THE MERGER
The following is a discussion of the transaction and the material terms of the merger agreement between Rockwell Collins
and B/E Aerospace. You are urged to read carefully the merger agreement in its entirety, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and incorporated by
reference herein.
Background of the Merger
As part of B/E Aerospace's ongoing strategic planning process, members of the B/E Aerospace Board and members of B/E Aerospace senior management
periodically review and assess B/E Aerospace's operations, financial performance and competitive position, as well as industry trends and potential strategic initiatives. In addition, members
of B/E Aerospace senior management meet with members of the B/E Aerospace Board in the ordinary course of business to discuss strategic alternatives in order to enhance stockholder value, including,
among other things, business combinations, acquisitions, divestitures, dividends and share repurchases. In connection with these reviews and assessments, from time to time, the B/E Aerospace Board and
members of B/E Aerospace senior management enlist the assistance of financial advisors and outside legal advisors.
As part of Rockwell Collins' ongoing strategic planning process, members of the Rockwell Collins Board and members of Rockwell Collins senior management periodically review and assess
Rockwell Collins' operations, financial performance and competitive position, as well as industry trends and potential strategic initiatives to accelerate growth. As part of this process, Rockwell
Collins considered a number of alternatives to expand and strengthen its business. Given Rockwell Collins' strong position in the products and services that it currently serves, Rockwell Collins
determined to focus its consideration of possible growth opportunities on businesses that were adjacent to Rockwell Collins current products and services. Rockwell Collins evaluated the possibility of
expanding channels or capabilities, but determined that adding products and services that would build on Rockwell Collins' existing strong customer relationships would be a more efficient and lower
risk path.
Accordingly, in early 2015, Rockwell Collins undertook an initiative to assess the desirability of expanding the industry segments addressed by Rockwell Collins. This initiative involved
a strategic assessment of Rockwell Collins' capabilities and customer relationships. Starting with approximately 80 companies that fit a general set of criteria, potential targets were analyzed
against these criteria. In considering potential acquisition targets, Rockwell Collins considered a number of factors and qualities with respect to potential acquisition targets, including the
technical differentiation of their respective products and services, the similarity of regulatory regimes in which they operated, their leadership position in the segments that they served, their
customer relationships and reputation and their full product life cycle capability. At Rockwell Collins' board meeting in June 2015, a short list of potential targets, which included B/E Aerospace,
was presented. In subsequent board meetings in November 2015, April 2016 and June 2016, the candidates were evaluated against changing market conditions and assessed fit. The short list of targets
evaluated by the Rockwell Collins Board at these meetings varied from 2 to 4 companies. Changes in the composition of the list were made based on Rockwell Collins' ongoing valuation analysis and
consideration of market conditions, as well as Rockwell Collins' assessment of the potential target's receptivity to a potential sale transaction. B/E Aerospace remained an acquisition candidate of
interest throughout this time.
The
following chronology sets forth a summary of the material events leading up to the execution of the merger agreement.
In
January 2016, a representative of a company, referred to as Party A, contacted Mr. Amin J. Khoury, Executive Chairman of B/E Aerospace, seeking to arrange a meeting. In the
ordinary course of business, B/E Aerospace senior management met with Party A from time to time to discuss, generally, the ongoing business relationship between the parties. In advance of this
particular meeting,
56
Table of Contents
representatives
of Party A requested to include a member of its business development team at such meeting, to which B/E Aerospace senior management agreed. In mid-February 2016, Mr. Khoury met
with representatives of Party A. During this meeting, the parties discussed, among other things, their businesses, their business relationship and general market trends. Party A did not make any
specific inquiries with respect to a potential transaction involving B/E Aerospace at or following such meeting.
In
February 2016, based on Citigroup's prior financial advisory work for Rockwell Collins, representatives of Rockwell Collins contacted representatives of Citigroup to inquire about
exploring a potential transaction in the aircraft interiors industry. Following that initial discussion on February 8, Rockwell Collins contacted representatives of Citigroup and expressed
preliminary interest in exploring a potential transaction with B/E Aerospace.
In
late February 2016, Mr. Jeffrey MacLauchlan, Senior Vice President of Corporate Development of Rockwell Collins, contacted Mr. Joseph Lower, Chief Financial Officer of
B/E Aerospace, to arrange a meeting. On February 29, 2016, Messrs. MacLauchlan and Lower met to discuss market conditions and industry trends. In addition, Mr. MacLauchlan
discussed the complementary nature of Rockwell Collins' and B/E Aerospace's respective businesses. At the conclusion of the meeting, Messrs. MacLauchlan and Lower agreed to stay in touch and to
potentially continue their conversation at a future date. Following the meeting, Mr. Lower informed other members of B/E Aerospace senior management about the meeting.
In
April 2016, a company, which, together with its parent company is referred to as Party B, called Mr. Khoury to arrange a meeting that would include, among others, a senior
executive of Party B. Mr. Khoury notified the B/E Aerospace Board of such request. On May 11, 2016, representatives of B/E Aerospace senior management met with representatives of Party B
to explore potential strategic alternatives, including an investment in B/E Aerospace by Party B or a combination of B/E Aerospace and Party B. Shortly thereafter, Party B informed B/E Aerospace
senior management that it was not prepared to make an investment in, or further explore a strategic transaction with, B/E Aerospace.
Between
February and June 2016, Rockwell Collins senior management continued to evaluate potential targets and their relative merits. Rockwell Collins senior management provided a status
report of this process to the Rockwell Collins Board at its April 2016 meeting. At the June 2016 meeting of the Rockwell Collins Board, Rockwell Collins senior management provided a further update on
its evaluation and recommended to the Rockwell Collins Board that Rockwell Collins engage more formally with B/E Aerospace to consider the potential for a transaction.
On
or about June 27, 2016, Mr. Kelly Ortberg, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Rockwell Collins, contacted Mr. Khoury telephonically.
Mr. Khoury and Mr. Ortberg discussed the complementary nature of Rockwell Collins' and B/E Aerospace's respective businesses, as well as the prospect of a potential transaction involving
the two companies. At the conclusion of the conversation, Mr. Ortberg advised that Mr. MacLauchlan would contact Mr. Lower to schedule a face-to-face meeting to continue the
discussions.
On
July 7, 2016, B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins executed a mutual non-disclosure agreement. Following execution of the agreement, representatives of senior management of
Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace scheduled a meeting for July 20, 2016.
On July 20, 2016, representatives of senior management of B/E Aerospace (Messrs. Khoury and Lower and Mr. Werner Lieberherr, President and Chief Executive Officer of
B/E Aerospace) and Rockwell Collins (Messrs. Ortberg and MacLauchlan, and Mr. Patrick Allen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Rockwell Collins) met at B/E Aerospace's
headquarters in Wellington, Florida to discuss the prospect of a potential transaction involving the two companies. Each party presented portions of their investor relations materials, which included
publicly available information about each company's respective financial and operational results, business and product lines. In addition, B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins discussed potential areas
of cost and revenue synergies
57
Table of Contents
that were identified by each party. Rockwell Collins expressed an interest in continuing discussions to further explore the potential combination benefits. The parties agreed that if further
discussions were held, advisors could be helpful in refining these estimates and approaches.
On
July 28, 2016, the B/E Aerospace Board met in Boston, Massachusetts in connection with the regularly scheduled annual meeting of stockholders of B/E Aerospace. At this meeting,
among other matters, B/E Aerospace senior management provided an overview of the recent interest expressed by Party A, Party B and Rockwell Collins in connection with a potential transaction involving
B/E Aerospace. Following conversations amongst the B/E Aerospace Board and B/E Aerospace senior
management, the B/E Aerospace Board directed B/E Aerospace senior management to explore potential strategic alternatives with assistance from independent financial advisors.
Subsequent
to the B/E Aerospace Board meeting, the parties agreed to meet to continue discussions and to include financial and legal advisors going forward.
On
August 9, 2016, senior management of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins met in New York to continue preliminary discussions regarding a potential transaction involving the two
companies and discussed the expectations for the meeting with advisors to occur the following day.
On August 10, 2016, representatives of senior management of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins, together with representatives from Shearman & Sterling LLP, which is
referred to as Shearman & Sterling, outside counsel to B/E Aerospace, Citigroup, as financial advisor to B/E Aerospace, Goldman Sachs, as financial advisor to B/E Aerospace, Skadden,
outside counsel to Rockwell Collins, and J.P. Morgan, as financial advisor to Rockwell Collins, met at the offices of Shearman & Sterling. At the meeting, representatives of senior management
of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins discussed their respective businesses. In addition, B/E Aerospace senior management discussed the financial outlook of B/E Aerospace and potential cost and
revenue synergies that could be achieved in connection with a potential combination of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins. At the conclusion of the meeting, senior management of B/E Aerospace and
Rockwell Collins agreed to perform additional due diligence and financial analyses with their respective representatives, and to meet again following such additional diligence and analyses to further
explore the prospects of a potential combination.
On
August 15, 2015, the executive committee of the Rockwell Collins Board met telephonically. At the meeting, Rockwell Collins senior management provided the committee with an
update on the potential acquisition of B/E Aerospace, including the meetings between the two parties on August 9 and August 10, 2016.
On August 16, 2016, the B/E Aerospace Board met telephonically. Present at the meeting were members of B/E Aerospace senior management and representatives from Shearman &
Sterling, Citigroup and Goldman Sachs. At the meeting, B/E Aerospace senior management discussed the B/E Aerospace five-year plan that had previously been distributed to the B/E Aerospace Board
and answered questions from members of the B/E Aerospace Board regarding the assumptions and inputs of the plan. The five-year plan, which had been prepared in connection with B/E Aerospace senior
management's evaluation of a potential transaction with Rockwell Collins, included information related to revenue, earnings before interest and income tax, earnings before interest, tax, depreciation
and amortization and free cash flow for the periods set forth therein. B/E Aerospace senior management then provided an update with respect to the ongoing discussions between B/E Aerospace and
Rockwell Collins, including a report on the meetings between the two parties on August 9 and August 10, 2016.
Also
at this meeting, representatives of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs discussed certain aspects of the transaction and advised the B/E Aerospace Board that it was expected that any
transaction would
include consideration consisting of a significant Rockwell Collins stock component. Representatives of Shearman & Sterling discussed with the B/E Aerospace Board, among other things, its
fiduciary duties under Delaware law in the context of a transaction process.
58
Table of Contents
Following
these discussions, representatives of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs were then excused from the meeting to allow the B/E Aerospace Board to discuss formally engaging both
Citigroup and Goldman Sachs as joint financial advisors. Representatives from each of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs were then asked to return to the meeting at separate times to answer specific
questions about their respective relationships with Rockwell Collins.
At
the conclusion of the meeting, the B/E Aerospace Board authorized B/E Aerospace senior management to proceed with negotiations with Rockwell Collins and to provide the B/E Aerospace
five-year plan to Rockwell Collins in order to facilitate further discussions. In addition, the B/E Aerospace Board authorized B/E Aerospace senior management to formally retain both Citigroup
and Goldman Sachs as joint financial advisors in connection with the consideration and review of strategic alternatives by the B/E Aerospace Board. On September 6, 2016, Citigroup and Goldman
Sachs each executed engagement letters with B/E Aerospace to provide financial advisory services to B/E Aerospace in connection with the consideration and review of strategic alternatives by the
B/E Aerospace Board.
On
August 22, 2016, representatives of senior management of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins met to further discuss the prospect of a potential transaction. The parties also
discussed their respective business plans, including each company's five-year plan, and presented certain legal, financial and operational information to each other.
On
September 2, 2016, the corporate strategy and finance committee and the executive committee of the Rockwell Collins Board met telephonically in a joint meeting. Present at the
meeting were members of Rockwell Collins senior management and representatives from Skadden and J.P. Morgan. At the meeting, Rockwell Collins senior management provided an update with respect to the
potential acquisition of B/E Aerospace, including a review of the process followed by Rockwell Collins senior management to identify suitable acquisition candidates and a review of B/E Aerospace's
financial and market profile, the impact of the potential acquisition on the companies' combined business portfolio and potential cost synergies. Representatives of J.P. Morgan discussed
J.P. Morgan's preliminary financial analysis perspectives with respect to the potential transaction. Rockwell Collins senior management then reviewed with the committees, and obtained their
concurrence on, the terms of a proposed preliminary, non-binding indication of interest for the potential transaction.
Later
on September 2, 2016, Rockwell Collins delivered a preliminary, non-binding indication of interest to B/E Aerospace, pursuant to which Rockwell Collins proposed to acquire
100% of the common stock of B/E Aerospace for a per share purchase price of between $58 and $60, to be paid 50% in cash and 50% in shares of Rockwell Collins common stock.
On
September 5, 2016, following preliminary discussions with B/E Aerospace senior management, representatives of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs were directed to contact
representatives of J.P. Morgan to inform J.P. Morgan that B/E Aerospace senior management believed that the B/E Aerospace Board would likely view Rockwell Collins' proposal as not sufficiently
attractive and would likely be unwilling to engage in further discussions based on the valuation included in the proposal.
On
September 7, 2016, the B/E Aerospace Board met at the offices of Shearman & Sterling. Also present at the meeting were members of B/E Aerospace senior management and
representatives from Shearman & Sterling, Citigroup and Goldman Sachs. At the meeting, B/E Aerospace senior management updated the B/E Aerospace Board with respect to the performance and
outlook of B/E Aerospace, other general market conditions that impact B/E Aerospace's businesses, and other factors viewed as relevant in determining whether B/E Aerospace should further
consider the Rockwell Collins proposal or other strategic alternatives. Following that discussion, B/E Aerospace senior management, together with its financial advisors, provided a general summary of
the September 2, 2016 non-binding indication of interest, and representatives of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs provided their
59
Table of Contents
preliminary
financial analysis with respect to B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins and an overview of preliminary discussions with J.P. Morgan with respect to the proposal.
The B/E Aerospace Board, together with senior management and its advisors, then engaged in a detailed discussion on how to best facilitate a process that would be in the best interests
of B/E Aerospace and its stockholders. The B/E Aerospace Board and B/E Aerospace senior management discussed possible strategic alternatives available to maximize stockholder
value, including executing B/E Aerospace's organic business plan, alternative capital structures and capital deployment priorities, potential strategic acquisitions or an alternative business
combination. B/E Aerospace senior management and the B/E Aerospace Board then discussed the current environment in the aerospace industry, including the trends in consolidation and
competition, and the likely effect of these factors on B/E Aerospace. Following these discussions, the B/E Aerospace Board did not believe that other strategic alternatives would likely
be as attractive as a potential transaction with Rockwell Collins (assuming more favorable terms could be negotiated).
B/E Aerospace senior management then provided an overview of its prior discussions with Party A and Party B regarding a potential transaction involving B/E Aerospace, and noted that
neither such
discussions resulted in an express or implied indication of interest from Party A or Party B that such companies were prepared to pursue a potential transaction involving B/E Aerospace.
The B/E Aerospace Board then asked one of its directors that had a previous relationship with (and from time to time speaks to representatives of) a potential strategic partner, referred to as
Party C, to contact Party C to gauge its interest in a potential transaction involving B/E Aerospace. Following the meeting and in response to the inquiry made by a member of the B/E Aerospace Board,
Party C advised that it was not interested in pursuing a transaction with B/E Aerospace.
Representatives of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs then provided an overview of potential transaction partners (other than Rockwell Collins) that may have both a strategic rationale and the
financial wherewithal to consummate a transaction with B/E Aerospace. These potential acquirers included companies currently serving the aerospace and defense markets as well as financial buyers. As
part of these discussions, the B/E Aerospace Board discussed whether other parties should be contacted in light of Rockwell Collins' proposal and discussed the likelihood that any other parties would
be interested in a strategic transaction involving B/E Aerospace on the same or similar terms to the Rockwell Collins proposal. Based upon these discussions, the prior contacts with Party A and
Party B (and subject to the result of the inquiry to be made to Party C), and advice from the financial advisors, the B/E Aerospace Board determined that such transaction partners
would not likely be able to consummate a transaction with B/E Aerospace that would provide equal or greater value to B/E Aerospace stockholders as compared to a potential transaction with
Rockwell Collins (assuming more favorable terms could be negotiated). As such, the B/E Aerospace Board determined not to expand its search for strategic alternatives with other third parties to avoid
the risk of losing momentum with what was viewed as the most attractive strategic alternative.
The B/E Aerospace Board, together with B/E Aerospace senior management and its advisors, then engaged in an extensive discussion regarding a potential transaction with Rockwell Collins.
Following these discussions, the B/E Aerospace Board determined that Rockwell Collins' proposal was, as then proposed, not yet sufficiently attractive from a financial point of view, but that further
discussion with Rockwell Collins was warranted. The B/E Aerospace Board authorized Citigroup and Goldman Sachs to advise J.P. Morgan that B/E Aerospace found the Rockwell Collins proposal to be
not sufficiently attractive and to provide guidance with respect to elements of the proposal that would need to be improved.
On
September 8, 2016, representatives of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs advised representatives of J.P. Morgan of the outcome of the B/E Aerospace Board meeting on
September 7, 2016, and the need to improve the economic terms of the proposal by Rockwell Collins in order for B/E Aerospace to further consider a potential combination.
60
Table of Contents
On September 14, 2016, the Rockwell Collins Board met in person for a regularly scheduled board meeting at Rockwell Collins' headquarters in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Present at the
meeting were members of Rockwell Collins senior management and representatives from Skadden and J.P. Morgan. At the meeting, representatives of Skadden discussed with the Rockwell Collins Board, among
other things, its fiduciary duties under Delaware law in the context of a potential acquisition of B/E Aerospace. Rockwell Collins senior management provided an update with respect to the
potential acquisition of B/E Aerospace, including a review of the process followed by management to identify suitable acquisition candidates and a review of B/E Aerospace's financial and market
profile, the impact of the potential acquisition on the companies' combined business portfolio and potential cost synergies. Rockwell Collins senior management then presented preliminary valuation
perspectives regarding B/E Aerospace and reviewed the terms of the preliminary, non-binding indication of interest submitted to B/E Aerospace on September 2, 2016 and B/E Aerospace's response
to such indication of interest. Rockwell Collins senior management then reviewed with the Rockwell Collins Board possible revisions to the terms of its indication of interest. The preliminary
valuation perspectives regarding B/E Aerospace presented by Rockwell Collins senior management and the possible revisions to the terms of the September 12, 2016 indication of interest
included the merger consideration (including a cash and stock mix) set forth in the merger agreement.
On
September 16, 2016, representatives of J.P. Morgan, at Rockwell Collins' direction, indicated to representatives of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs that Rockwell Collins remained
interested in a transaction and was prepared, subject to additional diligence, to negotiate a transaction (i) in a price range of $61 to $62 per share, consisting of 50% cash and 50% shares of
Rockwell Collins common stock, subject to a price collar, (ii) with termination fees payable by each company under certain circumstances of $200 million and (iii) whereby one
director designated by B/E Aerospace would be appointed to the Rockwell Collins Board.
Between September 16, 2016 and September 27, 2016, each of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins continued to perform additional due diligence on the other party, including a
telephonic due diligence session that was held on September 25, 2016 among B/E Aerospace, Rockwell Collins and their respective financial advisors.
On
September 20, 2016, members of the B/E Aerospace Board met telephonically with representatives of B/E Aerospace senior management, Shearman & Sterling, Citigroup and
Goldman Sachs, during which B/E Aerospace senior management, together with its financial advisors, provided an update on negotiations between B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins and reviewed the
revised terms of the proposed transaction conveyed to Citigroup and Goldman by J.P. Morgan on September 16, 2016.
On
September 21, 2016, the compensation committee of the B/E Aerospace Board, consulted with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, which is referred to as Gibson Dunn,
regarding the possible engagement of Gibson Dunn as independent legal counsel to assist the compensation committee in its evaluation of certain compensation matters related to a potential transaction.
Specifically, as previously disclosed in B/E Aerospace's public filings, since 2013, the B/E Aerospace Board and the compensation committee determined that they would favorably consider the grant of
transaction bonuses to the top named executive officers of B/E Aerospace in the event of a change in control transaction, which bonuses would be in addition to amounts payable under the employment
agreements with each executive. The final determination of the structure and the specific amount of such bonuses was deferred by the
compensation committee until such time as B/E Aerospace might become involved in active transaction negotiations. The compensation committee determined to retain Gibson Dunn, negotiated the terms of
the Gibson Dunn engagement, and ultimately executed an engagement letter with Gibson Dunn on September 30, 2016.
On September 27, 2016, representatives of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins senior management, as well as representatives from Shearman & Sterling, Citigroup, Goldman
Sachs, Skadden
61
Table of Contents
and J.P. Morgan met at the offices of Shearman & Sterling. Following several rounds of negotiations, the parties reached a tentative agreement, subject to further due diligence, the negotiation
of other material transaction terms and the negotiation of acceptable definitive documentation and board approval, on the following terms: (i) Rockwell Collins would acquire 100% of the common
stock of B/E Aerospace for $62 per share, with the consideration consisting of 50% cash and 50% shares of Rockwell Collins common stock, subject to a two-way 7.5% collar; (ii) the
termination fee payable by Rockwell Collins to B/E Aerospace under certain circumstances would be $300 million and the termination fee payable by B/E Aerospace to Rockwell Collins under certain
circumstances would be $200 million; (iii) Rockwell Collins would add two directors designated by B/E Aerospace to the Rockwell Collins Board; and (iv) certain B/E Aerospace
compensation and benefits related matters. Based upon Rockwell Collins' director qualification requirements, John T. Whates and Richard G. Hamermesh, both members of the B/E Aerospace Board, were
identified as the likely B/E Aerospace designees.
On September 27, 2016, members of Rockwell Collins senior management contacted Mr. Lieberherr to discuss Mr. Lieberherr's willingness to remain with the combined
company following the closing of the potential merger. Mr. Lieberherr retained Latham & Watkins LLP, which is referred to as Latham & Watkins, to advise him regarding the terms of any future
employment with the combined company. Mr. Lieberherr subsequently informed B/E Aerospace senior management of the possibility that he would continue to work for the combined company following
closing of the potential merger.
On
September 29, 2016, B/E Aerospace opened a virtual data room and invited Rockwell Collins and its representatives to review due diligence materials relating to B/E Aerospace
included therein.
On
September 30, 2016, Skadden distributed an initial draft of the merger agreement to Shearman & Sterling.
On
September 30, 2016, J.P. Morgan, at Rockwell Collins' request, provided due diligence materials relating to Rockwell Collins to Citigroup and Goldman Sachs, which in turn
provided these materials to B/E Aerospace for due diligence review. The due diligence materials included Rockwell Collin's strategic plan and related projections.
Between
September 30, 2016 and October 23, 2016, Rockwell Collins' and B/E Aerospace's legal counsels negotiated the terms and conditions of the merger agreement,
including, among other things, representations and warranties, covenants relating to conduct of business and regulatory approvals, tax matters relating to the KLX spin-off, the treatment of various
pre- and post-closing compensation-related matters, closing conditions and termination rights and fees.
Between October 1, 2016 and October 21, 2016, Mr. Lieberherr and his counsel, Latham & Watkins, negotiated terms of a future employment agreement with Rockwell
Collins and Skadden. In the course of these negotiations, Rockwell Collins and Mr. Lieberherr discussed a possible leadership role in the combined company and ultimately agreed that Mr. Lieberherr
would serve as an Executive Vice President of Rockwell Collins and the Chief Operating Officer of Rockwell Collins' aircraft interior systems business unit. On October 21, 2016,
Mr. Lieberherr and Rockwell Collins executed and delivered an employment agreement. Later that same day, Mr. Lieberherr notified B/E Aerospace senior management that he had entered into
such employment agreement.
On
October 3, 2016, Rockwell Collins hosted a telephonic due diligence call with B/E Aerospace and its financial advisors during which Rockwell Collins answered various questions
regarding Rockwell Collins, its strategic plan and projections and the related due diligence materials previously provided.
On
October 5, 2016, J.P. Morgan, at Rockwell Collins' request, provided additional due diligence materials relating to Rockwell Collins to Citigroup and Goldman Sachs, which in
turn provided these
62
Table of Contents
materials
to B/E Aerospace for due diligence review. The diligence materials included Rockwell Collins' plans for the merger and an initial draft of the Rockwell Collins rating agency presentation.
On
October 7, 2016, Rockwell Collins and representatives from J.P. Morgan met with S&P and Moody's to provide an overview of the potential transaction between B/E Aerospace and
Rockwell Collins.
On
October 12, 2016, the Rockwell Collins Board met telephonically. Present at the meeting were members of Rockwell Collins senior management and representatives from Skadden and
J.P. Morgan. Rockwell Collins senior management reviewed in detail the potential acquisition of B/E Aerospace, including the strategic rationale for the transaction, the estimated cost synergies
expected to be achieved in the transaction, B/E Aerospace's projected financial forecasts and pro forma financial forecasts of the combined companies, the proposed financing of the transaction, the
results of the financial and legal due diligence review performed on B/E Aerospace and various tax considerations relating to the KLX spin-off. Representatives of Skadden reviewed the terms of the
proposed draft merger agreement for the transaction. Representatives of J.P. Morgan discussed J.P. Morgan's preliminary financial analyses with respect to the transaction.
On
October 13, 2016, the B/E Aerospace Board met telephonically. B/E Aerospace senior management provided the B/E Aerospace Board with an update on negotiations between
B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins, including the status of negotiations with respect to certain key contractual terms, the status of the mutual due diligence process and certain timing
considerations. Mr. Khoury advised that Rockwell Collins was interested in retaining Mr. Lieberherr, and confirmed Mr. Lieberherr's willingness to remain with the combined company
pursuant to the terms of an employment agreement to be negotiated and executed at or immediately prior to signing.
On
October 13, 2016, following four telephonic meetings of the compensation committee with the participation of its independent advisors, Gibson Dunn and Pearl Meyer &
Partners, LLC (which also included a presentation from senior management's outside counsel, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP, and senior management's outside consulting and tax
advisory firm, Golden Parachute Tax Solutions LLC), the compensation committee recommended for approval by the B/E Aerospace Board, and the B/E Aerospace Board (with Mr. Khoury
abstaining) approved, the payment and terms of transaction bonuses for Messrs. Khoury, Lieberherr, Lower and Patch.
On
October 18, 2016, representatives of J.P. Morgan, at Rockwell Collins' direction, contacted representatives of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs to convey Rockwell Collins' intent to
revise the proposed mix of consideration, consisting of 55% cash (i.e., $34.10) and 45% stock (i.e., shares of Rockwell Collins common stock having a value equal to $27.90), subject to a
two-way 7.5% collar.
On October 21, 2016, the Rockwell Collins Board met at the offices of Skadden in New York. Present at the meeting were members of Rockwell Collins senior management and
representatives from Skadden and J.P. Morgan. Rockwell Collins senior management updated the Rockwell Collins Board on the results of the additional financial analysis and due diligence performed on
B/E Aerospace and the status of negotiations with B/E Aerospace. The reports on the additional financial analysis and due diligence presented by Rockwell Collins senior management included a review of
B/E Aerospace's change of control payments, a review of the anticipated synergies from the transaction and an assessment of certain B/E Aerospace employee and customer relations matters. Rockwell
Collins senior management also reviewed in detail the proposed financing of the transaction, including the terms of the proposed bridge commitment for a portion of the cash consideration.
Representatives of Skadden reviewed, among other things, the terms of the draft merger agreement, a copy of which previously had been provided to the Rockwell Collins Board along with a summary of the
material terms of the merger agreement. Representatives of J.P. Morgan reviewed J.P. Morgan's financial analyses with respect
to the proposed transaction and rendered J.P. Morgan's oral opinion to the Rockwell Collins Board that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its
63
Table of Contents
opinion, the merger consideration to be paid by Rockwell Collins was fair, from a financial point of view, to Rockwell Collins. (The oral opinion was subsequently confirmed in writing by delivery of
J.P. Morgan's written opinion dated October 23, 2016.) Following extensive discussion, the Rockwell Collins Board unanimously approved the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby and unanimously approved and adopted resolutions authorizing the transaction and related matters.
On
October 21, 2016, the B/E Aerospace Board met at the offices of Shearman & Sterling. B/E Aerospace senior management updated the B/E Aerospace Board on the status
of negotiations with Rockwell Collins and the results of the financial and legal due diligence performed on Rockwell Collins. Representatives of Shearman & Sterling reviewed, among other
things, the terms of the draft merger agreement, a copy of which previously had been provided to the B/E Aerospace Board along with a summary of the material terms of the merger agreement.
Representatives
of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs presented their updated financial analyses with respect to B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins.
Representatives
of Citigroup then advised the B/E Aerospace Board that, based on Citigroup's current understandings and subject to review of the execution version of the merger agreement
and future developments, Citigroup expected to be able to render an opinion to the B/E Aerospace Board, as of the date of the merger agreement and to the effect that, as of that date and based upon
and subject to the factors and assumptions described therein, the merger consideration to be paid to the holders (other than Rockwell Collins and its affiliates) of outstanding shares of common stock
of B/E Aerospace pursuant to the merger agreement is fair from a financial point of view to such holders.
Representatives of Goldman Sachs then advised the B/E Aerospace Board that, based on Goldman Sachs' current understandings and subject to review of the execution version of the merger
agreement and future developments, Goldman Sachs expected to be able to render an opinion to the B/E Aerospace Board, as of the date of the merger agreement and to the effect that, as of that
date and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions described therein, the merger consideration to be paid to the holders (other than Rockwell Collins and its affiliates) of outstanding
shares of common stock of B/E Aerospace pursuant to the merger agreement is fair from a financial point of view to such holders.
The
B/E Aerospace Board and its advisors engaged in an extended discussion of the potential transaction and the proposed terms and conditions of the merger agreement, considering a
number of factors, including the comparative likelihood of consummation of the potential transaction, the opportunities presented by the potential transaction, the recent and historical market prices
for B/E Aerospace common stock and Rockwell Collins common stock and the fact that the stock portion of the merger consideration would be subject to a two-way 7.5% collar. The B/E Aerospace
Board then reviewed the proposed resolutions authorizing the execution of the merger agreement. After carefully considering the merger agreement and the proposed resolutions, it was the consensus of
the B/E Aerospace Board that the merger was in the best interests of B/E Aerospace's stockholders and, subject to an acceptable outcome in the negotiation of the final issues under the merger
agreement, including certain tax matters, the ability of a party to terminate the agreement and the applicable fees payable in connection therewith, and certain other matters, the B/E Aerospace Board
agreed that it was prepared to approve and adopt such proposed resolutions and authorized B/E Aerospace senior management to continue to negotiate and to finalize the merger agreement.
On
the evening of October 21, 2016, representatives of Shearman & Sterling, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Skadden and J.P. Morgan met at the offices of Shearman &
Sterling to negotiate the final terms of the potential transaction.
On
the morning of October 22, 2016, the B/E Aerospace Board reconvened for a telephonic meeting with B/E Aerospace senior management and Shearman & Sterling. At the
meeting, B/E Aerospace senior management provided an update with respect to the negotiation of the terms and
64
Table of Contents
conditions
of the potential transaction with Rockwell Collins, the remaining issues related thereto and the proposed resolution of such issues. Following a discussion, the B/E Aerospace Board
authorized B/E Aerospace senior management to continue to negotiate and finalize the definitive transaction documents in accordance with the proposed terms discussed at the meeting.
On
October 22, 2016, representatives of senior management of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins and their respective advisors continued to negotiate the final terms and conditions
of the merger agreement and related transactions.
On
the morning of October 23, 2016, Shearman & Sterling circulated an execution version of the merger agreement to the B/E Aerospace Board, B/E Aerospace senior management,
Citigroup and Goldman Sachs. Later that morning, by written consent, the B/E Aerospace Board confirmed that the merger was in the best interests of B/E Aerospace's stockholders, unanimously approved
and adopted the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and unanimously approved and adopted the resolutions authorizing the transaction and related matters. The B/E Aerospace Board
received a
written opinion, dated October 23, 2016, from each of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs to the effect that, as of that date and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in such
opinion, the merger consideration to be paid to the holders (other than Rockwell Collins and its affiliates) of outstanding shares of common stock of B/E Aerospace pursuant to the merger agreement was
fair from a financial point of view to such holders.
On
the same day, each of B/E Aerospace, Rockwell Collins and Merger Sub executed and delivered the merger agreement. Thereafter, B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins issued a joint press
release announcing the merger.
Rockwell Collins Board of Directors' Recommendations and Its Reasons for the Transaction
On October 21, 2016, the Rockwell Collins Board unanimously (i) approved the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement; (ii) determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are advisable and in the best interests of Rockwell Collins and
Rockwell Collins' stockholders; (iii) directed that the Share Issuance proposal be submitted to a vote of Rockwell Collins' stockholders; and (iv) recommended that the stockholders of
Rockwell Collins vote "
FOR
" the Share Issuance proposal.
In evaluating the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, the Rockwell Collins Board consulted with Rockwell Collins' management and legal and
financial advisors and, in reaching its determinations, the Rockwell Collins Board considered a variety of factors with respect to the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the specific reasons described above under "Risk Factors" and "Background of the Merger" beginning on page 45 and page 56, respectively, and the factors
listed below.
-
-
The merger would significantly increase Rockwell Collins' scale and diversify its product portfolio, customer mix and geographic presence;
-
-
The merger would combine market leaders with complementary capabilities in avionics and interior products that also have a shared reputation
for innovation, quality and on-time delivery and a common customer base, including OEMs, airlines and lessors;
-
-
The combination of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins would accelerate technological leadership in integrated digital airplanes in that it
uniquely positions Rockwell Collins to provide a more integrated solution to meet the digital demands of the commercial airplane;
-
-
The merger would substantially increase Rockwell Collins' buyer-furnished equipment and aftermarket exposure by providing it with a large
revenue stream tied to passenger traffic growth and airline profitability with a substantial aftermarket component, which would serve to balance Rockwell Collins' current cyclical exposure to OEM
production rates;
65
Table of Contents
-
-
The combination of B/E Aerospace's leading business jet aircraft cabin interior products with Rockwell Collins' dealer network and owner and
maintenance databases would facilitate creation of a private aircraft interiors aftermarket, which is a significant new opportunity;
-
-
The expectation is that the combined company would achieve approximately $160 million of identified cost synergies from, among other
things, the elimination of corporate and public company costs, manufacturing consolidation, information technology consolidation and supply chain leveraging, and would have improved pre-tax earnings
of approximately $60 to $90 million per year for the first six years after the acquisition due to certain conforming purchase accounting adjustments related to capitalized development costs
related to seller furnished equipment contracts;
-
-
The merger would significantly enhance Rockwell Collins' financial profile by accelerating Rockwell Collins' free cash flow growth and would be
accretive to Rockwell Collins' earnings per share in the first full fiscal year following the acquisition;
-
-
The fact that the stock portion of the merger consideration is based upon a floating exchange ratio and subject to a two-way 7.5% collar, which
provides protection against fluctuations in the market price of Rockwell Collins common stock between the date of the merger agreement and the date of the completion of the merger;
-
-
The Rockwell Collins Board's knowledge of Rockwell Collins' business, operations, financial condition, earnings and prospects and its knowledge
of B/E Aerospace's business, operations, financial condition, earnings and prospects, taking into account B/E Aerospace's publicly-filed information and the results of Rockwell Collins' due diligence
review of B/E Aerospace;
-
-
The long-term and recent historical trading prices of Rockwell Collins common stock and B/E Aerospace common stock and the amount of the
merger consideration;
-
-
The expectation that the combined company will benefit from the experienced management teams of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace;
-
-
The commitments by both Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace to complete the merger, as set forth in the merger agreement, and the belief of the
Rockwell Collins Board that the transaction does not present significant regulatory concerns that would impact the ability to complete the merger;
-
-
The Rockwell Collins Board's review of Rockwell Collins' and B/E Aerospace's business, strategies, current and projected financial condition,
current earnings and earnings prospects;
-
-
The oral opinion of J.P. Morgan rendered to the Rockwell Collins Board on October 21, 2016, that, as of such date and based upon and
subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its opinion, the merger consideration to be paid by Rockwell Collins was fair, from a financial point of view, to Rockwell Collins, as more fully
described in the section entitled "Opinion of Rockwell Collins' Financial Advisor" beginning on page 73. The oral opinion was subsequently confirmed in writing by delivery of J.P.
Morgan's written opinion dated October 23, 2016. The full text of the written opinion of J.P. Morgan, which sets forth the assumptions made, matters considered and limits on the review
undertaken, is attached as Annex B to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference, and Rockwell Collins' stockholders are urged to read this written opinion in
its entirety;
-
-
The current environment in the aerospace industry, including the trend of consolidation and increased competition; and
-
-
The merger will be subject to the approval of Rockwell Collins' stockholders.
66
Table of Contents
The
Rockwell Collins Board also specifically considered the terms of the merger agreement, including the following:
-
-
The termination fee payable by B/E Aerospace to Rockwell Collins if B/E Aerospace terminates the merger agreement to pursue a competing
transaction with a third party or in certain other circumstances;
-
-
That if Rockwell Collins were to receive a takeover proposal from a third party that provided superior value to Rockwell Collins and its
stockholders, Rockwell Collins and the Rockwell Collins Board would be able, under circumstances described in the merger agreement, to consider such superior proposal and the Rockwell Collins Board
may change its recommendation that Rockwell Collins stockholders vote in favor of the Share Issuance proposal and/or terminate the merger agreement;
-
-
Rockwell Collins' ability, under circumstances described in the merger agreement, to provide information to and engage in discussions or
negotiations with a third party that makes an unsolicited bona fide written takeover proposal;
-
-
The ability of the Rockwell Collins Board, subject to certain conditions, to change its recommendation supporting the merger in response to an
intervening event if the Rockwell Collins Board determines that failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties;
-
-
Rockwell Collins' obligation to consummate the transaction is subject to the condition that Rockwell Collins has received an opinion regarding
the effect of the transaction on the tax-free nature of the KLX spin-off; and
-
-
The customary nature of Rockwell Collins' other representations, warranties and covenants in the merger agreement.
The
Rockwell Collins Board weighed the foregoing against a number of potentially negative factors, including:
-
-
The risk of not being able to realize all of the anticipated cost savings and operational synergies between Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace
and the risk that other anticipated benefits might not be realized;
-
-
The challenges inherent in the combination of two businesses of the size and complexity of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace;
-
-
The costs associated with the completion of the merger and the realization of the benefits expected to be obtained in connection with the
merger, including management's time and energy and potential opportunity cost;
-
-
The risks that the merger may not be completed and the challenges in absorbing the effect of any failure to complete the merger, including
stockholder and market reactions, as well as the diversion of management's attention from ongoing business concerns;
-
-
The fact that the value of the merger consideration payable to B/E Aerospace stockholders could increase in the event that the price of
Rockwell Collins common stock increases more than 7.5% prior to completion of the merger;
-
-
The restrictions on the conduct of Rockwell Collins' business during the period between the execution of the merger agreement and the
completion of the merger;
-
-
The risk that regulatory agencies may not approve the merger or may impose terms and conditions on their approvals that adversely affect the
business and financial results of the combined company as more fully described under "Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger" beginning on page 115;
67
Table of Contents
-
-
The termination fee payable by Rockwell Collins to B/E Aerospace if Rockwell Collins terminates the merger agreement to pursue a competing
transaction with a third party or in certain other circumstances;
-
-
The fact that Rockwell Collins will be required to reimburse B/E Aerospace for its expenses up to $56 million if the merger
agreement is terminated by either party because the Rockwell Collins stockholders did not approve the share issuance for the transaction;
-
-
The fact that the merger agreement does not preclude a third party from making an unsolicited proposal for a competing transaction with
B/E Aerospace and that, under certain circumstances more fully described in the sections "The Merger AgreementCovenants and AgreementsNo Solicitation" beginning on
page 140 and "The Merger AgreementCovenants and AgreementsAdverse Recommendation Change and Termination" beginning on page 141, B/E Aerospace may furnish
non-public information to and enter into discussions with such third party regarding the competing transaction and the B/E Aerospace Board may withdraw or modify its recommendations to
B/E Aerospace stockholders regarding the transaction and may terminate the merger agreement to enter into a competing transaction under certain circumstances;
-
-
The fact that certain senior executives of B/E Aerospace would receive substantial payments in connection with the merger;
-
-
The fact that B/E Aerospace could have substantial liabilities if the merger causes the KLX spin-off to fail to qualify for the KLX spin-off
tax treatment;
-
-
The risk that the Rockwell Collins stockholders do not approve the Share Issuance proposal;
-
-
The fact that Rockwell Collins' obligation to complete the transaction is not conditioned upon the ability of Rockwell Collins to obtain
financing for the cash portion of the consideration;
-
-
The risk of litigation related to the transaction; and
-
-
The risks of the type and nature described under "Risk Factors" beginning on page 45 and the matters described under "Cautionary Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" beginning on page 43.
This
discussion of the information and factors considered by the Rockwell Collins Board in reaching its conclusions and recommendation includes the principal factors considered by the
Rockwell Collins Board, but is not intended to be exhaustive and may not include all of the factors considered by the Rockwell Collins Board. In view of the wide variety of factors considered in
connection with its evaluation of the transaction, and the complexity of these matters, the Rockwell Collins Board did not find it useful and did not attempt to quantify, rank or assign any relative
or specific weights to the various factors that it considered in reaching its determination to approve the transaction, including the share issuance, and to make its recommendation to Rockwell Collins
stockholders. Rather, the Rockwell Collins Board viewed its decisions as being based on the totality of the information presented to it and the factors it considered, including its discussions with,
and questioning of, members of Rockwell Collins' management and Rockwell Collins' advisors, as well as its experience and history. In addition, individual members of the Rockwell Collins Board may
have assigned different weights to different factors.
The
Rockwell Collins Board unanimously determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement were advisable and in the best interests of Rockwell
Collins and its stockholders and approved the merger agreement. Accordingly, the Rockwell Collins Board unanimously recommends that Rockwell Collins stockholders vote
"
FOR
" the Share Issuance proposal at the Rockwell Collins special meeting.
68
Table of Contents
B/E Aerospace Board of Directors' Recommendations and Its Reasons for the Transaction
On October 23, 2016, the B/E Aerospace Board unanimously (i) approved and declared advisable the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement; (ii) determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are advisable and in the best interests of
B/E Aerospace and B/E Aerospace's stockholders; (iii) directed that the Merger proposal be submitted to a vote of B/E Aerospace's stockholders; and (iv) recommended
that the stockholders of B/E Aerospace vote "
FOR
" the Merger proposal.
In evaluating the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, the B/E Aerospace Board consulted with B/E Aerospace's management and legal
and financial advisors and, in reaching its determinations, the B/E Aerospace Board considered a variety of factors with respect to the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, including the specific reasons described above under "Risk Factors" and "Background of the Merger" beginning on page 45 and page 56, respectively, and the
factors listed below.
-
-
The merger would combine market leaders with complementary capabilities in avionics and interior products that also have a shared reputation
for innovation, quality and on-time delivery and a common customer base, including OEMs, airlines and lessors;
-
-
The combination of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins would accelerate technological leadership in integrated digital airplanes in that it
uniquely positions Rockwell Collins to provide a more integrated solution to meet the digital demands of the commercial airplane;
-
-
The merger would substantially increase Rockwell Collins' buyer-furnished equipment and aftermarket exposure by providing it with a large
revenue stream tied to passenger traffic growth and airline profitability with a substantial aftermarket component, which would serve to balance Rockwell Collins' current cyclical exposure to OEM
production rates, which additional value would accrue to B/E Aerospace stockholders in connection with the stock portion of the consideration to be received by B/E Aerospace stockholders;
-
-
The combination of B/E Aerospace's leading business jet aircraft cabin interior products with Rockwell Collins' dealer network and owner and
maintenance databases would facilitate creation of a private aircraft interiors aftermarket, which is a significant new opportunity;
-
-
The expectation is that the combined company would achieve approximately $160 million of identified cost synergies from, among other
things, the elimination of corporate and public company costs, manufacturing consolidation, information technology consolidation and supply chain leveraging, and would have improved pre-tax earnings
of approximately $60 to $90 million per year for the first six years after the acquisition due to certain conforming purchase accounting adjustments related to capitalized development costs
related to seller furnished equipment contracts;
-
-
The merger would significantly enhance Rockwell Collins' financial profile by accelerating Rockwell Collins' free cash flow growth and would be
accretive to Rockwell Collins' earnings per share in the first full fiscal year following the acquisition, thereby adding value to the stock portion of the consideration received by
B/E Aerospace stockholders;
-
-
The fact that the merger consideration consists of cash, providing B/E Aerospace stockholders with certainty of value and liquidity upon
completion of the merger, along with a significant stock component, which would result in B/E Aerospace stockholders immediately prior to the merger holding approximately 20.3% of the common
stock of Rockwell Collins immediately following completion of the merger, thus providing B/E Aerospace stockholders with meaningful participation in the upside potential of a larger, more
diversified company;
69
Table of Contents
-
-
The fact that the stock portion of the merger consideration is based upon a floating exchange ratio and subject to a two-way 7.5% collar, which
provides protection against fluctuations in the market price of Rockwell Collins common stock between the date of the merger agreement and the date of the completion of the merger;
-
-
The fact that the value of the merger consideration payable to B/E Aerospace stockholders could increase in the event that the price of
Rockwell Collins common stock increases more than 7.5% prior to completion of the merger;
-
-
The B/E Aerospace Board's knowledge of B/E Aerospace's business, operations, financial condition, earnings and prospects and its knowledge of
Rockwell Collins' business, operations, financial condition, earnings and prospects, taking into account Rockwell Collins' publicly-filed information and the results of B/E Aerospace's due
diligence review of Rockwell Collins;
-
-
The long-term and recent historical trading prices of B/E Aerospace common stock and Rockwell Collins common stock and the amount of the merger
consideration;
-
-
The implied value of the merger consideration at the offer price of $62 per share of B/E Aerospace stock represented:
-
-
a 34% premium to B/E Aerospace's closing share price of $46.34 as of July 20, 2016, the initial formal meeting between the
parties regarding a potential transaction;
-
-
a 22% premium to B/E Aerospace's closing share price of $50.65 as of October 20, 2016;
-
-
a 23% premium to B/E Aerospace's trailing 30-day volume-weighted average price of $50.61 as of October 20, 2016; and
-
-
a 28% premium to B/E Aerospace's trailing 90-day volume-weighted average price of 48.30 as of October 20, 2016;
-
-
The offer price of $62 per share of B/E Aerospace stock represented a multiple of 13.6 times EV/EBITDA of B/E Aerospace for the last 12
months ending September 30, 2016;
-
-
45% of the merger consideration would be in stock, which will allow B/E Aerospace's stockholders to participate in the future
performance of the combined company;
-
-
The expectation that the combined company will benefit from the experienced management teams of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins;
-
-
The commitments by both B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins to complete the merger, as set forth in the merger agreement, and the belief of the
B/E Aerospace Board that the transaction does not present significant regulatory concerns that would impact the ability to complete the merger;
-
-
The risks and uncertainties associated with, and inherent in, maintaining B/E Aerospace's existence as an independent company;
-
-
The B/E Aerospace Board's review of B/E Aerospace's and Rockwell Collins' business, strategies, current and projected financial condition,
current earnings and earnings prospects;
-
-
The written opinions of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs delivered to the B/E Aerospace Board on October 23, 2016, that, as of such
date and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in the opinion, the merger consideration to be paid to the holders (other than Rockwell Collins and its affiliates) of
B/E Aerospace common stock in the merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to such stockholders, as more fully described below under the caption "Opinions of
B/E Aerospace's Financial Advisors" beginning on page 81. The full text of the written opinions of Citigroup and Goldman Sachs, each dated October 23, 2016, which set
70
Table of Contents
forth,
among other things, the assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the reviews undertaken in rendering their opinions, are attached as Annex C and
Annex D, respectively, to this joint proxy statement/prospectus, and are incorporated herein by reference;
-
-
The current environment in the aerospace industry, including the trends in consolidation and increased competition, and the potential financial
impact of such trends on B/E Aerospace in the future;
-
-
The merger will be subject to the approval of B/E Aerospace's stockholders and that, in this regard, B/E Aerospace's directors and executive
officers do not own a sufficient interest in B/E Aerospace common stock, in the aggregate, to influence substantially the outcome of such stockholder vote; and
-
-
B/E Aerospace stockholders who do not vote to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger and who follow certain prescribed procedures
are entitled to appraisal rights under Delaware law.
The
B/E Aerospace Board also specifically considered the terms of the merger agreement, including the following:
-
-
The lack of a financing condition to Rockwell Collins' obligation to complete the merger;
-
-
The termination fee payable by Rockwell Collins to B/E Aerospace if Rockwell Collins terminates the merger agreement to pursue a competing
transaction with a third party or in certain other circumstances;
-
-
That if B/E Aerospace were to receive a takeover proposal from a third party that provided superior value to B/E Aerospace and its
stockholders, B/E Aerospace and the B/E Aerospace Board would be able, under certain circumstances described in the merger agreement, to consider such superior proposal and the B/E Aerospace Board may
change its recommendation that B/E Aerospace stockholders vote in favor of the Merger proposal and/or terminate the merger agreement;
-
-
B/E Aerospace's ability, under circumstances described in the merger agreement, to provide information to and engage in discussions or
negotiations with a third party that makes an unsolicited bona fide written takeover proposal;
-
-
The ability of the B/E Aerospace Board, subject to certain conditions, to change its recommendation supporting the merger in response to an
intervening event if the B/E Aerospace Board determines that failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties; and
-
-
The customary nature of B/E Aerospace's other representations, warranties and covenants in the merger agreement.
The
B/E Aerospace Board weighed the foregoing against a number of potentially negative factors, including:
-
-
The fact that the value of the merger consideration payable to B/E Aerospace stockholders could decrease in the event that the price of
Rockwell Collins common stock decreases more than 7.5% prior to completion of the merger;
-
-
The restrictions on the conduct of B/E Aerospace's business during the period between the execution of the merger agreement and the completion
of the merger;
71
Table of Contents
-
-
The costs associated with the completion of the merger and the realization of the benefits expected to be obtained in connection with the
merger, including management's time and energy and potential opportunity cost;
-
-
The risk that the merger may not be completed and the challenges in absorbing the effect of any failure to complete the merger, including
stockholder and market reactions, as well as the diversion of management's attention from ongoing business concerns;
-
-
The risk that regulatory agencies may not approve the merger or may impose terms and conditions on their approvals that adversely affect the
business and financial results of the combined company as more fully described under "Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger" beginning on page 115;
-
-
The merger agreement does not preclude a third party from making an unsolicited proposal for a competing transaction with Rockwell Collins and
that, under certain circumstances more fully described in the sections "The Merger AgreementCovenants and AgreementsNo Solicitation" beginning on page 140 and "The
Merger AgreementCovenants and AgreementsAdverse Recommendation Change and Termination" beginning on page 141, Rockwell Collins may furnish non-public information to
and enter into discussions with such third party regarding the competing transaction and the Rockwell Collins Board may withdraw or modify its recommendations to Rockwell Collins stockholders
regarding the merger and may terminate the merger agreement to enter into a competing transaction under certain circumstances;
-
-
The termination fee payable by B/E Aerospace to Rockwell Collins if B/E Aerospace terminates the merger agreement to pursue a competing
transaction with a third party or in certain other circumstances;
-
-
The risk that the B/E Aerospace stockholders do not approve the Merger proposal;
-
-
The risk that B/E Aerospace will be required to reimburse Rockwell Collins for its expenses up to $85 million if the merger agreement is
terminated by either party because the B/E Aerospace stockholders do not approve the Merger proposal;
-
-
The challenges inherent in the combination of two businesses of the size and complexity of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins;
-
-
The risk of litigation related to the transaction;
-
-
The risk of not being able to realize all of the anticipated cost savings and operational synergies between B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins
and the risk that other anticipated benefits might not be realized; and
-
-
The risks of the type and nature described under "Risk Factors," beginning on page 45 and the matters described under "Cautionary Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" beginning on page 43.
This
discussion of the information and factors considered by the B/E Aerospace Board in reaching its conclusions and recommendation includes the principal factors considered by
the B/E Aerospace Board, but is not intended to be exhaustive and may not include all of the factors considered by the B/E Aerospace Board. In view of the wide variety of factors
considered in connection with its evaluation of the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, and the complexity of these matters, the B/E Aerospace Board did not
find it useful and did not attempt to quantify, rank or assign any relative or specific weights to the various factors that it considered in reaching its determination to approve the merger and the
other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, and to make its recommendation to B/E Aerospace stockholders. Rather, the
72
Table of Contents
B/E Aerospace
Board viewed its decisions as being based on the totality of the information presented to it and the factors it considered, including its discussions with, and questioning of,
members of B/E Aerospace's management and B/E Aerospace's advisors, as well as its experience and history. In addition, individual members of the B/E Aerospace Board may have
assigned different weights to different factors.
Certain of B/E Aerospace's directors and executive officers have financial interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, those of B/E Aerospace's
stockholders generally. The B/E Aerospace Board was aware of and considered these potential interests, among other matters, in evaluating the merger and in making its recommendation to
B/E Aerospace stockholders. For a discussion of these interests, see "Interests of Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger" beginning on page 101.
The
B/E Aerospace Board unanimously determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement were advisable and in the best interests of
B/E Aerospace and its stockholders and approved the merger agreement. Accordingly, the B/E Aerospace Board
unanimously recommends that B/E Aerospace stockholders vote "
FOR
" the Merger proposal at the B/E Aerospace special meeting.
Opinion of Rockwell Collins' Financial Advisor
Pursuant to an engagement letter dated October 6, 2016, Rockwell Collins retained J.P. Morgan as its financial advisor in connection with
the merger.
At
the meeting of the Rockwell Collins Board on October 21, 2016, J.P. Morgan rendered its oral opinion to the Rockwell Collins Board that, as of such date and based upon and
subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its opinion, the merger consideration to be paid by Rockwell Collins was fair, from a financial point of view, to Rockwell Collins. J.P. Morgan has
confirmed its October 21, 2016 oral opinion by delivering its written opinion to the Rockwell Collins Board, dated October 23, 2016, that, as of such date, the merger consideration to be
paid by Rockwell Collins was fair, from a financial point of view, to Rockwell Collins.
The full text of the written opinion of J.P. Morgan, which sets forth the assumptions made, matters considered and limits on the review undertaken, is attached as
Annex B to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference. The summary of the opinion of J.P. Morgan set forth in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such opinion. Rockwell Collins stockholders are urged to read the opinion in its entirety. J.P. Morgan's opinion was addressed to the
Rockwell Collins Board (in its capacity as such) in connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the merger, was directed only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to Rockwell
Collins of the merger consideration to be paid by Rockwell Collins and did not address any other aspect of the merger. J.P. Morgan expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the merger consideration
to the holders of any class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of Rockwell Collins or as to the underlying decision by Rockwell Collins to engage in the merger. The issuance of J.P.
Morgan's opinion was approved by a fairness committee of J.P. Morgan. The opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of Rockwell Collins as to how such stockholder should vote
with respect to the merger or any other matter.
In
arriving at its opinion, J.P. Morgan, among other things:
-
-
reviewed a draft dated October 23, 2016 of the merger agreement;
-
-
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial information concerning B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins and the industries in
which they operate;
73
Table of Contents
-
-
compared the proposed financial terms of the merger with the publicly available financial terms of certain transactions involving companies
J.P. Morgan deemed relevant and the consideration received for such companies;
-
-
compared the financial and operating performance of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins with publicly available information concerning certain
other companies J.P. Morgan deemed relevant and reviewed the current and historical market prices of B/E Aerospace common stock and Rockwell Collins common stock and certain publicly traded securities
of such other companies;
-
-
reviewed certain internal financial analyses and forecasts prepared by the managements of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins relating to
their respective businesses and by Rockwell Collins relating to B/E Aerospace's business, as well as the estimated amount and timing of the cost savings and related expenses and synergies expected to
result from the merger, which are referred to as the Synergies; and
-
-
performed such other financial studies and analyses and considered such other information as J.P. Morgan deemed appropriate for the purposes of
its opinion.
In
addition, J.P. Morgan held discussions with certain members of the management of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins with respect to certain aspects of the merger, the past and
current business
operations of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins, the financial condition and future prospects and operations of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins, the effects of the merger on the financial
condition and future prospects of Rockwell Collins, and certain other matters J.P. Morgan believed necessary or appropriate to its inquiry.
In
giving its opinion, J.P. Morgan relied upon and assumed the accuracy and completeness of all information that was publicly available or was furnished to or discussed with J.P. Morgan
by B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins or otherwise reviewed by or for J.P. Morgan, and J.P. Morgan did not independently verify (and did not assume responsibility or liability for independently
verifying) any such information or its accuracy or completeness. J.P. Morgan did not conduct and was not provided with any valuation or appraisal of any assets or liabilities, nor did J.P. Morgan
evaluate the solvency of B/E Aerospace or Rockwell Collins under any applicable laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In relying on financial analyses and forecasts
provided to J.P. Morgan or derived therefrom, including the Synergies, J.P. Morgan assumed that they were reasonably prepared based on assumptions reflecting the best currently available estimates and
judgments by management as to the expected future results of operations and financial condition of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins to which such analyses or forecasts relate. J.P. Morgan expressed
no view as to such analyses or forecasts (including the Synergies) or the assumptions on which they were based. J.P. Morgan also assumed that the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement will have the tax consequences described in discussions with, and materials furnished to J.P. Morgan by, representatives of Rockwell Collins, and will be consummated as described in
the merger agreement, and that the definitive merger agreement would not differ in any material respects from the draft thereof furnished to J.P. Morgan. J.P. Morgan also assumed that the
representations and warranties made by Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace in the merger agreement and the related agreements were and will be true and correct in all respects material to J.P. Morgan's
analysis. J.P. Morgan is not a legal, regulatory or tax expert and relied on the assessments made by advisors to Rockwell Collins with respect to such issues. J.P. Morgan further assumed that all
material governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the merger will be obtained without any adverse effect on B/E Aerospace or Rockwell Collins or on
the contemplated benefits of the merger.
J.P.
Morgan's opinion was necessarily based on economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to J.P. Morgan as of, the date of such opinion.
J.P. Morgan's opinion noted that subsequent developments may affect J.P. Morgan's opinion, and that J.P. Morgan does not have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm such opinion. J.P. Morgan's
opinion is
74
Table of Contents
limited
to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger consideration to be paid by Rockwell Collins, and J.P. Morgan has expressed no opinion as to the fairness of any merger
consideration to the holders of any class of securities, creditors or other constituencies of Rockwell Collins or as to the underlying decision by Rockwell Collins to engage in the merger.
Furthermore, J.P. Morgan expressed no opinion with respect to the amount or nature of any compensation to any officers, directors, or employees of any party to the merger, or any class of such
persons relative to the merger consideration to be paid by Rockwell Collins or with respect to the fairness of any such
compensation. J.P. Morgan expressed no opinion as to the price at which Rockwell Collins common stock or B/E Aerospace common stock will trade at any future time.
The
terms of the merger agreement, including the exchange ratio, were determined through arm's length negotiations between Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace, and the decision to enter
into the merger agreement was solely that of the Rockwell Collins Board and the B/E Aerospace board of directors. J.P. Morgan's opinion and financial analyses constituted only one of the many factors
considered by the Rockwell Collins Board in its evaluation of the merger and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of the Rockwell Collins Board or management with respect to the merger
or the merger consideration.
In
accordance with customary investment banking practice, J.P. Morgan employed generally accepted valuation methodology in rendering its opinion to the Rockwell Collins Board and
contained in the presentation delivered to the Rockwell Collins Board in connection with the rendering of such opinion and does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or data
presented by J.P. Morgan. Some of the summaries of the financial analyses include information presented in tabular format. The tables are not intended to stand alone, and in order to more fully
understand the financial analyses used by J.P. Morgan, the tables must be read together with the full text of each summary. Considering the data set forth below without considering the full narrative
description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of J.P. Morgan's analyses.
B/E Aerospace Financial Analyses
Public Trading Multiples
Using
publicly available information, J.P. Morgan compared selected financial and market data of B/E Aerospace with similar data for selected publicly traded companies
that J.P. Morgan deemed relevant for purposes of analysis. The companies selected by J.P. Morgan were as follows:
-
-
HEICO Corporation;
-
-
Meggitt PLC;
-
-
Rockwell Collins, Inc.;
-
-
TransDigm Group Inc.; and
-
-
Zodiac Aerospace.
These companies were selected, among other reasons, because they are publicly traded companies with operations and businesses that, for purposes of J.P. Morgan's analysis, may be
considered similar to those of B/E Aerospace based on business sector participation, operational characteristics and financial metrics. Using publicly available information, J.P. Morgan calculated,
for each selected company, (i) the multiple of enterprise value as of October 20, 2016 to estimated EBITDA (which means earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization) for
calendar year 2017, or EV/EBITDA 2017E, and (ii) the multiple of closing share price as of October 20, 2016 to estimated earnings per share for calendar year 2017, or P/E 2017E, based on
Wall Street analysts' consensus
75
Table of Contents
estimates and FactSet data. This analysis indicated the following EV/EBITDA 2017E and P/E 2017E multiples:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EV/EBITDA
2017E
|
|
P/E
2017E
|
|
HEICO Corporation
|
|
|
13.5x
|
|
|
24.2x
|
|
Meggitt PLC
|
|
|
9.7x
|
|
|
12.1x
|
|
Rockwell Collins, Inc.
|
|
|
9.8x
|
|
|
14.6x
|
|
TransDigm Group Inc.
|
|
|
13.7x
|
|
|
19.7x
|
|
Zodiac Aerospace
|
|
|
12.9x
|
|
|
19.7x
|
|
Based
on the results of this analysis and other factors that J.P. Morgan considered relevant, J.P. Morgan selected a multiple reference range for EV/EBITDA 2017E of 10.0x - 13.5x
and a multiple reference range for P/E 2017E of 12.0x - 19.5x.
After
applying such ranges to Rockwell Collins management's estimate of the EBITDA and EPS, respectively, for B/E Aerospace for calendar year 2017 in the adjusted B/E Aerospace forecast,
the analysis indicated the following implied per share equity value ranges for B/E Aerospace common stock, rounded to the nearest $0.25:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Per Share
Equity Value
Range of
B/E Aerospace
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
EV/EBITDA 2017E
|
|
$
|
45.00
|
|
$
|
67.25
|
|
P/E 2017E
|
|
$
|
43.75
|
|
$
|
71.00
|
|
The ranges of implied per share equity values for B/E Aerospace common stock were compared to the closing share price of $50.65 of B/E Aerospace common stock as of October 20,
2016, and the offer price of $62.00 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock, which consists of $34.10 in cash consideration and shares of Rockwell Collins common stock with a value of $27.90 in stock
consideration, subject to adjustment as described in detail in "The Merger AgreementMerger Consideration to be Received by B/E Aerospace Stockholders" beginning on page 127 of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Transaction Multiples Analysis
Using publicly available information, J.P. Morgan examined selected transactions involving businesses that J.P. Morgan considered to be analogous to B/E Aerospace's
business or aspects thereof for purposes of analysis. These transactions were selected, among other reasons, because the businesses involved in these transactions share similar business
characteristics to B/E Aerospace based on business
76
Table of Contents
sector participation, operational characteristics and financial metrics. Specifically, J.P. Morgan reviewed the following transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month/Year
Announced
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target/Seller
|
|
TV/ LTM
EBITDA
|
|
LTM P / E
|
|
August 2015
|
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
|
|
Precision Castparts Corp.
|
|
|
12.3x
|
|
|
21.3x
|
|
March 2015
|
|
RBC Bearings Incorporated
|
|
Sargent Aerospace & Defense
|
|
|
13.3x/11.2x
|
(1)
|
|
N/A
|
|
March 2015
|
|
Alcoa Inc.
|
|
RTI International Metals Inc.
|
|
|
13.1x
|
|
|
39.8x
|
|
June 2014
|
|
Alcoa Inc.
|
|
Firth Rixson Ltd.
|
|
|
14.3x/15.0x
|
(2)
|
|
N/A
|
|
December 2013
|
|
Textron Inc.
|
|
Beechcraft Corp.
|
|
|
9.9x
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
November 2012
|
|
Precision Castparts Corp.
|
|
Titanium Metals Corp.
|
|
|
13.3x
|
|
|
28.1x
|
|
September 2011
|
|
United Technologies Corp.
|
|
Goodrich Corporation
|
|
|
12.9x
|
|
|
22.4x
|
|
September 2010
|
|
TransDigm Group Inc.
|
|
McKechnie Aerospace Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
12.9x
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
March 2010
|
|
Triumph Group, Inc.
|
|
Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc.
|
|
|
5.8x
|
(3)
|
|
8.5x
|
|
July 2007
|
|
The Carlyle Group
|
|
Sequa Corporation
|
|
|
12.0x
|
|
|
31.1x
|
|
March 2007
|
|
JLL Partners Inc.
|
|
McKechnie Aerospace
|
|
|
11.9x
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
March 2007
|
|
Meggitt-USA Inc.
|
|
K&F Industries Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
10.7x
|
|
|
19.5x
|
|
December 2006
|
|
Eaton Corporation
|
|
AT Holdings Corporation
|
|
|
11.0x
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
-
(1)
-
11.2x
multiple includes adjustment for tax benefits of approximately $78 million.
-
(2)
-
15.0x
multiple adjusted for earn out consideration of approximately $150 million.
-
(3)
-
Reflects
pro forma adjusted EBITDA, which includes acquiror-provided acquisition and purchase accounting adjustments.
J.P.
Morgan calculated, for each selected transaction, (i) the multiple of the transaction value to the target company's EBITDA for the 12-month period prior to the announcement
of the applicable transaction, or TV/ LTM EBITDA, and (ii) the multiple of the per share offer price in the transaction to the earnings per share of the target company or the equity value in
the transaction to the net income for the 12-month period prior to the announcement of the applicable transaction, or LTM P/E.
Based
on the results of this analysis and other factors that J.P. Morgan considered relevant, J.P. Morgan selected a multiple reference range of 10.0x - 14.0x for TV/ LTM EBITDA
and a multiple reference range of 20.0x - 30.0x for LTM P/E.
After
applying such ranges to figures provided by B/E Aerospace for LTM EBITDA and LTM EPS, respectively, for B/E Aerospace for the 12-month period ended September 30,
2016, the analysis indicated the following implied per share equity value ranges for B/E Aerospace common stock, rounded to the nearest $0.25:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Per Share
Equity Value
Range of
B/E Aerospace
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
TV/ LTM EBITDA
|
|
$
|
40.50
|
|
$
|
64.25
|
|
LTM P/E
|
|
$
|
65.75
|
|
$
|
98.75
|
|
The
ranges of implied per share equity values for B/E Aerospace common stock were compared to the closing price of $50.65 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock on October 20,
2016, and the offer price of $62.00 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
J.P.
Morgan conducted a discounted cash flow analysis for the purpose of determining the fully diluted equity value per share for B/E Aerospace common stock.
77
Table of Contents
J.P. Morgan calculated the unlevered free cash flows that B/E Aerospace is expected to generate (i) during the fourth quarter of calendar year 2016 through calendar year 2021
based upon the adjusted B/E Aerospace forecast and (ii) during calendar years 2022 through 2026 based upon extrapolations from the adjusted B/E Aerospace forecast reviewed and approved by
Rockwell Collins management. J.P. Morgan calculated a range of terminal values for B/E Aerospace at the end of the projection period by applying terminal growth rates, based on J.P. Morgan's
professional judgment given the nature of B/E Aerospace, its business and its industry, ranging from 2.5% to 3.5%. The unlevered free cash flows and the range of terminal values were then
discounted to present values using discount rates
ranging from 7.5% to 8.5%, which were chosen by J.P. Morgan based upon an analysis of the weighted average cost of capital of B/E Aerospace. The present values of the unlevered free cash flows and the
range of terminal values were then adjusted for B/E Aerospace's net debt and divided by the fully diluted shares outstanding of B/E Aerospace. The discounted cash flow analysis indicated an implied
per share equity value range for B/E Aerospace common stock, rounded to the nearest $0.25, of $53.50 to $78.25.
The
range of implied per share equity values for B/E Aerospace common stock was compared to the closing price of $50.65 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock on October 20,
2016, and the offer price of $62.00 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock.
Rockwell Collins Financial Analysis
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
J.P.
Morgan conducted a discounted cash flow analysis for the purpose of determining the fully diluted equity value per share for Rockwell Collins common stock.
J.P. Morgan calculated the unlevered free cash flows that Rockwell Collins is expected to generate (i) during fiscal years 2017 through 2021 based upon the Rockwell Collins
stand-alone management forecast and (ii) during fiscal years 2022 through 2026 based upon extrapolations from the Rockwell Collins stand-alone management forecast reviewed and approved by
Rockwell Collins management. J.P. Morgan calculated a range of terminal values for Rockwell Collins at the end of the projection period by applying terminal growth rates, based on J.P. Morgan's
professional judgment given the nature of Rockwell Collins, its business and its industry, ranging from 2.0% to 3.0% to the unlevered free cash flows excluding pension contributions, to which a 0%
terminal growth rate was applied per Rockwell Collins management instruction. The unlevered free cash flows and the range of terminal values were then discounted to present values using discount rates
ranging from 7.5% to 8.5%, which were chosen by J.P. Morgan based upon an analysis of the weighted average cost of capital of Rockwell Collins. The present values of the unlevered free cash flows and
the range of terminal values were then adjusted for Rockwell Collins' net debt and divided by the fully diluted shares outstanding of Rockwell Collins. The discounted cash flow analysis indicated an
implied per share equity value range for Rockwell Collins common stock, rounded to the nearest $0.25, of $98.25 to $136.75.
Potential Value Creation AnalysisIntrinsic Value Approach
J.P. Morgan prepared a value creation analysis that compared the implied equity value derived from J.P. Morgan's discounted cash flow analysis
of Rockwell Collins on a standalone basis to Rockwell Collins stockholders' pro forma ownership of the implied equity value of the combined company.
The pro forma combined company equity value was equal to: (i) Rockwell Collins' standalone discounted cash flow value of $15.1 billion (calculated using a 2.5% terminal
growth rate and 8.0% discount rate, representing the midpoint of the terminal growth rate and discount rate ranges, respectively, applied in the discounted cash flow analysis for Rockwell Collins
described above), plus (ii) B/E Aerospace's standalone discounted cash flow value of $6.5 billion (calculated using a 3.0% terminal growth rate and an 8.0% discount rate, representing
the midpoint of the terminal growth rate
78
Table of Contents
and discount rate ranges, respectively, applied in the discounted cash flow analysis for B/E Aerospace described above), plus (iii) the discounted cash flow value of Rockwell Collins management
expectations of after-tax synergies totaling $1.8 billion (calculated using a 3.0% terminal growth rate and an 8.0% discount rate representing the midpoint of the terminal growth rate and
discount rate ranges, respectively), less (iv) cash consideration of $3.8 billion (which includes the retirement of certain B/E Aerospace restricted stock units, transaction costs
and change of control expenses). J.P. Morgan then calculated the implied pro forma equity value of the combined company attributable to Rockwell Collins stockholders based on the implied equity
ownership percentage of 80% by Rockwell Collins stockholders implied by the exchange ratio in the consideration (assuming Rockwell Collins' closing share price as of October 20, 2016) and the
number of Rockwell Collins diluted shares outstanding on a standalone basis (based on information as of September 30, 2016 per Rockwell Collins management). J.P. Morgan then compared the result
to the implied equity value of Rockwell Collins on a standalone basis indicated by the discounted cash flow analysis of Rockwell Collins (described above) whereby the discount rates used were chosen
by J.P. Morgan based upon an analysis of the weighted average cost of capital of Rockwell Collins. The value creation analysis indicated an implied pro forma equity value of $15.6 billion
attributable to Rockwell Collins stockholders and implied pro forma accretion in implied equity value to Rockwell Collins stockholders of 3.4% higher than the implied equity value on a standalone
basis indicated by the discounted cash flow analysis of Rockwell Collins.
Other Information
Historical Stock Trading
J.P. Morgan reviewed the historical share prices of B/E Aerospace common stock for the 52-week period ended October 20, 2016. J.P. Morgan
noted that the low and high closing share prices during this period were $37.91 and $53.11 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock, respectively.
Equity Research Analyst Price Targets
J.P. Morgan reviewed the most recent publicly available research analyst price targets for B/E Aerospace common stock prepared and
published by selected equity research analysts. J.P. Morgan noted that the range of such price targets as of October 20, 2016 was $48.00 to $66.00 per share of B/E Aerospace common
stock.
J.P.
Morgan noted that the historical stock trading and equity research analyst price targets analyses are not valuation methodologies but were presented merely for reference only.
Miscellaneous
The
foregoing summary of financial analyses does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or data presented by J.P. Morgan. The preparation of a
fairness opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. J.P. Morgan believes that the foregoing summary and its analyses must be considered
as a whole and that selecting portions of the foregoing summary and these analyses, without considering all of its analyses as a whole, could create an incomplete view of the processes underlying the
analyses and its opinion. As a result, the ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis or combination of analyses
described above were merely utilized to create points of reference for analytical purposes and should not be taken to be the view of J.P. Morgan with respect to the actual value of Rockwell Collins or
B/E Aerospace. The order of analyses described does not represent the relative importance or weight given to those analyses by J.P. Morgan. In arriving at its opinion, J.P. Morgan did not attribute
any particular weight to any analyses or factors considered by it and did not form an opinion as to whether any individual analysis or factor (positive or negative), considered in isolation, supported
or failed to support its opinion. Rather, J.P. Morgan considered the totality of the factors and analyses performed in determining its opinion.
79
Table of Contents
Analyses based upon forecasts of future results are inherently uncertain, as they are subject to numerous factors or events beyond the control of the parties and
their advisors. Accordingly, forecasts and analyses used or made by J.P. Morgan are not necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than
suggested by those analyses. Moreover, J.P. Morgan's analyses are not and do not purport to be appraisals or otherwise reflective of the prices at which businesses actually could be acquired or sold.
None of the selected companies reviewed as described in the above summary is identical to B/E Aerospace, and none of the selected transactions reviewed was identical to the merger. However, the
companies selected were chosen because they are publicly traded companies with operations and businesses that, for purposes of J.P. Morgan's analysis, may be considered similar to those of B/E
Aerospace. The transactions selected were similarly chosen because their participants, size and other factors, for purposes of J.P. Morgan's analysis, may be considered similar to the merger. The
analyses necessarily involve complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operational characteristics of the companies involved and other factors that could affect the
companies compared to B/E Aerospace and the transactions compared to the merger.
As
a part of its investment banking business, J.P. Morgan and its affiliates are continually engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, investments for passive and control purposes, negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and
unlisted securities, private placements, and valuations for corporate and other purposes. J.P. Morgan was selected to advise Rockwell Collins with respect to the merger on the basis of, among
other things, such experience and its qualifications and reputation in connection with such matters and its familiarity with Rockwell Collins, B/E Aerospace and the industries in which they operate.
For services rendered in connection with the merger, Rockwell Collins agreed to pay J.P. Morgan a transaction fee of $27.5 million, of which $5.0 million became payable by
Rockwell Collins at the time J.P. Morgan delivered its opinion, and the balance of which is payable upon the closing of the merger. Rockwell Collins has also agreed to pay J.P. Morgan 10% of any
break-up fee received by Rockwell Collins following or in connection with the termination, abandonment or failure of the merger, provided that such fee will not exceed the amount that would have been
payable to J.P. Morgan if the merger had been consummated. In addition, Rockwell Collins has agreed to reimburse J.P. Morgan for certain of its expenses incurred in connection with its services,
including the fees and expenses of counsel, and will indemnify J.P. Morgan against certain liabilities arising out of J.P. Morgan's engagement. During the two years preceding the date of J.P. Morgan's
opinion, J.P. Morgan and its affiliates have had commercial or investment banking relationships with Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace for which J.P. Morgan and such affiliates have received
customary compensation. Such services during such period have included acting as joint bookrunner and joint lead arranger on Rockwell Collins' revolving credit facility in February 2016; as joint lead
arranger and joint bookrunner on the B/E Aerospace credit facilities in December 2014 and in May 2016; as lead arranger and lead-left bookrunner on credit facilities of KLX; as lead bookrunner on an
offering of debt securities of KLX in November 2014; and as financial advisor to B/E Aerospace in connection with the KLX spin-off in December 2014. J.P. Morgan and its affiliates also provided asset
management services to Rockwell Collins during such period. In addition, J.P. Morgan's commercial banking affiliate is an agent bank and a lender under outstanding credit facilities of Rockwell
Collins, B/E Aerospace and KLX, for which it receives customary compensation or other financial benefits. J.P. Morgan and its affiliates have committed to provide financing to Rockwell Collins in
connection with the merger for customary compensation, which is expected to be approximately $20 million in fees payable to J.P. Morgan in connection with such financing. During the two-year
period preceding delivery of its opinion, the aggregate fees received by J.P. Morgan from Rockwell Collins were approximately $3 million and from B/E Aerospace were approximately $10 million. In the
ordinary course of their businesses, J.P. Morgan and its affiliates may actively trade the debt and equity securities or financial instruments (including derivatives, bank loans or other obligations)
of Rockwell Collins or B/E Aerospace for their own
80
Table of Contents
accounts or for the accounts of customers and, accordingly, they may at any time hold long or short positions in such securities.
Opinions of B/E Aerospace's Financial Advisors
Opinion of Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
On October 23, 2016, Citigroup delivered to the B/E Aerospace Board a written opinion dated October 23, 2016, to the effect
that, as of such date and based on and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations and qualifications set forth in the written opinion, the merger
consideration to be received by the holders of outstanding shares of common stock of B/E Aerospace (other than excluded holders) in the merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to such
holders.
The full text of Citigroup's written opinion, dated October 23, 2016, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed,
matters considered and limitations and qualifications on the review undertaken by Citigroup in rendering its opinion, is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex C and is
incorporated into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference in its entirety. The summary of Citigroup's opinion set forth below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of
the opinion. We urge you to read the opinion carefully and in its entirety. Citigroup's opinion, the issuance of which was authorized by Citigroup's fairness opinion committee, was provided to the
B/E Aerospace Board (in its capacity as such) in connection with its evaluation of the merger and was limited to the fairness, from a financial point of view, as of the date of the opinion, to
the holders of outstanding shares of common stock of B/E Aerospace (other than excluded holders) of the merger consideration to be received by such holders in the merger. Citigroup's opinion
does not address any other aspects or implications of the merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote or act on any matters relating to
the merger or otherwise. Citigroup's opinion does not address the underlying business decision of B/E Aerospace to effect the merger, the relative merits of the merger as compared to any
alternative business strategies that might exist for B/E Aerospace or the effect of any other transaction in which B/E Aerospace might engage. The following is a summary of Citigroup's
opinion.
In
arriving at its opinion, Citigroup, among other things:
-
-
reviewed the merger agreement;
-
-
held discussions with certain senior officers, directors and other representatives and advisors of B/E Aerospace and certain senior
officers and other representatives and advisors of Rockwell Collins concerning the businesses, operations and prospects of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins;
-
-
examined certain publicly available business and financial information relating to B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins;
-
-
examined certain financial forecasts and other information and data relating to B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins which were provided
to or discussed with Citigroup by the respective managements of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins, including information relating to the potential strategic implications and operational
benefits (including the amount, timing and achievability thereof) anticipated by the managements of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins to result from the merger;
-
-
reviewed the financial terms of the merger as set forth in the merger agreement in relation to, among other things: current and historical
market prices and trading volumes of B/E Aerospace common stock and Rockwell Collins common stock, the historical and projected earnings and other operating data of B/E Aerospace and
Rockwell Collins and the capitalization and financial condition of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins;
81
Table of Contents
-
-
considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial terms of certain other transactions which Citigroup considered relevant in
evaluating the merger;
-
-
analyzed certain financial, stock market and other publicly available information relating to the businesses of other companies whose
operations Citigroup considered relevant in evaluating those of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins;
-
-
evaluated certain potential pro forma financial effects of the merger on Rockwell Collins; and
-
-
conducted such other analyses and examinations and considered such other information and financial, economic and market criteria as Citigroup
deemed appropriate in arriving at its opinion.
