TORONTO, Oct. 25, 2018 /CNW/ - Anaconda Mining Inc.
("Anaconda" or the "Company") (ANX: TSX)(OTCQX: ANXGF) is pleased
to announce an update to the Mineral Resource Estimate ("Mineral
Resource") prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101
("NI 43-101") for the 100% owned Goldboro Gold Project ("Goldboro"
or the "Project") located in Nova Scotia,
Canada. The following table summarizes the updated Mineral
Resource and comparative change from the previous Mineral Resource
dated December 31, 2017. The
schematic below further illustrates the areas of growth compared to
the previous Mineral Resource.
Highlights of the Goldboro Gold Project Mineral Resource
Update (effective July 19,
2018):
Category*
|
Tonnes
('000)
|
Grade
(g/t
Au)
|
Ounces
(Rounded)
|
% Change in
Grade
from Dec
2017**
|
% Change in
Ounces
from Dec
2017**
|
Measured
|
1,611.8
|
4.23
|
219,300
|
+ 42%
|
+ 447%
|
Indicated
|
2,166.2
|
5.50
|
383,400
|
+ 18%
|
(21%)
|
Measured and
Indicated
|
3,778.0
|
4.96
|
602,700
|
+11%
|
+15%
|
Inferred
|
2,126.4
|
6.63
|
453,200
|
+
56%
|
+
30%
|
* Combined Open
Pit and Underground Mineral Resources. Open Pit Mineral Resource
based on a 0.50 g/t Au cut-off grade; Underground Mineral Resource
based on 2.00 g/t Au cut-off grade ** Refer to the
Company's technical report entitled "Goldboro Project Preliminary
Economic Assessment" dated March 2, 2018 for further details (the
"Previous Report").
|
Anaconda is also pleased to report updated after-tax economics
with respect to the Preliminary Economic Assessment study ("PEA")
on Goldboro. The change in
after-tax economics reflects the confirmation with the Nova Scotia
Department of Natural Resources of the application of a mineral
royalty tax of a 1% net smelter return on gold production, which
supersedes the higher mineral tax applied in the Previous Report.
All dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars unless
otherwise noted.
"The updated Mineral Resource is a significant milestone
validating our investment thesis in Atlantic Canada. When we acquired Goldboro in 2017, we believed that the deposit
had substantial potential to expand. In our first campaign of over
12,000 meters of drilling, most of which was infill, we were able
to increase Measured and Indicated Resources by 15% and Inferred
Resources by 30%. Now the deposit contains over 600,000 ounces of
Measured and Indicated Resources and over 450,000 ounces of
Inferred Resources. More importantly, grade has improved
significantly and confidence in the Mineral Resource has risen,
highlighted by a 447% increase of ounces in the Measured category.
The deposit has only been drilled to relatively shallow depths and
is open along strike, down dip, and at depth. We are gaining
experience and confidence with the resource and geologic
structures, and believe we can continue to grow the deposit to a
much larger scale."
~ Dustin Angelo, President and
CEO
Highlights of the Goldboro PEA:
- With the update to the mineral royalty tax and a gold price of
$1,550 per ounce (~US$1,200* per ounce), after-tax NPV (5%)
improved to $88 million with an
after-tax IRR of 29.3%, resulting in an after-tax payback period of
3.3 years;
- At a $1,600 gold price per ounce
(~US$1,230* per ounce), the NPV (5%)
increases to $99 million and an
after-tax IRR of 32.0% and a payback period of 3.1 years;
- The Project has pre-production capital expenditures of
$47 million to establish the proposed
initial open pit operations prior to underground development and
production;
- Life of mine ("LOM") of 8.8 years with gold production of
375,900 ounces and LOM average operating cash cost** of
$654 per ounce (~US$505* per ounce) and all-in sustaining cash
cost** of $797 per ounce
(~US$615* per ounce).
* Assumes a 0.77 USD:
CAD exchange rate.
** See Non-IFRS Measures below.
|
The updated PEA only reflects the change in the mineral royalty
tax and does not incorporate increases to the Mineral Resource as
at July 19, 2018. The updated Mineral
Resource does not affect the validity or currency of the PEA, which
continues to use the Mineral Resource as reported in the Previous
Report. With the increase in Mineral Resources announced today,
Anaconda believes there is the potential for increased Project mine
life and higher potential future mill throughput, which will be
assessed in future studies.
Readers are cautioned that the PEA is preliminary in nature, it
includes Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too
speculative geologically to have the economic considerations
applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral
Reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized.
Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability.
