preferred Stock or Depositary Shares remain
outstanding.
A summary of the changes in the
stockholders’ equity accounts for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
Balance
at September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
26,709,370
|
|
|
$
|
47,659
|
|
|
$
|
74,920
|
|
|
$
|
5,416
|
|
|
$
|
(36,955
|
)
|
|
$
|
91,042
|
|
Issuance
of shares in connection with employee benefit plans
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
34,047
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
Issuance
of stock options
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
Issuance
of restricted stock
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
62,260
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
Exercise
of employee stock options
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
433,325
|
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,904
|
|
Preferred
Stock Conversion to Common Stock
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
486,321
|
|
|
|
4,438
|
|
|
|
(4,436
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Preferred
Stock redemption
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
Preferred
Stock dividends
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Translation
adjustment
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
4,594
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
4,594
|
|
Unrealized
net gain on foreign currency hedges
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
13,136
|
|
|
|
13,136
|
|
Balance
at June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
27,725,323
|
|
|
$
|
54,302
|
|
|
$
|
72,158
|
|
|
$
|
10,823
|
|
|
$
|
(23,819
|
)
|
|
$
|
113,464
|
|
NOTE
4.
EARNINGS PER
SHARE
The Company presents both basic and
diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) amounts. Basic EPS is computed by
dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number
of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS assumes the
conversion of all dilutive securities.
|
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share
for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, and 2007 are presented
below:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Basic
income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
.17
|
|
|
$
|
.21
|
|
|
$
|
.48
|
|
|
$
|
.74
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
.06
|
|
Basic
net income per common share
|
|
$
|
.17
|
|
|
$
|
.21
|
|
|
$
|
.48
|
|
|
$
|
.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income
per
share
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
.17
|
|
|
$
|
.20
|
|
|
$
|
.47
|
|
|
$
|
.49
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
Diluted
net income per common share
|
|
$
|
.17
|
|
|
$
|
.20
|
|
|
$
|
.47
|
|
|
$
|
.54
|
|
For the nine months ended June 30,
2007, the Company included the net gain on redemption of 84.9% of the Company’s
outstanding Preferred Stock of $6.0 million in computing basic earnings per
share, but the gain is excluded in the computation of diluted earnings per
share. Refer to the following tables for a reconciliation of the
amounts used in computing basic and diluted earnings per share.
The following presents the
reconciliation from net income to net income applicable to Common Stock used in
computing basic earnings per share:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
4,633
|
|
|
$
|
5,614
|
|
|
$
|
13,136
|
|
|
$
|
15,135
|
|
Preferred
stock dividends declared
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
Net
gain on redemption of Preferred Stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,023
|
|
Net
income applicable to Common Stock
|
|
$
|
4,633
|
|
|
$
|
5,532
|
|
|
$
|
13,135
|
|
|
$
|
20,686
|
|
In computing diluted earnings per
share, the Company follows the if-converted method, which assumes the conversion
of dilutive convertible securities. For the nine months ended June
30, 2007, the Preferred Stock redeemed was treated as being converted at the
beginning of the nine months ended June 30, 2007. Consequently, the
net gain on redemption of Preferred Stock and the undeclared and unpaid
Preferred Stock dividends were not included in computing net income applicable
to Common Stock. The following presents the reconciliation from net
income to net income applicable to Common Stock used in computing diluted
earnings per share:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
4,633
|
|
|
$
|
5,614
|
|
|
$
|
13,136
|
|
|
$
|
15,135
|
|
Preferred
stock dividends
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net
income applicable to Common Stock
|
|
$
|
4,633
|
|
|
$
|
5,614
|
|
|
$
|
13,136
|
|
|
$
|
15,135
|
|
The difference between basic and
diluted weighted-average common shares results from the assumed exercise of
outstanding stock options calculated using the treasury stock method, impact
from outstanding restricted stock awards using the treasury stock method and
assumed conversion of the Preferred Stock redeemed during the nine months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007. The following presents the number of
incremental weighted-average shares used in computing diluted per share
amounts:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
Weighted-average
shares outstanding:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
27,433,000
|
|
|
|
26,056,000
|
|
|
|
27,202,000
|
|
|
|
25,934,000
|
|
Incremental
shares from Preferred Stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
532,000
|
|
|
|
44,000
|
|
|
|
1,013,000
|
|
Incremental
shares from stock based compensation
|
|
|
542,000
|
|
|
|
1,010,000
|
|
|
|
729,000
|
|
|
|
945,000
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
27,975,000
|
|
|
|
27,598,000
|
|
|
|
27,975,000
|
|
|
|
27,892,000
|
|
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The total amount of anti-dilutive
securities for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were as
follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Total
shares of anti-dilutive securities
|
|
|
841,000
|
|
|
|
777,000
|
|
|
|
682,000
|
|
|
|
841,000
|
|
NOTE
5.
INVENTORIES
Inventories
consisted of the following:
|
|
June
30,
2008
|
|
|
September
30,
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
Raw
materials
|
|
$
|
39,707
|
|
|
$
|
36,268
|
|
Finished
goods
|
|
|
31,001
|
|
|
|
22,621
|
|
Supplies
|
|
|
1,594
|
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
Total
inventory
|
|
$
|
72,302
|
|
|
$
|
60,420
|
|
NOTE
6.
INCOME
TAXES
The amounts of income before income
taxes attributable to domestic and foreign continuing operations are as
follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
2,239
|
|
|
$
|
3,453
|
|
|
$
|
8,710
|
|
|
$
|
8,801
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
|
4,579
|
|
|
|
9,705
|
|
|
|
8,732
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,593
|
|
|
$
|
8,032
|
|
|
$
|
18,415
|
|
|
$
|
17,533
|
|
The
provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
1,253
|
|
|
$
|
1,893
|
|
|
$
|
5,272
|
|
|
$
|
4,594
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(775
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
960
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
|
$
|
5,263
|
|
|
$
|
3,819
|
|
A reconciliation of the income tax
expense for continuing operations at the federal statutory rate of 35% to the
Company's effective rate for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007 is as follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
Tax
expense at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
1,959
|
|
|
$
|
2,811
|
|
|
$
|
6,447
|
|
|
$
|
6,136
|
|
Disqualifying
disposition of stock options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Chargeback
Reimbursement
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
Foreign
tax rate differential
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
(304
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
Change
in the deferred tax assets valuation allowance
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(699
|
)
|
|
|
(1,595
|
)
|
State
taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Tax
rate change
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Adjustment
to tax contingency
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
Non-deductible
expenses and other, net
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
Income
tax provision
|
|
$
|
960
|
|
|
$
|
2,400
|
|
|
$
|
5,263
|
|
|
$
|
3,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective
income tax rate
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
29%
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company reversed the valuation allowance
against the deferred tax asset of its Brazilian subsidiary in the amount of $0.7
million. This was based on the Company’s analysis of the
profitability of the Brazilian subsidiary. The Brazilian subsidiary
has cumulative taxable income from 2004 to 2007 and is projecting taxable income
in the future. In addition to this, net operating losses in Brazil do
not expire.
The
Company does not provide for U.S. income taxes on foreign subsidiaries’
undistributed earnings intended to be permanently reinvested in foreign
operations. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of
additional tax that might be payable should the earnings be remitted or should
the Company sell its stock in the subsidiaries. The Company has
unremitted earnings from foreign subsidiaries of approximately $23.8
million. The Company has determined that the undistributed earnings
of foreign subsidiaries, exclusive of those repatriated under the American Jobs
Creation Act, will be permanently reinvested.
In June
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No.
48,
Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(“FIN 48”),
which clarifies the accounting and disclosure for “uncertain tax positions” (as
the term is defined in FIN 48). FIN 48 seeks to reduce the diversity
in practice associated with certain aspects of the recognition and measurement
related to accounting for income taxes. On October 1, 2007, the
Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48. The adoption of FIN 48 did
not have a material impact on our financial position or results of
operations. The Company also adopted the accounting policy to
classify any interest and penalties on unrecognized tax positions as income tax
in the event any arise in the future. The Company does not anticipate
a material change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the
next twelve months.
The Company files income tax returns in
the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various states and foreign
jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. income tax
examinations for periods preceding 2005. In our other major tax
jurisdictions, the earliest years remaining open to examination are as follows:
France - 2005, Australia – 2003, New Zealand - 2003 and the Netherlands –
2002. In addition, in our other foreign jurisdictions, we are no
longer subject to tax examinations for periods preceding 2001. In
April 2008, the Company received a letter from the Internal Revenue Service
notifying the Company that the 2006 federal income tax return had been selected
for examination. The Internal Revenue Service review began in June
2008 and is currently ongoing.
NOTE
7.
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
The Company has letters of credit
outstanding in the United States of approximately $1.9 million as of June 30,
2008 and September 30, 2007, and foreign letters of credit outstanding of $1.2
million and $11.8 million as of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007,
respectively.