In
rendering its opinion, Citigroup assumed and relied, without independent verification, upon the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other information and data publicly
available or provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with Citigroup and upon the assurances of the managements of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins that they were not aware of any
relevant information that was omitted or that remained undisclosed to Citigroup. With respect to financial forecasts and other information and data provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed
with Citigroup, Citigroup was advised by the respective managements of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins that such forecasts and other information and data were reasonably prepared on bases
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the managements of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins as to the future financial performance of B/E Aerospace and
Rockwell Collins, the potential strategic implications and operational benefits anticipated to result from the merger and the other matters covered thereby, and assumed, with B/E Aerospace's
consent, that the financial results (including the potential strategic implications and operational benefits anticipated to result from the merger) reflected in such forecasts and other information
and data will be realized in the amounts and at the times projected.
Citigroup
also assumed, with B/E Aerospace's consent, that the merger will be consummated in accordance with its terms, without waiver, modification or amendment of any material
term, condition or agreement and that, in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory or third party approvals, consents and releases for the merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or
condition will be imposed that would have an adverse effect on B/E Aerospace, Rockwell Collins or the contemplated benefits of the merger. Citigroup's opinion related to the relative values of
B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins. Citigroup did not express any opinion as to what the value of Rockwell Collins common stock actually will be when issued pursuant to the merger or the price
at which shares of Rockwell Collins common stock will trade at any time. Citigroup did not make and it was not provided with an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities
(contingent or otherwise) of B/E Aerospace or
Rockwell Collins and Citigroup did not make any physical inspection of the properties or assets of B/E Aerospace or Rockwell Collins. Citigroup's opinion did not address the underlying business
decision of B/E Aerospace to effect the merger, the relative merits of the merger as compared to any alternative business strategies that might exist for B/E Aerospace or the effect of
any other transaction in which B/E Aerospace might engage. Citigroup also expressed no view as to, and Citigroup's opinion did not address, the fairness (financial or otherwise) of the amount
or nature or any other aspect of any compensation to any officers, directors or employees of any parties to the merger, or any class of such persons, relative to the merger consideration or otherwise.
Citigroup's opinion was necessarily based upon information available to it, and financial, stock market and other conditions and circumstances existing, as of October 20, 2016, except as
otherwise noted.
For a summary of the material financial analyses presented by Citigroup, together with Goldman Sachs, to the B/E Aerospace Board in connection with the delivery of Citigroup's
opinion, see the section entitled "Financial Analyses by Financial Co-Advisors" beginning on page 86.
82
Table of Contents
Under
the terms of Citigroup's engagement, B/E Aerospace has agreed to pay Citigroup, for its financial advisory services in connection with the merger, an aggregate fee of
approximately $27.3 million, $5 million of which was payable upon delivery by Citigroup of its opinion and the remainder of which is payable upon completion of the merger. Subject to
certain limitations, B/E Aerospace also has agreed to reimburse Citigroup, subject to certain conditions, for reasonable and documented travel and other reasonable and documented out-of-pocket
expenses incurred by Citigroup in performing its services, including reasonable and documented fees and expenses of its legal counsel, and to indemnify Citigroup and related persons against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws, arising out of its engagement.
Citigroup
and its affiliates in the past have provided, and currently provide, services to B/E Aerospace unrelated to the merger, for which services Citigroup and such affiliates
have received and expect to receive compensation, including, without limitation, during the two-year period prior to October 23, 2016, having acted or acting (i) as financial advisor to
B/E Aerospace in connection with B/E Aerospace's spin-off of KLX Inc. in December 2014, and (ii) as lender, syndication agent, joint lead arranger and joint book-runner in
connection with a term loan and revolving credit facility of B/E Aerospace. During the two year period ended October 23, 2016, Citigroup has received compensation for financial advisory
and/or underwriting services provided by its Investment Banking Division directly to B/E Aerospace and/or its affiliates of approximately $18,700,000. Citigroup and its affiliates in the past
have also provided, and currently provide, services to Rockwell Collins unrelated to the merger, for which services Citigroup and such affiliates have received and expect to receive compensation,
including, without limitation, during the two-year period prior to October 23, 2016, acting as lender, syndication agent, joint lead arranger and joint book-runner in connection with two
revolving credit facilities of Rockwell Collins, as well as acting as lender in connection with certain committed corporate credit card facilities of Rockwell Collins. During the two-year period ended
October 23, 2016, Citigroup has received compensation for financial advisory and/or underwriting services provided by its Investment
Banking Division directly to Rockwell Collins and/or to its affiliates of approximately $50,000. In the ordinary course of business, Citigroup and its affiliates may actively trade or hold the
securities of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins for its own account or for the account of its customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities. In
addition, Citigroup and its affiliates (including Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates) may maintain relationships with B/E Aerospace, Rockwell Collins and their respective affiliates.
In response to a request by Rockwell Collins, made after the execution of the merger agreement, that Citigroup participate in the financing of the merger by Rockwell Collins, the B/E
Aerospace Board granted Citigroup permission to participate in such financing. Pursuant to such request and consent, Citigroup is now participating in such financing, including as a joint lead
arranger and lender with respect to certain credit facilities, and Citigroup is now actively exploring participating, and may participate as an active bookrunner with respect to capital markets
offerings.
The
B/E Aerospace Board selected Citigroup to act as one of its financial advisors in connection with the merger based on Citigroup's reputation and experience. Citigroup is an
internationally recognized investment banking firm which regularly engages in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings,
competitive bids, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes.
Opinion of Goldman, Sachs & Co.
On October 23, 2016, Goldman Sachs delivered to the B/E Aerospace Board a written opinion dated October 23, 2016, to the
effect that, as of such date and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth therein, the merger consideration to be paid to the holders (other than
83
Table of Contents
Rockwell
Collins and its affiliates) of outstanding shares of common stock of B/E Aerospace pursuant to the merger agreement was fair from a financial point of view to such holders.
The full text of the written opinion of Goldman Sachs, dated October 23, 2016, which sets forth assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered
and limitations on the review undertaken
in connection with the opinion, is attached as Annex D. Goldman Sachs provided its opinion for the information and assistance of the B/E Aerospace Board in connection with its
consideration of the merger. The Goldman Sachs opinion is not a recommendation as to how any holder of B/E Aerospace's common stock should vote with respect to the merger or any other
matter.
In
connection with rendering the opinion described above and performing its related financial analyses, Goldman Sachs reviewed, among other
things:
-
-
the merger agreement;
-
-
annual reports to stockholders and Annual Reports on Form 10-K of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins for the five fiscal years
ended December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, respectively;
-
-
certain interim reports to stockholders and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins;
-
-
certain other communications from B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins to their respective stockholders;
-
-
certain publicly available research analyst reports for B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins; and
-
-
certain internal financial analyses and forecasts for B/E Aerospace prepared by its management and for Rockwell Collins prepared by its
management, in each case, as approved for Goldman Sachs' use by B/E Aerospace (which is referred to as the Forecasts) and certain operating synergies projected by the managements of
B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins to result from the transaction, as approved for Goldman Sachs' use by B/E Aerospace (which is referred to as the Synergies).
Goldman
Sachs also held discussions with members of the senior managements of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins regarding their assessment of the strategic rationale for, and the
potential benefits of, the merger and the past and current business operations, financial condition and future prospects of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins; reviewed the reported price and
trading activity for shares of B/E Aerospace common stock and shares of Rockwell Collins common stock; compared certain financial and stock market information for B/E Aerospace and
Rockwell Collins with similar information for certain other companies the securities of which are publicly traded; reviewed the financial terms of certain recent business combinations in the aerospace
and defense industry and in other industries; and performed such other studies and analyses, and considered such other factors, as it deemed appropriate.
For
purposes of rendering its opinion, Goldman Sachs, with B/E Aerospace's consent, relied upon and assumed the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial, legal,
regulatory, tax, accounting and other information provided to, discussed with or reviewed by, it, without assuming any responsibility for independent verification thereof. In that regard, Goldman
Sachs assumed with B/E Aerospace's consent that the Forecasts and Synergies were reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the management
of B/E Aerospace. Goldman Sachs did not make an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets and liabilities (including any contingent, derivative or other off-balance-sheet assets and
liabilities) of B/E Aerospace or Rockwell Collins or any of their respective subsidiaries and it was not furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal. Goldman Sachs assumed that all
governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the merger will be obtained without any adverse effect on B/E Aerospace or Rockwell Collins or on the
expected benefits of the merger in any way
84
Table of Contents
meaningful
to its analysis. Goldman Sachs has also assumed that the merger will be consummated on the terms set forth in the merger agreement, without the waiver or modification of any term or
condition the effect of which would be in any way meaningful to its analysis.
Goldman
Sachs' opinion does not address the underlying business decision of B/E Aerospace to engage in the merger or the relative merits of the merger as compared to any strategic
alternatives that may be available to B/E Aerospace; nor does it address any legal, regulatory, tax or accounting matters. Goldman Sachs' opinion addresses only the fairness from a financial
point of view to the holders (other
than Rockwell Collins and its affiliates) of outstanding shares of common stock of B/E Aerospace, as of the date of the opinion, of the merger consideration to be paid to such holders pursuant
to the Merger Agreement. Goldman Sachs' opinion does not express any view on, and does not address, any other term or aspect of the merger agreement or the merger or any term or aspect of any other
agreement or instrument contemplated by the merger agreement or entered into or amended in connection with the merger, including the fairness of the merger to, or any consideration received in
connection therewith by, the holders of any other class of securities, creditors, or other constituencies of B/E Aerospace; nor as to the fairness of the amount or nature of any compensation to
be paid or payable to any of the officers, directors or employees of B/E Aerospace, or class of such persons in connection with the merger, whether relative to the merger consideration to be
paid to the holders (other than Rockwell Collins and its affiliates) of outstanding shares of common stock of B/E Aerospace pursuant to the merger agreement or otherwise. In addition, Goldman
Sachs does not express any opinion as to the prices at which shares of common stock of Rockwell Collins will trade at any time or as to the impact of the merger on the solvency or viability of
B/E Aerospace or Rockwell Collins or the ability of B/E Aerospace or Rockwell Collins to pay their respective obligations when they come due. Goldman Sachs' opinion was necessarily based
on economic, monetary, market and other conditions, as in effect on, and the information made available to it as of, the date of the opinion and Goldman Sachs assumed no responsibility for updating,
revising or reaffirming its opinion based on circumstances, developments or events occurring after the date of its opinion. Goldman Sachs' opinion was approved by a fairness committee of Goldman
Sachs.
Goldman
Sachs and its affiliates are engaged in advisory, underwriting and financing, principal investing, sales and trading, research, investment management and other financial and
non-financial activities and services for various persons and entities. Goldman Sachs and its affiliates and employees, and funds or other entities in which they invest or have other economic
interests or with which they co-invest, may at any time purchase, sell, hold or vote long or short positions and investments in securities, derivatives, loans, commodities, currencies, credit default
swaps and other financial instruments of B/E Aerospace, Rockwell Collins, any of their respective affiliates and third parties, or any currency or commodity that may be involved in the merger
contemplated by the merger agreement. Goldman Sachs acted as financial advisor to B/E Aerospace in connection with, and participated in certain of the negotiations leading to, the merger
contemplated by the merger agreement. Goldman Sachs has provided certain financial advisory and/or underwriting services to B/E Aerospace and/or its affiliates from time to time for which the
Investment Banking Division of Goldman Sachs has received, and may receive, compensation, including having acted as book manager with respect to a private offering of KLX, a former subsidiary of
B/E Aerospace, 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 (aggregate principal amount of $1,200,000,000) in November 2014; as lead arranger with respect to B/E Aerospace's term loan (aggregate
principal amount of $2,200,000,000) put in place in November 2014; as B/E Aerospace's financial advisor in connection with the KLX spin-off in December 2014; and as a participant in
B/E Aerospace's revolving credit facility (aggregate principal amount of $600,000,000) put in place in December 2014. During the two year period ended October 23, 2016, Goldman Sachs has
received compensation for financial advisory and/or underwriting services provided by its Investment Banking Division directly to B/E Aerospace and/or to its affiliates of approximately
$9,900,000. During the two-year period ended October 23, 2016, Goldman Sachs has not been engaged by Rockwell Collins or its affiliates to provide financial advisory or underwriting services
for which the
85
Table of Contents
Investment
Banking Division of Goldman Sachs has received compensation. Goldman Sachs may also in the future provide financial advisory and/or underwriting services to B/E Aerospace, Rockwell
Collins and their respective affiliates for which the Investment Banking Division of Goldman Sachs may receive compensation.
The
B/E Aerospace Board selected Goldman Sachs as its financial advisor because it is an internationally recognized investment banking firm that has substantial experience in
transactions similar to the merger. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated September 6, 2016, B/E Aerospace engaged Goldman Sachs to act as its financial advisor in connection with the
merger. The engagement letter between B/E Aerospace and Goldman Sachs provides for a transaction fee that is estimated, based on the information available as of the date of announcement, at
approximately $27.3 million, $5 million of which became payable at announcement of the transaction, and the remainder of which is contingent upon consummation of the transaction. In
addition, B/E Aerospace has agreed to reimburse Goldman Sachs for certain of its expenses, including attorneys' fees and disbursements, and to indemnify Goldman Sachs and related persons
against various liabilities, including certain liabilities under the federal securities laws.
Financial Analyses by Financial Co-Advisors
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses delivered by Citigroup and Goldman Sachs, referred to as the financial
co-advisors, to the B/E Aerospace Board in connection with rendering their respective opinions described above. The following summary, however, does not purport to be a complete description of
the financial analyses performed by the financial co-advisors, nor does the order of analyses described represent relative importance or weight given to those analyses by the financial co-advisors.
Some of the summaries of the financial analyses include information presented in tabular format. The tables must be read together with the full text of each summary and are alone not a complete
description of the financial co-advisors' financial analyses. Except as otherwise noted, the following quantitative information, to the extent that it is based on market data, is based on market data
as it existed on or before October 20, 2016, and is not necessarily indicative of current market conditions.
The
preparation of financial opinions is a complex process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of
those methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, financial opinions are not readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Selecting portions of the analyses or of the
summary set forth below, without considering the analyses as a whole, could create an incomplete view of the processes underlying each financial co-advisor opinion. In arriving at their respective
fairness determinations, the
financial co-advisors considered the results of all of their analyses and did not attribute any particular weight to any factor or analysis considered by them. Rather, each financial co-advisor made
its determination as to fairness on the basis of its experience and professional judgment after considering the results of all of its analyses. No company or transaction used in the above analyses as
a comparison is directly comparable to B/E Aerospace or Rockwell Collins or the contemplated merger.
The
financial co-advisors prepared these analyses for purposes of providing their respective opinions to the B/E Aerospace Board as to the fairness, from a financial point of
view, to the holders (other than Rockwell Collins and its affiliates) of outstanding shares of common stock of B/E Aerospace, as of the date of the opinions, of the merger consideration to be
paid to such holders pursuant to the merger agreement. These analyses do not purport to be appraisals nor do they necessarily reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold.
Analyses based upon forecasts of future results are not necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by these analyses. Because
these analyses are inherently subject to uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors or events beyond the control of the parties or their respective advisors, none of B/E Aerospace, Rockwell
Collins, Citigroup, Goldman
86
Table of Contents
Sachs
or any other person assumes responsibility if future results are materially different from those forecast.
The
merger consideration was determined through arm's-length negotiations between B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins, rather than by any financial advisor, and was approved by the
B/E Aerospace Board. The financial co-advisors provided advice to B/E Aerospace during these negotiations. The financial co-advisors did not, however, recommend any specific amount of
consideration to B/E Aerospace or the B/E Aerospace Board or that any specific amount of consideration constituted the only appropriate consideration for the transaction.
As
described above, each financial co-advisor's opinion to the B/E Aerospace Board was one of many factors taken into consideration by the B/E Aerospace Board in making its
determination to approve the merger agreement. The foregoing summary does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses performed by the financial co-advisors in connection with their
respective fairness opinions and is qualified in its entirety by reference to their respective written opinions attached as Annex C for Citigroup and Annex D for Goldman Sachs.
Historical Stock Trading Analysis.
The financial co-advisors first calculated $62.00 as the implied value of the per share merger
consideration
(which we refer to as the "implied per share consideration") by
adding the cash consideration of $34.10 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock to $27.90, the implied value of the stock portion of the per share merger consideration based on the closing
price per share of Rockwell Collins common stock on October 20, 2016.
The
financial co-advisors then reviewed the historical trading prices for B/E Aerospace common stock and compared the implied per share consideration to the closing price per
share of B/E Aerospace common stock as of October 20, 2016, the volume weighted average prices per share of B/E Aerospace common stock for the 30-day and 90-day periods ended
October 20, 2016, the intra-day high price per share of B/E Aerospace common stock for the 52-week period ended October 20, 2016, and the closing price per share of
B/E Aerospace common stock as of July 20, 2016 (the date of the initial meeting between the managements of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins to discuss a potential merger).
This
analysis indicated that the implied per share consideration to be paid to the holders (other than Rockwell Collins and its affiliates) of outstanding shares of common stock of
B/E Aerospace pursuant to the merger agreement represented:
-
-
a premium of 22.4% to the closing price of $50.65 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock as of October 20, 2016;
-
-
a premium of 22.5% to the volume weighted average price of $50.61 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock for the 30-day period ended
October 20, 2016;
-
-
a premium of 28.4% to the volume weighted average price of $48.30 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock for the 90-day period ended
October 20, 2016;
-
-
a premium of 16.4% to the 52-week intraday high price of $53.25 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock for the 52-week period ended
October 20, 2016; and
-
-
a premium of 33.8% to the closing price of $46.34 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock as of July 20, 2016.
Implied Premia Analysis for U.S. Transactions.
For each year from 2013 through 2016 (as of October 6, 2016), the financial
co-advisors
calculated, using publicly available information, the first quartile, median and third quartile one-day unaffected stock price premia paid in such year for acquisition transactions announced in such
year (expressed as a percentage of the merger consideration on the trading day prior to either (i) the announcement of the transaction or (ii) the date on which either the target
confirmed a sale process or merger talks in the six months leading up to the
87
Table of Contents
transaction
or rumors surfaced in the month leading up to the transaction). This analysis covered transactions announced or completed in this time period involving U.S. domiciled companies where the
consideration exceeded $500 million and consisted of a mixture of cash and stock. The analysis excluded transactions in the financial institutions and real estate sectors as well as
transactions with premia below 0%. The analysis indicated a first quartile, median and third quartile one-day unaffected stock premia of 18.5%, 27.7% and 41.7%, respectively. The financial co-advisors
then multiplied the 18.5%-41.7% range of premia to the closing price of $51.35 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock as of October 17, 2016, which resulted in an illustrative range of
prices per share of B/E Aerospace common stock of $60.75 to $72.75 (rounded to the nearest $0.25).
Selected Transactions Analysis.
The financial co-advisors analyzed certain publicly available information relating to the following
selected
transactions in the aerospace and defense industry since September 2011:
-
-
Berkshire Hathaway Inc./Precision Castparts Corp. (announced August 2015)
-
-
RBC Bearings Incorporated/Sargent Aerospace and Defense (announced March 2015)
-
-
TransDigm Group Incorporated/Telair Cargo Group (announced February 2015)
-
-
Cobham plc/Aeroflex Inc. (announced May 2014)
-
-
Rockwell Collins, Inc./Aeronautical Radio, Incorporated (announced August 2013)
-
-
General Electric Company/Avio S.p.A. (announced December 2012)
-
-
United Technologies Corporation/Goodrich Corporation (announced September 2011)
For
each of the selected transactions, the financial co-advisors calculated and compared FV as a multiple of the target's EBITDA for the last 12 months as most recently disclosed at the
time of the announcement of the transaction (which we refer to as the FV/LTM EBITDA Multiple). While none of the companies that participated in the selected transactions are directly comparable to
B/E Aerospace, the companies that participated in the selected transactions are companies with operations that, for the purposes of analysis, may be considered similar to certain of
B/E Aerospace's results, market size and product profile. In addition, the financial co-advisors calculated the FV/LTM EBITDA Multiple of B/E Aerospace, using the implied per share
consideration and B/E Aerospace's EBITDA for the 12 months ended September 30, 2016 as provided to the financial co-advisors by the management of B/E Aerospace.
The following tables present the results of this analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month/Year Announced
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
Target/Seller
|
|
FV/LTM
EBITDA
|
|
August 2015
|
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
|
|
Precision Castparts Corp.
|
|
|
13.2x
|
|
March 2015
|
|
RBC Bearings Incorporated
|
|
Sargent Aerospace & Defense
|
|
|
13.3x
|
(1)
|
February 2015
|
|
TransDigm Group Incorporated
|
|
Telair Cargo Group
|
|
|
12.1x
|
|
May 2014
|
|
Cobham plc
|
|
Aeroflex Inc.
|
|
|
11.4x
|
|
August 2013
|
|
Rockwell Collins, Inc.
|
|
Aeronautical Radio, Incorporated
|
|
|
12.6x
|
|
December 2012
|
|
General Electric Company
|
|
Avio S.p.A.
|
|
|
8.5x
|
|
September 2011
|
|
United Technologies Corporation
|
|
Goodrich Corporation
|
|
|
12.9x
|
|
-
(1)
-
Reflects
$500 million headline value. Multiple implied by $500 million transaction value less $78 million net present value from an Internal
Revenue Code Section 338(h) (10) election reflects a multiple of 11.2x.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed
Transaction
|
|
Ratio/Multiple
|
|
Low
|
|
Median
|
|
High
|
|
FV/LTM EBITDA
|
|
|
8.5x
|
|
|
12.6x
|
|
|
13.3x
|
|
|
13.6x
|
|
88
Table of Contents
The
financial co-advisors identified an illustrative range of FV/LTM EBITDA Multiples of 11.6x to 13.6x based on the 12.6x median FV/LTM EBITDA Multiple. The financial co-advisors then
applied the 11.6x to 13.6x range of FV/LTM EBITDA Multiples to B/E Aerospace's EBITDA for the last 12 months ended September 30, 2016 as provided to the financial co-advisors by
the management of B/E Aerospace, which resulted in a range of illustrative prices per share of B/E Aerospace common stock of $50.00 to $61.75 (rounded to the nearest $0.25).
Illustrative Present Value of Future Share Price AnalysisB/E Aerospace Standalone.
The financial co-advisors performed an
illustrative analysis of the implied present value of the future price per share of B/E Aerospace common stock (including the present value of projected dividends).
The
financial co-advisors first calculated an illustrative range of the implied future values per share of B/E Aerospace common stock as of the end of each of the fiscal years
2017 to 2020, respectively, by applying a forward earnings per share multiple range of 13.5x to 15.0x to the estimated earnings per share for B/E Aerospace for each of the fiscal years from
2018 to 2021 using the Forecasts. The financial co-advisors then discounted these implied future values per share to determine the implied present values as of September 30, 2016 using an
illustrative discount rate of 10.0% reflecting an estimate of B/E Aerospace's cost of equity. The financial co-advisors then, for each of the fiscal years 2017 to 2020, used the same
illustrative discount rate to discount the future values per share of
projected dividends from September 30, 2016 through and including the applicable fiscal year (using the Forecasts) to determine the implied present values of such projected dividends as of
September 30, 2016, and added such implied present values of the projected dividends to the range of present values it derived above. This analysis resulted in a range of implied present values
of $52.29 to $61.06 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock.
The
financial co-advisors also used the Forecasts to calculate an illustrative range of the implied future values per share of B/E Aerospace common stock as of the end of each of
the fiscal years 2017 to 2020, respectively, by applying a price to next 12 months earnings per share multiple of 14.2x, which represented B/E Aerospace's standalone next 12 months earnings per
share multiple as of October 17, 2016 based on IBES estimates, to the earnings per share of B/E Aerospace for each of the fiscal years from 2018 to 2021 using the Forecasts and then
discounted these implied future values per share to determine the implied present values as of September 30, 2016 using an illustrative discount rate range of 9.0% to 10.5%, reflecting an
estimate of B/E Aerospace's cost of equity. The financial co-advisors then, for each of the fiscal years 2017 to 2020, used the same illustrative range of discount rates to discount the future
values per share of projected dividends from September 30, 2016 through and including the applicable fiscal year (using the Forecasts) to determine a range of the implied present values of such
projected dividends as of September 30, 2016, and added such range of implied present values of the projected dividends to the range of present values it derived above. This analysis resulted
in a range of implied present values of $54.64 to $60.23 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock.
Illustrative Present Value of Future Share Price AnalysisRockwell Collins Standalone.
The financial co-advisors performed an
illustrative analysis of the implied present value of the future price per share of Rockwell Collins common stock (including the present value of projected dividends).
The
financial co-advisors first calculated an illustrative range of the implied future values per share of Rockwell Collins common stock for each of the fiscal years 2017 to 2020,
respectively, by applying a forward earnings per share multiple range of 14.0x to 15.5x to the estimated earnings per share of Rockwell Collins for each of the fiscal years from 2018 to 2021 using the
Forecasts and then discounted these implied future values per share to determine the implied present values as of September 30, 2016 using an illustrative discount rate of 8.5%, reflecting an
estimate of Rockwell Collins' cost of equity. The financial co-advisors then, for each of the fiscal years 2017 to 2020, used the same illustrative discount rate to discount the future values per
share of projected dividends from September 30, 2016 through and including the applicable fiscal year (using the Forecasts) to determine the implied present values of such projected dividends
as of September 30, 2016, and added such implied present values of
89
Table of Contents
the
projected dividends to the range of present values it derived above. This analysis resulted in a range of implied present values of $75.14 to $96.92 per share of Rockwell Collins common stock.
The
financial co-advisors also calculated an illustrative range of the implied future values per share of Rockwell Collins common stock for each of the fiscal years 2017 to 2020,
respectively, by applying a price to next 12 months earnings per share multiple of 14.8x, which represented Rockwell Collins' standalone next 12 month earnings per share multiple as of
October 17, 2016 based on IBES estimates, to the earnings per share for Rockwell Collins for each of the fiscal years from 2018 to 2021 using the Forecasts and then discounted these implied
future values per share to determine the implied present values as of September 30, 2016 using an illustrative discount rate range of 7.5% to 9.0%, reflecting an estimate of Rockwell Collins'
cost of equity. The financial co-advisors then, for each of the fiscal years 2017 to 2020, used the same illustrative range of discount rates to discount the future values per share of projected
dividends from September 30, 2016 through and including the applicable fiscal year (using the Forecasts) to determine a range of the implied present values of such projected dividends as of
September 30, 2016, and added such range of implied present values of the projected dividends to the range of present values it derived above. This analysis resulted in a range of implied
present values of $78.99 to $96.17 per share of Rockwell Collins common stock.
Illustrative Present Value of Future Pro Forma Combined Company Share Price Analysis Plus Cash Consideration.
The financial co-advisors
performed an
illustrative analysis of the implied present value of the future price per share of the combined company's common stock (including the present value of projected dividends) pro forma for consummation
of the merger to determine an illustrative range of the implied present values of the portion of the per share merger consideration consisting of Rockwell Collins common stock and added the per share
cash consideration to be paid pursuant to the merger to determine an illustrative range of the implied present values of the per share merger consideration into which each share of
B/E Aerospace common stock converts in the merger.
The
financial co-advisors calculated the implied future values per share of the pro forma combined company's common stock for each of the fiscal years 2017 to 2020, respectively, by
applying a price to next 12 months earnings per share multiple of 14.6x, which represented the blended next 12 month earnings per share multiple for B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins as of
October 17, 2016 based on IBES estimates, to the earnings per share of the pro forma combined company for each of the fiscal years from 2018 to 2021 using the Forecasts (including the
Synergies), and then discounted these implied future values per share to determine the implied present values as of September 30, 2016 using an illustrative discount rate range of 8.5% to 10%,
reflecting an estimate of the pro forma combined company's cost of equity. The financial co-advisors then, for each of the fiscal years 2017 to 2020, used the same illustrative range of discount rates
to discount the future values per share of projected dividends from September 30, 2016 through and including the applicable fiscal year (using the Forecasts and including the Synergies) to
determine a range of the implied present values of such projected dividends as of September 30, 2016, and added such range of implied present values of the projected dividends to the range of
present values it derived above. The financial co-advisors then multiplied the resulting range of implied present values for shares (which included the present values of project dividends) of the pro
forma combined company's common stock by an assumed exchange ratio of Rockwell Collins common stock for each share of B/E Aerospace stock (determined by using the closing price per share of
Rockwell Collins common stock on October 17, 2016), and added the product of that calculation to the $34.10 in per share cash consideration to be paid to holders of B/E Aerospace common
stock in the merger. This analysis resulted in a range of implied present values of the per share merger consideration, into which each share of B/E Aerospace common stock converts in the
merger, of $63.17 to $67.57.
Illustrative Discounted Cash Flow AnalysisB/E Aerospace Standalone.
Using the Forecasts, the financial co-advisors performed an
illustrative discounted cash flow analysis on B/E Aerospace. Using discount rates ranging from 7.75% to 9.25%, reflecting estimates of B/E Aerospace's weighted average
90
Table of Contents
cost of capital and derived by application of the Capital Asset Pricing Model, which takes into account certain company-specific metrics, including B/E Aerospace's target capital structure, the cost
of long-term debt, after-tax yield on permanent excess cash, if any, forecast tax rate and beta, as well as certain financial metrics for the United States financial markets generally, the financial
co-advisors discounted to present value as of September 30, 2016, (i) estimates of unlevered free cash flow for B/E Aerospace for the fourth calendar quarter of 2016 and the
calendar years 2017 through 2021 as reflected in the Forecasts and (ii) a range of illustrative terminal values for B/E Aerospace, which was calculated by applying a last 12 months
EBITDA multiple ranging from 10.5x to 12.0x to the terminal year estimate of the last 12 months of EBITDA for B/E Aerospace, as reflected in the Forecasts. The financial co-advisors derived
ranges of illustrative FVs for B/E Aerospace by adding the ranges of present values derived above. The financial co-advisors then subtracted from the range of illustrative FVs it derived for
B/E Aerospace the $1.938 billion of net debt of B/E Aerospace as of September 30, 2016 as provided by the management of B/E Aerospace to derive a range of illustrative
equity values for B/E Aerospace. The financial co-advisors then divided this range of illustrative equity values by the number of fully diluted outstanding shares of B/E Aerospace as
provided by the management of B/E Aerospace to derive a range of illustrative present values ranging from $59.15 to $73.02 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock.
Illustrative Discounted Cash Flow AnalysisRockwell Collins Standalone.
Using the Forecasts, the financial co-advisors performed an
illustrative discounted cash flow analysis on Rockwell Collins. Using discount rates ranging from 7.00% to 8.00%, reflecting estimates of Rockwell Collin's weighted average cost of capital and derived
by application of the Capital Asset Pricing Model, which takes into account certain company-specific metrics, including Rockwell Collins' target capital structure, the cost of long-term debt,
after-tax yield on permanent excess cash, if any, forecast tax rate and beta, as well as certain financial metrics for the United States financial markets generally, the financial co-advisors
discounted to present value as of September 30, 2016, (i) estimates of unlevered free cash flow for Rockwell Collins for the fiscal years ending on September 30, 2017 through
September 30, 2021 as reflected in the Forecasts and (ii) a range of illustrative terminal values for Rockwell Collins, which was calculated by applying a last 12 months EBITDA multiple
ranging from 9.5x to 11.0x to the terminal year estimate of the last 12 months of EBITDA for Rockwell Collins, as reflected in the Forecasts. The financial co-advisors derived ranges of illustrative
FVs for Rockwell Collins by adding the ranges of present values derived above. The financial co-advisors then subtracted from the range of illustrative FVs it derived for Rockwell Collins the $1.755
billion of net debt of Rockwell Collins as of
September 30, 2016, as provided by the management of Rockwell Collins and as approved for the financial co-advisors' use by B/E Aerospace, to derive a range of illustrative equity values
for Rockwell Collins. The financial co-advisors then divided this range of illustrative equity values by the number of fully diluted outstanding shares of Rockwell Collins, as provided by the
management of Rockwell Collins and as approved for the financial co-advisors' use by B/E Aerospace, to derive a range of illustrative present values ranging from $104.52 to $125.33 per share of
Rockwell Collins common stock.
Illustrative Discounted Cash Flow AnalysisPro Forma for Combined Company Plus Cash Consideration.
Using the Forecasts (including the
Synergies), the financial co-advisors performed an illustrative discounted cash flow analysis on the pro forma combined company to determine an illustrative range of implied present values of the
portion of the per share merger consideration consisting of Rockwell Collins common stock and added the per share cash consideration to be paid pursuant to the merger to determine an illustrative
range of the implied present values of the per share merger consideration into which each share of B/E Aerospace common stock converts in the merger. Using discount rates ranging from 7.25% to
8.50%, reflecting estimates of the pro forma combined company's weighted average cost of capital and derived by application of the Capital Asset Pricing Model, which takes into account certain
company-specific metrics, including the pro forma combined company's target capital structure, the cost of long-term debt, after-tax yield on permanent excess cash,
91
Table of Contents
if any, forecast tax rate and beta, as well as certain financial metrics for the United States financial markets generally, the financial co-advisors discounted to present value as of
September 30, 2016, (i) estimates of unlevered free cash flow for the pro forma combined company for the fiscal years ending on September 30, 2017 through September 30,
2021 as reflected in the Forecasts and including the Synergies, and (ii) a range of illustrative terminal values for the pro forma combined company, which was calculated by applying a last 12
months EBITDA multiple ranging from 9.75x to 11.25x to the terminal year estimate of last 12 months EBITDA for the pro forma combined company, as reflected in the Forecasts and including the
Synergies. The financial co-advisors derived ranges of illustrative FVs for the pro forma combined company by adding the ranges of present values derived above. The financial co-advisors then
subtracted from the range of illustrative FVs they derived for the pro forma combined company the $7.278 billion of pro forma net debt of the pro forma combined company, assuming the merger closed on
December 31, 2016, as provided by the managements of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins, and approved for the financial co-advisors use by B/E Aerospace, to derive a range of
illustrative equity values for the pro forma combined company. The financial co-advisors then divided this range of illustrative equity values by the number of fully diluted outstanding shares of the
pro forma combined company, as provided by the managements of B/E Aerospace and Rockwell Collins and approved for the financial co-advisors use by B/E Aerospace, to derive a range of
illustrative present values per share for the combined company's common stock. The financial co-advisors then multiplied the resulting range of implied present values per share of the pro forma
combined company's common stock by an assumed exchange ratio of Rockwell Collins common stock for each share of B/E Aerospace stock (determined by using the closing price per share of Rockwell
Collins common stock on October 17, 2016), and added the product of that calculation to
the $34.10 in per share cash consideration to be paid to holders of B/E Aerospace common stock in the merger. This analysis resulted in a range of implied present values of the per share merger
consideration, into which each share of B/E Aerospace common stock converts in the merger, of $69.13 to $78.09.
Selected Companies Analysis.
The financial co-advisors reviewed and compared certain financial information for B/E Aerospace to
corresponding
financial information, ratios and public market multiples for the following publicly traded corporations in the aerospace and defense industry (collectively referred to as the selected
companies):
-
-
Astronics Corporation,
-
-
Esterline Technologies Corporation,
-
-
Meggit PLC,
-
-
Moog Inc.,
-
-
Rockwell Collins, Inc.,
-
-
Woodward, Inc., and
-
-
Zodiac Aerospace, S.A.
Although
none of the selected companies is directly comparable to B/E Aerospace, the companies included were chosen because they are publicly traded companies with operations
that, for purposes of analysis, may be considered similar to certain operations of B/E Aerospace. The quantitative information used in this analysis, to the extent that it is based on market
data, was based on market data as of October 17, 2016.
The financial co-advisors also calculated and compared various financial multiples and ratios using information they obtained from SEC filings and IBES estimates. With respect to the
selected companies, the financial co-advisors calculated the ratio of the price of a share of common stock of the selected companies (using the applicable closing market price per share as of
October 17, 2016) to estimated earnings per share (which is referred to as the P/E Ratio) for calendar year 2017, and firm
92
Table of Contents
value, which is the market value of the diluted common equity, plus the book value of any preferred stock and debt, less the book value of cash and cash equivalents (which is referred to as FV), as a
multiple of projected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (which is referred to as EBITDA, and such multiple is referred to as the FV/EBITDA Multiple) for calendar year
2017. The multiples and ratios for each of the selected companies were based on IBES estimates. The following tables present the results of this analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FV/EBITDA
2017E
|
|
P/E 2017E
|
|
Astronics Corporation
|
|
|
8.7x
|
|
|
16.4x
|
|
B/E Aerospace, Inc.
|
|
|
11.0x
|
|
|
13.9x
|
|
Esterline Technologies Corporation
|
|
|
8.8x
|
|
|
13.7x
|
|
Meggit PLC
|
|
|
9.5x
|
|
|
12.2x
|
|
Moog Inc.
|
|
|
8.6x
|
|
|
14.4x
|
|
Rockwell Collins, Inc.
|
|
|
9.6x
|
|
|
14.6x
|
|
Woodard, Inc.
|
|
|
11.2x
|
|
|
17.6x
|
|
Zodiac Aerospace, S.A.
|
|
|
12.5x
|
|
|
19.6x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Companies
|
Ratio/Multiple:
|
|
Range
|
|
Median
|
P/E 2017E
|
|
12.2x - 19.6x
|
|
14.5x
|
FV/EBITDA 2017E
|
|
8.6x - 12.5x
|
|
9.5x
|
Calculated using IBES estimates.
Range and median include B/E Aerospace multiples calculated using IBES estimates.
For
reference purposes, the financial co-advisors identified an illustrative range of P/E Ratios of 13.0x to 16.0x using the median P/E Ratio of 14.5x for calendar year 2017. The
financial co-advisors then multiplied the estimated earnings per share of B/E Aerospace common stock for calendar year 2017, using the Forecasts, by the 13.0x to 16.0x illustrative range of P/E
Ratios for calendar year 2017, which resulted in an illustrative range of implied values of $47.50 to $58.50 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock (rounded to the nearest $0.25).
For
reference purposes, the financial co-advisors also identified an illustrative range of FV/EBITDA Multiples of 8.0x to 11.0x using the median FV/EBITDA Multiple of 9.5x for calendar
year 2017. The financial co-advisors then multiplied the estimated EBITDA for B/E Aerospace for calendar year 2017, using the Forecasts, by the 8.0x to 11.0x illustrative range of FV/EBITDA
Multiples for calendar year 2017, which resulted in an illustrative range of implied values of $32.25 to $51.50 per share of B/E Aerospace common stock (rounded to the nearest $0.25).
The
financial co-advisors also calculated (a) FV/EBITDA Multiples for B/E Aerospace, using the implied per share consideration to calculate FV and using the Forecasts for
2017 EBITDA, and (b) a P/E Ratio for B/E Aerospace, using the implied per share consideration as the price per share and the Forecasts for earnings per share for 2017. The following
table presents the results of this analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio/Multiple:
|
|
B/E Aerospace
(implied by the per share
consideration)
|
|
FV/EBITDA 2017E
|
|
|
12.6x
|
|
P/E 2017E
|
|
|
17.0x
|
|
93
Table of Contents
Certain Financial Projections
Certain Financial Projections Utilized by the Rockwell Collins Board of Directors and Rockwell Collins'
Financial Advisor
Rockwell Collins does not, as a matter of course, make long-term projections as to future performance available to the public other than
generally providing, on a quarterly basis, estimated ranges of certain expected financial results and operational metrics for the current or impending fiscal year in its regular earnings press
releases and other investor materials. Rockwell Collins avoids making public projections for extended periods due to, among other things, the unpredictability of the underlying assumptions and
estimates.
In connection with the proposed transaction, certain non-public, unaudited financial projections regarding Rockwell Collins' anticipated results of operations for fiscal years 2017
through 2021 were provided to the Rockwell Collins Board, Rockwell Collins' financial advisor, J.P. Morgan, and to B/E Aerospace. Such projections are referred to as the Rockwell Collins
management forecast. The Rockwell Collins management forecast includes the results of projected acquisitions over the forecast period. Also, in connection with the proposed transaction, certain
non-public, unaudited financial projections regarding Rockwell Collins' anticipated results of operations for fiscal years 2017 through 2021 excluding the results of projected acquisitions were
provided to the Rockwell Collins Board, J.P. Morgan and B/E Aerospace. Such projections are referred to as the Rockwell Collins stand-alone
management forecast. The Rockwell Collins management forecast and the Rockwell Collins stand-alone management forecast are the only financial forecasts provided by Rockwell Collins to
B/E Aerospace.
The Rockwell Collins management forecast and Rockwell Collins stand-alone management forecast are based on numerous estimates and assumptions. The 2017 amounts resulted from Rockwell
Collins' operating plan process, and reflect a detailed forecast primarily driven by Rockwell Collins' original equipment manufacturer production rate projections and other market insights into
expected revenues, as well as anticipated product line margins and discretionary spending. The 2017 amounts are consistent with the fiscal 2017 financial guidance provided publicly on
October 23, 2016. The 2018 to 2021 amounts resulted from Rockwell Collins' strategic and financial planning process, and reflect more general market-level forecasts primarily driven by original
equipment manufacturer rate projections and other market growth rate projections, as well as anticipated portfolio margins and discretionary spending. The underlying assumptions used in the strategic
and financial planning process are generally based on information and market factors known to management in the spring of 2016.
In addition, the Rockwell Collins Board received and reviewed certain non-public, unaudited financial projections regarding B/E Aerospace's anticipated results of operations for
the fiscal years 2016 through 2021, which were prepared by B/E Aerospace's management as described in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled "Certain
Financial Projections Utilized by the B/E Aerospace Board of Directors and B/E Aerospace's Financial Advisors" beginning on page 97. Rockwell Collins' management reviewed and
performed due diligence regarding such projections. Rockwell Collins' management made certain adjustments to the B/E Aerospace management forecast described below. Such projections, as
adjusted, are referred to as the adjusted B/E Aerospace forecast.
As discussed below, the B/E Aerospace management forecast is based on numerous estimates and assumptions. In preparing the adjusted B/E Aerospace forecast, Rockwell Collins made
adjustments to such forecast based on Rockwell Collins' view of key market drivers such as air traffic growth rates, original equipment manufacturer delivery rates, aircraft fleet growth, as well as
Rockwell Collins' views of B/E Aerospace's competitiveness in each product line and its backlog levels.
The forecasted financial information contained in this section "Certain Financial Projections Utilized by the Rockwell Collins Board of Directors and Rockwell Collins'
Financial Advisor" was not prepared for public disclosure. The inclusion of this information in this joint proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an admission or representation by Rockwell
Collins that the information is material.
94
Table of Contents
You should note that this forecasted financial information constitutes forward-looking statements. See "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" beginning on page 43.
The summaries of the forecasted financial information contained in this section "Certain Financial ProjectionsCertain Financial Projections Utilized by the
Rockwell Collins Board of Directors and Rockwell Collins' Financial Advisor" are being included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to give Rockwell Collins' stockholders access to non-public
information that was provided to J.P. Morgan or B/E Aerospace in the course of evaluating the merger, and are not intended to influence your decision whether to vote for the Share Issuance proposal or
any other proposal at the Rockwell Collins special meeting.
Rockwell
Collins uses certain financial measures that are not in accordance with GAAP as supplemental measures to evaluate its operational performance. While Rockwell Collins believes
that non-GAAP financial measures provide useful supplemental information, there are limitations associated with the use of non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in
accordance with GAAP, are not reported by all of Rockwell Collins' competitors and may not be directly comparable to similarly titled measures of Rockwell Collins' competitors due to potential
differences in the exact method of calculation.
The
following is a summary of the Rockwell Collins management forecast prepared by senior management of Rockwell Collins and given to B/E Aerospace, the Rockwell Collins Board and
J.P. Morgan, in each case, prior to the execution of the merger agreement (based on Rockwell Collins' fiscal year, in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
5,370
|
|
$
|
6,017
|
|
$
|
6,598
|
|
$
|
7,130
|
|
$
|
7,608
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
1,320
|
|
$
|
1,467
|
|
$
|
1,683
|
|
$
|
1,851
|
|
$
|
1,970
|
|
EBIT
|
|
$
|
1,055
|
|
$
|
1,129
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
$
|
1,411
|
|
$
|
1,526
|
|
Free Cash Flow
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
$
|
850
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
$
|
1,050
|
|
The
following is a summary of the Rockwell Collins stand-alone management forecast prepared by senior management of Rockwell Collins and given to B/E Aerospace, the Rockwell Collins
Board and J.P. Morgan (which forecast was approved by Rockwell Collins for J.P. Morgan's use and reliance for purposes of J.P. Morgan's financial analysis and opinion), in each case, prior to the
execution of the merger agreement (based on Rockwell Collins' fiscal year, in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
5,370
|
|
$
|
5,864
|
|
$
|
6,336
|
|
$
|
6,752
|
|
$
|
7,107
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
1,320
|
|
$
|
1,453
|
|
$
|
1,652
|
|
$
|
1,801
|
|
$
|
1,900
|
|
EBIT
|
|
$
|
1,055
|
|
$
|
1,120
|
|
$
|
1,268
|
|
$
|
1,377
|
|
$
|
1,477
|
|
Free Cash Flow
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
$
|
745
|
|
$
|
835
|
|
$
|
975
|
|
$
|
1,015
|
|
The
following is a summary of the adjusted B/E Aerospace forecast prepared by Rockwell Collins' management and given to the Rockwell Collins Board and J.P. Morgan (which forecast was
approved by Rockwell Collins for J.P. Morgan's use and reliance for purposes of J.P. Morgan's financial analysis and opinion), in each case, prior to the execution of the merger agreement (based on
B/E Aerospace's fiscal year, in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,871
|
|
$
|
3,059
|
|
$
|
3,175
|
|
$
|
3,361
|
|
$
|
3,508
|
|
$
|
3,656
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
603
|
|
$
|
651
|
|
$
|
702
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
$
|
765
|
|
$
|
790
|
|
EBIT
|
|
$
|
517
|
|
$
|
557
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
$
|
627
|
|
$
|
657
|
|
$
|
679
|
|
95
Table of Contents
In addition, the following tables show the estimated amount of unlevered free cash flows of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace, in each case that were calculated
by J.P. Morgan based upon the Rockwell Collins stand-alone management forecast and the adjusted B/E Aerospace forecast, respectively, which calculations were reviewed and approved by Rockwell Collins
for J.P. Morgan's use in connection with the illustrative discounted cash flow analyses as described under the section entitled "The MergerOpinion of Rockwell Collins' Financial Advisor"
beginning on page 73. These calculations were not included in the forecasted financial information provided to B/E Aerospace.
Rockwell Collins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year(1)
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
5,370
|
|
$
|
5,864
|
|
$
|
6,336
|
|
$
|
6,752
|
|
$
|
7,107
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
1,320
|
|
$
|
1,453
|
|
$
|
1,652
|
|
$
|
1,801
|
|
$
|
1,900
|
|
EBIT
|
|
$
|
1,055
|
|
$
|
1,120
|
|
$
|
1,268
|
|
$
|
1,377
|
|
$
|
1,477
|
|
Taxes
|
|
$
|
(262
|
)
|
$
|
(330
|
)
|
$
|
(386
|
)
|
$
|
(436
|
)
|
$
|
(464
|
)
|
EBIAT
|
|
$
|
793
|
|
$
|
790
|
|
$
|
882
|
|
$
|
941
|
|
$
|
1,013
|
|
Plus: Depreciation & Amortization
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
$
|
384
|
|
$
|
424
|
|
$
|
423
|
|
Less: Capital Expenditures
|
|
$
|
(200
|
)
|
$
|
(200
|
)
|
$
|
(225
|
)
|
$
|
(250
|
)
|
$
|
(275
|
)
|
Less: Changes in Net Working Capital, Other operating adjustments and Pension contributions
|
|
$
|
(250
|
)
|
$
|
(215
|
)
|
$
|
(238
|
)
|
$
|
(168
|
)
|
$
|
(177
|
)
|
Unlevered Free Cash Flow
|
|
$
|
608
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
$
|
803
|
|
$
|
947
|
|
$
|
984
|
|
-
(1)
-
Rockwell
Collins' fiscal year end is September 30.
B/E Aerospace
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year(1)
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
3,059
|
|
$
|
3,175
|
|
$
|
3,361
|
|
$
|
3,508
|
|
$
|
3,656
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
651
|
|
$
|
702
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
$
|
765
|
|
$
|
790
|
|
EBIT
|
|
$
|
557
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
$
|
627
|
|
$
|
657
|
|
$
|
679
|
|
Taxes
|
|
$
|
(129
|
)
|
$
|
(123
|
)
|
$
|
(118
|
)
|
$
|
(118
|
)
|
$
|
(122
|
)
|
EBIAT
|
|
$
|
428
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
$
|
539
|
|
$
|
556
|
|
Plus: Depreciation & Amortization
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
Less: Capital Expenditures
|
|
$
|
(122
|
)
|
$
|
(106
|
)
|
$
|
(101
|
)
|
$
|
(105
|
)
|
$
|
(111
|
)
|
Less: Changes in Net Working Capital
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
$
|
2
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
Unlevered Free Cash Flow
|
|
$
|
370
|
|
$
|
474
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
$
|
573
|
|
-
(1)
-
B/E
Aerospace's fiscal year end is December 31.
EBIT is a non-GAAP operating financial measure defined as earnings before interest and income taxes.
EBITDA is a non-GAAP operating financial measure defined as earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization.
EBIAT is a non-GAAP operating financial measure defined as earnings before interest and after taxes.
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP operating financial measure defined as net cash flow from operations minus capital expenditures.
96
Table of Contents
Unlevered free cash flow is a non-GAAP operating financial measure defined as EBIAT plus depreciation and amortization, less capital expenditures and less changes in net working capital.
Unlevered free cash flow for Rockwell Collins also factored in certain other operating adjustments and pension contributions.
Certain Financial Projections Utilized by the B/E Aerospace Board of Directors and B/E Aerospace's
Financial Advisors
B/E Aerospace does not, as a matter of course, create long-term projections as to future performance or make any other projections as to future
performance available to the public other than generally providing, from time to time, estimated ranges of certain expected financial results and operational metrics for the current or impending
fiscal year in its regular earnings press releases and other investor materials. B/E Aerospace avoids making public projections for extended periods due to, among other things, the unpredictability of
the underlying assumptions and estimates. However, in connection with its evaluation of the proposed merger, B/E Aerospace's senior management prepared certain non-public, unaudited financial
projections regarding B/E Aerospace's anticipated results of operations for fiscal years 2016 through 2021. Such projections were provided to B/E Aerospace's
financial advisors, Citigroup and Goldman Sachs, and to Rockwell Collins. Such projections are referred to as the B/E Aerospace management forecast. The B/E Aerospace management forecast was not
prepared for public disclosure. The B/E Aerospace management forecast is based on numerous estimates and assumptions. The outlook is developed in the context of assumed passenger traffic growth and
sustained airline profitability. The forecasts take into account awarded backlog with scheduled delivery dates, original equipment manufacturer rate projections, expected new product introductions and
anticipated program launches. The forecasts incorporate products produced for both new aircraft deliveries and refurbishment of existing aircraft. The projections are based upon anticipated program
margins with the continued benefit of cost reduction initiatives and disciplined expense management. The inclusion of the B/E Aerospace management forecast in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
does not constitute an admission or representation by B/E Aerospace that the information is material. You should note that projections included in the B/E Aerospace management forecast constitute
forward-looking statements. See "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" beginning on page 43 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
In addition, the B/E Aerospace Board received and reviewed certain non-public, unaudited financial projections regarding Rockwell Collins' anticipated results of operations for the
fiscal years 2017 through 2021, which were prepared by Rockwell Collins' management as described in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled "Certain Financial
Projections Utilized by the Rockwell Collins Board of Directors and Rockwell Collins' Financial Advisor" beginning on page 94. B/E Aerospace's management reviewed and performed due diligence
regarding such projections. Such projections were also provided to Citigroup and Goldman Sachs.
The
summaries of these projections are being included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to give B/E Aerospace's stockholders access to non-public information that was provided to
Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, and Rockwell Collins in the course of evaluating the proposed merger, and are not intended to influence your decision whether to vote for adoption of the merger agreement or
any other proposal at the B/E Aerospace special meeting.
B/E
Aerospace uses certain financial measures that are not in accordance with GAAP as supplemental measures to evaluate its operational performance. While B/E Aerospace believes that
non-GAAP financial measures provide useful supplemental information, there are limitations associated with the use of non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in
accordance with GAAP, are not reported by all of B/E Aerospace's competitors and may not be directly comparable to similarly titled measures of B/E Aerospace's competitors due to potential differences
in the exact method of calculation.
97
Table of Contents
The
following is a summary of the B/E Aerospace management forecast prepared by senior management of B/E Aerospace and given to Rockwell Collins, the B/E Aerospace Board, Citigroup and
Goldman Sachs, in each case, prior to the execution of the merger agreement (based on B/E Aerospace's fiscal year, in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,871
|
|
$
|
3,072
|
|
$
|
3,196
|
|
$
|
3,364
|
|
$
|
3,513
|
|
$
|
3,691
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
603
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
$
|
765
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
EBIT
|
|
$
|
517
|
|
$
|
558
|
|
$
|
604
|
|
$
|
629
|
|
$
|
657
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
Free Cash Flow
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
$
|
460
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
$
|
551
|
|
$
|
565
|
|
In addition, the following table shows the estimated amount of unlevered free cash flow of B/E Aerospace, which was calculated by Citigroup and Goldman Sachs using the B/E
Aerospace management forecast and the use of which was approved by B/E Aerospace management. These calculations were not included in the B/E Aerospace management forecasts provided to Rockwell
Collins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
Unlevered Free Cash Flow
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
$
|
536
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
$
|
576
|
|
EBIT is a non-GAAP operating financial measure defined as earnings before interest and income taxes. For purposes of the B/E Aerospace management forecast, EBIT is the same as operating
earnings.
EBITDA is a non-GAAP operating financial measure defined as earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization.
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP operating financial measure defined as net cash flow from operations minus capital expenditures.
Unlevered free cash flow is a non-GAAP operating financial measure defined as free cash flow plus the after-tax adjustment for interest expense less share based compensation.
The following table contains additional details regarding the calculation of various metrics included in the B/E Aerospace forecasted financial information included above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
603
|
|
$
|
655
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
$
|
765
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
Depreciation & Amortization
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
EBIT (Operating Earnings)
|
|
$
|
517
|
|
$
|
558
|
|
$
|
604
|
|
$
|
629
|
|
$
|
657
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
Net Cash Flow from Operations
|
|
$
|
327
|
|
$
|
476
|
|
$
|
566
|
|
$
|
611
|
|
$
|
656
|
|
$
|
676
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
Free Cash Flow
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
$
|
460
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
$
|
551
|
|
$
|
565
|
|
Net Adjustment for Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Adjustment for Share Based Compensation
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
$
|
(37
|
)
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
Unlevered Free Cash Flow
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
$
|
536
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
$
|
576
|
|
Important Information About Certain Financial Projections
The forecasted financial information contained in the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled "Certain Financial
Projections Utilized by the Rockwell Collins Board of Directors and Rockwell Collins' Financial Advisor" beginning on page 94 and the forecasted financial information contained in the section
of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled "Certain
98
Table of Contents
Financial Projections Utilized by the B/E Aerospace Board of Directors and B/E Aerospace's Financial Advisors" beginning on page 97 are collectively referred to as the unaudited financial
projections. While the unaudited financial projections summarized above in the sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled "Certain Financial Projections Utilized by the
Rockwell Collins Board of Directors and Rockwell Collins' Financial Advisor" beginning on page 94 and "Certain Financial Projections Utilized by the B/E Aerospace Board of
Directors and B/E Aerospace's Financial Advisors" beginning on page 97 were prepared by the respective managements of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace in good faith and based on
information available at the time of preparation, they constitute forward-looking information and no assurance can be made regarding actual future events. The estimates and assumptions underlying the
unaudited financial projections involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive, regulatory and financial market conditions and future business decisions that may
not be realized and that are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, including, among others, risks and uncertainties described in the sections of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus entitled "Risk Factors" beginning on page 45 and "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" beginning on page 43, all of which are difficult to predict
and many of which are beyond the control of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace. There can be no assurance that the underlying assumptions or projected results will be realized, and actual results will
likely differ, and may differ materially, from those reflected in the unaudited financial projections, whether or not the merger is completed. As a result, the unaudited financial projections cannot
be considered predictive of actual future operating results, and this information should not be relied on as such.
The
unaudited financial projections were prepared solely for internal use by Rockwell Collins or B/E Aerospace, as the case may be, or their respective financial advisors, and not with a
view toward public disclosure or with a view toward complying with the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of prospective
financial data, published
guidelines of the SEC regarding forward-looking statements and the use of non-GAAP measures or GAAP. In the view of Rockwell Collins' management and B/E Aerospace's management, the respective
forecasts prepared by them were prepared on a reasonable basis based on the information available to Rockwell Collins' management and B/E Aerospace's management, respectively, at the time of
their preparation. The unaudited financial projections, however, are not facts and should not be relied upon as being indicative of actual future results, and readers of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus are cautioned not to place undue, or any, reliance on this information. The inclusion of the unaudited financial projections in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is not an
admission or representation by Rockwell Collins or B/E Aerospace that such information is material or that the results contained in the prospective financial information will be achieved. None
of the unaudited financial projections reflect any impact of the merger or the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, except as noted herein. As a reminder, actual results may differ
materially from those contained in these unaudited financial projections.
The unaudited financial projections summarized in this section were prepared by and are the responsibility of the management of Rockwell Collins or B/E Aerospace, as the case may be. No
independent registered public accounting firm has examined, compiled or otherwise performed any procedures with respect to the prospective financial information contained in these financial forecasts
and, accordingly, no independent registered public accounting firm has expressed any opinion or given any other form of assurance with respect thereto and no independent registered public accounting
firm assumes any responsibility for the prospective financial information or its achievability. The reports of the independent registered public accounting firms incorporated by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus relate to the historical financial information of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace, respectively. Such reports do not extend to the unaudited financial
projections and should not be read to do so. Each of these independent registered public accounting firms disclaims any association with the prospective financial information. By including in this
joint proxy statement/
99
Table of Contents
prospectus a summary of certain of the unaudited financial projections regarding the operating results of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace, neither Rockwell Collins, B/E Aerospace nor any of their
respective advisors or other representatives has made or makes any representation to any person regarding the ultimate performance of Rockwell Collins or B/E Aerospace compared to the information
contained in the financial projections. The unaudited financial projections cover multiple years and such information by its nature becomes less predictive and subject to greater uncertainty with each
succeeding year.
Summaries
of the unaudited financial projections are not included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus in order to induce any B/E Aerospace stockholder to vote in favor of the B/E
Aerospace merger proposal or any of the other proposals to be voted on at the B/E Aerospace special meeting or any Rockwell Collins stockholder to vote in favor of the Rockwell Collins share issuance
proposal or any other proposal to be voted on at the Rockwell Collins special meeting.
EXCEPT
AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS, NEITHER ROCKWELL COLLINS NOR B/E AEROSPACE INTENDS TO UPDATE, AND EACH EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY TO UPDATE, OR
OTHERWISE REVISE THE ABOVE PROJECTIONS TO REFLECT CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING SINCE THEIR RESPECTIVE PREPARATION OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE OF UNANTICIPATED EVENTS, EVEN IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OR ALL OF
THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS ARE SHOWN TO BE IN ERROR OR NO LONGER APPROPRIATE (EVEN IN THE SHORT TERM) OR TO REFLECT CHANGES IN GENERAL ECONOMIC OR INDUSTRY CONDITIONS.
In light of the foregoing and the uncertainties inherent in the unaudited financial projections summarized in this section, stockholders of Rockwell Collins and
B/E Aerospace are cautioned not to place undue, if any, reliance on such unaudited financial projections. Since the date the unaudited financial projections summarized in this section were prepared,
Rockwell Collins has made publicly available its actual results of operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 and B/E Aerospace has made publicly available its actual
results of operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2016. You should review Rockwell Collins' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, filed
on November 15, 2016 and B/E Aerospace's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016, filed on October 28, 2016, to obtain this information. See
the section entitled "Where You Can Find More Information" beginning on page 197.
Governance of Rockwell Collins Following Completion of the Merger
The merger agreement provides that Rockwell Collins will take all necessary corporate action so that, upon and after the effective time, the
size of the Rockwell Collins Board will be increased by two members to a total of eleven, and two individuals selected by B/E Aerospace who meet Rockwell Collins' independence criteria and are
otherwise reasonably acceptable to Rockwell Collins will be appointed to the Rockwell Collins Board. One such individual will serve as a member of the class of directors of the Rockwell Collins Board
with terms expiring in 2018, and the other will serve as a member of the class of directors of the Rockwell Collins Board with terms expiring in 2020. Pursuant to this provision of the merger
agreement, John T. Whates and Richard G. Hamermesh, both members of the B/E Aerospace Board, were selected by B/E Aerospace to be appointed to the Rockwell Collins Board and are expected to serve as
members of the class of directors of the Rockwell Collins Board with terms expiring in 2018 and 2020, respectively. Other than such additional directors, no changes to the Rockwell Collins Board are
expected in connection with the consummation of the merger.
For
a more complete description of the material interests of directors of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace in the merger that may be in addition to, or different from, their
interests as
100
Table of Contents
stockholders, see "Interests of Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger" beginning on page 101.
Headquarters
Upon completion of the merger, Rockwell Collins' headquarters will remain in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
Interests of Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
Interests of Directors and Executive Officers of B/E Aerospace in the Merger
In considering the recommendation of the B/E Aerospace Board that B/E Aerospace stockholders vote
"FOR"
the merger proposal, B/E Aerospace
stockholders should be aware that B/E Aerospace's directors and executive officers have interests in the merger
that may be different from, or in addition to, those of B/E Aerospace stockholders generally. The B/E Aerospace Board was aware of these interests and considered them, among other matters, in
approving the merger agreement and recommending that the B/E Aerospace stockholders adopt the merger agreement.
The
following discussion sets forth certain of these interests in the merger of each person who has served as a non-employee director or executive officer of B/E Aerospace since
January 1, 2015. The amounts presented in the following discussion do not reflect the impact of applicable withholding or other taxes.
Consideration Payable for Shares Converted Pursuant to the Merger Agreement
As of November 18, 2016, the non-employee directors and executive officers of B/E Aerospace beneficially owned, in the aggregate, 203,829
shares of B/E Aerospace common stock (or approximately .2% of the outstanding shares as of such date), which for the purposes of this discussion and the table immediately below does not include shares
underlying outstanding unvested restricted stock awards or shares subject to restricted stock units. Each share of B/E Aerospace common stock issued prior to the date of the merger agreement (other
than canceled shares and dissenting shares) will be converted into the right to receive $34.10 per share in cash, without interest, from Rockwell Collins and a number of validly issued, fully paid and
non-assessable shares of Rockwell Collins common stock equal to the exchange ratio and, if applicable, cash in lieu of fractional shares of Rockwell Collins common stock. Upon the conversion of all
shares of B/E Aerospace common stock held by the non-employee directors and executive officers of B/E Aerospace, they would receive an aggregate of $12,637,398 in cash, which includes the value of the
shares of Rockwell Collins common stock to be issued pursuant to the merger agreement, assuming an exchange ratio of 0.3604 pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement.
The
following table sets forth, as of November 18, 2016, the cash consideration and the value of the Rockwell Collins common stock based on a presumed exchange ratio of 0.3604
that each
101
Table of Contents
non-employee
director and executive officer would receive in respect of their outstanding shares of B/E Aerospace common stock upon conversion pursuant to the merger agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of
B/E Aerospace
Shares(1)
|
|
Amount
Payable(2)
|
|
Non-Employee Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Albaugh
|
|
|
5,224
|
|
$
|
323,888
|
|
David J. Anderson
|
|
|
1,224
|
|
$
|
75,888
|
|
Richard G. Hamermesh
|
|
|
7,924
|
(3)
|
$
|
491,288
|
|
Jonathan M. Schofield
|
|
|
37,814
|
|
$
|
2,344,468
|
|
Mary M. VanDeweghe
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
$
|
77,128
|
|
John T. Whates
|
|
|
2,885
|
|
$
|
178,870
|
|
Named Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sean J. Cromie
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
$
|
97,960
|
|
Amin J. Khoury
|
|
|
82,866
|
|
$
|
5,137,692
|
|
Werner Lieberherr
|
|
|
8,563
|
(4)
|
$
|
530,906
|
|
Joseph T. Lower
|
|
|
30,681
|
|
$
|
1,902,222
|
|
Ryan M. Patch
|
|
|
2,304
|
|
$
|
142,848
|
|
Tommy G. Plant
|
|
|
4,784
|
|
$
|
296,608
|
|
Other Executive Officers
|
|
|
16,736
|
|
$
|
1,037,632
|
|
-
(1)
-
The
number of shares reflected in this column does not include shares subject to outstanding unvested restricted stock awards or shares underlying unvested
restricted stock units. For information with respect to restricted stock awards and restricted stock units, please see "Treatment of Restricted Stock Awards" and "Treatment
of Restricted Stock Units" beginning on page 102 and page 103, respectively.
-
(2)
-
The
value of each share of B/E Aerospace common stock is based upon the per share value of the merger consideration from Rockwell Collins, assuming an exchange ratio
of 0.3604 determined pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement. See "The Merger AgreementMerger Consideration to be Received by B/E Aerospace Stockholders" beginning on
page 127.
-
(3)
-
2,000
shares of B/E Aerospace common stock are indirectly held in a trust.
-
(4)
-
11,308
shares of B/E Aerospace common stock are indirectly held in a family trust.
Treatment of Restricted Stock Awards
As of November 18, 2016, non-employee directors and executive officers of B/E Aerospace held an aggregate of 368,310 restricted stock
awards, which are referred to as B/E Aerospace restricted stock awards, under a B/E Aerospace equity plan. As described below under "The Merger AgreementTreatment of B/E Aerospace
Stock-Based Awards" beginning on page 129, each unvested B/E Aerospace restricted stock award granted under a B/E Aerospace equity plan prior to the date of the merger agreement will vest as a
result of the merger (provided that to the extent that such award is subject to performance conditions, any performance conditions will be deemed to have been satisfied at the maximum level) and such
award will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to the product of the merger consideration and the number of shares of B/E Aerospace common stock subject
to such B/E Aerospace restricted stock award, with the portion of the merger consideration that consists of shares of Rockwell Collins common stock converted to a lump sum cash payment equal to the
product of the applicable number of shares of Rockwell Collins common stock and the stock price of Rockwell Collins common stock, as described in the merger agreement.
102
Table of Contents
The
following table provides information for the non-employee directors and executive officers of B/E Aerospace as of November 18, 2016, regarding the aggregate number of shares
of B/E Aerospace common stock subject to outstanding unvested B/E Aerospace restricted stock awards that will become vested upon consummation of the merger. The number of shares subject to B/E
Aerospace restricted stock awards provided in the following table does not include shares of B/E Aerospace common stock that are beneficially owned by the non-employee directors and executive officers
as provided in the table immediately above or shares underlying unvested restricted stock units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of
B/E Aerospace
Shares
Underlying
Unvested Restricted
Stock Awards
|
|
Value of Unvested
Restricted Stock
Awards(1)
|
|
Non-Employee Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Albaugh
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
$
|
118,296
|
|
David J. Anderson
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
$
|
118,296
|
|
Richard G. Hamermesh
|
|
|
2,687
|
|
$
|
166,594
|
|
Jonathan M. Schofield
|
|
|
2,687
|
|
$
|
166,594
|
|
Mary M. VanDeweghe
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
$
|
118,296
|
|
John T. Whates
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
$
|
166,656
|
|
Named Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sean J. Cromie
|
|
|
22,325
|
|
$
|
1,384,150
|
|
Amin J. Khoury
|
|
|
160,026
|
|
$
|
9,921,612
|
|
Werner Lieberherr
|
|
|
88,338
|
|
$
|
5,476,956
|
|
Joseph T. Lower
|
|
|
26,828
|
|
$
|
1,663,336
|
|
Ryan M. Patch
|
|
|
23,413
|
|
$
|
1,451,606
|
|
Tommy G. Plant
|
|
|
8,613
|
|
$
|
534,006
|
|
Other Executive Officers
|
|
|
24,981
|
|
$
|
1,548,822
|
|
-
(1)
-
The
value of each share of B/E Aerospace common stock is based upon the per share value of the merger consideration from Rockwell Collins, assuming an exchange ratio
of 0.3604. See "The Merger AgreementMerger Consideration to be Received by B/E Aerospace Stockholders" beginning on page 127.
Treatment of Restricted Stock Units
As of November 18, 2016, non-employee directors and executive officers of B/E Aerospace held an aggregate of 395,622 restricted stock
units, which are referred to as B/E Aerospace RSU awards, under the B/E Aerospace equity plans. As described below under "Treatment of B/E Aerospace Stock-Based Awards" beginning on
page 129, each unvested B/E Aerospace RSU award granted under a B/E Aerospace equity plan prior to the date of the merger agreement will vest as a result of the merger (provided that to the
extent that such award is subject to performance conditions, any performance conditions will be deemed to have been satisfied at the maximum level, which, in certain cases, is 200% of target) and such
award will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive a lump sum cash payment equal to the product of the merger consideration and the number of shares of B/E Aerospace common stock
underlying such B/E Aerospace RSU awards. Accordingly, the number of B/E Aerospace RSU awards for which vesting will accelerate set forth in the table below will be greater than the number of RSU
awards outstanding as of November 18, 2016.
Consistent with past practice, each of Amin J. Khoury, Joseph T. Lower, and Ryan M. Patch, as well as two additional executive officers, all of whose employment will terminate upon
consummation of the merger, have been granted on November 15, 2016 B/E Aerospace RSU awards (time- and performance-based), which will vest in full (with performance-based restricted
stock units vesting at
103
Table of Contents
200% of target for Messrs. Khoury, Lower, and Patch and 100% of target for the two additional executive officers) in the event the merger is consummated, and each such executive will be
entitled to a lump sum cash payment in cancellation of such awards in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement. Mr. Lieberherr's November 2016 B/E Aerospace RSU awards that are
outstanding prior to the effective time of the merger, will be converted to a cash amount (with performance conditions deemed to be satisfied at 200% of target) payable on the first anniversary of the
consummation of the merger, provided that he has not resigned without "good reason" (as defined in his employment agreement with Rockwell Collins, as described below). Pursuant to the transaction
bonus agreements between B/E Aerospace and each of Messrs. Khoury, Lieberherr, Patch, and Lower, as described further under "Interests of Directors and Executive Officers in the
MergerTransaction Bonuses" beginning on page 111, if such executive's employment is terminated prior to the consummation of the merger due to the executive's death or disability,
by B/E Aerospace for any reason or by the executive for "good reason" (as defined in the executive's employment agreement), the executive will be entitled to the immediate full vesting of the
executive's
November 2016 B/E Aerospace RSU awards (with performance-based RSUs vesting at 200% of target), with payment to be made upon the consummation of the merger.
As
negotiated as part of the merger agreement, each outstanding B/E Aerospace RSU award that is granted by B/E Aerospace on or following the date of the merger agreement other
than the RSU awards described in the immediately preceding paragraph, pursuant to the merger agreement, will upon the consummation of the merger be assumed by Rockwell Collins and converted into
restricted stock unit awards covering shares of Rockwell Collins common stock with performance-based B/E Aerospace RSU awards converting to time-based restricted stock units of Rockwell Collins based
on achievement of performance-based vesting conditions at 100% of target level.
The
following table provides information for each of the non-employee directors and executive officers of B/E Aerospace as of November 18, 2016, regarding the aggregate number of
shares of B/E Aerospace common stock underlying outstanding unvested B/E Aerospace RSU awards for which vesting will accelerate pursuant to the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of
B/E Aerospace Shares
Underlying
Unvested Restricted
Stock Units(1)
|
|
Value of Unvested
Restricted Stock
Units(2)
|
|
Non-Employee Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Albaugh
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
David J. Anderson
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Richard G. Hamermesh
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Jonathan M. Schofield
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Mary M. VanDeweghe
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
John T. Whates
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sean J. Cromie
|
|
|
37,708
|
|
$
|
2,337,896
|
|
Amin J. Khoury
|
|
|
169,485
|
|
$
|
10,508,070
|
|
Werner Lieberherr
|
|
|
217,326
|
|
$
|
13,474,212
|
|
Joseph T. Lower
|
|
|
88,655
|
|
$
|
5,496,610
|
|
Ryan M. Patch
|
|
|
45,219
|
|
$
|
2,803,578
|
|
Tommy G. Plant
|
|
|
31,526
|
|
$
|
1,954,612
|
|
Other Executive Officers
|
|
|
7,337
|
|
$
|
454,894
|
|
-
(1)
-
Amounts
shown in this column represent shares underlying unvested time- and performance-based B/E Aerospace RSU awards. For each B/E Aerospace RSU award subject to
performance vesting conditions granted prior to the date of the merger agreement, the amounts included in this column represent such award vesting at 200% of
104
Table of Contents
target.
For each November 2016 B/E Aerospace RSU award subject to performance vesting conditions, the amounts included in this column represent such award vesting at 200% of target for
Messrs. Khoury, Lieberherr, Lower, and Patch and 100% of target for Cromie, Plant, and the two additional executive officers, consistent with past practice.
-
(2)
-
The
value of each share of B/E Aerospace common stock is based upon the per share value of the merger consideration from Rockwell Collins, assuming an exchange ratio
of 0.3604. See "The Merger AgreementMerger Consideration to be Received by B/E Aerospace Stockholders" beginning on page 127.
Treatment of Non-Employee Director Stock Units
As of November 18, 2016, non-employee directors of B/E Aerospace held an aggregate of 42,813 stock units under the B/E Aerospace Amended
and Restated Non-Employee Directors Stock and Deferred Compensation Plan, which is referred to as the non-employee director plan. As described below under "Treatment of B/E Aerospace
Stock-Based Awards," beginning on page 117, each stock unit payable in shares of B/E Aerospace common stock granted under the non-employee director plan that is outstanding immediately prior to
the effective time of the merger will be converted into the right to receive $34.10 per share in cash, without interest, from Rockwell Collins and a number of validly issued, fully paid and
non-assessable shares of Rockwell Collins common stock equal to the exchange ratio and, if applicable, cash in lieu of fractional shares of Rockwell Collins common stock.
The
following table provides information for each of the non-employee directors of B/E Aerospace as of November 18, 2016, regarding the aggregate number of shares of B/E Aerospace
common stock underlying outstanding stock units which will convert to a cash payment and a number of shares of Rockwell Collins common stock pursuant to the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of
B/E Aerospace Shares
Underlying
Stock Units
|
|
Value of Stock
Units(1)
|
|
Non-Employee Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Albaugh
|
|
|
1,331
|
|
$
|
82,522
|
|
David J. Anderson
|
|
|
6,977
|
|
$
|
432,574
|
|
Richard G. Hamermesh
|
|
|
12,689
|
|
$
|
786,718
|
|
Jonathan M. Schofield
|
|
|
11,897
|
|
$
|
737,614
|
|
Mary M. VanDeweghe
|
|
|
6,469
|
|
$
|
401,078
|
|
John T. Whates
|
|
|
3,450
|
|
$
|
213,900
|
|
-
(1)
-
The
value of each stock unit award is based upon the per share value of the merger consideration from Rockwell Collins, assuming an exchange ratio of 0.3604. See
"The Merger AgreementMerger Consideration to be Received by B/E Aerospace Stockholders" beginning on page 127.
Potential Severance Payments in Connection with the Merger
B/E Aerospace has entered into employment agreements with Amin J. Khoury, Werner Lieberherr, Joseph T. Lower, Sean J. Cromie, Tommy G. Plant,
and Ryan M. Patch, as well as two additional executive officers. The employment agreements for Messrs. Khoury, Lieberherr, Lower, and Patch provide for automatic termination, severance
payments, and certain other benefits in connection with a change in control. Conversely, the employment agreements for Mr. Cromie and the two additional executive officers provide for certain
severance payments in the event of the executive's involuntary termination of employment in connection with a change in control, but do not provide for automatic termination upon a change in control.
The employment agreements generally provide for some variation of termination payments equal to the executive's salary and certain other forms of
105
Table of Contents
compensation payable from the date the executive is terminated until the last valid date of his employment agreement, plus an additional amount equal to a multiple of the executive's salary and/or
other forms of compensation.
In
addition, pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, the existing employment agreements of Messrs. Cromie and Plant will be amended to provide for severance payments equal
to the greater of (1) two times the executive's 2017 base salary or (2) the termination payments otherwise provided under the existing terms of the executive's employment agreement,
subject to other terms and conditions discussed below.
The existing employment agreements of the two additional executive officers, whose employment will be terminated in connection with the merger, will also be amended to provide for
severance payments equal to the greater of (i) three times the executive's 2017 base salary, as pursuant to a commitment in effect prior to the signing of the merger agreement, or
(ii) the termination payments otherwise provided under the existing terms of the executive's employment agreement, subject to other terms and conditions discussed below.
Under
the terms of Messrs. Khoury, Lieberherr, Lower, and Patch's employment agreements, upon the executive's termination, each executive and B/E Aerospace will execute a mutual
waiver and release of claims substantially in the form prescribed by their agreement.
The
merger will constitute a "change in control" under each employment agreement.
The
current employment agreements for Messrs. Khoury, Lieberherr, Lower, and Patch first became effective on September 15, 2014, July 29, 2013, October 1,
2014, and July 29, 2013, respectively. The current agreements for Messrs. Cromie and Plant first became effective on May 4, 2012 and February 4, 2013, respectively, and
will be amended pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, as described above.
Severance Terms of Employment Agreements with Messrs. Cromie and Plant
Under the terms of his existing employment agreement, if the employment of Mr. Cromie is terminated in connection with the merger due to
Mr. Cromie's termination by B/E Aerospace without "cause" (as defined in his employment agreement), or Mr. Cromie's resignation on account of a material reduction or change, without
Mr. Cromie's agreement, in his position, location, powers, duties or responsibilities, or due to an elimination or a material reduction of any compensation or material benefit payable pursuant
to Mr. Cromie's existing employment agreement, B/E Aerospace or its successor will pay Mr. Cromie a lump sum severance payment equal to the sum of the amounts provided
below:
-
-
Mr. Cromie's salary payable through the remainder of the full employment term, which ends on May 4, 2017; and
-
-
One times Mr. Cromie's salary as in effect at the time of his termination.
In
addition, Mr. Cromie, his spouse, and his eligible dependents will also be entitled to continued coverage under B/E Aerospace's medical, dental, and health plans (except for
the executive medical reimbursement plan) generally available to B/E Aerospace's executive officers as of the date of Mr. Cromie's termination on similar terms and conditions as active
executives until the earlier of one year from Mr. Cromie's termination or the date on which he becomes eligible for comparable benefits provided by another party.
Under
the terms of his existing employment agreement, Mr. Plant is not entitled to any single- or double-trigger severance payments in connection with the merger.
106
Table of Contents
In
connection with the merger, B/E Aerospace will amend the existing employment agreements of Messrs. Cromie and Plant to provide that:
-
-
The executive will be entitled to the cash retention awards as described below under "Grants of Retention Awards" beginning on
page 111; and
-
-
In the event of the executive's termination of employment without "cause" (as defined in their employment agreement) or resignation for the
mitigating factors described above at or within one year following the merger, the executive will be entitled to severance payments equal to the greater of (1) two times the executive's 2017
base salary or (2) the termination payments otherwise provided under the existing terms of the executive's employment agreement.
