United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarter ended: April 30, 2015
Commission file no.: 333-185572
BASTA HOLDINGS, CORP.
(Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)
Nevada
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
99-0367603
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1111 Kane Concourse, Suite 518, Bay Harbor
Islands, FL 33154
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip
Code)
Issuer's telephone number: (305) 867-1228
Indicate
by Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any. every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
|
Large accelerated filer |
o |
Accelerated filer |
o |
|
|
Non-accelerated filer |
o |
Smaller reporting company |
x |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o
No x
As of June 15, 2015 there were 3,730,000
shares of voting stock of the registrant issued and outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and
other publicly available documents may contain or incorporate statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Those statements appear in a number of places in this Form 10-K
and include statements regarding, among other matters, the state of the Aircraft/Crew/Maintenance/Insurance (“ACMI”)
leasing industry, our access to the capital markets, our ability to restructure contracts and operate aircraft, the structure of
our ACMI contracts and agreements, regulatory matters pertaining to compliance with governmental regulations and other factors
affecting our financial condition or results of operations. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,”
“plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates” and “should,” and variations
of these words and similar expressions, are used in many cases to identify these forward-looking statements. Any such forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual
results, performance or achievements, or industry results to vary materially from our future results, performance or achievements,
or those of our industry, expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, general
aviation industry, economic and business conditions, which will, among other things, affect demand for aircraft leasing, availability
and credit worthiness of current and prospective ACMI customers, contract rates, availability and cost of financing and operating
expenses, governmental actions and initiatives, and environmental and safety requirements, as well as the factors discussed under
“Item 1A. Risk Factors,” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
We file reports with the SEC. The SEC maintains
a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file
electronically with the SEC. including us. You can also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public
Reference Room at 100 F Street. NE. Washington. DC 20549. You can obtain additional information about the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
We undertake no obligation to revise or
update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect any event or circumstance that may arise after the date of this report,
except as required by law. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made throughout the entirety
of this quarterly report, which are designed to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
BASTA Holdings, Corp.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
| |
April 30, | | |
October 31, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Assets | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash | |
$ | 30,330 | | |
$ | 71,795 | |
Accounts receivable | |
| 1,392,894 | | |
| - | |
Deposits | |
| 50,000 | | |
| 50,000 | |
Prepaid Expense | |
| 10,000 | | |
| 281,899 | |
Total Current Assets | |
| 1,483,224 | | |
| 403,694 | |
Property and equipment, net | |
| 3,163 | | |
| 3,434 | |
Total Assets | |
$ | 1,486,387 | | |
$ | 407,128 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Liabilities and Stockholders Defecit | |
| | | |
| | |
Current Liabilities | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts payable | |
$ | 391,056 | | |
$ | 8,906 | |
Accrued liability | |
| - | | |
| 76,631 | |
Note payable | |
| 185,215 | | |
| - | |
Convertible note payable, net of discount | |
| 510,661 | | |
| 505,832 | |
Deferred revenue | |
| - | | |
| 62,400 | |
Advances payable - related party | |
| 29,528 | | |
| 29,528 | |
Derivative liability | |
| 50,034 | | |
| - | |
Total Current Liabilites | |
| 1,166,494 | | |
| 683,297 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Commitments and Contingencies | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Stockholders' Deficit | |
| | | |
| | |
Series A Preferred Stock $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized no shares issued and outstanding at April 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock $0.001 par value: 5,000,000 shares authorized, 37,500,000 shares issued and outstanding at April 30, 2015 and October
31, 2014 | |
| 38 | | |
| 38 | |
Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock $0.001 par value: 10,000 shares authorized, 10,000 shares issued and outstanding at April 30, 2015 and 0 shares issued
and outstanding at October 31, 2014 | |
| 10 | | |
| - | |
Common stock, $0.001 par
value;250,000,000 shares authorized; 3,730,000 shares issued and outstanding at April 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 | |
| 3,730 | | |
| 3,730 | |
Additional paid in capital | |
| 106,948 | | |
| 72,376 | |
Preferred stock receivable | |
| (1,000 | ) | |
| - | |
Accumulated deficit | |
| 210,167 | | |
| (352,313 | ) |
Total Stockholders' Deficit | |
| 319,893 | | |
| (276,169 | ) |
Total Liabilites and Stockholders' Deficit | |
$ | 1,486,387 | | |
$ | 407,128 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements
BASTA Holdings,
Corp.
Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
| |
For the | | |
For the | | |
For the | | |
For the | |
| |
three months | | |
three months | | |
six months | | |
six months | |
| |
ended | | |
ended | | |
ended | | |
ended | |
| |
April 30, | | |
April 30, | | |
April 30, | | |
April 30, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Commission Receivable, net | |
$ | 1,209,139 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 1,633,395 | | |
$ | 5,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Cost of commission Revenue | |
| 186,950 | | |
| - | | |
| 259,099 | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Gross Profit | |
| 1,022,189 | | |
| - | | |
| 1,374,296 | | |
| 5,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Operating Expense | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
General and administrative | |
| 484,206 | | |
| 151,493 | | |
| 717,856 | | |
| 162,428 | |
Depreciation | |
| 135 | | |
| - | | |
| 271 | | |
| - | |
Total operating expenses | |
| 484,341 | | |
| 151,493 | | |
| 718,127 | | |
| 162,428 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Income (loss) from operations | |
| 537,848 | | |
| (151,493 | ) | |
| 656,169 | | |
| (157,428 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Other income (expenses) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Derivative expense | |
| (50,034 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (50,034 | ) | |
| - | |
Interest expense | |
| (18,559 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (43,655 | ) | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net income (loss) before income taxes | |
| 469,255 | | |
| (151,493 | ) | |
| 562,480 | | |
| (157,428 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Provision for income tax | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net Loss | |
$ | 469,255 | | |
$ | (151,493 | ) | |
$ | 562,480 | | |
$ | (157,428 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net Loss per common share - Basic | |
$ | 0.13 | | |
$ | (0.04 | ) | |
$ | 0.15 | | |
$ | (0.04 | ) |
Net Loss per common share - Diluted | |
$ | 0.13 | | |
$ | (0.04 | ) | |
$ | 0.15 | | |
$ | (0.04 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted Averages Shares Outstanding - Basic | |
| 3,730,000 | | |
| 3,730,000 | | |
| 3,730,000 | | |
| 3,730,000 | |
Weighted Averages Shares Outstanding - Diluted | |
| 3,730,000 | | |
| 3,730,000 | | |
| 3,730,000 | | |
| 3,730,000 | |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
BASTA Holdings, Corp.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows
(unaudited)
| |
For the six months ended April 30, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Cash Flow From Operating Activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Net income (loss) | |
$ | 562,480 | | |
$ | (157,428 | ) |
Cash used in operating activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Depreciation expense | |
| 271 | | |
| 88 | |
Discount on convertible debenture | |
| 23,249 | | |
| - | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts receivable | |
| (1,392,894 | ) | |
| - | |
Deposits | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Prepaid expense | |
| 271,899 | | |
| 3,540 | |
Accounts payable | |
| 382,150 | | |
| 1,901 | |
Deferred revenue | |
| (62,400 | ) | |
| 13,000 | |
Accrued expense | |
| (56,254 | ) | |
| 40,232 | |
Derivative liability | |
| 50,034 | | |
| - | |
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities | |
| (221,465 | ) | |
| (98,667 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash Flow From Investing Activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Purchase of property and equipment | |
| - | | |
| (4,473 | ) |
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities | |
| - | | |
| (4,473 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash Flow From Financing Activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Net proceeds received from working capital advances | |
| - | | |
| 153,579 | |
Proceeds from issuance of note | |
| 180,000 | | |
| - | |
Payment of related party loan | |
| - | | |
| (639 | ) |
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | |
| 180,000 | | |
| 152,940 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net Change in Cash | |
| (41,465 | ) | |
| 49,800 | |
Cash, Beginning of Year | |
| 71,795 | | |
| 3,889 | |
Cash, End of Year | |
$ | 30,330 | | |
$ | 53,689 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow | |
| | | |
| | |
Information | |
| | | |
| | |
Cash paid for interest | |
$ | 30 | | |
$ | - | |
Cash paid for income Taxes | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Non-cash investing and financing activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Reclassification of loan payable-related party to paid in capital on forgiveness of loan | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 13,744 | |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS
Basta Holdings. Corp. (the "Company”,
“Basta”, “us”, “we”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 11. 2011
and intended to commence operations in the distribution of copper pipes and fittings for sanitary engineering. In January 2014,
the Company’s majority shareholder sold 100% of her ownership, which represented 80.43% of the Company’s outstanding
common shares, to a third party in a private transaction. Coincidental with this change of ownership, the Company discontinued
its previous business plan to distribute copper pipes and fittings and adopted a new business plan to provide aviation services
to third parties. Basta is a provider of contract procurement, aviation business development and aircraft management services for
fixed and rotary winged aircraft. Additional areas of existing and planned operational focus include provision of cargo aviation
services, long-term lease/charter management, fixed and rotary maintenance and overhaul service, business aviation, fixed base
operations (“FBO”) development and operation. The Company is currently under the leadership of Dr. Jacob Gitman, PhD,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
The Company’s primary service targets
include oil & gas companies, firefighting operators and governmental agencies. We seek to operate our business on a global
basis, providing aircraft and aviation services to customers in every major geographical region, including markets such as Asia,
the Pacific Rim, Latin America, the Middle East and Eastern Europe. Many of these markets are experiencing increased demand for
aviation services and have lower market saturation than more mature markets such as North America and Western Europe. We expect
that these markets will also present significant growth opportunities in upcoming years as the aging aircraft and infrastructure
in these markets require replacement and updates with new, modern facilities, technology and rugged fuel efficient aircraft. An
important focus of our strategy is meeting the needs of this replacement market. Governments and non-governmental organizations
(“NGO”s) in some of these markets have fewer alternatives, enabling us to command relatively higher contract rates
compared to those in more mature markets.
Our business plan seeks to mitigate the
risks of owning, operating and leasing aircraft through careful management and diversification of our ACMI contracts and counterparties
by geography, contract term, and aircraft age and type. We believe that diversification of our operating ACMI portfolio reduces
the risks associated with individual counterparty defaults and adverse geopolitical and regional economic events. We mitigate the
risks associated with cyclical variations in the aviation industry by managing customer concentrations and contract maturities
in our operating portfolio to minimize periods of concentrated contract expirations. In order to maximize residual values and minimize
the risk of obsolescence, our strategy is to lease and contract only rugged, easy to operate aircraft with proven track records
of field capable maintenance.
