UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Amendment
No. 2
To
FORM
20-F
|
¨
|
|
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
OR
|
x
|
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December
31, 2011
|
OR
|
¨
|
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
For
the transition period from ____ to ______
|
OR
|
¨
|
|
SHELL
COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
Date
of event requiring this shell company report:
|
|
Commission
file number: 001-33491
|
|
DEJOUR
ENERGY INC.
(Exact name of Registrant
as specified in its charter)
Province
of British Columbia, Canada
(Jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
598
- 999 Canada Place
Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3E1
(Address of principal
executive offices)
Mathew
Wong
598 - 999 Canada Place
Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3E1
Tel: (604) 638-5050
Facsimile: (604)
638-5051
(Name, Telephone,
E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of Each Class
|
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered
|
|
|
|
Common Shares,
without par value
|
|
NYSE Amex Equities
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section
12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities
for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
Indicate
the number of outstanding shares of each of the Registrant’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period
covered by the annual report:
130,786,069 common shares as at April 26, 2012
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
¨
No
x
If this
report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
¨
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant
is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large
accelerated filer
¨
|
Accelerated
filer
¨
|
Non-accelerated
filer
x
|
Indicate by check mark which basis of
accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S.
GAAP
¨
|
|
International
Financial Reporting Standards as issued
x
|
Other
¨
|
|
by
the International Accounting Standards Board
|
If “Other” has been checked
in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:
Item
17
¨
Item 18
¨
If this
is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes
¨
No
x
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This Amendment No. 2 (“Amendment No. 2”) to the
Annual Report on Form 20-F of Dejour Energy Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, originally
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 30, 2012 (the “Original Report”)
and amended on May 23, 2012, is being filed in order to address certain comments received from the Staff of the SEC.
This Amendment No. 2 speaks as of the
initial filing date of the Original Report, as amended. Other than as expressly set forth above, no part of the Original Report,
as amended, is being amended. Accordingly, other than as discussed above, this Amendment No. 2 does not purport to amend, update
or restate any other information or disclosure included in the Original Report, as amended, or reflect any events that have occurred
after the initial filing date of the Original Report, as amended. As a result, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, as amended, continues to speak as of April 26, 2012 or, to the extent applicable,
such other date as may be indicated in the Original Report, as amended.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GENERAL INFORMATION
|
4
|
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
|
4
|
CURRENCY AND EXCHANGE RATES
|
5
|
ABBREVIATIONS
|
5
|
PART I
|
6
|
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS.
|
6
|
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE.
|
6
|
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION.
|
6
|
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
|
18
|
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
39
|
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
|
39
|
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES.
|
47
|
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS.
|
60
|
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
|
63
|
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
|
64
|
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
|
68
|
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
84
|
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
|
86
|
PART II
|
87
|
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
|
87
|
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS
AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
87
|
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
87
|
ITEM 16. [RESERVED]
|
88
|
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
|
88
|
ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS
|
88
|
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
89
|
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
|
89
|
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND
AFFILIATED PERSONS
|
90
|
ITEM 16F. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
|
90
|
ITEM 16G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
90
|
ITEM 16H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
|
91
|
PART III
|
92
|
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
92
|
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
92
|
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
|
93
|
SIGNATURES
|
95
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
F-1
|
GENERAL
INFORMATION
All references in this annual report on
Form 20-F to the terms “we”, “our”, “us”, “the Company” and “Dejour”
refer to Dejour Energy Inc.
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report on Form 20-F and the
documents incorporated herein by reference contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements concern our anticipated results and developments in
the our operations in future periods, planned exploration and, if warranted, development of our properties, plans related to our
business and other matters that may occur in the future. These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based
on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management.
Any statements that express or involve
discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or
performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects” or “does not expect”, “is
expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “estimates”
or “intends”, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”,
“might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking
statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this annual report on Form 20-F concern, among other things:
|
·
|
drilling
inventory,
drilling
plans and
timing of
drilling,
re-completion
and tie-in
of wells;
|
|
·
|
productive
capacity
of wells,
anticipated
or expected
production
rates and
anticipated
dates of
commencement
of production;
|
|
·
|
drilling,
completion
and facilities
costs;
|
|
·
|
results
of our various
projects;
|
|
·
|
ability
to lower
cost structure
in certain
of our projects;
|
|
·
|
our
growth expectations;
|
|
·
|
timing
of development
of undeveloped
reserves;
|
|
·
|
the
performance
and characteristics
of the Company’s
oil and
natural
gas properties;
|
|
·
|
oil
and natural
gas production
levels;
|
|
·
|
the
quantity
of oil and
natural
gas reserves;
|
|
·
|
capital
expenditure
programs;
|
|
·
|
supply
and demand
for oil
and natural
gas and
commodity
prices;
|
|
·
|
the
impact of
federal,
provincial,
and state
governmental
regulation
on Dejour;
|
|
·
|
expected
levels of
royalty
rates, operating
costs, general
administrative
costs, costs
of services
and other
costs and
expenses;
|
|
·
|
expectations
regarding
our ability
to raise
capital
and to continually
add to reserves
through
acquisitions,
exploration
and development;
|
|
·
|
treatment
under governmental
regulatory
regimes
and tax
laws; and
|
|
·
|
realization
of the anticipated
benefits
of acquisitions
and dispositions.
|
These statements relate to analyses and
other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of
our management.
Forward-looking statements are subject
to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from
those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:
|
·
|
risks
related
to the marketability
and price
of oil and
natural
gas being
affected
by factors
outside
our control;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to world
oil and
natural
gas prices
being quoted
in U.S.
dollars
and our
production
revenues
being adversely
affected
by an appreciation
in the Canadian
dollar;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our ability
to execute
projects
being dependent
on factors
outside
our control;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to oil and
gas exploration
having a
high degree
of risk
and exploration
efforts
failing;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to cumulative
unsuccessful
exploration
efforts;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to oil and
natural
gas operations
involving
hazards
and operational
risks;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to seasonal
factors
and unexpected
weather;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to competition
in the oil
and gas
industry;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to the fact
that we
do not control
all of the
assets that
are used
in the operation
of our business;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our ability
to market
oil and
natural
gas depending
on its ability
to transport
the product
to market;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to high
demand for
drilling
equipment;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to title
to our properties;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our ability
to continue
to meet
its oil
and gas
lease or
license
obligations;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our anticipated
substantial
capital
needs for
future acquisitions;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our cash
flow from
reserves
not being
sufficient
to fund
its ongoing
operations;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to covenants
in issued
debt restricting
the ability
to conduct
future financings;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our being
exposed
to third
party credit
risks;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our being
able to
find, acquire,
develop
and commercially
produce
oil and
natural
gas;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our properties
not producing
as projected;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our estimated
reserves
being based
upon estimates;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to future
oil and
gas revenues
not resulting
in revenue
increases;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our managing
growth;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our being
dependent
on key personnel;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our operations
being subject
to federal,
state, local
and other
laws, controls
and regulations;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to uncertainty
regarding
claims of
title and
right of
aboriginal
people;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to environmental
laws and
regulations;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our facilities,
operations
and activities
emitting
greenhouse
gases;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our not
having paid
dividends
to date;
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our stock
price being
volatile;
and
|
|
·
|
risks
related
to our being
a foreign
private
issuer.
|
This list is not exhaustive of the factors
that may affect any of our forward-looking statements. Some of the important risks and uncertainties that could affect forward-looking
statements are described further under the section heading “Item 3. Key Information – D. Risk Factors” below.
If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materializes, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results
may vary materially from those expected, estimated or projected. Forward-looking statements in this document are not a prediction
of future events or circumstances, and those future events or circumstances may not occur. Given these uncertainties, users of
the information included herein, including investors and prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
forward-looking statements. Investors should consult our quarterly and annual filings with Canadian and U.S. securities commissions
for additional information on risks and uncertainties relating to forward-looking statements. We do not assume responsibility
for the accuracy and completeness of these statements.
Forward-looking statements are based on
our beliefs, opinions and expectations at the time they are made, and we do not assume any obligation to update our forward-looking
statements if those beliefs, opinions, or expectations, or other circumstances, should change, except as required by applicable
law.
We qualify all the forward-looking
statements contained in this annual report on Form 20-F by the foregoing cautionary statements.
CURRENCY
AND EXCHANGE RATES
Canadian Dollars Per U.S. Dollar
Unless otherwise indicated, all references
in this annual report are to Canadian dollars ("$" or "Cdn$").
The following tables set forth the number
of Canadian dollars required to buy one United States dollar (US$) based on the average, high and low nominal noon exchange rate
as reported by the Bank of Canada for each of the last five fiscal years and each of the last six months. The average rate
means the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period.
|
|
Canadian Dollars
Per One U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Average for the period
|
|
|
0.9891
|
|
|
|
1.0345
|
|
|
|
1.1416
|
|
|
|
1.0592
|
|
|
|
1.0697
|
|
|
|
March
2012
|
|
|
February
2012
|
|
|
January
2012
|
|
|
December
2011
|
|
|
November
2011
|
|
|
October
2011
|
|
High for the period
|
|
|
1.0015
|
|
|
|
1.0016
|
|
|
|
1.0272
|
|
|
|
1.0406
|
|
|
|
1.0487
|
|
|
|
1.0604
|
|
Low for the period
|
|
|
0.9849
|
|
|
|
0.9866
|
|
|
|
0.9986
|
|
|
|
1.0105
|
|
|
|
1.0126
|
|
|
|
0.9935
|
|
Exchange rates are based on the Bank of
Canada
nominal noon exchange rates
.
The nominal noon exchange rate on April 26, 2012 as reported by the Bank of Canada for the conversion of United States
dollars into Canadian dollars was US$1.00 = Cdn$0.9841.
ABBREVIATIONS
Oil
and Natural Gas Liquids
|
|
Natural
Gas
|
bbl
|
barrel
|
|
Mcf
|
thousand cubic feet
|
bbls
|
barrels
|
|
MCFD
|
thousand cubic feet per day
|
BOPD
|
barrels per day
|
|
MMcf
|
million cubic feet
|
Mbbls
|
thousand barrels
|
|
MMcf/d
|
million cubic feet per day
|
Mmbtu
|
million British thermal units
|
|
Mcfe
|
Thousand cubic feet of gas equivalent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
AECO
|
Intra-Alberta Nova
Inventory Transfer Price (NIT net price of natural gas).
|
BOE
|
Barrels of oil equivalent.
A barrel of oil equivalent is determined by converting a volume of natural gas to barrels using the ratio of 6 Mcf to one
barrel.
|
BOE/D
|
Barrels of oil equivalent
per day.
|
BCFE
|
Billion cubic feet
equivalent
|
MBOE
|
Thousand barrels of
oil equivalent.
|
NYMEX
|
New York Mercantile
Exchange.
|
WTI
|
West Texas Intermediate,
the reference price paid in U.S. dollars at Cushing Oklahoma for crude oil of standard grade.
|
PART I
|
ITEM 1.
|
IDENTITY
OF
DIRECTORS,
SENIOR
MANAGEMENT
AND
ADVISORS
|
Not applicable.
|
ITEM 2.
|
OFFER
STATISTICS
AND
EXPECTED
TIMETABLE
|
Not applicable.
A. Selected Financial Data
Our selected financial data and the information
in the following tables for the years ended December 31, 2007 - 2011 was derived from our audited consolidated financial statements.
These audited consolidated financial statements have been audited by BDO Canada LLP, Chartered Accountants, for the years ended
December 31, 2011 and 2010, and Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton LaBonte LLP, Chartered Accountants, for the years ended December 31,
2007 - 2009. Certain prior years’ comparative figures have been reclassified, if necessary.
The information in the following table
should be read in conjunction with the information appearing under the heading “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects” and our audited consolidated financial statements under the heading "Item 18. Financial Statements".
On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted
International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) for financial reporting purposes, using a transition date of
January 1, 2010. The Company’s annual audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31,
2011, including 2010 required comparative information, have been prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee
(“IFRIC”). Financial statements prior to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 were prepared in accordance with
Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“Canadian GAAP”). Reference is made to Note 21 of our audited consolidated
financial statements as at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 for a discussion
of the material measurement differences between Canadian GAAP and United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S.
GAAP”), and their effect on our financial statements.
Financial information included in this
annual report on Form 20-F for the years 2011 and 2010 is determined using IFRS, which differ from U.S. GAAP and Canadian GAAP.
Unless otherwise indicated, financial information included in this annual report on Form 20-F prior to year 2010 were in accordance
with Canadian GAAP.
We have not declared any dividends since
incorporation and do not anticipate that we will do so in the foreseeable future. Our present policy is to retain all available
funds for use in our operations and the expansion of our business.
The following table is a summary of selected
audited consolidated financial information of the Company for each of the two most recently completed financial years. The information
presented is presented in accordance with IFRS:
(Cdn$
in 000, except per share data)
|
|
Years Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Revenue (Oil and natural gas)
|
|
$
|
8,824
|
|
|
$
|
8,086
|
|
Net Loss for the Year
|
|
$
|
(11,043
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,124
|
)
|
Loss Per Share
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
Dividends Per Share
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Weighted Avg. Shares, basic (,000)
|
|
|
120,300
|
|
|
|
99,789
|
|
Weighted Avg. Shares, diluted (,000)
|
|
|
120,300
|
|
|
|
99,789
|
|
Year-end Shares (,000)
|
|
|
126,892
|
|
|
|
110,181
|
|
Working Capital (Deficiency)
|
|
$
|
(7,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,264
|
)
|
Resource Properties
|
|
$
|
25,043
|
|
|
$
|
24,432
|
|
Long-term Investments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Long-term Liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,383
|
|
|
$
|
738
|
|
Capital Stock
|
|
$
|
85,076
|
|
|
$
|
79,386
|
|
Retained Earnings (Deficit)
|
|
$
|
(76,510
|
)
|
|
$
|
(65,467
|
)
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
29,438
|
|
|
$
|
30,413
|
|
The following table is a summary of selected
audited consolidated financial information of the Company for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2009. The information
presented is presented in accordance with Canadian GAAP and is not comparable to the financial information presented in accordance
with IFRS.
(Cdn$
in 000, except per share data)
|
|
Years Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Revenue (Oil and natural gas)
|
|
$
|
6,471
|
|
|
$
|
5,766
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Net Loss for the Year
|
|
$
|
(12,807
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,891
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,810
|
)
|
Loss Per Share
|
|
$
|
(0.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.40
|
)
|
Dividends Per Share
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Weighted Avg. Shares, basic (,000)
|
|
|
78,926
|
|
|
|
72,211
|
|
|
|
66,588
|
|
Weighted Avg. Shares, diluted (,000)
|
|
|
78,926
|
|
|
|
72,211
|
|
|
|
66,588
|
|
Year-end Shares (,000)
|
|
|
95,791
|
|
|
|
73,652
|
|
|
|
70,128
|
|
Working Capital (Deficiency)
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,712
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,335
|
|
Resource Properties
|
|
$
|
41,758
|
|
|
$
|
57,684
|
|
|
$
|
35,411
|
|
Long-term Investments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,722
|
|
|
$
|
12,600
|
|
Long-term Liabilities
|
|
$
|
2,594
|
|
|
$
|
3,446
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Capital Stock
|
|
$
|
72,560
|
|
|
$
|
64,939
|
|
|
$
|
61,394
|
|
Retained Earnings (Deficit)
|
|
$
|
(39,386
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,579
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,688
|
)
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
45,886
|
|
|
$
|
62,643
|
|
|
$
|
63,143
|
|
Canadian GAAP Adjusted
to United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
Under U.S. GAAP the following financial
information would be adjusted from Canadian GAAP, and certain prior years’ comparative figures have been reclassified or
restated, if necessary. The following table is a summary of selected audited consolidated financial information of the Company
for the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2009. The information presented is presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP:
(Cdn$ in 000, except per share data)
|
|
Years Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Net Loss for the Year
|
|
$
|
(10,270
|
)
|
|
$
|
(34,181
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,523
|
)
|
Loss Per Share
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.44
|
)
|
Resource Properties
|
|
$
|
31,041
|
|
|
$
|
44,232
|
|
|
$
|
34,783
|
|
Retained Earnings (Deficit)
|
|
$
|
(54,785
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44,515
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,334
|
)
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
35,169
|
|
|
$
|
49,192
|
|
|
$
|
62,515
|
|
Exchange Rate History
See the disclosure under the heading "Currency
and Exchange Rates" above.
Recently Adopted Accounting Policies
and Future Accounting Pronouncements
IFRS
On January 1, 2011, we adopted
IFRS and the accounting policies have been applied in preparing the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December
31, 2011, the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the opening IFRS balance sheet on January
1, 2010. The detail accounting policies in accordance with IFRS are disclosed in Note 3 of the Company’s audited consolidated
financial statements and the details of transition to IFRS are disclosed in Note 25 of the Company’s audited consolidated
financial statements under the heading "Item 18. Financial Statements", below.
Future Accounting Pronouncements
Certain pronouncements were issued by
the IASB or the IFRIC that are mandatory for accounting periods beginning after January 1, 2011 or later periods.
The Company has early adopted the amendments
to IFRS 1 which replaces references to a fixed date of ‘1 January 2004’ with ‘the date of transition to IFRS’.
This eliminates the need for the Company to restate derecognition transactions that occurred before the date of transition to
IFRS. The amendment is effective for year-ends beginning on or after July 1, 2011; however, the Company has early adopted the
amendment. The impact of the amendment and early adoption is that the Company only applies IAS 39 derecognition requirements to
transactions that occurred after the date of transition.
The following are new standards, amendments
and interpretations, that have not been early adopted in these consolidated annual financial statements. The Company is currently
assessing the impact, if any, of this new guidance on the Company’s future results and financial position:
|
·
|
IFRS
7, Financial
Instruments:
Disclosures,
which requires
disclosure of
both gross and
net information
about financial
instruments eligible
for offset in
the balance sheet
and financial
instruments subject
to master netting
arrangements.
Concurrent with
the amendments
to IFRS 7, the
IASB also amended
IAS 32, Financial
Instruments:
Presentation
to clarify the
existing requirements
for offsetting
financial instruments
in the balance
sheet. The amendments
to IAS 32 are
effective as
of January 1,
2014.
|
|
·
|
IFRS
9 Financial Instruments
is part of the
IASB's wider
project to replace
IAS 39 Financial
Instruments:
Recognition and
Measurement.
IFRS 9 retains
but simplifies
the mixed measurement
model and establishes
two primary measurement
categories for
financial assets:
amortized cost
and fair value.
The basis of
classification
depends on the
entity's business
model and the
contractual cash
flow characteristics
of the financial
asset. The standard
is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2015.
|
|
·
|
IFRS
10 Consolidated
Financial Statements
is the result
of the IASB’s
project to replace
Standing Interpretations
Committee 12,
Consolidation
– Special
Purpose Entities
and the consolidation
requirements
of IAS 27, Consolidated
and Separate
Financial Statements.
The new standard
eliminates the
current risk
and rewards
approach and
establishes
control as the
single basis
for determining
the consolidation
of an entity.
The standard
is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2013.
|
|
·
|
IFRS
11 Joint Arrangements
is the result
of the IASB’s
project to replace
IAS 31, Interests
in Joint Ventures.
The new standard
redefines joint
operations and
joint ventures
and requires
joint operations
to be proportionately
consolidated
and joint ventures
to be equity
accounted. Under
IAS 31, joint
ventures could
be proportionately
consolidated.
The standard
is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2013.
|
|
·
|
IFRS
12 Disclosure
of Interests
in Other Entities
outlines the
required disclosures
for interests
in subsidiaries
and joint arrangements.
The new disclosures
require information
that will assist
financial statement
users to evaluate
the nature, risks
and financial
effects associated
with an entity’s
interests in
subsidiaries
and joint arrangements.
The standard
is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2013.
|
|
·
|
IFRS
13 Fair Value
Measurement defines
fair value, requires
disclosures about
fair value measurements
and provides
a framework for
measuring fair
value when it
is required or
permitted within
the IFRS standards.
The standard
is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2013.
|
|
·
|
IFRIC
20 Stripping
costs in the
production phase
of a mine, IFRIC
20 clarifies
the requirements
for accounting
for the costs
of the stripping
activity in the
production phase
when two benefits
accrue: (i) unusable
ore that can
be used to produce
inventory and
(ii) improved
access to further
quantities of
material that
will be mined
in future periods.
IFRIC 20 is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2013 with
earlier application
permitted and
includes guidance
on transition
for pre-existing
stripping assets.
The Company is
currently evaluating
the impact the
new guidance
is expected to
have on its consolidated
financial statements.
|
The following new standards, amendments
and interpretations that have not been early adopted in these consolidated financial statements, are not expected to have an effect
on the Company’s future results and financial position:
|
·
|
IFRS
1: Severe Hyperinflation
(Effective for
periods beginning
on or after July
1, 2011)
|
|
·
|
IAS
12: Deferred
Tax: Recovery
of Underlying
Assets (Amendments
to IAS 12 (Effective
for periods beginning
on or after January
1, 2012)
|
|
B.
|
Capitalization
and Indebtedness
|
Not Applicable.
|
C.
|
Reasons
for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
|
Not Applicable.
An investment in a company engaged in
oil and gas exploration involves an unusually high amount of risk, both unknown and known, present and potential, including, but
not limited to the risks enumerated below. An investment in our common shares is highly speculative and subject to a number
of known and unknown risks. Only those persons who can bear the risk of the entire loss of their investment should purchase our
securities. An investor should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information that we file with the SEC
and with Canadian securities regulators before investing in our common shares. The risks described below are not the only ones
faced. Additional risks that we are not currently aware of or that we currently believe are immaterial may become important factors
that affect our business. The risk factors set forth below and elsewhere in this annual report, and the risks discussed in our
other filings with the SEC and Canadian securities regulators, may have a significant impact on our business, financial condition
and/or results of operations and could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements.
See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”.
Our failure to successfully address the
risks and uncertainties described below would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or results
of operations, and the trading price of our common stock may decline and investors may lose all or part of their investment. We
cannot assure you that we will successfully address these risks or other unknown risks that may affect our business.
Risks related to commodity price fluctuations
The marketability and price of oil
and natural gas are affected by numerous factors outside of our control. Material fluctuations in oil and natural gas
prices could adversely affect our net production revenue and oil and natural gas operations.
Prices for oil and natural gas may fluctuate
widely in response to relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, market uncertainty and a variety
of additional factors that are beyond our control, such as:
|
·
|
the
domestic
and foreign
supply of
and demand
for oil
and natural
gas;
|
|
·
|
the
price and
quantity
of imports
of crude
oil and
natural
gas;
|
|
·
|
overall
domestic
and global
economic
conditions;
|
|
·
|
political
and economic
conditions
in other
oil and
natural
gas producing
countries,
including
embargoes
and continued
hostilities
in the Middle
East and
other sustained
military
campaigns,
and acts
of terrorism
or sabotage;
|
|
·
|
the
ability
of members
of the Organization
of Petroleum
Exporting
Countries
to agree
to and maintain
oil price
and production
controls;
|
|
·
|
the
level of
consumer
product
demand;
|
|
·
|
the
impact of
the U.S.
dollar exchange
rates on
oil and
natural
gas prices;
and
|
|
·
|
the
price and
availability
of alternative
fuels.
|
Our ability to market our oil and natural
gas depends upon our ability to acquire space on pipelines that deliver such commodities to commercial markets. We are also affected
by deliverability uncertainties related to the proximity of our reserves to pipelines and processing and storage facilities and
operational problems affecting such pipelines and facilities, as well as extensive governmental regulation relating to price,
taxes, royalties, land tenure, allowable production, the export of oil and natural gas and many other aspects of the oil and natural
gas business.
Both oil and natural gas prices are unstable
and are subject to fluctuation. Any material decline in prices could result in a reduction of our net production revenue. The
economics of producing from some wells may change as a result of lower prices, which could result in reduced production of oil
or natural gas and a reduction in the volumes and net present value of our reserves. We might also elect not to produce from certain
wells at lower prices. All of these factors could result in a material decrease in our net production revenue and a reduction
in our oil and natural gas acquisition, development and exploration activities.
Because world oil and natural gas
prices are quoted in U.S. dollars, our production revenues could be adversely affected by an appreciation of the Canadian dollar.
World oil and natural gas prices are quoted
in U.S. dollars, and the price received by Canadian producers, including us, is therefore affected by the Canadian/U.S. dollar
exchange rate, which will fluctuate over time. In recent years, the Canadian dollar has increased materially in value against
the U.S. dollar, which may negatively affect our production revenues. Further material increases in the value of the Canadian
dollar would exacerbate this potential negative effect and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
results of operations. An increase in the exchange rate for the Canadian dollar and future Canadian/U.S. exchange rates could
also negatively affect the future value of our reserves as determined by independent petroleum reserve engineers.
Risks related to operating an exploration,
development and production company
Our ability to execute projects
will depend on certain factors outside of our control. If we are unable to execute projects on time, on budget or at
all, we may not be able to effectively market the oil and natural gas that we produce.
We manage a variety of small and large
projects in the conduct of our business. Our ability to execute projects and market oil and natural gas will depend upon numerous
factors beyond our control, including:
|
·
|
the
availability
of adequate
financing;
|
|
·
|
the
availability
of processing
capacity;
|
|
·
|
the
availability
and proximity
of pipeline
capacity;
|
|
·
|
the
availability
of storage
capacity;
|
|
·
|
the
supply of
and demand
for oil
and natural
gas;
|
|
·
|
the
availability
of alternative
fuel sources;
|
|
·
|
the
effects
of inclement
weather;
|
|
·
|
the
availability
of drilling
and related
equipment;
|
|
·
|
changes
in governmental
regulations;
and
|
|
·
|
the
availability
and productivity
of skilled
labor.
|
Because of these factors, we could be
unable to execute projects on time, on budget or at all, and may not be able to effectively market the oil and natural gas that
we produce.
Oil and gas exploration has a high
degree of risk and our exploration efforts may be unsuccessful, which would have a negative effect on our operations.
There is no certainty that the expenditures
to be made by us in the exploration of our current projects, or any additional project interests we may acquire, will result in
discoveries of recoverable oil and gas in commercial quantities. An exploration project may not result in the discovery of commercially
recoverable reserves and the level of recovery of hydrocarbons from a property may not be a commercially recoverable (or viable)
reserve that can be legally and economically exploited. If exploration is unsuccessful and no commercially recoverable reserves
are defined, we would be required to evaluate and acquire additional projects that would require additional capital, or we would
have to cease operations altogether.
Cumulative unsuccessful exploration
efforts could result in us having to cease operations.
The expenditures to be made by us in the
exploration of our properties may not result in discoveries of oil and natural gas in commercial quantities. Many exploration
projects do not result in the discovery of commercially recoverable oil and gas deposits, and this occurrence could ultimately
result in us having to cease operations.
Oil and natural gas operations involve
many hazards and operational risks, some of which may not be fully covered by insurance. If a significant accident
or event occurs for which we are not fully insured, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could
be adversely affected.
Our involvement in the oil and natural
gas exploration, development and production business subjects us to all of the risks and hazards typically associated with those
types of operations, including hazards such as fire, explosion, blowouts, sour gas releases and spills, each of which could result
in substantial damage to oil and natural gas wells, production facilities, other property and the environment or personal injury.
In particular, we may explore for and produce sour natural gas in certain areas. An unintentional leak of sour natural gas could
result in personal injury, loss of life or damage to property, and may necessitate an evacuation of populated areas, all of which
could result in liability to us. In accordance with industry practice, we are not fully insured against all of these risks. Although
we maintain liability insurance in an amount that we consider consistent with industry practice, the nature of these risks is
such that liabilities could exceed policy limits, in which event we could incur significant costs that could have a material adverse
effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, the risks we face are not, in
all circumstances, insurable and, in certain circumstances, we may elect not to obtain insurance to deal with specific risks due
to the high premiums associated with such insurance or other reasons. For instance, we do not have insurance to protect against
the risk from terrorism. Oil and natural gas production operations are also subject to all of the risks typically associated with
those operations, including encountering unexpected geologic formations or pressures, premature decline of reservoirs and the
invasion of water into producing formations. Losses resulting from the occurrence of any of these risks could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Seasonal factors and unexpected
weather patterns may lead to declines in exploration and production activity.
The level of activity in the Canadian
oil and natural gas industry is influenced by seasonal weather patterns. Oil and natural gas development activities, including
seismic and drilling programs in northern Alberta and British Columbia, are restricted to those months of the year when the ground
is frozen. Wet weather and spring thaw may make the ground unstable. Consequently, municipalities and provincial transportation
departments enforce road bans that restrict the movement of rigs and other heavy equipment, thereby reducing activity levels.
In addition, certain oil and natural gas producing areas are located in areas that are inaccessible other than during the winter
months because the ground surrounding the sites in these areas consists of swampy terrain, and additional seasonal weather variations
will also affect access to these areas. Seasonal factors and unexpected weather patterns may lead to declines in exploration and
production activity during certain parts of the year.
The petroleum industry is highly
competitive, and increased competitive pressures could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations
and prospects.
The petroleum industry is competitive
in all of its phases. We compete with numerous other organizations in the search for, and the acquisition of, oil and natural
gas properties and in the marketing of oil and natural gas. Our competitors include oil and natural gas companies that have substantially
greater financial resources, staff and facilities than us. Our ability to increase our reserves in the future will depend not
only upon our ability to explore and develop our present properties, but also upon our ability to select and acquire other suitable
producing properties or prospects for exploratory drilling. Competitive factors in the distribution and marketing of oil and natural
gas include price and methods and reliability of delivery and storage.
We do not control all of the assets
that are used in the operation of our business and, therefore, cannot ensure that those assets will be operated in a manner favorable
to us.
Other companies operate some of the assets
in which we have an interest. As a result, we have a limited ability to exercise influence over the operation of those assets
or their associated costs, which could adversely affect our financial performance. Our return on assets operated by
others will therefore depend upon a number of factors that may be outside of our control, including the timing and amount of capital
expenditures, the operator's expertise and financial resources, the approval of other participants, the selection of technology
and risk management practices.
Our ability to market oil and natural
gas depends on our ability to transport our product to market. If we are unable to expand and develop the infrastructure
in the areas surrounding certain of our assets, we may not be able to effectively market the oil and natural gas that we produce.
Due to the location of some of our assets,
both in Canada and the United States, there is minimal infrastructure currently available to transport oil and natural gas from
our existing and future wells to market. As a result, even if we are able to engage in successful exploration and production
activities, we may not be able to effectively market the oil and natural gas that we produce, which could adversely affect our
business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Demand and competition for drilling
equipment could delay our exploration and production activities, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition,
results of operations and prospects.
Oil and natural gas exploration and development
activities depend upon the availability of drilling and related equipment (typically leased from third parties) in the particular
areas where such activities will be conducted. Demand for such limited equipment or access restrictions may affect the availability
of such equipment to us and may delay exploration and development activities. To the extent we are not the operator of our oil
and natural gas properties, we depend upon the operators of the properties for the timing of activities related to the properties
and are largely unable to direct or control the activities of the operators.
Title to our oil and natural gas
producing properties cannot be guaranteed and may be subject to prior recorded or unrecorded agreements, transfers, claims or
other defects.
Although title reviews may be conducted
prior to the purchase of oil and natural gas producing properties or the commencement of drilling wells, those reviews do not
guarantee or certify that an unforeseen defect in the chain of title will not arise to defeat our claim. Unregistered agreements
or transfers, or native land claims, may affect title. If title is disputed, we will need to defend our ownership through
the courts, which would likely be an expensive and protracted process and have a negative effect on our operations and financial
condition. In the event of an adverse judgment, we would lose our property rights. A defect in our title to any of
our properties may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We may be unable to meet all of
the obligations necessary to successfully maintain each of the licenses and leases and working interests in licenses and leases
related to its properties, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Our properties are held in the form of
licenses and leases and working interests in licenses and leases. If we or the holder of the license or lease fails to meet the
specific requirement of a license or lease, the license or lease may terminate or expire. None of the obligations required to
maintain each license or lease may be met. The termination or expiration of our licenses or leases or the working interests relating
to a license or lease may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Certain leases in our Kokopelli (formerly Gibson Gulch) and South Rangley properties will expire in 2012 and 2013.
