N
otes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2013
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
1.
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and related notes included in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The terms TCS, Company, we, us and our as used in this Form 10-Q refer to TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries as a combined entity, except where it is made clear that such terms mean only TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.
Use of Estimates.
The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures. Significant estimates and assumptions in these consolidated financial statements include estimates used in revenue recognition, fair value of business combinations, fair value associated with goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived asset impairment tests, estimated values of software development costs, income taxes and deferred valuation allowances, the fair value of marketable securities and stock based compensation, and legal and contingency fees. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
In the second quarter of 2012, our Navigation reporting units goodwill and long-lived assets with a carrying value of $164,500 were written down to estimated fair value of $38,797, resulting in an impairment charge of $125,703 to goodwill, acquired intangibles, and long-lived (fixed) assets. We engaged a third party valuation firm to assist in the determination of the fair value of goodwill, acquired intangibles, capitalized software, and long-lived assets. We utilized a discounted cash flow model to determine the fair value of goodwill and an income approach to determine the fair values of acquired intangibles, capitalized software, and long-lived assets.
Reclassifications.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows to conform to current period presentations. The reclassifications have no effect on the net increase in cash for the period.
Goodwill.
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets of acquired businesses. Goodwill is not amortized, but instead is evaluated annually for impairment using a discounted cash flow model and other measurements of fair value such as market comparable transactions. The authoritative guidance for the goodwill impairment model includes a two-step process. First, it requires a comparison of the book value of net assets to the fair value of the reporting units that have goodwill assigned to them. If the fair value is determined to be less than the book value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In the second step, a fair value for goodwill is estimated, based in part on the fair value of the reporting unit used in the first step, and is compared to its carrying value. The shortfall of the fair value below carrying value, if any, would represent the amount of goodwill impairment.
We assess goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or sooner should there be an indicator of impairment. We periodically analyze whether any such indicators of impairment, such as a sustained, significant decline in the Companys stock price and market capitalization, a decline in the Companys expected future cash flows, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, unanticipated competition, and/or slower growth rate, among others.
For goodwill impairment testing, we have four reporting units: two Commercial Segment units, Navigation and Other Commercial (which comprises our text messaging and location-based technology businesses, including E9-1-1 call routing); and two Government Segment units, Government Solutions Group and Cyber Intelligence.
7
In the second quarter of 2012, we received notice from a significant navigation application customer that it intended to adjust pricing for TCS services. Management considered this to be an indicator that we should evaluate the long-lived assets (including goodwill and other intangible assets) related to our 2009 acquisition of Networks In Motion, operating as our Navigation unit, for potential impairment. As a result, we recorded a $125,703 impairment charge in the second quarter of 2012 for the excess of the carrying value of goodwill, long-lived (fixed) assets including capitalized software for internal use, software development costs and acquired intangibles over the estimated fair value. No triggering events occurred with regard to other reporting units, so an interim analysis of other units was not completed.
In performing our annual goodwill impairment testing during the fourth quarter of 2012, we used a market approach based on observable public comparable company multiples for all reporting units. For our Navigation and Cyber Intelligence reporting units, we also used a discounted cash flow analysis. Where multiple approaches were used, we weighted the results from different methods to estimate the reporting units fair value. Our discounted cash flow models were based on our expectation of future market conditions for each of the reporting units, as well as discount rates that would be used by market participants in an arms-length transaction. Future events could cause us to conclude that market conditions have declined or discount rates have increased to the extent that our goodwill could be impaired. It is not possible at this time to determine if any such future impairment charge would result. There was no indication of any further impairment in any of our reporting units during the 2012 annual testing and accordingly, the second step of the goodwill impairment analysis was not performed.
Earnings per share.
Basic net income (loss) per common share is based upon the average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Stock options and restricted stock of approximately 11,500 shares and 14,700 shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and 32,100 shares and 25,200 shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
For the three and nine months ending September 30, 2013 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, shares issuable upon conversion of convertible debt were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. Shares issuable upon conversion of the convertible debt notes were included in the weighted average diluted shares for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Concurrent with the issuance of the convertible notes, we entered into convertible note hedge and warrant transactions. If the Companys share price is greater than the warrant exercise price of $12.74 per share for any period presented, the warrants would be dilutive to the Companys earnings per share. The convertible note hedge is excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the impact is always considered anti-dilutive since the call option would be exercised by us when the exercise price is lower than the market price. For the three and nine months ending September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Companys share price was less than the warrant exercise price of $12.74, therefore no value was assigned to the warrants because the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
Our two classes of common stock (Class A and B) share equally in dividends declared or accumulated and have equal participation rights in undistributed earnings. Additionally our unvested restricted stock does not contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends and dividend equivalents. As such, unvested shares of restricted stock are not participating securities and our basic and diluted earnings per share are not impacted by the two class method of computing earnings per share.