As of April 30, 2015, we provided management
advisory service for aircraft and provided ACMI contract advice to a globally diversified customer base comprised of 2 entities
(Monarch Air Group, LLC, and WAB International, Inc.). During 2014, we entered into several Letters of Intent with new partners
and are developing commitments to work with up to 18 additional aircraft.
As of April 30, 2015, all of our ACMI advised
contracts had the appropriately contracted number of aircraft assigned and operational.
Our capabilities include: ACMI Leasing,
Passenger and Cargo Operations, Aircraft Management Maintenance and Overhaul, Fixed Base Operator (FBO) Management, Logistics Management
for Construction, Mining, Logging, Remote Heavy Industry, Offshore Drilling Support, Aerial Mapping and Surveillance Services,
Air Ambulance, Logistical and Airlift Support Services, Search and Rescue, Very Important Person Transport, Emergency Evacuation,
Humanitarian Relief Efforts, Aviation Fuel Provision and Insertion and Extraction Operations.
The target market in which the Company
will focus its sales efforts is: the United Nations, the U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. State Department, the Canadian Department
of National Defense, the World Food Program, Fortune 500 Companies and worldwide NGOs.
Competition
The ACMI leasing of aircraft is highly
competitive. We face competition from aircraft manufacturers, banks, financial institutions, other ACMI leasing companies, aircraft
brokers and airlines. Some of our competitors may have greater operating and financial resources and access to lower capital costs
than we have. Competition for ACMI leasing transactions is based on a number of factors, including delivery dates, lease rates,
lease terms, other lease provisions, aircraft condition and the availability in the marketplace of the types of aircraft required
to meet the needs of aviation transport customers. Competition in the purchase and sale of used aircraft is based principally on
the availability of used aircraft, price, the terms of the lease to which an aircraft is subject and the creditworthiness of the
lessee, if any.
Government Regulation
The air transportation provider industry
is highly regulated. We operate commercial and private aircraft, and thus are directly subject to many industry laws and regulations,
such as regulations of the U S. Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”), the U.S. Department of Defense (“DOD”),
Department of State (the “DOS”), the U.S. Department of Transportation (“DOT”), or their counterpart organizations
in foreign countries regarding the operation of aircraft for public transportation of passengers and property. As discussed below,
we are subject to rigorous government regulation in a number of respects. In addition, our ACMI lessees are subject to extensive
regulation under the laws of the jurisdictions in which they are registered or operate. These laws govern, among other things,
the registration, operation, maintenance and condition of the aircraft.
We are required to register our aircraft
with an aviation authority mutually agreed upon with our ACMI lessee. Each aircraft registered to fly must have a Certificate of
Airworthiness, which is a certificate demonstrating the aircraft’s compliance with applicable government rules and regulations
and that the aircraft is considered airworthy. Each charter we lease requires a valid operation certificate to operate our aircraft.
We are required to maintain the Certificates of Airworthiness for the aircraft under ACMI lease.
Our involvement with the civil and governmental
aviation authorities of foreign jurisdictions consists largely of requests to register and deregister our aircraft on those countries’
registries. We are also subject to the regulatory authority of the DOD, the DOS and the U.S. Department of Commerce (the “DOC”)
to the extent such authority relates to the export of aircraft for lease and sale to foreign entities and the export of parts to
be installed on our aircraft. We may be required to obtain export licenses for parts installed in aircraft exported to foreign
countries. The DOC and the U.S. Department of the Treasury (through its Office of Foreign Assets Control) impose restrictions on
the operation of U.S.-made goods, such as aircraft and engines, in sanctioned countries, as well as on the ability of U.S. companies
to conduct business with entities in those countries. The U.S. Patriot Act of 2001 (the “Patriot Act”) prohibits financial
transactions by U.S. persons, including U.S. individuals, entities and charitable organizations, with individuals and organizations
designated as terrorists and terrorist supporters by the U.S. Secretary of State or the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury. The U.S.
Customs and Border Protection, a law enforcement agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, enforces regulations related
to the import of aircraft into the United States for maintenance or lease and the importation of parts into the U.S. for installation.
Jurisdictions in which aircraft are registered
as well as jurisdictions in which they operate may impose regulations relating to noise and emission standards. In addition, most
countries’ aviation laws require aircraft to be maintained under an approved maintenance program with defined procedures
and intervals for inspection, maintenance and repair. To the extent that aircraft are not subject to a lease or a lessee is not
in compliance, we are required to comply with such requirements, possibly at our own expense.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Basis of presentation
The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting
and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The Company has adopted
an October 31 fiscal year end.
Principles of consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Mercury Tours, Inc. All inter-company accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation for all periods presented.
Use of estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Fair value of financial instruments
The Company adopted the guidance of Accounting
Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 for fair value measurements which clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes
methods for measuring fair value, and establishes a fair value hierarchy to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value as
follows:
| · | Level 1-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices
in active markets for identical assets or liabilities available at the measurement date. |
| · | Level 2-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices
for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets
that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable
market data. |
| · | Level 3-Inputs are unobservable inputs
that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions on what assumptions the market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability based on the best available information. |
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated
balance sheets for cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, advances payable and deferred revenue approximate
their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The Company did not have any non-financial
assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of October 31, 2014 and 2013.
ASC 825-10 “Financial Instruments”,
allows entities to voluntarily choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value (fair value option). The
fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable, unless a new election date occurs. If
the fair value option is elected for an instrument, unrealized gains and losses for that instrument should be reported in earnings
at each subsequent reporting date. The Company did not elect to apply the fair value option to any outstanding instruments.