Risks related to financing continuing
and future operations
We have a working capital deficiency
and will be required to raise capital through financings. We may not be able to obtain capital or financing on satisfactory terms,
or at all.
As of December 31, 2011, the Company had
a working capital deficiency of approximately $7.8 million. Excluding the non-cash warrant liability of $2.2 million related to
the fair value of US$ denominated warrants issued in previous equity financings, the working capital deficiency includes a $5.5
million used demand line of credit. As at December 31, 2011, $1.5 million of the demand line of credit remains unused. We expect
to incur general and administration expenses of approximately $3.5 million over the next twelve months. The next review date for
the demand line of credit is scheduled on or before May 1, 2012. If we are unable to extend or refinance the bank line of credit
or meet our general and administration expenses or our share of the joint venture costs through revenues and field operating netback
from our oil and gas operations, we will need to raise capital through debt or equity financings. We cannot assure you that debt
or equity financing will be available to us, and even if debt or equity financing is available, it may not be on terms acceptable
to us. Our inability to access sufficient capital for our operations would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects.
The Company's ability to continue
as a going concern is dependent upon attaining profitable operations and obtaining sufficient financing to meet obligations and
continue exploration and development activities. Whether and when the Company can attain profitability is uncertain. These uncertainties
cast significant doubt upon the Company’s ability to continue as going concern.
In
the course of our development activities, we have sustained losses and expect losses in the year ended December 31, 2012. We expect
to finance our operations primarily through our existing cash and any future financing. Whether and when the Company can attain
profitability is uncertain. These uncertainties cast substantial doubt upon the Company’s ability to continue as going concern
in the next twelve months, because we will be required to obtain additional capital in the future to continue our operations and
there is no assurance that we will be able to obtain such capital, through equity or debt financing, or any combination thereof,
or on satisfactory terms or at all. Our independent auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their report on our consolidated
financial statements that describes uncertainties that cast substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a
going
concern. Our audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board applicable to a going concern, which implies we will continue
to meet our obligations and continue our operations for the next twelve months. Realization values may be substantially different
from carrying values as shown, and our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability
or
classification of recorded asset amounts or the amount and
classification of liabilities that might be necessary as a result of the going concern uncertainty.
We anticipate making substantial
capital expenditures for future acquisition, exploration, development and production projects. We may not be able to
obtain capital or financing necessary to support these projects on satisfactory terms, or at all.
We anticipate making substantial capital
expenditures for the acquisition, exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas reserves in the future. If our
revenues or reserves decline, we may not have access to the capital necessary to undertake or complete future drilling programs.
Debt or equity financing, or cash generated by operations, may not be available to us or may not be sufficient to meet our requirements
for capital expenditures or other corporate purposes. Even if debt or equity financing is available, it may not be
on terms acceptable to us. Our inability to access sufficient capital for our operations could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Our cash flow from our reserves
may not be sufficient to fund our ongoing activities at all times, thereby causing us to forfeit our interest in certain properties,
miss certain acquisition opportunities and reduce or terminate our operations.
Our cash flow from our reserves may not
be sufficient to fund our ongoing activities at all times and we are currently utilizing our bank line of credit to fund our working
capital deficit. From time to time, we may require additional financing in order to carry out our oil and gas acquisition, exploration
and development activities. Failure to obtain such financing on a timely basis could cause us to forfeit its interest in certain
properties, not be able to take advantage of certain acquisition opportunities and reduce or terminate our level of operations.
If our revenues from our reserves decrease as a result of lower oil and natural gas prices or otherwise, our ability to expend
the necessary capital to replace our reserves or to maintain our production will be impaired. If our cash flow from operations
is not sufficient to satisfy our capital expenditure requirements, there can be no assurance that additional debt or equity financing
will be available to meet these requirements or, if available, on favorable terms.
Debt that we incur in the future
may limit our ability to obtain financing and to pursue other business opportunities, which could adversely affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
From time to time, we may enter into transactions
to acquire assets or equity of other organizations. These transactions may be financed in whole or in part with debt, which may
increase our debt levels above industry standards for oil and natural gas companies of a similar size. Depending upon future exploration
and development plans, we may require additional equity and/or debt financing that may not be available or, if available, may
not be available on acceptable terms. None of our organizational documents currently limit the amount of indebtedness that we
may incur. The level of our indebtedness from time to time could impair our ability to obtain additional financing on a timely
basis to take advantage of business opportunities that may arise.
We may be exposed to the credit
risk of third parties through certain of our business arrangements. Non-payment or non-performance by any of these
third parties could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We may be exposed to third-party credit
risk through our contractual arrangements with our current or future joint venture partners, marketers of our petroleum and natural
gas production and other parties. In the event those entities fail to meet their contractual obligations to us, those failures
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, poor credit conditions
in the industry and of joint venture partners may affect a joint venture partner's willingness to participate in our ongoing capital
program, potentially delaying the program and the results of the program until we find a suitable alternative partner.
Risks related to maintaining reserves
and acquiring new sources of oil and natural gas
Our success depends upon our ability
to find, acquire, develop and commercially produce oil and natural gas, which depends upon factors outside of our control.
Oil and natural gas operations involve
many risks that even a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to overcome. Our long-term
commercial success depends upon our ability to find, acquire, develop and commercially produce oil and natural gas. We have
only recently commenced production of oil and natural gas. There is no assurance that our other properties or future
properties will achieve commercial production. Without the continual addition of new reserves, our existing reserves
and our production will decline over time as our reserves are exploited. A future increase in our reserves will depend not only
upon our ability to explore and develop any properties we may have from time to time, but also upon our ability to select and
acquire new suitable producing properties or prospects. No assurance can be given that we will be able to locate satisfactory
properties for acquisition or participation. Moreover, if acquisitions or participations are identified, we may determine that
current market conditions, the terms of any acquisition or participation arrangement, or pricing conditions, may make the acquisitions
or participations uneconomical, and further commercial quantities of oil and natural gas may not be produced, discovered or acquired
by us, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Properties that we acquire may not
produce as projected, and we may be unable to determine reserve potential, identify liabilities associated with the properties
or obtain protection from sellers against such liabilities.
Our long-term commercial success depends
upon our ability to find, acquire, develop and commercially produce oil and natural gas reserves. However, our review of acquired
properties is inherently incomplete, as it generally is not feasible to review in depth every individual property involved in
each acquisition. Even a detailed review of records and properties may not necessarily reveal existing or potential problems,
nor will it permit a buyer to become sufficiently familiar with the properties to assess fully their deficiencies and potential.
Inspections may not always be performed on every well, and environmental problems, such as ground water contamination, are not
necessarily observable even when an inspection is undertaken.
Our estimated reserves are based
on many assumptions that may prove to be inaccurate. Any material inaccuracies in the reserve estimates or the underlying
assumptions may adversely affect the quantities and present value of our reserves.
There are numerous uncertainties inherent
in estimating quantities of oil, natural gas reserves and the future cash flows attributed to the reserves. Our reserve and associated
cash flow estimates are estimates only. In general, estimates of economically recoverable oil and natural gas reserves and the
associated future net cash flows are based upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, such as historical production from
the properties, production rates, ultimate reserve recovery, timing and amount of capital expenditures, marketability of oil and
gas, royalty rates, the assumed effects of regulation by governmental agencies and future operating costs, all of which may vary
materially from actual results. All estimates are to some degree speculative, and classifications of reserves are only attempts
to define the degree of speculation involved. For those reasons, estimates of the economically recoverable oil and natural gas
reserves attributable to any particular group of properties, classification of such reserves based on risk of recovery and estimates
of future net revenues associated with reserves prepared by different engineers, or by the same engineers at different times,
may vary. Our actual production, revenues, taxes and development and operating expenditures with respect to our reserves will
vary from our estimates of them, and those variations could be material.
Estimates of proved reserves that may
be developed and produced in the future are often based upon volumetric calculations and upon analogy to similar types of reserves
rather than actual production history. Recovery factors and drainage areas are estimated by experience and analogy to similar
producing pools. Estimates based on these methods are generally less reliable than those based on actual production history. Subsequent
evaluation of the same reserves based upon production history and production practices will result in variations in the estimated
reserves, and those variations could be material.
Our future oil and natural gas production
may not result in revenue increases and may be adversely affected by operating conditions, production delays, drilling hazards
and environmental damages.
Future oil and natural gas exploration
may involve unprofitable efforts, not only from dry wells, but also from wells that are productive but do not produce sufficient
petroleum substances to return a profit after drilling, operating and other costs. Completion of a well does not assure a profit
on the investment or recovery of drilling, completion and operating costs. In addition, drilling hazards or environmental damage
could greatly increase the cost of operations, and various field operating conditions may adversely affect the production from
successful wells. These conditions include delays in obtaining governmental approvals or consents, shut-ins of connected wells
resulting from extreme weather conditions, insufficient storage or transportation capacity or other geological and mechanical
conditions. While diligent well supervision and effective maintenance operations can contribute to maximizing production rates
over time, production delays and declines from normal field operating conditions cannot be eliminated and can be expected to adversely
affect revenue and cash flow levels to varying degrees.
Risks related to management of the
Company
We may experience difficulty managing
our anticipated growth.
We may be subject to growth-related risks
including capacity constraints and pressure on our internal systems and controls. Our ability to manage growth effectively will
require us to continue to implement and improve our operational and financial systems and to attract and retain qualified management
and technical personnel to meet the needs of our anticipated growth. Our inability to deal with this growth could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We depend upon key personnel and
the absence of any of these individuals could result in us having to cease operations.
Our ability to continue our operation
business depends, in large part, upon our ability to attract and maintain qualified key management and technical personnel. Competition
for such personnel is intense and we may not be able to attract and retain such personnel.
Strategic relationships upon which
we may rely are subject to change, which may diminish our ability to conduct our operations.
Our ability to successfully acquire additional
licenses, to discover reserves, to participate in drilling opportunities and to identify and enter into commercial arrangements
depends on developing and maintaining close working relationships with industry participants and government officials and on our
ability to select and evaluate suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment. We may
not be able to establish these strategic relationships, or if established, we may not be able to maintain them. In addition, the
dynamics of our relationships with strategic partners may require us to incur expenses or undertake activities we would not otherwise
be inclined to undertake in order to fulfill our obligations to these partners or maintain our relationships. If our strategic
relationships are not established or maintained, our business prospects may be limited, which could diminish our ability to conduct
our operations.
We cannot be certain that current expected expenditures
and any current or planned completion/testing programs will be realized.
We believe that the costs used to prepare internal budgets
are reasonable, however, there are assumptions, uncertainties, and risk that may cause our allocated funds on a per well basis
to change as a result of having to alter certain activities from those originally proposed or programmed to reduce and mitigate
uncertainties and risks. These assumptions, uncertainties, and risks are inherent in the completion and testing of wells and can
include but are not limited to: pipe failure, casing collapse, unusual or unexpected formation pressure, environmental hazards,
and other operating or production risk intrinsic in oil and or gas activities. Any of the above may cause a delay in any of our
completion/testing programs or our ability to determine reserve potential.
Risks related to federal, state, local and other laws, controls
and regulations
We are subject to complex federal,
provincial, state, local and other laws, controls and regulations that could adversely affect the cost, manner and feasibility
of conducting our oil and natural gas operations.
Oil and natural gas exploration, production,
marketing and transportation activities are subject to extensive controls and regulations imposed by various levels of government,
which may be amended from time to time. Governments may regulate or intervene with respect to price, taxes, royalties and the
exportation of oil and natural gas. Regulations may be changed from time to time in response to economic or political conditions.
The implementation of new regulations or the modification of existing regulations affecting the oil and natural gas industry could
reduce demand for crude oil and natural gas and increase our costs, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, in order to conduct oil and natural gas operations, we
require licenses from various governmental authorities. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain all of the licenses
and permits that may be required to conduct operations that we may desire to undertake.
There is uncertainty regarding claims
of title and rights of the aboriginal people to properties in certain portions of western Canada, and such a claim, if made in
respect of our property or assets, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Aboriginal peoples have claimed aboriginal
title and rights to a substantial portion of western Canada. We are not aware that any claims have been made in respect of its
property and assets. However, if a claim arose and was successful it would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and prospects.
We are subject to stringent environmental
laws and regulations that may expose us to significant costs and liabilities, which could adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects.
All phases of the oil and natural gas
business present environmental risks and hazards and are subject to environmental regulation under a variety of federal, provincial,
state and local laws and regulations. Environmental legislation provides for, among other things, restrictions and prohibitions
on spills, releases or emissions of various substances produced in association with oil and natural gas operations. The legislation
also requires that wells and facility sites be operated, maintained, abandoned and reclaimed to the satisfaction of applicable
regulatory authorities. Compliance with legislation can require significant expenditures, and a breach of applicable environmental
legislation may result in the imposition of fines and penalties, some of which may be material. Environmental legislation is evolving
in a manner expected to result in stricter standards and enforcement, larger fines and liability and potentially increased capital
expenditures and operating costs. The discharge of oil, natural gas or other pollutants into the air, soil or water may give rise
to liabilities to governments and third parties and may require us to incur costs to remedy any discharge. Environmental laws
may result in a curtailment of production or a material increase in the costs of production, development or exploration activities,
or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
As a public company, our compliance
costs and risks have increased in recent years.
Legal, accounting and other expenses associated
with public company reporting requirements have increased significantly in the past few years. We anticipate that general and
administrative costs associated with regulatory compliance will continue to increase with on-going compliance requirements under
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as any new rules implemented by the SEC, Canadian Securities Administrators, the NYSE
Amex Equities and the Toronto Stock Exchange in the future. These rules and regulations have significantly increased our legal
and financial compliance costs and made some activities more time-consuming and costly. We cannot assure you that we will continue
to effectively meet all of the requirements of these regulations, including Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and National
Instrument 52-109 of the Canadian Securities Administrators. Any failure to effectively implement internal controls, or to resolve
difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results, cause us to fail to meet reporting obligations,
or result in our principal executive officer and principal financial officer being required to give a qualified assessment of
our internal control over financial reporting. Any such result could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial
information, which could have a material adverse effect on the trading price of our common shares and our ability to raise capital.
These rules and regulations have made it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance,
and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or
similar coverage in the future. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve
on our board of directors or as executive officers.
Risks Related to Our Being a Foreign
Private Issuer
As a foreign private issuer, our
shareholders may receive less complete and timely data.
We are a “foreign private issuer”
as defined in Rule 3b-4 under the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our equity securities are accordingly exempt
from Sections 14(a), 14(b), 14(c), 14(f) and 16 of the Exchange Act, pursuant to Rule 3a12-3 of the Exchange Act. Therefore, we
are not required to file a Schedule 14A proxy statement in relation to our annual meetings of shareholders. The submission of
proxy and annual meeting of shareholder information on Form 6-K may result in shareholders having less complete and timely information
in connection with shareholder actions. The exemption from Section 16 rules regarding reports of beneficial ownership and purchases
and sales of common shares by insiders and restrictions on insider trading in our securities may result in shareholders having
less data and there being fewer restrictions on insiders’ activities in our securities.
It may be difficult to enforce judgments
or bring actions outside the United States against us and certain of our directors and officers.
It may be difficult to bring and enforce
suits against us. We are incorporated in British Columbia, Canada. Many of our directors and officers are not residents
of the United States and some of our assets are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult
for U.S. holders of our common shares to effect service of process on these persons within the United States or to enforce judgments
obtained in the U.S. based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us or our officers and
directors. In addition, a shareholder should not assume that the courts of Canada (i) would enforce judgments of U.S.
courts obtained in actions against us or our officers or directors predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S.
federal securities laws or other laws of the United States, or (ii) would enforce, in original actions, liabilities against us
or our officers or directors predicated upon the U.S. federal securities laws or other laws of the United States.
Risks related to investing in our common
shares
We have not paid any dividends on
our common shares. Consequently, your only opportunity currently to achieve a return on your investment will be if
the market price of our common shares appreciates above the price that you pay for our common shares.
We have not declared or paid any dividends
on our common shares since our incorporation. Any decision to pay dividends on our common shares will be made by our
board of directors on the basis of our earnings, financial requirements and other conditions existing at such future time. Consequently,
your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment in our securities will be if the market price of our common shares
appreciates and you are able to sell your common shares at a profit.
Our common share price has been
volatile and your investment in our common shares could suffer a decline in value.
Our common shares are traded on the Toronto
Stock Exchange and the NYSE Amex Equities. The market price of our common shares may fluctuate significantly in response to a
number of factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include price fluctuations of precious metals, government
regulations, disputes regarding mining claims, broad stock market fluctuations and economic conditions in the United States.
Dilution through officer, director,
employee, consultant or agent options could adversely affect our shareholders.
Because our success is highly dependent
upon our officers, directors, employees, consultants and agents, we have granted to some or all of our key officers, directors,
employees, consultants and agents options to purchase common shares as non-cash incentives. To the extent that we grant significant
numbers of options and those options are exercised, the interests of our other shareholders may be diluted. As of April 26, 2012,
there were 9,329,001 common share purchase options outstanding, of which 7,201,506 common share purchase options are vested and
exercisable. If all the vested options were exercised, it would result in an additional 7,201,506 common shares being issued and
outstanding.
The issuance of additional common
shares may negatively affect the trading price of our common shares.
We have issued equity securities in the
past and may continue to issue equity securities to finance our activities in the future, including to finance future acquisitions,
or as consideration for acquisitions of businesses or assets. In addition, outstanding options and warrants to purchase our common
shares may be exercised, resulting in the issuance of additional common shares. The issuance by us of additional common shares
would result in dilution to our shareholders, and even the perception that such an issuance may occur could have a negative effect
on the trading price of our common shares.
|
ITEM 4.
|
INFORMATION
ON
THE
COMPANY
|
|
A.
|
History
and Development of the Company
|
Introduction
Our executive office is located at:
598 – 999 Canada Place
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 3E1
Telephone: (604) 638-5050
Facsimile: (604) 638-5051
Website: www.dejour.com
Email: rhodgkinson@dejour.com or mwong@dejour.com
The contact person is: Mr. Robert L. Hodgkinson,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer or Mr. Mathew H. Wong, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary.
Our common shares trade on the Toronto
Stock Exchange and the NYSE Amex Equities Stock Exchange under the symbol “DEJ”.
Our authorized capital consists of three
classes of shares: an unlimited number of common shares; an unlimited number of preferred shares designated as First Preferred
Shares, issuable in series; and an unlimited number of preferred shares designated as Second Preferred Shares, issuable in series.
There are no indentures or agreements limiting the payment of dividends and there are no conversion rights, special liquidation
rights, pre-emptive rights or subscription rights.
The First Preferred Shares have priority
over the Common Shares and the Second Preferred Shares with respect to the payment of dividends and in the distribution of assets
in the event of a winding up of Dejour. The Second Preferred Shares have priority over the Common Shares with respect to dividends
and surplus assets in the event of a winding up of Dejour.
As of December 31, 2011, there were 126,892,386
common shares issued and outstanding. As of December 31, 2011, there were no First Preferred Shares and no Second Preferred Shares
issued and outstanding.
Incorporation and Name Changes
Dejour Energy Inc. (formerly Dejour Enterprises
Ltd.) is incorporated under the laws of British Columbia, Canada. The Company was originally incorporated as “Dejour Mines
Limited” on March 29, 1968 under the laws of the Province of Ontario. By articles of amendment dated October 30, 2001, the
issued shares were consolidated on the basis of one (1) new for every fifteen (15) old shares and the name of the Company was
changed to Dejour Enterprises Ltd. On June 6, 2003, the shareholders approved a resolution to complete a one-for-three-share consolidation,
which became effective on October 1, 2003. In 2005, the Company was continued in British Columbia under the
Business Corporations
Act
(British Columbia). On March 9, 2011, the Company changed its name from Dejour Enterprises Ltd. to Dejour Energy Inc.
Financings
We have financed our operations through
funds from loans, public/private placements of common shares, common shares issued for property, common shares issued in debt
settlements, and shares issued upon exercise of stock options and share purchase warrants. The following table summarizes our
financings for the past three fiscal years.
Fiscal Year
|
|
Nature of Share Issuance
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Gross
Proceeds
(Cdn$)
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
|
631,856
|
|
|
|
273,223
|
|
|
|
Private Placement(1)
|
|
|
2,710,332
|
|
|
|
1,626,199
|
|
|
|
Public Offering(2)
|
|
|
10,766,665
|
|
|
|
3,425,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
Private Placement(3)
|
|
|
2,907,334
|
|
|
|
1,017,567
|
|
|
|
Private Placement(4)
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
Public Offering/Private Placement (5)
|
|
|
7,142,858
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
Private Placement (6)
|
|
|
2,339,315
|
|
|
|
888,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
Public Offering (7)
Exercise of Warrants
Exercise
of Options
|
|
|
11,010,000
4,551,841
1,150,000
|
|
|
|
3,288,641
1,688,147
402,500
|
|
|
(1)
|
In October 2009, we completed
a private placement and issued 2,710,332 flow-through shares
(“FTS”) at Cdn$0.60 per share. Gross proceeds raised
were Cdn$1,626,199. In connection with this private placement,
we paid finders’ fees of Cdn$83,980 and other related
costs of Cdn$73,427.
|
|
(2)
|
In December 2009, we completed
a public offering and issued 10,766,665 units at US$0.30 per
unit. Each unit consists of 10,766,665 common shares and 8,075,000
share purchase warrants, exercisable at US$0.40 per share on
or before December 23, 2014. Gross proceeds raised were Cdn$3,425,060
(US$3,230,000). In connection with this public offering, we
paid finders’ fees of Cdn$203,180 and other related costs
of Cdn$140,790. We also issued 645,999 agent’s warrants,
exercisable at US$0.46 per share on or before November 3, 2014.
The grant date fair values of the warrants and agent’s
warrants, estimated to be $888,250 and $71,060 respectively,
have been included in share capital on a net basis and accordingly
have not been recorded as a separate component of shareholders’
equity.
|
|
(3)
|
In March 2010, we completed
a private placement and issued 2,907,334 flow-through units
at Cdn$0.35 per unit. Each unit consists of 2,907,334 common
shares and 1,453,667 share purchase warrants, exercisable at
$0.45 per share on or before March 3, 2011. Gross proceeds
raised were Cdn$1,017,567. In connection with this private
placement, we paid finders’ fees of Cdn$54,575 and other
related costs of $52,819. We also issued 37,423 agent’s
warrants, exercisable at Cdn$0.45 per share on or before March
3, 2011.
|
|
(4)
|
In September 2010, we completed
a private placement and issued 2,000,000 flow-through shares
at Cdn$0.375 per share. Gross proceeds raised were Cdn$750,000.
In connection with this private placement, we paid finders’
fees of Cdn$37,500 and other related costs of Cdn$38,890.
|
|
(5)
|
In November 2010, we completed
an offering of 7,142,858 units at Cdn$0.28 per unit, partially
pursuant to a public offering and partially pursuant to a private
placement. Each unit consists of one common share and 0.65
of a common share purchase warrant. Each whole common share
purchase warrant is exercisable into one common share at Cdn$0.40
per share on or before November 17, 2015. Gross proceeds raised
were Cdn$2,000,000. In connection with this offering, we paid
finders’ fees of Cdn$120,000 and other related costs
of Cdn$123,423.
|
|
(6)
|
In December 2010, we completed
a private placement and issued 2,339,315 flow-through shares
at Cdn$0.38 per share. Gross proceeds raised were Cdn$888,940.
In connection with this private placement, we paid finders’
fees of Cdn$53,337 and other related costs of Cdn$61,862. We
also issued 140,359 agent’s warrants, exercisable at
Cdn$0.38 per share on or before December 23, 2011. Directors
and Officers of the Company purchased 513,157 shares of this
offering.
|
|
(7)
|
In February 2011, we completed
a public offering of 11,010,000 units at US $0.30 per unit.
Each unit consists of one common share and one-half of one
common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles
the holder to acquire one additional common share of the Company
at US$0.35 per common share on or before February 10, 2012.
Gross proceeds raised were Cdn$3,288,641 (US$3,303,000). In
connection with this private placement, the Company paid finders’
fees of Cdn$196,694 (US$199,710) in cash and other related
costs of Cdn$119,602 in cash.
|
Past Capital Expenditures
Fiscal
Year
|
|
Cash
flows used for equipment and resource properties
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009 (Canadian
GAAP)
|
|
Cdn$2,626,488 (1)
|
Fiscal 2010 (IFRS)
|
|
Cdn$5,038,711 (2)
|
Fiscal 2011 (IFRS)
|
|
Cdn$8,360,376 (3)
|
|
(1)
|
$39,279 of these funds was
spent on the purchase of corporate and other assets; and $2,587,209
was spent on our resource properties. (For a breakdown on the
resource property expenditures, see Note 6 to our audited consolidated
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009, filed with our annual report on Form 20-F on June 30,
2010.)
|
|
(2)
|
$26,945 of these funds was
spent on the purchase of corporate and other assets; and $5,011,766
was spent on our resource properties. (For a breakdown on the
resource property expenditures, see Notes 5 and 6 to our audited
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2011, filed with this annual report on Form
20-F.)
|
|
(3)
|
$28,867 of these funds was
spent on the purchase of corporate and other assets; and $8,331,509
was spent on our resource properties. (For a breakdown on the
resource property expenditures, see Notes 5 and 6 to our audited
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2011, filed with this annual report on Form
20-F.)
|
Capital Expenditures
Additions to property and equipment, and
exploration and evaluation assets:
|
|
Three months ended December 31,
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Land acquisition and retention
|
|
|
37,197
|
|
|
|
31,337
|
|
|
|
241,911
|
|
|
|
272,837
|
|
Drilling and completion
|
|
|
1,853,487
|
|
|
|
1,113,000
|
|
|
|
4,397,819
|
|
|
|
2,206,270
|
|
Facility and pipelines
|
|
|
290,381
|
|
|
|
331,799
|
|
|
|
2,949,008
|
|
|
|
1,243,616
|
|
Capitalized general and administrative
|
|
|
168,403
|
|
|
|
145,620
|
|
|
|
742,771
|
|
|
|
1,289,043
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
(15,261
|
)
|
|
|
28,867
|
|
|
|
26,945
|
|
|
|
|
2,349,616
|
|
|
|
1,606,495
|
|
|
|
8,360,376
|
|
|
|
5,038,711
|
|
During 2011, the Company further refined
its focus toward the conversion of resources into reserves. As a result, the Company’s asset characterization has moved
toward more tangible low risk near term development projects, moderate risk appraisal opportunities and moderate to high risk
exploration potential.
In 2011, the Company’s focus was
on production optimization of the Drake/Woodrush property, while finalizing pre-drilling activities for the Kokopelli development
and drilling a discovery well at South Rangely.
Most of the waterflood capital expenditures
have already been spent in fiscal 2011. Future capital expenditures at Woodrush in the upcoming year of 2012 are expected to be
approximately $1.2 to $1.5 million and funded through its cash flow from operations and the undrawn line of credit. In the U.S.,
the Company plans to drill up to eight wells during 2012 and its share of expenditures ranges from $6.5 to $11 million. The Company
plans to fund the expenditures through additional financing, including debt, equity or joint venture financing, or disposal of
non-core assets.
DAILY PRODUCTION
|
|
Three months ended December 31,
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
By Product
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (mcf/d)
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
1,614
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
Oil and natural gas liquids (bbls/d)
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
Total (boe/d)
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
The decrease in natural gas production for the year ended December 31, 2011 (“fiscal 2011”)
was primarily the result of the temporary curtailment of production due to maintenance related downtime at the regional gas processing
plant in the 2
nd
quarter of 2011 and extended to the third week of July 2011. This regional gas processing plant is
operated by a third party and is not under the Company’s control. Gas production resumed during the third week of July 2011.
The decrease in natural gas production for the current quarter was because gas production is restricted to a maximum daily limit,
due to 100% compressor capacity.
The decrease in oil production for the
current year was the result of production restrictions imposed by the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission of British Columbia
(“OGC”) on the Company’s Woodrush property prior to the successful implementation of the waterflood in the Halfway
“E” Pool.
General
The Company is in the business of acquiring,
exploring and developing energy projects with a focus on oil and gas exploration in Canada and the United States. The Company
holds approximately 113,000 net acres of oil and gas leases in the following regions:
|
·
|
The
Peace River
Arch of northwestern
British Columbia
and northeastern
Alberta, Canada
|
|
·
|
The
Piceance, Paradox
and Uinta Basins
in the US Rocky
Mountains
|
Summary
Over the past three years, the Company
has evolved its forward focus from acquiring resource potential toward conversion of resources into reserves. This process involved
several distinct steps on the same continuum including:
|
·
|
Classification
and prioritization
of acreage based
on economic
promise, technical
robustness,
infrastructural
and logistic
advantage and
commercial maturity
|
|
·
|
Evaluation and development
planning for top tier acreage positions
|
|
·
|
Developing partnerships
within financial and industry circles to speed the exploitation
process, and
|
|
·
|
Aggressively bringing
production on line where feasible
|
As a result of these moves, the Company’s
asset characterization has moved toward more tangible low risk near term development projects, moderate risk appraisal opportunities
and moderate to high risk exploration potential.
Our business objective is to grow our
oil and gas production and generate sufficient cash flow to continue to expand company operations and enhance shareholder value.
Specialized Skill and Knowledge:
Exploration
for and development of petroleum and natural gas resources requires specialized skills and knowledge including in the areas of
petroleum engineering, geophysics, geology and title. The Company and its subsidiaries have obtained personnel with the required
specialized skills and knowledge to carry out their respective operations. While the current labour market in the industry is
highly competitive, the Company expects to be able to attract and maintain appropriately qualified employees for fiscal 2012.
Cycles:
All of the Company's operations
in Canada are affected by seasonal operating conditions. Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd., our wholly owned subsidiary, holds properties
in northwestern Alberta and northeastern British Columbia which are accessible to heavy equipment in winter only when the ground
is frozen, typically between December to early April. For this reason drilling and pipeline construction ceases over the remainder
of the year, limiting growth to winter only. Production operations continue year round in these areas once production is established.
The prices that the Company will receive for oil and gas production in the future are weighted to world benchmark prices and may
be adversely affected by mild weather conditions. Recently there has been a significant change in the supply demand balance and
commodity prices have fallen dramatically. The Company expects this condition to persist for several months but the Company believes
that a balance between production and consumption and a stable price environment will be reestablished by the end of 2012. See
"Risk Factors – Risks related to operating an exploration, development and production company".
Environmental Protection:
The Company's
operations are subject to environmental regulations (including regular environmental impact assessments and permitting) in the
jurisdictions in which it operates. Such regulations cover a wide variety of matters, including, without limitation, emission
of greenhouse gases, prevention of waste, pollution and protection of the environment, labour regulations and worker safety. Under
such regulations there are preventative obligations, clean-up costs and liabilities for toxic or hazardous substances which may
exist on or under any of its properties or which may be produced as a result of its operations. Environmental legislation and
legislation relating to exploration and production of oil and natural gas will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased
fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree
of responsibility for companies and their directors and employees. Such stricter standards could impact the Company's costs and
have an adverse effect on results of operations. The Company expects to incur abandonment and site reclamation costs as existing
oil and gas properties are abandoned and reclaimed; however, the Company does not anticipate making material expenditures beyond
normal compliance with environmental regulations in 2012 and future years.
Employees:
The Company had the
equivalent of approximately 18 full-time employees and consultants during 2011.
