SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) of
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year
ended:
June
30, 2010
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) of
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from _____ to _____
Commission File Number:
000-50592
|
K-Fed Bancorp
|
|
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
20-0411486
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
1359
N. Grand Avenue, Covina, CA
|
|
|
|
91724
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
(800)
524-2274
|
|
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of each class
|
|
Name
of exchange on which registered
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock, $.01 par value per share
|
|
The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Indicated
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act
Yes
o
No
x
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes
o
No
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes
x
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data file required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files).
Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark if
disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form
10-K
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated
filer
o
Non-accelerated
filer
o
Smaller
Reporting Company
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
x
The
aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant, computed by reference to the average bid and asked price of such
common equity as of December 31, 2009 was $33.4 million. There were 13,290,200
shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value per share, outstanding
at August 24, 2010.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions
of the proxy statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
K-FED
BANCORP
Annual
Report on Form 10-K
For
the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010
Table
of Contents
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
78
|
Part I.
Item 1. Business.
General
K-Fed
Bancorp (the “Company”) is a federally-chartered stock holding company that was
formed in July 2003 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of K-Fed Mutual Holding Company
(the “MHC”), a federally-chartered mutual holding company, in connection with
the mutual holding company reorganization of Kaiser Federal Bank (the “Bank”), a
federally chartered stock savings bank. Upon completion of the mutual holding
company reorganization in July 2003, K-Fed Bancorp acquired all of the capital
stock of Kaiser Federal Bank. On March 30, 2004, K-Fed Bancorp completed a
minority stock offering in which it sold 5,686,750 shares, or 39.09%, of its
outstanding common stock to eligible depositors of Kaiser Federal Bank and the
Kaiser Federal Bank employee stock ownership plan in a subscription offering.
The remaining 8,861,750 outstanding shares of K-Fed Bancorp’s common stock are
owned by K-Fed Mutual Holding Company. At June 30, 2010, K-Fed Mutual Holding
Company owned 66.7% of the outstanding shares of common stock of K-Fed Bancorp,
with the remaining 33.3%, or 4,428,450 shares held by public
stockholders. K-Fed Bancorp owns 100% of Kaiser Federal Bank’s
outstanding common stock.
At June
30, 2010, K-Fed Bancorp had consolidated assets of $866.8 million, deposits of
$630.7 million and stockholders’ equity of $94.7 million. K-Fed
Bancorp has not engaged in any significant business to date. Its
primary activity is holding all of the outstanding shares of common stock of
Kaiser Federal Bank. K-Fed Bancorp does not maintain offices separate
from those of Kaiser Federal Bank or utilize persons other than certain of
Kaiser Federal Bank’s officers. Our executive offices are located at
1359 North Grand Avenue, Covina, California 91724 and our telephone number is
(626) 339-9663.
Kaiser
Federal Bank is a community oriented financial institution offering a variety of
financial services to meet the needs of the communities it serves. We are
headquartered in Covina, California, with branches or financial service centers
in Pasadena, Covina, Bellflower, Harbor City, Los Angeles and Panorama City to
serve Los Angeles County, financial service centers in Fontana and Riverside to
serve San Bernardino and Riverside counties, and one financial service center in
Santa Clara to serve Santa Clara County. Financial service centers provide all
of the services as our full service branches except they do not disburse cash;
however, there is an on-site ATM that dispenses cash.
We began
operations as a credit union in 1953 initially serving the employees of the
Kaiser Foundation Hospital in Los Angeles, California. As the Kaiser Permanente
Medical Care Program evolved so did the credit union, and in 1972, it changed
its name to Kaiser Permanente Federal Credit Union. The credit union grew to
primarily serve Kaiser Permanente employees and physicians who worked or lived
in California. The credit union serviced members with two branches, Pasadena and
Santa Clara, and a network of ATMs primarily located in Kaiser Permanente
medical centers. However, as a credit union, the credit union was legally
restricted to serve only individuals who shared a “common bond” such as a common
employer.
After
receiving the necessary regulatory and membership approvals, on November 1,
1999, Kaiser Permanente Federal Credit Union converted to a federal mutual
savings bank known as Kaiser Federal Bank which serves the general public as
well as Kaiser Permanente employees. Kaiser Federal Bank reorganized into the
mutual holding company structure in 2003 and became the wholly owned subsidiary
of K-Fed Bancorp.
Kaiser
Federal Bank’s principal business activity consists of attracting retail
deposits from the general public and originating primarily loans secured by
first mortgages on owner-occupied one-to-four family residences and multi-family
residences located in its market area and, to a lesser extent, automobile and
other consumer loans. Prior to 2007, Kaiser Federal Bank purchased, using our
own underwriting standards, a significant number of first mortgages on
owner-occupied, one-to-four family residences secured by properties located
throughout California. These purchases were primarily funded with
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings. Kaiser Federal Bank also
originated commercial real estate loans, but made the strategic decision to
cease such lending in January 2009 in light of the downturn in economic
conditions. Historically, we have not originated, or purchased, commercial
business, commercial construction, or residential construction loans and have no
current plans to do so.
Our
revenues are derived principally from interest on loans and mortgage-backed and
related securities. We also generate revenue from service charges and other
income.
We offer
a variety of deposit accounts having a wide range of interest rates and terms,
which generally include savings accounts, money market accounts, demand deposit
accounts and certificate of deposit accounts with varied terms ranging from 90
days to five years. We solicit deposits in our primary market areas of Los
Angeles, Orange, San Diego, San Bernardino, Riverside, and Santa Clara counties,
in California.
Recent
Developments
The Board
of Directors of the MHC, the Company and the Bank adopted a Plan of Conversion
and Reorganization (the “Plan”) on May 27, 2010, as amended August 24,
2010. The Plan is subject to the approval of the Company’s
stockholders, the Bank’s depositors and the Office of Thrift Supervision
(“OTS”), our primary banking regulator. Pursuant to the Plan, the MHC
will convert from the mutual holding company form of organization to the fully
stock public form. The MHC will then no longer
exist. Pursuant to the Plan, the Company, which owns 100% of the
Bank, also will be succeeded by a Maryland corporation, Kaiser Federal Financial
Group, Inc. As part of the conversion, the MHC’s ownership interest
of the Company will be offered for sale in a public offering. The
existing publicly held shares of the Company, which represent the minority
ownership interest in the Company, will be exchanged for new shares of common
stock of Kaiser Federal Financial Group, Inc. The exchange ratio will
ensure that immediately after the conversion and public offering, the public
stockholders of the Company will own the same aggregate percentage of Kaiser
Federal Financial Group, Inc. that they owned immediately prior to that time,
excluding any new shares purchased in the offering or cash paid in lieu of
fractional shares. When the conversion and public offering are
completed, all of the capital stock of the Bank will be owned by Kaiser Federal
Financial Group, Inc.
Available
Information
Our
Internet address is
www.k-fed.com
.
We make available free of charge, through our web site, annual reports on Form
10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K and
amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable
after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). All SEC filings of the Company
are also available at the SEC’s website,
www.sec.gov
.
Market
Area
The
financial services sector of the United States economy continues to experience a
declining economic environment. Economic conditions continued to
weaken both nationally and in our market area of California. With the
tightening of credit standards, there has been an imbalance between the number
of homes available for sale and the demand from qualified borrowers, creating
significant downward pressure on home prices. California, in
particular, experienced significant declines in real estate values over the past
several years and increasing unemployment rates as compared to the national
average.
Future
growth opportunities will be influenced by the stability of the regional economy
and other trends within California, including housing market
conditions. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, unemployment rates
in California increased to 12.3% at June 30, 2010 from 11.6% at June 30, 2009
and 7.0% at June 2008. This compares to the national unemployment
rate of 9.5% at June 30, 2010, 9.5% at June 30, 2009 and 5.5% at June 30,
2008. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the unemployment rates
(not seasonally adjusted) for the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana metropolitan
area, where most of our lending activity occurs increased to 11.6% at June 30,
2010 from 10.8% at June 30, 2009 and 6.8% at June 30, 2008. The
S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index for the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area
declined by approximately 36% at May 2010 as compared to the high reported in
2006. This compares to the S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home
Price Index decline of approximately 29% as compared to the high reported in
2006. The California Association of Realtors reported single-family
home sales decreased 4.2% in June 2010 as compared to June 2009.
According
to the California Building Industry Association, housing starts gained ground in
June 2010; however, production levels are still hovering around record
lows. In response to declining new home sales, builders reduced the
pace of new construction over the past several years. According to
the U.S. Census Bureau, one-to-four family and multi-family building permits
declined significantly in the past two years, both nationally and in
California. On a national level, one-to-four family building permits
declined 35% in 2008 and 36% in 2009. This compares to one-to-four
family building permits in California declining 43% in 2008 and 44% in
2009. Multi-family building permits declined 23% in 2008 and 49% in
2009 on a national level. This compares to multi-family building
permits in California declining 34% in 2008 and 56% in
2009. According to the Construction Industry Research Board, for the
first half of 2010 permits were up 17% when compared to the first half of
2009. One-to-four family permits were up 8% and multi-family permits
rose 35%. While the recent improvement in construction is
encouraging, the California housing market and economy have been adversely
impacted by the record low levels of building permits over the past several
years.
Competition
We face
strong competition in originating real estate and other loans and in attracting
deposits. Competition in originating real estate loans comes primarily from
other savings institutions, commercial banks, credit unions and mortgage
bankers. Other savings institutions, commercial banks, credit unions and finance
companies provide vigorous competition in consumer lending.
We
attract all of our deposits through our branch and ATM network. Competition for
those deposits is principally from other savings institutions, commercial banks
and credit unions, as well as mutual funds and other alternative investments. We
compete for these deposits by offering superior service and a variety of deposit
accounts at competitive rates. We have less than a 1% market share of deposits
in each of the markets in which we compete.
Lending
Activities
General
.
Historically, we originated and purchased first lien one-to-four family real
estate loans throughout our market area. However, we have not purchased any
one-to-four family real estate loans since June 2007 as we have focused our
efforts on originating multi-family residential loans. We also originate
consumer loans, primarily automobile loans. Prior to January 2009, we
also originated commercial real estate loans, but have ceased making such loans
until economic conditions improve and the real estate market
stabilizes.
Our loans
carry either a fixed or an adjustable rate of interest. We do not
offer adjustable rate loans where the initial rate is below the otherwise
applicable index rate (i.e., teaser rates). Mortgage loans generally have a
longer term amortization, with maturities up to 30 years, depending upon the
type of property with principal and interest due each month. Consumer loans are
generally short term and amortize monthly or have interest payable
monthly. We also have loans in our portfolio that only require
interest payments on a monthly basis. At June 30, 2010, our net loan portfolio
totaled $758.0 million, which constituted 87.4% of our total assets. With
respect to purchased loans, we underwrote each purchased loan in accordance with
our underwriting standards. The majority of the loans that we purchased were
acquired with servicing retained by the seller to allow for greater investments
in real-estate lending without having to significantly increase our servicing
and operations costs. We generally purchased these loans without recourse
against the seller.
At June
30, 2010, the maximum amount which we could have loaned to any one borrower and
the borrower’s related entities under applicable regulations was $13.4 million,
or 15% of our unimpaired capital. At June 30, 2010, we had no loans or group of
loans to related borrowers with outstanding balances in excess of this amount.
Our five largest lending relationships at June 30, 2010 were as
follows:
|
●
|
three
loans to an individual totaling $7.6 million, secured by a multi-tenant
medical office building and two multi-family
dwellings;
|
|
●
|
seven
loans to an individual for $7.5 million secured by seven multi-family
dwellings ranging from eight to 50
units;
|
|
●
|
three
loans to an individual for $6.8 million secured by a single tenant retail
building, a single tenant supermarket building and a 15 tenant mixed use
office building;
|
|
●
|
two
loans to an individual for $6.5 million secured by a 16 tenant medical
office building and a 54 unit multi-family dwelling;
and
|
|
●
|
two
loans to an individual for $5.7 million secured by a single tenant
industrial building and a single tenant office
building.
|
All of
the loans noted in the above relationships were performing in accordance with
their terms as of June 30, 2010.
The
following table presents information concerning the composition of the loan
portfolio in dollar amounts and in percentages as of the dates
indicated. There were no loans held for sale on any of the dates
indicated below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Real
estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family
|
|
$
|
335,631
|
|
|
|
43.55
|
%
|
|
$
|
377,230
|
|
|
|
50.22
|
%
|
|
$
|
428,727
|
|
|
|
57.51
|
%
|
|
$
|
469,459
|
|
|
|
66.88
|
%
|
|
$
|
437,024
|
|
|
|
68.63
|
%
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
278,397
|
|
|
|
36.12
|
|
|
|
196,575
|
|
|
|
26.17
|
|
|
|
132,290
|
|
|
|
17.75
|
|
|
|
88,112
|
|
|
|
12.55
|
|
|
|
89,220
|
|
|
|
14.01
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
113,458
|
|
|
|
14.72
|
|
|
|
121,143
|
|
|
|
16.13
|
|
|
|
115,831
|
|
|
|
15.54
|
|
|
|
77,821
|
|
|
|
11.09
|
|
|
|
58,845
|
|
|
|
9.24
|
|
Total
real estate loans
|
|
|
727,486
|
|
|
|
94.39
|
|
|
|
694,948
|
|
|
|
92.52
|
|
|
|
676,848
|
|
|
|
90.80
|
|
|
|
635,392
|
|
|
|
90.52
|
|
|
|
585,089
|
|
|
|
91.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile
|
|
|
29,492
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
|
|
41,798
|
|
|
|
5.56
|
|
|
|
52,299
|
|
|
|
7.01
|
|
|
|
53,100
|
|
|
|
7.56
|
|
|
|
41,572
|
|
|
|
6.53
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
1,096
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
1,446
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
1,787
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12,672
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
13,119
|
|
|
|
1.75
|
|
|
|
14,883
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
12,024
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
8,374
|
|
|
|
1.31
|
|
Total other
loans
|
|
|
43,260
|
|
|
|
5.61
|
|
|
|
56,216
|
|
|
|
7.48
|
|
|
|
68,587
|
|
|
|
9.20
|
|
|
|
66,570
|
|
|
|
9.48
|
|
|
|
51,733
|
|
|
|
8.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
770,746
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
751,164
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
745,435
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
701,962
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
636,822
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
deferred loan originations costs (fees)
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(discounts) premiums on purchased loans
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses
|
|
|
(13,309
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,229
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,805
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,722
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total
loans receivable, net
|
|
$
|
757,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
746,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
742,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
699,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
634,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
Maturity
.
The following schedule illustrates certain information at June 30, 2010
regarding the dollar amount of loans maturing in the portfolio based on their
contractual terms-to-maturity, but does not include scheduled payments or
potential prepayments. Demand loans, loans having no stated schedule of
repayments and no stated maturity are reported as due in one year or less. Loan
balances do not include undisbursed loan proceeds, unearned discounts, unearned
income and allowance for loan losses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
At June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
(1) year
(1)
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,027
|
|
|
$
|
1,096
|
|
|
$
|
2,690
|
|
|
$
|
4,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
1 year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
1 year through 3 years
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
3,469
|
|
|
|
15,518
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
|
20,623
|
|
After
3 years through 5 years
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
9,594
|
|
|
|
12,909
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
24,563
|
|
After
5 years through 10 years
|
|
|
37,006
|
|
|
|
23,137
|
|
|
|
99,304
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,419
|
|
|
|
166,904
|
|
After
10 years through 15 years
|
|
|
8,960
|
|
|
|
231,106
|
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
241,157
|
|
After
15 years
|
|
|
288,666
|
|
|
|
23,884
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
312,550
|
|
Total
due after 1 year
|
|
|
335,495
|
|
|
|
278,397
|
|
|
|
113,458
|
|
|
|
28,465
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,982
|
|
|
|
765,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
335,631
|
|
|
$
|
278,397
|
|
|
$
|
113,458
|
|
|
$
|
29,492
|
|
|
$
|
1,096
|
|
|
$
|
12,672
|
|
|
$
|
770,746
|
|
(1)
|
Includes
demand loans and loans that have no stated
maturity.
|
The
following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans at June 30, 2010 that
are due after June 30, 2011, which have fixed interest rates and adjustable
interest rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Real
estate loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family
|
|
$
|
276,859
|
|
|
$
|
58,636
|
|
|
$
|
335,495
|
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
278,397
|
|
|
|
278,397
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
113,458
|
|
|
|
113,458
|
|
Total real estate
loans
|
|
|
276,859
|
|
|
|
450,491
|
|
|
|
727,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile
|
|
|
28,465
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
28,465
|
|
Home
equity
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
loans
|
|
|
9,982
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,982
|
|
Total other
loans
|
|
|
38,447
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
38,447
|
|
Total
loans
|
|
$
|
315,306
|
|
|
$
|
450,491
|
|
|
$
|
765,797
|
|
One-to-four
Family Residential Lending
. At June 30, 2010, our first lien one-to-four
family residential mortgage loans totaled $335.6 million, or 43.5%, of our gross
loan portfolio. We generally underwrite our one-to-four family loans based on
the applicant’s employment, credit history and the appraised value of the
subject property. With respect to loans we have purchased, we underwrote each
loan based upon our underwriting standards prior to making the purchase.
Presently, we lend up to 80% of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase
price of the subject property for one-to-four family residential loans.
Properties securing our one-to-four family loans are appraised by independent
state licensed fee appraisers approved by our board of directors. We require our
borrowers to obtain title and hazard insurance, and flood insurance, if
necessary, in an amount not less than the value of the property
improvements.
We
currently originate one-to-four family mortgage loans on a fixed rate and
adjustable rate basis. Our pricing strategy for mortgage loans includes setting
interest rates that are competitive with other local financial institutions and
consistent with our internal needs. Adjustable rate loans are tied to indices
based on the one year London Inter Bank Offering Rate and U.S. Treasury
securities adjusted to a constant maturity of one year. A majority of our
adjustable rate loans carry an initial fixed rate of interest for either three
or five years which then converts to an interest rate that is adjusted annually
based upon the applicable index. Our one-to-four family mortgage loans are
structured with a thirty year maturity and with amortizations up to a 30-year
period. All of our one-to-four family loans are secured by properties located in
California. All our real estate loans contain a “due on sale” clause allowing us
to declare the unpaid principal balance due and payable upon the sale of the
security property.
Adjustable
rate mortgage loans generally pose different credit risks than fixed rate loan
mortgages, primarily because as interest rates rise, the borrower’s payment
rises, increasing the potential for default. At June 30, 2010, our
one-to-four family adjustable rate mortgage loan portfolio totaled $58.6
million, or 7.6% of our gross loan portfolio. At that date, the fixed rate
one-to-four family mortgage loan portfolio totaled $276.9 million, or 35.9% of
our gross loan portfolio. Included in non-accrual loans at June 30,
2010 were $2.9 million in adjustable rate one-to-four family mortgage loans and
$21.9 million in fixed rate one-to-four family mortgage loans.
In
addition, we previously purchased interest-only one-to-four family mortgage
loans. One-to-four family interest-only mortgage loans have decreased by $14.4
million, or 24.1% to $45.3 million at June 30, 2010 from $59.7 million at June
30, 2009. We have also purchased loans underwritten based upon stated income. A
stated income loan is a loan where the borrower’s income source is not subject
to verification through the application process, but the reasonableness of the
stated income is verified through review of other sources, such as compensation
surveys. One-to-four family stated income mortgage loans have decreased by $19.1
million, or 20.3% to $75.2 million at June 30, 2010 from $94.3 million at June
30, 2009. As of June 30, 2010, $53.4 million of stated income mortgage loans
were fixed rate loans and $21.8 million were adjustable rate
loans. Included in non-accrual loans at June 30, 2010 were $12.5
million in one-to-four family loans that were interest-only or stated income
loans that carried a specific valuation allowance of $1.7
million. There were $3.2 million in interest-only or stated income
loans that were modified as of June 30, 2010. The $3.2 million in
loans were classified as troubled debt restructurings and are included in
non-accrual loans. There are no special or unusual payment
arrangements on these loans.
In 2005,
we began to purchase interest-only loans assuming a fully amortizing monthly
payment and loan qualification was based upon the rate that would apply upon the
first interest rate adjustment. We have no plans to increase the
number of interest-only or stated income loans held in our loan portfolio or
originate such loans at this time and have not purchased any such loans since
2007. An interest-only loan typically provides for the payment of
interest (rather than both principal and interest) for a fixed period of three,
five or seven years, thereafter the loan payments adjust to include both
principal and interest for the remaining term. By imposing these
additional underwriting standards we believe these loans should not present
greater risk than other loans in our one-to-four family loan
portfolio.
The
following table describes certain risk characteristics of our one-to-four family
nonconforming mortgage loans held for investment as of June 30, 2010 and
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Credit Score
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Seasoning
(3)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-only
(4)
|
|
$
|
45,295
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
71.86
|
%
|
|
4.16
years
|
|
Stated
income
(4)(5)
|
|
|
75,184
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
66.95
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
|
Credit
score less than or equal
to
660
|
|
|
25,268
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
70.68
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-only
(4)
|
|
$
|
59,741
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
76.25
|
%
|
|
3.46
years
|
|
Stated
income
(4)(5)
|
|
|
94,263
|
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
71.84
|
|
|
|
4.34
|
|
Credit
score less than or equal
to
660
|
|
|
27,766
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
71.23
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
(1)
|
The
credit score is one factor in determining the credit worthiness of a
borrower based on the borrower’s credit history. The credit
score is as of origination.
|
(2)
|
LTV
(loan-to-value) is the ratio calculated by dividing the original loan
balance by the original appraised value of the real estate
collateral.
|
(3)
|
Seasoning
describes the number of years since the funding date of the
loan.
|
(4)
|
At
June 30, 2010 and 2009 there were $9.9 million and $16.8 million in loans
that are both stated income and interest-only,
respectively.
|
(5)
|
Stated
income is defined as a borrower provided level of income which is not
subject to verification during the loan origination process through the
borrower’s application, but the reasonableness of the borrower’s income is
verified through other sources.
|
Multi-Family
Residential Real Estate Lending
. We also offer multi-family residential
real estate loans through our loan division at the Covina headquarters office.
These loans are secured by real estate located in our primary market areas,
within the state of California. We generally originate multi-family
residential loans through our loan officers. Since multi-family
residential lending has become the predominate source of our loan origination
activity, we have hired additional seasoned loan officers, underwriters, and
support staff in this area. We seek to originate multi-family residential loans
with initial principal balances of $1.5 million or less. At
June 30, 2010, multi-family residential loans totaled $278.4 million, or 36.1%,
of our gross loan portfolio, and consisted of 415 loans outstanding with an
average loan balance of approximately $670,000 although we originate loans with
balances greater than this average.
Our
multi-family residential loans are originated with adjustable interest rates. We
use a number of indices to set the interest rate, including a rate based on the
constant maturity of one year U.S. Treasury securities. Our adjustable rate
loans carry an initial fixed rate of interest for one, three, five or seven
years which then convert to an interest rate that is adjusted annually based
upon the applicable index. Presently, our underwriting guidelines allow us to
lend up to 70% of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase price of
multi-family residential real estate. These loans require monthly payments,
amortize over a period of up to thirty years and have maximum maturity of thirty
years and carry prepayment penalties.
Loans
secured by multi-family residential real estate are underwritten based on
non-discriminatory underwriting standards and loan origination procedures
established by Kaiser Federal Bank’s Credit Committee. Loan policies
are reviewed annually, or more frequently if warranted, and approved by both the
Credit Committee and Kaiser Federal Bank’s board of directors. The
loan underwriting process is intended to assess the income producing potential
of the property and the financial strength of the borrower. We review
the borrower’s sources of income, cash flow, assets, and credit
history. We evaluate the historical and projected income and expenses
of the borrower and property. We also evaluate a guarantor when a
guarantee is provided as part of the loan. The net operating income,
which is the income derived from the operation of the property less all
operating expenses, must be sufficient to cover the payments related to the
outstanding debt. Appraisals and secondary review appraisals on properties
securing multi-family residential loans are performed by independent state
licensed fee appraisers approved by our board of directors.
Loans
secured by multi-family residential properties are generally larger and involve
a greater degree of credit risk than one-to-four family residential mortgage
loans. Because payments on loans secured by multi-family residential properties
are often dependent on the successful operation or management of the properties,
repayment of such loans may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate
market or the economy. If the cash flow from the project is reduced, or if
leases are not obtained or renewed, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may
be impaired. In order to monitor the adequacy of cash flows on income-producing
properties, the borrowers are required to provide periodic financial
information. To ensure adequate resources to request, follow-up, and
analyze borrower financial updates, additional staff has been allocated to these
functions, and staffing will be added in the future to support the size and
complexity of the portfolios. Included in non-accrual loans at June
30, 2010 were five multi-family residential real estate loans totaling $4.0
million, three of which were classified as troubled debt restructurings and are
current under the modified terms. See “—Asset Quality -
Non-Performing Assets.”
Commercial
Real Estate Lending
. In January 2009, we suspended offering new
commercial real estate loans due to the unstable economic outlook for this type
of loan. We will reevaluate whether to originate commercial real
estate loans in the future as market conditions change. The existing
portfolio is secured primarily by small retail establishments, small industrial
warehouse buildings and small office buildings located in our primary market
area, within the state of California, and are both owner and non-owner
occupied. These loans were originated through our staff at our Covina
headquarters office. Generally, we have not purchased commercial real
estate loans. At June 30, 2010, commercial real estate loans totaled
$113.5 million, or 14.7% of our gross loan portfolio, of which $24.1 million or
21.2% of this portfolio was to borrowers who occupy the property. The
table below shows the number and balance by collateral type of our commercial
real estate loans at June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
40,728
|
|
Owner
occupied
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
24,054
|
|
Manufacturing
facilities
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
16,912
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
16,188
|
|
Medical
office
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5,346
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
10,230
|
|
Total
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
$
|
113,458
|
|
We
originated only adjustable rate commercial real estate loans. The interest rate
on these loans is tied to a rate based on the constant maturity of one year U.S.
Treasury securities. A majority of our adjustable rate loans carry an initial
fixed rate of interest for either three or five years which then converts to an
interest rate that is adjusted annually based upon the index. Presently, our
underwriting guidelines allow us to lend up to 60% of the lesser of the
appraised value or purchase price for the commercial real estate. These loans
require monthly payments, amortize up to thirty years, have maturities of up to
fifteen years and carry prepayment penalties.
Loans
secured by commercial real estate were underwritten based on the income
producing potential of the property, the financial strength of the borrower and
any guarantors. The net operating income, which is the income derived from the
operation of the property less all operating expenses, must be sufficient to
cover the payments related to the outstanding debt. We may require an assignment
of rents or leases in order to be assured that the cash flow from the project
will be used to repay the debt. All loans required an appraisal and secondary
review from two different independent state licensed fee appraisers on our
approved appraiser list, which is approved by the board of
directors.
Loans
secured by commercial real estate properties are generally larger and involve a
greater degree of credit risk than one-to-four family residential mortgage
loans. Because payments on loans secured by commercial real estate properties
are often dependent on the successful operation or management of the properties,
repayment of such loans may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate
market or the economy. If the cash flow from the project is reduced, or if
leases are not obtained or renewed, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may
be impaired. In order to monitor the adequacy of cash flows on
income-producing properties, the borrowers are required to provide periodic
financial information. Included in non-accrual loans as of June 30,
2010 was one contractually current commercial real estate loan with a balance of
$2.7 million. See “—Asset Quality - Non-Performing
Assets.”
Consumer
Loans
. We offer a variety of secured consumer loans, including home
equity lines of credit, new and used automobile loans, and loans secured by
savings deposits. We also offer a limited amount of unsecured loans. Consumer
loans generally have shorter terms to maturity, which reduces our exposure to
changes in interest rates, and carry higher rates of interest than do
one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. At June 30, 2010, our consumer
loan portfolio, exclusive of automobile loans, totaled $13.8 million, or 1.8%,
of our gross loan portfolio.
The most
significant component of our consumer lending is automobile loans. We originate
automobile loans only on a direct basis with the borrower. Many of our
automobile loans are made to employees of the Kaiser Permanente Health Care
System. Loans secured by automobiles totaled $29.5 million, or 3.83%, of our
gross loan portfolio at June 30, 2010. Automobile loans may be written for up to
seven years for new automobiles and a maximum of five years for used automobiles
and have fixed rates of interest. Loan-to-value ratios for automobile loans are
up to 100% of the manufacturer’s suggested retail price for new automobiles and
up to 100% of value on used cars, based on valuation from official used car
guides.
Each
automobile loan requires the borrower to keep the financed vehicle fully insured
against loss or damage by fire, theft and collision. Nevertheless,
there can be no assurance that each financed vehicle will continue to be covered
by physical damage insurance provided by the borrower during the entire term
which the related loan is outstanding. In addition, we have the right
to force place insurance coverage in the event the required physical damage
insurance on an automobile is not maintained by the borrower.
Our
primary focus when originating automobile loans is on the ability of the
borrower to repay the loan rather than the value of the underlying
collateral. The amount financed by us is generally up to the
manufacturer’s suggested retail price of the financed vehicle plus sales tax,
dealer preparation fees, license fees and title fees, plus the cost of service
and warranty contracts obtained through us in connection with the
vehicle.
Consumer
loans may entail greater risk than do one-to-four family residential mortgage
loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans which are secured by rapidly
depreciable assets, such as automobiles. In these cases, any repossessed
collateral for a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment
of the outstanding loan balance. As a result, consumer loan collections are
dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability and, thus, are more
likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal
bankruptcy.
Loan
Approval Procedures and Authority.
All multi-family residential and
commercial real estate loans require an appraisal and secondary review appraisal
as part of the underwriting process. One-to-four family residential loans
require an appraisal and may be subject to a secondary review appraisal. Secured
consumer loans require evaluation of collateral. Additionally, any
loan request that results in a total credit exposure to one borrower of over
$500,000 and up to $1.5 million requires the additional approval of a second
underwriter and/or the Chief Credit Officer. Any loan request that
results in a total credit exposure to one borrower over $1.5 million and up to
$5 million requires the approval of the Credit Committee, which is currently
comprised of the Chairman of the Board, President/CEO, Chief Operating Officer,
Chief Credit Officer, and other senior lending staff. Loan requests
that result in a credit exposure to one borrower over $5.0 million require the
board of director’s approval. All loan approvals granted by the
Credit Committee are documented in the meeting minutes and reported to the board
of directors. Although our regulatory loans-to-one borrower limit is
substantially higher than the $5 million internal limit, and will increase with
the successful completion of this offering, our intention is to keep our lending
limits at their current levels.
Loan
Originations, Purchases, Sales and Repayments.
We originate loans through
employees located at our headquarters office. Walk-in customers and referrals
from our current customer base, advertisements, real estate brokers and mortgage
loan brokers are also important sources of loan
originations.
While we
originate adjustable rate and fixed rate loans, our ability to originate loans
is dependent upon customer demand for loans in our market area. Demand is
affected by local competition and the interest rate environment. In prior years,
we have also purchased real estate whole loans as well as participation
interests in real estate loans. However, we have not purchased any loans since
June 2007. At June 30, 2010, our real estate loan portfolio totaled $727.5
million or 94.4% of the gross loan portfolio. Purchased real estate loans
serviced by others at June 30, 2010 totaled $215.3 million, or 27.9% of the
gross loan portfolio. At June 30, 2009, our real estate loan
portfolio totaled $694.9 million or 92.5% of the gross loan portfolio. Purchased
real estate loans serviced by others at June 30, 2009 totaled $291.1 million, or
38.8% of the gross loan portfolio.
The
following table shows the loan originations, purchases, sales and repayment
activities for the years indicated.
|
|
For
the Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Originations
by type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustable
rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate one-to-four-family
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,491
|
|
-multi-family
residential
|
|
|
91,104
|
|
|
|
76,495
|
|
|
|
59,548
|
|
-commercial
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13,664
|
|
|
|
53,108
|
|
Non-real
estate – other consumer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
Total
adjustable
rate
|
|
|
91,104
|
|
|
|
90,159
|
|
|
|
117,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate one-to-four family
|
|
$
|
29,045
|
|
|
$
|
7,777
|
|
|
$
|
14,749
|
|
Non-real
estate - consumer automobile
|
|
|
8,285
|
|
|
|
12,395
|
|
|
|
24,960
|
|
-
other
consumer
|
|
|
9,397
|
|
|
|
11,264
|
|
|
|
13,569
|
|
Total
fixed
rate
|
|
|
46,727
|
|
|
|
31,436
|
|
|
|
53,278
|
|
Total
loans
originated
|
|
|
137,831
|
|
|
|
121,595
|
|
|
|
170,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustable
rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate one-to-four family
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
-multi-family
residential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
-commercial
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
adjustable
rate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate one-to-four family
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Total
fixed
rate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
loans
purchased
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
and repayments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
and loan participations sold
|
|
|
2,485
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Principal
repayments
|
|
|
115,764
|
|
|
|
115,866
|
|
|
|
127,137
|
|
Total
reductions
|
|
|
118,249
|
|
|
|
115,866
|
|
|
|
127,137
|
|
Decrease
in other items,
net
|
|
|
(8,472
|
)
|
|
|
(1,045
|
)
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
Net
increase
|
|
$
|
11,110
|
|
|
$
|
4,684
|
|
|
$
|
43,048
|
|
Asset
Quality
General.