Cash and cash equivalents
For purposes of the consolidated statements
of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less and money
market accounts to be cash equivalents.
Accounts receivable
The Company recognizes an allowance for
losses on accounts receivable in an amount equal to the estimated probable losses net of recoveries. The allowance is
based on an analysis of historical bad debt experience, current receivables aging, and expected future write-offs, as well as an
assessment of specific identifiable customer accounts considered at risk or uncollectible. Management determined that
an allowance was not required as of the balance sheet dates.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment are carried at cost
and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The cost of repairs and maintenance
is expensed as incurred; major replacements and improvements are capitalized. When assets are retired or disposed of, the cost
and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gains or losses are included in income in the year
of disposition. The Company examines the possibility of decreases in the value of fixed assets when events or changes in circumstances
reflect the fact that their recorded value may not be recoverable.
Impairment of long-lived assets
In accordance with ASC Topic 360, the Company
reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets
may not be fully recoverable, or at least annually. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the sum of expected undiscounted
future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. The amount of impairment is measured as the difference between
the asset’s estimated fair value and its book value. The Company did not record any impairment charges as of January 31,
2015
Revenue recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive
evidence of an arrangement exists, products are fully delivered or services have been provided, the purchase price is fixed or
determinable and collection is reasonably assured. Revenue from helicopter services on an “ad hoc” basis, which usually
entails a short contract notice period and duration, is recognized as the related services are performed and is based on a monthly
fixed fee plus additional fees for each hour flown. The Company works as an agent between its customers and the service
providers under these “ad hoc” service arrangements. Therefore, the Company recognizes revenue under these
arrangements on the net amount retained; which is the amount billed to the customer less the amount paid to the service providers.
Income taxes
The Company is governed by the income tax
laws of the United States of America. The Company accounts for income tax using the liability method prescribed by ASC 740, “Income
Taxes”. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial
reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates that will be in effect in the year in which the differences
are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance to offset deferred tax assets if based on the weight of available
evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The effect on
deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or loss in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company applies the provisions of ASC
740-10-50, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”, which provides clarification related to the process associated
with accounting for uncertain tax positions recognized in our consolidated financial statements. Audit periods remain open for
review until the statute of limitations has passed. The completion of review or the expiration of the statute of limitations for
a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the Company’s liability for income taxes. Any such adjustment could
be material to the Company’s results of operations for any given quarterly or annual period based, in part, upon the results
of operations for the given period. As of April 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014, the Company had no uncertain tax positions, and
will continue to evaluate for uncertain positions in the future. The Company is subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations
for the tax year ended October 31, 2012 through October 31, 2014.
Advertising
Advertising is expensed as incurred and
is included in general and administrative expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Stock-based compensation
Stock-based compensation is accounted for
based on the requirements of the Share-Based Payment Topic of ASC 718 which requires recognition in the consolidated financial
statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period
the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). The
ASC also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date
fair value of the award.
Pursuant to ASC Topic 505-50, for share-based
payments to consultants and other third-parties, compensation expense is determined at the “measurement date.” The
expense is recognized over the service period of the award. Until the measurement date is reached, the total amount of compensation
expense remains uncertain. The Company initially records compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the reporting
date. The Company issued no stock based compensation during the period ending January 31, 2015.
Net income (loss) per share of common
stock
The Company computes income (loss) per
share in accordance with “ASC-260”, “Earnings per Share” which requires presentation of both basic
and diluted earnings per share on the face of the statement of operations. Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing
net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.
Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock, common
stock equivalents and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during each period. During last year, 37,500 shares of Series
B Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value (“Series B Preferred Stock”) were issued. 10,000 shares of Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value (“Series C Preferred Stock”) were issued in April 2015. These
shares were not included in weighted average shares outstanding on a diluted basis because the effect of inclusion is anti-dilutive.
Related party transactions
A related party is generally defined as
(i) any person that holds 10% or more of the Company's securities including such person's immediate families, (ii) the Company's
management, (iii) someone that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the Company, or
(iv) anyone who can significantly influence the financial and operating decisions of the Company. A transaction is considered to
be a related party transaction when there is a transfer of resources or obligations between related parties.
The Company’s President, Treasurer,
Chief Executive Office, Chief Financial Officer and director, Jacob Gitman, owns 90% of Monarch Air Group, LLC (“Monarch”).
Effective January 31, 2014, the Company
entered into an Exclusive Agreement for the Promotion and Marketing of Services of Monarch. Upon execution of this agreement,
the Company received a one-time fee of $5,000, which has been reflected in revenues for the year ended October 31, 2014,
and Monarch agreed to pay us 10% of gross sales generated from the flight services under this agreement. No fees were paid to Basta
from Monarch due to this arrangement, and no revenues were generated from this contract as of April 30, 2015.
On May 30, 2014, the Company entered into
an Aircraft Management Agreement with Monarch. Pursuant to that Agreement, Monarch agreed to use, maintain and operate a Beechcraft
400 that the Company leases. Monarch agreed to maintain the aircraft and manage it at the Company’s expense and
cost and the Company agreed to pay Monarch 10% of all funds received for Charters in any given month. Additionally,
pilot salaries and benefits and other expenses, as defined, will be paid by the Company. Basta received no payments from Monarch
from this agreement, and no revenue was generated from this contract as of April 30, 2015.