Social or Environmental Policies:
The
health and safety of employees, contractors and the public, as well as the protection of the environment, is of utmost importance
to the Company. The Company endeavors to conduct its operations in a manner that will minimize adverse effects of emergency situations
by:
|
•
|
complying with government
regulations and standards;
|
|
•
|
following industry codes,
practices and guidelines;
|
|
•
|
ensuring prompt, effective
response and repair to emergency situations and environmental
incidents; and
|
|
•
|
educating employees and
contractors of the importance of compliance with corporate
safety and environmental rules and procedures.
|
The Company believes that all Company
personnel have a vital role in achieving excellence in environmental, health and safety performance. This is best achieved through
careful planning and the support and active participation of everyone involved.
Competitive Conditions:
The Company
operates in geographical areas where there is strong competition by other companies for reserve acquisitions, exploration leases,
licences and concessions and skilled industry personnel. The Company’s competitors include major integrated oil and natural
gas companies and numerous other independent oil and natural gas companies and individual producers and operators, many of whom
have greater financial and personnel resources than the Company. The Company’s ability to acquire additional property rights,
to discover reserves, to participate in drilling opportunities and to identify and enter into commercial arrangements with customers
is dependent upon developing and maintaining close working relationships with its current industry partners and joint operators,
and its ability to select and evaluate suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment.
Three Year History
2011
In 2011, the Company’s focus was
on production optimization of the Drake/Woodrush property, while finalizing pre-drilling activities for the Kokopelli development
and drilling a discovery well at South Rangely.
During the year, the Company achieved
the following major objectives and also made significant progress on key strategic initiatives that resulted in:
|
(1)
|
Successful implementation and
expansion of the Halfway “E” oil pool waterflood
on the Company’s Woodrush property.
|
|
(2)
|
Obtained a $7 million line
of credit from a Canadian bank to refinance the bridge loan
and to provide funds for general corporate purposes.
|
|
(3)
|
Generated positive operating
cash flow for the second half of the year.
|
|
(4)
|
Completed all requirements
for drilling on the Company’s federal leases at Gibson
Gulch, Piceance Basin, Colorado, resulting in the first drilling
permits being issued in the fourth quarter of the year.
|
|
(5)
|
Completed and tested a discovery
well at South Rangely. After the well was successfully fractured
and stimulated, the well flowed rich gas from the Mancos "B"
Sand in commercial quantities.
|
2010
In 2010, the Company’s focus was
on increasing production, reserves, and operational efficiency at the Drake/Woodrush properties, while maintaining all prospective
acreage holdings and positioning for renewed drilling activities as both the business environment and commodity prices improved.
During the year, the Company achieved
the following major objectives and also made significant progress on key strategic initiatives that resulted in:
|
(1)
|
Extended the limits of the
Woodrush halfway pool by drilling three successful development
wells in 2010.
|
|
(2)
|
Received approval from the
British Columbia Oil and Gas Commission to implement a waterflood
in the Halfway “E” oil pool at Woodrush and began
project implementation in October.
|
|
(3)
|
Raised gross proceeds of $4.7
million in equity, allowing the Company to support the development
of oil and gas properties in the Drake/Woodrush properties.
|
|
(4)
|
Obtained a bridge loan credit
facility of up to $5 million, allowing the Company to refinance
its existing bank facility and fund its working capital and
capital expenditures.
|
2009
In 2009, the Company’s focus was
on the restructuring of current assets and operations to reduce debt and lower operating costs while maintaining all prospective
acreage holdings and positioning for renewed drilling activities as both the business environment and commodity prices improved.
Despite the difficult environment faced
in 2009, the Company was able to achieve all major objectives and also make significant progress on key strategic initiatives
that resulted in the following:
|
(1)
|
Increased Net Proved and Probable
Reserves by more than 3,500% from slightly more than 6 BCFE
to over 217 BCFE. The before tax discounted (NPV
10
)
value of the Company’s proved and probable reserves,
net of all future costs for development is now valued at $324
million. This is up from $31 million as at December 31, 2008.
The major increase in reserves results from developments in
the Gibson Gulch field in the Piceance Basin where the Company
holds a 72% working interest in 2200 gross acres. This property
is discussed in more detail later in this report.
|
|
(2)
|
Reduced total
liabilities from $18.3 million to $6.2 million
|
|
(3)
|
Reduced working capital deficit
of $12.7 million at the end of 2008 to $20.0 thousand at the
end of 2009
|
|
(4)
|
Raised $5 million of equity,
allowing the Company to execute its winter drilling program
in Woodrush Field.
|
|
(5)
|
Strengthening our Board of
Directors with the addition of Stephen Mut as Co-Chairman of
the Board and Darren Devine as Director.
|
|
(6)
|
We disposed of all of our holdings
in Titan Uranium for proceeds of $2,305,491. We retained a
10% carried interest and a 1% net smelter return on approximately
578,365 acres of uranium leases.
|
United States vs. Foreign Sales/Assets
Commencing the second quarter of fiscal 2008, we recorded our
reported oil and gas revenue.
Gross Revenue for fiscal
year ended:
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2009 (Canadian
GAAP)
|
|
$
|
6,470,725
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
12/31/2010 (IFRS)
|
|
$
|
8,085,627
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
12/31/2011 (IFRS)
|
|
$
|
8,824,345
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Asset Location as of:
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2009 (Canadian
GAAP)
|
|
$
|
16,874,298
|
|
|
$
|
29,011,578
|
|
12/31/2010 (IFRS)
|
|
$
|
18,563,424
|
|
|
$
|
11,849,967
|
|
12/31/2011 (IFRS)
|
|
$
|
20,622,433
|
|
|
$
|
8,816,003
|
|
Commodity Price Environment
Generally, the demand for, and the price
of, natural gas increases during the colder winter months and decreases during the warmer summer months. Pipelines, utilities,
local distribution companies and industrial users utilize natural gas storage facilities and purchase some of their anticipated
winter requirements during the summer, which can lessen seasonal demand fluctuations. Crude oil and the demand for heating oil
are also impacted by seasonal factors, with generally higher prices in the winter. Seasonal anomalies, such as mild winters, sometimes
lessen these fluctuations.
Our results of operations and financial
condition are significantly affected by oil and natural gas commodity prices, which can fluctuate dramatically. The market for
oil and natural gas is beyond our control and prices are difficult to predict.
Forward Contracts
The Company is not bound by an agreement
(including any transportation agreement) directly or through an aggregator, under which it may be precluded from fully realizing,
or may be protected from the full effect of, future market prices for oil and gas.
The following table summarizes the Company’s
crude oil risk management positions at December 31, 2011:
Instrument type
|
|
Contract Month
|
|
Volume
|
|
Price per barrel
|
|
Western Texas Instrument (“WTI”)
Sold Futures
|
|
February 2012
|
|
4,000 barrels per month
|
|
US$
|
98
|
|
Western Texas Instrument (“WTI”)
Sold Futures
|
|
March 2012
|
|
4,000 barrels per month
|
|
US$
|
98
|
|
Western Texas Instrument (“WTI”)
Sold Futures
|
|
April 2012
|
|
4,000 barrels per month
|
|
US$
|
98
|
|
Additional Information Concerning Abandonment and Reclamation
Costs
For the Company’s Canadian and US
oil and gas interests, the well abandonment costs for all wells with reserves have been included at the property level. The Company
estimated the total undiscounted amount of the cash flows required to settle the retirement obligations to be approximately $1,635,000.
These obligations are expected to be settled over the next 20 years with the majority of costs incurred between 2018 and 2025.
Additional abandonment costs associated with non-reserves wells, lease reclamation costs and facility abandonment and reclamation
expenses have not been included.
Government Regulations
Our oil and natural gas exploration, production
and related operations, when developed, are subject to extensive laws and regulations promulgated by federal, state, tribal and
local authorities and agencies. These laws and regulations often require permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and reports
concerning operations, and impose other requirements relating to the exploration for and production of oil and natural gas. Many
of the laws and regulations govern the location of wells, the method of drilling and casing wells, the plugging and abandoning
of wells, the restoration of properties upon which wells are drilled, temporary storage tank operations, air emissions from flaring,
compression, the construction and use of access roads, sour gas management and the disposal of fluids used in connection with
operations.
Our operations are subject to environmental
regulations (including regular environmental impact assessments and permitting) in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Such
regulations cover a wide variety of matters, including, without limitation, emission of greenhouse gases, prevention of waste,
pollution and protection of the environment, labour regulations and worker safety. Under such regulations there are preventative
obligations, clean-up costs and liabilities for toxic or hazardous substances which may exist on or under any of its properties
or which may be produced as a result of its operations. Environmental legislation and legislation relating to exploration and
production of oil and natural gas will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance,
more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their
directors and employees. Such stricter standards could impact our costs and have an adverse effect on results of operations.
The Comprehensive Environmental, Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act, or CERCLA, and comparable state statutes impose strict, joint and several liability on owners
and operators of sites and on persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of "hazardous substances" found at
such sites. It is not uncommon for the government to file claims requiring cleanup actions, demands for reimbursement for government-incurred
cleanup costs, or natural resource damages, or for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal
injury and property damage allegedly caused by hazardous substances released into the environment. The Federal Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act, or RCRA, and comparable state statutes govern the disposal of "solid waste" and "hazardous waste"
and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for noncompliance, as well as requirements for corrective actions.
Although CERCLA currently excludes petroleum from its definition of "hazardous substance," state laws affecting our
operations may impose clean-up liability relating to petroleum and petroleum-related products. In addition, although RCRA classifies
certain oil field wastes as "non-hazardous," such exploration and production wastes could be reclassified as hazardous
wastes thereby making such wastes subject to more stringent handling and disposal requirements. CERCLA, RCRA and comparable state
statutes can impose liability for clean-up of sites and disposal of substances found on drilling and production sites long after
operations on such sites have been completed. Other statutes relating to the storage and handling of pollutants include the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, which requires certain owners and operators of facilities that store or otherwise handle oil to
prepare and implement spill response plans relating to the potential discharge of oil into surface waters. The OPA, contains numerous
requirements relating to prevention of, reporting of, and response to oil spills into waters of the United States. State laws
mandate oil cleanup programs with respect to contaminated soil. A failure to comply with OPA's requirements or inadequate cooperation
during a spill response action may subject a responsible party to civil or criminal enforcement actions.
The Endangered Species Act, or ESA, seeks
to ensure that activities do not jeopardize endangered or threatened animal, fish and plant species, or destroy or modify the
critical habitat of such species. Under the ESA, exploration and production operations, as well as actions by federal agencies,
may not significantly impair or jeopardize the species or its habitat. The ESA has been used to prevent or delay drilling activities
and provides for criminal penalties for willful violations of its provisions. Other statutes that provide protection to animal
and plant species and that may apply to our operations include, without limitation, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the
Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Although we believe that our operations are in substantial
compliance with these statutes, any change in these statutes or any reclassification of a species as threatened or endangered
or re-determination of the extent of "critical habit" could subject us to significant expenses to modify our operations
or could force us to discontinue some operations altogether.
The National Environmental Policy Act,
or NEPA, requires a thorough review of the environmental impacts of "major federal actions" and a determination of whether
proposed actions on federal and certain Indian lands would result in "significant impact." For purposes of NEPA, "major
federal action" can be something as basic as issuance of a required permit. For oil and gas operations on federal and certain
Indian lands or requiring federal permits, NEPA review can increase the time for obtaining approval and impose additional regulatory
burdens on the natural gas and oil industry, thereby increasing our costs of doing business and our profitability.
The Clean Water Act, or CWA, and comparable
state statutes, impose restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants, including spills and leaks of oil and other substances,
into waters of the United States. The discharge of pollutants into regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the
terms of a permit issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or an analogous state agency. The CWA regulates storm water
run-off from oil and natural gas facilities and requires a storm water discharge permit for certain activities. Such a permit
requires the regulated facility to monitor and sample storm water run-off from its operations. The CWA and regulations implemented
thereunder also prohibit discharges of dredged and fill material in wetlands and other waters of the United States unless authorized
by an appropriately issued permit. The CWA and comparable state statutes provide for civil, criminal and administrative penalties
for unauthorized discharges for oil and other pollutants and impose liability on parties responsible for those discharges for
the costs of cleaning up any environmental damage caused by the release and for natural resource damages resulting from the release.
The Safe Drinking Water Act, or SDWA,
and the Underground Injection Control (UIC) program promulgated thereunder, regulate the drilling and operation of subsurface
injection wells. EPA directly administers the UIC program in some states and in others the responsibility for the program has
been delegated to the state. The program requires that a permit be obtained before drilling a disposal well. Violation of these
regulations and/or contamination of groundwater by oil and natural gas drilling, production, and related operations may result
in fines, penalties, and remediation costs, among other sanctions and liabilities under the SWDA and state laws. In addition,
third party claims may be filed by landowners and other parties claiming damages for alternative water supplies, property damages,
and bodily injury.
The Clean Air Act, as amended, restricts
the emission of air pollutants from many sources, including oil and gas operations. New facilities may be required to obtain permits
before work can begin, and existing facilities may be required to incur capital costs in order to remain in compliance. In addition,
the EPA has promulgated more stringent regulations governing emissions of toxic air pollutants from sources in the oil and gas
industry, and these regulations may increase the costs of compliance for some facilities.
Significant studies and research have
been devoted to climate change and global warming, and climate change has developed into a major political issue in the United
States and globally. Certain research suggests that greenhouse gas emissions contribute to climate change and pose a threat to
the environment. Recent scientific research and political debate has focused in part on carbon dioxide and methane incidental
to oil and natural gas exploration and production. Many state governments have enacted legislation directed at controlling greenhouse
gas emissions, and future state and federal legislation and regulation could impose additional restrictions or requirements in
connection with our operations and favor use of alternative energy sources, which could increase operating costs and demand for
oil products. As such, our business could be materially adversely affected by domestic and international legislation targeted
at controlling climate change.
We expect to incur abandonment and site
reclamation costs as existing oil and gas properties are abandoned and reclaimed; however, we do not anticipate making material
expenditures beyond normal compliance with environmental regulations in 2012 and future years.
The health and safety of employees, contractors
and the public, as well as the protection of the environment, is of utmost importance to us. We endeavour to conduct our operations
in a manner that will minimize adverse effects of emergency situations by:
|
·
|
complying
with government
regulations
and standards;
|
|
·
|
following
industry
codes, practices
and guidelines;
|
|
·
|
ensuring
prompt,
effective
response
and repair
to emergency
situations
and environmental
incidents;
and
|
|
·
|
educating
employees
and contractors
of the importance
of compliance
with corporate
safety and
environmental
rules and
procedures.
|
We believe that all of our personnel have
a vital role in achieving excellence in environmental, health and safety performance. This is best achieved through careful planning
and the support and active participation of everyone involved.
Competition
We operate in geographical areas where
there is strong competition by other companies for reserve acquisitions, exploration leases, licences and concessions and skilled
industry personnel. Our competitors include major integrated oil and natural gas companies and numerous other independent oil
and natural gas companies and individual producers and operators, many of whom have greater financial and personnel resources
than us. Our ability to acquire additional property rights, to discover reserves, to participate in drilling opportunities and
to identify and enter into commercial arrangements with customers is dependent upon developing and maintaining close working relationships
with its current industry partners and joint operators, and its ability to select and evaluate suitable properties and to consummate
transactions in a highly competitive environment.
We compete with many companies possessing
greater financial resources and technical facilities for the acquisition of oil and gas properties, exploration and production
equipment, as well as for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees.
Seasonality
All of our operations in Canada are affected
by seasonal operating conditions. Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd., our wholly owned subsidiary, holds properties in northwestern
Alberta and northeastern British Columbia which are accessible to heavy equipment in winter only when the ground is frozen, typically
between December to early April. For this reason drilling and pipeline construction ceases over the remainder of the year, limiting
growth to winter only. Production operations continue year round in these areas once production is established. The prices that
we will receive for oil and gas production in the future are weighted to world benchmark prices and may be adversely affected
by mild weather conditions.
|
C.
|
Organizational
Structure
|
Dejour Energy Inc. (formerly Dejour Enterprises
Ltd.) is incorporated under the laws of British Columbia, Canada. The Company was originally incorporated as “Dejour Mines
Limited” on March 29, 1968 under the laws of the Province of Ontario. By articles of amendment dated October 30, 2001, the
issued shares were consolidated on the basis of one (1) new for every fifteen (15) old shares and the name of the Company was
changed to Dejour Enterprises Ltd. On June 6, 2003, the shareholders approved a resolution to complete a one-for-three-share consolidation,
which became effective on October 1, 2003. In 2005, the Company was continued in British Columbia under the
Business Corporations
Act
(British Columbia). On March 9, 2011, the Company changed its name from Dejour Enterprises Ltd. to Dejour Energy Inc.
Intercorporate Relationships
We have four 100% owned subsidiaries:
|
·
|
Dejour
Energy (USA)
Corp. (“Dejour
USA”),
a Nevada
corporation,
holds Dejour's
United States
oil and
gas interests,
|
|
·
|
Dejour
Energy (Alberta)
Ltd. (“DEAL”),
an Alberta
corporation,
holds its
Canadian
oil and
gas interests
in northwestern
Alberta
and northeastern
British
Columbia;
|
|
·
|
Wild
Horse Energy
Ltd. (“Wild
Horse”),
an inactive
Alberta
corporation,
and
|
|
·
|
0855524
B.C. Ltd.
(“0855524
”)
,
a British
Columbia
Corporation,
which had
disposed
of its Montney
(Buick Creek)
property
during 2010
and is currently
inactive.
|
|
D.
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Our executive offices are located in rented
premises of approximately 2,519 sq. ft. at 598 – 999 Canada Place, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 3E1. We began
occupying these facilities on July 1, 2009. Current monthly base rent is $6,088.
Resource Properties
Our current focus is on oil and gas properties
located in the United States and Canada. We formerly had direct interest in uranium exploration properties, which we sold to Titan
Uranium Inc. in 2006 for Titan common shares. We sold all of our Titan common shares in 2009, but retained a 1% NSR on all the
properties sold to Titan, and a 10% working interest in each claim, carried by Titan to a completed bankable feasibility study
after which we may elect to participate as to its 10% interest or convert to an additional 1% NSR.
We currently
have
oil and gas leases in the following regions:
|
·
|
The
Piceance,
Paradox
and Uinta
Basins in
the US Rocky
Mountains.
|
|
·
|
The
Peace River
Arch of
northeastern
British
Columbia
and north
western
Alberta,
Canada.
|
United States Oil and Gas Properties
In July 2006, our U.S. subsidiary, Dejour
USA, entered into a participation agreement (the “2006 Retamco Agreement”) with Retamco Operating, Inc. (“Retamco”),
a U.S. privately owned oil and gas corporation, and Brownstone Ventures (US) Inc. (“Brownstone”), a subsidiary of
Brownstone Ventures Inc., a Canadian company listed on the TSX-V. Under the agreement, Dejour USA and Brownstone agreed to participate
in the ownership of specified oil and gas leasehold interests and related exploration and development of those leases located
in the Piceance, Uinta and Paradox Basins of western Colorado and eastern Utah.
In June 2008, Dejour USA entered into
a further purchase and sale agreement with Retamco resulting in Dejour USA acquiring an additional 64,000 net acres involving
the same properties in which it purchased an interest in the 2006 Retamco Agreement. Additionally, as a part of this latter agreement
Dejour USA sold its 25% working interests in two wells in the North Barcus Creek Prospect (located in Piceance Basin, Colorado)
and its lease interest in the Rio Blanco Deep Prospect (located in northern Colorado).
Certain leases expired or sold, and the
Company currently has approximately 100,000 net acres in the Piceance, Paradox and Uinta Projects.
Kokopelli (Gibson Gulch)
The Company continued working with its
partners to bring this project into production. Dejour has a 71.43% working interest in this 2,200 acre project which is ideally
situated for exploitation of both the Williams Fork and Mancos shale bodies. The Williams Companies, Inc. and Bill Barrett Corporation
are developing and producing on adjacent acreage to the east, west and north of the Company’s acreage. Dejour USA has worked
closely with important constituents including local citizenry and government, the Bureau of Land Management and the Colorado Division
of Wildlife to develop a mutually acceptable development plan for this environmentally sensitive area. In 2010, we were granted
approval to develop a 660 acre portion of the leases with 10-acre spacing. Approval of this spacing on the remainder of the lease
acreage has enabled us and our partner to drill up to 220 wells (158 wells net to us) from a few multi-well drilling pads to optimally
exploit the gas reserves in the subsurface. Construction of the first drilling pad commenced in the fourth quarter of 2011 with
production expected to begin in the second half of 2012.
South Rangely
The Rangely Prospect Area is just south
of Rangely Field near the Utah border. In the Rangely prospect area, fractured Mancos Shale is producing gas. The Mancos also
contains sandstone intervals, Mancos A and Mancos B, which can be productive. The eastern shoulder of the Douglas Creek Arch and
the flanks of the Rangely Anticline as well as other areas of the basin are being explored for this Cretaceous age strata. The
Mancos is also considered a source rock in the area.
Evaluation and subsequent exploitation
of an oil prospect at South Rangely, was deferred from the fourth quarter of 2010 to the second quarter of 2011, as a result of
minor delays in the permitting process that prevented drilling from occurring before the winter drilling prohibitions designed
to protect big game habitat. Despite a minor delay, we did not alter our plans to drill an evaluation well on the 7,000 acre lease
located just south of Rangely field. Recent advances in horizontal drilling and fracture stimulation technology have moved this
previously marginal development into robust economic status. Success at South Rangely may allow us to revisit plans to evaluate
and potentially exploit a 22,000 acre tract at our North Rangely prospect.
In May 2011, we announced that we and
our partners had executed a development alliance with a private Dallas based US E&P with adjacent properties and in June 2011,
we announced that it has drilled and set casing on an initial vertical well to test the Mancos/Niobrara potential on its South
Rangely. After a thorough review of the well data the well will be completed, fractured and flow tested to determine the commercial
potential of the Lower Mancos “C” Sand in this area
In June 2011, the Company drilled and
cased an evaluation well on this 5,500 gross acre (3,300 net acre) lease which is located just south of the Rangely field. The
well was drilled and casing set on approximately 90 feet of gross Mancos "B" Sand and later successfully fractured and
stimulated. The well flowed rich gas from the Mancos "B" Sand in commercial quantities. Analysis of the gas showed a
higher natural gas liquid (“NGL”) yield from the South Rangely discovery than that expected from our NGL development
at Kokopelli (formerly Gibson Gulch).
West Grand Valley (Piceance Basin)
On the Company’s West Grand Valley
property, Dejour operates approximately 5,180 acres (gross) with a 71.43% working interest in an area of active drilling by EnCana,
Laramie Partners II and Axia. Success in developing the gas in the Lower Mancos (Niobrara) section has revitalized drilling interest
in this area of the Piceance Basin. Included in the West Grand Valley property acreage is the 1400+ acre Roan Creek evaluation
project. This project is located very close to and sandwiched between existing Williams Fork gas fields operated by Occidental
and Chevron. While it is likely that the Williams Fork at Roan Creek will be somewhat thinner than is found to the east and west,
Roan Creek has Mancos potential which can be tested via an exploratory tail to a Williams Fork appraisal well. During 2009, the
various geologic and commercial studies conducted by us highlighted the potential at Roan Creek. As a result of those studies,
we began to make plans for a single well drilling program. The permitting process is underway and drilling at Roan Creek will
follow the first increment of drilling at Kokopelli.
Future Exploration and Evaluation
As a result of a reasonably comprehensive
geologic and commercial study in 2009, Dejour has high graded two future development and appraisal projects including:
|
·
|
Plateau
(Piceance Basin)
– We have
71.43% working
interest in
this 3,014 acre
(gross) project
located south
of Roan Creek
has Williams
Fork potential
as evidenced
by successful
drilling by
EnCana Corporation
at acreage adjacent
to the Company’s
holdings.
|
|
·
|
North
Rangely –
We have 71.43%
working interest
in this 18,000
acre (gross)
project located
north of the
Rangely Field,
is prospective
for oil in the
Lower Mancos
(Niobrara),
Dakota, Morrison
and Phosphoria
formations.
|
These potential developments will be deferred
to at least 2013 as the current natural gas price has caused Dejour to delay the start of investments on its other leases in Colorado.
Exploitation of these opportunities will in all likelihood proceed once developments at Kokopelli, South Rangely and Roan Creek
have been advanced to the point that Company’s cash flow and proved producing reserve base can support the additional development
costs.
Other Prospect Areas
We have approximately 77,403 net acres
in the following prospect areas, which are considered as non-core projects of the Company.
Area
|
|
Prospect
|
|
Net
acres to Dejour
|
|
Piceance
|
|
Book
Cliffs
|
|
|
11,524
|
|
|
|
Gunnison
|
|
|
753
|
|
Paradox
|
|
San Juan
|
|
|
169
|
|
Uinta
|
|
Bitter Creek
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
Bonanza
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
Cisco
|
|
|
5,071
|
|
|
|
Displacement
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
Gorge Spring
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
Oil shale
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
Seep Ridge
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
Tri County
|
|
|
677
|
|
Northern Colorado
|
|
Meeker
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
Pinyon
|
|
|
4,637
|
|
|
|
Waddle Creek
|
|
|
80
|
|
Sub-Thrust
|
|
Dinosaur
|
|
|
44,878
|
|
|
|
Ashley
|
|
|
480
|
|
Sand Wash
|
|
Sand Wash
|
|
|
133
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
77,403
|
|
Canadian Oil and Gas Properties
Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Dejour Energy
(Alberta) Ltd. (“DEAL”), currently has interests in oil and gas properties in the Peace River Arch located principally
in northeastern British Columbia. DEAL’s holdings approximately 11,000 net acres concentrated in the Peace River Arch.
Summary of Operational Highlights
Production
and Netback Summary
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Production Volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas liquids (bbls)
|
|
|
81,468
|
|
|
|
86,119
|
|
Gas (mcf)
|
|
|
432,199
|
|
|
|
548,890
|
|
Total (BOE)
|
|
|
153,501
|
|
|
|
177,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Price Received:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas liquids ($/bbls)
|
|
|
88.98
|
|
|
|
67.46
|
|
Gas ($/mcf)
|
|
|
3.64
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
Total ($/BOE)
|
|
|
57.49
|
|
|
|
45.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties ($/BOE)
|
|
|
10.61
|
|
|
|
7.39
|
|
Operating and Transportation
Expenses ($/BOE)
|
|
|
16.18
|
|
|
|
14.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Netbacks ($/BOE)*
|
|
|
30.70
|
|
|
|
23.48
|
|
*
NON-GAAP MEASURES
Non-GAAP
measures are commonly used in the oil and gas industry. Certain measures in this Form 20-F includes disclosures of Call Cash Flow
from Operating Activities, Operating Netback, Operating Loss, and EBITDA, which are financial measures not prepared in accordance
with IFRS, and therefore are considered non-GAAP measures. A non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of historical or
future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts that are required to be disclosed
by GAAP.
The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for the numbers prepared in accordance with GAAP.
These measures
may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. These measures have been described and presented in this
document in order to provide shareholders and potential investors with additional information regarding our liquidity and our
ability to generate funds to finance our operations. The reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures are included in the table
below and elsewhere if there are any non-GAAP measures.
Operating Netback is a
non-GAAP measure defined as revenues less royalties and operating and transportation expenses.
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
8,824,000
|
|
|
|
8,086,000
|
|
Less: Royalties
|
|
|
(1,628,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,312,000
|
)
|
Less: Operating and transportation
expenses
|
|
|
(2,499,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,609,000
|
)
|
Operating Netback
|
|
|
4,697,000
|
|
|
|
4,165,000
|
|
The decrease in natural gas production
in 2011 was primarily the result of the temporary shut-in of gas production in the summer of 2011 due to maintenance related downtime
at the regional gas processing plant that is operated by a third party and is not under the Company’s control.
Production and Development Projects
Drake/Woodrush
2011
In December 2010, a waterflood project
application was expedited and approval was received. The project was implemented in early 2011 with water injection commencing
in March 2011. In the first quarter of 2011, gross production from the field was reduced to approximately 544 barrels of oil equivalent/day
(“BOED”) (408 BOED net) in response to the decreasing pressure in the Halfway oil sand. In October 2011, Dejour received
approval to operate the waterflood on a voidage replacement basis and in December drilled a third production well while increasing
total injection from 1200 BWPD to 2400 BWPD. The start-up and subsequent enhancement of the waterflood marked the end of major
capital investments in Woodrush. Dejour will concentrate on optimizing injection and production in the waterflood, controlling
cost and increasing margins on oil production.
Effective December 31, 2011, the Company's
reserve evaluation valued the before tax discounted net present value 10% (NPV
10
) of remaining proved reserves in the
Woodrush oil pool at $19 million net to Dejour’s 75% working interest. The reserve evaluation was conducted by an independent
firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP (“AJM Deloitte” or “AJM”) of Calgary, Alberta.
2010
After completing a 3-D seismic program
over the field in January 2010, we finalized drilling plans and in March 2010 commenced drilling of two development wells. The
first found the target Halfway sand tight, but encountered a new Gething Gas pool that was subsequently put on production at more
than 1,000 MCFD (100% gross). The second development well encountered the Halfway sand as expected, was completed and flow tested
at rates in excess of 500 BOPD (100% gross).
With the success of the drilling in March
2010, field production reached a record level in May 2010, averaging 970 BOED (100% gross), where 75% is oil. In the fourth quarter
of 2010, production from the field was reduced to approximately 560 BOED (100% gross) in response to increasing gas production
resulting from the decreasing pressure in the Halfway oil sand. In October 2010, the first water injection well was drilled to
the southeast limit of the reservoir. This well was produced briefly without the assistance of at 60 BOPD prior to conversion
to injection. In December 2010, a waterflood project application was expedited and approval was received. The project was fully
implemented in early 2011 with water injection commencing in March 2011. Water injection will be gradually ramped up to a level
of 1,500 to 2,000 BWPD with the resulting oil production expected to reach a peak of approximately 900 BOPD (100% gross) in the
second half of 2012.
In 2011 Dejour concentrated on optimizing
injection and production in the waterflood, controlling cost and increasing margins on gas production as the oil production is
gradually ramped up to its maximum level in the second half of 2012.
2009
DEAL was the successful bidder for 1,579
net acres of Crown land located adjacent to the northern boundary of the Woodrush lease which was offered for lease in November
2009. The price paid for this acquisition was approximately $340,000.
Late in 2009, we began preparations for
a 3-D seismic survey designed to investigate the northern portion of the Woodrush lease and the southern portion of the newly
acquired acreage. The survey was shot, processed and interpreted in late 2009/early 2010 with several drilling locations identified.
Rigs were contracted and two or three wells are anticipated to be drilled before activity is truncated at time of “break-up”
in the water prone areas which overlay the prospective oil and gas deposits.
In late 2009 and prior to the seismic
survey, DEAL drilled, sidetracked and suspended an oil and gas well with hydrocarbon shows in several intervals. The well location
was based upon previously acquired seismic data.
During 2009, DEAL sold 25% of its interest
in Woodrush/Drake for $4,500,000 in cash. Proceeds from the sale of the interest were used to fund expanded Woodrush/Drake investments
and to reduce our outstanding bank line of credit. DEAL’s working interest in Woodrush/Drake was 75% as at December 31,
2009.
Buick Creek (Montney)
In December 2010, we sold our entire 90%
interest in this area for net proceeds of approximately $952,000.
Reserve Data
The standards of the SEC require that
proved reserves be estimated using existing economic conditions (constant pricing). Based on this methodology, the Company’s
results have been calculated utilizing the 12-month average price for each of the years presented.
The Company reports in Canadian currency
and therefore the Reserves Data set forth in the tables below has been converted to Canadian dollars at the prevailing conversion
rate at December 31, 2011. The conversion rate used per Bank of Canada is 1.0170.
In 2011, AJM Deloitte, independent petroleum
engineering consultants based in Calgary, Alberta was retained by the Company to evaluate the Canadian properties of the Company.
Their report, titled “Reserve Estimation and Economic Evaluation, Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd.”, is dated March 23,
2012 and has an effective date of December 31, 2011. The report was originally completed on March 23, 2012 and subsequently updated
on October 31, 2012.
