ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for tools Level up your trading with our powerful tools and real-time insights all in one place.
Marker Therapeutics Inc

Marker Therapeutics Inc (MRKR)

3.10
0.1483
(5.02%)
Closed November 23 4:00PM
3.10
0.00
(0.00%)
After Hours: 4:54PM

Empower your portfolio: Real-time discussions and actionable trading ideas.

MRKR News

Official News Only

MRKR Discussion

View Posts
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 8 hours ago
Have you ever asked them why they don't address their shareholders on quarterly calls /Q&A but instead seem to rely on you to communicate? 
πŸ‘οΈ0
Phantom Lord Phantom Lord 20 hours ago
It's grant money.
πŸ‘οΈ0
microcapbiotech microcapbiotech 21 hours ago
Interesting cancer article. "Groundbreaking clinical trial cures cancer in 100% of patients."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/groundbreaking-clinical-trial-cures-cancer-in-100-of-patients/ar-AA1uqFJg?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=be9d60cda7174620ee78a7879d0f9022&ei=45
Which brings up a question that I asked about 2 years ago, WHY doesn't MRKR use their Multi TAA, (now called MAR) ALONG WITH a checkpoint inhibitor that blocks the PD-1 protein on T-cells? Never got an answer to that.
👍️ 1
Flyingj Flyingj 23 hours ago
Anybody know where the 1.92 million in sales came from this quarter? Is part of it right to try patients
πŸ‘οΈ0
Phantom Lord Phantom Lord 1 day ago
Very tight lipped on the data. Just that they are encouraged by what they are seeing but I would expect them to say that regardless of what is happening with the trial.
👍️ 1
ShadowHaven59 ShadowHaven59 1 day ago
Thank you
πŸ‘οΈ0
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 1 day ago
I never imagined a one trick pony biotech could put out a fresh 10q and forget to update their shareholders on the trial.  Seems impossible.  
πŸ‘οΈ0
CorsairNavigator20 CorsairNavigator20 1 day ago
Were you able to ask about data subsets. My line of conjecture would be they saw a commonality in patients with good outcomes, approached the FDA to narrow the indication and had to increase sample size. Only positive reason why it's taking forever. Yes that will really change the future of this company. Just trying to keep a positive spin. Were you able to get them to talk data at all or tell you it is going to be the greatest thing since sliced bread.
πŸ‘οΈ0
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 1 day ago
If the treatment is showing good efficacy it should be a cinch to enroll such small numbers.  So it begs the question, why would they sabotage their own company? 
πŸ‘οΈ0
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 1 day ago
Not a good sign for Marker, IMO.  Should've been Marker not Kalaris.  Nobody wants to talk about here, of course. 

https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/allovir-kalaris-reverse-merger-retina-diseases/732385/