8
The following table summarizes the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss), basic ............................................
|
$
|
(155
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,179
|
|
|
$
|
(2,855
|
)
|
|
$
|
(107,307
|
)
|
Adjustment for assumed dilution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on 4.5% convertible notes, net of taxes................
|
|
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss), diluted ..........................................
|
$
|
(155
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,897
|
|
|
$
|
(2,855
|
)
|
|
$
|
(107,307
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total basic weighted-average common shares outstanding .....
|
|
58,687
|
|
|
|
58,019
|
|
|
|
58,574
|
|
|
|
57,806
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock based on treasury stock method ............................................
|
|
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of 4.5% convertible notes, based on if converted method .............................................................
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares ..................................
|
|
58,687
|
|
|
|
68,505
|
|
|
|
58,574
|
|
|
|
57,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share-basic ...............................
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.86
|
)
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share-diluted .............................
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.86
|
)
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements.
In February 2013, the FASB amended the disclosure requirements regarding the reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendment does not change the current requirement for reporting net income or other comprehensive income, but requires additional disclosures about significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income including the effect of the reclassification on the related net income line items. This amendment was adopted prospectively effective January 1, 2013.
In March 2013, the FASB amended guidance related to a parent companys accounting for the release of the cumulative translation adjustment into net income upon derecognition of certain subsidiaries or groups of assets within a foreign entity or of an investment in a foreign entity. This guidance is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and is to be applied prospectively to derecognition events occurring after the effective date. We do not anticipate the adoption of this amendment will have a material impact on our financial statements.
In July 2013, the FASB
amended guidance related
to income taxes and the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. Under certain circumstances, unrecognized tax benefits should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect this pronouncement to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
2.
Stock-Based Compensation
Restricted Stock
We had 1,770 and 1,428 restricted stock units outstanding at a weighted-average grant date fair value per share of $2.75 and $3.00 as at September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Share-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight line basis, for only those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the vesting over one year for directors and vest in annual increments over three years for executives conditional on continued employment.
Stock Options
We had 17,506 and 17,229 stock options outstanding as at September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During the nine months of 2013, we granted 2,319 options and had exercises of 87 options. Share-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight line basis, net of any estimated forfeiture rate, for only those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally 5 years.
9
Total Stock-Based Compensation
We recognized total share-based compensation expense of $1,503 and $2,015 in the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $5,294 and $6,760 in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As of September 30, 2013 and 2012, we had $6,721 and $10,369, respectively, of total unrecognized share-based compensation expense, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 3 years, respectively.
3.
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Property and equipment acquired under capital leases totaled $1,351 and $3,524 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. We acquired $915 and $4,268 of property under capital leases during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.
Interest paid totaled $556 and $3,919 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. We paid $739 and $4,105 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.
Income taxes and estimated state income taxes paid totaled $36 and $326, respectively, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Income taxes paid totaled $173 and $982 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.
4.
Marketable Securities
Available-for-sale marketable securities at September 30, 2013 were:
|
Amortized
Cost
Basis
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
$
|
15,762
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,782
|
|
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
953
|
|
Total marketable securities
|
$
|
16,716
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,735
|
|
The estimated fair value of available-for-sale marketable securities by contractual maturity at September 30, 2013 were:
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Due within 1 year or less
|
$
|
5,316
|
|
Due within 1-2 years
|
|
7,621
|
|
Due within 2-3 years
|
|
3,798
|
|
|
$
|
16,735
|
|
Available-for-sale marketable securities at December 31, 2012 were:
|
Amortized
Cost
Basis
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
$
|
13,102
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,141
|
|
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1,734
|
|
Total marketable securities
|
$
|
14,834
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,875
|
|
The estimated fair value of available-for-sale marketable securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 2012 were:
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Due within 1 year or less
|
$
|
7,251
|
|
Due within 1-2 years
|
|
3,557
|
|
Due within 2-3 years
|
|
4,067
|
|
|
$
|
14,875
|
|
10
5.
