VANCOUVER, BC, March 26,
2024 /CNW/ - Nevada King Gold Corp. (TSXV:
NKG) (OTCQX: NKGFF) ("Nevada
King" or the "Company") is pleased to report
results from an extensive Phase I metallurgical testing program at
the Atlanta Gold Mine Project, located in the prolific Battle
Mountain Trend, 264km northeast of Las
Vegas, Nevada. The objective of the Phase I program was to
test the various mineralized host rocks at Atlanta for gold and silver extraction, using
conventional flowsheet unit operations to guide in selecting a
process flowsheet suitable for the commercial extraction of gold
and silver from the project. Results of the Phase I test work
support strong recoveries utilizing conventional Nevada oxide
processing methods for the representative mineralization types
present at Atlanta.
Highlights:
- Phase I testing used three surface bulk samples and 19
composites from drill core comprising the full range of rock types
and gold and silver grades encountered across Atlanta. Mineralization at Atlanta can be broadly characterized by two
major host domains: 1) Silicified breccias found within and
below the main Atlanta
unconformity, and 2) Volcanics found above the main
Atlanta unconformity (refer to
cross sections A-A and B-B in Figures 3-4 below).
- Results of Phase I support conventional Nevada oxide
processing methods for Atlanta
whereby:
- Silicified breccias are amenable to conventional milling for
high-grade material and High-Pressure Grinding Roll ("HPGR")
crushing and heap leaching for the lower-grade material.
- Volcanics are amenable to conventional milling for high-grade
material and Conventional Crush or Run-of-Mine ("ROM") heap
leaching for the lower-grade material.
- Applicable to process plant scenarios, gold extraction
from fine milling at a 200-mesh grind (P80=75µm) show a weighted
average extraction of 91.7% for gold hosted in volcanics and
85.9% for the high-grade silica breccias.
- Silver extraction from fine milling at a 200-mesh grind
(P80=75µm) show a weighted average 65.3% in the volcanics and 41.3%
in the silica breccias. At coarser crush size silver extractions
are similar between the two metallurgical domains.
- Applicable to heap leach scenarios, gold extraction from
conventional crushing (P80=12.5 mm) shows a weighted average
extraction of 87.1% for gold hosted in volcanics. Gold
extraction from HPGR crushed composites (using medium press force)
shows a weighted average 71.4% extraction from low-grade silica
breccias.
- A Phase 2 metallurgical PQ core drilling program has now been
completed to fill some gaps in the target resource envelope and
further laboratory testing utilizing material from this drilling is
scheduled to start later in 2024. The location of these holes can
be found in the drill hole plan map below in Figure 2.
Bulk Sample and Phase 1 metallurgical test work at Atlanta has been supervised by Gary Simmons (MMSA QP Number: 01013QP), formerly
the Director of Metallurgy and Technology for Newmont Mining Corp.
Mr. Simmons has supervised and managed numerous Carlin-style
metallurgical testing programs in the Great Basin with
characteristics similar to those found at Atlanta.
Mr. Simmons commented, "Historic production at Atlanta focused on near-surface high-grade
silica breccia ores that were processed and recovered using
conventional oxide milling practices. Historical records (1979-85)
indicate recoveries from the silica breccias necessitated a
fine-grind milling and Merrill-Crowe recovery process that averaged
81% for gold and 42% for silver at ball mill grind P80 =
120µm (microns). This historical milling operation was challenged
by the hard and abrasive nature of the silica breccias, resulting
in elevated-maintenance and operating costs in primary, secondary,
and tertiary crushing circuits.
"Today's results confirm that conventional oxide milling, and
HPGR crush heap-leach or ROM heap-leach, depending on
mineralization type, are well suited for processing gold and silver
mineralization at Atlanta.
