On November 8, 2022, the Court consolidated this matter and the Morsy Lawsuit (see below) into one case, and on November 30, 2022 stayed the consolidated derivative action pending (1) dismissal of the consolidated securities class action (the Schaub Lawsuit discussed above), or (2) the filing of an answer in the consolidated securities class action and notice by any party that they no longer consent to the voluntary stay of this consolidated derivative action. The case currently remains stayed.
Hany Morsy v. David Michery, et al.
On September 30, 2022, Hany Morsy, a purported stockholder, filed a derivative action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against the Company as a nominal defendant, Mr. Michery, Mr. Firer, former Company officer and director, Jerry Alban, and Company directors Mr. Novoa, Ms. Winter, Mr. Puckett, Mr. Betor, Mr. Miltner, and Mr. New (the “Morsy Lawsuit”). This lawsuit asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, and violation of Section 14 of the Exchange Act primarily in connection with the issues and claims asserted in the Schaub Lawsuit. The Morsy Lawsuit seeks to direct the Company to improve its corporate governance and internal procedures, and also seeks monetary damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, restitution, and an award of reasonable fees and expenses.
On November 8, 2022, the Court consolidated this matter and the Witt Lawsuit (see above) into one case and stayed the consolidated action (as discussed above). Based upon information presently known to management, the Company believes that the potential liability from this claim, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, cash flows or results of operations. Therefore, no liability has been reflected on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Thomas Robbins v. David Michery, et al.
On December 7, 2022, Thomas Robbins, a purported stockholder, filed a stockholder class action complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against the Company, Mr. Michery, and current or former Company directors Mr. Novoa, Ms. Winter, Mr. Betor, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Miltner, Mr. Puckett, and Mr. New (the “Robbins Lawsuit”). This lawsuit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under 8 Del. C. §§ 225, 227, and 242 related to the vote on a series of proposal at a special meeting of Company stockholders that was held on December 23, 2022, and asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty against all Company directors (except Mr. New). The Robbins Lawsuit also seeks an award of fees and costs related to this action.
On December 16, 2022, the Court entered a limited status quo order in the Robbins Lawsuit (the “Status Quo Order”), with respect to the vote of shares at the Company’s December 23, 2022 special meeting (or any adjournment thereof), pending final disposition of this action. On January 5, 2023, the Court consolidated this action with the Foley Lawsuit (discussed below), appointing lead plaintiffs and lead counsel. On January 25, 2023, the Court entered an order vacating the Status Quo Order.
Patrick V.P. Foley, Jr. and Jeffrey Pudlinski v. David Michery, et al.
On December 13, 2022, Patrick V.P. Foley, Jr. and Jeffrey Pudlinski, purported stockholders, filed a stockholder class action complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against the Company, Mr. Michery, and current or former Company directors Mr. Novoa, Ms. Winter, Mr. Betor, Mr. Anderson, Mr. Miltner, Mr. Puckett, and Mr. New (the “Foley Lawsuit”). This lawsuit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under 8 Del. C. §§ 225, 227, and 242 related to the vote on a series of proposal at a special meeting of Company stockholders that was held on December 23, 2022, and asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty against all Company directors (except Mr. New). The Foley Lawsuit also seeks an award of fees and costs related to this action.
On January 5, 2023, the Court consolidated this action with the Robbins Lawsuit (discussed above), appointing lead plaintiffs and lead counsel.