Fair Value Measurements
Our assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurements on a recurring basis and the required disclosures were:
As of September 30, 2013
|
Fair
Value
Total
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
Using Fair Value Hierarchy
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
43,659
|
|
|
$
|
43,659
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
15,782
|
|
|
|
15,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities
|
|
953
|
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
16,735
|
|
|
|
16,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan investments
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at fair value
|
$
|
61,341
|
|
|
$
|
61,341
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
$
|
597
|
|
|
$
|
597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Contractual acquisition earn-outs
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
Liabilities at fair value
|
$
|
939
|
|
|
$
|
597
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
342
|
|
As of December 31, 2012
|
Fair
Value
Total
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
Using Fair Value Hierarchy
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
36,623
|
|
|
$
|
36,623
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
13,141
|
|
|
|
13,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities
|
|
1,734
|
|
|
|
1,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
14,875
|
|
|
|
14,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan investments
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at fair value
|
$
|
52,188
|
|
|
$
|
52,188
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
$
|
394
|
|
|
$
|
394
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Contractual acquisition earn-outs
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
Liabilities at fair value
|
$
|
902
|
|
|
$
|
394
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
508
|
|
We hold marketable securities that are investment grade and are classified as available-for-sale. The securities include corporate bonds, and mortgage and asset backed securities that are carried at fair market value based on quoted market prices.
We hold trading securities as part of a rabbi trust to fund supplemental executive retirement plans and deferred income plans. The funds held are all managed by a third party, and include fixed income funds, equity securities, and money market accounts, or other investments for which there is an active quoted market. The related deferred compensation liabilities are valued based on the underlying investment selections in each participants account.
The contractual acquisition earn-outs were part of the consideration paid for acquisitions. The fair value of the earn-outs is based on probability-weighted payouts under different scenarios, discounted using a discount rate commensurate with the risk.
The following table provides a summary of the changes in the our contractual acquisition earn-outs measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the nine months ended September 30, 2013:
|
Fair Value
Measurements
Using Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2013
|
$
|
508
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
|
Fair value adjustment recognized in earnings
|
|
(166
|
)
|
Balance at September 30, 2013
|
$
|
342
|
|
11
Long-term debt, excluding leases, consists of borrowings under Senior Credit Facilites, 4.5% and 7.75% convertible senior notes, and promissory notes; see Note 11. The long-term debt, excluding leases, is currently reported at the borrowed amounts outstanding. At September 30, 2013, the estimated fair value of long-term debt, excluding leases, was $129,175 versus a carrying value of $140,829. At September 30, 2012, the estimated fair value of long-term debt, excluding leases, was $148,130 versus a carrying value of $161,850. The estimated fair value is based on a market approach using quoted market prices or current market rates for similar debt with approximately the same remaining maturities, where possible.
Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include long-lived assets, intangible assets, and goodwill. These items are recognized at fair value when they are considered to be impaired. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, there was no required fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. During the second quarter of 2012, our Navigation reporting units goodwill and long-lived assets with a carrying value of $164,500 at March 31, 2012 were written down to their estimated fair value of $38,797, resulting in an impairment charge of 125,703.
6.
Segment Information
Our two reporting segments are the Commercial and Government Segments.
Government Segment:
We provide professional services including field support of deployable wireless systems and cybersecurity training to the U.S. Department of Defense and other government and foreign customers. We own and operate secure satellite teleport facilities, resell access to satellite airtime (known as space segment), and design, furnish, install and operate wireless communication systems and components, including our SwiftLink
®
deployable communication systems which integrate high speed, satellite, and, internet protocol technology with secure, federal government-approved cryptologic devices.
Commercial Segment:
We are one of two leading companies that enable 9-1-1 call routing via cellular, Voice over Internet Protocol, and next generation technology. Other TCS hosted and managed services include cellular carrier infrastructure for text messaging and location-based platforms and applications, including turn-by-turn navigation. Commercial segment customers include wireless carrier network operators, Voice over Internet Protocol service providers, wireless device manufacturers, automotive industry suppliers, and state and local governments.
Management evaluates segment performance based on gross profit and all revenues reported below are from external customers. We do not maintain information regarding segment assets. Accordingly, asset information by reportable segment is not presented.