Thibodaux
Litigation
. Since September 2004, the Company has been a
defendant in litigation pending in District Court in the Parish of Orleans,
Louisiana (the “Thibodaux Lawsuit”) filed by C.M. Thibodaux Company
(“Thibodaux”). Other defendants in the case include Intracoastal
Tubular Services, Inc. (“ITCO”), thirty different oil companies (the “Oil
Company Defendants”), several insurance companies and four trucking
companies. Thibodaux, the owner of industrial property located in
Amelia, Louisiana that has historically been leased to tenants conducting
oilfield services businesses, contends that the property has been contaminated
with naturally occurring radioactive material (“NORM”). NORM is found
naturally occurring in the earth, and when pipe is removed from the ground it is
not uncommon for the corroded rust on the pipe to contain very small amounts of
NORM. The Company’s former Oilfield Services business leased a
portion of the subject property from Thibodaux. Thibodaux contends
that the subject property was contaminated with NORM generated during the
servicing of oilfield equipment by the Company and other tenants, and further
alleges that the Oil Company defendants (customers of Thibodaux’s tenants) and
trucking companies (which delivered tubular goods and other oilfield equipment
to the subject property) allowed or caused the uncontrolled dispersal of NORM on
Thibodaux’s property. Thibodaux seeks recovery from the Defendants
for clean-up costs, diminution or complete loss of property values, and other
damages. Discovery in the Thibodaux Lawsuit is ongoing, and the
Company intends to assert a vigorous defense in this litigation. At
this time, the Company does not believe it has any liability in this
matter. In the event the Company is found to have liability, the
Company believes it has insurance coverage applicable to this claim subject to a
$1.0 million self-insured retention. An adverse judgment against the
Company, combined with a lack of insurance coverage, could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations
and/or cash flows.
Environmental
Remediation.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (“CERCLA”), also known as
“Superfund,” and comparable state laws impose liability without regard to fault
or the legality of the original conduct on certain classes of persons who are
considered to be responsible for the release of a “hazardous substance” into the
environment. These persons include the owner or operator of the
disposal site or the site where the release occurred, and companies that
disposed or arranged for the disposal of the hazardous substances at the site
where the release occurred. Under CERCLA, such persons may be subject
to joint and several liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous
substances that have been released into the environment, for damages to natural
resources, and for the costs of
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
certain
health studies, and it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other
third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly
caused by the release of hazardous substances into the
environment. The Company is identified as one of many potentially
responsible parties (“PRPs”) under CERCLA in four claims relating to the
following sites: (i) the French Limited site northeast of Houston, Texas; (ii)
the Sheridan Disposal Services site near Hempstead, Texas; (iii) the Combe Fill
South Landfill site in Morris County, New Jersey; and (iv) the Malone Service
Company (MSC) Superfund site in Texas City, Texas.
Active remediation of the French
Limited site was concluded in 1996. If the Company is required to
contribute to the costs of additional remediation at that site, such additional
costs are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the
Company. With regard to the three remaining Superfund sites, the
Company believes it remains responsible for only
de minimus
levels of wastes
contributed to those sites, and that there are numerous other PRPs identified at
each of these sites that contributed significantly larger volumes of wastes to
the sites. The Company expects that its share of any allocated
liability for cleanup of the Sheridan Disposal Services site and the Combe Fill
South Landfill site will not be significant, and based on the Company’s current
understanding of the remedial status of each of these sites, together with its
relative position in comparison to the many other PRPs at those sites, the
Company does not expect its future environmental liability with respect to those
sites to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition,
results of operation, and/or cash flows. With regard to the MSC site,
in fiscal year 2005 the Company estimated the Company’s exposure and accrued a
liability in that amount, based on settlement offers made to PRPs by the
Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) in fiscal year 2005 and the Company’s
settlement discussions at that time. The EPA subsequently withdrew
its settlement offers to PRPs, in order to process additional evidence of
transactions at the MSC site, and the EPA is expected to issue a new allocation
to the PRPs, upon which revised settlement offers are expected. The
Company does not expect the eventual outcome with respect to the MSC site to
have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of
operations and/or cash flows.
Other Legal
Proceedings.
The Company is also named as a defendant in
certain other lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of
business. The outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted with
certainty, but the Company does not believe they will have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash
flows.
NOTE
8.
DEBT
Term debt at June 30, 2008 and
September 30, 2007 consisted of the following.
|
|
June
30,
2008
|
|
|
September
30,
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
Term
loan of ICO, Inc. under the terms of the Company’s domestic Credit
Agreement with Key Bank collateralized by assets of the Company’s
subsidiaries. Principal and interest paid quarterly through
October 2011. Interest rate as of June 30, 2008 was
4.4%.
|
|
$
|
10,833
|
|
|
$
|
13,333
|
|
Term
loan of ICO, Inc. under the terms of the Company’s domestic Credit
agreement with Key Bank collaterized by assets of the Company’s
subsidiaries. Principal and interest paid quarterly through
September 2012. Interest rate as of June 30, 2008 was
5.7%.
|
|
|
4,722
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Term
loan of the Company’s Italian subsidiary, collateralized by a mortgage
over the subsidiary’s real estate. Principal and interest paid
quarterly with a fixed interest rate of 5.2% through June
2016.
|
|
|
6,608
|
|
|
|
6,408
|
|
Various
other U.S. loans of the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries collateralized by
mortgages on land and buildings and other assets of the
subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2008, these loans had a weighted
average interest rate of 6.0% with maturity dates between November 2008
and May 2021. The interest and principal payments are made
monthly.
|
|
|
8,304
|
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
Various
other loans provided by foreign banks of the Company’s foreign
subsidiaries collateralized by mortgages on land and buildings and other
assets of the subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2008, these loans
had a weighted average interest rate of 7.2% with maturity dates between
August 2008 and March 2015. The interest and principal payments
are made monthly or quarterly.
|
|
|
14,528
|
|
|
|
12,695
|
|
Total
term debt
|
|
|
44,995
|
|
|
|
41,216
|
|
Less
current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
17,089
|
|
|
|
11,611
|
|
Long-term
debt less current maturities
|
|
$
|
27,906
|
|
|
$
|
29,605
|
|
The Company maintains several lines of
credit. The facilities are collateralized by certain assets of the
Company. The following table presents the borrowing capacity,
outstanding borrowings and net availability under the various credit facilities
in the Company’s domestic and foreign operations.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
As
of
|
|
|
As
of
|
|
|
As
of
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Millions)
|
|
Borrowing Capacity
(a)
|
|
$
|
22.9
|
|
|
$
|
28.1
|
|
|
$
|
58.6
|
|
|
$
|
58.6
|
|
|
$
|
81.5
|
|
|
$
|
86.7
|
|
Outstanding
Borrowings
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
Net
availability
|
|
$
|
22.5
|
|
|
$
|
28.1
|
|
|
$
|
45.5
|
|
|
$
|
42.5
|
|
|
$
|
68.0
|
|
|
$
|
70.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Based
on the credit facility limits less outstanding letters of
credit.
|
|
The Company maintains a Credit
Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with KeyBank National Association and Wells
Fargo Bank National Association (collectively referred to herein as “KeyBank”),
with a maturity date of October 2012. The KeyBank Credit Agreement
consists of a $30.0 million revolving credit facility, a five year $15.0 million
term loan (of which $10.8 million remains outstanding as of June 30, 2008) and
through an amendment in May 2008, an additional $5.0 million five year term
loan. The KeyBank Credit Agreement contains a variable interest rate
and contains certain financial and nonfinancial covenants. The borrowing
capacity of the $30.0 million revolving credit facility varies based upon the
levels of domestic cash, receivables and inventory. In April 2008, the
Company entered into an interest rate swap on its $10.8 million term loan that
essentially fixed the interest rate at 4.32%, subject to changes in the
Company’s leverage ratio. In July 2008, the Company entered into an
interest rate swap on its $4.7 million term loan essentially fixing the interest
rate at 5.69%, subject to changes in the Company’s leverage ratio.
The Company has various foreign
credit facilities in eight foreign countries. The available credit
under these facilities varies based either on the levels of accounts receivable
within the foreign subsidiary, or is a fixed amount. The foreign
credit facilities, which carry various financial covenants, are collateralized
by assets owned by the foreign subsidiaries.
At June 30, 2008, the Company’s
Australian subsidiary was in violation of a financial debt covenant related to
$4.9 million of term debt and $5.1 million of short term borrowings under its
credit facility with its lender in Australia. Of the $45.5 million of
total foreign credit availability as of June 30, 2008, $0.7 million related to
the Company’s Australian subsidiary. The Australian covenant not met
related to a metric of profitability compared to interest
expense. The Company is in the process of obtaining a waiver from its
lender in Australia. The Company has classified all of the Australian
term debt as current as of June 30, 2008. Because the Company’s
Australian subsidiary was in violation of a debt covenant as of June 30, 2008,
and the total debt outstanding was over $7.5 million, the Company was in
violation of its Credit Agreement with KeyBank. The Company has
obtained a waiver from KeyBank for this violation.
As of
June 30, 2007, the Company was in violation of financial debt covenants under
credit facilities in Australia, New Zealand and Malaysia. Because of
the violations under credit facilities in Australia and Malaysia, the Company
was in violation of its Credit Agreement with KeyBank. The Company
obtained waivers from KeyBank and from its New Zealand lender.
The
Company is currently in compliance with all of its credit facilities except for
its lender in Australia as discussed above.
NOTE
9.
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT
PLANS
The Company maintains several defined
contribution plans that cover domestic and foreign employees who meet certain
eligibility requirements related to age and period of service with the
Company. The plan in which each employee is eligible to participate
depends upon the subsidiary for which the employee works. All plans
have a salary deferral feature that enables participating employees to
contribute up to a certain percentage of their earnings, subject to governmental
regulations. Many of the foreign plans require the Company to match
employees’ contributions in cash. Employee contributions to the
Company’s domestic 401(k) plan have historically been voluntarily matched by the
Company with shares of ICO Common Stock. Both foreign and domestic
employees’ interests in Company matching contributions are generally vested
immediately upon contribution.