Gustavson Associates LLP, an independent
petroleum engineering consulting firm based in Boulder, Colorado has been retained by the Company to evaluate the US properties
of the Company. Their 2011 report, titled “Reserves Estimate and Financial Forecast as to Dejour’s Interest in the
Kokopelli Field Area, Garfield County, Colorado, and the South Rangely Field Area, Rio Blanco County, Colorado” is dated
February 15, 2012 and has an effective date of January 1, 2012. The report was originally completed on February 15, 2012 and subsequently
updated on April 5, 2013.
In 2010, GLJ Petroleum Consultants (“
GLJ
”),
independent petroleum engineering consultants based in Calgary, Alberta were retained by to evaluate our Canadian properties.
Their report, titled “Reserves Assessment and Evaluation of Canadian Oil and Gas Properties”, is dated March 22, 2011
and has an effective date of December 31, 2010.
The reserves data set forth below (the
"
Reserves Data
"), derived from AJM Deloitte and Gustavson’s reports, summarizes our oil, liquids and natural
gas reserves.
The AJM Deloitte and Gustavson reports
are based on certain factual data supplied by the Company, and AJM Deloitte and Gustavson's opinion of reasonable practice in
the industry. The extent and character of ownership and all factual data pertaining to the Company’s petroleum properties
and contracts (except for certain information residing in the public domain) were supplied by the Company to AJM and Gustavson
and accepted without any further investigation. AJM and Gustavson accepted this data as presented and neither title searches nor
field inspections were conducted. All statements relating to the activities of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2011
include a full year of operating data on the properties of the Company.
The reserve estimates of crude oil,
natural gas liquids and natural gas reserves provided herein are estimates only and there is no guarantee that the estimated reserves
will be recovered. Actual crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas reserves may be greater than or less than the estimates
provided herein.
Controls Over Reserve Report Preparation
Our reserve estimates reports as of December 31,
2011 are prepared by our independent qualified reserve evaluators, AJM and Gustavson. To ensure accuracy and completeness of the
data prior to disclosure of reserve estimates to the public, our reserves committee does the following: (1) reviews our procedures
for providing information to the independent qualified reserve evaluators, (2) meets with the independent qualified reserves evaluators
to determine whether any restrictions affected the ability of the qualified reserves evaluators to report without reservation,
(3) reviews the reserves data with management and the independent qualified reserves evaluator. If the reserve committee is satisfied
with results of its evaluation it will approve the content of our reserve disclosure. If any concerns arise in the reserve committee’s
evaluation, the reserve committee will work with our management and the independent qualified reserves evaluators to resolve the
issues before disclosure of reserves is made public.
As of December 31, 2011, the Company’s
reserve committee was composed of: Harrison Blacker, Robert Holmes and Richard Patricio. Please see “Item 6. Directors,
Senior Management and Employees, A. Directors and Senior Management” for biographical information on the members of the
reserve committee.
Summary of Oil and Gas Reserves as of Fiscal Year-End Based
on Average Fiscal Year Prices
|
|
Net
Reserves
|
|
Reserves
Category
|
|
Oil
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
Condensate
(MBO)
|
|
|
Natural
Gas
(Mmcf)
|
|
|
Natural
Gas Liquids
(Mbbl)
|
|
PROVED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
United
States
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
United
States
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
41,156
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
TOTAL
PROVED
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
42,066
|
|
|
|
3,867
|
|
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Proved
Undeveloped
Reserves
|
|
|
|
Oil
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
|
Condensate
(MBO)
|
|
|
|
Natural
Gas
(Mmcf)
|
|
|
|
Natural
Gas
Liquids
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
41,156
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
The significant majority of the undeveloped
reserves are scheduled to be developed within the next five years.
Canada – Increase in Total Proved
Oil Reserves of 190 Mbbls and decrease in Total Proved Natural Gas Reserves of 24 MMcf:
During the year ended December 31, 2011,
the Company received approval from the British Columbia Oil and Gas Commission to implement a waterflood pressure maintenance
system (“waterflood”) at its Woodrush property in northeastern British Columbia, Canada. Based on this approval and
the Company’s commitment to spend approximately $4,000,000 to implement the waterflood, AJM Deloitte increased, by way of
a technical revision, the Company’s total proved oil reserves by 190 Mbbl. There was no related increase in natural gas
reserves as the impact of the waterflood is not expected to increase recoverable natural gas reserves. Rather, there is expected
to be a decrease in natural gas reserves as the influx of water into the reservoir will replace some of the natural gas reserves-in-place.
This resulted in the decrease of natural gas reserves of 24 Mmcf.
United States – Increase in Total
Proved Natural Gas Liquids Reserves of 3,770 Mbbls:
During the year ended December 31, 2011,
the Company amended its method of reporting natural gas liquids to separate them from the Company’s natural gas reserves
and show them separately. This resulted in an increase of 3,770 Mbbls of natural gas liquids and a related decrease of 5,072 MMcf
of natural gas.
Total Proved Reserves
The table below compares our estimated
proved reserves and associated present value (discounted at an annual rate of 10%) of the estimated future revenue before income
tax.
|
|
December
31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
Gas Liquids
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
PV-10
(2)
|
|
Canada (Proved Developed and Undeveloped
Reserves)
|
|
(Mmcf)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(Mmcfe)
|
|
|
(in
thousands Cdn$)
|
|
2011 12-month average prices (SEC)
(1)
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
|
$
|
19,247
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Condensate
|
|
|
Gas Liquids
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
PV-10
(2)
|
|
United States (Proved Developed and Undeveloped
Reserves)
|
|
(Mmcf)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(Mmcfe)
|
|
|
(in
thousands Cdn$)
|
|
2011 12-month average prices (SEC)
(1)
|
|
|
41,314
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
3,863
|
|
|
|
66,214
|
|
|
$
|
33,462
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
Condensate
|
|
|
Gas Liquids
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
PV-10
(2)
|
|
Total (Proved Developed and Undeveloped
Reserves)
|
|
(Mmcf)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(Mmcfe)
|
|
|
(in
thousands Cdn$)
|
|
2011 12-month average prices (SEC)
(1)
|
|
|
42,066
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
3,867
|
|
|
|
68,892
|
|
|
$
|
52,709
|
|
Reconciliation to Standardized
Measure
As at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of Canadian dollars)
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Present value of estimated
future net cash flows before income taxes
|
|
$
|
19,247
|
|
|
$
|
33,462
|
|
|
$
|
52,709
|
|
Income taxes – discounted
|
|
|
(788
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(788
|
)
|
Standardized measure of discounted future
net cash flows
|
|
$
|
18,459
|
|
|
$
|
33,462
|
|
|
$
|
51,921
|
|
Notes:
|
(1)
|
The 12-month
average prices (SEC) are calculated based
on an average of the first price on the
first day of each month in 2011, adjusted
for wellhead differential and current costs
prevailing at December 31, 2011. The
12-month average prices (SEC) used for
Canadian properties were Cdn$90.15 per
barrel of oil and Cdn$3.82 per Mcf of natural
gas. The 12-month average prices (SEC)
used for US properties were US$89.19 per
barrel of condensate, US$30.24 per barrel
of ethane, US$43.18 per barrel of heavy
NGLs, and US$3.14 per Mcf of natural gas.
|
|
(2)
|
Present
value of estimated future net cash flows
before income taxes (PV-10) is considered
a non-GAAP financial measure as defined
by the SEC. We believe that
our PV-10 presentation is relevant and
useful to our investors because it presents
the discounted future net cash flows attributable
to our proved reserves before taking into
account the related deferred income taxes,
as such taxes may differ among various
companies because of differences in the
amounts and timing of deductible basis,
net operating loss carryforwards and other
factors. We believe investors
and creditors use our PV-10, before tax,
as a basis for comparison of the relative
size and value of our proved reserves to
the reserve estimates of other companies. PV-10
is not a measure of financial or operating
performance under GAAP and is not intended
to represent the current market value of
our estimated oil and natural gas reserves.
PV-10, before tax, should not be considered
in isolation or as a substitute for the
standardized measure of discounted future
net cash flows as defined under GAAP.
|
|
(3)
|
US dollars
are converted into Canadian dollars using
the closing exchange rate on December 31,
2011, which is US$1.00 = Cdn$1.017.
|
Oil and Gas Production, Production Prices and Production
Costs
The following is our total net oil and
gas production for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009. All production came from our Canadian properties.
There was no production from our United States properties in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, or 2009.
Production
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
|
Oil
(bbls)
|
|
|
Natural
Gas
(Mcf)
|
|
|
Natural
Gas Liquids
(bbls)
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
80,113
|
|
|
|
432,199
|
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
84,197
|
|
|
|
548,890
|
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
72,254
|
|
|
|
566,158
|
|
|
|
2,028
|
|
The following table includes the average prices the Company
received for its production for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Average
Sales Prices
|
Fiscal Year
Ended
|
|
Oil
($/bbls)
|
|
|
Natural
Gas
($/Mcf)
|
|
|
Natural
Gas Liquids
($/bbls)
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
88.72
|
|
|
|
3.64
|
|
|
|
104.19
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
67.67
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
|
|
64.04
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
54.67
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
|
|
|
52.91
|
|
The following table includes the average production cost, not
including ad valorem and severance taxes, per unit of production for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Average
Production Costs
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Oil
($/bbls)
|
|
|
Natural
Gas
($/Mcf)
|
|
|
Natural
Gas Liquids
($/bbls)
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
16.66
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
14.02
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
13.01
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
|
|
13.01
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
23.38
|
|
|
|
3.11
|
|
|
|
16.12
|
|
Drilling and Other Exploratory and Development Activities
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, we drilled
the following wells:
|
|
Net Exploratory
Wells
|
|
|
Net Development
Wells
|
|
Canada
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
Dry
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
Dry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Dry Wells
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Service Wells
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Suspended
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Wells
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Net Exploratory
Wells
|
|
|
Net Development
Wells
|
|
U.S.A
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
Dry
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
Dry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Wells
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, we drilled
the following wells:
|
|
Net Exploratory
Wells
|
|
|
Net Development
Wells
|
|
Canada
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
Dry
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
Dry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Dry Wells
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Service Wells
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Suspended
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Wells
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, we drilled
the following wells:
|
|
Net Exploratory
Wells
|
|
|
Net Development
Wells
|
|
Canada
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
Dry
|
|
|
Productive
|
|
|
Dry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Dry Wells
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Service Wells
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Suspended
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Wells
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Delivery Commitments
We have no current delivery commitments for either oil or natural
gas.
Oil and Gas Properties and Wells
As of December 31, 2011, we had 10 gross (7.13 net) producing
oil or natural gas wells.
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
Canada
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Producing
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
|
Shut-In
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
U.S.A
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shut-In (1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, we had 9 gross (6.63 net) producing
oil or natural gas wells.
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
Canada
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Producing
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
Shut-In
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
Interest in Oil and Gas Properties
The following table summarizes our landholdings as of December
31, 2011:
Landholdings
|
|
Developed Acreage
(1)
|
|
|
Undeveloped Acreage
(2)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
As of December 31, 2011
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
10,280
|
|
|
|
6,516
|
|
|
|
21,530
|
|
|
|
5,838
|
|
|
|
31,810
|
|
|
|
12,354
|
|
U.S.A
|
|
|
5,498
|
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
|
|
205,837
|
|
|
|
100,951
|
|
|
|
211,335
|
|
|
|
102,915
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15,778
|
|
|
|
8,480
|
|
|
|
227,367
|
|
|
|
106,789
|
|
|
|
243,145
|
|
|
|
115,269
|
|
|
(1)
|
Developed
acres are acres spaced or assigned to productive
wells including undrilled acreage held-by-production
under the terms of a lease.
|
|
(2)
|
Undeveloped
acres are acres on which wells have not been drilled
or completed to a point that would permit the
production of commercial quantities of oil or
gas, regardless of whether such acreage contains
proved reserves.
|
The following table lists the net undeveloped
acreage as of December 31, 2011, the net acreage expiring in the years ending December 31, 2012, 2013, and 2014 and thereafter:
Landholdings
|
|
Undeveloped
Acreage
|
|
As of December 31, 2011
|
|
Net acreage
|
|
|
2012 Expirations
|
|
|
2013 Expirations
|
|
|
2014 and thereafter Expirations
|
|
Canada:
|
|
|
5,838
|
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
Chinchaga
|
|
|
2,304
|
|
|
|
2,304
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Wembley
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Alderson
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Manning
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
Boundary Lake
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Kaybob
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S.A:
|
|
|
100,951
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
4,400
|
|
|
|
95,089
|
|
Ashley
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
Bitter Creek
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
Bonanza
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Book Cliffs
|
|
|
11,525
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
9,777
|
|
Cisco
|
|
|
5,071
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
4,751
|
|
Dinosaur
|
|
|
44,878
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
44,878
|
|
Displacement Point
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
4,072
|
|
Gorge Spring
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
Green River
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
2,401
|
|
Gunnison
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
Kokopelli
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
Meeker
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
2,287
|
|
Oil Shale
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
Pinyon Ridge
|
|
|
4,637
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
2,277
|
|
Plateau
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
N. Rangely
|
|
|
12,709
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,330
|
|
Roan Creek (Grand Valley)
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
San Juan
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
Sand Wash
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Seep Ridge
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Tri County South
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
Waddle Creek
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
TOTAL:
|
|
|
106,789
|
|
|
|
6,276
|
|
|
|
4,400
|
|
|
|
96,113
|
|
Uranium Properties
In 2009, we disposed of all of our 16,750,000
shares in Titan Uranium Inc. for proceeds of $2,305,491. We have 10% carried interest and 1% Net Smelter Return on certain uranium
exploration leases in Saskatchewan operated by Titan Uranium Inc. However, we no longer maintain the right of first refusal on
future financings, we are no longer required to provide geologists to Titan, and our representatives have since resigned from
the Titan Board of Directors.
|
ITEM 4A.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF
COMMENTS
|
Not Applicable.
|
ITEM 5.
|
OPERATING
AND
FINANCIAL
REVIEW
AND
PROSPECTS
|
The following is a discussion of our
consolidated operating results and financial position, including all our wholly-owned subsidiaries. It should be read in conjunction
with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2011 and related notes included therein
under the heading "Item 18. Financial Statements" below.
The financial statements of the Company
for the year ended December 31, 2011 are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)
as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and interpretations of the International Financial
Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”). These are the Company’s first consolidated annual financial statements
presented in accordance with IFRS.
The preparation of these consolidated
financial statements resulted in changes to the accounting policies as compared with the most recent annual financial statements
prepared under Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“Canadian GAAP”). These consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the Company’s 2010 annual financial statements and the explanation of how the transition
to IFRS has affected the reported financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company provided in note 25
of the Company’s consolidated financial statements included therein under the heading "Item 18. Financial Statements"
below.
Certain forward-looking statements
are discussed in this Item 5 with respect to our activities and future financial results. These are subject to risks and uncertainties
that may cause projected results or events to differ materially from actual results or events. Readers should also read the "Cautionary
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" above and “Item 3. Key Information - Risk Factors.”
INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING
STANDARDS
On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted
IFRS for financial reporting purposes, with a transition date of January 1, 2010. The consolidated financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2011, including required comparative information, have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. Previously,
the Company prepared its financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP. Unless otherwise noted, 2010 comparative financial
statement information has been prepared in accordance with IFRS.
The adoption of IFRS has not had a material
impact on the Company’s operations, strategic decisions, cash flow and capital expenditures. The most significant changes
to the Company’s accounting policies related to the accounting for its property, plant and equipment and accounting for
derivative financial instruments. Other impacted areas include stock-based compensation, foreign currency translation and accounting
for flow through shares.
Further information on the IFRS accounting
policies, impacts and reconciliation between previous Canadian GAAP and IFRS are provided in Note 3 and Note 25 to the Company’s
Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2011. The reconciliations include the Consolidated Balance Sheets
as at January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010, Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the year ended
December 31, 2010, and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The following provides a summary of the
significant IFRS accounting policy changes.
Exploration and Evaluation Assets
Under Canadian GAAP, the Company followed
the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (“CICA”) guideline on full cost accounting in which all costs directly
associated with the acquisition of, the exploration for, and the development of natural gas and crude oil reserves are capitalized
on a country-by-country cost centre basis. Costs accumulated within each country cost centre were depleted using the unit-of-production
method based on proved reserves determined using estimated future prices and costs. Under IFRS, the Company adopted new accounting
policies for its oil and gas activities, including pre-exploration costs, exploration and evaluation costs and development costs.
Under IFRS, pre-exploration costs are
expensed and exploration and evaluation (“E&E”) costs are those expenditures for an area or project for which
technical feasibility and commercial viability have not yet been determined. The technical feasibility and commercial viability
of extracting a mineral resource is considered to be determinable when proven reserves are determined to exist. Development (“D&P”)
costs include those expenditures for areas or projects where technical feasibility and commercial viability have been determined.
Under Canadian GAAP, all costs, including E&E assets were capitalized as Property and Equipment (“D&P”). Under
IFRS, E&E costs and D&P are disclosed as different class of assets.
Impairment
Under Canadian GAAP, the Company was required
to recognize an impairment loss if the carrying amount exceeds the undiscounted cash flows from proved reserves for the country
cost centre. If an impairment loss was to be recognized, it was then measured as the amount that the carrying value exceeded the
sum of the estimated fair value of the proved and probable reserves and the costs of unproved properties. Impairments recognized
under Canadian GAAP could not be reversed.
Under IFRS, the Company is required to
recognize and measure an impairment loss if the carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount for a cash-generating unit (“CGU”).
Oil and gas assets are grouped into CGUs based on their ability to generate largely independent cash flows. Under IFRS, the recoverable
amount is the higher of the estimated fair value less cost to sell and value in use. Impairment losses, other than goodwill, can
be reversed when there is a subsequent increase in the recoverable amount.
Upon adoption of IFRS, the Company recognized
an additional impairment charge of $14.7 million to the opening deficit at January 1, 2010, relating to certain non-core E&E
assets in the US. The impairment charge was based on the difference between the net book value of the assets and the estimated
recoverable amount. The recoverable amount was determined using the fair value less costs to sell based on the expected amount
for which the asset could be sold in an arm’s length transaction. Under Canadian GAAP, these assets were included in the
US country cost centre ceiling test, which was not impaired as at December 31, 2009.
Warrant Liabilities
The Company issued US$ denominated warrants
as part of equity financings, while the Company’s functional currency is the CAD$. Under Canadian GAAP, common share purchase
warrants were classified as equity.
Under IFRS, the Company determined that
the warrants denominated in US$ outstanding at the date of transition must be treated as warrant liabilities in the Company’s
statement of financial position. Any issuance costs related to the warrants denominated in a foreign currency are expensed upon
initial issuance. Prospectively, these warrants are re-measured at each balance sheet date based on estimated fair value, and
any resultant changes in fair value are recorded as non-cash valuation adjustments as income or loss in the respective period.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The Company makes estimates and assumptions
about the future that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Estimates and judgments are continually evaluated
based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under
the circumstances. In the future, actual experience may differ from these estimates and assumptions.
The effect of a change in an accounting
estimate is recognized prospectively by including it in profit or loss in the period of the change, if the change affects that
period only; or in the period of the change and future periods, if the change affects both.
Information about critical judgments in
applying accounting policies that have the most significant risk of causing material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets
and liabilities recognized in the condensed interim consolidated financial statements within the next financial year are discussed
below:
Reserves
The estimate of reserves is used in forecasting
the recoverability and economic viability of the Company’s oil and gas properties, and in the depletion and impairment calculations.
The process of estimating reserves is complex and requires significant interpretation and judgment. It is affected by economic
conditions, production, operating and development activities, and is performed using available geological, geophysical, engineering,
and economic data. Reserves are evaluated at least annually by the Company’s independent reserve evaluators and updates
to those reserves, if any, are estimated internally. Future development costs are estimated using assumptions as to the number
of wells required to produce the commercial reserves, the cost of such wells and associated production facilities and other capital
costs.
Exploration and evaluation expenditures
The application of the Company’s
accounting policy for exploration and evaluation expenditure requires judgment in determining whether it is likely that future
economic benefits will flow to the Company, which is based on assumptions about future events or circumstances. Estimates and
assumptions made may change if new information becomes available. If, after expenditure is capitalized, information becomes available
suggesting that the recovery of the expenditure is unlikely, the amount capitalized is written off in profit or loss in the period
the new information becomes available.
Impairment
A CGU is defined as the lowest grouping
of integrated assets that generate identifiable cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets
or groups of assets. The allocation of assets into CGUs requires significant judgment and interpretations with respect to the
integration between assets, the existence of active markets, similar exposure to market risks, shared infrastructures, and the
way in which management monitors the operations. The recoverable amounts of CGUs and individual assets have been determined based
on the higher of fair value less costs to sell or value-in-use calculations. The key assumptions the Company uses in estimating
future cash flows for recoverable amounts are anticipated future commodity prices, expected production volumes, future operating
and development costs. Changes to these assumptions will affect the recoverable amounts of CGUs and individual assets and may
then require a material adjustment to their related carrying value.
Derivative Financial Instruments
When estimating the fair value of derivative
financial instruments, the Company uses third-party models and valuation methodologies that utilize observable market data. In
addition to market information, the Company incorporates transaction specific details that market participants would utilize in
a fair value measurement, including the impact of non-performance risk. However, these fair value estimates may not necessarily
be indicative of the amounts that could be realized or settled in a current market transaction.
Decommissioning liability
Decommissioning provisions have been recognized
based on the Company’s internal estimates. Assumptions, based on the current economic environment, have been made which
management believes are a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the future liability. These estimates take into account any
material changes to the assumptions that occur when reviewed regularly by management. Estimates are reviewed at least annually
and are based on current regulatory requirements. Significant changes in estimates of contamination, restoration standards and
techniques will result in changes to provisions from period to period. Actual decommissioning costs will ultimately depend on
future market prices for the decommissioning costs which will reflect the market conditions at the time the decommissioning costs
are actually incurred. The final cost of the currently recognized decommissioning provisions may be higher or lower than currently
provided for.
Income taxes
The Company recognizes the net future
tax benefit related to deferred tax assets to the extent that it is probable that the deductible temporary differences will reverse
in the foreseeable future. Assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets requires the Company to make significant estimates
related to expectations of future taxable income. Estimates of future taxable income are based on forecast cash flows from operations
and the application of existing tax laws in each jurisdiction. To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ
significantly from estimates, the ability of the Company to realize the net deferred tax assets recorded at the reporting date
could be impacted. Additionally, future changes in tax laws in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates could limit the
ability of the Company to obtain tax deductions in future periods. All tax filings are subject to audit and potential reassessment.
Accordingly, the actual income tax liability may differ significantly from the estimated and recorded amounts.
Share-based payment transactions
The Company measures the cost of equity-settled
transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. Estimating
fair value for share-based payment transactions requires determining the most appropriate valuation model, which is dependent
on the terms and conditions of the grant. This estimate also requires determining the most appropriate inputs to the valuation
model including the expected life of the share option, volatility and dividend yield.
Future Accounting Pronouncements
Certain pronouncements were issued by
the IASB or the IFRIC that are mandatory for accounting periods beginning after January 1, 2011 or later periods.
The Company has early adopted the amendments
to IFRS 1 which replaces references to a fixed date of ‘1 January 2004’ with ‘the date of transition to IFRS’.
This eliminates the need for the Company to restate derecognition transactions that occurred before the date of transition to
IFRS. The amendment is effective for year-ends beginning on or after July 1, 2011; however, the Company has early adopted the
amendment. The impact of the amendment and early adoption is that the Company only applies IAS 39 derecognition requirements to
transactions that occurred after the date of transition.
The following new standards, amendments
and interpretations, that have not been early adopted in these consolidated annual financial statements. The Company is currently
assessing the impact, if any, of this new guidance on the Company’s future results and financial position:
|
·
|
IFRS
7, Financial
Instruments:
Disclosures,
which requires
disclosure of
both gross and
net information
about financial
instruments eligible
for offset in
the balance sheet
and financial
instruments subject
to master netting
arrangements.
Concurrent with
the amendments
to IFRS 7, the
IASB also amended
IAS 32, Financial
Instruments:
Presentation
to clarify the
existing requirements
for offsetting
financial instruments
in the balance
sheet. The amendments
to IAS 32 are
effective as
of January 1,
2014.
|
|
·
|
IFRS
9 Financial Instruments
is part of the
IASB's wider
project to replace
IAS 39 Financial
Instruments:
Recognition and
Measurement.
IFRS 9 retains
but simplifies
the mixed measurement
model and establishes
two primary measurement
categories for
financial assets:
amortized cost
and fair value.
The basis of
classification
depends on the
entity's business
model and the
contractual cash
flow characteristics
of the financial
asset. The standard
is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2015.
|
|
·
|
IFRS
10 Consolidated
Financial Statements
is the result
of the IASB’s
project to replace
Standing Interpretations
Committee 12,
Consolidation
– Special
Purpose Entities
and the consolidation
requirements
of IAS 27, Consolidated
and Separate
Financial Statements.
The new standard
eliminates the
current risk
and rewards
approach and
establishes
control as the
single basis
for determining
the consolidation
of an entity.
The standard
is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2013.
|
|
·
|
IFRS
11 Joint Arrangements
is the result
of the IASB’s
project to replace
IAS 31, Interests
in Joint Ventures.
The new standard
redefines joint
operations and
joint ventures
and requires
joint operations
to be proportionately
consolidated
and joint ventures
to be equity
accounted. Under
IAS 31, joint
ventures could
be proportionately
consolidated.
The standard
is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2013.
|
|
·
|
IFRS
12 Disclosure
of Interests
in Other Entities
outlines the
required disclosures
for interests
in subsidiaries
and joint arrangements.
The new disclosures
require information
that will assist
financial statement
users to evaluate
the nature, risks
and financial
effects associated
with an entity’s
interests in
subsidiaries
and joint arrangements.
The standard
is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2013.
|
|
·
|
IFRS
13 Fair Value
Measurement defines
fair value, requires
disclosures about
fair value measurements
and provides
a framework for
measuring fair
value when it
is required or
permitted within
the IFRS standards.
The standard
is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2013.
|
|
·
|
IFRIC
20 Stripping
costs in the
production phase
of a mine, IFRIC
20 clarifies
the requirements
for accounting
for the costs
of the stripping
activity in the
production phase
when two benefits
accrue: (i) unusable
ore that can
be used to produce
inventory and
(ii) improved
access to further
quantities of
material that
will be mined
in future periods.
IFRIC 20 is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2013 with
earlier application
permitted and
includes guidance
on transition
for pre-existing
stripping assets.
The Company is
currently evaluating
the impact the
new guidance
is expected to
have on its consolidated
financial statements.
|
The following new standards, amendments
and interpretations that have not been early adopted in these consolidated financial statements, are not expected to have an effect
on the Company’s future results and financial position:
|
·
|
IFRS
1: Severe Hyperinflation
(Effective for
periods beginning
on or after July
1, 2011)
|
|
·
|
IAS
12: Deferred
Tax: Recovery
of Underlying
Assets (Amendments
to IAS 12 (Effective
for periods beginning
on or after January
1, 2012)
|
On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted
IFRS for financial reporting purposes, using a transition date of January 1, 2010. The Company’s annual audited Consolidated
Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, including 2010 required comparative information, have been prepared
in accordance with IFRS. Financial statements prior to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 were prepared in accordance with
Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“Canadian GAAP”). Certain comparative figures for 2010 were restated
under IFRS.
All financial information is stated in
Canadian dollars, the Company’s presentation currency, unless otherwise noted. Some numbers have been rounded to the nearest
thousand for discussion purposes.
Revenues
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues
|
|
$
|
8,824,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,086,000
|
|
Royalties
|
|
|
(1,628,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,312,000
|
)
|
Revenues, net of royalties
|
|
|
7,196,000
|
|
|
|
6,774,000
|
|
Financial instrument gain (loss)
|
|
|
(59,000
|
)
|
|
|
68,000
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
7,171,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,878,000
|
|
For fiscal 2011, the Company recorded $8,824,000 in oil and natural gas sales as compared to $8,086,000
in oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids sales for the year ended December 31, 2010 (“fiscal 2010”). The increase
in gross revenues was due to higher realized oil prices in 2011. This was partly offset by lower oil and gas production for the
current year.
Royalties for fiscal 2011 increased to
$1,628,000 from $1,312,000 for fiscal 2010. The increase was attributable to higher oil revenue and the increase in the proportion
of revenue attributed to oil. Oil production is subject to higher royalty rate compared to the royalty rate for natural gas.
The following table summarizes the commodity
prices realized by the Company and the crude oil and natural gas benchmark prices for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Dejour Realized Average Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas ($/mcf)
|
|
$
|
3.64
|
|
|
$
|
4.13
|
|
Oil and natural gas liquids ($/bbl)
|
|
|
88.98
|
|
|
|
67.46
|
|
Total average price ($/boe)
|
|
$
|
57.49
|
|
|
$
|
45.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Benchmark Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edmonton Par ($/bbl)
|
|
$
|
95.16
|
|
|
$
|
77.81
|
|
Natural gas - AECO-C Spot ($ per
mcf)
|
|
$
|
3.67
|
|
|
$
|
4.13
|
|
In 2011, the Company changed the benchmark
prices from Western Canada Select to Edmonton Par. This is because Edmonton Par is more comparable to the Company’s oil
revenue sales.
For the current year, Dejour’s average
realized natural gas prices reflected lower benchmark prices compared to fiscal 2010. Oil prices received for fiscal 2011 increased
to $88.98 per barrel (“bbl”), compared to $67.46 per bbl for fiscal 2010.
Operating and Transportation Expenses
Operating and transportation expenses
include all costs associated with the production of oil and natural gas and the transportation of oil and natural gas to the processing
plants. The major components of operating expenses include labour, equipment maintenance, workovers, fuel and power. Operating
and transportation expenses for fiscal 2011 decreased to $2,499,000 from $2,609,000 for fiscal 2010. The decrease was due to lower
oil and gas production. Operating costs per BOE for both years were comparable despite lower oil and gas production.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses for
fiscal 2011 increased to $4,042,000 from $3,383,000 for fiscal 2010. The comparative figures for 2010 were restated under IFRS.
The increase was mainly due to the year-end bonus accrual for fiscal 2011 and
the non-recurring professional
fees associated with the required conversion to the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
Finance Costs and Change in Fair
Value of Warrant Liability
Finance costs for fiscal 2011 decreased
to $868,000 from $1,092,000 for fiscal 2010. The decrease was attributable to the line of credit facility obtained in September
2011 that bears a lower interest rate, compared to the bridge loan with a relatively higher interest rate.
The non-cash change in fair value of warrant
liability for fiscal 2011 was a loss of $1,580,000, compared to a gain of $68,000 for fiscal 2010. The warrant liability relates
to the fair value of certain warrants that were issued in the previous equity financings. These warrants are denominated in US
dollars, which is different than the functional currency of the Company. Under IFRS, they are classified as liabilities and any
change in the fair value is recognized in the profit or loss. Changes in fair value result from volatility in the Company’s
share prices and fluctuations in the US/Canadian dollar exchange rates. Due to higher market prices for the Company’s common
shares towards the end of the year, this resulted in higher valuation for these warrants and a non-cash valuation loss for fiscal
2011.
Amortization, Depletion and Impairment
Losses
For fiscal 2011, amortization, depletion
and impairment losses were $8,652,000, compared to $4,685,000 for fiscal 2010. The comparative figures for 2010 were restated
under IFRS. Amortization and depletion of property and equipment for fiscal 2011 was $2,404,000, compared to $3,493,000 for fiscal
2010. The decrease in amortization and depletion expenses was mainly due to the increased reserves in the Woodrush property at
December 31, 2011 and the decrease in production. Impairment losses of $6,248,000 for fiscal 2011 were recognized because the
carrying value of certain property and equipment and exploration and evaluation assets exceeded their recoverable amounts, while
the impairment losses of $1,192,000 for fiscal 2010 were recognized upon the expiry of certain leases for exploration and evaluation
assets and property and equipment.