Severance Terms of Employment Agreements with Additional Executive Officers
Under the terms of their existing employment agreements, if the employment of either of the two additional executive officers is terminated in
connection with the merger due to the executive's termination by B/E Aerospace without "cause" (as defined in their employment agreement), or the executive's resignation on account of a material
reduction or change, without the executive's agreement, in his position, location, powers, duties or responsibilities, or due to an elimination or a material reduction of any compensation or material
benefit payable pursuant to the executive's existing employment agreement, B/E Aerospace or its successor will generally pay the executive a lump sum severance payment equal to the sum of the amounts
provided below:
-
-
The executive's salary or the executive's salary and automobile allowance, as applicable, payable through the remainder of the full employment
term;
-
-
One times the executive's salary or the executive's salary and automobile allowance, as applicable, as in effect at the time of his
termination; and/or
-
-
The executive's target incentive performance bonus, if not previously paid.
In
addition, the two executive officers and certain of their eligible dependents will also be entitled to continued coverage under B/E Aerospace's medical, dental, and health plans
(which may include, without limitation, B/E Aerospace's executive medical reimbursement plan) then generally available to B/E Aerospace's executive officers on similar terms and conditions as active
executives for a period that may extend to one year following the executive's termination or terminate earlier when the executive becomes eligible for comparable benefits provided by another party.
Pursuant
to the terms of the merger agreement, B/E Aerospace will amend the existing employment agreements of the two additional executive officers to provide that the executive's
employment will be terminated upon the consummation of the merger and following such automatic termination:
-
-
The executive will be entitled to severance payments equal to the greater of (i) three times the executive's 2017 base salary, as
pursuant to a commitment in effect prior to the signing of the merger agreement, or (ii) the termination payments otherwise provided under the existing terms of the executive's employment
agreement; and
-
-
If requested, the executive will be available to provide transition consulting services for a period of up to one year after the merger for a
monthly fee equal to
1
/
12
of the sum of the executive's salary, incentive bonus, and target restricted stock units for 2017.
107
Table of Contents
Severance Terms of Mr. Khoury's Employment Agreement
Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Khoury's employment will be terminated upon the consummation of the merger and B/E
Aerospace or its successor will pay Mr. Khoury a lump sum severance payment equal to the sum of the amounts provided below:
-
-
Any accrued and unpaid salary and benefits through the date of his termination;
-
-
Any earned but unpaid bonuses payable to Mr. Khoury, as determined by the Compensation Committee, for any fiscal periods of B/E
Aerospace ending prior to the date of Mr. Khoury's termination; and
-
-
Payment of $11,870,000, which represents previously vested compensation which Mr. Khoury agreed to defer in connection with the KLX
spin-off until the termination of his employment.
In
addition, following any termination of his employment, Mr. Khoury and his spouse, for as long as they each may live, will be entitled to (i) all medical, dental, and
health benefits available from time to time to B/E Aerospace's executive officers and their spouses, respectively, on similar terms and
conditions as active employees are receiving on the date of Mr. Khoury's termination of employment (provided that the level of such benefits is not less than the benefits available to
Mr. Khoury on July 1, 2014, including, without limitation, 100% payment for or reimbursement of medical and dental services or costs incurred by Mr. Khoury and his family
(i.e., his spouse, his former spouse, his eligible dependents), the cost of which will be fully paid by B/E Aerospace) and (ii) the benefits available under B/E Aerospace's executive
medical reimbursement plan as of the date of Mr. Khoury's termination of employment, but in no event less than those in effect as of July 1, 2014 (the "Post-Employment Benefits").
Mr. Khoury's
agreement provides that if his employment terminates at any time for any reason other than death or incapacity, B/E Aerospace will retain him as a consultant for
strategic planning, financial planning, and merger and acquisition advice as well as such other services as may be mutually agreed by Mr. Khoury and B/E Aerospace for a five-year period. During
the consulting term, Mr. Khoury is entitled to receive, without limitation, $209,400 in annual consulting fees, an office in Wellington, Florida or another agreed upon location, a full-time
assistant, an automobile allowance, and travel in accordance with B/E Aerospace's policy on officer travel. In addition to the compensation, benefits, and perquisites to be provided pursuant to the
consulting agreement, Mr. Khoury's agreement further provides that Mr. Khoury will also be entitled to continue to participate in all employee benefit plans, life insurance plans, disability
income plans, incentive compensation plans and other benefit plans, as may be from time to time in effect for executives of B/E Aerospace generally, plus the Post-Employment Benefits.
If
any payments from B/E Aerospace to Mr. Khoury under the employment agreement or otherwise would be subject to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which is referred to as the Code (including any interest or penalties), an accounting firm and a legal advisor to, or other advisor designated by, Mr. Khoury
will determine whether to reduce those payments so that they would not be subject to the excise tax. Such payments will be reduced only if doing so would result in greater net after-tax proceeds being
received by Mr. Khoury. B/E Aerospace will pay the expenses of the accounting firm, and will reimburse Mr. Khoury for the fees of his legal or other advisor incurred in connection with
such determination and any legal and accounting fees incurred in connection with related disputes.
108
Table of Contents
Severance Terms of Mr. Lieberherr's Employment Agreement and New Employment Agreement with
Rockwell Collins
Pursuant to his existing employment agreement, Mr. Lieberherr's employment will be terminated as of the consummation of the merger and
B/E Aerospace or its successor will pay
Mr. Lieberherr a lump sum severance payment equal to the sum of the amounts provided below:
-
-
Any accrued and unpaid salary, automobile allowance, vacation time and benefits through the date of Mr. Lieberherr's termination;
-
-
Any earned but unpaid bonuses payable to Mr. Lieberherr, as determined by the Compensation Committee, for any fiscal periods of B/E
Aerospace ending prior to the date of Mr. Lieberherr's termination;
-
-
Mr. Lieberherr's salary and automobile allowance as in effect on the date of his termination payable through the remainder of his full
employment term; and
-
-
One times Mr. Lieberherr's salary and automobile allowance in effect as of the date of his termination.
In
addition, following any termination of his employment other than for cause, Mr. Lieberherr and his spouse, for as long as they each may live, and his eligible dependents,
during such eligibility, will be entitled to (i) all medical, dental, and health benefits available from time to time to B/E Aerospace's executive officers and their dependents, respectively,
on similar terms and conditions as active employees (provided that the level of such benefits is not less than the benefits available to Mr. Lieberherr on July 1, 2013, as well as 100%
payment for and reimbursement of all medical and dental services and costs incurred by Mr. Lieberherr and his family, the cost of which will be fully paid by B/E Aerospace) and (ii) the
benefits available under B/E Aerospace's executive medical reimbursement plan as of the date of Mr. Lieberherr's termination of employment, but in no event less than those in effect as of
July 1, 2013.
Should
a dispute related to the payments due under Mr. Lieberherr's employment agreement arise in connection with the consummation of the merger, B/E Aerospace will pay all
associated legal fees.
In
connection with the merger, Mr. Lieberherr also entered into a new employment agreement with Rockwell Collins, which will become effective upon the consummation of the merger.
From and after the effective time of the merger, Mr. Lieberherr's new agreement with Rockwell Collins will govern Mr. Lieberherr's employment with Rockwell Collins. However, under the
new employment agreement, Rockwell Collins agrees to honor all the obligations of Mr. Lieberherr's existing agreement with B/E Aerospace that continue following the effective time of the merger
(including, without limitation, the benefit continuation, governing law, legal fees, and indemnification provisions of Mr. Lieberherr's agreement with B/E Aerospace). The new agreement with
Rockwell Collins also provides for the payment of the severance amounts under Mr. Lieberherr's existing employment agreement pursuant to the terms of such agreement.
Pursuant
to the new employment agreement with Rockwell Collins, Mr. Lieberherr will serve as an Executive Vice President of Rockwell Collins and Chief Operating Officer of
Rockwell Collins' aircraft interior systems business unit for an indefinite employment term. Mr. Lieberherr will receive an annual base salary of $875,000, which is subject to upward adjustment
by the compensation committee of Rockwell Collins' Board, and will be eligible to receive an annual incentive target bonus equal to not less than 90% of his base salary. In addition,
Mr. Lieberherr will receive an automobile allowance of at least $1,700 per month. Mr. Lieberherr will be eligible to participate in and receive benefits under any life or disability
insurance, health, executive medical expense reimbursement, pension, retirement, accident and other benefit plans generally available to the executives of Rockwell Collins. Both during and after the
term of his employment with Rockwell Collins, Mr. Lieberherr will continue to receive certain benefits pursuant to his existing employment agreement with B/E Aerospace (including, without
limitation, executive medical, dental, and health plan benefits and executive health reimbursement benefits based on his base salary as in effect prior to the effective time of the merger).
109
Table of Contents
As soon as practicable after the consummation of the merger, Rockwell Collins will grant Mr. Lieberherr a $2,000,000 cash retention award, which will vest
and become payable in a lump sum on the first anniversary of the effective date of the merger. In the event Mr. Lieberherr's employment is terminated by Rockwell Collins without "cause" (as
defined in his employment agreement with Rockwell Collins) or he resigns for "good reason" (as defined in his employment agreement with Rockwell Collins), the retention award will vest and be paid in
a lump sum on the sixtieth day following the date of his termination, subject to Mr. Lieberherr's execution and non-revocation of a mutual waiver and release of claims. Commencing in November
2017 and continuing throughout the term of his employment, Mr. Lieberherr will be eligible to participate in any applicable equity compensation program of Rockwell Collins with terms no less
favorable than those provided to Rockwell Collins' other senior executives, provided that the grant date value of annual equity awards granted by Rockwell Collins will have a target value of
$1,300,000. Rockwell Collins will also make tax-deferred monthly contributions equal to 7.5% of Mr. Lieberherr's monthly salary to the B/E Aerospace 2010 Deferred Compensation Plan
(which is referred to as the DCP). In addition, on January 1 of each year, Rockwell Collins will make a contribution to the DCP in an amount equal to 20% of Mr. Lieberherr's salary in
effect at that time. All contributions to the DCP will vest in full on the date of contribution.
Mr. Lieberherr
is subject to non-competition and non-solicitation obligations during his employment with Rockwell Collins and for three years thereafter.
Mr. Lieberherr's
employment may be terminated by either himself or Rockwell Collins at any time and for any reason. In the event of the termination of Mr. Lieberherr's
employment due to his death or incapacity, Mr. Lieberherr or his designated beneficiary will receive any accrued and unpaid salary, automobile allowance, vacation time, and benefits through the
date of his termination (the "Lieberherr Accrued Amounts") and any earned but unpaid bonuses payable, as determined by the compensation committee of Rockwell Collins, for any fiscal periods ending
prior to the termination. In the event of termination of Mr. Lieberherr's employment for any reason other than his death or incapacity, Mr. Lieberherr will receive the Liberherr Accrued
Amounts.
Severance Terms of Mr. Lower's Employment Agreement
Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Lower's employment will be terminated as of the consummation of the merger and B/E Aerospace or
its successor will pay Mr. Lower a lump sum severance payment equal to the sum of the amounts provided below:
-
-
Any accrued and unpaid salary, automobile allowance, vacation time and benefits through the date of Mr. Lower's termination;
-
-
Any earned but unpaid bonuses payable to Mr. Lower, as determined by the Compensation Committee, for any fiscal periods of B/E Aerospace
ending prior to the date of Mr. Lower's termination; and
-
-
Two times Mr. Lower's salary and applicable target bonus in effect as of the date of his termination.
If
any payments from B/E Aerospace to Mr. Lower would be subject to an excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, an accounting firm and a legal or other advisor to
Mr. Lower will determine whether to reduce those payments so that they would not be subject to the excise tax. Such payments will be reduced only if doing so would result in greater net
after-tax proceeds being received by Mr. Lower. B/E Aerospace will pay the expenses of the accounting firm, and will reimburse Mr. Lower for the fees of his legal or other advisor.
110
Table of Contents
Severance Terms of Mr. Patch's Employment Agreement
Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Patch's employment will be terminated as of the consummation of the merger and B/E Aerospace or
its successor will pay Mr. Patch a lump sum severance payment equal to the sum of the amounts provided below:
-
-
Any accrued and unpaid salary, automobile allowance and vacation time through the date of Mr. Patch's termination;
-
-
Any earned but unpaid bonuses payable to Mr. Patch, as determined by the Compensation Committee, for any fiscal periods of B/E Aerospace
ending prior to the date of Mr. Patch's termination;
-
-
Mr. Patch's salary and automobile allowance as in effect on the date of his termination payable through the remainder of his full
employment term;
-
-
One times Mr. Patch's salary and automobile allowance in effect as of the date of his termination;
and
-
-
90% of Mr. Patch's salary in effect as of the date of his termination.
In
addition, following any termination of his employment other than for cause, Mr. Patch, his spouse/domestic partner, and his dependents, for a period of three years from his
termination date, will be entitled to (i) all medical, dental, and health benefits available from time to time to B/E Aerospace's executive officers on similar terms and conditions as
active employees (provided that the level of such benefits is not less than the benefits available to Mr. Patch on July 1, 2013), as well as 100% payment for and reimbursement of medical
and dental services and costs incurred by Mr. Patch, his spouse/domestic partner, and his dependents, the cost of which will be fully paid by B/E Aerospace, and (ii) the benefits
available under B/E Aerospace's executive medical reimbursement plan as of the date of Mr. Patch's termination of employment, but in no event less than those in effect as of
July 1, 2013.
Should
a dispute related to the payments due under Mr. Patch's employment agreement arise in connection with the consummation of the merger, B/E Aerospace will pay all associated
legal fees.
If
the severance payments and benefits provided under Mr. Patch's employment agreement would be subject to the excise taxes under Section 409A of the Code, he is also
entitled to receive (i) a payment sufficient to cover such excise taxes and (ii) an additional gross-up payment sufficient to pay for the taxes arising as a result of that payment.
Grants of Retention Awards
Pursuant to the merger agreement, Rockwell Collins will, upon consummation of the merger, make grants of Rockwell Collins cash retention awards,
which are referred to as parent retention awards, to Messrs. Cromie and Plant with a grant date value equal to 100% of, respectively, Mr. Cromie's and Mr. Plant's base salary, 50%
of which parent retention awards will vest and be payable on the six-month anniversary of the consummation of the merger and the remaining 50% on the first anniversary of the consummation of the
merger, subject to continued employment through each vesting date.
Transaction Bonuses
On October 23, 2016, B/E Aerospace entered into transaction bonus agreements with each of Messrs. Khoury, Lieberherr, Patch and
Lower. The transaction bonus agreements provide that, upon consummation of the merger, Messrs. Khoury, Lieberherr, Patch and Lower will receive transaction bonuses equal to, respectively,
$16,531,462, $8,400,000, $1,680,000 and $1,120,000, subject to the
111
Table of Contents
executive's continued employment through the date of the consummation of the merger. Each executive will be entitled to receive his transaction bonus (contingent on the consummation of the merger on
or before December 31, 2017), if his employment is terminated prior to the consummation of the merger due to his death or disability, by B/E Aerospace for any reason or by the executive for
"good reason" (as defined in the executive's employment agreement). In addition, the transaction bonus agreements with Messrs. Lower and Patch include a non-compete covenant covering the period
during the executive's employment and 18 (for Mr. Lower) or 12 (for Mr. Patch) months following the executive's termination.
To
the extent that any payments or benefits under the transaction bonus agreements, in combination with any other severance and change in control payments and benefits, otherwise
constitute "parachute payments" then such payments and benefits will be "cut-back" or reduced to the extent necessary, such that no portion of the payments and benefits is subject to the imposition of
excise taxes, but only if the net amount of such payment and benefits, as so reduced (and after subtracting any additional taxes due on such reduced payments and benefits) is greater than or equal to
the net amount of such payments and benefits without such reduction (but after subtracting the net amount of excise taxes and all additional taxes due on such unreduced payments and benefits).
Quantification of Potential Payments
The severance payments and benefits to each executive officer (excluding the two additional executive officers) are set forth below in
"Payments Upon a Change in Control and a Qualifying Termination," and assume the closing of the merger occurred on
November 18, 2016, which is the latest practicable date prior to the filing of this proxy statement, and such executive officer's employment is terminated by the executive officer for "good
reason" (as defined in his November 2016 award agreement) or by the surviving corporation without "cause" (as defined in the executive officer's employment agreement) (which we refer to as a
qualifying termination), if applicable, immediately after the closing of the merger. Payments included in "Payments Upon a Change in Control and a Qualifying Termination" assume that
severance payments and benefits are provided under the applicable officer's employment agreement (which, in the case of Mr. Lieberherr, refers to his new employment agreement with Rockwell
Collins, and, in the case of Messrs. Cromie and Plant, will be the executives' employment agreements, as such agreements will be amended in connection with the merger). The two additional
executive officers not covered under the table for "Payments Upon a Change in Control and a Qualifying Termination" would be entitled to receive an aggregate amount of approximately
$3,017,122 pursuant to their employment agreements, as such agreements will be amended in connection with the merger.
Indemnification and Insurance
The merger agreement provides that, for six years following the effective time of the merger, Rockwell Collins or the surviving corporation will
provide current and former directors and officers of B/E Aerospace with exculpation, indemnification and advancement of expenses no less favorable than currently provided by equivalent
provisions of the B/E Aerospace's certificate of incorporation and B/E Aerospace's bylaws as in effect immediately prior to the effective time of the merger. In addition, prior to the
merger, B/E Aerospace or Rockwell Collins will cause the surviving corporation as of or after the effective time, to purchase a six-year prepaid policy, with terms, conditions, retentions and
limits of liability that are no less favorable than the coverage provided under B/E Aerospace's existing policies of directors' and officers' liability insurance and fiduciary liability
insurance, with respect to matters arising on or before the effective time, including in connection with the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (provided that
B/E Aerospace will not pay, and the surviving corporation will not be required to pay, in excess of 300% of the last annual premium paid by B/E Aerospace prior to the date of the merger
agreement in respect of such policy).
112
Table of Contents
New Compensation Arrangements with Rockwell Collins
As described under "Governance of Rockwell Collins Following Completion of the Merger" beginning on page 100, the Rockwell Collins
Board will be increased by two members to a total of eleven members, and Richard G. Hamermesh and John T. Whates, members of the B/E Aerospace Board, will be appointed to the
Rockwell Collins Board.
Any
executive officers and directors who become officers, directors or employees or who otherwise are retained to provide services to Rockwell Collins or the surviving corporation may
enter into new individualized compensation arrangements and may participate in cash or equity incentive or other benefit plans maintained by Rockwell Collins or the surviving corporation.
Golden Parachute Compensation
The following table sets forth the information required by Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K regarding the compensation for each of
the named executive officers, which are referred to as NEOs, of B/E Aerospace (i) that is based on or otherwise becomes payable immediately prior to, or upon the effectiveness of, the
merger, assuming the closing of the merger occurred on November 18, 2016, which is the latest practicable date prior to the filing of this proxy statement, (ii) that becomes payable upon
the termination of employment of such NEO if such termination is a qualifying termination and occurs immediately after the closing of the merger, as well as additional amounts payable in connection
with the termination or (iii) that otherwise relates to the merger. In connection with the merger, Mr. Lieberherr's existing employment agreement with B/E Aerospace will be replaced by a
new employment agreement with Rockwell Collins, pursuant to which Rockwell Collins will continue to honor all the obligations of Mr. Lieberherr's existing agreement with B/E Aerospace that
survive following the effective time of the merger, as described more fully above under "Severance Terms of Mr. Lieberherr's Employment Agreement."
The
following table does not include any amount that would be payable upon any termination of service that is not in connection with the merger.
The payments described in the table below are made pursuant to the arrangements discussed in "Potential Severance Payments in Connection with the Merger" beginning on
page 105.
Golden Parachute Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Cash(1)
|
|
Equity(2)
|
|
Perquisites/
Benefits(3)
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
|
Amin Khoury
|
|
$
|
16,531,462
|
|
$
|
19,615,790
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
36,147,252
|
|
Werner Lieberherr
|
|
$
|
12,641,232
|
|
$
|
18,196,178
|
|
$
|
140,465
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
30,977,875
|
|
Joseph T. Lower
|
|
$
|
3,029,620
|
|
$
|
6,874,703
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
9,904,323
|
|
Sean J. Cromie
|
|
$
|
1,182,083
|
|
$
|
3,573,764
|
|
$
|
14,921
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
4,770,768
|
|
Tommy G. Plant
|
|
$
|
1,295,277
|
|
$
|
2,389,475
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
3,684,752
|
|
Ryan M. Patch
|
|
$
|
4,350,062
|
|
$
|
4,085,663
|
|
$
|
90,037
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
8,525,762
|
|
-
(1)
-
Amounts
shown reflect cash severance payments under the executive's employment agreement, and any applicable transaction bonuses. For Mr. Khoury, the amount
in this column represents a transaction bonus payment equal to $16,531,462. For Mr. Lieberherr, the amount in this column represents a cash severance payment equal to $4,241,232 and a
transaction bonus payment equal to $8,400,000. For Mr. Lower, the amount in this column represents a cash severance payment equal to $1,909,620 and a transaction bonus payment equal to
$1,120,000. For Mr. Cromie, the amount in this column represents a cash severance payment equal to $1,182,083. For Mr. Plant, the amount in this column represents a cash severance
payment equal to $803,400 and payment of a pro-rated annual incentive bonus for 2016, calculated based on actual performance at 185% of
113
Table of Contents
target,
equal to $491,877. For Mr. Patch, the amount in this column represents a cash severance payment equal to $2,670,062 and a transaction bonus payment equal to $1,680,000. The transaction
bonuses included in this column are single-trigger benefits and all other cash amounts included in this
column are double-trigger benefits and will be paid upon termination of employment. However, pursuant to the employment agreements of Messrs. Khoury, Lieberherr, Lower and Patch, termination
will occur automatically upon consummation of the merger.
-
(2)
-
Amounts
shown reflect the value provided in respect of B/E Aerospace restricted stock awards and B/E Aerospace RSU Awards, as more fully described above under
"Treatment of Restricted Stock Awards" and "Treatment of Restricted Stock Units." The amounts in this column are calculated based on a per share value of $59.53, which was
B/E Aerospace's average closing market price over the first five business days following the first public announcement of the merger, as required by Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K,
multiplied by the number of B/E Aerospace restricted stock awards and B/E Aerospace RSU Awards outstanding on a presumed closing date of November 18, 2016 and that would vest on a double
trigger basis at the effective time of the merger. All amounts included in this column are single-trigger benefits in that they will only be paid upon the consummation of the merger. For
Mr. Khoury, the amount in this column represents payments of $9,526,348 and $10,089,442 for his unvested and accelerated B/E Aerospace restricted stock awards and B/E Aerospace RSU awards,
respectively. For Mr. Lieberherr, the amount in this column represents payments of $5,258,761 and $12,937,417 for his unvested and accelerated B/E Aerospace restricted stock awards and B/E
Aerospace RSU awards, respectively. For Mr. Lower, the amount in this column represents payments of $1,597,071 and $5,277,632 for his unvested and accelerated B/E Aerospace restricted stock
awards and B/E Aerospace RSU awards, respectively. For Mr. Cromie, the amount in this column represents payments of $1,329,007 and $2,244,757 for his unvested and accelerated B/E Aerospace
restricted stock awards and B/E Aerospace RSU awards, respectively. For Mr. Plant, the amount in this column represents payments of $512,732 and $1,876,743 for his unvested and accelerated B/E
Aerospace restricted stock awards and B/E Aerospace RSU awards, respectively. For Mr. Patch, the amount in this column represents payments of $1,393,776 and $2,691,887 for his unvested and
accelerated B/E Aerospace restricted stock awards and B/E Aerospace RSU awards, respectively.
-
(3)
-
Amounts
shown reflect continuation of all medical, dental and health benefits as well as the benefits under the Amended and Restated Medical Care Reimbursement Plan
for Executives of B/E Aerospace, Inc. The amounts associated with the medical, dental and health benefits are calculated using 2016 enrollment rates and severance agreement terms, and represent
the value of coverage for one year post-termination. The amounts included in this column are double-trigger benefits and will be paid upon termination of employment. However, pursuant to the
employment agreements of Messrs. Lieberherr and Patch, termination will occur automatically upon consummation of the merger.
Director and Officer Indemnification
Under the merger agreement, certain indemnification and insurance rights exist in favor of B/E Aerospace and its subsidiaries' current
and former directors and officers. See "Interests of Directors and Executive Officers in the MergerIndemnification and Insurance" beginning on page 112 for information
about these rights.
Accounting Treatment
Rockwell Collins prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. The transaction will be accounted for by applying the acquisition
method in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 805,
Business Combinations,
or ASC 805, which requires the determination of the acquirer,
the acquisition date, the fair value of assets and liabilities of the acquiree and the measurement of
114
Table of Contents
goodwill.
The accounting guidance provides that in identifying the acquiring entity in a combination effected through an exchange of equity interests, all pertinent facts and circumstances must be
considered, including the relative voting rights of the stockholders of the constituent companies in the combined entity, the composition of the board of directors and senior management of the
surviving corporation, the relative size of each company and the terms of the exchange of equity securities in the business combination, including payment of any premium.
Based on the fact that current Rockwell Collins Board members will represent a majority of the directors of the Rockwell Collins Board immediately following completion of the
transaction, Rockwell
Collins stockholders will own approximately 80.8% of the stock of the surviving corporation with B/E Aerospace stockholders receiving a premium (as of the date preceding the transaction
announcement) over the fair market value of their shares on such date, as well as other terms of the transaction, Rockwell Collins is considered to be the acquirer of B/E Aerospace for accounting
purposes.
Accordingly,
Rockwell Collins will allocate the purchase price to the fair value of B/E Aerospace's assets and liabilities at the acquisition date. To the extent the net fair value of
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is less than the purchase price, goodwill will be recognized for the difference. Currently, the preliminary purchase price allocation indicates that
goodwill will be recognized because the preliminary net fair value of the assets to be acquired and liabilities to be assumed is less than the preliminary purchase price.
All
unaudited pro forma condensed combined consolidated financial statements contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus were prepared using the acquisition method of accounting.
The final allocation of the purchase price will be determined after the transaction is completed and after completion of an analysis to determine the estimated net fair value of B/E Aerospace's assets
and liabilities. Accordingly, the final acquisition accounting adjustments may be materially different from the unaudited pro forma adjustments. Any decrease in the estimated net fair value of the
assets and liabilities of B/E Aerospace as compared to the unaudited pro forma information included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus will have the effect of increasing the goodwill recognized
related to the transaction.
Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger
To complete the merger, Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace must obtain approvals or consents from, or make filings with, a number of United
States federal, state and foreign antitrust regulators. We describe below the material United States federal, state and foreign approvals. Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace are not currently aware of
any other material governmental consents, approvals or filings that are required prior to the parties' completion of the transaction other than those we describe below. If additional approvals,
consents and filings are required to complete the transaction, Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace intend to seek such consents and approvals and make such filings.
Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace expect to complete the transaction in the spring of 2017. Although Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace believe that they will receive the required
consents and approvals described below to complete the transaction, we cannot give any assurance as to the timing of these consents and approvals or as to Rockwell Collins' and B/E Aerospace's
ultimate ability to obtain such consents or approvals (or any additional consents or approvals which may otherwise become necessary) or that we will obtain such consents or approvals on terms and
subject to conditions
satisfactory to Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace. The receipt of the regulatory approvals (as described hereinafter) is a condition to the obligation of each of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace to
complete the merger. For more information about the receipt of regulatory approvals as a condition to closing under the merger agreement, see the section entitled "The Merger
AgreementCovenants and AgreementsAppropriate Actions; Consents; Filings" beginning on page 138.
115
Table of Contents
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act
The merger is subject to the requirements of the HSR Act and the related rules and regulations, which provide that certain transactions may not
be completed until required information has been furnished to the DOJ and the FTC and until certain waiting periods have been terminated, have expired or approval has been obtained. The HSR Act
requires Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace to observe a 30-day waiting period after the submission of their HSR filings before consummating their transaction, unless the waiting period is terminated
early.
On November 7, 2016, each of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace filed a Notification and Report Form under the HSR Act with the DOJ and the FTC, which filings started the initial
30-day waiting period required by the HSR Act. The required 30-day waiting period expired at 11:59 Eastern time on December 7, 2016.
Other Regulatory Approvals
The merger is also subject to antitrust review by governmental authorities in several foreign jurisdictions in which the companies have a
sufficient market presence to require filings. The parties are making filings in Europe, China, the Philippines, South Korea and Turkey.
Europe
Based on the businesses in which Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace are engaged, a merger filing with the European Commission, which is referred
to as the EC, and observation of the applicable review period under the EU Merger Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004) is required before the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby may close. The initial review period is 25 EC working days from filing of the EU notification, and can be extended to 35 EC working days if commitments are offered by the
parties (Phase I) or by an additional 20 EC working days at the request of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace. The review period may be further extended for an additional 90 EC working days or
for an even longer period of time for an in-depth investigation (Phase II).
China
Based on the businesses in which Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace are engaged, a merger notification will be made to the Anti-Monopoly Bureau
of the Ministry of Commerce of China. Under the anti-monopoly law, the transactions may not be consummated until the expiration of a 30 calendar day review period following the complete filing of a
notification concerning the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (Phase I). The review period may be extended for an additional 90 calendar days (Phase II) and
further for an additional 60 calendar days in the event of an in-depth investigation (Phase III).
South Korea
Based on the businesses in which Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace are engaged, an antitrust notification is required to the Korea Fair Trade
Commission, which is referred to as the KFTC, Under the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act, the transactions may not be consummated until the expiration of a 30 calendar day review period
following the complete filing of a notification concerning the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (Phase I). The review period may be extended for an additional 90
calendar days at the KFTC's discretion (Phase II).
116
Table of Contents
Philippines
Based on the businesses in which Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace are engaged, a merger notification must be made to the Philippine
Competition Commission. Under the Philippine Competition Act, the transactions may not be consummated until the expiration of a 30 calendar day review period following the complete filing of a
notification concerning the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (Phase I). The review period may be extended for an additional 60 calendar days for an in-depth
investigation (Phase II).
Turkey
Based on the businesses in which Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace are engaged, Turkish competition law requires notification of and approval
by the Turkish Competition Authority because the merger exceeds certain thresholds. The transactions may not be consummated until the expiration of a 30 calendar day review period following receipt of
the complete notification (Phase I). The review period may be extended for an additional 6 months at the Authority's discretion (Phase II).
Treatment of B/E Aerospace's Existing Debt; Financing
In connection with the merger, the parties intend to terminate B/E Aerospace's existing revolving credit facility and term loan facility.
Rockwell Collins' obligation to complete the merger is not conditioned upon its obtaining financing. Rockwell Collins anticipates that approximately $3.6 billion will be required to pay the
aggregate cash portion of the merger consideration to the B/E Aerospace stockholders. Rockwell Collins intends to fund the cash component of the merger through sources of debt financing.
For a more complete description of sources of funding for the merger, see "Source of Funding for the Merger" beginning on page 122.
Treatment of B/E Aerospace Stock-Based Awards
Treatment of B/E Aerospace Restricted Stock Awards and RSU Awards
Upon completion of the merger, each outstanding award of B/E Aerospace restricted stock and each B/E Aerospace restricted stock unit award that
in each case was granted prior to the date of the merger agreement will (i) become fully vested and, to the extent such award is subject to performance conditions, such performance conditions
will be deemed satisfied at the maximum level and (ii) be cancelled and converted into the right to receive a lump sum cash payment per share of B/E Aerospace common stock underlying such award
equal to the value of the per share merger consideration less any applicable withholding taxes. Upon completion of the merger, except for outstanding restricted stock unit awards granted to the
executive officers of B/E Aerospace in November 2016, consistent with past practice, which will be cancelled and converted into a cash payment pursuant to their terms, each outstanding award of B/E
Aerospace restricted stock and each B/E Aerospace restricted stock unit award that in each case was granted on or following the date of the merger agreement will be assumed by Rockwell Collins and
converted into a Rockwell Collins award of restricted stock or restricted stock unit award, as applicable, which will vest subject to the grantee's continued service with Rockwell Collins or its
affiliates through each applicable vesting date (with any performance conditions that were applicable to the B/E Aerospace award deemed satisfied at target level performance and following the closing,
the converted Rockwell Collins award subject only to time-based vesting) covering a number of shares of Rockwell Collins common stock (rounded down to the nearest whole share) determined by
multiplying the number of shares of B/E Aerospace that were subject to the B/E Aerospace award by a ratio of the value of the merger consideration divided by the Rockwell Collins stock price (with the
value of the stock consideration portion of the merger consideration determined by multiplying the number of such shares of Rockwell Collins common stock by the Rockwell Collins stock price).
117
Table of Contents
Treatment of B/E Aerospace Stock Units
Each stock unit credited to the account of any current or former director under the B/E Aerospace Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors
Stock and Deferred Compensation Plan that is outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, which is referred to as the effective time, will be converted into the right to receive
the merger consideration.
For a more complete description of the treatment of outstanding restricted stock unit awards granted to the executive officers of B/E Aerospace in November 2016, see
"Interests of Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger" beginning on page 101.
Any
applicable withholding taxes resulting from this treatment will be satisfied by reducing the amount of cash, if any, that would otherwise be provided to holders of such awards. If no
cash is to be provided to a holder of such an award or if the amount of cash that would otherwise be provided to a holder of such awards is not sufficient to cover the applicable withholding taxes,
then the number of shares of Rockwell Collins common stock that would otherwise be provided to the holder in accordance with the terms described above will be reduced to the extent necessary to cover
the shortfall.
Appraisal Rights
Rockwell Collins Stockholders Appraisal Rights
Under Delaware law, Rockwell Collins stockholders will not be entitled to any appraisal rights in connection with the merger or any other
transactions described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
B/E Aerospace Stockholders Appraisal Rights
Record holders of B/E Aerospace common stock who comply with the procedures summarized below will be entitled to appraisal rights if the merger
is completed. Under Section 262 of the General Corporation Law, which is referred to as Section 262, holders of shares of B/E Aerospace common stock with respect to which appraisal
rights are properly demanded and perfected and not withdrawn or lost are entitled, in lieu of receiving the merger consideration, to have the "fair value" of their shares (exclusive of any element of
value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger) at the effective time, judicially determined and paid to them in cash by complying with the provisions of Section 262. B/E
Aerospace is required to send a notice to that effect to each stockholder not less than 20 days prior to the B/E Aerospace special meeting. This joint proxy statement/prospectus constitutes
that notice to the record holders of B/E Aerospace common stock.
The
following is a brief summary of Section 262, which sets forth the procedures for demanding statutory appraisal rights. This summary, however, is not a complete statement of
the applicable requirements, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Section 262, a copy of the text of which is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex E. If
you wish to consider exercising your appraisal rights, you should carefully review the text of Section 262 contained in Annex E. Failure to comply timely and properly with the
requirements of Section 262 may result in the loss of your appraisal rights under the DGCL. The following summary does not constitute any legal or other advice nor does it constitute a
recommendation that stockholders exercise their appraisal rights under Section 262.
Stockholders
of record who desire to exercise their appraisal rights must do all of the following: (i) not vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement,
(ii) deliver in the manner set forth below a written demand for appraisal of the stockholder's shares to the Secretary of B/E Aerospace before the vote on the adoption of the merger agreement
at the B/E Aerospace special meeting, (iii) continuously hold the shares of record from the date of making the demand through completion of the merger and (iv) otherwise comply with the
requirements of Section 262.
118
Table of Contents
Only
a holder of record of B/E Aerospace common stock is entitled to demand an appraisal of the shares registered in that holder's name. A demand for appraisal must be executed by or for
the stockholder of record. The demand should set forth, fully and correctly, the stockholder's name as it appears on the certificates representing shares. If shares are owned of record in a fiduciary
capacity, such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, such demand must be executed by the fiduciary. If shares are owned of record by more than one person, as in a joint tenancy or tenancy in common,
the demand must be executed by or on behalf of all joint owners. An authorized agent, including an agent
of two or more joint owners, may execute the demand for appraisal for a stockholder of record; however, the agent must identify the record owner and expressly disclose that, in exercising the demand,
the agent is acting as agent for the record owner.
A
record owner, such as a broker, who holds shares as a nominee for others may exercise appraisal rights with respect to the shares held for all or less than all beneficial owners of
shares as to which the holder is the record owner. In that case, the written demand must set forth the number of shares covered by the demand. Where the number of shares is not expressly stated, the
demand will be presumed to cover all shares outstanding in the name of the record owner.
Beneficial
owners who are not record owners and who intend to exercise appraisal rights should consult with the record owner to determine the appropriate procedures for having the record
holder make a demand for appraisal with respect to the beneficial owner's shares. Any holder of shares held in "street name" who desires appraisal rights with respect to those shares must take such
actions as may be necessary to ensure that a timely and proper demand for appraisal is made by the record owner of the shares. Shares held through brokerage firms, banks and other financial
institutions are frequently deposited with and held of record in the name of a nominee of a central security depository, such as Cede & Co., The Depository Trust Company's nominee. A
demand for appraisal with respect to such shares must be made by or on behalf of the depository nominee and it must identify the depository nominee as the record owner. Any beneficial holder of shares
desiring appraisal rights with respect to such shares which are held through a brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution is responsible for ensuring that the demand for appraisal is made by
the record holder.
As
required by Section 262, a demand for appraisal must be in writing and must reasonably inform B/E Aerospace of the identity of the record holder (which might be a nominee as
described above) and of such holder's intention to seek appraisal of the holder's shares.
Stockholders of record who elect to demand appraisal of their shares must mail or deliver their written demand to: B/E Aerospace, Inc., 1400 Corporate Center Way, Wellington,
Florida 33414, Attention: Ryan M. Patch, Vice PresidentLaw, General Counsel and Secretary. The written demand for appraisal should specify the stockholder's name and mailing address. The
written demand must reasonably inform B/E Aerospace that the stockholder intends thereby to demand an appraisal of his, her or its shares. The written demand must be received by B/E Aerospace prior to
the vote on the Merger proposal at the B/E Aerospace special meeting. Neither voting (in person or by proxy) against, abstaining from voting on or failing to vote on the adoption of the merger
agreement will alone suffice to constitute a written demand for appraisal within the meaning of Section 262. In addition, the stockholder must not vote its shares of B/E Aerospace common stock
in favor of adoption of the merger agreement. An executed proxy that does not contain voting instructions will, unless revoked, be voted in favor of adoption of the merger agreement and will cause the
stockholder's right of appraisal to be lost. Therefore, a stockholder who desires to exercise appraisal rights should either (i) refrain from executing and submitting the enclosed proxy card or
(ii) vote by proxy against the adoption of the merger agreement or affirmatively register an abstention with respect thereto.
Notwithstanding
a stockholder's compliance with the foregoing requirements, Section 262 provides that, because immediately prior to the merger B/E Aerospace common stock was
listed on a national securities exchange, the Delaware Chancery Court will dismiss the proceedings as to all holders of
119
Table of Contents
shares
of B/E Aerospace common stock who are otherwise entitled to appraisal rights unless (i) the total number of shares of B/E Aerospace common stock entitled to appraisal exceeds 1% of the
outstanding shares of B/E Aerospace common stock or (ii) the value of the consideration provided in the merger for such total number of shares of B/E Aerospace common stock entitled to
appraisal exceeds $1 million.
Within
120 days after completion of the merger, but not thereafter, either the surviving corporation in the merger or any stockholder who has timely and properly demanded
appraisal of such stockholder's shares and who has complied with the requirements of Section 262 and is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights, or any beneficial owner for which a demand for
appraisal has been properly made by the record holder, may commence an appraisal proceeding by filing a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery, with a copy served on the surviving corporation in
the case of a petition filed by a stockholder, demanding a determination of the fair value of the shares of all stockholders who have properly demanded appraisal. There is no present intent on the
part of B/E Aerospace as the surviving corporation to file an appraisal petition and stockholders seeking to exercise appraisal rights should not assume that the surviving corporation will file such a
petition or that the surviving corporation will initiate any negotiations with respect to the fair value of such shares. Accordingly, stockholders who desire to have their shares appraised should
initiate any petitions necessary for the perfection of their appraisal rights within the time periods and in the manner prescribed in Section 262.
Within
120 days after completion of the merger, any stockholder who has complied with the applicable provisions of Section 262 will be entitled, upon written request, to
receive from the surviving corporation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares of B/E Aerospace common stock not voting in favor of the merger and with respect to which demands for
appraisal were received by the surviving corporation and the number of holders of such shares. A person who is the beneficial owner of shares held in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such
person may, in such person's own name, file a petition or request from the surviving corporation for the statement described in the previous sentence. Such statement must be mailed within
10 days after the written request therefor has been received by the surviving corporation.
If
a petition for appraisal is duly filed by a B/E Aerospace stockholder and a copy of the petition is delivered to the surviving corporation, then the surviving corporation will be
obligated, within 20 days after receiving service of a copy of the petition, to file with the Delaware Register in Chancery a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all
stockholders who have demanded an appraisal of their shares of B/E Aerospace common stock and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares of B/E Aerospace common stock have not been reached.
After notice to stockholders who have
demanded appraisal, if such notice is ordered by the Delaware Court of Chancery, the Delaware Court of Chancery will conduct a hearing upon the petition and determine those stockholders who have
complied with Section 262 and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The Delaware Court of Chancery may require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares and who
hold stock represented by certificates to submit their certificates of stock to the Delaware Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any
stockholder fails to comply with such direction, the Delaware Court of Chancery may dismiss the proceedings as to such stockholder. Where proceedings are not dismissed, the appraisal proceeding will
be conducted, as to the shares of B/E Aerospace common stock owned by such stockholders, in accordance with the rules of the Delaware Court of Chancery, including any rules specifically governing
appraisal proceedings.
After
a hearing on such petition, the Delaware Court of Chancery will determine which stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights and thereafter will appraise the shares owned by those
stockholders, determining the fair value of the shares exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, together with interest to be paid, if any, upon
the amount determined to be the fair value. Unless the Delaware Court of Chancery in its discretion
120
Table of Contents
determines
otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the date the merger is completed through the date of payment of the judgment will be compounded quarterly and will accrue at 5% over the
Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharges) as established from time to time during the period between the date the merger is completed and the date of payment of the judgment.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time before the entry of judgment in the proceedings, the surviving corporation may pay to each stockholder entitled to appraisal an amount in cash (which will be
treated as an advance against the payment due to such stockholder), in which case interest shall accrue after such payment only upon the sum of (i) the difference, if any, between the amount so
paid and the fair value of the shares as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and (ii) interest theretofore accrued, unless paid at that time. When the fair value is determined, the
Delaware Court of Chancery will direct the payment of such value, together with interest, if any, on the amount determined to be fair value, to the stockholders entitled to receive the same upon the
surrender by such holders of the certificates representing their shares, if any, or, immediately in the case of any uncertificated shares. The parties have made no determination as to whether such a
payment will be made if the merger is consummated, and B/E Aerospace reserves the right to make such a payment upon the consummation of the merger.
In
determining fair value, the Delaware Court of Chancery is to take into account all relevant factors. In
Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., et
al
., the Delaware Supreme Court stated that "proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise
admissible in court" should be considered in an appraisal proceeding and that "[f]air price obviously requires consideration of all relevant factors involving the value of a
company." The Delaware Supreme Court has stated that in making this determination of fair value the court must consider market value, asset value, dividends, earnings
prospects, the nature of the enterprise and any other facts which could be ascertained as of the date of the merger which throw any light on future prospects of the merged corporation.
Section 262 provides that fair value is to be determined "exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger." In
Cede & Co. v. Technicolor,
Inc.
, the Delaware Supreme Court stated that such exclusion is a "narrow exclusion
[that] does not encompass known elements of value," but which rather applies only to the speculative elements of value arising from such accomplishment or expectation. In
Weinberger
, the Delaware
Supreme Court construed Section 262 to mean that "elements of future value, including the nature of the enterprise,
which are known or susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the product of speculation, may be considered."
Stockholders
considering seeking appraisal should bear in mind that the fair value of their shares determined under Section 262 could be more than, the same as, or less than the
merger consideration they are entitled to receive pursuant to the merger agreement if they do not seek appraisal of their shares, and that opinions of investment banking firms as to the fairness from
a financial point of view of the consideration payable in a transaction are not opinions as to fair value under Section 262. Each of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace reserves the right to
assert, in any appraisal proceeding, that for purposes of Section 262, the "fair value" of a share of B/E Aerospace common stock is less than the applicable merger consideration.
The
cost of the appraisal proceeding may be determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and charged upon the parties as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems equitable in the
circumstances. However, costs do not include attorneys' and expert witness fees. The Delaware Court of Chancery may order that all or a portion of the expenses incurred by such stockholder in
connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and the fees and expenses of experts, be charged pro rata against the value of all shares entitled
to appraisal. In the absence of such a determination of assessment, each party bears its own expenses.
From
and after the date of completion of the merger, any stockholder who has duly demanded appraisal in compliance with Section 262 will not, after completion of the merger, be
entitled to vote
121
Table of Contents
for
any purpose any shares subject to such demand or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on such shares, except for dividends or distributions payable to stockholders of record at a
date prior to completion of the merger.
Within
10 days after the effective time, the surviving corporation must give notice of the date that the merger became effective to each of B/E Aerospace's stockholders who has
properly filed a written demand for appraisal, who did not vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and
who has otherwise complied with Section 262. At any time within 60 days after completion of the merger, any stockholder who has demanded appraisal and who has not commenced an appraisal
proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party will have the right to withdraw such stockholder's demand for appraisal and to accept the cash and Rockwell Collins common stock to which the
stockholder is entitled pursuant to the merger. After this period, the stockholder may withdraw such stockholder's demand for appraisal only with the written approval of the surviving corporation. If
no petition for appraisal is filed with the Delaware Court of Chancery within 120 days after completion of the merger, stockholders' rights to appraisal will cease and all stockholders will be
entitled only to receive the merger consideration as provided for in the merger agreement. No petition timely filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding appraisal will be dismissed as to any
stockholders without the approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery, and that approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems just. However, the preceding sentence
will not affect the right of any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined the proceeding as a named party to withdraw such stockholder's demand for appraisal and to accept
the terms offered upon the merger within 60 days after completion of the merger.
The
foregoing is a brief summary of Section 262 that sets forth the procedures for demanding statutory appraisal rights. This summary, however, is not a complete statement of all
applicable requirements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Section 262, a copy of the text of which is attached as Annex E to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Failure to comply strictly with all the procedures set forth in Section 262 may result in the loss of a stockholder's statutory appraisal rights.
Consequently, if you wish to exercise your appraisal rights, you are strongly urged to consult a legal advisor before attempting to exercise your appraisal rights.
Source of Funding for the Merger
Rockwell Collins' obligation to complete the merger is not conditioned upon its obtaining financing.
Rockwell Collins anticipates that approximately $3.6 billion will be required to pay the aggregate cash portion of the merger consideration to the B/E Aerospace stockholders.
Rockwell Collins expects to issue up to $4.35 billion in aggregate principal amount of its senior unsecured notes in one or more public offerings or private placements and borrow up to
$1.5 billion under a new senior unsecured syndicated term loan facility. Rockwell Collins has entered into a committed bridge loan credit facility of $4.35 billion that would be funded
only to the extent some or all of the senior unsecured notes described above are not issued prior to the consummation of the acquisition. Rockwell Collins expects to fund approximately
$3.6 billion (based on the outstanding shares of B/E Aerospace common stock on January 3, 2017) for the aggregate cash portion of the merger consideration payable to the B/E Aerospace
stockholders through the debt financing described above.
NYSE Listing of Rockwell Collins Common Stock; Delisting and Deregistration of B/E Aerospace Common Stock
Prior to the completion of the merger, Rockwell Collins has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to cause the shares of Rockwell Collins
common stock to be issued in connection with the merger to be approved for listing on the NYSE. The listing of the shares of Rockwell Collins common
122
Table of Contents
stock
on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance, is also a condition to completion of the merger.
If
the merger is completed, B/E Aerospace common stock will cease to be listed on the NASDAQ and B/E Aerospace common stock will be deregistered under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, which is referred to as the Exchange Act.
Litigation Relating to the Merger
In connection with the merger, two purported B/E Aerospace stockholders filed two putative class action lawsuits in the Court of Chancery in the
State of Delaware seeking to enjoin the merger and other relief. The lawsuits were captioned
The Vladimir Gusinsky Living Trust v. B/E Aerospace, et.
al.
, C.A. No. 12957-VCS (Del. Ch.) (filed December 1, 2016) and
Sharon Klein v. B/E Aerospace, et. al.
,
C.A. No. 12969-VCS (Del. Ch.) (filed December 8, 2016). On December 21, 2016, the two lawsuits were consolidated under the caption
In re B/E
Aerospace, Inc. Stockholder Litigation
, Consol. C.A. No. 12957-VCS, with the complaint filed on December 1, 2016 in the
Gusinsky
action as the operative
complaint. The defendants in the consolidated action are B/E Aerospace, the members of the B/E Aerospace
Board, Rockwell Collins and Merger Sub. The defendants filed motions to dismiss on December 23, 2016.
The complaint in the consolidated action alleges, among other things, that the directors of B/E Aerospace breached their fiduciary duties by misstating and/or omitting material
information from the Form S-4 filed by Rockwell Collins on November 23, 2016, and that the corporate defendants aided and abetted such alleged breaches of fiduciary duties.
In connection with the merger, one purported B/E Aerospace stockholder filed one putative class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
seeking to enjoin the merger and other relief. The lawsuit is captioned
Kipp Dodds v. B/E Aerospace, et. al.
, Case 1:16-cv-25038-KMM (S.D. Fla.)
(filed December 5, 2016). The defendants are B/E Aerospace and the members of the B/E Aerospace Board. The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint in this lawsuit.
The complaint in the
Dodds
action alleges, among other things, that the Form S-4 filed by Rockwell Collins on November 23,
2016 misstates and/or omits material information under Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, SEC Rule 14a-9 and
17 C.F.R. § 244.100.
The outcome of these lawsuits and any additional lawsuits filed in the future is uncertain. One of the conditions to the closing of the merger is that no governmental authority has
issued or entered any order after the date of the merger agreement having the effect of enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the merger or the other transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, and these lawsuits seek an order enjoining consummation of the merger. If the cases are not resolved, these lawsuits could prevent or delay completion of the merger and result in
substantial costs to Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace, including, but not limited to, costs associated with the indemnification of directors and officers. The defense or settlement of any lawsuit or
claim that remains unresolved at the time the merger is completed may adversely affect Rockwell Collins' and B/E Aerospace's business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
This section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus describes the material provisions of the merger agreement, but
does not describe all of the terms of the merger agreement and may not contain all of the information about the merger agreement that is important to you. The following summary is qualified by
reference to the complete text of the merger agreement, which is attached as Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and incorporated by reference herein. The rights and obligations of
Rockwell Collins, B/E Aerospace and the Merger Sub are governed by the express terms and conditions of the merger agreement and not by this summary or any of the other information contained in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. You are urged to read the full text of the merger agreement because it is the legal document that governs the merger.
The merger agreement contains representations, warranties and covenants by each of the parties thereto, which were made only for purposes of the merger agreement,
as of specified dates. The representations, warranties and covenants in the merger agreement were made solely for the benefit of the parties thereto;
may be subject to limitations agreed upon by the contracting parties, including being qualified by confidential disclosures made for the purposes of allocating contractual risk between the parties to
such agreement instead of establishing these matters as facts; and may be subject to standards of materiality applicable to the contracting parties that differ from those applicable to investors.
Investors should not rely on representations, warranties and covenants or any descriptions thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of Rockwell Collins, Merger Sub, B/E
Aerospace or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates. Investors are not entitled to rely on the representations and warranties, which are only for the benefit of the parties to the merger
agreement. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations, warranties and covenants may change after the date of the merger agreement, which subsequent information may or
may not be fully reflected in Rockwell Collins' or B/E Aerospace's public disclosures. Each such agreement should not be read alone, but should instead be read in conjunction with the other
information regarding the merger agreement, the merger, Rockwell Collins, B/E Aerospace and their respective affiliates and businesses, which is contained in or incorporated by reference into
this joint proxy statement/prospectus, as well as in the Forms 10-K, Forms 10-Q and other filings that each of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace have made or will make with the
SEC.
Structure of the Merger
The merger agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, and in accordance with the
DGCL, at the effective time, Merger Sub will be merged with and into B/E Aerospace. As a result of the merger, the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub will cease, and B/E Aerospace will
continue as the surviving corporation and a direct or indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Rockwell Collins. The certificate of incorporation of B/E Aerospace, as in effect immediately prior to
the effective time, will be amended in its entirety as set forth in Exhibit A to the merger agreement and, as so amended will be the certificate of incorporation of the surviving corporation. The
bylaws of Merger Sub, as in effect immediately prior to the effective time, will be the bylaws of the surviving corporation, except as to the name of the surviving corporation, which shall be "B/E
Aerospace, Inc."
Merger Consideration to be Received by B/E Aerospace Stockholders
At the effective time, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, each share of B/E Aerospace common stock
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than (i) shares of B/E Aerospace common stock that are owned, directly or indirectly, by Rockwell Collins, B/E Aerospace
(including as treasury stock) or Merger Sub, which will be cancelled immediately prior to the effective time, and (ii) shares of B/E Aerospace common stock with respect to which appraisal
rights are properly demanded and not withdrawn under Section 262 of
127
Table of Contents
the
DGCL, both of which are collectively referred to as the B/E Aerospace excluded shares) will be converted into the right to receive the merger consideration, which
is:
-
-
$34.10 in cash, without interest, from Rockwell Collins; and
-
-
a fraction of a validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable share of Rockwell Collins common stock, having a value equal to $27.90, subject
to adjustment based upon a two-way collar mechanism described below.
The
exchange ratio will be calculated based upon the volume-weighted average price per share of Rockwell Collins common stock on the NYSE (as reported by Bloomberg L.P. or, if not
reported on Bloomberg L.P., in another authoritative source mutually selected by Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace) on each of the 20 consecutive trading days ending with the trading
day immediately prior to the closing date, which is referred to as the Rockwell Collins stock price. If the Rockwell Collins stock price is greater than or equal to $77.41 and less than or equal to
$89.97, the exchange ratio will be equal to the quotient of (i) $27.90 divided by (ii) the Rockwell Collins stock price, which, in each case, will result in the stock consideration
having a value equal to $27.90. If the Rockwell Collins stock price is less than $77.41 or greater than $89.97, then a two-way collar mechanism will apply pursuant to which, (a) if the Rockwell
Collins stock price is greater than $89.97, the exchange ratio will be fixed at 0.3101 and the value of the stock consideration will be more than $27.90, and (b) if the Rockwell Collins
stock price is less than $77.41, the exchange ratio will be fixed at 0.3604 and the value of the stock consideration will be less than $27.90.
The following table sets forth an illustrative range of the potential merger consideration based on various Rockwell Collins stock prices, ranging from $65.00 to $110.00, which reflect
the 52-week stock price range for Rockwell Collins common stock as of January 7, 2017, plus or minus approximately 10 percent, as applicable. The highlighted rows represent the Rockwell
Collins stock price values that are within the two-way collar mechanism described above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rockwell Collins
Stock Price
|
|
Exchange
Ratio
|
|
Value of Stock
Consideration
per share of
B/E Aerospace
Common Stock
|
|
Cash Consideration
per share of
B/E Aerospace
Common Stock(1)
|
|
Total
Consideration
|
|
$
|
65.00
|
|
|
0.3604
|
|
$
|
23.42
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
57.52
|
|
$
|
68.00
|
|
|
0.3604
|
|
$
|
24.50
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
58.60
|
|
$
|
71.00
|
|
|
0.3604
|
|
$
|
25.58
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
59.68
|
|
$
|
74.00
|
|
|
0.3604
|
|
$
|
26.66
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
60.76
|
|
$
|
77.00
|
|
|
0.3604
|
|
$
|
27.75
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
61.85
|
|
$
|
80.00
|
|
|
0.3487
|
|
$
|
27.90
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
62.00
|
|
$
|
83.00
|
|
|
0.3361
|
|
$
|
27.90
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
62.00
|
|
$
|
86.00
|
|
|
0.3244
|
|
$
|
27.90
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
62.00
|
|
$
|
89.00
|
|
|
0.3134
|
|
$
|
27.90
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
62.00
|
|
$
|
92.00
|
|
|
0.3101
|
|
$
|
28.52
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
62.62
|
|
$
|
95.00
|
|
|
0.3101
|
|
$
|
29.45
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
63.55
|
|
$
|
98.00
|
|
|
0.3101
|
|
$
|
30.38
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
64.48
|
|
$
|
101.00
|
|
|
0.3101
|
|
$
|
31.32
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
65.42
|
|
$
|
104.00
|
|
|
0.3101
|
|
$
|
32.25
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
66.35
|
|
$
|
107.00
|
|
|
0.3101
|
|
$
|
33.18
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
67.28
|
|
$
|
110.00
|
|
|
0.3101
|
|
$
|
34.11
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
$
|
68.21
|
|
-
(1)
-
B/E
Aerospace stockholders will receive $34.10 in cash per share of B/E Aerospace common stock.
128
Table of Contents
The examples above are illustrative only. It is impossible to accurately predict the market price of Rockwell Collins common stock at the effective time or during the period over which
the Rockwell Collins stock price is calculated, and therefore impossible to accurately predict the number or value of the shares of Rockwell Collins common stock that B/E Aerospace stockholders will
receive in the merger. You should obtain current market quotations for shares of Rockwell Collins common stock.
All
fractional shares of Rockwell Collins common stock that would otherwise be issued to a B/E Aerospace stockholder as part of the merger consideration will be aggregated to
create whole shares of Rockwell Collins common stock that will be issued to B/E Aerospace stockholders as part of the merger consideration. If a fractional share of Rockwell Collins common stock
remains payable to a B/E Aerospace stockholder after aggregating all fractional shares of Rockwell Collins common stock payable to such B/E Aerospace stockholder, then such B/E Aerospace
stockholder will be paid, in lieu of such remaining fractional share of Rockwell Collins common stock, an amount in cash, without interest, rounded down to the nearest cent, equal to the product of
(x) the amount of the fractional share interest in a share of Rockwell Collins common stock to which such holder would otherwise be entitled (rounded to three decimal places) and (y) the
Rockwell Collins stock price.
Rockwell
Collins stockholders will continue to own their existing shares of common stock of Rockwell Collins, the form of which will not be changed by the transaction.
Treatment of B/E Aerospace Stock-Based Awards
B/E Aerospace
Treatment of B/E Aerospace Restricted Stock Awards and RSU Awards
Upon completion of the merger, each outstanding award of B/E Aerospace restricted stock and each B/E Aerospace restricted stock unit award that
in each case was granted prior to the date of the merger agreement will (i) become fully vested and, to the extent such award is subject to performance conditions, such performance conditions
will be deemed satisfied at the maximum level and (ii) be cancelled and converted into the right to receive a lump sum cash payment per share of B/E Aerospace common stock underlying such award
equal to the value of the per share merger consideration less any applicable withholding taxes. Upon completion of the merger, except for outstanding restricted stock unit awards granted to the
executive officers of B/E Aerospace in November 2016, consistent with past practice, which will be cancelled and converted into a cash payment pursuant to their terms, each outstanding award of B/E
Aerospace restricted stock and each B/E Aerospace restricted stock unit award that in each case was granted on or following the date of the merger agreement will be assumed by Rockwell Collins
and converted into a Rockwell Collins award of restricted stock or restricted stock unit award, as applicable, which will vest subject to the grantee's continued service with Rockwell Collins or its
affiliates through each applicable vesting date (with any performance conditions that were applicable to the B/E Aerospace award deemed satisfied at target level performance and following the closing,
the converted Rockwell Collins award subject only to time-based vesting) covering a number of shares of Rockwell Collins common stock (rounded down to the nearest whole share) determined by
multiplying the number of shares of B/E Aerospace that were subject to the B/E Aerospace award by a ratio of the value of the merger consideration divided by the Rockwell Collins stock price (with the
value of the stock consideration portion of the merger
consideration determined by multiplying the number of such shares of Rockwell Collins common stock by the Rockwell Collins stock price).
Treatment of B/E Aerospace Stock Units
Each stock unit credited to the account of any current or former director under the B/E Aerospace Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors
Stock and Deferred Compensation Plan that is outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, which is referred to as the effective time, will be converted into the right to receive
the merger consideration.
129
Table of Contents
For a more complete description of the treatment of outstanding restricted stock unit awards granted to the executive officers of B/E Aerospace in November 2016, see "The
MergerInterests of Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger" beginning on page 101.
Any
applicable withholding taxes resulting from this treatment will be satisfied by reducing the amount of cash, if any, that would otherwise be provided to holders of such awards. If no
cash is to be provided to a holder of such an award or if the amount of cash that would otherwise be provided to a holder of such awards is not sufficient to cover the applicable withholding taxes,
then the number of shares of Rockwell Collins common stock that would otherwise be provided to the holder in accordance with the terms described above will be reduced to the extent necessary to cover
the shortfall.
Closing
Unless another time, date or place is agreed to in writing by Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace, the closing of the merger will occur on a date
to be specified by Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace, but no later than the second business day after the satisfaction or waiver of the closing conditions set forth in the merger agreement (other
than those conditions that by their terms are to be satisfied at the closing, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver of such conditions).
Effective Time
The merger will become effective at the time the certificate of merger has been duly filed with the Delaware Secretary of State or at such other
date and time as is agreed between Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace and specified in the certificate of merger.
Conversion of Shares; Exchange of Certificates; No Fractional Shares
Conversion and Exchange of B/E Aerospace Common Stock
The conversion of shares of B/E Aerospace common stock, other than the B/E Aerospace excluded shares, into the right to receive the merger
consideration will occur automatically at the effective time. As promptly as practicable after the effective time, but in no event later than 5 business days after such time, Rockwell Collins'
exchange agent will mail a letter of transmittal to each holder of record of a certificate or book-entry share, in each case, representing shares of B/E Aerospace common stock, whose shares of B/E
Aerospace common stock were converted into the right to receive the merger consideration. The letter of transmittal will specify that delivery will be effected and risk of loss and title to such
certificates or book-entry shares, as applicable, will pass only upon proper delivery of such certificates (or affidavits of loss in lieu of such certificates) or book-entry shares to the exchange
agent. The letter of transmittal will be accompanied by instructions for surrendering such certificates or book-entry shares in exchange for the merger consideration, any dividends or distributions
payable pursuant to the merger agreement and cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Rockwell Collins common stock payable as part of the merger consideration. No interest will be paid or will accrue
on any cash payable upon surrender of a certificate or book-entry share. B/E Aerospace stockholders should not return stock certificates with the enclosed proxy card.
At
the effective time, shares of B/E Aerospace common stock will no longer be outstanding, will be automatically cancelled and will cease to exist, and each certificate or book-entry
share that represented shares of B/E Aerospace common stock immediately prior to the effective time will cease to have any
rights with respect to such B/E Aerospace common stock other than the right to receive, upon surrender of such certificate or book-entry share, the merger consideration as described above and subject
to the terms and conditions set forth in the merger agreement.
Following
surrender by holders of certificates or book-entry shares previously representing B/E Aerospace common stock to the exchange agent for exchange, such holders will
receive any
130
Table of Contents
dividends
or other distributions with a record date after the effective time and a payment date on or prior to the date of such surrender with respect to shares of Rockwell Collins common stock they
receive as merger consideration, without interest.
Rockwell
Collins and the exchange agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold from the consideration otherwise payable to any person under the merger agreement such amounts as Rockwell
Collins and the exchange agent are required to deduct and withhold from such consideration under the Code or under any provision of state, local or foreign tax law.
All
shares of Rockwell Collins common stock issued pursuant to the merger agreement will be issued in book-entry form unless a physical certificate is requested.
Representations and Warranties; Material Adverse Effect
The merger agreement contains a number of representations and warranties made by the parties thereto that are subject in some cases to
exceptions and qualifications (including exceptions that have not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, a "material adverse effect"). See the definition of "material adverse effect"
beginning on page 132 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The parties' representations and warranties under the merger agreement relate to, among other
things:
-
-
due organization, valid existence, good standing and qualification to do business;
-
-
capitalization and ownership of subsidiaries;
-
-
corporate authorization of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and the valid and binding nature of
the merger agreement;
-
-
the unanimous approval and recommendation by such party's board of directors of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement;
-
-
the B/E Aerospace Stockholder Approval and the Rockwell Collins Stockholder Approval;
-
-
required consents and approvals from governmental entities;
-
-
the absence of any conflicts or violations of organizational documents and other agreements or laws;
-
-
documents filed with the SEC and financial statements;
-
-
internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures relating to financial reporting;
-
-
the absence of certain changes or events;
-
-
conduct of their businesses in the ordinary course and the absence of a material adverse effect;
-
-
the absence of certain undisclosed liabilities;
-
-
the absence of certain legal proceedings, investigations and governmental orders;
-
-
possession of, and compliance with, permits necessary for the conduct of such party's business;
-
-
accuracy of information supplied or to be supplied in connection with this joint proxy statement/prospectus;
-
-
employee benefit plans;
-
-
employment and labor matters;
-
-
tax matters;
-
-
material contracts and related party transactions;
131
Table of Contents
-
-
intellectual property;
-
-
real and personal property;
-
-
environmental matters;
-
-
customers and suppliers;
-
-
compliance with certain aviation regulations;
-
-
compliance with certain domestic and foreign corruption laws and customs and international trade laws;
-
-
insurance policies;
-
-
brokers and transaction-related fees and expenses;
-
-
opinions from financial advisors; and
-
-
the absence of any other representations and warranties.
B/E
Aerospace has also made certain representations and warranties relating to product warranties, government security clearances, the inapplicability of anti-takeover laws, the valid
and binding nature of B/E Aerospace's amendment to the KLX tax sharing agreement and the truth and accuracy of matters relating to qualification of the KLX spin-off for the KLX spin-off tax treatment.
Rockwell
Collins and the Merger Sub have also made certain representations and warranties relating to sufficient financing, "interested stockholder" status and employment agreements with
members of B/E Aerospace's management.
The
representations and warranties of each of the parties to the merger agreement will expire upon the effective time.
Certain
of the representations and warranties made by the parties are qualified as to "knowledge," "materiality" or "material adverse effect." For purposes of the merger agreement,
"material adverse effect," when used in reference to Rockwell Collins or B/E Aerospace, means any event, occurrence, development or change that has a material adverse effect on the business, financial
condition or results of operations of the referenced party and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, except that, for purposes of the definition of "material adverse effect," none of the following (or
the results thereof) will constitute or be taken into account in determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred:
-
-
changes in general economic, financial market, regulatory, business, financial, political, geopolitical, credit or capital market conditions,
including interest or exchange rates;
-
-
general changes or developments in any of the industries or markets, or in the business conditions in the geographic regions, in which the
referenced party or any of its subsidiaries operate (or applicable portions or segments of such industries or markets);
-
-
changes in any applicable U.S. laws or accounting regulations or principles or interpretations thereof;
-
-
any outbreak or escalation of hostilities or war or any act of terrorism, or any acts of God, weather-related events, fires or natural
disasters;
-
-
any change in the price or trading volume of the referenced party's securities or other financial instruments or change in the referenced
party's credit rating, in and of itself (except that the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such change that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of "material adverse
effect" may be taken into account in determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred);
132
Table of Contents
-
-
any failure by the referenced party to meet its internal or published projections, budgets, plans or forecasts of its revenues, earnings or
other financial performance or results of operations or any published analyst or other third-party estimates or expectations of the referenced party's revenue, earnings or other financial performance
or results of operations for any period, in and of itself (except that the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such failure that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of
"material adverse effect" may be taken into account in determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred);
-
-
any action taken or not taken at the express written request of the other party after the date of the merger agreement; or
-
-
the public announcement or pendency of the merger or the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or the identity of the other
party;
provided
that if the facts, circumstances, events, changes, occurrences or effects set forth in the first four bullets have a material disproportionate impact on the referenced party and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to the other participants in the industries in which the referenced party and its subsidiaries operate, such facts, circumstances, events, changes, occurrences
or efforts may be taken into account in determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred.
Covenants and Agreements
Conduct of Business
Each of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace has agreed to certain covenants in the merger agreement restricting the conduct of its respective
business between the date of the merger agreement and the effective time. In general, each of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace has agreed that prior to the effective time or the termination of the
merger agreement in accordance with its terms, except as required by law, as agreed in writing by the other party (which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned) or as
otherwise expressly contemplated or permitted by the merger agreement, it will and will cause its subsidiaries to:
-
-
conduct its business in the ordinary course of business and in a manner consistent with past practice; and
-
-
to the extent consistent with the prior bullet, use reasonable best efforts to preserve its assets and business organization and maintain its
existing relationships with material customers, suppliers, distributors, regulators and business partners.
Conduct of Business of B/E Aerospace
In addition, without limiting the generality of the foregoing covenants described above, B/E Aerospace has agreed that, prior to the
effective time or the termination of the merger agreement in accordance with its terms, except as required by law, as agreed in writing by Rockwell Collins (which consent will not be unreasonably
withheld, delayed or conditioned) or as otherwise expressly contemplated or permitted by the merger agreement, it will not and will cause its subsidiaries not
to:
-
-
amend the B/E Aerospace certificate of incorporation or by-laws (or such equivalent organizational or governing documents of any of its
subsidiaries);
-
-
adjust, split, combine, subdivide, reclassify, redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire or amend the terms of B/E Aerospace's or any of its
subsidiaries' capital stock or other equity interests or any options, equity or equity-based compensation, warrants, convertible securities or other rights of any kind to acquire any shares of B/E
Aerospace's or any of its subsidiaries' capital stock or other equity interests;
133
Table of Contents
-
-
issue, sell, pledge, dispose, encumber, grant or authorize the same with respect to any shares of B/E Aerospace's or any of its subsidiaries'
capital stock or other equity interests, or any options, equity or equity-based compensation, warrants, convertible securities or other rights of any kind to acquire any shares of B/E Aerospace's or
any of its subsidiaries' capital stock or other equity interests, except that B/E Aerospace may issue shares (i) upon the settlement of certain stock-based awards outstanding as of the date of
the merger agreement or (ii) pursuant to the terms of the B/E Aerospace, Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, referred to as the ESPP, in effect immediately prior
to the date of this Agreement, and, consistent with past practice, B/E Aerospace granted approximately $30 million in grant date value of annual equity awards on November 15, 2016 (see
"The MergerInterests of Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger" beginning on page 101);
-
-
except with respect to the regular quarterly cash dividends of $0.21 per share, with record and payment dates for such dividends consistent
with past practice, declare, set aside, authorize, make or pay any dividend or other distribution, payable in cash, stock, property or otherwise, with respect to B/E Aerospace's or any of its
subsidiaries' capital stock or other equity interests, other than cash dividends and distributions paid by any subsidiary of B/E Aerospace to B/E Aerospace or any wholly owned subsidiary of B/E
Aerospace;
-
-
(i) establish, adopt, enter into any new, amend, terminate, or take any action to accelerate rights under, any material employee benefit plan,
except to the extent required pursuant to any material employee benefit plan; (ii) grant or pay, or commit to grant or pay, any bonus, incentive or profit-sharing award or payment;
(iii) increase, or commit to increase, the amount of the wages, salary, bonuses, commissions, fringe benefits, severance or other compensation (including equity or equity-based compensation,
whether payable in stock, cash or other property), benefits or remuneration payable to any current or former employee or director of, or individual service provider to, B/E Aerospace or any subsidiary
of B/E Aerospace, except for annual increases in base salaries to employees whose annual base compensation is below $150,000, in the ordinary course of business and in amounts and at such times as is
consistent with past practice; (iv) take any action (other than actions contemplated by the merger agreement) to accelerate any payment or benefit, the vesting of any equity or equity-based
award or the funding of any payment or benefit, payable or to become payable to any current or former employee or director of, or individual service provider to, B/E Aerospace or any of its
subsidiaries; (v) except pursuant to, or as contemplated by, certain specified agreements, enter into any employment, severance, change in control, retention, individual consulting or similar
agreement with any current or former employee or director of, or individual service provider to, B/E Aerospace or any of its subsidiaries (other than offer letters that provide for at-will employment
without any severance, retention or change in control benefits for newly hired employees or individual service providers who are hired in the ordinary course of business and whose annual base
compensation does not exceed $225,000 individually), (vi) communicate with the employees of B/E Aerospace or any of its subsidiaries regarding the compensation, benefits or other treatment they
will receive following the effective time, unless such communications are consistent with the terms provided herein; or (vii) except as may be required by GAAP, materially change any actuarial
or other assumptions used to calculate funding obligations with respect to any material employee benefit plan or materially change the manner in which contributions to such plans are made or the basis
on which such contributions are determined;
-
-
hire, engage, promote or terminate (other than for cause) any employee or other individual service provider who is or would be entitled to
receive annual base compensation of $225,000 or more;
-
-
except as contemplated by the ESPP in effect as of the date of the merger agreement, grant, confer or award equity or equity-based
compensation, options, convertible securities, restricted
134
Table of Contents
135
Table of Contents
-
-
modify, extend or enter into any collective bargaining or other similar labor-related agreement, except as required pursuant to an applicable
contract in effect as of the date of the merger agreement;
-
-
make any material change to its methods of accounting, except as required by GAAP (or any interpretation thereof), Regulation S-X of the
Exchange Act or a governmental authority or quasi-governmental authority (including the Financial Accounting Standards Board or any similar organization);
-
-
make or agree to make any capital expenditure exceeding $25,000,000 in the aggregate in any calendar quarter;
-
-
write up, write down or write off the book value of any material assets, except to the extent required by GAAP;
-
-
release, compromise, assign, settle or agree to settle any legal, administrative or other similar proceedings or actions (including any such
legal, administrative or other similar proceeding or action relating to the merger agreement or the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement with adverse parties other
than the other parties hereto) or insurance claim, other than settlements that result solely in monetary obligations involving payment (without the admission of wrongdoing) by B/E Aerospace or any of
its subsidiaries of (i) the amounts specifically reserved in accordance with GAAP with respect to such legal, administrative or other similar proceeding or actions on B/E Aerospace's
consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2015 or (ii) an amount not greater than $5,000,000 in the aggregate;
-
-
fail to maintain in effect the existing material insurance policies covering B/E Aerospace and its subsidiaries and their respective
properties, assets and businesses;
-
-
announce, implement or effect any facility closing, lay-off, early retirement programs, severance programs or reductions in force affecting
employees of B/E Aerospace or any of its subsidiaries, other than any such action not giving rise to more than $250,000 in severance and other liability related to such action;
-
-
cancel, dedicate to the public, disclaim, forfeit, reexamine or abandon without filing a substantially identical counterpart in the same
jurisdiction with the same priority or allow to lapse (except with respect to patents expiring in accordance with their terms) any intellectual property rights material to B/E Aerospace;
-
-
(i) make or change any material tax election or change any method of tax accounting; (ii) file any material amended tax return;
(iii) settle or compromise any audit or legal, administrative or other similar proceeding or action unless such settlement or compromise does not result in a tax liability that materially
exceeds the liability with respect to such audit or legal, administrative or other similar proceeding or action recorded or reflected in B/E Aerospace's documents filed under the Exchange Act or the
Securities Act since December 31, 2014 prior to the date hereof; (iv) agree to an extension or waiver of the statute of limitations with respect to a material amount of taxes;
(v) enter into any "closing agreement" within the meaning of Section 7121 of the Code (or any similar provision of state, local or non-U.S. law) with respect to any material tax; or
(vi) surrender any right to claim a material tax refund;
-
-
take (or knowingly fail to take) any action that (i) would cause the KLX spin-off to fail to qualify for the KLX spin-off tax treatment
or (ii) would cause certain transactions entered into by B/E Aerospace, KLX and their subsidiaries in connection with the KLX spin-off to fail to qualify for their reported tax treatment;
136
Table of Contents
-
-
merge or consolidate B/E Aerospace or any of its subsidiaries with any third party or adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation,
dissolution, restructuring, recapitalization or other reorganization of B/E Aerospace or any of its subsidiaries; or
-
-
enter into any agreement to do, or adopt any resolutions in support of, any of the foregoing.
Conduct of Business of Rockwell Collins
In addition, without limiting the generality of the foregoing covenants described above, Rockwell Collins has agreed that, prior to the
effective time or the termination of the merger agreement in accordance with its terms, except as required by law, as agreed in writing by B/E Aerospace (which consent will not be unreasonably
withheld, delayed or conditioned) or as otherwise expressly contemplated or permitted by the merger agreement, it will not and will cause its subsidiaries not
to:
-
-
amend Rockwell Collins' certificate of incorporation or by-laws in a manner that would be adverse to B/E Aerospace or its stockholders or
would, or would reasonably be expected to, have the effect of delaying or preventing the consummation of the merger or the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;
-
-
increase the size of the Rockwell Collins Board;
-
-
except with respect to quarterly cash dividends paid in the ordinary course, consistent with past practice, subject to increase by no more than
25% on a quarterly basis, declare, set aside, authorize, make or pay any dividend or other distribution, payable in cash, stock, property or otherwise, with respect to its capital stock or other
equity interests;
-
-
adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation or dissolution;
-
-
adjust, split, combine, subdivide or reclassify Rockwell Collins' capital stock;
-
-
issue or sell any shares of Rockwell Collins common stock representing more than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of Rockwell Collins
stock as of the date of the merger agreement; provided that Rockwell Collins may issue or sell shares of Rockwell Collins common stock pursuant to Rockwell Collins stock-based awards; or
-
-
enter into any agreement to do, or adopt any resolutions in support of, any of the foregoing.
Stockholder Meetings and Board Recommendations
The merger agreement requires each of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace to, as promptly as practicable following effectiveness of the
registration statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, duly call, give notice of, convene and hold a meeting of its respective stockholders for the purpose of
seeking (i) in the case of B/E Aerospace, the adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement by the holders of at least a majority of
the outstanding shares of B/E Aerospace common stock and (ii) in the case of Rockwell Collins, approval of the issuance of shares of Rockwell Collins common stock in connection with the merger
by at least a majority of the votes cast by shares of Rockwell Collins common stock represented (in person or by proxy) at such meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal, and will submit the
applicable proposal to its respective stockholders at such meeting and will not submit any other proposal in connection with such meeting without the prior written consent of the other party.
If
the applicable party's board of directors has not made an adverse recommendation change pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, such party's board of directors will
(i) recommend that its stockholders approve the proposal (a) in the case of B/E Aerospace, to adopt the merger agreement, referred to as the B/E Aerospace Recommendation and
(b) in the case of Rockwell Collins, for the issuance of shares of Rockwell Collins common stock in connection with the merger, referred to as the Rockwell Collins Recommendation,
(ii) include the applicable recommendation in this joint
137
Table of Contents
proxy
statement/prospectus and (iii) use its reasonable best efforts to (x) solicit from its stockholders proxies in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, in the case of B/E Aerospace, and in favor of the issuance of Rockwell Collins common stock in connection with the merger, in the case of Rockwell
Collins and (y) take all other action necessary or advisable to secure stockholder approval.
Even
if an adverse recommendation change has been made pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, unless the merger agreement has been terminated in accordance with its terms, the
obligations of the parties under the merger agreement will continue in full force and effect and will not be affected by the commencement, public proposal, public disclosure or communication to either
Rockwell Collins or B/E Aerospace of any acquisition proposal, as defined below under "No Solicitation."
For
purposes of the merger agreement, an adverse recommendation change refers to the (i) withdrawal, qualification or modification, or public proposal to withdraw, qualify or
modify, the B/E Aerospace Recommendation or the Rockwell Collins Recommendation, as applicable, in each case in a manner adverse to the other party or parties, as applicable, or (ii) the
approval or recommendation of any acquisition proposal, as defined below under "No Solicitation."
Appropriate Action; Consents; Filings
Each of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace has agreed to, and has agreed to cooperate with each other and use (and cause their respective
subsidiaries to use) reasonable best efforts to consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and to cause the conditions to the consummation of the merger to be satisfied as
promptly as reasonably practicable, including using reasonable best efforts to accomplish the following as promptly as reasonably practicable:
-
-
the obtaining of all actions or non-actions, consents, approvals, registrations, waivers, permits, authorizations, orders, expirations or
terminations of waiting periods, and other confirmations from any governmental authority or other person or entity that are or may become necessary, proper or advisable in connection with the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger;
-
-
the preparation and making of all registrations, filings, forms, notices, petitions, statements, submissions of information, applications and
other documents (including filings with governmental authorities) that are or may become necessary, proper or advisable in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, including the merger;
-
-
the taking of all steps as may be necessary, proper or advisable to obtain an approval from, or to avoid a legal, administrative or other
similar proceeding or actions by, any governmental authority or other person or entity in connection with the consummation of transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger;
-
-
the defending of any lawsuits or other legal, administrative or other similar proceedings or actions, whether judicial or administrative,
challenging the merger agreement or that would otherwise prevent or materially delay the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, performed or
consummated by each party in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, including seeking to have any stay or temporary restraining order entered by any court or other governmental authority
vacated or reversed; and
-
-
the execution and delivery of any additional instruments that are or may become reasonably necessary, proper or advisable to consummate the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, and to carry out fully the purposes of the merger agreement.
