SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14D-9/A
(Amendment No. 4)
Solicitation/Recommendation Statement
Under Section 14(d)(4) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
NCI, INC.
(Name of
Subject Company)
NCI, INC.
(Name of
Person(s) Filing Statement)
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock,
$0.019 par value per share
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock,
$0.019 par value per share
|
(Title or Class of Securities)
|
|
|
|
(Title or Class of Securities)
|
|
|
|
62886K104
|
|
|
|
None
|
(CUSIP Number of Class of Securities)
|
|
|
|
(CUSIP Number of Class of Securities)
|
Michele R. Cappello
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
NCI, Inc.
11730 Plaza
America Drive
Reston, VA 20190-4764
(703)
707-6900
(Name, address and telephone number of person authorized
to receive notices and communications on behalf of the person(s) filing statement)
With Copies to:
Deyan Spiridonov, Esq.
Paul Hastings LLP
4747
Executive Drive, Twelfth Floor
San Diego, California 92121
(858)
458-3000
☐
|
Check the box if the filing relates solely to preliminary communications made before the commencement of a tender offer.
|
This Amendment No. 4 amends and supplements Items 4 and 8 in the Solicitation/Recommendation
Statement on Schedule
14D-9
filed on July 17, 2017 with the Securities and Exchange Commission by NCI, Inc., a Delaware corporation (
NCI
or the
Company
), relating to
the tender offer made by Cloud Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Cloud Intermediate Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, to acquire all of the outstanding shares of NCIs Class A
common stock, par value $0.019 per share (the
Class
A Shares
), and NCIs Class B common stock, par value $0.019 per share (the
Class
B Shares
, together with the
Class A Shares, the
Shares
), at a price of $20.00 per Share, without interest, and subject to deduction for any required withholding of taxes, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase for
Cash, dated July 17, 2017, and the related Letter of Transmittal.
As described in Item 8 of the Schedule
14D-9
under the heading Legal Proceedings, the Company is providing certain additional disclosures that are supplemental to those contained in the Schedule
14D-9.
This supplemental information should be read in conjunction with the Schedule
14D-9,
which we urge you to read in its entirety. With respect to the litigation matters, without admitting any wrongdoing or that
any supplemental disclosures are material or required under any applicable rule, statute, regulation or law, the Company has agreed to provide these additional disclosures in order to avoid the costs, disruption and distraction of further
litigation. Except as otherwise indicated, the information set forth in the original Schedule
14D-9,
which is incorporated herein by reference, remains unchanged. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein
have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Schedule
14D-9.
Item 4.
|
The Solicitation or Recommendation.
|
(a) Item 4 of the Schedule
14D-9
under the heading Opinion of Wells Fargo SecuritiesSelected Companies Analysis is hereby amended and supplemented by replacing the existing section in its entirety as follows:
Selected Companies Analysis
. Wells Fargo Securities reviewed certain data for selected companies with publicly traded equity securities
that Wells Fargo Securities deemed relevant. The selected companies were selected because they were deemed similar to NCI in one or more respects, including, among other things, services offered, customers,
end-markets
and financial performance.
The financial data reviewed included:
|
|
|
Enterprise Value as a multiple of estimated Adjusted EBITDA for the calendar year 2017, or CY 2017E Adj. EBITDA; and
|
|
|
|
Share price as a multiple of estimated adjusted earnings per share for the calendar year 2017, or CY 2017E Adj. EPS.
|
The selected companies, the corresponding financial data and the mean, median, high and low of such financial data for the selected companies
were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
Enterprise Value/CY
2017E Adj. EBITDA
|
|
|
Share Price/
CY 2017E Adj. EPS
|
|
CSRA Inc.
|
|
|
9.5x
|
|
|
|
16.4x
|
|
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
|
|
|
11.0x
|
|
|
|
17.9x
|
|
CACI International Inc.
