UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number
0-8408
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
36-1984010
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1000 East Drake Road, Fort Collins, Colorado
|
|
80525
|
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(970) 482-5811
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class:
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered:
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.001455 per share
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definitions of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes
o
No
þ
As of April 20, 2010, 68,474,778 shares of the common stock with a par value of $0.001455 per share
were outstanding.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as recast,
Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as recast,
Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
349,352
|
|
|
$
|
334,661
|
|
|
$
|
688,660
|
|
|
$
|
679,405
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
244,316
|
|
|
|
235,539
|
|
|
|
483,868
|
|
|
|
479,825
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
34,130
|
|
|
|
29,093
|
|
|
|
66,965
|
|
|
|
61,553
|
|
Research and development costs
|
|
|
19,698
|
|
|
|
18,796
|
|
|
|
38,012
|
|
|
|
37,880
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
8,655
|
|
|
|
5,055
|
|
|
|
17,836
|
|
|
|
9,883
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,159
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,324
|
|
|
|
6,707
|
|
|
|
15,575
|
|
|
|
13,244
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
(883
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
(473
|
)
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
(827
|
)
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
Other expense
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
313,534
|
|
|
|
309,806
|
|
|
|
621,352
|
|
|
|
616,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
35,818
|
|
|
|
24,855
|
|
|
|
67,308
|
|
|
|
63,013
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(11,642
|
)
|
|
|
(6,333
|
)
|
|
|
(20,686
|
)
|
|
|
(17,388
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
24,176
|
|
|
|
18,522
|
|
|
|
46,622
|
|
|
|
45,625
|
|
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Woodward
|
|
$
|
24,068
|
|
|
$
|
18,474
|
|
|
$
|
46,424
|
|
|
$
|
45,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Earnings (Note 19):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive earnings attributable to Woodward
|
|
$
|
14,005
|
|
|
$
|
7,895
|
|
|
$
|
33,788
|
|
|
$
|
27,818
|
|
Comprehensive earnings (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive earnings
|
|
$
|
14,154
|
|
|
$
|
7,862
|
|
|
$
|
34,069
|
|
|
$
|
27,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share (Note 6):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share attributable to Woodward
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Woodward
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding (Note 6):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
68,436
|
|
|
|
67,824
|
|
|
|
68,398
|
|
|
|
67,810
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
69,876
|
|
|
|
68,832
|
|
|
|
69,830
|
|
|
|
69,067
|
|
Cash dividends per share
|
|
$
|
0.060
|
|
|
$
|
0.060
|
|
|
$
|
0.120
|
|
|
$
|
0.120
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as recast, Note 2)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
72,560
|
|
|
$
|
100,863
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for losses of $2,283 and $2,660, respectively
|
|
|
195,837
|
|
|
|
209,626
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
291,600
|
|
|
|
302,339
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
13,196
|
|
|
|
16,302
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
38,054
|
|
|
|
45,413
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
22,612
|
|
|
|
21,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
633,859
|
|
|
|
696,244
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
196,899
|
|
|
|
208,885
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
437,928
|
|
|
|
442,802
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
309,322
|
|
|
|
327,773
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
7,248
|
|
|
|
8,200
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
13,082
|
|
|
|
12,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,598,338
|
|
|
$
|
1,696,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
18,522
|
|
|
|
45,569
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
91,446
|
|
|
|
81,108
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
6,055
|
|
|
|
8,084
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
103,950
|
|
|
|
127,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
219,973
|
|
|
|
262,078
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
|
445,137
|
|
|
|
526,771
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
83,130
|
|
|
|
86,048
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
106,641
|
|
|
|
110,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
854,881
|
|
|
|
984,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 20)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.003 per share, 10,000 shares authorized,
no shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.001455 per share, 150,000 share authorized,
72,960 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
77,428
|
|
|
|
73,197
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (losses)
|
|
|
(2,507
|
)
|
|
|
10,129
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
4,715
|
|
|
|
4,904
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
779,722
|
|
|
|
741,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859,464
|
|
|
|
829,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock at cost, 4,487 shares and 4,621 shares, respectively
|
|
|
(113,629
|
)
|
|
|
(115,478
|
)
|
Treasury stock held for deferred compensation, at cost, 365 shares and 389 shares, respectively
|
|
|
(4,715
|
)
|
|
|
(4,904
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Woodward stockholders equity
|
|
|
741,120
|
|
|
|
709,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiary (Note 2)
|
|
|
2,337
|
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
743,457
|
|
|
|
711,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,598,338
|
|
|
$
|
1,696,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(as recast,
Note 2)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
46,622
|
|
|
$
|
45,625
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
37,994
|
|
|
|
28,358
|
|
Net loss on sales of assets
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,883
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(541
|
)
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
7,528
|
|
|
|
6,810
|
|
Reclassification of unrealized losses on derivatives to earnings
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
10,517
|
|
|
|
9,376
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
8,330
|
|
|
|
(12,999
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
15,933
|
|
|
|
(28,318
|
)
|
Current income taxes
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
6,821
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(6,510
|
)
|
|
|
(7,487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
125,981
|
|
|
|
51,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(14,136
|
)
|
|
|
(15,354
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
(369,065
|
)
|
Proceeds from working capital adjustment on disposal of F&P product line
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(38,230
|
)
|
|
|
(384,231
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(8,207
|
)
|
|
|
(8,136
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of treasury stock
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
|
|
888
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock compensation
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
Borrowings on revolving lines of credit and short-term borrowings
|
|
|
32,715
|
|
|
|
31,853
|
|
Payments on revolving lines of credit and short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(32,715
|
)
|
|
|
(35,884
|
)
|
Payments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(108,569
|
)
|
|
|
(12,850
|
)
|
Payments of long-term debt assumed in MPC acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,610
|
)
|
Payment for cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,308
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,081
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(114,580
|
)
|
|
|
353,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,474
|
)
|
|
|
(3,638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(28,303
|
)
|
|
|
17,040
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
100,863
|
|
|
|
109,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
72,560
|
|
|
$
|
126,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity attributable to Woodward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumu-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Noncon-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock
|
|
|
trolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
held for
|
|
|
interest in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
compre-
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
deferred
|
|
|
consol-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
paid-in
|
|
|
hensive
|
|
|
compen-
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
stock at
|
|
|
compen-
|
|
|
idated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock
|
|
|
capital
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
sation
|
|
|
earnings
|
|
|
cost
|
|
|
sation
|
|
|
subsidiary
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
73,197
|
|
|
$
|
10,129
|
|
|
$
|
4,904
|
|
|
$
|
741,505
|
|
|
$
|
(115,478
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,904
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,056
|
|
|
$
|
711,515
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
46,622
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,207
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,207
|
)
|
Sale of Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,594
|
|
Tax benefit attributable to exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,883
|
|
Purchase of stock by deferred
compensation plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Distribution of stock from deferred
compensation plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(12,888
|
)
|
Reclassification of unrecognized losses on
derivatives to earnings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Minimum post-retirement benefits liability
adjustments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
77,428
|
|
|
$
|
(2,507
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,715
|
|
|
$
|
779,722
|
|
|
$
|
(113,629
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,715
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,337
|
|
|
$
|
743,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
68,520
|
|
|
$
|
20,485
|
|
|
$
|
5,283
|
|
|
$
|
663,442
|
|
|
$
|
(122,759
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,283
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,622
|
|
|
$
|
632,416
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
45,625
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,136
|
)
|
Sale of Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Tax benefit attributable to exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
Purchase of stock by deferred
compensation plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
(708
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
Distribution of stock from deferred
compensation plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(862
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
(17,293
|
)
|
Reclassification of unrecognized losses on
derivatives to earnings, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Payments for cash flow hedge, net of deferred tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
Minimum post-retirement benefits liability
adjustments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
71,691
|
|
|
$
|
2,765
|
|
|
$
|
5,129
|
|
|
$
|
700,844
|
|
|
$
|
(121,687
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,129
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,578
|
|
|
$
|
656,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Woodward Governor Company
Note to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Ammounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Note 1. Basis of presentation and nature of operations
Basis of presentation
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Woodward Governor Company (Woodward or
the Company) as of March 31, 2010 and for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
included herein, have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm. These
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments which, in the
opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly Woodwards financial position as of March
31, 2010, and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented herein. The
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2009 was derived from Woodwards Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, adjusted to reflect the October
1, 2009 adoption of authoritative guidance relative to accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and authoritative guidance relative to inclusion of
participating securities in the calculation of earnings per share, as discussed in Note 2,
New
accounting standards
. The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended March 31,
2010 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for other interim
periods or for the full fiscal year. Dollar amounts contained in these Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements are in thousands, except per share amounts.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein have been prepared pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information
and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial
Statements and Notes thereto included in Woodwards Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2009 and other financial information filed with the SEC.
Management is required to use estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported revenues and
expenses recognized during the reporting period, and certain financial statement disclosures, in
the preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Significant estimates in these
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include allowances for doubtful accounts, net
realizable value of inventories, percent complete on long-term contracts, cost of sales incentives,
useful lives of property and identifiable intangible assets, the evaluation of impairments of
property, identifiable intangible assets and goodwill, income tax and valuation reserves, the
valuation of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, assumptions used in the
determination of the funded status and annual expense of pension and postretirement employee
benefit plans, the valuation of stock compensation instruments granted to employees, and
contingencies. Actual results could vary materially from Woodwards estimates.
Nature of operations
Woodward is an independent designer, manufacturer, and service provider of energy control and
optimization solutions for commercial and military aircraft and ground vehicles, turbines,
reciprocating engines, and electrical power system equipment. Woodwards innovative fluid energy,
combustion control, electrical energy and motion control systems help customers offer cleaner, more
reliable and more cost-effective equipment. Leading original equipment manufacturers use Woodwards
products and services in the aerospace, power generation and distribution and transportation
markets.
Woodward has four operating business segments Turbine Systems, Airframe Systems, Electrical
Power Systems and Engine Systems:
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
develops and manufactures systems and components that provide energy
control and optimization solutions for aircraft propulsion applications, including fuel and
combustion systems for turbine engines, as well as industrial gas and steam turbine
markets.
|
|
|
|
Airframe Systems
develops and manufactures high-performance cockpit, electromechanical
and hydraulic motion control systems, and mission-critical actuation systems and controls
for weapons, aircraft, turbine engines and combat vehicles, primarily for aerospace and
military applications.
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
develops and manufactures systems and components that provide
power sensing and energy control systems that improve the security, quality, reliability
and availability of electrical power networks for industrial markets, which include the
power generation, power distribution and power conversion industries.
|
|
|
|
Engine Systems
develops and manufactures systems and components that provide energy
control and optimization solutions for the industrial engine markets, which include the
power generation, transportation and process industries.
|
7
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
On April 3, 2009, Woodward acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of HR Textron Inc.
from Textron Inc., its
parent company, and the United Kingdom assets and certain liabilities related to HR Textron
Inc.s business (collectively HRT). HR Textron Inc. became a wholly owned subsidiary of Woodward
and was renamed Woodward HRT, Inc. following the consummation of the acquisition. HRT has been
integrated into Woodward within its Airframe Systems business segment.
On August 10, 2009, Woodward HRT sold the Fuel and Pneumatics product line (the F&P product
line) originally acquired by Woodward in April 2009 as part of the HRT acquisition.
Additional information about the acquisition of HRT and the sale of the F&P product line is
included in Note 4,
Business acquisitions and dispositions
.
To provide better focus and alignment of its business segment operations, Woodward moved the
development and manufacture of systems and components for steam turbine markets from Engine Systems
to Turbine Systems in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. All segment information for the three and
six month periods ended March 31, 2009 has been recast to reflect the realigned segment structure.
Note 2. New accounting standards
Accounting changes and recently adopted accounting standards
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued authoritative
guidance which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires
additional disclosures about a companys financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are
measured at fair value. In February 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which delayed the
effective date of this guidance for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least
annually), to fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after November
15, 2008. On October 1, 2008, Woodward adopted the measurement and disclosure impact of this
guidance with respect to financial assets and liabilities. On October 1, 2009, Woodward adopted the
measurement and disclosure of fair value with respect to non-financial assets and liabilities. This
guidance did not change existing guidance on whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value.
The adoption had no impact on Woodwards financial position and results of operations and required
no additional disclosures in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In November 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to address accounting for
collaborative arrangement activities that are conducted without the creation of a separate legal
entity for the arrangement. Revenues and costs incurred with third parties in connection with the
collaborative arrangement should be presented gross or net by the collaborators pursuant to
pre-existing accounting standards. Payments to or from collaborators should be presented in the
income statement based on the nature of the arrangement, the nature of the companys business and
whether the payments are within the scope of other accounting literature. Other detailed
information related to the collaborative arrangement is also required to be disclosed. The
requirements under this guidance must be applied to collaborative arrangements in existence at the
beginning of Woodwards fiscal 2010 using a modified version of retrospective application. Woodward
is currently not a party to significant collaborative arrangement activities, as defined by this
guidance, and therefore, the adoption of this guidance had no impact on its Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to affirm that the acquisition method
of accounting (previously referred to as the purchase method) be used for all business combinations
and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This guidance defines the
acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination
and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control. Among other
requirements, this guidance requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize
the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree at their acquisition-date fair values, and with limited exceptions, acquisition-related
costs will generally be expensed as incurred. This guidance requires certain financial statement
disclosures to enable users to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. This guidance must be applied prospectively to business combinations that are
consummated on or after October 1, 2009. Accordingly, Woodward will record and disclose business
combinations under the revised standard for any transactions consummated on or after October 1,
2009. In addition, adjustments of certain income tax balances related to acquired deferred assets,
including those acquired prior to the adoption of this new authoritative guidance, will be reported
as an increase or decrease to income tax expense. Accordingly, Woodward has recorded adjustments of
certain income tax balances under the revised authoritative guidance beginning October 1, 2009.
8
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to establish accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. Among other requirements, this guidance clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary, which is sometimes referred to as minority interest, is to be reported in the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets within stockholders equity, but separate from the parents
stockholders
equity. This guidance also requires consolidated net earnings and comprehensive earnings to
include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. Woodward
adopted this guidance effective October 1, 2009. This guidance must be applied prospectively for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning in fiscal 2010, except for
the presentation and disclosure requirements, which have been applied retrospectively for all
periods presented. Accordingly, the following have been retrospectively adjusted: the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the three and six months ended March 31, 2009, the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2009, the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash
Flows for the six months ended March 31, 2009, the Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Stockholders Equity for the six months ended March 31, 2009, accumulated other comprehensive
earnings for the six months ended March 31, 2009 as presented in Note 18,
Accumulated other
comprehensive earnings,
and total comprehensive earnings for the three and six months ended March
31, 2009 as presented in Note 19,
Total comprehensive earnings
. In accordance with the
authoritative guidance, Woodwards Consolidated Financial Statements have been recast from amounts
previously reported as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
As previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reported
|
|
|
As recast
|
|
|
reported
|
|
|
As recast
|
|
|
reported
|
|
|
As recast
|
|
Balance Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,696,422
|
|
|
$
|
1,696,422
|
|
|
$
|
927,017
|
|
|
$
|
927,017
|
|
|
$
|
829,767
|
|
|
$
|
829,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
987,184
|
|
|
$
|
984,907
|
|
|
$
|
297,389
|
|
|
$
|
294,601
|
|
|
$
|
285,336
|
|
|
$
|
282,554
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
709,238
|
|
|
|
711,515
|
|
|
|
629,628
|
|
|
|
632,416
|
|
|
|
544,431
|
|
|
|
547,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,696,422
|
|
|
$
|
1,696,422
|
|
|
$
|
927,017
|
|
|
$
|
927,017
|
|
|
$
|
829,767
|
|
|
$
|
829,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
73,197
|
|
|
|
73,197
|
|
|
|
68,520
|
|
|
|
68,520
|
|
|
|
48,641
|
|
|
|
48,641
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings
|
|
|
9,908
|
|
|
|
10,129
|
|
|
|
20,319
|
|
|
|
20,485
|
|
|
|
23,010
|
|
|
|
22,892
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
4,904
|
|
|
|
4,904
|
|
|
|
5,283
|
|
|
|
5,283
|
|
|
|
4,752
|
|
|
|
4,752
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
741,505
|
|
|
|
741,505
|
|
|
|
663,442
|
|
|
|
663,442
|
|
|
|
565,136
|
|
|
|
565,136
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
(120,382
|
)
|
|
|
(120,382
|
)
|
|
|
(128,042
|
)
|
|
|
(128,042
|
)
|
|
|
(97,214
|
)
|
|
|
(97,214
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Woodward stockholders equity
|
|
|
709,238
|
|
|
|
709,459
|
|
|
|
629,628
|
|
|
|
629,794
|
|
|
|
544,431
|
|
|
|
544,313
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
709,238
|
|
|
$
|
711,515
|
|
|
$
|
629,628
|
|
|
$
|
632,416
|
|
|
$
|
544,431
|
|
|
$
|
547,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
As previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reported
|
|
|
As recast
|
|
|
reported
|
|
|
As recast
|
|
|
reported
|
|
|
As recast
|
|
Statements of Earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
1,430,125
|
|
|
$
|
1,430,125
|
|
|
$
|
1,258,204
|
|
|
$
|
1,258,204
|
|
|
$
|
1,042,337
|
|
|
$
|
1,042,337
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,307,713
|
|
|
|
1,307,649
|
|
|
|
1,076,294
|
|
|
|
1,075,619
|
|
|
|
910,349
|
|
|
|
909,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
122,412
|
|
|
|
122,476
|
|
|
|
181,910
|
|
|
|
182,585
|
|
|
|
131,988
|
|
|
|
132,680
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(28,060
|
)
|
|
|
(28,060
|
)
|
|
|
(60,030
|
)
|
|
|
(60,030
|
)
|
|
|
(33,831
|
)
|
|
|
(33,831
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
94,352
|
|
|
|
94,416
|
|
|
|
121,880
|
|
|
|
122,555
|
|
|
|
98,157
|
|
|
|
98,849
|
|
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(692
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Woodward
|
|
$
|
94,352
|
|
|
$
|
94,352
|
|
|
$
|
121,880
|
|
|
$
|
121,880
|
|
|
$
|
98,157
|
|
|
$
|
98,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive earnings attributable to Woodward
|
|
$
|
83,941
|
|
|
$
|
83,996
|
|
|
$
|
119,189
|
|
|
$
|
119,473
|
|
|
$
|
109,528
|
|
|
$
|
109,319
|
|
Comp. earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive earnings
|
|
$
|
83,941
|
|
|
$
|
84,005
|
|
|
$
|
119,189
|
|
|
$
|
119,864
|
|
|
$
|
109,528
|
|
|
$
|
110,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to Woodward:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
218,652
|
|
|
$
|
218,652
|
|
|
$
|
125,354
|
|
|
$
|
125,354
|
|
|
$
|
117,718
|
|
|
$
|
117,718
|
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(714,130
|
)
|
|
|
(714,130
|
)
|
|
|
(35,909
|
)
|
|
|
(35,909
|
)
|
|
|
(67,048
|
)
|
|
|
(67,048
|
)
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
487,940
|
|
|
|
487,940
|
|
|
|
(48,904
|
)
|
|
|
(48,904
|
)
|
|
|
(66,496
|
)
|
|
|
(66,496
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
|
|
(1,432
|
)
|
|
|
(2,343
|
)
|
|
|
(2,343
|
)
|
|
|
3,743
|
|
|
|
3,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(8,970
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,970
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,198
|
|
|
$
|
38,198
|
|
|
$
|
(12,083
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,083
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to amend the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset and to require additional disclosures. The guidance for determining
useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective
date. The disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized
as of the effective date. Woodward adopted this guidance as of October 1, 2009. The adoption of
this guidance had no impact on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In November 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding the accounting for
defensive intangible assets. Defensive intangible assets are assets acquired in a business
combination that the acquirer (a) does not intend to use or (b) intends to use in a way other than
the assets highest and best use as determined by an evaluation of market participant
assumptions. While defensive intangible assets are not being actively used, they are likely
contributing to an increase in the value of other assets owned by the acquiring entity. This
guidance requires defensive intangible assets to be accounted for as separate units of accounting
at the time of acquisition and the useful life of such assets to be based on the period over which
the assets will directly or indirectly affect the entitys cash flows. Woodward will record and
disclose defensive intangible assets under the revised standard for transactions consummated, if
any, on or after October 1, 2009.