138
Table of Contents
Each
of the parties to the merger agreement agreed to, in consultation and cooperation with the other parties and as promptly as reasonably practicable (and in no event later than 10
business days after the date of the merger agreement), make its respective filings under the HSR Act (which the parties filed on November 7, 2016) and to thereafter make any other applications
and filings as reasonably determined by Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace under other applicable U.S. or foreign antitrust
laws with respect to the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement as promptly as practicable, but in no event later than as required by law.
Notwithstanding
the parties' obligations summarized above in this section, (i) neither B/E Aerospace nor its subsidiaries or affiliates will grant or offer to grant any
accommodation or concession (financial or otherwise), or make any payment, to any third party in connection with seeking or obtaining its consent to the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement and (ii) neither Rockwell Collins nor any of its affiliates will be required to agree to or proffer to sell, divest, lease, license, transfer, dispose of or otherwise encumber or
impair Rockwell Collins' or any of its affiliates' ability to own or operate any assets or properties of Rockwell Collins or any of its affiliates (including any equity or other interests in
B/E Aerospace) or any assets or properties of B/E Aerospace or any of its affiliates if such action would require the divestiture or holding separate (or any other remedy) of or with
respect to any assets of Rockwell Collins, B/E Aerospace or any of their affiliates or subsidiaries representing, in the aggregate, more than $175 million of annual revenue generated
between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015.
Each
of the parties has agreed to (i) furnish to the other such necessary information and reasonable assistance as the other may request in connection with the preparation of any
governmental filings, submissions or other documents; (ii) give the other reasonable prior notice of any such filing, submission or other document and, to the extent reasonably practicable, of
any communication with or from any governmental authority regarding the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, and permit the other to review and discuss in advance, and consider in good
faith the views, and secure the participation, of the other in connection with any such filing, submission, document or communication; (iii) and cooperate in responding as promptly as
reasonably practicable to any investigation or other inquiry from a governmental authority or in connection with any legal, administrative or other similar proceeding or action initiated by a
governmental authority or private party, including immediately informing the other party of any such investigation, inquiry or proceeding, and consulting in advance before making any presentations or
submissions to a governmental authority, or, in connection with any legal, administrative or other similar proceeding or action initiated by a private party, to any other person or entity.
Each
of the parties has also agreed to give reasonable prior notice to and consult with the other in advance of any meeting, conference or substantive communication with any governmental
authority, or, in connection with any legal or administrative proceeding by a private party, with any other person or entity, and to the extent not prohibited by applicable law or by the applicable
governmental authority or other person or entity, and to the extent reasonably practicable, not participate or attend any meeting or conference, or engage in any substantive communication, with any
governmental authority or such other person or entity in respect of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement without the other party, and in the event one party is prohibited from, or
unable to participate, attend or engage in, any such meeting, conference or substantive communication, keep such party apprised with respect thereto.
Each
party has agreed to furnish to the other copies of all substantive filings, submissions, correspondence and communications between it and its affiliates and their respective
representatives, on the one hand, and any governmental authority or members of any governmental authority's staff (or any other person or entity in connection with any legal, administrative or other
similar proceeding or
actions initiated by a private party), on the other hand, with respect to the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Each party may, as it deems advisable and necessary, reasonably
designate
139
Table of Contents
material
provided to the other party as "Outside Counsel Only Material," and also may redact the material as necessary to (i) remove personally sensitive information; (ii) remove
references concerning valuation, (iii) comply with contractual arrangements, (iv) address legal privilege or other confidentiality concerns, or (v) comply with applicable law.
Between
the date of the merger agreement and the effective time or the termination of the merger agreement in accordance with its terms, each of Rockwell Collins and Merger Sub will not,
and will ensure that their subsidiaries do not, consummate, or enter into any agreement providing for any acquisition, divestiture or merger that would reasonably be expected to materially delay or
prevent the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
No Solicitation
Each of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace has agreed:
-
-
to immediately cease and terminate, and to use reasonable best efforts to cause its officers, directors and other representatives to cease and
terminate, all existing discussions, negotiations and communications with any person or entity with respect to any acquisition proposal, such term referring to a proposal or offer from any person or
entity providing for any (i) merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination, recapitalization or similar transaction involving Rockwell Collins or B/E Aerospace, as
applicable, pursuant to which any such person or entity would own or control, directly or indirectly, 20% or more of the voting power of the referenced party, (ii) sale or other disposition,
directly or indirectly, of assets of the referenced party (including the capital stock or other equity interests of any of its subsidiaries) or any subsidiary of the referenced party representing 20%
or more of the consolidated assets, revenues or net income of the referenced party and its subsidiaries taken as a whole, (iii) issuance or sale or other disposition of capital stock or other
equity interests representing 20% or more of the voting power of the referenced party, (iv) tender offer, exchange offer or any other transaction or series of transactions in which any person
or entity will acquire, directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership or the right to acquire beneficial ownership of capital stock or other equity interests representing 20% or more of the voting
power of the referenced party or (v) any related combination of the foregoing; provided that, with respect to Rockwell Collins, such a proposal will only be deemed an acquisition proposal if it
is conditioned upon or requires for its completion the failure of the merger to occur;
-
-
not to, and not to authorize any of its representatives to, directly or indirectly (i) initiate, seek, solicit, knowingly encourage or
knowingly induce or take any other action reasonably expected to lead to an acquisition proposal, (ii) engage in negotiations or discussions with or provide any non-public information to any
person or entity relating to an acquisition proposal or grant any waiver or release under any standstill or other agreement (unless either party's board of directors determines in good faith that
refusing to grant such waiver or release would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law, in which case such party may waive such standstill provision in order to permit a third
party to make an acquisition proposal) or (iii) resolve to do any of the foregoing;
-
-
not to provide access (and within one business day of the date of the merger agreement, to terminate any such access) to any third party to any
data room (virtual or actual) containing any of such party's information; and
-
-
within two business days of the date of the merger agreement, to demand the return or destruction of all confidential, non-public information
and materials and all other information and materials related to any acquisition proposal that have been provided to third parties that have entered into confidentiality agreements relating to a
possible acquisition proposal with the referenced party or any of its subsidiaries.
140
Table of Contents
Notwithstanding
the foregoing, prior to obtaining stockholder approval with regard to the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, if either party
receives a bona fide written acquisition proposal that was not initiated, sought, solicited, knowingly encouraged, knowingly induced or otherwise procured in violation of the merger agreement, then
such party may:
-
-
contact the person or entity who has made such acquisition proposal in order to clarify the terms of such acquisition proposal so that such
party's board of directors (or any committee thereof) may inform itself about such acquisition proposal;
-
-
furnish information concerning its business, properties or assets to such person or entity pursuant to a confidentiality agreement with
confidentiality terms that, taken as a whole, are not materially less favorable to such party than those contained in the confidentiality agreement, dated as of July 7, 2016, between Rockwell
Collins and B/E Aerospace; and
-
-
negotiate and participate in discussions and negotiations with such person or entity concerning such acquisition proposal;
if,
in the case of the circumstances described in the immediately preceding two bullet points, the party's board of directors determines in good faith that such acquisition proposal constitutes or is
reasonably likely to constitute or result in a superior proposal, such term referring to a bona fide written acquisition proposal (provided that for purposes of the definition of superior proposal,
references to 20% in the definition of acquisition proposal will be deemed to be references to 50%) that the referenced party's board of directors determines in good faith (i) to be reasonably
likely to be consummated if accepted and (ii) to be more favorable to the referenced party's stockholders from a financial point of view than the merger and the other transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement, in each case, taking into account at the time of determination all relevant circumstances, including the various legal, financial and regulatory aspects of the proposal, all
the terms and
conditions of such proposal and the merger agreement, and any changes to the terms of the merger agreement offered by the other party to the merger agreement in response to such acquisition proposal.
Each
of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace will (i) promptly (and in any case within 24 hours) provide the other party notice (a) of the receipt of any
acquisition proposal, which notice will include a complete, unredacted copy of such acquisition proposal, and (b) of any inquiries, proposals or offers received by, any requests for non-public
information from, or any discussions or negotiations initiated or continued (or sought to be initiated or continued) with, the party or any of its representatives concerning an acquisition proposal,
and disclose the identity of the other party (or parties) and the material terms of such inquiry, offer, proposal or request and, in the case of written materials, provide copies of such materials,
(ii) promptly (and in any case within 24 hours) make available to the other party copies of all written materials provided by the referenced party to the proposing party but not
previously made available to the other party and (iii) keep the other party informed on a reasonably prompt basis (and, in any case, within 24 hours of any significant development) of
the status and material details (including amendments and proposed amendments) of any such acquisition proposal or other inquiry, offer, proposal or request.
Adverse Recommendation Change and Termination
Except as permitted by the merger agreement in the case of a superior proposal or an intervening event (in each case, as described immediately
below), neither the Rockwell Collins Board, the B/E Aerospace Board, nor any committee thereof will (i) make an adverse recommendation change or (ii) adopt or approve, or publicly
propose to adopt or approve, or allow such party to execute or enter into, any binding or non-binding letter of intent, agreement in principle, memorandum of understanding, merger agreement,
acquisition agreement, option agreement, joint venture agreement, partnership agreement or other agreement, commitment, arrangement or understanding contemplating
141
Table of Contents
or
otherwise in connection with, or that is intended to or would reasonably be expected to lead to, any acquisitions proposal.
Superior Proposal
Subject to the non-solicitation obligations described above and the obligations further described in this paragraph, if, prior to receipt of the
approval of their respective stockholders, either party receives an acquisition proposal that its respective board of directors determines in good faith constitutes a superior proposal that was not
initiated, sought, solicited, knowingly encouraged, knowingly induced or otherwise procured in violation of the merger agreement, such party's board of directors may (i) effect an adverse
recommendation change or (ii) terminate the merger agreement pursuant to the termination provisions as described below in order to enter into a definitive agreement providing for such superior
proposal if (a) such party's board of directors determines in good faith that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law;
(b) such party has notified the other party in writing that it intends to effect an adverse recommendation change or terminate the merger agreement pursuant to the termination provisions as
described below in order to enter into a definitive agreement providing for such superior proposal; (c) if applicable, such party has provided the other party a copy of the proposed definitive
agreements between such party and the person or entity making such superior proposal; (d) for a period of four days following the notice delivered pursuant to clause (b) above,
such party will have discussed and negotiated in good faith and made its representatives available to discuss and negotiate in good faith (in each case to the extent the other party desires to
negotiate) with the other party's representatives any proposed modifications to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement or the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement so that the
failure to take such action would no longer be inconsistent with the fiduciary duties of such party's board of directors under applicable law (it being understood and agreed that any amendment to any
material term or condition of any superior proposal will require a new notice and a new negotiation period that will expire on the later to occur of (1) two days following delivery of
such new notice from such party to the other party and (2) the expiration of the original four-day period described in clause (d) above); and (e) no earlier than the end of such
negotiation period, such party's board of directors will have determined in good faith, after considering the terms of any proposed amendment or modification to the merger agreement, that
(x) the acquisition proposal that is the subject of the notice described in clause (b) above still constitutes a superior proposal and (y) the failure to take such action would
still be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law.
Intervening Event
Subject to the non-solicitation obligations described above and the obligations further described in this paragraph, other than in connection
with a superior proposal and prior to receipt of the approval of their respective stockholders, each of the board of directors of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace may, in response to an
intervening event, withdraw, qualify, or modify, or publicly propose to withdraw, qualify or modify, the Rockwell Collins Recommendation or the
B/E Aerospace Recommendation, as applicable, only if (i) such party's board of directors determines in good faith that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its
fiduciary duties under applicable law; (ii) such party has notified the other party in writing that it intends to effect such adverse recommendation change (which notice will specify the facts
and circumstances providing the basis of the intervening event and for the determination of such party's board of directors to effect such adverse recommendation change in reasonable detail);
(iii) for a period of four days following the notice delivered pursuant to clause (ii) above, such party will have discussed and negotiated in good faith and made its
representatives available to discuss and negotiate in good faith (in each case to the extent the other party desires to negotiate) with the other party's representatives any proposed modifications to
the terms and conditions of the merger agreement or the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement so that the failure to take such action would no longer be inconsistent with the fiduciary
duties of such party's
142
Table of Contents
board
of directors under applicable law (it being understood and agreed that any material change to the relevant facts and circumstances will require a new notice and a new negotiation period that
will expire on the later to occur of (a) two days following delivery of such new notice from such party to the other party and (b) the expiration of the original four-day period
described above in this clause (iii)); and (iv) no earlier than the end of such negotiation period, the board of directors of such party will have determined in good faith, after
considering the terms of any proposed amendment or modification to the merger agreement, that the failure to take such action would still be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable
law.
Subject to Rockwell Collins' and B/E Aerospace's obligations with respect to their merger recommendations, as summarized in the section above, their obligations with respect to
effecting an adverse recommendation change as summarized immediately above, and their obligations with respect to publicity related to the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, nothing in
the merger agreement prohibits Rockwell Collins or B/E Aerospace or either of their respective boards of directors, as applicable, from (i) disclosing to its stockholders a position
contemplated by Rules 14d-9 and 14e-2(a) promulgated under the Exchange Act, or from issuing a "stop, look and listen" statement pending disclosure of its position thereunder or
(ii) making any disclosure to its stockholders if the applicable board of directors determines in good faith that its failure to make such disclosure would be inconsistent with its fiduciary
duties under applicable law; provided, however, that the obligations with respect to the adverse recommendation change and termination provisions described above will not be affected by this provision
and any such disclosure (other than issuance by the applicable party of a "stop, look and listen" or similar communication of the type contemplated by Rule 14d-9(f) under the Exchange Act) that
addresses or relates to the approval, recommendation or declaration of advisability by the applicable board of directors with respect to the merger agreement or an acquisition proposal will be deemed
to be an adverse recommendation change unless the applicable board of directors in connection with such communication publicly states that its recommendation with respect to the merger agreement has
not changed or refers to its prior recommendation without disclosing any adverse recommendation change.
Employee Benefits Matters
For the period beginning at the effective time and ending on December 31, 2018 employees who are actively employed by
B/E Aerospace or any of its subsidiaries immediately prior to the effective time, who are referred to as covered employees, will be provided by Rockwell Collins or any of its subsidiaries, for
so long as such covered employees remain employees of Rockwell Collins or any of its subsidiaries, with compensation (including salary or base rate of compensation, annual cash bonus opportunities,
commissions and severance) and benefits that are in the aggregate, no less favorable than the compensation (excluding any equity or equity-based compensation, retention, change of control, transaction
or similar bonuses and nonqualified deferred compensation) and benefits (excluding any defined benefit pension plan or retiree medical benefits) being provided by B/E Aerospace or its
subsidiaries to covered employees immediately prior to the effective time.
If
any covered employee first becomes eligible to participate under any Rockwell Collins benefit plan, following the effective time, Rockwell Collins will, for covered employees who
become eligible during 2017, use commercially reasonable efforts to (i) waive any preexisting condition exclusions and waiting periods with respect to participation and coverage requirements
applicable to any covered employee under any Rockwell Collins benefit plan providing medical, dental or vision benefits to the same extent such limitation would have been waived or satisfied under any
similar material employee benefit plan of B/E Aerospace, which is referred to as a B/E Aerospace benefit plan, that the covered employee participated in immediately prior to coverage
under the Rockwell Collins benefit plan and (ii) provide each covered employee with credit for any copayments and deductibles paid prior to the covered employee's coverage under any Rockwell
Collins benefit plan during the plan year in which the
143
Table of Contents
effective
time occurs, to the same extent such credit was given under any similar B/E Aerospace benefit plan that covered employee participated in immediately prior to coverage under the
Rockwell Collins benefit plan, in satisfying any applicable deductible or out-of-pocket requirements under the Rockwell Collins benefit plan for the plan year in which the effective time occurs.
As
of the effective time, Rockwell Collins will recognize all service of each covered employee prior to the effective time, to B/E Aerospace (or any of its predecessor entities or
subsidiaries) for vesting and eligibility purposes (but not for benefit accrual purposes under any defined benefit pension plan) and for purposes of determining future vacation accruals and severance
amounts to the same extent as such covered employee received, immediately before the effective time, credit for such service under any similar B/E Aerospace benefit plan in which such covered
employee participated immediately prior to the effective time; provided that service of each covered employee prior to the effective time will not be recognized for the purpose of any entitlement to
participate in, or receive benefits with respect to,
any (i) non-elective employer contributions under any plan of Rockwell Collins under Section 401(k) of the Code or (ii) Rockwell Collins retiree medical program in which any
covered employee participates after the effective time. In no event will there be any duplication of benefits for the same period of service.
B/E Aerospace
and its subsidiaries will satisfy all legal or contractual requirements to provide notice to, or to carry out any consultation procedure with, any employee or groups
of employees of B/E Aerospace or any of its subsidiaries, or any labor or trade union, labor organization or works council, which is representing any employee of B/E Aerospace or any of
its subsidiaries, in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Financing
The merger is not conditioned upon Rockwell Collins obtaining financing. If Rockwell Collins fails to obtain financing for the merger, it will
still be required to fulfill its obligations under the merger agreement, including, subject to provisions related to termination and fulfillment or waiver of the conditions to closing, its obligation
to consummate the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Rockwell
Collins has agreed to keep B/E Aerospace reasonably informed on a reasonably current basis of material developments in respect of obtaining financing for the merger.
B/E Aerospace has agreed to use reasonable best efforts to provide reasonable cooperation that is customary in connection with the arrangement of debt or equity financing that Rockwell Collins
deems reasonably necessary in connection with the merger and that is consistent with transactions substantially similar to the merger.
Designation of Directors
The merger agreement provides that Rockwell Collins will take all necessary corporate action so that, upon the effective time, the size of the
Rockwell Collins Board will be increased by two members to a total of eleven members, and two individuals selected by B/E Aerospace who meet Rockwell Collins' independence criteria and are otherwise
reasonably acceptable to Rockwell Collins will be appointed to the Rockwell Collins Board. One such individual will serve as a member of the class of directors of the Rockwell Collins Board with terms
expiring in 2018, and the other will serve as a member of the class of directors of the Rockwell Collins Board with terms expiring in 2020. Pursuant to this provision of the merger agreement, John T.
Whates and Richard G. Hamermesh, both members of the B/E Aerospace Board, were selected by B/E Aerospace to be appointed to the Rockwell Collins Board and are expected to serve as members of the class
of directors of the Rockwell
Collins Board with terms expiring in 2018 and 2020, respectively. Other than such additional directors, no changes to the Rockwell Collins Board are expected in connection with the consummation of the
merger.
144
Table of Contents
Other Covenants and Agreements
The merger agreement contains additional agreements relating to, among other matters:
Directors' and Officers' Indemnification and Insurance
The parties have agreed that all rights, existing at the time of the merger agreement, to indemnification and exculpation from liabilities
(including advancement of expenses) for acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the effective time, in favor of the current or former directors or officers of B/E Aerospace as provided in
the certificate of incorporation or the by-laws of B/E Aerospace or in any indemnification contract between such directors or officers and B/E Aerospace will survive the merger and will
continue in full force and effect.
For
6 years after the effective time, Rockwell Collins will maintain in effect the exculpation, indemnification and advancement of expenses equivalent to the provisions of the
certificate of incorporation or the by-laws of B/E Aerospace as in effect immediately prior to the effective time with respect to acts or omissions occurring prior to the effective time and
will not amend, repeal or otherwise modify any such provisions in any manner that would adversely affect the rights thereunder of any of the current or former directors or officers of
B/E Aerospace; provided that all rights to indemnification in respect of any action pending or asserted or any claim made within such 6-year period will continue until the disposition of such
action or resolution of such claim.
Prior to the effective time, B/E Aerospace will (or, if B/E Aerospace is unable to, after the effective time, Rockwell Collins will), purchase a 6-year prepaid "tail"
policy, with terms, conditions, retentions
and limits of liability that are no less favorable than the coverage provided under B/E Aerospace's existing policies of directors' and officers' liability insurance and fiduciary liability
insurance, with respect to matters arising on or before the effective time (including in connection with the merger agreement and the transactions or actions contemplated by the merger agreement), and
Rockwell Collins will maintain such policy in full force and effect, for its full term, and no other party will have any further obligation to purchase or pay for insurance; provided that
B/E Aerospace will not pay, and Rockwell Collins will not be required to pay, in excess of 300% of the last annual premium paid by B/E Aerospace prior to the date of the merger agreement
in respect of such "tail" policy. If B/E Aerospace for any reason fails to obtain such "tail" insurance policies prior to, as of or after the effective time, Rockwell Collins will, for
6 years from the effective time, maintain in effect the current policies of directors' and officers' liability insurance and fiduciary liability insurance maintained by B/E Aerospace
with respect to matters arising on or before the effective time, again without being required to pay annual premiums in excess of 300% of the last annual premium paid by B/E Aerospace prior to
the date of the merger agreement in respect of the coverage required to be obtained, but in such case Rockwell Collins will purchase as much coverage as reasonably practicable for such amount.
Certain Tax Matters
Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace have agreed to use reasonable best efforts to obtain from their respective legal advisors the opinions
related to the KLX spin-off tax treatment that are required as conditions to the closing of the merger, as described above.
In
addition, Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace have each agreed to deliver tax representation letters similar to the Rockwell Collins Signing Representation Letter and the
B/E Aerospace Signing Representation Letter, respectively, immediately prior to the closing, and covenanted that neither knew of any reason that it would not be able to deliver their respective
tax representation letters at the closing. Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace each agree to use their respective reasonable best efforts not to take any action what would cause any of the
representations, warranties and covenants in their respective tax representation letters that were delivered at signing to become untrue.
145
Table of Contents
Rockwell
Collins and B/E Aerospace represented that they had each received opinions as of the date of the merger agreement from their respective tax counsels to the effect that
the merger will not cause the KLX spin-off to fail to qualify for the KLX spin-off tax treatment.
Rockwell
Collins and B/E Aerospace agreed to use reasonable best efforts to jointly engage promptly after the date of the merger agreement a nationally recognized law firm to
serve as additional tax counsel in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement.
Section 16 Matters
Prior to the effective time, the parties will take all such steps as may be reasonably necessary or advisable to cause any dispositions of
B/E Aerospace common stock (including derivative securities) or acquisitions of Rockwell Collins common stock (including derivative securities) resulting from the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement by each individual who is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act with respect to B/E Aerospace or will become subject to such
reporting requirements with respect to Rockwell Collins, to be exempt under Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, to the extent permitted by law.
Public Disclosure
While the merger agreement is in effect, neither Rockwell Collins, B/E Aerospace nor any of their affiliates will disseminate any press
release or other public announcement concerning the merger agreement, the merger or the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement without the prior written consent of the other parties
to the merger agreement (which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), except (i) as required by law or the rules of a national securities exchange, (ii) to
the extent disclosed in or consistent with a press release or other document previously approved for external distribution by the other parties to the merger agreement or the registration statement on
Form S-4, of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, (iii) and to the extent the information included therein is not confidential information of any other party,
a party may communicate to financial analysts, investors and media representatives in a manner consistent with its past practice in compliance with applicable law. In addition, such obligation to
obtain prior written consent of the other parties to the merger agreement will not apply to press releases or public announcements if B/E Aerospace or Rockwell Collins has effected an adverse
recommendation change, to any disclosures in connection with either a determination by B/E Aerospace or Rockwell Collins, in accordance with their respective obligations under the
non-solicitation provisions of the merger agreement, that an acquisition proposal is a superior proposal or to any disclosures in connection with any dispute between the parties regarding the merger
agreement, the merger or the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Stock Exchange Listing
Rockwell Collins has agreed to use reasonable best efforts to cause the shares of Rockwell Collins common stock to be issued in connection with
the merger to be approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance, prior to the effective time.
Dividend Record Dates
B/E Aerospace will coordinate with Rockwell Collins to designate the record dates and payment dates for B/E Aerospace's quarterly
dividends to coincide with the record dates and payment dates for Rockwell Collins' quarterly dividends, it being the intention of the parties that holders of B/E Aerospace common stock and
Rockwell Collins common stock will not receive dividends twice for a corresponding fiscal quarter of either B/E Aerospace or Rockwell Collins.
146
Table of Contents
Conditions to the Merger
Conditions to the Obligations of the Parties to Complete the Merger
The obligations of each of Rockwell Collins, Merger Sub and B/E Aerospace to consummate the merger are subject to the satisfaction or (to
the extent permitted by law) waiver of the following conditions:
-
-
Rockwell Collins having obtained the Rockwell Collins Stockholder Approval and B/E Aerospace having obtained the B/E Aerospace
Stockholder Approval;
-
-
the shares of Rockwell Collins common stock to be issued in connection with the merger having been approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to
official notice of issuance;
-
-
the registration statement on Form S-4, of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, having become effective
under the Securities Act, and not being the subject of any stop order or any legal, administrative or other similar proceedings or actions by or before the SEC seeking a stop order;
-
-
any applicable waiting period (and any extension thereof) under the HSR Act relating to the consummation of the merger having expired or early
termination thereof having been granted, and any authorization or consent from a governmental authority required to be obtained with respect to the merger under any antitrust laws in Europe, China,
the Philippines, South Korea or Turkey having been obtained and remaining in full force and effect; and
-
-
no governmental authority having issued or entered any order or enacted any law after the date of the merger agreement having the effect of
enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the merger or the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Conditions to the Obligations of Rockwell Collins and Merger Sub to Complete the Merger
In addition, the obligations of Rockwell Collins and Merger Sub to complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction or (to the extent
permitted by law) waiver of the following conditions:
-
-
the representations and warranties of B/E Aerospace set forth in the merger agreement with respect to (i) capitalization being
true and correct in all respects (other than
de minimis
inaccuracies) and (ii) outstanding equity awards, ownership of subsidiaries, corporate
authorization of the merger agreement, required stockholder approval of adoption of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, the inapplicability of anti-takeover
laws, brokers and transaction-related fees and expenses, opinions from financial advisors and the valid and binding nature of B/E Aerospace's amendment to the KLX tax sharing agreement, being
true and correct in all material respects, without giving effect to qualifications in such representations and warranties with respect to materiality or material adverse effects on
B/E Aerospace, in the case of clauses (i) and (ii), as of the closing of the merger (or, in the case of representations and warranties made as of a specific date, as of such date), with
the representations and warranties listed in clauses (i) and (ii) referred to as the B/E Aerospace fundamental representations and warranties;
-
-
all other representations and warranties of B/E Aerospace set forth in the merger agreement (other than the B/E Aerospace
fundamental representations and warranties), without giving effect to qualifications in such representations and warranties with respect to materiality or material adverse effects on
B/E Aerospace, being true and correct as of the closing date (or, in the case of representations and warranties made as of a specific date, as of such date), except where failure to be true and
correct, individually or in the aggregate, has had or would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on B/E Aerospace;
147
Table of Contents
-
-
B/E Aerospace having performed or complied in all material respects with its obligations under the merger agreement required to be
performed or complied with on or prior to the closing of the merger;
-
-
since the date of the merger agreement, no event, occurrence, development or change having occurred that had or would reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on B/E Aerospace;
-
-
Rockwell Collins having received a certificate from an executive officer of B/E Aerospace certifying that the above conditions have been
satisfied; and
-
-
Rockwell Collins having received the Rockwell Collins Tax Advisor Opinion (or, if applicable, both the B/E Aerospace Tax Advisor Opinion
and a similar opinion from the additional tax counsel).
Conditions to the Obligation of B/E Aerospace to Complete the Merger
In addition, the obligation of B/E Aerospace to complete the merger is subject to the satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by law)
waiver of the following conditions:
-
-
the representations and warranties of Rockwell Collins and Merger Sub set forth in the merger agreement with respect to
(i) capitalization being true and correct in all respects (other than de minimis inaccuracies) and (ii) outstanding equity awards, ownership of subsidiaries, corporate authorization of
the merger agreement, required stockholder approval of the issuance of Rockwell Collins common stock in connection with the merger, brokers and transaction-related fees and expenses and opinions from
financial advisors being true and correct in all material respects, without giving effect to qualifications in such representations and warranties with respect to materiality or material adverse
effects on Rockwell Collins, in the case of clauses (i) and (ii), as of the closing of the merger (or, in the case of representations and warranties made as of a specific date, as of such
date), with the representations and warranties listed in clauses (i) and (ii) referred to as the Rockwell Collins fundamental representations and warranties;
-
-
all other representations and warranties of Rockwell Collins and Merger Sub set forth in the merger agreement (other than the Rockwell Collins
fundamental representations and warranties), without giving effect to qualifications in such representations and warranties with respect to materiality or material adverse effects on Rockwell Collins,
being true and correct as of the closing date (or, in the case of representations and warranties made as of a specific date, as of such date), except where failure to be true and correct, individually
or in the aggregate, has had or would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on Rockwell Collins;
-
-
Rockwell Collins and Merger Sub having performed or complied in all material respects with each of their respective obligations required under
the merger agreement to be performed or complied with on or prior to the closing of the merger;
-
-
since the date of the merger agreement, no event, occurrence, development or change having occurred that had or would reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on Rockwell Collins;
-
-
B/E Aerospace having received a certificate from an executive officer of Rockwell Collins certifying that the above conditions have been
satisfied; and
-
-
B/E Aerospace having received the B/E Aerospace Tax Advisor Opinion (or, if applicable, both the Rockwell Collins Tax Advisor
Opinion and a similar opinion from the additional tax counsel).
148
Table of Contents
Termination
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the effective time, before or after approval is obtained from the stockholders of
Rockwell Collins or B/E Aerospace (except as expressly noted otherwise), as follows:
-
-
by the mutual written consent of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace;
-
-
by either Rockwell Collins or B/E Aerospace if:
-
-
the merger has not been consummated on or before 5:00 p.m. (New York time) on October 21, 2017, except where the
party seeking to terminate the merger agreement for this reason has failed to perform or comply with any of its obligations under the merger agreement and such failure has been the principal cause or
resulted in the failure of the consummation of the merger on or before that date, this termination right being referred to as the End Date Termination Right;
-
-
any governmental authority has issued or entered any final, non-appealable order or enacted any law after the date of the merger
agreement that has the effect of permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the merger or the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, except where the issuance of
such order was proximately caused by the failure of the party seeking to terminate the merger agreement for this reason to perform or comply with any of its obligations under the merger agreement;
-
-
the Rockwell Collins Stockholder Approval has not been obtained upon a vote taken at the duly convened Rockwell Collins special
meeting or at any adjournment or postponement of such meeting; or
-
-
the B/E Aerospace Stockholder Approval has not been obtained upon a vote taken at the duly convened B/E Aerospace
special meeting or at any adjournment or postponement of such meeting;
-
-
by B/E Aerospace:
-
-
if Rockwell Collins or Merger Sub breaches or fails to perform any of their respective representations, warranties, covenants or
other agreements set forth in the merger agreement, resulting in the failure of a closing condition regarding (i) the accuracy of Rockwell Collins' representations or warranties (treating for
this purpose the representation and warranty made by Rockwell Collins regarding the truth and accuracy of the Rockwell Collins Signing Representation Letter as a Rockwell Collins fundamental
representation and warranty in the event the B/E Aerospace Tax Advisor Opinion and either the Rockwell Collins Tax Advisor Opinion or the similar opinion of the additional tax counsel cannot be
delivered) or (ii) the performance or compliance in all material respects with their respective obligations under the merger agreement required to be performed or complied with on or prior to
the closing of the merger, and, in each case, such breach or failure to perform is incapable of being cured prior to 5:00 p.m. (New York time) on October 21, 2017 or, if capable of being
cured, will not have been cured prior to the earlier of 5:00 p.m. (New York time) on October 21, 2017 or the date that is 30 days after delivery of notice by B/E Aerospace
to Rockwell Collins of such breach or failure to perform, except that B/E Aerospace will not have the right to terminate the merger agreement for this reason if B/E Aerospace is then in
material breach of any of its material obligations under the merger agreement, resulting in the failure of a closing condition regarding its performance or compliance with its obligations under the
merger agreement required to be performed or complied with on or prior to the closing of the merger, the termination right described in this bullet point being referred to as the B/E Aerospace
Breach Termination Right;
149
Table of Contents
-
-
prior to receipt of the Rockwell Collins Stockholder Approval, if Rockwell Collins makes an adverse recommendation change, fails
to include in this joint proxy statement/prospectus the Rockwell Collins recommendation or materially violates or breaches its non-solicitation obligations, the termination right described in this
bullet point being referred to as the B/E Aerospace Recommendation Change Termination Right;
-
-
prior to receipt of the B/E Aerospace Stockholder Approval, in order for B/E Aerospace to enter into a definitive
agreement with respect to a superior proposal to the extent permitted by and subject to the applicable terms and provisions of the non-solicitation provisions, provided that prior to or simultaneously
with such termination, B/E Aerospace pays to Rockwell Collins the termination fee, as described further below; or
-
-
if the closing condition regarding delivery to B/E Aerospace of the B/E Aerospace Tax Advisor Opinion (or, if
applicable, delivery of both the Rockwell Collins Tax Advisor Opinion and a similar opinion from the additional tax counsel) is not satisfied within 20 business days of the satisfaction or waiver of
all other closing conditions (other than those conditions that by their terms cannot be satisfied prior to the closing of the merger, but which conditions would be satisfied or would be capable of
being satisfied if the closing of the merger occurred as of such date), the termination right described in this bullet point being referred to as the B/E Aerospace Tax Opinion Termination
Right;
-
-
by Rockwell Collins:
-
-
if B/E Aerospace breaches or fails to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements set
forth in the merger agreement, resulting in the failure of a closing condition regarding (i) the accuracy of B/E Aerospace's representations or warranties (treating for this purpose the
representation and warranty made by B/E Aerospace regarding the truth and accuracy of the B/E Aerospace Signing Representation Letter as a B/E Aerospace fundamental representation
and warranty in the event the Rockwell Collins Tax Advisor Opinion and either the B/E Aerospace Tax Advisor Opinion or the similar opinion of the additional tax counsel cannot be delivered) or
(ii) the performance or compliance in all material respects with B/E Aerospace's obligations under the merger agreement required to be performed or complied with on or prior to the
closing of the merger, and, in each case, such breach or failure to perform is incapable of being cured prior to 5:00 p.m. (New York time) on October 21, 2017 or, if capable of being
cured, will not have been cured prior to the earlier of 5:00 p.m. (New York time) on October 21, 2017 or the date that is 30 days after delivery of notice by Rockwell Collins to
B/E Aerospace of such breach or failure to perform, except that Rockwell Collins will not have the right to terminate the merger agreement for this reason if Rockwell Collins is then in
material breach of any of its material obligations under the merger agreement, resulting in the failure of a closing condition regarding its performance or compliance with its obligations under the
merger agreement required to be performed or complied with on or prior to the closing of the merger, the termination right described in this bullet point being referred to as the Rockwell Collins
Breach Termination Right;
-
-
prior to receipt of the B/E Aerospace Stockholder Approval, if B/E Aerospace makes an adverse recommendation change,
fails to include in this joint proxy statement/prospectus the B/E Aerospace recommendation or materially violates or breaches its non-solicitation obligations, the termination right described
in this bullet point being referred to as the Rockwell Collins Recommendation Change Termination Right;
-
-
prior to receipt of the Rockwell Collins Stockholder Approval, in order for Rockwell Collins to enter into a definitive agreement
with respect to a superior proposal to the extent permitted by and subject to the applicable terms and provisions of the non-solicitation
150
Table of Contents
provisions,
provided that prior to or simultaneously with such termination, Rockwell Collins pays to B/E Aerospace the termination fee, as described further below; or
-
-
if the closing condition regarding delivery to Rockwell Collins of the Rockwell Collins Tax Advisor Opinion (or, if applicable,
delivery of both the B/E Aerospace Tax Advisor Opinion and a similar opinion from the additional tax counsel) is not satisfied within 20 business days of the satisfaction or waiver of all other
closing conditions (other than those conditions that by their terms cannot be satisfied prior to the closing of the merger, but which conditions would be satisfied or would be capable of being
satisfied if the closing of the merger occurred as of such date), the termination right described in this bullet point being referred to as the Rockwell Collins Tax Opinion Termination Right.
Effect of Termination
If the merger agreement is terminated as described above and the merger is abandoned, the terminating party must provide written notice to the
other party specifying the provisions of the merger agreement pursuant to which the termination is being made and the merger agreement will be null and void and of no effect, without liability on the
part of any party to the merger agreement, and the rights and obligations of any party to the merger agreement will cease, except that, obligations with respect to certain provisions of the merger
agreement will survive the termination of the merger agreement, including the following:
-
-
no termination will relieve any party of any liability or damages resulting from any intentional breach of the merger agreement prior to such
termination or fraud, in which case the aggrieved party will be entitled to all remedies available at law or in equity, including liability for damages (taking into account all relevant factors,
including the loss of the benefit of the merger, any lost stockholder premium, any lost synergies, the time value of money and any benefit to the breaching party or its stockholders arising from such
intentional breach or fraud); and
-
-
the confidentiality agreement entered into by Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace in connection with entering into the merger and the
provisions of the merger agreement with respect to the effect of termination, termination fees, and general provisions of interpretation and construction will survive any termination of the merger
agreement.
Under
the merger agreement, intentional breach means an action or omission taken or omitted to be taken that the breaching party intentionally takes (or fails to take) and knows (or
should reasonably
have known) would, or would reasonably be expected to, cause a material breach of the merger agreement.
Termination Fees and Expense Reimbursements
The merger agreement provides for payment of termination fees in connection with a termination of the merger agreement under the following
circumstances:
-
-
B/E Aerospace will pay to Rockwell Collins $200 million:
-
-
on the date of the consummation of the applicable acquisition proposal, if Rockwell Collins terminates the merger agreement
pursuant to the Rockwell Collins Breach Termination Right on the basis of a breach of a covenant or agreement contained in the merger agreement or either party terminates the agreement pursuant to the
End Date Termination Right or failure of B/E Aerospace to obtain the B/E Aerospace Stockholder Approval, and, in any such case, prior to the termination of the merger agreement (or prior
to the Rockwell Collins special meeting in the event of failure of B/E Aerospace to obtain the B/E Aerospace Stockholder Approval), an acquisition proposal (with regard to 50% of the
voting power, consolidated assets, revenues or net income of the applicable party) made
151
Table of Contents
after
the date of the merger agreement is publicly disclosed and not publicly withdrawn and, within 12 months of such termination, B/E Aerospace consummates an acquisition proposal or
enters into a definitive agreement with respect to an acquisition proposal that is ultimately consummated (regardless of when consummation occurs);
-
-
immediately prior to or simultaneously with termination, if B/E Aerospace terminates the merger agreement in order to enter
into a definitive agreement with respect to a superior proposal in accordance with the non-solicitation provisions; or
-
-
promptly, and in no event later than 3 business days after termination, if Rockwell Collins terminates the merger agreement
pursuant to the Rockwell Collins Recommendation Change Termination Right.
-
-
Rockwell Collins will pay to B/E Aerospace $300 million:
-
-
on the date of the consummation of the applicable acquisition proposal, if B/E Aerospace terminates the merger agreement
pursuant to the B/E Aerospace Breach Termination Right on the basis of a breach of a covenant or agreement contained in the merger agreement or either party terminates the agreement pursuant to
the End Date Termination Right or failure of Rockwell Collins to obtain the Rockwell Collins Stockholder Approval, and, in any such case, prior to the termination of the merger agreement (or prior to
the B/E Aerospace special meeting in the event of failure of Rockwell Collins to obtain the Rockwell Collins Stockholder Approval), an acquisition proposal (with regard to 50% of the voting
power, consolidated assets, revenues or net income of the applicable party) made after the date of the merger agreement is publicly disclosed and not publicly withdrawn and, within 12 months of
such termination, Rockwell Collins consummates an acquisition proposal or enters into a definitive agreement with respect to an acquisition proposal that is ultimately consummated (regardless of when
consummation occurs);
-
-
immediately prior to or simultaneously with termination, if Rockwell Collins terminates the merger agreement in order to enter
into a definitive agreement with respect to a superior proposal in accordance with the non-solicitation provisions; or
-
-
promptly, and in no event later than 3 business days after termination, if B/E Aerospace terminates the merger agreement
pursuant to the B/E Aerospace Recommendation Change Termination Right.
In
no event will Rockwell Collins or B/E Aerospace be required to pay a termination fee if such party has already paid a termination fee, and no termination fee will be payable
more than once.
In
addition to the termination fees described above, the merger agreement provides for expense reimbursements in connection with the termination of the merger agreement under the
following circumstances:
-
-
B/E Aerospace will reimburse Rockwell Collins for reasonable and documented out-of-pocket costs and expenses incurred by Rockwell
Collins, including all fees and expenses incurred by Rockwell Collins in connection with the financing of the merger and the fees and expenses of advisors incurred by Rockwell Collins in connection
with the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, in an amount not to exceed $85 million:
-
-
if the merger agreement is terminated (i) by either Rockwell Collins or B/E Aerospace due to failure of
B/E Aerospace to obtain the B/E Aerospace Stockholder Approval, (ii) by B/E Aerospace pursuant to the B/E Aerospace Tax Opinion Termination Right, (iii) by
Rockwell Collins pursuant to the Rockwell Collins Breach Termination Right or (iv) by Rockwell Collins pursuant to the Rockwell Collins Tax Opinion Termination Right and, in the case of this
clause (iv), either (1) a breach or inaccuracy in the B/E Aerospace Signing
152
Table of Contents
-
-
Rockwell Collins will reimburse B/E Aerospace for reasonable and documented out-of-pocket costs and expenses incurred by
B/E Aerospace, including all fees and expenses of advisors incurred by B/E Aerospace in connection with the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, in
an amount not to exceed $56 million:
-
-
If the merger agreement is terminated by either Rockwell Collins or B/E Aerospace due to failure of Rockwell Collins to
obtain the Rockwell Collins Stockholder Approval.
Payment
of the expense reimbursements by either party does not affect the other party's right to receive any applicable termination fees, but does reduce on a dollar-for-dollar basis any
termination fee that becomes due and payable to such other party under the terms of the merger agreement.
The right of either party to receive the applicable termination fee and expense reimbursement, in circumstances in which the applicable termination fee or expense reimbursement is owed,
is the sole and exclusive monetary remedy of the receiving party against the other party and its subsidiaries and representatives for all losses and damages suffered as a result of the failure of the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement to be consummated or failure to perform under the merger agreement or otherwise, except (i) in the event of
(a) termination due to failure of a party to include its required recommendation under the merger agreement in this joint proxy statement/prospectus or due to breach of such party's
non-solicitation obligations, (b) intentional breach of the covenant in the merger agreement related to certain tax matters or fraudulent breach of either party's representations and warranties
under the merger agreement related to their respective tax representation letters or (c) the right of each party to receive the applicable termination fee less the applicable expense
reimbursement under certain circumstances and (ii) that any party that fails to timely pay any termination fee or expense reimbursement due pursuant to the merger agreement will be obligated to
pay any costs and expenses in connection with any suit brought by the other party that results in a judgment against the delinquent party for the payment of such termination fee and expense
reimbursement.
Expenses
Except as otherwise described under "Termination Fees and Expense Reimbursements" above, all expenses incurred in connection with the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement shall be paid by the party incurring such expenses, whether or not the merger is consummated.
Amendment and Waiver
Amendment
The merger agreement may be amended by mutual agreement of the parties in writing at any time before or after receipt of the respective
stockholder approvals of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace, except that no amendment may be made (i) after receipt of either of the respective stockholder approvals of Rockwell Collins
and B/E Aerospace if such amendment would require, in accordance with applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange, further approval of the parties' respective stockholders,
(ii) that is not permitted under applicable law or (iii) that would adversely affect the rights of Rockwell Collins' financing sources under the merger agreement relating to amendment,
status as third-party beneficiaries, waiver of jury trial or governing law and liability with regard to legal, administrative or other similar proceedings or actions related to such financing sources.
153
Table of Contents
Waiver
At any time prior to the effective time, subject to applicable law, the parties may:
-
-
extend the time for the performance of any obligation or other act of any other party to the merger agreement;
-
-
waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties of any other party to the merger agreement contained in the merger agreement or in
any document delivered pursuant to the merger agreement; or
-
-
waive compliance with any agreement or condition contained in the merger agreement.
No failure or delay by any party in exercising any right under the merger agreement will operate as a waiver of such right nor will any single or partial exercise of any such right
preclude any other or further exercise of any other right under the merger agreement. Any agreement on the part of a party to any such extension or waiver will be valid only if set forth in an
instrument in writing signed on behalf of such party.
Third-Party Beneficiaries
The merger agreement is not intended to and will not confer upon any person or entity other than the parties thereto any rights or remedies,
except for:
-
-
from and after the effective time, the provisions of the merger agreement relating to indemnification and exculpation from liability for the
current or former directors and officers of B/E Aerospace;
-
-
from and after the effective time, the holders of B/E Aerospace common stock and B/E Aerospace equity awards; and
-
-
financing sources of Rockwell Collins, with respect to amendments to the merger agreement, waiver of jury trial or governing law and liability
with regard to legal, administrative or other similar proceedings or actions related to such financing sources.
Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Waiver of Jury Trial
Governing Law; Jurisdiction
The merger agreement and all legal, administrative and other similar proceedings or actions (whether based on contract, tort or otherwise)
arising out of or relating to the merger agreement or the actions of the parties to the merger agreement in the negotiation, administration, performance and enforcement of the merger agreement, will
be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice or conflict of laws provision or rule (whether of the State of Delaware or any
other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware.
Notwithstanding the provision described in the preceding paragraph, the parties have agreed not to bring any legal, administrative or other similar proceedings or actions against any of
Rockwell Collins' financing sources relating to the merger in any forum other than the Supreme Court of the State of New York or, if exclusive jurisdiction for any such proceeding or action is vested
in federal courts, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and appellate courts thereof. In addition, such proceedings or actions against any of Rockwell Collins'
financing sources will be governed by the laws of the State of New York, except that, prior to the closing of the merger, the definition of material adverse effect and the representations and
warranties in the merger agreement will, for the purposes of any commitment letter, engagement letter or definitive financing document in
154
Table of Contents
connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware.
B/E Aerospace
has agreed that it will have no rights or claims against any of Rockwell Collins' financing sources in connection with the merger agreement, the merger or any
financing document in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Waiver of Jury Trial
The parties have agreed to waive all rights to trial by jury in any action, proceeding or counterclaim between any of them arising out of or
relating to the merger agreement.
Enforcement
The parties have agreed that irreparable damage for which monetary damages, even if available, would not be an adequate remedy, would occur in
the event that any party to the merger agreement does not perform the provisions of the merger agreement (including failing to take such actions as are required of such party to consummate the merger
agreement) in accordance with the specified terms of the merger agreement or otherwise breach the provisions of the merger agreement. Accordingly, the parties acknowledged and agreed that, prior to
any termination of the merger agreement in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, the parties will be entitled to an injunction, specific performance and other equitable relief to prevent
breaches of the merger agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of the merger agreement, in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity. Each of
the parties agreed that it will not oppose the granting of an injunction, specific performance and other equitable relief on the basis that any other party has an adequate remedy at law or that any
award of specific performance is not an appropriate remedy for any reason at law or in equity. Any party seeking an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of the merger agreement and to enforce
specifically the terms and provisions of the merger agreement will not be required to provide any bond or other security in connection with any such order or injunction.
155
Table of Contents
INFORMATION ABOUT THE COMPANIES
Rockwell Collins
Rockwell Collins designs, produces and supports communications and aviation systems for commercial and military customers and provides
information management services through voice and data communication networks and solutions worldwide. The integrated system solutions and products Rockwell Collins provides to its served markets are
oriented around a set of core
competencies: communications, navigation, automated flight control, displays/surveillance, simulation and training, integrated electronics and information management systems. Rockwell Collins also
provides a wide range of services and support to its customers through a worldwide network of service centers, including equipment repair and overhaul, service parts, field service engineering,
training, technical information services and aftermarket used equipment sales. The structure of Rockwell Collins' business allows it to leverage these core competencies across markets and applications
to bring high value solutions to its customers.
Rockwell
Collins serves a worldwide customer base through its three operating segments: Commercial Systems, Government Systems and Information Management Services. The Commercial Systems
segment supplies aviation electronics systems, products and services to customers located throughout the world. The customer base is comprised of original equipment manufacturers of commercial air
transport, business and regional aircraft, commercial airlines and business aircraft operators. The Government Systems segment provides a broad range of electronic products, systems and services to
customers including the U.S. Department of Defense, various ministries of defense, other government agencies and defense contractors around the world. These products, systems and services support
airborne, precision weapon, ground and maritime applications on new equipment as well as in retrofit and upgrade applications designed to extend the service life and enhance the capability of existing
aircraft, vehicle and weapon platforms. The Information Management Services segment provides communications services, systems integration and security solutions across the aviation, airport, rail and
nuclear security markets to customers located around the world. The customer base includes commercial airlines, business aircraft operators, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), airport and
critical infrastructure operators and major passenger and freight railroads.
Rockwell
Collins serves a broad range of customers worldwide, including the U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Coast Guard, civil agencies, airports, defense contractors, foreign
ministries of defense, manufacturers of commercial helicopters, manufacturers of commercial air transport, business and regional aircraft, commercial airlines, fractional and other business jet
operators, the FAA, critical infrastructure operators and major passenger and freight railroads. Rockwell Collins markets its systems, products and services directly to its customers through an
internal marketing and sales force. In addition, it utilizes a worldwide dealer network to distribute its products and international sales representatives to assist with international sales and
marketing. In 2016, various branches of the U.S. Government, both directly and indirectly through subcontracts, accounted for 33% of Rockwell Collins' total sales.
Rockwell
Collins' executive offices are located at 400 Collins Road NE, Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52498 and its telephone number is (319) 295-1000. Rockwell Collins' website address is
www.rockwellcollins.com. Information contained on Rockwell Collins' website does not constitute part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Rockwell Collins' stock is publicly traded on the NYSE
under the ticker symbol "COL."
B/E Aerospace
B/E Aerospace is a world leading manufacturer of aircraft cabin interior products. B/E Aerospace designs, develops and manufactures a broad
range of products for both commercial aircraft and
156
Table of Contents
business
jets. B/E Aerospace's manufactured products include aircraft cabin seating, lighting systems, oxygen systems, food and beverage preparation and storage equipment, galley systems and modular
lavatory systems. B/E Aerospace also provides cabin interior reconfiguration, program management and certification services. B/E Aerospace sells and supports its products through its own global direct
sales and product support organization.
B/E
Aerospace's commercial aircraft segment includes seating products, interior systems, and engineering services for commercial aircraft, and brazing technologies and electronic systems
for the commercial and military aerospace markets. B/E Aerospace has the design and engineering capabilities to create and manufacture highly customized products tailored to customers' unique
preferences. As an industry leading manufacturer of interior systems for both narrow- and wide-body aircraft, B/E Aerospace supplies food and beverage preparation equipment, galleys and galley
air chillers, cabin lighting, oxygen systems and passenger service units (PSUs), lavatories, and water and waste systems. B/E Aerospace services also include optimizing cabin layout and installing
crew rest compartments. Additionally, B/E Aerospace is a market leader in the design, engineering, and manufacturing of customized, fully integrated thermal management, power conversion and
interconnect solutions that address complex power management requirements. Revenues for the commercial aircraft segment in the third quarter of 2016 were $578.8 million.
B/E Aerospace's business jet segment manufactures products that include a complete line of business jet seating and divan products, super first class environments, lighting systems, air
valves, water and waste systems, oxygen delivery systems and de-icing systems. B/E Aerospace is internationally recognized as a leading supplier of business jet products and services for leading
prominent business jet manufacturers and completion centers. Revenues for the business jet segment in the third quarter of 2016 were $153.9 million.
B/E
Aerospace was founded by Amin and Bob Khoury in 1987 upon the acquisition of Bach Engineering. After acquiring EECO, Inc. in 1989, the company's name was changed to B/E
Avionics. B/E Aerospace became a public company listed on the NASDAQ in April 1990. In 1992, B/E Aerospace acquired the assets of PTC Aerospace, Inc. and Aircraft Products Company,
transforming B/E Aerospace into a cabin interiors provider, and the company's name became "B/E Aerospace, Inc." Over the next 10 years, acquisitions of interior equipment companies
established B/E Aerospace as a renowned interiors provider. In 2001, B/E Aerospace expanded its operations to include distribution by acquiring M&M Aerospace. Honeywell's Consumables Solutions
business was acquired in 2008, establishing B/E Aerospace as a global leader in distributing aerospace fasteners and consumables, and provider of logistics services. In 2014, the Consumables
Management Segment, which consisted of B/E Aerospace's aerospace distribution and energy services businesses, was spun-off to form KLX.
B/E Aerospace's executive offices are located at 1400 Corporate Center Way, Wellington, Florida, 33414, its website address is
www.beaerospace.com,
and
its phone number is (561) 791-5000. Information contained on B/E Aerospace's website does not constitute part of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. B/E Aerospace common stock is listed on the NASDAQ, trading under the symbol "BEAV."
Merger Sub
Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of Rockwell Collins, is a Delaware corporation incorporated on October 19, 2016 for the purpose of
effecting the merger. Merger Sub has not conducted any activities other than those incidental to its formation and the matters contemplated by the merger agreement, including the preparation of
applicable regulatory filings in connection with the merger. The principal executive offices of Merger Sub are located at 400 Collins Road NE, Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52498.
157
Table of Contents
ROCKWELL COLLINS SPECIAL MEETING
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being provided to the Rockwell Collins stockholders as part of a solicitation
of proxies by the Rockwell Collins Board for use at the Rockwell Collins special meeting to be held at the time and place specified below and at any properly convened
meeting following an adjournment or postponement thereof. This joint proxy statement/prospectus provides Rockwell Collins stockholders with information they need to know to be able to vote or instruct
their vote to be cast at the Rockwell Collins special meeting.
Date, Time and Place
The special meeting of Rockwell Collins stockholders will be held at the Cedar Rapids Marriott, 1200 Collins Road NE, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, on
, at a.m. Rockwell Collins intends to mail this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the enclosed
form of proxy to its stockholders entitled to vote at the
Rockwell Collins special meeting on or about .
Purpose of the Rockwell Collins Special Meeting
At the Rockwell Collins special meeting, Rockwell Collins stockholders will be asked to consider and vote on the
following:
-
-
a proposal to issue Rockwell Collins common stock pursuant to the merger agreement, which is further described in the sections titled "The
Merger" and "The Merger Agreement," beginning on page 56 and page 127, respectively, and a copy of which is attached as Annex A to the joint proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this
notice, which is referred to as the Share Issuance proposal; and
-
-
a proposal to approve the adjournment of the Rockwell Collins special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit
additional proxies in the event there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the Share Issuance proposal, which is referred to as the Rockwell Collins Adjournment
proposal.
Completion
of the merger is conditioned on the approval of the Share Issuance proposal.
Recommendation of the Rockwell Collins Board
On October 21, 2016, the Rockwell Collins Board adopted the merger agreement, declared the merger agreement advisable and determined that
the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are in the best interests of Rockwell Collins and its stockholders.
Accordingly, the Rockwell Collins
Board unanimously recommends that Rockwell Collins stockholders vote "FOR" the Share Issuance proposal and "FOR" the Rockwell Collins Adjournment proposal.
Rockwell
Collins stockholders should carefully read this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including any documents incorporated by reference, and the annexes in their entirety for more
detailed information concerning the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Rockwell Collins Record Date; Stockholders Entitled to Vote
Only holders of record of Rockwell Collins common stock at the close of business on January 18, 2017 will be entitled to notice of, and
to vote at, the Rockwell Collins special meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
As
of the close of business on , the most recent practicable date for which such information was available, there
were shares of Rockwell Collins common
stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Rockwell Collins special meeting. The number of shares of Rockwell Collins common stock outstanding as of the record date is not expected to be
meaningfully different from the number as
158
Table of Contents
of .
Each share of Rockwell Collins common stock outstanding on the Rockwell Collins record date entitles the holder thereof to one vote on each proposal to be considered at the
Rockwell Collins special meeting, in person or by proxy through the Internet or by telephone or by a properly executed and delivered proxy with respect to the Rockwell Collins special meeting.
A complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Rockwell Collins special meeting will be available for examination by any Rockwell Collins stockholder in the Investor Relations
department at Rockwell Collins' corporate office at 400 Collins Road NE, Cedar Rapids, Iowa for purposes pertaining to the Rockwell Collins special meeting, between the hours
of and
for a period of 10 days before the Rockwell Collins special meeting, and at the time and place of the Rockwell Collins special meeting.
Voting by Rockwell Collins' Directors and Executive Officers
At the close of business on January 1, 2017, the most recent practicable date for which such information was available, Rockwell Collins
directors and executive officers and their affiliates were entitled to vote 360,392 shares of Rockwell Collins common stock or approximately less than 1% of the shares of Rockwell Collins common stock
outstanding on that date. The number and percentage of shares of Rockwell Collins common stock owned by directors and executive officers of Rockwell Collins and their affiliates as of the record date
are not expected to be meaningfully different from the number and percentage as of January 1, 2017. Rockwell Collins currently expects its directors and executive officers to vote their shares
in favor of all Rockwell Collins proposals, but no director or executive officer has entered into any agreement obligating him or her to do so.
Quorum
The Rockwell Collins by-laws provide that the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding stock of Rockwell Collins present either in
person or by proxy will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Rockwell Collins special meeting.
Abstentions
will count for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum for the transaction of business at the Rockwell Collins special meeting.
Broker
non-votes, if any, will not be counted for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum for the transaction of business at the Rockwell Collins special meeting.
Required Vote
The required votes to approve the Rockwell Collins proposals are as follows:
-
-
The Share Issuance proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes cast by shares of Rockwell Collins common stock
represented (in person or by proxy) at the Rockwell Collins special meeting.
-
-
The Rockwell Collins Adjournment proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of Rockwell Collins common stock
represented (in person or by proxy) at the Rockwell Collins special meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal, whether or not a quorum is present.
Voting of Proxies by Holders of Record
How to Vote by Proxy If You Are the Record Holder of Your Shares
If you were the record holder of your shares as of the Rockwell Collins record date, you may submit your proxy to vote by mail, by telephone or
via the Internet. Note that if you hold your shares through the Rockwell Collins Retirement Savings Plan, which was established pursuant to
159
Table of Contents
Section 401(k)
of the Internal Revenue Code and is referred to as the Rockwell Collins 401(k) Plan, additional restrictions apply as described below under "How to Vote Your 401(k) Plan Shares
by Proxy."
Voting via the Internet or by Telephone.
-
-
To submit your proxy via the Internet, go to
www.proxyvote.com
. Have your proxy card in hand
when you access the website and follow the instructions to vote your shares.
-
-
To submit your proxy by telephone, call . Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the
instructions to vote
your shares.
-
-
If you vote via the Internet or by telephone, you must do so no later than
p.m. on
.
Voting by Mail.
As an alternative to submitting your proxy via the Internet or by telephone, you may submit your proxy by mail.
-
-
To submit your proxy by mail, simply mark your proxy card, date and sign it and return it in the postage-paid envelope. If you do not have the
postage-paid envelope, please mail your completed proxy card to the following address:
-
-
If you vote by mail, your proxy card must be received no later than
p.m. on
.
How to Vote Your Rockwell Collins 401(k) Plan Shares by Proxy
If you hold shares of Rockwell Collins common stock through the Rockwell Collins 401(k) Plan, you may vote your shares by telephone, mail or via
the Internet as described above. If you vote your shares by telephone or via the Internet, your voting instructions must be received
before 11:59 p.m. (Eastern time)
on
in order for the Rockwell Collins 401(k) Plan trustee to vote your shares. If you vote your shares by mail, your voting instructions must be received
before 6:00 p.m. (Eastern time) on
in order for the Rockwell Collins 401(k) Plan trustee to vote your shares. If you hold
shares
through the Rockwell Collins 401(k) Plan and do not timely submit your voting instructions by this deadline, your applicable shares will be voted in the same proportion to the shares held in the
Rockwell Collins 401(k) Plan for which votes were cast.
If
you hold shares of Rockwell Collins common stock through the Rockwell Collins 401(k) Plan, you may attend the Rockwell Collins special meeting. However, shares held through the
Rockwell Collins 401(k) Plan can only be voted as described above, and cannot be voted in person at the Rockwell Collins special meeting.
General
Please be aware that any costs related to voting via the Internet, such as Internet access charges, will be your responsibility.
All
properly signed proxies that are timely received and that are not revoked will be voted at the Rockwell Collins special meeting according to the instructions indicated on the proxies
or, if no direction is indicated, they will be voted as recommended by the Rockwell Collins Board. Unless a Rockwell Collins stockholder checks the box on its proxy card to withhold discretionary
authority, the proxy holders may use their discretion to vote on other matters relating to the Rockwell Collins special meeting. In addition, as noted above, if you hold shares through the Rockwell
Collins 401(k) Plan, you may attend the Rockwell Collins special meeting, but those shares can only be voted as described above, and cannot be voted at the Rockwell Collins special meeting.
160
Table of Contents
Treatment of Abstentions; Failure to Vote
For purposes of the Rockwell Collins special meeting, an abstention occurs when a Rockwell Collins stockholder attends the Rockwell Collins
special meeting, either in person or by proxy, but abstains from voting.
-
-
For the Share Issuance proposal, if a Rockwell Collins stockholder present in person at the Rockwell Collins special meeting abstains from
voting, or responds by proxy with an "abstain" vote, it will have the effect of a vote cast "AGAINST" such proposal. If a Rockwell Collins stockholder is not present in person at the Rockwell Collins
special meeting and does not respond by proxy, it will have no effect on the vote count for such proposal (assuming a quorum is present).
-
-
For the Rockwell Collins Adjournment proposal, if a Rockwell Collins stockholder present in person at the Rockwell Collins special meeting
abstains from voting, or responds by proxy with an "abstain" vote, it will have the effect of a vote cast "AGAINST" such proposal. If a Rockwell Collins stockholder is not present in person at the
Rockwell Collins special meeting and does not respond by proxy, it will have no effect on the vote count for such proposal (assuming a quorum is present).
Shares Held in Street Name
If you are a Rockwell Collins stockholder and your shares are held in "street name" through a broker, bank or other nominee, you must provide
the record holder of your shares with instructions on how to vote the shares. Please follow the voting instructions provided by the bank or broker. You may not vote shares held in street name by
returning a proxy card directly to Rockwell Collins or by voting in person at the Rockwell Collins special meeting unless you provide a "legal proxy," which you must obtain from your broker, bank or
other nominee. Further, brokers, banks or other nominees who hold shares of Rockwell Collins common stock on behalf of their customers may not give a proxy to Rockwell Collins to vote those shares
with respect to the Share Issuance proposal and the Rockwell Collins Adjournment proposal without specific instructions from their customers, as brokers, banks and other nominees do not have
discretionary voting power on these "non-routine" matters. Broker non-votes occur when a broker or nominee is not instructed by the beneficial owner of shares to vote on a particular proposal for
which the broker does not have discretionary voting power. Therefore, if you are a Rockwell Collins stockholder and you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your
shares:
-
-
your broker, bank or other nominee may not vote your shares on the Share Issuance proposal, which broker non-votes, if any, will have no effect
on the vote count for such proposal (assuming a quorum is present); and
-
-
your broker, bank or other nominee may not vote your shares on the Rockwell Collins Adjournment proposal, which broker non-votes, if any, will
have no effect on the vote count for such proposal (regardless of whether a quorum is present).
Attendance at the Rockwell Collins
S
pecial Meeting and Voting in Person
Stockholders who wish to attend the Rockwell Collins special meeting will be required to present verification of ownership of Rockwell Collins
common stock, such as a bank or brokerage firm account statement, and will be required to present a valid government-issued picture identification, such as a driver's license or passport, to gain
admittance to the Rockwell Collins special meeting.
If
you are a stockholder of record and plan to attend the Rockwell Collins special meeting and wish to vote in person, you will be given a ballot at the Rockwell Collins special meeting.
Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, and you wish to
161
Table of Contents
vote
in person at the Rockwell Collins special meeting, you must bring to the Rockwell Collins special meeting a legal proxy from the record holder of the shares (your broker, bank or other nominee)
authorizing you to vote at the Rockwell Collins special meeting.
No cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, briefcases or packages will be permitted in the Rockwell Collins special
meeting.
Revocability of Proxies
Any stockholder giving a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time before the proxy is voted at the Rockwell Collins special meeting. If you
are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy in any of the following ways:
-
-
By delivering,
before
p.m. on
, to Rockwell Collins' Corporate Secretary or Assistant Secretary (at Rockwell Collins' executive offices at 400 Collins Road NE, Cedar Rapids, Iowa) a signed written notice of
revocation bearing a later date than the proxy, stating that the proxy is revoked;
-
-
By duly executing a subsequently dated proxy relating to the same shares of Rockwell Collins common stock and delivering it to Rockwell
Collins' Corporate Secretary or Assistant Secretary at the address in the bullet above
before
p.m.
on
;
-
-
By duly submitting a subsequently dated proxy relating to the same shares of Rockwell Collins common stock by telephone or via the Internet
(i.e., your most recent duly submitted voting instructions will be followed)
before
p.m.
on
; or
-
-
By attending the Rockwell Collins special meeting in person and voting such shares during the Rockwell Collins special meeting as described
above, although attendance at the Rockwell Collins special meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy.
If
you hold shares of Rockwell Collins common stock through the Rockwell Collins 401(k) Plan, you may revoke your proxy using any of the above methods (other than (4) above), but
must do so
before 11:59 p.m. (Eastern time) on
if you vote by telephone or via the Internet and your revocation must be
received
before 6:00 p.m. (Eastern time) on
if you vote by mail.
If
your shares are held by a broker, bank or other nominee or through the Rockwell Collins 401(k) Plan, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker,
bank or other nominee. You must contact your broker, bank or other nominee, or Rockwell Collins 401(k) Plan administrator to find out how to do so.
Solicitation
The Rockwell Collins Board is soliciting proxies for the Rockwell Collins special meeting from its stockholders. Rockwell Collins will bear the
entire cost of the solicitation of proxies, including preparation, assembly and delivery, as applicable, of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the proxy card and any additional materials furnished
to stockholders. Proxies may be solicited by directors, officers and a small number of Rockwell Collins' regular employees personally or by mail, telephone or facsimile, but such persons will not be
specially compensated for such service. Rockwell Collins has retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated, a proxy solicitation firm, to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of approximately $23,000
plus reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses. As appropriate, copies of solicitation material will be furnished to brokerage houses, fiduciaries and custodians that hold shares of Rockwell Collins
common stock of record for beneficial owners for forwarding to such beneficial owners. Rockwell Collins may also reimburse persons representing beneficial owners for their costs of forwarding the
solicitation material to such owners.
162
Table of Contents
Assistance
If you need assistance with voting via the Internet, voting by telephone or completing your proxy card, or have questions regarding the Rockwell
Collins special meeting, please contact Rockwell Collins' Shareowner Relations line at (319) 295-4045.
Your vote is very important regardless of the number of shares of Rockwell Collins common stock that you own. Please vote your shares via the Internet or by
telephone, or sign, date and return a proxy card promptly to ensure that your shares can be represented, even if you otherwise plan to attend the Rockwell Collins special meeting in
person.
Tabulation of Votes
Rockwell Collins has appointed Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, which is referred to as Wells Fargo, to serve as the Inspector of Election for
the Rockwell Collins special meeting. Wells Fargo will independently tabulate affirmative and negative votes and abstentions.
Adjournments
The Rockwell Collins special meeting may be adjourned to allow additional time for obtaining additional proxies. No notice of an adjourned
meeting need be given if the time and place thereof are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment was taken unless:
-
-
the adjournment is for more than 30 days, in which case a notice of the adjourned meeting will be given to each stockholder of record
entitled to vote at the meeting; or
-
-
if after the adjournment, a new record date for determination of stockholders entitled to vote is fixed for the adjourned meeting, in which
case the Rockwell Collins Board will fix as the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of such adjourned meeting the same or an earlier date as that fixed for determination of
stockholders entitled to vote at the adjourned meeting, and will give notice of the adjourned meeting to each stockholder of record as of such record date.
At
any adjourned meeting, all proxies will be voted in the same manner as they would have been voted at the original convening of the special meeting, except for any proxies that have
been effectively revoked or withdrawn prior to the adjourned meeting.
163
Table of Contents
ROCKWELL COLLINS PROPOSALS
Item 1. The Share Issuance Proposal
(Item 1 on Rockwell Collins Proxy Card)
In
the Share Issuance proposal, Rockwell Collins is asking its stockholders to approve the issuance of Rockwell Collins common stock pursuant to the merger agreement. Approval of the
Share Issuance proposal by Rockwell Collins stockholders is required for completion of the merger.
The Rockwell Collins Board unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" the Share Issuance proposal (Item 1).
Item 2. The Rockwell Collins Adjournment Proposal
(Item 2 on Rockwell Collins Proxy Card)
The
Rockwell Collins special meeting may be adjourned to another time or place from time to time, if necessary or appropriate, to permit further solicitation of proxies in the event
there are not sufficient votes at the time of the Rockwell Collins Special Meeting to approve the Share Issuance proposal.
If,
at the Rockwell Collins special meeting, the number of shares of Rockwell Collins common stock present or represented and voting in favor of the Share Issuance proposal is
insufficient to approve the Share Issuance proposal, Rockwell Collins intends to adjourn the Rockwell Collins special meeting in order to enable the Rockwell Collins Board to solicit additional
proxies for approval of the Share Issuance proposal.
In
the Rockwell Collins Adjournment proposal, Rockwell Collins is asking its stockholders to authorize the holder of any proxy solicited by the Rockwell Collins Board to vote in favor of
granting authority to the proxy holders, and each of them individually, to adjourn the Rockwell Collins special meeting to another time and place for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies. If
the Rockwell Collins stockholders approve the Rockwell Collins Adjournment proposal, Rockwell Collins could adjourn the Rockwell Collins special meeting and any adjourned session of the Rockwell
Collins special meeting and use the additional time to solicit additional proxies, including the solicitation of proxies from Rockwell Collins stockholders who have previously voted.
The Rockwell Collins Board unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" the Rockwell Collins Adjournment proposal (Item 2).
164
Table of Contents
B/E AEROSPACE SPECIAL MEETING
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being provided to the B/E Aerospace stockholders as part of a solicitation of
proxies by the B/E Aerospace Board for use at the B/E Aerospace special meeting to be held at the time and place specified below and at any properly convened meeting following an adjournment or
postponement thereof. This joint proxy statement/prospectus provides B/E Aerospace stockholders with information they need to know to be able to vote or instruct their vote to be cast at the B/E
Aerospace special meeting.
Date, Time and Place
The special meeting of B/E Aerospace stockholders will be held at ,
on , at a.m. (Eastern
time) B/E Aerospace intends to mail this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the enclosed form of proxy to its stockholders entitled to vote at the B/E Aerospace special meeting on or about
.
Purpose of the B/E Aerospace Special Meeting
At the B/E Aerospace special meeting, B/E Aerospace stockholders will be asked to consider and vote on the
following:
-
-
a proposal to adopt the merger agreement, which is further described in the sections titled "The Merger" and "The Merger Agreement," beginning
on page 56 and page 127, respectively, and a copy of which is attached as Annex A to the joint proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice, which is referred to as the Merger
proposal;
-
-
an advisory (non-binding) proposal to approve the compensation that may be paid or become payable to B/E Aerospace's named executive officers
that is based on or otherwise related to the proposed transactions, which is referred to as the Merger-Related Compensation proposal; and
-
-
a proposal to approve the adjournment of the B/E Aerospace special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit
additional proxies in the event there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the Merger proposal, which is referred to as the B/E Aerospace Adjournment proposal.
Completion
of the merger is conditioned on the approval of the Merger proposal.
Recommendation of the B/E Aerospace Board
On October 23, 2016, the B/E Aerospace Board adopted the merger agreement, declared the merger agreement advisable and determined that
the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are in the best interests of B/E Aerospace and its stockholders.
Accordingly, the B/E Aerospace Board
unanimously recommends that B/E Aerospace stockholders vote "FOR" the Merger proposal, "FOR" the Merger-Related Compensation proposal and "FOR" the B/E Aerospace Adjournment
proposal.
B/E
Aerospace stockholders should carefully read this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including any documents incorporated by reference, and the annexes in their entirety for more
detailed information concerning the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
B/E Aerospace Record Date; Stockholders Entitled to Vote
Only holders of record of B/E Aerospace common stock at the close of business on January 18, 2017 will be entitled to notice of, and to
vote at, the B/E Aerospace special meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
165
Table of Contents
As
of the close of business on , the most recent practicable date for which such information was available, there
were shares of B/E Aerospace common stock
outstanding and entitled to vote at the B/E Aerospace special meeting. The number of shares of B/E Aerospace common stock outstanding as of the record date is not expected to be meaningfully different
from the number as of . Each share of B/E Aerospace common stock outstanding on the B/E Aerospace record date entitles the holder thereof to one vote
on each proposal to be
considered at the B/E Aerospace special meeting, in person or by proxy through the Internet or by telephone or by a properly executed and delivered proxy with respect to the B/E Aerospace special
meeting.
A
complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the B/E Aerospace special meeting will be available for examination by any B/E Aerospace stockholder in the Investor Relations
department at B/E Aerospace's corporate office at 1400 Corporate Center Way, Wellington, Florida, for purposes pertaining to the B/E Aerospace special meeting, between the hours of
9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. (Eastern time) for a period of 10 days before the B/E Aerospace special meeting, and at the time and place of the B/E Aerospace special meeting.
Voting by B/E Aerospace's Directors and Executive Officers
At the close of business on January 1, 2017, the most recent practicable date for which such information was available, B/E Aerospace
directors and executive officers and their affiliates were entitled to vote 269,350 shares of B/E Aerospace common stock or less than 1% of the shares of B/E Aerospace common stock
outstanding on that date. The number and percentage of shares of
B/E Aerospace common stock owned by directors and executive officers of B/E Aerospace and their affiliates as of the record date are not expected to be meaningfully different from the number
and percentage as of January 1, 2017. B/E Aerospace currently expects its directors and executive officers to vote their shares in favor of all B/E Aerospace proposals, but no director or
executive officer has entered into any agreement obligating him or her to do so. The number of shares reflected above does not include shares subject to outstanding unvested restricted stock awards or
shares underlying unvested restricted stock units. For information with respect to restricted stock awards and restricted stock units, please see "Treatment of Restricted Stock Awards"
and "Treatment of Restricted Stock Units" beginning on page 102 and page 103, respectively.
Quorum
The B/E Aerospace by-laws require that the holders of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast be present in person or by proxy in order for
the business of the B/E Aerospace special meeting to be transacted.
Abstentions
will count for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum for the transaction of business at the B/E Aerospace special meeting.
Broker
non-votes, if any, will not be counted for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum for the transaction of business at the B/E Aerospace special meeting.
Required Vote
The required votes to approve the B/E Aerospace proposals are as follows:
-
-
The Merger proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of B/E Aerospace common stock.
-
-
The Merger-Related Compensation proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes cast by stockholders entitled to
vote on the proposal that are present in person or represented by proxy, assuming a quorum. Because the vote on the Merger-Related Compensation proposal is advisory only, it will not be binding on
either B/E Aerospace or
166
Table of Contents
Rockwell
Collins. Accordingly, if the Merger proposal is approved and the merger is completed, the merger-related compensation will be payable to B/E Aerospace's named executive officers, subject only
to the conditions applicable thereto, regardless of the outcome of the approval of the Merger-Related Compensation proposal.
-
-
The B/E Aerospace Adjournment proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the votes cast by B/E Aerospace stockholders
present in person or represented by proxy, whether or not a quorum is present.
Voting of Proxies by Holders of Record
How to Vote by Proxy If You Are the Record Holder of Your Shares
If you were the record holder of your shares as of the B/E Aerospace record date, you may submit your proxy to vote by mail, by telephone or via
the Internet. Note that if you hold your shares through the B/E Aerospace, Inc. Savings Plan, which was established pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and is
referred to as the B/E Aerospace 401(k) Plan, additional restrictions apply as described below under "How to Vote Your B/E Aerospace 401(k) Plan Shares by Proxy."
Voting via the Internet or by Telephone.
-
-
To submit your proxy via the Internet, go to
www.proxyvote.com
. Have your proxy card in hand
when you access the website and follow the instructions to vote your shares.
-
-
To submit your proxy by telephone, call . Have your proxy card in hand when you
call and then follow the instructions to vote
your shares.
-
-
If you vote via the Internet or by telephone, you must do so no later than 11:59 p.m. (Eastern time)
on
.
Voting by Mail.
As an alternative to submitting your proxy via the Internet or by telephone, you may submit your proxy by mail.
-
-
To submit your proxy by mail, simply mark your proxy card, date and sign it and return it in the postage-paid envelope. If you do not have the
postage-paid envelope, please mail your completed proxy card to the following address:
-
-
If you vote by mail, your proxy card must be received no later than 6:00 p.m. (Eastern time)
on
.
How to Vote Your B/E Aerospace 401(k) Plan Shares by Proxy
If you hold shares of B/E Aerospace common stock through the B/E Aerospace 401(k) Plan, you may vote your shares by telephone, mail or via the
Internet as described above. If you vote your shares by telephone or via the Internet, your voting instructions must be received
before 11:59 p.m. (Eastern time)
on
in order for the B/E Aerospace 401(k) Plan trustee to vote your shares. If you vote your shares by mail, your voting
instructions must be received
before 6:00 p.m. (Eastern time) on
in order for the B/E Aerospace 401(k)
Plan trustee to vote your shares. If you hold shares
through the B/E Aerospace 401(k) Plan and do not timely submit your voting instructions by this deadline, your applicable shares will be voted in the same proportion to the shares held in the
B/E Aerospace 401(k) Plan for which votes were cast.
If
you hold shares of B/E Aerospace common stock through the B/E Aerospace 401(k) Plan, you may attend the B/E Aerospace special meeting. However, shares held through the B/E Aerospace
401(k) Plan can only be voted as described above, and cannot be voted in person at the B/E Aerospace special meeting.
167
Table of Contents
General
Please be aware that any costs related to voting via the Internet, such as Internet access charges, will be your responsibility.
All
properly signed proxies that are timely received and that are not revoked will be voted at the B/E Aerospace special meeting according to the instructions indicated on the proxies
or, if no direction is indicated, they will be voted as recommended by the B/E Aerospace Board. Unless a B/E Aerospace stockholder checks the box on its proxy card to withhold discretionary authority,
the proxy holders may use their discretion to vote on other matters relating to the B/E Aerospace special meeting.
Treatment of Abstentions; Failure to Vote
For purposes of the B/E Aerospace special meeting, an abstention occurs when a B/E Aerospace stockholder attends the B/E Aerospace special
meeting, either in person or by proxy, but abstains from voting.
-
-
For the Merger proposal, if a B/E Aerospace stockholder present in person at the B/E Aerospace special meeting abstains from voting, or
responds by proxy with an "abstain" vote, it will have the effect of a vote cast "AGAINST" such proposal. If a B/E Aerospace stockholder is not present in person at the B/E Aerospace special meeting
and does not respond by proxy, it will have the effect of a vote cast "AGAINST" such proposal.
-
-
For the Merger-Related Compensation proposal, if a B/E Aerospace stockholder present in person at the B/E Aerospace special meeting abstains
from voting, or responds by proxy with an "abstain" vote, it will have no effect on the vote count for such proposal. If a B/E Aerospace stockholder is not present in person at the B/E Aerospace
special meeting and does not respond by proxy, it will have no effect on the vote count for such proposal (assuming a quorum is present).
