The table below provides information about income and capital changes for a share of common stock outstanding throughout the periods indicated
(excluding supplemental data provided below):
Note 1. Organization
DTF Tax-Free Income Inc. (“DTF” or the “Fund”) was incorporated under the laws of
the State of Maryland on September 24, 1991. The Fund commenced operations on November 29, 1991 as a diversified, closed-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). The Fund’s investment objective is current income exempt from regular federal income tax consistent with preservation of capital.
The Fund will terminate on or before March 1, 2028 unless (i) within 12 months prior to that date, the Fund conducts a tender offer for all of
its outstanding shares at 100% of their net asset value, (ii) the results of the tender offer leave the Fund with net assets of at least $75 million and (iii) a majority of the entire Board of Directors votes to reinstate the Fund’s perpetual
existence.
The conversion of the Fund into a seven-year term fund was enabled through the passage of proposals amending the Fund’s
charter (the “Charter Amendments”) by a majority of the holders of the Fund’s common and preferred stock, voting together as a single class, at the Fund’s annual meeting of shareholders on February 26, 2021. The Charter
Amendments became effective with the Fund’s filing of articles of amendment with the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation on March 1, 2021. Information regarding the charter amendment proposals and vote tabulations will be found in
the “Report of Annual Meeting of Shareholders” on page 26.
Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies
The Fund is an investment company that follows the accounting and reporting guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)
Topic 946 applicable to Investment Companies.
The following are the significant accounting policies of the Fund.
A. Investment Valuation: Debt securities are generally valued based on the evaluated bid using prices provided by one or more dealers
regularly making a market in that security, an independent pricing service, or quotes from broker-dealers, when such prices are believed to reflect the fair value of such securities and are generally classified as Level 2. The relative
liquidity of some securities in the Fund’s portfolio may adversely affect the ability of the Fund to accurately value such securities. Any securities for which it is determined that market prices are unavailable or inappropriate are valued at
fair value using a procedure determined in good faith by the Board of Directors and are classified as Level 2 or 3 based on the valuation inputs.
B. Investment Transactions and Investment Income: Securities transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses on
sales of securities are determined on the identified cost basis. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. The Fund amortizes premiums and accretes discounts on securities using the effective interest method. Premiums on securities are
amortized over the period remaining until first call date, if any, or if none, the remaining life of the security and discounts are accreted over the remaining life of the security for financial reporting purposes.
C. Federal Income Taxes: It is the Fund’s intention to comply with requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code
applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its taxable income and capital gains to its shareholders. Therefore, no provision for federal income or excise taxes is required. Management of the Fund has
concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements. Since tax authorities can examine previously filed tax returns, the Fund’s tax returns filed for the tax years 2017 to
2020 are subject to such review.
19
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
April 30, 2021
(Unaudited)
D. Dividends and Distributions: The Fund declares and pays dividends on its common
stock monthly from net investment income. Net capital gains, if any, in excess of capital loss carryforwards are expected to be distributed annually. Dividends and distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend
date. Dividends on the Fund’s Remarketable Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares (“RVMTP Shares”) are accrued on a daily basis and paid on a monthly basis and are determined as described in Note 6.
The amount and timing of distributions are generally determined in accordance with federal tax regulations, which may differ from U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
E. Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Note 3. Agreements and Management Arrangements
A. Adviser: The Fund has an Advisory Agreement with Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co. (the “Adviser”), an
indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (“Virtus”). The investment advisory fee is payable monthly at an annual rate of 0.50% of the Fund’s average weekly managed assets, which is defined as the average
weekly value of the total assets of the Fund minus the sum of all accrued liabilities of the Fund (other than the aggregate amount of any outstanding borrowings or other indebtedness constituting financial leverage).
B. Administrator: The Fund has an Administration Agreement with Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated (the
“Administrator” or “Baird”). The administration fee is payable quarterly at an annual rate of 0.14% of the Fund’s average weekly net assets, which is defined as the average weekly value of the total assets of the Fund minus
the sum of all accrued liabilities of the Fund (including the aggregate amount of any outstanding borrowings or other indebtedness constituting financial leverage).
C. Directors: The Fund pays each director not affiliated with the Adviser an annual fee. Total fees paid to directors for the six months
ended April 30, 2021 were $11,008.