In November 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance addressing whether securities granted
in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore,
need to be included in the earnings allocation
in computing earnings per share under the two class method. This guidance became effective for
Woodward on October 1, 2009. Upon the adoption of this guidance, all outstanding restricted stock,
which are participating securities, are considered in the calculation of both the basic and fully
diluted earnings per share calculations in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The
effects of this change are required to be applied retrospectively. Accordingly, the historical
earnings per share presented in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings and in Note 6,
Earnings per share
have been recast to reflect the retrospective application of this guidance.
In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to require that assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized at fair
value if fair value can be reasonably determined. If the fair value of such assets or liabilities
cannot be reasonably determined, then they would generally be recognized in accordance with certain
other pre-existing accounting standards. This guidance also amends the subsequent accounting for
assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination and certain other
disclosure requirements. This guidance became effective for assets or liabilities arising from
contingencies in business combinations that are consummated on or after October 1, 2009.
Accordingly, Woodward will record and disclose assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business
combinations that arise from contingencies under the revised standard for any transactions
consummated on or after October 1, 2009.
10
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Issued but not yet effective accounting standards:
In December 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to require employers to provide
additional disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement
plan. These disclosures should principally include information detailing investment policies and
strategies, the major categories of plan assets, the inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure the fair value of plan assets and an understanding of significant concentrations of risk
within plan assets. The required disclosures must be provided for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2009 (Woodwards fiscal 2010, the anticipated period of adoption). These disclosures
will be presented in Woodwards Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended September 30,
2010. Upon initial application, this guidance is not required to be applied to earlier periods that
are presented for comparative purposes. Woodward does not expect this guidance to have a
significant impact on its September 30, 2010 Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to eliminate the exception to consolidate
a qualifying special-purpose entity, change the approach to determining the primary beneficiary of
a variable interest entity and require companies to more frequently re-assess whether they must
consolidate variable interest entities. Under the new guidance, the primary beneficiary of a
variable interest entity is identified qualitatively as the enterprise that has both (a) the power
to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entitys
economic performance, and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially
be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity
that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. This guidance becomes
effective for Woodwards fiscal year 2011 and interim reporting periods thereafter. Woodward does
not expect this guidance to have a material impact on its Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to require an analysis to determine
whether a variable interest gives the entity a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity. This guidance requires an ongoing reassessment and eliminates the quantitative
approach previously required for determining whether an entity is the primary beneficiary. This
guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009 (fiscal year 2011 for
Woodward). Woodward is currently assessing the impact that this guidance may have on its Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that enables vendors to account for
products or services sold to customers (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit, as
was generally required by past guidance. The revised guidance provides for two significant changes
to the existing multiple element revenue arrangements guidance. The first change, which will likely
result in the requirement to separate more deliverables within an arrangement, relates to the
determination of when the individual deliverables included in a multiple element arrangement may be
treated as separate units of accounting. The second change modifies the manner in which the
transaction consideration is allocated across the separately identified deliverables. Together,
these changes are likely to result in earlier recognition of revenue and related costs for
multiple-element arrangements than under previous guidance. This guidance also significantly
expands the disclosures required for multiple-element revenue arrangements. This guidance is
required to be adopted in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 (fiscal year 2011 for
Woodward). Woodward expects to adopt the guidance as of October 1, 2010. Woodward is currently
assessing the impact this guidance may have on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that changes the accounting model for
revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements. The revised
guidance provides that tangible products containing software components and nonsoftware components
that function together to deliver the tangible products essential
functionality are no longer within the scope of the software revenue guidance in Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) Subtopic 985-605. In addition, the guidance requires that hardware
components of a tangible product containing software components always be excluded from the
software revenue guidance. This guidance also significantly expands the disclosures required for
multiple-element revenue arrangements. This guidance is required to be adopted in fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010 (fiscal year 2011 for Woodward). Woodward is currently
assessing the impact this guidance may have on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
11
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Note 3. Supplemental statements of cash flows information
Supplemental cash flow information follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Interest expense paid
|
|
$
|
15,609
|
|
|
$
|
5,699
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
17,285
|
|
|
|
8,887
|
|
Income tax refunds received
|
|
|
8,691
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
Non-cash investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt assumed in business acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,610
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment on account
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
Sales of assets on account
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
MPC Products Corporation (MPC Products), one of Woodwards subsidiaries acquired in fiscal
year 2009, was previously subject to an investigation by the Department of Justice (DOJ)
regarding certain of its government contract pricing practices prior to June 2005. In fiscal 2010,
MPC Products settled the criminal and civil claims related to the DOJs investigation and paid
approximately $22,500 in compensation and a fine of $2,500. The purchase price Woodward paid in
connection with the acquisition of MPC Products was reduced by $25,000 at the time of the
acquisition, which represents the amounts discussed above. Payment of this amount during the six
months ended March 31, 2010 is reflected as an investing activity in the Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows.
Note 4. Business acquisitions and dispositions
Woodward has recorded the HRT acquisition described below using the purchase method of
accounting and, accordingly, has included the results of operations of the acquired business in its
consolidated results as of the date of the acquisition. In accordance with authoritative accounting
guidance for business combinations in effect during its fiscal year 2009, the purchase price for
this acquisition is allocated to the tangible assets, liabilities, and intangible assets acquired
based on their estimated fair values. The excess purchase price over the respective fair values of
assets is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized under U.S. GAAP but is tested for
impairment at least annually (see Note 9,
Goodwill)
. The goodwill resulting from the HRT
acquisition is tax deductible.
HRT acquisition
On April 3, 2009, Woodward acquired all of the outstanding stock of HR Textron Inc. from
Textron Inc., its parent company, and the United Kingdom assets and certain liabilities related to
HR Textron Inc.s business, for approximately $380,749.
HRT provides advanced technology, engineering development, and manufacturing of
mission-critical actuation systems and controls for aircraft, turbine engines, weapons and combat
vehicles. It is recognized for hydraulic and electric primary flight control actuation products,
including electro-mechanical actuation systems for unmanned combat air vehicles and weapons, such
as the Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM) and the AIM-9X Sidewinder; hydraulic and electric
flight controls for fixed and rotor wing aircraft; servovalves for global aerospace; and turret
controls and stabilization systems for the U.S. M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank and other armored
vehicles worldwide. HRT has been integrated into Woodward within its Airframe Systems business
segment.
12
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The purchase price for the HRT acquisition is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to owners
|
|
$
|
377,660
|
|
Cash acquired
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Direct transaction costs
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
380,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first six months of fiscal 2010, the estimated fair values of the acquired current
assets were increased by $1,234, the accrued restructuring charges were increased by $1,834, and
other the current liabilities were decreased by $2,660 to reflect updated estimates of fair values
of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of April 3, 2009.
The allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed was
finalized as of March 31, 2010. The following table summarizes estimated fair values of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed on April 3, 2009, the date of the HRT acquisition, including
accrued restructuring charges:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
115,707
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
41,926
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
142,699
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
128,400
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
428,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
19,515
|
|
Accrued restructuring charges
|
|
|
9,334
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
|
13,077
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
6,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
47,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
380,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the intangible assets acquired, weighted average useful lives and amortization
methods follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
Method
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
70,900
|
|
|
15 years
|
|
Accelerated
|
Process technology
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
15 years
|
|
Accelerated
|
Product software
|
|
|
4,200
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
Accelerated
|
Backlog
|
|
|
21,900
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Accelerated
|
Favorable lease contracts
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
Straight Line
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Straight Line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
128,400
|
|
|
13 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated amortization is calculated based on the pattern of estimated future economic
benefits of the related intangible assets.
HRTs favorable lease contracts relate to a facility that Woodward has determined will be
vacated in late calendar year 2010, when the unamortized cost of the asset is expected to be
$1,050. This amount is included in the accrued restructuring charges assumed in connection with the
HRT acquisition.
Woodward made a 338(h)(10) election with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, which allows the
HRT acquisition to be treated as an asset purchase for income tax purposes. Accordingly, any
deferred tax assets and liabilities recorded by Textron Inc. at the acquisition date are not
available to Woodward because the election causes the HRT acquisition to be treated, for income tax
purposes, as though Woodward did not purchase an ongoing business.
13
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In connection with the HRT acquisition, Woodward assumed certain defined benefit pension
obligations contingent upon transfer of related pension plan assets. In September 2009, the trustee
of the related Textron-sponsored defined benefit plan transferred $46,788 to the Woodward HRT Plan.
An additional $1,019 was transferred by the Textron sponsored defined benefit plan to the Woodward
HRT Plan in October 2009 and was recorded as a Woodward HRT Plan receivable as of September 30,
2009.
The results of HRTs operations are included in Woodwards Consolidated Statements of Earnings
as of April 3, 2009.
On August 10, 2009, Woodward HRT sold the F&P product line for $48,000. During the quarter
ended March 31, 2010, Woodward received an additional $660 related to working capital adjustments
typical in such transactions. The F&P product line provided a variety of off-turbine fuel
management and pneumatic actuation components to producers of military and commercial aircraft and
helicopters, as well as their suppliers.
Pro forma results for Woodward giving effect to the HRT acquisition, excluding the F&P product
line
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of
operations of Woodward and HRT as if the acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of fiscal
year 2009. The pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes and is not
indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition and
related borrowings had taken place at the beginning of fiscal year 2009. The unaudited pro forma
financial information combines the historical results of Woodward with the historical results of
HRT for that period but excludes the historical results of the F&P product line.
Prior to the HRT acquisition by Woodward, HRT was a wholly owned subsidiary of Textron Inc.,
and as such was not a stand-alone entity, for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, the
historical operating results of HRT may not be indicative of the results that might have been
achieved, historically or in the future, if HRT had been a stand-alone entity. The unaudited pro
forma results for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2009 include amortization charges
for acquired intangible assets, eliminations of intercompany transactions, adjustments for stock
options issued, adjustments for depreciation expense for property, plant, and equipment,
adjustments to interest expense, adjustments for estimated general and administrative costs for
HRTs historical management and administrative structure and functions, disposal of the F&P product
line, and related tax effects.
The unaudited pro forma results for the three and six months ended March 31, 2009 compared to
the actual results reported in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
334,661
|
|
|
$
|
385,260
|
|
|
$
|
679,405
|
|
|
$
|
791,269
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
18,522
|
|
|
|
16,850
|
|
|
|
45,625
|
|
|
|
44,924
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
Note 5. Income taxes
U.S. GAAP requires that the interim period tax provision be determined as follows:
|
|
|
At the end of each quarter, Woodward estimates the tax that will be provided for the
fiscal year stated as a percent of estimated ordinary income for the fiscal year. The
term ordinary income refers to earnings from continuing operations before income taxes,
excluding significant unusual or infrequently occurring items.
|
The estimated annual effective rate is applied to the year to date ordinary income at the
end of each quarter to compute the year to date tax applicable to ordinary income. The tax
expense or benefit related to ordinary income in each quarter is the difference between the
most recent year to date and the prior quarter year-to-date computations.
|
|
|
The tax effects of significant unusual or infrequently occurring items are recognized as
discrete items in the interim period in which the events occur. The impact of changes in
tax laws or rates on deferred tax amounts, the effects of changes in judgment about
beginning of the year valuation allowances and changes in tax reserves resulting from the
finalization of tax audits or reviews are examples of significant unusual or infrequently
occurring items that are recognized as discrete items in the interim period in which the
event occurs.
|
14
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The determination of the annual effective tax rate is based upon a number of significant
estimates and judgments, including the estimated annual pretax income of Woodward in each tax
jurisdiction in which it operates and the development of tax planning strategies during the year.
In addition, as a global commercial enterprise, Woodwards tax expense can be impacted by changes
in tax rates or laws, the finalization of tax audits and reviews, as well as other factors that
cannot be predicted with certainty. As such, there can be significant volatility in interim tax
provisions.
The following table sets out the tax expense and the effective tax rate for Woodwards income
from operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
$
|
35,818
|
|
|
$
|
24,855
|
|
|
$
|
67,308
|
|
|
$
|
63,013
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
11,642
|
|
|
|
6,333
|
|
|
|
20,686
|
|
|
|
17,388
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
|
|
30.7
|
%
|
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
The effective tax rates in both the six months ended March 31, 2010 and the six months ended
March 31, 2009 benefited from favorable resolutions of tax matters of $1,760 and $3,422,
respectively.
The total amount of the gross liability for worldwide unrecognized tax benefits was $19,141 at
March 31, 2010 and $19,783 at September 30, 2009.
The amounts of unrecognized tax benefits that would impact Woodwards effective tax rate if
recognized, net of expected offsetting benefits, were $15,461 at March 31, 2010 and $15,550 at
September 30, 2009. At this time, Woodward estimates that it is reasonably possible that the
liability for unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by as much as $3,460 in the next twelve
months through completion of reviews by various worldwide tax authorities and completion of
internal revaluation assessments.
Woodward recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax
expense. Woodward had accrued interest and penalties of $4,475 as of March 31, 2010 and $3,804 as
of September 30, 2009.
Woodwards tax returns are audited by U.S., state, and foreign tax authorities and these
audits are at various stages of completion at any given time. Fiscal years remaining open to
examination in significant foreign jurisdictions include 2003 and forward. Woodward is subject to
U.S. Federal income tax examinations for fiscal years 2006 and forward and is subject to U.S. state
income tax examinations for fiscal years 2005 and forward.
The U.S. research tax credit expired as of December 31, 2009. The U.S. Congress is considering
legislation to provide a one-year, retroactive extension, however as of March 31, 2010, the expired
tax credit has not been reinstated. Accounting guidance requires Woodward to use the tax law in
effect at the balance sheet date. Accordingly, the calculation of its fiscal 2010 income tax
provision does not reflect any assumed benefit from the research tax credit for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010. In the event that the research tax credit is enacted in some form in
future periods, Woodward will account for that change in the tax law at that time.
Woodward does not expect the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to impact its income
tax expense in fiscal 2010 or thereafter.
Note 6. Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share attributable to Woodward is computed by dividing net earnings
available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding for the period.
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Woodward reflects the weighted average number of
shares outstanding after consideration of the dilutive effect of stock options.
In November 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance addressing whether securities granted
in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, thus, need
to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the two class
method. This guidance became effective for Woodward on October 1, 2009 and is required to be
applied retrospectively. Upon the adoption of this guidance shares of restricted stock, which are
participating securities, are considered in the calculation of both the basic and fully diluted
earnings per share calculations. The March 31, 2009 historical earnings per share amounts presented
below have been recast to reflect the retrospective application of this guidance for 70 shares of
restricted stock outstanding as of March 31, 2009. The inclusion of this participating security did
not impact previously reported basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six month
periods ended March 31, 2009, and there is no impact for the previously reported quarter ended June
30, 2009, nor for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
15
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following is a reconciliation of net earnings to net earnings per share basic and net
earnings per share diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Woodward
|
|
$
|
24,068
|
|
|
$
|
18,474
|
|
|
$
|
46,424
|
|
|
$
|
45,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
68,436
|
|
|
|
67,824
|
|
|
|
68,398
|
|
|
|
67,810
|
|
Assumed exercise of dilutive stock options
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
1,432
|
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
69,876
|
|
|
|
68,832
|
|
|
|
69,830
|
|
|
|
69,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share attribuable to Woodward
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Woodward
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following stock option grants were outstanding during the three and six month periods
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, but were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share
because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Options
|
|
|
1,102,367
|
|
|
|
1,443,346
|
|
|
|
447,207
|
|
|
|
696,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average option price
|
|
$
|
26.92
|
|
|
$
|
23.05
|
|
|
$
|
32.52
|
|
|
$
|
27.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7. Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
41,595
|
|
|
$
|
44,608
|
|
Work in progress
|
|
|
69,841
|
|
|
|
71,270
|
|
Component parts and finished goods
|
|
|
180,164
|
|
|
|
186,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
291,600
|
|
|
$
|
302,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Note 8. Property, plant, and equipment net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
10,899
|
|
|
$
|
11,231
|
|
Buildings and equipment
|
|
|
176,343
|
|
|
|
178,410
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
326,696
|
|
|
|
336,903
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
22,175
|
|
|
|
16,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536,113
|
|
|
|
542,877
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(339,214
|
)
|
|
|
(333,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
196,899
|
|
|
$
|
208,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
$
|
10,403
|
|
|
$
|
9,298
|
|
|
$
|
20,158
|
|
|
$
|
18,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9. Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Additions /
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
86,565
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
86,565
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
297,412
|
|
|
|
(2,722
|
)
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
294,290
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
17,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,285
|
)
|
|
|
16,448
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
41,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(467
|
)
|
|
|
40,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
442,802
|
|
|
$
|
(2,722
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,152
|
)
|
|
$
|
437,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions and adjustments recorded during the year represent changes in the estimated values
of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in purchase accounting, as described in Note 4,
Business
acquisitions and dispositions.