-
-
For the B/E Aerospace Adjournment proposal, if a B/E Aerospace stockholder present in person at the B/E Aerospace special meeting abstains from
voting, or responds by proxy with an "abstain" vote, it will have no effect on the vote count for such proposal. If a B/E Aerospace stockholder is not present in person at the B/E Aerospace special
meeting and does not respond by proxy, it will have no effect on the vote count for such proposal (assuming a quorum is present).
Shares Held in Street Name
If you are a B/E Aerospace stockholder and your shares are held in "street name" through a broker, bank or other nominee, you must provide the
record holder of your shares with instructions on how to vote the shares. Please follow the voting instructions provided by the bank or broker. You may not vote shares held in street name by returning
a proxy card directly to B/E Aerospace or by voting in person at the B/E Aerospace special meeting unless you provide a "legal proxy," which you must obtain from your broker, bank or other nominee.
Further, brokers, banks or other nominees who hold shares of B/E Aerospace common stock on behalf of their customers may not give a proxy to B/E Aerospace to vote those shares with respect to the
Merger proposal, the Merger-Related Compensation proposal and the B/E Aerospace Adjournment proposal without specific instructions from their customers, as brokers, banks and other nominees do not
have discretionary voting power on these "non-routine" matters. Broker non-votes occur when a broker or nominee is not instructed by the beneficial owner of shares to vote on a particular proposal for
which the broker does not have discretionary voting power.
168
Table of Contents
Therefore,
if you are a B/E Aerospace stockholder and you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares:
-
-
your broker, bank or other nominee may not vote your shares on the Merger proposal, which broker non-votes, if any, will have the same effect
as a vote AGAINST such proposal;
-
-
your broker, bank or other nominee may not vote your shares on the Merger-Related Compensation proposal, which broker non-votes, if any, will
have no effect on the vote count for such proposal (assuming a quorum is present); and
-
-
your broker, bank or other nominee may not vote your shares on the B/E Aerospace Adjournment proposal, which broker non-votes, if any, will
have no effect on the vote count for such proposal (regardless of whether a quorum is present).
Attendance at the B/E Aerospace Special Meeting and Voting in Person
Stockholders who wish to attend the B/E Aerospace special meeting will be required to present verification of ownership of B/E Aerospace common
stock, such as a bank or brokerage firm account statement, and will be required to present a valid government-issued picture identification, such as a driver's license or passport, to gain admittance
to the B/E Aerospace special meeting.
If
you are a stockholder of record and plan to attend the B/E Aerospace special meeting and wish to vote in person, you will be given a ballot at the B/E Aerospace special meeting.
Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, and you wish to vote in person at the B/E Aerospace special meeting, you must bring to the B/E
Aerospace special meeting a legal proxy from the record holder of the shares (your broker, bank or other nominee) authorizing you to vote at the B/E Aerospace special meeting. In addition, as noted
above, if you hold shares through the B/E Aerospace 401(k) Plan, you may attend the B/E Aerospace special meeting, but those shares can only be voted as described above, and cannot be voted at the B/E
Aerospace special meeting.
No cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, briefcases or packages will be permitted in the B/E Aerospace special
meeting.
Revocability of Proxies
Any stockholder giving a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time before the proxy is voted at the B/E Aerospace special meeting. If you are
a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy in any of the following ways:
-
-
By delivering,
before 6:00 p.m. (Eastern time) on
,
to B/E Aerospace's
Corporate Secretary, or Assistant Secretary, (at B/E Aerospace's executive offices at 1400 Corporate Center Way, Wellington, Florida) a signed written notice of revocation bearing a later date than
the proxy, stating that the proxy is revoked;
-
-
By duly executing a subsequently dated proxy relating to the same shares of B/E Aerospace common stock and delivering it to B/E Aerospace's
Corporate Secretary, or Assistant Secretary, at the address in the bullet above
before 12:00 p.m. (Eastern time) on
;
-
-
By duly submitting a subsequently dated proxy relating to the same shares of B/E Aerospace common stock by telephone or via the Internet
(i.e., your most recent duly submitted voting instructions will be followed)
before 11:59 p.m. (Eastern time) on
; or
-
-
By attending the B/E Aerospace special meeting in person and voting such shares during the B/E Aerospace special meeting as described
above, although attendance at the B/E Aerospace special meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy.
169
Table of Contents
If
you hold shares of B/E Aerospace common stock through the B/E Aerospace 401(k) Plan, you may revoke your proxy using any of the above methods (other than (4) above), but must
do so
before 11:59 p.m. (Eastern time) on
if you vote by telephone or via the Internet and your
revocation must be received
before 6:00 p.m. (Eastern time) on
if you vote by mail.
If
your shares are held by a broker, bank or other nominee or through the B/E Aerospace 401(k) Plan, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank
or other nominee. You must contact your broker, bank or other nominee, or B/E Aerospace 401(k) Plan administrator to find out how to do so.
Solicitation
The B/E Aerospace Board is soliciting proxies for the B/E Aerospace special meeting from its stockholders. B/E Aerospace will bear the entire
cost of the solicitation of proxies, including preparation, assembly and delivery, as applicable, of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the proxy card and any additional materials furnished to
stockholders. Proxies may be solicited by directors, officers and a small number of B/E Aerospace's regular employees personally or by mail, telephone or facsimile, but such persons will not be
specially compensated for such service. B/E Aerospace has retained Georgeson LLC to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of approximately $15,000 plus reasonable out-of-pocket costs
and expenses. As appropriate, copies of solicitation material will be furnished to brokerage houses, fiduciaries and custodians that hold shares of B/E Aerospace common stock of record for beneficial
owners for forwarding to such beneficial owners. B/E Aerospace may also reimburse persons representing beneficial owners for their costs of forwarding the solicitation material to such owners.
Assistance
If you need assistance with voting via the Internet, voting by telephone or completing your proxy card, or have questions regarding the B/E
Aerospace special meeting, please contact B/E Aerospace's Investor Relations department at (561) 791-5000.
Your vote is very important regardless of the number of shares of B/E Aerospace common stock that you own. Please vote your shares via the Internet or by
telephone, or sign, date and return a proxy card promptly to ensure that your shares can be represented, even if you otherwise plan to attend the B/E Aerospace special meeting in
person.
Tabulation of Votes
B/E Aerospace has appointed Computershare Trust Company, N.A., which is referred to as Computershare to serve as the Inspector of Election for
the B/E Aerospace special meeting. Computershare will independently tabulate affirmative and negative votes and abstentions.
Adjournments
The B/E Aerospace special meeting may be adjourned to allow additional time for obtaining additional proxies. No notice of an adjourned meeting
need be given if the time and place thereof are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment was taken unless:
-
-
the adjournment is for more than 30 days, in which case a notice of the adjourned meeting will be given to each stockholder of record
entitled to vote at the meeting; or
-
-
if after the adjournment, a new record date for determination of stockholders entitled to vote is fixed for the adjourned meeting, in which
case the B/E Aerospace Board will fix as the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of such adjourned meeting the same or an earlier date as that fixed for determination of
stockholders entitled to vote at the adjourned meeting, and will give notice of the adjourned meeting to each stockholder of record as of such record date.
At
any adjourned meeting, all proxies will be voted in the same manner as they would have been voted at the original convening of the special meeting, except for any proxies that have
been effectively revoked or withdrawn prior to the adjourned meeting.
170
Table of Contents
B/E AEROSPACE PROPOSALS
Item 1. The Merger Proposal
(Item 1 on B/E Aerospace Proxy Card)
In
the Merger proposal, B/E Aerospace is asking its stockholders to adopt the merger agreement. Approval of the Merger proposal by B/E Aerospace stockholders is required for completion
of the merger.
The B/E Aerospace Board unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" the Merger proposal (Item 1).
Item 2. The Merger-Related Compensation Proposal
(Item 2 on B/E Aerospace Proxy Card)
In
the Merger-Related Compensation proposal, B/E Aerospace is asking its stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the merger-related compensation arrangements of B/E Aerospace's
named executive officers.
Because
the vote on the Merger-Related Compensation proposal is advisory only, it will not be binding on either B/E Aerospace or Rockwell Collins. Accordingly, if the Merger proposal is
approved and the merger is completed, the merger-related compensation will be payable to B/E Aerospace's named executive officers, subject only to the conditions applicable thereto, regardless of the
outcome of the approval of the Merger-Related Compensation proposal.
The B/E Aerospace Board unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" the Merger-Related Compensation proposal (Item 2).
Item 3. The B/E Aerospace Adjournment Proposal
(Item 3 on B/E Aerospace Proxy Card)
The
B/E Aerospace special meeting may be adjourned to another time or place from time to time, if necessary or appropriate, to permit further solicitation of proxies in the event there
are not sufficient votes at the time of the B/E Aerospace Special Meeting to approve the Merger proposal.
If,
at the B/E Aerospace special meeting, the number of shares of B/E Aerospace common stock present or represented and voting in favor of the Merger proposal is insufficient to approve
the Merger proposal, B/E Aerospace intends to adjourn the B/E Aerospace special meeting in order to enable the B/E Aerospace Board to solicit additional proxies for approval of the Merger proposal.
In
the B/E Aerospace Adjournment proposal, B/E Aerospace is asking its stockholders to authorize the holder of any proxy solicited by the B/E Aerospace Board to vote in favor of granting
authority to the proxy holders, and each of them individually, to adjourn the B/E Aerospace special meeting to another time and place for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies. If the B/E
Aerospace stockholders approve the B/E Aerospace Adjournment proposal, B/E Aerospace could adjourn the B/E Aerospace special meeting and any adjourned session of the B/E Aerospace special
meeting and use the additional
time to solicit additional proxies, including the solicitation of proxies from B/E Aerospace stockholders who have previously voted.
The B/E Aerospace Board unanimously recommends a vote "FOR" the B/E Aerospace Adjournment proposal (Item 3).
171
Table of Contents
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been prepared to illustrate the estimated effects of the merger
and the related financing transactions. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of September 30, 2016 is based on the individual historical consolidated balance sheets of
Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace, and has been prepared to reflect the merger as if it occurred on September 30, 2016, which was the end of Rockwell Collins 2016 fiscal year. The
unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of income for the year ended September 30, 2016 combines the historical results of operations of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace, and
has been prepared to reflect the merger as if it occurred on October 1, 2015, the first day of Rockwell Collins 2016 fiscal year.
Rockwell
Collins operates on a 52/53 week fiscal year ending on the Friday closest to September 30. Fiscal year 2016 was a 52-week year. For ease of presentation,
September 30 is utilized consistently
throughout these unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements and notes to represent the fiscal year-end date. All date references contained herein relate to Rockwell Collins' fiscal
year unless otherwise stated. B/E Aerospace's fiscal year ends on December 31. As a result of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace's different fiscal
years:
-
-
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of September 30, 2016 combines Rockwell Collins' historical consolidated
balance sheet as of September 30, 2016, which was the end of Rockwell Collins' 2016 fiscal year, and B/E Aerospace's historical unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
September 30, 2016, which was the end of its third fiscal quarter; and
-
-
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of income for the year ended September 30, 2016 combines Rockwell Collins'
historical results of operations for the year ended September 30, 2016, which was the end of Rockwell Collins' 2016 fiscal year, and B/E Aerospace's historical unaudited results of
operations for the 12 months ended September 30, 2016, which have been derived from B/E Aerospace's condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended
December 31, 2015 and from B/E Aerospace's condensed consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
The
historical consolidated financial information in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements has been adjusted to give effect to pro forma events that are
(1) directly attributable to the merger, (2) factually supportable and (3) with respect to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of income, expected to have a
continuing impact on the combined results of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements do not give effect to any cost savings,
operating synergies or revenue synergies that may result from the merger or the costs to achieve any such cost savings, operating synergies and revenue synergies, except for adjustments to reflect the
net decrease in compensation expense related to certain B/E Aerospace executives and B/E Aerospace Board members for whom employment terminates immediately upon change in control in accordance with
existing employment arrangements.
The
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are for informational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of what the actual financial results of Rockwell
Collins would have been had the merger occurred on the dates or for the periods indicated, nor do they purport to project the financial results of Rockwell Collins for any future periods or as of any
date. The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements contain estimated adjustments, which are based on information available to management; accordingly, such adjustments are subject to change
and the impact of such changes may be material. Although Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace have entered into the merger agreement, there is no guarantee that the merger will be completed on
the terms set forth therein or at all.
172
Table of Contents
The
following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements should be read in conjunction with:
-
-
The accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
-
-
Rockwell Collins' audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended September 30, 2016; and
-
-
B/E Aerospace's audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2015 and B/E Aerospace's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
173
Table of Contents
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet
As of September 30, 2016
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
Rockwell Collins
|
|
Historical
B/E Aerospace
|
|
Pro Forma
Adjustments
|
|
Note
References
|
|
Pro Forma
Combined
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
3a
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
97
|
|
3b
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
1,939
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
(604
|
)
|
3c
|
|
|
2,587
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
3,490
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
|
|
|
5,013
|
|
Property
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
5,389
|
|
3d
|
|
|
8,122
|
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
2,237
|
|
3e
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
3f
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
25
|
|
3g
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
7,707
|
|
$
|
3,349
|
|
$
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
$
|
740
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
3h
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
98
|
|
3i
|
|
|
961
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
3j, 3k
|
|
|
411
|
|
Advance payments from customers
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
3j
|
|
|
405
|
|
Accrued customer incentives
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
3j
|
|
|
299
|
|
Product warranty costs
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
3j
|
|
|
192
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
(563
|
)
|
3j
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
3j, 3l
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,346
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
3,512
|
|
Long-term Debt, Net
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
|
3,664
|
|
3h
|
|
|
7,082
|
|
Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
1,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,660
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
514
|
|
3f
|
|
|
606
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
3m
|
|
|
1
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
|
(819
|
)
|
|
3,713
|
|
3m, 3n
|
|
|
4,400
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
3,327
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
1,482
|
|
3m, 3o
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(1,898
|
)
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
149
|
|
3m
|
|
|
(1,898
|
)
|
Common stock in treasury, at cost
|
|
|
(858
|
)
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
261
|
|
3m
|
|
|
(858
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareowners' equity
|
|
|
2,078
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
2,640
|
|
|
|
|
4,909
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
2,084
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
2,640
|
|
|
|
|
4,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
$
|
7,707
|
|
$
|
3,349
|
|
$
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying "Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements" beginning on page 176 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
174
Table of Contents
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Income
For the Year Ended September 30, 2016
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
Rockwell Collins
|
|
Historical
B/E Aerospace
|
|
Pro Forma
Adjustments
|
|
Note
References
|
|
Pro Forma
Combined
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
2,862
|
|
$
|
(2,862
|
)
|
3p
|
|
$
|
|
|
Product sales
|
|
|
4,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
3p
|
|
|
7,202
|
|
Service sales
|
|
|
848
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
3p
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
|
5,259
|
|
|
2,862
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
8,119
|
|
Costs, expenses and other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
|
(1,739
|
)
|
3q
|
|
|
|
|
Product cost of sales
|
|
|
3,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,292
|
|
3q, 3r
|
|
|
5,337
|
|
Service cost of sales
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
3q
|
|
|
629
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
3s
|
|
|
961
|
|
Research, development and engineering
|
|
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
3t
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
72
|
|
3u
|
|
|
227
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs, expenses and other
|
|
|
4,324
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
7,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
116
|
|
3v
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
727
|
|
$
|
335
|
|
$
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per basic common share attributable to Rockwell Collins common shareholders
|
|
$
|
5.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.93
|
|
Income from continuing operations per diluted common share attributable to Rockwell Collins common shareholders
|
|
$
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.88
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
130.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
2c
|
|
|
161.6
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
132.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
2c, 2d
|
|
|
163.4
|
|
See accompanying "Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements" beginning on page 176 of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
175
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1: Description of the Transaction and Basis of Presentation
On October 23, 2016, Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace announced that the board of directors of both companies reached an
agreement under which Rockwell Collins will acquire B/E Aerospace. Upon completion of the merger, each issued and outstanding share of B/E Aerospace
common stock will be converted into the right to receive the $62.00 per share merger consideration, including $34.10 in cash and a number of Rockwell Collins shares equal to the exchange ratio, which
depends on the Rockwell Collins stock price. If the Rockwell Collins stock price is greater than or equal to $77.41 and less than or equal to $89.97 per share, the exchange ratio will be the quotient
of $27.90 divided by the Rockwell Collins stock price. If the Rockwell Collins stock price is greater than $89.97, the exchange ratio will be 0.3101. If the Rockwell Collins stock price is less than
$77.41, the exchange ratio will be 0.3604. Accordingly, the actual number of shares and the value of Rockwell Collins common stock delivered to B/E Aerospace stockholders will depend on the
Rockwell Collins stock price, and the value of the shares of Rockwell Collins common stock delivered for each such share of B/E Aerospace common stock may be greater than, less than or equal to
$27.90. A 10% increase or decrease in the price of Rockwell Collins common stock from the closing price of Rockwell Collins common stock as of January 3, 2017 of $93.09 per share would increase
the value of merger consideration to be paid by approximately $289 million or decrease the value of merger consideration to be paid by approximately $97 million, respectively.
Rockwell Collins anticipates that approximately $3.560 billion will be required to pay the aggregate cash portion of the merger consideration to the B/E Aerospace
stockholders. Rockwell Collins expects to issue up to $4.35 billion in aggregate principal amount of its senior unsecured notes in one or more public offerings and/or private placements and
borrow up to $1.5 billion under a new senior unsecured syndicated term loan facility. Rockwell Collins has obtained a bridge loan commitment of $4.35 billion that would be funded only to
the extent some or all of the senior unsecured notes described above are not issued prior to the consummation of the acquisition. There can be no assurance that Rockwell Collins will finance the
merger in the manner and amount as anticipated.
The
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements were prepared using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 805,
Business Combinations,
or
ASC 805, which requires the determination of the acquirer, the acquisition date, the fair value of assets and liabilities of
the acquiree and the measurement of goodwill. Rockwell Collins is considered to be the acquirer of B/E Aerospace for accounting purposes.
To
prepare the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements, Rockwell Collins adjusted B/E Aerospace's assets and liabilities to their estimated fair values based
on preliminary valuation work. As of the date of this joint proxy statement/ prospectus, Rockwell Collins has not completed the detailed valuation work necessary to finalize the required estimated
fair values of the B/E Aerospace assets to be acquired and liabilities to be assumed and the related allocation of purchase price. The final allocation of the purchase price will be determined after
the transaction is completed and after completion of an analysis to determine the estimated net fair value of B/E Aerospace's assets and liabilities. Accordingly, the final acquisition
accounting adjustments may be materially different from the unaudited pro forma adjustments. Also, as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, Rockwell Collins has not identified all
adjustments necessary to conform B/E Aerospace's accounting policies to Rockwell Collins accounting policies. Rockwell Collins will conduct a final review of B/E Aerospace's accounting
policies as of the date of the completion of the merger in an effort to determine if differences in accounting policies require adjustment or reclassification of B/E Aerospace's results of
operations or reclassification of assets or liabilities to conform to Rockwell Collins' accounting policies and classifications. As a result of this review, the final acquisition accounting
adjustments may be materially different from the unaudited pro forma
176
Table of Contents
adjustments.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements do not give effect to any cost savings, operating synergies or revenue synergies that may result from the merger or the
costs to achieve any such cost savings, operating synergies and revenue synergies, except for adjustments to reflect the net decrease in compensation expense related to certain B/E Aerospace
executives and B/E Aerospace Board members for whom employment terminates immediately upon change in control in accordance with existing employment arrangements. There were no material
transactions between Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace during the periods presented in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements that would need to be eliminated except
as detailed in Note 3p below.
NOTE 2: Preliminary Consideration Transferred and Preliminary Fair Value of Net Assets Acquired
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet has been adjusted to reflect the estimated fair values of the B/E Aerospace
identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The excess of consideration over these fair values is recorded to goodwill. The preliminary unaudited pro forma purchase price allocation was
based on discussions with B/E Aerospace's management, Rockwell Collins historical experience, data that was available through the public domain, Rockwell Collins due diligence review of
B/E Aerospace's business, and reviews of publicly disclosed allocations for other acquisitions in the industry. Until the merger is completed, Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace are
limited in their ability to share information with each other. Upon completion of the merger, additional valuation work will be performed and any increases or decreases in the fair value of assets
acquired or liabilities assumed will result in adjustments to the balance sheet and/or statement of income until the purchase price allocation is finalized. The following tables represent the
estimated consideration transferred and preliminary allocation of total estimated consideration transferred as if the merger occurred on September 30, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Note
|
|
Amount
|
|
Calculation of estimated consideration to be transferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration to be paid for B/E Aerospace outstanding common stock
|
|
2a
|
|
$
|
3,415
|
|
Cash consideration to be paid for B/E Aerospace dilutive equity holders
|
|
2b
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash consideration
|
|
|
|
|
3,560
|
|
Less cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash consideration paid
|
|
|
|
|
3,434
|
|
Fair value of Rockwell Collins common stock to be issued for B/E Aerospace outstanding common stock
|
|
2c
|
|
|
2,892
|
|
Fair value of Rockwell Collins common stock to be issued for B/E Aerospace dilutive equity holders
|
|
2d
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated consideration transferred
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
1,237
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
392
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
6,203
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
10,342
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(974
|
)
|
B/E Aerospace debt expected to be repaid
|
|
|
(2,064
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(976
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
(4,014
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated total merger consideration
|
|
$
|
6,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
a.
-
Cash
consideration to be paid for B/E Aerospace outstanding common stock is computed as follows (for information regarding the source of funding for this cash
consideration, see Note 3h):
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Outstanding shares of B/E Aerospace common stock (as of October 25, 2016)
|
|
|
100.1
|
|
Dilutive shares of B/E Aerospace common stock entitled to merger consideration
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated shares of B/E Aerospace common stock entitled to merger consideration
|
|
|
100.2
|
|
Cash consideration to be paid per B/E Aerospace basic share
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration to be paid to B/E Aerospace shareholders
|
|
$
|
3,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
b.
-
Cash
consideration to be paid for each outstanding award of B/E Aerospace restricted stock and each B/E Aerospace restricted stock unit award that in
each case was granted prior to the date of the merger agreement is computed as follows (for information regarding the source of funding for this cash consideration, see Note 3h):
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares of B/E Aerospace dilutive security holders to be settled in cash, per merger agreement
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Cash consideration to be paid per B/E Aerospace dilutive share
|
|
$
|
62.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration to be paid to B/E Aerospace shareholders
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
Table of Contents
-
c.
-
The
fair value of Rockwell Collins common stock to be issued for B/E Aerospace outstanding common stock is computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Outstanding shares of B/E Aerospace common stock (as of October 25, 2016)
|
|
|
100.1
|
|
Dilutive shares of B/E Aerospace common stock entitled to merger consideration
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Total estimated shares of B/E Aerospace common stock entitled to merger consideration
|
|
|
100.2
|
|
Exchange ratio(1)
|
|
|
0.3101
|
|
Shares of Rockwell Collins common stock to be issued for B/E Aerospace outstanding common stock ($0.01 par value)
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Price per share of Rockwell Collins common stock as of January 3, 2017
|
|
$
|
93.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of Rockwell Collins common stock to be issued for B/E Aerospace common stock
|
|
$
|
2,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
The
exchange ratio is equal to 0.3101, which is the minimum exchange ratio under the two-way collar mechanism (explained in detail along with a more detailed
explanation of the merger consideration in Note 1 and in the section entitled "The Merger AgreementMerger Consideration to be Received by B/E Aerospace Stockholders" beginning on
page 127), based on the price of Rockwell Collins common stock as of January 3, 2017 ($93.09).
-
d.
-
The
fair value of Rockwell Collins restricted stock to be issued for each outstanding award of B/E Aerospace restricted stock and each B/E Aerospace
restricted stock unit award that in each case was granted on or following the date of the merger agreement is computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Shares of B/E Aerospace dilutive security holders to be exchanged for Rockwell Collins stock, per merger agreement
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Equity Award Exchange ratio(1)
|
|
|
0.06764
|
|
Shares of Rockwell Collins common stock to be issued for B/E Aerospace dilutive security holders
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Price per share of Rockwell Collins common stock as of January 3, 2017
|
|
$
|
93.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of Rockwell Collins restricted stock to be issued for B/E Aerospace restricted stock
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
Less: Estimated fair value allocated to post acquisition compensation expense
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value allocated to purchase consideration(2)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
(1)
-
The
equity award exchange ratio is equal to the value of the merger consideration (which is equal to $62.97, the sum of the values of the cash portion of the merger
consideration ($34.10) and the stock portion of the merger consideration ($28.87)) divided by Rockwell Collins stock price as of January 3, 2017 ($93.09). The merger consideration is explained
in detail in Note 1 and in the section entitled "The Merger AgreementMerger Consideration to be Received by B/E Aerospace Stockholders" beginning on page 127.
179
Table of Contents
-
(2)
-
Rockwell
Collins intends to conduct additional analysis to determine the fair value allocation of restricted stock between purchase consideration and
post-acquisition expense.
NOTE 3: Pro Forma Adjustments
Reclassifications
The following items are presented as reclassifications in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements for purposes of
conforming B/E Aerospace's classification of certain assets, liabilities, income and expenses to Rockwell Collins' classification for the combined
presentation:
-
-
$97 million of percentage of completion program costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings have been reclassified from
Inventories, net to Receivables, net
-
-
$563 million of Accrued liabilities have been reclassified as Compensation and benefits ($83 million), Advance payments from
customers ($122 million), Accrued customer incentives ($53 million), Product warranty costs ($105 million) and Other current liabilities ($200 million)
-
-
$2.862 billion of Revenues have been reclassified to Product sales ($2.793 billion) and Service sales ($69 million)
-
-
$1.739 billion of Cost of sales have been reclassified to Product cost of sales ($1.707 billion) and Service cost of sales
($32 million)
-
-
$275 million of Research, development and engineering expense has been reclassified to Product cost of sales
Adjustments to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet
The following pro forma adjustments have been reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet:
-
a.
-
Cash
and cash equivalents
Adjustments
to cash include the following;
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Net proceeds of bridge credit facility and new term loan
|
|
$
|
5,799
|
|
Fees associated with new Rockwell Collins revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Scheduled payment of accrued interest on B/E Aerospace term loan
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Repayment of B/E Aerospace term loan (see Note 3h)
|
|
|
(2,064
|
)
|
Cash purchase consideration (see Note 2)
|
|
|
(3,560
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment, Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
$5.799 billion net cash proceeds from new financing assumes gross borrowings of $4.35 billion from the bridge facility and $1.5 billion from the new term loan.
The gross proceeds are offset by bridge facility fees of $49 million, including $27 million of commitment fees which would be expensed prior to funding, and term loan fees of
$2 million. See Note 3h for additional information regarding the intended debt financing to fund the transaction.
-
b.
-
Receivables,
net
The
adjustment reflects the reclassification of $97 million of B/E Aerospace percentage of completion related program costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
from Inventories, net to Receivables, net in order to conform to Rockwell Collins presentation.
180
Table of Contents
-
c.
-
Inventories,
net
The
adjustments reflect the reclassification of $97 million of percentage of completion program costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings (see Note 3b) and the
elimination of $507 million of B/E Aerospace capitalized development costs on long-term seller furnished equipment (SFE) contracts. Revenue for the SFE contracts is recognized on percentage of
completion (units of delivery) basis by B/E Aerospace but is expected to be recognized when realizable and earned, consistent with the guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin 104 (SAB 104), after
the merger in order to conform with Rockwell Collins' accounting policies. The transition from percentage of completion to SAB 104 revenue recognition for the SFE programs is not expected to
have a material impact on the timing of revenue recognition related to those programs, but will have an impact on the timing of costs as reflected in Note 3r.
-
d.
-
Goodwill
The adjustment reflects the elimination of $814 million of historical B/E Aerospace goodwill, offset by the addition of new goodwill resulting from the merger. The
$6.203 billion of estimated merger-related goodwill is based on the preliminary estimates and information summarized in Note 2.
-
e.
-
Intangible
assets
The
adjustment reflects the elimination of $221 million of historical B/E Aerospace intangible assets, offset by a preliminary fair value estimate of identifiable
intangible assets acquired. The intangible assets to be acquired primarily consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except estimated life)
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
Estimated
Life
|
Acquired airline customer relationships
|
|
$
|
1,490
|
|
10 years
|
Acquired OEM customer relationships
|
|
|
259
|
|
13 years
|
Acquired developed technology
|
|
|
709
|
|
12 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment, Intangible assets
|
|
$
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
f.
-
Deferred
income taxes
The net adjustment of $733 million, comprised of a $219 million reduction of deferred tax assets and a $514 million increase in deferred tax liabilities, is
primarily due to recording the deferred tax impact of the acquired intangibles which are not tax deductible and the impact of the inventory adjustments related to the SFE contracts.
-
g.
-
Other
assets
Adjustments
reflect changes in capitalized debt issuance costs due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Rockwell Collins new bridge loan funding fees
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Rockwell Collins new revolving credit facility fees
|
|
|
2
|
|
Rockwell Collins new term loan fees
|
|
|
2
|
|
Elimination of Rockwell Collins costs related to existing revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment, Other assets
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
Note 3h for additional discussion of the related changes in short and long-term debt associated with the merger.
181
Table of Contents
-
h.
-
Short-term
debt and Long-term debt, net
Adjustments
to Short-term debt and Long-term debt, net include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Rockwell Collins borrowings pursuant to bridge financing
|
|
$
|
4,350
|
|
Rockwell Collins borrowings pursuant to term loan facility
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Repayment of B/E Aerospace existing term loan facility
|
|
|
(2,064
|
)
|
Elimination of unamortized issuance costs on repayment of B/E Aerospace existing term loan facility
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,814
|
|
Less current portion of new term loan facility
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment, Long-term debt, net
|
|
$
|
3,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rockwell Collins expects to fund the cash component of the acquisition consideration and refinance debt acquired with the transaction by issuing up to $4.35 billion in aggregate
principal amount of senior unsecured notes in one or more public offerings and/or private placements and borrowing up to $1.5 billion under a new senior unsecured syndicated term loan facility.
Rockwell Collins has obtained a bridge loan commitment of $4.35 billion that would be drawn only to the extent some or all of the senior unsecured notes described above are not issued prior to
consummation of the acquisition. Rockwell Collins also plans to enter into an agreement to extend the duration of its current five-year revolving credit facility by approximately three years and
increase the amount available under the facility to $1.5 billion from $1.2 billion currently available under its five-year and 364-day facilities. There can be no assurance that Rockwell
Collins will finance the merger in the manner and amounts as anticipated.
Rockwell
Collins has assumed, for purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements, that it will borrow $4.35 billion under the bridge facility and
$1.5 billion under a new term loan facility. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of September 30, 2016 has been adjusted to reflect the merger as if it occurred
on September 30, 2016, and consequently, in connection with obtaining the committed debt financing on such date, approximately $28 million of financing costs were recorded in Other
Assets on the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet.
As
noted above, Rockwell Collins anticipates that some or all of the bridge facility will be replaced prior to funding by the issuance of debt securities. Further, at or shortly after
completion of the merger, Rockwell Collins expects to repay the outstanding $2.064 billion principal amount of B/E Aerospace's existing term loan facility, which includes
$28 million unamortized issuance costs. Based on this anticipated debt financing and repayment of debt, Rockwell Collins estimates that the debt issuance costs (including underwriting fees and
related expenses) related to the $4.35 billion senior unsecured notes, rather than the bridge facility, would increase from $22 million to approximately $40 million, and that the
amortization, recorded as interest expense, would decrease from $22 million to approximately $4 million for the year ended September 30, 2016. Actual amounts could differ from
these assumptions.
-
i.
-
Accounts
payable
The
adjustments reflect the accrual of $33 million of Rockwell Collins estimated transaction related costs and $65 million of B/E Aerospace estimated transaction
costs.
-
j.
-
Current
liabilities
The
adjustments reflect the reclassification of $563 million of B/E Aerospace current liabilities from Accrued liabilities to Compensation and benefits
($83 million), Advance payments from customers
182
Table of Contents
($122 million),
Accrued customer incentives ($53 million), Product warranty costs ($105 million) and Other current liabilities ($200 million) in order to conform to
Rockwell Collins presentation.
-
k.
-
Compensation
and benefits
Adjustments
include the reclassification of $83 million of B/E Aerospace compensation and benefit liabilities from Accrued liabilities (see Note 3j) and the accrual
of $59 million in change of control severance obligations and transaction bonuses due to certain B/E Aerospace executives.
-
l.
-
Other
current liabilities
Adjustments
to Other current liabilities include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Reclassification from Accrued liabilities (see Note 3j)
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
Decrease in interest payable due to repayment of B/E Aerospace term loan facility
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Tax impact of transaction costs
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment, Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
m.
-
Shareowners'
equity
Adjustments
to Shareowners' equity include the elimination of B/E Aerospace's historical equity balances, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Common stock
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
819
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
(1,419
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
149
|
|
Common stock in treasury, at cost
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment, Shareowners' equity
|
|
$
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
n.
-
Additional
paid-in capital
Adjustments include $2.894 billion of new equity related to the issuance of Rockwell Collins common shares as merger consideration (see Note 2) and the elimination of
B/E Aerospace's historical deficit of $819 million (see Note 3m).
-
o.
-
Retained
earnings
Adjustments
to Retained earnings include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Elimination of B/E Aerospace historical balance (see Note 3m)
|
|
$
|
(1,419
|
)
|
Rockwell Collins transaction related costs
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Transaction bonuses due to certain B/E Aerospace executives
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Rockwell Collins bridge credit facility fees (see Note 3a)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Tax benefit of bridge facility costs and executive compensation
|
|
|
26
|
|
Rockwell Collins revolving credit facility fees
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment, Retained earnings
|
|
$
|
(1,482
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183
Table of Contents
Adjustments to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Income
The following pro forma adjustments have been reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of income:
-
p.
-
Revenues,
Product sales and Service sales
The
adjustments reflect reclassifications to reflect the segmentation of $2.862 billion of B/E Aerospace Revenues into Product sales ($2.793 billion) and Service
sales ($69 million) in order to conform to Rockwell Collins presentation. In addition, the adjustments reflect the elimination of $2 million of product sales between Rockwell Collins and
B/E Aerospace.
-
q.
-
Cost
of sales, Product cost of sales and Service cost of sales
The
adjustments reflect reclassifications to reflect the segmentation of $1.739 billion of B/E Aerospace Cost of sales into Product cost of sales ($1.707 billion)
and Service cost of sales ($32 million) in order to conform to Rockwell Collins presentation.
-
r.
-
Product
cost of sales
Adjustments
to Product cost of sales include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Amount
|
|
Reclassification of B/E Aerospace Cost of sales (see Note 3q)
|
|
$
|
1,707
|
|
Reclassification of B/E Aerospace Research, development and engineering costs (see Note 3t)
|
|
|
275
|
|
Amortization of new acquired intangible assets (see Note 3e)
|
|
|
228
|
|
Expense net costs capitalized for long-term SFE contracts (see Note 3c)
|
|
|
101
|
|
Eliminate B/E Aerospace historical intangible asset amortization expense
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Eliminate costs related to sales between Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment, Product cost of sales
|
|
$
|
2,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
amortization expense of new acquired intangible assets reflects straight-line amortization utilizing the asset values and useful lives described in Note 3e. The elimination of
net costs capitalized for program assets represents the net increase in capitalized program assets during the 12 months ended September 30, 2016.
-
s.
-
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
Adjustments
reflect the net decrease in compensation expense related to certain B/E Aerospace executives and Board members for whom employment terminates immediately upon change
in control in accordance with existing employment arrangements.
-
t.
-
Research,
development and engineering
The
adjustment reflects the reclassification of $275 million of B/E Aerospace research, development and engineering costs from Research, development and engineering to
Product cost of sales in order to conform to Rockwell Collins presentation.
184
Table of Contents
-
u.
-
Interest
expense
Adjustments
reflect the net increase in interest expense and debt issuance cost amortization related to new debt to finance a portion of the acquisition and the repayment of the existing
debt of B/E Aerospace as presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Amount
|
|
For new debt related to the acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
Bridge loan interest expense
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
Term loan interest expense
|
|
|
38
|
|
Bridge loan issuance cost amortization
|
|
|
22
|
|
Term loan issuance cost amortization
|
|
|
1
|
|
Credit facility issuance cost amortization
|
|
|
3
|
|
For debt expected to be repaid pursuant to the acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
B/E Aerospace term loan interest expense
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
B/E Aerospace term loan issuance cost amortization
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Rockwell Collins credit facility issuance cost amortization
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment, Interest expense
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
0.125 percent variance in the variable interest rate for the bridge facility would change interest expense for the year ended September 30, 2016 by approximately
$5 million. A 0.125% variance in the variable interest rate for the term loan would change interest expense for the year ended September 30, 2016 by approximately $2 million.
As described in Note 3h, Rockwell Collins anticipates that some or all of the bridge facility will be replaced prior to funding by proceeds from the issuance of new debt
securities. Based on this anticipated debt financing and loan repayment, Rockwell Collins estimates that interest expense related to the $4.35 billion senior unsecured notes, rather than the
bridge facility, would increase from $101 million to approximately $166 million, and that the amortization, recorded as interest expense, would decrease from $22 million to
approximately $4 million for the year ended September 30, 2016. Further, Rockwell Collins would incur additional post-funding fees under the bridge facility which would be avoided by
issuing debt securities. These post-funding fees have not been reflected as an adjustment to the unaudited pro forma income statement, as these fees would not have a continuing impact on the combined
results of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace.
-
v.
-
Income
tax expense
Adjustment
reflects the applicable tax provision on the pro forma adjustments presented in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of income. The pro forma adjustments
pertain primarily to the U.S. tax jurisdiction, and are subject to a 35% federal tax rate, plus applicable state taxes.
185
Table of Contents
COMPARISON OF RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS
OF ROCKWELL COLLINS AND B/E AEROSPACE
Both Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace are incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware and, accordingly, the rights of the
stockholders of each are currently governed by the DGCL. Rockwell Collins will continue to be a Delaware corporation following completion of the merger and will be governed by the DGCL.
Upon
completion of the merger, the B/E Aerospace stockholders immediately prior to the effective time will become Rockwell Collins stockholders. The rights of the former B/E Aerospace
stockholders and the Rockwell Collins stockholders will thereafter be governed by the DGCL and by Rockwell Collins' certificate of incorporation and by-laws.
The following description summarizes the material differences between the rights of the stockholders of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace based on their respective current certificates
of incorporation and by-laws and the DGCL, but is not a complete statement of all those differences, or a complete description of the specific provisions referred to in this summary. Stockholders
should read carefully the relevant provisions of the DGCL and the respective current certificates of incorporation and by-laws of Rockwell Collins and B/E Aerospace. For more information on how to
obtain the documents that are not attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus, see "Where You Can Find More Information" beginning on page 197.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Rockwell Collins Stockholders
|
|
Rights of B/E Aerospace Stockholders
|
Authorized Capital Stock
|
|
The authorized capital stock of Rockwell Collins consists of 1,000,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, without par value.
|
|
The authorized capital stock of B/E Aerospace consists of 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.
|
Special Meetings of Stockholders
|
|
Under the DGCL, a special meeting of stockholders may be called by the board of directors or by any other person authorized to do so in the certificate of incorporation or bylaws.
|
|
|
Rockwell Collins' certificate of incorporation and by-laws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be called only by the Rockwell Collins Board pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the Rockwell
Collins Board.
|
|
B/E Aerospace's by-laws provide that special meetings of B/E Aerospace stockholders may only be called by the chairman of the B/E Aerospace Board, if any, the president or the secretary (or in the case of
death, absence, incapacity or refusal of the secretary, by an assistant secretary or some other officer) upon application of a majority of the B/E Aerospace Board.
|
Stockholder Proposals and Nominations of Candidates for Election to the Board of Directors
|
|
Rockwell Collins' by-laws allow stockholders who are record holders on the date of notice and on the date of the annual meeting to nominate candidates for election to the Rockwell Collins Board and to propose business
to be brought before such annual meeting.
|
|
B/E Aerospace's by-laws allow stockholders to propose business to be brought before an annual meeting and allow stockholders who are record holders on the date of notice and on the record date for the determination of
stockholders entitled to vote at such annual meeting to nominate candidates for election to the B/E Aerospace Board.
|
186
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Rockwell Collins Stockholders
|
|
Rights of B/E Aerospace Stockholders
|
|
|
Such proposals (other than proposals included in the notice of meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act) and nominations, however, may only be brought by a stockholder who has given timely
notice in proper written form to Rockwell Collins' secretary prior to the meeting.
|
|
Such proposals (other than proposals included in the notice of meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act) and nominations, however, may only be brought by a stockholder who has given timely
notice in proper written form to B/E Aerospace's secretary prior to the meeting.
|
|
|
In connection with an annual meeting, to be timely, notice of such proposals and nominations must be delivered to the secretary at Rockwell Collins' principal executive office not less than 120 days nor more than
150 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the meeting is not within 30 days before or 60 days after such date, notice by the stockholder
must be received no earlier than 150 days prior to such meeting and no later than the later of 120 days prior to the meeting or, if the first public announcement of such meeting is less than 130 days prior to such meeting, the
10th day following the day on which disclosure of the date of the annual meeting was first made by Rockwell Collins.
|
|
In connection with an annual meeting, to be timely, notice of such proposals and nominations must be delivered to or mailed and received by the secretary at B/E Aerospace's principal executive offices not less than
90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the meeting is not within 30 days before or 70 days after such date,
notice by the stockholder must be received not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which notice of the date of the annual meeting was publicly announced.
|
Number of Directors
|
|
The DGCL provides that the board of directors of a Delaware corporation must consist of one or more directors, with the number of directors fixed by or in the manner provided in the corporation's bylaws unless the
certificate of incorporation fixes the number of directors.
|
|
|
Rockwell Collins' certificate of incorporation, and by-laws provide that the number of directors will be fixed from time to time exclusively pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the Rockwell Collins
Board.
|
|
The B/E Aerospace certificate of incorporation and by-laws provide that the B/E Aerospace Board will consist of not less than three nor more than nine directors.
|
|
|
There are currently nine positions authorized and nine directors serving on the Rockwell Collins Board.
|
|
There are currently seven positions authorized and seven directors serving on the B/E Aerospace Board.
|
Election of Directors
|
|
The DGCL provides that, unless the certificate of incorporation or bylaws provide otherwise, directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting
and entitled to vote on the election of directors.
|
187
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Rockwell Collins Stockholders
|
|
Rights of B/E Aerospace Stockholders
|
|
|
Rockwell Collins' certificate of incorporation and by-laws provide that the Rockwell Collins Board is divided into three classes of directors serving staggered three-year terms. Each class, to the extent possible, will be
equal in number. Each class holds office until the third annual stockholders' meeting for election of directors following the most recent election of such class.
|
|
B/E Aerospace's certificate of incorporation and by-laws provide that the B/E Aerospace Board is divided into three classes of directors serving staggered three-year terms. Each class holds office until the third annual
stockholders' meeting for election of directors following the most recent election of such class.
|
|
|
Rockwell Collins' directors are elected according to the DGCL statute summarized above, except that the Rockwell Collins Board has a majority voting policy for the election of directors pursuant to which, in an
uncontested election of directors, any nominee for director who receives more "withheld" votes than "for" votes must promptly tender his or her resignation to the Rockwell Collins Board. The Rockwell Collins Board's Nominating and Governance
Committee will promptly consider the resignation offer and make a recommendation to the Rockwell Collins Board as to whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation and whether other actions should be taken. The Rockwell Collins Board will act
on the tendered resignation within 90 days following certification of the election results. The Rockwell Collins Board's Nominating and Governance Committee and the Rockwell Collins Board, in making such decisions, may consider any factors or
other information that it considers appropriate and relevant.
|
|
B/E Aerospace's by-laws provide that a plurality of the votes properly cast for election to any office will elect to such office. The election of B/E Aerospace directors in uncontested elections is governed by a
"plurality plus" standard, pursuant to which any director candidate who receives more "withhold" votes than votes "for" election shall tender his or her resignation from the B/E Aerospace Board. The Executive Chairman will then consider such
resignation, taking into account B/E Aerospace's interests and any current or foreseeable factors or circumstances relating to such director, and recommend to the B/E Aerospace Board the action to be taken with respect to such resignation.
The B/E Aerospace Board then shall act on such recommendation relative to the tendered resignation.
|
Removal of Directors
|
|
Rockwell Collins' certificate of incorporation provides that directors may only be removed for cause and by the affirmative vote of 80% of the outstanding shares of Rockwell Collins capital stock entitled to vote
generally in the election of directors.
|
|
B/E Aerospace's certificate of incorporation and by-laws provide that any director may be removed, only for cause, and only by the affirmative vote of holders of not less than two-thirds of the total number of votes
of the then outstanding shares of capital stock of B/E Aerospace entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, but only if notice of such proposal was contained in the notice of such meeting.
|
188
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Rockwell Collins Stockholders
|
|
Rights of B/E Aerospace Stockholders
|
Limitation on Liability of Directors
|
|
Rockwell Collins' certificate of incorporation provides that no director will be personally liable to Rockwell Collins or any of its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for
liability for (i) any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to Rockwell Collins or its stockholders, (ii) acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) unlawful
payment of dividends, stock purchase or redemption pursuant to Section 174 of the DGCL or (iv) any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
|
|
B/E Aerospace's certificate of incorporation provides that no director will be personally liable to B/E Aerospace or its stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duty by the director as a director,
except that a director shall be liable to the extent that exculpation from liabilities is not permitted under the DGCL as in effect at the time such liability is determined.
|
Indemnification of Directors and Officers
|
|
Under the DGCL, a Delaware corporation must indemnify its present or former directors and officers against expenses (including attorneys' fees) actually and reasonably incurred to the extent that the officer or director
has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding brought against him or her by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director or officer of the corporation.
|
|
|
Delaware law provides that a corporation may indemnify its present and former directors, officers, employees and agents, as well as any individual serving with another corporation in that capacity at the corporation's
request against expenses (including attorney's fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement of actions taken, if the individual acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the
corporation and, in the case of a criminal proceeding, the individual had no reasonable cause to believe the individual's conduct was unlawful; except that no indemnification may be paid for judgments and settlements in actions by or in the right of
the corporation.
|
|
|
A corporation may not indemnify a current or former director or officer of the corporation against expenses to the extent the person is adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless a court approves the
indemnity.
|
189
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Rockwell Collins Stockholders
|
|
Rights of B/E Aerospace Stockholders
|
|
|
Rockwell Collins' by-laws provide that Rockwell Collins indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding of any nature,
whether civil, criminal, administrative, regulatory, arbitral or investigative (including actions or suits by or in the right of Rockwell Collins to procure a judgment), by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee
or agent of Rockwell Collins or any of its majority-owned subsidiaries (or any other entity at Rockwell Collins' request) against expenses, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection
with such action, suit or proceeding if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of Rockwell Collins and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no
reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful; except, with regard to actions or suits by or in the right of Rockwell Collins to procure a judgment, no indemnification will be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which
the claimant has been adjudged to be liable to Rockwell Collins, unless the Court of Chancery of Delaware or the court in which the action or suit was brought determines that, despite the adjudication of such liability, that claimant is fairly and
reasonably entitled to indemnity for the expenses which such court deems proper.
|
|
The B/E Aerospace certificate of incorporation requires B/E Aerospace to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or
proceeding by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of B/E Aerospace against expenses, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit
or proceeding to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, as long as the action, suit, proceeding, claim or counterclaim was not initiated by or on behalf of such person. B/E Aerospace is also required under its certificate of incorporation to
advance, to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware, expenses incurred in connection with any such action, suit or proceeding.
|
|
|
In the case of indemnification pursuant to the above described provisions, indemnification will be made only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that indemnification is proper in accordance with
the standards described above.
|
|
Any person seeking indemnification under the provision described above will be deemed to have met the standard of conduct required for such indemnification unless the contrary is established.
|
190
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Rockwell Collins Stockholders
|
|
Rights of B/E Aerospace Stockholders
|
|
|
In the event there has been no change of control of Rockwell Collins resulting in the acquisition by, with certain customary restrictions, any individual, person or group of 20% or more of the shares of common stock or
combined voting power then entitled to vote in the election of directors, referred to later in this paragraph as a change of control, such determination will be made by, (i) in the case of present or former directors or officers of Rockwell
Collins, either a majority of disinterested directors on the Rockwell Collins Board or, if there are no disinterested directors or if such disinterested directors so choose, by independent counsel or the stockholders of Rockwell Collins, or
(ii) in the case of a person who is not a present or former director or officer of Rockwell Collins, by the chief executive officer or another officer authorized by the Rockwell Collins Board. In the event there has been a change of control,
such determination will be made by independent counsel or (at the claimant's request) the Rockwell Collins Board or an officer of Rockwell Collins authorized to make such determination (in the case of a present or former officer or director of
Rockwell Collins). Claimants will also be indemnified against expenses actually and reasonably incurred in cooperating with the person or entity making the determination of entitlement to indemnification.
|
|
|
|
|
Under Rockwell Collins' by-laws, directors, officers, employees or agents of Rockwell Collins who are successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any of the above described actions, suits and proceedings by
reason of the fact that such person was a director, officer, employee or agent of Rockwell Collins will be indemnified against expenses actually and reasonably incurred by or on behalf of such person in connection therewith.
|
|
|
191
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Rockwell Collins Stockholders
|
|
Rights of B/E Aerospace Stockholders
|
|
|
Rockwell Collins' by-laws also provide that persons who are witnesses in the above described actions, suits and proceedings by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of
Rockwell Collins or any of its majority-owned subsidiaries (or any other entity at Rockwell Collins' request) will be indemnified against all expenses actually and reasonably incurred by or on behalf of such person in connection
therewith.
|
|
|
Amendments to Certificate of Incorporation
|
|
Under the DGCL, an amendment to the certificate of incorporation generally requires (i) the approval of the board of directors, (ii) the approval of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding stock
entitled to vote upon the proposed amendment and (iii) the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding stock of each class entitled to vote thereon as a class, if any.
|
|
|
Rockwell Collins' certificate of incorporation provides that the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the then outstanding voting stock of Rockwell Collins is required to amend, alter,
change or repeal, or adopt any provision of the certificate of incorporation inconsistent with, certain designated provisions relating to (i) the number and classification of the Rockwell Collins Board, removal of Rockwell Collins directors,
filling vacancies on the Rockwell Collins Board and the exemption of members of the Rockwell Collins Board for monetary damages related to breaches of fiduciary duty in certain circumstances and (ii) amendment of the certificate of
incorporation.
|
|
B/E Aerospace's certificate of incorporation provides that the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the total number of votes of the then outstanding shares of capital stock of B/E Aerospace entitled to
vote generally in the election of directors is required to amend or repeal, or adopt any provision inconsistent with the purpose or intent of, the provision in the certificate of incorporation relating to the classification of the B/E Aerospace Board
and removal of B/E Aerospace directors.
|
|
|
In all other instances, the DGCL standard for amendment to the certificate of incorporation described above applies.
|
|
In all other instances, the DGCL standard for amendment to the certificate of incorporation described above applies.
|
192
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Rockwell Collins Stockholders
|
|
Rights of B/E Aerospace Stockholders
|
Amendments to Bylaws
|
|
Rockwell Collins' certificate of incorporation and by-laws provide that the Rockwell Collins Board may make, alter, amend and repeal the Rockwell Collins by-laws, subject to the power of the holders of capital stock of
Rockwell Collins to alter or repeal the by-laws made by the Rockwell Collins Board; however, any such amendment or repeal by stockholders of Rockwell Collins will require the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the
then outstanding voting stock of Rockwell Collins, voting together as a single class.
|
|
B/E Aerospace's by-laws provide that the by-laws may be adopted, amended or repealed by a vote of a majority of the directors then in office or by vote of a majority of the stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Any
by-law, whether adopted, amended or repealed by the stockholders or directors, may be amended or reinstated by the stockholders or the directors.
|
Certain Business Combinations
|
|
Section 203 of the DGCL prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination with a stockholder acquiring more than 15% but less than 85% of the corporation's outstanding voting stock for three
years following the time that person becomes an "interested stockholder," unless prior to such date the board of directors approves either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested
stockholder or the business combination is approved by the board of directors and by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder or certain other exceptions are met. The
DGCL allows a corporation's certificate of incorporation to contain a provision expressly electing not to be governed by Section 203.
|
|
|
Rockwell Collins' certificate of incorporation includes restrictions on certain business combinations (discussed further below) in addition to the protections of the provisions of Section 203 of the DGCL
discussed above. Because Rockwell Collins has not opted out of Section 203 of the DGCL, it remains subject to such provision.
|
|
B/E Aerospace's certificate of incorporation does not contain a provision electing not to be governed by Section 203 of the DGCL, and so B/E Aerospace is subject to such provision.
|
193
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of Rockwell Collins Stockholders
|
|
Rights of B/E Aerospace Stockholders
|
|
|
Certain business combinations (or the agreements to enter into such business combinations) with interested stockholders (generally defined as persons beneficially owning voting stock of Rockwell Collins that represents
10% or more of votes then entitled to be cast), including (i) mergers or consolidations with interested stockholders or their affiliates, (ii) sales or other dispositions to interested stockholders of assets or securities of Rockwell
Collins with a fair market value of $25 million or more, (iii) adoption of any plan of liquidation or dissolution proposed by an interested stockholder or (iv) reclassification of securities (including any reverse stock split) or
recapitalization or consolidation of Rockwell Collins that increases the proportionate share of capital stock of Rockwell Collins held by an interested stockholder, each require the approval of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the
then outstanding voting stock of Rockwell Collins, unless such business combination is approved by at least two-thirds of continuing directors (generally defined as directors not affiliated with the respective interested stockholder and those elected
to succeed a continuing director by two-thirds of remaining continuing directors) or if certain price and procedure requirements designed to ensure certain minimum values of consideration to be paid to holders of Rockwell Collins capital stock have
been met.
|
|
|
Stockholder Rights Plan
|
|
Rockwell Collins does not have a stockholder rights plan currently in effect.
|
|
B/E Aerospace does not have a stockholder rights plan currently in effect.
|
194
Table of Contents
Section 3.2
Capitalization; Subsidiaries
.
(a) As
of the close of business on October 17, 2016 (the "
Capitalization Date
"), the authorized capital stock of the
Company consisted of (i) 200,000,000 shares of Company Common Stock, 101,603,153 of which were issued and outstanding (including outstanding Company Restricted Stock Awards representing
1,480,641 shares of Company Common Stock) and 5,964,264 of which were held by the Company as treasury stock, and (ii) 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per
share ("
Company Preferred Stock
"), no shares of which were outstanding. There are no other classes of capital stock of the Company and no bonds,
debentures, notes or other Indebtedness of the Company having the right to vote (or convertible into or exercisable for securities having the right to vote) on any matters on which holders of capital
stock of the Company may vote authorized, issued or outstanding. As of the close of business on the Capitalization Date, there were (A) no outstanding Company Options to purchase shares of
Company Common Stock, (B) outstanding Company Restricted
Stock Awards representing 1,480,641 shares of Company Common Stock; (C) outstanding Company RSU Awards representing 265,191 shares of Company Common Stock, which amount may be increased to a
maximum of 386,226 shares of Company Common Stock based on the satisfaction of performance conditions set forth in the applicable award agreements; (D) outstanding Company DSU Awards
representing 42,813 shares of Company Common Stock; (E) 320,508 shares of Company Common Stock reserved for future issuance under the Company ESPP; and (F) 4,532,252 shares of Company
Common Stock reserved for future issuance under the Company Equity Plan. From the close of business on the Capitalization Date through the date of this Agreement, there have been no issuances of
(i) any Company Common Stock, Company Preferred Stock or any other equity or voting interests in the Company other than issuances of shares of Company Common Stock pursuant to the exercise,
vesting or settlement, as applicable, of the Company Equity Awards outstanding as of the close of business on the Capitalization Date in accordance with the terms of such Company Equity Awards or
under the Company ESPP in accordance with its terms and (ii) any Company Equity Awards or any other equity or equity-based awards.
(b) All
of the issued and outstanding shares of Company Common Stock have been, and all of the shares of Company Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to the Company
Equity Awards, the Company Equity Plan or the Company ESPP will be, when issued in accordance with the respective terms thereof, duly authorized and validly issued and are, or will be when issued,
fully paid, nonassessable and free of preemptive rights. The Company has made available to Parent or its counsel accurate and complete copies of the Company Equity Plan and the forms of stock option,
restricted stock and restricted stock unit agreements evidencing the Company Equity Awards and, other than differences with respect to the number of shares of Company Common Stock covered thereby, the
grant date, the exercise price, regular vesting schedule and expiration date applicable thereto, no such stock option, restricted stock or restricted stock unit agreement
A-10
Table of Contents
contains
material terms that are not consistent with, or in addition to, such forms.
Section 3.2(b) of the Company Disclosure Letter
sets forth,
as of the close of business on the Capitalization Date, each outstanding Company Equity Award and to the extent applicable, the name of the holder thereof, the number of shares of Company Common Stock
issuable thereunder (including target and maximum numbers for Company Equity Awards subject to performance-based vesting), the grant date, the vesting date, whether or not it is subject to
performance-based vesting and the Company Equity Plan pursuant to which the award was made. Each grant of Company Equity Awards was made in accordance with the terms of the Company Equity Plan, the
Exchange Act and all other applicable Laws, including the NASDAQ Listing Rules. All of the outstanding Company Common Stock has been sold pursuant to an effective registration statement filed under
the federal securities Laws or an appropriate exemption therefrom.
(c) As
of the date of this Agreement, other than as set forth in
Section 3.2(a)
, there are no (i) existing
options, warrants, calls, preemptive rights, subscriptions or other rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, convertible securities, agreements, arrangements or commitments of
any kind obligating the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to issue, transfer, register or sell, or cause to be issued, transferred, registered or sold, any shares of capital stock or other equity
interests of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or securities convertible into or exchangeable for such shares or other equity interests, or obligating the Company to grant, extend or enter into
such options, warrants, calls, preemptive, subscriptions or other rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, convertible securities, agreements, arrangements or commitments,
(ii) outstanding obligations of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any capital stock or other equity interests the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, or any securities representing the right to purchase or otherwise receive any capital stock or other equity interests of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, (iii) stockholder
agreements, voting trusts or similar agreements with any Person to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is party (A) restricting the transfer of the capital stock or other equity
interests of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or (B) affecting the voting rights of capital stock or other equity interests of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or
(iv) outstanding or authorized equity or equity-based compensation awards, including any equity appreciation rights, security-based performance units, "phantom" stock, profit-participation or
other security rights issued by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or other agreements, arrangements or commitments of any character (contingent or otherwise) to which the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is party, in each case pursuant to which any Person is entitled to receive any payment from the Company based in whole or in part on the value of any capital stock or other equity
interests of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
(d) Each
Subsidiary of the Company existing on the date of this Agreement is listed on
Section 3.2(d) of the Company Disclosure
Letter
. Except as set forth on
Section 3.2(d) of the Company Disclosure Letter
, the Company owns, beneficially and of
record, directly or indirectly, all of the issued and outstanding company, partnership, corporate or similar (as applicable) ownership, voting or similar interests in each such Subsidiary, free and
clear of all Liens, and all company, partnership, corporate or similar (as applicable) ownership, voting or similar interests of each of the Subsidiaries are duly authorized and validly issued and are
fully paid, nonassessable and free of preemptive rights. Except for the Subsidiaries listed on
Section 3.2(d) of the Company Disclosure Letter
and investments in marketable securities and cash equivalents, none of the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries (i) owns directly or indirectly any shares of capital stock or other equity
interests, or any securities or obligations convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for such shares or equity interests, in any Person or (ii) has any obligation or has made any
commitment to acquire any shares of capital stock or other equity interests in any Person or to provide funds to or make any investment (in the form of a loan, capital contribution or otherwise) in
any Person.
A-11
Table of Contents
Section 3.3
Authority Relative to Agreement
.
(a) The
Company has all necessary corporate power and authority to execute, deliver and perform its obligations under this Agreement and, subject (in the case of the Merger)
to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the Company, and the
consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary corporate action by the Company, and (in the case of the Merger,
except for the (i) receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval and (ii) filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Delaware Secretary of State) no other corporate action or proceeding
on the part of the Company is necessary to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by the Company and the consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Company and, assuming due authorization, execution and delivery of this Agreement by the other parties hereto, constitutes a
legal, valid and binding obligation of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with its terms, except that (A) such enforcement may be subject to applicable bankruptcy,
insolvency (including all Laws related to fraudulent transfers), reorganization, moratorium or other similar Laws, now or hereafter in effect, affecting creditors' rights and remedies generally and
(B) the remedies of specific performance and
injunctive and other forms of equitable relief may be subject to equitable defenses and to the discretion of the court before which any Proceeding therefor may be brought.
(b) The
Company Board has, by resolutions unanimously adopted by the Company Board, (i) approved this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
(ii) determined that this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are advisable and in the best interests of the Company and the Company's stockholders,
(iii) directed that the adoption of this Agreement be submitted to a vote at the Company Stockholders' Meeting and (iv) resolved to make the Company Recommendation;
provided
that any change,
modification or rescission of such Company Recommendation by the Company Board in accordance with this Agreement shall not be
a breach of the representation in this clause (iv). As of the date of this Agreement, none of the aforesaid actions by the Company Board have been amended, rescinded or modified.
Section 3.4
Vote Required
.
Assuming the accuracy of the representations and warranties in
Section 4.26
, the adoption of this Agreement and the approval of
transactions contemplated by this Agreement by the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of Company Common Stock entitled to vote thereon at the Company Stockholders' Meeting (the
"
Company Stockholder Approval
") is the only vote of holders of securities of the Company that is required in connection with the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 3.5
No Conflict; Required Filings and Consents
.
(a) Neither
the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Company nor the consummation by the Company of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, nor
compliance by the Company with any of the applicable terms or provisions of this Agreement, will (i) violate any provision of the Company's Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws or the
certificate of incorporation or bylaws (or equivalent organizational documents) of any Subsidiary of the Company, (ii) assuming that the Consents, registrations, declarations, filings and
notices referenced in
Section 3.5(b)
have been obtained or made and (in the case of the Merger) the Company Stockholder Approval has been
received, conflict with or violate any Law applicable to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or by which any property or asset of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is bound or affected or
(iii) violate, conflict with or result in any breach of any provision of, or loss of any benefit, or constitute a default (with or without notice or lapse of time, or both) under, give rise to
any right of termination, acceleration or cancellation of or require the
A-12
Table of Contents
Consent
of, notice to or filing with any third party pursuant to any of the terms or provisions of any Contract to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or by which any property or
asset of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is bound or affected, or result in the creation of a Lien, other than any Permitted Lien, upon any of the property or assets of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries, other than, in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii), any such conflict, violation, breach, default, termination, acceleration, cancellation or Lien that (A) has not had,
and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect or (B) would not impair in any material respect the ability of the Company to
perform its obligations under this Agreement or to consummate the Merger, or would not prevent or materially delay the consummation of any of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
(b) No
consent, approval, license, permit, order or authorization (a "
Consent
") of, registration, declaration or filing with
or notice to any Governmental Authority is required to be obtained or made by or with respect to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries in connection with the execution, delivery and performance of
this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, other than (i) applicable requirements of and filings with the SEC under the Exchange Act or the
Securities Act (including the filing with the SEC of the Form S-4 and the Joint Proxy Statement), (ii) the filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Delaware Secretary of State,
(iii) applicable requirements under corporation, state securities or "blue sky" laws of various states, (iv) compliance with applicable rules and regulations of the NYSE and NASDAQ,
(v) such other items required solely by reason of the participation of Parent in the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, (vi) compliance with and filings or notifications under
the HSR Act and any other applicable United States or foreign competition, antitrust, merger control or investment Laws (together with the HSR Act, "
Antitrust
Laws
") and (vii) such other Consents, registrations, declarations, filings or notices the failure of which to be obtained or made (A) has not had, and would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect or (B) would not impair in any material respect the ability of the Company to perform its
obligations under this Agreement or to consummate the Merger, or would not prevent or materially delay the consummation of any of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 3.6
Company SEC Documents; Financial Statements
.
(a) Since
December 31, 2014, the Company has timely filed with (or furnished to) the SEC all forms, reports, schedules, statements, exhibits and other documents
(including exhibits, financial statements and schedules thereto and all other information incorporated therein and amendments and supplements thereto) required by it to be filed (or furnished) under
the Exchange Act or the Securities Act (collectively, the "
Company SEC Documents
"). As of its filing (or furnishing) date or, if amended prior to the
date of this Agreement, as of the date of the last such amendment, each Company SEC Document complied in all material respects with the applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and
the Securities Act, as the case may be. As of its filing date or, if amended prior to the date of this Agreement, as of the date of the last such amendment, each Company SEC Document filed pursuant to
the Exchange Act did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. Each Company SEC Document that is a registration statement, as amended or supplemented, if applicable, filed pursuant to the
Securities Act, as of the date such registration statement or amendment became effective prior to the date of this Agreement, did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements made therein not misleading. As of the date of this Agreement, there are no amendments or modifications to
the Company SEC Documents that were
A-13
Table of Contents
required
to be filed with (or furnished to) the SEC prior to the date of this Agreement, but that have not yet been filed with (or furnished to) the SEC. No Subsidiary of the Company is subject to the
periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. All of the audited financial statements and unaudited interim financial statements of the Company included in the Company SEC Documents
(i) comply in all material respects with the applicable accounting requirements and with the published rules and regulations of the SEC with respect thereto; (ii) have been prepared in
accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis during the periods involved (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto and except, in the case of the unaudited interim statements, as may be
permitted under Form 10-Q of the Exchange Act); and (iii) fairly present in all material respects the financial position, the stockholders' equity, the results of operations and cash
flows of the Company and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of the times and for the periods referred to therein (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto and subject, in the case of unaudited
interim financial statements, to normal and recurring year-end adjustments).
(b) The
Company has heretofore furnished to Parent complete and correct copies of all comment letters from the SEC since December 31, 2014 through the date of this
Agreement with respect to any of the Company SEC Documents, together with all written responses of the Company thereto. As of the date of this Agreement, there are no outstanding or unresolved
comments in comment letters received from the SEC staff with respect to any of the Company SEC Documents, and, to the Knowledge of the Company, none of the Company SEC Documents are subject to ongoing
SEC review.
(c) The
Company is in compliance in all material respects with the applicable provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the applicable listing and governance rules and
regulations of NASDAQ.
(d) The
Company maintains a system of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the Company's financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in conformity with GAAP. The Company has evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting and, to the extent required by applicable Law, presented in any applicable Company SEC Document that is a report on
Form 10-K or Form 10-Q or any amendment thereto its conclusions about the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by such
report or amendment based on such evaluation. Based on the Company's most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting prior to the date of this Agreement, (i) the Company has
no "significant deficiencies" or "material weaknesses" (as such terms are defined in Auditing Standard No. 5 of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, as in effect on the date of this
Agreement) in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information and (ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.
(e) The
Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) designed to ensure that all information
required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules
and forms of the SEC, and that all such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and to make the
certifications of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Company required under the Exchange Act with respect to such reports.
A-14
Table of Contents
(f) To
the Knowledge of the Company, as of the date of this Agreement, there are no SEC inquiries or investigations, other inquiries or investigations by Governmental
Authorities or internal investigations pending or threatened, in each case regarding any accounting practices of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any malfeasance by any director or executive
officer of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. Since December 31, 2014 through the date of this Agreement, there have been no material internal investigations regarding accounting or
revenue recognition discussed with, reviewed by or initiated at the direction of the chief executive officer, chief financial officer or general counsel, the Company Board or any committee thereof.
(g) Each
of the principal executive officer of the Company and the principal financial officer of the Company (or each former principal executive officer of the Company and
each former principal financial officer of the Company, as applicable) has made all certifications required by Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 under the Exchange Act and Sections 302 and 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act with respect to the Company SEC Documents, and the statements contained in such certifications are true and accurate. For purposes of this Agreement, "principal executive
officer" and "principal financial officer" shall
have the meanings given to such terms in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Company does not have, and has not arranged any, outstanding "extensions of credit" to directors or executive officers within the
meaning of Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
(h) Since
December 31, 2014, (i) neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any written or, to the Knowledge of the Company, oral complaint,
allegation, assertion or claim regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing practices, procedures, methodologies or methods of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or unlawful
accounting or auditing matters with respect to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries and (ii) no attorney representing the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, whether or not employed by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, has reported evidence of a violation of securities Laws, breach of fiduciary duty or similar violation by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their
respective officers, directors, employees or agents to the Company Board or any committee thereof or to the general counsel or chief executive officer of the Company pursuant to the rules of the SEC
adopted under Section 307 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, except, in each case, as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to
the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
(i) Neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to, or has any commitment to become a party to, any joint venture, off-balance sheet partnership or any
similar Contract (including any Contract or arrangement relating to any transaction or relationship between or among the Company and any of its Subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any unconsolidated
affiliate, on the other hand), including any structured finance, special purpose or limited purpose entity or Person, or any "off-balance sheet arrangements" (as defined in Item 303(a) of
Regulation S-K under the Securities Act), where the result, purpose or effect of such Contract is to avoid disclosure of any material transaction involving, or material liabilities of, the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries in the Company SEC Documents (including any audited financial statements and unaudited interim financial statements of the Company included therein).
Section 3.7
Absence of Certain Changes or Events
.
Since December 31, 2014 through the date of this Agreement, (a) except in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, the respective businesses of the
Company and its Subsidiaries have been conducted in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and (b) there has not been any event, development or state of circumstances
that has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.8
No Undisclosed Liabilities
.
Except for liabilities or obligations (a) as (and to the extent) reflected, disclosed or reserved against in the Company's financial statements (or the notes
A-15
Table of Contents
thereto)
included in the Company SEC Documents prior to the date of this Agreement, (b) incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice since June 30, 2016,
(c) incurred in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or (d) that have not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate,
a Company Material Adverse Effect, none of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has any liabilities or obligations of any nature, whether or not accrued, contingent, absolute or otherwise and
whether or not required to be reflected on a consolidated balance sheet of the Company (or the notes thereto) in accordance with GAAP.
Section 3.9
Litigation
.
As of the date of this Agreement, (a) there is no Proceeding pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any asset or
property of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, and (b) neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries nor any asset or property of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is subject to a
continuing Order, in each case, that (i) has been, or would reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole or (ii) would reasonably be expected to, individually or in the aggregate, impair in any material respect the ability of the Company to perform its obligations under this Agreement or to
consummate the Merger, or prevent or materially delay the consummation of any of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 3.10
Permits; Compliance with Laws
.
(a) (i)
The Company and its Subsidiaries are in possession of all material franchises, grants, licenses, permits, easements, variances, exemptions, consents, certificates,
approvals, registrations, clearances, orders and other authorizations necessary for the Company and its Subsidiaries to own, lease and operate their respective properties and assets and to carry on
their respective businesses as now being conducted, under and pursuant to all applicable Laws (the "
Company Permits
"), (ii) all such Company
Permits are in full force and effect and (iii) as of the date of this Agreement, no suspension, cancellation, withdrawal or revocation thereof is pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company,
threatened, except where the failure to be in possession of, failure to be in full force and effect or the suspension, cancellation, withdrawal or revocation thereof has not had, and would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Since
December 31, 2014, the Company and its Subsidiaries have been and are in compliance with (i) all applicable Laws and (ii) all Company Permits,
except where any failure to be in such compliance has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(c) Since
December 31, 2014 through the date of this Agreement, none of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or, to the Knowledge of the Company, any of their
respective directors, officers or employees, has received any written or, to the Knowledge of the Company, oral notification from a Governmental Authority asserting that the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries is not in compliance with any Laws or Company Permits, except where any failure to be in such compliance has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section 3.11
Information Supplied
.
None of the information supplied or to be supplied by or on behalf of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries for inclusion or incorporation by reference in (a) the Form S-4
to be filed with the SEC by Parent in connection with the registration under the Securities Act of the shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued in the Merger (as amended or supplemented from time to
time, the "
Form S-4
") will, at the time the Form S-4 is filed with the SEC, and at any time it is amended or supplemented or at the time
it becomes effective under the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein, in light of the circumstances under
which they are made, not misleading and (b) the joint proxy
A-16
Table of Contents
statement
to be sent to the stockholders of Parent relating to the Parent Stockholders' Meeting and to the stockholders of the Company relating to the Company Stockholders' Meeting (the
"
Joint Proxy Statement
") will, at the date it, or any amendment or supplement to it, is mailed to stockholders of the Company and stockholders of Parent
and at the time of the Company Stockholders' Meeting and at the time of the Parent Stockholders' Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they are made, not misleading (except that no representation or warranty is made by the Company regarding such portions thereof that
relate expressly to Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, including Merger Sub, or to statements made therein based on information supplied by or on behalf of Parent or Merger Sub for inclusion or
incorporation by reference therein). The Joint Proxy Statement will comply as to form in all material respects with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder.
Section 3.12
Employee Benefit Plans; Labor
.
(a)
Section 3.12(a) of the Company Disclosure Letter
sets forth a true and complete list, as of the date of this
Agreement, of (i) each material "employee benefit plan" (as such term is defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA), whether written or unwritten, that the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any
Company ERISA Affiliate adopted, maintains, sponsors, participates in, is a party or contributes to or with respect to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, could reasonably
be expected to have any material liability; and (ii) each other material employment or employee benefit plan, program, practice, policy, arrangement or agreement, whether written or unwritten,
including any
equity option, equity purchase, equity appreciation right or other equity or equity-based incentive, cash bonus or incentive compensation, employment, change in control, retention, retirement or
supplemental retirement, deferred compensation, profit-sharing, unemployment, severance, termination pay, welfare, hospitalization or medical, life, accidental death and dismemberment, long- or
short-term disability, fringe benefit or other similar compensation or employee benefit plan, program, practice, policy, arrangement or agreement for any current or former employee or director of, or
other individual service provider to, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that does not constitute an "employee benefit plan" (as defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA, whether or not ERISA
applies), that the Company or any of its Subsidiaries adopted, maintains, sponsors, participates in, is a party or contributes to, or with respect to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries could
reasonably be expected to have any liability (each, a "
Company Benefit Plan
"). With respect to each Company Benefit Plan, the Company has made available
to Parent a true and complete copy of (i) such Company Benefit Plan and all material amendments thereto (including a written description of the material provisions of each unwritten Company
Benefit Plan), (ii) each trust, insurance, annuity or other funding Contract, (iii) the most recent financial statements and actuarial or other valuation reports, (iv) the three
most recent annual reports on Form 5500, (v) the most recent determination letter (or, if applicable, advisory or opinion letter) from the IRS, (vi) the most recent summary plan
description and any material modification and (vii) all material notices given to such Company Benefit Plan, the Company or any Company ERISA Affiliate by the IRS, United States Department of
Labor, Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation or other Governmental Authority.
(b) Except
as has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect, (i) each of the Company
Benefit Plans has been established, adopted, operated, maintained and administered in accordance with its terms and applicable Laws, including ERISA and the Code, (ii) all payments and
contributions required to be made under the terms of any Company Benefit Plan and applicable Laws have been timely made or accrued or otherwise adequately reserved to the extent required by and in
accordance with GAAP and (iii) none of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or, to the Knowledge of the Company, any third party, has engaged in any non-exempt "prohibited transaction"
(within the meaning of Section 4975 of the Code or Section 406 of ERISA) with respect to any Company Benefit Plan that would result in the imposition of any liability to the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries.
A-17
Table of Contents
(c) Each
Company Benefit Plan intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code has either received a favorable determination letter from the IRS with respect
to such Company Benefit Plan as to its qualified status under the Code, or with respect to a prototype Company Benefit Plan, the prototype sponsor has received a favorable IRS opinion letter, or the
Company Benefit Plan or prototype sponsor has remaining a period of time under applicable Code regulations or pronouncements of the IRS in which to apply for such a letter and make any amendments
necessary to obtain a favorable determination or opinion as to the qualified status of each such Company Benefit Plan. To the Knowledge of the Company, no event has occurred since the most recent
determination or opinion letter or application therefor relating to any such Company Benefit Plan and no condition exists that has been or would reasonably be expected to adversely affect the
qualified status of any such Company Benefit Plan or result in the imposition of any liability, penalty or tax under ERISA or the Code that is, individually or in the aggregate, material to the
Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
(d) Except
as has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect, neither the Company nor any
Company ERISA Affiliate operates, maintains, contributes to, is required to contribute to or sponsors (or has in the past six (6) years established, operated, maintained, contributed to, was
required to contribute to or sponsored) (i) a "multiemployer plan" (as defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA), (ii) a "multiple employer plan" (within the meaning of
Section 413(c) of the Code), (iii) a "single-employer plan" (within the meaning of
Section 4001(a)(15) of ERISA), or (iv) a "multiple employer welfare arrangement" (within the meaning of Section 3(40) of ERISA). Except as would be, or reasonably be expected to
be, individually or in the aggregate, a material liability to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, no Subsidiary or connected or associated Person has now or at any time participated
in, maintained or been liable to contribute to a defined benefit pension plan for the benefit or in respect of any employee or former employee. Neither the Company nor any Company ERISA Affiliate has
incurred, or reasonably expects to incur, directly or indirectly, any liability under Title IV of ERISA or related provisions of the Code that has been or would reasonably be expected to be,
individually or in the aggregate, material to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, and that has not been satisfied in full, other than liability for premiums due to the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation (which premiums have been paid when due) and no condition exists that presents a material risk of incurring such liability. All pension liabilities have been accrued for and fully
reflected as a liability in the Company's financial statements in accordance with GAAP.
(e) To
the Knowledge of the Company, no employee of the Company or any Subsidiary has any claim or right to an early retirement benefit for which the Company or any
Subsidiary may be liable following the transfer of their employment to the Company or applicable Subsidiary pursuant to the English Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment)
Regulations 1981 or 2006.
(f) Except
as has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect, as of the date of this
Agreement there are no pending, or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened Proceedings, disputes or claims (other than routine claims for benefits) against or affecting any Company Benefit Plan,
by any employee or beneficiary covered under such Company Benefit Plan, as applicable, or otherwise involving such Company Benefit Plan.
(g) Neither
the execution or delivery of nor performance of the Company's obligations under this Agreement nor the consummation of the Merger will, either alone or in
conjunction with any other event (including any termination of employment upon or following the consummation of the Merger), (i) entitle any current or former director or employee of, or
individual service provider to, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to any payment or benefit (or result in the funding of any such payment or benefit), except as expressly provided in this
Agreement, (ii) increase the
A-18
Table of Contents
amount
or value of any benefit or compensation otherwise payable or required to be provided to any such director, employee or individual service provider, (iii) accelerate the time of payment,
funding or vesting of amounts due any such director, employee or individual service provider or, except as provided
for in this Agreement, (iv) result in any "excess parachute payment" (within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code) becoming due to any current or former employee or other individual
service provider of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or (v) limit or restrict the right of Parent, the Surviving Corporation, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to merge, amend or
terminate any Company Benefit Plan (other than any requirement to obtain the signature of a counterparty to amend, modify or terminate such Company Benefit Plan).
(h) Except
as has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect, none of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries has any obligations for post-termination health, welfare or life insurance benefits under any Company Benefit Plan (other than for continuation coverage required to be provided
pursuant to Section 4980B of the Code) or coverage in which the full cost of such benefit is borne entirely by the former employee (or such former employee's eligible dependents or
beneficiaries).
(i) Except
as has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect, each Foreign Plan
(i) has been established, operated, maintained and administered in compliance with its terms and operated in compliance with all applicable Laws; (ii) if required to be registered or
approved by a non-U.S. Governmental Authority, has been registered or approved and has been maintained in good standing with applicable regulatory authorities, and, to the Knowledge of the Company, no
event has occurred since the date of the most recent approval or application therefor relating to any such Foreign Plan that would reasonably be expected to adversely affect any such approval or good
standing; (iii) that is intended to qualify for special Tax treatment meets all requirements for such treatment; (iv) is fully funded or fully insured on an ongoing and termination or
solvency basis (determined using reasonable actuarial assumptions) in compliance with applicable Laws; and (v) is not subject to any pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened
claims by or on behalf of any participant in any Foreign Plan, or otherwise involving any such Foreign Plan or the assets of any Foreign Plan, other than routine claims for benefits.