D. Affiliated Shareholder: At April 30, 2021, Virtus Partners, Inc. (a wholly owned
subsidiary of Virtus) held 34,265 shares of the Fund which represent 0.49% of shares of common stock outstanding. These shares may be sold at any time.
Note 4. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term investments) for the six months ended April 30, 2021 were $6,943,551
and $30,175,764, respectively.
Note 5. Federal Tax Information
At April 30, 2021, the federal tax cost and aggregate gross unrealized appreciation (depreciation) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Tax
Cost
|
|
Unrealized
Appreciation
|
|
Unrealized
Depreciation
|
|
Net
Unrealized
Appreciation
|
|
$160,737,740
|
|
$14,286,281
|
|
$(22,502)
|
|
$14,263,779
|
The difference between the book basis and tax basis of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and cost of
investments is primarily attributable to the tax treatment of discount accretion on fixed income securities.
20
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
April 30, 2021
(Unaudited)
Note 6. Remarketable Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares
The Fund has issued and outstanding 650 shares of Series 2050 Remarketable Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares (“RVMTP
Shares”), each with a liquidation preference of $100,000.
The RVMTP Shares were privately placed with an institutional investor on
November 2, 2020. The proceeds were used to conduct an early redemption of the Fund’s Series 2021 Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares (“VMTP Shares”) at 100% of their liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid
dividends on November 12, 2020. The RVMTP Shares are a floating-rate form of preferred shares and are subject to a mandatory tender three years after issuance, but may remain outstanding either on the same terms or modified terms pursuant to an
agreement between the Fund and the holder(s), or under a remarketing process at such time. The Fund is required to redeem all outstanding RVMTP Shares on November 2, 2050, unless earlier redeemed, repurchased or extended. The RVMTP Shares are
subject to optional and mandatory redemption in certain circumstances. The redemption price per share is equal to the sum of the liquidation value per share plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends and a redemption premium, if any.
Key terms of the series of RVMTP Shares at April 30, 2021 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
|
|
Shares
Outstanding
|
|
Liquidation
Preference
|
|
|
Weekly Rate Reset
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Term
Redemption
Date
|
|
|
2050
|
|
650
|
|
|
$65,000,000
|
|
|
SIFMA Municipal Swap Index + 1.25%
|
|
|
1.31%
|
|
|
|
11/02/2050
|
|
The Fund incurred costs in connection with the issuance of the RVMTP Shares. These costs were recorded as a
deferred charge and are being amortized over a three year term. Amortization of these deferred offering costs of $67,599 is included under the caption “Interest expense and amortization of deferred offering costs on preferred shares” on
the Statement of Operations and the unamortized balance is deducted from the carrying amount of the RVMTP shares under the caption “Remarketable Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Unamortized deferred offering costs of $8,075 related to the VMTP Shares were fully expensed when these shares were redeemed.
Dividends on
the RVMTP Shares (which are treated as interest expense for financial reporting purposes) are accrued daily and paid monthly. The average daily liquidation value outstanding and the weighted daily average dividend rate of the RVMTP Shares during the
six months ended April 30, 2021, were $65,000,000 and 1.31%, respectively.
The RVMTP Shares are not listed on any exchange or
automated quotation system. The fair value of the RVMTP Shares is estimated to be their liquidation preference. The RVMTP Shares are categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. The Fund is subject to certain restrictions relating to
the RVMTP Shares, such as maintaining certain asset coverage, effective leverage ratio and overcollateralization ratio requirements. Failure to comply with these restrictions could preclude the Fund from declaring any distributions to common
shareholders or purchasing common shares and/or could trigger the mandatory redemption of the RVMTP Shares.
Note 7. Tender
Offer
On December 8, 2020, the Fund announced the commencement of a cash tender offer (the “Offer”) for up to
17.5% of the Fund’s outstanding shares of common stock at a price of 98% of the Fund’s closing net asset value per share (NAV) as of the close of the regular trading session on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on January 8, 2021.