In addition on August 10, 2009, Woodward HRT sold the F&P product
line for $48,000. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, Woodward received an additional $660
related to working capital adjustments typical in such transactions, which reduced goodwill.
Woodward tests goodwill for impairment on the reporting unit level on an annual basis and more
often if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair
value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The impairment tests consist of comparing the
fair value of reporting units, determined using discounted cash flows, with its carrying amount
including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, Woodward
compares the implied value of goodwill with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of goodwill
exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized to reduce the
carrying amount to its implied fair value. There was no impairment charge recorded in fiscal 2009
or in the first six months of fiscal 2010.
17
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Woodward completed its annual goodwill impairment test during the quarter ended March 31,
2010. Woodward considered the Turbine Systems, Airframe Systems and Engine Systems operating
segments to be reporting units. Woodward evaluated goodwill for the Electrical Power Systems
operating segment through three identified reporting units within the operating segment. The fair
value of Woodwards six reporting units was based on cash flow forecasts which have been updated to
reflect current global economic conditions, including anticipated weakening of global demand for
certain products and forecasts of demand increases anticipated as a result of the economic
recovery. Forecasted cash flows were discounted using an 11.3% weighted average cost of capital
assumption. The terminal value of the forecasted cash flows assumed an annual compound growth rate
after five years of 4.5% and was calculated using the Gordon Growth Model.
The results of Woodwards fiscal 2010 annual goodwill impairment test performed as of March
31, 2010 indicated that no goodwill impairment existed. The estimated fair value of each reporting
units was in excess of its carrying value. At March 31, 2010 the reporting unit with the closest
ratio of estimated fair value to carrying value was Woodwards recently acquired Airframe Systems
reporting unit, which has a significant concentration of business in the presently depressed
business jet and regional jet market segments. Our analysis indicates a premium of over 30%
compared to this reporting units carrying value.
As part of the Companys ongoing monitoring efforts, Woodward will continue to consider the
global economic environment and its potential impact on Woodwards business in assessing goodwill
recoverability. There can be no assurance that Woodwards estimates and assumptions regarding
forecasted cash flows of certain reporting units, or the duration of the current economic downturn,
or the period or strength of the recovery, made for purposes of the annual goodwill impairment test
performed during the second fiscal quarter of 2010, will prove to be accurate predictions of the
future. If Woodwards assumptions are not realized, it is possible that an impairment charge may
need to be recorded in future periods.
18
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Note 10. Other intangibles net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Customer relationships:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
44,327
|
|
|
$
|
(17,485
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,842
|
|
|
$
|
44,327
|
|
|
$
|
(16,746
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,581
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
176,581
|
|
|
|
(7,739
|
)
|
|
|
168,842
|
|
|
|
176,661
|
|
|
|
(2,068
|
)
|
|
|
174,593
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
2,144
|
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
|
|
1,412
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
(676
|
)
|
|
|
1,643
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
20,675
|
|
|
|
(12,647
|
)
|
|
|
8,028
|
|
|
|
20,675
|
|
|
|
(11,718
|
)
|
|
|
8,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
243,727
|
|
|
$
|
(38,603
|
)
|
|
$
|
205,124
|
|
|
$
|
243,982
|
|
|
$
|
(31,208
|
)
|
|
$
|
212,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
7,593
|
|
|
|
(3,275
|
)
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
7,941
|
|
|
|
(3,073
|
)
|
|
|
4,868
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
12,571
|
|
|
|
(6,564
|
)
|
|
|
6,007
|
|
|
|
12,613
|
|
|
|
(6,180
|
)
|
|
|
6,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
20,164
|
|
|
$
|
(9,839
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,325
|
|
|
$
|
20,554
|
|
|
$
|
(9,253
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Process technology:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
11,941
|
|
|
$
|
(4,710
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,231
|
|
|
$
|
11,941
|
|
|
$
|
(4,511
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,430
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
62,941
|
|
|
|
(4,703
|
)
|
|
|
58,238
|
|
|
|
62,981
|
|
|
|
(2,590
|
)
|
|
|
60,391
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
(1,346
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
12,593
|
|
|
|
(4,292
|
)
|
|
|
8,301
|
|
|
|
12,593
|
|
|
|
(3,797
|
)
|
|
|
8,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
87,475
|
|
|
$
|
(13,705
|
)
|
|
$
|
73,770
|
|
|
$
|
88,905
|
|
|
$
|
(12,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
76,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
39,623
|
|
|
|
(21,051
|
)
|
|
|
18,572
|
|
|
|
39,646
|
|
|
|
(14,325
|
)
|
|
|
25,321
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
|
|
(316
|
)
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
41,584
|
|
|
$
|
(21,481
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,103
|
|
|
$
|
41,729
|
|
|
$
|
(14,692
|
)
|
|
$
|
27,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
392,950
|
|
|
$
|
(83,628
|
)
|
|
$
|
309,322
|
|
|
$
|
395,170
|
|
|
$
|
(67,397
|
)
|
|
$
|
327,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
$
|
8,655
|
|
|
$
|
5,055
|
|
|
$
|
17,836
|
|
|
$
|
9,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future amortization expense associated with intangibles is expected to be:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (remaining)
|
|
$
|
25,943
|
|
2011
|
|
|
34,140
|
|
2012
|
|
|
31,335
|
|
2013
|
|
|
29,093
|
|
2014
|
|
|
25,996
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
162,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
309,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Note 11. Long-term debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008 Term loan Variable rate of 2.01% at March 31, 2010, matures October 2013; unsecured
|
|
$
|
91,625
|
|
|
$
|
144,375
|
|
2009 Term loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
Series B Notes 5.63%, due October 2013; unsecured
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Series C Notes 5.92%, due October 2015; unsecured
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Series D Notes 6.39%, due October 2018; unsecured
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Series E Notes 7.81%, due April 2016; unsecured
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
Series F Notes 8.24%, due April 2019; unsecured
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
Senior notes 6.39%, due October 2011; unsecured
|
|
|
21,429
|
|
|
|
32,143
|
|
Term notes 5.95%, due June 2012; secured by land and buildings
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
Fair value hedge adjustment for unrecognized discontinued hedge gains
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463,659
|
|
|
|
572,340
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(18,522
|
)
|
|
|
(45,569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
$
|
445,137
|
|
|
$
|
526,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under certain circumstances, the interest rate on each series of the Series B, C and D
Notes is subject to increase if Woodwards leverage ratio of consolidated net debt to consolidated
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, plus any unusual non-cash charges
to the extent deducted in computing net income minus any unusual non-cash gains to the extent added
in computing net income (Debt Covenant EBITDA) increases beyond a ratio of 3.5 to 1.0.
During the first half of fiscal 2010, Woodward prepaid $33,000 against the 2009 term loan and
$49,000 against the 2008 term loan. Required future principal payments of outstanding long-term
debt as of March 31, 2010, after giving effect to this prepayment, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (remainder)
|
|
$
|
3,855
|
|
2011
|
|
|
18,424
|
|
2012
|
|
|
18,372
|
|
2013
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
2014
|
|
|
165,375
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
463,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current portion of long-term debt includes $98 at March 31, 2010 and $128 at
September 30, 2009 related to the fair value hedge adjustment for unrecognized discontinued hedge
gains.
The 2008 term loan, the 2009 term loan, the Series B, C, D, E and F Notes (together, the
Notes) and the senior notes due October 2011 are held by multiple institutions. The term notes
are held by banks in Germany.
Woodwards obligations under the 2008 term loan, the 2009 term loan, the Notes and the senior
notes due October 2011 are guaranteed by Woodward FST, Inc., MPC Products Corporation and Woodward
HRT, Inc., each of which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Woodward.
Management believes that Woodward was in compliance with its financial debt covenants at March
31, 2010.
2008 and 2009 Term Loans
In October 2008, Woodward entered into a term loan credit agreement (the 2008 Term Loan
Credit Agreement), which provides for an initial $150,000 unsecured term loan facility, and may,
from time to time, be expanded by up to $50,000 of additional indebtedness, subject to the
Companys compliance with certain conditions and the lenders participation. The 2008 Term Loan
Credit Agreement bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.00% to 2.25% and requires quarterly principal
payments of $1,875.
20
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In April 2009, Woodward entered into a term loan credit agreement (the 2009 Term Loan Credit
Agreement and, together with the 2008 Term Loan Credit Agreement, the Term Loan Credit
Agreements), by and among Woodward, the institutions from time to time parties thereto, as
lenders, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as administrative agent. The 2009 Term Loan
Credit Agreement provides for an initial $120,000 unsecured term loan facility, and may be expanded
by up to $50,000 of additional indebtedness from time to time, subject to the Companys compliance
with certain conditions and the lenders participation. The outstanding indebtedness under the 2009
Term Loan Credit Agreement, which generally bore interest at LIBOR plus 2.50% to 3.50%, was
paid-off in full during the quarter ended March 31, 2010. Woodward intends to terminate the 2009
Term Loan Credit Agreement during the quarter ending June 30, 2010.
The Term Loan Credit Agreements contain customary terms and conditions, including, among
others, covenants that place limits on the Companys ability to incur liens on assets, incur
additional debt (including a leverage or coverage based maintenance test), transfer or sell the
Companys assets, merge or consolidate with other persons, make certain investments, make certain
restricted payments, and enter into material transactions with affiliates. The Term Loan Credit
Agreements contain financial covenants requiring that (a) the Companys ratio of consolidated net
debt to Debt Covenant EBITDA, not exceed a ratio of 3.5 to 1.0 and (b) the Company have a minimum
consolidated net worth of $400,000 with respect to the 2008 Term Loan Credit Agreement and $510,000
with respect to the 2009 Term Loan Credit Agreement, plus 50% of net income for any fiscal year and
50% of the net proceeds of certain issuances of capital stock, in each case on a rolling four
quarter basis. The Term Loan Credit Agreements also contain customary events of default, including
certain cross default provisions related to Woodwards other outstanding debt arrangements in
excess of $15,000, the occurrence of which would permit the lenders to accelerate the amounts due
thereunder.
The loans under the Term Loan Credit Agreements can be prepaid, or prepaid and terminated,
without penalty.
Series B, C, D, E and F Notes
In October 2008, Woodward entered into a note purchase agreement (the 2008 Note Purchase
Agreement) relating to the Series B, C and D Notes. In April 2009, Woodward entered into a note
purchase agreement (the 2009 Note Purchase Agreement and, together with the 2008 Note Purchase
Agreement, the Note Purchase Agreements) relating to the Series E and F Notes.
The Notes have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and may not be offered or
sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration
requirements. Holders of the Notes do not have any registration rights.
Woodwards obligations under the Notes rank equal in right of payment with all of Woodwards
other unsecured unsubordinated debt, including its outstanding debt under the Term Loan Credit
Agreements, revolving credit facility (see Note 12,
Line of credit facilities and short-term
borrowing)
and note purchase agreement relating to the senior notes due October 2011.
The Note Purchase Agreements contain customary restrictive covenants, including, among other
things, covenants that place limits on Woodwards ability to incur liens on assets, incur
additional debt (including a leverage or coverage based maintenance test), transfer or sell
Woodwards assets, merge or consolidate with other persons, and enter into material transactions
with affiliates. The Note Purchase Agreements also contain customary events of default, including
certain cross default provisions related to Woodwards other outstanding debt arrangements in
excess of $25,000 with respect to the 2008 Note Purchase Agreement and $30,000 with respect to the
2009 Note Purchase Agreement, the occurrence of which would permit the holders of the respective
Notes to accelerate the amounts due.
The 2008 Note Purchase Agreement contains financial covenants requiring that Woodwards (a)
ratio of consolidated net debt to consolidated Debt Covenant EBITDA not exceed a ratio of 4.0 to
1.0 during any material acquisition period, or a ratio of 3.5 to 1.0 at any other time on a rolling
four quarter basis, and (b) consolidated net worth at any time equal or exceed $425,000 plus 50% of
consolidated net earnings for each fiscal year beginning with the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008. Additionally, under the 2008 Note Purchase Agreement, Woodward may not permit the aggregate
amount of priority debt to at any time to exceed 20% of its consolidated net worth at the end of
the then most recently ended fiscal quarter. Priority debt generally refers to certain unsecured
debt of Woodwards subsidiaries and all debt of Woodward and its subsidiaries secured by liens
other than certain permitted liens.
21
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The 2009 Note Purchase Agreement contains financial covenants requiring that Woodwards (a)
ratio of consolidated net debt to consolidated Debt Covenant EBITDA not exceed a ratio of 3.5 to
1.0 at any time on a rolling four quarter basis, and
(b) consolidated net worth at all times equal or exceed $485,940 plus 50% of consolidated net
earnings for each fiscal year beginning with the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009.
Additionally, under the 2009 Note Purchase Agreement, Woodward may not permit the aggregate amount
of priority debt to at any time exceed 20% of its consolidated net worth at the end of the then
most recently ended fiscal quarter. Priority debt generally refers to certain unsecured debt of
Woodwards subsidiaries and all debt of Woodward and its subsidiaries secured by liens other than
certain permitted liens.
Woodward is permitted at any time, at its option, to prepay all, or from time to time prepay
any part of, the then outstanding principal amount of any series of the Notes at 100% of the
principal amount of the series of the Notes to be prepaid (but, in the case of partial prepayment,
not less than $1,000), together with interest accrued on such amount to be prepaid to the date of
payment, plus any applicable make-whole amount. The make-whole amount is computed by discounting
the remaining scheduled payments of interest and principal of the Notes being prepaid at a discount
rate equal to the sum of 50 basis points and the yield to maturity of U.S. Treasury securities
having a maturity equal to the remaining average life of the Notes being prepaid.
Note 12. Line of credit facilities and short-term borrowings
Woodward has a $225,000 revolving credit facility related to unsecured financing arrangements
with a syndicate of U.S. banks. The revolving credit facility agreement provides for an option to
increase the amount to $350,000, subject to the lenders participation, and has an expiration date
of October 2012. The interest rate on borrowings under the revolving credit facility agreement
varies with LIBOR, the federal funds rate, or the prime rate. The revolving credit facility
agreement contains certain covenants customary with such agreements, which are generally consistent
with the covenants applicable to Woodwards long-term debt agreements, and contains customary
events of default including certain cross default provisions related to Woodwards other
outstanding debt arrangements in excess of $15,000, the occurrence of which would permit the
lenders to accelerate the amounts due thereunder.
Woodward also has various foreign lines of credit and foreign overdraft facilities. The
foreign banking facilities are generally reviewed annually for renewal and are subject to the usual
terms and conditions applied by the banks.
As of March 31, 2010, availability under Woodwards short-term credit facilities follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
letters of
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Borrowing
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
credit
|
|
|
borrowings
|
|
|
availability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
$
|
225,000
|
|
|
$
|
(3,144
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
221,856
|
|
Foreign lines of credit and overdraft facilities
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
231,675
|
|
|
$
|
(3,144
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
228,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodward also has a foreign letter of credit facility in place for the issuance of
performance guarantees. Per the terms of the related facility agreement, this facility is limited
in use to the issuance of performance guarantees. As of March 31, 2010, $5,097 in performance
guarantees was issued against the $9,468 foreign letter of credit facility.
The Company participates in a pooling arrangement whereby certain foreign bank accounts of
Woodward or its subsidiaries may serve as collateral for borrowings by other Woodward subsidiaries
up to the total amounts deposited in the pool.
No borrowings were outstanding under any of Woodwards line of credit or other short-term
credit facilities as of March 31, 2010 or as of September 30, 2009.
Note 13. Derivative instruments and hedging activities
Woodward is exposed to global market risks, including the effect of changes in interest rates,
foreign currency exchange rates, changes in certain commodity prices and fluctuations in various
producer indices. From time to time, Woodward enters into derivative instruments for risk
management purposes only, including derivatives designated as accounting hedges and/or those
utilized as economic hedges. Woodward uses interest rate related derivative instruments to manage
its exposure to fluctuations of interest rates. Woodward does not enter into or issue derivatives
for trading purposes.
By using derivative and/or hedging instruments to manage its risk exposure, Woodward is
subject, from time to time, to credit risk and market risk on those derivative instruments. Credit
risk arises from the potential failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the
derivative and/or hedging instrument. When the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, the
counterparty owes Woodward, which creates credit risk for Woodward. Woodward minimizes this credit
risk by entering
into transactions with only high quality counterparties. Market risk arises from the potential
adverse effects on the value of derivative and/or hedging instruments that result from a change in
interest rates, commodity prices, or foreign currency exchange rates. Woodward minimizes this
market risk by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market
risk that may be undertaken.
22
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Woodward was not a party to any derivative instruments as of March 31, 2010. As of September
30, 2009, Woodward was a party to the forward foreign currency exchange contract described below.