|
|
|
11.9x
|
|
|
|
19.4x
|
|
Science Applications International Corporation
|
|
|
12.3x
|
|
|
|
18.5x
|
|
Engility Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
11.7x
|
|
|
|
13.1x
|
|
ManTech International Corporation
|
|
|
11.6x
|
|
|
|
26.6x
|
|
ICF International, Inc.
|
|
|
10.3x
|
|
|
|
15.6x
|
|
Vectrus, Inc.
|
|
|
10.5x
|
|
|
|
17.8x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
Enterprise Value/CY 2017E Adj. EBITDA
|
|
|
11.1x
|
|
|
|
11.3x
|
|
|
|
12.3x
|
|
|
|
9.5x
|
|
Share Price/CY 2017E Adj. EPS
|
|
|
18.2x
|
|
|
|
17.8x
|
|
|
|
26.6x
|
|
|
|
13.1x
|
|
Taking into account the results of the selected companies analysis, Wells Fargo Securities applied a multiple
range of 9.0x to 11.0x to NCIs CY 2017E Adj. EBITDA and 16.0x to 19.0x to NCIs CY 2017E Adj. EPS. The selected companies analysis indicated implied valuation reference ranges per Share of $20.22 to $24.56 based on NCIs
CY 2017E Adj. EBITDA and $17.03 to $20.23 based on NCIs CY 2017E Adj. EPS, as compared to the proposed Offer Price in the Offer and the Merger pursuant to the Merger Agreement of $20.00 per Share.
(b) Item 4 of the Schedule
14D-9
under the heading Opinion of Wells Fargo
SecuritiesSelected Transactions Analysis is hereby amended and supplemented by replacing the existing section in its entirety as follows:
Selected Transactions Analysis
. Wells Fargo Securities considered certain financial terms of certain transactions involving target
companies that Wells Fargo Securities deemed relevant. The selected transactions were selected because they involved target companies that were deemed similar to NCI in one or more respects including, among other things, size, services offered,
customers,
end-markets
and financial performance.
The financial data reviewed included Enterprise
Value as a multiple of Adjusted EBITDA for the last twelve months, most recently available prior to the announcement of the applicable transaction, or LTM Adjusted EBITDA.
The selected transactions, the corresponding financial data and the mean, median, high and low of such financial data, to the extent publicly
available for the selected transactions were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Announced
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target
|
|
Enterprise Value/ LTM
Adj. EBITDA(1)
|
November 2, 2016
|
|
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
|
|
Camber Corporation
|
|
9.2x
|
August 12, 2016
|
|
KBR, Inc.
|
|
Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc.
|
|
7.1x
|
May 23, 2016
|
|
KBR, Inc.
|
|
Wyle Inc.
|
|
9.0x
|
December 8, 2015
|
|
CACI International Inc.
|
|
L-3
NSS, Inc. and
L-3
Data Tactics, Inc.
|
|
N/A
|
July 23, 2015
|
|
Veritas Capital
|
|
Alion Science and Technology Corporation
|
|
N/A
|
November 5, 2014
|
|
Bridge Growth Partners, LLC
|
|
CRGT, Inc.
|
|
N/A
|
April 22, 2014
|
|
The SI Organization, Inc.
|
|
QinetIQ North America, Inc.
|
|
N/A
|
February 18, 2014
|
|
Camber Corporation
|
|
Avaya Government Solutions Inc.
|
|
N/A
|
December 23, 2013
|
|
Engility Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Dynamics Research Corporation
|
|
8.2x
|
February 21, 2012
|
|
Salient Federal Solutions, Inc.
|
|
ATS Corporation
|
|
6.4x
|
(1)
|
N/A means not publicly available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value/
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
LTM Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
8.0x
|
|
|
|
8.2x
|
|
|
|
9.2x
|
|
|
|
6.4x
|
|
Taking into account the results of the selected transactions analysis, Wells Fargo Securities applied a
multiple range of 7.0x to 9.0x to NCIs Adjusted EBITDA for the last twelve months ended March 31, 2017. The selected transactions analysis indicated an implied valuation reference range per Share of $15.09 to $19.21, as compared to the
proposed Offer Price in the Offer and the Merger pursuant to the Merger Agreement of $20.00 per Share.