Referring to a conceptual Atlanta
generalized flowsheet in Figure 1 below, a straightforward process
breaks out the host mineralization into their respective silica
breccia and volcanic units, running high-grade mineralization
through a mill and processing lower grade material via a
combination HPGR crush and ROM heap leaching. The adoption of HPGR
crushing technology (used at other mines in Nevada and around the world) will eliminate
SAG milling of silica breccias and high-grade volcanics that in
turn should result in reduced overall operating cost against a
conventional SABC (Semi-Autogenous-Ball Mill-Crusher) circuit
design. It is anticipated that this process will be more
cost-effective than historical methods, resulting in lower process
cutoff grades and potential for economic extraction of gold and
silver from a larger volume of material."
Collin Kettell, Founder & CEO
of Nevada King, stated, "Positive
results from the Phase 1 metallurgical test work released today
indicate a clear path forward for processing Atlanta's gold and silver mineralization via a
combination of crushed and run-of-mine heap leaching together with
conventional milling of high-grade mineralization. In a major
departure from historical processing and test-work at Atlanta, the potential for using HPGR
crushing, as indicated by Phase 1 enhanced test recoveries, could
result in very significant benefits and opportunities for flow
sheet development in a future potential mining operation. Test
results also indicate significantly higher Au/Ag recoveries in the
volcanic section, which is fast becoming a major component of the
overall mineralized footprint at Atlanta. Looking forward, ongoing resource
modeling and metallurgical studies will focus on optimizing the
potential economics of mining and processing scenarios utilizing
the alternative process options for which this Phase 1 testing
program has indicated positive extraction results."
Test Results Summary:
Atlanta mineralized resources
have been characterized into two major resource categories for gold
and silver processing: 1. Silicified breccias (mineralized material
in and below the main Atlanta
unconformity) and Volcanics (mineralized material above the main
Atlanta unconformity).
A breakout of the materials tested above and below the
Atlanta unconformity and the
laboratory metallurgy gold extraction test results are summarized
in Table 1. A full range of rock types at Atlanta have been tested and test results
clearly show the significant metallurgical difference between the
silicified breccias and the volcanics. A similar table summarizing
silver extractions for Atlanta can
be found in Table 2.
Silicified breccias, below the unconformity, are hard and
abrasive rocks and have a high degree of sensitivity to process
feed particle size.
- Victory Metals, Inc. (Nevada King Gold Corp.) NI 43-101
Technical Report on the Atlanta Project dated December 22, 2020, reported historic Atlanta mill recoveries, for the years 1979-85
at 81% for Au and 42% for Ag, at operating ball mill grind P80 =
120µm (microns).
- Silicified breccias are amenable to High Pressure Grinding Roll
(HPGR) comminution, where high-grade would report to a mill and
lower-grade to heap leaching. The determination between
higher-grade and lower-grade material will be dependent upon future
economic analysis.
- Of significant note is that as the silica breccia gold grade
decreases (<1.7 ppm Au), gold extraction increases at coarser
P80 particle size, as shown in Table 1. Thus, reinforcing the
benefit of milling higher grade and HPGR crush-heap leaching of the
lower grade resources.
- Volcanics, above the unconformity, are relatively insensitive
to process feed particle size and can be characterized as equal or
similar to central Nevada commercial heap leach operations.
- Volcanics are amenable to conventional milling, conventional
crush heap leaching and/or ROM heap leaching.
Gold extraction from fine milling at a 200 mesh grind (P80=75µm)
show a weighted average:
- 91.7% extraction in the volcanics
- 87.5 % extraction in the low-grade silica breccias
- 85.9% extraction in the high-grade silica breccias
Gold extraction from conventional crushing (P80=12.5 mm) show a
weighted average:
- 87.1% extraction from volcanics
- 62.1% extraction from low-grade silica breccias
- 37.0% extraction from high grade silica breccias
Gold extraction from HPGR crushed composites show a weighted
average:
- 81.9% extraction from volcanics (only four of the nine volcanic
composites were tested using HPGR as the remaining five composites
contained elevated levels fines and are not suitable for HPGR
processing)
- 71.4% extraction from low-grade silica breccias (<1.7 ppm
Au)
- 50.4% extraction from high-grade silica breccias
|
|
|
|
|
Gold Met Balances
|
|
|
KCA
Sample
No.