Goldboro Gold Project – Mineral Resource Estimate (effective
July 19, 2018)
The Mineral Resource was prepared by WSP Canada Inc. ("WSP")
under the supervision of Todd
McCracken, P. Geo., an "Independent Qualified Person", as
defined in NI 43-101. The effective date of this Mineral
Resource is July 19, 2018 and
includes historical diamond drilling as well as 12,356 metres of
drilling conducted by Anaconda in the Boston Richardson and East
Goldbrook Zones up to June 2018. Highlights of the updated
Mineral Resource include:
- A 23% increase in the number of combined Measured and Indicated
underground Mineral Resources to 518,200 ounces and an 8% increase
in grade to 5.52 g/t gold (2,921,700 tonnes);
- A 57% increase in grade to 6.70 g/t gold and a 30% increase in
the number of underground Inferred Mineral Resources to 445,500
ounces (2,067,900 tonnes);
- A 447% increase in the number of combined open pit and
underground Measured Mineral Resources to 219,300 ounces gold
(1,611,800 tonnes at 4.23 g/t gold); and
- The deposit remains open for expansion along strike, down dip,
and at depth.
Resource
Type
|
Au Cut-off
(g/t)
|
Category
|
Tonnes
(Rounded)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Troy Ounces
(Rounded)
|
Open Pit
|
0.50
|
Measured
|
608,700
|
2.80
|
54,900
|
Indicated
|
247,600
|
3.72
|
29,600
|
Measured and
Indicated
|
856,300
|
3.07
|
84,500
|
Inferred
|
58,500
|
4.10
|
7,700
|
Underground
|
2.00
|
Measured
|
1,003,100
|
5.10
|
164,400
|
Indicated
|
1,918,600
|
5.74
|
353,800
|
Measured and
Indicated
|
2,921,700
|
5.52
|
518,200
|
Inferred
|
2,067,900
|
6.70
|
445,500
|
Combined
Open Pit and
Underground
|
0.50/2.00
|
Measured
|
1,611,800
|
4.23
|
219,300
|
Indicated
|
2,166,200
|
5.50
|
383,400
|
Measured and
Indicated
|
3,778,000
|
4.96
|
602,700
|
Inferred
|
2,126,400
|
6.63
|
453,200
|
Mineral Resource
Estimate Notes
|
1.
|
Mineral Resources
were prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 and the CIM Definition
Standards (2014). Mineral Resources that are not mineral reserves
do not have demonstrated economic viability.
|
2.
|
Open pit Mineral
Resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t gold that is
based on a gold price of CAD$1,550/oz. and a gold processing
recovery factor of 95%.
|
3.
|
Underground
Mineral Resource is reported at a cut-off grade of 2.0 g/t gold
that is based on a gold price of CAD$1,550/oz. and a gold
processing recovery factor of 95%.
|
4.
|
Appropriate mining
costs, processing costs, metal recoveries, and inter ramp pit slope
angles were used by WSP to generate the pit shell.
|
5.
|
Appropriate mining
costs, processing costs, metal recoveries and stope dimensions were
used by WSP to generate the potential underground
resource.
|
6.
|
Rounding may
result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade, and
contained metal content.
|
7.
|
Tonnage and grade
measurements are in metric units. Contained gold ounces are in troy
ounces.
|
8.
|
Contributing assay
composites were capped at 80/g/t Au.
|
9.
|
A density factor
of 2.7g/cm3 was applied to all blocks.
|
The Mineral Resource is based on validated results of 316
surface drill holes and 119 underground drill holes, for a total of
79,104 metres of diamond drilling that was completed between 1984
and June 2018. The Mineral Resource
includes 12,356 metres of drilling conducted by Anaconda up to
June 2018, focused exclusively on
infill and expansion drilling in the Boston Richardson and East
Goldbrook Zones.
In July 2018, the Company
commenced a 10,000 metre drill program which aims to expand and
infill the West Goldbrook and Boston Richardson Systems of the
Goldboro Deposit.
Modeling was performed using GEOVIA Surpac®
6.8 software with gold grades estimated using ordinary kriging (OK)
interpolation methodology. Samples were composited at 1.0 metre
down hole and composites were capped at 80 g/t. Measured mineral
resources are defined as all interpolated blocks within the first
search pass and any interpolated block in the second pass with at
least 10 contributing composites samples and no more than two
composites from any one drillhole. Indicated mineral resources are
defined as all interpolated blocks within the second search pass
not classified as measured and any interpolated block in the third
pass with at least 9 contributing composites samples and no more
than two composites from any one drillhole. Inferred mineral
resources are defined as all remaining interpolated blocks that
occur within the various belt model solids. Block size is 1 metre *
by 1 metre (y) by 1 metre (z). The drilling-defined deposit is
divided into three spatial domains for modeling purposes, these
being (1) the Boston Richardson Zone, (2) the West Goldbrook Zone
and (3) the East Goldbrook Zone. At a long-term metal price of
$1,550 per ounce, reasonable
prospects are considered to exist for eventual economic extraction
of mineral resources defined at a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off value within
limits of the conceptual final pit shell prepared by WSP. Mineral
resources defined external to this pit shell are reported at a 2.0
g/t Au cut-off value and are considered to have reasonable
prospects for eventual economic extraction using underground mining
methods at the same long-term gold price. Additional information
about the mineral resource modeling methodology will be documented
in the upcoming NI 43-101 technical report.
