Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive
Agreement
On July 26,
2016, in connection with the settlement of its previously disclosed lawsuit against Merrick Bank Corporation
(“Merrick”), in the District Court for the District of Utah (Case No. 2:12-cv-197-RJS-BCW), regarding Southern
Sky Air Tours, d/b/a Direct Air, a former customer of JetPay, LLC that declared bankruptcy in March 2012 (the “Direct
Air Matter”), JetPay Corporation (“JetPay” or the “Company”) entered into (a) that certain
Settlement Agreement and Release by and among Merrick, JetPay Merchant Services, LLC (“JPMS”), JetPay ISO
Services, LLC (“JetPay ISO”), JetPay, LLC, WLES, L.P. (“WLES”) and JetPay (the “Merrick
Settlement Agreement”) and (b) that certain Settlement Agreement and Release by and among Trent Voigt, WLES and JetPay
(the “WLES Settlement Agreement” and, together with the Merrick Settlement Agreement, the
“Settlement”). In connection with the parties’ entry into the Merrick Settlement Agreement, the District
Court for the District of Utah dismissed the Direct Air Matter with prejudice on July 27, 2016.
Merrick Settlement
Agreement
The parties to the
Merrick Settlement Agreement agreed to take certain actions in order to settle all disputes between them relating to the Direct
Air Matter.
Pursuant to the Merrick
Settlement Agreement, JetPay agreed to release all claims to the $4,389,952 held in reserve at Merrick (the “Reserve”).
The Reserve is recorded as a non-current asset under the caption “Other Assets” on the Company’s balance sheet
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and the quarter ended March 31, 2016.
In addition,
JetPay agreed to enter into two promissory notes in favor of Merrick in the amounts of $3,850,000 (the “$3.85MM
Note”) and $5,000,000 (the “$5.00MM Note” and, together with the $3.85MM Note, the “Notes”).
The Notes are secured by the 3,333,333 shares of JetPay’s common stock issued in the name of WLES and held in escrow
(the “escrowed shares”) pursuant to that certain Escrow Agreement, dated December 28, 2012, by and among JetPay,
WLES, Trent Voigt and Merrick (the “Escrow Agreement”). The terms of the Notes are described in Section 2.03 of
this Current Report on Form 8-K. The Merrick Settlement Agreement provides that if JetPay refinances 50% or more of its
outstanding debt prior to the maturity date of the $3.85MM Note, the $3.85MM Note shall be paid in full before or as part of
that refinancing transaction.
In connection
with its entry into the Merrick Settlement Agreement, JetPay executed three Stipulated and Confessed Judgments in favor of
Merrick in the amounts of $32,500,000 (the “First Judgment”), $28,650,000 (the “Second Judgment”) and
$27,500,000 (the “Third Judgment” and, together with the First Judgment and the Second Judgment, the
“Judgments”), none of which shall be of any effect unless and until JetPay fails to make any payment when due
under the Notes. If JetPay fails to make payment when due under the Notes, Merrick, after a five day cure period, can seek to
obtain and/or enforce the applicable Judgments in the Federal District Court for Utah or in any court of competent
jurisdiction. Merrick may seek to obtain or enforce the First Judgment if a payment default occurs prior to the complete
pay-off of either of the Notes (in which case the Second Judgment and Third Judgment shall be of no force or effect). Merrick
may seek to obtain or enforce the Second Judgment if a payment default occurs after payoff of the $3.85MM Note but prior to
the complete payoff of the $5.00MM Note (in which case the First Judgment and Third Judgment shall be of no force or effect).
Merrick may seek to obtain or enforce the Third Judgment if a payment default occurs after payoff of the $5.00MM Note but
prior to the complete payoff of the $3.85MM Note (in which case the First Judgment and Second Judgment shall be of no force
or effect).
Upon timely payment
in full of all amounts due under the Notes, and subject to the satisfaction of the obligations created under the Merrick Settlement
Agreement, Merrick agreed to waive, release and forever discharge JetPay, JPMS, JetPay ISO, JetPay, LLC and WLES (collectively,
the “JetPay Entities”), together with their subsidiaries, affiliates, and predecessor companies and entities, and their
past and present employees, principals, owners, directors, officers, and agents, from any and all claims, causes of action, charges,
suits, debts, controversies, liabilities, promises, damages, judgments and demands of any kind, that were asserted or could have
been asserted in the Relevant Matters (as defined in the Merrick Settlement Agreement). Subject to the satisfaction of the obligations
created by the Merrick Settlement Agreement in favor of the JetPay Entities, the JetPay Entities agreed to waive, release, and
forever discharge Merrick, together with its subsidiaries, affiliates, and predecessor companies and entities, and its past and
present employees, principals, owners, directors, officers, and agents, from any and all claims, causes of action, charges, suits,
debts, controversies, liabilities, promises, damages, judgments, and demands of any kind, that were asserted or could have been
asserted in the Relevant Matters.