The
Company maintains a defined benefit plan for employees of the Company’s Dutch
operating subsidiary (the “Dutch Plan”). Participants are responsible for a
portion of the cost associated with the Dutch Plan, which provides retirement
benefits at the normal retirement age of 65. This Dutch Plan is insured by an
insurance contract with Aegon Levensverzekering N.V. ("Aegon"), located in The
Hague, The Netherlands. The Aegon insurance contract guarantees the
funding of the Company’s future pension obligations under the Dutch
Plan. Pursuant to the Aegon contract, Aegon is responsible for
payment of all future obligations under the provisions of the Dutch Plan, while
the Company pays annual insurance premiums to Aegon. Payment of the insurance
premiums by the Company constitutes an unconditional and irrevocable transfer of
the related pension obligation
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
under the
Dutch Plan from the Company to Aegon. Currently, Aegon’s Standard and
Poor’s financial strength rating is AA. The premiums paid by the
Company for the Aegon insurance contracts are included in pension
expense.
The
Company also maintains several termination plans, usually mandated by law,
within certain of its foreign subsidiaries, which plans provide for a one-time
payment to a covered employee upon the employee’s termination of
employment.
The amount of defined
contribution plan expense for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 was
$0.4 million and $1.2 million compared to $0.2 million and $0.8 million for the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2007. The amount of defined
benefit plan pension expense for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008
was $0.1 million and $0.3 million compared to $0.2 million and $0.5 million for
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007.
NOTE
10.
IMPAIRMENT, RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER COSTS (INCOME)
On July 2, 2007, the Company’s facility
in New Jersey suffered a fire that damaged certain equipment and one of the
facility’s buildings. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, the
Company recorded a receivable for $1.6 million related to its initial claims for
recovery from its insurance carrier. The Company received those funds
plus an additional $0.1 million during the second quarter of fiscal
2008. Additionally, the Company recorded a receivable in the second
quarter of fiscal 2008 for $1.8 million for further claims of recovery from its
insurance carrier related to damaged equipment as well as reimbursement for
business interruption expenses and lost income as a result of the 2007
fire. The $1.8 million was received in April 2008. During
the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded an additional
insurance receivable of $0.5 million. During the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2008, the Company incurred additional costs related to the
fire of $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively. As a result of
the above, the Company recorded a net gain of $0.4 million and $1.8 million
during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, in
impairment, restructuring and other costs (income).
For the nine months ended June 30,
2008, the Company has received in aggregate $3.5 million from its insurance
carrier for reimbursements of costs associated with the July 2007 fire in its
New Jersey facility, $2.3 million of which is classified in the statement of
cash flows as investing activities. The remaining $1.2 million
received is reflected in the statement of cash flows as operating
activities.
NOTE
11.
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS
During fiscal year 2002, the Company
completed the sale of substantially all of its Oilfield Services business to
National Oilwell Varco, Inc., formerly Varco International, Inc. The
Oilfield Services results of operations are presented as discontinued
operations, net of income taxes, in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations. Legal fees and other expenses incurred related to
discontinued operations are expensed as incurred to discontinued
operations.
The income from discontinued operations
during the nine months ended June 30, 2007 relates to the $2.3 million
settlement the Company entered into with its insurance carrier related to the
indemnity claims asserted by National Oilwell Varco, Inc.
NOTE
12.
QUANTITATIVE AND
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to certain market risks
as part of our ongoing business operations, including debt obligations that
carry variable interest rates, foreign currency exchange risk, and resin price
risk that could impact our financial condition, results of operations and/or
cash flows. We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through
regular operating and financing activities, including the use of derivative
financial instruments. Our intention is to use these derivative financial
instruments as risk management tools and not for trading purposes or
speculation.
As mentioned above, the Company’s
revenues and profitability are impacted by changes in resin
prices. The Company uses various resins (primarily polyethylene) to
manufacture its products. As the price of resin increases or
decreases, market prices for the Company’s products will also generally increase
or decrease. This will typically lead to higher or lower average
selling prices and will impact the Company’s operating income and operating
margin. The impact on operating income is due to a lag in matching
the change in raw material cost of goods sold and the change in product sales
prices. As of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, the Company had
$39.7 million and $36.3 million of raw material inventory and $31.0 million and
$22.6 million of finished goods inventory, respectively. The Company
attempts to minimize its exposure to resin price changes by monitoring and
carefully managing the quantity of its inventory on hand and product sales
prices.
As of
June 30, 2008, the Company had $66.0 million of net investment in foreign
wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company does not hedge the foreign
exchange rate risk inherent with this non-U.S. Dollar denominated
investment.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The Company does enter into forward
currency exchange contracts related to both future purchase obligations and
other forecasted transactions denominated in non-functional currencies,
primarily repayments of foreign currency intercompany transactions. Certain of
these forward currency exchange contracts qualify as cash flow hedging
instruments and
are
highly effective. In accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133, as amended and interpreted (“SFAS No. 133”), the
Company recognizes the amount of hedge ineffectiveness for these hedging
instruments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The hedge
ineffectiveness on the Company’s designated cash flow hedging instruments was
not a significant amount for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively. The Company’s principal foreign currency
exposures relate to the Euro, British Pound, Australian Dollar, New Zealand
Dollar, Malaysian Ringgit and Brazilian Real. The Company’s forward
contracts have original maturities of one year or less. The following table
includes the total value of foreign exchange contracts outstanding as of June
30, 2008 and September 30, 2007:
|
|
As
of
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Notional
value
|
|
$11.4 million
|
|
$12.6
million
|
Fair
market value
|
|
$0.5
million
|
|
$0.7
million
|
Maturity
Dates
|
|
July
2008
|
|
October
2007
|
|
|
through
November 2008
|
|
through
December 2007
|
When it is determined that a derivative
has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, or that forecasted transactions have
not occurred as specified in the hedge documentation, hedge accounting is
discontinued prospectively. As a result, these derivatives are marked
to market, with the resulting gains and losses recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
Foreign Currency Intercompany
Accounts and Notes Receivable
. As mentioned above, from
time-to-time, the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries provide capital to foreign
subsidiaries of the Company through U.S. dollar denominated interest bearing
promissory notes. In addition, certain of the Company’s foreign
subsidiaries also provide access to capital to other foreign subsidiaries of the
Company through foreign currency denominated interest bearing promissory
notes. Such funds are generally used by the Company’s foreign
subsidiaries to purchase capital assets and/or for general working capital
needs. The Company’s U.S. subsidiaries also sell products to the
Company’s foreign subsidiaries in U.S. dollars on trade credit
terms. In addition, the Company’s foreign subsidiaries sell products
to other foreign subsidiaries of the Company denominated in foreign currencies
that may not be the functional currency of the foreign
subsidiaries. These intercompany debts are accounted for in the local
functional currency of the foreign subsidiary, and are eliminated in the
Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. At June 30, 2008, the Company
had the following significant outstanding intercompany amounts as described
above:
Country
of subsidiary with
|
|
Country
of subsidiary with
|
|
Amount
in US$ as of
|
|
Currency
denomination
|
intercompany
receivable
|
|
intercompany
payable
|
|
June
30, 2008
|
|
of
receivable
|
United
States
|
|
Australia
|
|
$12.7
million
|
|
United
States Dollar
|
Holland
|
|
United
Kingdom
|
|
$2.5
million
|
|
Great
Britain Pound
|
New
Zealand
|
|
Australia
|
|
$2.4
million
|
|
New
Zealand Dollar
|
United
States
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
$1.4
million
|
|
United
States Dollar
|
New
Zealand
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
$1.3
million
|
|
New
Zealand Dollar
|
New
Zealand
|
|
United
Arab Emirates
|
|
$1.1
million
|
|
New
Zealand Dollar
|
Because these intercompany lending
transactions are denominated in various foreign currencies and are subject to
financial exposure from foreign exchange rate movement from the date a loan is
recorded to the date it is settled or revalued, any appreciation or depreciation
of the foreign currencies in which the transactions are denominated could result
in a gain or loss, respectively, to the Consolidated Statement of Operations,
subject to forward currency exchange contracts that may be entered into. To
mitigate this risk, the Company may enter into foreign currency exchange
contracts.
Interest Rate Swaps.
The
Company also enters into interest rate swap agreements that mitigate the
exposure to interest rate risk by converting variable-rate debt to a fixed rate.
The interest rate swap and instrument being hedged are marked to market in the
balance sheet.
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company entered into a Pay-Fixed / Receive
Variable Interest Rate swap on its term loan in the U.S. with KeyBank/Wells
Fargo of $11.7 million. This swap locks in the Company’s interest
rate on $11.7 million at 2.82% plus the credit spread on the
debt. The Company’s risk management objective with respect to
this interest rate swap is to hedge the variability to changes in cash flows
attributable to interest rate risk caused by changes in the benchmark interest
rate (i.e. LIBOR), related to $11.7 million of the Company’s variable-rate
debt.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
As of June 30, 2008, the Company
calculated the estimated fair value of the $11.7 million notional swap
identified above to be an asset of $0.1 million. The estimated fair
value of the swap was calculated by obtaining a quotation from Wells Fargo at
June 30, 2008. The fair value is an estimate of the net amount that
the Company would receive on June 30, 2008 if the agreement was transferred to
another party or cancelled by the Company.
NOTE
13.
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
Our
management structure and reportable segments are organized into five business
segments referred to as ICO Polymers North America, ICO Brazil, Bayshore
Industrial, ICO Europe and ICO Asia Pacific. This organization is
consistent with the way information is reviewed and decisions are made by
executive management.
