UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14D-9
SOLICITATION/RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT
UNDER SECTION 14(d)(4) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Amendment No. 2)
Miromatrix Medical Inc.
(Name of Subject Company)
Miromatrix Medical Inc.
(Name of Persons Filing Statement)
Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per share
(Title of Class of Securities)
60471P108
(CUSIP Number of Class of Securities)
Jeff Ross
Chief Executive Officer
6455 Flying Cloud Drive, Suite 107
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
(952) 942-6000
(Name, address, and telephone numbers of person
authorized to receive notices and communications on behalf of the persons filing statement)
With copies to:
Steven C. Kennedy
Michael A. Stanchfield
Brandon C. Mason
Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
2200 Wells Fargo Center
90 South Seventh Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
(612) 766-7000
¨ |
Check the box if the filing relates solely to preliminary communications made before the commencement of a tender offer. |
This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”)
amends and supplements the Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule 14D-9 of Miromatrix Medical Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the “Company”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on November 13,
2023, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Schedule 14D-9 (“Amendment No. 1”), filed with the SEC on November 15,
2023 (as amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Recommendation Statement”), relating to the tender offer by
Morpheus Subsidiary Inc. (“Purchaser”), a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of United Therapeutics
Corporation (“Parent”), a Delaware public benefit corporation, to purchase all of the outstanding shares of common
stock of the Company, par value $0.00001 per share (the “Shares”), for (a) $3.25 per Share in cash, plus (b) one
contractual contingent value right per Share, representing the right to receive a contingent payment of $1.75 in cash upon the achievement
of a specified milestone on or prior to December 31, 2025, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the offer to
purchase, dated as of November 13, 2023 (the “Offer to Purchase”), and in the related letter of transmittal (the
“Letter of Transmittal,” which, together with the Offer to Purchase and other related materials, as each may be amended,
supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, collectively constitute the “Offer”).
This Amendment is being filed in response to a
comment letter dated November 22, 2023 received from the staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and, in connection
therewith, to reflect intervening developments with respect to certain information disclosed in Item 8 of the Recommendation Statement.
All page references used herein refer to pages in the Recommendation Statement before any additions or deletions resulting from
the supplemental disclosures reflected in this Amendment, and capitalized terms used herein, unless otherwise defined, have the meanings
set forth in the Recommendation Statement. Underlined text shows text being added to a referenced disclosure in the Recommendation Statement
and stricken-through text shows text being deleted from a referenced disclosure in the Recommendation Statement. Except as otherwise set
forth below and in Amendment No. 1, the information set forth in the Recommendation Statement remains unchanged and is incorporated
by reference as relevant to the items in this Amendment.
Item 4. The Solicitation Or Recommendation.
Item 4 of the Recommendation Statement is amended
and supplemented as follows:
| 1. | In the discussion following the caption “Considerations against and risks associated with the
proposed Transactions:”, the last bullet point thereunder (titled “Interests of Insiders.”) on page 25 of the Recommendation
Statement is hereby revised and replaced in its entirety by the following: |
| ● | Interests of Insiders. The interests that certain directors and executive
officers of the Company may have with respect to the Transactions that may be different from, or in addition to, their interests as stockholders
of the Company or the interests of the Company’s other stockholders generally, as discussed above in “Item 3. Past Contacts,
Transactions, Negotiations and Agreements – Arrangements with Current Executive Officers, Directors and Affiliates of the Company.” |
| 2. | In the discussion following the caption “Summary of Piper Sandler’s Financial Analysis
– General”, the fourth paragraph thereunder beginning on page 32 of the Recommendation Statement is hereby revised and
supplemented and replaced in its entirety by the following: |
In connection with Piper Sandler’s services
as the financial advisor to the Board, the Company agreed to pay Piper Sandler an aggregate fee of approximately $2.5 million, (i) $750,000
of which was payable upon the rendering of the Piper Sandler Opinion, which was not contingent upon the consummation of the Transaction
or the conclusions reached in the Piper Sandler Opinion and (ii) approximately $1.75 million of which is payable contingent
upon the consummation of the Transaction. The Company also agreed to indemnify Piper Sandler against certain liabilities and reimburse
Piper Sandler for certain expenses in connection with Piper Sandler’s services. The Company also agreed to reimburse
Piper Sandler for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses relating to Piper Sandler’s engagement as such expenses are incurred, subject
to Company approval for expenses above a threshold. The Company’s engagement letter with Piper Sandler also included customary indemnification,
exculpation and contribution provisions, pursuant to which the Company has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless Piper Sandler and certain
of its related persons to the fullest extent lawful from and against any losses, claims, damages, liabilities and expenses asserted by
or attributable to any third party, and all actions, inquiries, proceedings and investigations in respect thereof, to which they may become
subject, arising out of or in connection with Piper Sandler’s engagement, except to the extent finally judicially determined to
have resulted primarily and directly from an indemnified person’s gross negligence, willful misconduct or bad faith.