As a result of the prolonged distressed economic environment, elevated
unemployment levels and a depressed real estate market, our loan portfolio
continues to show increased delinquency. While delinquency ratios
have increased we continue our disciplined lending practices including our
strict adherence to a long standing regimented credit culture that emphasizes
the consistent application of underwriting standards to all loans. In
this regard, we fully underwrite all loans based on an applicant’s employment
history, credit history and an appraised value of the subject
property. With respect to loans we purchased in the past, we
underwrote each loan based upon our own underwriting standards prior to making
the purchase. The following underwriting guidelines, among other
things, have been used by us as underwriting tools to further limit our
potential loss exposure:
|
●
|
All
variable rate one-to-four family residential loans are underwritten using
the fully indexed rate.
|
|
●
|
We
only lend up to 80% of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase price
for one-to-four family residential
loans.
|
|
●
|
We
only lend up to 70% of the appraised value or purchase price for
multi-family residential loans.
|
Additionally,
our portfolio has remained strongly anchored in traditional mortgage products.
We do not originate or purchase construction and development loans, teaser
option-ARM loans, negatively amortizing loans or high loan-to-value
loans.
At June
30, 2010, one-to-four family residential mortgage loans totaled $335.6 million,
or 43.5%, of our gross loan portfolio of which $276.9 million were fixed rate
and $58.6 million were adjustable rate loans. Adjustable rate
mortgages generally pose different credit risks than fixed rate mortgages,
primarily because as interest rates rise, the borrower’s payment rises,
increasing the potential for default. Included in non-accrual loans
at June 30, 2010 were $2.9 million in adjustable rate one-to-four family loans
and $21.9 million in fixed rate one-to-four family loans. Overall
this represents 7.4% of the one-to-four family residential mortgage loan
portfolio.
All of
our real estate loans are secured by properties located in
California. The following tables set forth our real estate loans and
non-accrual real estate loans by county:
Real
Estate Loans by County as of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los
Angeles
|
|
$
|
127,625
|
|
|
$
|
208,616
|
|
|
$
|
65,614
|
|
|
$
|
401,855
|
|
|
|
55.24
|
%
|
Orange
|
|
|
55,968
|
|
|
|
24,027
|
|
|
|
28,464
|
|
|
|
108,459
|
|
|
|
14.91
|
|
San
Diego
|
|
|
31,318
|
|
|
|
15,878
|
|
|
|
2,665
|
|
|
|
49,861
|
|
|
|
6.85
|
|
Riverside
|
|
|
14,912
|
|
|
|
6,850
|
|
|
|
9,376
|
|
|
|
31,138
|
|
|
|
4.28
|
|
San
Bernardino
|
|
|
13,584
|
|
|
|
14,033
|
|
|
|
4,181
|
|
|
|
31,798
|
|
|
|
4.37
|
|
Santa
Clara
|
|
|
25,634
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
26,211
|
|
|
|
3.60
|
|
Alameda
|
|
|
12,699
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
13,229
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
Other
|
|
|
53,891
|
|
|
|
8,351
|
|
|
|
2,693
|
|
|
|
64,935
|
|
|
|
8.93
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
335,631
|
|
|
$
|
278,397
|
|
|
$
|
113,458
|
|
|
$
|
727,486
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Non-accrual
Real Estate Loans by County as of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
of Non-
accrual
to Loans
in
Each Category
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los
Angeles
|
|
$
|
8,081
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8,081
|
|
|
|
2.01
|
%
|
Orange
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
San
Diego
|
|
|
2,942
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,665
|
|
|
|
5,607
|
|
|
|
11.25
|
|
Riverside
|
|
|
3,239
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,470
|
|
|
|
11.14
|
|
San
Bernardino
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
|
|
2,705
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,339
|
|
|
|
16.79
|
|
Santa
Clara
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
Alameda
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
7.45
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,998
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,027
|
|
|
|
6.20
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,754
|
|
|
$
|
3,965
|
|
|
$
|
2,665
|
|
|
$
|
31,384
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
%
|
Problem
Assets.
For one-to-four family residential, multi-family residential and
commercial real estate loans serviced by us, a notice is sent to the borrower
when the loan is eight days past due. When the loan is twenty days past due, we
mail a subsequent delinquency notice to the borrower. Typically, before the loan
becomes thirty days past due, contact with the borrower is made requesting
payment of the delinquent amount in full, or the establishment of an acceptable
repayment plan to bring the loan current. If an acceptable repayment plan has
not been agreed upon, loan personnel will generally prepare a notice of intent
to foreclose. The notice of intent to foreclose allows the borrower up to ten
days to bring the account current. Once the loan becomes sixty days delinquent,
and an acceptable repayment plan has not been agreed upon, the servicing officer
will turn over the account to the deed of trust trustee with instructions to
initiate foreclosure. Real estate loans serviced by a third party are
subject to the servicing institution’s collection policies. However, we track
each purchased loan individually to attempt to receive full payments as
scheduled. Each month, third party servicers are required to provide delinquent
loan status reports to our servicing officer, which are included in the
month-end delinquent real estate report to management.
When a
borrower fails to make a timely payment on a consumer loan, a delinquency notice
is sent when the loan is ten days past due. When the loan is twenty days past
due, we mail a subsequent delinquency notice to the borrower. Once a loan is
thirty days past due, our staff contacts the borrower by telephone to determine
the reason for delinquency and to request payment of the delinquent amount in
full or to establish an acceptable repayment plan to bring the loan current. If
the borrower is unable to make or keep payment arrangements, additional
collection action is taken in the form of repossession of collateral for secured
loans and legal action for unsecured loans.
At June
30, 2010, $208.8 million, or 62.2% of our one-to-four family residential
mortgage portfolio was serviced by others. As a result of a higher
level of delinquent loans nationwide, third party servicers have been unable to
service and in certain circumstances foreclose on properties in a timely
manner. Currently, we track the servicing of these loans on our core
mortgage servicing system. We have hired additional experienced
mortgage loan workout staff and reallocated existing staff to monitor the
collection activity of the servicers and perform direct customer outreach when a
loan falls 30 days past due. In many instances, our role has been to
provide direction to the third party servicers regarding loan modification
requests and to develop collection plans for individual loans, while maintaining
contact with the borrower. Due to a number of factors, including the
high rate of loan delinquencies, we believe our servicers have not vigorously
pursued collection efforts on our behalf. We have been unsuccessful
in negotiating the transfer of these servicing rights to us and are currently
pursuing legal action. We have filed legal suit against Bank of
America and expect to file suit against another servicer in the next few months
seeking to obtain the transfer of servicing rights on $205.2 million of loans
serviced by others. In anticipation of this effort, we have hired
additional staff in the real estate loan servicing area.
The
following table presents information concerning the composition of the
one-to-four family residential loan portfolio by servicer at June 30,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
of Non-
accrual
to Loans in
Each
Category
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
and serviced by others
|
|
$
|
208,800
|
|
|
|
62.21
|
%
|
|
$
|
16,048
|
|
|
|
7.69
|
%
|
Purchased
and servicing transferred to us
|
|
|
30,747
|
|
|
|
9.16
|
|
|
|
4,578
|
|
|
|
14.89
|
|
Originated
and serviced by us
|
|
|
96,084
|
|
|
|
28.63
|
|
|
|
4,128
|
|
|
|
4.30
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
335,631
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
24,754
|
|
|
|
7.38
|
%
|
Delinquent
Loans
. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to
our loan portfolio delinquencies at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
At
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
13,373
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
14,670
|
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,786
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,786
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Home
equity
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Total
loans
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
1,332
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
16,226
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
17,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
2,212
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
6,220
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
8,432
|
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Home
equity
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Total
loans
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
2,244
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
6,231
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
8,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
1,583
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
1,583
|
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
Home
equity
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Total
loans
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
1,730
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
1,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1,115
|
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Home
equity
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Total
loans
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
1,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
383
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
383
|
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Home
equity
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Total
loans
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
494
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
Delinquent
loans 60 days or more past due increased to $17.6 million or 2.28% of total
loans at June 30, 2010 from $8.5 million or 1.13% of total loans at June 30,
2009. Delinquent one-to-four family loans increased from $8.4 million
at June 30, 2009 to $14.7 million at June 30, 2010. In addition,
there were two multi-family residential loans totaling $2.8 million that were
over 90 days delinquent at June 30, 2010 and are in the process of
foreclosure.
Non-Performing
Assets
. Non-performing assets consist of non-accrual loans and foreclosed
assets. Loans to a customer whose financial condition has deteriorated are
considered for non-accrual status whether or not the loan is 90 days and over
past due. All loans past due 90 days and over are classified as non-accrual. On
non-accrual loans, interest income is not recognized until actually collected.
At the time the loan is placed on non-accrual status, interest previously
accrued but not collected is reversed and charged against current
income. Non-accrual loans also include certain troubled debt
restructurings.
At June
30, 2010, we had $16.0 million in troubled debt restructurings. Of
the $16.0 million in troubled debt restructurings, $13.0 million are included in
non-accrual loans in the following table. There were no further
commitments to customers whose loans are troubled debt restructurings at June
30, 2010.
Any
changes or modifications made to loans are carefully reviewed to determine
whether they are troubled debt restructurings. Any loan modifications
made due to financial difficulties of the borrower where a concession is made
are reported as troubled debt restructurings. Any other changes or
modifications made for borrowers who are not experiencing financial difficulties
are done on an infrequent basis. There were nine loans that were
modified in fiscal 2010 and not accounted for as troubled debt restructurings in
the amount of $6.2 million. The modifications were made to refinance
the credits to maintain the borrowing relationships and generally consisted of
term or rate modifications. The borrowers were not experiencing
financial difficulty and the modifications were made at market
terms.
Real
Estate Owned.
Real estate owned and repossessed assets consist
of real estate and other assets which have been acquired through foreclosure on
loans. At the time of foreclosure, assets are recorded at fair
value less estimated selling costs, with any write-down charged against the
allowance for loan losses. The fair value of real estate owned is
determined by a third party appraisal of the property.
The table
below sets forth the amounts and categories of our non-performing assets at the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Non-accrual
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family
|
|
$
|
15,561
|
|
|
$
|
6,766
|
|
|
$
|
1,583
|
|
|
$
|
1,115
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
2,786
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Home
equity
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Troubled
debt restructurings
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family
|
|
|
9,193
|
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
2,665
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
non-accrual loans
|
|
$
|
31,451
|
|
|
$
|
8,871
|
|
|
$
|
1,730
|
|
|
$
|
1,141
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate owned and repossessed assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family
|
|
$
|
1,373
|
|
|
$
|
496
|
|
|
$
|
1,045
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Home
equity
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
real estate owned and repossessed
assets
|
|
$
|
1,373
|
|
|
$
|
499
|
|
|
$
|
1,206
|
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
32,824
|
|
|
$
|
9,370
|
|
|
$
|
2,936
|
|
|
$
|
1,453
|
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing
loans to total loans
(1)
|
|
|
4.08
|
%
|
|
|
1.18
|
%
|
|
|
0.23
|
%
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
Non-performing
assets to total assets
|
|
|
3.79
|
%
|
|
|
1.05
|
%
|
|
|
0.35
|
%
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
Non-accrued
interest
(2)
|
|
$
|
408
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
(1)
|
Total
loans are net of deferred fees and
costs.
|
(2)
|
If
interest on the loans classified as non-accrual had been accrued, interest
income in these amounts would have been
recorded.
|
The
increase in non-accrual loans was a result of the increased delinquency in real
estate loans as a result of the continued deterioration in the housing market as
well as deteriorating general economic conditions and increased and prolonged
unemployment in our market area. We continue to work with responsible
borrowers to keep their properties and as a result we have restructured $16.0
million in mortgage loans of which $12.8 million were performing in accordance
with their revised contractual terms at June 30, 2010. This compares
to $2.1 million in restructured loans at June 30, 2009. Of the $16.0
million in restructured loans, $13.0 million were reported as non-accrual at
June 30, 2010. Troubled debt restructured loans are reported as
non-accrual until we are reasonably assured of repayment and sustained
performance according to the modified terms. At June 30, 2010, there
were $6.6 million of multi-family residential and commercial real estate loans
on non-accrual for which specific valuation allowances of $1.3 million have been
applied. Included in the $6.6 million of income property loans on
non-accrual at June 30, 2010 were five multi-family residential loans totaling
$3.9 million and one commercial real estate loan totaling $2.7
million.
At June
30, 2010, there were five multi-family residential loans on non-accrual. The
first multi-family residential loan was made to one borrower with a principal
balance of $1.8 million located in Adelanto, California at June 30,
2010. The loan was over 90 days delinquent and had a court appointed
receiver in place to manage the property and collect the rents during the
judicial foreclosure process. The second multi-family residential
loan located in Tehachapi, California was made in the amount of $1.0 million and
was over 90 days delinquent and in the process of foreclosure at June 30,
2010. The remaining three multi-family residential loans on
non-accrual were in the amount of $1.2 million in the aggregate and were
troubled debt restructurings at June 30, 2010. At June 30, 2010, we
had one non-accruing commercial real estate loan with a balance of $2.7 million
secured by a strip mall in San Diego, California, which was current at June 30,
2010, but had previously experienced cash flow problems.
Classified
Assets
. Regulations provide for the classification of loans and other
assets, such as debt and equity securities considered by regulators to be of
lesser quality, as “substandard,” “doubtful” or “loss.” An asset is
considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net
worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any.
“Substandard” assets include those characterized by the “distinct possibility”
that the insured institution will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are
not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses
inherent in those classified “substandard,” with the added characteristic that
the weaknesses present make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of
currently existing facts, conditions, and values, “highly questionable and
improbable.” Assets classified as “loss” are those considered
“uncollectible” and of such little value that their continuance as assets
without the establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted. Loans are
classified as special mention when it is determined a loan relationship should
be monitored more closely. Loans are classified as special mention for a variety
of reasons including changes in recent borrower financial condition, changes in
borrower operations, changes in value of available collateral, concerns
regarding changes in economic conditions in a borrower’s industry, and other
matters. A loan classified as special mention in many instances may be
performing in accordance with the loan terms.
When an
insured institution classifies problem assets as either substandard or doubtful,
it may establish general allowances for loan losses in an amount deemed prudent
by management and approved by the board of directors. General allowances
represent loss allowances which have been established to recognize the inherent
risk associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances,
have not been allocated to particular problem assets. When an insured
institution classifies problem assets as “loss,” it is required either to
establish a specific allowance for losses equal to 100% of that portion of the
asset so classified or to charge off such amount. An institution’s determination
as to the classification of its assets and the amount of its valuation
allowances is subject to review by the Office of Thrift Supervision and the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which may order the establishment of
additional general or specific loss allowances.
In
connection with the filing of our periodic reports with the Office of Thrift
Supervision and in accordance with our classification of assets policy, we
regularly review the problem assets in our portfolio to determine whether any
assets require classification in accordance with applicable regulations. The
total amount of classified assets represented 53.48% of our equity capital and
5.84% of our total assets at June 30, 2010, as compared to 23.15% of our equity
capital and 2.39% of our total assets at June 30, 2009. At June 30,
2010 and 2009, there were $31.5 million and $8.9 million in non-accrual loans
included in classified assets, respectively.
The
aggregate amount of our classified and special mention assets at the dates
indicated were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Classified
and Special Mention Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
40,513
|
|
|
|
13,964
|
|
|
|
3,519
|
|
Special
Mention
|
|
|
10,043
|
|
|
|
7,316
|
|
|
|
5,335
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
50,608
|
|
|
$
|
21,426
|
|
|
$
|
9,398
|
|
Allowance
for Loan Losses
. We maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb
probable incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based
on ongoing, quarterly assessments of the probable losses inherent in the loan
portfolio. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”),
the allowance is comprised of both specific and general valuation
allowances.
The
specific component relates to loans that are classified as
impaired. We consider a loan impaired when it is probable that we
will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the terms of the loan
agreement and determine impairment by computing a fair value either based on
discounted cash flows using the loan’s initial interest rate or the fair value
of the collateral, less estimated selling costs, if the loan is collateral
dependent. The general component covers non-impaired loans and is
based both on our historical loss experience as well as significant factors
that, in management’s judgment, affect the collectability of the portfolio as of
the evaluation date.
The
general valuation allowance is calculated by applying loss factors to
outstanding loans based on the internal risk evaluation of the loans or pools of
loans. Changes in risk evaluations of both performing and non-performing loans
affect the amount of the allowance. The appropriateness of the allowance is
reviewed and established by management based upon its evaluation of
then-existing economic and business conditions affecting key lending areas and
other conditions, such as credit quality trends (including trends in
non-performing loans expected to result from existing conditions), collateral
values, loan volumes and concentrations, specific industry conditions and peer
data within portfolio segments, and recent loss experience in particular
segments of the portfolio that existed as of the balance sheet date and the
impact that such conditions were believed to have had on the collectability of
the loan. Significant factors reviewed in determining the allowance for loan
losses included loss ratio trends by loan product and concentrations in
geographic regions as well as concentrations by third party servicers. Specific
valuation allowances on real estate loans are charged-off at foreclosure;
however, we include specific valuation allowances in our historical loss
experience ratios. Holding period restrictions imposed by the State
of California on lenders foreclosing on owner occupied real estate securing
one-to-four family residential loans and difficulty pursuing collection efforts
through third party servicers on our behalf has delayed our ability to
foreclose.
Our
multi-family and commercial real estate loans (“income property”) are less
seasoned, and therefore, to-date we have not incurred material charge-offs and
our delinquent history on income property loans has been less than our
single-family real estate loans. In addition, the multi-family
portfolio has been a significant growth area in our loan portfolio during
2010. For income property loans we review the debt service coverage
ratios, seasoning and peer group data. In 2010, we expanded our
migration analysis to include the credit loss migration from published sources,
including both the OTS and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in order to
determine the allowance for loan losses on income property loans, given the
characteristics of the peer group as compared to our portfolio. Due
to the loss experience of our peer group over the past year, our analysis of
debt service coverage ratios, and the growth of our income property loans year
over year, the general valuation portion of our income property loan portfolio
increased by $3.1 million at June 30, 2010, compared to June 30,
2009.
Senior
management reviews these conditions quarterly in discussions with our senior
credit officers. To the extent that any of these conditions is evidenced by a
specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the
evaluation date, management’s estimate of the effect of such conditions may be
reflected as a specific allowance applicable to such credit or portfolio
segment. Where any of these conditions is not evidenced by a specifically
identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date,
management’s evaluation of the loss related to this condition is reflected in
the general allowance. The evaluation of the inherent loss with respect to these
conditions is subject to a higher degree of uncertainty because they are not
identified with specific problem credits or portfolio segments.
Given
that management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses based on
a review of individual loans, historical loan loss experience, the value and
adequacy of collateral and economic conditions in our market area, this
evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates, including
the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired
loans that may be susceptible to significant change. Large groups of smaller
balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and are
excluded from specific impairment evaluation; their allowance for loan losses is
calculated in accordance with the allowance for loan losses policy described
above.
Because
the allowance for loan losses is based on estimates of losses inherent in the
loan portfolio, actual losses can vary significantly from the estimated amounts.
Our methodology as described above permits adjustments to any loss factor used
in the computation of the formula allowance in the event that, in management’s
judgment, significant factors which affect the collectability of the portfolio
as of the evaluation date are not reflected in the loss factors. By assessing
the estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis, we are
able to adjust specific and inherent loss estimates based upon any more recent
information that has become available. In addition, management’s determination
as to the amount of our allowance for loan losses is subject to review by the
Office of Thrift Supervision and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
which may require the establishment of additional general or specific allowances
based upon their judgment of the information available to them at the time of
their examination of Kaiser Federal Bank.
Our
provision for loan losses increased to $9.9 million for the year ended June 30,
2010 compared to $2.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. The provision
for loan losses for the year ended June 30, 2010 was comprised of $4.8 million
in general valuation allowances and $5.1 million in specific valuation
allowances. The increase in provision for loan losses was primarily
attributable to an increase in real estate loan delinquencies and troubled debt
restructurings during the period. Also impacting the provision for
loan losses for the year ended June 30, 2010 were multi-family residential and
commercial real estate loans totaling $6.4 million that were added to
non-accrual. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total
loans was 1.73% at June 30, 2010 as compared to 0.61% at June 30, 2009. The
allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-accrual loans was 42.32% at
June 30, 2010 as compared to 51.69% at June 30, 2009. The decreased
ratio at June 30, 2010 and 2009, as compared to prior years, is due to the
increase in delinquencies and non-performing loans during the
years. Total allowance for loan losses has increased as well over the
years as a result of the declining portfolio trends. The general valuation
allowance has increased from $3.4 million at June 30, 2009 to $8.0 million at
June 30, 2010. The general valuation allowance as a percentage of
total loans was 1.04% at June 30, 2010 as compared to 0.45% at June 30,
2009. The specific valuation allowance increased from $1.2 million at
June 30, 2009 to $5.3 million at June 30, 2010. The following sets
forth an analysis of our allowance for loan losses.
|
|
At
or For the Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of
year
|
|
$
|
4,586
|
|
|
$
|
3,229
|
|
|
$
|
2,805
|
|
|
$
|
2,722
|
|
|
$
|
2,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Consumer
–
automobile
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
Consumer
–
other
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Total
charge-offs
|
|
|
1,232
|
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Consumer
–
automobile
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Consumer
–
other
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Total
recoveries
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
charge-offs
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
Provision
for
losses
|
|
|
9,867
|
|
|
|
2,586
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
Balance
at end of
year
|
|
$
|
13,309
|
|
|
$
|
4,586
|
|
|
$
|
3,229
|
|
|
$
|
2,805
|
|
|
$
|
2,722
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to
average loans during the year
(1)
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
Net
charge-offs to average non-performing loans during
the
year
|
|
|
5.24
|
%
|
|
|
23.91
|
%
|
|
|
35.35
|
%
|
|
|
47.90
|
%
|
|
|
73.04
|
%
|
Allowance
for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
|
|
42.32
|
%
|
|
|
51.69
|
%
|
|
|
186.66
|
%
|
|
|
245.84
|
%
|
|
|
4,062.69
|
%
|
Allowance as a
percent of total loans
(1)
|
|
|
1.73
|
%
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
(1)
|
Loans
are net of deferred fees and costs
|
Allocation
of Allowance for Loan Losses
. The distribution of the allowance for
losses on loans at the dates indicated is summarized as
follows.
|
|
At
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of
Loans
in
Each
Category
to
Total
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of
Loans
in
Each
Category
to
Total
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of
Loans
in
Each
Category
to
Total
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of
Loans
in
Each
Category
to
Total
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of
Loans
in
Each
Category
to
Total
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Real
estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four
family
|
|
$
|
7,821
|
|
|
|
43.55
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,326
|
|
|
|
50.22
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,744
|
|
|
|
57.51
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,626
|
|
|
|
66.88
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
68.63
|
%
|
Multi-family
residential
|
|
|
3,643
|
|
|
|
36.12
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
26.17
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
17.75
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
12.55
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
14.01
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
1,599
|
|
|
|
14.72
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
16.13
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
15.54
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
11.09
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
9.24
|
|
Other
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
5.56
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
7.01
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
7.56
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
6.53
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
Other
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
1.75
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
1.31
|
|
Total
allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
13,309
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,586
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,229
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Investment
Activities
General
.
We are required by federal regulations to maintain an amount of liquid assets in
order to meet our liquidity needs. These assets consist of certain specified
securities. Cash flow projections are regularly reviewed and updated to assure
that adequate liquidity is provided.
We are
authorized to invest in various types of liquid assets, including U.S. Treasury
obligations, securities of various federal agencies, certain certificates of
deposit of insured banks and savings institutions, certain bankers’ acceptances,
repurchase agreements and federal funds. Subject to various restrictions,
federal savings banks may also invest their assets in investment grade
commercial paper and corporate debt securities and mutual funds whose assets
conform to the investments that a federally chartered savings bank is otherwise
authorized to make directly. See “How We Are Regulated - Kaiser Federal Bank”
for a discussion of additional restrictions on our investment
activities.
Under the
direction and guidance of the Asset and Liability Management Committee and board
policy, our president has the basic responsibility for the management of our
investment portfolio. Various factors are considered when making decisions,
including the marketability, maturity and tax consequences of the proposed
investment. The maturity structure of investments will be affected by various
market conditions, including the current and anticipated short and long term
interest rates, the level of interest rates, the trend of new deposit inflows,
and the anticipated demand for funds via deposit withdrawals and loan
originations and purchases.
The
current structure of our investment portfolio provides liquidity when loan
demand is high, assists in maintaining earnings when loan demand is low and
maximizes earnings while satisfactorily managing risk, including credit risk,
reinvestment risk, liquidity risk and interest rate risk. See “Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk – Asset and Liability Management and
Market Risk.”
At June
30, 2010, our investment portfolio totaled $6.0 million and consisted
principally of investment grade collateralized mortgage obligations and
mortgage-backed securities. From time to time, investment levels may increase or
decrease depending upon yields available on investment alternatives and
management’s projected demand for funds for loan originations, deposits, and
other activities. At June 30, 2010 we held no trust preferred
securities and have never invested in trust preferred securities.
The
following table sets forth the composition of our investment portfolio at the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
government and government sponsored entity bonds
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freddie
Mac
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
5.65
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
5.37
|
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
|
|
22.17
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freddie
Mac
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
32.25
|
|
|
|
3,712
|
|
|
|
38.01
|
|
|
|
4,982
|
|
|
|
31.06
|
|
Total
securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
37.90
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,236
|
|
|
|
43.38
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,539
|
|
|
|
53.23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
government and government sponsored
entity
bonds
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fannie
Mae
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
2.68
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
1.96
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
Freddie
Mac
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
2.17
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
Ginnie
Mae
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fannie
Mae
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
22.38
|
|
|
|
1,819
|
|
|
|
18.63
|
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
14.17
|
|
Freddie
Mac
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
33.87
|
|
|
|
3,251
|
|
|
|
33.29
|
|
|
|
4,350
|
|
|
|
27.11
|
|
Ginnie
Mae
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
Total
securities held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
3,751
|
|
|
|
62.10
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,528
|
|
|
|
56.62
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,504
|
|
|
|
46.77
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
securities
|
|
$
|
6,041
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,764
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
16,043
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning
deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
$
|
19,267
|
|
|
|
30.48
|
%
|
|
$
|
25,508
|
|
|
|
32.22
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,925
|
|
|
|
13.28
|
%
|
Federal
funds sold
|
|
|
31,775
|
|
|
|
50.26
|
|
|
|
41,020
|
|
|
|
51.81
|
|
|
|
32,660
|
|
|
|
62.66
|
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
12,179
|
|
|
|
19.26
|
|
|
|
12,649
|
|
|
|
15.97
|
|
|
|
12,540
|
|
|
|
24.06
|
|
Total
other earning assets
|
|
$
|
63,221
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
79,177
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
52,125
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
securities and other earning assets
|
|
$
|
69,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
88,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
68,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio
Maturities and Yields
. The composition and maturities of the
investment securities portfolio at June 30, 2010 are summarized in the following
table. Maturities are based on the final contractual payment dates,
and do not reflect the impact of prepayments or early redemptions that may
occur.
|
|
|
|
|
More
than One Year
through
Five Years
|
|
|
More
than Five Years
through
Ten Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freddie Mac
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freddie Mac
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
|
Total
securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,904
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,236
|
|
|
$
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
5.14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fannie Mae
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
Freddie Mac
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
4.36
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
4.36
|
|
Ginnie Mae
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
3.13
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
4.03
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
3.62
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fannie Mae
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
3.64
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
3.64
|
|
Freddie Mac
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
2,118
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Total
securities held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
4.97
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,243
|
|
|
|
3.94
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,751
|
|
|
$
|
3,866
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
4.97
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,147
|
|
|
|
4.59
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,987
|
|
|
$
|
6,156
|
|
|
|
4.65
|
%
|
Mortgage-Backed
Securities.
We invest in mortgage-backed securities insured or
guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae. We invest in
mortgage-backed securities to achieve positive interest rate spreads with
minimal administrative expense, and to lower our credit risk as a result of the
guarantees provided by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae or Ginnie
Mae.
Mortgage-backed
securities are created by pooling mortgages and issuing a security with an
interest rate that is less than the interest rate on the underlying
mortgages. Mortgage-backed securities typically represent a
participation interest in a pool of single-family or multi-family residential
mortgages, although we invest primarily in mortgage-backed securities backed by
one- to four-family mortgages. The issuers of such securities pool
and resell the participation interests in the form of securities to investors
such as Kaiser Federal Bank. Some securities pools are guaranteed as
to payment of principal and interest to investors. Mortgage-backed
securities generally yield less than the loans that underlie such securities
because of the cost of payment guarantees and credit
enhancements. However, mortgage-backed securities are more liquid
than individual mortgage loans since there is an active trading market for such
securities. In addition, mortgage-backed securities may be used to
collateralize our specific liabilities and obligations. Finally,
mortgage-backed securities are assigned lower risk weightings for purposes of
calculating our risk-based capital level.
Investments
in mortgage-backed securities involve a risk that actual payments will be
greater or less than the prepayment rate estimated at the time of purchase,
which may require adjustments to the amortization of any premium or acceleration
of any discount relating to such interests, thereby affecting the net yield on
our securities. We periodically review current prepayment speeds to
determine whether prepayment estimates require modification that could cause
amortization or accretion adjustments.
Collateralized
mortgage obligations are debt securities issued by a special-purpose entity that
aggregates pools of mortgages and mortgage-backed securities and creates
different classes of securities with varying maturities and amortization
schedules, as well as a residual interest, with each class possessing different
risk characteristics. The cash flows from the underlying collateral
are generally divided into “tranches” or classes that have descending priorities
with respect to the distribution of principal and interest cash flows, while
cash flows on pass-through mortgage-backed securities are distributed pro rata
to all security holders.
Interest
Earning Deposits in Other Financial Institutions
. Interest earning time
deposits in other financial institutions consists of certificates of deposit
placed with federally insured financial institutions in amounts that do not
exceed the insurable limit of $250,000. These deposits are used to invest our
excess liquidity as part of our overall asset/liability management. These
deposits had a weighted-average yield of 1.43% and a weighted average maturity
of 2.7 months at June 30, 2010.
Federal
Home Loan Bank Stock
. As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San
Francisco, we are required to own capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank.
The amount of stock we hold is based on percentages specified by the Federal
Home Loan Bank of San Francisco on our outstanding advances and the requirements
of their Mortgage Purchase Program. The redemption of any excess stock we hold
is at the discretion of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. The
carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco stock totaled $12.2
million and had a weighted-average-yield of 0.34% for the year ended June 30,
2010. The yield on the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco stock is produced
by stock dividends that are subject to the discretion of the board of directors
of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. On January 8, 2009 and April 10,
2009, the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco announced that it would not
pay a quarterly dividend and would not repurchase excess capital stock on the
next regularly scheduled repurchase dates.
Equity
Investment
. At June 30, 2010, we also had an investment in an affordable
housing fund totaling $1.2 million for the purposes of obtaining tax credits and
for Community Reinvestment Act purposes. The investment is being accounted for
using the equity method of accounting. The investment is evaluated regularly for
impairment based on the remaining allocable tax credits and tax
benefits.
Bank-Owned
Life Insurance
. In April 2005, we purchased $10.0 million in bank-owned
life insurance, which covers certain key employees, to provide tax-exempt income
to assist in offsetting costs associated with employee benefit plans offered by
Kaiser Federal Bank. The bank-owned life insurance is recorded at its cash
surrender value, or the amount that can be realized. At June 30,
2010, the cash surrender value was $12.4 million.
Sources
of Funds
General
.
Our sources of funds are deposits, payment of principal and interest on loans,
interest earned on or maturity of investment securities, borrowings, and funds
provided from operations.
Deposits
.
We offer a variety of deposit accounts to consumers with a wide range of
interest rates and terms. Our deposits consist of time deposit accounts,
savings, money market and demand deposit accounts. We have historically paid
competitive rates on our deposit accounts. We primarily rely on competitive
pricing policies, marketing and customer service to attract and retain these
deposits. At June 30, 2010, approximately 27% of the dollar amount of our
deposits were from customers who are employed by the Kaiser Permanente Medical
Care Program, one of the largest employers in Southern
California. Our ATMs are located in our branches and near Kaiser
Permanente Medical Centers and office buildings. We currently do not
accept brokered deposits and had none at June 30, 2010.
The flow
of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes
in money market and prevailing interest rates and bi-weekly direct deposits from
Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program payrolls. The variety of deposit accounts
we offer has allowed us to be competitive in obtaining funds and to respond with
flexibility to changes in consumer demand. We have become more susceptible to
short-term fluctuations in deposit flows, as customers have become more interest
rate conscious. We try to manage the pricing of our deposits in keeping with our
asset/liability management, liquidity and profitability objectives, subject to
competitive factors. Based on our experience, we believe that our deposits are a
relatively stable source of funds. Despite this stability, our ability to
attract and maintain these deposits and the rates paid on them has been and will
continue to be significantly affected by market conditions.