Net Loss and Operating Loss
The Company’s net loss for fiscal
2011 was $11,043,000 or $0.092 per share, compared to a net loss of $5,124,000 or $0.051 per share for fiscal 2010. The comparative
figures for 2010 were restated under IFRS. The increase in net loss was primarily due to the recognition of non-cash impairment
losses of $6,248,000 and non-cash valuation loss of $1,580,000 from the increase in fair value of warrant liability. This was
partly offset by the increase in revenues.
The Company’s operating loss for
fiscal 2011 was $3,215,000, compared to $4,000,000 for fiscal 2010. The decrease was primarily due to lower amortization and depletion
of property and equipment for the current year, as a result of the increased reserves in the Company’s Woodrush property.
The operating loss is a non-GAAP measure
defined as net income (loss) excluding non-cash items that management believes affects the comparability of operating results.
These items may include, but are not limited to, unrealized financial instrument gain (loss), impairment losses and impairment
reversals, gain (loss) on divestitures, and change in fair value of financial instruments.
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(11,043,000
|
)
|
|
|
(5,124,000
|
)
|
Add back (losses) and deduct gains:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment losses
|
|
|
6,248,000
|
|
|
|
1,192,000
|
|
Change in fair value of warrant liability
|
|
|
1,580,000
|
|
|
|
(68,000
|
)
|
Operating Loss – Non-GAAP
|
|
|
(3,215,000
|
)
|
|
|
(4,000,000
|
)
|
Financial Instruments
and Risk Management
The Company’s financial instruments
consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, bank line of credit, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
Management has determined that the fair value of these financial instruments approximates their carrying values due to their immediate
or short-term maturity.
Net smelter royalties and related rights to earn or relinquish interests in mineral properties
constitute derivative instruments. No value or discounts have been assigned to such instruments as there is no reliable basis
to determine fair value until properties are in development or production and reserves have been determined.
From time to time, the Company enters
into derivative contracts such as forwards, futures and swaps in an effort to mitigate the effects of volatile commodity prices
and protect cash flows to enable funding of its exploration and development programs. Commodity prices can fluctuate due to political
events, meteorological conditions, disruptions in supply and changes in demand.
The primary risks and how the Company
mitigates them are disclosed in
Item 11 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, below.
Stock Based Compensation
For fiscal 2011, the Company recorded
non-cash stock based compensation expense of $662,000 compared to $765,000 for fiscal 2010. The decrease in stock based compensation
expense was because many of the stock options previously granted had been fully vested.
|
B.
|
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
|
Cash Balance and Cash Flow
The Company had cash and cash equivalents
of $2,488,000 as at December 31, 2011. In addition to the cash balance, the Company has an unused line of credit of $1.5 million
from a Canadian Bank.
Bank Line of Credit Financing
In September 2011, the Company obtained
a $7 million revolving operating demand loan (“line of credit”), including a letter of credit facility to a maximum
of $700,000 for a maximum one year term, from a Canadian Bank to refinance the bridge loan and to provide operating funds. The
line of credit is at an interest rate of Prime + 1% (total 4% p.a. currently) and collateralized by a $10,000,000 debenture over
all assets of DEAL and a $10,000,000 guarantee from Dejour Energy Inc. In December 2011, the Company renewed the line of credit
with the Canadian Bank. The next review date is scheduled on or before May 1, 2012, but subject to change at the discretion of
the bank. As at December 31, 2011, a total of $5.5 million of this facility was utilized.
According to the terms of the facility,
DEAL is required to maintain a working capital ratio of greater than 1:1 at all times. The working capital ratio is defined as
the ratio of (i) current assets (including any undrawn and authorized availability under the facility) less unrealized hedging
gains to (ii) current liabilities (excluding current portion of outstanding balances of the facility) less unrealized hedging
losses. As at December 31, 2011, the Company is in compliance with the working capital ratio requirement.
Working Capital Position
As at December 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
|
Working capital deficit
|
|
|
(7,756,000
|
)
|
Non-cash warrant liability
|
|
|
2,245,000
|
|
Net cash working capital deficit
|
|
|
(5,511,000
|
)
|
As at December 31, 2011, the Company had
a working capital deficit of $7,756,000. Excluding the non-cash warrant liability of $2,245,000 related to the fair value of US$
denominated warrants issued in previous equity financings, the working capital deficit includes a $5.5 million used demand line
of credit with a $7 million credit limit. As at December 31, 2011, $1.5 million remains unused. The Company plans to remedy the
deficiency through the following:
|
·
|
Subsequent
to December
31, 2011, the
Company received
$1,200,000 from
the exercise
of warrants
and options.
|
|
·
|
Beginning
in June 2011,
oil production
increased as
a result of
the waterflood
at Woodrush.
Oil production
is expected
to increase
in 2012, generating
more cash flow
for the Company.
|
|
·
|
If
necessary and
at the right
market conditions,
the Company
may fund its
working capital
through additional
debt, equity
or joint venture
financing, or
disposal of
non-core assets.
|
Capital Resources
During the year ended December 31, 2011,
the Company continued to optimize the waterflood at its Woodrush property in Canada. Most of the waterflood capital expenditures
have already been spent in fiscal 2011. Future capital expenditures at Woodrush in 2012 are expected to be approximately $1.2
to $1.5 million and funded through its cash flow from operations and the undrawn line of credit. In the U.S., the Company plans
to drill up to eight wells during 2012 and its share of expenditures ranges from $6.5 to $11 million. The Company plans to fund
the expenditures through additional financing, including debt, equity or joint venture financing, or disposal of non-core assets.
|
C.
|
Research
and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc.
|
None.
Oil currently has risen near $100 per
barrel and the Company’s revenue from oil sales increased. On the other hand, the price of natural gas declined to low $2
range, lowering the Company’s gas revenue and the economics of natural gas properties. The marketability and price of oil
and natural gas are affected by numerous factors outside of the Company’s control, including domestic and foreign supply
and demand, economics and political conditions, weather and US$ exchange rate. (See risks factors disclosure). Some or all of
these [situations] are likely to have a material effect upon our net sales or revenues, income from continuing operations, profitability,
liquidity or capital resources, or cause reported financial information not necessarily to be indicative of future operating results
or financial condition.
|
E.
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
|
The Company has no material undisclosed
off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our results of operations
or financial condition at December 31, 2011.
|
F.
|
Tabular
Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
|
As of December 31, 2011, and in the normal
course of business we have obligations to make future payments, representing contracts and other commitments that are known and
committed.
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
Bank line of credit
|
|
|
5,545
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
5,545
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,768
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
5,924
|
|
The Company seeks safe harbor for our
forward-looking statements contained in Items 5.E and F. See the heading “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”
above.
|
ITEM 6.
|
DIRECTORS,
SENIOR
MANAGEMENT
AND
EMPLOYEES
|
|
A.
|
Directors
and Senior Management
|
The following table sets forth all current
directors and executive officers of Dejour as of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, with each position and office held
by them in the Company and the period of service as such.
Name, Jurisdiction of
Residence and Position
(1)
|
|
Principal
occupation or employment during the past 5 years
|
|
Number
of Dejour Common Shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or controlled or directed
(2)
|
|
|
Percentage
of Dejour Common Shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or controlled or directed
(2)
|
|
|
Director
Since
|
Robert L. Hodgkinson
British Columbia, Canada
Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Age: 62)
|
|
President
of a private company, Hodgkinson Equities Corporation, which provides consulting services to emerging businesses in the petroleum
resource industry. Formerly a director of Titan Uranium (TSX-V:TUE).
|
|
|
7,187,840
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
May
18/04
|
Stephen Mut
Colorado, USA
Director and Co-Chairman
(Age: 61)
|
|
Mr.
Mut has served as CEO of Nycon Energy Consulting since his retirement from Shell in mid 2009. At Shell, Mr. Mut served
as chief executive officer of a unit of Shell Exploration and Production Company from 2000 until his retirement in 2009. Prior
to that, Mr. Mut served in various executive roles at Atlantic Richfield Corporation.
|
|
|
1,701,001
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
Dec
17/09
|
Harrison Blacker
(4)
Colorado, U.S.A. Director, President and Chief Operating Officer of
Dejour Energy (USA) Inc.
(Age: 61)
|
|
President
of Dejour Energy (USA) Inc. since April 2008. Over 30 years of expertise managing oil and gas operations. Held the positions
of Chief Executive Officer with China Oman Energy Company and Portfolio Manager, Latin American Business Unit and General
Manager/ President of Venezuela Energy with Atlantic Richfield Corporation prior to joining Dejour USA
|
|
|
525,678
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
Apr
2/08
|
Richard
Patricio
(4)
Ontario, Canada
Director
(Age: 38)
|
|
Vice
President of Corporate & Legal Affairs and Secretary of Pinetree Capital Ltd. (investment and merchant banking firm).
Prior to joining Pinetree Capital, practiced law at a top tier law firm in Toronto and worked as in-house General Counsel
for a senior TSX listed company. Mr. Patricio is a lawyer qualified to practice in the Province of Ontario.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Oct
17/08
|
Robert
Holmes
(3) , (4)
California, U.S.A
Director
(Age: 68)
|
|
Began
career as an Investment Executive with Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, and held various senior executive positions
with the firm Blyth, Eastman, Dillon & Company. In 1980, co-founded Gilford Securities, Inc., a member of the
NYSE, and in 1992 founded a hedge fund, Gilford Partners. Has served on several boards including the North Central
College Trustees in Naperville, Illinois; Board of Trustees Sacred Heart Schools Chicago; Crested Butte Academy in Crested
Butte, Colorado; and Mary Wood Country Day School in Rancho Mirage, California.
|
|
|
1,663,000
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
Oct
17/08
|
Name, Jurisdiction of
Residence and Position
(1)
|
|
Principal
occupation or employment during the past 5 years
|
|
Number
of Dejour Common Shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or controlled or directed
(2)
|
|
|
Percentage
of Dejour Common Shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or controlled or directed
(2)
|
|
|
Director
Since
|
Craig
Sturrock
(3)
British Columbia,
Canada
Director
(Age: 68)
|
|
Tax
lawyer since 1971. Currently, he is a partner at Thorsteinssons LLP, and his practice focuses primarily on civil
and criminal tax litigation.
|
|
|
650,000
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
Aug
22/05
|
Darren
Devine
(3)
British Columbia, Canada
Director
(Age: 44)
|
|
Since
2003, Mr. Devine has been the principal of Chelmer Consulting Corp., a corporate finance consultancy. Prior to founding Chelmer
Consulting, Mr. Devine practiced law with the firm of Du Moulin Black LLP, in Vancouver, British Columbia. Mr. Devine is a
qualified Barrister and Solicitor in British Columbia, and a qualified solicitor in England and Wales.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Dec
17/09
|
Mathew Wong
British Columbia, Canada
Chief Financial Officer
(Age: 37)
|
|
Chartered
Accountant worked at Ernst & Young LLP from 1995 to 2000. Since then, he worked as the Corporate Accounting
Manager for Mitsubishi Canada Limited and CFO for Dejour Enterprise Ltd. Mr. Wong is a Chartered Accountant (CA)
in British Columbia, Canada, a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) in Washington State, USA and a Chartered Financial
Analyst (CFA).
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
N/A
|
Phil
Bretzloff, BA, LLB
British Columbia, Canada
Vice President and General
Counsel
(Age: 63)
|
|
Mr.
Bretzloff has acted for oil, gas and energy companies, including extensive work for Canadian and offshore private and public
corporations. Between 1980 and 1995, he was Senior Counsel for Petro-Canada. Subsequently, he was a Partner for 8 years with
Cumming Blackett Bretzloff Todesco, Gowlings, and Baker & McKenzie, where his clients included PetroChina, Shell, Exxon
Mobil, GazProm and Veba Oil and Gas.
|
|
|
59,500
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
Neyeska Mut
EVP Operations, Dejour Energy (USA) Corp.
(Age: 54)
|
|
Engineer.
Since 2000, she has been President of Nycon Energy Consulting working as an advisor to two major oil companies. Prior to forming
Nycon Energy Consulting Mrs. Mut pursued international opportunities with Atlantic Richfield Corporation. Mr. Mut has been
with Dejour since 2008.
|
|
|
50,001
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
(1)
|
Each director will serve until the next annual
general meeting of the Company or until a successor
is duly elected or appointed in accordance with the
Notice of Articles and Articles of the Company and
the
Business Corporations Act
(British Columbia).
|
|
(2)
|
The number of common shares beneficially owned,
directly or indirectly, or over which control or
direction is exercised is based upon information
furnished to the Company by individual directors
and executive officers.
|
|
(3)
|
Member of audit committee
.
|
|
(4)
|
Member of reserve committee
.
|
Board of Directors
Brief biographies for each member of Dejour's
board of directors are set forth below:
Robert
L. Hodgkinson
:
Mr. Hodgkinson was the founder and Chairman of Optima Petroleum, which drilled wells in Alberta
and the Gulf of Mexico before merging to form Petroquest Energy, a NASDAQ traded company. Subsequently, he founded and was CEO
of Australian Oil Fields, which would later merge to become Resolute Energy/Cardero Energy Inc. Mr. Hodgkinson was also a Vice-President
and partner of Canaccord Capital Corporation, and an early stage investor and original lease financier in Synenco Energy's Northern
Lights Project in the Alberta oil sands.
Stephen Mut
: Mr. Mut most recently
served as chief executive officer of a unit of Shell Exploration and Production Company. Prior to joining Shell in 2000, Mr. Mut
dedicated much of his career to operational and new business venture activities in the oil and gas, refining and marketing, and
chemical and mining sectors at Atlantic Richfield Corporation, where he served in various internationally based executive roles
in both upstream and downstream businesses. His global expertise has contributed to industry successes in Europe, South America,
the Asia Pacific and the United States.
Harrison
Blacker:
Mr. Blacker is an accomplished senior executive with over 30 years of expertise managing oil and gas
operations with major corporations in the United States, South America, China and the Middle East. Prior to joining Dejour, Mr.
Blacker was CEO of China Oman Energy Company, a joint venture between Oman Oil Company, IPIC and China Gas Holdings, importing
and distributing LNG and LPG from the Middle East into China. Mr. Blacker held positions as VP of Business Development and Senior
Investor Advisor with Oman Oil Company and Portfolio Manager, Latin American Business Unit and General Manager/ President of Venezuela
Energy with Atlantic Richfield Corporation. Mr. Blacker began his career with Amoco Production Company working in offshore construction
and field operations in the Gulf of Mexico.
Richard
Patricio:
Mr. Patricio is Vice President Corporate & Legal Affairs and Secretary of Pinetree Capital Ltd.
and Brownstone Ventures Inc. Mr. Patricio previously practiced law at a top tier law firm in Toronto and worked as in-house General
Counsel for a senior TSX listed company. Mr. Patricio is a lawyer qualified to practice in the Province of Ontario.
Robert
Holmes:
Mr. Holmes began his career as an Investment Executive with Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith,
and subsequently held various senior executive positions with the firm Blyth, Eastman, Dillon & Company (purchased by Paine
Webber & Co.). In 1980, Mr. Holmes co-founded Gilford Securities, Inc., a member of the NYSE, and in 1992 founded a hedge
fund, Gilford Partners. He has served on several boards including the North Central College Trustees in Naperville, Illinois;
Board of Trustees Sacred Heart Schools Chicago; Crested Butte Academy in Crested Butte, Colorado; and Mary Wood Country Day School
in Rancho Mirage, California. He graduated with a BA from North Central College in 1965.
Craig
Sturrock
:
Mr. Sturrock has served as a director and founding member of various public and private companies.
Admitted to the British Columbia Bar in 1969, he joined Thorsteinssons LLP, tax lawyers in 1971. He served for 15 years as a tax
lawyer and partner at Birnie, Sturrock & Company returning to Thorsteinssons as a partner in 1989. He is an author and speaker
for the Canadian and British Columbia Bar Associations, the Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia and the Canadian
Tax Foundation. He is also a former member of the Board of Governors of the Canadian Tax Foundation.
Darren Devine
: Mr. Devine is the
principal of Chelmer Consulting Corp., which provides corporate finance advisory services to private and public companies. Mr.
Devine is a qualified Barrister and Solicitor in British Columbia, and a qualified solicitor in England and Wales. Prior
to forming Chelmer Consulting, Mr. Devine practiced exclusively in the areas of corporate finance and securities law with a focus
on cross-border finance, stock exchange listings and mergers and acquisitions with the firm DuMoulin Black LLP in Vancouver, British
Columbia.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships between
any directors or executive officers of the Company.
Arrangements
There are no known arrangements or understandings
with any major shareholders, customers, suppliers or others, pursuant to which any of the Company’s officers or directors
was selected as an officer or director of the Company, other than indicated immediately above and at “Item 7. Major Shareholders
and Related Party Transactions - Related Party Transactions.”
Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies,
Penalties or Sanctions
To the knowledge of the Company, no director
or executive officer of the Company is, or has been in the last ten years, a director, chief executive officer or chief financial
officer of an issuer that, while that person was acting in that capacity, (a) was the subject of a cease trade order or similar
order or an order that denied the issuer access to any exemptions under Canadian securities legislation, for a period of more
than 30 consecutive days, or (b) was subject to an event that resulted, after that person ceased to be a director, chief executive
officer or chief financial officer, in the issuer being the subject of a cease trade or similar order or an order that denied
the issuer access to any exemption under Canadian securities legislation, for a period of more than 30 consecutive days. To the
knowledge of the Company, no director or executive officer of the Company, or a shareholder holding a sufficient number of securities
in the Company to affect materially the control of the Company, is or has been in the last ten years, a director or executive
officer of an issuer that, while or acting in that capacity within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became
bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings,
arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets. To the knowledge
of the Company, in the past ten years, no such person has become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation related to bankruptcy
or insolvency, or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver
manager or trustee appointed to hold their assets.
Conflicts of Interest
Certain of the Company's directors and
officers serve or may agree to serve as directors or officers of other reporting companies or have significant shareholdings in
other reporting companies and, to the extent that such other companies may participate in ventures in which the Company may participate,
the directors of the Company may have a conflict of interest in negotiating and concluding terms respecting the extent of such
participation. In the event that such a conflict of interest arises at a meeting of the Company's directors, a director who has
such a conflict will abstain from voting for or against the approval of such participation or such terms and such director will
not participate in negotiating and concluding terms of any proposed transaction. From time to time, several companies may participate
in the acquisition, exploration and development of natural resource properties thereby allowing for their participation in larger
programs, permitting involvement in a greater number of programs and reducing financial exposure in respect of any one program.
It may also occur that a particular company will assign all or a portion of its interest in a particular program to another of
these companies due to the financial position of the company making the assignment. Under the laws of the Province of British
Columbia, the directors of the Company are required to act honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the Company. In
determining whether or not the Company will participate in a particular program and the interest therein to be acquired by it,
the directors will primarily consider the degree of risk to which the Company may be exposed and its financial position at that
time. See also "Description of the Business – Risk Factors".
Basis of Compensation for Executive
Officers
The Company compensates its executive
officers through a combination of base compensation, bonuses and Common Stock options. The base compensation provides an immediate
cash incentive for the executive officers. Bonuses encourage and reward exceptional performance over the financial year. Common
Stock options ensure that the executive officers are motivated to achieve long term growth of the Company and continuing increases
in shareholder value. In terms of relative emphasis, the Company places more importance on Common Stock options as long term incentives.
Bonuses are related to performance and may form a greater or lesser part of the entire compensation package in any given year.
Each of these means of compensation is briefly reviewed in the following sections.
Base Compensation
Base compensation, including that of the
Chief Executive Officer, are set by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors on the basis of the applicable
executive officer’s responsibilities, experience and past performance. The compensation program is intended to provide a
base compensation competitive among companies of a comparable size and character in the oil and gas industry. In making such an
assessment, the Board considers the objectives set forth in the Company’s business plan and the performance of executive
officers and employees in executing the plan in combination with the overall result of the activities undertaken.
Common Stock Options
The Company provides long term incentive
compensation to its executive officers through the Common Stock Option Plan, which is considered an integral part of the Company’s
compensation program. Upon the recommendation of management and approval by the Board of Directors, stock options are granted
under the Company’s Option Plan to new directors, officers and key employees, usually upon their commencement of employment
with the Company. The Board approves the granting of additional stock options from time to time based on its assessment of the
appropriateness of doing so in light of the long term strategic objectives of the Company, its current stage of development, the
need to retain or attract key technical and managerial personnel in a competitive industry environment, the number of stock options
already outstanding, overall market conditions, and the individual’s level of responsibility and performance within the
Company.
The Board views the granting of stock
options as a means of promoting the success of the Company and creating and enhancing returns to its shareholders. As such, the
Board does not grant stock options in excessively dilutive numbers. Total options outstanding are presently limited to 10% of
the total number of shares outstanding under the rules of the TSX. Grant sizes are, therefore, determined by various factors including
the number of eligible individuals currently under the Option Plan and future hiring plans of the Company.
The Board granted a total of 2,046,000
stock options to the executive officers in 2011.
|
|
Annual Compensation
|
|
|
Long Term Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Payouts
|
|
|
|
|
Name and
Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Annual
Salary
|
|
|
Consulting
Fees
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
Securities
Under
Option/
SAR's
Granted
(#)
|
|
|
Shares/
Units
Subject to
Resale
Restrictions
($)
|
|
|
LTIP
Pay-
outs ($)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
($)
|
|
Robert L.
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
$
|
78,000
|
|
|
$
|
177,000
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Hodgkinson,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
78,000
|
|
|
$
|
177,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
369,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Chief Executive
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
78,000
|
|
|
$
|
177,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mathew Wong,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
$
|
78,000
|
|
|
$
|
151,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Chief Financial
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
78,000
|
|
|
$
|
151,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
217,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
78,000
|
|
|
$
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Harrison Blacker,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
US$
|
295,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
US$
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
$
|
58,000
|
*
|
Director and
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
US$
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
US$
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
433,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
President
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
US$
|
203,646
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
US$
|
98,553
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
of Dejour Energy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(USA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig Sturrock,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
$
|
7,000
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
$
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Holmes,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
$
|
6,500
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Patricio,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
$
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Mut,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
US$
|
138,573
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Director & Co-
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
US$
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Chairman
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
US$
|
14,286
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Darren Devine,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
Director
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neyeska Mut,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
US$
|
200,470
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
US$
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
306,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
EVP Operations
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
US$
|
200,470
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
194,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Of Dejour Energy
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
US$
|
163,300
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
US$
|
30,763
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
(USA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phil Bretzloff
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
$
|
130,984
|
|
|
$
|
13,320
|
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
Vice President &
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
$
|
77,401
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
General Counsel
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
$
|
74,635
|
|
|
$
|
7,200
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
*US$58,000 was paid for relocation expenses reimbursement.
Stock Option Grants
Name
|
|
Number of Options
Granted
|
|
|
Exercise Price per
Share
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Expiration Date
|
Robert Hodgkinson
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
March
16, 2011
|
|
March
15, 2014
|
Mathew Wong
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
March 16, 2011
|
|
March 15, 2014
|
Harrison Blacker
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
March 16, 2011
|
|
March 15, 2014
|
Craig Sturrock
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
March 16, 2011
|
|
March 15, 2014
|
Robert Holmes
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
March 16, 2011
|
|
March 15, 2014
|
Richard Patricio
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
March 16, 2011
|
|
March 15, 2014
|
Darren Devine
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
March 16, 2011
|
|
March 15, 2014
|
Stephen Mut
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
March 16, 2011
|
|
March 15, 2014
|
Neyeska Mut
|
|
|
306,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
March 16, 2011
|
|
March 15, 2014
|
Phil Bretzloff
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
March 16, 2011
|
|
March 15, 2014
|
Employees and Consultants
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
January 4, 2011
|
|
January 3, 2012
|
|
|
|
280,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
January 4, 2011
|
|
January 3, 2013
|
|
|
|
686,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
March 16, 2011
|
|
March 15, 2014
|
Director Compensation
The Company has compensation agreements
for its Directors who are not executive officers. Under the agreements, Directors receive $2,500 per meeting for the first 4 meetings
each year, and $1,500 for each meeting thereafter. The Board of Directors may award special remuneration to any Director undertaking
any special services on behalf of the Company other than services ordinarily required of a Director. Per an amendment to the agreements
approved by the Board of Directors, effective January 1, 2010, the Directors received $1,000 per quarter plus $500 for each meeting.
Long Term Incentive Plan Awards
Long term incentive plan awards ("
LTIP
")
means any plan providing compensation intended to serve as an incentive for performance to occur over a period longer than one
financial year, whether the performance is measured by reference to financial performance of the Company or an affiliate of the
Company, the price of the Company's shares, or any other measure, but does not include option or stock appreciation rights plans
or plans for compensation through restricted shares or units. The Company did not award any LTIPs to any executive officer during
the most recently completed financial year ended December 31, 2011. There are no pension plan benefits in place for the executive
officers.
Stock Appreciation Rights
Stock appreciation rights ("
SARs
")
means a right, granted by the Company or any of its subsidiaries as compensation for services rendered or in connection with office
or employment, to receive a payment of cash or an issue or transfer of securities based wholly or in part on changes in the trading
price of the Company's shares. No SARs were granted to, or exercised by, any executive officer of the Company during the most
recently completed financial year ended December 31, 2011.
Termination and Change of Control Remuneration
The Company has management contracts with the following executive
officers or the companies controlled by the executive officers:
Named Executive
Officer
|
|
Annual Base Salary and /
or
Consulting
Fees
|
|
|
Compensation Package on Termination of Contract, other than for
termination with cause
|
|
Compensation Package
on Termination
of Contract, in the event of a change in control
|
Robert Hodgkinson
|
|
$
|
255,000
|
|
|
1 times annual base salary
and consulting fee
|
|
2 times annual base salary and consulting
fee
|
Mathew Wong
|
|
$
|
229,000
|
|
|
1 times annual base salary and consulting
fee
|
|
2 times annual base salary and consulting fee
|
Harrison Blacker
|
|
US$
|
310,000
|
|
|
1 times annual base salary
|
|
2 times annual base salary
|
Neyeska Mut
|
|
US$
|
200,470
|
|
|
1 times annual base salary
|
|
2 times annual base salary
|
Bonus/Profit Sharing/Non-Cash Compensation
The Board adopted a bonus plan for eligible
executives, which include the senior executives of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company, including but not limited to
the CEO, President, Executive Vice-President and CFO who, by the nature of their positions are, in the opinion of the Committee,
in a senior position to contribute to the success of the Company.
The bonus plan includes both non-discretionary
and discretionary portions.
|
A)
|
Executives Non-Discretionary;
|
Each Eligible Executives will
receive a USD$100,000 award should:
|
i)
|
Total Shareholder Return %
exceeds Total XEG Return % by a minimum of 10% and in addition;
|
|
ii)
|
Total Shareholder Return is
positive (the share price of Dejour shares is higher at the
end of the year, in comparison to, the price of the shares
at the beginning of the year).
|
For example, for fiscal 2011,
if Total Shareholder Return % is 20%, while Total XEG Return is 5%, then Dejour’s stock outperformed the XEG by 15% and
a USD$100,000 award is payable to each executives. However, this award would only be payable in the event that during the same
period shareholder return is positive.
|
B)
|
Executives Discretionary;
|
The Compensation Committee, upon
the recommendation of the CEO, shall review (i) performance goals and objectives (“Performance Targets') for the Company
and the subsidiaries for such period and (ii) target awards (“Target Awards') for each Participant which shall be based
on, up to 30% of the Participant's base compensation, provided however, the Performance Targets for each Executive Participants
shall be exactly the same during each year, calculated based on the same percentage of each Participants base compensation, unless
otherwise agreed by the Participants.
Such Performance Targets shall include but not be
limited to the following:
|
·
|
Increase
in oil &
gas production;
|
|
·
|
Achievement
of financial
stability
and working
capital position
including
compliance
with the
Company loan
covenants;
|
|
·
|
Increase
in Proved
Developed
Production
(PDP) Reserves;
|
|
·
|
Increase
in Proved
and Probable
(2P) reserves;
|
|
·
|
Creating
significant
positive
impact on
the Company
business
as demonstrated
by significant
accomplishments
not in the
base budget/business
plan;
|
|
·
|
Increase
in Operating
Cash flow
and Adjusted
EBITDA;
|
|
·
|
Reduce
operation
costs;
|
|
·
|
Reducing
overhead
costs;
|
|
·
|
Other
factors or
extraordinary
success,
that in the
opinion of
the Committee,
enhance shareholder
value
|
For purposes of the bonus plan, “
XEG
” is
defined
as the iShares™ CDN Energy Sector Index Fund, trading under the symbol “XEG”
on the TSX.
Total Shareholder Return and Total XEG Return are based on the 20 days average closing shares price of Dejour
shares and XEG on the TSX at the end of each fiscal year.
Pension/Retirement Benefits
No funds were set aside or accrued by the Company during Fiscal
2011 to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for Directors or Senior Management.
Compensation Committee
The Company has a Compensation Committee
composed of three Directors, Robert Holmes, Craig Sturrock and Richard Patricio.
Role of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee exercises general
responsibility regarding overall executive compensation. The Board of Directors sets the annual compensation, bonus and other
benefits of the Chief Executive Officer and approves compensation for all other executive officers of the Company after considering
the recommendations of the Compensation Committee.
Audit Committee
The Company’s Board of Directors
has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established for the purpose of overseeing the accounting and financial reporting
processes of the Company and audits of the Company’s annual financial statements in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A)
of the Exchange Act. As of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, the Company’s Audit Committee is comprised
of Craig Sturrock, Robert Holmes and Darren Devine.
In the opinion of the Company’s
Board of Directors, all the members of the Audit Committee are independent (as determined under Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act
and Section 803A of the NYSE Amex Company Guide). The Audit Committee meets the composition requirements set forth
by Section 803B(2) of the NYSE Amex Company Guide. All three members of the Audit Committee are financially literate,
meaning they are able to read and understand the Company’s financial statements and to understand the breadth and level
of complexity of the issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Company’s financial statements.
The members of the Audit Committee do
not have fixed terms and are appointed and replaced from time to time by resolution of the Board of Directors.
Terms of Reference
for the Audit Committee
Audit Committee Mandate
The primary function of the audit committee
is to assist the Board in fulfilling its financial oversight responsibilities by reviewing the financial reports and other financial
information provided by the Company to regulatory authorities and Shareholders, the Company’s systems of internal controls
regarding finance and accounting and the Company’s auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes. Consistent with
this function, the audit committee will encourage continuous improvement of, and should foster adherence to, the Company’s
policies, procedures and practices at all levels. The audit committee’s primary duties and responsibilities are to:
|
·
|
Serve
as an independent
and objective
party to
monitor
the Company’s
financial
reporting
and internal
control
system and
review the
Company’s
financial
statements;
|
|
·
|
Review
and appraise
the performance
of the Company’s
external
auditors;
and
|
|
·
|
Provide
an open
avenue of
communication
among the
Company’s
auditors,
financial
and senior
management
and the
Board.
|
Composition
The audit committee shall be comprised
of three Directors as determined by the Board, the majority of whom shall be free from any relationship that, in the opinion of
the Board, would interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment as a member of the audit committee.
At least one member of the audit committee
shall have accounting or related financial management expertise. All members of the audit committee that are not financially literate
will work towards becoming financially literate to obtain a working familiarity with basic finance and accounting practices. For
the purposes of the Company's Charter, the definition of “financially literate” is the ability to read and understand
a set of financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable
to the breadth and complexity of the issues that can presumably be expected to be raised by the Company's financial statements.
The members of the audit committee shall
be elected by the Board at its first meeting following the annual Shareholders’ meeting. Unless a Chair is elected by the
full Board, the members of the audit committee may designate a Chair by a majority vote of the full audit committee membership.
Meetings
The audit committee shall meet a least
twice annually, or more frequently as circumstances dictate. As part of its job to foster open communication, the audit committee
will meet at least annually with the Chief Financial Officer and the external auditors in separate sessions.