ICO Polymers North America, ICO Brazil, ICO Europe and ICO Asia Pacific
primarily produce competitively priced engineered polymer powders for the
rotational molding industry as well as other specialty markets for powdered
polymers, including masterbatch and concentrate producers, users of
polymer-based metal coatings, and non-woven textile
markets. Additionally, these segments provide specialty size
reduction services on a tolling basis. “Tolling” refers to processing
customer owned material for a service fee. The Bayshore Industrial
segment designs and produces proprietary concentrates, masterbatches and
specialty compounds, primarily for the plastic film industry, in North America
and in selected export markets. The Company’s European segment
includes operations in France, Holland, Italy and the U.K. The
Company’s Asia Pacific segment includes operations in Australia, Malaysia, New
Zealand and the United Arab Emirates.
Nine
Months Ended
June
30, 2008
|
|
Revenue
From
External
Customers
|
|
|
Inter-
Segment
Revenues
|
|
|
Operating
Income
(Loss)
|
|
|
Depreciation
and
Amortization
|
|
|
Impairment,
Restructuring
and Other
Costs (Income)
(a)
|
|
Expenditures
for
Additions
to
Long-Lived
Assets
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
ICO
Europe
|
|
$
|
158,720
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
10,419
|
|
|
$
|
1,745
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
Bayshore
Industrial
|
|
|
71,563
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
8,755
|
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
ICO
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
58,989
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,394
|
|
ICO
Polymers North America
|
|
|
34,971
|
|
|
|
3,448
|
|
|
|
5,194
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
(1,802
|
)
|
|
|
6,431
|
|
ICO
Brazil
|
|
|
14,466
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
Total
from Reportable Segments
|
|
|
338,709
|
|
|
|
4,286
|
|
|
|
26,533
|
|
|
|
5,465
|
|
|
|
(1,756
|
)
|
|
|
10,971
|
|
Unallocated
General Corporate
Expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,924
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
338,709
|
|
|
$
|
4,286
|
|
|
$
|
21,609
|
|
|
$
|
5,580
|
|
|
$
|
(1,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,026
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
June
30, 2007
|
|
Revenue
From
External
Customers
|
|
|
Inter-
Segment
Revenues
|
|
|
Operating
Income
(Loss)
|
|
|
Depreciation
and
Amortization
|
|
|
Impairment,
Restructuring
and Other
Costs (Income)
(a)
|
|
Expenditures
for
Additions
to
Long-Lived
Assets
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
ICO
Europe
|
|
$
|
124,178
|
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
6,559
|
|
|
$
|
2,054
|
|
|
$
|
(625
|
)
|
|
$
|
912
|
|
Bayshore
Industrial
|
|
|
69,465
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
9,642
|
|
|
|
1,117
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
ICO
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
59,624
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
4,161
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
ICO
Polymers North America
|
|
|
31,486
|
|
|
|
3,153
|
|
|
|
4,313
|
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
ICO
Brazil
|
|
|
9,605
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Total
from Reportable Segments
|
|
|
294,358
|
|
|
|
3,671
|
|
|
|
24,942
|
|
|
|
5,314
|
|
|
|
(654
|
)
|
|
|
7,510
|
|
Unallocated
General Corporate
Expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,812
|
)
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
294,358
|
|
|
$
|
3,671
|
|
|
$
|
20,130
|
|
|
$
|
5,466
|
|
|
$
|
(654
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,611
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2008
|
|
Revenue
From
External
Customers
|
|
|
Inter-
Segment
Revenues
|
|
|
Operating
Income
(Loss)
(a)
|
|
|
Depreciation
and
Amortization
|
|
|
Impairment,
Restructuring
and Other
Costs (Income)
(a)
|
|
Expenditures
for
Additions
to
Long-Lived
Assets
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
ICO
Europe
|
|
$
|
58,226
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
3,901
|
|
|
$
|
603
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
Bayshore
Industrial
|
|
|
19,044
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
2,045
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
ICO
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
21,417
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
ICO
Polymers North America
|
|
|
12,081
|
|
|
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
(363
|
)
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
ICO
Brazil
|
|
|
4,950
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
Total
from Reportable Segments
|
|
|
115,718
|
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
|
|
7,970
|
|
|
|
1,893
|
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
3,920
|
|
Unallocated
General Corporate
Expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,503
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
115,718
|
|
|
$
|
1,480
|
|
|
$
|
6,467
|
|
|
$
|
1,932
|
|
|
$
|
(356
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,941
|
|
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2007
|
|
Revenue
From
External
Customers
|
|
|
Inter-
Segment
Revenues
|
|
|
Operating
Income
(Loss)
|
|
|
Depreciation
and
Amortization
|
|
|
Impairment,
Restructuring
and Other
Costs (Income)
(a)
|
|
|
Expenditures
for
Additions
to
Long-Lived
Assets
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
ICO
Europe
|
|
$
|
47,797
|
|
|
$
|
361
|
|
|
$
|
3,376
|
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
408
|
|
Bayshore
Industrial
|
|
|
25,684
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3,329
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
ICO
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
25,528
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
2,315
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
ICO
Polymers North America
|
|
|
11,083
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
ICO
Brazil
|
|
|
3,286
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Total
from Reportable Segments
|
|
|
113,378
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
10,636
|
|
|
|
1,804
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,463
|
|
Unallocated
General Corporate
Expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,676
|
)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
113,378
|
|
|
$
|
1,447
|
|
|
$
|
8,960
|
|
|
$
|
1,855
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3,514
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
As
of
June
30,
2008
(c)
|
|
|
As
of
September
30,
2007
(c)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
ICO
Europe
|
|
$
|
112,620
|
|
|
$
|
99,357
|
|
Bayshore
Industrial
|
|
|
37,071
|
|
|
|
50,487
|
|
ICO
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
65,981
|
|
|
|
60,817
|
|
ICO
Polymers North America
|
|
|
28,889
|
|
|
|
24,478
|
|
ICO
Brazil
|
|
|
8,504
|
|
|
|
6,563
|
|
Total
from Reportable Segments
|
|
|
253,065
|
|
|
|
241,702
|
|
Other
(b)
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
|
|
4,515
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
255,204
|
|
|
$
|
246,217
|
|
(a)
Impairment, restructuring and other costs (income) are included in operating
income (loss).
(b) Consists of unallocated Corporate
assets.
(c)
Includes goodwill of $4.8 million and $4.7 million for ICO Asia Pacific as of
June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, respectively, and $4.5 million for
Bayshore Industrial as of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007.
A
reconciliation of total reportable segment operating income to income from
continuing operations before income taxes is as follows:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
Reportable
segments operating income
|
|
$
|
7,970
|
|
|
$
|
10,636
|
|
|
$
|
26,533
|
|
|
$
|
24,942
|
|
Unallocated
general corporate expense
|
|
|
(1,503
|
)
|
|
|
(1,676
|
)
|
|
|
(4,924
|
)
|
|
|
(4,812
|
)
|
Consolidated
operating income
|
|
|
6,467
|
|
|
|
8,960
|
|
|
|
21,609
|
|
|
|
20,130
|
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense,
net
|
|
|
(1,039
|
)
|
|
|
(799
|
)
|
|
|
(3,158
|
)
|
|
|
(2,301
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
Income
from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
5,593
|
|
|
$
|
8,032
|
|
|
$
|
18,415
|
|
|
$
|
17,533
|
|
NOTE
14.
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
On July
26, 2008, the Company’s facility in the state of New Jersey suffered a fire
which caused damage to one of the facility’s buildings. The Company
has been in the process of relocating its production to Pennsylvania, and at the
time of this second fire, only one-third of the production lines in New Jersey
were operating. The Company expects to make claims for recovery under
its insurance policy which is subject to a deductible of $0.3
million. Additionally, the Company will make claims under an
insurance policy for business interruption to compensate for additional expenses
and loss of profit following the fire. The amount of the claims
cannot be estimated at this time.
ITEM 2
. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Introduction
How
We Generate Our Revenues
The Company’s revenues are primarily
derived from product sales and toll processing services in the polymer
processing industry.
Product sales result from the sale of
finished products to the customer such as polymer powders, proprietary
concentrates, masterbatches and specialty compounds. The creation of
such products begins with the Company purchasing resin (primarily
polyethylene) and other raw materials that are processed by the
Company, which may involve size reduction and/or
compounding. Compounding involves melt blending various resins and
additives to produce a homogeneous material. Compounding includes the
manufacture and sale of concentrates. Concentrates are polymers
loaded with high levels of chemical and organic additives that are melt blended
into base resins to give plastic films and other finished products desired
physical properties. After processing, the Company sells the finished
products to customers. The finished products produced by the Company
are most often used to manufacture household items (such as toys, household
furniture and trash receptacles), agricultural products (such as fertilizer and
water tanks), paint, metal and fabric coatings and consumer plastic products
such as plastic bags and food packaging.
Toll processing services involve both
size reduction and compounding whereby these services are performed on customer
owned material for a fee. We consider our toll processing services to
be completed when we have processed the customer owned material and no further
services remain to be performed. Pursuant to the service arrangements
with our customers, we are entitled to collect our agreed upon toll processing
fee after completion of our toll processing services. Shipping of the
product to and from our facilities is determined by and paid for by the
customer. The revenue we recognize for toll processing services is
net of the value of our customer’s product as we do not take ownership of our
customer’s material during any stage of the process.
Demand for the Company’s products and
services tends to be driven by overall economic factors and, particularly,
consumer spending. The trend of applicable resin prices also impacts
customer demand. As resin prices are falling, customers tend to
reduce their inventories and, therefore, reduce their need for the Company’s
products and services as customers choose to purchase resin on a just-in-time
basis rather than building large levels of inventory. Conversely, as
resin prices are rising, customers often increase their inventories and
accelerate their purchases of products and services from the Company to help
lower their raw material costs. Additionally, demand for the
Company’s products and services tends to be seasonal, with customer demand
historically being weakest during the Company’s first fiscal quarter due to the
holiday season.