Recent accounting pronouncements
In August 2014, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) 2014-15 requiring an entity’s
management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about entity’s
ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year
after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). The amendments in this Update are effective
for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application
is permitted.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09
which outlines a single comprehensive model for companies to use when accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers.
The core principle of the revenue recognition model is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of goods and services
to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods
or services. In order to achieve this core principle a company must apply the following steps in determining revenue recognition:
● |
Identify the contract(s) with a customer. |
● |
Identify the performance obligations in the contract. |
● |
Determine the transaction price. |
● |
Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract. |
● |
Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. |
The amendments in this ASU are effective
for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 including interim periods within that reporting period with early
application not allowed. Management is currently assessing whether the implementation of ASU 2014-09 will have any material effect
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04,
an update to ASC 310, "Receivables." The ASU clarifies that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs upon either
the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property or the borrower conveying all interest in the residential
real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar
legal agreement. The amendments are effective for annual periods, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning
after December 15, 2014. The amendments may be adopted using either a modified retrospective transition method or a prospective
transition method. Early adoption of the guidance is permitted. The impact of this guidance is currently being evaluated by the
Company, but is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or disclosures.
NOTE 3 - ADVANCES PAYABLE
During the year ended October 31, 2014,
the Company received advances from WAB for working capital purposes. The advances bear no interest, are payable on demand
and are unsecured. At April 30, 2015, the Company owed WAB $29,528.
NOTE 4 - CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE
On August 21, 2014, the Company entered
into a 6% Secured Convertible Debenture. The debenture carries a one year term. The debenture was issued in the amount of $500,000.
The debenture has a conversion feature at a share price of $6.70. The Company recognized a beneficial conversion feature (BCF)
due to the intrinsic value of the conversion rate compared to the market price of the common stock as of the grant date. A discount
is computed based on the share value at the time of issuance and amortized over the period of the debenture.
| |
April 30, 2015 | | |
October 31, 2014 | |
Convertible debenture – related party | |
$ | 500,000 | | |
$ | 500,000 | |
Beneficial conversion feature | |
| (10,333 | ) | |
| - | |
Accumulated interest | |
| 20,994 | | |
| - | |
Convertible debenture, net of BCF | |
$ | 510,661 | | |
$ | 500,000 | |
NOTE 5 - NOTE PAYABLE
The Company entered into a 6% Promissory
Note. The note matures on May 6, 2015. The note was issued in the amount of $180,000 on November 5, 2014.
| |
April 30, 2015 | |
Note payable | |
$ | 180,000 | |
Accumulated interest | |
| 5,215 | |
Note payable | |
$ | 185,215 | |
NOTE 6 – DERIVATIVE LIABILITY
The Company entered into a Financial Advisory
Agreement which included the sale of 10,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock. The shares of Series C Preferred Stock are convertible
into common shares equivalent to 9.99% ownership interest of the company at the time of conversion. The shares can be converted
at any time. The conversion feature of the shares of Series C Preferred Stock resulted in a derivate liability for the company
based on the value of the common shares if converted.
The Company assesses the fair value of
the conversion using the Black Scholes pricing model and records a derivative expense for the value. The Company then assesses
the fair value of the shares quarterly based on the Black Scholes Model and increases or decreases the liability to the new value,
and records a corresponding gain or loss. The Company uses expected volatility based primarily on historical volatility using weekly
pricing observations for recent periods that correspond to the expected life of the warrants. The risk-free interest rate is based
on U.S. Treasury securities rates.
| |
March 31, 2015 | |
Risk-free interest rate at grant date | |
| .11 | % |
Expected stock price volatility | |
| 329 | % |
Expected dividend payout | |
| – | |
Expected option in life-years | |
| 1 | |
As of April 30, 2015, total derivative
liability is $50,034 and the derivate expense for the agreement was $50,034.
NOTE 7 - STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
On April 10, 2014, the Company amended
its articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share from 75,000,000
common shares to 250,000,000 common shares. Additionally, the Company changed its capitalization to include 5,000,000 shares of
Series A Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value (“Series A Preferred Stock”), and 5,000,000 shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock, which are issuable at the discretion of the board of directors.
On April 1, 2015, the Company approved
amended it articles of incorporation to, among other items, increase the authorized preferred stock of the Company from 10,000,000
to 20,000,000 shares. On April 16, 2015, the Company designated 10,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, all of which were issued
to The Vantage Group, Ltd (the “Consultant”).
Series A Preferred Stock
Dividends shall be paid on Series A Preferred
Stock at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock shall be entitled to ten (10) votes on
all shareholder matters.
Series B Preferred Stock
Dividends shall be paid on the Series B
Preferred Stock at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Upon the request of the holder, each share of Series B Preferred Stock
shall be convertible into two (2) shares of Common Stock. Shares of Series B Preferred Stock shall not be entitled to vote on any
shareholder matter and shall have no voting rights whatsoever.
As of January 31, 2015, the Company had
3,730,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, no Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding, and 37,500 Series
B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
Series C Preferred Stock
The Company may not declare, pay or set
aside any dividends on shares of any other class or series of capital stock of the Company unless the holders of the Series C Preferred
Stock then outstanding shall first receive, or simultaneously receive, a dividend on each outstanding share of Series C Preferred
Stock that is equal to or greater than the dividend to be paid to any other class or series of capital stock of the Company. The
Series C Preferred Stock has a stated value of $.001 per share and is convertible into 9.99% of the Company’s issued and
outstanding shares of common stock, calculated on a fully diluted basis.