The
following table sets forth our deposit flows during the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening
balance
|
|
$
|
566,193
|
|
|
$
|
495,058
|
|
|
$
|
494,128
|
|
Deposits,
net of withdrawals
|
|
|
53,572
|
|
|
|
58,013
|
|
|
|
(14,269
|
)
|
Interest
credited
|
|
|
10,929
|
|
|
|
13,122
|
|
|
|
15,199
|
|
Ending
balance
|
|
$
|
630,694
|
|
|
$
|
566,193
|
|
|
$
|
495,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase
|
|
$
|
64,501
|
|
|
$
|
71,135
|
|
|
$
|
930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
increase
|
|
|
11.39
|
%
|
|
|
14.37
|
%
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
The
following table shows the distribution of, and certain other information
relating to, deposits by type of deposit, as of the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing
demand
|
|
$
|
53,022
|
|
|
|
8.41
|
%
|
|
$
|
50,161
|
|
|
|
8.86
|
%
|
|
$
|
43,267
|
|
|
|
8.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
131,693
|
|
|
|
20.88
|
|
|
|
129,390
|
|
|
|
22.85
|
|
|
|
122,622
|
|
|
|
24.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money
market
|
|
|
120,719
|
|
|
|
19.14
|
|
|
|
108,858
|
|
|
|
19.23
|
|
|
|
78,598
|
|
|
|
15.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates
of deposit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.30%
- 1.99%
|
|
|
89,657
|
|
|
|
14.21
|
|
|
|
16,603
|
|
|
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
2.00%
- 2.99%
|
|
|
117,489
|
|
|
|
18.63
|
|
|
|
99,222
|
|
|
|
17.52
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
3.00%
- 3.99%
|
|
|
78,642
|
|
|
|
12.47
|
|
|
|
102,933
|
|
|
|
18.18
|
|
|
|
97,608
|
|
|
|
19.72
|
|
4.00%
- 4.99%
|
|
|
32,682
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
|
|
|
52,035
|
|
|
|
9.19
|
|
|
|
126,783
|
|
|
|
25.61
|
|
5.00%
- 5.99%
|
|
|
6,790
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
6,991
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
26,113
|
|
|
|
5.27
|
|
Total
certificates of deposit
|
|
$
|
325,260
|
|
|
|
51.57
|
%
|
|
$
|
277,784
|
|
|
|
49.06
|
%
|
|
$
|
250,571
|
|
|
|
50.61
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
630,694
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
566,193
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
495,058
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
The
following table indicates the amount of certificates of deposit by time
remaining until maturity as of June 30, 2010.
|
|
Less
than
or
equal to
one
year
|
|
|
More
than
one
to two
years
|
|
|
More
than
two
to three
years
|
|
|
More
than
three
to four
years
|
|
|
More
than
four
years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.30% - 1.99%
|
|
$
|
78,532
|
|
|
$
|
11,102
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
89,657
|
|
2.00% - 2.99%
|
|
|
47,305
|
|
|
|
12,472
|
|
|
|
16,628
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
40,603
|
|
|
|
117,489
|
|
3.00% - 3.99%
|
|
|
57,919
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
16,636
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
78,642
|
|
4.00% - 4.99%
|
|
|
11,593
|
|
|
|
3,106
|
|
|
|
3,387
|
|
|
|
14,596
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
32,682
|
|
5.00% - 5.99%
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
6,468
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,790
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
195,649
|
|
|
$
|
33,445
|
|
|
$
|
21,043
|
|
|
$
|
31,713
|
|
|
$
|
43,410
|
|
|
$
|
325,260
|
|
As of
June 30, 2010, the aggregate amount of outstanding certificates of deposit in
amounts greater than or equal to $100,000 was $155.7 million as compared to
$116.2 million at June 30, 2009. The following table sets forth the
maturity of those certificates as of June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months or
less
|
|
$
|
16,015
|
|
Over
three through six
months
|
|
|
10,298
|
|
Over
six through twelve
months
|
|
|
49,476
|
|
Over
twelve
months
|
|
|
79,866
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
155,655
|
|
Borrowings
.
Although deposits are our primary source of funds, we may utilize borrowings
when they are a less costly source of funds, and can be invested at a positive
interest rate spread, when we desire additional capacity to fund loan demand or
when they meet our asset/liability management goals. Our borrowings historically
have consisted of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. See
Note 9 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
We may
obtain advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco upon the
security of our mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities. These advances
may be made pursuant to several different credit programs, each of which has its
own interest rate, range of maturities and call features. At June 30, 2010, we
had $137.0 million in Federal Home Loan Bank advances outstanding. At June 30,
2010, we had available additional advances from the FHLB of San Francisco in the
amount of $219.1 million. We interchange the use of deposits and borrowings to
fund assets, such as the origination of loans, depending on various factors
including liquidity and asset/liability management strategies. In fiscal 2009 we
established a line of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. As
of June 30, 2010, we pledged $109.2 million commercial real estate, $29.5
million automobile loans and $100,000 in investment securities to secure any
future borrowings. At June 30, 2010, the available line of credit was $77.7
million. We have never drawn on this line of credit.
The
following table sets forth information as to our Federal Home Loan Bank advances
for the periods indicated.
|
|
At
or For the Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at end of
period
|
|
$
|
137,000
|
|
|
$
|
207,004
|
|
|
$
|
235,019
|
|
Average
balance outstanding
|
|
$
|
157,770
|
|
|
$
|
214,088
|
|
|
$
|
226,173
|
|
Maximum
month-end balance
|
|
$
|
207,002
|
|
|
$
|
235,018
|
|
|
$
|
245,021
|
|
Weighted
average interest rate during
the
period
|
|
|
4.60
|
%
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
Weighted
average interest rate at end
of
period
|
|
|
4.59
|
%
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
|
|
4.46
|
%
|
Employees
At June
30, 2010, we had a total of 96 full-time employees and 11 part-time employees.
Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining
group. Management believes that we have good relations with our
employees.
How
We Are Regulated
Set forth
below is a brief description of certain laws and regulations which are
applicable to K-Fed Bancorp and Kaiser Federal Bank. The description of these
laws and regulations, as well as descriptions of laws and regulations contained
elsewhere herein, does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the applicable laws and regulations.
Legislation
is introduced from time to time in the United States Congress that may affect
the operations of K-Fed Bancorp and Kaiser Federal Bank. In addition, the
regulations governing K-Fed Bancorp and Kaiser Federal Bank may be amended from
time to time by the Office of Thrift Supervision or its successor. Any such
legislation or regulatory changes in the future could adversely affect K-Fed
Bancorp or Kaiser Federal Bank. No assurance can be given as to whether or in
what form any such changes may occur.
New
Federal Legislation
Congress
has recently enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) which will significantly change the current bank
regulatory structure and affect the lending, investment, trading and operating
activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The
Dodd-Frank Act will eliminate our current primary federal regulator, the Office
of Thrift Supervision, and will require Kaiser Federal Bank to be regulated by
the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the primary federal regulator for
national banks). The Dodd-Frank Act also authorizes the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System to supervise and regulate all savings
and loan holding companies like K-Fed Bancorp, in addition to bank holding
companies which it currently regulates. As a result, the Federal
Reserve Board’s current regulations applicable to bank holding companies,
including holding company capital requirements, will apply to savings and loan
holding companies. These capital requirements are substantially
similar to the capital requirements currently applicable to Kaiser Federal Bank,
as described in “—Federal Banking Regulation—Capital
Requirements.” The Dodd-Frank Act also requires the Federal Reserve
Board to set minimum capital levels for bank holding companies that are as
stringent as those required for the insured depository subsidiaries, and the
components of Tier 1 capital would be restricted to capital instruments that are
currently considered to be Tier 1 capital for insured depository
institutions. Bank holding companies with assets of less than $500
million are exempt from these capital requirements. Under the
Dodd-Frank Act, the proceeds of trust preferred securities are excluded from
Tier 1 capital unless such securities were issued prior to May 19, 2010 by bank
or savings and loan holding companies with less than $15 billion of
assets. The legislation also establishes a floor for capital of
insured depository institutions that cannot be lower than the standards in
effect today, and directs the federal banking regulators to implement new
leverage and capital requirements within 18 months that take into account
off-balance sheet activities and other risks, including risks relating to
securitized products and derivatives.
The
Dodd-Frank Act also creates a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with
broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has broad rule-making authority for a wide
range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings
institutions such as Kaiser Federal Bank, including the authority to prohibit
“unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all
banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in
assets. Banks and savings institutions with $10 billion or less in
assets will be examined by their applicable bank regulators, in Kaiser Federal
Bank’s case, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The new
legislation also weakens the federal preemption available for national banks and
federal savings associations, and gives state attorneys general the ability to
enforce applicable federal consumer protection laws.
The
legislation also broadens the base for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
insurance assessments. Assessments will now be based on the average
consolidated total assets less tangible equity capital of a financial
institution. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increases the
maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit
unions to $250,000 per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2009, and
non-interest bearing transaction accounts have unlimited deposit insurance
through December 31, 2013. Additionally, effective July 6, 2010,
regulatory changes in overdraft and interchange fee restrictions may reduce our
noninterest income. Lastly, the Dodd-Frank Act will increase
stockholder influence over boards of directors by requiring companies to give
stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called “golden
parachute” payments, and authorizing the Securities and Exchange Commission to
promulgate rules that would allow stockholders to nominate their own candidates
using a company’s proxy materials. The legislation also directs the
Federal Reserve Board to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation
paid to bank holding company executives, regardless of whether the company is
publicly traded or not.
K-Fed
Bancorp
General
.
K-Fed Bancorp is a federal mutual holding company subsidiary within the meaning
of Section 10(o) of the Home Owners’ Loan Act. It is required to file reports
with and is subject to regulation and examination by the OTS. In addition, the
OTS has enforcement authority over K-Fed Bancorp and any non-savings institution
subsidiaries. This permits the OTS to restrict or prohibit activities that it
determines to be a serious risk to the Bank. This regulation is intended
primarily for the protection of the depositors and not for the benefit of
stockholders of K-Fed Bancorp. Any change in these laws or regulations, whether
by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of Thrift Supervision,
its successor, or Congress, could have a material adverse impact on
K-
Fed
Bancorp and Kaiser Federal Bank and their operations. Under the
Dodd-Frank Act, the functions of the Office of Thrift Supervision relating to
savings and loan holding companies and their subsidiaries, as well as rulemaking
and supervision authority over thrift holding companies, will be transferred to
the Federal Reserve Board.
Activities
Restrictions
. K-Fed Bancorp is subject to statutory and regulatory
restrictions on its business activities specified by federal regulations, which
include performing services and holding properties used by a savings institution
subsidiary, activities authorized for savings and loan holding companies as of
March 5, 1987, and non-banking activities permissible for bank holding companies
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 or authorized for financial
holding companies pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
If Kaiser
Federal Bank fails the qualified thrift lender test, K-Fed Bancorp must, within
one year of that failure, register as, and will become subject to, the
restrictions applicable to bank holding companies. See “- Qualified Thrift
Lender Test.”
Waivers
of Dividends by K-Fed Mutual Holding Company
. OTS regulations require
K-Fed Mutual Holding Company to notify the OTS of any proposed waiver of its
receipt of dividends from K-Fed Bancorp. The OTS reviews dividend waiver notices
on a case-by-case basis, and, in general, does not object to any such waiver if
the mutual holding company provides the OTS with written notice of its intent to
waive its right to receive dividends 30 days prior to the proposed date of
payment of the dividend, and the OTS does not object. The OTS shall not object
to a notice of intent to waive dividends if: (i) the waiver would not
be detrimental to the safe and sound operation of the savings association; and
(ii) the board of directors of the mutual holding company expressly determines
that waiver of the dividend by the mutual holding company is consistent with the
directors’ fiduciary duties to the mutual members of such company. The OTS will
not consider waived dividends in determining an appropriate exchange ratio in
the event of a full conversion to stock form. K-Fed Mutual Holding
Company waived its right to receive dividends paid by K-Fed Bancorp during the
year ended June 30, 2010 and we anticipate that K-Fed Mutual Holding Company
will waive future dividends paid by K-Fed Bancorp, if any.
Conversion
of K-Fed Mutual Holding Company to Stock Form.
The Board of
Directors of the MHC, the Company and the Bank adopted a Plan of Conversion and
Reorganization on May 27, 2010, as amended on August 24, 2010. The
Plan is subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders, the Bank’s
depositors and the Office of Thrift Supervision, our primary banking
regulator. Pursuant to the Plan, the MHC will convert from the mutual
holding company form of organization to the fully public stock
form. The MHC will then no longer exist. Pursuant to the
Plan, the Company, which owns 100% of the Bank, also will be succeeded by a
Maryland corporation, Kaiser Federal Financial Group, Inc. As part of
the conversion, the MHC’s ownership interest of the Company will be offered for
sale in a public offering. The existing publicly held shares of the
Company, which represent the minority ownership interest in the Company, will be
exchanged for new shares of common stock of Kaiser Federal Financial Group,
Inc. The exchange ratio will ensure that immediately after the
conversion and public offering, the public stockholders of the Company will own
the same aggregate percentage of Kaiser Federal Financial Group, Inc. that they
owned immediately prior to that time, excluding any new shares purchased in the
offering or cash paid in lieu of fractional shares. When the
conversion and public offering are completed, all of the capital stock of the
Bank will be owned by Kaiser Federal Financial Group, Inc.
Kaiser
Federal Bank
General.
Kaiser Federal Bank is examined and supervised by the Office of Thrift
Supervision and is subject to examination by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation. This regulation and supervision establishes a
comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution may engage and is
intended primarily for the protection of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation’s deposit insurance fund and depositors. Under this
system of federal regulation, financial institutions are periodically examined
to ensure that they satisfy applicable standards with respect to their capital
adequacy, assets, management, earnings, liquidity and sensitivity to market
interest rates. Following completion of its examination, the federal
agency critiques the institution’s operations and assigns its rating (known as
an institution’s CAMELS rating). Under federal law, an institution
may not disclose its CAMELS rating to the public. Kaiser Federal Bank
also is a member of and owns stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of San
Francisco, which is one of the twelve regional banks in the Federal Home Loan
Bank System. Kaiser Federal Bank is also regulated to a lesser extent
by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, governing reserves to
be maintained against deposits and other matters. The Office of
Thrift Supervision examines Kaiser Federal Bank and prepares reports for the
consideration of its board of directors on any operating
deficiencies. Kaiser Federal Bank’s relationship with its depositors
and borrowers is also regulated to a great extent by federal law and, to a much
lesser extent, state law, especially in matters concerning the ownership of
deposit accounts and the form and content of Kaiser Federal Bank’s mortgage
documents.
Under the
recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision’s functions
relating to federal savings associations, including rulemaking authority, are to
be transferred to the Comptroller of the Currency within one year of the date of
enactment of the new legislation, unless extended by up to six months by the
Secretary of the Treasury. The thrift charter has been preserved and a new
Deputy Comptroller of the Currency will supervise and examine federal savings
associations and savings banks.
Set forth
below is a brief description of certain regulatory requirements that are or will
be applicable to Kaiser Federal Bank. The description below is
limited to certain material aspects of the statutes and regulations addressed,
and is not intended to be a complete description of such statutes and
regulations and their effects on Kaiser Federal Bank.
Federal
Banking Regulation
Business
Activities.
A federal savings bank derives its lending and
investment powers from the Home Owners’ Loan Act, as amended, and the
regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision. Under these laws and
regulations, Kaiser Federal Bank may invest in mortgage loans secured by
residential and nonresidential real estate, commercial business loans and
consumer loans, certain types of debt securities and certain other assets,
subject to applicable limits. Kaiser Federal Bank also may establish
subsidiaries that may engage in activities not otherwise permissible for Kaiser
Federal Bank, including real estate investment and securities and insurance
brokerage.
Capital
Requirements.
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations require
federal savings banks to meet three minimum capital standards: a 1.5% tangible
capital ratio, a 4% leverage ratio (3% for federal savings banks receiving the
highest rating on the CAMELS rating system) and an 8% risk-based capital
ratio.
The
risk-based capital standard for federal savings banks requires the maintenance
of Tier 1 (core) and total capital (which is defined as core capital and
supplementary capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least 4% and 8%,
respectively. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all
assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets, are multiplied by a
risk-weight factor of 0% to 100%, assigned by the Office of Thrift Supervision,
based on the risks believed inherent in the type of asset. Core
capital is defined as common stockholders’ equity (including retained earnings),
certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority
interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles
other than certain mortgage servicing rights and credit card
relationships. The components of supplementary capital currently
include cumulative preferred stock, long-term perpetual preferred stock,
mandatory convertible securities, subordinated debt and intermediate preferred
stock, the general valuation allowance for loan losses limited to a maximum of
1.25% of risk-weighted assets and up to 45% of net unrealized gains on
available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair
values. Overall, the amount of supplementary capital included as part
of total capital cannot exceed 100% of core capital. Additionally, a
savings bank that retains credit risk in connection with an asset sale may be
required to maintain additional regulatory capital because of the purchaser’s
recourse to the savings bank. Kaiser Federal Bank does not typically
engage in asset sales.
At June
30, 2010, Kaiser Federal Bank’s capital exceeded all applicable
requirements.
Loans-to-One
Borrower.
Generally, a federal savings bank may not make a loan or extend credit to a
single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of unimpaired capital and
surplus. An additional amount may be loaned, equal to 10% of
unimpaired capital and surplus, if the loan is secured by readily marketable
collateral, which generally does not include real estate. As of June
30, 2010, Kaiser Federal Bank was in compliance with the loans-to-one borrower
limitations.
Qualified
Thrift Lender Test.
As
a federal savings bank, Kaiser Federal Bank must satisfy the qualified thrift
lender, or “QTL,” test. Under the QTL test, Kaiser Federal Bank must
maintain at least 65% of its “portfolio assets” in “qualified thrift
investments” in at least nine months of the most recent 12
months. “Portfolio assets” generally means total assets of a savings
institution, less the sum of specified liquid assets up to 20% of total assets,
goodwill and other intangible assets, and the value of property used in the
conduct of the savings bank’s business.
“Qualified
thrift investments” include various types of loans made for residential and
housing purposes, investments related to such purposes, including certain
mortgage-backed and related securities, and loans for personal, family,
household and certain other purposes up to a limit of 20% of portfolio
assets. “Qualified thrift investments” also include 100% of an
institution’s credit card loans, education loans and small business
loans. Kaiser Federal Bank also may satisfy the QTL test by
qualifying as a “domestic building and loan association” as defined in the
Internal Revenue Code.
A savings
bank that fails the qualified thrift lender test must either convert to a bank
charter or operate under specified restrictions. At June 30, 2010,
Kaiser Federal Bank held 84.53% of its “portfolio assets” in “qualified thrift
investments,” and satisfied this test.
Capital
Distributions.
Office
of Thrift Supervision regulations govern capital distributions by a federal
savings bank, which include cash dividends, stock repurchases and other
transactions charged to the capital account. A savings bank must file
an application for approval of a capital distribution if:
|
●
|
the
total capital distributions for the applicable calendar year exceed the
sum of the savings bank’s net income for that year to date plus the
savings bank’s retained net income for the preceding two
years;
|
|
●
|
the
savings bank would not be at least adequately capitalized following the
distribution;
|
|
●
|
the
distribution would violate any applicable statute, regulation, agreement
or Office of Thrift Supervision-imposed condition;
or
|
|
●
|
the
savings bank is not eligible for expedited treatment of its
filings.
|
Even if
an application is not otherwise required, every savings bank that is a
subsidiary of a holding company must still file a notice with the Office of
Thrift Supervision at least 30 days before the board of directors declares a
dividend or approves a capital distribution.
The
Office of Thrift Supervision may disapprove a notice or application
if:
|
●
|
the
savings bank would be undercapitalized following the
distribution;
|
|
●
|
the
proposed capital distribution raises safety and soundness concerns;
or
|
|
●
|
the
capital distribution would violate a prohibition contained in any statute,
regulation or agreement.
|
In
addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act provides that an insured depository
institution may not make any capital distribution, if after making such
distribution the institution would be undercapitalized.
Liquidity.
A
federal savings bank is required to maintain a sufficient amount of liquid
assets to ensure its safe and sound operation.
Community
Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending Laws.
All federal savings
banks have a responsibility under the Community Reinvestment Act and related
regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision to help meet the credit needs of
their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. In
connection with its examination of a federal savings bank, the Office of Thrift
Supervision is required to assess the bank’s record of compliance with the
Community Reinvestment Act. In addition, the Equal Credit Opportunity
Act and the Fair Housing Act prohibit lenders from discriminating in their
lending practices on the basis of characteristics specified in those
statutes. A bank’s failure to comply with the provisions of the
Community Reinvestment Act could, at a minimum, result in denial of certain
corporate applications such as branches or mergers, or in restrictions on its
activities. The failure to comply with the Equal Credit Opportunity
Act and the Fair Housing Act could result in enforcement actions by the Office
of Thrift Supervision, as well as other federal regulatory agencies and the
Department of Justice. Kaiser Federal Bank received a “satisfactory”
Community Reinvestment Act rating in its most recent federal
examination.
Transactions
with Related Parties.
A federal savings bank’s authority to
engage in transactions with its affiliates is limited by Office of Thrift
Supervision regulations and by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act
and its implementing Regulation W. An affiliate is a company that
controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with an insured
depository institution such as Kaiser Federal Bank. In general,
loan transactions between an insured depository institution and its affiliate
are subject to certain quantitative and collateral requirements. In
this regard, transactions between an insured depository institution and its
affiliate are limited to 10% of the institution’s unimpaired capital and
unimpaired surplus for transactions with any one affiliate and 20% of unimpaired
capital and unimpaired surplus for transactions in the aggregate with all
affiliates. Collateral in specified amounts ranging from 100% to 130%
of the amount of the transaction must usually be provided by affiliates in order
to receive loans from the bank. In addition, Office of Thrift
Supervision regulations prohibit a savings bank from lending to any of its
affiliates that are engaged in activities that are not permissible for bank
holding companies and from purchasing the securities of any affiliate, other
than a subsidiary. Finally, transactions with affiliates must be
consistent with safe and sound banking practices, not involve low-quality assets
and be on terms that are as favorable to the institution as comparable
transactions with non-affiliates. The Office of Thrift Supervision
requires federal savings banks to maintain detailed records of all transactions
with affiliates.
Kaiser
Federal Bank’s authority to extend credit to its directors, executive officers
and 10% stockholders, as well as to entities controlled by such persons, is
currently governed by the requirements of Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the
Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O of the Federal Reserve
Board. Among other things, these provisions require that extensions
of credit to insiders (i) be made on terms that are substantially the same as,
and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than,
those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons and that
do not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other
unfavorable features, and (ii) not exceed certain limitations on the amount of
credit extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate, which limits
are based, in part, on the amount of Kaiser Federal Bank’s
capital. In addition, extensions of credit in excess of certain
limits must be approved by Kaiser Federal Bank’s board of
directors.
Enforcement.
The
Office of Thrift Supervision has primary enforcement responsibility over federal
savings institutions and has the authority to bring enforcement action against
all “institution-affiliated parties,” including stockholders, and attorneys,
appraisers and accountants who knowingly or recklessly participate in wrongful
action likely to have an adverse effect on an insured
institution. Formal enforcement action by the Office of Thrift
Supervision may range from the issuance of a capital directive or cease and
desist order, to removal of officers and/or directors of the institution and the
appointment of a receiver or conservator. Civil penalties cover a
wide range of violations and actions, and range up to $25,000 per day, unless a
finding of reckless disregard is made, in which case penalties may be as high as
$1 million per day. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation also
has the authority to terminate deposit insurance or to recommend to the Director
of the Office of Thrift Supervision that enforcement action be taken with
respect to a particular savings institution. If action is not taken
by the Director, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has authority to take
action under specified circumstances.
Standards
for Safety and Soundness.
Federal law requires each federal
banking agency to prescribe certain standards for all insured depository
institutions. These standards relate to, among other things, internal
controls, information systems and audit systems, loan documentation, credit
underwriting, interest rate risk exposure, asset growth, compensation, and other
operational and managerial standards as the agency deems
appropriate. The federal banking agencies adopted Interagency
Guidelines Prescribing Standards for Safety and Soundness to implement the
safety and soundness standards required under federal law. The
guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking
agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions
before capital becomes impaired. The guidelines address internal
controls and information systems, internal audit systems, credit underwriting,
loan documentation, interest rate risk exposure, asset growth, compensation,
fees and benefits. If the appropriate federal banking agency
determines that an institution fails to meet any standard prescribed by the
guidelines, the agency may require the institution to submit to the agency an
acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard. If an
institution fails to meet these standards, the appropriate federal banking
agency may require the institution to submit a compliance
plan.
Prompt
Corrective Action Regulations
.
Under
the prompt corrective action regulations, the Office of Thrift Supervision is
required and authorized to take supervisory actions against undercapitalized
federal savings banks. For this purpose, a savings bank is placed in
one of the following five categories based on the savings bank’s
capital:
|
●
|
well-capitalized
(at least 5% leverage capital, 6% Tier 1 risk-based capital and 10% total
risk-based capital);
|
|
●
|
adequately
capitalized (at least 4% leverage capital (3% for federal savings banks
with a composite examination rating of 1), 4% Tier 1 risk-based capital
and 8% total risk-based capital);
|
|
●
|
undercapitalized
(less than 4% leverage capital (3% for federal savings banks with a
composite examination rating of 1), 4% Tier 1 risk-based capital or 3%
leverage capital);
|
|
●
|
significantly
undercapitalized (less than 6% total risk-based capital, 3% Tier 1
risk-based capital or 3% leverage capital);
or
|
|
●
|
critically
undercapitalized (less than 2% tangible
capital).
|
Generally,
the Office of Thrift Supervision is required to appoint a receiver or
conservator for a savings bank that is “critically undercapitalized” within
specific time frames. The regulations also provide that a capital
restoration plan must be filed with the Office of Thrift Supervision within 45
days of the date a savings bank receives notice that it is “undercapitalized,”
“significantly undercapitalized” or “critically
undercapitalized.” The criteria for an acceptable capital restoration
plan include, among other things, the establishment of the methodology and
assumptions for attaining adequately capitalized status on an annual basis,
procedures for ensuring compliance with restrictions imposed by applicable
federal regulations, the identification of the types and levels of activities
the savings bank will engage in while the capital restoration plan is in effect,
and assurances that the capital restoration plan will not appreciably increase
the current risk profile of the savings bank. Any holding company for
the savings bank required to submit a capital restoration plan must guarantee
the lesser of: an amount equal to 5% of a savings bank’s assets at the time it
was notified or deemed to be undercapitalized by the Office of Thrift
Supervision, or the amount necessary to restore the savings bank to adequately
capitalized status. This guarantee remains in place until the Office
of Thrift Supervision notifies the savings bank that it has maintained
adequately capitalized status for each of four consecutive calendar quarters,
and the Office of Thrift Supervision has the authority to require payment and
collect payment under the guarantee. Failure by a holding company to
provide the required guarantee will result in certain operating restrictions on
the savings bank, such as restrictions on the ability to declare and pay
dividends, pay executive compensation and management fees, and increase assets
or expand operations.
The
Office of Thrift Supervision may also take any one of a number of discretionary
supervisory actions against undercapitalized federal savings banks, including
the issuance of a capital directive and the replacement of senior executive
officers and directors.
At June
30, 2010, Kaiser Federal Bank met the criteria for being considered
“well-capitalized.”
Insurance
of Deposit Accounts.
The Dodd-Frank Act permanently increased the maximum amount of deposit insurance
for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor,
retroactive to January 1, 2009. Non-interest bearing transaction
accounts have unlimited deposit insurance through December 31,
2013.
Pursuant to the Federal
Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (the “Reform Act”), the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation is authorized to set the reserve ratio for the Deposit
Insurance Fund annually at between 1.15% and 1.5% of estimated insured deposits.
The Dodd-Frank Act mandates that the statutory minimum reserve ratio of the
Deposit Insurance Fund increase from 1.15% to 1.35% of insured deposits by
September 30, 2020. Banks with assets of less than $10 billion, such
as Kaiser Federal Bank, are exempt from any additional assessments necessary to
increase the reserve fund above 1.15%.
As part
of a plan to restore the reserve ratio to 1.15%, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation imposed a special assessment equal to five basis points of assets
less Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, which was payable on September 30,
2009. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has
increased its quarterly deposit insurance assessment rates and amended the
method by which rates are calculated. Beginning in the second quarter
of 2009, institutions are assigned an initial base assessment rate ranging from
12 to 45 basis points of deposits depending on risk category. The initial base
assessment is then adjusted based upon the level of unsecured debt, secured
liabilities, and brokered deposits to establish a total base assessment rate
ranging from seven to 77.5 basis points.
On
November 12, 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation approved a final
rule requiring insured depository institutions to prepay on December 30, 2009,
their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009,
and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012. Estimated assessments for
the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010 are based upon the assessment
rate in effect on September 30, 2009, with three basis points added for the 2011
and 2012 assessment rates. In addition, a 5% annual growth in the
assessment base is assumed. Prepaid assessments are to be applied
against the actual quarterly assessments until exhausted, and may not be applied
to any special assessments that may occur in the future. Any unused
prepayments will be returned to the institution on June 30, 2013. On
December 30, 2009, we prepaid $3.6 million in estimated assessment fees for the
fourth quarter of 2009 through 2012. Because the prepaid assessments
represent the prepayment of future expense, they do not affect our tax
obligations or regulatory capital (the prepaid asset will have a risk-weighting
of 0%).
Insurance of deposits may
be terminated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation upon a finding that
an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or
unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law,
regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation. We do not currently know of any practice, condition or violation
that may lead to termination of our deposit insurance.
In addition to the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments, the Financing Corporation (“FICO”) is
authorized to impose and collect, with the approval of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, assessments for anticipated payments, issuance costs and
custodial fees on bonds issued by the FICO in the 1980s to recapitalize the
former Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. The bonds issued by the
FICO are due to mature in 2017 through 2019. For the quarter ended June 30,
2010, the annualized FICO assessment was equal to 1.04 basis points for each
$100 in domestic deposits maintained at an institution.
Temporary
Liquidity Guarantee Program.
The Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation’s Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program guarantees newly issued
senior unsecured debt of a participating organization, up to certain limits
established for each institution, issued between October 14, 2008 and June 30,
2009. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation extended this
component of the program to cover debt issued through October 31,
2009. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation will pay the unpaid
principal and interest on Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation-guaranteed debt
instruments upon the uncured failure of the participating entity to make timely
payments of principal or interest in accordance with the terms of the
instrument. The guarantee will remain in effect until December 31,
2012. In return for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s guarantee,
participating institutions are required to pay the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation a fee based on the amount and maturity of the debt. We
opted not to participate in this part of the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee
Program.
The other
component of the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program provides full federal
deposit insurance coverage for non-interest bearing transaction deposit
accounts, regardless of dollar amount, until June 30, 2010. Through
December 31, 2009, an annualized 10 basis point assessment on balances in
noninterest-bearing transaction accounts that exceed $250,000 was assessed to
insured depository institutions that have not opted out of this component of the
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. Beginning January 1, 2010, the
fees will be based on the institution’s risk category rating assigned with
respect to regular Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments.
Institutions
in Risk Category I (generally well-capitalized institutions with composite
CAMELS 1 or 2 ratings) will pay an annualized assessment rate of 15 basis
points. Institutions in Risk Category II (generally adequately capitalized
institutions with composite CAMELS 3 or better) will pay an annualized
assessment rate of 20 basis points. Institutions in Risk Category III or
IV (generally under capitalized or composite CAMELS 4 or 5) will pay an
annualized assessment rate of 25 basis points.
We opted to
participate in this component of the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. On
June 22, 2010, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation adopted a final rule
extending the program until December 31, 2010 and retaining the discretion to
further extend the program until December 31, 2011. The assessment rate remains
the same from the prior extension. We opted into the extension.
U.S.
Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program.
The
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 provides the Secretary of the
Treasury with broad authority to implement certain actions to help restore
stability and liquidity to U.S. financial markets. One of the programs resulting
from the legislation is the Troubled Asset Relief Program—Capital Purchase
Program, which provides direct equity investment by the U.S. Treasury Department
in perpetual preferred stock or similar securities of qualified financial
institutions. This program is voluntary (subject to regulatory approval) and
requires an institution to comply with a number of restrictions and provisions,
including limits on executive compensation, stock redemptions and declaration of
dividends. We opted not to participate in this
program.
Prohibitions
Against Tying Arrangements
.
Federal
savings banks are prohibited, subject to some exceptions, from extending credit
to or offering any other service, or fixing or varying the consideration for
such extension of credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain
some additional service from the institution or its affiliates or not obtain
services of a competitor of the institution.
Federal
Home Loan Bank System.
Kaiser Federal Bank is a member of the
Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan
Banks. The Federal Home Loan Bank System provides a central credit
facility primarily for member institutions as well as other entities involved in
home mortgage lending. As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of
San Francisco, Kaiser Federal Bank is required to acquire and hold shares of
capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank. As of June 30, 2010,
Kaiser Federal Bank was in compliance with this requirement.