The Offer expired on January 7, 2021, at which time 4,335,961 shares were duly tendered and not withdrawn. Because the shares tendered exceeded 1,491,119 shares, the Offer was oversubscribed. Therefore, in accordance with the terms and
21
DTF TAX-FREE INCOME INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
April 30, 2021
(Unaudited)
conditions specified in the Offer, the Fund purchased shares from all tendering stockholders on a pro rata basis, disregarding fractions. The proration factor for the Offer was 34.389423%. The
purchase price per share of properly tendered shares was $15.77 per share, equal to 98% of the NAV as of the close of the regular trading session of the NYSE on January 8, 2021. Payment for the tendered shares was made on January 11, 2021
in the amount of $23,514,947. Shares that were not tendered continue to remain outstanding.
Note 8. Indemnifications
Under the Fund’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising
out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications to other parties. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is
unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not occurred. However, the Fund has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these arrangements and expects the risk of loss to be remote.
Note 9. Subsequent Events
Management has evaluated the impact of all subsequent events on the Fund through the date the financial statements were issued, and has
determined that there were no subsequent events requiring recognition or disclosure in these financial statements.
22
RENEWAL OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT (Unaudited)
Under Section 15(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the terms of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement must be reviewed and approved at least annually by the Board of Directors of the Fund (the “Board”), including a majority
of the directors who are not “interested persons” of the Fund, as defined in section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act (the “Independent Directors”). Section 15(c) of the 1940 Act also requires the Fund’s directors to
request and evaluate, and the Fund’s investment adviser to furnish, such information as may reasonably be necessary to evaluate the terms of the investment advisory agreement. To assist the Board with this responsibility, the Board has
appointed a Contracts Committee, which is composed of the Independent Directors of the Fund and acts under a written charter that was most recently amended on December 17, 2015. A copy of the charter is available on the Fund’s website at
www.dpimc.com/dtf and in print to any shareholder, upon request.
The Contracts Committee, assisted by the advice of independent legal
counsel, conducted an annual review of the terms of the Fund’s contractual arrangements, including the investment advisory agreement with Duff & Phelps Investment Management Co. (the “Adviser”). Set forth below is a
description of the Contracts Committee’s annual review of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement, which provided the material basis for the Board’s decision to continue the investment advisory agreement.
In the course of the Contracts Committee’s review, the members of the Contracts Committee considered all of the information they deemed
appropriate, including informational materials furnished by the Adviser in response to a request made by independent counsel on behalf of the Contracts Committee. In arriving at its recommendation that continuation of the investment advisory
agreement was in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders, the Contracts Committee took into account all factors that it deemed relevant, without identifying any single factor or group of factors as
all-important or controlling. Among the factors considered by the Contracts Committee, and the conclusion reached with respect to each, were the following:
Nature, extent, and quality of services. The Contracts Committee considered the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to
the Fund by the Adviser. Among other materials, the Adviser furnished the Contracts Committee with a copy of its most recent investment adviser registration form (Form ADV). In evaluating the quality of the Adviser’s services, the Contracts
Committee noted the various complexities involved in the operations of the Fund, such as the use of leverage in the form of the Fund’s preferred stock, and concluded that the Adviser is consistently providing high-quality services to the Fund
in an increasingly complex environment. The Contracts Committee also considered the length of service of the individual professional employees of the Adviser who provide services to the Fund and noted an almost total lack of turnover. In the
Contracts Committee’s view, the long-term service of capable and conscientious professionals provides a significant benefit to the Fund and its shareholders. The Contracts Committee also considered the Fund’s investment performance as
discussed below. The Contracts Committee also took into account its evaluation of the quality of the Adviser’s code of ethics and compliance program. The Contracts Committee also considered the consistent quality of the services being provided
by the Adviser even in light of the disruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. In light of the foregoing, the Contracts Committee concluded that it was generally satisfied with the nature, extent and
quality of the services provided to the Fund by the Adviser.