On April 23, 2015, the Company issued the
Consultant 10,000 shares of its Series C Preferred Stock. The share are unpaid as of April 30, 2015
NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS
Material agreements
On January 31, 2014, the Company entered
into the following two agreements:
Agreement with WAB
Effective January 31, 2014, the Company
entered into an Exclusive Agreement for Management related to two of WAB’s aviation services contracts. As consideration
for this agreement, the Company originally agreed to amend its articles of incorporation to authorize the issuance of a number
of shares of Series A Preferred Stock to be determined at a later date and each such share was to entitle the holder to a certain
number of votes. As the terms of this proposed agreement had not been finalized at January 31, 2014, the proposed issuance of the
undetermined number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock was not recorded in the Company’s financial statements at January
31, 2014. On March 12, 2014, prior to the amendment of the Company’s articles of incorporation and prior to the determination
of the number of shares of Series A Preferred Stock to be issued or the issuance of any such shares, the Company amended the agreement
while maintaining the same effective date. The amended agreement calls for the Company to provide management services which include
vendor and financial management under two of WAB’s contracts. The amendment provides that the Company will be
paid ten percent (10%) of the gross revenues from the two contracts and eliminated the Company’s obligation to issue any
shares of Series A Preferred Stock to WAB.
The Company has entered into an
agreement with WAB to provide helicopters on ACMI basis.
WAB provides airlift support, dedicated
helicopters and rotary and fixed wing aircraft to international clientele. WAB’s services include cargo and passenger transportation,
logging, mining support, offshore drilling support, relief efforts, firefighting and search-and-rescue.
As of April 30, 2015, the Company had not
commenced any activities pursuant to the Exclusive Agreement for Management. On May 1, 2014, the Company’s management decided
to amend the agreement with WAB to enable Basta to enter into its own management services agreements with customers, some of which
include former customers of WAB.
Agreement with Monarch
Effective January 31, 2014, the Company
entered into an Exclusive Agreement for the Promotion and Marketing of Services of Monarch, 90% of which is owned by the Company’s
President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Office, Chief Financial Officer and director, Jacob Gitman. Upon execution of this agreement,
the Company received a one-time fee of $5,000, which has been reflected in revenues for the year ended October 31, 2014.
In addition, Monarch agreed to pay the Company 10% of gross sales generated from the flight services under this agreement. During
2015 no fees were paid to the Company from Monarch due to this arrangement.
Monarch is a Florida limited liability
company that is in the business of providing aircraft, crew maintenance and insurance leases for rotary and fixed wing aircraft
as well as chartering on-demand private, corporate and luxury flights. No revenues were generated from this contract as of April
30, 2015.
Operating
lease
On April 20, 2014 and effective on May
5, 2014, the Company entered into a two year Aircraft Dry Operating Lease Agreement (the “Aircraft Dry Lease”) with
an individual in connection with the lease of an aircraft. The Aircraft Dry Lease expires on May 6, 2016, can be renewed by agreement
in writing by all parties, and can be cancelled at any time with at least 60 day notice to the other without cause. Payments due
pursuant to Aircraft Dry Lease are $10,000 per month plus $700 per flight hours flown in the previous month. Upon receipt of the
aircraft, it was determined that it had maintenance issues that would keep it from safely flying for a significant period, and
so the lease was adjusted to start once the aircraft is deemed safe for flight. The lease did not commence as of the date of these
financial statements.
On May 30, 2014, we entered into an Aircraft
Management Agreement with Monarch. Pursuant to that Agreement, Monarch agreed to use, maintain and operate a Beechcraft 400 that
the Company leases. Monarch agreed to maintain the aircraft and manage it at the Company’s expense and cost and
the Company agreed to pay Monarch 10% of all funds received for Charters in any given month. Additionally, pilot salaries
and benefits and other expenses, as defined, will be paid by the Company. As of April 30, 2015, the Company received no payments
from Monarch from this agreement.
Letter of Intent with Peruvian Company
On August 15, 2014, we entered into a Letter
of Intent (“LOI”) with Heliflight Peru SAC ("Heliflight Peru") which provides the framework for the leasing
of helicopters to Heliflight Peru. Both parties had 90 days to complete due diligence and to execute a final agreement and one
hundred twenty (120) days to close the transaction. The LOI requires that once a final agreement is reached, Heliflight Peru will
be required to lease helicopters with certain minimum hours. The amount of revenues that the Company will generate if a final agreement
is reached is to be determined. There is of no assurance that a final agreement will be reached, as the initial term of the LOI
has expired and the parties to the LOI have not entered into another written agreement.
Letter of Intent with Colombian Company
On August 19, 2014, we entered into a Letter
of Intent with Heli Jet S.A.S. ("Heli Jet") which provides the framework for us acquiring 49% of Heli Jet, which is located
in Bogota, Colombia. Heli Jet is a general aviation company with two locations in Colombia that specializes in providing fixed
wing aircraft leases primarily in the form of chartered jets for corporate executives. The amount of revenues which the Company
will generate if a final agreement is reached is to be determined. There is no assurance that a final agreement will be reached.
