Baron Capital Enterprise Inc (CE) (BCAP) Quote

Trips volume picking Up!! That 6 million dollar salary is waiting on you Jake!! Hmbl paid staff and investors handsomely!!

37,260,000 bidding .0001
Ask is 177,200 .0003

It's almost impossible to load these cheap shares.



After end of year dumps, this will rock n' roll in 2025 🚀

I'm thinking no wells notice for Jake. One day they will just up and file suit.


.

Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

Company "Tweets" from Jake P Noch have not proven to be credible or a reliable source of information. Transparent as a brick wall, openly lies to his shareholders while draining their pockets to fill his own without regard for any shareholder besides himself. Wells notice for Mr Noch and his share dumping scheme(s) in 2025?

Filing doesnt, the stuff after that takes time. He is just not doing it.

if you don't like it- stop wasting everyone's time- nobody is making you buy or sell. as adults, we know our chances. ranting like a child doesn't change anyone's mind.

More on Jake P. Noch's MASSIVE SPOTIFY FRAUD:

https://www.billboard.com/pro/spotify-indie-label-streaming-fraud-millions-fake-accounts-countersuit/

Spotify Countersues Indie Label, Alleging Massive Streaming Fraud & Millions of Fake Accounts

Spotify has countersued indie label Sosa Entertainment and its founder Jake Noch, alleging massive streaming fraud, unjust enrichment and the creation of millions of fake accounts to generate…

BY DAN RYS

In November 2019, indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment and its founder, 20-year-old Jake Noch, filed a lawsuit against Spotify that alleged the streaming service failed to pay royalties on over 550 million streams of its music. The suit, which was also brought on behalf of Noch’s PRO Pro Music Rights (which was later removed), sought $150,000 in statutory damages for each infringement, and alleged that Spotify removed its music not because it detected “abnormal streaming activity,” as the service claimed, but because it was trying to dodge paying royalties on the streams.

Now, Spotify has fired back with a countersuit alleging that Noch “designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams” in order to “manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters.” The filing, which is supported by screenshots of messages allegedly between Noch and a “bot farmer” and charts that show streams on Noch’s music go from zero into the hundreds of thousands in a matter of days, also alleges that Noch directed the bot farmer to create millions of fake accounts and changed the names of songs in his catalog to closely resemble those of established hit songs, like XXXTentacion’s “SAD!” and DJ Snake’s “Taki Taki.”

Indie Hip-Hop Label Files Suit Against Spotify Over Catalog Takedown

Trending on Billboard

Noch, who lists himself as the chief executive of Sosa and Pro Music Rights, as well as a handful of additional music companies, has quite the proud litigious history, having released several press releases touting lawsuits against Spotify, Apple, Google, YouTube, Amazon, SoundCloud, Pandora, Deezer, iHeartRadio and more. Pro Music Rights claims a database of some 2 million tracks, including more than 23,000 by various artists using some form of the name “LEGATO,” like LEGATO_DIMY, LEGATODE45, LEGATODI001, LEGATOGILL2002 and LEGATOKAL999, to name a few.

According to Spotify’s counterclaim, filed Monday (May 18), the service first detected artificial streaming activity on Noch’s content in March 2016 and eventually banned his music from the service, before extending that ban to all content related to Noch. Noch then tried to “smuggle” the content back onto the service using slightly different names and created millions of fake accounts to stream that music.

In June 2016, a whistleblower contacted Spotify with screenshots that purported to show Noch directing the person to create millions (direct quote: “i need millions”) of fake accounts. And while Spotify had identified the fraud a few months prior, the company had already paid a small amount of royalties to Sosa and Noch — royalties that otherwise would have gone to legitimate songwriters with songs being streamed by legitimate fans. According to the complaint, for one of Noch’s albums that jumped from zero streams to more than 400,000 in just days, 99% of its streams came from Spotify’s ad-supported free tier and from accounts registered to male users in the United States, a pattern that was also found for other works.

Noch then changed distributors and changed the names of some of his companies in order to dodge Spotify’s fraud detection systems, with slightly different artist names, song titles and cover artwork. In one section of the complaint, attorneys wrote that “analysts at Spotify found that 5,500 ‘users’ streaming one of the Sosa albums ‘originated’ from a small American town with a total population of 10,000. For that album, the stream count jumped from zero to 749,000 streams in a span of only two days… This pattern is highly anomalous and not at all correlated to any possible pattern of genuine streaming activity.”


Spotify Combines Artist, Label Analytics In One Place

In another example from the complaint, in what the filing calls “title track parasitism,” Noch and Sosa uploaded tracks called “SAD!” with the same punctuation as the XXXTentacion hit, and “Taki Take,” shortly after the similarly-named DJ Snake song reached the top 20 of the Billboard Hot 100. Some of the tracks that Noch and Sosa would release on Spotify were AI-generated sound loops.