As of September 30, 2008, all previous derivative instruments into which Woodward had entered were
terminated.
In 2001, Woodward entered into treasury lock agreements that were designated as cash flow
hedges of its long-term debt. The discontinuance of these treasury lock agreements resulted in
losses that are recognized as an increase of interest expense over the term of the associated debt
(10 years) using the effective interest method. The unrecognized portion of the loss is recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive earnings.
In 2002, Woodward entered into certain interest rate swaps that were designated as fair value
hedges of its long-term debt. The discontinuance of these interest rate swaps resulted in gains
that are recognized as a reduction of interest expense over the term of the associated debt (10
years) using the effective interest method. The unrecognized portion of the gain is presented as an
adjustment to long-term debt based on the accounting guidance in effect at the time the interest
rate swaps were terminated.
In September 2008, the Company entered into treasury lock agreements with a notional amount
totaling $100,000 that qualified as cash flow hedges under authoritative guidance for derivatives
and hedging. The objective of this derivative instrument was to hedge the risk of variability in
cash flows related to future interest payments of a portion of the anticipated future debt
issuances attributable to changes in the designated benchmark interest rate associated with the
expected issuance of long-term debt. The hedges were terminated prior to September 30, 2008
resulting in a realized gain of approximately $108 and the gain was recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive earnings as of September 30, 2008, net of tax. The realized gain on the termination
of the treasury lock agreements is being recognized as a reduction of interest expense over a
seven-year period on the hedged debt issued on October 1, 2008 using the effective interest method.
In March 2009, Woodward entered into LIBOR lock agreements with a total notional amount of
$50,000 that qualified as cash flow hedges under authoritative guidance for derivatives and
hedging. The objective of this derivative instrument was to hedge the risk of variability in cash
flows over a seven-year period related to future interest payments of a portion of anticipated
future debt issuances attributable to changes in the designated benchmark interest rate associated
with the then expected issuance of long-term debt to acquire HRT. The hedges were terminated in
March 2009, resulting in a loss of $1,308. The realized loss was recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive earnings, net of tax. The realized loss on the terminated LIBOR lock agreements is
being recognized as an increase of interest expense over a seven-year period on the hedged debt,
which was issued on April 3, 2009, using the effective interest method.
In September 2009, Woodward entered into a foreign currency exchange rate contract to purchase
7,900 for approximately $11,662 in early October 2009. The objective of this derivative
instrument, which was not designated as an accounting hedge, was to limit the risk of foreign
currency exchange rates on certain short-term intercompany loan balances. An unrealized loss of
$173 on the derivative instrument was carried at fair market value in Accrued liabilities as of
September 30, 2009. A loss of $71 was realized on the settlement of the forward contract in October
2009.
The following table discloses the remaining unrecognized gains and losses associated with
derivative instruments on Woodwards Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Unrecognized Gain (Loss)
|
|
2001 Treasury lock
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings
|
|
$
|
(115
|
)
|
|
$
|
(171
|
)
|
2002 Interest rate swap
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
2008 Treasury lock
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
2009 LIBOR lock
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings
|
|
|
(1,121
|
)
|
|
|
(1,215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,018
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,096
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative not designated as hedging instrument
|
|
|
|
Recognized Gain (Loss)
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contract
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following tables disclose the impact of derivative instruments on Woodwards
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Expense)
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized in
|
|
in Earnings
|
|
|
OCI on
|
|
|
OCI into
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
on Derivative
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Derivatives in fair value hedging relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Interest rate swap
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 Treasury lock
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
2008 Treasury lock
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
2009 LIBOR lock
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Expense)
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized in
|
|
in Earnings
|
|
|
OCI on
|
|
|
OCI into
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
on Derivative
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Derivatives in fair value hedging relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Interest rate swap
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 Treasury lock
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
2008 Treasury lock
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
2009 LIBOR lock
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
(1,308
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Expense)
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized in
|
|
in Earnings
|
|
|
OCI on
|
|
|
OCI into
|
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
on Derivative
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Derivatives in fair value hedging relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Interest rate swap
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 Treasury lock
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
2008 Treasury lock
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
2009 LIBOR lock
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
Derivative in foreign currency relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contract
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Reclassified
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Expense)
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized
|
|
in Earnings
|
|
|
OCI on
|
|
|
OCI into
|
|
|
|
in Earnings
|
|
on Derivative
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Derivatives in fair value hedging relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Interest rate swap
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 Treasury lock
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
2008 Treasury lock
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
2009 LIBOR lock
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
(1,308
|
)
|
|
$
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the carrying value of the unrecognized gains and losses on terminated derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges as of March 31, 2010, Woodward expects to reclassify
$256 of net unrecognized losses on terminated derivative instruments from accumulated other
comprehensive earnings to earnings during the next twelve months.
Note 14. Accrued liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Salaries and other member benefits
|
|
$
|
26,217
|
|
|
$
|
32,135
|
|
Department of Justice matter (see Note 20)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Current portion of restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
6,477
|
|
|
|
11,619
|
|
Warranties
|
|
|
9,460
|
|
|
|
10,005
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
11,997
|
|
|
|
12,376
|
|
Accrued retirement benefits
|
|
|
2,727
|
|
|
|
2,734
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
15,625
|
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
Taxes, other than income
|
|
|
5,812
|
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
Other
|
|
|
25,635
|
|
|
|
26,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
103,950
|
|
|
$
|
127,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Deferred revenues increased at March 31, 2010 compared to September 30, 2009 due
primarily to a customer prepayment which is expected to be fully earned within one year.
Warranties
Provisions of Woodwards sales agreements include product warranties customary to these types
of agreements. Accruals are established for specifically identified warranty issues that are
probable to result in future costs. Warranty costs are accrued on a non-specific basis whenever
past experience indicates a normal and predictable pattern exists. Changes in accrued product
warranties were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Warranties, September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
10,005
|
|
Increases to accruals related to warranties during the period
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
Settlements of amounts accrued
|
|
|
(3,049
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Warranties, March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
9,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and other charges
The main components of accrued non-acquisition related restructuring charges include workforce
management costs associated with the early retirement and the involuntary seperation of employees
in connection with a strategic realignment of global workforce capacity. Restructuring charges
related to business acquisitions include a number of items such as those associated with
integrating similar operations, workforce management, vacating certain facilities, and the
cancellation of some contracts. During the six months ended March 31, 2010, accrued restructuring
charges were increased by $1,834 to reflect updated estimates of anticipated costs in connection
with the HRT acquisition. The business acquisition related accrued restructuring charges of $6,074
as of March 31, 2010 relate primarily to the planned closing of the Pacoima, California facility as
part of a decision to consolidate HRTs production facilities.
The summary of the activity in accrued restructuring charges during the three and six months
ended March 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Accrued restructuring charges, September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
3,196
|
|
|
$
|
9,668
|
|
|
$
|
12,864
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
(932
|
)
|
|
|
(1,932
|
)
|
Foreign currency exchange rates
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring charges, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
2,187
|
|
|
|
10,136
|
|
|
|
12,323
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(495
|
)
|
|
|
(4,896
|
)
|
|
|
(5,391
|
)
|
Non-cash adjustments
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rates
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring charges, March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
1,390
|
|
|
$
|
6,074
|
|
|
$
|
7,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities as of March 31, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectiely, include $987
and $1,245 of accrued restructuring charges not expected to be settled within twelve months.
26
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Note 15. Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net accrued retirement benefits, less amounts recognized with accrued
liabilities
|
|
$
|
83,812
|
|
|
$
|
83,837
|
|
Uncertain tax positions, net of offsetting benefits, less amounts recognized
with accrued liabities
|
|
|
15,461
|
|
|
|
15,550
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,368
|
|
|
|
10,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
106,641
|
|
|
$
|
110,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 16. Retirement benefits
Woodward provides various benefits to certain current and former employees through defined
benefit plans, retirement healthcare benefit plans and various defined contribution plans.
Eligibility requirements and benefit levels vary depending on employee location. A September 30
measurement date is utilized to value plan assets and obligations for all of Woodwards defined
benefit and retirement healthcare benefit plans.
U.S. GAAP requires that, for obligations outstanding as of September 30, 2009, the funded
status reported in interim periods shall be the same asset or liability recognized in the previous
year-end statement of financial position adjusted for (a) subsequent accruals of net periodic
benefit cost that exclude the amortization of amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive
income (for example, subsequent accruals of service cost, interest cost, and return on plan assets)
and (b) contributions to a funded plan, or benefit payments.
In connection with the acquisition of HRT (see Note 4.
Business acquisitions and
dispositions
), Woodward assumed pension benefit obligations and postretirement healthcare benefit
obligation that contributed to increases in recognized expenses for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2010 compared to the three and six months ended March 31, 2009.
Effective January 1, 2010, the HRT pension plan was amended so that non-bargained HRT
employees hired after December 31, 2009 will not participate in the plan. Also, effective January
1, 2010, non-bargained HRT employees hired before January 1, 2010 will be ineligible for matching
contributions for participation in defined contribution plans. Non-bargained HRT employees hired
after December 31, 2009 will be eligible to fully participate in Woodwards defined contribution
plans.
Effective April 19, 2010, the HRT pension plan was amended so that bargained HRT employees
hired after April 19, 2010 will not participate in the plan. The amendment also included certain
modifications to the calculation of postretirement plan benefit payments to bargained employees
which Woodward expects to result in an increase to projected benefit obligations plan of
approximately $4,000 at the next remeasurement date. Also, effective January 1, 2010, bargained HRT
employees hired before April 19, 2010 will be ineligible for matching contributions for
participation in defined contribution plans. Bargained HRT employees hired after April 18, 2009
will be eligible to fully participate in Woodwards defined contribution plans.
27
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The components of the net periodic pension costs recognized are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Retirement pension benefits
United States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
912
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,824
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
2,445
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,190
|
)
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
(2,380
|
)
|
|
|
(564
|
)
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit
|
|
$
|
1,012
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
2,023
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement pension benefits
other countries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
395
|
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(590
|
)
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
(1,206
|
)
|
|
|
(1,061
|
)
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit
|
|
$
|
376
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
765
|
|
|
$
|
457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
$
|
447
|
|
|
$
|
413
|
|
|
$
|
1,839
|
|
|
$
|
1,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the net periodic retirement healthcare benefit costs recognized are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Retirement healthcare benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
(312
|
)
|
|
|
(808
|
)
|
|
|
(624
|
)
|
|
|
(1,616
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit (cost)
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
|
$
|
(179
|
)
|
|
$
|
571
|
|
|
$
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions
|
|
$
|
911
|
|
|
$
|
1,316
|
|
|
$
|
1,466
|
|
|
$
|
2,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The exact amount of cash contributions made to these plans in any year is dependent upon
a number of factors, including minimum funding requirements in the jurisdictions in which Woodward
operates and arrangements made with trustees of certain foreign plans. As a result, the actual
funding in fiscal 2010 may differ from the current estimate. Woodward estimates its cash
contributions in fiscal 2010 will be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement pension benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
Other countries
|
|
$
|
6,760
|
|
United States
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
Retirement healthcare benefits
|
|
|
2,769
|
|
Note 17. Stock-based compensation
Stock options
Stock option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of Woodwards
stock at the date of grant, and generally with a four-year graded vesting schedule and a term of 10
years.
The fair value of options granted was estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Expected term
|
|
6.5 years
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
6.5 years
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
Estimated volatility
|
|
|
51.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
51.0
|
%
|
|
|
43.0
|
%
|
Estimated dividend yield
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
Weighted-average
forfeiture rate
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
The following is a summary of the activity for stock option awards during the three and
six months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
4,068
|
|
|
$
|
14.48
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
23.18
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
11.54
|
|
Options cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
32.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
4,659
|
|
|
|
15.75
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
26.72
|
|
Options cancelled
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
32.73
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
12.53
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
24.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
4,601
|
|
|
|
15.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Restricted stock
The following is a summary of the activity for restricted stock awards during the three and
six months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Date Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
33.49
|
|
Shares granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Shares vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Shares forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
33.49
|
|
Shares granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Shares vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Shares forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
33.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock shares participate in dividends during the vesting period.
30
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Note 18. Accumulated other comprehensive earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodward
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
29,464
|
|
|
$
|
(221
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,243
|
|
Translation adjustments, net of reclassification to earnings
|
|
|
(13,820
|
)
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
(13,692
|
)
|
Taxes associated with translation adjustments
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
16,493
|
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
16,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated unrealized derivative losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
(801
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(801
|
)
|
Reclassification to interest expense
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
Taxes associated with interest reclassification
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
(714
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(714
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated minimum post-retirement benefit liability adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
(18,534
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,534
|
)
|
Minimum benefit liability adjustment
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
Taxes associated with benefit adjustments
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
(18,286
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,286
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive earnings
|
|
$
|
(2,507
|
)
|
|
$
|
(138
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,645
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodward
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
23,709
|
|
|
$
|
(166
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,543
|
|
Translation adjustments, net of reclassification to earnings
|
|
|
(15,633
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
(15,839
|
)
|
Taxes associated with translation adjustments
|
|
|
(1,529
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(1,454
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
6,547
|
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated unrealized derivative losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
Payments for cash flow hedge, net of deferred tax
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
Reclassification to interest expense
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
Taxes associated with interest reclassification
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
(904
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(904
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated minimum post-retirement benefit liability adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
(3,087
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,087
|
)
|
Minimum benefit liability adjustment
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Taxes associated with benefit adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
(2,878
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,878
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive earnings
|
|
$
|
2,765
|
|
|
$
|
(297
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Note 19. Total comprehensive earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Comprehensive earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Woodward
|
|
$
|
24,068
|
|
|
$
|
18,474
|
|
|
$
|
46,424
|
|
|
$
|
45,538
|
|
Other comprehensive earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net
|
|
|
(10,345
|
)
|
|
|
(10,105
|
)
|
|
|
(12,971
|
)
|
|
|
(17,162
|
)
|
Reclassification of unrealized losses on derivatives
to earnings
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Payments for cash flow hedge, net of deferred tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive earnings attributable to Woodward
|
|
$
|
14,005
|
|
|
$
|
7,895
|
|
|
$
|
33,788
|
|
|
$
|
27,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive earnings attributable to
noncontrolling interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive earnings attributable to
noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive earnings
|
|
$
|
14,154
|
|
|
$
|
7,862
|
|
|
$
|
34,069
|
|
|
$
|
27,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 20. Commitments and contingencies
Woodward is currently involved in claims, pending or threatened litigation or other legal
proceedings, or regulatory proceedings arising in the normal course of business, including, among
others, those relating to product liability claims, employment matters, workers compensation
claims, contractual disputes, product warranty claims and alleged violations of various
environmental laws. Woodward has accrued for individual matters that it believes are likely to
result in a loss when ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely amount of loss.
Woodward is partially self-insured in the U.S. for healthcare and workers compensation up to
predetermined amounts, above which third party insurance applies. Management regularly reviews the
probable outcome of these claims and proceedings, the expenses expected to be incurred, the
availability and limits of the insurance coverage, and the established accruals for liabilities.
While the outcome of pending claims and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty,
management believes that any liabilities that may result from these claims and proceedings will not
have a material adverse effect on its liquidity, financial condition, or results of operations.
In addition, MPC Products Corporation (MPC Products), one of Woodwards subsidiaries
acquired in fiscal year 2009, was previously subject to an investigation by the Department of
Justice (DOJ) regarding certain of its government contract pricing practices prior to June 2005,
and related administrative actions by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). In October 2009, MPC
Products reached an agreement with the DOJ to resolve the criminal and civil claims related to the
investigation. As part of the settlement of the civil claims, MPC Products paid approximately
$22,500 in compensation. The civil settlement was approved by the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Illinois (the District Court) on October 7, 2009. In connection with the
settlement of the criminal claims, on November 4, 2009, MPC Products pled guilty to one count of
wire fraud related to its pre-June 2005 government contract pricing practices, and paid a fine of
$2,500. Pursuant to the plea agreement, MPC Products was also placed on probation for two years.
The criminal case plea agreement and sentencing were approved by the District Court in November
2009, concluding the DOJs investigation of these matters.
On October 7, 2009, Woodward and MPC Products entered into a three-year administrative
agreement with the DOD. The administrative agreement lifted a suspension, which was in place from
July 8, 2009 until October 7, 2009, of MPC Products from receiving new government contracts.
Accordingly, MPC Products is again fully eligible to bid, receive and perform on U.S. government
contracts. The administrative agreement requires, among other things, that Woodward and its
affiliates, including MPC Products, implement certain enhancements to existing ethics and
compliance programs and make periodic reports to the DOD. Woodward and its affiliates have been
implementing these enhancements and furnishing reports as required by the administrative agreement.
32
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The purchase price Woodward paid in connection with the acquisition of MPC Products was
reduced by $25,000 at the time of the acquisition, which represents the amounts discussed above.
Payment of this amount during the six months ended March 31, 2010 is reflected as an investing
activity in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
In connection with the sale of the F&P product line during fiscal 2009, Woodward intends to
assign to a subsidiary of the purchaser its rights and responsibilities related to certain
contracts with the U.S. Government. As is customary and as requested by the U.S. Government,
Woodward expects to guarantee to the U.S. Government the purchasers subsidiarys obligations under
the contracts. The purchaser has agreed to indemnify Woodward for any liability incurred with
respect to the guarantee.
In the event of a change in control of Woodward, as defined in change-in-control agreements
with its current corporate officers, Woodward may be required to pay termination benefits to such
officers.
Note 21. Financial instruments
The estimated fair values of Woodwards financial instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
72,560
|
|
|
$
|
72,560
|
|
|
$
|
100,863
|
|
|
$
|
100,863
|
|
Investments in deferred compensation
program
|
|
|
5,916
|
|
|
|
5,916
|
|
|
|
5,331
|
|
|
|
5,331
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
|
(513,982
|
)
|
|
|
(463,526
|
)
|
|
|
(588,229
|
)
|
|
|
(572,142
|
)
|
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, which include investments in money market
funds and short-term borrowings at variable interest rates, are assumed to be equal to their
carrying amounts. Cash and cash equivalents have short-term maturities and market interest rates.