Cost
of Sales and Services
Cost of sales and services is primarily
comprised of raw materials (resins and various additives), compensation and
benefits to non-administrative employees, electricity, repair and maintenance,
occupancy costs and supplies.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative
expenses consist primarily of compensation and related benefits paid to the
sales and marketing, executive management, information technology, accounting,
legal, human resources and other administrative employees of the Company, other
sales and marketing expenses, communications costs, systems costs, insurance
costs, consulting costs and legal and professional accounting fees.
How
We Manage Our Operations
The
Company’s management structure and reportable segments are organized into five
business segments referred to as ICO Polymers North America, ICO Brazil,
Bayshore Industrial, ICO Europe and ICO Asia Pacific. This
organization is consistent with the way information is reviewed and decisions
are made by executive management.
The ICO
Polymers North America, ICO Brazil, ICO Europe and ICO Asia Pacific segments
primarily produce competitively priced polymer powders for the rotational
molding industry as well as other specialty markets for powdered polymers,
including masterbatch and concentrate producers, users of polymer-based metal
coatings, and non-woven textile markets. Masterbatches are
concentrates that incorporate all of the additives a customer needs into a
single package for a particular product manufacturing process, as opposed to
requiring numerous packages. Additionally, these segments provide
specialty size reduction services on a tolling basis. The Bayshore
Industrial segment designs and produces proprietary concentrates, masterbatches
and specialty compounds, primarily for the plastic film industry, in North
America and in selected export markets. The Company’s ICO Europe
segment includes operations in France, Holland, Italy and the
U.K. The Company’s ICO Asia Pacific segment includes operations in
Australia, Malaysia, New Zealand and the United Arab Emirates.
Results
of Operations
Three and nine months ended June 30,
2008 compared to the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007
Executive
Summary
For the
nine months ended June 30, 2008, our revenues grew $44.4 million or
15%. The growth in revenues along with the benefit from the
translation effect of foreign currencies compared to the U.S. Dollar led to a 7%
increase in operating income or $1.5 million. Our European region has
performed very well this year producing strong growth in revenues and operating
income. For the third quarter of this fiscal year, we saw our
business slow down primarily at our Bayshore Industrial segment and our
Australian locations compared to the same quarter of the prior year, when it was
strong for both locations. During the quarter, we also reversed a
valuation allowance that was placed on the deferred tax assets of our subsidiary
in Brazil in the amount of $0.7 million. This was due to the
continued improvement in earnings for our Brazilian subsidiary.
|
|
Summary
Financial Information
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
Total
revenues
|
|
$
|
115,718
|
|
|
$
|
113,378
|
|
|
$
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
$
|
338,709
|
|
|
$
|
294,358
|
|
|
$
|
44,351
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
SG&A
(1)
|
|
|
10,441
|
|
|
|
9,727
|
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
31,431
|
|
|
|
27,440
|
|
|
|
3,991
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
6,467
|
|
|
|
8,960
|
|
|
|
(2,493
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
%)
|
|
|
21,609
|
|
|
|
20,130
|
|
|
|
1,479
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Income
from continuing operations
|
|
|
4,633
|
|
|
|
5,632
|
|
|
|
(999
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
%)
|
|
|
13,152
|
|
|
|
13,714
|
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
%)
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
4,633
|
|
|
$
|
5,614
|
|
|
|
(981
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
|
$
|
13,136
|
|
|
$
|
15,135
|
|
|
$
|
(1,999
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes
(2)
|
|
|
80,100
|
|
|
|
88,150
|
|
|
|
(8,050
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
%)
|
|
|
245,600
|
|
|
|
246,150
|
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Gross margin
(3)
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
(2.1
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
(1.0
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
SG&A
as a percentage of revenues
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
|
.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income as a percentage of revenues
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
(2.3
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
(.4
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
“SG&A” is defined as selling, general and administrative expense
(including stock option compensation expense).
|
|
(2)
“Volumes” refers to total metric tons sold either selling
proprietary products or toll processing services.
|
|
(3)
Gross margin is calculated as the difference between revenues and
cost of sales and services, divided by revenues.
|
|
Revenues.
Total
revenues increased $2.3 million or 2% to $115.7 million during the three months
ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same period of fiscal
2007. During the nine month period, revenues increased $44.4 million
or 15%. Revenues are impacted by volumes sold by the Company
(“volume”), changes in selling prices and mix of finished products sold or
services performed (“price/product mix”) and the impact from changes in foreign
currencies relative to the U.S. Dollar (“translation effect”).
The components of the increase in
revenue are:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2008
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
June
30, 2008
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
(7%
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,322
|
)
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
$
|
5,709
|
|
Price/product
mix
|
|
|
1%
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
13,569
|
|
Translation
effect
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
8,862
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
25,073
|
|
Total
increase
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
$
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
$
|
44,351
|
|
The translation effect of changes in
foreign currencies relative to the U.S. Dollar caused an increase in revenues of
$8.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and $25.1 million for the
nine months ended June 30, 2008 due primarily to a stronger Euro and Australian
Dollar compared to the U.S. Dollar. A decrease in volumes sold for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 led to a decrease in revenues of $8.3 million. The
volume reduction was primarily a result of reduced customer demand at the
Company’s Bayshore Industrial and Australian locations. Although
total volumes declined slightly in the nine month comparative periods caused by
a decline in toll service volumes, product sales volumes increased
2%. The increase in product sales volumes, which has a higher average
selling price than toll services due to the raw material component, caused the
overall impact from changes in volumes to increase revenue by $5.7
million.
The Company’s revenues are impacted
by the change in raw material prices (“resin” prices) as well as product sales
mix. As the price of resin increases or decreases, market prices for
our products will generally also increase or decrease. This will
typically lead to higher or lower average selling prices. Average
selling prices were higher in the current year period than the prior year
periods for both the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008. This
fact, as well as a change in product sales mix during the nine months ended June
30, 2008, primarily for Bayshore Industrial, caused an increase in revenues of
$13.6 million
for the
nine months ended June 30, 2008. During the three months ended June
30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007, the impact from
higher average selling prices was partially reduced by a less favorable product
mix at our Bayshore Industrial segment. Although the Company
participates in numerous markets, the graph below illustrates the trend in our
resin prices.
A comparison of revenues by segment
and discussion of the significant segment changes is provided
below.
Revenues
by segment for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
of Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
of Total
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
ICO
Europe
|
|
$
|
58,226
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
$
|
47,797
|
|
|
|
42%
|
|
|
$
|
10,429
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
Bayshore
Industrial
|
|
|
19,044
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
|
|
25,684
|
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
(6,640
|
)
|
|
|
(26%
|
)
|
ICO
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
21,417
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
|
25,528
|
|
|
|
22%
|
|
|
|
(4,111
|
)
|
|
|
(16%
|
)
|
ICO
Polymers North America
|
|
|
12,081
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
11,083
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
ICO
Brazil
|
|
|
4,950
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
3,286
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
1,664
|
|
|
|
51%
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
115,718
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
$
|
113,378
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
$
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
Revenues
by Segment
|
Revenues
by Segment
|
ICO
Europe’s revenues increased $10.4 million or 22% as a result of the translation
effect of stronger European currencies compared to the U.S. Dollar which caused
an increase in revenues of $5.9 million, and an increase in average selling
prices due in part to higher resin costs resulted in an increase of $4.7 million
in revenues. This was partially offset by a decrease in volumes, primarily toll
service volumes which decreased revenues by $0.2 million.
Bayshore
Industrial’s revenues decreased $6.6 million or 26% due to a reduction in
customer demand and less favorable product sales mix.
ICO Asia
Pacific’s revenues decreased $4.1 million or 16% due primarily to a reduction in
volumes sold of 20%, which reduced revenues by $4.8 million. During
the prior year period, sales into the water tank market significantly increased
in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2007. However, the
water tank market slowed in fiscal year 2008. Lower average selling
prices and changes in product mix also reduced revenues by $1.5
million. The translation effect of the stronger foreign currencies
compared to the U.S. Dollar increased revenues by $2.2 million.
ICO Polymers North America’s revenues
increased $1.0 million or 9% primarily due to higher average selling prices and
changes in product sales mix.
ICO Brazil’s revenues increased $1.7
million or 51% due to an increase in product sales volumes (as a result of
increased customer demand) which increased revenue by $0.9
million. Additionally, the translation effect of the stronger
Brazilian Real, compared to the U.S. Dollar, caused an increase in revenues of
$0.8 million.
Revenues
by segment for the nine months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the nine months
ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
of Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
of Total
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
ICO
Europe
|
|
$
|
158,720
|
|
|
|
47%
|
|
|
$
|
124,178
|
|
|
|
42%
|
|
|
$
|
34,542
|
|
|
|
28%
|
|
Bayshore
Industrial
|
|
|
71,563
|
|
|
|
21%
|
|
|
|
69,465
|
|
|
|
24%
|
|
|
|
2,098
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
ICO
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
58,989
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
|
|
59,624
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
(1%
|
)
|
ICO
Polymers North America
|
|
|
34,971
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
31,486
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
3,485
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
ICO
Brazil
|
|
|
14,466
|
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
9,605
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
4,861
|
|
|
|
51%
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
338,709
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
$
|
294,358
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
$
|
44,351
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
Nine
Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
Nine
Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
Revenues
by Segment
|
Revenues
by Segment
|
ICO
Europe’s revenues increased $34.5 million or 28% as a result of the translation
effect of stronger European currencies compared to the U.S. Dollar which caused
an increase in revenues of $16.5 million. Additionally, an increase
in average selling prices due in part to higher resin costs resulted in an
increase of $11.1 million in revenues. Finally, an increase in
product sales volumes as a result of an increase in customer demand and improved
market and economic conditions increased revenues by $7.9
million. This was partially offset by a decrease in toll processing
volumes which decreased revenues by $1.0 million.