NOTE 9 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management has evaluated all subsequent
events through the date of filing and there are no reportable events.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Overview
Please see Note 1 to the Company’s
Condensed Financial Statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Current Operating Environment and Outlook
After a decade of unprecedented defense
spending to support operations in Afghanistan and throughout the Middle East, our industry is adjusting to a period of reduced
funding and budget uncertainty brought about by the convergence of a variety of policy, political and fiscal realities. These factors
include the ongoing draw-down of U.S. troops in Afghanistan, and governmental spending cuts. While there exists potential challenges
that could adversely impact our business on a short term basis, we believe the longer term industry trends are positive and will
result in continued demand in our target markets for the types of services we provide. Such trends include the realignment of the
military force structure, leading to increased outsourcing of non-combat functions, including life-cycle asset management functions
ranging from organizational to depot-level maintenance;
While determining the size and scope of
the U.S. and international presence in Afghanistan is dependent on concluding a Bilateral Security Agreement (“BSA”),
we still anticipate remaining issues will be resolved and that there will be opportunities to support the enduring U.S. and NATO
presence. Support opportunities include the U.S. Department of State (“DoS”), which is expected to expand and include
the U.S. embassy in Kabul and four consulates around the country. Additionally, we anticipate that there will be a continued need
to advise, assist and help professionalize Afghan National Security Forces for many years, as specified in the U.S. Afghanistan
Strategic Partnership Agreement.
In the Middle East, we expect instability
and challenges to our customer’s regional relationships will persist. However, we believe U.S. defense ties and presence
throughout the region will continue to be of vital strategic interest to the U.S. and its allies. We believe that our aviation
services and support will be key enablers in this environment and we are especially well positioned to provide these services to
both U.S. forces and Allied nations. Finally, the re-balance to Asia reflects the increased importance of the Asia-Pacific regions,
in both security and economic terms for the U.S. As the U.S. revitalizes and reinforces its presence in this vital region, we expect
to see increased demand for our services to our existing and future customer base.
A convergence of market factors have led
us to recognize a significant opportunity to establish a super-competitive Independent Aviation Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul
(MRO) service strategically located in the U.S. to satisfy soaring demands of the world’s commercial jet transport fleet.
We are pursuing a strategy that not only recognizes the enormous opportunity that these factors are creating, but also introduces
a market-changing business model to rapidly gain customers and control market share for sustainable long-term growth. Once established
and operated domestically, we plan on replicating our MRO business model in the rapidly expanding aviation markets of China and
the former Soviet Union.
Results of Operations for the Three
Months Ended April 30, 2015 Compared to the Three Months Ended April 30, 2014
Revenue
We recognized $1,209,139 net revenues in
the three months ended April 30, 2015 compared to net revenues of $0 for the three months ended April 30, 2014. The Company received
$2,840,029 from one customer, resulting in commission revenues of $1,209,139. The Company commenced operations as a provider of
aviation services in February 2014.
Operating Expenses
During the three month period ending April
30, 2015, we incurred general and administrative expenses and professional fees of $484,206, an increase of $332,713 compared to
$151,493 incurred during the same period in 2014. General and administrative expenses incurred during the three months ended April
30, 2015 were generally related to corporate overhead, financial and administrative contracted services, such as legal and accounting,
developmental costs, and marketing expenses.
Interest Expense
During the three months ended April 30,
2015, the company incurred interest expense in the amount of $18,559 compared to $0 for the three months ended April 30, 2014,
of which $8,201 was related to the beneficial conversion feature relating to a $500,000 convertible note entered into on August
21, 2014.
Derivative expense
During the three months ended April 30
2015, the company incurred derivative liability expense of $50,034 compared to $0 for the three months ended April 30, 2014. The
derivative expense resulted from the conversion feature from the sale of preferred stock in connation with a financial advisory
agreement, see Note 6.
Net Income
Our net income for the three months ended
April 30, 2015 was $469,255 as compared to a net loss of $151,493 for the same period in 2014 due to the factors described above.
Results of Operations for the Six
Months Ended April 30, 2015 Compared to the Six Months Ended April 30, 2014
Revenue
We recognized $1,633,395 net revenues in
the six months ended April 30, 2015 compared to net revenues of $5,000 for the six months ended April 30, 2014. The Company received
$4,538,694 from one customer resulted in commission revenues of $1,633,395. The Company commenced operations as a provider of aviation
services in February 2014.
Operating Expenses
During the six month period ending April
30, 2015, we incurred general and administrative expenses and professional fees of $717,856, an increase of $555,428 compared to
$162,428 incurred during the same period in 2014. General and administrative expenses incurred during the six months ended April
30, 2015 were generally related to corporate overhead, financial and administrative contracted services, such as legal and accounting,
developmental costs, and marketing expenses.
Interest Expense
During the six months ended April 30, 2015,
the company incurred interest expense in the amount of $43,655 compared to $0 for the six months ended April 30, 2014, of which
$23,249 was related to the beneficial conversion feature relating to a $500,000 convertible note entered into on August 21, 2014.
Derivative expense
During the six months ended April 30 2015,
the company incurred derivative liability expense of $50,034 compared to $0 for the six months ended April 30, 2014. The derivative
expense resulted from the conversion feature from the sale of preferred stock in connation with a financial advisory agreement,
see Note 6.
Net Income
Our net income for the six months ended
April 30, 2015 was $562,480 as compared to a net loss of $157,428 for the same period in 2014 due to the factors described above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We cannot be certain that the economic
environment or other factors will not adversely impact our business, financial condition or results of operations in the future.
We believe that our primary sources of liquidity of strong customer collections will enable us to continue to perform under our
existing relationships and support further growth of our business. However, adverse conditions, such as a long term credit crisis
or sequestration, could adversely affect our ability to obtain additional liquidity at acceptable terms or at all.