(c) Item 4
of the Schedule
14D-9
under the heading Opinion of Wells Fargo SecuritiesDiscounted Cash Flow Analysis is hereby amended and supplemented by replacing the existing section in its entirety as
follows:
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
. Wells Fargo Securities performed a discounted cash flow analysis of NCI by calculating the
estimated net present value of the projected unlevered,
after-tax
free cash flows of NCI based on adjusted unlevered free cash flows derived from the Company Projections and other information provided by NCI.
For purposes of the discounted cash flow analysis, Wells Fargo Securities treated stock based compensation as a cash expense and excluded deferred taxes and certain other items. For purposes of the discounted cash flow analyses, Wells Fargo
Securities applied perpetuity growth rates ranging from 2.0% to 3.0% and discount rates ranging from 10.5% to 11.5%. The range of perpetuity growth rates was selected based on Wells Fargo Securities experience and professional judgment and the
range of discount rates was selected based on Wells Fargo Securities experience and professional judgment and a calculation of NCIs cost of capital. The discounted cash flow analysis indicated an implied valuation reference range per
Share of $16.32 to $19.76, as compared to the proposed Offer Price in the Offer and the Merger pursuant to the Merger Agreement of $20.00 per Share.
(d) Item 4 of the Schedule
14D-9
under the heading Opinion of Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company, IncorporatedSelected Public Companies Analysis is hereby amended and supplemented by inserting the following after the first full paragraph on page 44:
The following table sets forth the multiples of the selected companies indicated by this analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EV / EBITDA
|
|
|
P/E
|
|
Company
|
|
LTM
|
|
|
CY17
|
|
|
CY18
|
|
|
LTM
|
|
|
CY17
|
|
|
CY18
|
|
Large-cap:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
|
|
|
11.7x
|
|
|
|
11.0x
|
|
|
|
10.4x
|
|
|
|
18.9x
|
|
|
|
17.9x
|
|
|
|
16.3x
|
|
CACI International Inc.
|
|
|
11.8x
|
|
|
|
11.9x
|
|
|
|
10.8x
|
|
|
|
19.5x
|
|
|
|
19.4x
|
|
|
|
17.8x
|
|
CSRA Inc.
|
|
|
8.3x
|
|
|
|
9.8x
|
|
|
|
9.4x
|
|
|
|
14.6x
|
|
|
|
16.4x
|
|
|
|
15.4x
|
|
Engility Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
11.1x
|
|
|
|
11.7x
|
|
|
|
11.4x
|
|
|
|
N.M.
|
|
|
|
13.1x
|
|
|
|
12.3x
|
|
ManTech International Corporation
|
|
|
11.8x
|
|
|
|
11.6x
|
|
|
|
11.1x
|
|
|
|
26.2x
|
|
|
|
26.6x
|
|
|
|
25.3x
|
|
Science Applications International Corporation
|
|
|
12.5x
|
|
|
|
12.2x
|
|
|
|
11.1x
|
|
|
|
23.1x
|
|
|
|
18.5x
|
|
|
|
16.9x
|
|
Small cap:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICF International, Inc.
|
|
|
10.6x
|
|
|
|
10.2x
|
|
|
|
9.5x
|
|
|
|
19.2x
|
|
|
|
15.6x
|
|
|
|
14.5x
|
|
Vectrus, Inc.
|
|
|
8.4x
|
|
|
|
10.4x
|
|
|
|
9.9x
|
|
|
|
14.3x
|
|
|
|
17.8x
|
|
|
|
16.2x
|
|
N.M.: Not meaningful.