Bayshore
Industrial’s revenues increased $2.1 million or 3% primarily due to a favorable
change in product mix which increased revenues by $2.8 million. A
decline in volumes sold due to a decrease in customer demand decreased revenues
by $0.7 million.
ICO Asia
Pacific’s revenues decreased by $0.6 million or 1% as a result of a decline in
volumes sold due to reduced customer demand which reduced revenues by $4.6
million. Lower average selling prices due to challenging market
conditions and changes in product mix reduced revenues by $2.1
million. Partially offsetting these declines was the translation
effect of the stronger Australian and New Zealand Dollar and Malaysian Ringgit
which increased revenues by $6.1 million.
ICO Polymers North America’s revenues
increased $3.5 million or 11% as a result of an increase in volumes sold due to
an increase in customer demand as well as higher average selling prices and a
more favorable product sales mix.
ICO Brazil’s revenues increased $4.9
million or 51% due to the translation effect of the stronger Brazilian Real
compared to the U.S. Dollar which caused an increase in revenues of $2.5 million
and as a result of an increase in volumes sold (due to higher customer demand)
of 26% which increased revenues by $2.4 million.
Gross
Margins.
Consolidated gross margins (calculated as the
difference between revenues and cost of sales and services, divided by revenues)
decreased from 18.1% to 16.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and
declined from 17.8% to 16.8% for the nine months ended June 30,
2008. For the three month comparative periods, gross margins declined
as a result of several items. First, our product sales mix
changed. Revenues increased at our European segment which generally
has a lower gross margin than the rest of the Company. Revenues at
our Bayshore Industrial segment, which has a higher gross margin than the rest
of the Company, declined. Also, the increase in resin prices in the
current year compared to the prior periods had the effect of increasing our
average selling prices and revenue base without a corresponding increase in
gross profit by the same percentage, which results in a lower gross
margin. Additionally, higher operating costs per metric ton,
including logistics costs and electricity, also contributed to the effect of
reducing our gross margins. Last, a reduction in gross margin in our
Asia Pacific segment as a result of a reduction in volumes sold, higher
logistics costs and pricing pressures factored into the overall decline in gross
margin.
For the
nine month comparative period, gross margin declined due to the change in
product sales mix discussed above, the effect of higher average selling prices,
higher operating costs and the lower margins in Asia
Pacific. However, these items were partially offset by an increase in
our feedstock margins (the difference between product sales revenues and related
costs of raw materials sold.)
Selling, General and
Administrative
. Selling, general and administrative expenses
(“SG&A”) increased $0.7 million or 7% and $4.0 million or 15% for the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2008. The increase in SG&A for the
three-month comparative period was due primarily to the translation effect of
the stronger foreign currencies which increased SG&A by $0.6
million. The increase in SG&A of $4.0 million or 15% for the
nine-month comparative periods was due primarily to the translation effect of
the stronger foreign currencies which increased SG&A by $1.9 million, higher
compensation and benefits cost of $1.3 million and higher external professional
fees of $0.7 million. As a percentage of revenues, SG&A was 9.0%
and 9.3% of revenues during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively, compared to 8.6% and 9.3% for the same periods last
year.
Impairment, restructuring and other
costs (income)
. On July 2, 2007, the Company’s facility in New
Jersey suffered a fire that damaged certain equipment and one of the facility’s
buildings. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company
recorded a receivable for $1.6 million related to its initial claims for
recovery from its insurance carrier. The Company received those funds
plus an additional $0.1 million during the second quarter of fiscal
2008. Additionally, the Company recorded a receivable in the second
quarter of fiscal 2008 for $1.8 million for further claims of recovery from its
insurance carrier related to damaged equipment as well as reimbursement for
business interruption expenses and lost income as a result of the
fire. The $1.8 million was received in April 2008. During
the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded an additional
insurance receivable of $0.5 million. During the three and nine
months ended June 30, 2008, the Company incurred additional costs related to the
fire of $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively. As a result of
the above, the Company recorded a net gain of $0.4 million and $1.8 million
during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, in
impairment, restructuring and other costs (income).
During
the nine months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded a pre-tax gain of $0.6
million related to the sale of a building in the Company’s Dutch
subsidiary.
Operating income (loss) by segment and
discussion of significant segment changes for the three months ended June 30,
2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007 follows.
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
ICO
Europe
|
|
$
|
3,901
|
|
|
$
|
3,376
|
|
|
$
|
525
|
|
|
|
16%
|
|
Bayshore
Industrial
|
|
|
2,045
|
|
|
|
3,329
|
|
|
|
(1,284
|
)
|
|
|
(39%
|
)
|
ICO
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
2,315
|
|
|
|
(2,326
|
)
|
|
|
(100%
|
)
|
ICO
Polymers North America
|
|
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
ICO
Brazil
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
256%
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
7,970
|
|
|
|
10,636
|
|
|
|
(2,666
|
)
|
|
|
(25%
|
)
|
Unallocated
General Corporate Expense
|
|
|
(1,503
|
)
|
|
|
(1,676
|
)
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
(10%
|
)
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
6,467
|
|
|
$
|
8,960
|
|
|
$
|
(2,493
|
)
|
|
|
(28%
|
)
|
Operating
income (loss) as a percentage
of
revenues
|
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
ICO
Europe
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Bayshore
Industrial
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
(2%
|
)
|
ICO
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
(9%
|
)
|
ICO
Polymers North America
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
ICO
Brazil
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
(2%
|
)
|
ICO
Europe’s operating income improved $0.5 million or 16% due primarily to the
effect of the stronger European currencies compared to the U.S. Dollar which
improved operating income by $0.4 million.
Bayshore Industrial’s operating income
fell $1.3 million or 39% primarily as a result of a decrease in volumes sold due
to reduced customer demand and to a lesser extent an increase in operating costs
per metric ton.
ICO Asia Pacific’s operating income
decreased $2.3 million or 100% as a result of a decline in customer demand which
reduced volumes sold. Additionally, pricing pressure due to
challenging market conditions led to a reduction in feedstock
margins.
ICO Polymers North America’s operating
income increased $0.3 million or 17%. During the third quarter of
Fiscal Year 2008, the Company recorded a net $0.4 million gain from expected
insurance recoveries. The Company’s New Jersey facility was running
at only a third of its production lines during the third quarter of fiscal 2008
as a result of the July 2007 fire that occurred in the plant. On July
26, 2008, the Company had a second fire at its plant in New Jersey.
The Company has been in the process of relocating its production to Pennsylvania
and therefore will cease production at its New Jersey facility.
ICO
Brazil’s operating income increased $0.2 million or 256% due primarily to a
growth in volumes sold and an increase in feedstock margins.
Operating income (loss) by segment and
discussion of significant segment changes for the nine months ended June 30,
2008 compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2007 follows.
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
|
ICO
Europe
|
|
$
|
10,419
|
|
|
$
|
6,559
|
|
|
$
|
3,860
|
|
|
|
59%
|
|
Bayshore
Industrial
|
|
|
8,755
|
|
|
|
9,642
|
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
|
|
(9%
|
)
|
ICO
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
1,612
|
|
|
|
4,161
|
|
|
|
(2,549
|
)
|
|
|
(61%
|
)
|
ICO
Polymers North America
|
|
|
5,194
|
|
|
|
4,313
|
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
ICO
Brazil
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
107%
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
26,533
|
|
|
|
24,942
|
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
6%
|
|
Unallocated
General Corporate Expense
|
|
|
(4,924
|
)
|
|
|
(4,812
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
2%
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
21,609
|
|
|
$
|
20,130
|
|
|
$
|
1,479
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
Operating
income as a
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
percentage
of revenues
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change
|
|
ICO
Europe
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
Bayshore
Industrial
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
(2%
|
)
|
ICO
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
(4%
|
)
|
ICO
Polymers North America
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
ICO
Brazil
|
|
|
4%
|
|
|
|
3%
|
|
|
|
1%
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
6%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
(1%
|
)
|
ICO Europe’s operating income improved
$3.9 million or 59% due primarily to an improvement in product sales volumes and
feedstock margins. Additionally, the effect of the stronger European
currencies compared to the U.S. Dollar improved operating income by $1.1
million.
Bayshore
Industrial’s operating income decreased $0.9 million or 9% due primarily from an
increase in production costs per metric ton.
ICO Asia Pacific’s operating income
decreased $2.5 million or 61% as a result of a decrease in volumes sold, an
increase in operating costs and higher SG&A costs. The higher
operating costs were primarily caused by an increase in logistics
costs. The higher SG&A costs were due to an increase in employees
to support the expansion of our facility in Malaysia as well as the opening of
our facility in the United Arab Emirates.
ICO Polymers North America’s operating
income increased $0.9 million or 20% primarily as a result of an increase in
product sales volumes due to an increase in customer
demand. Additionally, the Company has recognized a net gain of $1.8
million during the nine months ended June 30, 2008 due to the reimbursement from
the insurance company related to the fire at our New Jersey
facility. A considerable portion of the insurance reimbursement was
for business interruption expenses and lost income as a result of the
fire.
ICO
Brazil’s operating income increased $0.3 million or 107% due to growth in
volumes sold due to an increase in customer demand.