Goldboro Gold Project – PEA Update
The updated Goldboro PEA base case after-tax net present value
at a 7% discount rate is $76 million,
with an after-tax internal rate of return of 29.3% and pay-back
period of 3.3 years. The change in after-tax economics reflects the
confirmation with the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources
of the application of a mineral royalty tax of a 1% net smelter
return on gold production, pursuant to Section 121(3) of the
Mineral Resources Act and as outlined under Section 71(f) of the
Mineral Resources Regulations. This supersedes the higher mineral
tax applied in the Previous Report. The base case scenario assumes
a long-term gold price of $1,550 per
ounce (~US$1,200).
The updated PEA does not incorporate updates to the
Mineral Resource as at July 19, 2018.
With the increase in Mineral Resources, Anaconda believes there is
the potential for increased mine life at the Project and higher
potential future mill throughput. The Company is currently
preparing to move the Project towards a feasibility study where the
newly updated Mineral Resource will be further assessed.
The gold price sensitivity on a pre-tax and after-tax basis as
presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively, demonstrate the
significant potential increase in the NPV and IRR of the Project in
an increasing gold price environment.
Table 1 – Pre-tax discounted NPV- gold price
sensitivity
Pre-Tax NPV*
($M)
|
Gold Price (C$ /
Ounce)
|
|
|
$1,450
|
$1,500
|
Base
Case
$1,550
|
$1,600
|
$1,700
|
Discount
Rates
|
0%
|
$152
|
$171
|
$189
|
$208
|
$245
|
5%
|
$107
|
$122
|
$137
|
$152
|
$182
|
Base Case
7%
|
$93
|
$107
|
$120
|
$134
|
$162
|
10%
|
$74
|
$86
|
$99
|
$111
|
$135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRR
%
|
32
|
35
|
38
|
41
|
47
|
Payback –
Years
|
3.2
|
3.1
|
2.9
|
2.8
|
2.6
|
Table 2 – After-tax discounted NPV- gold price
sensitivity
After-Tax NPV*
($M)
|
Gold Price (C$ /
Ounce)
|
|
|
$1,450
|
$1,500
|
Base
Case
$1,550
|
$1,600
|
$1,700
|
Discount
Rates
|
0%
|
$101
|
$114
|
$127
|
$140
|
$166
|
5%
|
$67
|
$78
|
$88
|
$99
|
$119
|
Base Case
7%
|
$56
|
$66
|
$76
|
$85
|
$105
|
10%
|
$42
|
$51
|
$60
|
$68
|
$85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRR
%
|
24
|
27
|
29
|
32
|
37
|
Payback –
Years
|
3.6
|
3.4
|
3.3
|
3.1
|
2.9
|
After-tax cash flows reflect a combined Federal and Provincial
tax rate of 31% and the Nova
Scotia mining royalty tax, which is calculated as a 1% net
smelter return on revenue from gold production.
The Company carries tax pools that have not been incorporated
into the asset-level economic analysis, which have the potential to
increase the after-tax value of the Project. The estimated tax loss
pools available as at December 31,
2017 were as follows: Non-capital losses of $9.7 million, Cumulative Canadian Exploration
Expense of $7.4 million and
Cumulative Canadian Development Expenses of $5.9 million.
A Technical Report prepared in accordance with NI43-101 for the
Goldboro Gold Project will be filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) within
45 days of this news release. Readers are encouraged to read the
Technical Report in its entirety, including all qualifications,
assumptions and exclusions that relate to the PEA. The Technical
Report is intended to be read as a whole and sections should not be
read or relied upon out of context.
QUALIFIED PERSONS
This news release has been reviewed and approved by the below
noted Qualified Persons. The Qualified Persons have reviewed or
verified all information for which they are individually
responsible, including sampling, analytical, and test results
underlying the information or opinions contained herein.
- Gordana Slepcev. P.Eng., Chief Operating Officer and
Paul McNeill, P. Geo., Vice
President Exploration with Anaconda Mining Inc., "Qualified
Persons".
- Todd McCracken, P. Geo., Manager
– Mining of WSP, an "Independent Qualified Person", under NI
43-101.
- Shane Ghouralal, P.Eng.,
Engineer, of WSP, an "Independent Qualified Person", under NI
43-101.
- Sebastian Bertelegni, P.Eng.,
Director – Mining Infrastructure, of WSP, an "Independent Qualified
Person", under NI 43-101.
A version of this press release will be available in French on
Anaconda's website (www.anacondamining.com) in two to three
business days.
