(All amounts in US$ unless otherwise
specified)
Capstone Mining Corp. (“Capstone” or the “Company”) (TSX:CS)
announces an updated Technical Report for its Cozamin Mine in
Zacatecas, Mexico and extends mine life to 2031. Mineral Reserves
increased by 39% to 14.1 million tonnes grading 1.77% copper and
44.4 grams per tonne (g/t) silver and Indicated and Inferred
Mineral Resources increased by 10% to 29.7 million tonnes grading
1.52% copper and 44 g/t silver. The new reserve mine plan is
projected to produce 512 million pounds of copper and 16.0 million
ounces of silver over the next 10 years.
This press release features multimedia. View
the full release here:
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210127005944/en/
Figure 1. 10+ Year Mine Life, Higher
Mining Rates at 1.77% Copper. The 2021 LOMP shows a longer mine
life with higher average production and grades similar to the 2020
mine plan. (Graphic: Business Wire)
HIGHLIGHTS
- Updated life of mine plan (“LOMP”) released. Average
annual copper production of 51.2 million pounds of copper and 1.6
million ounces of silver production over 10 years at average C1
costs, including the 50% silver stream, of $1.02 per payable pound
of copper. From 2021 to 2027, average annual production is 58.8
million pounds of copper and 1.7 million ounces of silver. Average
projected C1 costs over this period are $0.96 per payable pound of
copper.
- Ramp-up to 3,780 tonnes per day (“tpd”), or 1.38 million
tonnes per annum (“tpa”), by the end of Q1 2021 is on track. A
new section of ramp to open the one-way traffic circuit to
debottleneck the mine was completed in early December 2020, ahead
of schedule.
- Estimated Reserves increased by 39% to 14.1 million
tonnes, relative to April 30, 2020; contained copper and silver
increased by 37% and 49%, respectively. Approximately half of this
increase is due to recovery of high-grade pillars using paste
backfill.
- Tailings management transformation activities are
progressing on schedule, including feasibility level design and
studies in support of permitting a filtered (dry stack) tailings
storage facility. This conversion from a slurry tailings
impoundment aligns with industry leading socio-environmental best
practice for tailings management.
- A pre-feasibility study (“PFS”) for an underground paste
backfill system was completed in December 2020. The study
indicates a paste backfill system will allow ore extraction
containing over 100 million pounds of copper and 3.1 million ounces
of silver between 2023 and 2031, that would have otherwise been
left as unmined pillars. The PFS design has a capital cost estimate
ranging from $41 million to $45 million and an increase in
operating costs of approximately $7.50 per tonne of ore mined.
Capstone management has approved the paste backfill project and
work has commenced on procurement of long lead items.
- Initiating “Impact23” Growth Project: exploration
excellence, innovative mining techniques and enhanced pillar
recovery are areas identified to have growth potential for
Cozamin. By 2023, the goal is to further extend mine life, increase
environmental and safety standards, and improve operational
efficiencies at Cozamin, utilizing mineral resources already
discovered in addition to testing new targets.
Brad Mercer, Capstone’s SVP and Chief Operating Officer said,
“The LOMP announced today maximizes extraction of the orebody’s
high grade core by deferring stoping in this area until the paste
backfill plant is in operation in 2023. Projected production
averages nearly 60 million pounds of copper per year for seven
years at first quartile costs. The Impact23 Growth Project that we
are kickstarting today is aiming to demonstrate in a 2023 technical
report how Cozamin can sustain these levels of performance well
into the 2030s.”
Darren Pylot, Capstone’s President and CEO said, “After 14 years
in operation, the best years of Cozamin are ahead. The mine is
world-class with sustainable low costs and leading safety and
environmental performance entrenched throughout the organization.
The growth initiatives are supported by an entrepreneurial fabric
at Capstone, as we embrace innovation and technology to create high
impact value for our shareholders.”
MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATE
Table 1 presents Cozamin’s Mineral Reserve estimate for all
zones as of October 31, 2020, including the Mala Noche Footwall
Zone (“MNFWZ”) and the Mala Noche Vein (“MNV”).