|
Comp ID
|
Unconf*1
Abv/Below
|
Atlanta Geology
|
37µm BR
|
75µm BR
|
1,700µm BR
|
12.5mm Column
|
25.0mm Column
|
HPGR Column
|
|
|
Formation
|
Subunit
|
Au Ext
%
|
Calc Hd
Au (ppm)
|
Au Ext
%
|
Calc Hd
Au (ppm)
|
Au Ext
%
|
Calc Hd
Au (ppm)
|
Au Et
%
|
Calc Hd
Au (ppm)
|
Au Ext
%
|
Calc Hd
Au (ppm)
|
Au Ext
%
|
Calc Hd
Au (ppm)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96607
A
|
ATV-3
|
Above
|
VolInt
|
Qtz latite porph,
Int.
|
83.4
|
1.820
|
86.5
|
1.823
|
64.6
|
1.941
|
70.3
|
1.874
|
|
|
75.5
|
1.979
|
|
|
96609
A
|
ATV-5
|
Above
|
Tww
|
Volc. Ss
|
93.3
|
0.312
|
88.9
|
0.126
|
67.4
|
0.141
|
|
|
72.1
|
0.140
|
|
|
|
|
96616
A
|
ATV-12
|
Above
|
Tww
|
Dacite tuff
|
92.8
|
0.500
|
96.2
|
0.521
|
78.4
|
0.509
|
84.7
|
0.476
|
|
|
87.8
|
0.500
|
|
|
96617
A
|
ATV-13
|
Above
|
Tww
|
Dacite tuff
|
80.4
|
1.539
|
84.8
|
1.498
|
77.6
|
1.462
|
|
|
81.5
|
1.865
|
|
|
|
|
96619
A
|
ATV-15
|
Above
|
VolInt
|
Tuff dike
bxa
|
90.0
|
6.363
|
92.0
|
6.793
|
82.0
|
6.927
|
|
|
82.4
|
7.165
|
|
|
|
|
96620 A
|
ATV-16
|
Above
|
VolInt
|
Qtz latite porph,
Int.
|
90.7
|
0.529
|
90.7
|
0.593
|
86.6
|
0.610
|
88.8
|
0.633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96621 A
|
ATV-17
|
Above
|
SBX-2
|
hydro-breccia
|
83.9
|
1.214
|
88.6
|
1.324
|
73.3
|
1.209
|
76.1
|
1.403
|
|
|
81.7
|
1.440
|
|
|
96622 A
|
ATV-18
|
Above
|
VolInt
|
Qtz latite porph,
Int.
|
86.7
|
1.531
|
88.0
|
1.639
|
81.8
|
1.566
|
86.3
|
1.666
|
|
|
88.0
|
1.615
|
|
|
96623 A
|
ATV-19
|
Above
|
BXZ
|
Dolomite
|
97.1
|
7.951
|
95.4
|
7.174
|
91.8
|
7.842
|
93.0
|
8.250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wt Average
|
|
|
|
90.9
|
2.418
|
91.7
|
2.388
|
83.1
|
2.467
|
87.1
|
2.384
|
82.0
|
3.057
|
81.9
|
1.384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96612 A
|
ATV-8
|
Below
|
Oes
|
Dolomite
|
78.5
|
0.237
|
82.4
|
0.289
|
50.8
|
0.299
|
44.0
|
0.218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96610 A
|
ATV-6
|
Below
|
VolInt
|
tuff dike
bxa
|
94.9
|
0.375
|
94.3
|
0.348
|
64.0
|
0.336
|
44.6
|
0.249
|
|
|
60.6
|
0.277
|
|
|
96614 A
|
ATV-10
|
Below
|
SBX
|
Wk Si
Dolomite
|
77.5
|
0.244
|
83.2
|
0.333
|
68.9
|
0.360
|
57.1
|
0.331
|
|
|
66.4
|
0.277
|
|
|
96601 B
|
ABS#1
|
Below
|
Ol
|
Silicified
Dolomite
|
80.3
|
0.340
|
76.6
|
0.337
|
55.8
|
0.344
|
52.1
|
0.349
|
|
|
62.9
|
0.375
|
|
|
96615 A
|
ATV-11
|
Below
|
SBX
|
SBX
|
87.0
|
0.575
|
87.7
|
0.570
|
61.9
|
0.559
|
48.4
|
0.531
|
|
|
62.4
|
0.558
|
|
|
96605 A
|
ATV-1
|
Below
|
VolInt
|
Qtz latite porph,
Int.