(j) Neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to or otherwise bound by any collective bargaining agreement, Contract or other labor-related agreement,
arrangement or understanding with a labor or trade union, or labor organization or works council (each a "
Labor Agreement
"), nor is any such Labor
Agreement presently being negotiated, nor, to the Knowledge of the Company, are there any employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries represented by a labor or trade union, labor organization
or works council. The Company has made available to Parent a true and complete copy of each Labor Agreement and all material amendments thereto. There are no organizing activities, representation
campaigns, certification proceedings or petitions seeking a representation proceeding pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened by or with respect to any of the employees of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries. Since December 31, 2014, there has not been any, and there are no pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened strikes, walkouts, lockouts, slowdowns or
other labor stoppages against or affecting the Company or its Subsidiaries.
(k) The
Company and its Subsidiaries are, and since December 31, 2014 have been, in compliance with the terms of the Company Benefits Plans, any applicable Labor
Agreement and all applicable Laws respecting or relating to recruitment, employment and employment practices, and agency and other workers, including all Laws respecting terms and conditions of
employment, health and safety, wages and hours, child labor, immigration, employment discrimination, disability rights or benefits, equal
opportunity, plant closures and layoffs, affirmative action, workers' compensation, labor relations, employee leave issues and unemployment insurance, except where
A-19
Table of Contents
failure
to comply has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect.
(l) Except
as has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect, the Company and its
Subsidiaries have been in compliance with all Laws applicable to "workers" (as defined in the English Employment Rights Act 1996), and "contractors" or "subcontractors" (in each case, as defined by
Executive Order 11246).
(m) Prior
to the date of this Agreement, the Company and its Subsidiaries have satisfied any pre-signing legal or contractual requirement to provide notice to, or to enter
into any consultation procedure with, any labor union, labor organization or works council, which is representing any employee, in connection with the execution of this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
(n) To
the Knowledge of the Company, no employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries who is an officer for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act is in any
respect in violation of any term of any employment agreement, nondisclosure agreement, common law nondisclosure obligation, fiduciary duty, non-competition agreement, restrictive covenant or other
obligation (i) to the Company or its Subsidiaries or (ii) to a former employer relating (A) to the right to be employed by the Company or its Subsidiaries or (B) to the
material misuse of trade secrets or proprietary information. No employee of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries who is an officer for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act has given
notice of intent to terminate or, to the Knowledge of the Company, intends to terminate his or her employment with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
Section 3.13
Taxes
.
(a) The
Company and each of its Subsidiaries have (i) timely filed or caused to be timely filed (taking into account any extension of time within which to file) all
material Tax Returns required to be filed by any of them and all such filed Tax Returns (taking into account all amendments thereto) are true, complete and accurate in all material respects and
(ii) paid all material Taxes due and owing (whether
or not shown on such Tax Returns), except, in the case of clause (ii) hereof, with respect to Taxes contested in good faith by appropriate Proceedings and for which adequate reserves or
accruals have been established in accordance with GAAP.
(b) The
unpaid Taxes of the Company and its Subsidiaries did not, as of the date of their most recent consolidated financial statements included in the Company SEC Documents
prior to the date of this Agreement, materially exceed the reserve or accrual for Tax liability (excluding any reserve for deferred Taxes established to reflect timing differences between book and Tax
income) set forth on the face of such consolidated financial statements (rather than in any notes thereto). Since the date of their most recent consolidated financial statements, none of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries has incurred any material liability for Taxes outside the ordinary course of business or otherwise inconsistent with past custom and practice.
(c) As
of the date of this Agreement, there are no pending, threatened in writing or ongoing audits, examinations, investigations or other Proceedings by any Governmental
Authority in respect of material Taxes of or with respect to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. None of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has waived any statute of limitations with respect
to material Taxes or agreed to any extension of time with respect to a material Tax assessment or deficiency. No written claim has been made by any Governmental Authority in a jurisdiction where the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries does not currently file a Tax Return that it is or may be subject to taxation by that jurisdiction in respect of Taxes that would be covered by or the subject
of such
A-20
Table of Contents
Tax
Return, nor has any such assertion been threatened or proposed in writing and received by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
(d) All
Taxes that the Company or any of its Subsidiaries are or were required by Law to withhold or collect have been duly and timely withheld or collected in all material
respects on behalf of its respective employees, independent contractors or other third parties and, have been timely paid to the proper Governmental Authority or other Person or properly set aside in
accounts for this purpose.
(e) None
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has ever been a member of a consolidated, combined or unitary Tax group (other than such a group the common parent of
which is the Company or any of its Subsidiaries), and, except with respect to the Tax Sharing and Indemnification Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2014, by and between KLX and the Company,
as amended as of the date
hereof by the KLX TSA Amendment (the "
KLX Tax Sharing Agreement
"), none of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has any liability for Taxes of any
other Person (other than Taxes of the Company or any Subsidiary) under Treasury Regulation Section 1.1502-6 (or any similar provision of foreign, state or local law), as a transferee or
successor, by Contract or otherwise.
(f) Except
with respect to the KLX Tax Sharing Agreement, none of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party to or is bound by any Tax sharing, Tax allocation or Tax
indemnification agreement or arrangement (other than such an agreement or arrangement exclusively between or among the Company and its Subsidiaries or customary commercial Contracts entered into in
the ordinary course of business, the principal subject matter of which is not Taxes) that will not be terminated on or before the Closing Date without any future liability to the Company or its
Subsidiaries.
(g) There
are no Liens for a material amount of Taxes on any of the assets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries other than Permitted Liens.
(h) None
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has participated in or been a party to a transaction that, as of the date of this Agreement, constitutes a "listed
transaction" that is required to be reported to the IRS pursuant to Section 6011 of the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations thereunder.
(i) Except
for the KLX External Spin-Off and the KLX Internal Restructuring, within the last two (2) years, none of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has been a
party to any transaction intended to qualify under Section 355 of the Code.
(j) Without
regard to the Merger, to the Knowledge of the Company, the KLX External Spin-Off qualified for the KLX Spin-Off Tax Treatment.
(k) Without
regard to the Merger, to the Knowledge of the Company, the KLX Internal Restructuring qualified for the Tax treatment of the KLX Internal Restructuring
originally reported on the relevant Tax Returns of the Company, KLX or applicable Subsidiary of either.
(l) The
Company and its Subsidiaries are and have been, and to the Knowledge of the Company, KLX is and has been, in compliance with the KLX Tax Sharing Agreement in all
material respects.
Section 3.14
Material Contracts
.
(a)
Section 3.14(a) of the Company Disclosure Letter
sets forth a complete and correct list, as of the date of this
Agreement, of each Company Material Contract, a complete and correct copy of each of which has been made available to Parent. For purposes of this Agreement, "
Company Material
Contract
" means any Contract to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party
A-21
Table of Contents
or
to or by which any asset or property of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is bound or affected, except for this Agreement, that:
(i) is
a Contract with a vendor providing for payments of more than $25,000,000 in the past twelve (12) months or expected to require payments of more than
$25,000,000 within twelve (12) months of the date of this Agreement (it being understood that the Company is not making any representation or warranty as to the actual amount of future payments
to be paid under any such Contract);
(ii) is
a Contract with a customer providing for payments of more than $50,000,000 in the past twelve (12) months or expected to require payments of more than
$50,000,000 within twelve (12) months of the date of this Agreement (it being understood that the Company is not making any representation or warranty as to the actual amount of future payments
to be received under any such Contract);
(iii) constitutes
a "material contract" (as such term is defined in item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act) of the Company and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, and is required to be filed with the SEC;
(iv) is
a joint venture, strategic alliance, partnership, shareholder or similar Contract that is material to the operation of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole;
(v) is
a management or service consulting Contract providing for annual payments of more than $2,500,000;
(vi) is
an agency, sales, marketing, commission, export, customs, distribution, advertising, dealer, franchise, international or domestic sales representative or similar
Contract providing for annual payments of more than $15,000,000;
(vii) is
a Contract (other than those between or among the Company and any of its Subsidiaries) relating to Indebtedness of the Company (whether outstanding or as may be
incurred) in an amount in excess of $25,000,000;
(viii) is
a Contract (other than those between or among the Company or any of its Subsidiaries) relating to Indebtedness of a third party owed to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries providing for annual payments of more than $25,000,000;
(ix) creates
future payment obligations, including settlement agreements, outside the ordinary course of business in excess of $50,000,000
(x) is
an agreement under which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has granted any Person registration rights (including demand and piggy-back registration rights);
(xi) with
respect to any business that is material to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, is a Contract that (A) obligates the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries to conduct such business on an exclusive basis with any third party, or (B) upon consummation of the Merger, will obligate Parent or any of its Subsidiaries to conduct such
business with any third party on an exclusive basis;
(xii) is
a material Contract with any Governmental Authority;
(xiii) is
a non-competition or non-solicitation Contract or any other Contract that, in each case, materially limits (A) the manner in which, or the localities in
which, any material business of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, is or has a right to be conducted or (B) the types of businesses that the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken
as a whole, conduct or have a right to conduct;
A-22
Table of Contents
(xiv) is
a Contract relating to the acquisition or disposition of any business or operations (whether by merger, sale of stock, sale of assets, consolidation or otherwise)
entered into within the past three (3) years, for aggregate consideration under such Contract in excess of $50,000,000;
(xv) is
any license, consent to use, non-assertion, coexistence or similar Contract concerning Intellectual Property Rights or software used by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries (other than non-customized software subject to customary "shrink-wrap" or "click-through" type Contracts) that (A) provides for annual payments of more than $25,000,000 or
(B) grants an exclusive license or similar exclusive right to use to any third party that is material to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
(xvi) is
a material hedging, derivative or similar Contract (including interest rate, currency or commodity swap agreements, cap agreements, collar agreements and any
similar Contract designed to protect a Person against fluctuations in interest rates, currency exchange rates or commodity prices);
(xvii) each
"single source" supply Contract that is material to the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, are supplied to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries from an exclusive source;
(xviii) is
a Contract granting a right of first refusal or first negotiation to any third party over any material assets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, taken as
a whole; or
(xix) is
a Contract with KLX or any of its Subsidiaries.
(b) Except
as has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect, none of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries is in breach of or default (or, with the giving of notice or lapse of time or both, would be in default) under the terms of, and none has taken any action resulting in the termination
of, acceleration of performance required by, or resulting in a right of termination or acceleration under, any Company Material Contract. As of the date of this Agreement, to the Knowledge of the
Company, no other party to any Company Material Contract is in breach of or default (or, with the giving of notice or lapse of time or both, would be in default) under the terms of, and none has taken
any action resulting in the termination of, acceleration of performance required by, or resulting in a right of termination or acceleration under, any Company Material Contract. Each Company Material
Contract is (i) a valid and binding obligation of the Company or its Subsidiary that is a party thereto, as applicable, and, to the Knowledge of the Company, the other parties thereto,
(
provided
that (A) such enforcement may be subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency (including all Laws related to fraudulent transfers),
reorganization, moratorium or other similar Laws, now or hereafter in effect, relating to creditors' rights and remedies generally and (B) the remedies of specific performance and injunctive
and other forms of equitable relief may be subject to equitable defenses and to the discretion of the court before which any Proceeding therefor may be brought) and (ii) in full force and
effect.
(c) No
(i) current or former officer or director of the Company; (ii) beneficial owner of five percent (5%) or more of any voting securities of
the Company; or (iii) any "affiliate" or "associate" of any such Person, has any interest in any Contract or property (real or personal, tangible or intangible), used in, or pertaining to the
business of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, which interest would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC and that has not
been so disclosed in the Company SEC Documents.
A-23
Table of Contents
Section 3.15
Trademarks, Patents and Copyrights
.
(a) Except
as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, the applications for and registrations of Intellectual Property Rights owned by the Company or its Subsidiaries are (i) free and clear of all Liens (other than Permitted Liens) and
(ii) in effect, subsisting and, to the Knowledge of the Company, valid.
(b) To
the Knowledge of the Company, except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to the Company
and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, the Company and its Subsidiaries own, validly license or have the right to use in the manner currently used, all patents, trademarks, trade names, copyrights,
Internet domain names, service marks, know-how, trade secrets and other intellectual property rights, and any registrations and applications therefor (the "
Intellectual
Property Rights
") that are used in the respective businesses of the Company and its Subsidiaries.
(c) To
the Knowledge of the Company, except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to the Company
and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, the conduct of the respective businesses of the Company and its Subsidiaries as currently conducted does not infringe upon, misappropriate or otherwise violate
any Intellectual Property Rights of any other Person. As of the date of this Agreement, there is no claim for any such infringement, misappropriation or other violation pending or, to the Knowledge of
the Company, threatened, except for any such infringement, misappropriation or other violation that has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate,
materially adverse to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole. To the Knowledge of the Company, no other Person is infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating any Intellectual
Property Right that is material to the respective businesses of the Company and its Subsidiaries as currently conducted, except for any such infringement, misappropriation or other violation that has
not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
(d) To
the Knowledge of the Company, there have been no material security breaches in the information technology systems of the Company and its Subsidiaries or the
information technology systems of any other Persons to the extent used by or on behalf of the Company and its Subsidiaries. Since December 31, 2014, except as has not been, and would not
reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, the Company and its Subsidiaries have at all times complied
with all applicable Laws, as well as their own rules, policies and procedures, relating to privacy, data protection and the collection, retention, protection and use of personal information.
(e) The
representations and warranties set forth in this
Section 3.15
and
Section 3.12(n)
are the only representations and warranties being made by the
Company in this Agreement with respect to any infringement,
misappropriation or other violation of Intellectual Property Rights.
Section 3.16
Real and Personal Property
.
(a)
Section 3.16(a) of the Company Disclosure Letter
sets forth a complete and accurate list of all real property
owned by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (collectively, the "
Company Owned Real Property
").
(b)
Section 3.16(b) of the Company Disclosure Letter
sets forth a complete and accurate list of each lease pursuant to
which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries leases, subleases or licenses an interest in real property from any other Person (whether as a tenant, subtenant or pursuant to other occupancy
arrangements) (collectively, the "
Company Leased Real Property
" and together with the Company Owned Real Property, the "
Company
Real Property
").
A-24
Table of Contents
(c) Except
as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, the Company and its Subsidiaries (as applicable) have (i) good title to, or valid leasehold interests in, all of their respective properties and assets, free and clear of all Liens,
except for Permitted Liens and (ii) exclusive possession of all Company Leased Real Property, other than any use and occupancy rights granted to third party owners, tenants or licensees
pursuant to agreements with respect to such Company Leased Real Property, entered into in the ordinary course of business.
(d) Each
lease, sublease or license for Company Leased Real Property is a valid and binding obligation of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that is a party thereto, as
applicable, and to the Knowledge of the Company, the other parties thereto, except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to
the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
provided
that (i) such enforcement may be subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency
(including all Laws related to fraudulent transfers), reorganization, moratorium or other similar Laws, now or hereafter in effect, relating to creditors' rights and remedies generally and
(ii) the remedies of specific performance and injunctive relief and other forms of equitable relief may be subject to equitable defenses and to the discretion of the court before which any
Proceeding therefor may be brought.
(e) As
of the date of this Agreement, except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, material to the Company and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, none of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has received any written communication from, or given any written communication to, or to the Knowledge of the Company,
received or given any other type of communication from or to, any other party to a lease for Company Leased Real Property or any lender, alleging that the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or such
other party, as the case may be, is in default under such lease.
(f) Except
as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, no Person, other than the Company or a Subsidiary of the Company, possesses, uses or occupies all or any portion of any Company Real Property. There are no outstanding options or rights of
first refusal to purchase the Company Owned Real Property. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary of the Company is a party to any agreement, right of first offer, right of first refusal or option
with respect to the purchase or sale of any real property or interest therein. There are no pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened Proceedings to take all or any portion of the
Company Real Property or any interest therein by eminent domain or any condemnation proceeding (or the jurisdictional equivalent thereof) or any sale or disposition in lieu thereof.
Section 3.17
Environmental
.
Except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, material to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole:
(a) the
Company and its Subsidiaries are in compliance with all applicable Environmental Laws, including possessing and complying with the terms of all Company Permits
required for their operations under applicable Environmental Laws;
(b) as
of the date of this Agreement, there is no Proceeding or Order pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened pursuant to any Environmental Law against the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries;
(c) as
of the date of this Agreement, none of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has received notice or a request for information alleging that the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries has been or is in actual or potential violation of any applicable Environmental Law or otherwise may be liable under any applicable Environmental Law, which violation or liability is
unresolved;
A-25
Table of Contents
(d) there
have been no Releases of Hazardous Materials on or underneath any location that is reasonably likely to result in an obligation by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries to remediate such Releases pursuant to applicable Environmental Law or otherwise result in liability to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to applicable Environmental Law
with respect to such Releases; and
(e) the
Company has delivered or otherwise made available for inspection to the Parent copies of any Phase I or II environmental site assessments in the possession of
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries pertaining to (i) any unresolved claims arising under or related to any Environmental Law; (ii) any Hazardous Materials in, on, beneath or adjacent
to any property currently or formerly owned, operated or leased by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries; or (iii) the Company's or any of its Subsidiaries' compliance with applicable
Environmental Laws.
Section 3.18
Customers and Suppliers
.
None of the ten (10) largest customers (by revenue) of the businesses of the Company and its Subsidiaries during the twelve (12) months prior to the date of this Agreement,
the ten (10) largest suppliers (by cost) of the businesses of the Company and its Subsidiaries during the twelve (12) months prior to the date of this Agreement or the ten
(10) largest "single source" suppliers (by cost) of the businesses of the Company and its Subsidiaries during the twelve (12) months prior to the date of this Agreement has canceled or
otherwise terminated, or to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened in writing to cancel or otherwise terminate, its relationship with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or to materially decrease
the quantity of products or services purchased from or sold to, respectively, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries since December 31, 2015, outside of ordinary cyclical fluctuations in
business from the placing and fulfillment of Contracts.
Section 3.19
Product Warranty; Aviation Regulation Compliance
.
Except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole,
(a) each product manufactured, sold, leased or delivered by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has been in substantial conformity with all applicable contractual specifications and all
express and implied warranties made by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (except to the extent non-conformity is not material or otherwise consented to by a customer), and neither the Company nor
any of its Subsidiaries has any liability for replacement or repair thereof or other damages in connection therewith, (b) the Company and each of its Subsidiaries (i) is in compliance
with all applicable Laws prescribed by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration ("
FAA
") under Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations and similar
Laws prescribed by foreign aviation authorities (such Laws, including those prescribed by the FAA, collectively, "
Aviation Regulations
"),
(ii) has not violated, been subject to an investigation with respect to or made voluntary disclosures with respect to potential violations of any Aviation Regulations during the last two
(2) years and (iii) has not been cited by the FAA or foreign aviation authorities for any material discrepancies or violations during inspections or audits during the last two
(2) years. Except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, the
Company has not received any Air Worthiness Directives (as such term is defined in the Federal Aviation Regulations, 14 C.F.R. § 39, as amended) issued by the FAA (or, with respect
to such issuances by any foreign aviation Governmental Authority, the foreign equivalent thereof) pursuant to which a known safety deficiency was found in any of the products of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries at any time during the last two (2) years, and no such Air Worthiness Directives are pending.
Section 3.20
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Anti-Corruption
.
(a) Since
October 1, 2013, to the Knowledge of the Company, none of the Company or its Subsidiaries, nor any director, officer, employee or agent of the Company, has
directly or indirectly made, offered to make, or attempted to make any contribution, gift, bribe, rebate, payoff, influence
A-26
Table of Contents
payment,
kickback or other payment to any Person, private or public, regardless of what form, whether in money, property or services, in violation of the FCPA, the U.S. Travel Act, the U.K. Bribery
Act 2010, the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions or any other applicable Law relating to anti-corruption or anti-bribery
(collectively, the "
Anti-Corruption Laws
"). Without limiting the foregoing, to the Knowledge of the Company, none of the Company or its Subsidiaries,
nor any director, officer, employee, stockholder (solely to the extent acting on behalf of the Company) or agent of the Company, has directly or indirectly offered or given anything of value to
(i) any foreign official, any foreign political party or official thereof or any candidate for political office or (ii) any Person, while knowing that all or a portion of such thing of
value will be offered, given or promised, directly or indirectly, to any foreign official, to any foreign political party or official thereof or to any candidate for foreign political office for the
purpose of the following: (A) influencing any act or decision of such foreign official, political party, party official or candidate in his, her or its official capacity, including influencing
such foreign official, political party, party official or candidate to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such foreign official, political party, party official or candidate,
or securing any improper advantage or (B) inducing such foreign official, political party, party official or candidate to use his, her or its influence with a foreign Governmental Authority or
instrumentality thereof to affect or influence any act or decision of such Governmental Authority or instrumentality, in order to assist the Company or any Subsidiaries in obtaining or retaining
business for or with, or directing business to, any Person.
(b) To
the Knowledge of the Company, neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries (i) is under external or internal investigation for any material violation of the
Anti-Corruption Laws, (ii) has received any notice or other communication (in writing or otherwise) from any Governmental Authority regarding any material violation of, or failure to comply
with, any Anti-Corruption Laws or (iii) is the subject of any internal complaint, audit or review process regarding a material violation of the Anti-Corruption Laws.
(c) The
Company and its Subsidiaries maintain an adequate system or systems of internal controls reasonably designed to (i) ensure compliance with the Anti-Corruption
Laws and (ii) prevent and detect violations of the Anti-Corruption Laws.
Section 3.21
Customs and International Trade Laws
.
(a) Since
October 1, 2013, the Company and its Subsidiaries have been in compliance with all applicable Customs & International Trade Laws and there are no
unresolved formal claims concerning the liability of any of the Company or its Subsidiaries under such Laws. Without limiting the foregoing, (i) at all times since October 1, 2013, the
Company and its Subsidiaries and, to the Knowledge of the Company,
Persons acting on their behalf have obtained all import and export licenses and all other Consents required for the export, import or reexport of goods, services, software and technology required for
the operation of the respective businesses of the Company and its Subsidiaries, including Customs & International Trade Authorizations; (ii) since October 1, 2013, no Governmental
Authority has initiated any Proceedings or imposed any civil or criminal fine, penalty, seizure, forfeiture, revocation of a Customs & International Trade Authorization, debarment or denial of
future Customs & International Trade Authorizations against any of the Company or its Subsidiaries or any of their respective directors, officers or, to the Knowledge of the Company, employees
or agents, of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (in their capacity as such) in connection with any actual or alleged violation of any applicable Customs & International Trade Laws; and
(iii) to the Knowledge of the Company, since October 1, 2013, there have been no investigations, written claims or written requests for information by a Governmental Authority with
respect to the Company's and its Subsidiaries' Customs & International Trade Authorizations and compliance with applicable Customs & International Trade
A-27
Table of Contents
Laws,
except, in each case, as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
(b) Neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries, and no director, officer or, to the Knowledge of the Company, employee thereof (i) is a Sanctioned Person; or
(ii) has pending or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened claims against it with respect to Sanctions.
(c) Each
of the Company and its Subsidiaries and any director, officer or, to the Knowledge of the Company, employee thereof (i) is in compliance in all material
respects with, and, since October 1, 2013, has not materially violated any Sanctions; and (ii) has in place adequate controls and systems reasonably designed to ensure compliance with
applicable Laws pertaining to Sanctions in each of the jurisdictions in which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries do or in the past have done business.
Section 3.22
Government Contracts
.
Section 3.22 of the Company Disclosure Letter
sets forth a correct and complete list of Security Clearances held by the Company,
any of its Subsidiaries and any of their respective Affiliates. To the Knowledge of the Company, there are no facts that are reasonably likely to give rise to the revocation of any Security Clearance
of the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective Affiliates. The Company, its Subsidiaries and their respective Affiliates are in compliance with applicable requirements relating to
their respective Security Clearances, including those specified in the Industrial Security Regulation (DOD 5220.22-R) and the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (DOD 5220.22-M),
except, in each case, as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
Section 3.23
Insurance
.
Except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole,
(a) the Company and its Subsidiaries have paid, or caused to be paid, all premiums due under all insurance policies of the Company and its Subsidiaries, and all such insurance policies are in
full force and effect, (b) as of the date of this Agreement, none of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries has received written notice (i) that they are in default with respect to any
obligations under such policies or (ii) of cancellation or termination with respect to any such policies, or refusal or denial of any coverage, reservation of rights or rejection of any claim
under any such policies, in each case that is held by, or for the benefit of, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
Section 3.24
Takeover Statutes
.
The Company Board has taken such actions and votes as are necessary to render the provisions of any "fair price," "moratorium," "control share acquisition" or any other takeover or
anti-takeover statute or similar federal or state Law (including Section 203 of the DGCL) inapplicable to this Agreement, the Merger or any other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 3.25
Brokers
.
No investment banker, broker or finder other than Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co., the fees and expenses of each of which will be paid by the
Company, is entitled to any investment banking, brokerage, finder's or similar fee or commission in connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement based upon
arrangements made by or on behalf of the Company or any of its Affiliates. True, correct and complete copies of all the engagement letters between the Company and each of Goldman,
Sachs & Co. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. have been made available to Parent.
Section 3.26
Opinion of Financial Advisors
.
The Company Board has received the opinion of each of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co., dated as of the date of this Agreement, to the effect
that, as of the date of this Agreement, and based upon and subject to the qualifications, limitations and assumptions set forth in each such opinion, respectively, the Merger Consideration to be paid
to the holders of shares of Company Common Stock (other than Canceled Shares and Dissenting Shares) pursuant to this Agreement is fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders. Promptly after
the date of this Agreement, true, correct and complete copies of such opinions will be made available to Parent for informational purposes only.
A-28
Table of Contents
Section 3.27
Company Tax Representation Letters
.
As of the date of this Agreement, the representations, warranties and covenants in the Company Signing Representation Letter and, to the Knowledge of the Company, in the KLX Signing
Representation Letter, are true and correct in all material respects.
Section 3.28
KLX Tax Sharing Agreement Amendment
.
(a) The
First Amendment to the Tax Sharing and Indemnification Agreement between the Company and KLX, in the form provided to Parent as of the date hereof (the
"
KLX TSA Amendment
"), has been entered into by Company and KLX prior to the execution of this Agreement and remains a valid and binding obligation of
Company and KLX, in full force and effect. The Company has delivered a copy of the opinion of Shearman & Sterling LLP to KLX that is a Qualified Supplemental Tax Opinion (as defined in
the KLX Tax Sharing Agreement) in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to KLX in accordance with the KLX TSA Amendment.
(b) The
Company has delivered, or caused to be delivered, a copy of the KLX Signing Representation Letter to Parent prior to the execution of this Agreement.
Section 3.29
No Other Representations or Warranties
.
Except for (a) the representations and warranties contained in this
Article III
and (b) the representations,
warranties and covenants contained in the Company Signing Representation Letter and the Company Closing Representation Letter, neither the Company nor any other Person on behalf of the Company makes
any express or implied representation or warranty with respect to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any other information provided to Parent or Merger Sub in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, including the accuracy, completeness or timeliness thereof.
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT AND MERGER SUB
Except (i) as disclosed in the Parent SEC Documents filed with (or furnished to) the SEC by Parent on or after December 31, 2014
and prior to the date of this Agreement (but in each case excluding any risk factor disclosure contained under the heading "Risk Factors" (other than any factual information contained therein) or in
any "forward-looking statements" legend or in any similarly non-specific, predictive or forward-looking statements) and to the extent publicly available on
EDGAR or (ii) as disclosed in the Parent Disclosure Letter, Parent and Merger Sub hereby, jointly and severally, represent and warrant to the Company as follows:
Section 4.1
Organization; Qualification.
Each of Parent and Merger Sub is a corporation duly organized
and validly existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and has the requisite corporate power
and authority to conduct its business as it is now being conducted and to own, lease and operate its properties and assets in the manner in which its properties and assets are currently operated,
except where the failure to be so validly existing and authorized has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Parent and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole. Each of Parent and Merger Sub is duly qualified or licensed to do business and is in good standing in each jurisdiction in which the character or location of the
property owned, leased or operated by it or the nature of the business conducted by it makes such qualification or licensing necessary, except where the failure to be so duly qualified or licensed and
in good standing has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect. The Parent Organizational Documents have been made
available to the Company and are currently in effect, and neither Parent nor Merger Sub, as applicable, is in violation of any of the provisions thereof, except where such failure or violation has not
been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
A-29
Table of Contents
Section 4.2
Capitalization; Subsidiaries
.
(a) As
of the close of business on the Capitalization Date, the authorized capital stock of Parent consisted of (i) 1,000,000,000 shares of Parent Common Stock,
143,777,488 of which were issued and outstanding and 13,587,492 of which were held by Parent as treasury stock, and (ii) 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock of Parent, without par value, no
shares of which were outstanding. There are no other classes of capital stock of Parent and no bonds, debentures, notes or other Indebtedness of Parent having the right to vote (or convertible into or
exercisable for securities having the right to vote) on any matters on which holders of capital stock of Parent may vote authorized, issued or outstanding. As of the close of business on the
Capitalization Date, there were (A) outstanding options to purchase 3,893,821 shares of Parent Common Stock and (B) outstanding Parent Equity Awards (other than options to purchase
Parent Common Stock) representing 756,217 shares of Parent Common Stock.
(b) All
of the issued and outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock have been, and all of the shares of Parent Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to the Parent Equity
Awards, the Parent 2015 Long-Term Incentives Plan or the Parent Employee Stock Purchase Plan will be, when issued in accordance with the respective terms thereof, duly authorized and validly issued,
and, along with the shares of Parent Common Stock issuable pursuant to this Agreement (subject to obtaining the Parent Stockholder Approval), are, or will be when issued, fully paid, nonassessable and
free of preemptive
rights. All of the outstanding Parent Common Stock has been sold pursuant to an effective registration statement filed under the federal securities Laws or an appropriate exemption therefrom.
(c) As
of the date of this Agreement, other than as set forth in
Section 4.2(a)
, there are no (i) existing
options, warrants, calls, preemptive rights, subscriptions or other rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, convertible securities, agreements, arrangements or commitments of
any kind obligating Parent to issue, transfer, register or sell, or cause to be issued, transferred, registered or sold, any shares of capital stock of Parent or securities convertible into or
exchangeable for such shares, or obligating Parent to grant, extend or enter into such options, warrants, calls, preemptive, subscriptions or other rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock
unit awards, convertible securities, agreements, arrangements or commitments, (ii) outstanding obligations of Parent to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any capital stock of Parent or
any securities representing the right to purchase or otherwise receive any capital stock of Parent, (iii) stockholder agreements, voting trusts or similar agreements with any Person to which
Parent is a party (A) restricting the transfer of the capital stock of Parent or (B) affecting the voting rights of capital stock of Parent or (iv) outstanding or authorized
equity or equity-based compensation awards, including any equity appreciation rights, security-based performance units, "phantom" stock, profit-participation or other security rights issued by Parent,
or other agreements, arrangements or commitments of any character (contingent or otherwise) to which Parent is party, in each case pursuant to which any Person is entitled to receive any payment from
Parent based in whole or in part on the value of any capital stock of Parent.
(d) All
of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Merger Sub is, and at the Effective Time will be, owned by Parent or a direct or indirect wholly owned Subsidiary of
Parent. Merger Sub has no outstanding options, warrants, rights or any other agreements pursuant to which any Person other than Parent may acquire any equity security of Merger Sub.
(e) The
number of shares of authorized Parent Common Stock that have not been issued, subscribed for or otherwise committed to be issued is at least equal to the number of
shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued pursuant to this Agreement.
A-30
Table of Contents
Section 4.3
Authority Relative to Agreement
.
(a) Each
of Parent and Merger Sub have all necessary corporate power and authority to execute, deliver and perform their respective obligations under this Agreement and,
subject (in the case of the issuance of shares of Parent Common Stock in connection with the Merger) to obtaining the Parent Stockholder Approval, to consummate the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Parent and Merger Sub, and the consummation by Parent and
Merger Sub of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary corporate action by Parent and Merger Sub, and (in the case of the Parent Stock
Issuance, except for the (i) receipt of the Parent Stockholder Approval and (ii) filing of the Certificate of Merger with the Delaware Secretary of State) no other corporate action or
proceeding on the part of Parent or Merger Sub is necessary to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Parent and Merger Sub and the consummation by Parent and Merger
Sub of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by Parent and Merger Sub and, assuming due authorization, execution and delivery of this
Agreement by the other parties hereto, constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of each of Parent and Merger Sub, enforceable against each of Parent and Merger Sub in accordance with its
terms, except that (A) such enforcement may be subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency (including all Laws related to fraudulent transfers), reorganization, moratorium or other similar
Laws, now or hereafter in effect, affecting creditors' rights and remedies generally and (B) the remedies of specific performance and injunctive and other forms of equitable relief may be
subject to equitable defenses and to the discretion of the court before which any Proceeding therefor may be brought.
(b) The
Parent Board and the board of directors of Merger Sub have, by resolutions unanimously adopted thereby, (i) approved this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, (ii) determined that this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are advisable and in the best interests of Parent and Merger Sub and
their respective stockholders, as applicable, (iii) in the case of the Parent Board, directed that the Parent Stock Issuance be submitted to a vote at the Parent Stockholders' Meeting and
(iv) in the case of the Parent Board, resolved to make the Parent Recommendation;
provided
that any change, modification or rescission of such
Parent Recommendation by the Parent Board in accordance with this Agreement shall not be a breach of the representation in this clause (iv). Parent, acting in its capacity as the sole
stockholder of Merger Sub, has approved and adopted this Agreement. As of the date of this Agreement, none of the aforesaid actions by the Parent Board or the board of directors of Merger Sub have
been amended, rescinded or modified.
Section 4.4
Vote Required
.
The approval by a majority of votes cast at the Parent Stockholders' Meeting of the Parent Stock Issuance (the "
Parent Stockholder
Approval
") is the only vote of holders of securities of Parent that is required in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 4.5
No Conflict; Required Filings and Consents
.
(a) Neither
the execution and delivery of this Agreement by Parent and Merger Sub nor the consummation by Parent and Merger Sub of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, nor compliance by Parent and Merger Sub with any of the applicable terms or provisions of this Agreement, will (i) violate any provision of the Parent Organizational Documents,
(ii) assuming that the Consents, registrations, declarations, filings and notices referenced in
Section 4.5(b)
have been obtained or made
and (in the case of the Parent Stock Issuance) the Parent Stockholder Approval has been received, conflict with or violate any Law applicable to Parent or Merger Sub or by which any property or asset
of Parent or Merger Sub is bound or affected or (iii) violate, conflict with or result in any breach of any provision of, or loss of any benefit, or constitute a
A-31
Table of Contents
default
(with or without notice or lapse of time, or both) under, give rise to any right of termination, acceleration or cancellation of or require the Consent of, notice to or filing with any third
party pursuant to any of the terms or provisions of any Contract to which Parent or Merger Sub is a party or by which any property or asset of Parent or Merger Sub is bound or affected, or result in
the creation of a Lien, other than any Permitted Lien, upon any of the property or assets of Parent or Merger Sub, other than, in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii), any such conflict,
violation, breach, default, termination, acceleration, cancellation or Lien that (A) has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent
Material Adverse Effect or (B) would not impair in any material respect the ability of Parent or Merger Sub to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement or to consummate the
Merger, or would not prevent or materially delay the consummation of any of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(b) No
Consent of, registration, declaration or filing with or notice to any Governmental Authority is required to be obtained or made by or with respect to Parent or Merger
Sub in connection with the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, other than (i) applicable requirements
of and filings with the SEC under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act (including the filing with the SEC of the Form S-4 and the Joint Proxy Statement), (ii) the filing of the
Certificate of Merger with the Delaware Secretary of State, (iii) applicable requirements under corporation, state securities or "blue sky" laws of various states, (iv) compliance with
applicable rules and regulations of NASDAQ and the New York Stock Exchange (the "
NYSE
"), (v) such other items required solely by reason of the
participation of the Company in the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, (vi) compliance with and filings or notifications under Antitrust Laws and (vii) such other Consents,
registrations, declarations, filings or notices the failure of which to be obtained or made (A) has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Parent Material Adverse Effect or (B) would not impair in any material respect the ability of Parent or Merger Sub to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement or to consummate
the Merger, or would not prevent or materially delay the consummation of any of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 4.6
Parent SEC Documents; Financial Statements
.
(a) Since
December 31, 2014, Parent has timely filed with (or furnished to) the SEC all forms, reports, schedules, statements, exhibits and other documents (including
exhibits, financial statements and schedules thereto and all other information incorporated therein and amendments and supplements thereto) required by it to be filed (or furnished) under the Exchange
Act or the Securities Act (collectively, the "
Parent SEC Documents
"). As of its filing (or furnishing) date or, if amended prior to
the date of this Agreement, as of the date of the last such amendment, each Parent SEC Document complied in all material respects with the applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the
Securities Act, as the case may be. As of its filing date or, if amended prior to the date of this Agreement, as of the date of the last such amendment, each Parent SEC Document filed pursuant to the
Exchange Act did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. Each Parent SEC Document that is a registration statement, as amended or supplemented, if applicable, filed pursuant to the
Securities Act, as of the date such registration statement or amendment became effective prior to the date of this Agreement, did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements made therein not misleading. As of the date of this Agreement, there are no amendments or modifications to
Parent SEC Documents that were required to be filed with (or furnished to) the SEC prior to the date of this Agreement, but that
A-32
Table of Contents
have
not yet been filed with (or furnished to) the SEC. No Subsidiary of Parent is subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. All of the audited financial statements and
unaudited interim financial statements of Parent included in Parent SEC Documents (i) comply in all material respects with the applicable accounting requirements and with the published rules
and regulations of the SEC with respect thereto; (ii) have been prepared in accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis during the periods involved (except as may be indicated in the
notes thereto and except, in the case of the unaudited interim statements, as may be permitted under Form 10-Q of the Exchange Act); and (iii) fairly present in all material respects the
financial position, the stockholders' equity, the results of operations and cash flows of Parent and its consolidated Subsidiaries as of the times and for the periods referred to therein (except as
may be indicated in the notes thereto and subject, in the case of unaudited interim financial statements, to normal and recurring year-end adjustments).
(b) Parent
has heretofore furnished to the Company complete and correct copies of all comment letters from the SEC since December 31, 2014 through the date of this
Agreement with respect to any of the Parent SEC Documents, together with all written responses of Parent thereto. As of the date of this Agreement, there are no outstanding or unresolved comments in
comment letters received from the SEC staff with respect to any of Parent SEC Documents, and, to the Knowledge of Parent, none of Parent SEC Documents are subject to ongoing SEC review.
(c) Parent
is in compliance in all material respects with the applicable provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the applicable listing and governance rules and regulations
of the NYSE.
(d) Parent
maintains a system of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of Parent's financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in conformity with GAAP. Parent has evaluated the
effectiveness of Parent's internal control over financial reporting and, to the extent required by applicable Law, presented in any applicable Parent SEC Document that is a report on Form 10-K
or Form 10-Q or any amendment thereto its conclusions about the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by such report or amendment
based on such evaluation. Based on Parent's most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting prior to the date of this Agreement, (i) Parent has no "significant deficiencies"
or "material weaknesses" (as such terms are defined in Auditing Standard No. 5 of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, as in effect on the date of this Agreement) in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect Parent's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and
(ii) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Parent's internal control over financial reporting.
(e) Parent
maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) designed to ensure that all information
required to be disclosed by Parent in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and
forms of the SEC, and that all such information is accumulated and communicated to Parent's management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and to make the
certifications of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of Parent required under the Exchange Act with respect to such reports.
(f) To
the Knowledge of Parent, as of the date of this Agreement, there are no SEC inquiries or investigations, other inquiries or investigations by Governmental Authorities
or internal investigations pending or threatened, in each case regarding any accounting practices of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any malfeasance by any director or executive officer of Parent
or any of
A-33
Table of Contents
its
Subsidiaries. Since December 31, 2014 through the date of this Agreement, there have been no material internal investigations regarding accounting or revenue recognition discussed with,
reviewed by or initiated at the direction of the chief executive officer, chief financial officer or general counsel, the Parent Board or any committee thereof.
(g) Each
of the principal executive officer of Parent and the principal financial officer of Parent (or each former principal executive officer of Parent and each former
principal financial officer of Parent, as applicable) has made all certifications required by Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 under the Exchange Act and Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act with respect to Parent SEC Documents, and the statements contained in such certifications are true and accurate. For purposes of this Agreement, "principal executive officer" and "principal
financial officer" shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Parent does not have, and has not arranged any, outstanding "extensions of credit" to directors or executive
officers within the meaning of Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
(h) Since
December 31, 2014, (i) neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any written, or, to the Knowledge of Parent, oral complaint,
allegation, assertion or claim regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing practices, procedures, methodologies or methods of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, or unlawful accounting
or auditing matters with respect to Parent or any of its Subsidiaries and (ii) no attorney representing Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, whether or not employed by Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries, has reported evidence of a violation of securities Laws, breach of fiduciary duty or similar violation by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective officers,
directors, employees or agents to the Parent Board or any committee thereof or to the general counsel or chief executive officer of Parent pursuant to the rules of the SEC adopted under
Section 307 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, except, in each case, as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Parent and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
(i) Neither
Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to, or has any commitment to become a party to, any joint venture, off-balance sheet partnership or any similar
Contract (including any Contract or arrangement relating to any transaction or relationship between or among Parent and any of its Subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any unconsolidated affiliate, on
the other hand), including any structured finance, special purpose or limited purpose entity or Person, or any "off-balance sheet arrangements" (as defined in Item 303(a) of
Regulation S-K under the Securities Act), where the result, purpose or effect of such Contract is to avoid disclosure of any material transaction involving, or material liabilities of, Parent
or any of its Subsidiaries in Parent SEC Documents (including any audited financial statements and unaudited interim financial statements of Parent included therein).
Section 4.7
Absence of Certain Changes or Events
.
Since December 31, 2014 through the date of this Agreement, (a) except in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, the respective businesses of
Parent and its Subsidiaries have been conducted in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and (b) there has not been any event, development or state of circumstances that
has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.8
No Undisclosed Liabilities
.
Except for liabilities or obligations (a) as (and to the extent) reflected, disclosed or reserved against in Parent's financial statements (or the notes thereto) included in the
Parent SEC Documents prior to the date of this Agreement, (b) incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice since June 30, 2016, (c) incurred in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or (d) that have not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material
Adverse Effect, none of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries has any liabilities or obligations of any nature, whether or not
A-34
Table of Contents
accrued,
contingent, absolute or otherwise and whether or not required to be reflected on a consolidated balance sheet of Parent (or the notes thereto) in accordance with GAAP.
Section 4.9
Litigation
.
As of the date of this Agreement, (a) there is no Proceeding pending or, to the Knowledge of Parent, threatened against Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any asset or property
of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, and (b) neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries nor any asset or property of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is subject to a continuing Order, in each
case, that (i) has been, or would reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole or (ii) would
reasonably be expected to, individually or in the aggregate, impair in any material respect the ability of Parent to perform its obligations under this Agreement or to consummate the Merger, or
prevent or materially delay the consummation of any of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 4.10
Permits; Compliance with Laws
.
(a) (i)
Parent and its Subsidiaries are in possession of all material franchises, grants, licenses, permits, easements, variances, exemptions, consents, certificates,
approvals, registrations, clearances, orders and other authorizations necessary for Parent and its Subsidiaries to own, lease and operate their respective properties and assets and to carry on their
respective businesses as now being conducted under and pursuant to all applicable Laws (the "
Parent Permits
"), (ii) all such Parent Permits are
in full force and effect and (iii) as of the date of this Agreement, no suspension, cancellation, withdrawal or revocation thereof is pending or, to the Knowledge of Parent, threatened, except
where the failure to be in possession of, failure to be in full force and effect or the suspension, cancellation, withdrawal or revocation thereof has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Since
December 31, 2014, Parent and its Subsidiaries have been and are in compliance with (i) all applicable Laws and (ii) all Parent Permits,
except where any failure to be in such compliance has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
(c) Since
December 31, 2014 through the date of this Agreement, none of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or, to the Knowledge of Parent, any of their respective
directors, officers or employees, has received any written or, to the Knowledge of Parent, oral notification from a Governmental Authority asserting that Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is not in
compliance with any Laws or Parent Permits, except where any failure to be in such compliance has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent
Material Adverse Effect.
Section 4.11
Information Supplied
.
None of the information supplied or to be supplied by or on behalf of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries for inclusion or incorporation by reference in (a) the Form S-4
will, at the time the Form S-4 is filed with the SEC, and at any time it is amended or supplemented or at the time it becomes effective under the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading and (b) the Joint Proxy Statement will,
at the date it, or any amendment or supplement to it, is mailed to stockholders of the Company and stockholders of Parent and at the time of the Company Stockholders' Meeting and at the time of the
Parent Stockholders' Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they are
made, not misleading (except that no representation or warranty is made by Parent regarding such portions thereof that relate expressly to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or to statements made
therein based on information supplied by or on behalf of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries for inclusion or incorporation by reference therein). The Joint Proxy Statement will comply as to form
in all material respects with the requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
A-35
Table of Contents
Section 4.12
Employee Benefit Plans
.
(a) Except
as has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect, (i) each of the Parent
Benefit Plans has been established, adopted, operated, maintained and administered in accordance with its terms and applicable Laws, including ERISA and the Code, (ii) all payments and
contributions required to be made under the terms of any Parent Benefit Plan and applicable Laws have been timely made or accrued or otherwise adequately reserved to the extent required by and in
accordance with GAAP and (iii) none of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or, to the Knowledge of Parent, any third party, has engaged in any non-exempt "prohibited transaction" (within the
meaning of Section 4975 of the Code or Section 406 of ERISA) with respect to any Parent Benefit Plan that would result in the imposition of any liability to Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries.
(b) Each
Parent Benefit Plan intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code has either received a favorable determination letter from the IRS with respect
to such Parent Benefit Plan as to its qualified status under the Code, or with respect to a prototype Parent Benefit Plan, the prototype sponsor has received a favorable IRS opinion letter, or the
Parent Benefit Plan or prototype sponsor
has remaining a period of time under applicable Code regulations or pronouncements of the IRS in which to apply for such a letter and make any amendments necessary to obtain a favorable determination
or opinion as to the qualified status of each such Parent Benefit Plan. To the Knowledge of Parent, no event has occurred since the most recent determination or opinion letter or application therefor
relating to any such Parent Benefit Plan and no condition exists that has been or would reasonably be expected to adversely affect the qualified status of any such Parent Benefit Plan or result in the
imposition of any liability, penalty or tax under ERISA or the Code that is, individually or in the aggregate, material to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
(c) Except
as has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect, neither Parent nor any Parent
ERISA Affiliate operates, maintains, contributes to, is required to contribute to or sponsors (or has in the past six (6) years established, operated, maintained, contributed to, was required
to contribute to or sponsored) (i) a "multiemployer plan" (as defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA), (ii) a "multiple employer plan" (within the meaning of Section 413(c) of
the Code), (iii) a "single-employer plan" (within the meaning of Section 4001(a)(15) of ERISA), or (iv) a "multiple employer welfare arrangement" (within the meaning of
Section 3(40) of ERISA).
(d) Except
as has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect, as of the date of this Agreement
there are no claims pending, or, to the Knowledge of Parent, threatened Proceedings, disputes or claims (other than routine claims for benefits) against or affecting any Parent Benefit Plan, by any
employee or beneficiary covered under such Parent Benefit Plan, as applicable, or otherwise involving such Parent Benefit Plan.
(e) Parent
and its Subsidiaries are, and since December 31, 2014 have been, in compliance with all applicable Laws respecting or relating to recruitment, employment
and employment practices, and agency and other workers, including all Laws respecting terms and conditions of employment, health and safety, wages and hours, child labor, immigration, employment
discrimination, disability rights or benefits, equal opportunity, plant closures and layoffs, affirmative action, workers' compensation, labor relations, employee leave issues and unemployment
insurance, except where failure to comply has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
(f) To
the Knowledge of Parent, no employee of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries who is an officer for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act is in any respect in
violation of any term of
A-36
Table of Contents
any
employment agreement, nondisclosure agreement, common law nondisclosure obligation, fiduciary duty, non-competition agreement, restrictive covenant or other obligation (i) to Parent or its
Subsidiaries or (ii) to a former employer relating (A) to the right to be employed by Parent or its Subsidiaries or (B) to the material misuse of trade secrets or proprietary
information. No employee of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries who is an officer for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act has given notice of intent to terminate or, to the Knowledge of
Parent, intends to terminate his or her employment with Parent or any of its Subsidiaries.
Section 4.13
Taxes
.
(a) Parent
and each of its Subsidiaries have (i) timely filed or caused to be timely filed (taking into account any extension of time within which to file) all
material Tax Returns required to be filed by any of them and all such filed Tax Returns (taking into account all amendments thereto) are true, complete and accurate in all material respects and
(ii) paid all material Taxes due and owing (whether or not shown on such Tax Returns), except, in the case of clause (ii) hereof, with respect to Taxes contested in good faith by
appropriate Proceedings and for which adequate reserves or accruals have been established in accordance with GAAP.
(b) The
unpaid Taxes of Parent and its Subsidiaries did not, as of the date of their most recent consolidated financial statements included in the Parent SEC Documents prior
to the date of this Agreement, materially exceed the reserve or accrual for Tax liability (excluding any reserve for deferred Taxes established to reflect timing differences between book and Tax
income) set forth on the face of such consolidated financial statements (rather than in any notes thereto). Since the date of their most recent consolidated financial statements, neither Parent nor
any of its Subsidiaries has incurred any material liability for Taxes outside the ordinary course of business or otherwise inconsistent with past custom and practice.
(c) As
of the date of this Agreement, there are no pending, threatened in writing or ongoing audits, examinations, investigations or other Proceedings by any Governmental
Authority in respect of material Taxes of or with respect to Parent or any of its Subsidiaries. Neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has waived any statute of limitations with respect to
material Taxes or agreed to any extension of time with respect to a material Tax assessment or deficiency. No written claim has been made by any Governmental Authority in a jurisdiction where Parent
or any of its Subsidiaries does not currently file a Tax Return that it is or may be subject to taxation by that jurisdiction in respect of Taxes that would be covered by or the subject of such
Tax Return, nor has any such assertion been threatened or proposed in writing and received by Parent or any of its Subsidiaries.
(d) All
Taxes that Parent or any of its Subsidiaries are or were required by Law to withhold or collect have been duly and timely withheld or collected in all material
respects on behalf of its respective employees, independent contractors or other third parties and, have been timely paid to the proper Governmental Authority or other Person or properly set aside in
accounts for this purpose.
(e) Neither
Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has ever been a member of a consolidated, combined or unitary Tax group (other than such a group the common parent of which is
Parent or any of its Subsidiaries), and neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has any liability for Taxes of any other Person (other than Taxes of Parent or any Subsidiary) under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6 (or any similar provision of foreign, state or local law), as a transferee or successor, by Contract or otherwise.
(f) Neither
Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to or is bound by any Tax sharing, Tax allocation or Tax indemnification agreement or arrangement (other than such
an agreement or arrangement exclusively between or among Parent and its Subsidiaries or customary commercial Contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business, the principal subject matter of
which is
A-37
Table of Contents
not
Taxes) that will not be terminated on or before the Closing Date without any future liability to the Company or its Subsidiaries.
(g) There
are no Liens for a material amount of Taxes on any of the assets of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries other than Permitted Liens.
(h) Neither
Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has participated in or been a party to a transaction that, as of the date of this Agreement, constitutes a "listed
transaction" that is required to be reported to the IRS pursuant to Section 6011 of the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations thereunder.
(i) Within
the last two (2) years, neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries has been a party to any transaction intended to qualify under Section 355 of the
Code.
(j) As
of the date of this Agreement, the representations, warranties and covenants in the Parent Signing Representation Letter are true and correct in all material
respects.
Section 4.14
Material Contracts
.
Except as has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect, none of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is in
breach of or default (or, with the giving of notice or lapse of time or both, would be in default) under the terms of, and none has taken any action resulting in the termination of, acceleration of
performance required by, or resulting in a right of termination or acceleration under, any Contract material to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole (each a "
Parent
Material Contract
"). As of the date of this Agreement, to the Knowledge of Parent, no other party to any Parent Material Contract is in breach of or default (or, with the
giving of notice or lapse of time or both, would be in default) under the terms of, and none has taken any action resulting in the termination of, acceleration of performance required by, or resulting
in a right of termination or acceleration under, any Parent Material Contract. Each Parent Material Contract is (a) a valid and binding obligation of Parent or its Subsidiary that is a party
thereto, as applicable, and, to the Knowledge of Parent, the other parties thereto, (
provided
that (i) such enforcement may be subject to
applicable bankruptcy, insolvency (including all Laws related to fraudulent transfers), reorganization, moratorium or other similar Laws, now or hereafter in effect, relating to creditors' rights and
remedies generally and (ii) the remedies of specific performance and injunctive and other forms of equitable relief may be subject to equitable defenses and to the discretion of the court
before which any Proceeding therefor may be brought) and (b) in full force and effect.
Section 4.15
Trademarks, Patents and Copyrights
.
(a) Except
as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, the applications for and registrations of Intellectual Property Rights owned by Parent or its Subsidiaries are (i) free and clear of all Liens (other than Permitted Liens) and
(ii) in effect, subsisting and, to the Knowledge of Parent, valid.
(b) To
the Knowledge of Parent, except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Parent and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, Parent and its Subsidiaries own, validly license or have the right to use in the manner currently used, all Intellectual Property Rights that are used in the respective
businesses of Parent and its Subsidiaries.
(c) To
the Knowledge of Parent, except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Parent and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, the conduct of the respective businesses of Parent and its Subsidiaries as currently conducted does not infringe upon, misappropriate or otherwise violate any
Intellectual Property Rights of any other Person. As of the date of this Agreement, there is no claim for any
A-38
Table of Contents
such
infringement, misappropriation or other violation pending or, to the Knowledge of Parent, threatened, except for any such infringement, misappropriation or other violation that has not been, and
would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole. To the Knowledge of Parent, no other Person is
infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating any Intellectual Property Right that is material to the respective businesses of Parent and its Subsidiaries as currently conducted, except for any
such infringement, misappropriation or other violation that has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Parent and its
Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
(d) To
the Knowledge of Parent, there have been no material security breaches in the information technology systems of Parent and its Subsidiaries or the information
technology systems of any other Persons to the extent used by or on behalf of Parent and its Subsidiaries. Since December 31, 2014, except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected
to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, Parent and its Subsidiaries have at all times complied with all applicable Laws, as well
as their own rules, policies and procedures, relating to privacy, data protection and the collection, retention, protection and use of personal information.
(e) The
representations and warranties set forth in this
Section 4.15
and
Section 4.12(f)
are the only representations and warranties being made by
Parent in this Agreement with respect to any infringement,
misappropriation or other violation of Intellectual Property Rights.
Section 4.16
Real and Personal Property
.
Except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, Parent and its
Subsidiaries (as applicable) have good title to, or valid leasehold interests in, all of their respective properties and assets, free and clear of all Liens, except for Permitted Liens.
Section 4.17
Environmental
.
Except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, material to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole:
(a) Parent
and its Subsidiaries are in compliance with all applicable Environmental Laws, including possessing and complying with the terms of all Parent Permits required
for their operations under applicable Environmental Laws;
(b) as
of the date of this Agreement, there is no Proceeding or Order pending or, to the Knowledge of Parent, threatened pursuant to any Environmental Law against Parent or
any of its Subsidiaries;
(c) as
of the date of this Agreement, none of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries has received notice or a request for information alleging that Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries has been or is in actual or potential violation of any applicable Environmental Law or otherwise may be liable under any applicable Environmental Law, which violation or liability is
unresolved; and
(d) there
have been no Releases of Hazardous Materials on or underneath any location that is reasonably likely to result in an obligation by Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries to remediate such Releases pursuant to applicable Environmental Law or otherwise result in liability to Parent or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to applicable Environmental Law with
respect to such Releases.
Section 4.18
Customers and Suppliers
.
None of the ten (10) largest customers (by revenue) of the businesses of Parent and its Subsidiaries during the twelve (12) months prior to the date of this Agreement, the
ten (10) largest suppliers (by cost) of the businesses of Parent and its Subsidiaries during the twelve (12) months prior to the date of this Agreement or the ten (10) largest
"single source" suppliers (by cost) of the businesses of Parent and its Subsidiaries during the twelve (12) months prior to the date of this Agreement has canceled or otherwise terminated, or
to the
A-39
Table of Contents
Knowledge
of Parent, threatened in writing to cancel or otherwise terminate, its relationship with Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or to materially decrease the quantity of products or services
purchased from or sold to, respectively, Parent or any of its Subsidiaries since December 31, 2015, outside of ordinary cyclical fluctuations in business from the placing and fulfillment of
Contracts.
Section 4.19
Aviation Regulation Compliance
.
Except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, Parent and each
of its Subsidiaries (a) is in compliance with all applicable Aviation Regulations, (b) has not violated, been subject to an investigation with respect to or made voluntary disclosures
with respect to potential violations of any Aviation Regulations during the last two (2) years and (c) has not been cited by the FAA or foreign aviation authorities for any material
discrepancies or violations during inspections or audits during the last two (2) years. Except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate,
materially adverse to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, Parent has not received any Air Worthiness Directives (as such term is defined in the Federal Aviation Regulations, 14 C.F.R.
§ 39, as amended) issued by the FAA (or, with respect to such issuances by any foreign aviation Governmental Authority, the foreign equivalent thereof) pursuant to which a known
safety deficiency was found in any products of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries at any time during the last two (2) years, and no such Air Worthiness Directives are pending.
Section 4.20
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Anti-Corruption
.
(a) Since
October 1, 2013, to the Knowledge of Parent, none of Parent or its Subsidiaries, nor any director, officer, employee or agent of Parent, has directly or
indirectly made, offered to make, or attempted to make any contribution, gift, bribe, rebate, payoff, influence payment, kickback or other payment to any Person, private or public, regardless of what
form, whether in money, property or services, in violation of the Anti-Corruption Laws. Without limiting the foregoing, none of Parent or its Subsidiaries, nor, to the Knowledge of Parent or its
Subsidiaries, any director, officer, employee, stockholder (solely to the extent acting on behalf of Parent) or agent of Parent, has directly or indirectly offered or given anything of value to
(i) any foreign official, any foreign political party or official thereof or any candidate for political office or (ii) any Person, while knowing that all or a portion of such thing of
value will be offered, given or promised, directly or indirectly, to any foreign official, to any foreign political party or official thereof or to any candidate for foreign political office for the
purpose of the following: (A) influencing any act or decision of such foreign official, political party, party official or candidate in his, her or its official capacity, including influencing
such foreign official, political party, party official or candidate to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such foreign official, political party, party official or candidate,
or securing any improper advantage or (B) inducing such foreign official, political party, party official or candidate to use his, her or its influence with a foreign Governmental Authority, or
instrumentality thereof, to affect or influence any act or decision of such Governmental Authority or instrumentality, in order to assist Parent or any Subsidiaries in obtaining or retaining business
for or with or directing business to, any Person.
(b) To
the Knowledge of Parent, neither Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries (i) is under external or internal investigation for any material violation of the
Anti-Corruption Laws, (ii) has received any notice or other communication (in writing or otherwise) from any Governmental Authority regarding any material violation of, or failure to comply
with, any Anti-Corruption Laws or (iii) is the subject of any internal complaint, audit or review process regarding a material violation of the Anti-Corruption Laws.
(c) Parent
and its Subsidiaries maintain an adequate system or systems of internal controls reasonably designed to (i) ensure compliance with the Anti-Corruption Laws
and (ii) prevent and detect violations of the Anti-Corruption Laws.
A-40
Table of Contents
Section 4.21
Customs and International Trade Laws
.
(a) Since
October 1, 2013, Parent and its Subsidiaries have been in compliance with all Customs & International Trade Laws and there are no unresolved formal
claims concerning the liability of any of Parent or its Subsidiaries under such Laws. Without limiting the foregoing, (i) at all times since October 1, 2013 Parent and its Subsidiaries
and, to the Knowledge of Parent, Persons acting on their behalf have obtained all import and export licenses and all other Consents required for the export, import or reexport of goods, services,
software and technology required for the operation of the respective businesses of Parent and its Subsidiaries, including Customs & International Trade Authorizations; (ii) since
October 1, 2013, no Governmental Authority has initiated any Proceedings or imposed any civil or criminal fine, penalty, seizure, forfeiture, revocation of a Customs & International
Trade Authorization, debarment or denial of future Customs & International Trade Authorizations against any of Parent or its Subsidiaries or any of their respective directors, officers or, to
the Knowledge of Parent, employees or agents, of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries (in their capacity as such) in connection with any actual or alleged violation of any applicable Customs &
International Trade Laws; and (iii) to the Knowledge of Parent, since October 1, 2013, there have been no investigations, written claims or written requests for information by a
Governmental Authority with respect to Parent's and its Subsidiaries' Customs & International Trade Authorizations and compliance with applicable Customs & International
Trade Laws, except, in each case, as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
(b) Neither
Parent nor any of its Subsidiaries, and no director, officer or, to the Knowledge of Parent, employee thereof (i) is a Sanctioned Person; or
(ii) has pending or, to the Knowledge of Parent, threatened claims against it with respect to Sanctions.
(c) Each
of Parent and its Subsidiaries and any director, officer or, to the Knowledge of Parent, employee thereof (i) is in compliance in all material respects with,
and, since October 1, 2013, has not materially violated any Sanctions; and (ii) has in place adequate controls and systems reasonably designed to ensure compliance with applicable Laws
pertaining to Sanctions in each of the jurisdictions in which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries do or in the past have done business.
Section 4.22
Insurance
.
Except as has not been, and would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the aggregate, materially adverse to Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole,
(a) Parent and its Subsidiaries have paid, or caused to be paid, all premiums due under all insurance policies of Parent and its Subsidiaries, and all such insurance policies are in full force
and effect, (b) as of the date of this Agreement, none of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries has received written notice (i) that they are in default with respect to any obligations under
such policies or (ii) of cancellation or termination with respect to any such policies, or refusal or denial of any coverage, reservation of rights or rejection of any claim under any such
policies, in each case that is held by, or for the benefit of, Parent or any of its Subsidiaries.
Section 4.23
Brokers
.
No investment banker, broker or finder other than J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, the fees and expenses of which will be paid by Parent, is entitled to any investment banking,
brokerage, finder's or similar fee or commission in connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of Parent or Merger
Sub.
Section 4.24
Opinion of Financial Advisor
.
Parent has received the opinion of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, dated as of the date of this Agreement, to the effect that, as of the date of such opinion, on the basis of and
subject to the factors, qualifications, limitations and assumptions set forth in such opinion, the Merger Consideration to be paid by Parent in the proposed Merger is fair, from a
A-41
Table of Contents
financial
point of view, to Parent. Promptly after the date of this Agreement, a true, correct and complete copy of such opinion will be made available to the Company for informational purposes only.
Section 4.25
Financing
.
Parent and Merger Sub collectively will have, as of the Closing Date, sufficient cash to consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement that require
payment on the Closing Date. The obligations of Parent and Merger Sub hereunder are not subject to any condition regarding Parent's, Merger Sub's or any other Person's ability to obtain financing for
the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 4.26
Share Ownership
.
None of Parent, Merger Sub or any of their Affiliates has been, at any time during the three (3) years preceding the date of this Agreement, an "interested stockholder" of the
Company, as defined in Section 203 of the DGCL. As of the date of this Agreement, none of Parent, Merger Sub or their respective Affiliates owns (directly or indirectly, beneficially or of
record) any Company Common Stock and none of Parent, Merger Sub or any of their respective Affiliates holds any rights to acquire any Company Common Stock except pursuant to this Agreement (in each
case other than
de minimis
holdings held by directors and officers of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries).
Section 4.27
Management Agreements
.
Other than this Agreement and the amendments to the employment agreements referenced in
Section 4.27 to the Parent Disclosure
Letter
, as of the date of this Agreement, there are no Contracts, undertakings, commitments, agreements or obligations or understandings between Parent or Merger Sub or any of
their Affiliates, on the one hand, and any member of the Company's management or the Company Board, on the other hand, relating in any way to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the
operations of the Company after the Effective Time.
Section 4.28
No Other Representations or Warranties
.
Except for (a) the representations and warranties contained in this
Article IV
and (b) the representations,
warranties and covenants contained in the Parent Signing Representation Letter and the Parent Closing Representation Letter, none of Parent, Merger Sub nor any other Person on behalf of Parent or
Merger Sub makes any express or implied representation or warranty with respect to Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or any other information provided to the Company in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including the accuracy, completeness or timeliness thereof.
COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS
Section 5.1
Conduct of Business by the Company Pending the Merger
.
The Company covenants and agrees that, between the date of this Agreement and the earlier of the Effective Time and the date, if any, on which this Agreement is terminated in accordance
with
Section 7.1
, except (A) as may be required by Law, (B) as may be agreed in writing by Parent (which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned), (C) as may be expressly contemplated or permitted pursuant to this Agreement or (D) as set forth on
Section 5.1 of the Company Disclosure Letter
, (x) the Company shall, and shall cause its Subsidiaries to, conduct the business of the
Company and its Subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business and in a manner consistent with past practice and, to the extent consistent therewith, use reasonable best efforts to preserve its
assets and business organization and maintain its existing relationships with material customers, suppliers, distributors, regulators and business partners, and (y) the Company shall not, and
shall cause its Subsidiaries not to, directly or indirectly:
(a) amend
the Certificate of Incorporation or the Bylaws of the Company (or such equivalent organizational or governing documents of any of its Subsidiaries);
A-42
Table of Contents
(b) adjust,
split, combine, subdivide, reclassify, redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire or amend the terms of the Company's or any of its Subsidiaries' capital stock or
other equity interests or any options, equity or equity-based compensation, warrants, convertible securities or other rights of any kind to acquire any shares of the Company's or any of its
Subsidiaries' capital stock or other equity interests;
(c) issue,
sell, pledge, dispose, encumber, grant or authorize the same with respect to, any shares of the Company's or its Subsidiaries' capital stock or other equity
interests, or any options, equity or equity-based compensation, warrants, convertible securities or other rights of any kind to acquire any shares of the Company's or any of its Subsidiaries' capital
stock or other equity interests;
provided
,
however
, that the Company may issue shares (i) upon
the settlement of any Company RSU Award or Company DSU Award outstanding as of the date of this Agreement or (ii) pursuant to the terms of the Company ESPP in effect immediately prior to the
date of this Agreement;
(d) except
with respect to the regular quarterly cash dividends of $0.21 per share, with record and payment dates for such dividends consistent with past practice, declare,
set aside, authorize, make or pay any dividend or other distribution, payable in cash, stock, property or otherwise, with respect to the Company's or any of its Subsidiaries' capital stock or other
equity interests, other than cash dividends
and distributions paid by any Subsidiary of the Company to the Company or any wholly owned Subsidiary of the Company;
(e) (i)
establish, adopt, enter into any new, amend, terminate, or take any action to accelerate rights under, any Company Benefit Plan or plan, program, policy, practice,
agreement or arrangement that would be a Company Benefit Plan if it had been in effect on the date of this Agreement, except to the extent required pursuant to any Company Benefit Plan;
(ii) grant or pay, or commit to grant or pay, any bonus, incentive or profit-sharing award or payment; (iii) increase, or commit to increase, the amount of the wages, salary, bonuses,
commissions, fringe benefits, severance or other compensation (including equity or equity-based compensation, whether payable in stock, cash or other property), benefits or remuneration payable to any
current or former employee or director of, or individual service provider to, the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, except for annual increases in base salaries to employees whose annual base
compensation is below $150,000, in the ordinary course of business and in amounts and at such times as is consistent with past practice; (iv) take any action (other than actions contemplated by
this Agreement) to accelerate any payment or benefit, the vesting of any equity or equity-based award or the funding of any payment or benefit, payable or to become payable to any current or former
employee or director of, or individual service provider to, the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company; (v) except pursuant to, or as contemplated by, any agreement set forth on
Section 3.12(j) of the Company
Disclosure Letter
, enter into any employment, severance, change in control, retention, individual consulting or
similar agreement with any current or former employee or director of, or individual service provider to, the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company (other than offer letters that provide for at-will
employment without any severance, retention or change in control benefits for newly hired employees or individual service providers who are hired in the ordinary course of business and whose annual
base compensation does not exceed $225,000 individually), (vi) communicate with the employees of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company regarding the compensation, benefits or other
treatment they will receive following the Effective Time, unless such communications are consistent with the terms provided herein; or (vii) except as may be required by GAAP, materially change
any actuarial or other assumptions used to calculate funding obligations with respect to any Company Benefit Plan or materially change the manner in which contributions to such plans are made or the
basis on which such contributions are determined;
A-43
Table of Contents
(f) hire,
engage, promote or terminate (other than for cause) any employee or other individual service provider who is or would be entitled to receive annual base
compensation of $225,000 or more;
(g) except
as contemplated by the Company ESPP in effect as of the date of this Agreement, grant, confer or award equity or equity-based compensation, options, convertible
securities, restricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock units or other rights to acquire any of the Company's or its Subsidiaries' capital stock or other equity interests;
(h) make
any loan or advance (other than travel and similar advances to its employees in the ordinary course of business) to any Person in excess of $50,000 in the
aggregate;
(i) forgive
any loans or advances to any officers, employees or directors of the Company or its Subsidiaries, or any of their respective Affiliates, or change its existing
borrowing or lending arrangements for or on behalf of any of such Persons pursuant to an employee benefit plan or otherwise, except in the ordinary course of business in connection with relocation
activities of any employees of the Company or its Subsidiaries;
(j) acquire
(including by merger, consolidation or acquisition of stock or assets) any corporation, partnership, limited liability company, joint venture, other business
organization or any division or all or any material portion of the assets, business or properties of any other Person, in each case, for aggregate consideration in excess of $20,000,000;
(k) sell,
pledge, dispose of, transfer, abandon, lease, license, mortgage, incur any Lien (other than Permitted Liens) (including pursuant to a sale-leaseback transaction or
an asset securitization transaction) on or otherwise transfer or encumber any material portion of the assets, business, properties or rights of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (other than
licenses of Intellectual Property Rights in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice), except (i) sales of inventory in the ordinary course of business and consistent with
past practice, (ii) transfers among the Company and its Subsidiaries or (iii) disposition of obsolete assets or expired inventory;
(l) (i)
pay, discharge or satisfy any Indebtedness that has a prepayment cost, "make whole" amount, prepayment penalty or similar obligation (other than (A) the
payment, discharge or satisfaction, required pursuant to the terms of the Company's Existing Credit Agreement as in effect as of the date of this Agreement and (B) Indebtedness incurred by the
Company or its wholly owned Subsidiaries and owed to the Company or its wholly owned Subsidiaries) or (ii) cancel any material Indebtedness (individually or in the aggregate) or waive or amend
any claims or rights of substantial value;
(m) (i)
incur, create, assume or otherwise become liable for any Indebtedness or guarantee any such Indebtedness of any Person (other than a wholly owned Subsidiary of the
Company), including the issuance of any debt security and the assumption or guarantee of obligations of any Person or issue or sell any debt securities or options, warrants, calls or other rights to
acquire any debt securities of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries' (except for (A) Indebtedness or guarantees for drawdowns with respect to the Company's revolving credit facility under its
Existing Credit Agreement in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and (B) Indebtedness owed to the Company or its wholly owned Subsidiaries) or (ii) make any
loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any other Person (other than to or in the Company or any direct or indirect wholly owned Subsidiary of the Company);
(n) terminate,
enter into, agree to any material amendment or modification of or renew or waive any material rights under any Company Material Contract or any Contract
relating to Company Leased Real
Property, in each case other than Company Material Contracts of the type described in
Sections 3.14(a)(i)
,
(ii)
,
(v)
,
(vi)
,
(xii)
or
(xv)
in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice;
A-44
Table of Contents
(o) modify,
extend or enter into any Labor Agreement, except as required pursuant to an applicable Contract in effect as of the date of this Agreement;
(p) make
any material change to its methods of accounting, except as required by GAAP (or any interpretation thereof), Regulation S-X of the Exchange Act or a
Governmental Authority or quasi-Governmental Authority (including the Financial Accounting Standards Board or any similar organization);
(q) make
or agree to make any capital expenditure exceeding $25,000,000 in the aggregate in any calendar quarter;
(r) write
up, write down or write off the book value of any material assets, except to the extent required by GAAP;
(s) release,
compromise, assign, settle or agree to settle any Proceeding (including any Proceeding relating to this Agreement or the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement with adverse parties other than the other parties hereto) or insurance claim, other than settlements that result solely in monetary obligations involving payment
(without the admission of wrongdoing) by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries of (i) the amounts specifically reserved in accordance with GAAP with respect to such Proceeding on the Company's
consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2015 or (ii) an amount not greater than $5,000,000 in the aggregate;
(t) fail
to maintain in effect the existing material insurance policies covering the Company and its Subsidiaries and their respective properties, assets and businesses;
(u) announce,
implement or effect any facility closing, lay-off, early retirement programs, severance programs or reductions in force affecting employees of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries, other than any such action not giving rise to more than $250,000 in severance and other liability related to such action;
(v) cancel,
dedicate to the public, disclaim, forfeit, reexamine or abandon without filing a substantially identical counterpart in the same jurisdiction with the same
priority or allow to lapse (except with respect to patents expiring in accordance with their terms) any Intellectual Property Rights material to the Company;
(w) (i)
make or change any material Tax election or change any method of Tax accounting; (ii) file any material amended Tax Return; (iii) settle or compromise
any audit or Proceeding unless such settlement or compromise does not result in a Tax liability that materially exceeds the liability with respect to such audit or Proceeding recorded or reflected in
the Company SEC Documents prior to the date hereof; (iv) agree to an extension or waiver of the statute of limitations with respect to a material amount of Taxes; (v) enter into any
"closing agreement" within the meaning of Section 7121 of the Code (or any similar provision of state, local or non-U.S. Law) with respect to any material Tax; or (vi) surrender any
right to claim a material Tax refund;
(x) take
(or knowingly fail to take) any action, including consenting to any action pursuant to the KLX Tax Sharing Agreement that would cause (i) the KLX External
Spin-Off to fail to qualify for the KLX Spin-Off Tax Treatment or (ii) the KLX Internal Restructuring to fail to qualify for the Tax treatments originally reported on the relevant Tax Returns
of the Company, KLX or any applicable Subsidiary of either;
(y) merge
or consolidate the Company or any of its Subsidiaries with any third party or adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution, restructuring,
recapitalization or other reorganization of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries; or
A-45
Table of Contents
(z) enter
into any agreement to do, or adopt any resolutions in support of, any of the foregoing.
Section 5.2
Conduct of Business by Parent Pending the Merger
.
Parent covenants and agrees that, between the date of this Agreement and the earlier of the Effective Time and the date, if any, on which this Agreement is terminated in accordance with
Section 7.1
, except (A) as may be required by Law, (B) as may be agreed in writing by the Company (which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned), (C) as may be expressly contemplated or permitted pursuant to this Agreement or (D) as set forth in
Section 5.2 of the Parent Disclosure Letter
, (x) Parent shall conduct its business in the ordinary course of business and in a manner
consistent with past practice and, to the extent consistent therewith, use reasonable best efforts to preserve its assets and business organization and maintain its existing relationships with
material customers, suppliers, distributors, regulators and business partners, and (y) Parent shall not, directly or indirectly:
(a) amend
the Parent Organizational Documents in a manner that would be adverse to the Company or its stockholders or would, or would reasonably be expected to, have the
effect of delaying or preventing the consummation of the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
(b) increase
the size of the Parent Board;
(c) except
with respect to quarterly cash dividends paid in the ordinary course, consistent with past practice, subject to increase by no more than twenty-five percent (25%)
on a quarterly basis, declare, set aside, authorize, make or pay any dividend or other distribution, payable in cash, stock, property or otherwise, with respect to its capital stock or other equity
interests;
(d) adopt
a plan of complete or partial liquidation or dissolution;
(e) adjust,
split, combine, subdivide or reclassify Parent's capital stock; or
(f) issue
or sell any shares of Parent Common Stock representing more than five percent (5%) of the issued and outstanding shares of Parent Common Stock as of the date of
this Agreement;
provided
,
however
, that Parent may issue or sell shares of Parent Common Stock pursuant
to Parent Equity Awards, the Parent 2015 Long-Term Incentives Plan, the Parent Employee Stock Purchase Plan and any other Parent Benefit Plan; or
(g) enter
into any agreement to do, or adopt any resolutions in support of, any of the foregoing.
Section 5.3
Preparation of the Form S-4 and the Joint Proxy Statement; Stockholder Meetings
.
(a) As
promptly as practicable after the execution of this Agreement (but in any event, no more than thirty (30) days following the date hereof, unless the parties
otherwise agree to another time period), Parent and the Company shall jointly prepare, and Parent and the Company, as applicable, shall cause to be filed with the SEC the Joint Proxy Statement in
preliminary form. Parent shall prepare (and consider the Company's comments in good faith) and cause to be filed with the SEC within thirty (30) days after the execution of this Agreement, the
Form S-4, in which the Joint Proxy Statement will be included as a prospectus, in connection with the registration under the Securities Act of the Parent Common Stock to be issued in the
Merger. Each of Parent and the Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to (i) cause the Form S-4 and the Joint Proxy Statement to comply with the applicable rules and regulations
promulgated by the SEC, (ii) have the Form S-4 declared effective under the Securities Act as promptly as practicable after such filing (including by responding to comments from the
SEC), and, prior to the effective date of the Form S-4, take all action reasonably required to be taken under any applicable state securities Laws in connection with the Parent Stock Issuance
and (iii) keep the Form S-4 effective through the Closing Date in order to permit the consummation of the Merger. Each of Parent and
A-46
Table of Contents
the
Company shall furnish all information as may be reasonably requested by the other in connection with any such action and the preparation, filing and distribution of the Form S-4 and the
Joint Proxy Statement. As promptly as practicable after the Form S-4 shall have become effective, each of Parent and the Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause the Joint Proxy
Statement to be mailed to its respective stockholders. No filing of, or amendment or supplement to, the Form S-4 will be made by Parent, and no filing of, or amendment or supplement to, the
Joint Proxy Statement will be made by Parent or the Company, in each case without providing the other party with a reasonable opportunity to review and comment thereon. If, at any time prior to the
Effective Time, any information relating to Parent of the Company or any of their respective Affiliates, directors or officers, should be discovered by Parent or the Company which should be set forth
in an amendment or supplement to either the Form S-4 or the Joint Proxy Statement, so that either such document would not include any misstatement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading, the party that discovers such information shall promptly notify the
other parties hereto and an appropriate amendment or supplement describing such information shall be prepared and, following a reasonable opportunity for the other party (and its counsel) to review
and comment on such amendment or supplement, promptly filed with the SEC and, to the extent required by applicable Law, disseminated to the stockholders of Parent and the Company. Subject to
applicable Law, each party shall notify the other promptly of the time when the Form S-4 has become effective, of the issuance of any stop order or suspension of the qualification of the Parent
Common Stock issuable in connection with the Merger for offering or sale in any jurisdiction, or of the receipt of any comments from the SEC or the staff of the SEC and of any request by the SEC or
the staff of the SEC for amendments or supplements to the Joint Proxy Statement or the Form S-4 or for additional information and shall supply each other with copies of all correspondence
between either party or any of its Representatives, on the one hand, and
the SEC or its staff, on the other hand, with respect to the Joint Proxy Statement, the Form S-4 or the Merger.