Woodwards cash and cash equivalents include funds deposited or invested in the U.S. and overseas
that are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Woodward believes that
its deposited and invested funds are held by or invested with credit worthy financial institutions
or counterparties and that the funds are highly liquid.
Investments related to the deferred compensation program used to provide deferred compensation
benefits to certain employees are assumed to be equal to their carrying amounts because the assets
are marked to market value each reporting period.
The fair value of long-term debt at fixed interest rates was estimated based on a model that
discounted future principal and interest payments at interest rates available to the Company at the
end of the period for similar debt of the same maturity. The weighted-average interest rates used
to estimate the fair value of long-term debt at fixed interest rates were 3.6% at March 31, 2010
and 4.8% at September 30, 2009.
Note 22. Fair value measurements
Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet are categorized based upon a fair value hierarchy established by U.S. GAAP, which prioritizes
the inputs used to measure fair value into the following levels:
|
|
Level 1: Inputs based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities at the measurement date.
|
|
|
Level 2: Quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in
markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable and can be corroborated by
observable market data.
|
|
|
Level 3: Inputs reflect managements best estimates and assumptions of what market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable
in the market and significant to the valuation of the instruments.
|
33
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table presents information about Woodwards financial assets and liabilities
that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the
valuation techniques Woodward utilized to determine such fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in money
market funds
|
|
$
|
2,690
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,690
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
5,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets
|
|
$
|
8,606
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in money
market funds
|
|
$
|
20,130
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,130
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
5,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets
|
|
$
|
25,461
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward
contract
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in money market funds:
Woodward sometimes invests excess cash in money market
funds not insured by the FDIC. Woodward believes that the investments in money market funds are on
deposit with credit worthy financial institutions and that the funds are highly liquid. The
investments in money market funds are reported at fair value, with realized gains from interest
income realized in earnings and are included in Cash and cash equivalents. The fair values of
Woodwards investments in money market funds are based on the quoted market prices for the net
asset value of the various money market funds.
Trading securities:
Woodward holds marketable equity securities, through investments in
various mutual funds, related to its deferred compensation program. Based on Woodwards intentions
regarding these instruments, marketable equity securities are classified as trading securities. The
trading securities are reported at fair value, with realized gains and losses recognized in
earnings. The trading securities are included in Other current assets. The fair values of
Woodwards trading securities are based on the quoted market prices for the net asset value of the
various mutual funds.
Forward contract:
As of September 30, 2009, Woodward was a party to a forward contract. The
value of the unrealized loss on the derivative instrument, which was classified as an accrued
liability, was derived from published foreign currency exchange rates as of September 30, 2009.
Note 23. Segment information
Segment profit is determined based on internal performance measures used by the Chief
Executive Officer to assess the performance of each business in a given period. In connection with
that assessment, the Chief Executive Officer excludes matters such as charges for restructuring
costs, interest income and expense, and certain gains and losses from asset dispositions.
To provide better focus and alignment of its business segment operations, Woodward moved the
development and manufacture of systems and components for steam turbine markets from Engine Systems
to Turbine Systems in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2009. All segment information for the three and six months ended March 31,
2009, have been recast to reflect the realigned segment structure.
34
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
A summary of consolidated net sales follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Segment net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External net sales
|
|
$
|
144,844
|
|
|
$
|
164,571
|
|
|
$
|
284,930
|
|
|
$
|
316,853
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
2,269
|
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
4,599
|
|
|
|
8,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net sales
|
|
|
147,113
|
|
|
|
168,043
|
|
|
|
289,529
|
|
|
|
324,862
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External net sales
|
|
|
90,260
|
|
|
|
50,909
|
|
|
|
181,309
|
|
|
|
102,569
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net sales
|
|
|
90,873
|
|
|
|
51,610
|
|
|
|
182,600
|
|
|
|
103,928
|
|
Electrical Power
Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External net sales
|
|
|
43,664
|
|
|
|
45,221
|
|
|
|
92,545
|
|
|
|
93,138
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
10,863
|
|
|
|
13,300
|
|
|
|
18,785
|
|
|
|
27,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net sales
|
|
|
54,527
|
|
|
|
58,521
|
|
|
|
111,330
|
|
|
|
120,363
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External net sales
|
|
|
70,584
|
|
|
|
73,960
|
|
|
|
129,876
|
|
|
|
166,845
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
7,639
|
|
|
|
11,274
|
|
|
|
16,226
|
|
|
|
23,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net sales
|
|
|
78,223
|
|
|
|
85,234
|
|
|
|
146,102
|
|
|
|
190,528
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External net sales
|
|
|
349,352
|
|
|
|
334,661
|
|
|
|
688,660
|
|
|
|
679,405
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
21,384
|
|
|
|
28,747
|
|
|
|
40,901
|
|
|
|
60,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net sales
|
|
$
|
370,736
|
|
|
$
|
363,408
|
|
|
$
|
729,561
|
|
|
$
|
739,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of consolidated earnings follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Segment earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
32,355
|
|
|
$
|
37,635
|
|
|
$
|
64,429
|
|
|
$
|
70,879
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
4,976
|
|
|
|
3,233
|
|
|
|
7,385
|
|
|
|
5,034
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
4,859
|
|
|
|
9,137
|
|
|
|
12,182
|
|
|
|
18,303
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
6,147
|
|
|
|
4,882
|
|
|
|
9,382
|
|
|
|
12,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment earnings
|
|
|
48,337
|
|
|
|
54,887
|
|
|
|
93,378
|
|
|
|
106,684
|
|
Nonsegment expenses
|
|
|
(5,315
|
)
|
|
|
(23,546
|
)
|
|
|
(10,725
|
)
|
|
|
(31,310
|
)
|
Interest expense and income, net
|
|
|
(7,204
|
)
|
|
|
(6,486
|
)
|
|
|
(15,345
|
)
|
|
|
(12,361
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated earnings before
income taxes
|
|
$
|
35,818
|
|
|
$
|
24,855
|
|
|
$
|
67,308
|
|
|
$
|
63,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Woodward Governor Company
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Segment assets consist of accounts receivable, inventories, property, plant and equipment
- net, goodwill, and other intangibles net. A summary of consolidated total assets follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Segment assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
338,437
|
|
|
$
|
344,789
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
759,789
|
|
|
|
801,300
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
134,603
|
|
|
|
135,808
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
189,532
|
|
|
|
200,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets
|
|
|
1,422,361
|
|
|
|
1,482,123
|
|
Unallocated corporate property, plant, and
equipment, net
|
|
|
7,141
|
|
|
|
6,857
|
|
Other unallocated assets
|
|
|
168,836
|
|
|
|
207,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets
|
|
$
|
1,598,338
|
|
|
$
|
1,696,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 24. Subsequent events
On April 21, 2010, Woodwards Board of Directors approved the purchase by Woodward of the 26%
noncontrolling interest in Woodward Governor India Limited, a Woodward consolidated subsidiary, for
approximately $8,000. Upon completion of the transaction, Woodward will own 100% of Woodward
Governor India Limited. The transaction is expected to be completed during the fiscal quarter
ending June 30, 2010.
On April 21, 2010, Woodwards Board of Directors also approved a quarterly cash dividend of
$0.06 per share, payable on June 1, 2010 to shareholders of record as of May 18, 2010.
36
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements regarding
future events and our future results within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that are deemed
forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates,
forecasts, and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions
of management. Words such as anticipate, believe, estimate, seek, goal, expect,
forecasts, intend, continue, outlook, plan, project, target, can, could, may,
should, will, would, variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to
identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of
our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses, and other
characteristics of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements may include, among others, statements relating to:
|
|
|
future sales, earnings, cash flow, uses of cash, and other measures of financial
performance;
|
|
|
|
|
description of our plans and expectations for future operations;
|
|
|
|
|
the effect of economic downturns or growth in particular regions;
|
|
|
|
|
the effect of changes in the level of activity in particular industries or markets;
|
|
|
|
|
the availability and cost of materials, components, services, and supplies;
|
|
|
|
|
the scope, nature, or impact of acquisition activity and integration into our
businesses;
|
|
|
|
|
the development, production, and support of advanced technologies and new products and
services;
|
|
|
|
|
new business opportunities;
|
|
|
|
|
restructuring costs and savings;
|
|
|
|
|
our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions with respect to recent acquisitions
and expected business opportunities that may be available to us;
|
|
|
|
|
the outcome of contingencies;
|
|
|
|
|
future repurchases of common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
future levels of indebtedness and capital spending; and
|
|
|
|
|
pension plan assumptions and future contributions.
|
Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are
subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict, including:
|
|
|
a decline in business with, or financial distress of, our significant customers;
|
|
|
|
|
the continued instability in the financial markets and prolonged unfavorable economic
and other industry conditions;
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain financing, on acceptable terms or at all, to implement our
business plans, complete acquisitions, or otherwise take advantage of business
opportunities or respond to business pressures;
|
|
|
|
|
the long sales cycle, customer evaluation process, and implementation period of some of
our products and services;
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to implement, and realize the intended effects of, our restructuring
efforts;
|
|
|
|
|
any failure to fully comply, to the U.S. Governments satisfaction, with any of the
terms of the civil and criminal settlements related to the U.S. Department of Justice
(DOJ) investigation of the pre-June 2005 government contract pricing practices of MPC
Products Corporation (MPC Products) and the related administrative agreement with the
U.S. Department of Defense (DOD);
|
37
|
|
|
our ability to successfully manage competitive factors, including prices, promotional
incentives, industry consolidation, and commodity and other input cost increases;
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to reduce our expenses in proportion to any sales shortfalls;
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of our subcontractors to perform contractual obligations and our suppliers
to provide us with materials of sufficient quality or quantity required to meet our
production needs at favorable prices or at all;
|
|
|
|
|
the success of, or expenses associated with, our product development activities;
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to integrate acquisitions and manage costs related thereto;
|
|
|
|
|
our substantial debt obligations, our debt service requirements, and our ability to
operate our business, pursue business strategies and incur additional debt in the light of
covenants contained in our outstanding debt agreements;
|
|
|
|
|
future impairment charges resulting from changes in the estimates of fair value of
reporting units or of long-lived assets;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in domestic or international tax statutes;
|
|
|
|
|
changes in future subsidiary results;
|
|
|
|
|
environmental liabilities related to manufacturing activities;
|
|
|
|
|
our continued access to a stable workforce and favorable labor relations with our
employees;
|
|
|
|
|
the geographical location of a significant portion of the Woodward HRT business in
California, which historically has been susceptible to natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully manage regulatory, tax, and legal matters (including
government contracting, product liability, patent, and intellectual property matters);
|
|
|
|
|
risks from operating internationally, including the impact on reported earnings from
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, and changes in the legal and regulatory
environments of countries in which we operate; and
|
|
|
|
|
certain provisions of our charter documents and Delaware law that could discourage or
prevent others from acquiring our company.
|
These factors are representative of the risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that could cause
actual outcomes and results to differ materially from what is expressed or forecast in our
forward-looking statements. Other factors are discussed under Risk Factors in our Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and are incorporated by reference.
Therefore, actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any
forward-looking statements. For additional information regarding factors that may affect our actual
financial condition and results of operations, see the information under the caption Risk Factors
in Item 1A in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2009. We undertake no
obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.
Unless we have indicated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references in this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
to Woodward, the Company, we, us, and our refer to
Woodward Governor Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Amounts presented in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
are in thousands except per share
amounts.
OVERVIEW
We are an independent designer, manufacturer, and service provider of energy control and
optimization solutions for commercial and military aircraft and ground vehicles, turbines,
reciprocating engines, and electrical power system equipment. Our innovative fluid energy,
combustion control, electrical energy, and motion control systems help customers offer cleaner,
more reliable and more cost-effective equipment. Leading original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)
use our products and services in the aerospace, power generation and distribution, and
transportation markets.
Our strategic focus is energy control and optimization solutions. The control of energy,
including fluid and electrical energy, combustion, and motion, is a growing requirement in the
markets we serve. Our customers look to us to optimize the efficiency, emissions, and operation of
power equipment in both commercial and military operations. Our core technologies leverage well
across our markets and customer applications, enabling us to develop and integrate cost-effective
and state-of-
the-art fuel, combustion, fluid, actuation and electronic systems. We focus primarily on OEMs
and equipment packagers, partnering with them to bring superior component and system solutions to
their demanding applications.
38
We have four operating business segments Turbine Systems, Airframe Systems, Electrical Power
Systems and Engine Systems:
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
develops and manufactures systems and components that provide energy
control and optimization solutions for aircraft propulsion applications, including fuel and
combustion systems for turbine engines, as well as industrial gas and steam turbine
markets.
|
|
|
|
|
Airframe Systems
develops and manufactures high-performance cockpit, electromechanical
and hydraulic motion control systems, and mission-critical actuation systems and controls
for weapons, aircraft, turbine engines, and combat vehicles, primarily for aerospace and
military applications.
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
develops and manufactures systems and components that provide
power sensing and energy control systems that improve the security, quality, reliability
and availability of electrical power networks for industrial markets, which include the
power generation, power distribution, and power conversion industries.
|
|
|
|
|
Engine Systems
develops and manufactures systems and components that provide energy
control and optimization solutions for the industrial engine markets, which include the
power generation, transportation and process industries.
|
To provide better focus and alignment of our business segment operations, we moved the
development and manufacture of systems and components for steam turbine markets from Engine Systems
to Turbine Systems in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. All segment information for the three and
six months ended March 31, 2009 have been recast to reflect the realigned segment structure.
We use segment information internally to assess the performance of each segment and to make
decisions on the allocation of resources.
This discussion should be read together with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contained in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2009, and the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and
Notes included in this report. Financial information for the acquired HRT business is reflected in
our financial statements from the April 3, 2009 acquisition date. As a result of this acquisition,
a comparison of results for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 to the three and six
months ended March 31, 2009 may not be particularly meaningful.
References to organic net sales, segment earnings or EBIT refer to financial information of
Woodward businesses excluding the business acquired in the HRT acquisition, which has been
integrated into Woodward within the Airframe Systems business segment.
References to net earnings represent net earnings attributable to Woodward Governor Company.
Non-U.S. GAAP Financial Measures
Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT), earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA) and free cash flow are financial measures not prepared and presented in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S.
GAAP). Management uses EBIT to evaluate Woodwards performance without financing and tax related
considerations, as these elements may not fluctuate with operating results. Management uses EBITDA
in evaluating Woodwards operating performance, making business decisions, including developing
budgets, managing expenditures, and forecasting future periods, and evaluating capital structure
impacts of various strategic scenarios. Management uses free cash flow, which is derived from
cash flows provided by operating activities, in reviewing the financial performance of Woodwards
various business segments and evaluating cash levels. Securities analysts, investors, and others
frequently use EBIT, EBITDA and free cash flow in their evaluation of companies, particularly those
with significant property, plant, and equipment, and intangible assets that are subject to
amortization. The use of these non-U.S. GAAP financial measures is not intended to be considered in
isolation of, or as a substitute for, the financial information prepared and presented in
accordance with U.S. GAAP. As EBIT and EBITDA exclude certain financial information compared with
net earnings, the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure, users of this financial information
should consider the information that is excluded. Free cash flow does not necessarily represent
funds available for discretionary use and is not necessarily a measure of our ability to fund our
cash needs. Our calculations of EBIT, EBITDA and free cash flow may differ from similarly titled
measures used by other companies, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures.
39
EBIT and EBITDA for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
24,176
|
|
|
$
|
18,522
|
|
|
$
|
46,622
|
|
|
$
|
45,625
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
11,642
|
|
|
|
6,333
|
|
|
|
20,686
|
|
|
|
17,388
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,324
|
|
|
|
6,707
|
|
|
|
15,575
|
|
|
|
13,244
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
(883
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
43,022
|
|
|
|
31,341
|
|
|
|
82,653
|
|
|
|
75,374
|
|
Amortization of
intangible assets
|
|
|
8,655
|
|
|
|
5,055
|
|
|
|
17,836
|
|
|
|
9,883
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
10,403
|
|
|
|
9,298
|
|
|
|
20,158
|
|
|
|
18,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
62,080
|
|
|
$
|
45,694
|
|
|
$
|
120,647
|
|
|
$
|
103,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic EBIT for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
EBIT
|
|
$
|
43,022
|
|
|
$
|
31,341
|
|
|
$
|
82,653
|
|
|
$
|
75,374
|
|
Less: HRT operating
income
|
|
|
(8,297
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,397
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic EBIT
|
|
$
|
34,725
|
|
|
$
|
31,341
|
|
|
$
|
68,256
|
|
|
$
|
75,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
125,981
|
|
|
$
|
51,826
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(14,136
|
)
|
|
|
(15,354
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow
|
|
$
|
111,845
|
|
|
$
|
36,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Highlights
Net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were $349,352, which was an increase of 4.4%
from $334,661 for the second quarter of the prior year. Without the effects of foreign currency
exchange rates, net sales for the current quarter would have been approximately $5,300 lower
compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Organic net sales were down $44,438, or 13.3%, for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009.
EBIT for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $43,022, up 37.3% from $31,341 in the same
period of fiscal 2009. EBIT was significantly impacted by organic sales volume declines across all
our business segments, partially offset by savings resulting from cost reduction actions primarily
taken in fiscal 2009 and the impact of the acquisition of HRT.
Organic EBIT increased $3,384 or 10.8% to $34,725 for the three months ended March 31, 2010
from $31,341 in the same period in fiscal 2009. Organic EBIT in the second quarter of 2009 included
pretax special charges of $16,605.
Net earnings for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were $24,068, or $0.34 per diluted share,
compared to $18,474, or $0.27 per diluted share, for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The results
of operations in the second quarter of 2009 included pretax special charges to expense of $16,605,
or $0.16 per share.