Investment performance of the Fund and the Adviser. The Contracts
Committee reviewed the Fund’s investment performance over time and compared that performance to other funds in its peer group. In making its comparisons, the Contracts Committee utilized data provided by the Adviser and a report from Broadridge
(“Broadridge”), an independent provider of investment company data. As reported by Broadridge, the Fund’s net asset value (“NAV”) total return ranked below the median among all leveraged
closed-end general and insured municipal debt funds for the 3- and 5-year periods ended June 30, 2020, and above the median
for the 1-year period ended June 30, 2020. The Adviser provided the Contracts Committee with performance information for the Fund for various periods, measured against two benchmarks: the Bloomberg
Barclays Municipal Bond Index and the Lipper Leveraged Municipal Debt Funds Average (the Fund’s category as determined by Thomson Reuters Lipper). The Committee noted that the Fund’s NAV total return had underperformed the Bloomberg
Barclays Municipal Bond Index for the 1-, 3- and 5-year periods ended June 30, 2020. The Contracts Committee further noted
that on a market value total return basis, the Fund had outperformed the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index over the 1- and 5-year periods ended June 30, 2020,
while noting that it had
23
underperformed the index for the 3-year period ended June 30, 2020. The Committee further noted that the Fund’s total return on an NAV basis had
underperformed compared to the Lipper Leveraged Municipal Debt Fund Average for the 3- and 5-year periods ended June 30, 2020, while outperforming the average for
the most recent 1-year period. On a market value basis, the Committee noted that the Fund’s total return had underperformed compared to the Lipper Leveraged Municipal Debt Fund Average for the 5-year period ended June 30, 2020, while outperforming the average for the 1- and 3-year periods ended June 30, 2020. In
evaluating the Fund’s performance, the Contracts Committee further considered the Adviser’s explanation that the fixed-income investments comprising certain of the benchmarks include higher yielding, lower-quality bonds in which the Fund
is not permitted to invest.
Costs of services and profits realized. The Contracts Committee considered the reasonableness of the
compensation paid to the Adviser, in both absolute and comparative terms, and also the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates from its relationship with the Fund. To facilitate this analysis, the Contracts Committee retained Broadridge
to furnish a report comparing the Fund’s management fee (defined as the sum of the advisory fee and administration fee) and other expenses to the similar expenses of other municipal debt funds selected by Broadridge (the “Broadridge
expense group”). The Contracts Committee reviewed, among other things, information provided by Broadridge comparing the Fund’s contractual management fee rate (at common asset levels) and actual management fee rate (reflecting fee waivers,
if any) as a percentage of total assets and as a percentage of assets attributable to common stock to other funds in its Broadridge expense group. Based on the data provided on management fee rates, the Contracts Committee noted that: (i) the
Fund’s contractual management fee rate at a common asset level was above the median of its Broadridge expense group; (ii) the actual total expense rate was higher than the median of its Broadridge expense group on the basis of assets
attributable to common stock and on a total asset basis; and (iii) the actual management fee rate was at the median of its Broadridge expense group on the basis of assets attributable to common stock, but higher than the median on a total asset
basis.
In reviewing expense ratio comparisons between the Fund and other funds in the peer group selected by Broadridge, the Contracts
Committee considered leverage-related expenses separately from other expenses. The Contracts Committee noted that leverage-related expenses are not conducive to direct comparisons between funds, because the leverage-related expenses on a fund’s
income statement are significantly affected by the amount, type, tenor and accounting treatment of the leverage used by each fund, among other factors, and considered the Adviser’s report indicating that the tenor of the Fund’s leverage
was the primary driver of the difference between the Fund’s investment-related expenses and those of other funds in the Broadridge peer group. Also, unlike all the other expenses of the Fund (and other funds) which are incurred in return for a
service, leverage expenses are incurred in return for the receipt of additional capital that is then invested by the Fund (and other funds using leverage) in additional portfolio securities that produce revenue directly offsetting the leverage
expenses. Accordingly, in evaluating the cost of the Fund’s leverage, the Contracts Committee considered the specific benefits to the Fund’s common shareholders of maintaining such leverage, noting that the Fund’s management and the
Board regularly monitor the amount, form, terms and risks of the Fund’s leverage, and that such leverage has continued to be accretive, generating net income for the Fund’s common shareholders over and above its cost.
The Adviser also furnished the Contracts Committee with copies of its financial statements, and the financial statements of its parent company,
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. The Adviser also provided information regarding the revenue and expenses related to its management of the Fund, and the methodology used by the Adviser in allocating such revenue and expenses among its various
clients. In reviewing those financial statements and other materials, the Contracts Committee examined the profitability of the investment advisory agreement to the Adviser and determined that the profitability of that contract was reasonable in
light of the services rendered to the Fund. The Contracts Committee considered that the Adviser must be able to compensate its employees at competitive levels in order to attract and retain high-quality personnel to provide high-quality service to
the Fund. The Contracts Committee concluded that the investment advisory fee was the product of arm’s length bargaining and that it was fair and reasonable to the Fund.