(b) Subject
to the earlier termination of this Agreement in accordance with
Section 7.1
, the Company shall, as soon as
practicable following the effectiveness of the Form S-4, duly call, give notice of, convene (on a date selected by the Company in consultation with Parent, which date is intended to be the date
of the Parent Stockholders' Meeting) and hold a meeting of its stockholders (the "
Company Stockholders' Meeting
") for the purpose of seeking the Company
Stockholder Approval, and shall submit such proposal to such holders at the Company Stockholders' Meeting and shall not submit any other proposal to such holders in connection with the Company
Stockholders' Meeting without the prior written consent of Parent. The Company in consultation with Parent shall set a record date for Persons entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Company
Stockholders' Meeting and shall not change such record date without the prior written consent of Parent and shall not adjourn or otherwise postpone or delay such Company Stockholders' Meeting without
the prior written consent of Parent. If the Company Board has not made a Company Adverse Recommendation Change, the Company shall, through the Company Board, make the Company Recommendation, and shall
include such Company Recommendation in the Joint Proxy Statement, and use its reasonable best efforts to (i) solicit from its stockholders proxies in favor of the adoption of this Agreement and
(ii) take all other action necessary or advisable to secure the Company Stockholder Approval. Notwithstanding any Company Adverse Recommendation Change, unless this Agreement is terminated in
accordance with its terms, the obligations of the parties hereunder shall continue in full force and effect and such obligations shall not be affected by the commencement, public proposal, public
disclosure or communication to the Company of any Company Acquisition Proposal (whether or not a Company Superior Proposal).
A-47
Table of Contents
(c) Subject
to the earlier termination of this Agreement in accordance with
Section 7.1
, Parent shall, as soon as
practicable following the effectiveness of the Form S-4, duly call, give notice of, convene (on a date selected by Parent in consultation with the Company, which date is intended to be the date
of the Company Stockholders' Meeting) and hold a meeting of its stockholders (the "
Parent Stockholders' Meeting
") for the purpose of seeking the Parent
Stockholder Approval, and shall submit such proposal to such holders at the Parent Stockholders' Meeting and shall not submit any other proposal to such holders in connection with the Parent
Stockholders' Meeting without the prior written consent of the Company. Parent in consultation with the Company shall set a record date for Persons entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Parent
Stockholders' Meeting and shall not change such record date without the prior written consent of the Company and shall not adjourn or otherwise postpone or delay such Parent Stockholders' Meeting
without the prior written consent of the Company. If the Parent Board has not made a Parent Adverse Recommendation Change, Parent shall, through the Parent Board, make the Parent Recommendation, and
shall include such Parent Recommendation in the Joint Proxy Statement, and use its reasonable best efforts to (i) solicit from its stockholders proxies in favor of the Parent Stock Issuance and
(ii) take all other action necessary or advisable to secure the Parent Stockholder Approval. Notwithstanding any Parent Adverse Recommendation Change, unless this Agreement is terminated in
accordance with its terms, the obligations of the parties hereunder shall continue in full force and effect and such obligations shall not be affected by the commencement,
public proposal, public disclosure or communication to Parent of any Parent Acquisition Proposal (whether or not a Parent Superior Proposal).
(d) The
Company and Parent will use their respective reasonable best efforts to hold the Company Stockholders' Meeting and the Parent Stockholders' Meeting on the same date
and as soon as practicable after the date of this Agreement.
Section 5.4
Appropriate Action; Consents; Filings
.
(a) Subject
to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the parties hereto will cooperate with each other and use (and will cause their respective Subsidiaries to use)
their respective reasonable best efforts to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and to cause the conditions to the Merger set forth in
Article VI
to be satisfied as promptly
as reasonably practicable, including using reasonable best efforts to accomplish the following as promptly
as reasonably practicable: (i) the obtaining of all actions or non-actions, consents, approvals, registrations, waivers, permits, authorizations, orders, expirations or terminations of waiting
periods, and other confirmations from any Governmental Authority or other Person that are or may become necessary, proper or advisable in connection with the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, including the Merger; (ii) the preparation and making of all registrations, filings, forms, notices, petitions, statements, submissions of information,
applications and other documents (including filings with Governmental Authorities) that are or may become necessary, proper or advisable in connection with the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, including the Merger; (iii) the taking of all steps as may be necessary, proper or advisable to obtain an approval from, or to avoid a Proceeding by, any
Governmental Authority or other Person in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including the Merger; (iv) the defending of any lawsuits or other
Proceedings, whether judicial or administrative, challenging this Agreement or that would otherwise prevent or materially delay the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
including the Merger, performed or consummated by each party in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, including seeking to have any stay or temporary restraining order entered by any court or
other Governmental Authority vacated or reversed; and (v) the execution and delivery of any additional instruments that are or may become reasonably necessary, proper or advisable to consummate
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
A-48
Table of Contents
including
the Merger, and to carry out fully the purposes of this Agreement. Each of the parties hereto shall, in consultation and cooperation with the other parties and as promptly as reasonably
practicable (and in no event later than ten (10) Business Days following the date that this Agreement is executed),
make and not withdraw (without the other parties' consent) its respective filings under the HSR Act, and thereafter make any other applications and filings as reasonably determined by the Company and
Parent under other applicable Antitrust Laws with respect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement as promptly as practicable, but in no event later than as required by Law. Parent shall pay
all filing fees and other charges for the filings required under any Antitrust Law by the Company and Parent. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, without the prior
written consent of Parent, none of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates will grant or offer to grant any accommodation or concession (financial or otherwise), or make any payment, to
any third party in connection with seeking or obtaining its consent (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed) to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(b) In
connection with and without limiting the efforts referenced in this
Section 5.4
, each of the parties hereto
will (i) furnish to the other such necessary information and reasonable assistance as the other may request in connection with the preparation of any governmental filings, submissions or other
documents; (ii) give the other reasonable prior notice of any such filing, submission or other document and, to the extent reasonably practicable, of any communication with or from any
Governmental Authority regarding the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and permit the other to review and discuss in advance, and consider in good faith the views, and secure the
participation, of the other in connection with any such filing, submission, document or communication; (iii) and cooperate in responding as promptly as reasonably practicable to any
investigation or other inquiry from a Governmental Authority or in connection with any Proceeding initiated by a Governmental Authority or private party, including immediately informing the other
party of any such investigation, inquiry or Proceeding, and consulting in advance before making any presentations or submissions to a Governmental Authority, or, in connection with any Proceeding
initiated by a private party, to any other Person. In addition, each of the parties hereto will give reasonable prior notice to and consult with the other in advance of any meeting, conference or
substantive communication with any Governmental Authority, or, in connection with any Proceeding by a private party, with any other Person, and to the extent not prohibited by applicable Law or by the
applicable Governmental Authority or other Person, and to the extent reasonably practicable, not participate or attend any meeting or conference, or engage in any substantive communication, with any
Governmental Authority or such other Person in respect of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement without the other party, and in the event one party is prohibited from, or unable to
participate, attend or engage in, any such meeting, conference or substantive communication, keep such party apprised with respect thereto. Each party shall furnish to the other copies of all
substantive filings, submissions, correspondence and communications between it and its Affiliates and their respective Representatives, on the one hand, and any Governmental Authority or members of
any Governmental Authority's staff (or any other Person in connection with any Proceeding initiated by a private party), on the other hand, with respect to the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement. Each party may, as it deems advisable and necessary, reasonably designate material provided to the other party as "Outside Counsel Only Material," and also may redact the material as
necessary to (A) remove personally sensitive information; (B) remove references concerning valuation, (C) comply with contractual arrangements, (D) address legal privilege
or other confidentiality concerns, or (E) comply with applicable Law.
(c) The
parties shall consult with each other with respect to obtaining all permits and Consents necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
including the Merger.
A-49
Table of Contents
(d) Notwithstanding
anything in this Agreement to the contrary, none of Parent or any of its Affiliates shall be required to agree to or proffer to sell, divest, lease,
license, transfer, dispose of or otherwise encumber or impair Parent's or any of its Affiliates' ability to own or operate any assets or properties of Parent or any of its Affiliates (including for
the avoidance of doubt, any equity or other interests in the Company) or any assets or properties of the Company or any of its Affiliates if such action would require the divestiture or holding
separate (or any other remedy) of or with respect to any assets of Parent, the Company or any of their Affiliates or Subsidiaries representing, in the aggregate, more than $175,000,000 of annual
revenue generated between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015.
(e) Parent
and Merger Sub agree that, between the date of this Agreement and the earlier of the Effective Time and the termination of this Agreement in accordance with
Section 7.1
, each of Parent and Merger
Sub shall not, and shall ensure that none of their Subsidiaries shall, consummate, or enter into any
agreement providing for, any acquisition, divestiture or merger that would reasonably be expected to materially delay or prevent the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 5.5
Access to Information; Confidentiality.
(a) Upon
reasonable notice, the Company shall (and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to) afford reasonable access to Parent's Representatives, during normal business
hours and upon reasonable notice throughout the period from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time (or until the earlier termination of this Agreement in accordance with
Section 7.1
), to
the personnel, advisors, properties, books and records of the Company and its Subsidiaries and, during such period, shall (and
shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to) furnish reasonably promptly to such Representatives all information concerning the business, properties and personnel of the Company and its Subsidiaries, and
to provide copies thereof, as may reasonably be requested;
provided, however
, that nothing herein shall require the Company or any of its Subsidiaries
to disclose any information to Parent or Merger Sub if such disclosure would, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, (i) violate applicable Law or the provisions of any agreement to which
the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or (ii) jeopardize any attorney-client or other legal privilege;
provided
,
further
,
however
, that in each such case, the Company shall cooperate with Parent to enable Parent and
Parent's Representatives to enter into appropriate confidentiality, joint defense or similar documents or arrangements so that Parent and Parent's Representatives may have access to such information.
No investigation or access permitted pursuant to this
Section 5.5(a)
shall affect or be deemed to modify any representation, warranty, covenant
or agreement made by the Company hereunder. All information furnished by the Company, its Subsidiaries and the Company's officers, employees and other Representatives pursuant to this
Section 5.5(a)
shall be kept confidential in accordance with the Confidentiality Agreement.
(b) Upon
reasonable notice, Parent shall (and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries and Merger Sub to) afford to Representatives of the Company reasonable access, during
normal business hours and upon reasonable notice throughout the period from the date of this Agreement the Effective Time (or until the earlier termination of this Agreement in accordance with
Section 7.1
), to the personnel, advisors, properties, books and records of Parent and its Subsidiaries and, during such period, shall (and shall
cause each of its Subsidiaries to) furnish reasonably promptly to such Representatives all information concerning the business, properties and personnel of Parent and its Subsidiaries, and to provide
copies thereof, as may reasonably be requested;
provided
,
however
, that nothing herein shall require
Parent or any of its Subsidiaries to disclose any information to the Company if such disclosure would, in the reasonable judgment of Parent, (i) violate applicable Law or the provisions of any
agreement to which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries is a party or (ii) jeopardize any attorney-client or other legal privilege;
provided
,
further
,
however
, that in each such case, Parent shall cooperate with the Company to enable the Company
and the Company's
A-50
Table of Contents
Representatives
to enter into appropriate confidentiality, joint defense or similar documents or arrangements so that the Company and the Company's Representatives may have access to such information.
No investigation or access permitted pursuant to this
Section 5.5(b)
shall affect or be deemed to modify any representation, warranty, covenant
or agreement made by Parent or Merger Sub hereunder. All information furnished by the Company, its Subsidiaries, Merger Sub and Parent's officers, employees and other Representatives pursuant to this
Section 5.5(b)
shall be kept confidential in accordance with the Confidentiality Agreement.
Section 5.6
No Solicitation by the Company.
(a) From
the date of this Agreement until the earlier of the Effective Time and the termination of this Agreement in accordance with
Section 7.1
, except as provided in
Section 5.6(b)
or
Section 5.6(d)
, (i) the Company shall immediately cease, and shall instruct and use its reasonable best efforts to cause its officers,
directors and other Representatives to cease, and cause to be terminated all existing discussions, negotiations and communications with any Persons or entities with respect to any Company Acquisition
Proposal (other than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement); (ii) the Company shall not, and shall not authorize or permit any of its Representatives to, directly or indirectly
through another Person, (A) initiate, seek, solicit, knowingly encourage (including by way of furnishing any non-public information) or knowingly induce or take any other action which would
reasonably be expected to lead to a Company Acquisition Proposal, (B) engage in negotiations or discussions with, or provide any non-public information or non-public data to, any Person (other
than Parent or any of its Affiliates or Representatives) relating to any Company Acquisition Proposal or grant any waiver or release under any standstill or other agreement (except that if the Company
Board determines in good faith that the failure to grant any waiver or release would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, the Company may waive any such standstill provision
in order to permit a third party to make a Company Acquisition Proposal) or (C) resolve to do any of the foregoing; (iii) the Company shall not provide and shall, within
one (1) Business Day of the date of this Agreement, terminate access of any third party to any data room (virtual or actual) containing any of the Company's information; and
(iv) within two (2) Business Days after the date of this Agreement, the Company shall demand the return or destruction of all confidential, non-public information and materials and all
other information and materials related to any Company Acquisition Proposal that have been provided to third parties that have entered into confidentiality agreements relating to a possible Company
Acquisition Proposal with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
(b) Notwithstanding
the foregoing, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, if the Company receives a bona fide written Company Acquisition Proposal
from a third party that was not initiated, sought, solicited, knowingly encouraged, knowingly induced or otherwise procured in violation of this Agreement, then the Company may (i) contact the
Person who has made such
Company Acquisition Proposal in order to clarify the terms of such Company Acquisition Proposal so that the Company Board (or any committee thereof) may inform itself about such Company Acquisition
Proposal, (ii) furnish information concerning its business, properties or assets to such Person pursuant to a confidentiality agreement with confidentiality terms that, taken as a whole, are
not materially less favorable to the Company than those contained in the Confidentiality Agreement and (iii) negotiate and participate in discussions and negotiations with such Person
concerning such Company Acquisition Proposal, in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii), if the Company Board determines in good faith that such Company Acquisition Proposal constitutes or is
reasonably likely to constitute or result in a Company Superior Proposal. The Company (A) shall promptly (and in any case within twenty-four (24) hours) provide Parent notice
(1) of the receipt of any Company Acquisition Proposal, which notice shall include a complete, unredacted copy of such Company Acquisition
A-51
Table of Contents
Proposal,
and (2) of any inquiries, proposals or offers received by, any requests for non-public information from, or any discussions or negotiations initiated or continued (or sought to be
initiated or continued) with, the Company or any of its Representatives concerning a Company Acquisition Proposal, and disclose the identity of the other party (or parties) and the material terms of
such inquiry, offer, proposal or request and, in the case of written materials, provide copies of such materials, (B) shall promptly (and in any case within
twenty-four (24) hours) make available to Parent copies of all written materials provided by the Company to such party but not previously made available to Parent and (C) shall
keep Parent informed on a reasonably prompt basis (and, in any case, within twenty-four (24) hours of any significant development) of the status and material details (including
amendments and proposed amendments) of any such Company Acquisition Proposal or other inquiry, offer, proposal or request.
(c) Except
as permitted by
Section 5.6(d)
or
Section 5.6(e)
,
neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall (i) withdraw, qualify or modify, or publicly propose to withdraw, qualify or modify, the Company Recommendation, in each case in a
manner adverse to Parent or Merger Sub, (ii) approve or recommend any Company Acquisition Proposal or (iii) adopt or approve, or publicly propose to adopt or approve, or allow the
Company to execute or enter into, any binding or non-binding letter of intent, agreement in principle, memorandum of understanding, merger agreement, acquisition agreement, option agreement, joint
venture agreement, partnership agreement or other agreement, commitment, arrangement or understanding contemplating or otherwise in connection with, or that is intended to or would reasonably be
expected to lead to, any Company Acquisition Proposal (other than a confidentiality agreement pursuant to
Section 5.6(b)
) (any action described
in clauses (i) and (ii) of this sentence being referred to as a "
Company Adverse Recommendation Change
").
(d) If,
at any time prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company Board receives a Company Acquisition Proposal that the Company Board determines in
good faith constitutes
a Company Superior Proposal that was not initiated, sought, solicited, knowingly encouraged, knowingly induced or otherwise procured in violation of this Agreement, the Company Board may
(i) effect a Company Adverse Recommendation Change or (ii) cause the Company to terminate this Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.1(c)(iii)
in order to enter into a definitive agreement
providing for such Company Superior Proposal if (A) the Company Board
determines in good faith that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law; (B) the Company has notified Parent in writing that it
intends to effect a Company Adverse Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement; (C) if applicable, the Company has provided Parent a copy of the proposed definitive agreements between
the Company and the Person making such Company Superior Proposal; (D) for a period of four (4) days following the notice delivered pursuant to clause (B) of this
Section 5.6(d)
, the
Company shall have discussed and negotiated in good faith and made the Company's Representatives available to discuss and
negotiate in good faith (in each case to the extent Parent desires to negotiate) with Parent's Representatives any proposed modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement so that the failure to take such action would no longer be inconsistent with the Company Board's fiduciary duties under applicable Law (it being understood
and agreed that any amendment to any material term or condition of any Company Superior Proposal shall require a new notice and a new negotiation period that shall expire on the later to occur of
(1) two (2) days following delivery of such new notice from the Company to Parent and (2) the expiration of the original four (4)-day period described in clause (D) above);
and (E) no earlier than the end of such negotiation period, the Company Board shall have determined in good faith, after considering the terms of any proposed amendment or modification to this
Agreement, that (x) the Company Acquisition Proposal that is the subject of the notice described in clause (B) above still constitutes a Company Superior
A-52
Table of Contents
Proposal
and (y) the failure to take such action would still be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law.
(e) Other
than in connection with a Company Superior Proposal (which shall be subject to
Section 5.6(d)
and shall not
be subject to this
Section 5.6(e)
), prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval the Company Board may take any action in response to a
Company Intervening Event prohibited by clause (i) of
Section 5.6(c)
, only if (i) the Company Board determines in good faith that
the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law; (ii) the Company has notified Parent in writing that it intends to effect such a Company
Adverse Recommendation Change pursuant to this
Section 5.6(e)
(which notice shall specify the facts and circumstances providing the basis of the
Company Intervening Event and for the Company Board's determination to effect a Company Adverse Recommendation Change in reasonable detail); (iii) for a period of four (4) days following
the notice delivered pursuant to clause (ii) of this
Section 5.6(e)
, the Company shall have discussed and negotiated in good faith and
made the Company's Representatives available to discuss and negotiate in good faith (in each case to the extent Parent desires to negotiate), with Parent's Representatives any proposed modifications
to the terms and conditions of this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement so that the failure to take such action would no longer be inconsistent with the Company Board's fiduciary duties under applicable Law (it being understood
and agreed that any material change to the relevant facts and circumstances shall require a new notice and a new negotiation period that shall expire on the later to occur of (A) two
(2) days following delivery of such new notice from the Company to Parent and (B) the expiration of the original four (4)-day period described above in this clause (iii)); and
(iv) no earlier than the end of such negotiation period, the Company Board shall have determined in good faith, after considering the terms of any proposed amendment or modification to this
Agreement, that the failure to take such action would still be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law.
(f) Nothing
contained in this Agreement shall prohibit the Company or the Company Board from (i) disclosing to its stockholders a position contemplated by
Rules 14d-9 and 14e-2(a) promulgated under the Exchange Act, or from issuing a "stop, look and listen" statement pending disclosure of its position thereunder or (ii) making any
disclosure to its stockholders if the Company Board determines in good faith that the failure of the Company Board to make such disclosure would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under
applicable Law;
provided
,
however
, that (1) in no event shall this
Section 5.6(f)
affect the
obligations specified in
Section 5.6(d)
or
5.6(e)
and (2) any such disclosure (other than issuance by the Company of a "stop, look and listen" or
similar communication of the type
contemplated by Rule 14d-9(f) under the Exchange Act) that addresses or relates to the approval, recommendation or declaration of advisability by the Company Board with respect to this
Agreement or a Company Acquisition Proposal shall be deemed to be a Company Adverse Recommendation Change unless the Company Board in connection with such communication publicly states that its
recommendation with respect to this Agreement has not changed or refers to the prior recommendation of the Company Board, without disclosing any Company Adverse Recommendation Change.
Section 5.7
No Solicitation by Parent.
(a) From
the date of this Agreement until the earlier of the Effective Time and the termination of this Agreement in accordance with
Section 7.1
, except as provided in
Section 5.7(b)
or
Section 5.7(d)
, (i) Parent shall immediately cease, and shall instruct and use its reasonable best efforts to cause its officers,
directors and other Representatives to cease, and cause to be terminated all existing discussions, negotiations and communications with any Persons or entities with respect to any Parent Acquisition
Proposal (other than the transactions contemplated by this Agreement); (ii) Parent shall not, and shall not authorize or permit any of its Representatives to,
A-53
Table of Contents
directly
or indirectly through another Person, (A) initiate, seek, solicit, knowingly encourage (including by way of furnishing any non-public information), or knowingly induce or take any
other action which would reasonably be expected to lead to a Parent Acquisition Proposal, (B) engage in negotiations or discussions with, or provide any non-public information or non-public
data to, any Person (other than the Company or any of its Affiliates or Representatives) relating to any Parent Acquisition Proposal or grant any waiver or release under any standstill or other
agreement (except that if the Parent Board determines in good faith that the failure to grant any waiver or release would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, Parent may
waive any such standstill provision in order to permit a third party to make a Parent Acquisition Proposal) or (C) resolve to do any of the foregoing; (iii) Parent shall not provide and
shall, within one (1) Business Day of the date of this Agreement, terminate access of any third party to any data room (virtual or actual) containing any of Parent's information;
and (iv) within two (2) Business Days after the date of this Agreement, Parent shall demand the return or destruction of all confidential, non-public information and materials and
all other information and materials related to any Parent Acquisition Proposal that have been provided to third parties that have entered into confidentiality agreements relating to a possible Parent
Acquisition Proposal with Parent or any of its Subsidiaries.
(b) Notwithstanding
the foregoing, at any time prior to obtaining the Parent Stockholder Approval, if Parent receives a bona fide written Parent Acquisition Proposal from a
third party that was not initiated, sought, solicited, knowingly encouraged, knowingly induced or otherwise procured in violation of this Agreement, then Parent may (i) contact the Person who
has made such Parent Acquisition Proposal in order to clarify the terms of such Parent Acquisition Proposal so that the Parent Board (or any committee thereof) may inform itself about such Parent
Acquisition Proposal, (ii) furnish information concerning its business, properties or assets to such Person pursuant to a confidentiality agreement with confidentiality terms that, taken as a
whole, are not materially less favorable to Parent than those contained in the Confidentiality Agreement and (iii) negotiate and participate in discussions and negotiations with such Person
concerning such Parent Acquisition Proposal, in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii), if the Parent Board determines in good faith that such Parent Acquisition Proposal constitutes or is
reasonably likely to constitute or result in a Parent Superior Proposal. Parent (A) shall promptly (and in any case within twenty-four (24) hours) provide the Company notice
(1) of the receipt of any Parent Acquisition Proposal, which notice shall include a complete, unredacted copy of such Parent Acquisition Proposal, and (2) of any inquiries, proposals or
offers received by, any requests for non-public information from, or any discussions or negotiations initiated or continued (or sought to be initiated or continued) with, Parent or any of its
Representatives concerning a Parent Acquisition Proposal, and disclose the identity of the other party (or parties) and the material terms of such inquiry, offer, proposal or request and, in the case
of written materials, provide copies of such materials, (B) shall promptly (and in any case within twenty-four (24) hours) make available to the Company copies of all written materials
provided by Parent to such party but not previously made available to the Company and (C) shall keep the Company informed on a reasonably prompt basis (and, in any case, within twenty-four
(24) hours of any significant development) of the status and material details (including amendments and proposed amendments) of any such Parent Acquisition Proposal or other inquiry, offer,
proposal or request.
(c) Except
as permitted by
Section 5.7(d)
or
Section 5.7(e)
,
neither the Parent Board nor any committee thereof shall (i) withdraw, qualify or modify, or publicly propose to withdraw, qualify or modify, Parent Recommendation, in each case in a manner
adverse to the Company, (ii) approve or recommend any Parent Acquisition Proposal or (iii) adopt or approve, or publicly propose to adopt or approve, or allow Parent to execute or enter
into, any binding or non-binding letter of intent, agreement in principle, memorandum of understanding, merger agreement, acquisition agreement, option agreement, joint venture agreement, partnership
agreement or other agreement,
A-54
Table of Contents
commitment,
arrangement or understanding contemplating or otherwise in connection with, or that is intended to or would reasonably be expected to lead to, any Parent Acquisition Proposal (other than a
confidentiality agreement pursuant to
Section 5.7(b)
) (any action described in clauses (i) and (ii) of this sentence being referred
to as a "
Parent Adverse Recommendation Change
").
(d) If,
at any time prior to the receipt of Parent Stockholder Approval, the Parent Board receives a Parent Acquisition Proposal that the Parent Board determines in good
faith constitutes a Parent Superior Proposal that was not initiated, sought, solicited, knowingly encouraged, knowingly induced or otherwise procured in violation of this Agreement, the Parent Board
may (i) effect a Parent Adverse Recommendation Change or (ii) cause Parent to terminate this Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.1(d)(iii)
in order to enter into a definitive agreement
providing for such Parent Superior Proposal if (A) the Parent Board
determines in good faith that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law; (B) Parent has notified the Company in writing that it
intends to effect a Parent Adverse Recommendation Change or terminate this Agreement; (C) if applicable, Parent has provided the Company a copy of the proposed definitive agreements between
Parent and the Person making such Parent Superior Proposal; (D) for a period of four (4) days following the notice delivered pursuant to clause (B) of this
Section 5.7(d)
, Parent
shall have discussed and negotiated in good faith and made Parent's Representatives available to discuss and negotiate in
good faith (in each case to the extent Company desires to negotiate) with the Company's Representatives any proposed modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement so that the failure to take such action would no longer be inconsistent with the Parent Board's fiduciary duties under applicable Law (it being understood and agreed
that any amendment to any material term or condition of any Parent Superior Proposal shall require a new notice and a new negotiation period that shall expire on the later to occur of (1) two
(2) days following delivery of such new notice from Parent to the Company and (2) the expiration of the original four (4)-day period described in clause (D) above); and
(E) no earlier than the end of such negotiation period, the Parent Board shall have determined in good faith, after considering the terms of any proposed amendment or modification to this
Agreement, that (x) the Parent Acquisition Proposal that is the subject of the notice described in clause (B) above still constitutes a Parent Superior Proposal and (y) the
failure to take such action would still be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law.
(e) Other
than in connection with a Parent Superior Proposal (which shall be subject to
Section 5.7(d)
and shall not
be subject to this
Section 5.7(e)
), prior to obtaining Parent Stockholder Approval the Parent Board may take any action in response to a Parent
Intervening Event prohibited by clause (i) of
Section 5.7(c)
, only if (i) the Parent Board determines in good faith that the
failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law; (ii) Parent has notified the Company in writing that it intends to effect such a Parent Adverse
Recommendation Change pursuant to this
Section 5.7(e)
(which notice shall specify the facts and circumstances providing the basis of the Parent
Intervening Event and for the Parent Board's determination to effect a Parent Adverse Recommendation Change in reasonable detail); (iii) for a period of four (4) days following the
notice delivered pursuant to clause (ii) of this
Section 5.7(e)
, Parent shall have discussed and negotiated in good faith and made
Parent's Representatives available to discuss and negotiate in good faith (in each case to the extent Company desires to negotiate), with Company's Representatives any proposed modifications to the
terms and conditions of this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement so that the failure to take such action would no longer be inconsistent with the Parent Board's fiduciary
duties under applicable Law (it being understood and agreed that any material change to the relevant facts and circumstances shall require a new notice and a new negotiation period that shall expire
on the later to occur of (A) two (2) days following delivery of such new notice from Parent to the Company and (B) the expiration of the original four (4)-day period described
above in this clause (iii)); and (iv) no earlier than the end of such negotiation period, the Parent Board shall have determined in good faith, after considering the terms of any
proposed amendment or modification to this Agreement, that the failure to take such action would still be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law.
A-55
Table of Contents
(f) Nothing
contained in this Agreement shall prohibit Parent or the Parent Board from (i) disclosing to its stockholders a position contemplated by
Rules 14d-9 and 14e-2(a) promulgated under the Exchange Act, or from issuing a "stop, look and listen" statement pending disclosure of its position thereunder or (ii) making any
disclosure to its stockholders if the Parent Board determines in good faith that the failure of the Parent Board to make such disclosure would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under
applicable Law;
provided
,
however
, that (1) in no event shall this
Section 5.7(f)
affect the
obligations specified in
Section 5.7(d)
or
Section 5.7(e)
and (2) any such disclosure (other than issuance by Parent of a "stop, look and
listen" or similar communication of the
type contemplated by Rule 14d-9(f) under the Exchange Act) that addresses or relates to the approval, recommendation or declaration of advisability by the Parent Board with respect to this
Agreement or a Parent Acquisition Proposal shall be deemed to be a Parent Adverse Recommendation Change unless the Parent Board in connection with such communication publicly states that its
recommendation with respect to this Agreement has not changed or refers to the prior recommendation of the Parent Board, without disclosing any Parent Adverse Recommendation Change.
Section 5.8
Directors' and Officers' Indemnification and Insurance.
(a) Parent
and Merger Sub agree that all rights to indemnification and exculpation from liabilities, including advancement of expenses, for acts or omissions occurring at or
prior to the Effective Time now existing in favor of the current or former directors or officers of the Company (the "
D&O Indemnified Parties
") as
provided in the Certificate of Incorporation, the Bylaws or any indemnification Contract between such directors or officers and the Company (in each case, as in effect on the date of this Agreement)
shall survive the Merger and shall continue in full force and effect. For a period of six (6) years from the Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation shall, and Parent shall cause the
Surviving Corporation to, maintain in effect the exculpation, indemnification and advancement of expenses equivalent to the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws as in effect
immediately prior to the Effective Time with respect to acts or omissions occurring prior to the Effective Time and shall not amend, repeal or otherwise modify any such provisions in any manner that
would adversely affect the rights thereunder of any D&O Indemnified Parties;
provided
,
however
, that all
rights to indemnification in respect of any action pending or asserted or any claim made within such period shall continue until the disposition of such action or resolution of such claim. From and
after the Effective Time, Parent shall guarantee and stand surety for, and shall cause the Surviving Corporation to honor, in accordance with their respective terms, each of the covenants contained in
this
Section 5.8
.
(b) Prior
to the Effective Time, the Company shall or, if the Company is unable to, Parent shall cause the Surviving Corporation as of or after the Effective Time to,
purchase a six (6)-year prepaid "tail" policy, with terms, conditions, retentions and limits of liability that are no less favorable than the coverage provided under the Company's existing policies of
directors' and officers' liability insurance and fiduciary liability insurance, with respect to matters arising on or before the Effective Time (including in connection with this Agreement and the
transactions or actions contemplated by this Agreement), and Parent shall cause such policy to be maintained in full force and effect, for its full term, and cause all obligations thereunder to be
honored by the Surviving Corporation, and no other party shall have any further obligation to purchase or pay for insurance hereunder;
provided
,
however
,
that the Company shall not pay, and the Surviving Corporation shall not be required to pay, in excess of 300% of the last annual premium paid
by the Company prior to the date of this Agreement in respect of such "tail" policy. If the Company or the Surviving Corporation for any reason fail to obtain such "tail" insurance policies prior to,
as of or after the Effective Time, Parent shall, for a period of six (6) years from the Effective Time, cause the Surviving Corporation to maintain in effect the current policies of directors'
and officers' liability insurance and fiduciary liability insurance maintained by the Company with respect to
A-56
Table of Contents
matters
arising on or before the Effective Time;
provided
,
further
,
however
, that after the Effective Time, Parent
shall not be required to pay annual premiums in excess of 300% of the last annual premium paid by the
Company prior to the date of this Agreement in respect of the coverage required
to be obtained pursuant hereto, but in such case shall purchase as much coverage as reasonably practicable for such amount.
(c) The
covenants contained in this
Section 5.8
are intended to be for the benefit of, and shall be enforceable by,
each of the D&O Indemnified Parties and their respective heirs and shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which any such Person is entitled, whether pursuant to Law, contract or
otherwise.
(d) In
the event that Parent or the Surviving Corporation or any of their respective successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or merges into any other Person and
shall not be the continuing or surviving corporation or entity of such consolidation or merger or (ii) transfers or conveys all or substantially all of its properties and assets to any Person,
then, and in each such case, proper provision shall be made so that the successors or assigns of Parent or the Surviving Corporation, as the case may be, shall assume the obligations set forth in this
Section 5.8
.
Section 5.9
Notification of Certain Matters.
Subject to applicable Law, the Company shall give prompt
notice to Parent, and Parent shall give prompt notice to the Company, of (a) the occurrence or
non-occurrence of any event whose occurrence or non-occurrence, as the case may be, would reasonably be expected to cause, in the case of the Company, any condition set forth in
Section 6.2
not to
be satisfied, or in the case of Parent, any condition set for the in
Section 6.3
not to be satisfied, at any time from the date of this Agreement to the Effective Time; (b) any notice or other
communication
received by such party from any Governmental Authority in connection with this Agreement, the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or from any Person alleging that the
consent of such Person is or may be required in connection with the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement and (c) any claims, investigations or Proceedings commenced
or, to such party's Knowledge, threatened in writing against, relating to or involving or otherwise affecting such party or any of its Subsidiaries that relate to this Agreement, the Merger or the
other transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, no such notification shall affect the representations, warranties, covenants or
agreements of the parties or the conditions to the obligations of the parties hereunder.
Section 5.10
Public Disclosure.
So long as this Agreement is in effect, neither Parent, nor the Company,
nor any of their respective Affiliates, will disseminate any press release or other
public announcement concerning this Agreement, the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, except as may be required by Law or the rules of a national securities exchange or
to the extent disclosed in or consistent with the Joint Proxy Statement or Form S-4, without the prior consent of each of the other parties hereto, which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld, conditioned or delayed. The parties have agreed to the text of the joint press release announcing the execution of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, without prior consent of the
other parties, each party (a) may communicate information that is not confidential information of any other party to financial analysts, investors and media representatives in a manner
consistent with its past practice in compliance with applicable Law and (b) may disseminate the information included in a press release or other document previously approved for external
distribution by the other parties. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the requirements of this
Section 5.10
shall not apply
to (i) any such press release or public announcement if (A) the Company Board has effected any Company Adverse Recommendation Change in accordance with this Agreement or (B) the
Parent Board has effected a Parent Adverse Recommendation Change in accordance with this Agreement and (ii) any disclosure by the Company or Parent of any information concerning this Agreement,
the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement in connection with a determination by (A) the Company in accordance with
Section 5.6(b)
or
Section 5.6(d)
that a Company Acquisition Proposal constitutes, or
A-57
Table of Contents
may
constitute, a Company Superior Proposal, (B) Parent in accordance with
Section 5.7(b)
of
Section 5.7(d)
that a Parent Acquisition Proposal
constitutes, or may constitute, a Parent Superior Proposal, or (C) any dispute between
the parties regarding this Agreement, the Merger or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 5.11
Employee Benefits; Labor.
(a) For
purposes of this
Section 5.11
, (i) the term "
Covered
Employees
" shall mean employees who are actively employed by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries immediately prior to the Effective Time; and (ii) the term
"
Continuation Period
" shall mean the period beginning at the Effective Time and ending on December 31st of the year following the year in
which the Effective Time occurs.
(b) During
the Continuation Period, Parent shall, or shall cause a Subsidiary of Parent to, provide to the Covered Employees for so long as such Covered Employees remain
employees of Parent or any of its Subsidiaries during the Continuation Period, compensation (such term to include salary or base rate of compensation, annual cash bonus opportunities, commissions and
severance) and benefits that are in
the aggregate, no less favorable than the compensation (excluding any equity or equity-based compensation, retention, change of control, transaction or similar bonuses and nonqualified deferred
compensation) and benefits (excluding any defined benefit pension plan or retiree medical benefits) being provided by the Company or its Subsidiaries to Covered Employees immediately prior to the
Effective Time.
(c) In
the event any Covered Employee first becomes eligible to participate under any Parent Benefit Plan following the Effective Time, Parent shall, or shall cause a
Subsidiary of Parent to, for Covered Employees who become eligible during the calendar year including the Effective Time, use commercially reasonable efforts to (i) waive any preexisting
condition exclusions and waiting periods with respect to participation and coverage requirements applicable to any Covered Employee under any Parent Benefit Plan providing medical, dental or vision
benefits to the same extent such limitation would have been waived or satisfied under any similar Company Benefit Plan the Covered Employee participated in immediately prior to coverage under the
Parent Benefit Plan; and (ii) provide each Covered Employee with credit for any copayments and deductibles paid prior to the Covered Employee's coverage under any Parent Benefit Plan during the
plan year in which the Effective Time occurs, to the same extent such credit was given under any similar Company Benefit Plan that Covered Employee participated in immediately prior to coverage under
the Parent Benefit Plan, in satisfying any applicable deductible or out-of-pocket requirements under the Parent Benefit Plan for the plan year in which the Effective Time occurs.
(d) As
of the Effective Time, Parent shall recognize, or shall cause a Subsidiary of Parent to recognize, all service of each Covered Employee prior to the Effective Time,
to the Company (or any predecessor entities of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries) for vesting and eligibility purposes (but not for benefit accrual purposes under any defined benefit pension
plan) and for purposes of determining future vacation accruals and severance amounts to the same extent as such Covered Employee received, immediately before the Effective Time, credit for such
service under any similar Company Benefit Plan in which such Covered Employee participated immediately prior to the Effective Time;
provided
that
service of each Covered Employee prior to the Effective Times shall not be recognized for the purpose of any entitlement to participate in, or receive benefits with respect to, any
(i) non-elective employer contributions under any plan of Parent under Section 401(k) of the Code or (ii) Parent retiree medical program in which any Covered Employee participates
after the Effective Times. In no event shall anything contained in this
Section 5.11
result in any duplication of benefits for the same period of
service.
(e) In
the event that the employment of any of the Covered Employees specified on
Section 5.11(e) of the Company Disclosure
Letter
is terminated by the Company, Parent or a
A-58
Table of Contents
Subsidiary
of Parent other than for cause, as set forth in
Section 5.11(e) of the Company Disclosure Letter
, at or within a year following
Closing, Parent shall, or shall cause the Surviving Corporation to, provide severance benefits to such Covered Employee that are at least as favorable as those set forth on
Section 5.11(e) of the Company Disclosure
Letter
.
(f) Parent
shall cause the Surviving Corporation to perform the Company's obligations under the agreements set forth on
Section 5.11(f) of the
Company Disclosure Letter
subject to the terms of such agreements.
(g) The
Company and its Subsidiaries shall satisfy all legal or contractual requirements to provide notice to, or to carry out any consultation procedure with, any employee
or groups of employees of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or any labor or trade union, labor organization or works council, which is representing any employee of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(h) After
the date of this Agreement and prior to the Effective Time, the Company (i) shall not terminate, except for cause, any of the employees of the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries listed on
Section 5.11(h) of the Company Disclosure Letter
, and (ii) shall notify Parent in writing as promptly as
practicable in the event that any employee listed on
Section 5.11(h) of the Company Disclosure Letter
has given, or has been given, notice of
termination of his or her employment.
(i) Parent
shall make grants of Parent cash retention awards ("
Parent Retention Awards
") to the Covered Employees listed on
Section 5.11(i) of the Company Disclosure
Letter
, with grant date values in the amounts set forth in the last column of such schedule, provided
that such Covered Employees are employees of Parent or a Subsidiary of Parent on the day following the Closing Date, which Parent Retention Awards shall vest 50% on the six-month anniversary of the
Closing Date and the remaining 50% on the first anniversary of the Closing Date;
provided
that the Covered Employee remains employed by Parent or a
Subsidiary of Parent through each such vesting date.
(j) The
parties hereto acknowledge and agree that all provisions contained in this
Section 5.11
with respect to
employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries are included for the sole benefit of the respective parties hereto and shall not create any right (i) in any other Person, including employees,
former employees, any participant or any beneficiary thereof, in any Company Benefit Plan, or (ii) to continued employment with the Company, Parent or their respective Subsidiaries or
Affiliates. Notwithstanding anything in this
Section 5.11
to the contrary, nothing in this Agreement, whether
express or implied, shall be treated as an amendment or other modification of any Company Benefit Plan or any other employee benefit plans of the Company, Parent or any of their respective
Subsidiaries or Affiliates or shall prohibit Parent or any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates from amending or terminating any employee benefit plan.
Section 5.12
Merger Sub.
Parent will take all actions necessary to (a) cause Merger Sub to perform
its obligations under this Agreement and to consummate the Merger on the terms
and conditions set forth in this Agreement and (b) ensure that Merger Sub prior to the Effective Time shall not conduct any business, incur or guarantee any Indebtedness or make any
investments, other than as specifically contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 5.13
Rule 16b-3 Matters.
Prior to the Effective Time, Parent and the Company shall take
all such steps as may be reasonably necessary or advisable (to the extent permitted under
applicable Law and no-action letters issued by the SEC) to cause any dispositions of Company Common Stock (including derivative securities with respect to Company Common Stock) or acquisitions of
Parent Common Stock (including derivative securities with respect to Parent Common Stock) resulting from the transactions contemplated by this Agreement by each individual who is subject to the
reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act with respect to the Company or will become subject
A-59
Table of Contents
to
such reporting requirements with respect to Parent, to be exempt under Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, to the extent permitted by applicable Law.
Section 5.14
Repayment and Termination of Existing Credit Agreement.
At least one (1) Business Day
prior to the Closing Date, the Company shall deliver to Parent an executed copy of a customary payoff letter from the agents
under the Existing Credit Agreement in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Parent relating to the repayment in full of all obligations thereunder or secured thereby, the termination of all
commitments in connection therewith and the release of all Liens securing the obligations thereunder (the "
Payoff Letter
"). The Company shall, and shall
cause its Subsidiaries to, deliver to Parent (or the agent under the Existing Credit Agreement, in the case of prepayment and termination notices) prior to the Closing, in form and substance
reasonably satisfactory to Parent, all the documents, filings and notices required for the termination of commitments under the Existing Credit Agreement and the release of all Liens securing the
obligations thereunder, including the filing of UCC releases, termination of control agreements, and delivery of possessory collateral, which shall in each case be subject to the occurrence of the
Closing and the repayment in full of all obligations then outstanding under the Existing Credit Agreement.
Section 5.15
Certain Tax Matters.
(a) Each
of the Company and Parent shall use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the Tax opinions described in
Section 6.2(e)
and
Section 6.3(e)
.
(b) Immediately
prior to Closing, the Company shall execute and deliver representation letters to Parent Tax Counsel, Company Tax Counsel and the Additional Tax Counsel (as
applicable) substantially in the form set forth in
Exhibit B
, with such changes, updates or refinements, jointly agreed to by each law firm that
is delivering an opinion described in
Sections 6.2(e)
or
6.3(e)
, as may be necessary to reflect
any changes in, or clarifications of, facts prior to the Closing (the "
Company Closing Representation Letter
").
(c) Immediately
prior to Closing, Parent shall execute and deliver representation letters to Parent Tax Counsel, Company Tax Counsel and the Additional Tax Counsel (as
applicable) substantially in the form set forth in
Exhibit C
, with such changes, updates or refinements, jointly agreed to by each law firm that
is delivering an opinion described in
Sections 6.2(e)
or
6.3(e)
, as may be necessary to reflect
any changes in, or clarifications of, facts prior to the Closing (the "
Parent Closing Representation Letter
").
(d) The
Company shall use its reasonable best efforts not to take or cause to be taken any action that would cause to be untrue (or fail to take or cause not to be taken any
action which inaction would cause to be untrue) any of the representations, warranties and covenants made in the Company Signing Representation Letter. As of the date of this Agreement, Company knows
of no reason why it would not able to deliver the Company Closing Representation Letter.
(e) Parent
shall use its reasonable best efforts not to take or cause to be taken any action that would cause to be untrue (or fail to take or cause not to be taken any
action which inaction would cause to be untrue) any of the representations, warranties and covenants made in the Parent Signing Representation Letter. As of the date of this Agreement, Parent knows of
no reason why it would not be able to deliver the Parent Closing Representation Letter.
(f) The
Company has received an opinion of Shearman & Sterling LLP, dated as of the date hereof, to the effect that, on the basis of the facts,
representations, assumptions, limitations and exclusions set forth or referred to in such opinion, the Merger will not cause the KLX External Spin-Off to fail to qualify for the KLX Spin-Off Tax
Treatment and such opinion has not been rescinded, revoked or modified. The parties acknowledge that in rendering the opinion described in this
Section 5.15(f)
, Shearman &
Sterling LLP has required and relied upon (and has incorporated by reference) reasonable and customary
representations, warranties and covenants, including the Parent Signing Representation Letter and the Company Signing Representation Letter.
A-60
Table of Contents
(g) Parent
has received an opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, dated as of the date hereof, to the effect that, on the basis of the facts,
representations, assumptions, limitations and exclusions set forth or referred to in such opinion, the Merger will not cause the KLX External Spin-Off to fail to qualify for the KLX Spin-Off Tax
Treatment and such opinion has not been rescinded, revoked or modified. The parties acknowledge that in rendering the opinion described in this
Section 5.15(g)
, Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP has required and relied upon (and has incorporated by reference)
reasonable and customary representations, warranties and covenants, including the Parent Signing Representation Letter and the Company Signing Representation Letter.
(h) The
Company shall deliver, or cause to be delivered, a copy of the KLX Closing Representation Letter, if any, to Parent prior to Closing;
provided
that Parent acknowledges and agrees that KLX is not
required to deliver a KLX Closing Representation Letter pursuant to the KLX TSA Amendment.
(i) Parent
and the Company shall use reasonable best efforts to jointly engage, promptly following the date hereof, one of the law firms set forth on Schedule 5.15(i)
or, if unable to engage any of such firms, such other law firm of recognized national standing expert in the matters at issue that is mutually acceptable to Parent and the Company (such selected firm,
the "
Additional Tax Counsel
") to serve as
the Additional Tax Counsel pursuant to this Agreement. Each of the Company and Parent agrees to pay fifty percent (50%) of the fees and expenses of the Additional Tax Counsel.
Section 5.16
Stock Exchange Listing.
Parent shall use
its reasonable best efforts to cause the shares of Parent Common Stock to be issued in connection with the Merger to be approved for listing on
the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance, at or prior to the Effective Time.
Section 5.17
Parent's Financing Activities.
(a) Parent
and Merger Sub will keep the Company reasonably informed on a reasonably current basis of the status of material developments in respect of obtaining financing
for the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(b) Parent
and Merger Sub acknowledge and agree that the obtaining of the financing for the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement is not a
condition to the Closing. For the avoidance of doubt, if financing for the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement has not been obtained, Parent and Merger Sub shall continue
to be obligated, prior to any termination of this Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.1
and subject to the fulfillment or waiver of the conditions
set forth in
Article VI
, to complete the Merger and consummate the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(c) Without
limiting the generality of
Section 5.4
, prior to the Closing, the Company shall, and shall cause its
Subsidiaries to, and shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause its and their respective Representatives to, on a timely basis, upon the reasonable request of Parent, provide reasonable
cooperation that is customary in connection with the arrangement, marketing, syndication and consummation of debt and/or equity financing deemed reasonably necessary by Parent (including upon a
request to Parent by its financing sources) in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and consistent with transactions that are substantially similar to the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the following:
(i) furnishing,
or causing to be furnished, to Parent, (A) audited balance sheets for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and
such further fiscal years ended at least ninety (90) days prior to the Closing Date, and audited statements of income and cash flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015,
December 31, 2014, and December 31,
A-61
Table of Contents
2013
and such further fiscal years ended at least ninety (90) days prior to the Closing Date and (B) unaudited balance sheets and related statements of income and cash flows for each
fiscal quarter ended after the close of its most recent fiscal year which are no more than one hundred and thirty-five (135) days old at Closing, in the case of clauses (A) and (B),
prepared in accordance with GAAP and reviewed (SAS 100) by the Company's accountants (with such review (x) including a review of the financial statements for the corresponding period in the
previous fiscal year and (y) being conducted in accordance with applicable accounting standards), together with all other written historical financial information (and related management
discussion and analysis prepared in connection therewith) regarding the Company and its Affiliates as may be reasonably requested by Parent that may be required in order for Parent to complete and
deliver customary confidential information, bank or offering memoranda or prospectuses, in connection with such financing (other than portions customarily provided by financing sources), including the
information required under any commitment letter, engagement letter or definitive financing document in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or in connection with a
customary offering of securities;
(ii) providing
reasonable assistance to Parent for the preparation of pro forma financial information and projections required to consummate any such financing or to comply
with applicable Law;
(iii) using
reasonable best efforts to secure the consent of the independent accountants of the Company and its Subsidiaries related to the financial statements described in
this
Section 5.17
;
(iv) requesting
that the Company's and its Subsidiaries' independent accountants reasonably participate in drafting sessions and accounting due diligence sessions in
connection with the financing, including requesting that they provide customary comfort letters (including "negative assurance" comfort) with respect to financial information related to the Company
and its Subsidiaries, to the extent required in connection with the marketing and syndication of the financing or as are customarily required in an underwritten offering of securities;
(v) providing
reasonable assistance to Parent in its preparation of customary rating agency presentations, road show materials, customary bank or co-investor information
memoranda, prospectuses, bank syndication materials, credit agreements, offering memoranda, private placement memoranda, definitive financing documents (as well as customary certificates) and similar
or related documents customarily prepared in connection with financings of the type described in this
Section 5.17
, and which may incorporate by
reference periodic and current reports filed by the Company with the SEC;
(vi) reasonably
cooperating with customary marketing efforts of Parent for the financing, including causing its management team, with appropriate seniority and expertise,
and external auditors and advisors, to assist in preparation for and to participate in a reasonable number of meetings, presentations, road shows, due diligence sessions, drafting sessions, and
sessions with rating agencies, in each case, upon reasonable notice and at mutually agreeable dates and times;
(vii) using
reasonable best efforts to ensure that any syndication or marketing effort in connection with the financing benefits materially from any existing lending and
investment banking relationship of the Company and its Subsidiaries;
(viii) reasonably
cooperating with the Financing Sources in an evaluation of the assets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries for the purpose of establishing collateral
arrangements in connection with the financing;
A-62
Table of Contents
(ix) using
reasonable best efforts to deliver to Parent, no later than three (3) Business Days prior to the Closing Date, any materials and documentation about the
Company and its Subsidiaries required under applicable "know your customer" and anti-money laundering Laws (including the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to
Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001);
(x) to
the extent the Company or any of its Subsidiaries will become a party to any definitive agreement in respect of the financing following the Effective Time, provide
(including using reasonable best efforts to obtain such documents from its advisors) customary certificates, corporate authorizations and other customary closing documents and definitive agreements as
may be reasonable requested by Parent or the Financing Sources;
(xi) informing
Parent promptly in writing if the Company Board or a committee thereof, the Company's chief financial officer or any other executive officer of the Company
concludes that any previously issued financial statements included or intended to be used in connection with the financing should no longer be relied upon;
(xii) informing
Parent promptly in writing if any member of the Company Board, the Company's chief financial officer or any other executive officer of the Company shall have
knowledge of any facts as a result of which a restatement of any of the Company's or its Subsidiaries' financial statements is required or reasonably likely; and
(xiii) reasonably
cooperating with Parent and the Financing Sources in connection with (A) Parent's efforts to obtain customary corporate ratings;
(B) assisting Parent in obtaining opinions of the Company's counsel; (C) providing customary authorization letters to the Financing Sources; (D) providing customary authorizations
for the use of the Company's logos; (E) providing access to documents and other information in connection with continuing due diligence investigations; and (F) the payoff of existing
Indebtedness of the Company, whether in the form of a tender offer, change of control offer, redemption, satisfaction and discharge, consent solicitation, or otherwise;
provided
that (1) neither the Company nor any of its Affiliates shall be required to pay any commitment or other similar fee in connection with
any financing to be obtained by Parent or any of Parent's Affiliates in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, (2) the effectiveness of any documentation executed by
the Company with respect thereto, and the attachment of any Lien to any assets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, shall be subject to the consummation of the Closing, (3) no director or
officer of any the Company shall be required to execute any agreement, certificate, document or instrument with respect to such financing that would be effective prior to the Closing (other than
certifications of the financial statements), (4) the Company, its controlled Affiliates and their respective Representatives shall be indemnified and held harmless by Parent from and against
any and all liabilities, losses, damages, claims, costs, expenses, interest, awards, judgments and penalties suffered or incurred by them in connection with claims asserted by a Financing Source in
connection with the arrangement of such financing to the fullest extent permitted by Law and with appropriate contribution to the extent such indemnification is not available, other than to the extent
any such liabilities, losses, damages, claims, costs, expenses, interest, awards, judgments or penalties are the result of the gross negligence, bad faith or willful misconduct of the Company, its
Affiliates or their respective Representatives, or such Person's material breach of this Agreement, or with respect to any material misstatement or omission in information provided hereunder by any of
the foregoing Persons for use in connection herewith or with the financing and (5) Parent shall promptly after termination of this Agreement in accordance with
Section 7.1
, upon written
request by the Company, reimburse the Company or any of its controlled Affiliates for all reasonable and documented
out-of-pocket costs or expenses actually incurred by each such Person in complying
A-63
Table of Contents
with
their respective covenants pursuant to this
Section 5.17
. Parent acknowledges and agrees that the obtaining of any such financing is not a
condition to the Closing.
(d) All
non-public or other confidential information regarding the Company or its Affiliates obtained by Parent, its Affiliates, the Financing Sources or their respective
Representatives, in each case pursuant to this
Section 5.17
, shall be kept confidential in accordance with the Confidentiality Agreement;
provided
that such information may be shared (i) on a non-public basis with prospective lenders and investors during syndication and marketing of
the financing in connection herewith and participants in the financing, in each case that enter into confidentiality arrangements customary for financing transactions of the same type as such
financing (including customary "click-through" confidentiality undertakings), and (ii) on a confidential basis with rating agencies;
provided
,
further
,
that the foregoing shall not prohibit such information from being included in bank or co-investor information memoranda, prospectuses, bank
syndication materials, offering memoranda and private placement memoranda (including under Rule 144A or a registered offering under the Securities Act). The Company hereby consents to the
reasonable use of the Company's and its Affiliates' trademarks, service marks and logos solely in connection with the financing for the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement;
provided
that such trademarks, service marks and logos are used in a manner that is not intended to or reasonably likely to harm or disparage
the Company or its Affiliates or the reputation or goodwill of the Company or its Affiliates, and on such other customary terms and conditions as shall be mutually agreed.
Section 5.18
Stock Exchange Delisting; Deregistration.
Prior to the Effective Time, the Company shall
cooperate with Parent and use its reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions, and do or
cause to be done all things, necessary, proper or advisable on its part under Laws and rules and policies of NASDAQ to cause the delisting of the Company and of the shares of Company Common Stock from
NASDAQ as promptly as practicable after the Effective Time and the deregistration of the shares of Company Common Stock under the Exchange Act as promptly as practicable after such delisting. The
Company shall not cause the Company Common Stock to be delisted from NASDAQ prior to the Effective Time. If the Surviving Corporation is required to file any quarterly or annual report by a filing
deadline that is imposed by the Exchange Act which falls on a date within the ten (10) days following the Closing Date, the Company will deliver to Parent at least five (5) Business Days
prior to the Closing a substantially final draft of any such annual or quarterly report reasonably likely to be required to be filed during such period.
Section 5.19
State Takeover Laws.
If any state takeover statute becomes or is deemed to become
applicable to the Company or the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
then the Company Board shall take any and all actions necessary to render such statutes inapplicable to the foregoing.
Section 5.20
Stockholder Litigation.
The Company shall give Parent the opportunity to participate in
the defense or settlement of any stockholder litigation brought by any stockholder of the Company
against the Company and/or its directors or executive officers relating to the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, whether commenced prior to or after the execution and
delivery of this Agreement. The Company agrees that it shall not settle or offer to settle any litigation commenced prior to or after the date of this Agreement against the Company or any of its
directors or executive officers by any stockholder of the Company relating to this Agreement, the Merger, any other transaction contemplated by this Agreement or otherwise, without the prior written
consent of Parent.
Section 5.21
Resignations.
Prior to the Effective Time, upon Parent's request, the Company shall cause
any director of the Company and each subsidiary of the Company to execute and deliver
a letter effectuating his or her resignation as a director of such entity effective as of the Effective Time.
A-64
Table of Contents
Section 5.22
Board Membership.
Prior to the Effective Time, Parent shall take all necessary corporate
action so that, upon and after the Effective Time, (i) the size of the Parent Board
is increased by two (2) members to a total of eleven (11) members, (ii) an individual selected by the Company who meets Parent's independence criteria as in effect as of the date
of this Agreement and who is otherwise reasonably acceptable to Parent is appointed to the Parent Board as a member of the class of directors of the Parent Board with terms expiring in 2018 and
(iii) an individual selected by the Company who meets Parent's independence criteria as in effect as of the date of this Agreement and who is otherwise reasonably acceptable to Parent is
appointed to the Parent Board as a member of the class of directors of the Parent Board with terms expiring in 2020.
Section 5.23
Dividend Record Dates.
The Company shall coordinate with Parent to designate the record
dates and payment dates for the Company's quarterly dividends to coincide with the record dates
and payment dates for Parent's quarterly dividends, it being the intention of the parties that holders of Parent Common Stock and Company Common Stock shall not receive dividends twice for a
corresponding fiscal quarter of either Parent or the Company.
ARTICLE VI
CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER
Section 6.1
Conditions to the Obligations of Each Party.
The respective obligations of each party to
consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement are subject to the satisfaction or
(to the extent permitted by Law) waiver by the Company and Parent at or prior to the Closing of the following conditions:
(a) Parent
shall have obtained the Parent Stockholder Approval and the Company shall have obtained the Company Stockholder Approval;
(b) the
Parent Stock Issuance shall have been approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance;
(c) the
Form S-4 shall have become effective under the Securities Act and shall not be the subject of any stop order or any Proceedings by or before the SEC seeking a
stop order;
(d) (i)
any applicable waiting period (and any extension thereof) under the HSR Act relating to the consummation of the Merger shall have expired or early termination
thereof shall have been granted and (ii) any authorization or consent from a Governmental Authority required to be obtained with respect to the Merger under any Antitrust Law as set forth on
Section 6.1(d) of the
Parent Disclosure Letter
hereto shall have been obtained and shall remain in full force and effect;
(e) no
Governmental Authority of competent jurisdiction shall have issued or entered any Order after the date of this Agreement, and no Law shall have been enacted or
promulgated after the date of this Agreement, in each case, that (whether temporary or permanent) is then in effect and has the effect of enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the
Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Section 6.2
Conditions to Obligations of Parent and Merger Sub to Effect the Merger.
The obligations of
Parent and Merger Sub to effect the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement are subject to the satisfaction or (to
the extent permitted by Law) waiver by Parent at or prior to the Closing of the following additional conditions:
(a) each
of the representations and warranties of the Company (i) contained in
Section 3.2(a)
shall be true and
correct in all respects (other than
de minimis
inaccuracies) as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except to the extent
such representations and warranties are expressly made as of a specific date, in which case such representations and warranties shall be so true and correct as of such specific date only),
(ii) contained in
A-65
Table of Contents
Sections 3.2(b)
,
3.2(c)
,
3.2(d)
,
3.3
,
3.4
,
3.24
,
3.25
,
3.26
and
3.28(a)
(together with
Section 3.2(a)
, the "
Company Fundamental Representations
") shall be true and correct in all
material respects, without giving effect to any materiality or "Company Material Adverse Effect" qualifications therein, as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except to
the extent such representations and warranties are expressly made as of a specific date, in which case such representations and warranties shall be so true and correct as of such specific date only)
and (iii) contained in this Agreement (other than the Company Fundamental Representations), without giving effect to any materiality or "Company Material Adverse Effect" qualifications therein,
shall be true and correct as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except to the extent such representations and warranties are expressly made as of a specific date, in
which case such representations and warranties shall be so true and correct as of such specific date only), except where the failure of such representations and warranties to be true and correct,
individually or in the aggregate, has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, a Company Material Adverse Effect;
(b) the
Company shall have performed or complied in all material respects with its obligations required under this Agreement to be performed or complied with on or prior to
the Closing;
(c) since
the date of this Agreement, there shall not have occurred any event, occurrence, development or change that has had or would reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect;
(d) Parent
shall have received a certificate signed by an executive officer of the Company certifying as to the matters set forth in
Section 6.2(a)
,
Section 6.2(b)
and
Section 6.2(c)
; and
(e) Parent
shall have received the written opinion of Parent Tax Counsel (or, if Parent Tax Counsel advises that it will not deliver a written opinion to Parent, a written
opinion from each of (i) Company Tax Counsel and (ii) the Additional Tax Counsel) as of the Closing Date to the effect that, on the basis of the facts, representations, assumptions,
limitations and exclusions set forth or referred to in such opinion, the Merger will not cause the KLX External Spin-Off to fail to qualify for the KLX Spin-Off Tax Treatment. In rendering the opinion
described in this
Section 6.2(e)
, Parent Tax Counsel (or Company Tax Counsel and Additional Tax Counsel) may require and rely upon (and may
incorporate by reference) reasonable and customary representations, warranties and covenants, including the Parent Closing Representation Letter and the Company Closing Representation Letter.
Section 6.3
Conditions to Obligation of the Company to Effect the Merger.
The obligation of the Company
to effect the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement is subject to the satisfaction or (to the extent
permitted by Law) waiver by the Company at or prior to the Closing of the following additional conditions:
(a) each
of the representations and warranties of Parent and Merger Sub (i) contained in
Section 4.2(a)
shall
be true and correct in all respects (other than
de minimis
inaccuracies) as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except to
the extent such representations and warranties are expressly made as of a specific date, in which case such representations and warranties shall be so true and correct as of such specific date only),
(ii) contained in
Sections 4.2(b)
,
4.2(c)
,
4.2(d)
,
4.3
,
4.4
,
4.23
and
4.24
(together with
Section 4.2(a)
, the
"
Parent Fundamental Representations
") shall be true and correct in all material respects, without giving effect to any materiality or "Parent Material
Adverse Effect" qualifications therein, as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except to the extent such representations and warranties are expressly made as of a
specific date, in which case such representations and warranties shall be so true and correct as of such specific date only) and (iii) contained in this Agreement (other than the Parent
Fundamental Representations), without
A-66
Table of Contents
giving
effect to any materiality or "Parent Material Adverse Effect" qualifications therein, shall be true and correct as of the Closing Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except to
the extent such representations and warranties are expressly made as of a specific date, in which case such representations and warranties shall be so true and correct as of such specific date only),
except where the failure of such representations and warranties to be true and correct, individually or in the aggregate, has not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, a Parent Material
Adverse Effect;
(b) Parent
and Merger Sub shall have performed or complied in all material respects with each of their respective obligations required under this Agreement to be performed
or complied with on or prior to the Closing;
(c) since
the date of this Agreement, there shall not have occurred any event, occurrence, development or change that has had or would reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect;
(d) the
Company shall have received a certificate signed by an executive officer of Parent certifying as to the matters set forth in
Section 6.3(a)
,
Section 6.3(b)
and
Section 6.3(c)
; and
(e) the
Company shall have received the written opinion of Company Tax Counsel (or, if Company Tax Counsel advises that it will not deliver a written opinion to the Company,
a written opinion from each of (i) Parent Tax Counsel and (ii) Additional Tax Counsel) as of the Closing Date to the effect that, on the basis of the facts, representations, assumptions,
limitations and exclusions set forth or referred to in such opinion, the Merger will not cause the KLX External Spin-Off to fail to qualify for the KLX Spin-Off Tax Treatment. In rendering the opinion
described in this
Section 6.3(e)
, Company Tax Counsel (or Parent Tax Counsel and Additional Tax Counsel) may require and rely upon (and may
incorporate by reference) reasonable and customary representations, warranties and covenants, including the Company Closing Representation Letter and the Parent Closing Representation Letter.
Section 6.4
Frustration of Closing Conditions.
Neither Parent nor Merger Sub may rely on the failure of
any condition set forth in
Section 6.1
or
Section 6.2
to be satisfied if such failure was primarily caused by the failure of Parent or Merger Sub
to perform any of their respective
material obligations under this Agreement. The Company may not rely on the failure of any condition set forth in
Section 6.1
or
Section 6.3
to be
satisfied if such failure was primarily caused by its failure to perform any of its material obligations under this Agreement.
ARTICLE VII
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
Section 7.1
Termination.
Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, this
Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Effective Time, whether before or
after the Company Stockholder Approval or Parent Stockholder Approval is obtained (except as otherwise expressly noted), as follows:
(a) by
mutual written consent of each of Parent and the Company; or
(b) by
either Parent or the Company, if:
(i) the
Merger shall not have been consummated on or before 5:00 p.m. (New York time) on October 21, 2017 (the "
Termination
Date
");
provided
that the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 7.1(b)(i)
shall not be available to any
party if the failure of such party to perform or comply with any of its obligations under this
Agreement has been the principal cause of or resulted in the failure of the Closing to have occurred on or before the Termination Date;
A-67
Table of Contents
(ii) prior
to the Effective Time, any Governmental Authority of competent jurisdiction shall have issued or entered any Order after the date of this Agreement or any Law
shall have been enacted or promulgated after the date of this Agreement that has the effect of permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the Merger or other transactions contemplated
by this Agreement, and in the case of such an Order, such Order shall have become final and non-appealable;
provided
,
however
, that the right to terminate
this Agreement under this
Section 7.1(b)(ii)
shall not be
available to a party if the issuance of such Order was proximately caused by, or resulted in, the failure of such party, and in the case of Parent, including the failure of Merger Sub, to perform or
comply with any of its obligations under this Agreement;
(iii) the
Company Stockholder Approval shall not have been obtained upon a vote taken thereon at the Company Stockholders' Meeting duly convened therefor or at any
adjournment or postponement thereof; or
(iv) the
Parent Stockholder Approval shall not have been obtained upon a vote taken thereon at the Parent Stockholders' Meeting duly convened therefor or at any adjournment
or postponement thereof;
(c) by
the Company if:
(i) Parent
or Merger Sub shall have breached or failed to perform any of their respective representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements set forth in this
Agreement, which breach or failure to perform (A) would result in the failure of a condition set forth in
Section 6.3(a)
(treating for
this purpose
Section 4.13(j)
as a Parent Fundamental Representation under
Section 6.3(a)
,
but only if both Company Tax Counsel and either Parent Tax Counsel or Additional Tax Counsel cannot deliver the opinions described in
Section 6.3(e)
) or
Section 6.3(b)
and (B) is not capable of being cured by Parent
or Merger Sub, as applicable, by the Termination Date or, if capable of being cured, shall not have been cured by Parent or Merger Sub on or before the earlier of (x) the Termination Date and
(y) the date that is thirty (30) calendar days following the Company's delivery of written notice to Parent of such breach or failure to perform;
provided
that the Company shall not have the
right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 7.1(c)(i)
if the Company is then in material breach of any of its material obligations under this Agreement so as to result in the
failure of a condition set forth in
Section 6.2(b)
;
(ii) at
any time prior to the receipt of the Parent Stockholder Approval, the Parent Board shall have (A) made a Parent Adverse Recommendation Change,
(B) failed to include in the Joint Proxy Statement the Parent Recommendation or (C) materially violated or breached any of its obligations under
Section 5.7
;
(iii) at
any time prior to receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, in order for the Company to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to a Company Superior
Proposal to the extent permitted by, and subject to the applicable terms and conditions of,
Section 5.6(d)
;
provided
that prior to or simultaneously
with such termination, the Company pays or causes to be paid to Parent the Company Termination Fee; or
(iv) if
the condition set forth in
Section 6.3(e)
has not been satisfied within twenty (20) Business
Days following the date on which all conditions of the Closing were satisfied or waived, other than (A) the condition set forth in
Section 6.3(e)
and (B) those conditions that by their
terms cannot be satisfied prior to the Closing, but which conditions would be
satisfied or would be capable of being satisfied if the Closing occurred as of such date.
A-68
Table of Contents
(d) by
Parent if:
(i) the
Company shall have breached or failed to perform any of its representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements set forth in this Agreement, which breach or
failure to perform (A) would result in the failure of a condition set forth in
Section 6.2(a)
(treating for this purpose
Section 3.27
as a
Company Fundamental Representation under
Section 6.2(a)
, but only if
both Parent Tax Counsel and either Company Tax Counsel or Additional Tax Counsel cannot deliver the opinions described in
Section 6.2(e)
) or
Section 6.2(b)
and (B) is not capable of being cured by the Company by the Termination Date or, if capable of being cured, shall not have
been cured by the Company on or before the earlier of (x) the Termination Date and (y) the date that is thirty (30) calendar days following Parent's delivery of written notice to
the Company of such breach or failure to perform;
provided
that Parent shall not have the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this
Section 7.1(d)(i)
if Parent or Merger Sub is then in material breach of any of its material obligations under this Agreement so as to result in
the failure of a condition set forth in
Section 6.3(b)
;
(ii) at
any time prior to the receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company Board shall have (A) made a Company Adverse Recommendation Change,
(B) failed to include in the Joint Proxy Statement the Company Recommendation or (C) materially violated or breached any of its obligations under
Section 5.6
;
(iii) at
any time prior to receipt of the Parent Stockholder Approval, in order for Parent to enter into a definitive agreement with respect to a Parent Superior Proposal to
the extent permitted by, and subject to the applicable terms and conditions of,
Section 5.7(d)
;
provided
that prior to or simultaneously with such
termination, Parent pays or causes to be paid to the Company the Parent Termination Fee; or
(iv) if
the condition set forth in
Section 6.2(e)
has not been satisfied within twenty (20) Business
Days following the date on which all conditions of the Closing were satisfied or waived, other than (A) the condition set forth in
Section 6.2(e)
and (B) those conditions that by their
terms cannot be satisfied prior to the Closing, but which conditions would be
satisfied or would be capable of being satisfied if the Closing occurred as of such date.
Section 7.2
Effect of Termination.
In the event that
this Agreement is terminated and the Merger abandoned pursuant to
Section 7.1
, written
notice thereof shall be given by the terminating party to the other party, specifying the provisions hereof pursuant to which such termination is made, and this Agreement shall forthwith become null
and void and of no effect without liability on the part of any party hereto, and all rights and obligations of any party hereto shall cease;
provided
,
however
, that, except as otherwise provided in
Section 7.3
or in any other provision of this
Agreement, no such termination shall relieve any party hereto of any liability or damages resulting from any intentional breach of this Agreement prior to such termination or fraud, in which case,
except as provided in
Section 7.3
, the aggrieved party shall be entitled to all remedies available at law or in equity, including liability for
damages determined taking into account all relevant factors, including the loss of the benefit of the Merger, any lost shareholder premium, any lost synergies, the time value of money and any benefit
to the breaching party or its shareholders arising from such intentional breach or fraud; and
provided
,
further
, that the Confidentiality Agreement, this
Section 7.2
,
Section 7.3
and
Article VIII
shall survive any termination of this Agreement
pursuant to
Section 7.1
. For purposes of this Agreement, "intentional breach" shall mean an action or omission taken or omitted to be taken that the
breaching party intentionally takes (or fails to take) and knows (or should reasonably have known) would, or would reasonably be expected to, cause a material breach of this Agreement.
A-69
Table of Contents
Section 7.3
Termination Fees.
(a) If
this Agreement is terminated by:
(i) Parent
pursuant to
Section 7.1(d)(i)
on the basis of a breach of a covenant or agreement contained in this
Agreement or either Parent or the Company pursuant to
Section 7.1(b)(i)
or
Section 7.1(b)(iii)
and in any such case (A) prior to such
termination (or prior to the Company Stockholders' Meeting in the case of
termination pursuant to
Section 7.1(b)(iii)
), a Company Acquisition Proposal that has been made after the date of this Agreement shall have been
publicly disclosed and not publicly withdrawn prior to such date and (B) within twelve (12) months after such termination, a Company Acquisition Proposal is consummated or the Company
enters into a definitive agreement with respect to a Company Acquisition Proposal, which transaction is thereafter consummated (regardless of when such transaction is consummated)
(
provided
,
however
, that for purposes of this
Section 7.3(a)(i)(B)
, the references to "twenty percent
(20%)" in the definition of Company Acquisition Proposal shall be deemed to be references
to "fifty percent (50%)");
(ii) the
Company pursuant to
Section 7.1(c)(iii)
; or
(iii) Parent
pursuant to
Section 7.1(d)(ii)
;
then,
in any such case, the Company shall pay, or cause to be paid, to Parent the Company Termination Fee.
Any
payments required to be made under this
Section 7.3(a)
shall be made by wire transfer of same-day funds to the account or
accounts designated by Parent, (x) in the case of clause (i) above, on the same day as the consummation of the transaction contemplated therein, (y) in the case of
clause (ii) above, immediately prior to or simultaneously with such termination and (z) in the case of clause (iii) above, promptly, but in no event later than three
(3) Business Days after the date of such termination.
(b) If
this Agreement is terminated by:
(i) the
Company pursuant to
Section 7.1(c)(i)
on the basis of a breach of a covenant or agreement contained in this
Agreement or either Parent or the Company pursuant to
Section 7.1(b)(i)
or
Section 7.1(b)(iv)
, and in any such case (A) prior to such
termination (or prior to the Parent Stockholders' Meeting in the case of
termination pursuant to
Section 7.1(b)(iv)
), a Parent Acquisition Proposal that has been made after the date of this Agreement shall have been
publicly disclosed and not publicly withdrawn prior to such date and (B) within twelve (12) months after such termination, a Parent Acquisition Proposal is consummated or Parent enters
into a definitive agreement with respect to a Parent Acquisition Proposal, which transaction is thereafter consummated (regardless of when such transaction is consummated)
(
provided
,
however
, that for purposes of this
Section 7.3(b)(i)(B)
, the references to "twenty percent
(20%)" in the definition of Parent Acquisition Proposal shall be deemed to be references
to "fifty percent (50%)");
(ii) Parent
pursuant to
Section 7.1(d)(iii)
; or
(iii) the
Company pursuant to
Section 7.1(c)(ii);
then,
in any such case, Parent shall pay, or cause to be paid, to the Company the Parent Termination Fee.
Any
payments required to be made under this
Section 7.3(b)
shall be made by wire transfer of same-day funds to the account or
accounts designated by the Company, (x) in the case of clause (i) above, on the same day as the consummation of the transaction contemplated therein, (y) in the case of
clause (ii) above, immediately prior to or simultaneously with such termination and (z) in the case of
A-70
Table of Contents
clause (iii)
above, promptly, but in no event later than three (3) Business Days after the date of such termination.
(c) In
the event this Agreement is terminated by (i) either Parent or the Company pursuant to
Section 7.1(b)(iii)
, (ii) the Company pursuant to
Section 7.1(c)(iv)
or
(iii) Parent pursuant to
Section 7.1(d)(i)
or
Section 7.1(d)(iv)
and any of
(A) (x) a breach or inaccuracy in any representation, warranty or covenant contained in
Section 3.27
and the fact or facts giving rise to
such breach or inaccuracy causes Parent Tax Counsel to be unwilling or unable to deliver the opinion described in
Section 6.2(e)
and
(y) either Company Tax Counsel or the Additional Tax Counsel is unwilling or unable to deliver the opinion described in
Section 6.2(e)
for
any reason or (B) the Company fails to comply with
Section 5.15
, then the Company shall pay Parent (by wire transfer of immediately
available funds) the reasonable and documented out-of-pocket costs and expenses, including all fees and expenses incurred in connection with the financing of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement and the fees and expenses of counsel, accountants, investment bankers, experts and consultants, incurred by Parent and Merger Sub in connection with this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement in an amount not to exceed $85,000,000 (the "
Parent Expenses
");
provided
that any payment of the Parent Expenses shall not affect Parent's right to receive any Company Termination Fee otherwise due under
Section 7.3(a)
, but shall reduce, on a dollar-for-dollar basis,
any Company Termination Fee that becomes due and payable under
Section 7.3(a)
.
(d) In
the event this Agreement is terminated by either Parent or the Company pursuant to
Section 7.1(b)(iv)
, then
Parent shall pay the Company (by wire transfer of immediately available funds) the reasonable and documented out-of-pocket costs and expenses, including the fees and expenses of counsel, accountants,
investment bankers, experts and consultants, incurred by the Company in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement in an amount not to exceed $56,000,000 (the
"
Company Expenses
");
provided
that any payment of the Company Expenses shall not affect the Company's
right to receive any Parent Termination Fee otherwise due under
Section 7.3(b)
, but shall reduce, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, any Parent
Termination Fee that becomes due and payable under
Section 7.3(b)
.
(e) Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, the parties agree that in no event shall either the Company or Parent be required to pay the
Company Termination Fee or the Parent Termination Fee, as applicable, on more than one occasion.
(f) Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, Parent's right to receive payment from the Company of the Company Termination Fee pursuant to
Section 7.3(a)
and/or the right to receive
payment of the Parent Expenses pursuant to
Section 7.3(c)
, shall, in circumstances in which the Company Termination Fee or Parent Expenses (as applicable) are owed, constitute the sole and
exclusive monetary remedy (other than (i) in the event of a termination pursuant to
Section 7.1(d)(ii)(B)
and
(C)
, (ii) in the event of an
intentional breach by the Company
of
Section 5.15
or a fraudulent breach of
Section 3.27
and (iii) Parent's right,
after having received the Parent Expenses, to receive the Company Termination Fee less the Parent Expenses in the circumstances expressly contemplated in
Section 7.3(a)
) of Parent and Merger Sub
against the Company and its Subsidiaries and any of their respective former, current or future general
or limited partners, stockholders, members, managers, directors, officers, employees, agents, Representatives or assignees (collectively, the "
Company Related
Parties
") for all losses and damages suffered as a result of the failure of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement to be consummated or for a breach or failure to
perform hereunder or otherwise, and upon payment of such amounts, none of the Company Related Parties shall have any further liability or obligation relating to or arising out of this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement (except that the Company shall also be obligated with respect to any amounts owing pursuant to
Section 7.3(g)
). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
set forth in this Agreement,
A-71
Table of Contents
the
Company's right to receive payment from Parent of the Parent Termination Fee pursuant to
Section 7.3(b)
and/or the right to receive payment
of the Company Expenses pursuant to
Section 7.3(d)
, shall, in circumstances in which the Parent Termination Fee or Company Expenses (as
applicable) are owed, constitute the sole and exclusive monetary remedy (other than (i) in the event of a termination pursuant to
Section 7.1(c)(ii)(B)
and
(C)
, (ii) in the event of an intentional breach by Parent of
Section 5.15
or a fraudulent breach of
Section 4.13(j)
and (iii) the Company's
right, after having received the Company Expenses, to receive the Parent Termination Fee less the Company Expenses in the circumstances expressly contemplated in
Section 7.3(b)
) of the Company
against Parent and its Subsidiaries and any of their respective former, current or future general or limited
partners, stockholders, members, managers, directors, officers, employees, agents, Representatives or assignees (collectively, the "
Parent Related
Parties
") for all losses and damages suffered as a result of the failure of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement to be consummated or for a breach or failure to
perform hereunder or otherwise, and upon payment of such amounts, none of the Parent Related Parties shall have any further liability or obligation relating to or arising out of this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement (except that Parent shall also be obligated with respect to any amounts owing pursuant to
Section 7.3(g)
).
(g) Each
of the parties hereto acknowledges that (i) the agreements contained in this
Section 7.3
are an
integral part of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and (ii) without these agreements, the parties would not enter into this Agreement; accordingly, if the Company or Parent, as
applicable, fails to timely pay any amount due pursuant to this
Section 7.3
and, in order to obtain such payment, Parent or the Company, as
applicable, commences a suit that results in a judgment against the other for the payment of any amount set forth in this
Section 7.3
, the
Company or Parent, as applicable, shall pay the other its costs and expenses in connection with such suit (including reasonable attorneys' fees), together with interest on such amount at an annual
rate equal to the prime rate as published in The Wall Street
Journal in effect on the date such payment was required to be made through the date such payment was actually received, or such lesser rate as is the maximum permitted by applicable Law.