40
Year To Date Highlights
Net sales for the six months ended March 31, 2010 were $688,660, an increase of 1.4% from
$679,405 for the same period of the prior year. Without the effects of foreign currency exchange
rates, net sales for the six month period would have been approximately $14,200 lower compared to
the same period in fiscal 2009.
Organic net sales were down $108,074, or 15.9%, for the six months ended March 31, 2010,
compared to the six months ended March 31, 2009.
EBIT for the six months ended March 31, 2010 was $82,653, up 9.7% from $75,374 in the same
period of fiscal 2009. EBIT was significantly impacted by organic sales volume declines across all
our business segments, partially offset by savings resulting from cost reduction actions primarily
taken in fiscal 2009 and the impact of the acquisition of HRT.
Organic EBIT for the six months ended March 31, 2010 decreased to $68,256 for the six months
ended March 31, 2010 from $75,374 in the same period in fiscal 2009.
Year to date net earnings for the six months ended March 31, 2010 were $46,424, or $0.66 per
diluted share, compared to $45,538, or $0.66 per diluted share, in the same period in fiscal 2009.
Excluding the impact of special charges recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2009, year
to date earnings per share for the six months ended March 31, 2009 were $0.82.
At March 31, 2010, our total assets were $1,598,338, including $72,560 in cash and cash
equivalents, and our total debt was $463,659. During the six months ended March 31, 2010, we paid
$108,569 of long-term debt through scheduled and unscheduled repayments. As of March 31, 2010, we
had borrowing availability of $221,856 under our $225,000 revolving credit facility, net of
outstanding letters of credit.
The results for the six months ended March 31, 2010 reflect our continued focus on generating
cash from operations, which allowed us to prepay $82,000 in long-term debt during the period. Net
cash provided by operating activities for the six month period was $125,981 compared to $51,826 for
the same period in fiscal 2009, reflecting lower levels of inventories and receivables, and lower
payments for liabilities, including variable compensation payments, compared to the prior year
period.
Free cash flows for the six months ended March 31, 2010 were $111,845, up 206.7% from the same
period in fiscal 2009. EBITDA increased by $16,915, or 16.3% during the six months ended March 31,
2010 compared to the same period in fiscal 2009, from $103,732 to $120,647.
We believe liquidity and cash generation are important to our strategy of self-funding our
ongoing operating needs. We also believe that the restructuring actions we implemented in fiscal
2009 have generated, and will continue to generate, improved cash flows from operations and that
this level of cash generation, together with our existing cash and available borrowings,
will adequately support our ongoing operations.
41
Results of Operations
Net Sales
The following table presents the breakdown of consolidated net sales by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Segment net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
147,113
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
$
|
168,043
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
$
|
289,529
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
$
|
324,862
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
90,873
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
51,610
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
182,600
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
103,928
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
54,527
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
58,521
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
111,330
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
120,363
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
78,223
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
85,234
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
146,102
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
190,528
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment net sales
|
|
|
370,736
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
363,408
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
729,561
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
739,681
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Less intersegment net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
|
(2,269
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3,472
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4,599
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(8,009
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
(613
|
)
|
|
|
(0
|
)
|
|
|
(701
|
)
|
|
|
(0
|
)
|
|
|
(1,291
|
)
|
|
|
(0
|
)
|
|
|
(1,359
|
)
|
|
|
(0
|
)
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
(10,863
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(13,300
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(18,785
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(27,225
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
(7,639
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(11,274
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(16,226
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(23,683
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net external sales
|
|
$
|
349,352
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
334,661
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
688,660
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
679,405
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net external sales for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010
increased by $14,691, or 4.4%, and $9,255, or 1.4%, respectively, compared to the same periods in
fiscal 2009. Details of the changes in consolidated net external sales are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month
|
|
|
Six Month
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Consolidated net external sales at March 31,
2009
|
|
$
|
334,661
|
|
|
$
|
679,405
|
|
Acquisition of HRT
|
|
|
59,129
|
|
|
|
117,329
|
|
Turbine Systems volume changes
|
|
|
(22,391
|
)
|
|
|
(36,945
|
)
|
Airframe Systems volume changes
|
|
|
(19,778
|
)
|
|
|
(38,589
|
)
|
Electrical Power Systems volume changes
|
|
|
(4,148
|
)
|
|
|
(7,624
|
)
|
Engine Systems volume changes
|
|
|
(5,293
|
)
|
|
|
(41,327
|
)
|
Price changes and sales mix
|
|
|
1,843
|
|
|
|
2,190
|
|
Effects of changes in foreign currency
|
|
|
5,329
|
|
|
|
14,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net external sales at March 31,
2010
|
|
$
|
349,352
|
|
|
$
|
688,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales increases associated with the acquisition of HRT in April 2009 partially offset
organic sales volume decreases. Total organic net sales decreased $44,438, or 13.3%, and $108,074,
or 15.9%, for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010 compared to the three and six
month periods ended March 31, 2009. Organic net sales declined primarily due
to volume changes across all of our segments of $51,610 and $124,485 for the three and six
month periods ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same periods in 2009.
As part of their component and system offerings, Turbine Systems and Engine Systems sell
electronic controls manufactured by Electrical Power Systems. Engine Systems also manufactures
certain components of larger systems ultimately sold by Turbine Systems. These intersegment
activities have historically increased growth in our Turbine Systems and Engine Systems segments.
Further integration of our Airframe Systems segment is also expected to result in the manufacture
of additional electronic controls by Electrical Power Systems.
Turbine Systems segment net sales
(including intersegment sales) were $147,113 and $289,529
for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $168,043 and $324,862 in the same
periods of fiscal 2009. While we believe our experience is largely consistent with underlying
economic market trends, we also believe the fleet dynamics of platforms on which we have content,
such as Airbus A320 and Boeing 777, have allowed us to be somewhat less negatively impacted by the
effects of the current economic down-cycle than some of our competitors. Primary impacts of the
down-cycle have included slowing deliveries of business and regional jets, industrial
aeroderivative gas turbines and industrial heavy frame gas turbines. Commercial aircraft deliveries
of narrow-body and large-body aircraft and military sales have remained relatively stable, although
order patterns have fluctuated.
42
Year-over-year declines were experienced in both the aerospace and industrial markets. The
continuing impact of the global recession has resulted in excess temporary supplies of electricity
in certain markets, which has contributed to reduced sales volumes of industrial gas and steam
turbines. Also, uncertainty caused by the delay in issuance of new emissions standards in the U.S.
continues to dampen customer demand.
Airframe Systems segment net sales
(including intersegment sales) were $90,873 and $182,600
for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010 compared to $51,610 and $103,928 in the
same periods of fiscal 2009.
On April 3, 2009, we acquired HRT and we have integrated this business into Woodward, and more
specifically into our Airframe Systems segment. HRT net sales of $59,129 and $117,329 in the three
and six month periods ended March 31, 2010 were down slightly compared to the same pre-acquisition
periods in fiscal 2009 due to modest declines in our rotorcraft, military aircraft, military
ground, and certain other markets.
Airframe Systems organic net sales for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 were
down 38.8% and 37.6% compared to the three and six months ended March 31, 2009. The sales decline
in the organic business was primarily due to continued production softness in the overall regional
and business jet OEM and aftermarket markets, coupled with reduced utilization of various platforms
supplied by Airframe Systems to airframers. The sales decline was also impacted by reduced demand
on various electro-optical programs to which we have significant exposure. Aftermarket net sales
continued to experience slight declines due to passenger and cargo carriers removing planes from
service.
Electrical Power Systems segment net sales
(including intersegment sales) were $54,527 and
$111,330 for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010, compared to $58,521 and $120,363
in the same periods a year ago. Without the effects of foreign currency exchange rates, net sales
for the current three and six month periods would have been approximately $2,800 and $8,600 lower
compared to the same periods ended March 31, 2009. Decreased sales of wind turbine converters were
partially offset by increases in non-wind related power generation and distribution equipment.
Intersegment sales declined $2,437 and $8,440 during the three and six month periods ended
March 31, 2010 to $10,863 and $18,785, respectively, compared to the three and six month periods
ended March 31, 2009. The intersegment sales declines reflect weakness in demand for industrial gas
turbine and reciprocating engines used in power generation applications.
Wind converter sales declined in the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to
the same periods of fiscal 2009. During the first three quarters of fiscal 2009, Electrical Power
Systems experienced growth in demand for wind converters, but saw a significant decrease in demand
during the second half of fiscal 2009, which has continued during the first six months of fiscal
2010. Wind converter demand continues to be impacted by tighter lender requirements for project
financing as well as delays in finalizing government subsidy programs in the U.S. and elsewhere.
During the second half of fiscal 2009 demand for our non-wind power generation and
distribution equipment and services declined. Demand for these products was up slightly in the
three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period of fiscal 2009.
Engine Systems segment net sales
(including intersegment sales) were $78,223 and $146,102 for
the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $85,234 and $190,528 in the same periods
of fiscal 2009. However, sales for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were up $10,344 from
$67,879 in the three months ended December 31, 2009.
Although sales of short-cycle engine control products supporting the construction and
alternative-fuel vehicle markets have shown improvements, the lower year-over-year sales levels
were primarily attributable to continued declines in large engine applications which serve the
marine and power generation markets.
Price changes and sales mix:
Selling price increases across several products in Turbine
Systems and Engine Systems were in response to prevailing market conditions, partially offset by
price decreases and changes in sales mix by customer in Electrical Power Systems.
Foreign currency exchange rates:
Our worldwide sales activities are primarily denominated in
U.S. dollars (USD), European Monetary Units (the Euro), Great Britain pounds (GBP) and
Chinese Yuan (CNY). As the USD, Euro and GBP fluctuate against each other and other currencies,
we are exposed to gains or losses on sales transactions. If CNY, which has not fluctuated against
other currencies in 2009 or 2010, is allowed to fluctuate against other currencies in the future,
we would be exposed to gains or losses on sales transactions denominated in CNY.
During the first three and six months of fiscal 2010, our organic net sales were positively
impacted by approximately $5,300 and $14,200 due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates,
compared to the same periods of fiscal 2009.
43
Costs and Expenses
The following table presents costs and expenses in relation to net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
349,352
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
334,661
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
688,660
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
679,405
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$
|
244,316
|
|
|
|
69.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
235,539
|
|
|
|
70.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
483,868
|
|
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
479,825
|
|
|
|
70.6
|
%
|
Selling, general, and
administrative
expenses
|
|
|
34,130
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
29,093
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
66,965
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
61,553
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
Research and development
costs
|
|
|
19,698
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
18,796
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
38,012
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
37,880
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Amortization of intangible
assets
|
|
|
8,655
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
5,055
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
17,836
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
9,883
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Restructuring and other
charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,159
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
15,159
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
(593
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1,057
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1,252
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Interest and other expenses
|
|
|
7,328
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
6,723
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
15,728
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
13,344
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated costs and
expenses
|
|
$
|
313,534
|
|
|
|
89.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
309,806
|
|
|
|
92.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
621,352
|
|
|
|
90.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
616,392
|
|
|
|
90.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
decreased to $244,316, or 69.9% of sales, in the three months ended March
31, 2010 from $235,539, or 70.4% of sales, in the three months ended March 31, 2009. Cost of goods
sold decreased to $483,868, or 70.3% of sales, in the six months ended March 31, 2010 from
$479,825, or 70.6% of sales, for the six months ended March 31, 2009.
Correspondingly, gross margins (as measured by net sales less cost of goods sold divided by
net sales) increased to 30.1% and 29.7% for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010, compared
to 29.6% and 29.4% for the same periods last year, largely as a result of our focus on cost
control.
During the three and six month periods ending March 31, 2010, cost of goods sold increased by
approximately $3,700 and $9,800 due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, compared to the
same period of fiscal 2009.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
increased as a percent of sales to 9.8% and 9.7%
for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to 8.7% and 9.1% in the same periods
of fiscal 2009. Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2010 increased $5,037 and $5,412 compared with the same periods of fiscal 2009,
reflecting the addition of the related expenses of the HRT business and higher variable
compensation accruals compared to amounts recorded in the same periods in the prior year, partially
offset by the impact of cost reduction efforts taken during fiscal 2009.
Research and development costs
as a percent of sales were 5.6% and 5.5% for the three and six
month periods ended March 31, 2010 compared to 5.6% for both periods in fiscal 2009. Research and
development costs increased $902 and $132 for the three and six months ended March 31, 2010
compared to the same periods in the prior year. Results for the three and six month periods ended
March 31, 2010 reflect the impact of the acquisition of HRT offset by reduced workforce resulting
from fiscal 2009 restructuring activities, when compared to the three and six month periods in
fiscal 2009. Our research and development activities extend across virtually our entire customer
base, and our current level of spending is consistent with our strategy of continuing to invest in
future platforms and technologies.
Amortization of intangible assets
as a percent of sales was 2.5% and 2.6% for the three and
six months ended March 31, 2010 compared to 1.5% for both periods of fiscal 2009, primarily
reflecting increased amortization expense related to $128,400 of intangible assets acquired in the
HRT acquisition in April 2009.
Restructuring and other charges
of $15,159 were recognized during the three months ended March
31, 2009. No restructuring charges were incurred in the three or six month periods ended March 31,
2010 or in the three month period ended December 31, 2008. The non-acquisition related
restructuring and other charges recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2009 resulted from a
number of projects we implemented which were intended to maintain our margins through cost
reduction and efficiency improvements. The program savings were primarily related to indirect
expenses, selling, general, and administrative expenses, material productivity, and facility
rationalization.
44
Interest and other expenses
as a percent of sales was 2.1% and 2.3% for the three and six
months ended March 31, 2010 compared to 2.0% for both periods of fiscal 2009. Interest expense
increased in the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010 because of interest on $220,000
of long-term debt issued in April 2009, which was used primarily to finance the HRT acquisition,
partially offset by interest savings due to debt reductions.
Since the acquisition of HRT in April 2009, we have made unscheduled prepayments of $151,000
on our outstanding long-term debt. Since the HRT acquisition, total current and long-term debt has
declined from $651,859 to $463,659.
Earnings
The following table presents earnings by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
32,355
|
|
|
$
|
37,635
|
|
|
$
|
64,429
|
|
|
$
|
70,879
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
4,976
|
|
|
|
3,233
|
|
|
|
7,385
|
|
|
|
5,034
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
4,859
|
|
|
|
9,137
|
|
|
|
12,182
|
|
|
|
18,303
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
6,147
|
|
|
|
4,882
|
|
|
|
9,382
|
|
|
|
12,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment earnings
|
|
|
48,337
|
|
|
|
54,887
|
|
|
|
93,378
|
|
|
|
106,684
|
|
Nonsegment expenses
|
|
|
(5,315
|
)
|
|
|
(23,546
|
)
|
|
|
(10,725
|
)
|
|
|
(31,310
|
)
|
Interest expense and income, net
|
|
|
(7,204
|
)
|
|
|
(6,486
|
)
|
|
|
(15,345
|
)
|
|
|
(12,361
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated earnings before income
taxes
|
|
|
35,818
|
|
|
|
24,855
|
|
|
|
67,308
|
|
|
|
63,013
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(11,642
|
)
|
|
|
(6,333
|
)
|
|
|
(20,686
|
)
|
|
|
(17,388
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net earnings
|
|
$
|
24,176
|
|
|
$
|
18,522
|
|
|
$
|
46,622
|
|
|
$
|
45,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents earnings by segment as a percent of segment net sales, including
intersegment sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
|
22.3
|
%
|
|
|
21.8
|
%
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Electrical Power
Systems
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
Total segment earnings decreased by $6,550 and $13,306 for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2010 as compared to the same periods of fiscal 2009. Organic segment earnings decreased
$14,847 and $27,703 for the three and six month periods in fiscal 2010 primarily due to organic
sales volume declines of $44,438 and $108,074, and were partially offset by savings from workforce
management and other cost savings initiatives.
45
Turbine Systems segment earnings
decreased $5,280, or 14.0%, and $6,450, or 9.1%, in the
three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same periods of fiscal 2009
due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month
|
|
|
Six Month
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Earnings at March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
37,635
|
|
|
$
|
70,879
|
|
Sales volume changes
|
|
|
(9,272
|
)
|
|
|
(14,587
|
)
|
Selling price changes
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
|
|
2,711
|
|
Sales mix
|
|
|
3,482
|
|
|
|
4,470
|
|
Changes in variable compensation
|
|
|
(996
|
)
|
|
|
(1,449
|
)
|
Effects of changes in foreign currency
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
Savings related to workforce management
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
4,600
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(2,273
|
)
|
|
|
(1,957
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings at March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
32,355
|
|
|
$
|
64,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems segment earnings decreased in the three and six months ended March 31, 2010
compared to the same periods in fiscal 2009 primarily as a result of the decrease in sales volume.
Earnings as a percent of sales decreased to 22.0% in the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared
to 22.4% in the same period of fiscal 2009. Earnings as a percent of sales improved in the six
month period ending March 31, 2010 to 22.3% from 21.8% in the same period of fiscal 2009. The sales
volume impact was partially offset by the impacts of workforce management and other cost control
initiatives, a more favorable sales mix, and changes in our selling prices that were made in
response to prevailing market conditions.
Airframe Systems segment earnings
increased $1,743, or 53.9%, and $2,351, or 46.7%, in the
three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same periods of fiscal 2009 due
to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month
|
|
|
Six Month
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Earnings at March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
3,233
|
|
|
$
|
5,034
|
|
Acquisition of HRT
|
|
|
8,297
|
|
|
|
14,397
|
|
Organic sales volume changes
|
|
|
(8,770
|
)
|
|
|
(19,423
|
)
|
Sales mix
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
|
|
(405
|
)
|
Intangible amortization
|
|
|
(673
|
)
|
|
|
(2,091
|
)
|
Changes in variable compensation
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
(809
|
)
|
Change in customer funded R&D
|
|
|
(879
|
)
|
|
|
(1,639
|
)
|
Savings related to workforce management
|
|
|
5,471
|
|
|
|
12,792
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(872
|
)
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings at March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
4,976
|
|
|
$
|
7,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The HRT acquisition contributed $8,297 and $14,397 to Airframe Systems segment earnings for
the three and six months ended March 31, 2010. Our Airframe Systems integration is expected to
contribute to improved profitability, broader control system content, and better aftermarket
presence and support. Airframe Systems has begun to realize previously anticipated benefits from
cost reduction efforts taken at both MPC and HRT, and the operational integration of the MPC and
HRT businesses is proceeding consistent with our expectations. Additional expense control
initiatives, the costs of which were included in accrued restructuring costs recorded in connection
with the HRT acquisition and related primarily to the planned closing of the Pacoima, California
facility as part of a decision to consolidate HRTs production facilities, are expected to occur
during the remainder of calendar year 2010.