Unallocated
general corporate expenses increased $0.1 million or 2% due to higher external
professional fees of $0.7 million, an increase in compensation costs of $0.2
million and other smaller increases in expenses. These increases were
partially offset by an increase in the allocation of corporate expenses to its
business units of $1.1 million.
Interest Expense,
Net
. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, net
interest expense increased $0.2 million or 30% and $0.9 million or 37%,
respectively, as a result of an increase in borrowings to finance an increase in
working capital and the repurchase of Preferred Stock.
Income Taxes (from continuing
operations).
The Company’s effective income tax rates were
provisions of 17% and 29% during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008,
compared to the U.S. statutory rate of 35%. The primary reason for
the lower rates was the reversal of the valuation allowance against the deferred
tax asset in the company’s Brazilian subsidiary of $0.7 million in the three
months ending June 30, 2008.
The
Company’s effective income tax rates were provisions of 30% and 22% during the
three and nine months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, compared to the U.S.
statutory rate of 35%. The Company’s effective income tax rate of 22% during the
nine months ended June 30, 2007 was primarily due to the reversal of the
valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets in the Company’s Italian
subsidiary of $1.4 million in the second quarter. In addition, the
reduction of the tax contingency reserve in the first quarter of 2007 of $0.4
million further reduced the effective tax rate for the nine month
period.
Income (Loss) From Discontinued
Operations.
The income from discontinued operations during the
nine months ended June 30, 2007 relates to the settlement the Company entered
into with its insurance carrier related to the indemnity claims asserted by
National Oilwell Varco, Inc. for $2.3 million.
Net Income.
For
the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008, the Company had net income of
$4.6 million and $13.1 million, respectively, compared to net income of $5.6
million and $15.1 million for the comparable periods in fiscal 2007, due to the
factors discussed above.
Foreign Currency
Translation.
The fluctuations of the U.S. Dollar against the
Euro, British Pound, New Zealand Dollar, Brazilian Real, Malaysian Ringgit and
the Australian Dollar have impacted the translation of revenues and expenses of
our
international
operations. The table below summarizes the impact of changing
exchange rates for the above currencies for the three and nine months ended June
30, 2008.
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30, 2008
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
June
30, 2008
|
|
|
Net
revenues
|
$8.9
million
|
|
$25.1
million
|
Operating
income
|
$0.4
million
|
|
$1.4
million
|
Pre-tax
income
|
$0.3
million
|
|
$1.2
million
|
Net
income
|
$0.4
million
|
|
$0.9
million
|
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS
No. 157,
Fair Value
Measurements
(“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines “fair value,”
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, rather, its
application will be made pursuant to other accounting pronouncements that
require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007,
and interim periods within those years. This standard will be
effective for the Company starting with our interim period ending December 31,
2008. The provisions of SFAS 157 are to be applied prospectively upon
adoption, except for limited specified exceptions. The Company does not
expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on its financial
position or results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 159,
The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115
(“SFAS 159”). Under SFAS 159, a company may
elect to measure eligible financial assets and financial liabilities at fair
value at specified election dates. Unrealized gains and losses on
items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings
at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently assessing
whether or not we will elect the fair value option.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations
(“SFAS
141 (R)”) and No. 160,
Noncontrolling interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements
(“SFAS 160”). The goal of
these standards is to improve, simplify, and converge internationally the
accounting for business combinations and the reporting of noncontrolling
interests in consolidated financial statements. The provisions of
SFAS 141 (R) and SFAS 160 are effective for the Company on October 1,
2009. As SFAS No. 141will apply to future acquisitions, it is not
possible at this time for the Company to determine the impact of adopting this
standard.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (“SFAS 161”),
Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133.
This Statement changes the disclosure
requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are
required to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c)
how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The
Company will be required to adopt this standard in the interim period ending
December 31, 2009. This Statement encourages, but does not require,
comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. We
are currently evluating the impact of adopting this new standard.
In April
2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets
("FSP FAS 142-3"). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors
that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to
determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets ("SFAS 142"). The intent of FSP FAS 142-3
is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible
asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the
fair value of the asset under SFAS 141(R) and other applicable accounting
literature. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company does not anticipate
that the adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 will have a material impact on its results of
operations or financial condition.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF
03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions Are Participating Securities," ("FSP EITF 03-6-1"). This
FSP addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions
are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be
included in computing earnings per share under the two-class
method described in SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share." This
FSP will be effective for the Company beginning with the first quarter of fiscal
2010 and will be applied retrospectively. We are currently evaluating
the impact of adopting this new standard.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The following are considered
by management as key measures of liquidity applicable to the
Company:
|
June
30, 2008
|
September
30, 2007
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$3.9
million
|
|
$8.6
million
|
|
Working
capital
|
$71.0
million
|
|
$57.9
million
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
declined $4.7 million and working capital increased $13.1 million during the
nine months ended June 30, 2008 due to the factors described below.
Cash
Flows
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities by continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
3,887
|
|
|
$
|
12,522
|
|
Net
cash used for operating activities by discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
Net
cash used for investing activities by continuing
operations
|
|
|
(8,633
|
)
|
|
|
(6,674
|
)
|
Net
cash used for financing activities by continuing
operations
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(20,548
|
)
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
Net decrease in cash
and equivalents
|
|
$
|
(4,652
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,438
|
)
|
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities
The Company generated $3.9 million of
cash from operating activities by continuing operations during the nine months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to $12.5 million generated in the period ended June
30, 2007. The main reason for the change was due to changes in
working capital. Inventories were a use of cash in the current year
of $8.3 million compared to generating cash of $1.0 million in the prior year
period. This change was primarily due to higher inventory volumes in
our Australian location, where we encountered a reduction in demand in the water
tank market in the current fiscal year which led to higher inventory
volumes. We expect that our inventory volumes in Australia will
continue to decline over the coming months compared to our levels at June 30,
2008. During the current fiscal year, the Company used $14.8 million
of cash for accounts payable compared to generating cash of $8.5 million for
accounts payable in the prior year period. This change was due to the
timing of inventory purchases and the higher inventory levels in
Australia. Offsetting those two items were cash inflows from accounts
receivable in the current fiscal year of $10.4 million compared to a use of cash
for accounts receivable of $16.0 million in the prior year
period. This change is due to a decline in revenues in the three
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the revenues in the three months ended
September 30, 2007 of $7.9 million while in the prior year periods, revenues in
the three months ended June 30, 2007 were higher than the three months ended
September 30, 2006.
Cash provided by discontinued
operations was $1.1 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2007 primarily due
to the receipt of $2.3 million from the company’s insurance carrier in the third
quarter of fiscal 2007 related to the Company’s settlement with National Oilwell
Varco, Inc., related to indemnity claims.
Cash
Flows Used for Investing Activities
Capital expenditures totaled $11.0
million during the nine months ended June 30, 2008. These
expenditures were related primarily to the Company’s relocation to Pennsylvania
from its New Jersey facility and to the expansion of the Company’s production
capacity. The Company leased a facility in Pennsylvania and is
incurring capital expenditures related to the build out of the leased
facility. The Company began production in the Pennsylvania facility
in the third fiscal quarter of 2008 and anticipates having all equipment
relocated from its New Jersey facility to its Pennsylvania facility within the
next 6 months. Approximately 58% of the $11.0 million of capital
expenditures was spent at the Company’s ICO Polymers North America
segment. The Company expects capital expenditures to be approximately
$3.0 million for the remainder of the fiscal year. For the nine
months ended June 30, 2008, the Company received $2.3 million from its insurance
carrier for reimbursements of costs associated with the fire in the Company’s
New Jersey facility that is classified in the statement of cash flow as
investing activities.
During the second quarter of fiscal
2007, the Company completed the sale of a building at its Dutch subsidiary for
net proceeds of $0.9 million and recorded a pre-tax gain of $0.6
million.
Cash
Flows Used For Financing Activities
During the nine months ended June 30,
2008, cash used for financing activities was $0.1 million. In the
prior year period, the Company used $20.5 million for financing activities
primarily to finance the repurchase of 85% of the Company’s Preferred
Stock.
Financing
Arrangements
The Company maintains several lines of
credit. The facilities are collateralized by certain assets of the
Company. The following table presents the borrowing capacity,
outstanding borrowings and net availability under the various credit facilities
in the Company’s domestic and foreign operations.
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
As
of
|
|
|
As
of
|
|
|
As
of
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Millions)
|
|
Borrowing Capacity
(a)
|
|
$
|
22.9
|
|
|
$
|
28.1
|
|
|
$
|
58.6
|
|
|
$
|
58.6
|
|
|
$
|
81.5
|
|
|
$
|
86.7
|
|
Outstanding
Borrowings
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
|
Net
availability
|
|
$
|
22.5
|
|
|
$
|
28.1
|
|
|
$
|
45.5
|
|
|
$
|
42.5
|
|
|
$
|
68.0
|
|
|
$
|
70.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Based
on the credit facility limits less outstanding letters of
credit.
|
|
The Company maintains a Credit
Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with KeyBank National Association and Wells
Fargo Bank National Association (collectively referred to herein as “KeyBank”),
with a maturity date of October 2012. The KeyBank Credit Agreement
consists of a $30.0 million revolving credit facility, a five year $15.0 million
term loan (of which $10.8 million remains outstanding as of June 30, 2008) and
through an amendment in May 2008, an additional $5.0 million five year term
loan. The KeyBank Credit Agreement contains a variable interest rate
and contains certain financial and nonfinancial covenants. The borrowing
capacity of the $30.0 million revolving credit facility varies based upon the
levels of domestic cash, receivables and inventory. In April 2008, the
Company entered into an interest rate swap on its $10.8 million term loan that
essentially fixed the interest rate at 4.32%, subject to changes in the
Company’s leverage ratio. In July 2008, the Company entered into an
interest rate swap on its $5.0 million term loan essentially fixing the interest
rate at 5.69%, subject to changes in the Company’s leverage ratio.
