Highlights:
(All dollars USD)
- Large, long-life project with 31.2 million pounds produced over
31 years
- Low initial capital costs of $47.5M
- Unit operating costs (including taxes and royalties) of
$27.70/lb and ASIC
(all in sustaining costs) of $34.83/lb
- Pre-income tax IRR of 62% and NPV (8%) of $278 million (at $75/lb U3O8)
- Post-income tax IRR 56% and NPV (8%) $239 million (at
$75/lb
U3O8)
- Life of Project post-income tax cash flow exceeds $1 billion
- Upside opportunities include:
- Potential for accelerated development of the resource beyond
one million pound per annum straight line case outlined in the PEA;
existing license allows for a 3-million-pound capacity at planned
CPP (Central Processing Plant);
- Potential for enhanced recoveries (PEA assumes recovery of 68%
of the resource in the production area) or expansion of the current
resource through infill and exploration drilling;
- Inclusion of Crownpoint resource in future production
planning; and
- Realized uranium prices more than $75/lb pricing assumptions used in the PEA; for
example, at a spot price of $90/lb
after-tax NPV (8%) is $294,497,000.
TORONTO, Jan. 11,
2024 /CNW/ - Laramide Resources Ltd.
("Laramide" or the "Company") (TSX: LAM) (ASX: LAM)
(OTCQX: LMRXF), is pleased to announce the positive results of an
independent Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") for the 100%
owned Churchrock In-Situ Uranium Project ("Churchrock Project")
located in New Mexico, U.S. The
PEA has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of
National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101") by SLR International
Corporation ("SLR"), an independent consulting firm with
considerable expertise in mining and mineral processing, including
uranium mining in the United
States.
"Laramide is pleased with the results described in this PEA
analysis of the Churchrock Project, which is the first economic
study to consider the entirety of the large and robust resource
amenable to ISR development. The study confirms that
Churchrock has the potential to be a long life, high margin
project," says Marc Henderson,
President and CEO of Laramide Resources. "Importantly, as a
late-stage development project located in the western United States, Churchrock is well positioned
to address some of the potential nuclear utility security of supply
concerns clearly reflected in spot uranium prices which have risen
dramatically and now exceed $90/lb."
Summary of Economics
The base case economic assessment results in a pre-income tax
internal rate of return ("IRR") of 62% and a pre-income tax net
present value ("NPV") of US$287
million when applying an eight percent discount rate and
$75 uranium price.
The economic assessment reflects the development of a steady
state 3,000 gpm (gallons per minute) in situ recovery (ISR)
operation, which includes Churchrock Satellite Plants, Crownpoint
CPP (Central Processing Plant), and associated wellfields near
Churchrock, New Mexico. The PEA
assumes recovery of approximately 68% of the uranium resource in
the production area.
Following an initial capital cost of $47.5 million for the development of the initial
wellfield and associated process infrastructure, subsequent
wellfields are developed sequentially, the cost of which is
accounted for in the PEA as sustaining capital.
The capital and operating cost estimates for ISR mineral
recovery and yellowcake production in the PEA are based on factored
costs from other comparable ISR operations, judgment, and analogy.
Although there was some previous commercial underground mining
production experience at Churchrock area, this Technical Report
concerns only the ISR method for the
U3O8.
An economic analysis was performed using the assumptions
outlined in this News Release. The SLR QPs note that, unlike
Mineral Reserves, Mineral Resources do not have demonstrated
economic viability. This PEA is preliminary in nature and is based
on Inferred Mineral Resources that are considered too geologically
speculative to have modifying factors applied to them that would
enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves, and there is no
certainty that this economic assessment will be realized.
Summary of Capital
Costs for 31.2 Mlb LOM Production Schedule (Q1 2022 US dollar
basis)
|
Initial Capital Cost
(Year -4 through Year 1)
|
Total (US$
000)
|
Pre-production
Permitting
|
$4,000
|
Restoration
Demonstration
|
$2,400
|
Wellfield Cost (SE1/4
of Section 8 only)
|
$5,356
|
Satellite IX
Plant
|
$12,939
|
Elution
Plant
|
$6,026
|
Environmental
|
$2,866
|
Total Direct
Costs
|
$33,587
|
|
|
EPCM / Owners /
Indirect Cost
|
$4,740
|
Contingency
|
$8,982
|
Initial
Capital
|
$47,539
|
|
|
Sustaining Capital
(Year 2 through Year 37)
|
$122,477
|
Total
Capital
|
$169,990
|
Reclamation and
Closure
|
$101,100
|
Total Capital +
Reclamation and Closure
|
$270,115
|
The LOM average operating cost includes mineral recovery,
on-site yellowcake production with hauling cost to Laramide's
Crownpoint Processing Facility approximately 22 miles from
Churchrock, general and administration, and freight of the product
from the CPP to a point of sale, along with various royalties and
taxes.
LOM Operating Cost
Estimate
|
Item
|
LOM Operating
Cost
(US$ 000)
|
LOM Unit Operating
Cost
(US $/lb)
|
Wellfield + Satellite
IX Plant Ops
|
$157,141
|
$5.04
|
Well Field
Development
|
$194,729
|
$6.24
|
Elution Plant
Ops
|
$178,161
|
$5.71
|
Waste
Management
|
$160,461
|
$5.14
|
Restoration
Ops
|
$32,160
|
$1.03
|
G&A
|
$17,932
|
$0.57
|
Capitalized Operating
Costs
|
$(5,356)
|
$(0.17)
|
Total Site Operating
Costs
|
$735,228
|
$23.56
|
Product Transport to
Market
|
|
|
Total Production
Costs
|
$735,228
|
$23.56
|
Royalties
|
$89,680
|
$2.88
|
New Mexico Severance
Tax
|
$39,389
|
$1.26
|
Total Operating
Costs
|
$909,493
|
$27.70
|
Project Description and Resources
The Churchrock Project and nearby properties represent one of
the largest and highest-grade undeveloped ISR uranium projects in
the USA. The Churchrock Project is
located on the western end of the Grants Mineral Belt in the main
portion of the historical Churchrock Mining District, approximately
10 miles north-northeast of Gallup, in McKinley
County New Mexico. Churchrock is situated within the
sub-district of the Grants Mineral Belt of northwestern
New Mexico, the most prolific
historical uranium district in the United
States with cumulative production of 340 million pounds from
1948 to 2002.
The Churchrock Project consists of two groups of property
parcels, Churchrock and Crownpoint, separated by approximately 22
miles. A single U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (US NRC) license
(SUA-1580) covers parts of Churchrock and Crownpoint and is in timely renewal status.
Further renewals of the NRC license and other permits, including a
State of New Mexico aquifer
injection permit, will be required before production activities can
commence. This PEA evaluates uranium mineral recovery by ISR
methods at the Churchrock location and processing in a proposed new
facility at the nearby Crownpoint
location where significant project infrastructure already exists.
The purpose of this PEA is to assess the engineering, development,
and operating design criteria and overall economic and technical
merits of the proposed ISR mineral recovery operations at
Churchrock. The potential ISR mineral recovery of other Mineral
Resources on the Crownpoint
property parcels was not evaluated and is not addressed in this
PEA.
The history of exploration and mine development activities for
the Churchrock Project dates to the late 1950s. Underground mine
development occurred at the Section 17 property (Old Churchrock
Mine), in the early 1960s by Phillips Petroleum and affiliates, and
in the early 1980s by United Nuclear Corporation (UNC). Exploration and development activities
continued through the early 1990s by Uranium Resources Inc. (URI).
The properties were acquired by Laramide in January 2017 from URI (now Westwater Resources,
Inc.).
As of the effective date of this report, Laramide and its
predecessor companies have completed a total of 1,701 holes
totaling 1,867,562 ft, from 1957 to 2023, of which 1,694 drill
holes were used to prepare the Mineral Resource estimates. The
Churchrock project area consists of all or portions of eight
sections of land totaling approximately 4,683 acres. The properties
are accessible from New Mexico State Highway 566, which crosses the
Project, and locally via dirt roads.
Table 1 summarizes the Mineral Resource estimate for the Project
(by Section) prepared by SLR, based on drill hole data available as
of September 30, 2017, with an
effective date of May 16, 2023.
Mineral Resources totaling 33.9 million tons at an average grade
of 0.075% eU3O8 containing 50.8 million
pounds U3O8 (inferred) were reported in
20171. The Churchrock Mineral Resource Estimate was
based on results of several historical surface rotary drilling
campaigns from 1957 to 1991 and completed utilizing the GT contour
method, an industry standard for estimating uranium roll-front type
deposits hosted within groundwater-saturated sandstones. The
mineralization at the Project has been previously shown to be
amenable to ISR techniques. No Mineral Reserves have been estimated
for the Project.
Table 1: Summary of Mineral Resources by
Section2
Classification
|
Sand
Unit
|
Tonnage
(Tons)
|
Grade
(% eU3O8)
|
Contained
Metal (U3O8 lb)
|
Inferred
|
Section 4,
T16N-R16W
|
9,896,000
|
0.071
|
14,090,000
|
|
Section 7,
T16N-R16W
|
2,500,000
|
0.058
|
2,910,000
|
|
Section 8,
T16N-R16W
|
6,472,000
|
0.079
|
10,220,000
|
|
Section 9,
T16N-R16W
|
3,393,000
|
0.096
|
6,510,000
|
|
Section 17,
T16N-R16W
|
4,518,000
|
0.074
|
6,710,000
|
|
Section 12,
T16N-R17W
|
4,768,000
|
0.060
|
5,700,000
|
|
Section 13,
T16N-R17W
|
2,331,000
|
0.100
|
4,680,000
|
Total
Inferred
|
33,879,000
|
0.075
|
50,820,000
|
____________________________________
|
1 ASX:
Laramide announces 51 Million Pounds Mineral Resource Estimate on
the Church Rock Uranium Project, October 10, 2017
|
2 1. CIM
(2014) definitions were followed for Mineral Resources.
|
2. Mineral Resources
are reported at a GT cut-off of 0.5 ft-% eU3O8.
|
3. A minimum thickness
of 2.0 ft was used.
|
4. A minimum cut-off
grade of 0.02% eU3O8 (based on historical mineral recovery costs
and parameters from the district) was used.
|
5. Internal maximum
dilution of 5.0 ft was used.
|
6. Grade values have
not been adjusted for disequilibrium.
|
7. Tonnage factor of 15
ft3/ton based on historical used by the mineral recovery operators
was applied.
|
8. Mineralized areas
defined by isolated or widely spaced drill holes, or located within
the area previously subject to past production were excluded from
the estimate.
|
9. Totals may not add
due to rounding.
|
Technical Report and Qualified Person
Technical information contained in this news release has been
reviewed and approved by Mark B.
Mathisen, C.P.G., Principal Geologist, and Stuart E.
Collins, P.E., Principal Mining Engineer, SLR International
Corporation, who are considered to be independent Qualified Persons
("QP") as defined in National Instrument 43-101, Standards of
Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43-101).
This PEA demonstrates a business case for the further
advancement of the Project. Certain licensing/permitting issues
remain to be resolved and further technical studies are recommended
to validate Mineral Resources and hydrological assumptions.
The Churchrock Project PEA has been prepared in accordance with
the requirements of NI 43-101 by Mark B.
Mathisen, C.P.G., and Stuart E. Collins, P.E., SLR
International Corporation, Houmao Liu, Ph.D., P.E., Itasca Denver
Inc., Lee (Pat) Gochnour, MMSA (QP),
Gochnour & Associate Inc, Walter L. Niccoli, P.E., Telesto
Solutions, Inc., and Benjamin J.
Schiffer, P.G., WWC Engineering, who are QPs as defined
under NI 43-101. The full technical report on the PEA will be filed
on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and Laramide Resources' website
www.laramide.com within 45 days of the issuance of this news
release.
Follow us on Twitter @LaramideRes
About Laramide Resources
Ltd.:
Laramide is focused on exploring and developing high-quality
uranium assets in Australia and
the western United States. The
company's portfolio comprises five advanced uranium projects in
districts with historical production or superior geological
prospectivity. Each asset has been carefully chosen for their size,
production potential, and are considered late-stage, low-technical
risk projects.
The Westmoreland project in
Queensland, Australia, is one of
the largest uranium development assets held by a junior mining
company. This project has a PEA that describes an economically
robust, open-pit mining project with a mine-life of 13 years.
Additionally, the adjacent Murphy Project in the Northern Territory
of Australia is a greenfield asset
that Laramide strategically acquired to control the majority of the
mineralized system along the Westmoreland trend.
In the United States,
Laramide's assets include the NRC licensed Crownpoint-Churchrock
Uranium Project, which is proposed to be developed using in-situ
recovery ("ISR") production methodology. The Company also owns the
La Jara Mesa project in the historic Grants mining district of
New Mexico and an underground
project, called La Sal, in Lisbon
Valley, Utah.
Forward-looking Statements and
Cautionary Language
This release includes certain statements that may be deemed
to be "forward-looking statements". All statements in this release,
other than statements of historical facts, that address events or
developments that management of the Company expect, are
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are
frequently, but not always, identified by words such as "expects",
"anticipates", "believes", "plans", "projects", "intends",
"estimates", "envisages", "potential", "possible", "strategy",
"goals", "objectives", or variations thereof or stating that
certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might"
or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of
these terms and similar expressions. Actual results or developments
may differ materially from those in forward-looking statements.
Laramide disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, save and except as may be
required by applicable securities laws.
Since forward-looking information address future events and
conditions, by their very nature they involve inherent risks and
uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those
currently anticipated due to a number of factors and risks. These
include, but are not limited to, exploration and production for
uranium; delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or
development projects or capital expenditures; the uncertainty of
resource estimates; health, safety and environmental risks;
worldwide demand for uranium; uranium price and other commodity
price and exchange rate fluctuations; environmental risks;
competition; incorrect assessment of the value of acquisitions;
ability to access sufficient capital from internal and external
sources; and changes in legislation, including but not limited to
tax laws, royalties and environmental regulations.
SOURCE Laramide Resources Ltd.