The following tables set forth the results of our reportable segments and a reconciliation of segment gross profit to net income (loss):
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Gvmt
|
|
|
Comm.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Gvmt
|
|
|
Comm.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
$
|
34,817
|
|
|
$
|
37,217
|
|
|
$
|
72,034
|
|
|
$
|
37,890
|
|
|
$
|
41,206
|
|
|
$
|
79,096
|
|
Systems
|
|
17,497
|
|
|
|
6,502
|
|
|
|
23,999
|
|
|
|
53,846
|
|
|
|
7,114
|
|
|
|
60,960
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
52,314
|
|
|
|
43,719
|
|
|
|
96,033
|
|
|
|
91,736
|
|
|
|
48,320
|
|
|
|
140,056
|
|
Direct costs of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct cost of services
|
|
23,718
|
|
|
|
15,855
|
|
|
|
39,573
|
|
|
|
28,076
|
|
|
|
17,469
|
|
|
|
45,545
|
|
Direct cost of systems
|
|
15,199
|
|
|
|
5,478
|
|
|
|
20,677
|
|
|
|
45,912
|
|
|
|
4,473
|
|
|
|
50,385
|
|
Total direct costs
|
|
38,917
|
|
|
|
21,333
|
|
|
|
60,250
|
|
|
|
73,988
|
|
|
|
21,942
|
|
|
|
95,930
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services gross profit
|
|
11,099
|
|
|
|
21,362
|
|
|
|
32,461
|
|
|
|
9,814
|
|
|
|
23,737
|
|
|
|
33,551
|
|
Systems gross profit
|
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
3,322
|
|
|
|
7,934
|
|
|
|
2,641
|
|
|
|
10,575
|
|
Total gross profit
|
$
|
13,397
|
|
|
$
|
22,386
|
|
|
$
|
35,783
|
|
|
$
|
17,748
|
|
|
$
|
26,378
|
|
|
$
|
44,126
|
|
12
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Gvmt
|
|
|
Comm.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Gvmt
|
|
|
Comm.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
$
|
104,409
|
|
|
$
|
112,734
|
|
|
$
|
217,143
|
|
|
$
|
103,947
|
|
|
$
|
118,036
|
|
|
$
|
221,983
|
|
Systems
|
|
51,261
|
|
|
|
15,265
|
|
|
|
66,526
|
|
|
|
118,136
|
|
|
|
14,594
|
|
|
|
132,730
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
155,670
|
|
|
|
127,999
|
|
|
|
283,669
|
|
|
|
222,083
|
|
|
|
132,630
|
|
|
|
354,713
|
|
Direct costs of revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct cost of services
|
|
73,756
|
|
|
|
47,340
|
|
|
|
121,096
|
|
|
|
77,616
|
|
|
|
52,811
|
|
|
|
130,427
|
|
Direct cost of systems
|
|
42,207
|
|
|
|
13,195
|
|
|
|
55,402
|
|
|
|
100,905
|
|
|
|
10,339
|
|
|
|
111,244
|
|
Total direct costs
|
|
115,963
|
|
|
|
60,535
|
|
|
|
176,498
|
|
|
|
178,521
|
|
|
|
63,150
|
|
|
|
241,671
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services gross profit
|
|
30,653
|
|
|
|
65,394
|
|
|
|
96,047
|
|
|
|
26,331
|
|
|
|
65,225
|
|
|
|
91,556
|
|
Systems gross profit
|
|
9,054
|
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
|
|
11,124
|
|
|
|
17,231
|
|
|
|
4,255
|
|
|
|
21,486
|
|
Total gross profit
|
$
|
39,707
|
|
|
$
|
67,464
|
|
|
$
|
107,171
|
|
|
$
|
43,562
|
|
|
$
|
69,480
|
|
|
$
|
113,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Total segment gross profit
|
$
|
35,783
|
|
|
$
|
44,126
|
|
|
$
|
107,171
|
|
|
$
|
113,042
|
|
Research and development expense
|
|
(7,898
|
)
|
|
|
(9,799
|
)
|
|
|
(25,745
|
)
|
|
|
(27,392
|
)
|
Sales and marketing expense
|
|
(6,684
|
)
|
|
|
(8,041
|
)
|
|
|
(22,445
|
)
|
|
|
(23,144
|
)
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
(13,824
|
)
|
|
|
(14,931
|
)
|
|
|
(42,552
|
)
|
|
|
(40,276
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment
|
|
(3,768
|
)
|
|
|
(3,689
|
)
|
|
|
(10,885
|
)
|
|
|
(10,499
|
)
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets
|
|
(1,142
|
)
|
|
|
(1,431
|
)
|
|
|
(3,427
|
)
|
|
|
(3,520
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125,703
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
(2,173
|
)
|
|
|
(2,088
|
)
|
|
|
(6,126
|
)
|
|
|
(5,367
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred finance fees
|
|
(1,538
|
)
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
(3,275
|
)
|
|
|
(568
|
)
|
Loss on early retirement of debt
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
(1,349
|
)
|
|
|
3,842
|
|
|
|
(7,497
|
)
|
|
|
(123,510
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
1,194
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
4,642
|
|
|
|
16,203
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(155
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,179
|
|
|
$
|
(2,855
|
)
|
|
$
|
(107,307
|
)
|
7.