Economies of scale. The Contracts Committee considered whether the Fund has appropriately benefited from any economies of scale. The
Contracts Committee concluded that currently the Fund is not sufficiently large to realize benefits from economies of scale with fee breakpoints. The Contracts Committee encouraged the Adviser to continue to work towards reducing costs by leveraging
relationships with service providers across the complex of funds advised by the Adviser.
24
Comparison with other advisory contracts. The Contracts Committee also received
comparative information from the Adviser with respect to its standard fee schedule for investment advisory clients other than the Fund. The Contracts Committee noted that, among all accounts managed by the Adviser, the Fund’s advisory fee rate
is higher than the Adviser’s standard fee schedule. However, the Contracts Committee noted that the services provided by the Adviser to the Fund are significantly more extensive and demanding than the services provided by the Adviser to its non-investment company, institutional accounts. Specifically, in providing services to the Fund, the Contracts Committee considered that the Adviser needs to: (1) comply with the 1940 Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act and other federal securities laws and New York Stock Exchange requirements, (2) provide for external reporting (including quarterly and semi-annual reports to shareholders, annual audited financial statements and disclosure of proxy
voting), tax compliance and reporting (which are particularly complex for investment companies), requirements of Section 19 of the 1940 Act relating to the source of distributions, (3) prepare for and attend meetings of the Board and its
committees, (4) communicate with Board and committee members between meetings, (5) communicate with a retail shareholder base consisting of thousands of investors, (6) manage the use of financial leverage and respond to changes in the
financial markets and regulatory environment that could affect the amount and type of the Fund’s leverage and (7) respond to unanticipated issues in the financial markets or regulatory environment that can impact the Fund. Based on the
fact that the Adviser only provides the foregoing services to its investment company clients and not to its institutional account clients, the Contracts Committee concluded that the management fees charged to the Fund are reasonable compared to
those charged to other clients of the Adviser, when the nature and scope of the services provided to the Funds are taken into account. Furthermore, the Contracts Committee noted that many of the Adviser’s other clients would not be considered
“like accounts” of the Fund because these accounts are not of similar size and do not have the same investment objectives as, or possess other characteristics similar to, the Fund.
Indirect benefits. The Contracts Committee considered possible sources of indirect benefits to the Adviser from its relationship to the
Fund, and enhanced reputation that may aid in obtaining new clients. As a fixed-income fund, the Contracts Committee noted that the Fund does not utilize affiliates of the Adviser for brokerage purposes.
Conclusion. Based upon its evaluation of all material factors, including the foregoing, and assisted by the advice of independent legal
counsel, the Contracts Committee concluded that the continued retention of the Adviser as investment adviser to the Fund was in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders. Accordingly, the Contracts Committee recommended to the full Board
that the investment advisory agreement with the Adviser be continued for a one-year term ending March 1, 2022. On December 17, 2020, the Contracts Committee presented its recommendations, and the
criteria on which they were based, to the full Board, whereupon the Board, including all of the Independent Directors voting separately, accepted the Contracts Committee’s recommendations and unanimously approved the continuation of the current
investment advisory agreement with the Adviser for a one-year term ending March 1, 2022.
INFORMATION
ABOUT PROXY VOTING BY THE FUND (Unaudited)
Although the Fund does not typically hold voting securities, a description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how
to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling the Administrator toll-free at (833) 604-3163 or is available on the Fund’s website www.dpimc.com/dtf or on the SEC’s website
www.sec.gov.
INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUND’S PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS (Unaudited)
The Fund files its complete
schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third fiscal quarters of each fiscal year (quarters ended January 31 and July 31) as an exhibit to Form NPORT-P. The Fund’s Form NPORT-P is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the Fund’s schedule of portfolio holdings is available without charge, upon request, by calling the Administrator toll-free at (833)
604-3163 or is available on the Fund’s website at www.dpimc.com/dtf.
25
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
Notice is hereby given in
accordance with Section 23(c) of the 1940 Act that the Fund may from time to time purchase its shares of common stock in the open market.