Federal
Reserve System
Federal
Reserve Board regulations require federal savings banks to maintain
noninterest-earning reserves against their transaction accounts, such as
negotiable order of withdrawal and regular checking accounts. At June
30, 2010, Kaiser Federal Bank was in compliance with these reserve
requirements.
Other
Regulations
Interest
and other charges collected or contracted for by Kaiser Federal Bank are subject
to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest
rates. Kaiser Federal Bank’s operations are also subject to federal
laws applicable to credit transactions, such as the:
|
●
|
Truth-In-Lending
Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer
borrowers;
|
|
●
|
Home
Mortgage Disclosure Act, requiring financial institutions to provide
information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether
a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the
housing needs of the community it
serves;
|
|
●
|
Equal
Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race,
creed or other prohibited factors in extending
credit;
|
|
●
|
Fair
Credit Reporting Act, governing the use and provision of information to
credit reporting agencies;
|
|
●
|
Fair
Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be
collected by collection agencies;
|
|
●
|
Truth
in Savings Act; and
|
|
●
|
Rules
and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the
responsibility of implementing such federal
laws.
|
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 addresses, among other issues, corporate governance,
auditing and accounting, executive compensation, and enhanced and timely
disclosure of corporate information. As directed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer will be required to certify
that our quarterly and annual reports do not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact. The rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange
Commission under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have several requirements, including
having these officers certify that: they are responsible for establishing,
maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting; they have made certain disclosures to our auditors and
the audit committee of the board of directors about our internal control over
financial reporting; and they have included information in our quarterly and
annual reports about their evaluation and whether there have been changes in our
internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could
materially affect internal control over financial reporting. We have
existing policies, procedures and systems designed to comply with these
regulations, and we are further enhancing and documenting such policies,
procedures and systems to ensure continued compliance with these
regulations.
Federal
Securities Laws
The stock
of K-Fed Bancorp is registered with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. K-Fed Bancorp is subject to the information, proxy
solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements of the SEC
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
K-Fed
Bancorp stock held by persons who are affiliates of K-Fed Bancorp may not be
resold without registration unless sold in accordance with certain resale
restrictions. Affiliates are generally considered to be officers, directors and
principal stockholders. If K-Fed Bancorp meets specified current public
information requirements, each affiliate of K-Fed Bancorp will be able to sell
in the public market, without registration, a limited number of shares in any
three-month period.
Federal
Taxation
General
.
K-Fed
Bancorp and Kaiser Federal Bank are subject to federal income taxation in the
same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions discussed
below. The following discussion of federal taxation is intended only
to summarize certain pertinent federal income tax matters and is not a
comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to K-Fed Bancorp or Kaiser
Federal Bank.
K-Fed
Bancorp and Kaiser Federal Bank are not currently under audit with respect to
their federal income tax returns and their federal income tax returns have not
been audited for the past five years.
Method
of Accounting
.
For
federal income tax purposes, K-Fed Bancorp currently reports its income and
expenses on the accrual method of accounting and uses a tax year ending June 30
for filing its federal and state income tax returns.
Alternative
Minimum Tax
.
The
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, imposes an alternative minimum tax
(“AMT”) at a rate of 20% on a base of regular taxable income plus certain tax
preferences (“alternative minimum taxable income” or “AMTI”). The AMT
is payable to the extent such AMTI is in excess of an exemption amount and the
AMT exceeds the regular income tax. Net operating losses can offset
no more than 90% of AMTI. Certain payments of AMT may be used as
credits against regular tax liabilities in future years. K-Fed
Bancorp and Kaiser Federal Bank have been subject to the AMT but currently have
no such amounts available as credits for carryover.
Net
Operating Loss Carryovers.
Generally, a financial institution may
carry back net operating losses to the preceding two taxable years and forward
to the succeeding 20 taxable years. However, as a result of recent
legislation, subject to certain limitations, the carryback period for net
operating losses incurred in 2008 or 2009 (but not both years) has been expanded
to five years. At June 30, 2010, Kaiser Federal Bank had no net operating
loss carryovers for federal income tax purposes.
Corporate
Dividends-Received Deduction
.
K-Fed
Bancorp may exclude from its federal taxable income 100% of dividends received
from Kaiser Federal Bank as a wholly owned subsidiary.
Capital
Loss Carryovers.
Generally, a financial institution may carry
back capital losses to the preceding three taxable years and forward to the
succeeding five taxable years. At June 30, 2010, K-Fed Bancorp and
its subsidiaries have no capital loss carryovers.
State
Taxation
K-Fed Bancorp and Kaiser
Federal Bank are subject to the California Corporate (Franchise) tax which is
assessed at the rate of 10.84%. For this purpose, taxable income
generally means federal taxable income subject to certain modifications provided
for in California law.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The
following are the most significant risk factors that could impact our business,
financial results and results of operations. Investing in our common
stock involves risks, including those described below. In addition to
the risks and uncertainties described below, other risks and uncertainties not
currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may
materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations. The value or market price of our common stock could
decline due to any of these identified or other risks, and you could lose all or
part of your investment.
Further
deterioration of economic conditions in our primary market of California, could
seriously impair the value of our loan portfolio and adversely affect our
results of operations.
All our
real estate loans are secured by properties located in
California. Decreases in California real estate values beginning in
2008 and continuing through the current period have adversely affected the value
of properties collateralizing our loans. As of June 30, 2010, 94.4%
or $727.5 million of our loan portfolio consisted of loans secured by real
estate. As a result of the weak economy in California, our level of
non-performing and delinquent loans has increased dramatically in recent
periods. At June 30, 2010, loans delinquent 90 days or more totaled
$16.2 million, or 2.1% of total loans compared to $6.2 million or 0.8% of total
loans at June 30, 2009. At June 30, 2010, non-performing loans
totaled $31.5 million, or 4.1% of total loans compared to $8.9 million, or 1.2%
of total loans at June 30, 2009. In the event that we are required to
foreclose on a property securing a mortgage loan or pursue other remedies in
order to protect our investment, there can be no assurance that we will recover
funds in an amount equal to any remaining loan balance as a result of prevailing
general economic or local conditions, real estate values and other factors
associated with the ownership of real property. As a result, the
market value of the real estate or other collateral underlying the loans may
not, at any given time, be sufficient to satisfy the outstanding principal
amount of the loans. Consequently, we would sustain significant loan losses and
potentially incur a higher provision for loan loss expense. Adverse changes in
the economy may also have a negative effect on the ability of borrowers to make
timely repayments of their loans, which could have an adverse impact on
earnings. See “Business- Market Area- Asset Quality.”
Our
loan portfolio possesses increased risk due to our level of multi-family
residential real estate, commercial real estate and consumer loans which could
increase our level of provision for loan losses.
Our
outstanding multi-family residential real estate, commercial real estate and
consumer loans accounted for 56.5% of our total loan portfolio as of June 30,
2010. Generally, management considers these types of loans to involve
a higher degree of risk compared to permanent first mortgage loans on
one-to-four family, owner occupied residential properties. These
loans have higher risks than permanent loans secured by residential real estate
for the following reasons:
|
●
|
Multi-Family
Residential Real Estate Loans.
These loans are
underwritten on the income producing potential of the property, financial
strength of the borrower and any guarantors. Repayment is
dependent on income being generated in amounts sufficient to cover
operating expenses and debt service. At June 30, 2010, 36.1% of
our total loan portfolio consisted of multi-family loans, and we intend,
subject to market conditions, to increase our origination of multi-family
residential loans. As a result of this recent change in our
lending emphasis, a significant portion of our multi-family residential
loans are relatively new or “unseasoned,” and have not been outstanding
for a sufficient period of time to demonstrate performance and indicate
the potential risks in the loan
portfolio.
|
|
●
|
Commercial
Real Estate Loans.
These loans are underwritten on the
income producing potential of the property or the successful operation of
the borrowers’ or tenants’ businesses, financial strength of the borrower
and any guarantors. Repayment is dependent on income being
generated in amounts sufficient to cover operating expenses and debt
service.
|
|
●
|
Consumer
Loans.
Collateralized consumer loans (such as automobile
loans) are collateralized by assets that may not provide adequate source
of repayment of the loan due to depreciation, damage or
loss. As a result, consumer loan collections are dependent on
the borrower’s continuing financial stability and thus, are more likely to
be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal
bankruptcy.
|
Management
plans to continue its increased emphasis on higher yielding products such as
multi-family residential real estate loans, while returning to a moderate growth
of one-to-four family residential real estate loans. Many of our commercial and
multi-family residential real estate loans are not fully amortizing and contain
large balloon payments upon maturity. These balloon payments may require the
borrower to either sell or refinance the underlying property in order to make
the balloon payment. Further, commercial and multi-family residential real
estate loans generally have relatively large balances to single borrowers or
related groups of borrowers. Accordingly, if we make any errors in judgment in
the collectability of our commercial and multi-family residential real estate
loans or the valuation of underlying collateral, any resulting charge-offs may
be larger on a per loan basis than those incurred with our residential or
consumer loan portfolios. As a result of the above factors, management may
determine it necessary to increase the level of provision for loan losses.
Increased provisions for loan losses could negatively affect our results of
operations.
Our
loan portfolio possesses increased risk due to its amount of nonconforming
loans.
A
significant portion of our one-to-four family residential loans are
nonconforming to secondary market requirements, and are therefore, not saleable
to Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae. At June 30, 2010, about 17.0% of our
one-to-four family residential loan portfolio consisted of loans that were
considered nonconforming due to loan size. Included in non-accrual
loans at June 30, 2010 were two loans totaling $1.2 million that were
nonconforming due to each loan’s principal amount.
As of
June 30, 2010, we held in portfolio one-to-four family interest-only mortgage
loans totaling $45.3 million or 5.9% of gross loans as compared to $59.7 million
or 7.8% of gross loans at June 30, 2009. The interest rates on these loans are
generally initially fixed for three, five, seven or ten year terms and then
adjust in accordance with the terms of the loan to require payment of both
principal and interest in order to amortize the loan for the remainder of the
term. At June 30, 2010, $11.3 million of these loans convert to
fully-amortizing status within the next five years. From February
2004 until February 2007, we originated or purchased interest-only loans on the
basis that the loans were underwritten at the fully indexed and fully amortized
rate. During such period, we also purchased loans to borrowers who
provide limited or no documentation of income, known as stated income
loans. A stated income loan is a loan where the borrower’s income
source is not subject to verification through the application process, but the
reasonableness of the stated income is verified through review of other sources,
such as compensation surveys. At June 30, 2010, we had $75.2 million in stated
income loans, or 9.8% of gross loans, as compared to $94.3 million, or 12.2% of
gross loans at June 30, 2009. Included in our stated income loans at June 30,
2010 were $9.9 million in interest-only loans. We have not purchased
any one- to-four family loans since 2007.
Nonconforming
one-to-four family residential loans are generally considered to have an
increased risk of delinquency and foreclosure than conforming loans and may
result in higher levels of provision for loan losses. For example, if
the interest rate adjustment results in the borrower being unable to make higher
payments of both interest and principal or to refinance the loan, we would be
required to initiate collection efforts including foreclosure in order to
protect our investment. The percentage of nonconforming loans that
are either performing or less than 60 days delinquent at June 30, 2010 was 88.7%
as compared to 95.2% at June 30, 2009. There can be no assurance that
our nonconforming loan portfolio would not be adversely affected should regional
and national economic conditions deteriorate further. In addition, there can be
no assurance, that we will recover funds in an amount equal to any remaining
loan balance. Consequently, we could sustain loan losses and potentially incur a
higher provision for loan losses.
High
loan-to-value ratios on a portion of our residential mortgage loan portfolio
expose us to greater risk of loss.
Many of
our residential mortgage loans are secured by liens on mortgage properties in
which the borrowers have little or no equity because of the decline in home
values in our market areas. Residential loans with high loan-to-value
ratios will be more sensitive to declining property values than those with lower
combined loan-to-value ratios and, therefore, may experience a higher incidence
of default and severity of losses. In addition, if the borrowers sell
their homes, such borrowers may be unable to repay their loans in full from the
sale. As a result, these loans may experience higher rates of
delinquencies, defaults and losses.
If
the allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual losses, our
results of operations may be negatively affected
.
In the
event that loan customers do not repay their loans according to their terms and
the collateral security for the payments of these loans is insufficient to pay
any remaining loan balance, we may experience significant loan losses. Such
credit risk is inherent in the lending business, and failure to adequately
assess such credit risk could have a material adverse affect on our financial
condition and results of operations. Management makes various assumptions and
judgments about the collectability of the loan portfolio, including the
creditworthiness of the borrowers and the value of the real estate and other
assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of the loans. In
determining the amount of the allowance for loans losses, management reviews the
loan portfolio and historical loss and delinquency experience, as well as
overall economic conditions and peer data. If management’s assumptions are
incorrect, the allowance for loan losses may be insufficient to cover probable
incurred losses in the loan portfolio, resulting in additions to the
allowance. The allowance for loan losses is also periodically
reviewed by the Office of Thrift Supervision, who may disagree with the
allowance and require us to increase such amount. Additions to the
allowance for loans losses would be made through increased provisions for loan
losses and could negatively affect our results of operations. At June 30, 2010,
our allowance for loan losses was $13.3 million, or 1.7% of total loans and
42.3% of non-performing loans as compared to $4.6 million, or 0.6% of total
loans and 51.7% of non-performing loans at June 30, 2009.
If
our non-performing assets continue to increase, our earnings will
suffer.
At June
30, 2010, our non-performing assets totaled $32.8 million, which was an increase
of $23.5 million or 250.4% over non-performing assets at June 30,
2009. Our non-performing assets adversely affect our net income in
various ways. We do not record interest income on non-accrual loans or real
estate owned. We must establish an allowance for loan losses that reserves for
losses inherent in the loan portfolio that are both probable and reasonably
estimable through current period provisions for loan losses. From
time to time, we also write down the value of properties in our real estate
owned portfolio to reflect changing market values. Additionally, there are legal
fees associated with the resolution of problem assets as well as carrying costs
such as taxes, insurance and maintenance related to our real estate owned.
Further, the resolution of non-performing assets requires the active involvement
of management, which can distract them from our overall supervision of
operations and other income-producing activities. Finally, if our estimate of
the allowance for loan losses is inadequate, we will have to increase the
allowance for loan losses accordingly.
A
major portion of our one-to-four family residential loan portfolio is serviced
by third parties which limits our ability to foreclose on such loans and
foreclosure is further limited by California law.
At June 30, 2010, $208.8
million or 62.2% of our one-to-four family residential loans were serviced by
third parties. Of this amount, $16.0 million or 7.7% percent were
non-performing. Our policy is to timely pursue our foreclosure rights
to maximize our ability to obtain control of the property, however, our ability
to implement this policy requires the timely cooperation of our third party
servicers.
When a
loan goes into default, it is the responsibility of the third party servicer to
enforce the borrower’s obligation to repay the outstanding
indebtedness. In the event the borrower is unable to bring the loan
current or a loan modification is not agreed to, the servicer is obligated to
foreclose on the property on behalf of Kaiser Federal Bank. Due to a
number of factors, including the high rate of loan delinquencies, we believe
that our servicers have not vigorously pursued collection efforts on our
behalf. We have attempted to exercise our rights under servicing
agreements to have the loan servicing returned to us so that we can aggressively
resolve the delinquency status of these loans. We have been unsuccessful in
negotiating the transfer of these servicing rights to us and are currently
pursuing legal action to obtain the transfer of these servicing
rights.
In addition, the State of
California recently enacted a law that places severe restrictions on the ability
of a lender to foreclose on owner occupied real estate securing one-to-four
family residential loans. This law has added 90 days to the standard
timeline for foreclosures of most owner occupied single family
mortgages. Other similar bills placing additional temporary
moratoriums on foreclose sales otherwise modifying the foreclosure procedures to
the benefit of borrowers and the detriment of lenders may be enacted by the
United State Congress or the State of California in the
future.
Delays in our ability to
foreclose on property, whether caused by restrictions under state or federal law
or the failure of a third party servicer to timely pursue foreclosure action,
can increase our potential loss on such property, due to other factors such as
lack of maintenance, unpaid property taxes and adverse changes in market
conditions. These delays may adversely affect our ability to limit
our credit losses.
If
property taken into real estate owned is not properly valued or sufficiently
reserved to cover actual losses, or if we are required to increase our valuation
reserves, our earnings could be reduced.
We obtain
updated valuations in the form of appraisals and broker price opinions when a
loan has been foreclosed and the property is transferred to real estate owned,
and at certain other times during the asset’s holding period. Our net
book value in the loan at the time of foreclosure and thereafter is compared to
the lower of adjusted cost basis or updated market value of the
foreclosed property less estimated selling costs (fair value). A
charge-off is recorded for any excess in the asset’s net book value over its
fair value when the loan is transferred to real estate owned. If our
valuation determination is inaccurate, the fair value of our investments in real
estate may not be sufficient to recover our net book value in such assets,
resulting in the need for additional charge-offs. Additional
charge-offs to our investments in real estate could have an adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations.
In
addition, bank regulators periodically review our real estate owned and may
require us to recognize further charge-offs. Any increase in our
charge-offs, as required by such regulators, may have an adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations.
Our
litigation related costs might continue to increase.
Kaiser
Federal Bank is subject to a variety of legal proceedings that have arisen in
the ordinary course of its business. In the current economic
environment, our involvement in litigation has increased significantly,
primarily as a result of the increase in our non-performing
assets. In addition, we may incur additional litigation costs related
to our seeking to terminate certain third-party loan servicers. There
can be no assurance that our loan workout and other activities will not result
in increased litigation expense that may have a material adverse effect on our
profitability.
We
depend on our management team to implement our business strategy and execute
successful operations and we could be harmed by the loss of their
services.
We are
dependent upon the services of our senior management team. Our
strategy and operations are directed by the senior management team. Any loss of
the services of the President and Chief Executive Officer or other members of
the management team could impact our ability to implement our business strategy,
and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our ability
to compete in our markets.
Strong
competition in our primary market area may reduce our ability to attract and
retain deposits and also may increase our cost of funds.
We
operate in a very competitive market for the attraction of deposits, the primary
source of our funding. Historically, our most direct competition for
deposits has come from credit unions, community banks, large commercial banks
and thrift institutions within our primary market areas. In recent
years competition has also come from institutions that largely deliver their
services over the internet. Such competitors have the competitive
advantage of lower infrastructure costs. Particularly in times of
extremely low or extremely high interest rates, we have faced significant
competition for investors’ funds from short-term money market securities and
other corporate and government securities. During periods of
regularly increasing interest rates, competition for interest bearing deposits
increases as customers, particularly certificate of deposit customers, tend to
move their accounts between competing businesses to obtain the highest rates in
the market. As a result, Kaiser Federal Bank incurs a higher cost of funds in an
effort to attract and retain customer deposits. We strive to grow our
lower cost deposits, such as non-interest bearing checking accounts, in order to
reduce our cost of funds.
Strong
competition in our primary market area may reduce our ability to originate loans
and also decrease our yield on loans.
We are
located in a competitive market that affects our ability to obtain loans through
origination as well as originating them at rates that provide an attractive
yield. Competition for loans comes principally from mortgage bankers,
commercial banks, other thrift institutions, nationally based homebuilders and
credit unions. Internet based lenders have also become a greater
competitive factor in recent years. Such competition for the
origination of loans may limit future growth and earnings
prospects.
Changes
in interest rates could adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
Our results of operations
and financial condition are significantly affected by changes in interest
rates. Our results of operations depend substantially on our net
interest income, which is the difference between the interest income we earn on
our interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest
expense we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and
borrowings. Because our interest-bearing liabilities generally
reprice or mature more quickly than our interest-earning assets, an increase in
interest rates generally would tend to result in a decrease in net interest
income.
Changes in interest rates
may also affect the average life of loans and mortgage-related securities.
Decreases in interest rates can result in increased prepayments of loans and
mortgage-related securities, as borrowers refinance to reduce their borrowing
costs. Under these circumstances, we are subject to reinvestment risk
to the extent that we are unable to reinvest the cash received from such
prepayments at rates that are comparable to the rates on existing loans and
securities. Additionally, increases in interest rates may decrease loan demand
and make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable rate loans. Also,
increases in interest rates may extend the life of fixed-rate assets, which
would restrict our ability to reinvest in higher yielding alternatives, and may
result in customers withdrawing certificates of deposit early so long as the
early withdrawal penalty is less than the additional interest they could receive
on an alternative investment.
If
our investment in the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco becomes impaired,
our earnings and stockholders’ equity could decrease.
We are required to own
common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco to qualify for
membership in the Federal Home Loan Bank System and to be eligible to borrow
funds under the Federal Home Loan Bank’s advance program. Our
investment in Federal Home Loan Bank common stock as of June 30, 2010 was $12.2
million. Federal Home Loan Bank common stock is not a marketable
security and can only be redeemed by the Federal Home Loan
Bank.
Federal Home Loan Banks
may be subject to accounting rules and asset quality risks that could materially
lower their regulatory capital. In an extreme situation, it is possible that the
capitalization of a Federal Home Loan Bank, including the Federal Home Loan Bank
of San Francisco, could be substantially diminished or reduced to zero.
Consequently, there is a risk that our investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of
San Francisco common stock could be deemed impaired at some time in the future,
and if this occurs, it would cause our earnings and stockholders’ equity to
decrease by the amount of the impairment charge.
The
United States economy remains weak and unemployment levels are
high. A prolonged recession, especially one affecting our geographic
market area, will adversely affect our business and financial
results.
The United States
experienced a severe economic recession in 2008 and 2009, which effects have
continued into 2010. Recent growth has been slow and unemployment
remains at very high levels and is not expected to improve in the near
future. Loan portfolio quality has deteriorated at many financial
institutions reflecting, in part, the weak United States economy and high
unemployment rates. In addition, the value of real estate collateral
supporting many commercial loans and home mortgages has declined and may
continue to decline, increasing the risk that we would incur losses if borrowers
default on their loans. Bank and bank holding company stock prices
have declined substantially, and it is significantly more difficult for banks
and bank holding companies to raise capital or borrow funds.
The Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation Quarterly Banking Profile has reported that non-performing
assets as a percentage of assets for Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation-insured financial institutions rose to 3.43% as of March 31, 2010,
compared to 0.95% as of December 31, 2007. For the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Quarterly Banking
Profile has reported that return on average assets was 0.54% for Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation-insured financial institutions compared to 0.81% for the
year ended December 31, 2007. The NASDAQ Bank Index declined 36.9%
between December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2010. At June 30, 2010, our
non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets was 3.79%, and our return
on average assets was 0.38% for the year ended June 30,
2010.
Continued negative
developments in the financial services industry and the domestic and
international credit markets may significantly affect the markets in which we do
business, the market for and value of our loans and investments, and our ongoing
operations, costs and profitability. Continued declines in both the
volume of real estate sales and the sale price couple with the current recession
and the associated increase in unemployment may result in higher than expected
loan delinquencies or problem assets, a decline in demand for our products and
services, or lack of growth or a decrease in deposits. These
potential negative events may cause us to incur losses, adversely affect our
capital, liquidity, financial condition and business
operations. These declines may have a greater affect on our earnings
and capital than on the earnings and capital of financial institutions whose
loan portfolios are more diversified. Moreover, continued declines in
the stock market in general, or stock values of financial institutions and their
holding companies specifically, could adversely affect our stock
performance.
Any
future Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance premiums and/or special
assessments will adversely impact our earnings.
Due to
the costs of resolving the increasing numbers of bank failures in 2008 and 2009,
on May 22, 2009, the FDIC adopted a final rule levying a five basis point
special insurance premium assessment on each insured depository institution’s
assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009. We recorded an
expense of $407,000 during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, to reflect the
special assessment. Any further special assessments that the FDIC
levies will be recorded as an expense during the appropriate
period. In addition, the FDIC increased the general assessment rate
and, therefore, our federal deposit general insurance premium expense will
increase compared to prior periods.
The FDIC
also issued a final rule pursuant to which all insured depository institutions
were required to prepay on December 30, 2009 their estimated assessments for the
fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. The
assessment rate for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for 2010 was based on each
institution’s total base assessment rate for the third quarter of 2009, modified
to assume that the assessment rate in effect on September 30, 2009 had been in
effect for the entire third quarter, and the assessment rate for 2011 and 2012
would be equal to the modified third quarter assessment rate plus an additional
three basis points. In addition, each institution’s base assessment
rate for each period was calculated using its third quarter assessment base,
adjusted quarterly for an estimated 5% annual growth rate in the assessment base
through the end of 2012. We made a payment of $3.6 million to the
FDIC on December 30, 2009, and recorded the payment as a prepaid expense, which
will be amortized to expense over three years.
In the
event that the special assessment and the prepayment do not provide sufficient
funds for the FDIC to resolve future bank failures, the FDIC may require another
special assessment or increase assessment rates for all FDIC insured
institutions. An increase in assessments will adversely affect our
results of operations.
We
may engage in FDIC-assisted transactions, which could present additional risks
to our business.
We may
have opportunities to acquire the assets and liabilities of failed banks in
FDIC-assisted transactions, including transactions in Southern
California. Although these FDIC-assisted transactions typically
provide for FDIC assistance to an acquirer to mitigate certain risks, such as
sharing exposure to loan losses and providing indemnification against certain
liabilities of the failed institution, we are (and would be in future
transactions) subject to many of the same risks we would face in acquiring
another bank in a negotiated transaction, including risks associated with
maintaining customer relationships and failure to realize the anticipated
acquisition benefits in the amounts and within the timeframes we
expect. In addition, because these acquisitions are structured in a
manner that would not allow us the time and access to information normally
associated with preparing for and evaluating a negotiated acquisition, we may
face additional risks in FDIC-assisted transactions, including additional strain
on management resources, management of problem loans, problems relating to
integration of personnel and operating systems and impact to our capital
resources requiring us to raise additional capital. We cannot assure
you that we will be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems
encountered in connection with any FDIC-assisted transactions. Our
inability to overcome these risks could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover,
even though we may desire to participate in an FDIC-assisted transaction, we can
offer no assurances that the FDIC would allow us to participate, or what the
terms of such transaction might be or whether we would be successful in
acquiring the bank or assets and/or deposits that we are seeking.
We
operate in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by
changes in laws and regulations.
We are currently subject
to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the Office of Thrift
Supervision and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Such regulators
govern the activities in which we may engage, primarily for the protection of
depositors and the Deposit Insurance Fund. These regulatory
authorities have extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and
enforcement activities, including the ability to impose restrictions on a bank’s
operations, reclassify assets, determine the adequacy of a bank’s allowance for
loan losses and determine the level of deposit insurance premiums
assessed. New financial reform legislation , entitled the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act has been enacted by Congress that
will change the bank regulatory framework, create an independent consumer
protection bureau that will assume the consumer protection responsibilities of
the various federal banking agencies, and establish more stringent capital
standards for banks and bank holding companies. The legislation will
also result in new regulations affecting the lending, funding, trading and
investment activities of banks and bank holding companies. Any
further changes in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of
regulatory policy, new regulations or legislation or additional deposit
insurance premiums could have a material impact on our
operations. Because our business is highly regulated, the laws and
applicable regulations are subject to frequent change. Any new laws,
rules and regulations could make compliance more difficult or expensive or
otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition or
prospects.
Financial
reform legislation recently enacted by Congress will, among other things,
eliminate the Office of Thrift Supervision, tighten capital standards, create a
new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and result in new laws and regulations
that are expected to increase our costs of operations.
Congress
has recently enacted the Dodd-Frank Act which will significantly change the
current bank regulatory structure and affect the lending, investment, trading
and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding
companies. The Dodd-Frank Act will eliminate our current primary
federal regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, and require Kaiser Federal
Bank to be regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the
primary federal regulator for national banks). The Dodd-Frank Act also
authorizes the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to supervise and
regulate all savings and loan holding companies like K-Fed Bancorp, in addition
to bank holding companies which it currently regulates. As a result,
the Federal Reserve Board’s current regulations applicable to bank holding
companies, including holding company capital requirements, will apply to savings
and loan holding companies. These capital requirements are
substantially similar to the capital requirements currently applicable to Kaiser
Federal Bank, as described in “How We Are Regulated—Federal Banking
Regulation—Capital Requirements.” The Dodd-Frank Act also requires
the Federal Reserve Board to set minimum capital levels for bank holding
companies that are as stringent as those required for the insured depository
subsidiaries, and the components of Tier 1 capital would be restricted to
capital instruments that are currently considered to be Tier 1 capital for
insured depository institutions. Bank holding companies with assets
of less than $500 million are exempt from these capital
requirements. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the proceeds of trust
preferred securities are excluded from Tier 1 capital unless such securities
were issued prior to May 19, 2010 by bank or savings and loan holding companies
with less than $15 billion of assets. The legislation also
establishes a floor for capital of insured depository institutions that cannot
be lower than the standards in effect today, and directs the federal banking
regulators to implement new leverage and capital requirements within 18 months
that take into account off-balance sheet activities and other risks, including
risks relating to securitized products and derivatives.
The
Dodd-Frank Act also creates a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with
broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has broad rule-making authority for a wide
range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings
institutions such as Kaiser Federal Bank, including the authority to prohibit
“unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all
banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in
assets. Banks and savings institutions with $10 billion or less in
assets will be examined by their applicable bank regulators, in the Bank’s case,
the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The new legislation
also weakens the federal preemption available for national banks and federal
savings associations, and gives state attorneys general the ability to enforce
applicable federal consumer protection laws.
The
legislation also broadens the base for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
insurance assessments. Assessments will now be based on the average consolidated
total assets less tangible equity capital of a financial
institution. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increases the
maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit
unions to $250,000 per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2009, and
non-interest bearing transaction accounts have unlimited deposit insurance
through December 31, 2013. Additionally, effective July 6, 2010,
regulatory changes in overdraft and interchange fee restrictions may reduce our
non-interest income. Lastly, the Dodd-Frank Act will increase
stockholder influence over boards of directors by requiring companies to give
stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called “golden
parachute” payments, and by authorizing the Securities and Exchange Commission
to promulgate rules that would allow stockholders to nominate their own
candidates using a company’s proxy materials. The legislation also
directs the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive
compensation paid to bank holding company executives, regardless of whether the
company is publicly traded or not.
It is
difficult to predict at this time what effect the new legislation and
implementing regulations will have on community banks, including the lending and
credit practices of such banks. Moreover, many of the provisions of
the Dodd-Frank Act will not take effect for at least a year, and the legislation
requires various federal agencies to promulgate numerous and extensive
implementing regulations over the next several years. Although the
substance and scope of these regulations cannot be determined at this time, it
is expected that the legislation and implementing regulations, particularly
those relating to the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, will curtail our
revenue opportunities and increase our operating and compliance costs, and could
require us to hold higher levels of regulatory capital and/or liquidity or
otherwise adversely affect our business or financial results in the
future.
Changes
in laws and regulations and the cost of regulatory compliance with new laws and
regulations may adversely affect our operations and our income.
In response to the
financial crisis of 2008 and early 2009, Congress has taken actions that are
intended to strengthen confidence and encourage liquidity in financial
institutions, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has taken actions to
increase insurance coverage on deposit accounts. The Dodd-Frank Act
and implementing regulations are likely to have a significant effect on the
financial services industry, which are likely to increase operating costs and
reduce profitability. In addition, there have been proposals made by members of
Congress and others that would reduce the amount delinquent borrowers are
otherwise contractually obligated to pay on their mortgage loans and limit an
institution’s ability to foreclose on mortgage collateral.
The potential exists for
additional federal or state laws and regulations, or changes in policy,
affecting lending and funding practices and liquidity
standards. Moreover, bank regulatory agencies have been active in
responding to concerns and trends identified in examinations, and have issued
many formal enforcement orders requiring capital ratios in excess of regulatory
requirements. Bank regulatory agencies, such as the Office of Thrift Supervision
and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, govern the activities in which we
may engage, primarily for the protection of depositors, and not for the
protection or benefit of potential investors. In addition, new laws and
regulations may increase our costs of regulatory compliance and of doing
business, and otherwise affect our operations. New laws and regulations may
significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the markets for and
value of our loans and investments, the fees we can charge, and our ongoing
operations, costs and profitability. Legislative proposals limiting our rights
as a creditor could result in credit losses or increased expense in pursuing our
remedies as a creditor.
The
recently enacted financial reform legislation may have an adverse effect on our
ability to pay dividends, which would adversely affect the value of our common
stock.
The value of K-Fed Bancorp’s common stock is significantly affected by our
ability to pay dividends to our public shareholders. K-Fed Bancorp’s
ability to pay dividends to our shareholders is subject to the ability of Kaiser
Federal Bank to make capital distributions to K-Fed Bancorp, and also to the
availability of cash at the holding company level in the event earnings are not
sufficient to pay dividends. Moreover, our ability to pay dividends and
the amount of such dividends is affected by the ability of K-Fed Mutual Holding
Company, our mutual holding company, to waive the receipt of dividends declared
by K-Fed Bancorp. K-Fed Mutual Holding Company currently waives its right
to receive most of its dividends on its shares of K-Fed Bancorp, which means
that K-Fed Bancorp has more cash resources to pay dividends to our public
stockholders than if K-Fed Mutual Holding Company accepted such dividends.