Section 7.4
Amendment.
This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement of the parties hereto in
writing at any time before or after receipt of the Company Stockholder Approval or
Parent Stockholder Approval;
provided
,
however
, that after the Company Stockholder Approval or Parent
Stockholder Approval has been obtained, there shall not be any amendment that by applicable Law or in accordance with the rules of any stock exchange requires further approval by the stockholders of
the Company or Parent, as applicable, without such further approval of such stockholders nor any amendment or change not permitted under applicable Law;
provided
,
further
, that no amendment to this Agreement shall be made that would adversely affect the
rights of the Financing Sources as set forth in this
Section 7.4
or
Sections 8.8
,
8.13
or
8.14
without the prior written consent of the Financing Sources.
Section 7.5
Extension; Waiver.
At any time prior to the Effective Time, subject to applicable Law, any
party hereto may (a) extend the time for the performance of any obligation or other
act of any other party hereto, (b) waive any inaccuracy in the representations and warranties of the other party contained herein or in any document delivered pursuant hereto and
(c) waive compliance with any agreement or condition contained herein. Any such extension or waiver shall only be valid if set forth in an instrument in writing signed by the party or parties
to be bound thereby. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no failure or delay by the Company, Parent or Merger Sub in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof nor shall any single or
partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise of any other right hereunder. Any agreement on the part of a party hereto to any such extension or waiver shall be valid only if set
forth in an instrument in writing signed on behalf of such party.
A-72
Table of Contents
ARTICLE VIII
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 8.1
Non-Survival of Representations and Warranties.
The representations, warranties and
agreements in this Agreement and in any certificate delivered pursuant hereto shall terminate at the Effective Time;
provided
,
however
, that this
Section 8.1
shall
not limit any covenant or agreement of the parties which by its terms contemplates performance after the Effective Time.
Section 8.2
Expenses.
Except as expressly set forth herein (including
Section 7.3
), all expenses incurred in connection with this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be paid by the party incurring such expenses, whether or not the Merger is consummated.
Section 8.3
Notices.
All notices, consents and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and
shall be given (and shall be deemed to have been duly given upon receipt) by hand
delivery, by prepaid overnight courier (providing written proof of delivery) or by confirmed facsimile transmission or electronic mail, addressed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Rockwell Collins, Inc.
400 Collins Road N.E.
Cedar Rapids, IA 52498
|
|
|
Phone:
|
|
(319) 263-0212
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
(319) 295-3599
|
|
|
Email:
|
|
robert.perna@rockwellcollins.com
|
|
|
Attention:
|
|
Robert Perna
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
155 North Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606
|
|
|
Phone:
|
|
(312) 407-0700
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
(312) 407-0411
|
|
|
Email:
|
|
Charles.Mulaney@skadden.com;
Richard.Witzel@skadden.com
|
|
|
Attention:
|
|
Charles W. Mulaney, Jr.
Richard C. Witzel, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B/E Aerospace, Inc.
1400 Corporate Center Way
Wellington, FL 33414
|
|
|
Phone:
|
|
(561) 791-5000 x1405
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
(561) 791-3966
|
|
|
Email:
|
|
ryan_patch@beaerospace.com
|
|
|
Attention:
|
|
Ryan Patch
|
|
|
A-73
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
Shearman & Sterling LLP
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
Phone:
|
|
(212) 848-4000
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
(212) 848-7179
|
|
|
Email:
|
|
ccondon@shearman.com
rkatz@shearman.com
|
|
|
Attention:
|
|
Creighton O'M. Condon
Robert M. Katz
|
|
|
or
to such other address, electronic mail address or facsimile number for a party as shall be specified in a notice given in accordance with this
Section 8.3
;
provided
that any notice received by facsimile transmission or electronic mail or
otherwise at the addressee's location on any Business Day after 5:00 P.M. (addressee's local time) or on any day that is not a Business Day shall be deemed to have been received at
9:00 A.M. (addressee's local time) on the next Business Day;
provided
,
further
, that notice of
any change to the address or any of the other details specified in or pursuant to this
Section 8.3
shall not be deemed to have been received
until, and shall be deemed to have been received upon, the later of the date specified in such notice or the date that is five (5) Business Days after such notice would otherwise be deemed to
have been received pursuant to this
Section 8.3
.
Section 8.4
Interpretation; Certain Definitions.
(a) The
parties have participated collectively in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises,
this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted collectively by the parties, and no presumption or burden of proof shall arise favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any
provisions of this Agreement.
(b) The
words "hereof," "herein," "hereby," "hereunder" and "herewith" and words of similar import shall refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular
provision of this Agreement. References to articles, sections, paragraphs, exhibits, annexes and schedules are to the articles, sections and paragraphs of, and exhibits, annexes and schedules to, this
Agreement, unless otherwise specified, and the table of contents and headings in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this
Agreement. Whenever the words "include," "includes" or "including" are used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the phrase "without limitation." Words describing the singular
number shall be deemed to include the
plural and vice versa, words denoting any gender shall be deemed to include all genders, words denoting natural persons shall be deemed to include business entities and vice versa and references to a
Person are also to its permitted successors and assigns. The phrases "the date of this Agreement" and "the date hereof" and terms or phrases of similar import shall be deemed to refer to
October 23, 2016, unless the context requires otherwise. References to any information or document being "made available" or "furnished" and words of similar import shall include such
information or document having been posted to the online data room hosted on behalf of the Company by Merrill Corporation at https://us1.merrillcorp.com/bidder/index_frame.do?projectId=219685 prior to
the date of this Agreement. Terms defined in the text of this Agreement have such meaning throughout this Agreement, unless otherwise indicated in this Agreement, and all terms defined in this
Agreement shall have the meanings when used in any certificate or other document made or delivered pursuant hereto unless otherwise defined therein. Any Law defined or referred to herein or in any
agreement or instrument that is referred to herein means such Law as from time to time amended, modified or supplemented, including (in the case of statutes) by succession of comparable
A-74
Table of Contents
successor
Laws (
provided
that for purposes of any representations and warranties contained in this Agreement that are made as of a specific date or
dates, references to any statute shall be deemed to refer to such statute, as amended, and to any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder, in each case, as of such date). All references to
"dollars" or "$" refer to currency of the United States.
Section 8.5
Severability.
If any term, provision, covenant or restriction of this Agreement is held by
a court of competent jurisdiction or other authority to be invalid, void or
unenforceable, the remainder of the terms, provisions, covenants and restrictions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated. Upon
such determination that any term or other provision is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced, the parties hereto shall negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect the
original intent of the parties as closely as possible in a mutually acceptable manner in order that the Merger be consummated as originally contemplated to the fullest extent possible.
Section 8.6
Assignment.
Neither this Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations
hereunder shall be assigned by any of the parties hereto (whether by operation of Law or
otherwise) without the prior written consent of the other parties hereto, except that any Merger Sub may assign any or all of its rights, interests and obligations hereunder to one or more direct or
indirect wholly owned Subsidiaries of Parent, or a combination thereof so long as such assignment would not delay, impair or prevent consummation of the Merger or otherwise have a Parent Material
Adverse Effect and Parent continues to remain liable for all of such obligations as if no such assignment had occurred. Subject to the preceding sentence, this Agreement will be binding upon, inure to
the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties and their respective permitted successors and assigns. Any attempted assignment in violation of this
Section 8.6
shall be null and void.
Section 8.7
Entire Agreement.
This Agreement (including the exhibits, annexes and appendices hereto)
constitutes, together with the Confidentiality Agreement, the Company Disclosure Letter and
the Parent Disclosure Letter, the entire agreement, and supersedes all other prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral, among the parties, or any of them, with respect to the subject
matter hereof.
Section 8.8
No Third-Party Beneficiaries.
This Agreement is not intended to and shall not confer upon
any Person other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies hereunder;
provided
,
however
, that it is specifically intended that (a) the D&O
Indemnified Parties (with
respect to
Section 5.8
and this
Section 8.8
from and after the Effective Time),
(b) from and after the Effective time, the holders of Company Common Stock and Company Equity Awards (with respect to
Article II
) and
(c) each Financing Source (solely with respect to this
Section 8.8
and
Sections 7.4
,
8.13
and
8.14
hereof) are each
intended third-party beneficiaries hereof.
Section 8.9
Governing Law.
This Agreement and all Proceedings (whether based on contract, tort or
otherwise) arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the actions of Parent, Merger
Sub or the Company in the negotiation, administration, performance and enforcement thereof, shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the Laws of the State of Delaware, without giving
effect to any choice or conflict of laws provision or rule (whether of the State of Delaware or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the Laws of any jurisdiction other than the
State of Delaware.
Section 8.10
Specific Performance.
The parties agree that irreparable damage for which monetary damages,
even if available, would not be an adequate remedy, would occur in the event that any party
hereto does not perform the provisions of this Agreement (including failing to take such actions as are required of it hereunder to consummate this Agreement) in accordance with its specified terms or
otherwise breach such provisions. Accordingly, the parties acknowledge and agree that, prior to any termination of this Agreement in accordance with
Section 7.1
, the parties shall be entitled to an
A-75
Table of Contents
injunction,
specific performance and other equitable relief to prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions hereof, in addition to any other remedy to which
they are entitled at law or in equity. Each of the parties agrees that it will not oppose the granting of an injunction, specific performance and other equitable relief on the basis that any other
party has an adequate remedy at law or that any award of specific performance is not an appropriate remedy for any reason at law or in equity. Any party seeking an injunction or injunctions to prevent
breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall not be required to provide any bond or other security in connection with any such order or
injunction.
Section 8.11
Consent to Jurisdiction.
(a) Each
of the parties hereto hereby, with respect to any legal claim or Proceeding arising out of this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
(i) expressly and irrevocably submits, for itself and with respect to its property, generally and unconditionally, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Delaware Court of Chancery and any
appellate court therefrom within the State of Delaware (or, if the Delaware Court of Chancery declines to accept jurisdiction over a particular matter, any state or federal court within the State of
Delaware), (ii) agrees that it will not attempt to deny or defeat such personal jurisdiction by motion or other request for leave from any such courts, (iii) agrees that it will not
bring any claim or Proceeding relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement except in such courts and (iv) irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent it may
legally and effectively do so, and agrees not to assert, by way of motion or as a defense, counterclaim or otherwise, any objection which it may now or hereafter have to the laying of venue of any
claim or Proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each of Parent, Merger Sub and the Company agrees that a final and nonappealable judgment in any
Proceeding shall be conclusive and may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by Law.
(b) Each
party irrevocably consents to the service of process in any claim or Proceeding with respect to this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
or for recognition and enforcement of any judgment in respect hereof brought by any other party hereto may be made by mailing copies thereof by registered or certified United States mail, postage
prepaid, return receipt requested, to its address as specified in or pursuant to
Section 8.3
and such service of process shall be sufficient to
confer personal jurisdiction over such party in such claim or Proceeding and shall otherwise constitute effective and binding service in every respect.
Section 8.12
Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, all of which shall
together be considered one and the same agreement. Delivery of an executed signature
page to this Agreement by electronic transmission shall be as effective as delivery of a manually signed counterpart of this Agreement.
Section 8.13
WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL.
EACH OF PARENT, MERGER SUB AND THE COMPANY
HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, PROCEEDING OR COUNTERCLAIM
(WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE) BETWEEN ANY OF THEM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE ACTIONS OF PARENT, MERGER SUB OR THE COMPANY IN THE NEGOTIATION, ADMINISTRATION,
PERFORMANCE AND ENFORCEMENT THEREOF, INCLUDING WITH RESPECT TO ANY PROCEEDING OR COUNTERCLAIM THAT INVOLVES THE FINANCING SOURCES.
Section 8.14
Certain Claims.
(a) Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, each of the parties hereto agrees that it will not bring or support any Proceeding (whether based
on contract, tort or otherwise) against the Financing Sources in any way relating to this Agreement or the Merger,
A-76
Table of Contents
including
any dispute arising out of or relating in any way to any commitment letter, engagement letter or definitive financing document in connection with the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement or the performance thereof, in any forum other than the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, or, if under applicable Law, exclusive jurisdiction is vested in the
federal courts, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (and appellate courts thereof). The parties hereto further agree that all of the provisions of
Section 8.13
relating to waiver of jury trial shall apply to any Proceeding referenced in this
Section 8.14(a)
.
(b) Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, each of the parties hereto agrees that all Proceedings (whether based on contract, tort or
otherwise) against the Financing Sources in any way relating to this Agreement or the Merger, including any dispute arising out of or relating in any way to any commitment letter, engagement letter or
definitive financing document in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or the performance thereof, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with, the Laws of the
State of New York;
provided
,
however
, that on or prior to the Closing Date, the definitions of Company
Material Adverse Effect and the representations set forth in this Agreement shall, for the purposes of any commitment letter, engagement letter or definitive financing document in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the Laws of the State of Delaware,
without giving effect to any choice or conflict of laws provision or rule (whether of the State of Delaware or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the Laws of any jurisdiction
other than the State of Delaware.
(c) Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, the Company agrees that neither it nor any of its Representatives or Affiliates shall have any
rights or claims against any Financing Source in connection with or related to this Agreement, the Merger or any commitment letter, engagement letter or definitive financing document in connection
with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or any alternative financing in connection therewith. In addition, no Financing Source shall have any liability or obligation to the Company or
any of the Company's Affiliates or Representatives in connection with or related to this Agreement, the Merger or any commitment letter, engagement letter or definitive financing document in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including for any consequential, special, exemplary, punitive or indirect damages (including any loss of profits, business or
anticipated savings) or damages of a tortious nature. Nothing in this
Section 8.14(c)
shall modify or alter the rights of Parent under any
commitment letter, engagement letter or definitive financing document in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement between or among Parent and any of its Subsidiaries and any
Financing Source entered into in connection with or as contemplated by this Agreement, and in the event of a conflict between the foregoing and any provision in any commitment letter, engagement
letter or any such definitive financing documentation, as applicable, the provisions of such commitment letter, engagement letter or definitive financing documentation, as applicable, shall govern and
control.
(d) In
executing any certificate or other documentation in connection with this Agreement, directors, officers and employees of Parent and the Company are acting in their
corporate capacities and are not assuming personal liability in connection therewith.
[
Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page follows
.]
A-77
Table of Contents
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parent, Merger Sub and the Company have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first written above by their respective officers
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC.
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ ROBERT K. ORTBERG
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Robert K. Ortberg
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
[
Signature Page to Merger Agreement
]
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUARTERBACK MERGER SUB CORP.
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ ROBERT PERNA
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Robert Perna
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Vice President
|
[
Signature Page to Merger Agreement
]
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B/E AEROSPACE, INC.
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ AMIN J. KHOURY
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Amin J. Khoury
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Executive Chairman of the Board
|
[
Signature Page to Merger Agreement
]
Table of Contents
APPENDIX A
DEFINITIONS
As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
"
Affiliate
" shall mean, with respect to any Person, any individual, partnership, corporation, entity or other Person that directly, or
indirectly through one or more intermediaries, Controls, is Controlled by, or is under common Control with, the first Person specified.
"
Business Day
" shall mean any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a day on which all banking institutions in New York, New York are
authorized or obligated by Law or executive order to close.
"
Code
" shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
"
Company Acquisition Proposal
" shall mean a proposal or offer from any Person providing for any (i) merger, consolidation, share
exchange, business combination, recapitalization or similar transaction involving the Company, pursuant to which any such Person would own or control, directly or indirectly, twenty percent (20%) or
more of the voting power of the Company, (ii) sale or other disposition, directly or indirectly, of assets of the Company (including the capital stock or other equity interests of any of its
Subsidiaries) or any Subsidiary of the Company representing twenty percent (20%) or more of the consolidated assets, revenues or net income of the Company and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole,
(iii) issuance or sale or other disposition of capital stock or other equity interests representing twenty percent (20%) or more of the voting power of the Company, (iv) tender offer,
exchange offer or any other transaction or series of transactions in which any Person will acquire, directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership or the right to acquire beneficial ownership of capital
stock or other equity interests representing twenty percent (20%) or more of the voting power of the Company or (v) any related combination of the foregoing.
"
Company Disclosure Letter
" shall mean the disclosure letter delivered by the Company to Parent simultaneously with the execution of this
Agreement.
"
Company Equity Awards
" shall mean the Company Options, Company Restricted Stock Awards, Company RSU Awards and Company DSU Awards.
"
Company Equity Plan
" shall mean the BE Aerospace, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time, and any other
equity or equity-based plan, program, or arrangement of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or any predecessor thereof, other than the Company ESPP.
"
Company ERISA Affiliate
" shall mean any Person under common control with the Company within the meaning of Section 414(b),
Section 414(c), Section 414(m) or Section 414(o) of the Code, and the regulations issued thereunder.
"
Company ESPP
" shall mean the B/E Aerospace, Inc. Amended and Restated 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended from time to
time.
"
Company Intervening Event
" means a material event or circumstance that was not known to the Company Board on the date of this Agreement
(or if known, the consequences of which were not known to the Company Board as of the date of this Agreement), which event or circumstance, or any consequence thereof, becomes known to the Company
Board prior to the Company Stockholder Approval;
provided
,
however
, that in no event shall any inquiry,
offer or proposal that constitutes or
would reasonably be expected to lead to a Company Acquisition Proposal constitute a Company Intervening Event.
"
Company Material Adverse Effect
" shall mean any event, occurrence, development or change that has a material adverse effect on the
business, financial condition or results of operations of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
provided
,
however
, that none of the following
(or the
Appendix A-1
Table of Contents
results
thereof) shall constitute or be taken into account in determining whether a Company Material Adverse Effect shall have occurred: (i) changes in general economic, financial market,
regulatory, business, financial, political, geopolitical, credit or capital market conditions, including interest or exchange rates; (ii) general changes or developments in any of the
industries or markets, or in the business conditions in the geographic regions, in which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries operate (or applicable portions or segments of such industries or
markets); (iii) changes in any applicable U.S. Laws or accounting regulations or principles or interpretations thereof; (iv) any change in the price or trading volume of the Company's
securities or other financial instruments or change in the Company's credit rating, in and of itself (
provided
that the facts or occurrences giving rise
to or contributing to such change that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of "Company Material Adverse Effect" may be taken into account in determining whether a Company Material Adverse
Effect has occurred); (v) any failure by the Company to meet its internal or published projections, budgets, plans or forecasts of its revenues, earnings or other financial performance or
results of operation or any published analyst or other third party estimates or expectations of the Company's revenue, earnings or other financial performance or results of operations for any period,
in and of itself (
provided
that the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such failure that are not otherwise excluded from the
definition of "Company Material Adverse Effect" may be taken into account in determining whether a Company Material Adverse Effect has occurred); (vi) any outbreak or escalation of hostilities
or war or any act of terrorism, or any acts of God, weather-related events, fires or natural disasters; (vii) any action taken or not taken at the express written request of Parent after the
date of this Agreement; or (viii) the public announcement or pendency of the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the identity of Parent;
provided
that if the facts,
circumstances, events, changes, occurrences or effects set forth in clauses (i) through (iii) and
(vi) above have a material disproportionate impact on the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to the other participants in the industries in which the Company and its
Subsidiaries operate, such facts, circumstances, events, changes, occurrences or efforts may be taken into account in determining whether a Company Material Adverse Effect has occurred.
"
Company Option
" shall mean each option to purchase shares of Company Common Stock.
"
Company Recommendation
" shall mean the recommendation of the Company Board that the stockholders of the Company adopt this Agreement and
approve the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including the Merger.
"
Company Signing Representation Letter
" shall mean the representation letter executed by the Company on or prior to the date of this
Agreement and delivered to Parent Tax Counsel and Company Tax Counsel, attached hereto as Exhibit D.
"
Company Superior Proposal
" shall mean a bona fide written Company Acquisition Proposal
(
provided
that for purposes of this definition, references to twenty percent (20%) in the definition of "Company Acquisition Proposal" shall be deemed
to be references to fifty percent (50%)) which the Company Board determines in good faith (i) to be reasonably likely to be consummated if accepted and (ii) to be more favorable to the
Company's stockholders from a financial point of view than the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, in each case, taking into account at the time of determination all
relevant circumstances, including the various legal, financial and regulatory aspects of the proposal, all the terms and conditions of such proposal and this Agreement, and any changes to the terms of
this Agreement offered by Parent in response to such Company Acquisition Proposal.
"
Company Tax Counsel
" shall mean Shearman & Sterling LLP or such other nationally recognized law firm as the Company may
select.
"
Company Termination Fee
" shall mean $200,000,000.00.
Appendix A-2
Table of Contents
"
Confidentiality Agreement
" shall mean the confidentiality agreement, dated July 7, 2016, between Parent and the Company.
"
Contract
" shall mean any binding written contract, subcontract, lease, sublease, conditional sales contract, purchase order, sales order,
license, indenture, note, bond, loan, instrument, understanding, permit, concession, franchise, commitment, partnership, limited liability company or other agreement.
"
Control
" shall mean the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies
of a Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities or partnership or other interests, by Contract or otherwise. The terms "Controlling" and "Controlled by" shall have correlative
meanings.
"
Customs & International Trade Authorizations
" shall mean any and all licenses, registrations, and approvals required pursuant to
the Customs & International Trade Laws for the lawful export or import of goods, software, technology, technical data, and services and international financial transactions.
"
Customs & International Trade Laws
" shall mean the applicable export control, sanctions, import, customs and trade, anti-bribery,
and anti-boycott Laws of any jurisdiction in which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is incorporated or does business, including the UK Bribery Act 2010, the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
other applicable Laws, administered or enforced by the U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. International Trade Commission, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement,
and their predecessor agencies; the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended; the Export Administration Regulations, including related restrictions with regard to transactions involving Persons
on the U.S. Department of Commerce Denied Persons List, Unverified List or Entity List; the Arms Export Control Act, as amended; the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, including related
restrictions with regard to transactions involving Persons on the Debarred List; the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended; the Trading With the Enemy Act, as amended; the Iran
Sanctions Act, as amended, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, and the embargoes and restrictions administered by
OFAC; Executive Orders regarding embargoes and restrictions on transactions with designated countries and entities, including Persons designated on OFAC's list of Specially Designated Nationals and
Blocked Persons, and Persons designated on the U.S. Department of State sanctions lists; the anti-boycott Laws administered by the U.S. Department of Commerce; and the anti-boycott Laws administered
by the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
"
Delaware Secretary of State
" shall mean the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.
"
Environmental Laws
" shall mean all applicable and legally enforceable Laws relating to pollution or protection of the environment,
natural resources or human health and safety, including Laws relating to Releases of Hazardous Materials and the manufacture, processing, distribution, use, treatment, storage, Release, transport or
handling of Hazardous Materials, including the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq.), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C.
§6901 et seq.), the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. §3000(f) et seq.), the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. §2601 et seq.), the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.
§7401 et seq.), the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. §2701 et seq.), the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C.
§9601 et seq.), the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. §1531 et seq.), and other similar foreign, state and local statutes, in effect as of the date of this Agreement.
"
Equity Award Exchange Ratio
" means the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the Merger Consideration by (ii) the Parent Stock
Price;
provided
that the value of the portion of the Merger Consideration that consists of shares of Parent Common Stock shall be determined by
multiplying (x) the number of such shares of Parent Common Stock by (y) the Parent Stock Price.
Appendix A-3
Table of Contents
"
ERISA
" shall mean the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
"
Exchange Act
" shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
"
Exchange Ratio
" shall mean the following (in each case rounded to four decimal places): (i) if the Parent Stock Price is an amount
greater than $89.97, then the Exchange Ratio is 0.3101; (ii) if the Parent Stock Price is an amount greater than or equal to $77.41 but less than or equal to $89.97, then the Exchange Ratio
shall be an amount equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) $27.90 by (y) the Parent Stock Price; and (iii) if the Parent Stock Price is less than $77.41, then the Exchange
Ratio is 0.3604.
"
Existing Credit Agreement
" shall mean the Credit Agreement, dated as of December 16, 2014, among the Company, as Borrower,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as Syndication Agents, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, TD Bank,
N.A., Royal Bank of Canada, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Barclays Bank PLC, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. and Capital One Business Credit Corp., as Documentation Agents,
and certain lenders party thereto, as amended prior to the date of this Agreement.
"
FCPA
" shall mean the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended.
"
Financing Source
" shall mean, in its capacity as such, any agent, arranger, lender, underwriter, purchaser, noteholder or other debt or
equity financing source providing a commitment to provide or arrange all or part of the financing pursuant to any commitment letter, engagement letter or any definitive financing documents in
connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or any alternative financing in connection therewith (whether debt or equity and whether public or private), including any joinder
agreements, indentures or credit agreements entered into pursuant thereto or related thereto, and their respective Affiliates, and such agent's, arranger's, lender's, underwriter's, purchaser's,
noteholder's or other debt or equity financing source's (and their respective Affiliates') equityholders, members, employees, officers, directors, attorneys, agents, advisors or Representatives, and
their respective successors and permitted assigns.
"
Foreign Plan
" shall mean Company Benefit Plans that are subject to any Law other than U.S., federal, state or local law.
"
GAAP
" shall mean the United States generally accepted accounting principles.
"
Governmental Authority
" shall mean any United States (federal, state or local) or foreign government, or any governmental, regulatory,
judicial or administrative authority, agency or commission.
"
Hazardous Materials
" shall mean any material, substance, chemical or waste (or combination thereof) that (i) is listed, defined,
designated, regulated or classified as hazardous, toxic, radioactive, dangerous, a pollutant, a contaminant, petroleum, oil or words of similar meaning or effect under any Law relating to pollution,
waste or the environment or (ii) can form the basis of any liability under any Law relating to pollution, waste or the environment.
"
HSR Act
" shall mean the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder.
"
Indebtedness
" shall mean (i) any indebtedness or other obligation for borrowed money, whether current, short-term or long-term and
whether secured or unsecured, (ii) any indebtedness evidenced by a note, bond, debenture or other Security or similar instrument, (iii) any liabilities or obligations with respect to
interest rate swaps, collars, caps and similar hedging obligations, (iv) any capitalized lease obligations, (v) any direct or contingent obligations under letters of credit, bankers'
acceptances, bank
Appendix A-4
Table of Contents
guarantees,
surety bonds and similar instruments, each to the extent drawn upon and paid, (vi) any obligation to pay the deferred purchase price of property or services (other than trade
accounts payable in the ordinary course of business) and (vii) guarantees in respect of clauses (i) through (vi) including guarantees of another Person's Indebtedness or any
obligation of another Person which is secured by assets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or Parent or any of its Subsidiaries, as applicable.
"
IRS
" shall mean the United States Internal Revenue Service.
"
KLX
" shall mean KLX, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
"
KLX Closing Representation Letter
" shall mean the representation letter executed by KLX and delivered to Shearman & Sterling,
dated as of the Closing Date, described in Section 7.3(f) of the KLX Tax Sharing Agreement.
"
KLX Contribution
" shall have the same meaning as the term "Contribution" in the KLX Tax Sharing Agreement.
"
KLX Debt Repayment
" shall have the same meaning as the term "Debt Repayment" in the KLX Tax Sharing Agreement.
"
KLX Distribution
" shall have the same meaning as the term "Distribution" in the KLX Tax Sharing Agreement.
"
KLX External Spin-Off
" shall have the same meaning as the term "External Spin-Off" in the KLX Tax Sharing Agreement.
"
KLX Internal Restructuring
" shall have the same meaning as the term "Internal Restructuring" in the KLX Tax Sharing Agreement.
"
KLX Signing Representation Letter
" shall mean the representation letter executed by KLX on or prior to the date of this Agreement and
delivered to Shearman & Sterling LLP pursuant to the KLX TSA Amendment.
"
KLX Spin-Off Tax Treatment
" shall mean the qualification of (i) the KLX Contribution and the KLX Distribution, taken together, as
a reorganization under Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code pursuant to which no gain or loss was recognized by the Company or KLX under Sections 357, 361 and 1032 of the Code with each of
the Company and KLX as a party to the reorganization, (ii) the KLX Debt Repayment as a transfer under Section 361(b)(3) of the Code such that no gain was recognized by the Company upon
the receipt of cash proceeds in connection with the KLX Contribution and (iii) the KLX Distribution for nonrecognition of gain or loss under Sections 355 and 361 of the Code.
"
Knowledge
" shall mean the actual knowledge of each of the following officers and employees of the Company or Parent, as applicable, after
reasonable inquiry by each such person: (i) for the Company: Amin J. Khoury, Werner Lieberherr, Joseph T. Lower and Ryan M. Patch; and (ii) for Parent: Robert K. Ortberg, Patrick E.
Allen and Robert J. Perna.
"
Law
" shall mean any domestic, federal, state, municipal, local, national, supranational or foreign statute or law (whether statutory or
common law), constitution, code, ordinance, rule, regulation, order, writ, judgment, decree, binding directive (including those of any applicable self-regulatory organization), arbitration award,
agency requirement or any other enforceable requirement of any Governmental Authority.
"
Lien
" shall mean liens, claims, mortgages, encumbrances, pledges, security interests, easements or charges of any kind.
"
NASDAQ
" shall mean The NASDAQ Stock Market.
"
OFAC
" shall mean the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
Appendix A-5
Table of Contents
"
Order
" shall mean any decree, order, judgment, injunction, temporary restraining order or other order in any
Proceeding by or with any Governmental Authority.
"
Parent Acquisition Proposal
" shall mean a proposal or offer from any Person providing for any (i) merger, consolidation, share
exchange, business combination, recapitalization or similar transaction involving Parent, pursuant to which any such Person would own or control, directly or indirectly, twenty percent (20%) or more
of the voting power of Parent, (ii) sale or other disposition, directly or indirectly, of assets of Parent (including the capital stock or other equity interests of any of its Subsidiaries) or
any Subsidiary of Parent representing twenty percent (20%) or more of the consolidated assets, revenues or net income of Parent and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole, (iii) issuance or sale or
other disposition of capital stock or other equity interests representing twenty percent (20%) or more of the voting power of Parent, (iv) tender offer, exchange offer or any other transaction
or series of transactions in which any Person will acquire, directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership or the right to acquire beneficial ownership of capital stock or other equity interests
representing twenty percent (20%) or more of the voting power of Parent or (v) any related combination of the foregoing, in the case of each of (i) through (v) above, a condition
of which is that the transactions contemplated by this Agreement do not occur or that could only be completed if the transactions contemplated by this Agreement do not occur.
"
Parent Benefit Plan
" shall mean (i) each material "employee benefit plan" (as such term is defined in Section 3(3) of
ERISA), whether written or unwritten, that Parent, any of its Subsidiaries or any Parent ERISA Affiliate adopted, maintains, sponsors, participates in, is a party or contributes to or with respect to
which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries could reasonably be expected to have any material liability; and (ii) each other material employment or employee benefit plan, program, practice, policy,
arrangement or agreement, whether written or unwritten, including any equity option, equity purchase, equity appreciation right or other equity or equity-based incentive, cash bonus or incentive
compensation, employment, change in control, retention, retirement or supplemental retirement, deferred compensation, profit-sharing, unemployment, severance, termination pay, welfare, hospitalization
or medical, life, accidental death and dismemberment, long- or short-term disability, fringe benefit or other similar compensation or employee benefit plan, program, practice, policy, arrangement or
agreement for any current or former employee or director of, or other individual service provider to, Parent or any of its Subsidiaries that does not constitute an "employee benefit plan" (as defined
in Section 3(3) of ERISA), that Parent or any of its Subsidiaries adopted, maintains, sponsors, participates in, is a party or contributes to, or with respect to which Parent or any of its
Subsidiaries could reasonably be expected to have any liability.
"
Parent Disclosure Letter
" shall mean the disclosure letter delivered by Parent to the Company simultaneously with the execution of this
Agreement.
"
Parent Equity Awards
" shall mean options to purchase Parent Common Stock, restricted stock awards subject to time-based or other vesting
or lapse restrictions, restricted stock unit awards subject to time-based, performance or other vesting or lapse restrictions or performance shares subject to time-based, performance or other vesting
or lapse restrictions.
"
Parent ERISA Affiliate
" shall mean any Person under common control with Parent within the meaning of Section 414(b),
Section 414(c), Section 414(m) or Section 414(o) of the Code, and the regulations issued thereunder.
"
Parent Intervening Event
" means a material event or circumstance that was not known to the Parent Board on the date of this Agreement (or
if known, the consequences of which were not known to the Parent Board as of the date of this Agreement), which event or circumstance, or any consequence thereof, becomes known to the Parent Board
prior to the Parent Stockholder Approval;
provided
,
however
, that in no event shall any inquiry, offer
or proposal that constitutes or would reasonably be expected to lead to a Parent Acquisition Proposal constitute a Parent Intervening Event.
Appendix A-6
Table of Contents
"
Parent Material Adverse Effect
" shall mean any event, occurrence, development or change that has a material adverse effect on the
business, financial condition or results of operations of Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
provided
,
however
, that none of the following (or
the results thereof) shall constitute or be taken into account in determining whether a Parent Material Adverse
Effect shall have occurred: (i) changes in general economic, financial market, regulatory, business, financial, political, geopolitical, credit or capital market conditions, including interest
or exchange rates; (ii) general changes or developments in any of the industries or markets, or in the business conditions in the geographic regions, in which Parent or any of its Subsidiaries
operate (or applicable portions or segments of such industries or markets); (iii) changes in any applicable U.S. Laws or accounting regulations or principles or interpretations thereof;
(iv) any change in the price or trading volume of Parent's securities or other financial instruments or change in Parent's credit rating, in and of itself
(
provided
that the facts or occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such change that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of "Parent
Material Adverse Effect" may be taken into account in determining whether a Parent Material Adverse Effect has occurred); (v) any failure by Parent to meet its internal or published
projections, budgets, plans or forecasts of its revenues, earnings or other financial performance or results of operation or any published analyst or other third party estimates or expectations of
Parent's revenue, earnings or other financial performance or results of operations for any period, in and of itself (
provided
that the facts or
occurrences giving rise to or contributing to such failure that are not otherwise excluded from the definition of "Parent Material Adverse Effect" may be taken into account in determining whether a
Parent Material Adverse Effect has occurred); (vi) any outbreak or escalation of hostilities or war or any act of terrorism, or any acts of God, weather-related events, fires or natural
disasters; (vii) any action taken or not taken at the express written request of the Company after the date of this Agreement; or (viii) the public announcement or pendency of the Merger
or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement or the identity of the Company;
provided
that if the facts, circumstances, events, changes,
occurrences or effects set forth in clauses (i) through (iii) and (vi) above have a material disproportionate impact on Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to
the other participants in the industries in which Parent and its Subsidiaries operate, such facts, circumstances, events, changes, occurrences or efforts may be taken into account in determining
whether a Parent Material Adverse Effect has occurred.
"
Parent Organizational Documents
" shall mean the certificate of incorporation and bylaws, each as amended as of the date of this
Agreement, of each of Parent and Merger Sub.
"
Parent Recommendation
" shall mean the recommendation of the Parent Board that the stockholders of Parent approve the Parent Stock
Issuance.
"
Parent Signing Representation Letter
" shall mean the representation letter executed by Parent on or prior to the date of this Agreement
and delivered to Parent Tax Counsel and Company Tax Counsel, attached hereto as Exhibit E.
"
Parent Stock Price
" shall mean the average VWAP of Parent Common Stock for the twenty (20) consecutive Trading Days ending
immediately prior to the Closing Date, starting with the opening of trading on the first such Trading Day to the closing of the last Trading Day prior to the Closing Date.
"
Parent Superior Proposal
" shall mean a bona fide written Parent Acquisition Proposal
(
provided
that for purposes of this definition, references to twenty percent (20%) in the definition of "Parent Acquisition Proposal" shall be deemed to
be references to fifty percent (50%)) which the Parent Board determines in good faith (i) to be reasonably likely to be consummated if accepted and (ii) to be more favorable to Parent's
stockholders from a financial point of view than the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement, in each case, taking into account at the time of determination all relevant
circumstances, including the various legal, financial and regulatory aspects of
Appendix A-7
Table of Contents
the
proposal, all the terms and conditions of such proposal and this Agreement, and any changes to the terms of this Agreement offered by the Company in response to such Parent Acquisition Proposal.
"
Parent Tax Counsel
" shall mean Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP or such other nationally recognized law firm as
Parent may select.
"
Parent Termination Fee
" shall mean $300,000,000.00.
"
Permitted Lien
" shall mean (i) any Lien for Taxes not yet due or that are being contested in good faith by appropriate Proceedings
and for which adequate accruals or reserves have been established in accordance with GAAP, (ii) statutory Liens of landlords and Liens of carriers, warehousemen, mechanics, materialmen,
repairmen and other similar Liens incurred in the ordinary course of business, or that are not yet due or that are being contested in good faith by appropriate Proceedings and for which adequate
accruals or reserves have been established in accordance with GAAP, (iii) Liens incurred or deposits made in the ordinary course of business in connection with workers' compensation,
unemployment insurance or other types of social security or foreign equivalents, (iv) zoning, building codes, and other land use Laws regulating the use or occupancy of leased real property or
the activities conducted thereon that are imposed by any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over such leased real property and that are not violated in any material respect by the current use
and operation of such leased real property or the operation of the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries, (v) with respect to all leased real property, all Liens encumbering the interest
of the fee owner or any superior lessor, sublessor or licensor, (vi) Liens or other imperfections of title, if any, that would not reasonably be expected to be, individually or in the
aggregate, material to a Person and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, including Liens for any supplemental Taxes or assessments not shown by public records, including refinancings thereof,
(vii) in the case of Intellectual Property Rights, licenses of rights entered into in the ordinary course of business, (viii) any other Liens that will be released on or prior to the
Closing Date and (ix) the replacement, extension or renewal of any of the foregoing.
"
Person
" shall mean an individual, a corporation, a limited liability company, a partnership, an association, a trust or any other entity
or organization, including a Governmental Authority.
"
Proceedings
" shall mean legal, administrative, arbitral or other proceedings, suits, actions, investigations, examinations, claims,
hearings, charges, complaints, indictments or litigations.
"
Release
" shall mean any actual or threatened release, spill, emission, discharge, leaking, pumping, injection, deposit, disposal,
dispersal, leaching or migration of Hazardous Materials, including the movement of Hazardous Materials through or in the air, soil, surface water, groundwater or real property.
"
Representative
" shall mean, with respect to any Person, such Person's Affiliates and its and their respective officers, directors,
managers, partners, employees, accountants, counsel, financial advisors, consultants and other advisors or representatives and, with respect to Parent, its Financing Sources.
"
Sanctioned Country
" shall mean, at any time, a country or territory which is itself the subject or target of comprehensive Sanctions (at
the time of this Agreement, Crimea, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria).
"
Sanctioned Person
" shall mean any Person that is the target of Sanctions, including, (i) any Person listed in any
Sanctions-related list of designated Persons maintained by OFAC or the U.S. Department of State, the United Nations Security Council, the European Union, Her majesty's Treasury of the United Kingdom,
Switzerland or any European Union member state, (ii) any Person located, organized or resident in a Sanctioned Country, or (iii) any Person 50% or more owned or otherwise controlled by
any such Person or Persons described in the foregoing clauses (i) and (ii).
"
Sanctions
" shall mean economic or financial sanctions or trade embargoes imposed, administered or enforced from time to time by the U.S.
government through OFAC or the U.S. Department of
Appendix A-8
Table of Contents
State,
the United Nations Security Council, the European Union or any European Union member state, Her Majesty's Treasury of the United Kingdom or Switzerland.
"
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
" shall mean the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended.
"
SEC
" shall mean the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
"
Securities Act
" shall mean the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
"
Securities Laws
" shall mean the Securities Act, the Exchange Act, state securities or "blue sky" laws, all similar foreign securities
laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.
"
Security
" shall mean, with respect to any Person, any series of common stock, preferred stock and any other equity securities or capital
stock of such Person (including interests convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any equity interest in any such series of common stock, preferred stock, and any other equity securities
or capital stock of such Person), however described and whether voting or non-voting.
"
Security Clearances
" shall mean all personnel and facility security clearances required for access to information classified pursuant to
Executive Order 13526 or similar Order that is necessary for operation of a Person's business as presently conducted.
"
Subsidiary
" of a Person shall mean any other Person with respect to which the first Person (i) has the right to elect a majority
of the board of directors or other Persons performing similar functions or (ii) beneficially owns more than fifty percent (50%) of the voting stock (or of any other form of voting or
controlling equity interest in the case of a Person that is not a corporation), in each case, directly or indirectly through one or more other Persons.
"
Tax
" or "
Taxes
" shall mean any and all taxes, fees, levies, duties, tariffs, imposts, and
other similar charges (together with any and all interest, penalties and additions to tax) imposed by any Governmental Authority, including taxes or other charges on or with respect to income,
franchises, windfall or other profits, gross receipts, property, sales, use, capital stock, payroll, employment, social security, workers' compensation, unemployment compensation, or net worth, and
taxes or other charges in the nature of excise, withholding, ad valorem, stamp, transfer, value added, or gains taxes.
"
Tax Returns
" shall mean returns, reports and information statements, including any schedule or attachment thereto, with respect to Taxes
required to be filed with the IRS or any other Governmental Authority.
"
Trading Day
" shall mean any day on which the NYSE is open for trading;
provided
that a
"Trading Day" only includes those days that have a scheduled closing time of 4:00 PM New York City time.
"
Treasury Regulations
" shall mean regulations promulgated by the IRS under the Code.
"
VWAP
" shall mean, for any Trading Day, the volume-weighted average price per share of Parent Common Stock on the NYSE (as reported by
Bloomberg L.P. or, if not reported therein, in another authoritative source mutually selected by the Company and Parent).
Appendix A-9
Table of Contents
Exhibit A
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
B/E AEROSPACE, INC.
FIRST
: The name of the corporation is B/E Aerospace, Inc. (the "
Corporation
").
SECOND
: The address of the registered office of the Corporation in the State of Delaware is 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, County of
New Castle,
Delaware 19801. The name of its registered agent at that address is The Corporation Trust Company.
THIRD
: The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a corporation may be organized under the
General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware as set forth in Title 8 of the Delaware Code (the "
DGCL
").
FOURTH
: The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is 1,000 shares of Common Stock, each
having a par
value of one cent ($0.01).
FIFTH
: The following provisions are inserted for the management of the business and the conduct of the affairs of the Corporation, and
for further
definition, limitation and regulation of the powers of the Corporation and of its directors and stockholders:
(1) The
business and affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by or under the direction of the Board of Directors.
(2) The
directors shall have concurrent power with the stockholders to make, alter, amend, change, add to or repeal the By-Laws of the Corporation.
(3) The
number of directors of the Corporation shall be as from time to time fixed by, or in the manner provided in, the By-Laws of the Corporation. Election of directors
need not be by written ballot unless the By-Laws so provide.
(4) In
addition to the powers and authority hereinbefore or by statute expressly conferred upon them, the directors are hereby empowered to exercise all such powers and do
all such acts and things as may be exercised or done by the Corporation, subject, nevertheless, to the provisions of the DGCL, this Certificate of Incorporation, and any By-Laws adopted by the
stockholders; provided, however, that no By-Laws hereafter adopted by the stockholders shall invalidate any prior act of the directors which would have been valid if such By-Laws had not been adopted.
SIXTH
: Meetings of stockholders may be held within or without the State of Delaware, as the By-Laws may provide. The books of the
Corporation may be
kept (subject to any provision contained in the DGCL) outside the State of Delaware at such place or places as may be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors or in the By-Laws of the
Corporation.
SEVENTH
: The Corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision contained in this Certificate of
Incorporation, in the
manner now or hereafter prescribed by statute, and all rights conferred upon stockholders herein are granted subject to this reservation.
EIGHTH
: The Corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision contained in this Certificate of
Incorporation, in the
manner now or hereafter prescribed herein and by the laws of the State of Delaware, all rights conferred upon stockholders herein are granted subject to this reservation.
1
Table of Contents
NINTH
: With respect to acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the effective time of the merger between the the Corporation and
Quarterback Merger
SubCorp. (the "Effective Time"), this Corporation shall, to the maximum extent permitted from time to time under the law of the State of Delaware, indemnify and, upon request, advance expenses to any
person who is or was a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit, proceeding or claim, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by
reason of the fact that such person is or was or has agreed to be a director or officer of this Corporation prior to the Effective Time or while a director or officer is or was serving, prior to the
Effective Time, at the request of this Corporation as a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or agent of any corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, including
service with respect to employee benefit plans, against expenses (including attorney's fees and expenses), judgments, fines, penalties and amounts paid in settlement incurred in connection with the
investigation, preparation to defend or defense of such action, suit, proceeding or claim; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not require this Corporation to indemnify or advance expenses to
any person in connection with any action, suit, proceeding, claim or counterclaim initiated by or on behalf of such person. Such indemnification shall not be exclusive of other indemnification rights
arising under any by-law, agreement, vote of directors or stockholders or otherwise and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs and legal representatives of such person. Any person seeking
indemnification under this Article 9 shall be deemed to have met the standard of conduct required for such indemnification unless the contrary shall be established. Any repeal or modification
of the foregoing provisions of this Article 9 shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a director or officer of this Corporation with respect to any acts or omissions of such
director or officer occurring prior to such repeal or modification.
TENTH
: With respect to acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the Effective Time, a director of this Corporation shall not be
liable to this
Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except to the extent that exculpation from liabilities is not permitted under the Delaware General
Corporation Law as in effect at the time such liability is determined. Any repeal or modification of the foregoing provisions of this Article 10 shall not adversely affect any right or
protection of a director or officer of this Corporation with respect to any acts or omissions of such director or officer occurring prior to such repeal or modification.
*
* * * *
2
Table of Contents
Annex B
October 23,
2016
The
Board of Directors
Rockwell Collins, Inc.
400 Collins Road N.E.
Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52498
Members
of the Board of Directors:
You
have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to Rockwell Collins, Inc. (the "Company") of the consideration to be paid by the Company in the
proposed merger (the "Transaction") of Quarterback Merger Sub Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the "Merger Subsidiary"), with B/E Aerospace, Inc. (the "Merger Partner").
Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Agreement"), among the Company, the Merger Subsidiary and the Merger Partner, the Merger Partner will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, and each share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Merger Partner (the "Merger Partner Common Stock") issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the
Transaction (other than Canceled Shares (as defined in the Agreement) and Dissenting Shares (as defined in the Agreement)), will be converted into the right to receive consideration per share equal to
$34.10 in cash, without interest (the "Cash Consideration"), and that number of shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (the "Company Common Stock") equal to the Exchange
Ratio (and, if applicable, cash in lieu of fractional shares of Parent Common Stock (as defined in the Agreement) payable in accordance with the Agreement) (such number of shares of Company Common
Stock and any such cash in lieu of fractional shares, together with the Cash Consideration, the "Consideration"). For purposes of the Agreement, the Exchange Ratio means the following (in each case
rounded to four decimal places): (i) if the Parent Stock Price (as defined in the Agreement) is an amount greater than $89.97, then the Exchange Ratio is 0.3101; (ii) if the Parent Stock
Price (as defined in the Agreement) is an amount greater than or equal to $77.41 but less than or equal to $89.97, then the Exchange Ratio shall be an amount equal to the quotient obtained by dividing
$27.90 by the Parent Stock Price (as defined in the Agreement); and (iii) if the Parent Stock Price (as defined in the Agreement) is less than $77.41, then the Exchange Ratio is 0.3604.
In
connection with preparing our opinion, we have (i) reviewed a draft dated October 23, 2016 of the Agreement; (ii) reviewed certain publicly available business and
financial information concerning the Merger Partner and the Company and the industries in which they operate; (iii) compared the proposed financial terms of the Transaction with the publicly
available financial terms of certain transactions involving companies we deemed relevant and the consideration received for such companies; (iv) compared the financial and operating performance
of the Merger Partner and the Company with publicly available information concerning certain other companies we deemed relevant and reviewed
the current and historical market prices of the Merger Partner Common Stock and the Company Common Stock and certain publicly traded securities of such other companies; (v) reviewed certain
internal financial analyses and forecasts prepared by the managements of the Merger Partner and the Company relating to their respective businesses and by the Company relating to the Merger Partner's
business, as well as the estimated amount and timing of the cost savings and related expenses and synergies expected to result from the Transaction (the "Synergies"); and (vi) performed such
other financial studies and analyses and considered such other information as we deemed appropriate for the purposes of this opinion.
B-1
Table of Contents
In
addition, we have held discussions with certain members of the management of the Merger Partner and the Company with respect to certain aspects of the Transaction, the past and
current business operations of the Merger Partner and the Company, the financial condition and future prospects and operations of the Merger Partner and the Company, the effects of the Transaction on
the financial condition and future prospects of the Company, and certain other matters we believed necessary or appropriate to our inquiry.
In
giving our opinion, we have relied upon and assumed the accuracy and completeness of all information that was publicly available or was furnished to or discussed with us by the Merger
Partner and the Company or otherwise reviewed by or for us. We have not independently verified any such information or its accuracy or completeness and, pursuant to our engagement letter with the
Company, we did not assume any obligation to undertake any such independent verification. We have not conducted or been provided with any valuation or appraisal of any assets or liabilities, nor have
we evaluated the solvency of the Merger Partner or the Company under any state or federal laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. In relying on financial analyses and forecasts
provided to us or derived therefrom, including the Synergies, we have assumed that they have been reasonably prepared based on assumptions reflecting the best currently available estimates and
judgments by management as to the expected future results of operations and financial condition of the Merger Partner and the Company to which such analyses or forecasts relate. We express no view as
to such analyses or forecasts (including the Synergies) or the assumptions on which they were based. We have also assumed that the Transaction and the other transactions contemplated by the Agreement
will have the tax consequences described in discussions with, and materials furnished to us by, representatives of the Company, and will be consummated as described in the Agreement, and that the
definitive Agreement will not differ in any material respects from the draft thereof furnished to us. We have also assumed that the representations and warranties made by the Company and the Merger
Partner in the Agreement and the related agreements are and will be true and correct in all respects material to our analysis. We are not legal, regulatory or tax experts and have relied on the
assessments made by advisors to the Company with respect to such issues. We have further assumed that all material governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals necessary for the
consummation of the Transaction will be obtained without any adverse effect on the Merger Partner or the Company or on the contemplated benefits of the Transaction.
Our
opinion is necessarily based on economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information made available to us as of, the date hereof. It should be understood that
subsequent developments may affect this opinion and that we do not have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm this opinion. Our opinion is limited to the fairness, from a financial point of
view, of the Consideration to be paid by the Company in the proposed Transaction and we express no opinion as to the fairness of the Consideration to the holders of any class of securities, creditors
or other constituencies of the Company or as to the underlying decision by the Company to engage in the Transaction. Furthermore, we express no opinion with respect to the amount or nature of any
compensation to any officers, directors, or employees of any party to the Transaction, or any class of such persons relative to the Consideration to be paid by the Company in the Transaction or with
respect to the fairness of any such compensation. We are expressing no opinion herein as to the price at which the Company Common Stock or the Merger Partner Common Stock will trade at any future
time.
We
have acted as financial advisor to the Company with respect to the proposed Transaction and will receive a fee from the Company for our services, a substantial portion of which will
become payable only if the proposed Transaction is consummated. In addition, the Company has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities arising out of our engagement. During the two years
preceding the date of this letter, we and our affiliates have had commercial or investment banking relationships with the Company and the Merger Partner for which we and such affiliates have received
customary
B-2
Table of Contents
compensation.
Such services during such period have included acting as joint bookrunner and joint lead arranger on the Company's revolving credit facility in February 2016; as joint lead arranger and
joint bookrunner on the Merger Partner's credit facilities in December 2014 and in May 2016; as lead arranger and lead-left bookrunner on credit facilities of KLX Inc., an entity that was spun
out of the Merger Partner in December 2014 ("KLX"), in December 2014 and May 2015; as lead bookrunner on an offering of debt securities of KLX in November 2014; and as financial advisor to the Merger
Partner in connection with the spin-off of KLX in December 2014. We and our affiliates also provided asset management services to the Company during such period. In addition, our commercial banking
affiliate is an agent bank and a lender under outstanding credit facilities of the Company, the Merger Partner and of KLX, for which it receives customary compensation or other financial benefits. We
anticipate that we and our affiliates will arrange and/or provide financing to the Company in connection with the Transaction for customary compensation. In addition, we and our affiliates hold, on a
proprietary basis, less than 1% of the outstanding common stock of each of the Company and the Merger Partner. In the ordinary course of our businesses, we and our affiliates may actively trade the
debt and equity securities or financial instruments (including derivatives, bank loans or other obligations) of the Company or the Merger Partner for our own account or for the accounts of customers
and, accordingly, we may at any time hold long or short positions in such securities or other financial instruments.
On
the basis of and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion as of the date hereof that the Consideration to be paid by the Company in the proposed Transaction is fair, from a
financial point of view, to the Company.
The
issuance of this opinion has been approved by a fairness opinion committee of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. This letter is provided to the Board of Directors of the Company (in
its capacity as such) in connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the Transaction. This opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of the Company as to how such
shareholder should vote with respect to the Transaction or any other matter. This opinion may not be disclosed, referred to, or communicated (in whole or in part) to any third party for any purpose
whatsoever except with our prior written approval. This opinion may be reproduced in full in any registration, proxy or information statement relating to the Transaction which the Company must, under
any applicable law, file with any government agency or distribute to its shareholders and where such filing must include this opinion. This opinion may not otherwise be disclosed publicly in any
manner without our prior written approval.
Very
truly yours,
J.P.
MORGAN SECURITIES LLC
B-3
ANNEX C
388
Greenwich St
New York, NY 10013
October 23,
2016
The
Board of Directors
B/E Aerospace, Inc.
1400 Corporate Center Way
Wellington, FL 33414
Members
of the Board:
You
have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of the common stock of B/E Aerospace, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Company"),
of the Merger Consideration (defined below) to be received by such holders pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
October 23, 2016 (the "Merger Agreement"), among Rockwell Collins, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Parent"), Quarterback Merger Sub Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned
subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"), and Company. As more fully described in the Merger Agreement, (i) Merger Sub will be merged with and into Company (the "Merger") and (ii) each
outstanding share of the common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Company ("Company Common Stock"), other than shares of Company Common Stock held by holders who are entitled to and properly demand
appraisal of their shares of Company Common Stock and shares of Company Common Stock that are owned, directly or indirectly, by Parent, Company (as treasury shares or otherwise) or Merger Sub (such
holders, collectively, "Excluded Holders"), will be converted into the right to receive $34.10 in cash (the "Cash Consideration") and that number of shares (and cash in lieu of any fraction thereof)
of common stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Parent Common Stock"), of Parent equal to (a) if the Parent Stock Price (as defined in the Merger Agreement) is greater than $89.97, 0.3101;
(b) if the Parent Stock Price is greater than or equal to $77.41 but less than or equal to $89.97, the quotient (rounded to four decimal places) obtained by dividing (x) $27.90 by
(y) the Parent Stock Price; and (c) if the Parent Stock Price is less than $77.41, 0.3604 (the "Stock Consideration"; together with the Cash Consideration, the "Merger Consideration").
In
arriving at our opinion, we reviewed the Merger Agreement and held discussions with certain senior officers, directors and other representatives and advisors of Company and certain
senior officers and other representatives and advisors of Parent concerning the businesses, operations and prospects of Company and Parent. We examined certain publicly available business and
financial information relating to Company and Parent as well as certain financial forecasts and other information and data relating to Company and Parent which were provided to or discussed with us by
the respective managements of Company and Parent, including information relating to the potential strategic implications and operational benefits (including the amount, timing and achievability
thereof) anticipated by the managements of Company and Parent to result from the Merger. We reviewed the financial terms of the Merger as set forth in the Merger Agreement in relation to, among other
things: current and historical market prices and trading volumes of Company Common Stock and Parent Common Stock; the historical and projected earnings and other operating data of Company and Parent;
and the capitalization and financial condition of Company and Parent. We considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial terms of certain other transactions which we considered relevant in
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
C-1
evaluating
the Merger and analyzed certain financial, stock market and other publicly available information relating to the businesses of other companies whose operations we considered relevant in
evaluating those of Company and Parent. We also evaluated certain potential pro forma financial effects of the Merger on Parent. In addition to the foregoing, we conducted such other analyses and
examinations and considered such other information and financial, economic and market criteria as we deemed appropriate in arriving at our opinion. The issuance of our opinion has been authorized by
our fairness opinion committee.
In
rendering our opinion, we have assumed and relied, without independent verification, upon the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other information and data publicly
available or provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with us and upon the assurances of the managements of Company and Parent that they are not aware of any relevant information that has
been omitted or that remains undisclosed to us. With respect to financial forecasts and other information and data relating to Company and Parent provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with
us, we have been advised by the respective managements of Company and Parent that such forecasts and other information and data were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of the managements of Company and Parent as to the future financial performance of Company and Parent, the potential strategic implications and operational benefits
anticipated to result from the Merger and the other matters covered thereby, and have assumed, with your consent, that the financial results (including the potential strategic implications and
operational benefits anticipated to result from the Merger) reflected in such forecasts and other information and data will be realized in the amounts and at the times projected.
We
have assumed, with your consent, that the Merger will be consummated in accordance with its terms, without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or
agreement and that, in the course of obtaining the necessary regulatory or third party approvals, consents and releases for the Merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition will be imposed
that would have an adverse effect on Company, Parent or the contemplated benefits of the Merger. Our opinion, as set forth herein, relates to the relative values of Company and Parent. We are not
expressing any opinion as to what the value of the Parent Common Stock actually will be when issued pursuant to the Merger or the price at which the Parent Common Stock will trade at any time. We have
not made or been provided with an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Company or Parent nor have we made any physical inspection of the
properties or assets of Company or Parent. Our opinion does not address the underlying business decision of Company to effect the Merger, the relative merits of the Merger as compared to any
alternative business strategies that might exist for Company or the effect of any other transaction in which Company might engage. We also express no view as to, and our opinion does not address, the
fairness (financial or otherwise) of the amount or nature or any other aspect of any compensation to any officers, directors or employees of any parties to the Merger, or any class of such persons,
relative to the Merger Consideration. Our opinion is necessarily based upon information available to us, and financial, stock market and other conditions and circumstances existing, as of the date
hereof.
Citigroup
Global Markets Inc. has acted as financial advisor to Company in connection with the proposed Merger and will receive a fee for such services, a significant portion of
which is contingent upon the consummation of the Merger. We also will receive a fee in connection with the delivery of this opinion. We and our affiliates in the past have provided, and currently
provide, services to Company unrelated to the proposed Merger, for which services we and such affiliates have received and expect to receive compensation, including, without limitation, during the two
year period prior to the date hereof, having acted or acting (i) as financial advisor to Company in connection with Company's spin-off of KLX Inc. in December 2014, and (ii) as
lender, syndication agent, joint lead arranger and joint book-runner in connection with a term loan and revolving credit facility of Company. We and our affiliates in the past have also provided, and
currently provide, services to
C-2
Parent
unrelated to the proposed Merger, for which services we and such affiliates have received and expect to receive compensation, including, without limitation, during the two year period prior to
the date hereof, acting as lender, syndication agent, joint lead arranger and joint book-runner in connection with two revolving credit facilities of Parent, as well as acting as lender in connection
with certain committed corporate credit card facilities of Parent. In the ordinary course of our business, we and our affiliates may actively trade or hold the securities of Company and Parent for our
own account or for the account of our customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities. In addition, we and our affiliates (including Citigroup Inc.
and its affiliates) may maintain relationships with Company, Parent and their respective affiliates.
Our
advisory services and the opinion expressed herein are provided for the information of the Board of Directors of Company in its evaluation of the proposed Merger, and our opinion is
not intended to
be and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote or act on any matters relating to the proposed Merger.
Based
upon and subject to the foregoing, our experience as investment bankers, our work as described above and other factors we deemed relevant, we are of the opinion that, as of the
date hereof, the Merger Consideration to be received by the holders of Company Common Stock (other than Excluded Holders) in the Merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.
Very
truly yours,
CITIGROUP
GLOBAL MARKETS INC.
C-3
ANNEX D
200
West Street -- New York, NY 10282-2198
Tel: 212-902-1000 -- Fax: 212-902-3000
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
October 23,
2016
Board
of Directors
B/E Aerospace, Inc.
1400 Corporate Center Way
Wellington, Florida 33414-2105
Ladies
and Gentlemen:
You
have requested our opinion as to the fairness from a financial point of view to the holders (other than Rockwell Collins Inc. ("Parent") and its affiliates) of the outstanding
shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Shares"), of B/E Aerospace, Inc. (the "Company") of the Merger Consideration (as defined below) to be paid to such holders pursuant to
the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 23, 2016 (the "Agreement"), by and among Parent, Quarterback Merger Sub Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent ("Merger Sub"), and the
Company. Pursuant to the Agreement, Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company (the "Merger") and each outstanding Share (other than Canceled Shares and Dissenting Shares (as defined in the
Agreement)) will be converted into $34.10 in cash (the "Cash Consideration") and that number of shares (and cash in lieu of any fraction thereof) of common stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Parent
Common Stock"), of Parent equal to (a) if the Parent Stock Price (as defined in the Agreement) is greater than $89.97, 0.3101; (b) if the Parent Stock Price is greater than or equal to
$77.41 but less than or equal to $89.97, the quotient (rounded to four decimal places) obtained by dividing $27.90 by the Parent Stock Price; and (c) if the Parent Stock Price is less than
$77.41, 0.3604 (the "Stock Consideration"; together with the Cash Consideration, the "Merger Consideration").
Goldman,
Sachs & Co. and its affiliates are engaged in advisory, underwriting and financing, principal investing, sales and trading, research, investment management and
other financial and non-financial activities and services for various persons and entities. Goldman, Sachs & Co. and its affiliates and employees, and funds or other entities they manage
or in which they invest or have other economic interests or with which they co-invest, may at any time purchase, sell, hold or vote long or short positions and investments in securities, derivatives,
loans, commodities, currencies, credit default swaps
and other financial instruments of the Company, Parent, any of their respective affiliates and third parties, or any currency or commodity that may be involved in the transaction contemplated by the
Agreement (the "Transaction"). We have acted as financial advisor to the Company in connection with, and have participated in certain of the negotiations leading to, the Transaction. We expect to
receive fees for our services in connection with the Transaction, the principal portion of which is contingent upon consummation of the Transaction, and the Company has agreed to reimburse certain of
our expenses arising, and indemnify us against certain liabilities that may arise, out of our engagement. We have Securities and Investment Services Provided by Goldman, Sachs & Co.
provided certain financial advisory and/or underwriting services to the Company and/or its affiliates from time to time for which our Investment Banking Division has received, and may receive,
compensation, including having acted as book manager with respect to a private offering of KLX, Inc.'s, a former subsidiary of the Company, 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 (aggregate principal
amount of $1,200,000,000) in November 2014; as lead arranger with respect to the Company's term loan (aggregate principal amount
D-1
of
$2,200,000,000) put in place in November 2014; as the Company's financial advisor in connection with the spin-off of KLX, Inc., in December 2014; and as a participant in the Company's
revolving credit facility (aggregate principal amount of $600,000,000) put in place in December 2014. We may also in the future provide financial advisory and/or underwriting services to the Company,
Parent and their respective affiliates for which our Investment Banking Division may receive compensation.
In
connection with this opinion, we have reviewed, among other things, the Agreement; annual reports to stockholders and Annual Reports on Form 10-K of the Company and Parent for
the five fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, respectively; certain interim reports to stockholders and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q of the Company and
Parent; certain other communications from the Company and Parent to their respective stockholders; certain publicly available research analyst reports for the Company and for Parent; and certain
internal financial analyses and forecasts for the Company prepared by its management and for Parent prepared by its management, in each case, as approved for our use by the Company (the "Forecasts"),
and certain operating synergies projected by the managements of the Company and Parent to result from the Transaction, as approved for our use by the Company (the "Synergies"). We have also held
discussions with members of the senior managements of the Company and Parent regarding their assessment of the strategic rationale for, and the potential benefits of, the Transaction and the past and
current business operations, financial condition and future prospects of the Company and Parent; reviewed the reported price and trading activity for the Shares and shares of Parent Common Stock;
compared certain financial and stock market information for the Company and Parent with similar information for certain other companies the securities of which are publicly traded; reviewed the
financial terms of certain recent business combinations in the aerospace and defense industry and in other industries; and performed such other studies and analyses, and considered such other factors,
as we deemed appropriate.
For
purposes of rendering this opinion, we have, with your consent, relied upon and assumed the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial, legal, regulatory, tax, accounting and
other information provided to, discussed with or reviewed by, us, without assuming any responsibility for
independent verification thereof. In that regard, we have assumed with your consent that the Forecasts and the Synergies have been reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of the management of the Company. We have not made an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets and liabilities (including any contingent, derivative or other
off-balance-sheet assets and liabilities) of the Company or Parent or any of their respective subsidiaries and we have not been furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal. We have assumed that
all governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the Transaction will be obtained without any adverse effect on the Company or Parent or on the expected
benefits of the Transaction in any way meaningful to our analysis. We have assumed that the Transaction will be consummated on the terms set forth in the Agreement, without the waiver or modification
of any term or condition the effect of which would be in any way meaningful to our analysis.
Our
opinion does not address the underlying business decision of the Company to engage in the Transaction, or the relative merits of the Transaction as compared to any strategic
alternatives that may be available to the Company; nor does it address any legal, regulatory, tax or accounting matters. This opinion addresses only the fairness from a financial point of view to the
holders (other than Parent and its affiliates) of Shares, as of the date hereof, of the Merger Consideration to be paid to such holders pursuant to the Agreement. We do not express any view on, and
our opinion does not address, any other term or aspect of the Agreement or Transaction or any term or aspect of any other agreement or instrument contemplated by the Agreement or entered into or
amended in connection with the Transaction, including, the fairness of the Transaction to, or any consideration received in connection therewith by, the holders of any other class of securities,
creditors, or other constituencies of the
D-2
Company;
nor as to the fairness of the amount or nature of any compensation to be paid or payable to any of the officers, directors or employees of the Company, or class of such persons, in connection
with the Transaction, whether relative to the Merger Consideration to be paid to the holders (other than Parent and its affiliates) of Shares pursuant to the Agreement or otherwise. We are not
expressing any opinion as to the prices at which shares of Parent Common Stock will trade at any time or as to the impact of the Transaction on the solvency or viability of the Company or Parent or
the ability of the Company or Parent to pay their respective obligations when they come due. Our opinion is necessarily based on economic, monetary, market and other conditions as in effect on, and
the information made available to us as of, the date hereof and we assume no responsibility for updating, revising or reaffirming this opinion based on circumstances, developments or events occurring
after the date hereof. Our advisory services and the opinion expressed herein are provided for the information and assistance of the Board of Directors of the Company in connection with its
consideration of the Transaction and such opinion does not constitute a recommendation as to how any holder of Shares should vote with respect to such Transaction or any other matter. This opinion has
been approved by a fairness committee of Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Based
upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof, the Merger Consideration to be paid to the holders (other than Parent and its affiliates) of
Shares pursuant to the Agreement is fair from a financial point of view to such holders.
Very
truly yours,
(GOLDMAN,
SACHS & CO.)
D-3
Table of Contents
ANNEX E
Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
8 Del.C. § 262
§ 262. Appraisal rights
(a) Any
stockholder of a corporation of this State who holds shares of stock on the date of the making of a demand pursuant to subsection (d) of this section with
respect to such shares, who continuously holds such shares through the effective date of the merger or consolidation, who has otherwise complied with subsection (d) of this section and who has
neither voted in favor of the merger or consolidation nor consented thereto in writing pursuant to § 228 of this title shall be entitled to an appraisal by the Court of Chancery of
the fair value of the stockholder's shares of stock under the circumstances described in subsections (b) and (c) of this section. As used in this section, the word "stockholder" means a
holder of record of stock in a corporation; the words "stock" and "share" mean and include what is ordinarily meant by those words; and the words "depository receipt" mean a receipt or other
instrument issued by a depository representing an interest in 1 or more shares, or fractions thereof, solely of stock of a corporation, which stock is deposited with the depository.
(b) Appraisal
rights shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a constituent corporation in a merger or consolidation to be effected pursuant to
§ 251 (other than a merger effected pursuant to § 251(g) of this title and, subject to paragraph (b)(3) of this section, § 251(h) of
this title), § 252, § 254, § 255, § 256, § 257, § 258, § 263 or
§ 264 of this title:
(1) Provided,
however, that, except as expressly provided in § 363(b) of this title, no appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the
shares of any class or series of stock, which stock, or depository receipts in respect thereof, at the record date fixed to determine the stockholders entitled to receive notice of the meeting of
stockholders to act upon the agreement of merger or consolidation, were either: (i) listed on a national securities exchange or (ii) held of record by more than 2,000 holders; and
further provided that no appraisal rights shall be available for any shares of stock of the constituent corporation surviving a merger if the merger did not require for its approval the vote of the
stockholders of the surviving corporation as provided in § 251(f) of this title.
(2) Notwithstanding
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of stock of a
constituent corporation if the holders thereof are required by the terms of an agreement of merger or consolidation pursuant to §§ 251, 252, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 263
and 264 of this title to accept for such stock anything except:
a. Shares
of stock of the corporation surviving or resulting from such merger or consolidation, or depository receipts in respect thereof;
b. Shares
of stock of any other corporation, or depository receipts in respect thereof, which shares of stock (or depository receipts in respect thereof) or depository
receipts at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be either listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000 holders;
c. Cash
in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts described in the foregoing paragraphs (b)(2)a. and b. of this section; or
d. Any
combination of the shares of stock, depository receipts and cash in lieu of fractional shares or fractional depository receipts described in the foregoing
paragraphs (b)(2)a., b. and c. of this section.
(3) In
the event all of the stock of a subsidiary Delaware corporation party to a merger effected under § 251(h), § 253 or
§ 267 of this title is not owned by the parent immediately prior to the merger, appraisal rights shall be available for the shares of the subsidiary Delaware corporation.
Table of Contents
(4) In
the event of an amendment to a corporation's certificate of incorporation contemplated by § 363(a) of this title, appraisal rights shall be
available as contemplated by § 363(b) of this title, and the procedures of this section, including those set forth in subsections (d) and (e) of this section, shall
apply as nearly as practicable, with the word "amendment" substituted for the words "merger or consolidation," and the word "corporation" substituted for the words "constituent corporation" and/or
"surviving or resulting corporation."
(c) Any
corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that appraisal rights under this section shall be available for the shares of any class or series of its
stock as a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation, any merger or consolidation in which the corporation is a constituent corporation or the sale of all or substantially all of the
assets of the corporation. If the certificate of incorporation contains such a provision, the provisions of this section, including those set forth in subsections (d), (e), and (g) of
this section, shall apply as nearly as is practicable.
(d) Appraisal
rights shall be perfected as follows:
(1) If
a proposed merger or consolidation for which appraisal rights are provided under this section is to be submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, the
corporation, not less than 20 days prior to the meeting, shall notify each of its stockholders who was such on the record date for notice of such
meeting (or such members who received notice in accordance with § 255(c) of this title) with respect to shares for which appraisal rights are available pursuant to
subsection (b) or (c) of this section that appraisal rights are available for any or all of the shares of the constituent corporations, and shall include in such notice a copy of this
section and, if 1 of the constituent corporations is a nonstock corporation, a copy of § 114 of this title. Each stockholder electing to demand the appraisal of such stockholder's
shares shall deliver to the corporation, before the taking of the vote on the merger or consolidation, a written demand for appraisal of such stockholder's shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it
reasonably informs the corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to demand the appraisal of such stockholder's shares. A proxy or vote against the merger
or consolidation shall not constitute such a demand. A stockholder electing to take such action must do so by a separate written demand as herein provided. Within 10 days after the effective
date of such merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation shall notify each stockholder of each constituent corporation who has complied with this subsection and has not voted in
favor of or consented to the merger or consolidation of the date that the merger or consolidation has become effective; or
(2) If
the merger or consolidation was approved pursuant to § 228, § 251(h), § 253, or § 267 of
this title, then either a constituent corporation before the effective date of the merger or consolidation or the surviving or resulting corporation within 10 days thereafter shall notify each
of the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent corporation who are entitled to appraisal rights of the approval of the merger or consolidation and that appraisal rights are
available for any or all shares of such class or series of stock of such constituent corporation, and shall include in such notice a copy of this section and, if 1 of the constituent corporations is a
nonstock corporation, a copy of § 114 of this title. Such notice may, and, if given on or after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, shall, also notify such
stockholders of the effective date of the merger or consolidation. Any stockholder entitled to appraisal rights may, within 20 days after the date of mailing of such notice or, in the case of a
merger approved pursuant to § 251(h) of this title, within the later of the consummation of the offer contemplated by § 251(h) of this title and 20 days
after the date of mailing of such notice, demand in writing from the surviving or resulting corporation the appraisal of such holder's shares. Such demand will be sufficient if it reasonably informs
the corporation of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends thereby to demand the appraisal of such holder's shares. If such notice did not notify stockholders of the effective
date of the merger or consolidation, either (i) each such
E-2
Table of Contents
constituent
corporation shall send a second notice before the effective date of the merger or consolidation notifying each of the holders of any class or series of stock of such constituent
corporation that are entitled to appraisal rights of the effective date of the merger or consolidation or (ii) the surviving or resulting corporation shall send such a second notice to all such
holders on or within 10 days after such effective date; provided, however, that if such second notice is sent more than 20 days following the sending of the first notice or, in the case
of a merger approved pursuant to
§ 251(h) of this title, later than the later of the consummation of the offer contemplated by § 251(h) of this title and 20 days following the sending of
the first notice, such second notice need only be sent to each stockholder who is entitled to appraisal rights and who has demanded appraisal of such holder's shares in accordance with this
subsection. An affidavit of the secretary or assistant secretary or of the transfer agent of the corporation that is required to give either notice that such notice has been given shall, in the
absence of fraud, be prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein. For purposes of determining the stockholders entitled to receive either notice, each constituent corporation may fix, in advance,
a record date that shall be not more than 10 days prior to the date the notice is given, provided, that if the notice is given on or after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, the
record date shall be such effective date. If no record date is fixed and the notice is given prior to the effective date, the record date shall be the close of business on the day next preceding the
day on which the notice is given.
(e) Within
120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, the surviving or resulting corporation or any stockholder who has complied with
subsections (a) and (d) of this section hereof and who is otherwise entitled to appraisal rights, may commence an appraisal proceeding by filing a petition in the Court of Chancery
demanding a determination of the value of the stock of all such stockholders. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation,
any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party shall have the right to withdraw such stockholder's demand for appraisal and to accept the
terms offered upon the merger or consolidation. Within 120 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, any stockholder who has complied with the requirements of
subsections (a) and (d) of this section hereof, upon written request, shall be entitled to receive from the corporation surviving the merger or resulting from the consolidation a
statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the merger or consolidation and with respect to which demands for appraisal have been received and the aggregate number of
holders of such shares. Such written statement shall be mailed to the stockholder within 10 days after such stockholder's written request for such a statement is received by the surviving or
resulting corporation or within 10 days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal under subsection (d) of this section hereof, whichever is later.
Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, a person who is the beneficial owner of shares of such stock held either in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such person may, in such
person's own name, file a petition or request from the corporation the statement described in this subsection.
(f) Upon
the filing of any such petition by a stockholder, service of a copy thereof shall be made upon the surviving or resulting corporation, which shall within
20 days after such service file in the office of the Register in Chancery in which the petition was filed a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have
demanded payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached by the surviving or resulting corporation. If the petition shall be filed by the
surviving or resulting corporation, the petition shall be accompanied by such a duly verified list. The Register in Chancery, if so ordered by the Court, shall give notice of the time and place fixed
for the hearing of such petition by registered or certified mail to the surviving or resulting corporation and to the stockholders shown on the list at the addresses therein stated. Such notice shall
also be given by 1 or more publications at least 1 week before the day of the hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Wilmington, Delaware or such
E-3
Table of Contents
publication
as the Court deems advisable. The forms of the notices by mail and by publication shall be approved by the Court, and the costs thereof shall be borne by the surviving or resulting
corporation.
(g) At
the hearing on such petition, the Court shall determine the stockholders who have complied with this section and who have become entitled to appraisal rights. The
Court may require the stockholders who have demanded an appraisal for their shares and who hold stock represented by certificates to submit their certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery for
notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings; and if any stockholder fails to comply with such direction, the Court may dismiss the proceedings as to such stockholder. If immediately
before the merger or consolidation the shares of the class or series of stock of the constituent corporation as to which appraisal rights are available were listed on a national securities exchange,
the Court shall dismiss the proceedings as to all holders of such shares who are otherwise entitled to appraisal rights unless (1) the total number of shares entitled to appraisal exceeds 1% of
the outstanding shares of the class or series eligible for appraisal, (2) the value of the consideration provided in the merger or consolidation for such total number of shares exceeds
$1 million, or (3) the merger was approved pursuant to § 253 or § 267 of this title.
(h) After
the Court determines the stockholders entitled to an appraisal, the appraisal proceeding shall be conducted in accordance with the rules of the Court of Chancery,
including any rules specifically governing appraisal proceedings. Through such proceeding the Court shall determine the fair value of the shares exclusive of any element of value arising from the
accomplishment or expectation of the merger or consolidation, together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. In determining such fair value, the Court
shall take into account all relevant factors. Unless the Court in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, and except as provided in this subsection, interest from the effective date
of the merger through the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time
to time during the period between the effective date of the merger and the date of payment of the judgment. At any time before the entry of judgment in the proceedings, the surviving corporation may
pay to each stockholder entitled to appraisal an amount in cash, in which case interest shall accrue thereafter as provided herein only upon the sum of (1) the difference, if any, between the
amount so paid and the fair value of the shares as determined by the Court, and (2) interest theretofore accrued, unless paid at that time. Upon application by the surviving or resulting
corporation or by any stockholder entitled to participate in the appraisal proceeding, the Court may, in its discretion, proceed to trial upon the appraisal prior to the final determination of the
stockholders entitled to an appraisal. Any stockholder whose name appears on the list filed by the surviving or resulting corporation pursuant to subsection (f) of this section and who has
submitted such stockholder's certificates of stock to the Register in Chancery, if such is required, may participate fully in all proceedings until it is finally determined that such stockholder is
not entitled to appraisal rights under this section.
(i) The
Court shall direct the payment of the fair value of the shares, together with interest, if any, by the surviving or resulting corporation to the stockholders
entitled thereto. Payment shall be so made to each such stockholder, in the case of holders of uncertificated stock forthwith, and the case of holders of shares represented by certificates upon the
surrender to the corporation of the certificates representing such stock. The Court's decree may be enforced as other decrees in the Court of Chancery may be enforced, whether such surviving or
resulting corporation be a corporation of this State or of any state.
(j) The
costs of the proceeding may be determined by the Court and taxed upon the parties as the Court deems equitable in the circumstances. Upon application of a
stockholder, the Court may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and
the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all the shares entitled to an appraisal.
E-4
Table of Contents
(k) From
and after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights as provided in subsection (d) of this section
shall be entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock (except dividends or other distributions payable to stockholders of record
at a date which is prior to the effective date of the merger or consolidation); provided, however, that if no petition for an appraisal shall be filed within the time provided in subsection (e)
of this section, or if such stockholder shall deliver to the surviving or resulting corporation a written withdrawal of such stockholder's demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the merger or
consolidation, either within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation as provided in subsection (e) of this section or thereafter with the written approval of the
corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal shall cease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no appraisal proceeding in the Court of Chancery shall be dismissed as to any stockholder
without the approval of the Court, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Court deems just; provided, however that this provision shall not affect the right of any stockholder who
has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party to withdraw such stockholder's demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered upon the merger or
consolidation within 60 days after the effective date of the merger or consolidation, as set forth in subsection (e) of this section.
(l) The
shares of the surviving or resulting corporation to which the shares of such objecting stockholders would have been converted had they assented to the merger or
consolidation shall have the status of authorized and unissued shares of the surviving or resulting corporation.
E-5
Table of Contents