In all, Spotify’s counterclaim seeks relief for fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, indemnification, unjust enrichment and deceptive business practices. As another line in the complaint reads, “This was one of the most egregious fraudulent streaming operations from a single rights holder that Spotify had to deal with in its company’s history.”

After the publication of this story, Noch provided a comment to Billboard which reads, in part, “Spotify’s claims are laughable… I also greatly look forward to the day we get to go to court, and I hope that all of Spotify’s shareholders will pay close attention to these cases… Time will prove that we are right.”

###

And time did not prove documented fraudster and scammer Jake P. Noch right since Spotify didn't have to pay him a penny.

Jake P. Noch has not disclosed if he had to pay damages to Spotify. He uses a "non-disclosure agreement" as an excuse to not say anything about the lawsuit while Spotify, having the same "non-disclosure agreement" has already stated that they didn't pay a cent.

you need to get up to speed-- read the co tweets
Company tweets/X posts from Jake P. Noch, BCAP CEO and documented fraudster?

Jake P. Noch - BCAP CEO:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/v7gmvd/spotify-sues-self-described-music-prodigy-who-allegedly-ran-royalties-scam

Spotify Sues Self-Described 'Music Prodigy' Who Allegedly Ran Royalties Scam

Spotify says Jake Noch "[generated] hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams" and engaged in "title track parasitism" among other fraudulent practices on its platform.

JC

By Jelisa Castrodale

May 19, 2020, 4:38pm

Last November, the 20-year-old head of indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment filed a massive (and massively complicated) lawsuit against Spotify, alleging that the digital music service hadn't paid royalties on more than 550 million streams of its songs. According to Billboard, Sosa Entertainment founder Jake Noch also named his other company, PRO Music Rights, as a plaintiff in the lawsuit, and the co-plaintiffs sought millions of dollars in damages, asking for $150,000 for each infringement.

Noch's lawsuit accused Spotify of a number of transgressions, including unfair and deceptive business practices, willfully removing Sosa Entertainment's content, "obliterating" his expectations, and refusing to pay royalties. In a statement, Noch said that he was willing to "fight to the end" if it meant that Spotify would ultimately compensate the artists who were affected.

"I have a duty to see this through so that I can pay my artists what they are owed from Spotify," he said. "I know others feel the same way as I blaze this trail for the music community, who I know is behind me and roots for our success in bringing down Spotify."

Part of Noch's problems with the company started in the spring of 2017 when Spotify removed all of Sosa Entertainment's song's from its servers and "blanket banned" Noch and his companies from using the platform going forward. According to Noch—who describes himself as a "musical prodigy" in his lawsuit—Spotify informed him that the songs were removed because of "abnormal streaming activity," but the company didn't give him the opportunity to explain what could've caused the weird-looking streaming data. Noch has alleged that Spotify just "fabricated a reason" to kick him off the platform, in an attempt to avoid having to pay the royalties that he was due.

But in its own countersuit, filed on Monday, Spotify says no, it was just because of the abnormal streaming, and also because Noch allegedly "designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams" in order to game the system and rack up a ton of royalty payments.

"Starting in 2016, Noch designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams on songs he had seeded on Spotify’s online music-streaming service," the company's complaint reads. "Noch’s objective was plain: to manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters."

Billboard reports that Spotify removed Noch's content from its platform after being contacted by a whistleblower who claimed that Noch had instructed a bot farmer to create literally millions of fake accounts to stream songs from the Sosa Entertainment catalog. Spotify's own analysts became suspicious when one of Noch's records went from zero streams to 400,000 in under a week, while a second album racked up 749,000 streams in two days. (Spotify also apparently determined that 5,500 of the accounts that played the latter record supposedly all lived in the same American town—even though the town's total population was just around 10,000 people.)

The company has also accused Noch of "title track parasitism," which involves uploading songs with the same name and punctuation of legitimate hit songs. Spotify's legal filing identified two "AI-generated sound loops" that had been given the same name as then-popular tracks by DJ Snake and XXXTentacion.

"This was one of the most egregious fraudulent streaming operations from a single rights holder that Spotify had to deal with in its company’s history," Spotify wrote in its complaint. The company's countersuit is asking for compensation for a long list of Noch's alleged transgressions, including fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, indemnification, unjust enrichment and deceptive business practices.

Damn, most 20-year-olds can only dream of being dragged that hard by an international streaming service. A musical prodigy, indeed.

you need to get up to speed-- read the co tweets

What are you objecting too? You are not an attorney with standing here, there is no judge, Ihub is not a court.

Another joker that doesn't know how to respond to a post.


.

Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

Objection your honor speculation!!