K-Fed Mutual Holding Company is required to obtain Office of Thrift Supervision
approval before it may waive its receipt of dividends, and the current dividend
waiver approval is effective through December 2010. It is expected that
K-Fed Mutual Holding Company will continue to waive the receipt of future
dividends except to the extent dividends are needed to fund its continuing
operations.
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations allow federally chartered mutual
holding companies to waive dividends without taking into account the amount of
waived dividends in determining an appropriate exchange ratio in the event of a
conversion of a mutual holding company to stock form. However, under the
recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act, the powers and duties of the Office of Thrift
Supervision relating to mutual holding companies will be transferred to the
Federal Reserve Board within one year of the enactment of the legislation
(subject to an extension of up to six months), and the Office of Thrift
Supervision will be eliminated. Accordingly, the Federal Reserve Board
will become the new regulator of K-Fed Bancorp and K-Fed Mutual Holding
Company. The Dodd-Frank Act also provides that a mutual holding company
will be required to give the Federal Reserve Board notice before waiving the
receipt of dividends, and sets forth the standards for granting a waiver,
including a requirement that waived dividends be considered in determining an
appropriate exchange ratio in the event of a conversion of the mutual holding
company to stock form. The Dodd-Frank Act, however, further provides that
the Federal Reserve Board may not consider waived dividends in determining an
appropriate exchange ratio in a conversion to stock form by any federal mutual
holding company, such as K-Fed Mutual Holding Company, that have waived
dividends prior to December 1, 2009. The Federal Reserve Board
historically has generally not allowed mutual holding companies to waive the
receipt of dividends, and there can be no assurance as to the conditions, if
any, the Federal Reserve Board will place on future dividend waiver requests by
grandfathered mutual holding companies such as K-Fed Mutual Holding
Company.
Public Shareholders Do Not Exercise Voting Control Over Us.
A majority of our voting stock is owned by K-Fed Mutual Holding Company.
K-Fed Mutual Holding Company is controlled by its board of directors, who
consist of those persons who are members of the board of directors of K-Fed
Bancorp and Kaiser Federal Bank. K-Fed Mutual Holding Company elects all
members of the board of directors of K-Fed Bancorp, and, as a general matter,
controls the outcome of all matters presented to the stockholders of K-Fed
Bancorp for resolution by vote, except for matters that require a vote greater
than a majority vote. Consequently, K-Fed Mutual Holding Company, acting
through its board of directors, is able to control the business and operations
of K-Fed Bancorp and may be able to prevent any challenge to the ownership or
control of K-Fed Bancorp by stockholders other than K-Fed Mutual Holding
Company. There is no assurance that K-Fed Mutual Holding Company will not
take actions that the public stockholders believe are against their
interests.
System
failure or breaches of our network security could subject us to increased
operating costs as well as litigation and other liabilities.
The
computer systems and network infrastructure we use could be vulnerable to
unforeseen problems. Our operations are dependent upon our ability to
protect our computer equipment against damage from physical theft, fire, power
loss, telecommunications failure or a similar catastrophic event, as well as
from security breaches, denial of service attacks, viruses, worms and other
disruptive problems caused by hackers. Any damage or failure that
causes an interruption in our operations could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations. Computer
break-ins, phishing and other disruptions could also jeopardize the security of
information stored in and transmitted through our computer systems and network
infrastructure, which may result in significant liability to us and may cause
existing and potential customers to refrain from doing business with
us. Although we, with the help of third-party service providers,
intend to continue to implement security technology and establish operational
procedures to prevent such damage, there can be no assurance that these security
measures will be successful. In addition, advances in computer
capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other developments
could result in a compromise or breach of the algorithms we and our third-party
service providers use to encrypt and protect customer transaction
data. A failure of such security measures could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff
Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
At June
30, 2010, we had three full service offices and six financial service centers.
Our financial service centers provide all the same services as a full service
office except they do not dispense cash; however, cash is available from an ATM
located on site. The net book value of our investment in premises, equipment and
fixtures, excluding computer equipment, was $1.7 million at June 30,
2010.
The
following table provides a list of our offices.
Location
|
|
Owned
or
Leased
|
|
Lease
Expiration
Date
|
|
Deposits
at
June
30, 2010
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOME
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1359
North Grand Avenue (1)
Covina,
CA 91724
|
|
Leased
|
|
April
2020
|
|
$
|
87,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOCATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252
South Lake Avenue (1)
Pasadena,
CA 91101
|
|
Leased
|
|
May
2015
|
|
|
64,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3375
Scott Boulevard, Suite 312 (2)
Santa
Clara, CA 95054
|
|
Leased
|
|
May
2014
|
|
|
70,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9714
Sierra Avenue, Suite 101 (2)
Fontana,
CA 92335
|
|
Leased
|
|
December
2014
|
|
|
47,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8501
Van Nuys Boulevard (1)
Panorama
City, CA 91402
|
|
Leased
|
|
March
2011
|
|
|
136,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10105
Rosecrans Avenue (2)
Bellflower,
CA 90706
|
|
Leased
|
|
March
2011
|
|
|
61,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26640
Western Avenue, Suite N (2)
Harbor
City, CA 90170
|
|
Leased
|
|
February
2011
|
|
|
36,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1110
N. Virgil Avenue (2)
Los
Angeles, CA 90029
|
|
Leased
|
|
March
2011
|
|
|
85,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11810
Pierce Street, Suite 150 (2)
Riverside,
CA 92505
|
|
Owned
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
41,107
|
|
(2)
|
Financial
service center.
|
We
believe that our current facilities are adequate to meet the present and
immediately foreseeable needs of Kaiser Federal Bank and K-Fed
Bancorp. We currently expect to renew our leases that expire in
2011.
We use an
in-house system with support provided by a third-party vendor to maintain our
data base of depositor and borrower customer information. The net book value of
our data processing and computer equipment at June 30, 2010 was
$306,000.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
From time
to time, we are involved as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions
arising in the normal course of business. We do not anticipate
incurring any material liability as a result of this litigation or any material
impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
Item 4. Removed and Reserved.
Part II.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities.
K-Fed
Bancorp’s common stock is currently quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol “KFED.” K-Fed Mutual Holding Company owns 8,861,750 shares, or
66.7% of our outstanding common stock. The approximate number of holders of
record of the Company’s common stock as of June 30, 2010 was
2,240. Certain shares of the Company are held in “nominee” or
“street” name and accordingly, the number of beneficial owners of such shares is
not know or included in the foregoing number.
The
following table sets forth the high and low trading prices by quarter for shares
of K-Fed Bancorp common stock and cash dividends paid per share for the years
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
The high
and low trading prices for the quarterly periods noted below were obtained from
the Nasdaq Stock Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
ended September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
10.30
|
|
|
$
|
8.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
Quarter
ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
9.50
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
Quarter
ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
9.27
|
|
|
|
7.30
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
Quarter
ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
|
|
8.76
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
ended September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
10.99
|
|
|
$
|
8.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
Quarter
ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
9.70
|
|
|
|
6.20
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
Quarter
ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
8.49
|
|
|
|
6.15
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
Quarter
ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
|
|
6.76
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
Dividend
Policy
Dividend payments by K-Fed
Bancorp are dependent primarily on dividends it receives from Kaiser Federal
Bank. A regulation of the OTS imposes limitations on “capital distributions” by
savings institutions.
No
capital distributions to
K-Fed Bancorp
were made
during fiscal years 2010 or 2009.
Equity
Compensation Plans
Set forth
below is information, as of June 30, 2010, regarding equity compensation plans
categorized by those plans that have been approved by stockholders and those
plans that have not been approved by stockholders.
Plan
|
|
Number
of
Securities to
be
Issued
Upon
Exercise
of
Outstanding
Options
and
Rights
(1)
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Remaining
Available
For
Issuance
Under
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by stockholders
|
|
|
454,400
|
|
|
$
|
12.15
|
|
|
|
102,555
|
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by stockholders
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
|
454,400
|
|
|
$
|
12.15
|
|
|
|
102,555
|
|
|
(1)
|
Consists
of options granted to directors and employees to purchase stock under the
2004 K-Fed Bancorp Stock Option
Plan.
|
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Period
|
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Price
Paid Per
Share
|
|
|
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as Part
of
Publicly Announced
Plans
*
|
|
|
Maximum
Number of
Shares
That May Yet be
Purchased
Under the
Plan
|
|
07/1/09
– 07/31/09
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
89,105
|
|
08/1/09
– 08/31/09
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
89,105
|
|
09/1/09
– 09/30/09
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
9.17
|
|
|
|
139,849
|
|
|
|
88,505
|
|
10/1/09
– 10/31/09
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
88,505
|
|
11/1/09
– 11/30/09
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
8.66
|
|
|
|
140,024
|
|
|
|
88,330
|
|
12/1/09
– 12/31/09
|
|
|
12,301
|
|
|
|
8.66
|
|
|
|
152,325
|
|
|
|
76,029
|
|
01/1/10
– 01/31/10
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
76,029
|
|
02/1/10
– 02/28/10
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
152,432
|
|
|
|
75,922
|
|
03/1/10
– 03/31/10
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
8.78
|
|
|
|
152,512
|
|
|
|
75,842
|
|
04/1/10
– 04/30/10
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
75,842
|
|
05/1/10
– 05/31/10
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
153,637
|
|
|
|
74,717
|
|
06/1/10
– 06/30/10
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
74,717
|
|
*
On
August 27, 2008, the Company announced its intention to repurchase an additional
5% of its outstanding publicly held common stock, or 228,354 shares of stock.
139,249 shares were purchased under this plan in the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The
following tables set forth selected consolidated historical financial and other
data of K-Fed Bancorp and its subsidiary for the periods and at the dates
indicated. The following is only a summary and you should read it in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of K-Fed Bancorp and
related notes to the consolidated financial statements. The
information at June 30, 2010 and 2009 and for the years ended June 30, 2010,
2009 and 2008 is derived in part from the audited consolidated financial
statements that appear in this Form 10-K. The information at June 30,
2008, 2007 and 2006 and for the years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 is derived in
part from audited consolidated financial statements that do not appear in this
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Selected
Financial Condition Data
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
866,802
|
|
|
$
|
895,097
|
|
|
$
|
849,291
|
|
|
$
|
799,870
|
|
|
$
|
739,114
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
39,560
|
|
|
|
73,705
|
|
|
|
51,240
|
|
|
|
22,339
|
|
|
|
25,579
|
|
Interest
earning time deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
19,267
|
|
|
|
25,508
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,363
|
|
|
|
9,010
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
4,236
|
|
|
|
8,539
|
|
|
|
13,579
|
|
|
|
11,289
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
3,751
|
|
|
|
5,528
|
|
|
|
7,504
|
|
|
|
21,096
|
|
|
|
24,738
|
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
12,179
|
|
|
|
12,649
|
|
|
|
12,540
|
|
|
|
9,870
|
|
|
|
8,746
|
|
Loans
receivable, net
|
|
|
757,985
|
|
|
|
746,875
|
|
|
|
742,191
|
|
|
|
699,143
|
|
|
|
634,093
|
|
Total
deposits
|
|
|
630,694
|
|
|
|
566,193
|
|
|
|
495,058
|
|
|
|
494,128
|
|
|
|
463,454
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
137,000
|
|
|
|
207,004
|
|
|
|
235,019
|
|
|
|
210,016
|
|
|
|
179,948
|
|
State
of California time deposit
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
94,705
|
|
|
|
92,558
|
|
|
|
90,328
|
|
|
|
91,957
|
|
|
|
92,337
|
|
|
|
For
the years ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
|
Selected
Operating Data
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest income
|
|
$
|
45,014
|
|
|
$
|
45,173
|
|
|
$
|
45,238
|
|
|
$
|
41,166
|
|
|
$
|
35,821
|
|
Total
interest expense
|
|
|
18,088
|
|
|
|
22,883
|
|
|
|
25,769
|
|
|
|
23,140
|
|
|
|
17,464
|
|
Net
interest income
|
|
|
26,926
|
|
|
|
22,290
|
|
|
|
19,469
|
|
|
|
18,026
|
|
|
|
18,357
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
9,867
|
|
|
|
2,586
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
17,059
|
|
|
|
19,704
|
|
|
|
18,507
|
|
|
|
17,497
|
|
|
|
17,705
|
|
Total
noninterest income
|
|
|
4,689
|
|
|
|
4,549
|
|
|
|
4,320
|
|
|
|
4,259
|
|
|
|
3,426
|
|
Terminated
stock offering costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Noninterest
expense
|
|
|
17,022
|
|
|
|
16,749
|
|
|
|
15,547
|
|
|
|
14,588
|
|
|
|
13,476
|
|
Total
noninterest expense
|
|
|
17,022
|
|
|
|
16,749
|
|
|
|
16,826
|
|
|
|
14,588
|
|
|
|
13,476
|
|
Income
before income tax expense
|
|
|
4,726
|
|
|
|
7,504
|
|
|
|
6,001
|
|
|
|
7,168
|
|
|
|
7,655
|
|
Income
tax expense
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
2,755
|
|
|
|
2,133
|
|
|
|
2,504
|
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
3,340
|
|
|
$
|
4,749
|
|
|
$
|
3,868
|
|
|
$
|
4,664
|
|
|
$
|
4,929
|
|
Basic
earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
Dividends
per share
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
At
or for the year ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected
Operating Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return
on assets (ratio of net income to average total assets)
|
|
|
0.38
|
%
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
0.47
|
%
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
|
|
0.68
|
%
|
Return
on equity (ratio of net income to average total equity)
|
|
|
3.58
|
%
|
|
|
5.21
|
%
|
|
|
4.18
|
%
|
|
|
5.07
|
%
|
|
|
5.33
|
%
|
Dividend payout
ratio
(1)
|
|
|
172.31
|
%
|
|
|
121.52
|
%
|
|
|
146.82
|
%
|
|
|
113.66
|
%
|
|
|
78.62
|
%
|
Ratio of
non-interest expense to average total assets
(2)
|
|
|
1.92
|
%
|
|
|
1.94
|
%
|
|
|
2.03
|
%
|
|
|
1.90
|
%
|
|
|
1.87
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio
(3)
|
|
|
53.84
|
%
|
|
|
62.41
|
%
|
|
|
65.35
|
%
|
|
|
65.46
|
%
|
|
|
61.86
|
%
|
Ratio
of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing
liabilities
|
|
|
115.90
|
%
|
|
|
115.01
|
%
|
|
|
115.99
|
%
|
|
|
117.84
|
%
|
|
|
119.38
|
%
|
Average interest
rate spread
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
|
|
1.87
|
%
|
|
|
2.17
|
%
|
Interest
rate spread at end of year
|
|
|
3.17
|
%
|
|
|
2.57
|
%
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
|
|
1.84
|
%
|
|
|
2.18
|
%
|
Net interest margin
(4)
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
|
2.71
|
%
|
|
|
2.45
|
%
|
|
|
2.43
|
%
|
|
|
2.66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
Quality Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing
assets to total assets
|
|
|
3.79
|
%
|
|
|
1.05
|
%
|
|
|
0.35
|
%
|
|
|
0.18
|
%
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
Allowance for loan
losses to non-performing loans
(5)
|
|
|
42.32
|
%
|
|
|
51.69
|
%
|
|
|
186.66
|
%
|
|
|
245.84
|
%
|
|
|
4,062.69
|
%
|
Allowance for loan
losses to total loans
(5)
(6)
|
|
|
1.73
|
%
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
Net
charge-offs to average outstanding loans
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
Non-performing
loans to total loans
|
|
|
4.08
|
%
|
|
|
1.18
|
%
|
|
|
0.23
|
%
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
to total assets at end of year
|
|
|
10.93
|
%
|
|
|
10.34
|
%
|
|
|
10.64
|
%
|
|
|
11.50
|
%
|
|
|
12.54
|
%
|
Average
equity to average assets
|
|
|
10.51
|
%
|
|
|
10.57
|
%
|
|
|
11.17
|
%
|
|
|
11.95
|
%
|
|
|
12.84
|
%
|
Tier
1 leverage (Kaiser Federal Bank only)
|
|
|
9.42
|
%
|
|
|
8.65
|
%
|
|
|
8.40
|
%
|
|
|
8.27
|
%
|
|
|
9.58
|
%
|
Tier
1 risk-based (Kaiser Federal Bank only)
|
|
|
13.48
|
%
|
|
|
12.76
|
%
|
|
|
12.31
|
%
|
|
|
12.69
|
%
|
|
|
15.42
|
%
|
Total
risk-based (Kaiser Federal Bank only)
|
|
|
14.73
|
%
|
|
|
13.32
|
%
|
|
|
12.81
|
%
|
|
|
13.23
|
%
|
|
|
16.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
branches
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Number of ATMs
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Number of loans
|
|
|
7,219
|
|
|
|
8,800
|
|
|
|
10,480
|
|
|
|
9,442
|
|
|
|
8,942
|
|
Number of deposit
accounts
|
|
|
67,439
|
|
|
|
66,988
|
|
|
|
65,668
|
|
|
|
66,330
|
|
|
|
64,995
|
|
Assets
in millions per full-time equivalent employee
|
|
$
|
8.54
|
|
|
$
|
9.62
|
|
|
$
|
9.54
|
|
|
$
|
8.79
|
|
|
$
|
7.46
|
|
(1)
|
The
dividend payout ratio is calculated using dividends declared, including
those waived by K-Fed Bancorp’s mutual holding company parent, K-Fed
Mutual Holding Company, divided by net income. The following
table shows information regarding cash dividends paid to our
stockholders:
|
|
|
For
the year ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
in
thousands)
|
|
Dividends
paid to public stockholders
|
|
$
|
1,856
|
|
|
$
|
1,872
|
|
|
$
|
1,957
|
|
|
$
|
1,844
|
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
Dividends
paid to K-Fed Mutual Holding Company
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
dividends paid
|
|
$
|
1,856
|
|
|
$
|
1,872
|
|
|
$
|
1,957
|
|
|
$
|
1,844
|
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
Total
dividends waived by K-Fed Mutual Holding Company
|
|
$
|
3,899
|
|
|
$
|
3,899
|
|
|
$
|
3,722
|
|
|
$
|
3,456
|
|
|
$
|
2,481
|
|
Total
dividends paid and total dividends waived by K-Fed Mutual Holding
Company
|
|
$
|
5,755
|
|
|
$
|
5,771
|
|
|
$
|
5,679
|
|
|
$
|
5,300
|
|
|
$
|
3,875
|
|
(2)
|
Noninterest
expense, exclusive of terminated stock offering
costs.
|
(3)
|
Efficiency
ratio represents noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest
income plus noninterest income, exclusive of securities gains and losses
and terminated stock offering
costs.
|
(4)
|
Net
interest income divided by average interest-earning
assets.
|
(5)
|
The
allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was
$13.3 million, $4.6 million, $3.2 million, $2.8 million and $2.7 million,
respectively.
|
(6)
|
Total
loans are net of deferred fees and
costs.
|
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
Forward
Looking Statements
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements and information
relating to the Company and the Bank that are based on the beliefs of management
as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to
management. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact
that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They
often include words like “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,”
“estimate,” “project,” or future conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,”
“could,” or “may” and similar expressions or the negative
thereof. Certain factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from expected results include, changes in the interest rate
environment, changes in general economic conditions, legislative and regulatory
changes that adversely affect the business of K-Fed Bancorp and Kaiser Federal
Bank, and changes in the securities markets. Should one or more of
these risks or uncertainties materialize or should underlying assumptions prove
incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described
herein. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on
forward-looking statements. The Company disclaims any obligation to
revise or update any forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K to
reflect future events or developments.
Overview
and Business Strategy
Our
results of operations depend primarily on our net interest income, which is the
difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, which principally
consist of loans and investment securities, and interest expense on
interest-bearing liabilities, which principally consist of deposits and
borrowings. Our results of operations also are affected by the level of our
provisions for loan losses, noninterest income and noninterest expenses.
Noninterest income consists primarily of service charges on deposit accounts and
ATM fees and charges. Noninterest expense consists primarily of salaries and
employee benefits, occupancy, equipment, ATM costs, federal deposit insurance
premiums and other expenses. Our results of operations may also be affected
significantly by general and local economic and competitive conditions, changes
in market interest rates, governmental policies and actions of regulatory
authorities.
Our
strategy continues to focus on operating as an independent financial institution
dedicated to serving the needs of customers in our market area, which extends
from Southern California to the San Francisco Bay area as a result of our
history as a credit union serving the employees of the Kaiser Permanente Medical
Care Program. Our historical focus has allowed us to capitalize on
convenient access to Kaiser Permanente employees and their family members and
establish Kaiser Federal Bank as their primary financial institution by, for
example, the direct deposit of their bi-weekly or monthly
paychecks. Our three branch offices and six financial service centers
are located in close proximity to Kaiser Permanente medical centers making
Kaiser Federal Bank an attractive choice. Financial service centers
provide all the services of a branch office but do not accept or dispense cash
except through an on-site ATM. Most of our 57 ATMs are strategically located at
or near Kaiser Permanente facilities. By utilizing a “cashless” branch we are
able to reduce personnel costs at the branch and improve our efficiency in the
delivery of financial services while at the same time, building and maintaining
relationships with our customers. For the year ended June 30, 2010,
our ratio of noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest income plus
noninterest income (commonly referred to as our “efficiency ratio”) was
53.84%. We intend to expand our deposit base by building upon the
niche of Kaiser Permanente employees and our existing market
locations.
Our goal
is to promote the financial well being of our customers and the communities we
serve, through the delivery of high quality financial services and prudent
management. We seek to accomplish this goal by:
|
●
|
continuing
our emphasis on maintaining cost efficiencies by utilizing internet
banking, and maintaining easily accessible financial service centers and
ATMs;
|
|
●
|
branch
expansion through leasing new branch/financial service center facilities
or by acquiring branches from other financial institutions in close
proximity to Kaiser Permanente Medical Centers in Southern California and
surrounding communities. We have no current understandings or
agreements for the establishment of any new branch/financial service
center;
|
|
●
|
reducing
our non-performing assets by devoting additional personnel to collection
efforts;
|
|
●
|
capitalizing
on our customer relationships by expanding such relationships through
internet banking and on-line bill payment services and developing new
customer relationships to increase our core
deposits;
|
|
●
|
increasing
our origination of multi-family residential lending while maintaining a
moderate growth of one-to-four family residential real estate loans and
consumer loans; and
|
|
●
|
expanding
our market presence through acquisitions of other financial institutions,
including FDIC-assisted acquisitions, primarily in Southern
California. We have no current understandings or agreements for any
specific acquisition.
|
Remote
access methods, such as our 57 ATMs, audio response unit, call center, bill
payment and internet banking continue to process over 90% of our customer
transactions. Branches and financial service centers strategically located for
our markets provide touchstones to attract new account holders and facilitate
transactions that cannot be completed electronically.
Historically,
a majority of the deposits have been used to originate or purchase one-to-four
family residential real estate, multi-family residential or commercial real
estate loans. Prior to 2007, Kaiser Federal Bank purchased, using our
own underwriting standards, a significant number of first mortgages on
owner-occupied, one-to-four family residences secured by properties located
throughout California. Kaiser Federal Bank also originated commercial
real estate loans, but made the strategic decision to cease such lending in
January 2009 in light of the downturn in economic conditions. We will
continue to emphasize multi-family residential real estate loans, and to a
lesser extent, one-to-four family residential real estate and consumer
loans. Historically, we have not originated, or purchased, commercial
business, commercial construction, or residential construction loans and have no
current plans to do so.
We have a
commitment to our customers, existing and new, to provide high quality service.
Our goal is to grow Kaiser Federal Bank while providing cost effective services
to our market area.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
In
reviewing and understanding our financial information, you are encouraged to
read and understand the significant accounting policies used in preparing our
consolidated financial statements.
These
policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements and
are essential in understanding Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation. Our accounting and financial reporting
policies conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and to general
practices within the banking industry. Accordingly, the consolidated financial
statements require certain estimates, judgments, and assumptions, which are
believed to be reasonable, based upon the information available. These estimates
and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses
during the periods presented. The following accounting policies comprise those
that management believes are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and
evaluating our reported financial results.
Allowance for Loan Losses.
The allowance for loan losses and
related provision expense are susceptible to change if the credit quality of our
loan portfolio changes, which is evidenced by charge-offs and non-performing
loan trends. Our loan mix is also changing as we increase our income property
(multi-family residential and commercial real estate) loan portfolio after
ceasing one-to-four family loan purchases in 2007. Generally, one-
to-four family residential real estate lending has a lower credit risk profile
compared to consumer lending (such as automobile or personal lines of credit
loans). Income property lending, however, has a higher credit risk profile than
consumer and one- to-four family residential real estate loans due to these
loans being larger in amount and non-homogenous in structure and
term. Changes in economic conditions, the mix and size of the loan
portfolio and individual borrower conditions can dramatically impact our level
of allowance for loan losses in relatively short periods of
time. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is
maintained at a level that represents our best estimate of credit losses in the
loan portfolio. While management uses available information to recognize losses
on loans, future additions to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary
based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, our banking regulators and
external auditor periodically review our allowance for loan losses. These
entities may require us to recognize additions to the allowance for loan losses
based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of
their review.
Management
evaluates current information and events regarding a borrower’s ability to repay
its obligations and considers a loan to be impaired when the ultimate
collectability of amounts due, according the contractual terms of the loan
agreement, is in doubt. If an impaired loan is collateral-dependent, the fair
value of the collateral, less estimated costs to sell, is used to determine the
amount of impairment, if any. The amount of the impairment can be
adjusted, based on current data, until such time as the actual basis is
established by acquisition of the collateral. Impairment losses are
reflected in the allowance for loan losses through a charge to the provision for
loan losses. Subsequent recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan
losses.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments.
The estimation of fair value
is significant to certain of our assets, including investment securities
available-for-sale, real estate owned and the value of loan collateral for
impaired loans. These are all recorded at either fair value or the
lower of cost or fair value. Fair values are determined based on
third party sources, when available. Furthermore, generally accepted
accounting principles require disclosure of the fair value of financial
instruments as a part of the notes to the consolidated financial
statements.
Fair
values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information
and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in Note 17 of our consolidated
financial statements. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and
other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items.
Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the
estimates.
Comparison
of Financial Condition at June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009.
Assets
.
Total assets decreased $28.3
million, or 3.2% to $866.8 million at June 30, 2010 from $895.1 million at June
30, 2009 due primarily to a decrease in total cash and cash equivalents,
interest earning time deposits in other financial institutions, and to a lesser
extent, a decrease in our investment securities portfolio, partially offset by
an increase in our net loans. Total cash and cash equivalents and interest
earning time deposits in other financial institutions decreased $40.4 million,
or 40.7% to $58.8 million at June 30, 2010 from $99.2 million at June 30, 2009.
The decrease was a result of the repayment of $70.0 million in FHLB advances
that matured during the year. The repayment was funded with liquidity
available through deposit growth.
Our
investment securities portfolio decreased $3.7 million, or 38.1% to $6.0 million
at June 30, 2010 from $9.8 million at June 30, 2009. The decrease was
attributable to maturities and normal repayments of principal on our
mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations.
Our net
loan portfolio increased by $11.1 million, or 1.5% to $758.0 million at June 30,
2010 from $746.9 million at June 30, 2009 due primarily to an increase in
multi-family residential loans partially offset by an increase in the allowance
for loan losses. Multi-family residential loans increased $81.8 million, or
41.6% to $278.4 million at June 30, 2010 from $196.6 million at June 30, 2009.
One-to-four family real estate loans decreased $41.6 million, or 11.0% to $335.6
million at June 30, 2010 from $377.2 million at June 30, 2009 due to loan
repayments, charge-offs and transfers of property to real estate owned.
Commercial real estate loans decreased $7.7 million, or 6.3% to $113.5 million
at June 30, 2010 from $121.1 million at June 30, 2009. Consumer loans which are
comprised primarily of automobile loans decreased $13.0 million, or 23.0% to
$43.3 million at June 30, 2010 from $56.2 million at June 30, 2009. Real estate
loans comprised 94.4% of the total loan portfolio at June 30, 2010, compared
with 92.5% at June 30, 2009. The decrease in one-to-four family real estate
loans and commercial real estate loans and increase in multi-family residential
loans was due in part to management’s decision to emphasize originations of
multi-family residential loans as a means of diversifying the loan portfolio and
increasing our loan yield.
The
allowance for loan losses increased by $8.7 million to $13.3 million at June 30,
2010 from $4.6 million at June 30, 2009. The increase was primarily
attributable to an increase in real estate loan delinquencies and troubled debt
restructurings during the year. See “—Asset Quality-Allowance for
Loan Losses.”
Other
assets increased by $4.6 million to $8.7 million at June 30, 2010 from $4.2
million at June 30, 2009. The increase in other assets was primarily a result of
the FDIC prepayment of insurance premiums of $3.6 million paid in December 2009.
As of June 30, 2010 the FDIC prepayment balance was $3.1 million.
Deposits
.
Total deposits increased
$64.5 million, or 11.4% to $630.7 million at June 30, 2010 from $566.2 million
at June 30, 2009. The growth was comprised of increases of $47.4 million in
certificates of deposit, $5.2 million in checking and savings accounts and $11.9
million in money market accounts. The increase in certificate of deposit
accounts was a result of promotions for these types of accounts as well as an
increase in non-promotional individual retirement account balances. Checking and
savings balances as well as money market accounts have steadily increased
throughout the year.
Borrowings
.
Advances from the FHLB of
San Francisco decreased $70.0 million, or 33.8% to $137.0 million at June 30,
2010 from $207.0 million at June 30, 2009. The decline was the result of
scheduled maturities throughout the year and was funded with available liquid
assets as well as increased deposits. In addition, the entire $25.0
million State of California time deposit was repaid at maturity.
Stockholders’
Equity
.
Stockholders’
equity increased $2.1 million, or 2.3% to $94.7 million at June 30, 2010 from
$92.6 million at June 30, 2009 primarily as a result of $3.3 million in net
income for the year ended June 30, 2010 and the allocation of employee stock
ownership plan shares, stock awards, and stock options totaling
$834,000. This increase was partially offset by the payment of
dividends of $1.9 million for year ($0.44 per share) and stock repurchases of
$126,000.
Average
Balances, Net Interest Income, Yields Earned and Rates Paid
The
following table sets forth certain information at June 30, 2010 and for the
years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The average yields and
costs are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balance of assets
or liabilities, respectively, for the years presented. Average balances are
derived primarily from month-end balances. Management does not believe that the
use of month-end balances rather than daily average balances has caused any
material differences in the information presented.
|
|
At
June 30,
|
|
|
For
the year ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Average
Yield/Cost
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
Yield/Cost
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
Yield/Cost
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Average
Yield/Cost
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
receivable
(1)
(2)
|
|
|
5.84
|
%
|
|
$
|
755,802
|
|
|
$
|
44,136
|
|
|
|
5.84
|
%
|
|
$
|
745,870
|
|
|
$
|
43,706
|
|
|
|
5.86
|
%
|
|
$
|
723,953
|
|
|
$
|
42,582
|
|
|
|
5.88
|
%
|
Securities
(3)
|
|
|
4.77
|
|
|
|
7,732
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
4.54
|
|
|
|
13,418
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
4.52
|
|
|
|
24,197
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
4.48
|
|
Federal
funds sold
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
45,413
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
34,930
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
30,301
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
2.88
|
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12,577
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
12,636
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
|
|
11,305
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
5.06
|
|
Interest-earning
deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
26,348
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
|
|
16,513
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
3,669
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
3.43
|
|
Total
interest-earning assets
|
|
|
5.44
|
|
|
|
847,872
|
|
|
|
45,014
|
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
823,367
|
|
|
|
45,173
|
|
|
|
5.49
|
|
|
|
793,425
|
|
|
|
45,238
|
|
|
|
5.70
|
|
Non-interest
earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
888,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
862,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
827,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money
market
|
|
|
0.77
|
%
|
|
$
|
117,330
|
|
|
$
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
|
$
|
93,547
|
|
|
$
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
|
$
|
75,213
|
|
|
$
|
1,915
|
|
|
|
2.55
|
%
|
Savings
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
130,854
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
122,357
|
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
127,759
|
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
Certificates
of deposit
|
|
|
2.63
|
|
|
|
311,737
|
|
|
|
9,095
|
|
|
|
2.92
|
|
|
|
260,916
|
|
|
|
10,123
|
|
|
|
3.88
|
|
|
|
236,062
|
|
|
|
10,918
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
4.54
|
|
|
|
171,616
|
|
|
|
7,293
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
239,088
|
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
|
245,024
|
|
|
|
10,824
|
|
|
|
4.42
|
|
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
2.27
|
|
|
|
731,537
|
|
|
|
18,088
|
|
|
|
2.47
|
|
|
|
715,908
|
|
|
|
22,883
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
684,058
|
|
|
|
25,769
|
|
|
|
3.77
|
|
Non-interest
bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
795,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
770,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
888,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
862,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
827,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
interest rate spread
|
|
|
3.17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,926
|
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,290
|
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,469
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.71
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio
of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115.99
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Calculated
net of deferred fees, loan loss reserves and includes non-accrual
loans.
|
(2)
|
Interest
income includes loan fees of $235,000, $323,000 and $328,000 for the years
ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
|
(3)
|
Calculated
based on amortized cost.
|
(4)
|
Net
interest income divided by interest-earning
assets.
|
Rate/Volume
Analysis
The
following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and
interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. For each category of interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes
attributable to (1) changes in volume, which are changes in volume multiplied by
the old rate; (2) changes in rate, which are changes in rate multiplied by the
old volume; and (3) changes in rate/volume, which are the changes in rate times
the changes in volume.
|
|
For
the Year Ended June 30,
2010
vs. 2009
|
|
|
For
the Year Ended June 30,
2009
vs. 2008
|
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
Due
to
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
Due
to
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Rate/
Volume
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Rate/
Volume
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Interest-Earning Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
receivable
(1)
|
|
$
|
582
|
|
|
$
|
(150
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
430
|
|
|
$
|
1,289
|
|
|
$
|
(160
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,124
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
Federal
funds sold
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
(291
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
Interest-earning
deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
118
|
|
Total
interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
560
|
|
|
$
|
(646
|
)
|
|
$
|
(73
|
)
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,444
|
|
|
$
|
(1,124
|
)
|
|
$
|
(385
|
)
|
|
$
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money
market
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
$
|
(902
|
)
|
|
$
|
(229
|
)
|
|
$
|
(683
|
)
|
|
$
|
467
|
|
|
$
|
(499
|
)
|
|
$
|
(122
|
)
|
|
$
|
(154
|
)
|
Savings
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
(509
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(468
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(973
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(1,021
|
)
|
Certificates
of deposit
|
|
|
1,972
|
|
|
|
(2,511
|
)
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
(1,028
|
)
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
(1,759
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(795
|
)
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
(2,796
|
)
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(2,615
|
)
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
(670
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(916
|
)
|
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
(3,670
|
)
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
(4,794
|
)
|
|
|
1,266
|
|
|
|
(3,901
|
)
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
(2,886
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in net interest income/spread
|
|
$
|
860
|
|
|
$
|
3,024
|
|
|
$
|
751
|
|
|
$
|
4,635
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
2,777
|
|
|
$
|
(134
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,821
|
|
(1)
|
Total
loans are net of deferred fees and
costs.
|
Comparison
of Results of Operations for the Years Ended June 30, 2010 and
2009.