Responsibilities and Duties
To fulfill its responsibilities and duties,
the audit committee shall:
Documents/Reports Review
|
(a)
|
Review and update this Charter
annually.
|
|
(b)
|
Review the Company's financial
statements, MD&A and any annual and interim earnings, press
releases before the Company publicly discloses this information
and any reports or other financial information (including quarterly
financial statements), which are submitted to any governmental
body, or to the public, including any certification, report,
opinion, or review rendered by the external auditors.
|
|
(c)
|
Approve, on behalf of the Board,
the Corporation’s interim financial statements to be
filed pursuant to section 4.3 of NI 51-102, before the Corporation
publicly discloses such information.
|
External
Auditors
|
(a)
|
Review annually, the performance
of the external auditors who shall be ultimately accountable
to the Board and the audit committee as representatives of
the Shareholders of the Company.
|
|
(b)
|
Obtain annually, a formal written
statement of external auditors setting forth all relationships
between the external auditors and the Company, consistent with
Independence Standards Board Standard 1.
|
|
(c)
|
Review and discuss with the
external auditors any disclosed relationships or services that
may impact the objectivity and independence of the external
auditors.
|
|
(d)
|
Take, or recommend that the
full Board take, appropriate action to oversee the independence
of the external auditors.
|
|
(e)
|
Recommend to the Board the
selection and, where applicable, the replacement of the external
auditors nominated annually for Shareholder approval.
|
|
(f)
|
At each meeting, consult with
the external auditors, without the presence of management,
about the quality of the Company’s accounting principles,
internal controls and the completeness and accuracy of the
Company's financial statements.
|
|
(g)
|
Review and approve the Company's
hiring policies regarding partners, employees and former partners
and employees of the present and former external auditors of
the Company.
|
|
(h)
|
Review with management and
the external auditors the audit plan for the year-end financial
statements and intended template for such statements.
|
|
(i)
|
Review and pre-approve all
audit and audit-related services and the fees and other compensation
related thereto, and any non-audit services, provided by the
Company’s external auditors. The pre-approval requirement
is waived with respect to the provision of non-audit services
if:
|
|
i.
|
the aggregate amount of
all such non-audit services provided to the Company constitutes
not more than five percent of the total amount of revenues
paid by the Company to its external auditors during the
fiscal year in which the non-audit services are provided;
|
|
ii.
|
such services were not
recognized by the Company at the time of the engagement
to be non-audit services; and
|
|
iii.
|
such services are promptly
brought to the attention of the audit committee by the
Company and approved prior to the completion of the audit
by the audit committee or by one or more members of the
audit committee who are members of the Board to whom authority
to grant such approvals has been delegated by the audit
committee.
|
Provided the pre-approval of the non-audit
services is presented to the audit committee's first scheduled meeting following such approval such authority may be delegated
by the audit committee to one or more independent members of the audit committee.
Financial
Reporting Processes
|
(a)
|
In consultation with the external
auditors, review with management the integrity of the Company's
financial reporting process, both internal and external.
|
|
(b)
|
Consider the external auditors’
judgments about the quality and appropriateness of the Company’s
accounting principles as applied in its financial reporting.
|
|
(c)
|
Consider and approve, if appropriate,
changes to the Company’s auditing and accounting principles
and practices as suggested by the external auditors and management.
|
|
(d)
|
Review significant judgments
made by management in the preparation of the financial statements
and the view of the external auditors as to appropriateness
of such judgments.
|
|
(e)
|
Following completion of the
annual audit, review separately with management and the external
auditors any significant difficulties encountered during the
course of the audit, including any restrictions on the scope
of work or access to required information.
|
|
(f)
|
Review any significant disagreement
among management and the external auditors in connection with
the preparation of the financial statements.
|
|
(g)
|
Review with the external auditors
and management the extent to which changes and improvements
in financial or accounting practices have been implemented.
|
|
(h)
|
Review any complaints or concerns
about any questionable accounting, internal accounting controls
or auditing matters.
|
|
(i)
|
Review certification process.
|
|
(j)
|
Establish a procedure for the
confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Company
of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.
|
Other
Review
any related-party transactions
Audit Committee Oversight
At no time since the commencement of the
Company’s most recently completed financial year was a recommendation of the audit committee to nominate or compensate an
external auditor not adopted by the Board of Directors.
The Company had the equivalent of approximately
18 full-time employees and consultants during 2011, of which 10 are located in Canada and 8 in USA.
Directors and Officer Beneficial
Ownership
The following table discloses as of April
26, 2012, Directors and Senior Management who beneficially own the Company's voting securities, consisting solely of common shares,
and the amount of the Company's voting securities owned by the Directors and Senior Management as a group.
Shareholdings of Directors and Senior
Management as of April 26, 2012
Title of Class
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Notes
|
|
Amount
and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
Percent
of Class
|
|
Common
|
|
Robert L. Hodgkinson
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
8,783,658
|
|
|
|
6.72
|
%
|
Common
|
|
Harrison Blacker
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
1,618,678
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
%
|
Common
|
|
Mathew H. Wong
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
605,872
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
Common
|
|
Craig Sturrock
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
1,092,500
|
|
|
|
0.84
|
%
|
Common
|
|
Robert Holmes
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
2,708,000
|
|
|
|
2.07
|
%
|
Common
|
|
Richard Patricio
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
295,000
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
%
|
Common
|
|
Stephen Mut
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
2,676,001
|
|
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
Common
|
|
Darren Devine
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
Common
|
|
Neyeska Mut
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
523,001
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
Common
|
|
Phil Bretzloff
|
|
(10)
|
|
|
333,250
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
|
|
Total Directors/Management
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,885,960
|
|
|
$
|
14.44
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Of these shares, 7,187,840 are
represented by common shares, 914,000 are represented by vested
stock options and 681,818 are represented by currently exercisable
share purchase warrants. 1,500,000 of these shares are owned
by 7804 Yukon Inc., a private company owned by Robert Hodgkinson;
3,600,499 are common shares owned by Hodgkinson Equities Corp.,
a private company owned by Robert Hodgkinson. A further 405,000
stock options have been granted but not yet vested.
|
|
(2)
|
Of these shares, 525,678 are
represented by common shares, 943,000 are represented by vested
stock options and 150,000 are represented by currently exercisable
share purchase warrants. A further 390,000 stock options have
been granted but not yet vested.
|
|
(3)
|
Of these shares, 122 are represented
by common shares, 549,500 are represented by vested stock options
and 56,250 are represented by currently exercisable share purchase
warrants. 98 of these common shares are held by 390855 BC Ltd.,
a private company owned by Mathew Wong; 24 common shares are
owned by Pui Ngor Lee, Mr. Wong’s mother. A further 267,500
stock options have been granted but not yet vested.
|
|
(4)
|
Of these shares, 650,000 are
represented by common shares, 292,500 are represented by vested
stock options and 150,000 are represented by currently exercisable
share purchase warrants. A further 107,500 stock options have
been granted but not yet vested.
|
|
(5)
|
Of these shares, 1,663,000 are
represented by common shares, 295,000 are represented by vested
stock options and 750,000 are represented by currently exercisable
share purchase warrants. A further 105,000 stock options have
been granted but not yet vested.
|
|
(6)
|
Of these shares, 295,000 are
represented by vested stock options. A further 105,000 stock
options have been granted but not yet vested.
|
|
(7)
|
Of these shares, 1,701,001 are
represented by common shares, 600,000 are represented by vested
stock options and 375,000 are represented by currently exercisable
share purchase warrants. A further 50,000 stock options have
been granted but not yet vested.
|
|
(8)
|
Of these shares, 250,000 are
represented by vested stock options. A further 50,000 stock options
have been granted but not yet vested.
|
|
(9)
|
Of these shares, 50,001 are represented
by common shares and 473,000 are represented by vested stock
options. A further 227,000 stock options have been granted but
not yet vested.
|
|
(10)
|
Of these shares, 59,500 are
represented by common shares and 273,750 are represented by
vested stock options. A further 126,250 stock options have been
granted but not yet vested.
|
All
percentages based on 130,786,069 shares outstanding as of April 26, 2012.
Stock Option Plan
We have a Stock Option Plan (the
“Option Plan”), the principal purposes of which
is to (i) advance our interests by aiding us, and our subsidiaries,
in motivating, attracting and retaining key employees and directors capable of assuring the future success of the Company; and
(ii) secure for us and our shareholders the benefits inherent in the ownership of our common shares by key employees and directors
of the Company and our subsidiaries
. We also have a United States stock incentive sub-plan that was
initially approved in 2009 and amended in 2012 (the “Sub-Plan”) and forms a part of the Option Plan. Any option granted
under the Sub-Plan is also subject to the terms and conditions of the Option Plan. Where there is a conflict between the terms
and conditions of the Sub-Plan and the terms and conditions of the Option Plan, the terms and conditions of the Option Plan govern.
Directors, officers, employees and other insiders of us or
any of our subsidiaries, as well as any person or corporation engaged to provide services for us or for any entity controlled
by us for an initial, renewable or extended period of twelve months or more (or a lesser period of time if approved by the committee
that administers the Option Plan and acceptable to the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) (including individuals employed
by such person or corporation), are eligible to participate in the Option Plan. Eligible participants who are natural persons
resident in the United States, United States citizens, or are otherwise subject to United States tax law may participate in the
Sub-Plan.
At the time of grant of any option, the aggregate number of
common shares reserved for issuance under the Option Plan (which includes the Sub-Plan) that may be made subject to options any
time and from time to time, together with common shares reserved for issuance at that time under any of our other share compensation
arrangements, may not exceed 10% of the total number of issued and outstanding common shares, on a non-diluted basis, on the date
of grant of the option. Of this 10%, the number of common shares reserved for issuance to any one participant pursuant to the
Sub-Plan in any year may not exceed 5% of our total outstanding common shares on a non-diluted basis. Common shares subject to
any option (or portion thereof) under the Option Plan that has been cancelled or otherwise terminated prior to the issuance or
transfer of such common shares will again be available for options under the Option Plan. The number of common shares authorized
under the Option Plan may be increased, decreased or fixed by the Board of Directors. Subject to adjustment in accordance with
the Sub-Plan, an aggregate of 12,800,000 common shares, less those common shares issued under the Option Plan, may be issued pursuant
to stock options issued under the Sub-Plan. If a stock option terminates, is forfeited or is cancelled without the issuance of
any common shares, or any common shares covered by a stock option or to which a stock option relates are not issued for any other
reason, then the number of common shares counted against the aggregate number of common shares available under the Sub-Plan with
respect to such stock option, to the extent of any such termination, forfeiture, cancellation or other event, will again be available
for granting stock options under the Sub-Plan.
The option exercise price will be determined by the committee
that administers the Option Plan or the Sub-Plan administrator, as applicable. The exercise price may not be less than the last
closing price per common share on the TSX on the trading day immediately preceding the day the options are granted, or if the
common shares are not listed on the TSX, on the most senior of any other exchange on which the common shares are then traded,
on the last trading day immediately preceding the date of grant of such options.
The Option Plan may be terminated by the committee that administers
the Option Plan at any time. The Sub-Plan terminates at midnight on January 5, 2022, unless it is terminated before then by our
Board of Directors. Any option outstanding under the Option Plan or Sub-Plan at the time of termination shall remain in effect
until such option has been exercised, has expired, has been surrendered to us or has been terminated.
A copy of the Option Plan and Sub-Plan is incorporated by reference
into this Form 20-F as Exhibits 4.17 and 4.18, respectively.
Stock Options Outstanding
The names and titles of the Directors/Executive
Officers of the Company to whom outstanding stock options have been granted and the number of common shares subject to such options
is set forth in the following table as of April 26, 2012:
Stock Options Outstanding as of April
26, 2012
Name
|
|
Number of Options Held
|
|
|
Number
of
Options
Vested
|
|
|
Exercise Price per Share
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Hodgkinson
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
|
|
262,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
10/28/2008
|
|
10/28/2013
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
5/5/2009
|
|
5/4/2014
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
2/4/2010
|
|
2/3/2015
|
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
2/16/2010
|
|
2/15/2015
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
187,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
3/16/2011
|
|
3/15/2014
|
Harrison Blacker
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
10/28/2008
|
|
10/28/2013
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
5/5/2009
|
|
5/4/2014
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
2/4/2010
|
|
2/3/2015
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
2/16/2010
|
|
2/15/2015
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
187,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
3/16/2011
|
|
3/15/2014
|
Mathew Wong
(1)
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
122,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
10/28/2008
|
|
10/28/2013
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
5/5/2009
|
|
5/4/2014
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
2/4/2010
|
|
2/3/2015
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
2/16/2010
|
|
2/15/2015
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
187,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
3/16/2011
|
|
3/15/2014
|
Craig Sturrock
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
10/28/2008
|
|
10/28/2013
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
5/5/2009
|
|
5/4/2014
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
2/4/2010
|
|
2/3/2015
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
3/16/2011
|
|
3/15/2014
|
Robert Holmes
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
10/28/2008
|
|
10/28/2013
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
32,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
02/12/2009
|
|
02/12/2014
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
2/4/2010
|
|
2/3/2015
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
3/16/2011
|
|
3/15/2014
|
Richard Patricio
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
10/28/2008
|
|
10/28/2013
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
32,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
02/12/2009
|
|
02/12/2014
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
2/4/2010
|
|
2/3/2015
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
3/16/2011
|
|
3/15/2014
|
Stephen Mut
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
6/29/2009
|
|
6/29/2014
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
2/4/2010
|
|
2/3/2015
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
262,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
3/16/2011
|
|
3/15/2014
|
Darren Devine (2)
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
2/4/2010
|
|
2/3/2015
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
3/16/2011
|
|
3/15/2014
|
Neyeska Mut
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
84,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
10/28/2008
|
|
10/28/2013
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
52,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
2/12/2009
|
|
2/12/2014
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
2/4/2010
|
|
2/3/2015
|
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
2/16/2010
|
|
2/15/2015
|
|
|
|
306,000
|
|
|
|
191,250
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
3/16/2011
|
|
3/15/2014
|
Phil Bretzloff
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
52,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
10/28/2008
|
|
10/28/2013
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
48,750
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
2/12/2009
|
|
2/12/2014
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
2/4/2010
|
|
2/3/2015
|
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
87,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
3/16/2011
|
|
3/15/2014
|
Total Officers/Directors
|
|
|
6,719,000
|
|
|
|
5,234,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
125,000 options granted on May 5, 2009 were issued to 390855
B.C. Ltd., a private company owned by Mathew Wong.
|
|
(2)
|
200,000 options granted on February 4, 2010 were issued
to Chelmer Investments Corp., a private company owned by Darren
Devine. On October 25, 2010, these options were re-issued to
the name of Darren Devine with the same exercise price, vesting
term and expiration date.
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MAJOR
SHAREHOLDERS
AND
RELATED
PARTY
TRANSACTIONS.
|
Shareholders
The Company is aware of one person who
each beneficially own 5% or more of the Registrant's voting securities. The following table lists as of April 26, 2012 persons
and/or companies holding 5% or more beneficial interest in the Company’s outstanding common stock.
5% or Greater Shareholders as of April
26, 2012
Title of Class
|
|
Name of Owner
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial
Ownership
|
|
|
Percent of Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
Robert L. Hodgkinson (1)
|
|
|
8,783,658
|
|
|
|
6.72
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Of these shares, 7,187,840 are
represented by common shares, 914,000 are represented by vested
stock options and 681,818 are represented by currently exercisable
share purchase warrants. 1,500,000 of these shares are owned
by 7804 Yukon Inc., a private company owned by Robert Hodgkinson;
3,600,499 are common shares owned by Hodgkinson Equities Corp.,
a private company owned by Robert Hodgkinson. A further 405,000
stock options have been granted but not yet vested.
|
All percentages based on
130,786,069 shares outstanding as of April 26, 2012.
Changes in ownership by major shareholders
To the best of the Company’s knowledge
there have been no changes in the ownership of the Company’s shares other than disclosed herein.
Voting Rights
The Company’s major shareholders
do not have different voting rights.
Shares Held in the United States
As of April 26, 2012, there were approximately
7,534 registered holders of the Company’s shares in the United States, with combined holdings of 90,890,625 common shares.
Change of Control
As of April 26, 2012, there were no arrangements
known to the Company which may, at a subsequent date, result in a change of control of the Company.
Control by Others
To the best of the Company’s knowledge,
the Company is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation, any foreign government, or any other natural
or legal person, severally or jointly.
|
B.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Other than as disclosed below, from January
1, 2009 through December 31, 2011, the Company did not enter into any transactions or loans between the Company and any (a) enterprises
that directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, control or are controlled by, or are under common control with
the Company; (b) associates; (c) individuals owning, directly or indirectly, an interest in the voting power of the Company that
gives them significant influence over the Company, and close members of any such individual’s family; (d) key management
personnel and close members of such individuals' families; or (e) enterprises in which a substantial interest in the voting power
is owned, directly or indirectly by any person described in (c) or (d) or over which such a person is able to exercise significant
influence.
|
(a)
|
Loan from Hodgkinson Equity
Corporation (“HEC”)
|
HEC loan to the Company
On June 22, 2009, as amended
on September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with HEC in regard to the outstanding debt
of $1,800,000 assumed from DEAL by the Company. Pursuant to the agreements, $450,000 of the debt was converted into 1,363,636
units consisting of 1,363,636 common shares and 681,818 common share purchase warrants exercisable at a price of $0.55 for a period
of 5 years. The fair value of the units was estimated to be $450,000. The remaining $1,350,000 was converted into a 12% note due
on January 1, 2011 and the Company was required to pay 3% fee on the outstanding balance of the loan as at December 31, 2009.
As a result of the sale of 5% working interest in the Drake/Woodrush area to HEC in December 2009 (effective June 1, 2009), both
parties agreed to reduce the loan balance by the purchase price of $911,722 including taxes and adjustments. In addition, the
loan balance was further reduced by a payment of $50,351. As at December 31, 2009, a balance of $387,927 remained outstanding.
As at December 31, 2010, a balance of $250,000 remained outstanding. In January 2011, the remaining balance of loan from HEC was
repaid in full in cash (see Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements for details).
|
(b)
|
Loan from Brownstone Ventures
Inc. (“Brownstone”)
|
On June 22, 2009, as amended
on September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with Brownstone in regard to the outstanding
debt of $4,604,040 (US$3,780,000). Pursuant to the agreement, $2,200,000 (US$2,000,000) of the debt was converted into 6,666,667
units consisting of 6,666,667 common shares and 3,333,333 common share purchase warrants exercisable at a price of $0.55 for a
period of 5 years. The fair value of the units was estimated to be US$2,000,000. The remaining $2,070,140 (US$1,780,000) of the
debt was converted into a Canadian dollar denominated 12% note due on January 1, 2011.
As a part of the debt settlement
on June 22, 2009, the Company also issued Brownstone 2,000,000 common share purchase warrants exercisable at $0.50 for a period
of 2 years, with an option to force the exercise of the warrants if the Company’s common shares trade at a price of $0.80
or greater for 30 consecutive calendar days.
As at December 31, 2009, a
balance of $1,957,474 remained outstanding comprised of the loan balance of $2,070,140 minus unamortized portion of finance fees
of $112,666. In December 2010, the loan was paid off in full in cash.
|
(c)
|
During 2011, compensation
awarded to key management included a total of salaries and
consulting fees of $1,771,981 (2010 - $1,215,191 and 2009
- $1,470,947) and non-cash stock-based compensation of $451,071
(2010 - $486,018 and 2009 - $188,668). Key management includes
the Company’s officers and directors. The salaries and
consulting fees are included in general and administrative
expenses. Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
at December 31, 2011 is $396,618 (December 31, 2010 - $12,000
and December 31, 2009 - $Nil) owing to a company controlled
by an officer of the Company.
|
|
(d)
|
In 2011, the Company incurred
a total of $2,301 (2010 - $268,440 and 2009 - $382,748) in
interest expense and finance costs to a company controlled
by an officer of the Company and Brownstone.
|
|
(e)
|
Included in interest and other
income, in 2011, is $30,000 (2010 - $30,000 and 2009 - $30,000)
received from the companies controlled by officers of the
Company for rental income.
|
|
(f)
|
In July 2008, Brownstone Ventures
Inc. (“Brownstone”) became a 28.53% working interest
partner in the US properties. Previously, Brownstone controlled
more than 10% of outstanding common shares of the Company.
Effective September 28, 2011, Brownstone ceased to control
more than 10% of outstanding common shares of the Company.
Included in accounts receivable at December 31, 2011 is $Nil
(2010 - $168,771 and 2009 - $72,752) owing from Brownstone.
|
|
(g)
|
In December 2009, a company
controlled by the CEO of the Company (“HEC”) became
a 5% working interest partner in the Woodrush property. Included
in accounts receivable at December 31, 2011 is $Nil (2010
- $967 and 2009 - $Nil) owing from HEC. Included in accounts
payable and accrued liabilities at December 31, 2011 is $53,668
(2010 - $166,139 and 2009 - $63,679) owing to HEC.
|
|
(h)
|
In 2011, we completed a private
placement of 11,010,000 units issued at US$0.30 per unit.
Certain directors and officers of the Company purchased 2,000,000
units of this offering (see Note 13 to the consolidated financial
statements for details).
|
|
(i)
|
In December 2011, HEC exercised
250,000 warrants with an exercise price of US$0.35 each that
were issued in February 2011.
|
|
(j)
|
Included in the total salaries
and consulting fees incurred during 2009 was $107,000 paid
to a former officer of the Company to terminate the consulting
agreement.
|
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel
Not Applicable.
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION.
|
|
A.
|
Consolidated
Statements and Other Financial Information
|
Financial Statements
Description
|
|
Page
|
Consolidated Financial Statements
for the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
|
F-1 - F-56
|
Supplementary Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures - Unaudited
|
|
F-57 - F-65
|
Legal Proceedings
The Directors and the management of the
Company do not know of any material, active or pending, legal proceedings against them; nor is the Company involved as a plaintiff
in any material proceeding or pending litigation.
The Directors and the management of the
Company know of no active or pending proceedings against anyone that might materially adversely affect an interest of the Company.
Dividend Policy
The Company has not
paid any dividends on its common shares. The Company may pay dividends on its common shares in the future if it generates profits.
Any decision to pay dividends on common shares in the future will be made by the board of directors on the basis of the earnings,
financial requirements and other conditions existing at such time.
None.
|
ITEM 9.
|
THE
OFFER
AND
LISTING
|
|
A.
|
Offering
and Listing Details
|
The Company’s common shares are
traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange and on the NYSE Amex, in both cases under the symbol “DEJ.” The following
tables set forth for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices in Canadian dollars of our common shares traded on
the Toronto Stock Exchange and in United States dollars on the NYSE Amex. The Company traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange
Venture Exchange in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, until November 20, 2008 when it began trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange.
The Company changed its symbol to “DEJ” after a one for three share consolidation effective October 1, 2003.
The Company changed its Toronto Stock Exchange trading symbol on May 23, 2007 to “DEJ” to coincide with its listing
on the American Stock Exchange (now NYSE Amex) on the same day under the symbol “DEJ”.
The following table contains the annual
high and low market prices for the five most recent fiscal years:
Toronto Stock Exchange (Cdn$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
2008
(1)
|
|
$
|
2.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
3.28
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
(1) Common shares listed on Toronto Stock
Exchange on November 20, 2008.
NYSE Amex (US$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
2.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
2007
(1)
|
|
$
|
2.95
|
|
|
$
|
1.29
|
|
(1) Shares listed for trading on NYSE Amex on May 7, 2007
The following table contains the high
and low market prices for our common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the NYSE Amex for each fiscal quarter for the two
most recent fiscal years and any subsequent period:
Toronto Stock Exchange (Cdn$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
Q3
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
Q2
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Q1
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
Q3
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Q2
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
Q1
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
(1) Common
shares listed on Toronto Stock Exchange on November 20, 2008.
NYSE Amex (US$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
Q3
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
Q2
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
Q1
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
Q3
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Q2
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Q1
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
(1) Shares listed for trading on NYSE Amex on May 7, 2007
The following table contains the high
and low market prices for our common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the NYSE Amex for each of the most recent six months:
Toronto Stock Exchange (Cdn$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
October, 2011
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
November, 2011
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
December, 2011
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
January, 2012
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
February, 2012
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
March, 2012
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
NYSE Amex (US$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
October, 2011
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
November, 2011
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
December, 2011
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
January, 2012
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
February, 2012
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
March, 2012
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
On April 20, 2012, the closing price of
our common shares on the TSX was Cdn $0.29 per common share and on the NYSE Amex was US $0.30 per common share.
Not Applicable.
Our common shares, no par value, are traded on the TSX under the symbol “DEJ” and are traded
on the NYSE Amex under the symbol "DEJ".
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
|
ITEM 10.
|
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
|
Not Applicable.
|
B.
|
Memorandum
and Articles of Association
|
Dejour Energy Inc. (formerly Dejour Enterprises
Ltd.) is incorporated under the laws of British Columbia, Canada. The Company was originally incorporated as “Dejour Mines
Limited” on March 29, 1968 under the laws of the Province of Ontario. By articles of amendment dated October 30, 2001, the
issued shares were consolidated on the basis of one (1) new for every fifteen (15) old shares and the name of the Company was
changed to Dejour Enterprises Ltd. On June 6, 2003, the shareholders approved a resolution to complete a one-for-three-share consolidation,
which became effective on October 1, 2003. In 2005, the Company was continued in British Columbia under the Business Corporations
Act (British Columbia) (the “Act”). Effective March 9, 2011, the Company changed its name from Dejour Enterprises
Ltd. to Dejour Energy Inc.
There are no restrictions on what business the Company may carry on in the Articles of Incorporation.
Under Article 17 of the Company’s
Articles and under Part 5, Division 3 of the Act, a director must declare its interest in any existing or proposed contract or
transaction with the Company and is not allowed to vote on any transaction or contract with the Company in which has a disclosable
interest, unless all directors have a disclosable interest in that contract or transaction, in which case any or all of those
directors may vote on such resolution. A director may hold any office or place of profit with the Company in conjunction with
the office of director, and no director shall be disqualified by his office from contracting with the Company. A director or his
firm may act in a professional capacity for the Company and he or his firm shall be entitled to remuneration for professional
services. A director may become a director or other officer or employee of, or otherwise interested in, any corporation or firm
in whom the Company may be interested as a shareholder or otherwise. The director shall not be accountable to the Company for
any remuneration or other benefits received by him from such other corporation or firm subject to the provisions of the Act.
Article 16 of the Company’s Articles
addresses the powers and duties of the directors. Directors must, subject to the Act, manage or supervise the management of the
business and affairs of the Company and have the authority to exercise all such powers which are not required to be exercised
by the shareholders as governed by the Act. Article 19 of the Company’s Articles addresses Committees of the Board of Directors.
Directors may, by resolution, create and appoint an executive committee consisting of the director or directors that they deem
appropriate. This executive committee has, during the intervals between meetings of the Board, all of the directors’ powers,
except the power to fill vacancies in the Board, the power to remove a Director, the power to change the membership of, or fill
vacancies in, any committee of the Board and any such other powers as may be set out in the resolution or any subsequent directors’
resolution. Directors may also by resolution appoint one or more committees other than the executive committee.
These committees may be delegated any
of the directors’ powers except the power to fill vacancies on the board of directors, the power to remove a director, the
power to change the membership or fill vacancies on any committee of the directors, and the power to appoint or remove officers
appointed by the directors. Article 18 of the Company’s Articles details the proceedings of directors. A director may, and
the Secretary or Assistant Secretary, if any, on the request of a director must call a meeting of the directors at any time. The
quorum necessary for the transaction of the business of the directors may be fixed by the directors and if not so fixed shall
be deemed to a majority of the directors. If the number of directors is set at one, it quorum is deemed to be one director.
Article 8 of the Company’s Articles
details the borrowing powers of the directors. They may, on behalf of the Company:
|
·
|
Borrow
money in
a manner
and amount,
on any security,
from any
source and
upon any
terms and
conditions
as they
deem appropriate;
|
|
·
|
Issue
bonds, debentures,
and other
debt obligations
either outright
or as security
for any
liability
or obligation
of the Company
or any other
person at
such discounts
or premiums
and on such
other terms
as they
consider
appropriate;
|
|
·
|
Guarantee
the repayment
of money
by any other
person or
the performance
of any obligation
of any other
person;
and
|
|
·
|
Mortgage,
charge,
or grant
a security
in or give
other security
on, the
whole or
any part
of the present
or future
assets and
undertaking
of the Company.
|
A director need not be a shareholder of
the Company, and there are no age limit requirements pertaining to the retirement or non-retirement of directors. The directors
are entitled to the remuneration for acting as directors, if any, as the directors may from time to time determine. If the directors
so decide, the remuneration of directors, if any, will be determined by the shareholders. The remuneration may be in addition
to any salary or other remuneration paid to any officer or employee of the Company as such who is also a director. The Company
must reimburse each director for the reasonable expenses that he or she may incur in and about the business of the Company. If
any director performs any professional or other services for the Company that in the opinion of the directors are outside the
ordinary duties of a director, or if any director is otherwise specially occupied in or about the Company’s business, he
or she may be paid remuneration fixed by the directors, or, at the option of that director, fixed by ordinary resolution and such
remuneration may be either in addition to, or in substitution for, any other remuneration that he or she may be entitled to receive.
Unless other determined by ordinary resolution, the directors on behalf of the Company may pay a gratuity or pension or allowance
on retirement to any director who has held any salaried office or place of profit with the Company or to his or her spouse or
dependents and may make contributions to any fund and pay premiums for the purchase or provision of any such gratuity, pension
or allowance.
Article 21 of the Company’s Articles
provides for the mandatory indemnification of directors, former directors, and alternate directors, as well as his or hers heirs
and legal personal representatives, or any other person, to the greatest extent permitted by the Act. The indemnification includes
the mandatory payment of expenses actually and reasonably incurred by such person in respect of that proceeding. The failure of
a director, alternate director, or officer of the Company to comply with the Act or the Company’s Articles does not invalidate
any indemnity to which he or she is entitled. The directors may cause the Company to purchase and maintain insurance for the benefit
of eligible parties who:
|
(a)
|
is or was a director, alternate
director, officer, employee or agent of the Company;
|
|
(b)
|
is or was a director, alternate
director, officer employee or agent of a corporation at a time
when the corporation is or was an affiliate of the Company;
|
|
(c)
|
at the request of the Company,
is or was a director, alternate director, officer, employee
or agent of a corporation or of a partnership, trust, joint
venture or other unincorporated entity;
|
|
(d)
|
at the request of the Company,
holds or held a position equivalent to that of a director, alternate
director or officer of a partnership, trust, joint venture or
other unincorporated entity;
|
against any liability incurred by him
or her as such director, alternate director, officer, employee or agent or person who holds or held such equivalent position
Under Article 9 of the Company’s
Articles and subject to the Act, the Company may alter its authorized share structure by directors’ resolution or ordinary
resolution, in each case determined by the directors, to:
|
(a)
|
create one or more classes or
series of shares or, if none of the shares of a series of a
class or series of shares are allotted or issued, eliminate
that class or series of shares;
|
|
(b)
|
increase, reduce or eliminate
the maximum number of shares that the Company is authorized
to issue out of any class or series of shares or establish a
maximum number of shares that the company is authorized to issue
out of any class or series of shares for which no maximum is
established;
|
|
(c)
|
subdivide or consolidate all
or any of its unissued, or fully paid issued, shares;
|
|
(d)
|
if the Company is authorized
to issue shares of a class or shares with par value;
|
|
(i)
|
decrease the par value of
those shares; or
|
|
(ii)
|
if none of the shares of
that class of shares are allotted or issued, increase the
par value of those shares;
|
|
(e)
|
change all or any of its unissued,
or fully paid issued, shares with par value into shares without
par value or any of its unissued shares without par value into
shares with par value;
|
|
(f)
|
alter the identifying name of
any of its shares; or
|
by ordinary resolution otherwise alter
its share or authorized share structure.
