Former Executive Wasn't Defamed When Biomet Called Him a Compliance Risk, Court Rules
October 10 2019 - 7:45PM
Dow Jones News
By Dylan Tokar
Designating someone a compliance risk doesn't constitute
defamation, a federal appeals court in Chicago has ruled.
The ruling, issued this week, is a victory for medical device
manufacturer Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc., which was sued by a
former employee after it placed him on a list of entities that the
company said posed a risk to its compliance with antibribery
laws.
The lawsuit was filed in 2016 by Alejandro Yeatts, a former
employee of a Biomet Inc. subsidiary in Argentina, who came under
scrutiny by Biomet after it reached a series of foreign bribery
settlements with U.S. authorities in 2012. Mr. Yeatts had accused
the company of defaming him by placing him on the list, which
restricted Biomet employees and agents from doing business with
him.
A district court in January threw out Mr. Yeatts's lawsuit on
legal grounds. By calling him a compliance risk, the company was
stating an opinion that couldn't be proven false, the district
court said.
It was reasonable for Biomet to take a "hypersensitive view" of
potential compliance risks in light of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act investigations it had faced, the district court
added.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on Wednesday
upheld the decision. "Even if there were zero evidence he engaged
in criminal conduct, that would not prove false Biomet's concern
that Yeatts posed a compliance risk," the Seventh Circuit said.
A representative of Biomet and lawyers for Mr. Yeatts didn't
respond to requests for comment.
Mr. Yeatts's lawsuit offered a behind-the-scenes look at a
turbulent series of years for Warsaw, Ind.-based Biomet, which
merged with Zimmer Holdings Inc. in 2015.
The dispute centered on a Brazilian distributor, Prosintese,
which Biomet terminated in 2008 after learning it had bribed
health-care providers to promote Biomet products, according to the
Seventh Circuit's ruling.
Soon after moving to cut ties with Prosintese, Biomet began
doing business with another distributor, Bio2, which hired the
owner of Prosintese as a consultant, the court said. Mr. Yeatts,
who was a business manager for Biomet's South American operations,
continued to communicate with Prosintese's owner -- who was now
Bio2's consultant.
Meanwhile, Biomet came under investigation by U.S. authorities
for making improper payments to public health-care providers in
Argentina, Brazil and China.
The company in 2012 agreed to pay more than $22 million to
resolve violations of the FCPA in joint settlements with the U.S.
Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
misconduct stretched from roughly 2000 to 2008, authorities
said.
As part of its settlement with the Justice Department, Biomet
also agreed to hire an independent monitor to oversee the company's
compliance program for an 18-month period.
Biomet's respite from legal scrutiny didn't last long. In 2013,
it received an anonymous whistleblower email about the Prosintese
owner's ongoing work for the company, according to the Seventh
Circuit ruling.
Under the terms of the company's 2012 settlements, Biomet was
forced to alert the Justice Department and its compliance monitor
to the allegations, which caused prosecutors to launch another
investigation, the court said.
Biomet eventually concluded that Mr. Yeatts had continued to
market and sell Biomet products in Brazil with the Prosintese
owner, despite the prohibition against doing so, it said.
Biomet suspended Mr. Yeatts in April 2014 and terminated him in
September 2015. Meanwhile, in response to a recommendation by its
monitor, it issued a restricted parties list, which included Mr.
Yeatts. A statement included with the list said that the entities
on it posed "significant and unacceptable compliance risks." The
list was sent to employees and business partners in Latin America,
the court said.
The Justice Department finished its second investigation of
Biomet in 2017 and concluded that the medical device manufacturer
hadn't complied with its 2012 agreement.
Biomet entered into a second agreement with the department and
the SEC in 2017, when it agreed to pay another $30 million in
penalties.
Write to Dylan Tokar at dylan.tokar@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
October 10, 2019 19:30 ET (23:30 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Zimmer Biomet (NYSE:ZBH)
Historical Stock Chart
From Sep 2024 to Oct 2024
Zimmer Biomet (NYSE:ZBH)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2023 to Oct 2024