Data as of
June 28, 2017
(e) Item 4 of the Schedule
14D-9
under the heading Opinion of Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, IncorporatedSelected Transactions Analysis is hereby amended and supplemented by amending and restating the table in the first paragraph of such section in its
entirety as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Closed
|
|
Acquirer
|
|
Target
|
|
Implied EV/
LTM EBITDA
|
|
April 2017
|
|
The KEYW Corporation
|
|
Sotera Defense Solutions, Inc.
|
|
|
11.8x
|
|
December 2016
|
|
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.
|
|
Camber Corporation
|
|
|
9.2x
|
|
September 2016
|
|
KBR Holdings, LLC
|
|
Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc.
|
|
|
6.9x
|
|
July 2016
|
|
KBR Holdings, LLC
|
|
Wyle Inc.
|
|
|
9.0x
|
|
February 2016
|
|
CACI Inc. - Federal
|
|
L-3
National Security Solutions, Inc.
|
|
|
8.1x
|
|
November 2015
|
|
STG Group
|
|
Global Defense & National Security Solutions
|
|
|
8.5x
|
|
January 2014
|
|
Engility Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Dynamics Research Corporation
|
|
|
8.2x
|
|
March 2012
|
|
Salient Federal Solutions, Inc.
|
|
ATS Corporation
|
|
|
6.5x
|
|
Data as of June 28, 2017
(f) Item 4 of the Schedule
14D-9
under the heading Opinion of Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated Discounted Cash Flow Analysis is hereby amended and supplemented by amending and restating the second and third paragraphs of such section in their entirety as follows:
Terminal Multiple Method
. Stifel first estimated the terminal value of NCIs projected cash flows by applying a range of terminal
multiples Stifel deemed relevant to NCIs estimated fiscal year 2021 EBITDA, which multiples ranged from 7.8x to 8.5x, and were determined considering the results of the selected company analyses described above, applying Stifels
professional judgment. Stifel calculated projected unlevered free cash flow from the second half of calendar year 2017 and calendar years 2018 through 2021 based on adjusted unlevered free cash flows derived from the Company Projections and other
information provided by NCI. For purposes of the discounted cash flow analysis, Stifel treated stock based compensation as a cash expense and excluded deferred taxes and certain other items. Stifel discounted these cash flows and the terminal value
to present values using discount rates of 10.5% to 12.5% based on NCIs estimated weighted average cost of capital, as calculated based on NCIs peers, consideration of NCIs company-specific circumstances and Stifels business
and industry knowledge. This analysis indicated a range of enterprise values that Stifel then decreased by NCIs net debt to calculate a range of equity values. Stifel then divided these equity values by fully-diluted shares outstanding using
the treasury stock method to calculate implied equity values per share ranging from $20.26 to $21.65, the high end of which range was the average value of the equity values per share derived using the
high-end
terminal multiple and applying discount rates of 10.5% and 12.5%, and the low end of which range was the average value of the equity values per share derived using the
low-end
terminal multiple and applying
discount rates of 10.5% and 12.5%.
Perpetuity Growth Method
. Stifel first estimated the terminal value of NCIs projected
cash flows by applying a range of perpetuity growth rates Stifel deemed relevant to NCIs estimated calendar year 2021 free cash flows, which growth rates ranged from 2.0% to 3.0% and were selected by Stifel applying its experience and
professional judgment. Stifel calculated projected unlevered free cash flow from the second half of calendar year 2017 and calendar years 2018 through 2021 as described above under Terminal Multiple Method, and discounted these
cash flows and the terminal value to present values using discount rates of 10.5% to 12.5% based on NCIs estimated weighted average cost of capital, as calculated based on NCIs peers, consideration of NCIs company-specific
circumstances and Stifels business and industry knowledge. This analysis indicated a range of enterprise values that Stifel then decreased by NCIs net debt to calculate a range of equity values. Stifel then divided these equity values by
fully-diluted shares outstanding using the treasury stock method to calculate implied equity values per share ranging from $16.74 to $18.25, the high end of which range was the average value of the equity values per share derived using the
high-end
growth rate and applying discount rates of 10.5% and 12.5%, and the low end of which range was the average value of the equity values per share derived using the
low-end
growth rate and applying discount rates of 10.5% and 12.5%.