Segment earnings increased for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010 compared
to the same periods of fiscal 2009, primarily due to the HRT acquisition and restructuring savings,
partially offset by the impact of the organic sales volume declines, changes in customer funded
R&D, higher levels of intangible amortization, and higher levels of variable compensation.
46
Organic segment earnings resulted in a loss of $3,321 during the three months ended March 31,
2010 compared to earnings of $3,233 in the same period of fiscal 2009. For the six month period
ended March 31, 2010, organic segment earnings resulted in a loss of $7,012 compared to earnings of
$5,034 in the prior year period. The decrease in organic earnings in both periods was driven
primarily by the decrease in sales volumes, increased amortization expense, lower levels of
customer funding for research and development, and increased costs associated with initiatives to
secure new business and develop new platforms, partially offset by the impacts of workforce
management actions taken during fiscal year 2009 in response to declining sales.
Non-cash intangible amortization expense in the three months ended March 31, 2010 of $7,023
and for the six month period ended March 31, 2010 of $14,522 were related to the MPC and HRT
acquisitions.
Electrical Power Systems segment earnings
decreased $4,278, or 46.8%, and $6,121, or 33.4%,
in the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same periods of fiscal
2009 due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month
|
|
|
Six Month
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Earnings at March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
9,137
|
|
|
$
|
18,303
|
|
Sales volume changes
|
|
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
|
(5,832
|
)
|
Selling price changes
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
Sales mix
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
Changes in variable compensation
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
|
|
(940
|
)
|
Effects of changes in foreign currency
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
Expansion of wind converter production in U.S.
and China
|
|
|
(893
|
)
|
|
|
(1,294
|
)
|
Savings related to workforce management
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1,256
|
)
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings at March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
4,859
|
|
|
$
|
12,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in earnings in both the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010 compared
to the same periods in fiscal 2009 was driven mainly by the decrease in sales volumes, which was
primarily due to reduced current market demand for wind turbines, and sales mix. Earnings were also
negatively impacted by increased costs associated with expansion of wind converter production into
the U.S. and China and higher variable compensation costs. These negative factors were partially
offset by increased sales of power generation and distribution equipment, foreign currency exchange
rates and savings realized as a result of workforce management actions taken during fiscal 2009 in
response to declining sales.
Segment earnings as a percent of segment net sales were 8.9% and 10.9% for the three and six
month periods ended March 31, 2010 compared to 15.6% and 15.2% in the same periods of fiscal 2009.
Engine Systems segment earnings
increased $1,265, or 25.9%, and decreased $3,086, or 24.8%,
in the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010 as compared to the same periods of fiscal
2009 due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month
|
|
|
Six Month
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Earnings at March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
4,882
|
|
|
$
|
12,468
|
|
Sales volume changes
|
|
|
(3,279
|
)
|
|
|
(19,301
|
)
|
Selling price changes
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
Sales mix
|
|
|
(771
|
)
|
|
|
1,906
|
|
Changes in variable compensation
|
|
|
(650
|
)
|
|
|
(981
|
)
|
Effects of changes in foreign currency
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
Decreased infrastructure and overhead related
expenses
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
Savings related to workforce management
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
8,546
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
|
2,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings at March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
6,147
|
|
|
$
|
9,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the three month period ended March 31, 2010, lower sales volumes, unfavorable sales mix and
increases in variable compensation costs were more than offset by the benefits of cost savings
related to workforce management activities in 2009, reduced infrastructure and overhead spending,
and other factors, resulting in increased segment earnings.
47
Segment earnings decreased in the six month period ended March 31, 2010. Lower sales volumes
and increases in variable compensation costs negatively impacted earnings, but were partially
offset by price increases, favorable sales mix, cost savings related to workforce management
activities, and reduced infrastructure and overhead spending.
Nonsegment expenses
for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010 decreased to
$5,315, or 1.5%, of sales and $10,725, or 1.6% of sales, from $23,546 and $31,310 in the same
periods of fiscal 2009.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded $16,605 in special charges to
properly size our business for the economic environment related to the global recession. The
special charges were composed of $14,254 in workforce management costs, $905 related to the
impairment of a vacated facility, $1,255 in inventory write-downs related specifically to order
cancellations and $191 in other charges. Without these special charges, nonsegment expenses for the
three and six months ended March 31, 2009 were $6,941, or 2.1%, and $14,705, or 2.2% of net sales.
Excluding the impact of the special charges, the year-over-year decline in nonsegment expenses
in the three and six months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same periods in fiscal 2009
resulted mainly from reductions in variable compensation, cost reduction efforts and lower
intercompany profit eliminations. We anticipate that our ongoing rate of spend will be slightly
above the spend rate experienced during the six months ended March 31, 2010.
Income taxes
were provided at an effective rate on earnings before income taxes of 32.5% and
30.7% for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010 compared to 25.5% and 27.6% for the
same periods of fiscal 2009. The change in the effective tax rate (as a percent of earnings before
income taxes) was attributable to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month
|
|
|
Six Month
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Effective tax rate at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
Retroactive extension of research credit recorded in fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Research credit in fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Resolution of tax issue recorded in the six months ended March 31,
2009
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Resolution of tax issue recorded in the six months ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
Foreign earnings mix
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
Other changes, net
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
|
|
30.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total amount of the gross liability for worldwide unrecognized tax benefits reported in
other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet was $19,141 at March 31, 2010, and
$19,783 at September 30, 2009. At March 31, 2010, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that
would impact Woodwards effective tax rate, if recognized, was $15,461. At this time, we estimate
that it is reasonably possible that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by as
much as $3,460 in the next twelve months through completion of reviews by various worldwide tax
authorities.
We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense.
Woodward had accrued interest and penalties of $4,475 as of March 31, 2010 and $3,804 as of
September 30, 2009.
Woodwards tax returns are audited by U.S., state, and foreign tax authorities, and these
audits are at various stages of completion at any given time. Fiscal years remaining open to
examination in significant foreign jurisdictions include 2003 and forward. Woodward is subject to
U.S. Federal income tax examinations for fiscal years 2006 and forward, and is subject to U.S.
state income tax examinations for fiscal years 2005 and forward.
The U.S. research tax credit expired as of December 31, 2009. The U.S. Congress is considering
legislation to provide a retroactive extension; however as of March 31, 2010, the expired tax
credit has not been reinstated. Accounting guidance requires us to use the tax law in effect at the
balance sheet date. Accordingly, the calculation of our 2010 income tax provision does not reflect
any assumed benefit from the research tax credit for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. In
the event the research tax credit is enacted in some form in future periods, we will account for
that change in the tax law at that time.
We do not expect the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to impact our income tax
expenses in 2010 or thereafter.
Financial Condition, Liquidity, and Capital Resources
We believe liquidity and cash generation are important to our strategy of self-funding our
ongoing operating needs. We also believe that the restructuring actions we implemented in fiscal
2009 have generated, and will continue to generate, improved cash flows from operations and that
this level of cash generation, together with our existing cash and available borrowings, will
adequately support our on-going operations.
48
Our ability to service our long-term debt, to remain in compliance with the various
restrictions and covenants contained in our debt agreements and to fund working capital, capital
expenditures and product development efforts will depend on our ability to generate cash from
operating activities which in turn is subject to, among other things, future operating performance
as well as general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, and other conditions,
some of which may be beyond our control.
Historically, we have been able to finance our ongoing businesses, including capital
expenditures and product development, with cash flows provided by operating activities. We expect
that cash generated from our operating activities will continue to fund our operating needs. In the
event we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operating activities, we have a
revolving credit facility comprised of unsecured financing arrangements with a syndicate of U.S.
banks totaling $225,000, with an option to increase the amount to $350,000, subject to the lenders
participation. In addition, we have various foreign lines of credit tied to net amounts on deposit
at certain foreign financial institutions, which are generally reviewed annually for renewal.
Historically, we have used borrowings under these foreign lines of credit to finance certain local
operations.
During fiscal 2009 we incurred $620,000 of long-term debt in connection with our 2009
acquisitions. Since April 2009, we have made non-scheduled principal prepayments of $151,000,
including $82,000 during the first six months of fiscal year 2010. Year to date, we have made
principal payments on our outstanding debt of $108,569.
At March 31, 2010, we were in compliance with the financial covenants under our existing
long-term debt agreements and revolving credit facility.
We believe liquidity and cash generation are important to fund our ongoing operating needs. We
also believe that the restructuring and other cost reduction actions we have been taking will
continue to generate cash flow from operations and that this level of cash generation, together
with our existing cash and available borrowings, will adequately support our operations.
We believe we have adequate access to several sources of contractually committed borrowings
and other available credit facilities. However, we could be adversely affected if banks supplying
our short-term borrowing requirements refuse to honor their contract commitments, cease lending, or
declare bankruptcy. While we believe the lending institutions participating in our credit
arrangements are financially capable, events in the global credit markets during fiscal year 2009
and the first half of fiscal 2010, including the failure, takeover or rescue by various government
entities of major financial institutions, have created uncertainty of credit availability.
Assets
Segment assets consist of accounts receivable, inventories, property, plant, and equipment -
net, goodwill, and other intangibles net. The following table presents assets by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Turbine Systems
|
|
$
|
338,437
|
|
|
$
|
344,789
|
|
Airframe Systems
|
|
|
759,789
|
|
|
|
801,300
|
|
Electrical Power Systems
|
|
|
134,603
|
|
|
|
135,808
|
|
Engine Systems
|
|
|
189,532
|
|
|
|
200,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets
|
|
|
1,422,361
|
|
|
|
1,482,123
|
|
Nonsegment assets
|
|
|
175,977
|
|
|
|
214,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets
|
|
$
|
1,598,338
|
|
|
$
|
1,696,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turbine Systems segment assets
decreased $6,352 during the six months ended March 31, 2010,
reflecting lower net carrying cost of property, plant and equipment, accounts receivable and
inventories. The decrease in property, plant and equipment was due to depreciation expense
outpacing capital expenditures. Both accounts receivables and inventories were down slightly.
Airframe Systems segment assets
decreased $41,511 during the six months ended March 31, 2010
as a result of lower accounts receivable, inventories, intangible assets, and property, plant and
equipment. The decrease in accounts receivable and inventories is primarily due to lower sales
volume and managements focus on rationalizing inventory levels relative to anticipated sales
activity. The decrease in intangible assets was due to amortization expense. The decrease in
property, plant and equipment was due to depreciation expense outpacing capital expenditures.
49
Electrical Power Systems segment assets
decreased $1,205 during the six months ended March
31, 2010 primarily due to lower inventory and intangible assets, partially offset by increased
accounts receivable. The decrease in inventories is primarily due to lower sales volume compared to
prior fiscal years and managements focus on rationalizing inventory levels relative to anticipated
sales activity. The decrease in intangible assets was due to amortization expense. Accounts
receivable increased primarily due to longer terms granted to certain customers.
Excluding the effects of foreign currency exchange rates, Electrical Power Systems segment
assets increased by approximately $6,100, due primarily to increases of accounts receivable and
property, plant and equipment. The property, plant and equipment increases related mainly to
capital expenditures associated with the expansion of our plant in Poland.
Engine Systems segment assets
decreased by $10,694 during the six months ended March 31, 2010
due primarily to lower levels of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. Property,
plant and equipment decreased due to depreciation expense exceeding capital expenditures.
Intangible assets decreased due to amortization expense recognized during six months ended March
31, 2010. Accounts receivable and inventories also decreased.
The effects of foreign currency fluctuations decreased Engine Systems segment assets by
approximately $3,700 during the six months ended March 31, 2010.
Nonsegment assets
decreased $38,322 during the six months ended March 31, 2010 primarily
because of decreases in cash and cash equivalents and deferred income tax assets. The changes in
cash and cash equivalents related to payments of long-term debt and the payment of $25,000 in
connection with MPC Products settlement with the DOJ, partially offset by cash provided by
operating activities. Changes in cash are discussed more fully in a separate section of this
Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Other Balance Sheet Measures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
413,886
|
|
|
$
|
434,166
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
|
445,137
|
|
|
|
526,771
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
106,641
|
|
|
|
110,010
|
|
Total Stockholders equity
|
|
|
743,457
|
|
|
|
711,515
|
|
Working capital
(current assets less current liabilities) decreased to $413,886 at March 31,
2010 from $434,166 at September 30, 2009. Lower levels of cash, accounts receivable, inventories,
and deferred income tax assets and higher accounts payable were partially offset by reductions in
accrued liabilities and the current portion of long-term debt.
Short-term borrowings:
We have a $225,000 revolving credit facility, with an option to
increase the amount to $350,000, subject to the lenders participation. In addition, we have
further short-term borrowing capabilities under various foreign lines of credit tied to net amounts
on deposit at certain foreign financial institutions, which are generally reviewed annually for
renewal. We use these facilities to meet short-term funding requirements. As of March 31, 2010 and
September 30, 2009, no short-term borrowings were outstanding. As of March 31, 2010, we had
borrowing availability of $221,856 under our $225,000 revolving credit facility, net of outstanding
letters of credit, and borrowing availability of $6,675 under our foreign lines of credit, net of
outstanding letters of credit.
Provisions of our short-term and long-term debt agreements include covenants customary to such
agreements, including certain cross default provisions, which require us to maintain specified
minimum or maximum financial measures and place limitations on various investing and financing
activities. The agreements also permit the lenders to accelerate repayment
requirements in the event of a material adverse event. Our most restrictive covenants require
us to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth, a maximum consolidated debt to consolidated
operating cash flow ratio, and a maximum ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, plus any unusual non-cash charges to the extent
deducted in computing net income, minus any unusual non-cash gains to the extent added in computing
net income (Debt Covenant EBITDA). See additional discussion in Notes 11,
Long-term debt,
and 12,
Line of credit facilities and short-term borrowings,
to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 1 Financial Statements.
50
Long-term debt, less current portion
decreased in the six months ended March 31, 2010 due
primarily to unscheduled debt prepayments made during the period and scheduled reclassifications of
long-term debt to current portion of long-term debt. $82,000 of long-term debt was prepaid during
the six months ended March 31, 2010, including $53,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Other liabilities
include $83,812 of accrued retirement benefits, primarily related to
postretirement employee benefit plans, which are not expected to significantly impact our cash
flows during fiscal year 2010.
Stockholders equity
increased by $31,942 in the six month period ended March 31, 2010,
primarily due to net earnings during the period, which were partially offset by cash dividend
payments to stockholders.
In 2007, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200,000 of our outstanding
shares of common stock on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions over a three-year
period that will end in October 2010. No shares have been purchased under the authorization since
fiscal 2008. As of March 31, 2010 and $168,075 remains available for stock repurchase.
Commitments, contingencies and guarantees
at March 31, 2010 include claims, pending or
threatened litigation or other legal proceedings, or regulatory proceedings arising in the normal
course of business, including, among others, those relating to product liability claims, employment
matters, workers compensation claims, contractual disputes, product warranty claims and alleged
violations of various environmental laws. We have accrued for individual matters that we believe
are likely to result in a loss when ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely amount
of loss.
Woodward is partially self-insured in the U.S. for healthcare and workers compensation up to
predetermined amounts, above which third party insurance applies. Management regularly reviews the
probable outcome of these claims and proceedings, the expenses expected to be incurred, the
availability and limits of the insurance coverage, and the established accruals for liabilities.
While the outcome of pending claims and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty,
management believes that any liabilities that may result from these claims and proceedings will not
have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition, or results of operations.
In the event of a change in control of Woodward, as defined in change-in-control agreements
with our current corporate officers, we may be required to pay termination benefits to such
officers. We believe the change-in-control agreements are appropriate to enable our executives to
remain focused on running the business, and to protect the value of the Company by retaining key
talent, in the event of a change in control. We further believe that change in control agreements
are necessary to help ensure actions and behaviors that are aligned with and in the best interests
of the Companys stockholders in the event of a change of control and to facilitate a smooth
transition.
Contractual Obligations
We have various contractual obligations, including obligations related to long-term debt,
operating leases, purchases, retirement pensions and retirement healthcare. These contractual
obligations are summarized and discussed more fully in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2009. We prepaid $82,000 of long-term debt during the six months
ended March 31, 2010.
In connection with the sale of the F&P product line during fiscal 2009, we intend to assign to
a subsidiary of the purchaser our rights and responsibilities related to certain contracts with the
U.S. Government. As is customary and as requested by the U.S. Government, we expect to guarantee to
the U.S. Government the purchasers subsidiarys obligations under the contracts. The purchaser has
agreed to indemnify us for any liability incurred with respect to the guarantee.
51
Cash Flows
Cash flows were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
125,981
|
|
|
$
|
51,826
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(38,230
|
)
|
|
|
(384,231
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(114,580
|
)
|
|
|
353,083
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(1,474
|
)
|
|
|
(3,638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(28,303
|
)
|
|
|
17,040
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
100,863
|
|
|
|
109,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
72,560
|
|
|
$
|
126,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities
increased by $74,155 for the six month period
compared to the same period of fiscal 2009. The increase was driven mainly by decreases in
inventories as a result of lower sales levels and by managements focus on rationalizing inventory
levels relative to anticipated sales activity and lower cash payments for accounts payable and
variable compensation programs compared to the first six months of fiscal 2009.