General
.
Net income for the year
ended June 30, 2010 was $3.3 million, a decrease of $1.4 million, or 29.7%, as
compared to net income of $4.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2009.
Earnings per basic and diluted common share were $0.26 for the year ended June
30, 2010 compared to $0.36 for the year ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in net
income primarily resulted from an increase in the provision for loan losses,
partially offset by an increase in net interest income.
Interest
Income
.
Interest
income decreased by $159,000, or 0.4%, to $45.0 million for the year ended June
30, 2010 from $45.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. The primary
reasons for the decline in interest income were decreases in interest on
securities, dividends on FHLB stock and interest on federal funds
sold. These decreases were nearly offset by an increase in interest
and fees on loans. Our interest income has benefited from our fixed
rate single-family loans and multi-family residential loans, which supported our
yield on loans receivable in the recent declining rate environment.
Interest
and fees on loans increased $430,000, or 1.0%, to $44.1 million for the year
ended June 30, 2010 from $43.7 million for the year ended June 30,
2009. The primary reason for the increase was an increase in the
average loan receivable balance of $9.9 million, or 1.3% to $755.8 million for
the year ended June 30, 2010 from $745.9 million for the year ended June 30,
2009 due to increased originations of multi-family residential loans during the
year. In addition, 82.5% of our one-to-four family real estate loans
are fixed rate loans that did not reprice in the low interest rate
environment. These loans have a weighted average interest rate of
5.86%, which enabled us to maintain the average loan yield at 5.84% for the year
ended June 30, 2010 as compared to 5.86% for the year ended June 30,
2009. The beneficial effect of our significant amount of fixed-rate
loans, which help us maintain higher loan yields in periods when market interest
rates decline significantly, will in turn constrain the increase in our average
loan yield as market interest rates increase.
Interest
income on securities decreased by $255,000, or 42.1%, to $351,000 for the year
ended June 30, 2010 from $606,000 for the year ended June 30, 2009. The decrease
was primarily attributable to a $5.7 million decrease in the average balance of
investment securities from $13.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 to
$7.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2010 as a result of maturities and
normal repayments of principal on our mortgage-backed securities and
collateralized mortgage obligations.
FHLB
dividends decreased by $271,000, or 86.3%, to $43,000 for the year ended June
30, 2010 from $314,000 for the year ended June 30, 2009. The decrease was
attributable to the FHLB paying only a nominal dividend as compared to the prior
year. Based on announcements from the FHLB, we are not expecting
significant levels of dividend payments for the foreseeable future.
Other
interest income decreased by $63,000, or 11.5%, to $484,000 for the year ended
June 30, 2010 from $547,000 for the year ended June 30, 2009. The decrease was a
result of a 63 basis point decline in the average yield earned on federal funds
sold from 0.87% for the year ended June 30, 2009 to 0.24% for the year ended
June 30, 2010. The yield earned on federal funds sold was impacted by the low
targeted federal funds rate.
Interest
Expense
. Interest expense decreased $4.8 million, or 21.0%, to $18.1
million for the year ended June 30, 2010 from $22.9 million for the year ended
June 30, 2009. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 73 basis point
decline in the average cost of interest bearing liabilities from 3.20% for the
year ended June 30, 2009 to 2.47% for the year ended June 30, 2010 as a result
of low interest rates during the year. The decrease was partially offset by an
increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities of $15.6 million
from $715.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 to $731.5 million for the
year ended June 30, 2010 due primarily to an increase in the average balance of
deposits during the year.
The
decrease in interest expense was also the result of a decline in the average
balance of borrowings which decreased $67.5 million, or 28.2%, to $171.6 million
for the year ended June 30, 2010 from $239.1 million for the year ended June 30,
2009. The decline was the result of scheduled FHLB advance repayments and was
funded with available liquid assets due to increased deposits.
Provision for
Loan Losses
. We maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb probable
incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based on
ongoing, quarterly assessments of the probable losses inherent in the loan
portfolio. Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance
consists of several key elements, which include loss ratio analysis by type of
loan and specific allowances for identified problem loans, including the results
of measuring impaired loans as provided in ASC 310,
“Receivables.” These accounting standards prescribe the measurement
methods, income recognition and disclosures related to impaired
loans. See “—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” and “– Asset
Quality- Allowance for Loan Losses.”
Our
provision for loan losses increased to $9.9 million for the year ended June 30,
2010 compared to $2.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. The provision
for loan losses for the year ended June 30, 2010 was comprised of $4.8 million
in general valuation allowances and $5.1 million in specific valuation
allowances. The increase in provision for loan losses was primarily
attributable to an increase in real estate loan delinquencies and troubled debt
restructurings during the year. The increase in delinquencies and
troubled debt restructurings was experienced primarily in our one-to-four family
residential mortgage loans as a result of the decline in the housing market and
deteriorating general economic conditions. Also, impacting the
provision for loan losses for the year ended June 30, 2010 was one commercial
real estate and five multi-family residential property loans totaling $6.6
million that were added to non-accrual status with specific valuation allowances
of $1.3 million.
Noninterest
Income
.
Our
noninterest income increased by $140,000, or 3.1%, to $4.7 million for the year
ended June 30, 2010 from $4.6 million for the year ended June 30,
2009. The increase in noninterest income was primarily a result of an
increase in ATM fees and charges due to increased transaction
volume. Recent changes in regulations may have a negative effect on
ATM fees in future periods any may reduce our noninterest income.
Noninterest
Expense
.
Our
noninterest expense increased $273,000, or 1.6%, to $17.0 million for the year
ended June 30, 2010 compared to $16.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2009.
The increase was primarily due to an increase in ATM expense and professional
services, partially offset by a decline in salaries and benefits
expense.
ATM
expense increased $162,000, or 10.2%, to $1.8 million for the year ended June
30, 2010 from $1.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. The
increase was primarily due to increased transaction volume.
Professional
services increased $261,000, or 33.9%, to $1.0 million for the year ended June
30, 2010 from $769,000 for the year ended June 30, 2009. The increase was
primarily due to an increase in legal fees and recruitment costs.
Salaries
and benefits represented 46.8% and 48.8% of total noninterest expense for the
year ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Total salaries and
benefits decreased $197,000, or 2.4%, to $8.0 million for the year ended June
30, 2010 from $8.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. The
decrease was primarily due to no payments made under the annual incentive plan
for fiscal 2010 as compared to $228,000 made under the annual incentive plan for
fiscal 2009.
Income Tax
Expense
. Income tax expense decreased to $1.4 million for the year ended
June 30, 2010 compared to $2.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2009. This
decrease was primarily the result of lower pretax income for the year ended June
30, 2010 compared to the year ended June 30, 2009. The effective tax rate was
29.3% and 36.7% for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
decrease in the effective tax rate was a result of the impact of tax credits on
lower projected taxable income.
Comparison
of Results of Operations for the Years Ended June 30, 2009 and
2008.
General.
Net income for the year ended June 30, 2009 was $4.7 million, an increase
of $881,000, or 22.8%, from net income of $3.9 million for the year ended June
30, 2008. Earnings per basic and diluted common share were $0.36 for the year
ended June 30, 2009 compared to $0.29 for the year ended June 30,
2008. Net income for the year ended June 30, 2008 included $1.3
million in stock offering costs resulting from the cancellation of the stock
offering in November 2007 due to unfavorable market conditions. The
recognition of these expenses resulted in a decline of $0.06 in basic and
diluted earnings per share for the year ended June 30,
2008. Excluding the effect of the stock offering costs, the increase
in net income was primarily the result of increased net interest income
resulting from a lower cost of funds offset by an increase in the provision for
loan losses.
Interest
Income
. Interest income decreased $65,000, or 0.1%, to $45.2 million for
the year ended June 30, 2009 from $45.2 million for the year ended June 30,
2008. The increase in interest and fees on loans was offset by a decrease in
interest on securities, FHLB dividends and other interest income.
Interest
and fees on loans increased by $1.1 million, or 2.6% to $43.7 million for the
year ended June 30, 2009 from $42.6 million for the year ended June 30,
2008. The primary factor for the increase was an increase in the
average loans receivable balance of $21.9 million, or 3.0%, to $745.9 million
for the year ended June 30, 2009 from $724.0 million for the year ended June 30,
2008.
Interest
income on securities decreased by $479,000, or 44.1%, to $606,000 for the year
ended June 30, 2009 from $1.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2008. The
decrease was attributable to a $10.8 million decrease in the average balance of
investment securities from $24.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2008 to
$13.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 as a result of maturities and
normal repayments of principal on our mortgage-backed securities and
collateralized mortgage obligations.
FHLB
dividends decreased by $258,000, or 45.1%, to $314,000 for the year ended June
30, 2009 from $572,000 for the year ended June 30, 2008. The decrease
was attributable to the FHLB not paying quarterly dividends for the last half of
our fiscal 2009.
Other
interest income decreased by $452,000 or 45.2% to $547,000 for the year ended
June 30, 2009 from $999,000 for the year ended June 30, 2008. The decrease was a
result of 201 basis points decrease in the average yield earned on federal funds
sold to 0.87% for the year ended June 30, 2009 from 2.88% for the year ended
June 30, 2008. The yield earned on federal funds sold was reduced by
the actions taken by the Federal Reserve in lowering the targeted federal funds
rate.
Interest
Expense
. Interest expense decreased $2.9 million, or 11.2%, to $22.9
million for the year ended June 30, 2009 from $25.8 million for the year ended
June 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 57 basis point
decline in the average cost of interest bearing liabilities from 3.77% for the
year ended June 30, 2008 to 3.20% for the year ended June 30, 2009, partially
offset by an increase in the average balance of interest bearing liabilities
from $684.1 million at June 30, 2008 to $715.9 million at June 30,
2009. The decline in rates was a result of a general decline in the
overall interest rate environment while the increase in balances was a result of
depositors looking for the safety of banks with strong capital positions as well
as money market and certificate of deposit promotions offered during the
year.
The
average balance of money market accounts increased by $18.3 million, or 24.4% to
$93.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 from $75.2 million for the year
ended June 30, 2008. The average cost of money market accounts
decreased 67 basis points to 1.88% for the year ended June 30, 2009 from 2.55%
for the year ended June 30, 2008. The average balance of savings accounts
decreased by $5.4 million, or 4.2% to $122.4 million for the year ended June 30,
2009 from $127.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2008. The
average cost of savings accounts decreased 76 basis points to 0.89% for the year
ended June 30, 2009 from 1.65% for the year ended June 30, 2008. The
average balance of certificates of deposit increased by $24.8 million, or 10.5%,
to $260.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 from $236.1 million for the
year ended June 30, 2008. The average cost of certificates of deposit decreased
75 basis points to 3.88% for the year ended June 30, 2009 from 4.63% for the
year ended June 30, 2008.
The
average balance of borrowings decreased $5.9 million, or 2.4%, to $239.1 million
for the year ended June 30, 2009 from $245.0 million for the year ended June 30,
2008. The decline was the result of scheduled advance repayments and was funded
with available liquid assets due to increased deposits. The average cost of
borrowings decreased 28 basis points to 4.14% for the year ended June 30, 2009
from 4.42% for the year ended June 30, 2008.
Provision for
Loan Losses.
Our provision for loan losses increased by $1.6 million to
$2.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $962,000 for the
year ended June 30, 2008. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total
loans was 0.61% at June 30, 2009 as compared to 0.43% at June 30, 2008. The
increase in provision for loan losses was primarily attributable to an increase
in real estate loan delinquencies as well as an increase in loans that were
reviewed for impairment. The increase in delinquencies was
experienced primarily in our one-to-four family loans as a result of the
continued deterioration in the housing market as well as the decline in general
economic conditions and increased unemployment in our market area.
Noninterest
Income
. Noninterest income increased $229,000, or 5.3%, to $4.5 million
for the year ended June 30, 2009 from $4.3 million for the year ended June 30,
2008. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in ATM fees and
charges as a result of an increase in ATM surcharge fees for non-customers. In
addition there were lower losses attributable to our investment in a California
Affordable Housing Program Fund. See “Investment Activities—Equity
Investment.”
Noninterest
Expense
. Our noninterest expense decreased $77,000 or 0.5% to $16.7
million for the year ended June 30, 2009 from $16.8 million for the year ended
June 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to the recognition of $1.3 million
in terminated stock offering costs for the year ended June 30, 2008 without a
similar charge for the year ended June 30, 2009. Excluding the stock
offering costs, noninterest expense increased $1.2 million due to increases in
federal deposit insurance premiums due primarily to the special assessment, ATM
expense and other operating expenses.
Salaries
and benefits represented 48.8% and 48.1% of total noninterest expense for the
years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Total salaries and benefits
increased $67,000, or 0.8%, to $8.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2009
from $8.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2008. The increase was primarily
due to annual salary increases and an increase in the number of full-time
equivalent employees partially offset by a decrease in ESOP expense as a result
of a decline in the market value of our stock during the year.
ATM
expense increased $245,000, or 18.2% to $1.6 million for the year ended June 30,
2009 from $1.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2008. The increase was
primarily due to ATM installations, one-time communication capacity expense, and
an increase in ATM fraud losses.
Federal
deposit insurance premiums increased $619,000, or 150.2% to $1.0 million for the
year ended June 30, 2009 from $412,000 for the year ended June 30, 2008. The
increase was primarily due to an increase in the general assessment rate and the
FDIC imposing a special assessment of approximately $400,000 at June 30, 2009
due to ongoing bank failures.
Other
operating expenses increased $203,000, or 15.3% to $1.5 million for the year
ended June 30, 2009 from $1.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2008. The
increase in other expense was due to real estate loan servicing repurchases and
higher real estate owned and foreclosure expenses.
Income Tax
Expense.
Income tax expense for the year ended June 30, 2009 was $2.8
million as compared to $2.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2008. This
increase was primarily the result of a higher pre-tax income of $1.5 million for
the year ended June 30, 2009. The effective tax rate was 36.7% and 35.5% for the
years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in the
effective tax rate was attributable to an increase in nondeductible expense
related to stock options and stock awards.
Liquidity,
Capital Resources and Commitments
Liquidity
may increase or decrease depending upon the availability of funds and
comparative yields on investments in relation to the return on loans.
Historically, we have maintained liquid assets at levels above the minimum
requirements previously imposed by Office of Thrift Supervision regulations and
above levels believed to be adequate to meet the requirements of normal
operations, including potential deposit outflows. Cash flow projections are
regularly reviewed and updated to assure that adequate liquidity is
maintained.
Our
liquidity, represented by cash and cash equivalents, interest bearing accounts
and mortgage-backed and related securities, is a product of our operating,
investing and financing activities. Our primary sources of funds are deposits,
amortization, prepayments and maturities of outstanding loans and
mortgage-backed and related securities, and other short-term investments and
funds provided from operations. While scheduled payments from the amortization
of loans and mortgage-backed related securities and maturing investment
securities and short-term investments are relatively predictable sources of
funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general
interest rates, economic conditions and competition. In addition, we invest
excess funds in short-term interest-earning assets, which provide liquidity to
meet lending requirements. We also generate cash through borrowings. We utilize
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and previously used State of California time
deposits, to leverage our capital base and provide funds for our lending and
investment activities, and enhance our interest rate risk
management.
Liquidity
management is both a daily and long-term function of business management. Excess
liquidity is generally invested in short-term investments such as overnight
deposits. On a longer-term basis, we maintain a strategy of investing in various
lending products as described in greater detail under “Business - Lending
Activities.” We use our sources of funds primarily to meet ongoing
commitments, to pay maturing certificates of deposit and savings withdrawals, to
fund loan commitments and to maintain our portfolio of mortgage-backed and
related securities. At June 30, 2010, total approved loan commitments amounted
to $2.5 million, which includes the unadvanced portion of loans of $2.3
million. Certificates of deposit and advances from the Federal Home
Loan Bank of San Francisco scheduled to mature in one year or less at June 30,
2010, were $195.6 million and $77.0 million, respectively. Based on historical
experience, management believes that a significant portion of maturing deposits
will remain with Kaiser Federal Bank and we anticipate that we will continue to
have sufficient funds, through deposits and borrowings, to meet our current
commitments.
At June
30, 2010, we had available additional advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
of San Francisco in the amount of $219.1 million. We also had an available line
of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco of $77.7 million at
June 30, 2010, which has not been drawn upon.
Contractual
Obligations
In the
normal course of business, we enter into contractual obligations that meet
various business needs. These contractual obligations include certificates of
deposit to customers, borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank, lease
obligations for facilities, and commitments to purchase and/or originate loans.
The following table summarizes our long-term contractual obligations at June 30,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB
advances
|
|
$
|
137,000
|
|
|
$
|
77,000
|
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Operating
lease obligations
|
|
|
5,510
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
2,268
|
|
Loan
commitments to originate residential mortgage loans
|
|
|
2,452
|
|
|
|
2,452
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Available
home equity and unadvanced lines of credit
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Certificates
of deposit
|
|
|
325,260
|
|
|
|
195,649
|
|
|
|
54,488
|
|
|
|
75,123
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
commitments and contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
472,519
|
|
|
$
|
278,106
|
|
|
$
|
115,721
|
|
|
$
|
76,424
|
|
|
$
|
2,268
|
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As a
financial service provider, we routinely are a party to various financial
instruments with off-balance sheet risks, such as commitments to extend credit
and unused lines of credit. While these contractual obligations
represent our future cash requirements, a significant portion of commitments to
extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments
are subject to the same credit policies and approval process accorded to loans
we make. For additional information, see Note 16 of the Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Capital
Consistent
with our goal to operate a sound and profitable financial organization, we
actively seek to continue as a “well capitalized” institution in accordance with
regulatory standards. Total stockholders’ equity was $94.7 million at June 30,
2010 or 10.93%, of total assets. As of June 30, 2010, we exceeded all regulatory
capital requirements. Our regulatory capital ratios at June 30, 2010 were as
follows: core capital 9.42%; Tier I risk-based capital 13.48%; and total
risk-based capital 14.73%. The regulatory capital requirements to be considered
well capitalized are 5%, 6% and 10%, respectively. See “How We Are Regulated-
Capital Requirements.”
For the
year ended June 30, 2010, we repurchased 14,388 shares of our common stock at an
average cost of $8.76. For the year ended June 30, 2009, we repurchased 180,718
shares of our common stock at an average cost of $10.21.
Impact
of Inflation
The
consolidated financial statements presented herein have been prepared in
accordance with GAAP. These principles require the measurement of financial
position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without
considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to
inflation.
Our
primary assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest
rates have a more significant impact on our performance than the effects of
general levels of inflation. Interest rates, however, do not necessarily move in
the same direction or with the same magnitude as the price of goods and
services, since such prices are affected by inflation. In a period of rapidly
rising interest rates, the liquidity and maturity structure of our assets and
liabilities are critical to the maintenance of acceptable performance
levels.
The
principal effect of inflation, as distinct from levels of interest rates, on
earnings is in the area of non-interest expense. Such expense items as employee
compensation, employee benefits and occupancy and equipment costs may be subject
to increases as a result of inflation. An additional effect of inflation is the
possible increase in the dollar value of the collateral securing loans that we
have made.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
For
discussion of Recent Accounting Pronouncements, please see Note 1-Nature of
Business and Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements beginning on Page F-9.
Item
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk.
Asset
and Liability Management and Market Risk
Our Risk When
Interest Rates Change.
The rates of interest we earn on assets and pay on
liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Market
interest rates change over time. Our fixed rate loans generally have longer
maturities than our fixed rate deposits. Accordingly, our results of operations,
like those of other financial institutions, are impacted by changes in interest
rates and the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities. The risk
associated with changes in interest rates and our ability to adapt to these
changes is known as interest rate risk and is our most significant market
risk.
How We Measure
Our Risk of Interest Rate Changes.
As part of our attempt to manage our
exposure to changes in interest rates and comply with applicable regulations, we
monitor our interest rate risk. In monitoring interest rate risk, we continually
analyze and manage assets and liabilities based on their payment streams and
interest rates, the timing of their maturities, and their sensitivity to actual
or potential changes in market interest rates. In order to minimize
the potential for adverse effects of material and prolonged increases in
interest rates on our results of operations, we have adopted investment/asset
and liability management policies to better match the maturities and repricing
terms of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The board
of directors recommend and set the asset and liability policies of Kaiser
Federal Bank, which are implemented by the asset/liability management
committee.
The
purpose of the asset/liability management committee is to communicate,
coordinate and control asset/liability management consistent with our business
plan and board approved policies. The committee establishes and monitors the
volume and mix of assets and funding sources taking into account relative costs
and spreads, interest rate sensitivity and liquidity needs. The objectives are
to manage assets and funding sources to produce results that are consistent with
liquidity, capital adequacy, growth, risk and profitability goals.
The
asset/liability management committee generally meets on a weekly basis to
review, among other things, economic conditions and interest rate outlook,
current and projected liquidity needs and capital position, anticipated changes
in the volume and mix of assets and liabilities and interest rate risk exposure
limits versus current projections pursuant to net present value of portfolio
equity analysis and income simulations. The asset/liability management committee
recommends appropriate strategy changes based on this review. The chairman or
his designee is responsible for reviewing and reporting on the effects of the
policy implementations and strategies to the board of directors at least
monthly.
In order
to manage our assets and liabilities and achieve the desired liquidity, credit
quality, interest rate risk, profitability and capital targets, we have focused
our strategies on:
|
●
|
maintaining
an adequate level of adjustable rate
loans;
|
|
●
|
originating
a reasonable volume of short- and intermediate-term
loans;
|
|
●
|
managing
our deposits to establish stable deposit relationships;
and
|
|
●
|
using
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and pricing on fixed-term non-core
deposits to align maturities and repricing
terms.
|
At times,
depending on the level of general interest rates, the relationship between long-
and short-term interest rates, market conditions and competitive factors, the
asset/liability management committee may determine to increase our interest rate
risk position somewhat in order to maintain our net interest
margin.
The
asset/liability management committee regularly reviews interest rate risk by
forecasting the impact of alternative interest rate environments on net interest
income and market value of portfolio equity, which is defined as the net present
value of an institution’s existing assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet
instruments, and evaluating such impacts against the maximum potential changes
in net interest income and market value of portfolio equity that are authorized
by the board of directors of Kaiser Federal Bank.
The
Office of Thrift Supervision provides Kaiser Federal Bank with the information
presented in the following tables, which is based on information provided to the
Office of Thrift Supervision by Kaiser Federal Bank. It presents the change in
Kaiser Federal Bank’s net portfolio value at June 30, 2010 that would occur upon
an immediate change in interest rates based on Office of Thrift Supervision
assumptions but without giving effect to any steps that management might take to
counteract that change.
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
Increase (Decrease) in
NPV
|
|
|
NPV
as a Percentage of Present
Value of Assets (3)
|
|
Change in Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
Rate
(basis
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPV
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
points)
(1)
|
|
NPV
(2)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Ratio
(4)
|
|
|
(basis
points)
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+300
|
|
$
|
86,201
|
|
|
$
|
(23,994
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
|
9.99
|
%
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
+200
|
|
|
97,379
|
|
|
|
(12,816
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
|
11.06
|
%
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
+100
|
|
|
106,255
|
|
|
|
(3,940
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
11.86
|
%
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
—
|
|
|
110,195
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12.15
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
-100
|
|
|
100,716
|
|
|
|
(9,479
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
11.15
|
%
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
(1)
|
Assumes
an instantaneous uniform change in interest rates at all
maturities.
|
(2)
|
NPV
is the discounted present value of expected cash flows from assets,
liabilities and off-balance sheet
contracts.
|
(3)
|
Present
value of assets represents the discounted present value of incoming cash
flows on interest-earning assets.
|
(4)
|
NPV
Ratio represents NPV divided by the present value of
assets.
|
The
Office of Thrift Supervision uses certain assumptions in assessing the interest
rate risk of savings banks. These assumptions relate to interest rates, loan
prepayment rates, deposit decay rates, and the market values of certain assets
under differing interest rate scenarios, among others.
As with
any method of measuring interest rate risk, shortcomings are inherent in the
method of analysis presented in the foregoing tables. For example, although
assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they
may react in different degrees to changes in the market interest rates. Also,
the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in
advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types
may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as
adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features, that restrict changes in interest
rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, if interest
rates change, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from
certificates of deposit could deviate significantly from those assumed in
calculating the table.
Item
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Please
see pages F-1 through F-42 of this Form 10-K.
Item
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure.
None.
Item
9A. Controls and Procedures.
Our
management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this
report. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
the period covered by this report are effective in ensuring that the information
required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under
the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management
(including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely
manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
There
have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Act) that occurred during the quarter ended
June 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Please
see Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and
the Attestation Report of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
Pages F-2 and F-3.
Item
9B. Other Information.
None.
Part III.
Item
10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate
Governance.
Directors and
Executive Officers.
The information required by this item is incorporated
herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2010
Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.
The information concerning
compliance with the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 by directors, officers, and ten percent stockholders of the
Company required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the
Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2010 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
Code of
Ethics.
The
Company has adopted a written Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics applies to the
Company’s and the Bank’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer. A copy of the Company’s Code of Ethics is available on our
website at
www.k-fed.com
.
Amendments to and waivers
from the Code of Ethics will also be disclosed on our website.
Item
11. Executive Compensation.
The
information concerning executive compensation required by this item is
incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement
for its 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters.
The information
concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and
related stockholder matters required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2010 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
Item
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director
Independence.
The
information concerning certain relationships and related transactions and
director independence required by this item is incorporated herein by reference
from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2010 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
Item
14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The
information concerning principal accountant fees and services is incorporated
herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement for its 2010
Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Part IV.
Item
15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
|
(a)
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|
|
|
See
Part II – Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Exhibits:
|
|
3.1
|
Charter
of Registrant (1)
|
|
3.2
|
Bylaws
of Registrant (2)
|
|
4.0
|
Form
of Stock Certificate of Registrant (1)
|
|
10.1
|
Registrant’s
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (1)
|
|
10.2
|
Amendments
to the Registrant’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (3)
|
|
10.3
|
Amended
and Restated Kaiser Federal Bank 2005 Executive
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
Retirement
Plan (3)
|
|
10.4
|
Registrant’s
2004 Stock Option Plan
(4)
|
|
10.5
|
Amendment
to the Registrant’s 2004 Stock Option Plan (3)
|
|
10.6
|
Registrant’s
2004 Recognition and Retention Plan
(4)
|
|
10.7
|
Kaiser
Federal Bank Annual Incentive Plan (3)
|
|
21.0
|
Subsidiaries
of the Registrant (1)
|
|
23.1
|
Consent
of Crowe Horwath LLP
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
|
(1)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as
amended, initially filed on December 9, 2003 with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (Registration No.333-111029), and incorporated herein
by reference.
|
(2)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 6,
2010 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission File No.
000-50592) and incorporated herein by reference.
|
(3)
|
Filed
as an exhibit to Kaiser Federal Financial Group, Inc.’s Registration
Statement on Form S-1, as amended, initially filed on May 28, 2010 with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (Registration No. 333-167179), and
incorporated herein by reference.
|
(4)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2004 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on September 23, 2004.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of
section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
K-Fed Bancorp
|
|
|
Date: August
25, 2010
|
/s/
K. M. Hoveland
|
|
K.
M. Hoveland
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
Date:
August 25, 2010
|
/s/
James L. Breeden
|
|
James
L. Breeden
|
|
Director
and Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
Date: August
25, 2010
|
/s/
K. M. Hoveland
|
|
K.
M. Hoveland
Director,
President, Chief Executive
Officer
and Principal Executive Officer
|
|
|
Date: August
25, 2010
|
/s/
Dustin Luton
|
|
Dustin
Luton
Chief
Financial Officer
Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer
|
|
|
Date: August
25, 2010
|
/s/
Rita H. Zwern
|
|
Rita
H. Zwern
Director
and Secretary
|
|
|
Date: August
25, 2010
|
/s/
Giovani O. Dacumos
|
|
Giovani
O. Dacumos
Director
|
|
|
Date: August
25, 2010
|
/s/
Diana Peterson-More
|
|
Diana
Peterson-More
Director
|
|
|
Date: August
25, 2010
|
/s/
Michael J. Sacher
|
|
Michael
J. Sacher
Director
|
|
|
Date: August
25, 2010
|
/s/
Robert C. Steinbach
|
|
Robert
C. Steinbach
Director
|
|
|
Date: August
25, 2010
|
/s/
Laura G. Weisshar
|
|
Laura
G. Weisshar
Director
|
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
|
Page
|
|
|
Management’s
Report on Internal Control
|
F-2
|
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-3
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition at June 30, 2010 and
2009
|
F-4
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income for the Years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and
2008
|
F-5
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for
the Years Ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
F-6
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and
2008
|
F-7
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-9
|
MANAGEMENT’S
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL
The
management of K-Fed Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting,
as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect
the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and
expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. All internal control systems, no matter how
well designed, have inherent limitations, including the possibility of human
error and the circumvention of overriding controls. Accordingly, even an
effective system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only
reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to
the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
Management
has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of June 30, 2010, based on the framework set forth by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework. Based on that assessment, management concluded
that, as of June 30, 2010, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting was effective.
The
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
June 30, 2010, has been audited by Crowe Horwath LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm. As stated in their report, they express an unqualified
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of June 30, 2010. See “Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm.”
/s/
K. M. Hoveland
|
|
/s/
Dustin Luton
|
K. M. Hoveland
|
|
Dustin Luton
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors
K-Fed
Bancorp
Covina,
California
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of K-Fed
Bancorp (“Company”) as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of
income, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2010. We also
have audited K-Fed Bancorp’s internal control over financial reporting as of
June 30, 2010, based on
criteria established in Internal
Control
—
Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO)."