ABOUT ANACONDA MINING INC.
Anaconda Mining is a TSX-listed gold mining, development, and
exploration company, focused in the prospective Atlantic Canadian
jurisdictions of Newfoundland and
Nova Scotia. The Company operates
the Point Rousse Project located in the Baie Verte Mining District
in Newfoundland, comprised of the
Stog'er Tight open pit mine, the Pine Cove open pit mine, the
Argyle Mineral Resource, the fully-permitted Pine Cove Mill and
7-million tonne capacity tailings facility, and approximately 9,150
hectares of prospective gold-bearing property. Anaconda is also
developing the Goldboro Gold Project in Nova Scotia, a high-grade Mineral Resource,
subject of a 2018 a preliminary economic assessment which
demonstrates a strong project economics.
The Company also has a wholly owned exploration company that is
solely focused on early stage exploration in Newfoundland and New
Brunswick.
NON-IFRS MEASURES
Anaconda has included certain non-IFRS performance measures
as detailed below. In the gold mining industry, these are common
performance measures but may not be comparable to similar measures
presented by other issuers. The Company believes that, in addition
to conventional measures prepared in accordance with IFRS, certain
investors use this information to evaluate the Company's
performance and ability to generate cash flow. Accordingly, it is
intended to provide additional information and should not be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of
performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.
Operating Cash Costs per Ounce of Gold – Anaconda calculates
operating cash costs per ounce by dividing operating expenses per
the consolidated statement of operations, net of silver sales
by-product revenue, by the gold ounces sold during the applicable
period. Operating expenses include mine site operating costs such
as mining, processing and administration as well as royalties,
however excludes depletion and depreciation and rehabilitation
costs.
All-In Sustaining Costs per Ounce of Gold – Anaconda has
adopted an all-in sustaining cost performance measure that reflects
all of the expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of
gold from current operations. While there is no standardized
meaning of the measure across the industry, the Company's
definition conforms to the all-in sustaining cost definition as set
out by the World Gold Council in its guidance dated June 27, 2013. The World Gold Council is a
non-regulatory, non-profit organization established in 1987 whose
members include global senior mining companies. The Company
believes that this measure will be useful to external users in
assessing operating performance and the ability to generate free
cash flow from current operations.
The Company defines all-in sustaining costs as the sum of
operating cash costs (per above), sustaining capital (capital
required to maintain current operations at existing levels),
corporate administration costs, sustaining exploration, and
rehabilitation accretion and amortization related to current
operations. All-in sustaining costs excludes capital expenditures
for significant improvements at existing operations deemed to be
expansionary in nature, exploration and evaluation related to
growth projects, financing costs, debt repayments, and
taxes. Canadian and US dollars are noted for realized gold
price, operating cash costs per ounce of gold and all-in sustaining
costs per ounce of gold. Both currencies are considered relevant
and the Company uses the average foreign exchange rate for the
period.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This news release contains "forward-looking information"
within the meaning of applicable Canadian and United States securities legislation.
Forward-looking information includes, but is not limited to,
disclosure regarding the economics and project parameters presented
in the PEA, including, without limitation, IRR, all-in sustaining
costs, NPV and other costs and economic information, possible
events, conditions or financial performance that is based on
assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action;
the timing and costs of future development and exploration
activities on the Company's projects; success of development and
exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements;
time lines for further studies; planned exploration and development
of properties and the results thereof; and planned expenditures and
budgets and the execution thereof. Generally, forward-looking
information can be identified by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as "plans", "expects", or "does not expect", "is
expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts",
"intends", "anticipates", or "does not anticipate", or "believes"
or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain
actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might", or
"will be taken", "occur", or "be achieved". Forward-looking
information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at
the date the information is made, and is based on a number of
assumptions and is subject to known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results,
level of activity, performance or achievements of Anaconda to be
materially different from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking information, including risks associated with the
exploration, development and mining such as economic factors as
they effect exploration, future commodity prices, changes in
foreign exchange and interest rates, actual results of current
production, development and exploration activities, government
regulation, political or economic developments, environmental
risks, permitting timelines, capital expenditures, operating or
technical difficulties in connection with development activities,
employee relations, the speculative nature of gold exploration and
development, including the risks of diminishing quantities of
grades of resources, contests over title to properties, and changes
in project parameters as plans continue to be refined as well as
those risk factors discussed in Anaconda's annual information form
for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2017, available on www.sedar.com.
Although Anaconda has attempted to identify important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
contained in forward-looking information, there may be other
factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or
intended. There can be no assurance that such information will
prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could
differ materially from those anticipated in such information.
Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on
forward-looking information. Anaconda does not undertake to update
any forward-looking information, except in accordance with
applicable securities laws.
SOURCE Anaconda Mining Inc.