(g) Item 4 of the Schedule
14D-9
under the heading Certain Financial Projections is hereby amended and supplemented by restating the table on page 48 (including all footnotes) in its entirety as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
(amounts in millions)
|
|
|
|
2017E
|
|
|
2018P
|
|
|
2019P
|
|
|
2020P
|
|
|
2021P
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
344.1
|
|
|
$
|
367.2
|
|
|
$
|
397.3
|
|
|
$
|
435.7
|
|
|
$
|
448.8
|
|
Operating Costs &
Expenses
(1)
|
|
$
|
319.4
|
|
|
$
|
339.6
|
|
|
$
|
366.4
|
|
|
$
|
400.2
|
|
|
$
|
410.3
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
14.7
|
|
|
$
|
16.5
|
|
|
$
|
18.5
|
|
|
$
|
21.4
|
|
|
$
|
23.2
|
|
Adjusted Diluted EPS
(2)(3)
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
(2)(4)
|
|
$
|
31.6
|
|
|
$
|
34.0
|
|
|
$
|
37.1
|
|
|
$
|
41.9
|
|
|
$
|
44.4
|
|
Free Cash Flow
(2)(5)
|
|
$
|
25.8
|
|
|
$
|
25.1
|
|
|
$
|
25.7
|
|
|
$
|
26.0
|
|
|
$
|
29.4
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes misappropriation loss and related expenses or any gains from the recovery of assets or insurance proceeds related to the previously disclosed embezzlement of Company funds by NCIs former controller and
acquisition costs because such amounts are unknown and, due to the variability and uncertainty of such amounts, cannot be accurately quantified without unreasonable efforts.
|
(2)
|
Adjusted Diluted EPS, Adjusted EBITDA and Free Cash Flow are
non-GAAP
financial measures.
Non-GAAP
financial measures should not be
considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information presented in compliance with GAAP, and
non-GAAP
financial measures as used by NCI may not be comparable to similarly titled amounts
used by other companies.
|
(3)
|
Adjusted Diluted EPS represents net income (which, as described in footnote 1, excludes the impact of misappropriation loss and related expenses or any gains from recovery of assets or insurance proceeds related to the
previously disclosed embezzlement of Company funds by the Companys former controller and acquisition costs) divided by the projected number of diluted shares outstanding.
|
(4)
|
Adjusted EBITDA represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, which we calculate as revenue, minus total operating costs and expenses (which, as described in footnote 1, excludes
misappropriation loss and related expenses or any gains from recovery of assets or insurance proceeds related to the previously disclosed embezzlement of Company funds by the Companys former controller and acquisition costs), plus depreciation
and amortization. The following is a reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017E
|
|
|
2018P
|
|
|
2019P
|
|
|
2020P
|
|
|
2021P
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
14.7
|
|
|
$
|
16.5
|
|
|
$
|
18.5
|
|
|
$
|
21.4
|
|
|
$
|
23.2
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
9.4
|
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
$
|
13.7
|
|
|
$
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
$
|
24.7
|
|
|
$
|
27.6
|
|
|
$
|
30.8
|
|
|
$
|
35.5
|
|
|
$
|
38.5
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
$
|
6.9
|
|
|
$
|
6.4
|
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
6.4
|
|
|
$
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
31.6
|
|
|
$
|
34.0
|
|
|
$
|
37.1
|
|
|
$
|
41.9
|
|
|
$
|
44.4
|
|
(5)
|
Free Cash Flow represents Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities minus capital expenditures. The following is a reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017E
|
|
|
2018P
|
|
|
2019P
|
|
|
2020P
|
|
|
2021P
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
$
|
28.5
|
|
|
$
|
28.2
|
|
|
$
|
29.0
|
|
|
$
|
29.1
|
|
|
$
|
32.5
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free Cash Flow
|
|
$
|
25.8
|
|
|
$
|
25.1
|
|
|
$
|
25.7
|
|
|
$
|
26.0
|
|
|
$
|
29.4
|
|
Item 8.