Inventory
Inventory consisted of the following:
|
September 30,
2013
|
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
Component parts
|
$
|
9,310
|
|
|
$
|
8,018
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
3,066
|
|
Total inventory
|
$
|
10,811
|
|
|
$
|
11,084
|
|
13
8.
Acquired Intangible Assets, Capitalized Software Development Costs, and Goodwill
Our acquired intangible assets and capitalized software development costs consisted of the following:
|
September 30, 2013
|
|
|
December 31, 2012
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Acquired intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer lists and other
|
$
|
34,733
|
|
|
$
|
12,406
|
|
|
$
|
22,327
|
|
|
$
|
34,733
|
|
|
$
|
9,115
|
|
|
$
|
25,618
|
|
Trademarks and patents
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
|
780
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
Total acquired intangible assets
|
|
36,067
|
|
|
|
13,323
|
|
|
|
22,744
|
|
|
|
36,067
|
|
|
|
9,895
|
|
|
|
26,172
|
|
Software development costs, including acquired technology
|
|
48,234
|
|
|
|
32,849
|
|
|
|
15,385
|
|
|
|
46,246
|
|
|
|
27,317
|
|
|
|
18,929
|
|
Total acquired intangible assets and software development costs
|
$
|
84,301
|
|
|
$
|
46,172
|
|
|
$
|
38,129
|
|
|
$
|
82,313
|
|
|
$
|
37,212
|
|
|
$
|
45,101
|
|
Estimated future amortization expense:
Three-months ending December 31, 2013
|
$
|
2,988
|
|
Year ending December 31, 2014
|
|
9,052
|
|
Year ending December 31, 2015
|
|
7,512
|
|
Year ending December 31, 2016
|
|
6,475
|
|
Year ending December 31, 2017
|
|
4,096
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
8,006
|
|
|
$
|
38,129
|
|
Acquired intangible assets:
As a result of the fair value evaluation of the Navigation reporting unit in the second quarter of 2012, we recorded a $13,964 impairment charge for the excess of the carrying value of acquired intangible assets over the estimated fair value.
Software development costs:
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we capitalized $319 and $1,988, respectively, of software development costs for certain software projects after the point of technological feasibility had been reached but before the software was available for general release. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we capitalized $303 and $768, respectively, of software development costs. Accordingly, these costs have been capitalized and are being amortized over their estimated useful lives beginning when the products are available for general release. The capitalized costs relate to our location-based software. We believe that these capitalized costs will be recoverable from future gross profits generated by these products.
We routinely update our estimates of the recoverability of the software products that have been capitalized. Management uses these estimates as the basis for evaluating the carrying values and remaining useful lives of the respective assets. During the second quarter of 2012, we recorded an impairment charge of $12,420 after determining certain capitalized software development costs related to the Navigation reporting unit were not recoverable based on decreased projected revenues and sales pipeline.
Goodwill:
The carrying amount of goodwill is as follows:
|
Commercial
Segment
|
|
|
Government
Segment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012
|
$
|
58,154
|
|
|
$
|
54,296
|
|
|
$
|
112,450
|
|
As a result of our impairment test of goodwill related to its Navigation reporting unit during the second quarter of 2012, an $86,332 impairment charge was recorded for the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value.
14
9.
Concentrations of Credit Risk and Major Customers
The financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk are accounts receivable and unbilled receivables. Those customers that comprised 10% or more of our revenue, accounts receivable and unbilled receivables are summarized in the following tables:
Percentage of total revenue:
|
Segment
|
|
|
% of Total Revenue For
the Three
Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
% of Total
Revenue For
the Nine
Months Ended
September 30,
|
Customer
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
U.S. Government agencies and departments
|
|
Government
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
Customer A
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Customer B
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
<10
|
%
|
|
|
<10
|
%
|
|
|
<10
|
%
|
|
|
<10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of receivables (billed and unbilled) as of September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer
|
Segment
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
U.S. Government
|
|
Government
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
Customer A
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Customer B
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Line of Credit
We have maintained a line of credit arrangement with our principal bank since 2003. On June 25, 2013, we closed on a new Senior Secured Credit Facility (the "Senior Credit Facility), with the Silicon Valley Bank and a syndicate of lenders. The Senior Credit Facility includes a new revolving loan facility (Revolving Loan Facility) replacing the line under the July 2012, Fourth Amendment to our previous Loan and Security Agreement (Line of Credit).