Subject to Section9.2 of the Company’s
Articles and the Act, the Company may:
|
(1)
|
by directors’ resolution
or ordinary resolution, in each case determined by the directors,
create special rights or restrictions for, and attach those
special rights or restrictions to, the shares of any class or
series of shares, if none of those shares have been issued,
or vary or delete any special rights or restrictions attached
to the shares of any class or series of shares, if none of those
shares have been issued; and
|
|
(2)
|
by special resolution
of the shareholders of the class or series affected, do
any of the acts in Section 9.1 of the Company’s
Articles if any of the shares of the class or series of
shares has been issued.
|
The Company may by resolution of its directors
or by ordinary resolution, in each case as determined by the directors, authorize an alteration of its Notice of Articles in order
to change its name.
The directors may, whenever they think
fit, call a meeting of shareholders. An annual general meeting shall be held once every calendar year at such time (not being
more than 15 months after holding the last preceding annual meeting) and place as may be determined by the Directors.
There are no limitations upon the rights
to own securities.
There are no provisions that would have
the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control of the Company.
There is no special ownership threshold
above which an ownership position must be disclosed. However, any ownership level above 10% must be disclosed to the TSX and all
applicable Canadian Securities Commission.
Description of Share Capital
The Company is authorized to issue an
unlimited number of common shares, preferred shares and series 1 preferred shares of which, as of April 26, 2012, 130,786,069
common shares, are issued and outstanding.
The rights, preferences and restrictions attaching to each
class of the Company’s shares are as follows:
Common Shares
All the common
shares of the Company are of the same class and, once issued, rank equally as to dividends, voting powers, and participation in
assets. All common shareholders are entitled to receive notice of, attend and be heard at any meeting of shareholders of
the Company, excepting a meeting of the holders of shares of another class, as such, and excepting a meeting of the holders of
a particular series, as such. Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all
matters to be acted upon by the shareholders, including the election of directors.
Except as otherwise required by law
the holders of the Company’s common shares will possess all voting power. Generally, all matters to be voted on by shareholders
must be approved by a majority (or, in the case of election of directors, by a plurality) of the votes entitled to be cast by
all common shares that are present in person or represented by proxy. Subject to the special rights and restrictions attached
to the shares of any class or series of classes, one holder of common shares issued, outstanding and entitled to vote, represented
in person or by proxy, is necessary to constitute a quorum at any meeting of our shareholders.
Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding
up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, or other disposition of the property or assets of the Company, holders of
shares of common stock are entitled to receive pro rata the assets of Company, if any, remaining after payments of all debts and
liabilities to the holders of preferred shares or any other shares ranking senior to shares of common stock. No shares have
been issued subject to call or assessment. There are no pre-emptive or conversion rights and no provisions for redemption
or purchase for cancellation, surrender, or sinking or purchase funds.
The holders of the Company’s common
shares will be entitled to such cash dividends as may be declared from time to time by our Board of Directors but such dividend
will rank junior to the holders of preferred shares and series 1 preferred shares.
In the event of any merger or consolidation
with or into another company in connection with which the Company’s common shares are converted into or exchangeable for
shares, other securities or property (including cash), all holders of the Company’s common shares will be entitled to receive
the same kind and amount of shares and other securities and property (including cash).
There are no
indentures or agreements limiting the payment of dividends on the Company’s common shares and there are no special liquidation
rights or subscription rights attaching to the Company’s common shares
.
Preferred Shares
Preferred shares may, at any time and
from time to time, be issued in one or more series and the Company may, by directors’ resolution or ordinary resolution,
do one or more of the following:
|
·
|
determine
the maximum
number of
shares of
any of those
series of
preferred
shares that
the Company
is authorized
to issue,
determine
that there
is no maximum
number or
alter any
determination
made or
otherwise,
in relation
to a maximum
number of
those shares,
and authorize
the alteration
of the Notice
of Articles
accordingly;
|
|
·
|
alter
the Articles
of the Company,
and authorize
the alteration
of the Notice
of Articles,
to create
an identifying
name by
which the
shares of
any of those
series of
preferred
shares may
be identified
or to alter
any identifying
name created
for those
shares;
and
|
|
·
|
alter
the Articles
of the Company,
and authorize
the alteration
of the Notice
of Articles,
to attach
special
rights or
restrictions
to the shares
of any of
those series
of preferred
shares or
to alter
any special
rights or
restrictions
attached
to those
shares,
subject
to the special
rights and
restrictions
attached
to the preferred
shares.
|
If the alterations, determinations or
authorizations contemplated above are to be made in relation to a series of shares of which there are issued shares, those alterations,
determinations or authorizations may be made by ordinary resolution. However, no special rights or restrictions attached to a
series of preferred shares shall confer on the series of preferred shares priority over another series of preferred shares respecting
(i) dividends or (ii) return of capital on the dissolution of the Company or on the occurrence of any event that entitles the
shareholders holding the shares of all series of preferred shares to a return of capital.
All holders of preferred shares shall
not be entitled to receive notice of, attend and be heard at any meeting of or vote at any meeting of shareholders of the Company,
except any specific meeting of the holders of preferred shares.
The holders of the Company’s preferred
shares will be entitled to such cash dividends as may be declared from time to time by our Board of Directors and shall rank senior
to the holders of our common shares and any other shares of the Company ranking junior to the preferred shares.
Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding
up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, or other disposition of the property or assets of the Company, holders of
the holders of the Preferred Shares, including the Series 1 Preferred Shares, shall be entitled to receive, for each preferred
share held, from the property and assets of the Company, a sum equivalent to the amount paid up thereon together with the premium
(if any) thereon and any dividends declared thereon before any amount shall be paid or any property or asset of the Company is
distributed to the holders of the common shares or any other shares ranking junior to the preferred shares with respect to repayment
of capital. After payment to the holders of the preferred shares of the amount so payable to them, the holders of the preferred
shares shall not be entitled to share in any further distribution of the property or assets of the Company except as specifically
provided in special rights and restrictions attached to any particular series of preferred shares
Series 1 Preferred Shares
The Company may, at any time and from
time to time, issue series 1 preferred shares. The Company may, by directors’ resolution or ordinary resolution passed before
the issue of any series 1 preferred shares, in each case as determined by the directors or, if there are issued series 1 preferred
shares, by ordinary resolution, do one or more of the following:
|
·
|
determine
the maximum
number of
the series
1 preferred
shares that
the Company
is authorized
to issue,
determine
that there
is no maximum
number or
alter any
determination
made in
relation
to a maximum
number of
those shares,
and authorize
the alteration
of the Notice
of Articles
accordingly;
|
|
·
|
alter
the Articles
of the Company,
and authorize
the alteration
of the Notice
of Articles,
to alter
the name
of the series
1 preferred
shares;
and
|
|
·
|
alter
the Articles
of the Company,
and authorize
the alteration
of the Notice
of Articles,
to attach
special
rights or
restrictions
to the series
1 preferred
shares or
to alter
any special
rights or
restrictions
attached
to those
shares,
subject
to the special
rights and
restrictions
attached
to the preferred
shares.
|
The special rights and restrictions that
may be attached to the series 1 preferred shares may include, without in any way limiting or restricting the generality of such
paragraph, rights and restrictions respecting the following:
|
·
|
the
rate or
amount of
dividends,
whether
cumulative,
non-cumulative
or partially
cumulative
and the
dates, places
and currencies
of payment
thereof;
|
|
·
|
the
consideration
for, and
the terms
and conditions
of, any
purchase
for cancellation
or redemption
thereof,
including
redemption
after a
fixed term
or at a
premium,
conversion
or exchange
rights;
|
|
·
|
the
terms and
conditions
of any share
purchase
plan or
sinking
fund;
|
|
·
|
the
restrictions
respecting
the payment
of dividends
on, or the
repayment
of capital
in respect
of, any
other shares
of the Company;
|
|
·
|
the
issuance
of any shares
of any other
class or
series of
shares of
the Company
or any evidences
of indebtedness
or any other
securities
convertible
into or
exchangeable
for such
shares
|
No special rights or restrictions attached
to the series 1 preferred shares confers on the series 1 preferred shares priority over another series of preferred shares respecting
(i) dividends or (ii) return of capital on the dissolution of the Company or on the occurrence of any event that entitles the
shareholders holding the shares of all series of preferred shares to a return of capital.
All holders of series 1 preferred shares
are not entitled to receive notice of, attend and be heard at any meeting of or vote at any meeting of shareholders of the Company,
except any specific meeting of the holders of series 1 preferred shares.
The holders of the Company’s series
1 preferred shares will be entitled to such cash dividends as may be declared from time to time by the Company’s Board of
Directors and will rank senior to the holders of the Company’s common shares and any other shares of the Company ranking
junior to the preferred shares.
Dividend Record
The Company has not paid any dividends
on its common shares and has no policy with respect to the payment of dividends.
Ownership of Securities and Change
of Control
There are no limitations on the rights
to own securities, including the rights of non-resident or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights on the securities
imposed by foreign law or by the constituent documents of the Company.
Any person who beneficially owns, directly
or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over more than 10% of the Company’s voting shares is considered an insider,
and must file an insider report with the Canadian regulatory commissions within ten days of becoming an insider, disclosing any
direct or indirect beneficial ownership of, or control or direction over securities of the Company. In addition, if the Company
itself holds any of its own securities, the Company must disclose such ownership.
There are no provisions in the Company’s
Articles or Notice of Articles that would have an effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company
operating only with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring involving the Company or its subsidiaries.
Differences from Requirements in
the United States
Except for the Company’s quorum
requirements, certain requirements related to related party transactions and the requirement for notice of shareholder meetings,
discussed above, there are no significant differences in the law applicable to the Company, in the areas outlined above, in Canada
versus the United States. In most states in the United States, a quorum must consist of a majority of the shares entitled to vote.
Some states allow for a reduction of the quorum requirements to less than a majority of the shares entitled to vote. Having a
lower quorum threshold may allow a minority of the shareholders to make decisions about the Company, its management and operations.
In addition, most states in the United States require that a notice of meeting be mailed to shareholders prior to the meeting
date. Additionally, in the United States, a director may not be able to vote on the approval of any transaction in which the director
has an interest.
The following are material contracts to which the Company is
a party:
Bank Line of Credit and Bridge Loan
In March 2010, the Company
negotiated a credit facility for a bridge loan of up to $5,000,000 with a due date of September 22, 2010. This facility was secured
by a first floating charge over all the assets of DEAL, and bore interest at 12% per annum. At December 31, 2011, the Canadian
oil and natural gas interests and properties with a carrying amount of $nil (December 31, 2010 - $12,418,812) were held as collateral
for the loan. By agreement, the due date of the loan was extended to October 31, 2011. Pursuant to the agreement, outstanding
advances were due to be fully repaid no later than October 31, 2011 or, upon the earlier of non-core asset sales of DEAL. During
the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company made total monthly principal payments of $700,000 and repaid the outstanding balance
of $4,100,000 in full. This facility was used to support the development of the Company’s oil and gas properties in the
Drake/Woodrush area.
In September 2011, the Company obtained
a $7 million revolving operating demand loan (“line of credit”), including a letter of credit facility to a maximum
of $700,000 for a maximum one year term, from a Canadian Bank to refinance the bridge loan and to provide operating funds. The
line of credit is at an interest rate of Prime + 1% (total 4% p.a. currently) and collateralized by a $10,000,000 debenture over
all assets of DEAL and a $10,000,000 guarantee from Dejour Energy Inc. In December 2011, the Company renewed the line of credit
with the Canadian Bank. The next review date is scheduled on or before May 1, 2012, but subject to change at the discretion of
the bank. As at December 31, 2011, a total of $5,545,457 of this facility was utilized.
According to the terms of the facility,
DEAL is required to maintain a working capital ratio of greater than 1:1 at all times. The working capital ratio is defined as
the ratio of (i) current assets (including any undrawn and authorized availability under the facility) less unrealized hedging
gains to (ii) current liabilities (excluding current portion of outstanding balances of the facility) less unrealized hedging
losses. As at December 31, 2011, the Company is in compliance with the working capital ratio requirement.
HEC loan to DEAL
On May 15, 2008, DEAL issued a promissory
note for up to $2,000,000 to HEC, a private company controlled by the CEO of the Company.
The promissory
note is secured by the assets, equipment, fixtures, inventory and accounts receivable of DEAL, bears interest at the Royal Bank
of Canada Prime Rate per annum, and has a loan fee of 1% of the outstanding amount per month. The principal, interest and loan
fee were payable on demand after August 15, 2008. Upon securing the bank line of credit in August 2008, HEC signed a subordination
and postponement agreement which restricted the principal repayment of the promissory note subject to the bank’s prior approval
and DEAL meeting certain loan covenants. As at December 31, 2008, $1,950,000 had been advanced on the promissory note. Repayments
of $90,642 and $59,358 were made on March 5, 2009 and on April 3, 2009 respectively. As at June 22, 2009, the Company assumed
from DEAL the remaining outstanding balance of $1,800,000.
HEC loan to the Company
On August 11, 2008, the Company borrowed
$600,000 from HEC. The loan was secured by all assets of the Company, repayable on demand, bore interest at the Canadian prime
rate per annum, and had a loan fee of 1% of the outstanding amount per month. At December 31, 2008 $600,000 had been advanced
to the Company.
On March 19, 2009, a repayment of $600,000 was made and as at December 31, 2009, no
balance remained outstanding.
On September 12, 2008, as consideration
for HEC agreeing to postpone the $2,000,000 promissory note and providing the additional loan of $600,000, HEC was granted an
option to become a working interest partner with DEAL. Upon electing to become a working interest partner, HEC must pay DEAL an
amount equal to 10% of the actual price paid for the acquisition of the Montney (Buick Creek) property in northeastern British
Columbia. HEC is also required to pay its pro-rata share of the operating costs. On February 26, 2009, HEC exercised its option
and elected to become a 10% working interest partner in DEAL’s Montney (Buick Creek) property. The option price was $90,642.
On June 22, 2009, as amended on September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with HEC in regard to the outstanding debt of $1,800,000
assumed from DEAL by the Company. Pursuant to the agreements, $450,000 of the debt was converted into 1,363,636 units consisting
of 1,363,636 common shares and 681,818 common share purchase warrants exercisable at a price of $0.55 for a period of 5 years.
The fair value of the units was estimated to be $450,000. The remaining $1,350,000 was converted into a 12% note due on January
1, 2011 and the Company was required to pay 3% fee on the outstanding balance of the loan as at December 31, 2009. As a result
of the sale of 5% working interest in the Drake/Woodrush area to HEC in December 2009 (effective June 1, 2009), both parties agreed
to reduce the loan balance by the purchase price of $911,722 including taxes and adjustments. In addition, the loan balance was
further reduced by a payment of $50,351. As at December 31, 2009, a balance of $387,927 remained outstanding. In December 2010,
a repayment of $137,927 was made to HEC by the Company. As at December 31, 2010, a balance of $250,000 remained outstanding. Subsequent
to December 31, 2010, the loan was repaid in full in cash.
Brownstone loan to the Company
On June 18, 2008, a promissory note with
a face value of $4,078,800 (US $4,000,000) was issued to Brownstone. Brownstone owned more than 10% of outstanding common shares
of the Company and one of Brownstone’s directors also serves on the board of directors of the Company.
The
promissory note was secured
by a general security agreement issued by the Company in favour of Brownstone,
and
bore interest at 5% per annum. The principal and interest were repayable by the earlier of the completion of an equity and/or
debt financing, and July 1, 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2008, a repayment of $222,948 (US$220,000) was made and at
December 31, 2008 a balance of $4,604,040 (US$3,780,000) owed.
On June 22, 2009, as amended on September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with Brownstone in regard to the outstanding debt of $4,604,040
(US$3,780,000). Pursuant to the agreement, $2,200,000 (US$2,000,000) of the debt was converted into 6,666,667 units consisting
of 6,666,667 common shares and 3,333,333 common share purchase warrants exercisable at a price of $0.55 for a period of 5 years.
The fair value of the units was estimated to be US$2,000,000. The remaining $2,070,140 (US$1,780,000) of the debt was converted
into a Canadian dollar denominated 12% note due on January 1, 2011. As at December 31, 2009, a balance of $1,957,474 remained
outstanding comprised of the loan balance of $2,070,140 minus unamortized portion of finance fees of $112,666. In December 2010,
the loan was paid off in full in cash.
As a part of the debt settlement on June
22, 2009, the Company also issued Brownstone 2,000,000 common share purchase warrants exercisable at $0.50 for a period of 2 years,
with an option to force the exercise of the warrants if the Company’s common shares trade at a price of $0.80 or greater
for 30 consecutive calendar days.
Purchase and Sale Agreement between
the Registrant and Pengrowth Corporation dated April 17, 2009
In April 2009, the Company’s Canadian
subsidiary, DEAL, entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Pengrowth Corporation. Under the agreement, DEAL agreed to sell
100% of its working interest in the Carson Creek area to Pengrowth for gross proceeds of $2,100,000.
In 2009, the Company’s Canadian
subsidiary, DEAL, entered into the following purchase and sale Agreements in regard to the disposition of a total 25% working
interest in the Drake/Woodrush area for total gross proceeds of $4,500,000:
Date of agreement
|
|
Transferee
|
|
Working interest %
|
|
|
Gross Proceeds
|
|
June 10, 2009
|
|
John James Robinson
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
$
|
540,000
|
|
June 15, 2009
|
|
C.U. YourOilRig Corp.
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,800,000
|
|
July 8, 2009
|
|
Woodrush Energy Partners LLC
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,080,000
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
RockBridge Energy Inc.
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
HEC
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
$
|
900,000
|
|
There are no governmental laws, decrees,
or regulations in Canada relating to restrictions on the export or import of capital, or affecting the remittance of interest,
dividends, or other payments to non-resident holders of the Company’s common stock. Any remittances of dividends to United
States residents are, however, subject to a 15% withholding tax (10% if the shareholder is a corporation owning at least 10% of
the outstanding Common Stock of the Company) pursuant to Article X of the reciprocal tax treaty between Canada and the United
States.
Except as provided in the Investment Canada
Act (the “ICA”), there are no limitations specific to the rights of non-Canadians to hold or vote the common shares
of the Company under the laws of Canada or the Province of British Columbia or in the charter documents of the Company.
Management of the Company considers that
the following general summary is materially complete and fairly describes those provisions of the ICA pertinent to an investment
by an American investor in the Company.
The ICA requires a non-Canadian making
an investment which would result in the acquisition of control of a Canadian business, the gross value of the assets of which
exceed certain threshold levels or the business activity of which is related to Canada’s cultural heritage or national identity,
to either notify, or file an application for review with, Investment Canada, the federal agency created by the ICA.
The notification procedure involves a
brief statement of information about the investment of a prescribed form which is required to be filed with Investment Canada
by the investor at any time up to 30 days following implementation of the investment. It is intended that investments requiring
only notification will proceed without government intervention unless the investment is in a specific type of business activity
related to Canada’s cultural heritage and national identity.
If an investment is reviewable under the
ICA, an application for review in the form prescribed is normally required to be filed with Investment Canada prior to the investment
taking place and the investment may not be implemented until the review has been completed and the Minister responsible for Investment
Canada is satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada. If the Minister is not satisfied that the investment
is likely to be of net benefit to Canada, the non-Canadian must not implement the investment or, if the investment has been implemented,
may be required to divest himself of control of the business that is the subject of the investment.
The following investments by non-Canadians
are subject to notification under the ICA:
|
(a)
|
an investment
to establish a new Canadian business; and
|
|
(b)
|
an investment
to acquire control of a Canadian business
that is not reviewable pursuant to the ICA.
|
An investment is reviewable under the
ICA if there is an acquisition by a non-Canadian of a Canadian business and the asset value of the Canadian business being acquired
equals or exceeds the following thresholds:
|
(a)
|
for non-WTO Investors, the threshold
is $5,000,000 for a direct acquisition and over $50,000,000
for an indirect acquisition. The $5,000,000 threshold will apply
however for an indirect acquisition if the asset value of the
Canadian business being acquired exceeds 50% of the asset value
of the global transaction;
|
|
(b)
|
except as specified in paragraph
(c) below, a threshold is calculated annually for reviewable
direct acquisitions by or from WTO Investors. The threshold
for 2012 is $330,000,000. Pursuant to Canada’s international
commitments, indirect acquisitions by or from WTO Investors
are not reviewable; and
|
|
(c)
|
the limits set out in paragraph
(a) apply to all investors for acquisitions of a Canadian business
that is a cultural business.:
|
WTO Investor as defined in the ICA means:
|
(a)
|
an individual,
other than a Canadian, who is a national of
a WTO Member or who has the right of permanent
residence in relation to that WTO Member;
|
|
(b)
|
a government
of a WTO Member, whether federal, state or
local, or an agency thereof;
|
|
|
an entity that is not a Canadian-controlled
entity, and that is a WTO investor-controlled entity, as determined in
accordance with the ICA;
|
|
(c)
|
a corporation
or limited partnership:
|
|
(i)
|
that is not a Canadian-controlled
entity, as determined pursuant to the ICA;
|
|
(ii)
|
that is not a WTO investor
within the meaning of the ICA;
|
|
(iii)
|
of which less than a majority
of its voting interests are owned by WTO investors;
|
|
(iv)
|
that is not controlled
in fact through the ownership of its voting interests;
and
|
|
(v)
|
of which two thirds of the
members of its board of directors, or of which two thirds
of its general partners, as the case may be, are any combination
of Canadians and WTO investors;
|
|
(i)
|
that is not a Canadian-controlled
entity, as determined pursuant to the ICA;
|
|
(ii)
|
that is not a WTO investor
within the meaning of the ICA;
|
|
(iii)
|
that is not controlled
in fact through the ownership of its voting interests,
and
|
|
(iv)
|
of which two thirds of
its trustees are any combination of Canadians and WTO investors,
or
|
|
(e)
|
any other
form of business organization specified by
the regulations that is controlled by a WTO
investor.
|
WTO Member as defined in the ICA means a member of the World
Trade Organization.
Generally, an acquisition is direct if
it involves the acquisition of control of the Canadian business or of its Canadian parent or grandparent and an acquisition is
indirect if it involves the acquisition of control of a non-Canadian parent or grandparent of an entity carrying on the Canadian
business. Control may be acquired through the acquisition of actual or de jure voting control of a Canadian corporation or through
the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of the Canadian business. No change of voting control will be deemed to have
occurred if less than one-third of the voting control of a Canadian corporation is acquired by an investor.
The ICA specifically exempts certain transactions
from either notification or review. Included among the category of transactions is the acquisition of voting shares or other voting
interests by any person in the ordinary course of that person’s business as a trader or dealer in securities.
CANADIAN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following summary describes the principal
Canadian federal income tax considerations generally applicable to a holder who is the beneficial holder of common shares of the
Company and who, at all relevant times, for the purposes of the application of the Income Tax Act
(Canada) and the Income
Tax Regulations (collectively, the “
Canada Tax Act
”) (i) deals at arm’s length with the Company, (ii)
is not affiliated with the Company, (iii) holds the common shares as capital property, and (iv) who, for the purposes of the Canada
Tax Act and the Canada – United States Income Tax Convention (the “
Treaty
”), is at all relevant times
resident in and only in the United States, is a qualifying person entitled to all of the benefits of the Treaty, and (v) does
not use or hold and is not deemed to use or hold the shares in carrying on a business in Canada (a “
U.S. Holder
”).
Special rules, which are not discussed below, may apply to a U.S. Holder that is an insurer or authorized foreign bank that carries
on business in Canada and elsewhere.
This summary is based on the current provisions
of the Canada Tax Act and the current published administrative policies and assessing practices of the Canada Revenue Agency (“
CRA
”)
published in writing prior to the date hereof. This summary also takes into account all specific proposals to amend the Canada
Tax Act and Regulations publicly announced by the Minister of Finance (Canada) prior to the date hereof (collectively, the “
Tax
Proposals
”) and assumes all Tax Proposals will be enacted in the form proposed. There is no certainty that the Tax Proposals
will be enacted in the form proposed, if at all. This summary does not otherwise take into account or anticipate any changes in
laws or administrative policy or assessing practice whether by judicial, regulatory, administrative or legislative decision or
action nor does it take into account provincial, territorial or foreign income tax legislation or considerations.
This summary is of a general nature only
and is not, and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular purchaser of Units.
This summary is not exhaustive of all Canadian federal income tax considerations. Accordingly, purchasers should consult their
own tax advisors regarding the income tax consequences of purchasing Units based on their particular circumstances.
Dividends
Dividends paid or credited or deemed to
be paid or credited to a U.S. Holder by the Company will be subject to Canadian withholding tax at the rate of 25% under the Canada
Tax Act, subject to any reduction in the rate of withholding to which the U.S. Holder is entitled under the Treaty. For example,
if the U.S. Holder is entitled to benefits under the Treaty and is the beneficial owner of the dividends, the applicable rate
of Canadian withholding tax is generally reduced to 15%. The rate of Canadian withholding tax for such U.S. Holder will generally
be further reduced under the Treaty to 5% if such holder is a corporation that beneficially owns at least 10% of the voting shares
of the Company, and may be further reduced to nil if such holder is a qualifying pension fund or charity.
Dispositions
A U.S. Holder will not be subject to tax
under the Canada Tax Act on any capital gain realized on a disposition of a common share (including a deemed disposition on death),
unless the common share is or is deemed to be “taxable Canadian property” to the U.S. Holder for the purposes of the
Canada Tax Act and the U.S. Holder is not entitled to relief under the Treaty.
Generally, provided the Shares are listed
on a “designated stock exchange” as defined in the Canada Tax Act (which includes the TSX) at the time of disposition,
the Shares will not constitute taxable Canadian property of a U.S. Holder, unless at any time during the 60-month period immediately
preceding the disposition, the U.S. Holder, persons with whom the U.S. Holder did not deal at arm’s length, or the U.S.
Holder together with all such persons, owned 25% or more of the issued shares of any class of shares of the Company and more than
50% of the fair market value of those shares was derived directly or indirectly from any one or combination of (i) real or immovable
property situated in Canada,(ii) Canadian resource properties, (iii) timber resource properties, and (iv) options in respect of,
or interests in, or for civil rights law rights in, property described in any of (i) to (iii), whether or not that property exists.
U.S. Holders whose common shares may constitute
taxable Canadian property should consult with their own tax advisors.
CERTAIN UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME
TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following is a general summary of
certain material U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to a U.S. Holder (as defined below) arising from and relating
to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares of the Company.
This summary is for general information
purposes only and does not purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential U.S. federal income tax considerations
that may apply to a U.S. Holder arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares. In
addition, this summary does not take into account the individual facts and circumstances of any particular U.S. Holder that may
affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such U.S. Holder, including specific tax consequences to a U.S. Holder under
an applicable tax treaty. Accordingly, this summary is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal or U.S. federal
income tax advice with respect to any U.S. Holder. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal,
U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences relating to
the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares.
No legal opinion from U.S. legal counsel
or ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) has been requested, or will be obtained, regarding the U.S.
federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares. This summary is not binding on
the IRS, and the IRS is not precluded from taking a position that is different from, and contrary to, the positions taken in this
summary. In addition, because the authorities on which this summary is based are subject to various interpretations, the IRS and
the U.S. courts could disagree with one or more of the positions taken in this summary.
Scope of this Summary
Authorities
This summary is based on the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury Regulations (whether final, temporary, or proposed), published
rulings of the IRS, published administrative positions of the IRS, U.S. court decisions, the Convention Between Canada and the
United States of America with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital, signed September 26, 1980, as amended (the “Treaty”),
and U.S. court decisions that are applicable and, in each case, as in effect and available, as of the date of this document. Any
of the authorities on which this summary is based could be changed in a material and adverse manner at any time, and any such
change could be applied on a retroactive or prospective basis which could affect the U.S. federal income tax considerations described
in this summary. This summary does not discuss the potential effects, whether adverse or beneficial, of any proposed legislation
that, if enacted, could be applied on a retroactive or prospective basis.
U.S. Holders
For purposes of this summary, the term
"U.S. Holder" means a beneficial owner of common shares that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
·
|
an
individual
who is a citizen
or resident
of the U.S.;
|
|
·
|
a
corporation
(or other
entity taxable
as a corporation
for U.S. federal
income tax
purposes)
organized
under the
laws of the
U.S., any
state thereof
or the District
of Columbia;
|
|
·
|
an
estate whose
income is
subject to
U.S. federal
income taxation
regardless
of its source;
or
|
|
·
|
a
trust that
(a) is subject
to the primary
supervision
of a court
within the
U.S. and the
control of
one or more
U.S. persons
for all substantial
decisions
or (b) has
a valid election
in effect
under applicable
Treasury regulations
to be treated
as a U.S.
person.
|
Non-U.S. Holders
For purposes of this summary, a “non-U.S.
Holder” is a beneficial owner of common shares that is not a U.S. Holder. This summary does not address the U.S. federal
income tax consequences to non-U.S. Holders arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common
shares. Accordingly, a non-U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. federal alternative
minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences (including the potential application
of and operation of any income tax treaties) relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares.
U.S. Holders Subject to Special U.S.
Federal Income Tax Rules Not Addressed
This summary does not address the U.S.
federal income tax considerations applicable to U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including
the following U.S. Holders: (a) U.S. Holders that are tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, individual retirement
accounts, or other tax-deferred accounts; (b) U.S. Holders that are financial institutions, underwriters, insurance companies,
real estate investment trusts, or regulated investment companies; (c) U.S. Holders that are dealers in securities or currencies
or U.S. Holders that are traders in securities that elect to apply a mark-to-market accounting method; (d) U.S. Holders that have
a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar; (e) U.S. Holders that own common shares as part of a straddle,
hedging transaction, conversion transaction, constructive sale, or other arrangement involving more than one position; (f) U.S.
Holders that acquired common shares in connection with the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for
services; (g) U.S. Holders that hold common shares other than as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code
(generally, property held for investment purposes); (h) partnerships and other pass-through entities (and investors in such partnerships
and entities); or (i) U.S. Holders that own or have owned (directly, indirectly, or by attribution) 10% or more of the total combined
voting power of the outstanding shares of the Company. This summary also does not address the U.S. federal income tax considerations
applicable to U.S. Holders who are: (a) U.S. expatriates or former long-term residents of the U.S. subject to Section 877 of the
Code; (b) persons that have been, are, or will be a resident or deemed to be a resident in Canada for purposes of the Act; (c)
persons that use or hold, will use or hold, or that are or will be deemed to use or hold common shares in connection with carrying
on a business in Canada; (d) persons whose common shares constitute “taxable Canadian property” under the Act; or
(e) persons that have a permanent establishment in Canada for the purposes of the Treaty. U.S. Holders that are subject to special
provisions under the Code, including U.S. Holders described immediately above, should consult their own tax advisor regarding
the U.S. federal, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences
relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares.
If an entity that is classified as a partnership
(or pass-through entity) for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds common shares, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to
such partnership and the partners of such partnership generally will depend on the activities of the partnership and the status
of such partners. Partners of entities that are classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes should consult
their own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership,
and disposition of common shares.
Tax Consequences Not Addressed
This summary does not address the U.S.
federal, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences to
U.S. Holders of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor
regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and foreign
tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
of the Acquisition, Ownership, and Disposition of Common Shares
If the Company is not considered a “passive
foreign investment company” (a “PFIC”, as defined below) at any time during a U.S. Holder’s holding period,
the following sections will generally describe the U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders of the acquisition, ownership,
and disposition of the Company’s common shares.