|
Additional Information.
|
Item 8 of the Schedule
14D-9
under the heading Legal Proceedings is hereby amended and supplemented by restating the section in its entirety as follows:
Legal Proceedings
The Company and
members of the NCI Board are named as defendants in three putative class action lawsuits, all filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, challenging the Transactions,
one of which also names Parent and Purchaser as defendants. The first suit was filed on July 19, 2017 and is docketed as
Elliot Schwartz v. NCI, Inc., Charles K. Narang, Paul A. Dillahay,
James P. Allen, Paul V. Lombardi, Cindy E. Moran, Austin J. Yerks and Daniel R. Young,
Case No.
1:17-CV-00816-LO-TCB
(the
Schwartz Action
). The second suit was filed
on July 21, 2017 and is docketed as
Colleen Witmer v. NCI, Inc., Charles K. Narang, Paul A. Dillahay, James P. Allen, Paul V. Lombardi, Cindy E. Moran, Austin J. Yerks, Daniel R. Young, H.I.G. Capital, L.L.C., Cloud Intermediate Holdings,
L.L.C., and Cloud Merger Sub, Inc.,
Case No.
1:17-CV-00838-LO-JFA
(the
Witmer Action
). The third suit was filed on July 25, 2017 and is docketed as
Deborah A. Nichols v. NCI, Inc., Charles K. Narang, Paul A. Dillahay, Daniel R. Young, Paul Lombardi, James P. Allen, Cindy E. Moran and Austin
J. Yerks,
Case No.
1:17-CV-00839-LO-MSN
(the
Nichols Action
). Each
of the Schwartz Action, the Witmer Action and the Nichols Action alleges that NCI and the members of the NCI Board violated Section 14 of the Exchange Act by issuing a Schedule
14D-9
that was materially
misleading and omitted material facts related to the Transactions. Each of the Schwartz Action, the Witmer Action and the Nichols Action also allege that the members of the NCI Board violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, as controlling
persons who had the ability to prevent the Schedule
14D-9
from being materially false and misleading. Each of the Schwartz Action, the Witmer Action and the Nichols Action seek, among other things, an
injunction against the consummation of the proposed Transactions and an award of costs for the actions, including reasonable attorneys and experts fees.
To eliminate the expense and uncertainties resulting from such lawsuits, and without admitting any wrongdoing or that any supplemental
disclosures are material or required to be made, the Company has agreed to include additional disclosures in this Schedule
14D-9
that address the claims raised in the three actions. The defendants believe that
the three actions are each without merit. Notwithstanding that belief, one of the conditions to the completion of the Offer is that no court or other governmental authority of competent jurisdiction has issued an order or injunction restraining,
enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the Offer. As such, if the plaintiffs are successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting the consummation of the Offer, then such injunction may prevent the Offer from being consummated or
being consummated within the expected timeframe.
The foregoing descriptions do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their
entirety by reference to the complaints for the Schwartz Action, the Witmer Action and the Nichols Action, copies of which are attached as Exhibits (a)(5)(E), (a)(5)(F) and (a)(5)(G), respectively, to this Schedule
14D-9
and are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
SIGNATURE
After due inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify that the information set forth in this statement is true, complete and
correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 2, 2017
|
|
|
|
NCI, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Paul A. Dillahay
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Paul A. Dillahay
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President
|
Nci, Inc. (MM) (NASDAQ:NCIT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2024 to Jan 2025
Nci, Inc. (MM) (NASDAQ:NCIT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jan 2024 to Jan 2025