K-Fed Bancorp's management is responsible
for these
financial statements,
for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of internal control over financial reporting in the accompanying
Management’s Report on Internal Control. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Company's
internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
A
company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation
of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of K-Fed Bancorp as of June 30,
2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2010 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also, in our opinion, K-Fed Bancorp maintained, in all
material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2010, based
on
criteria established in
Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO)
.
|
/s/ Crowe Horwath
LLP
|
|
|
Crowe Horwath
LLP
|
Oak
Brook, Illinois
August
25, 2010
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
June
30,
2010
|
|
|
June
30,
2009
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and due from banks
|
|
$
|
7,785
|
|
|
$
|
32,685
|
|
Federal
funds sold
|
|
|
31,775
|
|
|
|
41,020
|
|
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
39,560
|
|
|
|
73,705
|
|
Interest
earning time deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
19,267
|
|
|
|
25,508
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale, at fair value
|
|
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
4,236
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity, fair value of $3,866 and $5,625 at June 30, 2010 and
June 30, 2009, respectively
|
|
|
3,751
|
|
|
|
5,528
|
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
|
|
12,179
|
|
|
|
12,649
|
|
Loans
receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $13,309 and $4,586 at June
30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively
|
|
|
757,985
|
|
|
|
746,875
|
|
Accrued
interest receivable
|
|
|
3,234
|
|
|
|
3,402
|
|
Premises
and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
2,562
|
|
Core
deposit intangible
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,950
|
|
|
|
3,950
|
|
Bank-owned
life insurance
|
|
|
12,372
|
|
|
|
11,884
|
|
Real
estate owned (REO)
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
8,721
|
|
|
|
4,155
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
866,802
|
|
|
$
|
895,097
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest
bearing
|
|
$
|
53,022
|
|
|
$
|
50,161
|
|
Interest
bearing
|
|
|
577,672
|
|
|
|
516,032
|
|
Total
deposits
|
|
|
630,694
|
|
|
|
566,193
|
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank advances, short-term
|
|
|
77,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank advances, long-term
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
137,004
|
|
State
of California time deposit
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
4,403
|
|
|
|
4,342
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
772,097
|
|
|
|
802,539
|
|
Commitments
and contingent liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonredeemable
serial preferred stock, $.01 par value;
2,000,000
shares authorized; issued and outstanding — none
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common
stock, $0.01 par value; 18,000,000 authorized;
June
30, 2010 — 14,728,440 shares issued
June
30, 2009 — 14,728,440 shares issued
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
59,513
|
|
|
|
59,134
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
54,996
|
|
|
|
53,512
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Unearned
employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) shares
|
|
|
(1,706
|
)
|
|
|
(2,161
|
)
|
Treasury
stock, at cost (June 30, 2010 — 1,438,240 shares; June 30, 2009 —
1,423,852 shares)
|
|
|
(18,277
|
)
|
|
|
(18,151
|
)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
94,705
|
|
|
|
92,558
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
866,802
|
|
|
$
|
895,097
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Years
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
and fees on loans
|
|
$
|
44,136
|
|
|
$
|
43,706
|
|
|
$
|
42,582
|
|
Interest
on securities, taxable
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank dividends
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
Other
interest
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
Total
interest income
|
|
|
45,014
|
|
|
|
45,173
|
|
|
|
45,238
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
on deposits
|
|
|
10,795
|
|
|
|
12,975
|
|
|
|
14,945
|
|
Interest
on borrowings
|
|
|
7,293
|
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
|
|
10,824
|
|
Total
interest expense
|
|
|
18,088
|
|
|
|
22,883
|
|
|
|
25,769
|
|
Net
interest income
|
|
|
26,926
|
|
|
|
22,290
|
|
|
|
19,469
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
9,867
|
|
|
|
2,586
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
17,059
|
|
|
|
19,704
|
|
|
|
18,507
|
|
Noninterest
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
charges and fees
|
|
|
2,194
|
|
|
|
2,227
|
|
|
|
2,259
|
|
ATM
fees and charges
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
Referral
commissions
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
Loss
on equity investment
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
(377
|
)
|
Bank-owned
life insurance
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
Other
noninterest income
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Total
noninterest income
|
|
|
4,689
|
|
|
|
4,549
|
|
|
|
4,320
|
|
Noninterest
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries
and benefits
|
|
|
7,969
|
|
|
|
8,166
|
|
|
|
8,099
|
|
Occupancy
and equipment
|
|
|
2,349
|
|
|
|
2,378
|
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
ATM
expense
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
Advertising
and promotional
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
Professional
services
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
876
|
|
Federal
deposit insurance premiums
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
Postage
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
Stock
offering costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
Other
operating expense
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
Total
noninterest expense
|
|
|
17,022
|
|
|
|
16,749
|
|
|
|
16,826
|
|
Income
before income tax expense
|
|
|
4,726
|
|
|
|
7,504
|
|
|
|
6,001
|
|
Income
tax expense
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
|
|
2,755
|
|
|
|
2,133
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
3,340
|
|
|
$
|
4,749
|
|
|
$
|
3,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss)
Income, net
|
|
|
Unearned
ESOP
Shares
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance,
July 1, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,724,760
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
57,626
|
|
|
$
|
48,724
|
|
|
$
|
(126
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,071
|
)
|
|
|
(775,815
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,343
|
)
|
|
$
|
91,957
|
|
Comprehensive
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income for the year ended June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
3,868
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,868
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,868
|
|
Other
comprehensive income – unrealized gain on
securities,
net of tax
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Total
comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
4,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared
($0.42 per share)
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,957
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,957
|
)
|
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(467,319
|
)
|
|
|
(4,963
|
)
|
|
|
(4,963
|
)
|
Stock
options earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
Allocation
of stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
Issuance
of stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Forfeiture
of stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,320
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Tax
adjustment of stock awards and options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Allocation
of ESOP common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
Balance,
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,713,440
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
58,448
|
|
|
$
|
50,635
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
(2,616
|
)
|
|
|
(1,243,134
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,306
|
)
|
|
$
|
90,328
|
|
Comprehensive
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income for the year ended June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
4,749
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,749
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,749
|
|
Other
comprehensive income – unrealized gain on
securities,
net of tax
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Total
comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
4,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared
($0.44 per share)
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,872
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,872
|
)
|
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(180,718
|
)
|
|
|
(1,845
|
)
|
|
|
(1,845
|
)
|
Stock
options earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
Allocation
of stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
Issuance
of stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Allocation
of ESOP common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Balance,
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,728,440
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
59,134
|
|
|
$
|
53,512
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
(2,161
|
)
|
|
|
(1,423,852
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,151
|
)
|
|
$
|
92,558
|
|
Comprehensive
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income for the year ended June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
3,340
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,340
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,340
|
|
Other
comprehensive income (loss) – unrealized loss on
securities,
net of tax
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Total
comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
3,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared
($0.44 per share)
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,856
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,856
|
)
|
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(14,388
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
Stock
options earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
Allocation
of stock awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
Allocation
of ESOP common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
Balance,
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,728,440
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
59,513
|
|
|
$
|
54,996
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
(1,706
|
)
|
|
|
(1,438,240
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18,277
|
)
|
|
$
|
94,705
|
|
* K-Fed
Mutual Holding Company waived its receipt of dividends on the 8,861,750 shares
it owns.
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial statements
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Years
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
3,340
|
|
|
$
|
4,749
|
|
|
$
|
3,868
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accretion)
amortization of net premium on securities
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
(Accretion)
amortization of net premiums on loan purchases
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Amortization
(accretion) of net loan origination fees
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
Gain
on sale of REO
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
REO
direct write-down
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
9,867
|
|
|
|
2,586
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock dividend
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
|
|
(572
|
)
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
880
|
|
Amortization
of core deposit intangible
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Loss
on equity investment
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
Increase
in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
(488
|
)
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
|
|
(454
|
)
|
Accretion
of net premiums on purchased certificates of deposit
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
(Accretion)
amortization of debt exchange costs
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
Allocation
of ESOP common stock
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
Allocation
of stock awards
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
Stock
options earned
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
Provision
for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(1,535
|
)
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
Net
change in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Net
change in other assets
|
|
|
(3,256
|
)
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
Net
change in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
10,005
|
|
|
|
9,042
|
|
|
|
6,222
|
|
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from maturities and principal repayments of available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
4,397
|
|
|
|
5,271
|
|
Proceeds
from maturities and principal repayments of held-to-maturity
securities
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
13,592
|
|
Net
change in interest earning time deposits with other financial
institutions
|
|
|
6,241
|
|
|
|
(25,508
|
)
|
|
|
7,363
|
|
Net
change in loans
|
|
|
(23,521
|
)
|
|
|
(9,219
|
)
|
|
|
(45,133
|
)
|
Proceeds
from sale of real estate owned
|
|
|
1,735
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
Redemption
(purchase) of FHLB stock
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
(2,098
|
)
|
Purchase
of equity investment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
Purchases
of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
(456
|
)
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(11,669
|
)
|
|
|
(25,995
|
)
|
|
|
(21,338
|
)
|
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from FHLB advances
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
93,500
|
|
Repayment
of FHLB advances
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
|
|
(28,000
|
)
|
|
|
(68,500
|
)
|
Dividends
paid on common stock
|
|
|
(1,856
|
)
|
|
|
(1,872
|
)
|
|
|
(1,957
|
)
|
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(1,845
|
)
|
|
|
(4,963
|
)
|
Net
change in deposits
|
|
|
64,501
|
|
|
|
71,135
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
Increase
in (repayment of) State of California time deposit
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Tax
benefit from stock award vesting
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(32,481
|
)
|
|
|
39,418
|
|
|
|
44,017
|
|
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(34,145
|
)
|
|
|
22,465
|
|
|
|
28,901
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
73,705
|
|
|
|
51,240
|
|
|
|
22,339
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
39,560
|
|
|
$
|
73,705
|
|
|
$
|
51,240
|
|
Continued
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Years
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
paid on deposits and borrowings
|
|
$
|
18,107
|
|
|
$
|
22,914
|
|
|
$
|
25,741
|
|
Income
taxes paid
|
|
|
2,557
|
|
|
|
3,060
|
|
|
|
2,079
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
NONCASH DISCLOSURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers
from loans to real estate owned
|
|
$
|
2,497
|
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
1,045
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
1.
|
NATURE OF BUSINESS AND
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
|
Nature of Business:
K-Fed
Bancorp (the “Company”) is a majority-owned subsidiary of K-Fed Mutual Holding
Company (the “Parent” or “MHC”). The Company and its Parent are holding
companies. The Company’s sole subsidiary, Kaiser Federal Bank (the “Bank”), is a
federally chartered stock savings association, which provides retail and
commercial banking services to individuals and business customers from its nine
branch and financial service center locations throughout California. While the
Bank originates many types of residential and commercial real estate loans, the
majority of its one-to-four family residential real estate loans have been
purchased from other financial institutions.
The
Company’s business activities generally are limited to passive investment
activities and oversight of its investment in the Bank. Unless the context
otherwise requires, all references to the Company include the Bank and the
Company on a consolidated basis.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis
of Presentation:
The
financial statements of
K-Fed Bancorp have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and predominant
practices followed by the financial services industry. The consolidated
financial statements presented in this annual report include the accounts of
K-Fed Bancorp and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Kaiser Federal
Bank. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. K-Fed Mutual Holding Company is owned by the
depositors of the Bank. These financial statements do not include the
transactions and balances of K-Fed Mutual Holding Company.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation
of Consolidated Financial Statements:
The preparation of consolidated
financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of income and
expenses during the reporting period. Changes in these estimates and assumptions
are considered reasonably possible and may have a material impact on the
consolidated financial statements and thus actual results could differ from the
amounts reported and disclosed herein. Material estimates that are particularly
susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination
of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of real estate owned and
financial instruments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Cash and cash equivalents consist of vault and ATM cash, daily federal funds
sold, demand deposits due from other banks, and other certificates of deposit
that have an original maturity of less than ninety days. For purposes of the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the Company reports net cash flows for
customer loan and deposit transactions, as well as transactions involving
interest earning time deposits in other financial institutions.
Interest Earning Time Deposits in
Other Financial Institutions:
Interest earning time deposits in other
financial institutions consist of certificates of deposit with original
maturities greater than ninety days and are carried at cost. The weighted
average remaining maturity at June 30, 2010 was 2.7 months. Accrued
interest on these deposits at June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $14,000 and $28,000,
respectively.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
Securities:
Securities
available-for-sale represent securities that may be sold prior to maturity.
These securities are stated at fair value, and any unrealized net gains and
losses are reported as a separate component of equity until realized, net of any
tax effect. Premiums or discounts are recognized in interest income using the
effective interest method over the estimated life of the investment. Gains and
losses on sales are recorded on the trade date and determined using the specific
identification method.
Securities
available-for-sale may be sold in response to changes in market interest rates,
repayment rates, the need for liquidity, and changes in the availability and the
yield on alternative investments. Declines in the fair value of securities below
their cost that are other than temporary are reflected as realized losses. In
estimating other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”), management
considers: (1) the length of time and extent that fair value has been
less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near term prospectus of the
issuer, and (3) the Company’s intent to sell or if it is more likely than not
that the Company will be required to sell the security in an unrealized loss
position before recovery of its amortized cost basis.
Securities
for which the Company has the ability and positive intent to hold to maturity
are classified as held-to-maturity and are recorded at cost, adjusted for
unamortized premiums or discounts.
Management
evaluates securities for OTTI at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently
when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock:
The Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (“FHLB”)
system, is required to maintain an investment in capital stock of the FHLB in an
amount equal to the greater of 1% of its outstanding mortgage loans or 4.7% of
advances from the FHLB. No ready market exists for the FHLB stock, and it has no
quoted market value. The Bank carries FHLB stock at cost, classified as a
restricted security, and periodically evaluated for impairment based on the
ultimate recoverability of the par value. Cash and stock dividends
are reported as income.
Loans:
Loans are stated at the
amount of unpaid principal, reduced by an allowance for loan losses and deferred
net loan origination fees, and increased by net premiums (discounts) on
purchased loans. Interest on loans is recognized over the terms of the loans and
is accrued as earned, using the effective interest method. Net premiums
(discounts) on purchased loans are recognized in interest income as a yield
adjustment over the estimated lives of the loan pools using the effective
interest method. The estimated lives of these loan pools are re-evaluated
periodically based on actual prepayments. Loan fees and certain direct loan
origination costs are deferred, and the net fee or cost is recognized as an
adjustment to interest income using the effective interest method over the
estimated lives of the related loans.
A loan is
considered to be delinquent when payments have not been made according to the
contractual terms, typically evidenced by non-payment of a monthly installment
by the due date. Generally, accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when
the loan becomes past due ninety days as to either principal or interest. All
interest accrued, but not collected, for loans that are placed on non-accrual
status or subsequently charged off is reversed against interest income. Income
is subsequently recognized on the cash basis until, in management’s judgment,
the borrower’s ability to make periodic interest and principal payments is
reasonably assured, in which case the loan is returned to accrual
status.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
Allowance for Loan Losses:
The allowance for loan losses is established
through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loans are charged off
against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that
collectability of the
principal
is
unlikely. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the
allowance.
The
allowance is an amount that management believes will absorb probable incurred
losses relating to specifically identified loans, as well as probable incurred
losses inherent in the balance of the loan portfolio, based on an evaluation of
the collectability of existing loans and prior loss experience. This evaluation
also takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume
of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem
loans, peer data for certain portfolio segments, and current economic conditions
that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay. This evaluation does not include
the effects of expected losses on specific loans or groups of loans that are
related to future events or expected changes in economic conditions. While
management uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future
adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes
in economic conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of
their examination process, periodically review the allowance for loan losses,
and may require adjustments to the allowance based on their judgment about
information available to them at the time of their examinations.
The
allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component
relates to loans that are classified as doubtful or substandard. For such loans
that are also classified as impaired, a specific valuation allowance is
established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable
market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that
loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on
historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors.
A loan is
impaired when it is probable, based on current information and events, the Bank
will be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest payments due in
accordance with the terms of the loan agreement. Loans for which terms have been
modified in a manner resulting in a concession, and for which the borrower is
experiencing financial difficulties are considered troubled debt restructurings
(“TDR”) and classified as impaired. Real estate loans are evaluated
for impairment based on their past due status and are measured on an individual
basis based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the
loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s
observable market price or the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs
to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent. TDRs are measured at the present
value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s original effective
interest rate. Collateral dependent TDRs are evaluated for impairment
based on the fair value of the collateral, less estimated selling
costs. The amount of impairment and any subsequent changes are
included in the allowance for loan losses.
Large
groups of smaller balance homogenous loans are collectively evaluated for
impairment. Accordingly, the Bank does not separately identify individual
consumer loans or one-to-four family loans that are not 90 days or more past due
for impairment disclosures.
Transfers of Financial
Assets:
Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as
sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over
transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been
isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of
conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or
exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Company does not maintain effective
control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them
before their maturity.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
Premises and Equipment:
Leasehold improvements and furniture and equipment are carried at cost, less
accumulated depreciation and amortization. Buildings are depreciated
using the straight-line method with a useful life of twenty-five years.
Furniture and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets, which is usually three to five years. The
cost of leasehold improvements is amortized using the straight-line method over
the lesser of the terms of the related leases or their useful life, which is
usually five to ten years.
Real Estate
Owned:
Real estate acquired in
settlement of loans (“REO”) consists of property acquired through foreclosure
proceedings or by deed in lieu of foreclosure. Generally, all loans greater than
ninety days delinquent are processed for foreclosure. The Bank acquires title to
the property in most foreclosure actions that are not reinstated by the
borrower. Once real estate is acquired in settlement of a loan, the property is
recorded as REO at fair market value, less estimated selling costs. If the
carrying value exceeds the fair value at the time of the transfer, the
difference is charged to the allowance for loan losses. The fair
value of the REO is generally based upon a current independent third party
appraisal and the REO balance is reduced for any subsequent declines in fair
value and expensed. Operating costs after acquisition are expensed as
incurred.
Bank-Owned Life
Insurance:
The Bank has purchased life insurance policies on
certain key employees. Bank-owned life insurance is recorded at the
amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the balance sheet
date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other
amounts due that are probable at settlement. The Office of Thrift Supervision
(“OTS”) has adopted a policy, to restrict regulated thrift institutions from
investing more than 25% of total capital in bank-owned life insurance without
first notifying and obtaining authorization from an OTS regional
office. At June 30, 2010 the Bank had 14.6% of total capital invested
in bank-owned life insurance.
Investment in Limited Liability
Partnership:
The Company has an investment in an affordable
housing fund totaling $1.2 million and $1.5 million at June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, for the purposes of obtaining tax credits and for Community
Reinvestment Act purposes. The investment is recorded in other assets on the
balance sheet and is accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under
the equity method of accounting, the Company recognizes its ownership share of
the profits and losses of the fund. This investment is regularly evaluated for
impairment by comparing the carrying value to the remaining tax credits and
future tax benefits expected to be received. Tax credits received from the fund
are accounted for in the period earned (the flow-through method) and are
included in income as a reduction of income tax expense.
Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets:
Goodwill results from business acquisitions and
represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of acquired
tangible assets and liabilities and identifiable intangible assets. Goodwill is
assessed at least annually for impairment and any such impairment will be
recognized in the period identified. The Company utilizes March
31
as
the date to perform the annual impairment test.
Other
intangible assets consist of core deposit intangible assets arising from a
branch acquisition. They are initially measured at fair value and then are
amortized on an accelerated method over their estimated useful life, which was
determined to be eight years.
Long-Term
Assets:
Premises and equipment, core deposit and other
long-term assets are reviewed for impairment when events indicate their carrying
amount may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired,
the assets are recorded at fair value.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
Loan Commitments and Related
Financial Instruments:
Financial instruments include
off-balance sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make or purchase
loans. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before
considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments
are recorded when they are funded.
Stock-Based Compensation:
Compensation cost is recognized for stock options and restricted stock
awards issued to employees, based on the fair value of these awards at the date
of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair
value of stock options, while the market price of the Company’s common stock at
the date of grant is used for stock awards. Compensation cost is
recognized straight-line over the vesting period.
Income Taxes:
The Company and
its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of
the state of California. The Company is no longer subject to
examination by taxing authorities for fiscal years before 2006. The
Company files consolidated income tax returns and allocates tax liabilities and
benefits among subsidiaries pursuant to a tax sharing
agreement. Income tax expense is the total of the current year income
tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and
liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected
future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and
tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax
rates. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when,
in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company
recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax
expense.
A tax
position is recognized as a benefit only if it is "more likely than not" that
the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination
being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount
of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on
examination. For tax positions not meeting the "more likely than not"
test, no tax benefit is recorded. At June 30, 2010 there were no tax
positions in which the full benefit was not recorded.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
(“ESOP”):
The cost of shares issued to the ESOP but not yet
allocated to participants is shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity.
Compensation expense is based on the market price of shares as they are
committed to be released to participant accounts. Dividends on allocated ESOP
shares reduce retained earnings; dividends on unearned ESOP shares are used to
service the debt.
Earnings per Common
Share:
Basic earnings per common share is net income divided
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
ESOP shares are considered outstanding for this calculation unless unearned. All
outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to
nonforfeitable dividends are considered participating securities for this
calculation and had an immaterial impact on the calculation for the three years
ended June 30, 2010. Diluted earnings per common share includes the
dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock
options.
Comprehensive
Income:
Comprehensive income consists of net income and other
comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and
losses on securities available-for-sale which are also recognized as separate
components of equity, net of tax.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
Loss
Contingencies:
Loss contingencies, including claims and legal
actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities
when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be
reasonably estimated. Management does not believe there are such matters that
will have a material effect on the financial statements.
Restrictions on
Cash:
The Company is required to maintain reserve balances in
cash or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, based on a
percentage of deposits. The total of those reserve balances was $1.5 million and
$1.0 million at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Dividend
Restrictions:
Banking regulations require maintaining certain
capital levels and may limit the dividends paid by the Bank to the Company or by
the Company to stockholders. These restrictions pose no practical
limit on the ability of the Bank or the Company to pay dividends at historical
levels.
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments:
Fair values of financial instruments are
estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully
disclosed in Note 17. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and
other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items.
Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the
estimates.
Operating
Segments:
While the chief decision-makers monitor the revenue
streams of the various products and services, operations are managed and
financial performance is evaluated on a Company-wide basis. Operating segments
are aggregated into one as operating results for all segments are
similar. Accordingly, all of the financial service operations are
considered by management to be aggregated in one reportable operating
segment.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements:
Adoption of New Accounting
Standards
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (ASC 820-10). This Statement defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. This Statement also establishes a fair value
hierarchy about the assumptions used to measure fair value and clarifies
assumptions about risk and the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an
asset. The standard was effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff
Position (FSP) No. 157-2, Effective Date of SFAS No. 157, which is currently
FASB ASC 820-10. This FSP delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157
for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually)
to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. The adoption of this Standard did not have a
material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial
position. Please see Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements for the impact
of the disclosures required by this Standard.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations (ASC 805). ASC 805 establishes principles and
requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial
statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in an acquiree, including the recognition and
measurement of goodwill acquired in a business combination. ASC
805 was effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15,
2008. The adoption of this Standard did not have a material effect on
the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
In
June 2009, the FASB replaced SFAS No. 162, The FASB Accounting
Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, with SFAS No. 168, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, and established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification
TM
as
the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be
applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements
in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the
Securities and Exchange Commission under authority of federal securities laws
are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification was
effective for financial statements issued for periods after September 15,
2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on
the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
In
June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position EITF 03-6-1—Determining
Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are
Participating Securities (ASC 260-10). This FASB Staff Position (FSP)
addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are
participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, included in the
earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS) under the two-class
method. ASC 260-10 provides that unvested share-based payment awards that
contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether
paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the
computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method. This FSP was
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. All
prior-period EPS data presented were to be adjusted retrospectively (including
interim financial statements, summaries of earnings, and selected financial
data) to conform to the provisions of this FSP. The adoption of this
Standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations
or financial position.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 115-2 and
No. 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
(ASC 320-10), which amended existing guidance for determining whether impairment
is other-than-temporary for debt securities. This guidance requires
an entity to assess whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not
that it will be required to sell, a security in an unrealized loss position
before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of these criteria is met,
the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized as
impairment through earnings. For securities that do not meet the
aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components
as follows: 1) OTTI related to other factors, which is recognized in other
comprehensive income and 2) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be
recognized in the income statement. The credit loss is determined as the
difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected
and the amortized cost basis. Additionally, disclosures about
other-than-temporary impairments for debt and equity securities were
expanded. ASC 320-10 was effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods
ending after March 15, 2009. The adoption of this Standard did
not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial
position.
In
August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
No. 2009-05, Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (ASC 820). This Update
provides amendments to ASC 820 for the fair value measurement of liabilities by
clarifying that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for
the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to
measure fair value using a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the
identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted prices for similar
liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets, or that is consistent
with the principles of ASC 820. The amendments in this guidance also
clarify that both a quoted price for the identical liability at the measurement
date and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in
an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are
required are Level 1 fair value measurements. The guidance was
effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning
after issuance. The adoption of this Update did not have a material
effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial
position.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
In
January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 Fair value measurements and
disclosures (ASC 820) – Improving disclosures about fair value measurements,
requiring increased fair value disclosures. There are two components to
the increased disclosure requirements set forth in this Update: (1) a
description of, as well as the disclosure of, the dollar amount of transfers in
or out of level one or level two (2) in the reconciliation for fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs (level three), a reporting
entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances
and settlements (that is, gross amounts shall be disclosed as opposed to a
single net figure). Increased disclosures regarding the transfers in/out of
level one and two are required for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2009. The adoption of this portion of the Update did not
have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results
of operations, cash flows, or financial statements. Increased disclosures
regarding the level three fair value reconciliation are required for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company does not
expect the adoption of this Update to have a significant impact to the Company’s
financial statements.
Effect of Newly Issued But
Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards
In
June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets, an Amendment of SFAS No. 140 (ASC 860). The
new accounting requirement amends previous guidance relating to the transfers of
financial assets and eliminates the concept of a qualifying special purpose
entity. This Statement must be applied as of the beginning of each
reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after
November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting
period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. This
Statement must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the effective
date. Additionally, on and after the effective date, the concept of a
qualifying special-purpose entity is no longer relevant for accounting
purposes. Therefore, formerly qualifying special-purpose entities
should be evaluated for consolidation by reporting entities on and after the
effective date in accordance with the applicable consolidation guidance.
Additionally, the disclosure provisions of this Statement were also amended and
apply to transfers that occurred both before and after the effective date of
this Statement. The Company does not expect the adoption of this
Statement to have a significant impact to the Company’s financial
statements.
In June
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No.
46 (R) (ASC 810), which amended guidance for consolidation of variable interest
entities by replacing the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for
determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a
variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which
enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity
that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (1) the
obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive
benefits from the entity. Additional disclosures about an
enterprise’s involvement in variable interest entities are also required. This
guidance is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entity’s first
annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim
periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual
reporting periods thereafter. Early adoption is prohibited. The
Company does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a significant
impact to the Company’s financial statements.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
In
July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (ASC 310):
Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance
for Credit Losses, which updated disclosure requirements with respect to the
credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for loan losses.
According to the guidance, there are two levels of detail at which credit
information will be presented - the portfolio segment level and class
level. The portfolio segment level is defined as the level where financing
receivables are aggregated in developing a company’s systematic method for
calculating its allowance for loan losses. The class level is the second
level at which credit information will be presented and represents the
categorization of financing related receivables at a slightly less aggregated
level than the portfolio segment level. Companies will now be required to
provide the following disclosures as a result of this update: a rollforward of
the allowance for loan losses at the portfolio segment level with the ending
balances further categorized according to impairment method along with the
balance reported in the related financing receivables at period end; additional
disclosure of nonaccrual and impaired financing receivables by class as of
period end; credit quality and past due/aging information by class as of period
end; information surrounding the nature and extent of loan modifications and
troubled-debt restructurings and their effect on the allowance for loan losses
during the period; and detail of any significant purchases or sales of financing
receivables during the period. The increased period-end disclosure
requirements become effective for periods ending on or after December 15,
2010. The increased disclosures for activity within a reporting period
become effective for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010.
The provisions of this Update will expand the Company’s current disclosures with
respect to its allowance for loan losses.
Reclassifications:
Some items
in prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current
presentation. The reclassifications did not impact prior year’s net
income, total assets, or stockholder’s equity.
2.
INVESTMENTS
The
amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities and the related
gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income were as follows:
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
(residential):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freddie
Mac
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations (residential):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freddie
Mac
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1,904
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,290
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
(residential):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freddie
Mac
|
|
$
|
524
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
511
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations (residential):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freddie
Mac
|
|
|
3,712
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,595
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,236
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,106
|
|
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
The
carrying amount, unrecognized gains and losses, and fair value of securities
held-to-maturity were as follows:
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Gross
Unrecognized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrecognized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
(residential)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fannie
Mae
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
Freddie
Mac
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Ginnie
Mae
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations (residential)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fannie
Mae
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,386
|
|
Freddie
Mac
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
2,118
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,751
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
(residential)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fannie
Mae
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
Freddie
Mac
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Ginnie
Mae
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations (residential)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fannie
Mae
|
|
|
1,819
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
Freddie
Mac
|
|
|
3,251
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
3,330
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,528
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,625
|
|
There
were no sales of securities during the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and
2008.
All
mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations have varying
contractual maturity dates at June 30, 2010.
Expected
maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the
right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties.
Accrued
interest on securities at June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was $24,000 and
$38,000, respectively.
Securities
pledged at June 30, 2010 had a carrying amount of $100,000 and were pledged to
secure a line of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco. Securities pledged at June 30, 2009 had a carrying amount
of $9.5 million and were pledged to secure State of California
Time.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
Securities
with unrealized losses at June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, aggregated by
investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position, are as follows:
|
|
Less
than 12 months
|
|
|
12
months or more
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
June
30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
|
$
|
1,120
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,120
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
Total
temporarily impaired
|
|
$
|
1,120
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,120
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
Total
temporarily impaired
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,353
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
The
Company evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a
quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant
such evaluation. Consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to
which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuer, and the Company does not have the intent to
sell these securities and it is not more than likely it will be required to sell
the securities before their anticipated recovery. In analyzing an issuer’s
financial condition, the Company may consider whether the securities are issued
by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating
agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial
condition.
At June
30, 2010, two debt securities had an unrealized loss of 0.2% of the Company’s
amortized cost basis. At June 30, 2009, three debt securities had
unrealized losses of 0.2% of the Company’s amortized cost basis. The
unrealized losses relate principally to the general change in interest rates and
liquidity, and not credit quality, that has occurred since the securities
purchase dates, and such unrecognized losses or gains will continue to vary with
general interest rate level fluctuations in the future. As management does not
have the intent to sell the debt securities prior to their anticipated recovery,
which may be maturity, and it is not more than likely it will be required to
sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, no declines are deemed to
be other-than-temporary.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
The
composition of loans consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Real
Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-four family residential,
fixed rate
|
|
$
|
276,995
|
|
|
$
|
303,287
|
|
One-to-four family residential,
variable rate
|
|
|
58,636
|
|
|
|
73,943
|
|
Multi-family residential,
variable rate
|
|
|
278,397
|
|
|
|
196,575
|
|
Commercial real estate,
variable rate
|
|
|
113,458
|
|
|
|
121,143
|
|
|
|
|
727,486
|
|
|
|
694,948
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile
|
|
|
29,492
|
|
|
|
41,798
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
1,096
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
Other consumer loans, primarily
unsecured
|
|
|
12,672
|
|
|
|
13,119
|
|
|
|
|
43,260
|
|
|
|
56,216
|
|
Total
loans
|
|
|
770,746
|
|
|
|
751,164
|
|
Deferred
net loan origination costs
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
Net
discounts on purchased loans
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
Allowance
for loan losses
|
|
|
(13,309
|
)
|
|
|
(4,586
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
757,985
|
|
|
$
|
746,875
|
|
Loans to
executive officers, directors and their affiliates totaled $1.0 million and $1.1
million at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company’s
one-to-four family stated income mortgage loans totaled $75.2 million and $94.3
million at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company’s
one-to-four family interest-only mortgages loans totaled $45.3 million and $59.7
at June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively. Included in
non-accrual loans at June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $12.5 million and $4.9 million
in one-to-four family loans that are interest-only or stated income
loans. Stated income is defined as a borrower provided level of
income, which is not subject to verification during the loan origination process
through the borrower’s application, but the reasonableness of the borrower’s
income is verified through other sources. In 2005, the Bank began to
underwrite interest-only loans assuming a fully amortizing monthly payment and
loan qualification was based upon the maximum rate that would apply upon the
first interest rate adjustment.
Purchased
real estate loans serviced by others totaled $215.3 million and $291.1 million
at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Accrued
interest receivable on loans totaled $3.1 million and $3.2 million at June 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
The
following is an analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses (in
thousands):
|
|
|
Years
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance,
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
4,586
|
|
|
$
|
3,229
|
|
|
$
|
2,805
|
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
9,867
|
|
|
|
2,586
|
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
Loans
charged off
|
|
|
(1,232
|
)
|
|
|
(1,488
|
)
|
|
|
(906
|
)
|
|
Balance,
end of year
|
|
$
|
13,309
|
|
|
$
|
4,586
|
|
|
$
|
3,229
|
|
Individually
impaired loans were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Loans
with no allocated allowance
|
|
$
|
8,289
|
|
|
$
|
3,804
|
|
|
Loans
with allocated allowance
|
|
|
26,120
|
|
|
|
5,056
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,409
|
|
|
$
|
8,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
allowance for loan losses allocated
|
|
$
|
5,291
|
|
|
$
|
1,201
|
|
Based on
management’s analysis of the collateral and/or the present value of expected
future cash flows of the individual loans, no allowance for loan losses was
deemed necessary for certain impaired loans above.