As credit has remained tight during the first half of fiscal 2010 due to the global economy,
we continue to believe that adequate liquidity and cash generation will be important to the
execution of our strategic initiatives. We believe the restructuring and other cost reduction
actions we have taken during fiscal year 2009 and the first half of fiscal 2010 will permit us to
continue to generate adequate cash flow from operations. We also believe that this level of cash
generation, together with our existing cash and available borrowings, will adequately support our
operations.
Net cash flows used in investing activities
decreased by $346,001 compared to the same period
last year. During the six months ended March 31, 2009, we completed acquisitions which used
$369,065 of cash. During the six months ended March 31, 2010 we paid $25,000 to the DOJ to settle a
liability assumed in the MPC acquisition. The purchase price we paid in connection with the
acquisition of MPC Products was reduced by $25,000 at the time of the acquisition to account for
this contingent liability, and therefore the $25,000 payment is classified as cash used for
business acquisitions.
Cash paid for capital expenditures was $14,136 during the six months ended March 31, 2010,
compared to $15,354 during the same period last year. We intend to remain focused on our low cost
strategy, continuing our expansion in Poland, which came online during the three months ended March
31, 2010, and maximizing efficient use of existing resources. Future capital expenditures are
expected to be funded through cash flows from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit
facility and available foreign lines of credit.
On April 21, 2010, Woodwards Board of Directors approved the purchase by Woodward of the 26%
noncontrolling interest in Woodward Governor India Limited, a Woodward consolidated subsidiary, for
approximately $8,000. Upon completion of the transaction, Woodward will own 100% of Woodward
Governor India Limited. The transaction is expected to be completed during the fiscal quarter
ending June 30, 2010.
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
decreased by $467,663 during the six
months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period last year. During the six months ended
March 31, 2009, we issued $400,000 of long-term debt, which was used primarily to finance business
acquisitions. During the six months ended March 31, 2010, we repaid $108,569 of outstanding debt,
including unscheduled debt prepayments of $82,000.
As a result of the decreases in outstanding current and long-term debt during the six months
ended March 31, 2010, our debt to total capitalization ratio decreased to 38.4% as of March 31,
2010 compared to 44.6% as of September 30, 2009.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP
requires us to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Note 1,
Basis of presentation
and nature of operations,
to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009 describes the significant accounting policies and
methods used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Our critical accounting
estimates, discussed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,
2009, include estimates for revenue recognition, purchase
accounting, inventory valuation, postretirement benefit obligations, reviews for impairment of
goodwill, and our provision for income taxes. Such accounting policies and estimates require
significant judgments and assumptions to be used in the preparation of the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, and actual results could differ materially from the amounts reported based on
variability in factors affecting these estimates.
52
Our management discusses the development and selection of our critical accounting policies and
estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors at least annually.
Goodwill
is tested for impairment on the reporting unit level on an annual basis and more
often if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair
value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The impairment tests consist of comparing the
fair value of reporting units, determined using discounted cash flows, with its carrying amount
including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we compare
the implied value of goodwill with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds
the implied fair value of goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized to reduce the carrying
amount to its implied fair value. There was no impairment charge recorded in fiscal 2009 or in the
first six months of fiscal 2010.
We completed our annual goodwill impairment test during the quarter ended March 31, 2010. The
fair value of the reporting units was based on reporting unit level cash flow forecasts which have
been updated to reflect current global economic conditions, including anticipated weakening of
global demand for certain products. Forecasted cash flows were discounted using an 11.3% weighted
average cost of capital assumption. The terminal value of the forecasted cash flows assumed an
annual compound growth rate of 4.5% after five years and was calculated using the Gordon Growth
Model.
The results of our fiscal 2010 annual goodwill impairment test performed as of March 31, 2010
indicated that no goodwill impairment existed. The estimated fair value of each of our reporting
units was in excess of it carrying value. At March 31, 2010 the reporting unit with the closest
ratio of estimated fair value to carrying value was our recently acquired Airframe Systems
reporting unit, which has a significant concentration of business in the presently depressed
business jet and regional jet market segments. Our analysis indicates a premium of over 30%
compared to this reporting units carrying value.
As part of our ongoing monitoring efforts, we will continue to consider the global economic
environment and its potential impact on our businesses in assessing goodwill recoverability. There
can be no assurance that our estimates and assumptions regarding forecasted cash flows of certain
reporting units as well as the duration of the current economic downturn, or the period or strength
of the recovery, made for purposes of the annual goodwill impairment test performed during the
second fiscal quarter of 2010, will prove to be accurate predictions of the future. If our
assumptions are not realized it is possible that an impairment charge may need to be recorded in
future periods.
Market Risks
In the normal course of business, we have exposures to interest rate risk from our long-term
debt and foreign currency exchange rate risk related to our foreign operations and foreign currency
transactions. We are also exposed to various market risks that arise from transactions entered into
in the normal course of business related to items such as the cost of raw materials and changes in
inflation. Certain contractual relationships with customers and vendors mitigate risks from changes
in raw material costs and foreign currency exchange rate changes that arise from normal purchasing
and normal sales activities.
Our market risks are discussed more fully in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2009.
New Accounting Standards
Accounting changes and recently adopted accounting standards
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued authoritative
guidance which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires
additional disclosures about a companys financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are
measured at fair value. In February 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which delayed the
effective date of this guidance for nonfinancial assets and liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least
annually), to fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after November
15, 2008. On October 1, 2008, we adopted the measurement and disclosure impact of this guidance
with respect to financial assets and liabilities. On October 1, 2009, we adopted the measurement
and disclosure of fair value with respect to non-financial assets and liabilities. This guidance
did not change existing guidance on whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value. The
adoption had no impact on our financial position and results of operations and required no
additional disclosures in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
53
In November 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to address accounting for
collaborative arrangement activities that are conducted without the creation of a separate legal
entity for the arrangement. Revenues and costs incurred with third parties in connection with the
collaborative arrangement should be presented gross or net by the collaborators pursuant to
pre-existing accounting standards. Payments to or from collaborators should be presented in the
income statement based on the nature of the arrangement, the nature of the companys business and
whether the payments are within the scope of other accounting literature. Other detailed
information related to the collaborative arrangement is also required to be disclosed. The
requirements under this guidance must be applied to collaborative arrangements in existence at the
beginning of our fiscal 2010 using a modified version of retrospective application. We are
currently not a party to significant collaborative arrangement activities, as defined by this
guidance, and therefore, the adoption of this guidance had no impact on our Condensed Consolidated
Financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to affirm that the acquisition method
of accounting (previously referred to as the purchase method) be used for all business combinations
and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. This guidance defines the
acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination
and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control. Among other
requirements, this guidance requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize
the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree at their acquisition-date fair values, and with limited exceptions, acquisition-related
costs will generally be expensed as incurred. This guidance requires certain financial statement
disclosures to enable users to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. This guidance must be applied prospectively to business combinations that are
consummated on or after October 1, 2009. Accordingly, we will record and disclose business
combinations under the revised standard for any transactions consummated on or after October 1,
2009. In addition, adjustments of certain income tax balances related to acquired deferred assets,
including those acquired prior to the adoption of this new authoritative guidance, will be reported
as an increase or decrease to income tax expense. Accordingly, we have recorded adjustments of
certain income tax balances under the revised authoritative guidance beginning October 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to establish accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. Among other requirements, this guidance clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary, which is sometimes referred to as minority interest, is to be reported in the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets within stockholders equity, but separate from the parents
stockholders equity. This guidance also requires consolidated net earnings and comprehensive
earnings to include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. We
adopted this guidance effective October 1, 2009. This guidance must be applied prospectively for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning in fiscal 2010, except for
the presentation and disclosure requirements, which has been applied retrospectively for all
periods presented. Accordingly, the following have been retrospectively adjusted: our Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the three and six months ended March 31, 2009, our Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2009, our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash
Flows for the six months ended March 31, 2009, our Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Stockholders Equity for the six months ended March 31, 2009, accumulated other comprehensive
earnings for the six months ended March 31, 2009 as presented in Note 18,
Accumulated other
comprehensive earnings,
and total comprehensive earnings for the three and six months ended March
31, 2009 as presented in Note 19,
Total comprehensive earnings,
in the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
In April 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to amend the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset and to require additional disclosures. The guidance for determining
useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date.
The disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of
the effective date. We adopted this guidance as of October 1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance
had no impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In November 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding the accounting for
defensive intangible assets. Defensive intangible assets are assets acquired in a business
combination that the acquirer (a) does not intend to use or (b) intends to use in a way other than
the assets highest and best use as determined by an evaluation of market participant assumptions.
While defensive intangible assets are not being actively used, they are likely contributing to an
increase in the value of other assets owned by the acquiring entity. This guidance requires
defensive intangible assets to be accounted for as separate units of accounting at the time of
acquisition and the useful life of such assets to be based on the period over which the assets will
directly or indirectly affect the entitys cash flows. We will record and disclose defensive
intangible assets under the revised standard for transactions consummated, if any, on or after
October 1, 2009.
In November 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance addressing whether securities granted
in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore,
need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the two class
method. This guidance became effective for us on October 1, 2009.
Upon the adoption of this guidance all outstanding restricted stock, which are participating
securities, are considered in the calculation of both the basic and fully diluted earnings per
share calculations in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The effects of this change
are required to be applied retrospectively. Accordingly, the historical earnings per share
presented have been recast to reflect the retrospective application of this guidance.
54
In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to require that assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized at fair
value if fair value can be reasonably determined. If the fair value of such assets or liabilities
cannot be reasonably determined, then they would generally be recognized in accordance with certain
other pre-existing accounting standards. This guidance also amends the subsequent accounting for
assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination and certain other
disclosure requirements. This guidance became effective for assets or liabilities arising from
contingencies in business combinations that are consummated on or after October 1, 2009.
Accordingly, we will record and disclose assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business
combinations that arise from contingencies under the revised standard for any transactions
consummated on or after October 1, 2009.
Issued but not yet effective accounting standards:
In December 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to require employers to provide
additional disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan.
These disclosures should principally include information detailing investment policies and
strategies, the major categories of plan assets, the inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure the fair value of plan assets and an understanding of significant concentrations of risk
within plan assets. The required disclosures must be provided for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2009 (our fiscal 2010 year-end). These disclosures will be presented in our
Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended September 30, 2010. Upon initial application,
this guidance is not required to be applied to earlier periods that are presented for comparative
purposes. We do not expect this guidance to have a significant impact on our September 30, 2010
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to eliminate the exception to consolidate
a qualifying special-purpose entity, change the approach to determining the primary beneficiary of
a variable interest entity and require companies to more frequently re-assess whether they must
consolidate variable interest entities. Under the new guidance, the primary beneficiary of a
variable interest entity is identified qualitatively as the enterprise that has both (a) the power
to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entitys
economic performance, and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially
be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity
that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. This guidance becomes
effective for our fiscal year 2011 and interim reporting periods thereafter. We do not expect this
guidance to have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to require an analysis to determine
whether a variable interest gives the entity a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity. This guidance requires an ongoing reassessment and eliminates the quantitative
approach previously required for determining whether an entity is the primary beneficiary. This
guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009 (our fiscal year
2011). We are currently assessing the impact that this guidance may have on our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that enables vendors to account for
products or services sold to customers (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit, as
was generally required by past guidance. The revised guidance provides for two significant changes
to the existing multiple element revenue arrangements guidance. The first change, which will likely
result in the requirement to separate more deliverables within an arrangement, relates to the
determination of when the individual deliverables included in a multiple element arrangement may be
treated as separate units of accounting. The second change modifies the manner in which the
transaction consideration is allocated across the separately identified deliverables. Together,
these changes are likely to result in earlier recognition of revenue and related costs for
multiple-element arrangements than under previous guidance. This guidance also significantly
expands the disclosures required for multiple-element revenue arrangements. This guidance is
required to be adopted in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 (our fiscal year 2011).
We expect to adopt the guidance as of October 1, 2010. We are currently assessing the impact this
guidance may have on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that changes the accounting model for
revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements. The revised
guidance provides that tangible products containing software components and nonsoftware components
that function together to deliver the tangible products essential functionality are no longer
within the scope of the software revenue guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
Subtopic 985-605. In addition, the guidance requires that hardware components of a tangible product
containing software components always be excluded from the software revenue guidance. This guidance
is required to be adopted in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 (our fiscal year
2011). We expect to adopt the guidance as of October 1, 2010. We are currently assessing the impact
this guidance may have on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
55
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In the normal course of business, we have exposures to interest rate risk from our long-term
debt, and foreign currency exchange rate risk related to our foreign operations and foreign
currency transactions. We are also exposed to various market risks that arise from transactions
entered into in the normal course of business related to items such as the cost of raw materials
and changes in inflation. Certain contractual relationships with customers and vendors mitigate
risks from changes in raw material costs and foreign currency exchange rate changes that arise from
normal purchasing and normal sales activities.
These market risks are discussed more fully in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2009.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and procedures, which are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in
the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. These disclosure controls and procedures
include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Act is accumulated and communicated
to management, including our Principal Executive Officer (Thomas A. Gendron, Chief Executive
Officer and President) and Principal Financial Officer (Robert F. Weber, Jr., Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Thomas A. Gendron and Robert F. Weber, Jr., evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. Based on their
evaluations; they concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March
31, 2010.
Furthermore, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting,
except as discussed below, during the fiscal quarter covered by this Form 10-Q that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
Management included the internal controls of MPC in its assessment of the effectiveness of
Woodwards internal controls over financial reporting, beginning in the first quarter of fiscal
year 2010. Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010, management will include the internal
controls of HRT in its assessment of the effectiveness of Woodwards internal controls over
financial reporting. MPC and HRT were acquired in the prior fiscal year and were excluded from
managements annual report on internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009, in accordance with the general guidance issued by the SEC regarding exclusion
of certain acquired businesses. MPC and HRT will be included in managements annual report on
internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010.
We considered the results of our pre-acquisition due diligence activities, the continuation by
HRT of its established internal control over financial reporting, and our implementation of
additional internal control over financial reporting activities as part of our overall evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2010. The objectives of HRTs established
internal control over financial reporting are consistent, in all material respects, with Woodwards
objectives. However, we believe the design of HRTs established internal control over financial
reporting is sufficiently different from Woodwards overall design to conclude that Woodwards
internal control over financial reporting materially changed during the quarter in which we
completed our acquisition of HRT, which was the quarter ended June 30, 2009. We are in the process
of completing a more complete review of HRTs internal control over financial reporting and will be
implementing changes to better align its reporting and controls with the rest of Woodward. HRT
constituted 21.5% of the total assets in Woodards Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as
of March 31, 2010. HRT constituted 17.0% of the total net sales in Woodwards Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for the six months ended March 31, 2010.
56
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
Woodward is currently involved in claims, pending or threatened litigation or other legal
proceedings, or regulatory proceedings arising in the normal course of business, including, among
others, those relating to product liability claims, employment matters, workers compensation
claims, contractual disputes, product warranty claims and alleged violations of various
environmental laws. We have accrued for individual matters that we believe are likely to result in
a loss when ultimately resolved using estimates of the most likely amount of loss.
While the outcome of pending claims and proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty,
management believes that any liabilities that may result from these claims and proceedings will not
have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition, or results of operations.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Investment in our securities involves risk. An investor or potential investor should consider
the risks summarized in Item 1A. Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009, when making investment decisions regarding our
securities. The risk factors that were disclosed in our Form 10-K have not materially changed since
the date our Form 10-K was filed.
57
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a)
|
|
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
|
Sales of common stock issued from treasury to one of our directors during the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
|
Consideration
|
|
|
|
Sold
|
|
|
Received
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 through January 31, 2010
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
February 1, 2010 through February 28,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The securities were sold in reliance upon the exemption contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities
Act of 1933.
(b)
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number (or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Dollar Value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
|
of Shares that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of
|
|
|
may yet be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
|
under the
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Plans or
|
|
|
Plans or
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Paid Per Share
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
Programs (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2010
through January 31,
2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
168,075
|
|
February 1, 2010
through February
28, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,075
|
|
March 1, 2010
through March 31,
2010 (2)
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
31.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,075
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
During September 2007, the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to
$200,000 of our outstanding shares of common stock on the open market or privately negotiated
transactions over a three-year period that will end in October 2010.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The Woodward Governor Company Executive Benefit Plan, which is a separate legal entity,
acquired shares of common stock on the open market related to the reinvestment of dividends for
treasury stock shares under our deferred compensation plan.
|
58
Item 4.
Other Information
Three matters were submitted to a vote of stockholders at the January 22, 2010 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. The results of the voting were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
|
Withheld
|
|
1. Election of Directors for a
three year term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John D. Cohn
|
|
|
53,145,165
|
|
|
|
1,359,190
|
|
Michael H. Joyce
|
|
|
53,086,800
|
|
|
|
1,417,555
|
|
James R. Rulseh
|
|
|
53,126,324
|
|
|
|
1,378,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
|
Against
|
|
|
Abstain
|
|
2. Ratification of the Appointment of
Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
|
|
|
61,470,942
|
|
|
|
585,253
|
|
|
|
148,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
|
Against
|
|
|
Abstain
|
|
3. Shareholder proposal to eliminate
the classification of the terms
of the Directors
|
|
|
36,676,465
|
|
|
|
16,963,517
|
|
|
|
864,363
|
|
Item 6.
Exhibits
(a) Exhibits filed as Part of this Report are listed in the Exhibit Index.
59
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
|
|
Date: April 22, 2010
|
/s/
Thomas A. Gendron
|
|
|
Thomas A. Gendron
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
Date: April 22, 2010
|
/s/
Robert F. Weber, Jr.
|
|
|
Robert F. Weber, Jr.
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
60
WOODWARD GOVERNOR COMPANY
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Thomas A. Gendron, filed as an exhibit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Robert F. Weber, Jr., filed as an exhibit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
Section 1350 certifications, filed as an exhibit.
|
61
Woodward Governor Company (MM) (NASDAQ:WGOV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Woodward Governor Company (MM) (NASDAQ:WGOV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024