The Revolving Loan Facility includes an aggregate principal amount available to borrow of up to $30,000 and matures on March 31, 2018. The principal amount outstanding under the Revolving Loan Facility is payable prior to or on the maturity date. Interest on the Revolving Loan Facility is payable monthly and accrues at Eurodollar/LIBOR (beginning at L+3.75%) or Alternate Base Rate (ABR) (beginning at ABR +2.75%), which may be adjusted as provided in the Credit Agreement.
The Revolving Loan Facility includes two sub-facilities: (i) a $10,000 letter of credit sub-facility pursuant to which the bank may issue letters of credit, and (ii) a $5,000 swingline sub-facility.
Under our previous Line of Credit, the maximum amount we could borrow was $35,000, limited by certain credit sub-facilities. Interest was calculated at a floating per annum rate equal to one-half of one percentage point (0.5%) above the prime rate.
As of September 30, 2013, there were no borrowings on our Revolving Loan Facility, and we had $30,000 of unused borrowing availability. As of December 31, 2012, we had $6,000 of borrowings outstanding under the Line of Credit and had approximately $25,400 of unused borrowing availability under our Line of Credit.
15
11.
Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
September 30,
2013
|
|
|
December 31,
2012
|
|
Senior credit facility
|
$
|
66,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
7.75% Convertible notes due 2018
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5% Convertible notes due 2014
|
|
18,792
|
|
|
|
93,500
|
|
Bank term loan paid in full June 26, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,779
|
|
Promissory notes payable to microDATA sellers
|
|
5,537
|
|
|
|
14,010
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
140,829
|
|
|
|
149,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
(7,137
|
)
|
|
|
(16,784
|
)
|
Non-current portion of long-term debt
|
$
|
133,692
|
|
|
$
|
132,505
|
|
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt at September 30, 2013 are as follows:
2013
|
$
|
415
|
|
2014
|
|
26,407
|
|
2015
|
|
3,325
|
|
2016
|
|
3,741
|
|
2017
|
|
6,153
|
|
2018
|
|
100,788
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
$
|
140,829
|
|
Senior credit facilities
On June 25, 2013, we closed on new $130,000 Senior Credit Facilities (the "Senior Credit Facilities") which include (i) a $56,500 term loan A facility ("Term Loan A Facility"), (ii) a $43,500 delayed draw term loan facility ("Delayed Draw Term Loan Facility"), and (iii) a $30,000 revolving loan facility ("Revolving Loan Facility.") The Senior Credit Facilities also include a $25,000 incremental loan arrangement subject to the Company's future needs and bank approval, although no assurances can be given that this incremental loan amount will be available to us when and if needed.
On June 25, 2013, we borrowed $56,500 under the Term Loan A Facility at closing. Proceeds were used for (i) repayment of the remaining balance under 2012 Term Loan, which was terminated, (ii) approximately $16,000 for on-going working capital and other general corporate purposes, and (iii) fees and expenses associated with the new facility. On September 30, 2013, we borrowed $10,000 under the Delayed Draw Term Loan Facility and the proceeds were used towards the retirement of the 4.5% Convertible Senior Notes, discussed below.
Additional liquidity is available through the undrawn $30,000 Revolving Loan Facility, to be used for our on-going working capital and other general corporate purposes, replacing the previous line of credit which has been paid off and terminated, see Line of Credit Note 10.
Loans borrowed under the Term Loan A Facility, the Revolving Loan Facility or the Delayed Draw Term Loan Facility may be borrowed at rates based on the Eurodollar/LIBOR (beginning at L +3.75%) or Alternate Base Rate (ABR) (beginning at ABR + 2.75%), which may be adjusted as provided in the Credit Agreement.
The Term Loan A Facility and the Delayed Draw Term Loan Facility have a maturity date of March 31, 2018, unless extended as provided in the Credit Agreement, and the Revolving Loan Facility has a termination date of March 31, 2018, unless extended as provided in the Credit Agreement. Beginning October 1, 2013, the Term Loan A Facility and the Delayed Term Loan are payable in consecutive quarterly installments of $416 on the first day of each fiscal quarter, increasing to $831 on December 31, 2014 and to $1,247 on December 31, 2016 and to $2,413 on December 31, 2017, with the remaining principal due at maturity. Additional Delayed Draw Term Loan Facility borrowings would be repaid in consecutive quarterly installment payments in the same proportion as the installment payments for the Term Loan A and existing Delayed Draw Term Loan borrowings, with the remaining principal due at maturity.