WLES Settlement Agreement
In connection with
JetPay’s and WLES’s entry into the Merrick Settlement Agreement, WLES, Trent Voigt and JetPay entered into the WLES
Settlement Agreement to set forth their agreement regarding their respective obligations and understandings regarding the actions
to be taken with respect to the Merrick Settlement Agreement.
Under the terms
of the WLES Settlement Agreement, WLES agreed to transfer the indebtedness represented by that certain promissory note, dated
December 28, 2012 (the “WLES Note”), in the original principal amount of $2,381,369 issued by JetPay in favor of
WLES to Merrick. In addition, WLES agreed to amend that certain promissory note, dated June 7, 2013, as amended, in the
original principal amount of $491,693 issued by JetPay, LLC. in favor of Trent Voigt in order to (a) extend its maturity
date from September 30, 2016 to September 30, 2017 and (b) waive all interest payments for the period from September 30, 2016
to September 30, 2017. This note in favor of Mr. Voigt shall become due and payable immediately should Mr.
Voigt’s employment with JetPay be terminated other than for cause.
In addition, pursuant
to the WLES Settlement Agreement, WLES authorized JetPay to arrange a private sale of that number of escrowed shares to the extent necessary to satisfy JetPay’s obligations to Merrick under the $5.00MM Note (up
to a total of 2,200,000 escrowed shares). As required by the Merrick Settlement Agreement, (a) any net proceeds from the sale of
escrowed shares shall be delivered to Merrick until Merrick has received all principal and interest payments due under the $5.00MM
Note, (b) any sale of the escrowed shares shall be made on an arm’s length basis, (c) if such sale is to an affiliate of
JetPay, it shall be at a price and upon other terms equivalent to those of an arm’s length sale to an unaffiliated third-party
and (d) if the purchase price per share is less than 90% of the most recently listed price per share of JetPay common stock on
the NASDAQ Capital Market, then such sale shall be subject to the prior approval of Merrick. All unsold escrowed shares will remain
in escrow until all obligations of the JetPay Entities under the Merrick Settlement Agreement are fulfilled.
Upon consummation
of the sale of more than 1,666,667 of the escrowed shares, JetPay shall issue to WLES fully vested and immediately exercisable
warrants with an expiration date of five years from the date of the WLES Settlement Agreement to purchase that number of shares
of JetPay common stock equal to 50% of the difference between (a) the number of escrowed shares actually sold by WLES and (b)
1,666,666 shares of JetPay common stock, at an exercise price per share equal to the amount per share paid for the sold escrowed
shares. In the event that JetPay defaults on its obligations to Merrick under the Merrick Settlement Agreement and some or all
of the remaining escrowed shares are forfeited to Merrick as a result, JetPay agreed to issue to WLES, for no further consideration,
that number of shares of JetPay common stock equal to the forfeited escrowed shares.
The WLES Settlement Agreement also provides for the allocation of any recoveries by JPMS in
connection with the claims brought by JMPS in
American Express Travel Related Services and JetPay Merchant Services, LLC
v. Valley National Bank
, Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-7827 (D. N.J.) (the “Valley National Matter”).
Pursuant to the WLES
Settlement Agreement, JetPay, on behalf of itself and all of its affiliates and subject to the satisfaction of the obligations
created by the WLES Settlement Agreement in favor of JetPay, agreed to waive, release, and forever discharge WLES and Trent Voigt,
together with their respective subsidiaries, affiliates, and predecessor companies and entities, and their respective past and
present employees, principals, owners, directors, officers, and agents, from any and all claims, causes of action, charges, suits,
debts, controversies, liabilities, promises, damages, judgments, and demands of any kind, that were asserted or could have been
asserted in connection with all indemnification obligations of WLES and Trent Voigt under the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
as of July 6, 2012, by and between JetPay, WLES and Trent Voigt, as subsequently amended.
As of the date
of this Current Report on Form 8-K, JetPay anticipates a loss of approximately $6.1 million, net of (i) the $2,381,369
outstanding under the WLES Note and related accrued interest and (ii) proceeds from the sale of the escrowed shares. The
ultimate loss may differ depending on, among other things, the success of the sale of the escrowed shares.
The foregoing descriptions
of the Merrick Settlement Agreement and the WLES Settlement Agreement do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their
entireties by reference to the full text of the Merrick Settlement Agreement filed herewith as Exhibit 10.1 and the WLES Settlement
Agreement filed herewith as Exhibit 10.2.