|
85.8
|
1.166
|
86.4
|
1.157
|
53.8
|
1.131
|
46.2
|
1.147
|
|
|
60.7
|
1.121
|
|
|
96603 B
|
ABS#3
|
Below
|
SBX
|
SBX
|
91.4
|
1.549
|
88.5
|
1.465
|
80.6
|
1.692
|
82.6
|
1.422
|
|
|
84.1
|
1.624
|
|
|
96602 B
|
ABS#2
|
Below
|
SBX
|
SBX
|
92.1
|
1.539
|
90.2
|
1.442
|
74.5
|
1.599
|
65.1
|
1.550
|
|
|
74.1
|
1.594
|
|
|
Wt Average (<1.7 ppm Au)
|
|
|
|
88.6
|
0.753
|
87.5
|
0.743
|
68.3
|
0.790
|
61.2
|
0.725
|
|
|
71.4
|
0.832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96613 A
|
ATV-9
|
Below
|
SBX
|
SBX
|
91.0
|
2.344
|
90.0
|
2.412
|
53.3
|
2.617
|
39.9
|
2.534
|
|
|
53.1
|
2.643
|
|
|
96618 A
|
ATV-14
|
|
VolInt
|
Silicified Ryolite
Int.
|
85.0
|
2.462
|
80.6
|
2.248
|
45.9
|
1.967
|
46.8
|
1.992
|
|
|
54.9
|
1.958
|
|
|
96611 A
|
ATV-7
|
Below
|
SBX
|
SBX
|
93.5
|
2.487
|
93.5
|
2.253
|
52.8
|
2.321
|
35.2
|
2.306
|
|
|
53.8
|
2.278
|
|
|
96608 A
|
ATV-4
|
Below
|
SBX
|
SBX
|
90.6
|
4.742
|
80.5
|
5.117
|
47.8
|
5.009
|
32.8
|
5.400
|
|
|
40.9
|
6.452
|
|
|
96606 A
|
ATV-2
|
Below
|
BXZ
|
volc tuff
bxa
|
94.1
|
6.166
|
88.1
|
5.961
|
66.8
|
6.150
|
|
|
|
|
56.3
|
6.304
|
|
|
Wt Average (>1.7 ppm Au)
|
|
|
|
91.5
|
3.640
|
85.9
|
3.598
|
55.5
|
3.613
|
37.0
|
3.058
|
|
|
50.4
|
3.927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*1 -
|
Unconformity - Below:
Gold Extraction % is highly senstivity to feed particle size,
Unconformity - Above: Gold Extraction % has low sensitivity to feed
particle size.
|
|
|
|
Table 1. Gold Metallurgical Results, Bottle Roll
& Column Leach Tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silver Met
Balances*2
|
|
|
KCA
Sample No.
|
Comp ID
|
Unconf*2 Abv/Below
|
Atlanta Geology
|
37µm BR
|
75µm BR
|
1,700µm BR
|
12.5mm Columns
|
25mm Columns
|
HPGR Columns
|
|
|
Formation
|
Subunit
|
Ag Ext
%
|
Calc Hd
Ag (ppm)
|
Ag Ext
%
|
Calc Hd
Ag (ppm)
|
Ag Ext
%
|
Calc Hd
Ag (ppm)
|
Ag Ext
%
|
Calc Hd
Ag (ppm)
|
Ag Ext
%
|
Calc Hd
Ag (ppm)
|
Ag Ext
%
|
Calc Hd
Ag (ppm)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96607
A
|
ATV-3
|
Above
|
VolInt
|
Qtz latite porph,
Int.
|
43.2
|
2.5
|
24.3
|
4.6
|
13.1
|
4.9
|
12.4
|
4.0
|
|
|
13.7
|
5.2
|
|
|
96609
A
|
ATV-5
|
Above
|
Tww
|
Volc. Ss
|
55.7
|
2.0
|
22.3
|
3.8
|
8.2
|
3.8
|
|
|
9.4
|
3.07
|
|
|
|
|
96616
A
|
ATV-12
|
Above
|
Tww
|
Dacite tuff
|
36.0
|
0.4
|
8.0
|
1.5
|
8.5
|
0.9
|
11.6
|
0.9
|
|
|
8.9
|
0.8
|
|
|
96617
A
|
ATV-13
|
Above
|
Tww
|
Dacite tuff
|
77.9
|
1.1
|
37.2
|
2.3
|
47.1
|
1.5
|
|
|
60.6
|
0.99
|
|
|
|
|
96619 A
|
ATV-15
|
Above
|
VolInt
|
Tuff dike
bxa
|
83.2
|
69.1
|
82.3
|
63.1
|
38.4
|
66.6
|
|
|
30.8
|
65.04
|
|
|
|
|
96620 A
|
ATV-16
|
Above
|
VolInt
|
Qtz latite porph,
Int.
|
20.4
|
3.4
|
14.9
|
3.9
|
7.4
|
3.1
|
6.6
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96621 A
|
ATV-17
|
Above
|
SBX-2
|
hydro-breccia
|
61.1
|
36.2
|
64.6
|
38.6
|
33.4
|
38.2
|
29.1
|
46.6
|
|
|
37.6
|
35.8
|
|
|
96622 A
|
ATV-18
|
Above
|
VolInt
|
Qtz latite porph,
Int.
|
44.4
|
1.4
|
34.0
|
2.1
|
44.4
|
1.2
|
27.2
|
1.8
|
|
|
23.8
|
1.9
|
|
|
96623 A
|
ATV-19
|
Above
|
BXZ
|
Dolomite
|
52.6
|
32.0
|
56.9
|
33.9
|
35.6
|
31.4
|
45.4
|
45.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wt Average
|
|
|
|
68.1
|
16.5
|
65.3
|
17.1
|
34.3
|
16.9
|
34.7
|
17.0
|
30.3
|
23.033
|
33.6
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96612 A
|
ATV-8
|
Below
|
Oes
|
Dolomite
|
40.0
|
1.0
|
20.2
|
1.8
|
5.7
|
2.3
|
8.8
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96618 A
|
ATV-14
|
|
VolInt
|
Silicified Ryolite
Int.
|
83.5
|
1.7
|
49.7
|
2.5
|
43.9
|
1.7
|
35.9
|
1.7
|
|
|
38.8
|
2.4
|
|
|
96605 A
|
ATV-1
|
Below
|
VolInt
|
Qtz latite porph,
Int.
|
64.1
|
2.5
|
34.4
|
4.0
|
18.4
|
4.1
|
16.1
|
3.6
|
|
|
24.5
|
3.3
|
|
|
96610 A
|
ATV-6
|
Below
|
VolInt
|
tuff dike
bxa
|
70.1
|
3.0
|
39.8
|
4.3
|
29.0
|
5.0
|
25.5
|
4.0
|
|
|
27.6
|
4.5
|
|
|
96614 A
|
ATV-10
|
Below
|
SBX
|
Wk Si
Dolomite
|
55.4
|
2.5
|
22.4
|
5.1
|
10.3
|
5.5
|
4.7
|
5.7
|
|
|
7.7
|
5.9
|
|
|
96602 B
|
ABS#2
|
Below
|
SBX
|
SBX
|
56.8
|
15.9
|
54.4
|
15.2
|
52.8
|
13.3
|
29.7
|
12.7
|
|
|
34.2
|
14.0
|
|
|
96606 A
|
ATV-2
|
Below
|
BXZ
|
volc tuff
bxa
|
55.1
|
10.8
|
24.9
|
18.5
|
16.5
|
15.8
|
9.4
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96608 A
|
ATV-4
|
Below
|
SBX
|
SBX
|
53.7
|
12.8
|
21.6
|
23.0
|
8.7
|
19.0
|
3.2
|
21.3
|
|
|
7.1
|
22.7
|
|
|
96615 A
|
ATV-11
|
Below
|
SBX
|
SBX
|
78.8
|
25.7
|
62.0
|
34.7
|
46.3
|
32.9
|
29.0
|
30.4
|
|
|
42.8
|
30.4
|
|
|
96611 A
|
ATV-7
|
Below
|
SBX
|
SBX
|
57.8
|
21.5
|
35.6
|
33.2
|
24.9
|
27.6
|
28.1
|
37.5
|
|
|
31.7
|
37.9
|
|
|
96613 A
|
ATV-9
|
Below
|
SBX
|
SBX
|
73.9
|
35.6
|
56.5
|
47.7
|
64.7
|
42.3
|
53.2
|
47.7
|
|
|
61.6
|
50.7
|
|
|
96601 B
|
ABS#1
|
Below
|
Ol
|
Silicified
Dolomite
|
23.8
|
65.2
|
23.5
|
62.6
|
9.6
|
51.5
|
3.5
|
63.9
|
|
|
8.5
|
62.7
|
|
|
96603 B
|
ABS#3
|
Below
|
SBX
|
SBX
|
43.2
|
134.9
|
46.0
|
119.7
|
31.5
|
132.2
|
22.1
|
122.6
|
|
|
28.5
|
132.0
|
|
|
Wt Average
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
25.6
|
41.3
|
28.7
|
31.4
|
27.2
|
22.4
|
28.4
|
|
|
29.8
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*2 -
|
Silver grades are lower
and extractions are higher in resources above the
unconformity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2. Silver Metallurgical Results, Bottle Roll
& Column Leach Tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
QA/QC Protocols
All PQ-diameter core for the Phase 1 testing program was ¼ cut
with a diamond saw, with the ¼ sample being sent to American Assay
Lab in Reno, Nevada, while the ¾
samples were sent to Kappes and Cassiday Associates, also in
Reno. Samples were cut under the
Company's supervision in its Winnemucca,
Nevada, warehouse and all samples were placed in heavy
canvas bags. CRF standards and coarse blanks were inserted into the
sample stream on a one-in-twenty sample basis, meaning both inserts
are included in each 20-sample group. Samples were shipped by a
local contractor in large sample shipping crates directly to
American Assay Lab in Reno,
Nevada, with full custody being maintained at all times. At
American Assay Lab, samples were weighted then crushed to 75%
passing 2mm and pulverized to 85% passing 75 microns in order to
produce a 300g pulverized split. Prepared samples are initially run
using a four acid + boric acid digestion process and conventional
mutli-element ICP-OES analysis. Gold assays are initially run using
30-gram samples by lead fire assay with an OES finish to a 0.003
ppm detection limit, with samples greater than 10 ppm finished
gravimetrically. Every sample is also run through a cyanide leach
for gold with an ICP-OES finish. The QA/QC procedure involves
regular submission of Certified Analytical Standards and
property-specific duplicates.
Qualified Person
The geological information in this news release has been
reviewed and approved by Calvin R.
Herron, P.Geo., who is a Qualified Person as defined by
National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101"). Mr. Herron is not
independent for purposes of NI 43-101 as he is Exploration Manager
of Nevada King.
About Nevada King Gold
Corp.
Nevada King is the third largest
mineral claim holder in the State of
Nevada, behind Nevada Gold
Mines (Barrick/Newmont) and Kinross
Gold. Starting in 2016 the Company has staked large project
areas hosting significant historical exploration work along the
Battle Mountain trend located
close to current or former producing gold mines. These project
areas were initially targeted based on their potential for hosting
multi-million ounce gold deposits and were subsequently staked
following a detailed geological evaluation. District-scale projects
in Nevada King's portfolio include
(1) the 100% owned Atlanta Mine, located 100km southeast of
Ely, (2) the Lewis and Horse
Mountain-Mill Creek projects, both located between Nevada Gold Mines' large Phoenix and Pipeline mines, and (3) the Iron
Point project, located 35km east of Winnemucca, Nevada.
The Atlanta Mine is a historical gold-silver producer with a NI
43-101 compliant pit-constrained resource of 460,000 oz Au in the
measured and indicated category (11.0M tonnes at 1.3 g/t) plus an inferred
resource of 142,000 oz Au (5.3M
tonnes at 0.83 g/t). See the NI 43-101 Technical Report on
Resources titled "Atlanta Property, Lincoln County, NV" with an effective date of
October 6, 2020, and a report date of
December 22, 2020, as prepared by
Gustavson Associates and filed under the Company's profile on
SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.com).
Resource
Category
|
Tonnes
(000s)
|
Au
Grade
(ppm)
|
Contained Au
Oz
|
Ag
Grade
(ppm)
|
Contained Ag
Oz
|
Measured
|
4,130
|
1.51
|
200,000
|
14.0
|
1,860,000
|
Indicated
|
6,910
|
1.17
|
260,000
|
10.6
|
2,360,000
|
Measured +
Indicated
|
11,000
|
1.30
|
460,000
|
11.9
|
4,220,000
|
Inferred
|
5,310
|
0.83
|
142,000
|
7.3
|
1,240,000
|
Table 3. NI
43-101 Mineral Resources at the Atlanta Mine
|
|
Please see the Company's website at www.nevadaking.ca.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX
Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this release.
Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward Looking
Information
This news release contains certain "forward-looking
information" and "forward-looking statements" (collectively
"forward-looking statements") within the meaning of applicable
securities legislation. All statements, other than statements of
historical fact, included herein, without limitation, statements
relating the future operations and activities of Nevada King, are forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are frequently, but not always,
identified by words such as "expects", "anticipates", "believes",
"intends", "estimates", "potential", "possible", and similar
expressions, or statements that events, conditions, or results
"will", "may", "could", or "should" occur or be achieved.
Forward-looking statements in this news release relate to, among
other things, statements regarding extraction results from
the Phase I program and the effect thereof, laboratory testing of
material from the Company's Phase 2 metallurgical PQ core drilling
program, and the effect of extraction results thereof. There can be
no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, and
actual results and future events could differ materially from those
anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements reflect
the beliefs, opinions and projections on the date the statements
are made and are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates
that, while considered reasonable by Nevada
King, are inherently subject to significant business,
economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties and
contingencies. Many factors, both known and unknown, could cause
actual results, performance or achievements to be materially
different from the results, performance or achievements that are or
may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and
the parties have made assumptions and estimates based on or related
to many of these factors. Such factors include, without limitation,
the ability to complete proposed exploration work, the results of
exploration, continued availability of capital, and changes in
general economic, market and business conditions. Readers should
not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements and
information contained in this news release concerning these items.
There is no certainty, and the Company cannot provide assurance,
that the results of the Phase I program will be realized in part or
at all. The findings will require further assessment and analysis,
including additional met core variability testing, comminution and
environmental characterization and design engineering studies.
Nevada King does not assume any
obligation to update the forward-looking statements of beliefs,
opinions, projections, or other factors, should they change, except
as required by applicable securities laws.
View original content to download
multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nevada-king-reports-positive-metallurgical-test-results-confirms-suitability-of-conventional-oxide-processing-methods-at-atlanta-302099184.html
SOURCE Nevada King Gold Corp.