16
The Senior Credit Facilities are secured by substantially all of the Companys tangible and intangible assets, including intellectual property. The Credit Agreement contains customary representations and warranties of the Company and customary covenants and events of default. Availability under the Revolving Loan Facility and the Delayed Draw Term Loan Facility is subject to certain conditions, including the continued accuracy of the Companys representations and warranties and compliance with covenants. The Senior Credit Facilities are also subject to possible mandatory repayments from excess cash flow and other sources, such as net cash proceeds of debt or equity issuances, asset sales, casualty insurance claims and other recovery events, as described in the Credit Agreement. During the continuance of an event of default, at the request of the required lenders, all outstanding loans shall bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the rate that would otherwise be applicable thereto plus 2%, and shall be payable from time to time on demand.
7.75% Convertible notes
On May 8, 2013, we completed privately-negotiated exchange agreements with noteholders under which we retired $50,000 of our outstanding 4.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014 issued in 2009 (the 2014 Notes) in exchange for $50,000 of new 7.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 (the 2018 Notes).
The 2018 Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated as of May 8, 2013 (the Indenture), between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the Trustee). We offered the 2018 Notes to certain holders of the 2014 Notes in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The 2018 Notes bear interest at 7.75% per year, payable semiannually in arrears in cash on June 30 and December 30 of each year, beginning on December 30, 2013. The 2018 Notes are TCSs senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all of its present and future senior unsecured debt and senior to any future subordinated debts and will be effectively subordinate to all of TCSs present and future secured debt to the extent of the collateral securing that debt.
Holders may convert the 2018 Notes at their option on any day prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day (as defined in the Indenture) immediately preceding June 30, 2018. The conversion rate will initially be 96.637 shares of Class A common stock per $1 (one thousand) principal amount of 2018 Notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of $10.348 per share of Class A common stock, which is the same conversion price as the 2014 Notes. Shares of the Companys Class A common stock into which the 2018 Notes are convertible have been reserved for issuance by the Company. We may redeem some or all of the 2018 Notes at any time on or after June 30, 2014 at the redemption prices set forth in the Indenture plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. In addition, subject to certain exceptions, holders may require us to repurchase, for cash, all or part of their 2018 Notes upon a fundamental change (as defined in the Indenture) at a price equal to the purchase prices set forth in the Indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the fundamental change purchase date.
The Indenture contains customary terms and covenants, including that upon certain events of default occurring and continuing, either the Trustee or the holders of not less than 25% in aggregate principal amount of the 2018 Notes then outstanding may declare the entire principal amount of all the 2018 Notes plus accrued interest, if any, to be immediately due and payable.
4.5% Convertible notes
In 2009, we sold $103,500 aggregate principal amount of 4.5% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014. During the fourth quarter of 2012, we repurchased $10,000 of the outstanding 2014 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. During the third quarter of 2013, we repurchased an additional $24,708 of the outstanding 2014 Notes and recorded a loss of $151 on the retirement including transition costs. On May 8, 2013, we retired $50,000 in aggregate principal of these 2014 Notes, in exchange for $50,000 of new 7.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018, as discussed above.
The 2014 Notes are not registered and were offered under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. Concurrent with the issuance of the 2014 Notes, we entered into convertible note hedge transactions and warrant transactions, also detailed below, that are expected to reduce the potential dilution associated with the conversion of the 2014 Notes. Holders may convert the 2014 Notes at their option on any day prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day (as defined in the Indenture) immediately preceding November 1, 2014. The conversion rate will initially be 96.637 shares of Class A common stock per $1 (one thousand) principal amount of 2014 Notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $10.35 per share of Class A common stock. The effect of the convertible note hedge and warrant transactions is an increase in the effective conversion premium of the 2014 Notes to $12.74 per share.
The convertible note hedge and the warrant transactions are separate transactions, each entered into by the Company with the counterparties, which are not part of the terms of the 2014 Notes and will not affect the holders rights under the 2014 Notes. The cost of the convertible note hedge transactions to the Company was approximately $23,800, and was accounted for as an equity transaction in accordance with ASC 815-40
, Contracts in Entitys own Equity
. The Company received proceeds of approximately $13,000 related to the sale of the warrants, which has also been classified as equity as the warrants meet the classification criteria under ASC 815-40-25, in which the warrants and the convertible note hedge transactions require settlements in shares and provide the Company with the choice of a net cash or common shares settlement. As the convertible note hedge and warrants are indexed to our common stock, we
17
recognized them in permanent equity in
Additional paid-in capital,
and will not recognize subsequent changes in fair value as long as the instruments remain classified as equity.