Table 1 – Mineral Reserve Estimate as of
October 31, 2020
Category
Tonnes
(kt)
Copper
(%)
Silver
(g/t)
Zinc
(%)
Lead
(%)
Copper Metal
(kt)
Silver Metal
(koz)
Zinc Metal
(kt)
Lead Metal
(kt)
Proven
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Probable
14,127
1.77
44.4
0.54
0.21
250
20,179
77
29
Proven + Probable
14,127
1.77
44.4
0.54
0.21
250
20,179
77
29
Compared to April 30, 2020
+39%
-1%
+7%
+53%
+314%
+37%
+49%
+112%
+474%
NOTES: Tucker Jensen, P.Eng.,
Superintendent Mine Operations at Capstone Mining Corp., is the
Qualified Person for this Cozamin Mineral Reserve update.
Disclosure of the Cozamin Mineral Reserves as of October 31, 2020
was completed using fully diluted mineable stope shapes generated
by the Maptek Vulcan Mine Stope Optimizer software and estimated
using the 2020 MNFWZ resource block model created by Garth Kirkham,
P.Geo., FGC and the 2017 MNV resource block model created by J.
Vincent, P.Geo., formerly of Capstone Mining Corp. Mineral Reserves
are reported at or above a US$48.04/t net smelter return (“NSR”)
cut-off in conventionally backfilled zones for 2020-2022, a
US$51.12/t NSR cut-off in conventionally backfilled zones for
2023+, a US$56.51/t NSR cut-off in paste backfilled zones of Vein
10, and a US$56.12/t NSR cut-off in paste backfilled zones of Vein
20 using three formulae based on zone mineralization. Copper-silver
dominant zones use the NSR formula: (Cu*50.476 +
Ag*0.406)*(1-NSRRoyalty%). MNFWZ zinc-silver zones use the NSR
formula: (Ag*0.259 + Zn*15.081 + Pb*15.418)*(1-NSRRoyalty%). MNV
zinc-silver dominant zones use the NSR formula: (Ag*0.203 +
Zn*13.163 + Pb*13.233)*(1-NSRRoyalty%). Metal price assumptions (in
US$) of Cu = $2.75/lb, Ag = $17.00/oz, Pb = $0.90/lb, Zn = $1.00/lb
and metal recoveries of 96% Cu, 84% Ag, 0% Pb and 0% Zn in
copper-silver dominant zones, 0% Cu, 60% Ag, 92% Pb and 86% Zn in
MNFWZ zinc-silver dominant zones, and 0% Cu, 53% Ag, 79% Pb and 75%
Zn in MNV zinc-silver dominant zones. Mineral reserve calculations
consider mining by long-hole stoping and mineral processing by
flotation. Tonnage and grade estimates include dilution and mining
losses. The NSR royalty rate applied varies between 1% and 3%
depending on the mining concession, and royalties are treated as
costs in mineral reserve estimation. An exchange rate of MX$20 per
US$1 is assumed. All metals are reported as contained. Figures may
not sum exactly due to rounding.
LIFE OF MINE PLAN AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2020
Cozamin’s LOMP has been updated based on the Mineral Reserves
presented in Table 1. Compared to previous mine plans since 2018,
the 2021 LOMP as shown in Figure 1 shows a longer mine life of 10
years with higher average production and a grade at 1.77%, similar
to the 1.79% grade in the 2020 mine plan. This LOMP includes
throughput rates of approximately 1.38 million tonnes per annum
from 2021 through 2029, followed by declining rates through 2031,
before potential additions from Impact23. See Table 2 for a
detailed year-by-year mine plan. In its highest grade years,
projected copper and silver production from 2021 through 2027
average 58.8 million pounds and 1.70 million ounces, respectively,
representing increases of 61% and 53%, respectively, relative to
estimated 2020 production as presented in the Cozamin Technical
Report dated October 23, 2020.
Figure 1 – 10+ Year Mine Life, Higher Mining
Rates at 1.77% Copper
Table 2 – Updated Life of Mine Plan 2021
to 2031
LOMP – 2021 to
20311
2020E2
2021E
2022E
2023E
2024E
2025E
2026E
2027E
2028E
2029E
2030E
2031E
Cu Production (M lbs)
36.5
51.2
56.5
65.2
65.9
57.8
57.4
57.3
42.2
35.2
23.3
4.1
Ag Production (M troy
ozs)
1.125
1.52
1.65
1.76
1.84
1.72
1.75
1.67
1.48
1.38
1.20
0.34
Pb Production (M lbs)
0.9
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.6
6.1
5.6
4.2
6.7
10.9
9.8
5.9
Zn Production (M lbs)
11.8
0.71
0.0
0.0
1.1
9.8
7.7
6.6
12.0
16.7
20.1
8.4
Tonnes milled (M
tonnes)
1.07
1.36
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.38
1.23
0.31
Cu Grade (%)
1.62
1.79
1.94
2.22
2.25
1.99
1.97
1.97
1.46
1.26
0.97
0.68
Cu Recovery (%)
95.6
95.6
96.0
96.2
96.2
95.5
95.7
95.7
94.6
91.5
88.9
87.3
Ag Grade (g/t)
41.4
41.8
43.8
45.8
48.1
46.2
46.8
44.6
41.3
40.7
43.5
51.6
Ag Recovery (%)
79.1
83.8
85.0
86.3
86.3
83.8
84.4
84.6
80.4
76.5
69.9
67.0
Mining Cost ($/t
milled)
26.40
22.90
24.70
29.01
28.25
28.42
28.11
27.26
28.15
27.23
26.30
22.90
Milling Cost ($/t
milled)
9.82
10.14
9.24
11.73
11.73
11.73
11.73
11.73
11.73
12.66
12.64
12.64
G&A Cost ($/t
milled)
7.10
6.54
6.84
6.86
6.86
6.88
6.88
6.88
6.86
6.87
7.63
6.54
C1 Cost3 ($/lb payable
Cu)
0.96
0.96
0.95
1.03
0.96
0.88
0.95
0.98
1.20
1.27
1.50
0.57
Sustaining CAPEX (M$)
21.9
24.5
22.3
17.1
15.9
18.2
9.9
9.3
9.5
1.7
1.4
0.3
Expansion CAPEX (M$)
-
13.0
32.1
1.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
NOTES:
1.
Cozamin’s LOMP has been updated based on the Mineral Reserves as of
October 31, 2020. Operating and capital costs assume an exchange
rate of MXN$20 per USD$1.
2.
2020E figures are for 12 months and are a combination of actual
results and estimates, as reported in the October 23, 2020
Technical Report, and may not accurately represent actual 2020
figures.
3.
C1 Costs assume by-product pricing of Ag = $25.00/oz from 2021
to 2025 and $22.00/oz thereafter, Pb = $0.90/lb and Zn = $1.10/lb
from 2021 to 2025 and $1.00/lb thereafter. C1 Costs are net of
by-products and includes the 50% silver stream, which provides 10%
of silver price to Capstone for 50% of silver produced, and is an
alternative performance measure. Please see "Alternative
Performance Measures" at the end of this release.
UNDERGROUND PASTE BACKFILL
As part of the technical study described in the Technical
Report, Cozamin recently completed a PFS to assess the use of
underground paste backfill to decrease the number of pillars needed
for geotechnical stability, thereby increasing the mineral
extraction ratio. The Mineral Reserve estimate presented in Table 1
includes recovery of approximately 2.2 million tonnes grading 2.09%
copper and 44.3 g/t silver that would have been left as unmined
pillars without the use of paste backfill.
The proposed paste backfill system includes a tailings filter
plant, a paste mixing plant, twin boreholes to deliver paste
underground and an underground distribution system (“UDS”). The
filter plant, paste plant and conveyor to transport filtered
tailings to the tailings storage facility (“TSF”), in relation to
the mill and other nearby surface infrastructure, are shown in
Figure 2. The system is expected to be commissioned starting in Q4
2022, with ramp-up completed in Q1 2023. PFS design of these
facilities was completed by Paterson & Cooke in December 2020,
and a Feasibility Study (“FS”) is underway with completion expected
in April 2021. Mine planning was completed by Cozamin, with design
support provided by a geotechnical consultant, and paste backfill
operational guidance provided by AMC Consultants. Preparation of
documents to support permit applications for the paste backfill
system is underway.
Based on the PFS, capital cost for the tailings filtration and
paste backfill system is estimated to range from $40.8 million to
$45.0 million, depending on the filtration technology selected,
including 25% contingency. The tailings filter plant is required
for the conversion to filtered tailings storage, but a portion of
the combined capital cost estimate, approximately $17 million, is
required for paste production, transport and deposition
underground. Average operating costs for tailings filtration and
the production, transport and deposition of paste are estimated at
approximately $7.50 per tonne of ore mined, partially offset by
lower mine development costs.
Figure 2 – Future Location of Tailings
Filtration and Paste Plant
TAILINGS MANAGEMENT
Cozamin intends to convert from the current slurry tailings
facility that has been safely operated for over 15 years to a
filtered (dry stack) tailings facility. Feasibility-level design of
the filtered tailings facility is expected to be completed in Q1
2021, and preparations are being made to submit the required permit
applications. It is expected that this conversion to filtered
tailings will significantly decrease the mine’s
socio-environmental, geotechnical and water supply risks, while
decreasing water consumption and make-up water costs. The planned
paste backfill system will use tailings for paste production,
greatly decreasing the volume of tailings requiring an above ground
storage impoundment.
OPPORTUNITIES – IMPACT23 GROWTH PROJECT
Capstone is advancing several initiatives with potential to
further extend mine life, increase environmental and safety
standards, and improve operational efficiencies at Cozamin. The
following opportunities are not included in this updated LOMP and
do not impact the Mineral Reserve estimate as of October 31, 2020.
Capstone’s goal with this project is to target a positive NAV
impact, to be underpinned by an updated technical report in 2023,
through exploration on drill targets open on each end of the
deposit, selective mining techniques to decrease dilution and lower
mining costs, and enhanced pillar recovery to leverage the benefits
of the planned paste backfill plant.
Exploration Excellence Remains Top Priority
Exploration expansion potential at the MNFWZ remains open in
both the West and the East. The 2021 exploration budget of $5
million for 40,000 meters of surface drilling will primarily target
expansion drilling in the newly recognized West target area, see
Figures 3 and 4. Additional infill drilling to upgrade resources in
the down-dip southeast area of Vein 20, and initial testing of new
brownfield targets on adjacent vein systems, many with historical
production, all within the Cozamin claim block will also be
completed.
The MNFWZ West target is an extension of Vein 20 recently
identified by an extensive review of historical drilling data and
confirmed by initial drill testing of the concept in 2020. The West
target is supported by a reinterpretation of the geology in this
area and has easy access from both the MNV and MNFWZ
infrastructure. Development capacity in 2021 is limited to driving
one non-production drift and therefore the East exploration drift
has been delayed to 2022. Development of the new West exploration
crosscuts will commence in Q1 2021, in tandem with the surface
drilling program, with an estimated cost of $1.8 million additional
to the drilling program. Once completed, future drilling will shift
to underground starting in 2022.
Figure 3 – MNFWZ 2021 Drilling
Program
Figure 4 – MNFWZ West Drilling
Targets
A detailed Company exploration update including Cozamin and
other greenfield targets is scheduled for release in March
2021.
Innovative Mining Techniques for Resource to Reserve
Conversion
A study will be initiated in 2021 to assess alternative mining
techniques with the objective of lowering costs and dilution to
convert resources to reserves from the Indicated Resource shown in
Table 3. The current mining methods are Longitudinal Longhole Open
Stoping and AVOCA and possible alternatives that will be studied
include Cut-and-Fill, Drift-and-Fill and Longhole Open Stoping with
ore sorting technology.
Table 3 – Mineral Resources Exclusive of Mineral Reserves and
Pillars as of October 31, 2020, Potential Resource to Reserve
Conversion Targeted
MNFWZ
Indicated (I)
Tonnes
(kt)
Copper
(%)
Silver
(g/t)
Zinc
(%)
Lead
(%)
Copper Metal
(kt)
Silver Metal
(koz)
Zinc
Metal
(kt)
Lead
Metal
(kt)
Copper-Silver Zones
9,472
1.56
35
0.51
0.05
148
10,796
48
4
Zinc-Lead-Silver Zones
4,138
0.38
28
2.22
0.98
16
3,786
92
41
NOTES: Please refer to Table 4 for full
details of the Mineral Resource estimate.
Enhanced Pillar Recovery
A study aimed at enhancing pillar recoveries will commence
shortly with short-term and long-term opportunities identified.
With the paste backfill plant expected in operation by 2023,
pillars in the MNFWZ and throughout historic mining areas at
Cozamin are an opportunity for recovery. The following are the main
studies within the Enhanced Pillar Recovery Project:
- Cemented Rockfill (CRF). Cozamin is assessing the
opportunity to rapidly implement a CRF system to allow the safe and
economic recovery of additional pillars. This includes areas mined
prior to the planned start of paste backfilling in Q1 2023, and/or
where it is not economic to deliver paste. Preliminary results
indicate that CRF could be implemented with low capital cost well
in advance of Q1 2023, and additional study is underway.
- Used Filtration Equipment. The updated LOMP assumes the
start of paste backfilling in Q1 2023 in part because of long lead
times for the procurement of tailings filters. Cozamin is assessing
a package of used tailings filters that could potentially allow
more rapid filter plant construction and paste backfilling starting
significantly earlier than Q1 2023.
- Paste Backfill System Optimization. The paste backfill
PFS makes a number of conservative estimates for equipment and
materials costs, geotechnical stability and other factors. The FS
currently underway includes additional laboratory testing and more
detailed system design. It is expected that this FS may identify
opportunities for capital and operating cost savings, and for
increased pillar recovery through optimization of the mine
plan.
- Historic Pillar Recovery. Cozamin has left unmined
pillars needed for geotechnical stability throughout its mine life,
and will continue to do so until paste backfill is available.
Typically, conventional backfilled areas have been designed to
leave approximately 26% of the total mineralization behind in
pillars. Cozamin intends to assess the potential to return to
previously mined areas to safely use paste backfill to economically
recover pillars left prior to the start of paste backfilling.
Stope Dilution
Stope dilution in the deeper areas of the northwest end of the
MNFWZ have been high compared to other longhole open stope mines,
driven by narrow veins and local geotechnical conditions. As mining
progresses away from this area, an initiative is underway to reduce
dilution site-wide through improved engineering, planning,
long-hole drill control and optimized explosives design guided by a
team of consultants and site experts.
Truckless Headings
An initiative is underway to redesign the upper areas of Cozamin
Reserves to ore pass use, increasing safety and efficiency, while
increasing air quality, thereby decreasing ventilation requirements
in these areas.
MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE
Table 4 presents the Mineral Resource estimate for all zones as
of October 31, 2020. Mineral Resource estimates do not account for
mining loss and dilution.
Estimated Measured and Indicated Resources have increased by 10%
relative to April 30, 2020, with 29.7 million tonnes grading 1.52%
copper, 44 g/t silver, 1.10% zinc and 0.32% lead. This change is
the result of step-out drilling and infill drilling at MNFWZ that
upgraded 1.5 million tonnes of Inferred Resource to Indicated
classification, and updated net smelter return (“NSR”) formulae
adopted for the cut-off applied, that includes predicted long-term
metals prices in line with current industry norms, updated recovery
curves, royalties and other operational considerations for MNFWZ
and MNV.
Table 4 – Mineral Resource Estimate as of
October 31, 2020 at a US$50/t NSR Cut-Off
Classification
Tonnes
(kt)
Copper
(%)
Silver
(g/t)
Zinc
(%)
Lead
(%)
Copper Metal
(kt)
Silver Metal
(koz)
Zinc Metal
(kt)
Lead Metal
(kt)
Measured (M)
407
1.24
53
1.23
0.40
5
698
5
2
Indicated (I)
29,265
1.53
43
1.10
0.32
446
40,799
322
94
Total M + I
29,672
1.52
44
1.10
0.32
451
41,497
327
95
Inferred
13,869
0.54
39
2.23
0.74
75
17,383
309
103
NOTES: Mineral Resources are
classified according to CIM (2014) definitions, estimated following
CIM (2019) guidelines and have an effective date of October 31,
2020. Mineral Resources are reported inclusive of Mineral Reserves.
Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability. The Independent Qualified Person
for the estimates is Mr. Garth D. Kirkham, P.Geo., FGC., of Kirkham
Geosystems Ltd. Mineral Resources are reported using four formulae
for NSR based on mineralization. Copper-silver dominant zones use
the NSR formula: (Cu*60.779 + Ag*0.485)*(1-NSRRoyalty%).
Copper-zinc zones use the NSR formula: (Cu*58.430 + Ag*0.416 +
Zn*15.368 + Pb*7.837)*(1-NSRRoyalty%). MNFWZ zinc-silver dominant
zones use the NSR formula: (Ag*0.304 + Zn*18.323 +
Pb*17.339)*(1-NSRRoyalty%). MNV zinc-silver dominant zones use the
NSR formula: (Ag*0.256 + Zn*16.401 + Pb*14.977)*(1-NSRRoyalty%).
Metal price assumptions (in US$) used to calculate the NSR for all
deposits are: Cu = $3.25/lb, Ag = $20.00/oz, Zn = $1.20/lb and Pb =
$1.00/lb. Recoveries used in the four NSR formulae are based on
mineralization. Copper-silver dominant zones use the following
recoveries: 96% Cu and 85% Ag. Copper-zinc zones use the following
recoveries: 92% Cu, 79% Ag, 72% Zn and 42% Pb. MNFWZ zinc-silver
dominant zones use the following recoveries: 60% Ag, 86% Zn and 92%
Pb. MNV zinc-silver dominant zones use the following recoveries:
55% Ag, 77% Zn and 80% Pb. The NSR formulae include confidential
current smelter contract terms, transportation costs and royalty
agreements from 1 to 3%, as applicable. An exchange rate of MX$20
per US$1 is assumed. Totals may not sum exactly due to rounding.
The NSR cut-off of US$50/tonne is based on historical mining and
milling costs plus general and administrative costs. The Mineral
Resource Estimate encompasses both the MNFWZ and the MNV. Drilling
campaigns from 2018 have focused on the MNFWZ and no drilling has
been performed on the MNV since 2017. The Mineral Resource
considers underground mining by longhole stoping and mineral
processing by flotation. No dilution is incorporated in the Mineral
Resource. All metals are reported as contained. Mineral Resource
estimates do not account for mining loss and dilution. These
Mineral Resource estimates include Inferred Mineral Resources
considered too speculative geologically to apply economic
considerations for categorization as Mineral Reserves. However, it
is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral
Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Resources.
NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 43-101
A National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101") Technical Report will
be prepared to summarize the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve
estimates by the Qualified Persons and will be filed on SEDAR
within 45 days of this news release.
Readers are cautioned that the conclusions, projections and
estimates set out in this news release are subject to important
qualifications, assumptions and exclusions, all of which will be
detailed in the 2021 Technical Report. To fully understand the
summary information set out above, the 2021 Technical Report that
will be filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com should be read in its
entirety.
QUALIFIED PERSONS
The following Qualified Persons, as defined by NI 43-101, are
independent from Capstone (except as noted below) and have reviewed
and approved the content of this news release that is based on
content from their respective portions of the 2021 Technical
Report:
- Gregg Bush, P.Eng. (Non-independent)
- Leslie Correia, Pr.Eng., Paterson & Cooke Canada Inc.
- Jenna Hardy, P.Geo., FGC, Nimbus Management Ltd.
- Tucker Jensen, P.Eng., Capstone Mining Corp.
(Non-independent)
- Garth Kirkham, P.Geo., FGC, Kirkham Geosystems Ltd.
- Chris Martin, CEng MIMMM, Blue Coast Metallurgy Ltd.
- Vivienne McLennan, P.Geo., Capstone Mining Corp.
(Non-independent)
- Josh Moncrieff, P.Geo., Capstone Mining Corp.
(Non-independent)
- Humberto Preciado, PhD, P.E., Wood Environment &
Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.
MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE METHODOLOGY
The Mineral Resource estimate reported herein was prepared by
Garth Kirkham of Kirkham Geosystems Ltd. of Burnaby, BC, Canada, an
Independent Qualified Person under Canadian Securities
Administrators’ National Instrument 43-101. The Mineral Resources
presented herein have been estimated in conformity with generally
accepted CIM best practice guidelines and are reported in
accordance with NI 43-101. The estimate was completed using
MineSightTM software using a three-dimensional block model (12
metre by 5 metre by 10 metre block size with 4 metre by 0.5 metre
by 2 metre sub-blocks). The MNFWZ model is comprised of eight
interpreted three-dimensional wireframes which were the primary
estimation domains and hard boundaries were used to constrain the
interpolation of grades into the block model. Interpolation
parameters have been derived based on geostatistical analysis
conducted on 1 metre composited drill holes. Block grades have been
estimated using Ordinary Kriging (OK) methodology and the mineral
resources have been classified based on proximity to sample data
and the continuity of mineralization in accordance with the
categories in CIM Definition Standards (May 10, 2014) along with
CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best
Practice Guidelines (November 29, 2019). The MNFWZ resource has
been estimated using a total of 1,128 diamond drill holes with
4,371 sample composites.
ABOUT CAPSTONE MINING CORP.
Capstone Mining Corp. is a Canadian base metals mining company,
focused on copper. Our two producing mines are the Pinto Valley
copper mine located in Arizona, US and the Cozamin copper-silver
mine in Zacatecas State, Mexico. In addition, Capstone owns 70% of
Santo Domingo, a large scale, fully-permitted, copper-iron-gold
project in Region III, Chile, in partnership with Korea Resources
Corporation, as well as a portfolio of exploration properties.
Capstone's strategy is to focus on the optimization of operations
and assets in politically stable, mining-friendly regions, centred
in the Americas. We are committed to the responsible development of
our assets and the environments in which we operate. Our
headquarters are in Vancouver, Canada and we are listed on the
Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX). Further information is available at
www.capstonemining.com.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This news release, and the documents incorporated by reference
herein, contains “forward-looking information” within the meaning
of Canadian securities legislation and “forward-looking statements”
within the meaning of the United States Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, “forward-looking
statements”). These forward-looking statements are made as of the
date of this document and Capstone Mining Corp. (“Capstone” or the
“Company”) does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to
update these forward-looking statements, except as required under
applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements
relate to future events or future performance and reflect our
expectations or beliefs regarding future events. Forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect
to the continuing success of mineral exploration, Capstone’s
ability to fund future exploration activities, the estimation of
mineral resources and mineral reserves, the expected success of the
underground paste backfill system study, the realization of mineral
reserve estimates, the timing and amount of estimated future
production, costs of production and capital expenditures, the
success of our mining operations, the estimations for potential
quantities and grade of inferred resources and exploration targets,
environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses and title
disputes. In certain cases, forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”,
“aiming”, “approximately”, “guidance”, “scheduled”, “target”,
“estimates”, “forecasts”, “extends”, “convert”, “potential”,
“intends”, “anticipates”, “believes” or variations of such words
and phrases, or statements that certain actions, events or results
“may”, “could”, “should”, “would”, “will”, “might” or “will be
taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative of these terms or
comparable terminology. By their very nature, forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors that may cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to be materially different from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by the
forward-looking statements. Such factors include, amongst others,
risks related to inherent hazards associated with mining operations
and closure of mining, projects, the inherent uncertainty of
mineral exploration and estimations of exploration targets,
potential delays in exploration due to COVID-19 or governmental
action, increase to operating costs directly or indirectly related
to due to COVID-19 including but not limited to supply chain
issues, future prices of copper and other metals, compliance with
financial covenants, surety bonding, our ability to raise capital
or fund explorations, Capstone’s ability to acquire properties for
growth, counterparty risks associated with sales of our metals,
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, changes in general
economic conditions, accuracy of mineral resource and mineral
reserve estimates, operating in foreign jurisdictions with risk of
changes to governmental regulation, compliance with governmental
regulations, compliance with environmental laws and regulations,
reliance on approvals, licences and permits from governmental
authorities, impact of climatic conditions on our operations, title
or royalty claims and rights to mineral tenure, increased taxes on
mining activities, interruption of production due indirectly or
directly to criminal activity land reclamation and mine closure
obligations, uncertainties and risks related to the potential
development of the Cozamin project, increased operating and capital
costs, challenges to title to our mineral properties, maintaining
ongoing social license to operate, dependence on key management
personnel, potential conflicts of interest involving our directors
and officers, corruption and bribery, limitations inherent in our
insurance coverage, labour relations, increasing energy prices,
competition in the mining industry, risks associated with joint
venture partners, our ability to integrate new acquisitions into
our operations, cybersecurity threats, legal proceedings, and other
risks of the mining industry as well as those factors detailed from
time to time in the Company’s interim and annual financial
statements and MD&A of those statements, all of which are filed
and available for review under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com. Although the Company has attempted to identify
important factors that could cause our actual results, performance
or achievements to differ materially from those described in our
forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause
our results, performance or achievements not to be as anticipated,
estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that our
forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as our actual
results, performance or achievements could differ materially from
those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should
not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.
ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Alternative performance measures are furnished to provide
additional information. These non-GAAP performance measures are
included in this News Release because these statistics are key
performance measures that management uses to monitor performance,
to assess how the Company is performing, and to plan and assess the
overall effectiveness and efficiency of mining operations. These
performance measures do not have a standard meaning within
International Financial Reporting Standings (“IFRS”) and,
therefore, amounts presented may not be comparable to similar data
presented by other mining companies. These performance measures
should not be considered in isolation as a substitute for measures
of performance in accordance with IFRS.
C1 Cash Costs Per Payable Pound of Copper Produced
C1 cash costs per payable pound of copper produced is a key
performance measure that management uses to monitor performance.
Management uses this measure to assess how well the Company’s
producing mines are performing and to assess overall efficiency and
effectiveness of the mining operations.
NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 43-101 COMPLIANCE
Unless otherwise indicated, Capstone has prepared the technical
information in this news release (“Technical Information”) based on
information contained in the technical reports, news releases and
MD&A’s (collectively the “Disclosure Documents”) available
under Capstone Mining Corp.’s company profile on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com. Each Disclosure Document was prepared by, or under
the supervision of, a qualified person (a “Qualified Person”) as
defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for
Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators (“NI
43-101”). Readers are encouraged to review the full text of the
Disclosure Documents which qualifies the Technical Information.
Readers are advised that mineral resources that are not mineral
reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The
Disclosure Documents are each intended to be read as a whole, and
sections should not be read or relied upon out of context. The
Technical Information is subject to the assumptions and
qualifications contained in the Disclosure Documents.
The Technical Information in this news release has been prepared
in accordance with definitions and best practices referenced in NI
43-101 and reviewed and approved by Brad Mercer, P. Geol.,
Capstone's Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, a
Qualified Person and the person who oversees exploration activities
on the Cozamin Mine property.
View source
version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210127005944/en/
Jerrold Annett, VP, Strategy and Capital Markets 647-273-7351
jannett@capstonemining.com
Virginia Morgan, Manager, IR and Communications 604-674-2268
vmorgan@capstonemining.com
Capstone Copper (TSX:CS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Capstone Copper (TSX:CS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024