The Company has various foreign
credit facilities in eight foreign countries. The available credit
under these facilities varies based either on the levels of accounts receivable
within the foreign subsidiary, or is a fixed amount. The foreign
credit facilities, which carry various financial covenants, are collateralized
by assets owned by the foreign subsidiaries.
At June 30, 2008, the Company’s
Australian subsidiary was in violation of a financial debt covenant related to
$4.9 million of term debt and $5.1 million of short term borrowings under its
credit facility with its lender in Australia. Of the $45.5 million of
total foreign credit availability as of June 30, 2008, $0.7 million related to
the Company’s Australian subsidiary. The Australian covenant not met
related to a metric of profitability compared to interest
expense. The Company is in the process of obtaining a waiver from its
lender in Australia. The Company has classified all of the Australian
term debt as current as of June 30, 2008. Because the Company’s
Australian subsidiary was in violation of a debt covenant as of June 30, 2008,
and the total debt outstanding was over $7.5 million, the Company was in
violation of its Credit Agreement with KeyBank. The Company obtained
a waiver from KeyBank for this violation.
Presently, the Company anticipates that
cash flow from operations and availability under credit facilities will be
sufficient to meet its short and long-term operational
requirements.
As of
June 30, 2007, the Company was in violation of financial debt covenants under
credit facilities in Australia, New Zealand and Malaysia. Because of
the violations under credit facilities in Australia and Malaysia, the Company
was in violation of its Credit Agreement with KeyBank. The Company
obtained waivers from KeyBank and from its New Zealand lender. The
Company is currently in compliance with all of its credit facilities except in
Australia as discussed above.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements.
The
Company does not have any financial instruments classified as off-balance sheet
(other than operating leases) as of June 30, 2008 and September 30,
2007.
ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
We are exposed to certain market risks
as part of our ongoing business operations, including debt obligations that
carry variable interest rates, foreign currency exchange risk, and resin price
risk that could impact our financial condition, results of operations and/or
cash flows. We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through
regular operating and financing activities, including the use of derivative
financial instruments. Our intention is to use these derivative financial
instruments as risk management tools and not for trading purposes or
speculation.
As mentioned above, the Company’s
revenues and profitability are impacted by changes in resin
prices. The Company uses various resins (primarily polyethylene) to
manufacture its products. As the price of resin increases or
decreases, market prices for the Company’s products will generally also increase
or decrease. This will typically lead to
higher or
lower average selling prices and will impact the Company’s operating income and
operating margin. The impact on operating income is due to a lag in
matching the change in raw material cost of goods sold and the change in product
sales prices. As of June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, the Company
had $39.7 million and $36.3 million of raw material inventory and $31.0 million
and $22.6 million of finished goods inventory, respectively. The
Company attempts to minimize its exposure to resin price changes by monitoring
and carefully managing the quantity of its inventory on hand and product sales
prices.
As of
June 30, 2008, the Company had $66.0 million of net investment in foreign
wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company does not hedge the foreign
exchange rate risk inherent with this non-U.S. Dollar denominated
investment.
The Company does enter into forward
currency exchange contracts related to both future purchase obligations and
other forecasted transactions denominated in non-functional currencies,
primarily repayments of foreign currency intercompany transactions. Certain of
these forward currency exchange contracts qualify as cash flow hedging
instruments and are highly effective. In accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, as amended and interpreted (“SFAS No.
133”), the Company recognizes the amount of hedge ineffectiveness for these
hedging instruments in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The
hedge ineffectiveness on the Company’s designated cash flow hedging instruments
was not a significant amount for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The Company’s principal foreign currency
exposures relate to the Euro, British Pound, Australian Dollar, New Zealand
Dollar, Malaysian Ringgit and Brazilian Real. The Company’s forward
contracts have original maturities of one year or less. The following table
includes the total value of foreign exchange contracts outstanding as of June
30, 2008 and September 30, 2007:
|
|
As
of
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Notional
value
|
|
$11.4 million
|
|
$12.6
million
|
Fair
market value
|
|
$0.5
million
|
|
$0.7
million
|
Maturity
Dates
|
|
July
2008
|
|
October
2007
|
|
|
through
November 2008
|
|
through
December 2007
|
Because these intercompany lending
transactions are denominated in various foreign currencies and are subject to
financial exposure from foreign exchange rate movement from the date a loan is
recorded to the date it is settled or revalued, any appreciation or depreciation
of the foreign currencies in which the transactions are denominated could result
in a gain or loss, respectively, to the Consolidated Statement of Operations,
subject to forward currency exchange contracts that may be entered into. To
mitigate this risk, the Company may enter into foreign currency exchange
contracts.
Interest Rate Swaps.
The Company also enters into interest rate swap
agreements that mitigate the exposure to interest rate risk by converting
variable-rate debt to a fixed rate. The interest rate swap and instrument being
hedged are marked to market in the balance sheet.
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company entered into a Pay-Fixed / Receive
Variable Interest Rate swap on its term loan in the U.S. with KeyBank/Wells
Fargo of $11.7 million. This swap locks in the Company’s interest
rate on $11.7 million at 2.82% plus the credit spread on the
debt. The Company’s risk management objective with respect to
this interest rate swap is to hedge the variability to changes in cash flows
attributable to interest rate risk caused by changes in the benchmark interest
rate (i.e. LIBOR), related to $11.7 million of the Company’s variable-rate
debt.
As of
June 30, 2008, the Company calculates the estimated fair value of the $11.7
million notional swap identified above to be an asset of $0.1
million. The estimated fair value of the swap was calculated by
obtaining a quotation from Wells Fargo at June 30, 2008. The
fair value is an estimate of the net amount that the Company would receive on
June 30, 2008 if the agreement was transferred to another party or cancelled by
the Company.
The
Company’s variable interest rates subject the Company to the risks of increased
interest costs associated with any upward movements in market interest
rates. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had $20.7 million of variable
interest rate debt. The Company’s variable interest rates are tied to
various bank rates. At June 30, 2008, based on our current level of
borrowings, a 1% increase in interest rates would increase interest expense
annually by approximately $0.2 million.
Foreign Currency Intercompany
Accounts and Notes Receivable
. From time-to-time, the
Company’s U.S. subsidiaries provide capital to foreign subsidiaries of the
Company through U.S. dollar denominated interest bearing promissory
notes. In addition, certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries
also provide access to capital to other foreign subsidiaries of the Company
through foreign currency denominated interest bearing promissory
notes. Such funds are generally used by the Company’s foreign
subsidiaries to purchase capital assets and/or for general working capital
needs. In addition, the Company’s U.S. subsidiaries sell products to
the Company’s foreign subsidiaries in U.S. dollars on trade credit
terms. The Company’s foreign subsidiaries also sell products to other
foreign subsidiaries of the Company denominated in foreign currencies that may
not be the
functional
currency of the foreign subsidiaries. Because these intercompany
debts are accounted for in the local functional currency of the foreign
subsidiary, any appreciation or depreciation of the foreign currencies in which
the transactions are denominated could result in a gain or loss, respectively,
to the Consolidated Statement of Operations, subject to forward currency
exchange contracts that may be entered into. These intercompany loans
are eliminated in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. At June
30, 2008, the Company had the following significant outstanding intercompany
amounts as described above:
Country
of subsidiary with
|
|
Country
of subsidiary with
|
|
Amount
in US$ as of
|
|
Currency
denomination
|
intercompany
receivable
|
|
intercompany
payable
|
|
June
30, 2008
|
|
of
receivable
|
United
States
|
|
Australia
|
|
$12.7
million
|
|
United
States Dollar
|
Holland
|
|
United
Kingdom
|
|
$2.5
million
|
|
Great
Britain Pound
|
New
Zealand
|
|
Australia
|
|
$2.4
million
|
|
New
Zealand Dollar
|
United
States
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
$1.4
million
|
|
United
States Dollar
|
New
Zealand
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
$1.3
million
|
|
New
Zealand Dollar
|
New
Zealand
|
|
United
Arab Emirates
|
|
$1.1
million
|
|
New
Zealand Dollar
|
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of
June 30, 2008, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b). Based upon this
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are
effective.
There
were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting
during our third fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1
. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For a description of the Company’s
legal proceedings, see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
in Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and Part I, Item 3 of
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed December 10, 2007.
ITEM 1A
. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information
set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in
Part I, Item 7, under the heading "Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007, which could materially affect our
business, financial condition or future results. There have been no
material changes in our Risk Factors as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form
10-K. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not
the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties
not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating
results.
ITEM 6
. EXHIBITS
|
The
following instruments and documents are included as Exhibits to this Form
10-Q:
|
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
31.1*
|
—
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and ICO, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section
7241.
|
31.2*
|
—
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer and ICO, Inc. pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section
7241.
|
32.1**
|
—
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer of ICO, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350.
|
32.2**
|
—
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of ICO, Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350.
|
*Filed
herewith
**Furnished
herewith
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
ICO, Inc.
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
August 8,
2008
|
/s/
A. John Knapp, Jr.
|
|
A.
John Knapp, Jr.
|
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer, and
|
|
Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Bradley T. Leuschner
|
|
Bradley
T. Leuschner
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
- 31 -
Ico (NASDAQ:ICOC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Ico (NASDAQ:ICOC)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024