Interest on the 2014 Notes is payable semiannually on November 1 and May 1 of each year, beginning May 1, 2010. The 2014 Notes will mature and convert on November 1, 2014, unless previously converted in accordance with their terms. The 2014 Notes are TCSs senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all of its present and future senior unsecured debt and senior to any future subordinated debts and will be effectively subordinate to all of TCSs present and future secured debt to the extent of the collateral securing that debt.
As a result of the repurchase and exchange of $84,708 of the outstanding 2014 Notes, the convertible note hedge was adjusted to reflect the reduced number of outstanding 2014 Notes. The convertible note hedge transactions originally covering 10,001 shares was adjusted to cover proportionally fewer of shares of Class A common stock. The warrants were not affected by the retirements of the 2014 Notes.
Term loan from commercial bank
In July 2012, we borrowed $45,000 under a term loan agreement (2012 Term Loan) with the Silicon Valley Bank, as administrative agent and collateral agent (SVB.) Approximately $19,400 of the borrowings under the 2012 Term Loan were used to pay off the prior term loan with SVB and transaction fees and approximately $20,000 were used as part of the acquisition of microDATA. The 2012 Term Loan was paid in full with funds borrowed under the new Term Loan A Facility, as discussed above.
Promissory notes payable to microDATA sellers
On July 6, 2012, we issued $14,250 in promissory notes as part of the consideration paid for our acquisition of microDATA bearing simple interest at 6%. The promissory notes are due in two installments: $7,500 plus interest was paid June 30, 2013 and $6,750 due June 30, 2014, less post-closing indemnification adjustments of $1,213 as of September 30, 2013, up to a maximum adjustment of $2,000. The promissory notes are effectively subordinated to TCSs structured debt.
12.
Capital Leases
We lease certain equipment under capital leases. Capital leases are collateralized by the leased assets. Amortization of leased assets is included in depreciation and amortization expense.
Future minimum payments under capital lease obligations consisted of the following at September 30, 2013:
2013
|
$
|
1,691
|
|
2014
|
|
4,831
|
|
2015
|
|
3,167
|
|
2016
|
|
1,628
|
|
2017
|
|
553
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
11,870
|
|
Less: amounts representing interest
|
|
(702
|
)
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments (including current portion of $5,134)
|
$
|
11,168
|
|
13.
Income Taxes
We reported income tax benefits of $1,194 and $4,642 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, as compared to $337 and $16,203 tax benefit recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012. The benefit recorded for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013 is comprised of current year tax benefit of $3,215 based on estimated annual pretax income (loss) plus a discrete adjustment of $1,427 related to a tax benefit resulting from the May 8, 2013 convertible note exchange and the repurchase of some the 4.5% Convertible Senior Notes. The benefit for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 is comprised of current year tax benefit of $978 based on estimated annual pretax income (loss) plus a discrete adjustment of $17,190 related to the Navigation reporting unit goodwill and long-lived asset impairment charge.
We do not anticipate a significant change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.
14.
Commitments and Contingencies
Some customers seek indemnification under their contractual arrangements with the Company for costs associated with defending lawsuits alleging infringement of certain patents through the use of our products and services, and the use of our products
18
and services in combination with products and services of other vendors. In some cases we have agreed to assume the defense of the case. In others, the Company will continue to negotiate with these customers in good faith because the Company believes its technology does not infringe the cited patents and due to specific clauses within the customer contractual arrangements that may or may not give rise to an indemnification obligation. The Company cannot currently predict the outcome of these matters and the resolutions could have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Due to the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of litigation and other legal proceedings and uncertainties regarding the Companys existing litigation and other legal proceedings, the Company is unable to estimate the amount or range of reasonably possible loss in excess of amounts reserved. The Companys assessments are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management, but that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause the Company to change those estimates and assumptions. Therefore, it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more pending litigation or other contingencies could have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements in a future fiscal period.
The application and interpretation of applicable state and local sales and other tax laws to certain of our service and system offerings in certain jurisdictions is uncertain. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Company makes a provision for a liability for taxes when it is both probable that the liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability or range of liability can be reasonably estimated. These provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted if necessary. At September 30, 2013, the Company is subject to an on-going state and local tax audit by the Washington State Department of Revenue. As this and other tax audits progress in the normal course of business, the Company will review and adjust a provision for loss as appropriate.
Other than the items discussed immediately above, we are not currently subject to any other material legal proceedings. However, we may from time to time become a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business.