We are planning to finance the operations
of our business with available cash balances, internally generated funds, ACMI leasing, aircraft acquisition and trading activity,
and debt financings. In 4th quarter 2015, the Company plans on acquiring a corporate credit rating in an effort to
lower our cost of funds and broadening our access to attractively priced capital.
Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended
April 30, 2015 Compared to the Six Months Ended April 30, 2014
As of April 30, 2015, we had cash and cash
equivalents of $30,330, accounts receivable of $1,392,894, Deposits of $50,000, prepaid expenses of $10,000. Net
cash used in operating activities for the six months ended April 30, 2015 was approximately $221,465. Current liabilities of $1,166,494
consisted of: $391,056 for accounts payable, convertible debenture of $510,661, note payable of $185,215, derivative liability
of $50,034 and advances payable – related party $29,528. As of April 30, 2015, we have a negative working capital of $316,730.
The accompanying financial statements have
been prepared contemplating a continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company incurred operating gain (losses) of $562,480
and ($157,428) for the six months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
We have not generated positive cash flows
from operating activities. For the six months ended April 30, 2015, net cash flows used in operating activities was $221,465. Net
cash flows from operating activities was $98,667 for the six months ended April 30, 2014. Most of the 2015 net cash flow used in
operating activities was related to the prepayment of costs associated with ACMI contracts.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
We used $0 from investing activities
during the six months ended April 30, 2015 compared to $4,473 in 2014, for the purchase of property and equipment during 2014.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
For the six months ended April 30, 2015,
we generated net cash flows of $180,000 from the issuance of a note. This compares to $152,940 during six months ended April 30,
2014, from working capital advances.
Plan of Operations and Funding; Risks
and Uncertainties Related to Our Future Capital Requirements
We expect that working capital requirements
will continue to be funded through a combination of our existing funds and further issuances of securities. Our working capital
requirements are expected to increase in line with the growth of our business.
Existing working capital, further advances
and debt instruments, and anticipated cash flow are expected to be adequate to fund our operations over the next twelve months.
We have no lines of credit or other bank financing arrangements. Generally, we have financed operations to date through the proceeds
of the private placement of equity and debt instruments. In connection with our business plan, management anticipates additional
increases i operating expenses and capital expenditures relating to: (i) acquisition of inventory; (ii) developmental expenses
associated with a start-up business; and (iii) marketing expenses. We intend to finance these expenses with further issuances of
securities, and debt issuances. Thereafter, we expect we will need to raise additional capital and generate revenues to meet long-term
operating requirements. Additional issuances of equity or convertible debt securities will result in dilution to our current shareholders.
Further, such securities might have rights, preferences or privileges senior to our common stock. Additional financing may not
be available upon acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we
may not be able to take advantage of prospective new business endeavors or opportunities, which could significantly and materially
restrict our business operations.
Plans to open FBO and MRO operations: The
Company in anticipates that it will complete its development project for opening MRO’s and FBO’s sometime in the late
4th Quarter of 2015. There are currently no revenue projections or business plans discussing same.
Contractual obligations
The Company’s management anticipates
that the agreement(s) described in Note 8 to the Company’s Condensed Financial Statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q between itself, Monarch and WAB will continue along the currently existing lines. There are no additional
contractual expansions planned for 2015.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements
as defined by Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk.
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported as specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information required to be disclosed by us in reports
that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)
and our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), Jacob Gitman, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management,
with the participation of our CEO and CFO, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
as of April 30, 2015.
Based on this evaluation we concluded that
as of April 30, 2015 our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective such that the information relating to our company
required to be disclosed in our SEC reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in SEC rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure as a result of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting including deficiencies
in properly documenting customer and supplier relationships and revenue recognition procedures.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
No changes in the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting have come to management’s attention during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that
have materially affected, or are likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
The Company knows of no legal proceedings
to which it is a party or to which any of its property is the subject which are pending, threatened or contemplated or any unsatisfied
judgments against the Company.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults In Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
31.1 |
Section 302 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer * |
32.1 |
Section 906 Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer** |
101.INS |
XBRL Instance Document * |
101.SCH |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document * |
101.CAL |
XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document * |
101.LAB |
XBRL Taxonomy Labels Linkbase Document * |
101.PRE |
XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document * |
101.DEF |
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document * |
|
*Filed Herewith. |
|
** Furnished Herewith. |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Basta Holdings, Corp. |
|
|
|
Date: June 15, 2015 |
By: |
/s/ Jacob Gitman |
|
|
Jacob Gitman |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of the Principal Executive
Officer
Pursuant to §240.13a−14 or §240.15d−14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
I, Jacob Gitman, certify that:
1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Basta Holdings, Corp.;
2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;
3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed
such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
(d) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 15, 2015
|
/s/ Jacob Gitman |
|
Jacob Gitman |
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Basta Holdings, Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Jacob Gitman, the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:
1. The
Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
This certificate is being made for the
exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Executive Officer and the Treasurer of the Company with the requirements of Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than
as specifically required by law.
Date: June
15, 2015
|
By: |
/s/ Jacob Gitman |
|
Name: |
Jacob Gitman |
|
Title: |
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
BlackPoll Fleet (CE) (USOTC:BPOL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2024 to Jan 2025
BlackPoll Fleet (CE) (USOTC:BPOL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jan 2024 to Jan 2025