Jeeezz.... Another joker that doesn't understand how to respond to a post?? The Judges take their sweet time... Attorneys filing a complaint only need a few days, or a week or two for something complicated... This suit doesn't seem that complicated. I think there is another issue.

.

Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

Patience. He's working on it. Court crap takes time.

So... Where's that lawsuit against the TA??


..


.

37.6m bidding.
YAAAAAAAAWWWWN...

Keep pumping your insignificant BS.

We're all on to you.

37.6m bidding.

Can't get any of them.

2025 will be a hot stock market, this should be the 2nd biggest runner.

thanks!

35,110,000 .0001
177,200 .0003

what is the bid and ask?

Where's your 38 million bid today?

Pumping ghosts.

LOL!!!!

Miracle on 34th Street!!

lol guy doesn't even understand the difference between a bid and an ask on an OTC stock. That's when you know nothing he says is credible. Anyways, nows the time to buy this, strong hold into 2025. All my picks will be winners.

Where was the 38 million bid you recently pumped? It was never filled.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175572020

The volume today was 786,000.

How are your stock picks CNNA, GVSI, MEDX, CIVX and HQGE doing? LOL!!!

You can't seem to pick a winner. I put my money on WNFT and you're stuck in Sharp's disaster.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174582628

lol had to chime in, he seriously can't be that dense no wonder why i likes to troll.

Apparently not. He's very confused about how this stock stuff works. You buy low and sell at a higher price, hold the rest for a huge run up. Huge bids came back recently on several bottom picks. 2025 will be a huge run for these types of stocks. It's setting up bigtime 🚀

don't you understand the difference between a BID and an ASK??????????????

That's even worse. A 38 million bid that never went through.

I don't check the trades because I already know this is a scam.

At least that person didn't lose money.

You are desperate and pathetic pumping non-existent trades!

its a BID-- SMH- don't you know the difference? Hope you don't trade OTC- no wonder you lost money

38m bid on Expert Market is very rare. His other one has a 55m bid on EM. It might be insiders in the know trying for end of year tax loss sellers. 2025 will be great here. I'm bidding with the insiders, currently why the heck not ❗️ 🤠

38m bidding. Biggest bid in a long time🚀

LOL!!!

A whopping $3800 that someone just lost in this scam.

Desperate pumping.

Yes. But it will be a fun way to go. Weeeee 🚀

Is it .0001's?? We got a long way to Go!! New Year new Money 💰

38m bidding. Biggest bid in a long time🚀

You got a LONG time before he'll have what he needs. I still can't find the lawsuit he needs to file against the TA to gain access to the records. You can't make a filing without that info, each filing has to account for shares issuances and conversions properly.

The question should be WHY is the TA refusing to give documented fraudster Jake P. Noch the documents he needs?

He said he would file a "friendly" (LOL!!!) lawsuit against the TA to get the books and still no record for the lawsuit which would be public information.

You got a LONG time before he'll have what he needs. I still can't find the lawsuit he needs to file against the TA to gain access to the records. You can't make a filing without that info, each filing has to account for shares issuances and conversions properly.

So until you see that, assume it is 1+ month from that date. He tweets about everything, so I doubt he would not announce the filing in NY.

https://x.com/Sunset_TG/status/1865061474382520649

When will the filings drop to otc markets ? 

Nevermind BCAP.
That's the smartest thing you have ever posted.

Nevermind BCAP. Have a Happy Holidays

CEO can post updates again here. Please let us know if there is anything new. Happy Holidays.

.000001
Enough said.

So success took a shot at you......what are you going to do Jake become unsuccessful??

4,959,700 .0001 x 177,200 .0003

No dumps.

CEO while regulators investigate the numerous tips and complaints.

FYI, one big issue that needs done is the court filing with the TA to get the records. Until Jake has the records, he cannot really do much. Filings require the company to review the shares. I just did a check of the NYS courts, I still do not see anything filed. There is a cycle time required there that Jake is not admitting in his timeline, it is Dec 14th. I have sued a company in the NYS supreme court system (and won). I doubt he is using he local courts, that would not make sense.

Therefore, the idea that this would be trading in Jan is just silly.

Here are several cases related to the TA, nothing happens for even a MONTH on average after the filing and we are now hitting the end of year were nothing new gets done. To even suggest getting current by early Jan is pure foolishness and he knows it. They have sat on their hands not filing the lawsuit in NYS for over a month now, these things take time.

This won't be trading before late Feb.

https://x.com/Sunset_TG/status/1867730130660983246

https://x.com/Sunset_TG/status/1867730130660983246

Thanks for the updates

Yep not incurring all those fees to stay at 0.0001! Merger should be good here

CEO will have almost half a million in this after all fees.

This will definitely have a huge pump in 2025.