| 3. | In the discussion following the caption “Summary of Piper Sandler’s Financial Analysis
– Certain Prospective Financial Information”, the first paragraph thereunder beginning on page 33 of the Recommendation
Statement is hereby revised and supplemented and replaced in its entirety by the following: |
The Company does not, as a matter of course, develop
or publicly disclose long-term projections or internal projections of the Company’s future financial performance, revenues, earnings,
financial condition or other results due to, among other reasons, the uncertainty of the underlying assumptions and estimates. However,
in connection with the Board’s evaluation of the Transactions, the Board considered certain non-public unaudited prospective financial
information prepared by Company management relating to the Company, which we refer to as the “Projections.” The Projections,
which were approved by the Board on October 16, 2023, are detailed below under the caption “The Projections”. The
Projections were provided to Piper Sandler for its use and reliance in connection with its financial analyses and opinion summarized above
and were also provided to Parent on October 24, 2023 as part of its final confirmatory due diligence.
| 4. | In the discussion following the caption “Background of the Offer and Merger”, the sentence
on page 20 of the Recommendation Statement that starts “On October 16, 2022 . . .” is hereby revised and replaced
in its entirety by the following: |
On October 16, 20222023,
the Board executed an action by written consent to approve the Projections, including the Company financial model and financial projections
(including underlying assumptions) as management had provided.
Item 5. Person/Assets, Retained, Employed, Compensated or Used.
Item 5 of the Recommendation Statement is amended and supplemented
as follows:
| 1. | The discussion following the caption “(a) Solicitations or recommendations.” on page 36
of the Recommendation Statement is supplemented by adding the following as a new third paragraph immediately following the second paragraph: |
Although the information above regarding the
Company’s financial advisors is provided for the sake of completeness given their involvement in the process described above under
“Item 4. The Solicitation or Recommendation.”, neither Piper Sandler nor Craig-Hallum has been employed, retained or compensated
to make solicitations or recommendations to the stockholders of the Company on the Company’s behalf with respect to the Offer.
Item 8. Additional Information.
Item 8 of the Recommendation Statement is amended and supplemented
as follows:
| 1. | The discussion following the caption “(f) Legal Proceedings” on page 44 of the
Recommendation Statement is hereby revised and replaced in its entirety by the following: |
As of November 30, 2023, the Company is
aware of three lawsuits that have been filed by purported stockholders of the Company regarding the Merger.
On November 15, 2023, a purported stockholder
of the Company filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware captioned Miller v. Miromatrix Medical
Inc., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-01300-UNA. A second substantially similar lawsuit was filed the same day by another purported
stockholder of the Company in the same court captioned Williams v. Miromatrix Medical Inc., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-01301-UNA.
A third substantially similar lawsuit was filed on November 28, 2023 by a purported stockholder of the Company in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York captioned Saproo v. Miromatrix Medical Inc., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-10384.
The aforementioned lawsuits are collectively referred to in this Recommendation Statement as the “Merger Lawsuits.” The Merger
Lawsuits name the Company and the members of the Board as defendants and allege that the defendants made materially incomplete and misleading
statements about the Merger in violation of Sections 14(d) and 14(e) of the Exchange Act, Rule 14d-9 promulgated thereunder
and that each Board member violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The Merger Lawsuits seek, among other relief, (i) injunctive
relief preventing the parties from proceeding with the Merger until the alleged disclosure deficiencies have been remedied; (ii) rescission
in the event the Merger is consummated or alternatively rescissory damages; (iii) a declaration that the defendants violated Sections
14 and/or 20(a) of the Exchange Act; (iv) an award of costs, including attorneys’ fees; and (v) an order directing
the members of the Board to file a solicitation/recommendation statement on Schedule 14D-9 that does not contain any untrue statements
of material fact.
Additional complaints may be filed
against the Company, the Board, Parent and/or Purchaser in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement,
the Schedule TO and this Recommendation Statement. If such additional complaints are filed, none of the Company, Parent and/or
Purchaser will necessarily announce such additional complaints absent a legal requirement to do so.
SIGNATURE
After due inquiry and to the best of my knowledge
and belief, I certify that the information set forth in this statement is true, complete and correct.
|
|
Dated: November 30, 2023 |
MIROMATRIX MEDICAL INC. |
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ James Douglas |
|
Name: |
James Douglas |
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer |
MiroMatrix Medical (NASDAQ:MIRO)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
MiroMatrix Medical (NASDAQ:MIRO)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024