👍 1
Phantom Lord Phantom Lord 1 day ago
This is only partly true. They stopped the MT401 AML PII trial to refocus their efforts in AML on the OTS version of MT401. That trial was supposed to start by the end of this year but true to form the company blew right by their own timeframe. It's supposed to start first half of next year now, IIRC. Who really knows if this will end up being the right decision or not.
👍️ 2
Phantom Lord Phantom Lord 1 day ago
I'm not worried about bad data. I'm worried that management is making poor decisions in their execution of the release. Ah86 hit the nail on the head. Their problem has always been trickling out data on an inconsequential number of patients. It's great to see the CRs but when the total number of patients you're reporting on is 3, no one is going to care. They need a bigger number. I believe they know this but in my communications with the company they are very reluctant to share the enrollment numbers. That worries me. Originally the trial was supposed to enroll 37 patients. No reason it should not be fully enrolled by now at 37 patients. That being said, back in May the enrollment on clinicaltrials.gov was increased to 79. Take with that what you will. Basically, the company needs data on more patients. They gave us the data on the initial 3 as a "tease" or indicator of how the trial started but the next data release better be at least 30 patients. There is no excuse for anything less than that.
👍️ 2
ah86 ah86 1 day ago
oh i'm not missing a thing except that i'm dumbfounded that a bunch of folks would be pessimistic having sunk a ton of money in an investment.
Talk about paradox, oh my!
An alien, if given the same facts, would bet that these folks are confident of success.
πŸ‘οΈ0
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 1 day ago
The market cap is now that of a promising in vitro experiment.  
πŸ‘οΈ0
Buckboard Buckboard 1 day ago
Thanks. The thing you are missing is many of us on here would NOT walk away "with a few bucks" selling now. We're already down a ton and would lock in big losses. My theory is hope for the best because biggest losses already in even if they close shop. I am a pessimist like B Franklin so have no big hopes here.
πŸ‘οΈ0
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 1 day ago
Shrugs. 
πŸ‘οΈ0
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 1 day ago
Already in penny stock land with a horrible $25M market cap.  It's the small amount of shares outstanding thanks to the reverse split that's throwing you off. 
πŸ‘οΈ0
microcapbiotech microcapbiotech 2 days ago
That definition is obvious and simple for even the most simple to comprehend. Bad data is the kind of data that gets trials CANCELED like the AML trials were.
πŸ‘οΈ0
ah86 ah86 2 days ago
Yes, you're wrong on some fronts. This is an open label trial. You can see failure from across the Atlantic. No company as is the case with this one, can have 'bad data' and put it in the fridge.
Patience is key here. Just over 3 bucks. You may walk away with some $$ if you sell now, though I don't know your avg cost per share. But for those that are impatient, they should pray N is greater than 10 otherwise you're back to pennystock land. The stuff works but on just 3 people is apparently equivalent to 'bad data'
If they post at minimum similar results on a greater number and you may call yourself a genius for picking this ticker.
👍️ 1
ah86 ah86 2 days ago
Define bad data,and you'll answer yourself.
πŸ‘οΈ0
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 2 days ago
2029
πŸ‘οΈ0
Buckboard Buckboard 2 days ago
I may be wrong about this and PL will definitely know but it was my understanding that if they had the data collected and it was bad, they had to release that info within a few days. Otherwise, people would be still buying stock while the company withheld bad news.
👍️ 1
microcapbiotech microcapbiotech 2 days ago
This company never produced bad data?? Is that why the AML trials were canceled?? because they produced good AML data??
I guess good data is why the website went from having several trials going to just one trial now.
πŸ‘οΈ0
ah86 ah86 2 days ago
Allow me. The data isn't bad. This company has never produced bad data. Period.
The problem has always been? wait for it, drum roll - N
You can't get heads to turn with N being 2 or 3.
And that exactly, without doubt, is what is taking this so long. And failing to provide enough of N will cause this to slip like it hit a banana peel.
👍️ 1
ShadowHaven59 ShadowHaven59 2 days ago
Phantom Lord, what is the latest date you would give this company to show the data before you would start thinking that the data is bad? thank you.
πŸ‘οΈ0
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 4 days ago
So, this Marker board member pays Marker cash to buyout their manufacturing start up facility, then he becomes a contractor where Marker pays him millions quarterly for what exactly we're not sure.  The company oddly cancels all their agreements to raise cash. All as MRKR provides no update on the progress of their one trial.  Do I have that right so far?

https://markertherapeutics.com/our-company/board-of-directors/

👍 1
Phantom Lord Phantom Lord 5 days ago
Love that ignore button, lol
👍️ 5 🫣 1
ah86 ah86 5 days ago
I found the ignore button. Such a blessing!
πŸ‘οΈ0
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 5 days ago
I wouldn't worry about under or over at this point, I'd worry about  stealing your IP, assuming you're a shareholder, of course.
πŸ‘οΈ0
ShadowHaven59 ShadowHaven59 5 days ago
For what it’s worth, I emailed the company, Stating if upper management believes in the platform. They should buy some shares on the open market as a sign of confidence for the market and shareholders. I doubt anything will happen, but hey you never know. I can’t tell if the shares are under priced or overvalued. Lol.
πŸ‘οΈ0
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 5 days ago
You mean when he allegedly talks to managment? Don't you think a normal shareholder would want to comment on that last 10Q having no update on the trial? 
🚫 2 ❌️ 2
travayl travayl 5 days ago
Phantom generally posts when he has information to share.
👋 1 👍️ 1
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 5 days ago
Phantom goes silent, of course. 
🙈 1 🙉 1
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 1 week ago
Because I do believe in this T cell tech, I'm actually more worried they're trying to slip it out the back door as we wait for something that may never come.  Feels that way. 
πŸ‘οΈ0
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 1 week ago
I saw that.  But I'm not sure 34% is bad in biotech?? LOL.  It's more about what you bet heavy on.  Seems like maybe 5% of biotech investors actually do well.  It's a racket, IMO.  
πŸ‘οΈ0
PonkenPlonken PonkenPlonken 1 week ago
I think its driftwood for a while
Too bad they didnt follow up on funding or anything at all
πŸ‘οΈ0
CorsairNavigator20 CorsairNavigator20 1 week ago
Check out his track record, it's 34%. And yes they do investment banking.
πŸ‘οΈ0
CorsairNavigator20 CorsairNavigator20 1 week ago
I hear the pain, I go back to the days after the Tapimmune merger. You should be used to the inability of this group to meet commitments. I am waiting for the data and would like to know why a phase 1 needs 31 patients which has not been fully enrolled. I have 100% expectations they will do the dilution at that point. Zombies move faster. I try to use humor to keep from getting upset. Doesn't always work
πŸ‘οΈ0
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 1 week ago
Geez, you're angry.  Just quickly scanned the 10q for a trial update but recall this:

In August 2021, we entered into a Controlled Equity OfferingSM Sales Agreement, or the ATM Agreement, with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. and RBC Capital Markets, LLC, or the Sales Agents, pursuant to which we can offer and sell, from time to time at our sole discretion through the Sales Agents, shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $75.0 million. Any shares of our common stock sold will be issued pursuant to our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-258687), which the SEC
πŸ‘οΈ0
jobynimble jobynimble 1 week ago
Did they end the Cantor ATM too?

You can’t be serious, just more proof that you do zero due diligence and just get a kick out of trying to be a disruptor…
πŸ‘οΈ0
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 1 week ago
Pretty hostile response for a nothing. Did they end the Cantor ATM too?
πŸ‘οΈ0
ah86 ah86 1 week ago
Somebody should take away all your devices. What fcking open ATM with Cantor are you talking about?
Yes, you are wrong.
πŸ‘οΈ0
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 1 week ago
I hope analyst Dr. Huseynov's call wastn't just another retail trap.   
πŸ‘οΈ0
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 1 week ago
This is no start up.  They're burning through what little cash they have and I think with only one open ATM source with Cantor?? The CEO seems disinterested in holding calls.  Right now it's feeling like another Take the money and run scenario. Look at Tap and AlloVir.  History is important and it's up to this CEO to tell us things are different with this one.  Really hope I'm wrong on this one but that 10q and the lack of a call was an absolute disgrace.
πŸ‘οΈ0
PonkenPlonken PonkenPlonken 1 week ago
too bad no follow up on the funding... or anything else.
πŸ‘οΈ0
Flyingj Flyingj 1 week ago
I think MRKRs management team should have to get in the ring with Tyson tomorrow night. Especially if his an investor.
👍️ 1
CorsairNavigator20 CorsairNavigator20 1 week ago
When I worked startup, we used to joke some of them were a room full of PhDs looking for a product.
I am truly hoping that they are looking at some CRs and see if they fit a subgroup to focus on for phase2. I have no idea but we will wait and find out. That could be a great Christmas present. Actually I have very little faith that they will let us know in the fourth quarter. It could be Easter.
👍️ 2
learningcurve2020 learningcurve2020 1 week ago
Don't think I've ever been in a biotech that failed to mention in the 10q the progress of their one trial.  Can only mean no progress since the last 10q?? Seems impossible.   Meanwhile Cell Ready / Director of Marker is being paid handsomely for services but for what exactly? No  quarterly call either. Terrible.  What's going on here? 
πŸ‘οΈ0
ShadowHaven59 ShadowHaven59 1 week ago
I am also frustrated and disappointed coming home to this news! I also received today a response from the company from my email, it states, I understand your frustrations and appreciate your patience. we are currently working towards providing a comprehensive Data update and are looking forward to sharing this with our investors after completions of some remaining details. we appreciate your patience as we finalize These steps. this is for the smarter people than myself, to try and analyze. thank you I appreciate all your opinions and information. Very very frustrated shareholder.
👍️ 1
microcapbiotech microcapbiotech 1 week ago
DITTO!!! I've been in TPIV/MRKR for a quarter of a CENTURY, getting a BIT TIRED of the waiting game.
👍️ 1

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock