Arias Resource Capital announced today that they are nominating
five new nominees – J. Alberto Arias, Derek White, Daniel
Tellechea, Ricardo Arrarte, and Alonso Checa (collectively, the
“
ARC Nominees”) – for election to the Board of
Directors (the “
Board”) of Sierra
Metals Inc. (“
Sierra” or the
“
Company”) (TSX: SMT) at Sierra’s annual general
and special meeting of shareholders currently scheduled to be held
on June 28, 2023. Arias Resource Capital Fund II L.P. and Arias
Resource Capital Fund II (Mexico) L.P. (the “
Nominating
Shareholders”), together with other affiliates of Arias
Resource Capital and its principal (together with the Nominating
Shareholders, “
ARC”) hold approximately 27% of the
outstanding shares of Sierra. The ARC Nominees intend to act
quickly to resolve Sierra’s mounting losses, share price collapse
and financial liquidity crisis, and to restore the Company to its
previous track record of excellence and value creation prior to
mid-2021.
The destruction of shareholder value began when
ARC representatives left the Board in mid-2021. ARC is calling on
all Sierra shareholders to avoid further shareholder value
destruction by significantly reconstituting the Board with the ARC
Nominees. The ARC Nominees have in-depth knowledge and experience
with Sierra’s operations and a track-record of delivering high
shareholder returns. The ARC Nominees include former Sierra Board
members, J. Alberto Arias and Ricardo Arrarte, who have achieved
positive total shareholder returns of 93.12% in 2020 and a
cumulative return of 188.33% for the period between 2010 and
mid-2021, as compared to the total negative returns of -73.68% that
shareholders have seen over the last four quarters ending March 31,
2023.
ARC’s Case for Change
The figures below are compelling evidence of the
need for change at Sierra given its abysmal results following the
departure of ARC’s representatives from the Sierra Board in
mid-2021.
Figure 1: Sierra’s shareholders have
suffered an unimaginable value destruction in the past two years,
after a revolving suite of executives and directors
with less than 1% combined ownership took
charge
Sierra Market Capitalization Evolution
Over Time (TSX, US$mm)
Source: Bloomberg, from March 31, 2021 to April 28, 2023. Trend
line is shown for the period from June 10, 2021 to April 28,
2023.
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/aab69595-2a8e-483b-a506-8ed58e7d23c2
Figure 2: Sierra’s total ore throughput
has fallen dramatically since 2021, reversing a
multi-year growth trend of capital efficient
expansions
Sierra Consolidated Ore Processed per
Quarter
Source: Company quarterly filings
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/fd067c7c-1cf1-4f8c-bc54-02b5182c32bd
Figure 3: Sierra’s financial position has
deteriorated since 2021, with escalating net debt levels and
dwindling cash levels, a situation unimaginable at any time prior
to 2022 and which highlights the Board’s poor oversight and
leadership
Sierra Net Debt and Cash Position per
Quarter (US$mm)
Source: Company quarterly filings
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/34a17fff-c55b-4e54-838a-c54ecfd6e3df
Figure 4: Quarterly adjusted EBITDA and
working capital decreased sharply into negative territory despite
massive Capex investments by Sierra (over US$100mm
in 2021 and 2022 combined)
Sierra Quarterly Adjusted EBITDA per
Quarter (US$mm)
Source: Company quarterly filings. Adjusted EBITDA definition as
disclosed by the Company in its MD&A filings.
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/34af782b-6549-46c3-b284-17208574f7e2
Figure 5: Sierra delivered a remarkable
11-year track record of consistent production growth while ARC led
the Board. Post 2021, its performance fell catastrophically and
destroyed value
Sierra 2010 – 2022 Annual Ore Throughput
Growth (million tonnes)
Source: Company filings
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/046735fd-af87-4fa2-8498-2fd232c78398
Figure 6: Sierra also delivered a
remarkable 10-year trend of consistent growth of mineral resources
reflecting ARC’s vision of the three mines’ geologic potential
while leading the Board. The trend reversed post-2021 which eroded
value and growth momentum
Sierra 2010 – 2022 Annual Reserve and
Resource Growth (million tonnes)
Source: Company filings
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/1353a6f3-f839-44bc-9a61-9a948a2227ff
ARC believes the Sierra Board is no longer acting in the
best interests of all shareholders
Since ARC representatives left the Board in
mid-2021, Sierra’s share price has been in a freefall, declining a
staggering 91%.1 The current Board members, with combined share
ownership of less than 1%, are not incentivized, and have not
demonstrated the necessary operational mining or financial markets
acumen to turn Sierra around.
Barely one year after the failure of a prior
strategic review process was disclosed,2 the Company announced
another strategic review process on October 18, 2022, in the face
of “liquidity challenges” and stated, “absent additional support
and increased funding, the Company’s ability to continue operations
in the ordinary course may be impacted.” Less than two weeks later,
on October 27, 2022, ARC and Compañia Minera Kolpa S.A.
(“Kolpa”) provided Sierra with a letter of intent
(the “LOI”) to effect an operational merger along
with a concurrent fully funded US$30 million convertible debenture
financing by a third party. We strongly believe that this
transaction would have immediately helped alleviate the Company’s
liquidity and operational challenges.
After effectively avoiding any meaningful
engagement with ARC and Kolpa on the proposed transaction, it is
clear that the Board has once again failed to identify strategic
alternatives that provide any value enhancement opportunities for
shareholders—even though ARC and Kolpa recently reconfirmed the
continued availability of the concurrent US$30 million financing
transaction and submitted enhanced terms in respect of an
operational merger, which represented, and continues to represent,
a significant premium to the prevailing market price of Sierra
shares. The Board is failing to act with the urgency necessary to
preserve Sierra and continuing to destroy shareholder value.
Sierra’s financial situation should be of
concern to all shareholders. In March 2023, Sierra confirmed that a
bridge loan of US$6,250,000 was used to cover its first quarter
2023 loan payment. More than six months after Sierra’s loans went
into forbearance, Sierra’s management and Board have not closed a
refinancing contract.3 Despite its materiality, the expected terms
of the “refinancing contract” remain undisclosed and its signing
has been deferred thereby avoiding accountability to shareholders
and leaving Sierra’s fate in the hands of its lenders. A bridge
loan is NOT a true refinancing, but typically is short term,
high-cost debt which may make it difficult to attract truly
independent financing. Even if the Company is able to defer its
remaining 2023 loan payments, it is still unclear how the Company
is going address 2024 and beyond, as the Company has indicated that
production is expected to remain depressed at its flagship
Yauricocha mine in Peru until 2025.4
The Company’s 2022 annual financial statements
showed that shareholder losses more than tripled last year as
mining production dropped by 21% and costs increased by up to 41%
relative to 2021 costs. This poor performance is surprising given
the context of massive Capex investment in the Company (US$100
million in 2021 and 2022 combined), as well as the significant cash
outflows from its Peruvian subsidiary Sociedad Minera Corona S.A.
(“Corona”) which include US$50 million in dividends and a US$50
million increase in account receivables of Corona from related
parties (which include Sierra Metals Inc., Dia Bras Mexicana and
Dia Bras Peru S.A.C.) from June 30, 2021 to December 31, 2022.
J. Alberto Arias, director and principal of ARC,
stated, “After transforming Sierra from a small producer that was
largely irrelevant in the capital markets in the late 2000s to a
very profitable midsize mining player in the copper-silver space
and working diligently as its Chairman for over eight years until
January 2021, it is painful to watch the speed with which the
Company’s fortunes have declined since stepping down from the Board
in July 2021.”
He added, “Since Sierra announced its financial
distress last October, ARC has provided the Board with concrete
solutions to turn around the Company but has seen no real
engagement six months down the road. We have no faith that the
current Board can turn things around. Instead, we are nominating
the right people for the job, with a sense of urgency to avoid the
risk of complete shareholder value destruction, a path which the
Company unfortunately seems to be heading down at breakneck speed.
Sierra has high quality assets, so the loss of over 90% of the
market capitalization over the past two years is difficult to
understand and is in stark contrast to the returns we achieved
during our tenure on the Board. There is a pressing need for change
at the Board level.”
Despite Sierra hiring CIBC World Markets in
November 2022, it has not disclosed any results of its strategic
review process. No information has been provided to shareholders on
any other available alternatives for the Company or how they
compare with the LOI that ARC and Kolpa provided to the Company in
October 2022.
Current financial distress
The extent of the operating and financial
challenges that have caused the destruction of shareholder value
have been revealed in Sierra’s latest filings.
Set out below are some of the troubling
highlights from the Company’s recent performance:
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/8fb6bf54-51e9-4bb8-9cbd-2a021fbab5d1
Sierra Operational and Cost Metrics Following ARC’s
Departure from the Sierra Board5 |
|
Q1 2021 |
Q1 2023 |
Change (%) |
FY 2021 |
FY 2022 |
Change (%) |
Sierra Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughput ('000 tonnes) |
774 |
577 |
-25.5% |
2,902 |
2,288 |
-21.2% |
Copper equivalent production ('000 lbs) |
25,496 |
18,009 |
-29.4% |
89,962 |
64,218 |
-28.6% |
Cash cost (US$ per Copper eq. Lbs) |
1.62 |
N/A |
N/A |
1.81 |
2.55 |
+40.9% |
Yauricocha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughput (tonnes) |
326 |
219 |
-32.8% |
1,257 |
1,054 |
-16.1% |
Copper equivalent production ('000 lbs) |
15,937 |
9,003 |
-43.5% |
59,470 |
39,185 |
-34.1% |
Cash cost (US$ per Copper eq. Lbs) |
1.48 |
N/A |
N/A |
1.46 |
2.23 |
+52.7% |
Bolivar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughput (tonnes) |
372 |
299 |
-19.5% |
1,350 |
942 |
-30.2% |
Copper equivalent production ('000 lbs) |
7,285 |
7,588 |
+4.2% |
22,207 |
16,931 |
-23.8% |
Cash cost (US$ per Copper eq. Lbs) |
1.58 |
N/A |
N/A |
2.18 |
2.99 |
+37.2% |
Sierra Financial Results Highlight its Liquidity Crisis as
Consequence of Inadequate Oversight6 |
(In millions of dollars) |
FY 2021 |
FY 2022 |
Change (%) |
Revenues |
272.0 |
192.1 |
-29.4% |
Adjusted EBITDA |
104.7 |
13.0 |
-87.6% |
Net loss attributable to shareholders |
-27.4 |
-87.5 |
+219.8% |
Working capital |
17.3 |
-84.4 |
-587.3% |
Short term financial debt |
24.9 |
87.8 |
+253.2% |
Total cash |
34.9 |
5.1 |
-85.5% |
NOTE: Net loss for 2022 includes non-cash impairment charges
totaling US$50 million. As of December 31, 2022, the Company was in
default of its debt covenants and therefore classified all of the
debt as current liabilities. US$18.8 million of US$25.0 million
principal debt repayment obligations are due in 2023. |
Five highly qualified director nominees to bring urgent
change at Sierra
ARC is the virtual founder and by far the
largest shareholder of Sierra. ARC strongly believes that there is
an urgent need to significantly reconstitute the Board so it is
aligned with the interests of all shareholders.
The ARC Nominees provide that alignment. The ARC
Nominees, who include three Peruvian nationals, one Mexican
national, and one Canadian, understand Sierra’s challenges and have
local knowledge and experience needed to transform the Company.
They have a deep understanding of the geologic potential of
Sierra’s Yauricocha, Bolivar and Cusi mines and former experience
managing these mines, the quality of which is currently
misunderstood and underappreciated by most of the Sierra Board.
The ARC Nominees have in-country experience in
the mining and metals industry in Peru and Mexico, expertise in
geological, mining and metallurgical engineering, experience in
permitting and community engagement, and expertise in mining
finance and M&A transactions in the metals sector. ARC believes
that there is no better group of people to restore Sierra to its
prior levels of profitability than those that were involved in
growing Sierra to those levels of excellence in the first place and
those who have demonstrated operational and financial experience in
situations like this. Based on our track record, we expect the ARC
Nominees will provide access to broader financing sources and
strategic partners to generate medium and long-term solutions to
Sierra’s current liquidity crisis while embarking on an extensive
marketing and capital markets engagement that will help Sierra
regain its attractiveness to investors.
The ARC Nominees are:
J. Alberto Arias
Mr. Arias brings 30 years of experience in the
field of international mining finance and is the founder of Arias
Resource Capital Management LP, having raised close to US$700
million in two private equity funds. He is also the virtual founder
of Sierra, Chairman of the Board of Largo Inc., and Board member of
Kolpa as a consequence of the investment by ARC in these companies.
Mr. Arias worked at Goldman Sachs as Managing Director and Head of
Equity Research for metals and mining in the U.S., Canada and Latin
America before founding Arias Resource Capital Management LP. He
has also worked at UBS Warburg as Executive Director and Analyst
covering the Latin American metals and mining sector.
Derek White
Mr. White has over 30 years of experience in the
mining and metals industry and is the President and CEO of Ascot
Resources Ltd. He is a Chartered Accountant, an ICSA Accredited
Director and holds a degree in Geological Engineering from the
University of British Columbia. Prior to his current role, Mr.
White was the Principal of Traxys Capital Partners LLP, a private
equity firm specializing in the mining and minerals sectors. He was
the President and CEO of KGHM International Ltd. from 2012 to 2015
and was Executive Vice President, Business Development and Chief
Financial Officer of Quadra FNX Mining Ltd. from 2004 to 2012. He
has also held various executive positions with International Vision
Direct Ltd., BHP-Billiton Plc, Billiton International Metals BV and
Impala Platinum Ltd., in Vancouver, Toronto, London, The Hague, and
Johannesburg.
Daniel Tellechea
Mr. Tellechea is the Interim Chief Executive
Officer of Largo Inc. and brings extensive experience in
international mining. He was the President & CEO of Sierra
between 2007 and 2014 and was President and CEO of Asarco LLC from
2003 to 2005. He served as the Managing Director of Finance and
Administration for Asarco's parent, Grupo Mexico from 1994 to 2003
and also served as Asarco's Chief Financial Officer and
Vice-president of finance for Southern Copper Corporation from 1999
to 2003. Daniel is also a member of the board of Kolpa.
Ricardo Arrarte
Mr. Arrarte currently serves as a Director on
the investment team for Arias Resource Capital and is the Chief
Executive Officer for Cautivo Mining Inc. Mr. Arrarte is a Mining
and Mechanical Engineer with an MBA from the George Washington
University. He is experienced in mine and plant design, managing
mining operations, production and costs with large teams of
personnel. Mr. Arrarte brings over 20 years of experience in
management, operations, and consulting for mining companies. Mr.
Arrarte was a director of Sierra from 2019 to 2021. He has worked
with Hochschild Mining PLC as Operations Manager in charge of four
silver mines in Peru, Compañia Minera Caudalosa SA as Chief
Executive Officer, Consorcio Minero Horizonte as Planning and
Engineering Manager, Buenavetura Ingenieros SA – BISA as an
Engineering Consultant, Fosfatos Del Pacifico SA as Mine Manager,
and Cementos Pacasmayo SAA as Geology and Mine Central Manager.
Alonso Checa
Mr. Checa brings over 12 years of experience in
M&A transactions in the metals sector and is well-versed with
the mining industry in Peru. Mr. Checa worked for J.P. Morgan in
the Latin America Investment Banking and M&A Advisory team, and
he currently serves as a Director at Arias Resource Capital
Management LP and is a member of the board of directors of
Kolpa.
The Choice to Restore Sierra to its
Former Track-Record of Prosperity and Value Creation is
CLEAR
ARC Nominees |
OR |
Current Board |
√ Aligned with the interests of all shareholders |
× No “skin in the game” – less than 1% combined share
ownership |
√ Transformed Sierra from small mining company to a profitable
US$600mm+ market cap company |
× Destruction of Sierra market capitalization to less than US$50mm
– down 91% since ARC representatives left Board |
√ Executive and Board experience with Sierra assets |
× No prior experience with Sierra assets |
√ Track record of growth and positive shareholder returns |
× Unimaginable deterioration of operations resulting in Company
facing financial distress |
√ Access to financing sources and strategic partners |
× Two failed strategic processes – did not act urgently on premium
offers and financing opportunities |
√ Local knowledge and operational and financial acumen in the
mining industry |
× No demonstration of ability to turn Company around |
ARC has a five-point plan and a track-record to
match
1. Increase Ore Throughput with Safety as a Top
Priority and Achieve Optimum Levels of Economies of Scale: A
refreshed Board with in-depth experience with Sierra’s assets will
aid Sierra management to boost the efficiency of the operations
through productivity improvements, cost reductions and targeted
exploration investments. With previous ARC leadership on the Board,
Sierra achieved capital-efficient output expansion of its three
mines, considered remarkable by metal industry standards. This
successful track record is also evident in other companies where
ARC has invested. This expertise and experience will be
instrumental in the operational turnaround of Sierra’s mines.
2. Stronger Board Expertise to Obtain Better
Financing Alternatives and Strategic Partnerships: ARC responded
quickly to Sierra’s public announcement of its financial
difficulties with a full-fledged strategic and financing proposal.
The ARC Nominees bring strong market credibility that should
provide access to broader financing sources and strategic partners
to generate medium and long-term solutions to Sierra’s current
liquidity crisis that Sierra urgently needs to maximize shareholder
value. For example, the LOI that ARC and Kolpa provided to the
Company in October 2022 outlined that the concurrent financing
would be provided by a strategic investment firm that is NOT an
affiliate of Kolpa or its shareholders, with the full support of
Kolpa shareholders. This reflects the access to capital and
creativity that ARC can put to work to solve Sierra’s problems.
3. Return of Ownership Mentality: ARC has been
Sierra’s largest shareholder for over 10 years. Driven by that
ownership alignment, when ARC representatives were on the Board,
the Board’s focus was on maximizing shareholder value for all
shareholders. This incentivized generating consistent returns on
capital and reducing waste and inefficiencies in the Company. The
ARC team members worked closely with management to instill a sense
of ownership across the whole organization, which became an
important element of Sierra’s corporate culture. Sierra’s focus and
alignment with value creation is now clearly lost under the current
Board that has “no skin in the game” with less than 1% combined
share ownership in Sierra. Over the last two years, the destruction
of Sierra’s corporate culture has resulted in a decline in
operating efficiency, the inability to hold onto key talent, and a
significant loss of shareholder value. A refreshed Board, including
the ARC Nominees, will re-instill the culture of value creation
success and ownership mentality that prevailed when ARC’s
representatives were on the Board.
4. Leadership Realignment: Despite recent
departures, the Company has several competent team members. These
include individuals hired in the recent past and the vast majority
of talented employees with whom ARC worked prior to 2021, who, ARC
believes, are frustrated with the current Board’s inefficacy and
would like to bring the previous track-record of success back to
the Company. Aligning this talent with the right roles and bringing
back key members with institutional and operational knowledge – who
ARC understands quit because of the current Board’s mismanagement –
will be possible under a refreshed Board with experience with
Sierra’s assets.
5. Shareholder Transparency: Sierra has almost
completely stopped informing the markets on the state of its
financial and liquidity positions and about progress on exploration
or its growth development plans, which are critical for the market
to properly assess the Company’s investment merits and its value.
The Company’s reduced transparency and failure to adequately engage
and market its strengths has made it less friendly to capital
markets and has diminished its attractiveness to investors. The ARC
Nominees are well known for their success in capital markets and
investor relations. They will highlight Sierra’s strengths in
precious metals and metals that are in high demand for a low carbon
future, such as copper and zinc, which have positive supply-demand
fundamentals in the medium term.
ADVISORS
ARC has retained Kingsdale Advisors as its
strategic shareholder and communications advisor. ARC has retained
Stikeman Elliott LLP as its legal advisor.
ABOUT ARC
Arias Resource Capital, founded in 2007, is a
Miami-based private equity firm in the metals sector that invests
in critical materials empowering the clean energy revolution.
CAUTIONARY NOTES AND FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This news release contains forward-looking
information within the meaning of applicable securities laws and
are prospective in nature. Forward-looking information is not based
on historical facts, but rather on current expectations and may
include projections about future events and estimates and their
underlying assumptions, statements regarding plans, objectives,
intentions and expectations with respect to future financial
results, events, operations, services, product development and
potential, and statements regarding future performance.
Forward-looking statements are generally identified by the words
"expects", "anticipates", "believes", "intends", "estimates",
"plans", "will", “may”, “should”, “could”, “believes”, “potential”
or “continue” and similar expressions, or the negative thereof.
Forward-looking statements information in this news release
include, without limitation, statements regarding the potential
benefits and development of the ARC Nominees and the expected
impact and results of Sierra’s strategic review process and
Sierra’s corporate governance practices. There are numerous risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results and ARC’s plans
and objectives to differ materially from those expressed in, or
implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and
statements in this news release, including, without limitation, the
risks described under the headings such as “Cautionary Statement –
Forward Looking Information” and "Risk Factors" in Sierra’s annual
information form dated March 28, 2023 for its fiscal year ended
December 31, 2022, and other risks identified in Sierra's filings
with Canadian securities regulatory authorities which are available
under Sierra’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and with the SEC
on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. The forward-looking statements speak only
as of the date hereof and, other than as required by applicable
law, ARC undertakes no duty or obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking information or statements contained in this news
release as a result of new information, future events, changes in
expectation or otherwise.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING ARC’S PROPOSED BOARD
NOMINEES
The ARC Nominees will be nominated to serve as
new independent directors of the Board until the next annual
meeting of shareholders of the Company, or until their successors
are elected or appointed in accordance with applicable law. The
table below sets out, in respect of each of the ARC Nominees, his
or her name, province or state and country of residence, and his or
her principal occupation, business or employment within the five
preceding years. None of the ARC Nominees have any compensation
arrangement with ARC or associated companies in connection with
their nominations and services, should they be elected, as
directors on the Company’s Board.
NameProvince/State, Country of
Residence |
Present Principal Occupation, Business or Employment and in
Five Preceding Years |
Number of Common Shares of Sierra Beneficially Owned or
Controlled |
J. Alberto AriasFlorida, USA |
Portfolio Manager of Arias Resource Capital Management
LP.Non-Executive Chairman, Board of Directors (September 2019 to
present) of Largo Inc.Non-Executive Chairman (March 2013 to January
2021) and director (November 2008 to July 2021) of Sierra.Director
(December 2016 to January 2020) of Cautivo Mining Inc. |
Mr. Arias beneficially owns, or exercises control or direction
over, 717,110 shares of Sierra.In addition, Mr, Arias is the sole
director of each of the general partner of the Nominating
Shareholders, and indirectly controls Arias Resource Capital
Management LP. As such, Mr. Arias may be deemed to share voting and
dispositive power with respect to securities of the Company held by
these entities (30,064,883 common shares held by Arias Resource
Capital II L.P.; 1,706,040 common shares of Sierra held by Arias
Resource Capital Fund II (Mexico) L.P.; 696,437 common shares of
Sierra held by Arias Resource Capital Management LP; and 10,558,154
common shares of Sierra held by Arias Resource Capital GP Ltd.),
but he disclaims any beneficial ownership of any such securities,
except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. |
Derek WhiteBritish Columbia, Canada |
President and Chief Executive Officer of Ascot Resources Ltd. |
Nil. |
Daniel TellecheaArizona, USA |
Interim Chief Executive Officer (February 2023 to present) of Largo
Inc.Independent Consultant (July 2014 to February 2023). |
177,542 common shares of Sierra. |
Alonso ChecaLima, Peru |
Private Equity Executive and Director of Arias Resource Capital
Management LP. |
Nil. |
Ricardo ArrarteLima, Peru |
Director of Arias Resource Capital Management LP.Director (April
2019 to July 2021) of Sierra.Chief Executive Officer (August 2017
to present) of Cautivo Mining Inc. |
Nil. |
Other Boards of Reporting
Issuers
As of the date hereof, the ARC Nominees
currently serve as directors of other reporting issuers as
follows:
ARC Nominee |
Other Reporting Issuer |
J. Alberto Arias |
Largo Inc. |
Derek White |
Battery Mineral Resources Corp., Minto Metals Corp. |
Daniel Tellechea |
Largo Inc. |
Alonso Checa |
N/A |
Ricardo Arrarte |
N/A |
Other Information Concerning the ARC
Nominees
To the knowledge of ARC and other than as
described below, none of the directors or officers of ARC, or any
joint actors, associates or affiliates of the foregoing, or any of
the ARC Nominees or their respective associates or affiliates, has:
(a) any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction
since the commencement of the Company’s most recently completed
financial year or in any proposed transaction which has materially
affected or will materially affect the Company or any of its
subsidiaries; or (b) any material interest, direct or indirect, by
way of beneficial ownership of securities or otherwise, in any
matter proposed to be acted on at Sierra’s annual general and
special meeting of shareholders currently scheduled to be held on
June 28, 2023 (“Sierra’s 2023 AGM”), other than
the re-constitution of the Board or as disclosed in accordance with
applicable law.
On October 31, 2022, Sierra confirmed receipt of
the LOI submitted by Kolpa, among others, including the Nominating
Shareholders. The LOI, as supplemented after the date thereof,
outlined indicative terms for a proposed business combination of
Kolpa and Sierra and concurrent financing by an investment
firm.
Penalties or Sanctions
To the knowledge of ARC, as at the date hereof,
none of ARC’s proposed board nominees, has been subject to: (i) any
penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities
legislation or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered
into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority;
or (ii) any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or
regulatory body that would be likely to be considered important to
a reasonable security holder in deciding whether to vote for an ARC
Nominee.
Individual Bankruptcies
To the knowledge of ARC, none of ARC’s proposed
board nominees is, at the date hereof, or has been, within ten (10)
years prior to the date hereof, become bankrupt, made a proposal
under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or
become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or
compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or
trustee appointed to hold the assets of that individual.
Corporate Cease Trade Orders or Bankruptcies
To the knowledge of ARC and other than as
described below, no ARC Nominee is, at the date hereof, or has
been, within ten (10) years prior to the date hereof: (a) a
director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of any
company that (i) was subject to a cease trade order, an order
similar to a cease trade order or an order that denied the relevant
company access to any exemption under securities legislation that
was in effect for a period of more than thirty (30) consecutive
days (each, an "order"), in each case that was issued while the ARC
Nominee was acting in the capacity as director, chief executive
officer or chief financial officer, or (ii) was subject to an order
that was issued after the ARC Nominee ceased to be a director,
chief executive officer or chief financial officer and which
resulted from an event that occurred while that person was acting
in the capacity as director, chief executive officer or chief
financial officer; (b) a director or executive officer of any
company that, while such ARC Nominee was acting in that capacity,
or within one (1) year of such ARC Nominee ceasing to act in that
capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation
relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or
instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with
creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed
to hold its assets; or (c) someone who became bankrupt, made a
proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or
insolvency, or became subject to or instituted any proceedings,
arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver,
receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of such
ARC Nominee.
Mr. Arias served as a member of the board of
directors for Colossus Minerals Inc. (“Colossus”)
less than one year from March 2013 to January 2014. On January 14,
2014, Colossus announced it had approved the filing of a notice of
intention to make a proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency
Act (Canada), to enable the company to pursue a sale process and
restructuring with the benefit of creditor protection and under
court supervision. On March 13, 2014, the Ontario Superior Court of
Justice (in Bankruptcy and Insolvency) approved a proposal and plan
of reorganization that was unanimously accepted by the creditors of
Colossus.
Mr. Tellechea served as a director of Mercator
Minerals Ltd. (“Mercator”) from April 5, 2012 to
September 4, 2014. On August 26, 2014, Mercator and its wholly
owned subsidiary, Creston Moly Corp., filed a Notice of Intention
to Make a Proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act
(Canada). On September 9, 2014, the official receiver issued a
Certificate of Assignment in Bankruptcy for Mercator, effective
from the date of bankruptcy, being September 5, 2014.
Additional Information
In connection with the Nominating Shareholders’
solicitation of proxies in respect of Sierra’s 2023 AGM, the
Nominating Shareholders intend to file and mail to Sierra
shareholders an information circular and form of proxy in due
course.
Any solicitation made by ARC will be made by it
and not by or on behalf of the management of Sierra. All costs
incurred for any solicitation will be borne by ARC, provided that,
subject to applicable law, ARC may seek reimbursement from Sierra
of ARC’s out-of-pocket expenses, including proxy solicitation
expenses and legal fees, incurred in connection with any successful
result at a meeting of Sierra shareholders. Proxies may be
solicited by ARC pursuant to an information circular sent to
shareholders after which solicitations may be made by or on behalf
of ARC by mail, telephone, fax, email or other electronic means as
well as by newspaper or other media advertising, and in person by
directors, officers and employees of ARC, who will not be
specifically remunerated therefor. ARC may also solicit proxies in
reliance upon the public broadcast exemption to the solicitation
requirements under applicable Canadian corporate and securities
laws, including through press releases, speeches or publications,
and by any other manner permitted under applicable Canadian laws.
ARC may engage the services of one or more agents and authorize
other persons to assist in soliciting proxies on its behalf, which
agents would receive customary fees for such services. In
particular, Kingsdale Advisors (the “Proxy
Solicitor”) has been engaged to solicit proxies in the
United States and Canada. Pursuant to this engagement, the Proxy
Solicitor will receive an initial fee of C$150,000 plus a customary
fee for each call to and from shareholders. In addition, the Proxy
Solicitor may be entitled to a fee of up to C$150,000 in connection
with a successful solicitation campaign. Proxies may be revoked by
instrument in writing by a shareholder giving the proxy or by its
duly authorized officer or attorney, or in any other manner
permitted by law and the articles or by-laws of Sierra. None of ARC
nor, to its knowledge, any of its associates or affiliates, has any
material interest, direct or indirect: (i) in any transaction since
the beginning of Sierra’s most recently completed financial year or
in any proposed transaction that has materially affected or would
materially affect Sierra or any of its subsidiaries; or (ii) by way
of beneficial ownership of securities or otherwise, in any matter
proposed to be acted on by Sierra, other than the election of
directors to the board of Sierra or as disclosed in accordance with
applicable law.
Sierra trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol
“SMT”. Sierra’s head office is located at 77 King Street West,
Suite 400, Toronto, Ontario M5K 0A1.
CONTACT
Andrew SidnellVice President, Special SituationsKingsdale
Advisors647-265-4522asidnell@kingsdaleadvisors.com
_____________________________
1 Sierra shares traded on the TSX at C$3.83 per share (or
US$3.25 per share) on June 10, 2021 and at C$0.38 per share (or
US$0.28 per share) on April 28, 2023. Source: Bloomberg.2 Sierra
Metals Completes Strategic Review Process, Initiates Annual Base
Dividend of US$0.03 per Share and Appoints Two New Directors to its
Board, 2021.
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211007005386/en/.3 Sierra
Metals Announces Refinancing Agreement and Ongoing Discussions to
Allow for Flexibility on Debt Repayment for 2023, 2023.
https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230313005278/en/. 4 Sierra
2022 earnings call and Sociedad Minera Corona S.A. annual report5
Sierra quarterly press releases and reports. Cash cost and copper
equivalent pounds have the meanings set out in Sierra’s MD&A.6
Sierra quarterly press releases and reports. Adjusted EBITDA and
other calculations have the meanings set out in Sierra's
MD&A.
Sierra Metals (TSX:SMT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2024 to Dec 2024
Sierra Metals (TSX:SMT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2023 to Dec 2024