Individually
impaired loans were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monthly
average of individually impaired loans during the
year
|
|
$
|
21,928
|
|
|
$
|
5,974
|
|
|
$
|
1,818
|
|
Payments
received on impaired loans are recorded as a reduction of principal or as
interest income depending on management’s assessment of the ultimate
collectability of the loan principal. Generally, interest income on
an impaired loan is recorded on a cash basis when the outstanding principal is
brought current. For the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
income recorded on impaired loans totaled $396,000, $80,000, and $53,000,
respectively. Interest income recorded on impaired loans for all
periods presented was recorded on a cash basis.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
Non-accrual
loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Loans
past due over 90 days still on accrual
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Non-accrual
loans
|
|
|
31,451
|
|
|
|
8,871
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,451
|
|
|
$
|
8,871
|
|
Non-accrual
loans include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively
evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans that are not
performing. Included in the non-accrual loans were $13.0 million and
$2.1 million in troubled debt restructurings at June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The Company has allocated $1.7 million and $553,000 of
specific reserves to loans in which the terms have been modified as TDRs as of
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. At June 30, 2010 there were two
troubled debt restructured loans in the amount of $3.0 million that were
accruing interest and not included in non-accrual loans. There were
no further commitments to customers whose loans are troubled debt restructurings
at June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
Changes
in real estate owned are summarized as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Beginning
of year
|
|
$
|
496
|
|
|
$
|
1,045
|
|
|
Transfers
in
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
Capitalized
improvements
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
Direct
write-down
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(1,579
|
)
|
|
|
(2,570
|
)
|
|
End
of year
|
|
$
|
1,373
|
|
|
$
|
496
|
|
|
Net
income (expenses) related to foreclosed assets are as follows and are
included in other operating expense (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net
gain on sales
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
Direct
write-down
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Operating
expenses, net of rental income
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
The
Company has no valuation allowance or activity in the valuation allowance
account during the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and
2008.
|
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
The
Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program employs a large percentage of the Bank’s
account holders. Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of customers
are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic
region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet
contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic
conditions. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio,
all of the real estate loans are secured by properties located in California and
many of the borrowers reside in California; therefore, credit performance
depends on the economic stability of California.
6.
PREMISES AND
EQUIPMENT
Premises
and equipment are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Building
|
|
$
|
1,218
|
|
|
$
|
1,218
|
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
|
992
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
Furniture
and equipment
|
|
|
5,394
|
|
|
|
5,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,604
|
|
|
|
7,375
|
|
|
Accumulated
depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(5,569
|
)
|
|
|
(4,813
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,035
|
|
|
$
|
2,562
|
|
Depreciation
expense on premises and equipment totaled $770,000, $853,000, and $880,000 for
the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
The
Company leases office space in eight buildings. The operating leases contain
renewal options and provisions requiring the Company to pay property taxes and
operating expenses over base period amounts. All rental payments are dependent
only upon the lapse of time. Minimum rental payments under operating leases are
as follows at June 30, 2010 (in thousands):
|
Years
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2,268
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,510
|
|
Rental
expense, including property taxes and common area maintenance for the years
ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008 for all facilities leased under operating
leases totaled $1.1 million, $1.0 million and $1.0 million,
respectively. The lease for our Covina branch and Company
headquarters was renewed during the year ended June 30, 2010 from an expiration
date of April 2010 to April 2020 which resulted in an increase in minimum rental
payments of $4.1 million at June 30, 2010 as compared to $327,000 at June 30,
2009.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
7.
|
GOODWILL AND
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
Goodwill
The
activity in goodwill is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
Years
Ended
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Beginning
of year
|
|
$
|
3,950
|
|
|
$
|
3,950
|
|
|
Acquired
goodwill
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
End
of year
|
|
$
|
3,950
|
|
|
$
|
3,950
|
|
Acquired
Intangible Assets
Acquired
intangible assets were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
|
Core
deposit intangibles
|
|
$
|
676
|
|
|
$
|
591
|
|
|
$
|
676
|
|
|
$
|
529
|
|
Aggregate
amortization expense was $62,000, $79,000, and $97,000 for the years ended June
30, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
Estimated
amortization expense is as follows as of June 30, 2010 (in
thousands):
|
Years
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
13
|
|
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
The
following table shows the distribution of, and certain other information
relating to, deposits by type of deposit, as of the dates indicated (in
thousands):
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
demand
|
|
$
|
53,022
|
|
|
$
|
50,161
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
131,693
|
|
|
|
129,390
|
|
|
Money
market
|
|
|
120,719
|
|
|
|
108,858
|
|
|
Certificates
of deposit
|
|
|
325,260
|
|
|
|
277,784
|
|
|
Total
deposits
|
|
$
|
630,694
|
|
|
$
|
566,193
|
|
Deposits
by maturity are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
No
contractual maturity
|
|
$
|
305,434
|
|
|
$
|
288,409
|
|
|
0-1
year maturity
|
|
|
195,649
|
|
|
|
126,290
|
|
|
Over
1-2 year maturity
|
|
|
33,445
|
|
|
|
103,832
|
|
|
Over
2-3 year maturity
|
|
|
21,043
|
|
|
|
10,444
|
|
|
Over
3-4 year maturity
|
|
|
31,713
|
|
|
|
4,465
|
|
|
Over
4-5 year maturity
|
|
|
43,410
|
|
|
|
32,753
|
|
|
Total
deposits
|
|
$
|
630,694
|
|
|
$
|
566,193
|
|
The
aggregate amount of certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more
at June 30, 2010 and 2009 was $155.7 million and $116.2 million,
respectively.
Interest
expense by major category is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
Years
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
$
|
622
|
|
|
$
|
1,091
|
|
|
$
|
2,112
|
|
|
Money
market
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
1,915
|
|
|
Certificates
of deposit
|
|
|
9,095
|
|
|
|
10,123
|
|
|
|
10,918
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,795
|
|
|
$
|
12,975
|
|
|
$
|
14,945
|
|
At June
30, 2010 and 2009, 27.3% and 27.5% of the dollar amount of our deposits were
from customers who are employed by the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care
Program.
Deposits
from executive officers, directors, and their affiliates totaled $1.1 million
and $1.0 million at June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
9.
|
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK
ADVANCES
|
At June
30, 2010, the stated interest rates on the Bank’s advances from the FHLB ranged
from 3.97% to 5.28% with a weighted average stated rate of 4.59%. At
June 30, 2009, the stated interest rates on the Bank’s advances from the FHLB
ranged from 3.90% to 5.28%, with a weighted average stated rate of
4.51%.
The
contractual maturities by year of the Bank’s FHLB advances are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Years
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
70,000
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
77,000
|
|
|
|
77,000
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
Total
advances
|
|
|
137,000
|
|
|
|
207,000
|
|
|
Deferred
debt exchange costs
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
137,000
|
|
|
$
|
207,004
|
|
The
Bank’s advances from the FHLB are collateralized by certain real estate loans
with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $547.1 million and $457.4 million
as of the most recent notification date for June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. At June 30, 2010 and 2009, the remaining amount available to
borrow under this agreement was $219.1 million and $143.5 million, respectively.
Each advance is payable at its maturity date. At June 30,
2010 and
2009, the Bank had a $20.0
million callable FHLB advance
scheduled to mature on June 28, 2012, which
gives the FHLB the option to require repayment of the advance quarterly after
June 28, 2009. FHLB advances are subject to a prepayment penalty if repaid
before the maturity date.
The
average balance of FHLB advances for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were
$157.8 million and $214.1 million with average costs of 4.60% and 4.50%,
respectively.
|
In
July 2007, the Company began participating in the State of California’s
Time Deposit program. Under this program, the State of California will
deposit funds at the Bank in exchange for the pledging of certain
investment and real estate loan collateral. As of June 30, 2010
the State of California Time Deposit was paid
off.
|
|
In
fiscal 2009 the Bank established a line of credit with the Federal Reserve
Bank of San Francisco. As of June 30, 2010 $109.2 million of commercial
real estate loans, $29.5 million of automobile loans, and $100,000 of
investment securities were pledged as collateral. At June 30,
2010 the available line of credit was $77.7 million. The Bank
has never drawn on this line of
credit.
|
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
401(k)
Plan
: The Company has a 401(k) pension plan that allows
eligible employees to defer a portion of their salary into the 401(k) plan. The
Company matches 50% of the first 10% of employees’ wage reductions. The Company
contributed $141,000, $148,000, and $114,000 respectively, to the plan for the
years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008.
Deferred Compensation
Plan
: The Company has an executive salary deferral program for
the benefit of certain senior executives that have been designated to
participate in the program. The program allows an additional opportunity for key
executives to defer a portion of their compensation into a non-qualified
deferral program to supplement their retirement earnings. At June 30, 2010 and
2009 the Company has accrued a liability for executive deferrals of $1.1
million. Expenses related to the plan are limited to interest expense
on the deposit accounts in which these funds are invested, which was $38,000,
$45,000, and $47,000 for years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008,
respectively.
Incentive
Plan
: The Company maintains an Annual Incentive Plan for key
employees. Participants are awarded a percentage of their base salary for
attaining certain personal performance goals. The compensation expense related
to these plans for years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008 totaled $122,000,
$279,000, and $368,000 respectively.
Postretirement Medical
Benefits
: The Company provides postretirement medical benefits
to eligible retired employees and their spouses. The plan covers
employees who were hired on or before May 31, 2005, have 20 or more years of
service and retire after age 55. The (benefit) expense related to
this plan was $(71,000), $75,000, and $70,000 for the years ended June 30, 2010,
2009, and 2008, respectively. The total postretirement obligation was
$679,000 and $750,000 at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
12.
|
EMPLOYEE STOCK
COMPENSATION
|
Recognition and Retention
Plan (“RRP”):
The Company’s RRP
provides for the issuance of shares to directors, officers, and
employees.
Compensation expense is
recognized over the vesting period of the awards based on the fair value at date
of grant. Compensation expense recognized was $230,000, $408,000, and
$417,000 for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
These shares vest over a five year period. Pursuant to the
Company’s 2004 RRP, 227,470 shares of the Company’s common stock may be
awarded. There were 23,000 restricted shares outstanding and the
Company had an aggregate of 59,250 shares available for future issuance under
the RRP at June 30, 2010.
A summary
of changes in the Company’s RRP shares for the year follows:
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant
Date
Fair
Value
|
|
|
RRP
shares at July 1, 2009
|
|
|
53,780
|
|
|
$
|
13.33
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(30,780
|
)
|
|
|
14.00
|
|
|
RRP
shares at June 30, 2010
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
$
|
12.43
|
|
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
As of
June 30, 2010 and 2009, there was $229,000 and $459,000 of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to nonvested shares under the plan. The
unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of thirty-one
months. The
total fair value of shares vested during the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009,
and 2008 was $268,000, $234,000, and $357,000, respectively.
Stock Option Plan
(“SOP”):
The Company’s SOP provides for issue of options to directors,
officers and employees. Pursuant to the Company’s 2004 SOP, 568,675
shares of the Company’s common stock may be awarded. The Company
implemented the SOP to promote the long-term interest of the Company and its
stockholders by providing an incentive to those key employees who contribute to
the operational success of the Company. The options become
exercisable in equal installments over a five-year period beginning one year
from the date of grant. The options expire ten years from the date of
grant and are subject to certain restrictions and
limitations. Compensation expense related to the SOP was $193,000,
$350,000 and $347,000 for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008 and the
total income tax benefit was $42,000, $97,000, and $86,000,
respectively.
A summary
of the activity in the stock option plan is presented below:
|
|
June
30,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in
thousands)
|
|
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
|
|
484,400
|
|
|
$
|
12.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
or expired
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)
|
|
|
10.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at end of year
|
|
|
454,400
|
|
|
$
|
12.15
|
|
6.23
years
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
Fully
vested and expected to vest
|
|
|
454,400
|
|
|
$
|
12.15
|
|
6.23
years
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
Options
exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
306,400
|
|
|
$
|
13.65
|
|
5.23
years
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
Information
related to the stock option plan during each year follows:
|
|
June
30,
2010
|
|
|
June
30,
2009
|
|
|
June
30,
2008
|
|
Intrinsic
value of stock options exercised
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Cash
received from options exercised
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Tax
benefit realized from option exercises
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Weighted
average fair value of stock options granted
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
|
$
|
2.58
|
|
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
There
were no stock options granted during the year ended June 30,
2010. Stock options granted during the years ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 were computed using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the
fair value of options with the following assumptions as of the date of
grant:
|
|
June
30,
2010
|
|
|
June
30,
2009
|
|
|
June
30,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
%
|
|
|
3.88
|
%
|
Expected
option life
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
7.00
years
|
|
|
7.00
years
|
|
Expected
price volatility
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
33.10
|
%
|
|
|
22.79
|
%
|
Expected
dividend yield
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
%
|
|
|
2.90
|
%
|
The
risk-free interest rate is the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury
zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the full vesting period of the
stock option in effect at the time of the grant. Although the contractual term
of the stock options granted is ten years, the expected term of the stock is
less because option restrictions do not permit recipients to sell or hedge their
options, and therefore, we believe, encourage
exercise of the option before the end of the contractual term. The Company does
not have sufficient historical information about its own employees vesting
behavior; therefore, the expected term of stock options was estimated using the
average of the vesting period and contractual term. The expected stock price
volatility is estimated by considering the Company’s own stock volatility for
the period since March 31, 2004, the initial trading date. Expected dividends
are the estimated dividend rate over the expected term of the stock options. At
June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, the Company used a forfeiture rate of 0% due to
the remaining recipient mix and their ability to hold the options until
expiration.
At June
30, 2010 the Company had an aggregate of 102,555 options available for future
issuance under the SOP. As of June 30, 2010 there was $225,000 of
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options. At
June 30, 2010 the remaining cost was expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 3.1 years. Expense will vary based on actual
forfeitures.
13.
|
EMPLOYEE STOCK
OWNERSHIP PLAN
|
During
2004, the Bank implemented the Employee Stock Ownership Plan, which covers
substantially all of its employees. In connection with the stock offering, the
Company issued 454,940 shares of common stock for allocation under the ESOP in
exchange for a ten-year note in the amount of $4.5 million. The $4.5 million for
the ESOP purchase was borrowed from the Company with the ESOP shares being
pledged as collateral for the loan.
The loan
is secured by shares purchased with the loan proceeds and will be repaid by the
ESOP with funds from the Bank’s contributions to the ESOP and earnings on ESOP
assets. Shares issued to the ESOP are allocated to ESOP participants based on
the proportion of debt service paid during the year. Principal and interest
payments are scheduled to occur over a ten-year period. Principal contributions
to the ESOP were $466,000 $448,000, and $429,000 for the years ended June 30,
2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
During
the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008, 45,494 shares of stock with
average fair values of $9.04, $8.43, and $11.94, per share were committed to be
released. Compensation expense was $411,000, $383,000, and $543,000
for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008,
respectively. Shares held by the ESOP are as follows:
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Allocated
shares
|
|
|
284,338
|
|
|
|
238,844
|
|
Unearned
shares
|
|
|
170,602
|
|
|
|
216,096
|
|
Total
ESOP shares
|
|
|
454,940
|
|
|
|
454,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
value of unearned shares (in thousands)
|
|
$
|
1,549
|
|
|
$
|
1,984
|
|
The
components of income tax expense are as follows:
|
|
Years
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
2,223
|
|
|
$
|
2,327
|
|
|
$
|
1,597
|
|
State
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
|
2,921
|
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
|
|
2,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(1,188
|
)
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1,535
|
)
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
Income
tax expense
|
|
$
|
1,386
|
|
|
$
|
2,755
|
|
|
$
|
2,133
|
|
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
The
income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by
applying the United States federal income tax rate to pretax income due to the
following:
|
|
Years
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Federal
income tax at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
1,607
|
|
|
$
|
2,551
|
|
|
$
|
2,040
|
|
State
taxes, net of federal tax benefit
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
General
business credit
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
Bank-owned
life insurance
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
Stock
options
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
RRP
expenses
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Other,
net
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,386
|
|
|
$
|
2,755
|
|
|
$
|
2,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
expense as a percentage of income before tax
|
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
|
|
36.7
|
%
|
|
|
35.5
|
%
|
The
Company’s total net deferred tax assets are as follows:
|
|
June
30
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses
|
|
$
|
3,147
|
|
|
$
|
1,887
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
Accrued
state income tax
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
RRP
Plan
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Premises
and equipment
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Total deferred tax
assets
|
|
|
4,622
|
|
|
|
3,022
|
|
Deferred
tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
and other intangibles
|
|
|
(486
|
)
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank Stock dividends
|
|
|
(809
|
)
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
Net
unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
Total
deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(1,317
|
)
|
|
|
(1,284
|
)
|
Net
deferred tax asset, included in other assets
|
|
$
|
3,305
|
|
|
$
|
1,738
|
|
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
|
No
valuation allowance was provided on deferred tax assets as of June 30,
2010 and 2009.
|
|
As
of June 30, 2010 and 2009, there were no unrecognized tax
benefits. There were no interest or penalties recorded in the
income statement for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and
2008. There were no amounts accrued for interest and penalties
at June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
|
15.
|
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
AND RESTRICTIONS ON RETAINED
EARNINGS
|
The Bank
is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal
banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate
certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators
that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s financial
statements. The regulations require the Bank to meet specific capital adequacy
guidelines that involve quantitative measures of Bank’s assets, liabilities, and
certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting
practices. The Bank’s capital classification is also subject to qualitative
judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other
factors.
Quantitative
measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank
to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of
total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets
(as defined) and Tier 1 capital to total assets (as defined). Management’s
opinion, as of June 30, 2010, is that the Bank meets all capital adequacy
requirements to which it is subject.
As of
June 30, 2010 and 2009, the most recent notification from the OTS, categorized
the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must
maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk based and Tier 1 leverage ratios
as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since the
notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s
category.
The
Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following
table.
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Minimum
Capital
Adequacy
Requirements
|
|
|
Minimum
Required to
be Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective
Actions
Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
June
30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
$
|
88,639
|
|
|
|
14.73
|
%
|
|
$
|
48,141
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
60,176
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier
1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
81,111
|
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
24,070
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
36,106
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
Tier
1 (core) capital (to adjusted tangible assets)
|
|
|
81,111
|
|
|
|
9.42
|
|
|
|
34,425
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
43,031
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
June
30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
$
|
80,077
|
|
|
|
13.32
|
%
|
|
$
|
48,096
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
60,120
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier
1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
76,713
|
|
|
|
12.76
|
|
|
|
24,048
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
36,072
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
Tier
1 (core) capital (to adjusted tangible assets)
|
|
|
76,713
|
|
|
|
8.65
|
|
|
|
35,493
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
44,367
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
The
following is a reconciliation of the Bank’s equity under GAAP to regulatory
capital (in thousands):
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
GAAP
Equity
|
|
$
|
84,524
|
|
|
$
|
80,295
|
|
Goodwill
and other intangibles (less deferred tax)
|
|
|
(3,413
|
)
|
|
|
(3,582
|
)
|
Tier
1 Capital
|
|
|
81,111
|
|
|
|
76,713
|
|
General
allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
7,528
|
|
|
|
3,364
|
|
Total regulatory
capital
|
|
$
|
88,639
|
|
|
$
|
80,077
|
|
OTS
regulations impose various restrictions on savings institutions with respect to
their ability to make distributions of capital, which include dividends, stock
redemptions or repurchases, cash-out mergers and other transactions charged to
the capital account.
Generally,
savings institutions, such as Kaiser Federal Bank, that before and after the
proposed distribution are well-capitalized, may make capital distributions
during any calendar year up to 100% of net income for the year-to-date plus
retained net income for the two preceding calendar years. However, an
institution deemed to be in need of more than normal supervision by the OTS may
have its dividend authority restricted. The amount of retained earnings
available for dividends was $10.6 million at June 30, 2010. Kaiser Federal Bank
may pay dividends to K-Fed Bancorp in accordance with this general
authority.
The
Qualified Thrift Lender test requires at least 65% of assets be maintained in
housing-related finance and other specified areas. If this test is
not met, limits are placed on growth, branching, new investments, FHLB advances
and dividends, or the Bank must convert to a commercial bank
charter. Management believes that this test is met.
K-Fed
Bancorp is not currently subject to prompt corrective action
regulations.
16.
|
LOAN COMMITMENTS AND
OTHER RELATED ACTIVITIES
|
The
Company is a party to various legal actions normally associated with collections
of loans and other business activities of financial institutions, the aggregate
effect of which, in management’s opinion, would not have a material adverse
effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the
Company.
At June
30, 2010 and 2009, there were $31.8 million and $41.0 million, respectively, in
cash and cash equivalents with balances in excess of insured
limits.
Outstanding
mortgage loan commitments at June 30, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $2.5 million and
$4.6 million, respectively. There were no fixed rate loan commitments
at June 30, 2010 and $4.0 million of fixed rate loan commitments at June 30,
2009. As of June 30, 2010 and 2009, commitments were issued at a
weighted average rate of 6.18% and 5.49%, respectively. There were no
commitments to purchase mortgage loans at June 30, 2010 and 2009.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
Available
credit on home equity and unsecured lines of credit is summarized as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Home
equity
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
Other
consumer
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
2,755
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,297
|
|
|
$
|
2,912
|
|
Commitments
for home equity and unsecured lines of credit may expire without being drawn
upon. Therefore, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent
future cash requirements of the Company. These commitments are not reflected in
the financial statements.
17.
|
FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS
|
FASB ASC
820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize
the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when
measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be
used to measure fair value:
Level 1
: Quoted prices
(unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the
entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2
: Significant other
observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar
assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market
data.
Level 3
: Significant
unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or
liability.
The fair
values of securities available-for-sale are determined by obtaining quoted
prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix
pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value
debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific
securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other
benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).
There
were no financial or nonfinancial instruments transferred in or out of Level 1,
2, or 3 input categories during the years ended June 30, 2010 and
2009.
The fair
value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan
losses is generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may
utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including
comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the
appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the
comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are typically
significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining
fair value.
Nonrecurring
adjustments to certain real estate properties classified as real estate owned
are measured at fair value, less costs to sell. Fair values are
generally based on third party appraisals of the property, resulting in a Level
3 classification. In cases where the carrying amount exceeds the fair
value, less costs to sell, an impairment loss is recognized.
As of
June 30, 2010 and 2009, there were no liabilities measured at fair
value.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
Assets
measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized in the following
tables:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements Using
|
|
Assets at June 30, 2010
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level
1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities (residential)
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations (residential)
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,949
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Assets at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities (residential)
|
|
$
|
524
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
524
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations (residential)
|
|
$
|
3,712
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,712
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The
following financial assets were measured at fair value on a non-recurring
basis:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements Using
|
|
Assets at June 30, 2010
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level
1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Impaired
loans
|
|
$
|
20,829
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
20,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired
loans
|
|
$
|
3,855
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
following nonfinancial assets were measured at fair value on a non-recurring
basis:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements Using
|
|
Assets at June 30, 2010
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level
1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Real
estate owned
|
|
$
|
429
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
429
|
|
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
Impaired
loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral
for collateral dependent loans, had a principal balance of $26.1 million at June
30, 2010 as compared to $5.1 million at June 30, 2009. The fair value
of collateral is calculated using a third party appraisal. The
valuation allowance for these loans was $5.3 million at June 30, 2010 as
compared to $1.2 million at June 30, 2009. An additional provision
for loan losses of $5.1 million and $1.6 million was made for the year ended
June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 relating to impaired loans.
Real
estate owned is measured at fair value less estimated costs to sell at
transfer. If the fair value of the asset declines, a write-down is
recorded through expense. During the year ended June 30, 2010, the
Company incurred a charge of $50,000 to reduce real estate owned to fair
value. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company did not incur
any charges to reduce real estate owned to fair value.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available
market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However,
considerable judgment is necessarily required to interpret market data to
develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein
are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a
market exchange. The use of different assumptions and/or estimation
methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value
amounts.
The
following methods and assumptions were used to estimate fair value of each class
of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair
value:
Securities
Estimated
fair values for securities held-to-maturity are obtained from quoted market
prices where available. Where quoted market prices are not available, estimated
fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable
instruments.
Securities
available-for-sale that are previously reported are excluded from the fair value
disclosure below.
Loans
The
estimated fair value for all loans is determined by discounting the estimated
cash flows using the current rate at which similar loans would be made to
borrowers with similar credit ratings and maturities.
Impaired
loans that are previously reported are excluded from the fair value disclosure
below.
Deposits
The
estimated fair value of deposit accounts (savings, non interest bearing demand
and money market accounts) is the carrying amount. The fair value of
fixed-maturity time certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting the
estimated cash flows using the current rate at which similar certificates would
be issued.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
FHLB
Advances
The fair
values of the FHLB advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses,
based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of
borrowing arrangements.
Other On-Balance Sheet
Financial Instruments
Other
on-balance sheet financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents,
interest earning time deposits in other financial institutions, accrued interest
receivable, FHLB stock and accrued expenses and other liabilities. The carrying
value of each of these financial instruments is a reasonable estimation of fair
value. It was not practicable to determine the fair value of FHLB
stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial
Instruments
The fair
values for the Company’s off-balance sheet loan commitments are estimated based
on fees charged to others to enter into similar agreements taking into account
the remaining terms of the agreements and credit standing of the Company’s
customers. The estimated fair value of these commitments is not
significant.
The
estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are summarized as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
June
30, 2010
|
|
|
June
30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Financial
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
$
|
39,560
|
|
|
$
|
39,560
|
|
|
$
|
73,705
|
|
|
$
|
73,705
|
|
Interest earning time deposits
in other financial institutions
|
|
|
19,267
|
|
|
|
19,267
|
|
|
|
25,508
|
|
|
|
25,508
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
3,751
|
|
|
|
3,866
|
|
|
|
5,528
|
|
|
|
5,625
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank
stock
|
|
|
12,179
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
12,649
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Loans receivable,
net
|
|
|
737,156
|
|
|
|
745,906
|
|
|
|
743,020
|
|
|
|
767,255
|
|
Accrued interest
receivable
|
|
|
3,234
|
|
|
|
3,234
|
|
|
|
3,402
|
|
|
|
3,402
|
|
Financial
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
630,694
|
|
|
|
637,684
|
|
|
|
566,193
|
|
|
|
575,638
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
137,000
|
|
|
|
141,773
|
|
|
|
207,004
|
|
|
|
215,677
|
|
State
of California time deposit
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,320
|
|
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
18.
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON
SHARE
|
The
factors used in the earnings per share computation follow (in thousands, except
per share data):
|
|
Years
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
3,340
|
|
|
$
|
4,749
|
|
|
$
|
3,868
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
|
|
13,097,701
|
|
|
|
13,129,422
|
|
|
|
13,570,411
|
|
Basic earnings per
share
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
3,340
|
|
|
$
|
4,749
|
|
|
$
|
3,868
|
|
Weighted average
common shares outstanding for basic earnings per common
share
|
|
|
13,097,701
|
|
|
|
13,129,422
|
|
|
|
13,570,411
|
|
Add: Dilutive
effects of stock options
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
Average shares and dilutive
potential common shares
|
|
|
13,097,701
|
|
|
|
13,129,422
|
|
|
|
13,570,411
|
|
Diluted earnings per common
share
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
RRP
awards contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends and are considered
participating securities. RRP shares of 23,000, 53,780, and 66,560
are included in weighted average common shares outstanding for the years ended
June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. Stock options are not
considered participating securities as they do not contain rights to
nonforfeitable dividends. Stock options for 454,400, 484,400, and
322,400 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings
per common share for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008,
respectively, because to do so would be anti-dilutive.
19.
|
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
(LOSS) INCOME
|
Other
comprehensive (loss) income components and related taxes were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
Years
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Net
change unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
(76
|
)
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
Tax
effect
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
Other
comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(45
|
)
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
20.
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
The
following table sets forth our Company’s unaudited results of operations for the
four quarters of 2010 and 2009
.
|
|
Three
months ended
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except share data)
|
|
Year
ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
$
|
11,320
|
|
|
$
|
11,217
|
|
|
$
|
11,251
|
|
|
$
|
11,226
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
5,130
|
|
|
|
4,455
|
|
|
|
4,341
|
|
|
|
4,162
|
|
Net
interest income
|
|
|
6,190
|
|
|
|
6,762
|
|
|
|
6,910
|
|
|
|
7,064
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
5,650
|
|
|
|
2,272
|
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
Noninterest
income
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
Other
noninterest expense
|
|
|
4,273
|
|
|
|
4,320
|
|
|
|
4,250
|
|
|
|
4,179
|
|
Income
(loss) before income tax
|
|
|
2,252
|
|
|
|
(2,015
|
)
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
2,986
|
|
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
(809
|
)
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,410
|
|
|
$
|
(1,206
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
Basic
and Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
$
|
11,505
|
|
|
$
|
11,112
|
|
|
$
|
11,284
|
|
|
$
|
11,272
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
6,230
|
|
|
|
5,945
|
|
|
|
5,478
|
|
|
|
5,230
|
|
Net
interest income
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
5,167
|
|
|
|
5,806
|
|
|
|
6,042
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
Noninterest
income
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
Other
noninterest expense
|
|
|
3,935
|
|
|
|
3,965
|
|
|
|
4,218
|
|
|
|
4,631
|
|
Income
before income tax
|
|
|
2,187
|
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
Income
tax expense
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
1,409
|
|
|
$
|
931
|
|
|
$
|
1,194
|
|
|
$
|
1,215
|
|
Basic
and Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
The
increase in the provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009 was primarily attributable to the significant
increase in real estate loan delinquencies and troubled debt restructurings
during the periods. The increase in delinquencies and troubled debt
restructurings was experienced primarily in one-to-four family residential
mortgage loans as a result of the continued deterioration in the housing market,
as well as declining general economic conditions and elevated unemployment
levels.
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
21.
|
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
Condensed
financial information of K-Fed Bancorp follows (in thousands):
CONDENSED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
June
30,
2010
|
|
|
June
30,
2009
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,448
|
|
|
$
|
5,672
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
4,236
|
|
ESOP
Loan
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
2,387
|
|
Investment
in bank subsidiary
|
|
|
84,524
|
|
|
|
80,295
|
|
Accrued
income receivable
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
$
|
94,712
|
|
|
$
|
92,608
|
|
Liabilities
& Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
Stockholders’
equity
|
|
|
94,705
|
|
|
|
92,558
|
|
|
|
$
|
94,712
|
|
|
$
|
92,608
|
|
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
Years
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on ESOP
Loan
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
Dividend from
subsidiary
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
Interest on investment
securities, taxable
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
Other interest and dividend
income
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Total income
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminated
stock offering costs
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
Other operating
expenses
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
(Loss)
income before income taxes and equity in undistributed earnings of bank
subsidiary
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(848
|
)
|
Income tax (benefit)
expense
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
(Loss)
income before equity in undistributed earnings of bank
subsidiary
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(514
|
)
|
Equity in undistributed
earnings of bank subsidiary
|
|
|
3,395
|
|
|
|
4,712
|
|
|
|
4,382
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
3,340
|
|
|
$
|
4,749
|
|
|
$
|
3,868
|
|
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
Years
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
3,340
|
|
|
$
|
4,749
|
|
|
$
|
3,868
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed
earnings of bank subsidiary
|
|
|
(3,395
|
)
|
|
|
(4,712
|
)
|
|
|
(4,382
|
)
|
Amortization of net premiums on
investments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Net change in accrued income
receivable
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Net change in other
assets
|
|
|
(517
|
)
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
Net change in accrued expenses
and other liabilities
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
Investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of
available-for-sale investments
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
4,397
|
|
|
|
5,271
|
|
Net change in ESOP loan
receivable
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
Net cash provided by investing
activities
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
4,845
|
|
|
|
5,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid on common
stock
|
|
|
(1,856
|
)
|
|
|
(1,872
|
)
|
|
|
(1,957
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury
stock
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(1,845
|
)
|
|
|
(4,963
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(1,982
|
)
|
|
|
(3,717
|
)
|
|
|
(6,920
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
(2,031
|
)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
5,672
|
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
6,036
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
5,448
|
|
|
$
|
5,672
|
|
|
$
|
4,005
|
|
K-FED
BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
22.
|
PLAN OF CONVERSION AND
REORGANIZATION
|
The Board
of Directors of the MHC, the Company and the Bank adopted a Plan of Conversion
and Reorganization (the “Plan”) on May 27, 2010, as amended August 24,
2010. The Plan is subject to the approval of the Company’s
stockholders, the Bank’s depositors and the Office of Thrift
Supervision. Pursuant to the Plan, the MHC will convert from the
mutual holding company form of organization to the fully public stock
form. The MHC will then no longer exist. Pursuant to the
Plan, the Company, which owns 100% of the Bank, also will be succeeded by a
Maryland corporation, Kaiser Federal Financial Group, Inc. As part of
the conversion, the MHC’s ownership interest of the Company will be offered for
sale in a public offering. The existing publicly held shares of the
Company, which represent the minority ownership interest in the Company, will be
exchanged for new shares of common stock of Kaiser Federal Financial Group,
Inc. The exchange ratio will ensure that immediately after the
conversion and public offering, the public stockholders of the Company will own
the same aggregate percentage of Kaiser Federal Financial Group, Inc. that they
owned immediately prior to that time, excluding any new shares purchased in the
offering or cash paid in lieu of fractional shares. When the
conversion and public offering are completed, all of the capital stock of the
Bank will be owned by Kaiser Federal Financial Group, Inc.
The cost
of conversion and issuing the capital stock will be deferred and deducted from
the proceeds of the offering. In the event the conversion and
offering are not completed, any deferred costs will be charged to
operations. At June 30, 2010, the Company has included in Other
Assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition $503,000 of
capitalized costs related to the conversion and reorganization.
F-42
K-Fed Bancorp (MM) (NASDAQ:KFED)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
K-Fed Bancorp (MM) (NASDAQ:KFED)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024