Distributions on Common Shares
A U.S. Holder that receives a distribution,
including a constructive distribution, with respect to a common share will be required to include the amount of such distribution
in gross income as a dividend (without reduction for any Canadian income tax withheld from such distribution) to the extent of
the current or accumulated “earnings and profits” of the Company, as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
A dividend generally will be taxed to a U.S. Holder at ordinary income tax rates. To the extent that a distribution exceeds the
current and accumulated “earnings and profits” of the Company, such distribution will be treated first as a tax-free
return of capital to the extent of a U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the common shares and thereafter as gain from the sale or
exchange of such common shares (see “Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of Common Shares” below). However, the Company
does not intend to maintain the calculations of earnings and profits in accordance with U.S. federal income tax principles, and
each U.S. Holder should therefore assume that any distribution by the Company with respect to the common shares will constitute
ordinary dividend income. Dividends received on common shares generally will not be eligible for the “dividends received
deduction.”
For taxable years beginning before January
1, 2013, a dividend paid by the Company generally will be taxed at the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term capital
gains if (a) the Company is a “qualified foreign corporation” (as defined below), (b) the U.S. Holder receiving
such dividend is an individual, estate, or trust, and (c) certain holding period requirements are met. The Company generally
will be a “qualified foreign corporation” under Section 1(h)(11) of the Code (a “QFC”) if (a) the
Company is eligible for the benefits of the Treaty, or (b) common shares of the Company are readily tradable on an established
securities market in the U.S. However, even if the Company satisfies one or more of such requirements, the Company will not be
treated as a QFC if the Company is a PFIC for the taxable year during which the Company pays a dividend or for the preceding taxable
year. (See the section below under the heading "Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules").
If the Company is a QFC, but a U.S. Holder
otherwise fails to qualify for the preferential tax rate applicable to dividends discussed above, a dividend paid by the Company
to a U.S. Holder, including a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate, or trust, generally will be taxed at ordinary income
tax rates (and not at the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term capital gains). The dividend rules are complex, and each
U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the dividend rules.
Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of
Common Shares
A U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss
on the sale or other taxable disposition of common shares in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between (a) the amount
of cash plus the fair market value of any property received and (b) such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in such common shares
sold or otherwise disposed of. Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, any such gain or loss generally will be capital gain
or loss, which will be long-term capital gain or loss if, at the time of the sale or other disposition, such common shares are
held for more than one year.
Gain or loss recognized by a U.S. Holder
on the sale or other taxable disposition of common shares generally will be treated as “U.S. source” for purposes
of applying the U.S. foreign tax credit rules unless the gain is subject to tax in Canada and is sourced as “foreign source”
under the Treaty and such U.S. Holder elects to treat such gain or loss as “foreign source.”
Preferential tax rates apply to long-term
capital gains of a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate, or trust. There are currently no preferential tax rates for long-term
capital gains of a U.S. Holder that is a corporation. Deductions for capital losses are subject to significant limitations under
the Code.
Receipt of Foreign Currency
The amount of any distribution paid in
foreign currency to a U.S. Holder in connection with the ownership of common shares, or on the sale, exchange or other taxable
disposition of common shares, generally will be equal to the U.S. dollar value of such foreign currency based on the exchange
rate applicable on the date of receipt (regardless of whether such foreign currency is converted into U.S. dollars at that time).
A U.S. Holder that receives foreign currency and converts such foreign currency into U.S. dollars at a conversion rate other than
the rate in effect on the date of receipt may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss, which generally would be treated
as U.S. source ordinary income or loss. If the foreign currency received is not converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt,
a U.S. Holder will have a basis in the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt. Any U.S. Holder
who receives payment in foreign currency and engages in a subsequent conversion or other disposition of the foreign currency may
have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would be treated as ordinary income or loss, and generally will be U.S. source
income or loss for foreign tax credit purposes. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own U.S. tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal
income tax consequences of receiving, owning, and disposing of foreign currency.
Foreign Tax Credit
A U.S. Holder who pays (whether directly
or through withholding) Canadian income tax with respect to dividends paid on common shares generally will be entitled, at the
election of such U.S. Holder, to receive either a deduction or a credit for such Canadian income tax paid. Generally, a credit
will reduce a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability on a dollar-for-dollar basis, whereas a deduction will reduce
a U.S. Holder’s income subject to U.S. federal income tax. This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to
all foreign taxes paid (whether directly or through withholding) by a U.S. Holder during a year.
Complex limitations apply to the foreign
tax credit, including the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of a U.S. Holder’s U.S.
federal income tax liability that such U.S. Holder’s “foreign source” taxable income bears to such U.S. Holder’s
worldwide taxable income. In applying this limitation, a U.S. Holder’s various items of income and deduction must be classified,
under complex rules, as either “foreign source” or “U.S. source.” Generally, dividends paid by a foreign
corporation should be treated as foreign source for this purpose, and gains recognized on the sale of stock of a foreign corporation
by a U.S. Holder should be treated as U.S. source for this purpose, except as otherwise provided in an applicable income tax treaty,
and if an election is properly made under the Code. However, the amount of a distribution with respect to the common shares that
is treated as a “dividend” may be lower for U.S. federal income tax purposes than it is for Canadian federal income
tax purposes, resulting in a reduced foreign tax credit allowance to a U.S. Holder. In addition, this limitation is calculated
separately with respect to specific categories of income. Dividends paid by the Company generally will constitute “foreign
source” income and generally will be categorized as “passive income.”
The foreign tax credit rules are complex,
and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the foreign tax credit rules.
Additional Tax on Passive Income
|
|
For tax years beginning after December
31, 2012, certain individuals, estates and trusts whose income exceeds
certain thresholds will be required to pay a 3.8% Medicare surtax on “net
investment income” including, among other things, dividends and
net gain from disposition of property (other than property held in a trade
or business). U.S. Holders should consult with their own tax advisors
regarding the effect, if any, of this tax on their ownership and disposition
of common shares.
|
Information Reporting; Backup Withholding
Tax For Certain Payments
Under U.S. federal income tax law and
regulations, certain categories of U.S. Holders must file information returns with respect to their investment in, or involvement
in, a foreign corporation. For example, recently enacted legislation generally imposes new U.S. return disclosure obligations
(and related penalties) on U.S. Holders that hold certain specified foreign financial assets in excess of $50,000. The definition
of specified foreign financial assets includes not only financial accounts maintained in foreign financial institutions, but also,
unless held in accounts maintained by a financial institution, any stock or security issued by a non-U.S. person, any financial
instrument or contract held for investment that has an issuer or counterparty other than a U.S. person and any interest in a foreign
entity. U. S. Holders may be subject to these reporting requirements unless their common shares are held in an account at a domestic
financial institution. Penalties for failure to file certain of these information returns are substantial. U.S. Holders of common
shares should consult with their own tax advisors regarding the requirements of filing information returns, these rules, including
the requirement to file an IRS Form 8938.
Payments made within the U.S., or by a
U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, of dividends on, and proceeds arising from the sale or other taxable disposition of, common shares
generally will be subject to information reporting and backup withholding tax, at the rate of 28% (and increasing to 31% for payments
made after December 31, 2012), if a U.S. Holder (a) fails to furnish such U.S. Holder’s correct U.S. taxpayer identification
number (generally on Form W-9), (b) furnishes an incorrect U.S. taxpayer identification number, (c) is notified by the
IRS that such U.S. Holder has previously failed to properly report items subject to backup withholding tax, or (d) fails
to certify, under penalty of perjury, that such U.S. Holder has furnished its correct U.S. taxpayer identification number and
that the IRS has not notified such U.S. Holder that it is subject to backup withholding tax. However, certain exempt persons,
such as corporations, generally are excluded from these information reporting and backup withholding tax rules. Any amounts withheld
under the U.S. backup withholding tax rules will be allowed as a credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax
liability, if any, or will be refunded, if such U.S. Holder furnishes required information to the IRS in a timely manner. Each
U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the information reporting and backup withholding rules.
Passive Foreign Investment Company
Rules
If the Company were to constitute a PFIC
(as defined below) for any year during a U.S. Holder’s holding period, then certain different and potentially adverse tax
consequences would apply to such U.S. Holder’s acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares.
The Company generally will be a PFIC under
Section 1297 of the Code if, for a tax year, (a) 75% or more of the gross income of the Company for such tax year is passive income
(the “income test”) or (b) 50% or more of the value of its average quarterly assets held by the Company either produce
passive income or are held for the production of passive income, based on the fair market value of such assets (the “asset
test”). “Gross income” generally includes all revenues less the cost of goods sold, plus income from investments
and from incidental or outside operations or sources, and “passive income” includes, for example, dividends, interest,
certain rents and royalties, certain gains from the sale of stock and securities, and certain gains from commodities transactions.
Active business gains arising from the sale of commodities generally are excluded from passive income if substantially all (85%
or more) of a foreign corporation’s commodities are (a) stock in trade of such foreign corporation or other property of
a kind which would properly be included in inventory of such foreign corporation, or property held by such foreign corporation
primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, (b) property used in the trade or business of such foreign
corporation that would be subject to the allowance for depreciation under Section 167 of the Code, or (c) supplies of a type regularly
used or consumed by such foreign corporation in the ordinary course of its trade or business, and certain other requirements are
satisfied.
In addition, for purposes of the PFIC
income test and asset test described above, if the Company owns, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the total value of the
outstanding shares of another foreign corporation, the Company will be treated as if it (a) held a proportionate share of the
assets of such other foreign corporation and (b) received directly a proportionate share of the income of such other foreign corporation.
In addition, for purposes of the PFIC income test and asset test described above, “passive income” does not include
any interest, dividends, rents, or royalties that are received or accrued by the Company from a “related person” (as
defined in Section 954(d)(3) of the Code), to the extent such items are properly allocable to the income of such related person
that is not passive income.
Under certain attribution rules, if the
Company is a PFIC, U.S. Holders will be deemed to own their proportionate share of any subsidiary of the Company which is also
a PFIC (a ‘‘Subsidiary PFIC’’), and will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on (i) a distribution on
the shares of a Subsidiary PFIC or (ii) a disposition of shares of a Subsidiary PFIC, both as if the holder directly held the
shares of such Subsidiary PFIC.
The Company does not believe that it was
a PFIC during the tax year ending December 31, 2011. However, PFIC classification is fundamentally factual in nature, generally
cannot be determined until the close of the tax year in question, and is determined annually. Additionally, the analysis depends,
in part, on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to differing interpretations. Furthermore,
if for any given year the Company reaches either of the test standards (i.e., “income test” and “asset test”),
it remains a PFIC forever, no matter how active it becomes in the future. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the Company
has never been and will not become a PFIC for any tax year during which U.S. Holders hold common shares.
If the Company were a PFIC in any tax
year and a U.S. Holder held common shares, such holder generally would be subject to special rules with respect to “excess
distributions” made by the Company on the common shares and with respect to gain from the disposition of common shares.
An “excess distribution” generally is defined as the excess of distributions with respect to the common shares received
by a U.S Holder in any tax year over 125% of the average annual distributions such U.S. Holder has received from the Company during
the shorter of the three preceding tax years, or such U.S. Holder’s holding period for the common shares. Generally, a U.S.
Holder would be required to allocate any excess distribution or gain from the disposition of the common shares ratably over its
holding period for the common shares. Such amounts allocated to the year of the disposition or excess distribution would be taxed
as ordinary income, and amounts allocated to prior tax years would be taxed as ordinary income at the highest tax rate in effect
for each such year and an interest charge at a rate applicable to underpayments of tax would apply.
While there are U.S. federal income tax
elections that sometimes can be made to mitigate these adverse tax consequences (including, without limitation, the “QEF
Election” and the “Mark-to-Market Election”), such elections are available in limited circumstances and must
be made in a timely manner. U.S. Holders should be aware that, for each tax year, if any, that the Company is a PFIC, the Company
can provide no assurances that it will satisfy the record keeping requirements of a PFIC, or that it will make available to U.S.
Holders the information such U.S. Holders require to make a QEF Election under Section 1295 of the Code with respect of the Company
or any Subsidiary PFIC. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisers regarding the potential application of the PFIC
rules to the ownership and disposition of common shares, and the availability of certain U.S. tax elections under the PFIC rules.
|
F.
|
Dividends
and Paying Agents
|
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
We are subject to the informational requirements
of the Exchange Act and file reports and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any of our reports and other information
at, and obtain copies upon payment of prescribed fees from, the Public Reference Room maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. In addition, the SEC maintains a Website that contains reports, proxy and information statements
and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. The public may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
We are required to file reports and other
information with the securities commissions in Canada. You are invited to read and copy any reports, statements or other information,
other than confidential filings, that we file with the provincial securities commissions. These filings are also electronically
available from the Canadian System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) (http://www.sedar.com),
the Canadian equivalent of the SEC’s electronic document gathering and retrieval system.
We “incorporate by reference”
information that we file with the SEC, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those
documents. The information incorporated by reference is an important part of this Form 20-F and more recent information
automatically updates and supersedes more dated information contained or incorporated by reference in this Form 20-F.
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt
from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements to shareholders.
We will provide without charge to each
person, including any beneficial owner, to whom a copy of this annual report has been delivered, on the written or oral request
of such person, a copy of any or all documents referred to above which have been or may be incorporated by reference in this annual
report (not including exhibits to such incorporated information that are not specifically incorporated by reference into
such information). Requests for such copies should be directed to us at the following address:
598
– 999 Canada Place, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 3E1, Telephone: (604) 638-5050, Facsimile: (604) 638-5051.
|
I.
|
Subsidiary
Information
|
Not applicable.
|
ITEM 11.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND
QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES
ABOUT
MARKET
RISK
|
The Company is engaged primarily in mineral
and oil and gas exploration and production and manages related industry risk issues directly. The Company may be at risk for environmental
issues and fluctuations in commodity pricing. Management is not aware of and does not anticipate any significant environmental
remediation costs or liabilities in respect of its current operations.
The Company’s functional currency
is the Canadian dollar. The Company operates in foreign jurisdictions, giving rise to significant exposure to market risks from
changes in foreign currency rates. The financial risk is the risk to the Company’s operations that arises from fluctuations
in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates. Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments
to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.
The Company also has exposure to a number
of risks from its use of financial instruments including: credit risk, liquidity risk, and market risk. This note presents information
about the Company’s exposure to each of these risks and the Company’s objectives, policies and processes for measuring
and managing risk, and the Company’s management of capital.
The Board of Directors has overall responsibility
for the establishment and oversight of the Company’s risk management framework. The Board has implemented and monitors compliance
with risk management policies. The Company’s risk management policies are established to identify and analyze the risks
faced by the Company, to set appropriate risk limits and controls, and to monitor risks and adherence to market conditions and
the Company’s activities.
Credit risk arises from credit exposure
to receivables due from joint venture partners and marketers included in accounts receivable. The maximum exposure to credit risk
is equal to the carrying value of the financial assets.
The Company is exposed to third party
credit risk through its contractual arrangements with its current or future joint venture partners, marketers of its petroleum
and natural gas production and other parties. In the event such entities fail to meet their contractual obligations to the Company,
such failures may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The objective of managing the third party
credit risk is to minimize losses in financial assets. The Company assesses the credit quality of the partners, taking into account
their financial position, past experience, and other factors. The Company mitigates the risk of non-collection of certain amounts
by obtaining the joint venture partners’ share of capital expenditures in advance of a project and by monitoring accounts
receivable on a regular basis. As at December 31, 2011 and 2010, no accounts receivable has been deemed uncollectible or written
off during the year.
As at December 31, 2011, the Company’s
receivables consist of $64,583 (2010 - $195,514) from joint interest partners, $774,100 (2010 - $408,700) from oil and natural
gas marketers and $48,498 (2010 - $84,412) from other trade receivables.
The Company considers all amounts outstanding
for more than 90 days as past due. Currently, there is no indication that amounts are non-collectable; thus an allowance for doubtful
accounts has not been set up. As at December 31, 2011, $5,787 (2010 - $152,056) of accounts receivable are past due, all of which
are considered to be collectable.
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company
will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. The Company’s approach to managing liquidity is to
ensure, as far as possible, that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed
conditions without incurring unacceptable losses or risking harm to the Company’s reputation.
As the
industry in which the Company operates is very capital intensive, the majority of the Company’s spending is related to its
capital programs. The Company prepares annual capital expenditure budgets, which are regularly monitored and updated as considered
necessary. Further, the Company utilizes authorizations for expenditures on both operated and non-operated projects to further
manage capital expenditures. To facilitate the capital expenditure program, the Company has a bank line of credit facility (note
8). The Company also attempts to match its payment cycle with collection of oil and natural gas revenues on the 25
th
of
each month.
Accounts
payable are considered due to suppliers in one year or less while the bridge loan was repaid in full during the year ended December
31, 2011. The bank line of credit, which is scheduled to be reviewed on or before May 1, 2012, is repayable upon demand.
Market
risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, and interest rates will affect
the Company’s net earnings. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within
acceptable limits, while maximizing returns. The Company utilizes financial derivatives to manage certain market risks. All such
transactions are conducted in accordance with the risk management policy that has been approved by the Board of Directors.
|
(d)
|
Foreign Currency Exchange
Risk
|
Foreign
currency exchange rate risk is the risk that the fair value of financial instruments or future cash flows will fluctuate as a
result of changes in foreign exchange rates. Although substantially all of the Company’s oil and natural gas sales are denominated
in Canadian dollars, the underlying market prices in Canada for oil and natural gas are impacted by changes in the exchange rate
between the Canadian and United States dollars. Given that changes in exchange rate have an indirect influence, the impact of
changing exchange rates cannot be accurately quantified. The Company had no forward exchange rate contracts in place as at or
during the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
The Company was exposed to the following foreign currency risk
at December 31, 2011:
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Expressed in foreign currencies
|
|
CND$
|
|
|
CND$
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,772,982
|
|
|
|
601,519
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
69,667
|
|
|
|
168,770
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(1,346,564
|
)
|
|
|
(227,531
|
)
|
Balance sheet exposure
|
|
|
496,085
|
|
|
|
542,758
|
|
The following foreign exchange rates applied for the year ended
and as at December 31:
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
YTD average USD to CAD
|
|
|
1.0170
|
|
|
|
0.9946
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
0.9893
|
|
|
|
1.0305
|
|
The Company has performed a sensitivity
analysis on its foreign currency denominated financial instruments. Based on the Company’s foreign currency exposure noted
above and assuming that all other variables remain constant, a 10% appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar would
result in the decrease of net loss of $49,609 at December 31, 2011 (2010 - $54,276). For a 10% depreciation of the above foreign
currencies against the Canadian dollar, assuming all other variables remain constant, there would be an equal and opposite impact
on net loss.
Interest
rate risk is the risk that future cash flows will fluctuate as a result of changes in market interest rates. During the year ended
December 31, 2011, interest rate fluctuations on the Company’s credit facility have no significant impact on its net loss
because the Company had no floating rate debt in place at or during the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company had no interest
rate swaps or financial contracts in place at or during the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
Commodity
price risk is the risk that the fair value of financial instruments or future cash flows will fluctuate as a result of changes
in commodity prices. Commodity prices for oil and natural gas are impacted by world economic events that dictate the levels of
supply and demand. The Company has attempted to mitigate commodity price risk on its future sales of crude oil through the use
of financial derivative sales contracts.
With respect to the commodity contracts
in place at December 31, 2011, an increase of US$10/barrel in the price of oil, assuming all other variables remain constant,
would have positively impacted income before taxes by approximately $120,000 (2010 - $Nil). A similar decline in commodity prices
would be an equal and opposite impact on income before taxes. The Company had no commodity contracts in place at December 31,
2010.
|
(g)
|
Capital Management
Strategy
|
The Company’s policy on capital
management is to maintain a prudent capital structure so as to maintain financial flexibility, preserve access to capital markets,
maintain investor, creditor and market confidence, and to allow the Company to fund future developments. The Company considers
its capital structure to include share capital, cash and cash equivalents, bank line of credit, and working capital. In order
to maintain or adjust capital structure, the Company may from time to time issue shares or enter into debt agreements and adjust
its capital spending to manage current and projected operating cash flows and debt levels.
The Company’s current borrowing
capacity is based on the lender’s review of the Company’s oil and gas reserves. The Company is also subject to various
covenants. Compliance with these covenants is monitored on a regular basis and at December 31, 2011, the Company is in compliance
with all covenants.
The Company’s share capital is not
subject to any external restrictions. The Company has not paid or declared any dividends, nor are any contemplated in the foreseeable
future. There have been no changes to the Company’s capital management strategy during the year ended December 31, 2011.
|
ITEM 12.
|
DESCRIPTION
OF
SECURITIES
OTHER
THAN
EQUITY
SECURITIES
|
A.-C.
Not applicable.
D. American Depositary Receipts
The Company does not have securities registered as American
Depositary Receipts.
PART II
|
ITEM 13.
|
DEFAULTS,
DIVIDEND
ARREARAGES
AND
DELINQUENCIES
|
None.
|
ITEM 14.
|
MATERIAL
MODIFICATIONS
TO
THE
RIGHTS
OF
SECURITY
HOLDERS
AND
USE
OF
PROCEEDS
|
A. – D.
None.
Not Applicable
.
|
ITEM 15.
|
CONTROLS
AND
PROCEDURES
|
|
A.
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
|
As of the end of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2011, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures”
(as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”), was performed by the Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation,
the Company’s
CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to give reasonable assurance
that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i)
recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated
and communicated to management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar
functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The reason
that our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective is because a few submissions required
to be furnished on Form 6-K were inadvertently filed late. The applicable information was filed on a timely basis with the Canadian
securities regulators on SEDAR and was publicly accessible on
www.SEDAR.com
and on the Company’s website, but was not timely furnished on Edgar on Form 6-K. We have taken steps designed to ensure
that future information required to be furnished on Form 6-K will be so furnished on a timely basis.
|
B.
|
Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
|
The Company’s
management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, is responsible
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the Company’s internal control over financial reporting,
as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting
is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and
fair presentation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards.
It should be noted that a control system, no matter how well conceived or operated, can only provide reasonable assurance,
not absolute assurance, that the objectives of the control system are met. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness
to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s management, (with
the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s Chief Financial Officer), conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. This
evaluation was based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on its assessment, management has concluded that, as
of December 31, 2011, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective and
management’s
assessment did not identify material weaknesses.
|
C.
|
Attestation
Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
Because
the Company is not an “accelerated filer” or “large accelerated filer” within the meaning of such terms
under the Exchange Act, this Annual Report is not required to include an attestation report of the Company’s independent
auditors regarding the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
|
D.
|
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
|
During the fiscal year ended December
31, 2011, the Company improved staff training and the review of financial statement close process and used 3
rd
party
consulting assistance to address certain weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that were
identified in 2010.
|
ITEM 16A.
|
AUDIT
COMMITTEE
FINANCIAL
EXPERT
|
The Company does not have any audit committee
financial expert that serves on the Company’s audit committee. In 2011, the Company adopted the International Financial
Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), previously we prepared our financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally
accepted accounting principles. The audit committee members do not yet have sufficient experience and in-depth of understanding
of IFRS such that they meet the SEC definition of audit committee financial expert.
The Board of Directors of the Company
has adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics that outlines the Company’s values and its commitment to ethical business practices
in every business transaction. This code applies to all directors, officers, and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries
and affiliates. A copy of the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the Company’s website
at
www.dejour.com
.
Reporting Unethical and Illegal
Conduct/Ethics Questions
The Company is committed to taking prompt
action against violations of the Code of Conduct and Ethics and it is the responsibility of all directors, officers and employees
to comply with the Code and to report violations or suspected violations to the Company’s Compliance Officer. Employees
may also discuss their concerns with their supervisor who will then report suspected violations to the Compliance Officer.
The Compliance Officer is appointed by
the Board of Directors and is responsible for investigating and resolving all reported complaints and allegations and shall advise
the President and CEO, the CFO and/or the Audit Committee.
During the fiscal year ended December
31, 2011, the Company did not substantially amend, waive, or implicitly waive any provision of the Code with respect to any of
the directors, executive officers or employees subject to it.
|
ITEM 16C.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT
FEES
AND
SERVICES
|
The following table sets out the fees
billed to the Company by BDO Canada LLP for professional services rendered during fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and December
31, 2010. During these years, BDO Canada LLP was our external auditors.
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2010
|
|
Audit
Fees
(1)
|
|
$
|
152,639
|
|
|
$
|
145,900
|
|
Audit Related
Services
(2)
|
|
$
|
251,853
|
|
|
$
|
49,680
|
|
Tax Fees
(3)
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
|
|
Nil
|
|
All Other Fees
(4)
|
|
|
24,691
|
|
|
|
5,534
|
|
Notes:
|
(1)
|
Audit fees consist of
fees for the audit of the Company’s annual financial
statements and review of the Company’s quarterly
financial statements, or services that are normally provided
in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or
engagements.
|
|
(2)
|
Audit-related fees consist
of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably
related to the performance of the audit or review of
the Company’s financial statements and are not
reported as Audit fees. During fiscal 2011 and 2010,
the services provided in this category included reviews
on IFRS conversion, consultation on accounting and audit-related
matters, and review of reserves disclosure.
|
|
(3)
|
Tax fees consist of fees
for tax compliance services, tax advice and tax planning.
During fiscal 2011 and 2010, the services provided in
this category included assistance and advice in relation
to the preparation of corporate income tax returns.
|
|
(4)
|
The services provided
in this category included all other services fees that
are not reported as other categories and consist of Canadian
Public Accountability Board,, US gatekeeper review and
administration fees.
|
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Generally, in the past, prior to engaging
the Company’s auditors to perform a particular service, the Company’s audit committee has, when possible, obtained
an estimate for the services to be performed. The audit committee in accordance with procedures for the Company approved all of
the services described above.
In relation to the pre-approval of all
audit and audit-related services and fees the Company’s audit committee charter provides that the audit committee shall:
Review and pre-approve all audit
and audit-related services and the fees and other compensation related thereto, and any non-audit services, provided by the Company’s
external auditors. The pre-approval requirement is waived with respect to the provision of non-audit services if:
|
i.
|
the aggregate amount of all
such non-audit services provided to the Company constitutes
not more than five percent of the total amount of revenues
paid by the Company to its external auditors during the fiscal
year in which the non-audit services are provided;
|
|
ii.
|
such services were not recognized
by the Company at the time of the engagement to be non-audit
services; and
|
|
iii.
|
such services are promptly
brought to the attention of the Committee by the Company
and approved prior to the completion of the audit by the
Committee or by one or more members of the Committee who
are members of the Board to whom authority to grant such
approvals has been delegated by the Committee.
|
Provided the pre-approval of
the non-audit services is presented to the Committee’s first scheduled meeting following such approval such authority may
be delegated by the Committee to one or more independent members of the Committee.
We did not rely on the de minimus
exemption provided by Section (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of SEC Regulation S-X in 2011.
|
ITEM 16D.
|
EXEMPTIONS
FROM
THE
LISTING
STANDARDS
FOR
AUDIT
COMMITTEES
|
None.
|
ITEM 16E.
|
PURCHASES
OF
EQUITY
SECURITIES
BY
THE
ISSUER
AND
AFFILIATED
PERSONS
|
The Company did not repurchase any common shares in the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2011.
|
ITEM 16F.
|
CHANGE
IN
REGISTRANT’S
CERTIFYING
ACCOUNTANT
|
Effective on August 20, 2010, we terminated the services of
our principal registered independent public accountant, Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP (“DMCL”).
In DMCL’s principal accountant reports
on our financial statements for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, no adverse opinion was issued and no
opinion of DMCL was modified as to audit scope or accounting principles. No audit reports of DMCL in each of the past two fiscal
years contained any adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, or was qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or
accounting principles.
The change in auditor was recommended and approved by our audit
committee.
In the two most recent fiscal years and
any interim period preceding the dismissal of DMCL, we are not aware of any disagreements with DMCL on any matter of accounting
principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement(s), if not resolved
to the satisfaction of DMCL, would have caused it to make references to the subject matter of the disagreement(s) in connection
with its report.
We are not aware of any reportable events (as set forth in
Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F) that have occurred during the two most recent fiscal years and the interim period preceding the
dismissal of DMCL.
On August 20, 2010, we engaged BDO Canada
LLP (“BDO”) as its new principal registered independent accountant effective on August 20, 2010, to audit our financial
records. BDO is registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. During the two most recent fiscal years and the
interim period preceding the appointment of BDO, we did not consult BDO regarding the application of accounting principles to
a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements,
and neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to us that it considered an important factor in reaching a decision
as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined
in Item 16F(a)(1)(iv) of Form 20-F) or a reportable event (as described in Item 16F(a)(1)(v) of Form 20-F).
|
ITEM 16G.
|
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
|
The Company’s common shares are
listed on the NYSE Amex. Section 110 of the NYSE Amex Company Guide permits the NYSE Amex to consider the laws, customs and practices
of foreign issuers in relaxing certain NYSE Amex listing criteria, and to grant exemptions from NYSE Amex listing criteria based
on these considerations. A company seeking relief under these provisions is required to provide written certification from independent
local counsel that the non-complying practice is not prohibited by home country law. A description of the significant ways in
which the Company’s governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies pursuant to NYSE Amex standards
is as follows:
Shareholder Meeting Quorum
Requirement
: The NYSE Amex minimum quorum requirement for a shareholder meeting is one-third of the outstanding shares of
common stock. In addition, a company listed on NYSE Amex is required to state its quorum requirement in its bylaws. The Company’s
quorum requirement is set forth in its Articles and bylaws. A quorum for a meeting of members of the Company is one holder of
common shares issued, outstanding and entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy.
Proxy Delivery Requirement
:
NYSE Amex requires the solicitation of proxies and delivery of proxy statements for all shareholder meetings, and requires that
these proxies shall be solicited pursuant to a proxy statement that conforms to SEC proxy rules. The Company is a “foreign
private issuer” as defined in Rule 3b-4 under the Exchange Act, and the equity securities of the Company are accordingly
exempt from the proxy rules set forth in Sections 14(a), 14(b), 14(c) and 14(f) of the Exchange Act. The Company solicits proxies
in accordance with applicable rules and regulations in Canada.
Shareholder Approval Requirement:
The Company will follow Toronto Stock Exchange rules for shareholder approval of new issuances of its common shares. Following
Toronto Stock Exchange rules, shareholder approval is required for certain issuances of shares that: (i) materially affect control
of the Company; or (ii) provide consideration to insiders in aggregate of 10% or greater of the market capitalization of the listed
issuer and have not been negotiated at arm’s length. Shareholder approval is also required, pursuant to TSX rules, in the
case of private placements: (x) for an aggregate number of listed securities issuable greater than 25% of the number of securities
of the listed issuer which are outstanding, on a non-diluted basis, prior to the date of closing of the transaction if the price
per security is less than the market price; or (y) that during any six month period are to insiders for listed securities or options,
rights or other entitlements to listed securities greater than 10% of the number of securities of the listed issuer which are
outstanding, on a non-diluted basis, prior to the date of the closing of the first private placement to an insider during the
six month period.
The foregoing is consistent with the laws,
customs and practices in Canada.
In addition, the Company may from time-to-time
seek relief from NYSE Amex corporate governance requirements on specific transactions under Section 110 of the NYSE Amex Company
Guide by providing written certification from independent local counsel that the non-complying practice is not prohibited by our
home country law, in which case, the Company shall make the disclosure of such transactions available on the Company’s website
at www.dejour.com. Information contained on its website is not part of this annual report.
|
ITEM 16H
.
|
MINE
SAFETY DISCLOSURE
|
Not Applicable.
PART
III
|
ITEM 17.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
The Company has elected to provide financial
statements pursuant to Item 18.
|
ITEM 18.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted
International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) for financial reporting purposes, using a transition date of
January 1, 2010. The Company’s annual audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31,
2011, including 2010 required comparative information, have been prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee
(“IFRIC”). Financial statements prior to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 were prepared in accordance with
Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“Canadian GAAP”).
Report
of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants, dated March 29, 2012
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Loss for the years ending December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Shareholder’s Equity for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Supplementary
Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures - Unaudited
Financial Statements
Description
|
|
Page
|
Consolidated Financial
Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
F-1 -
F-48
|
Supplementary Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures -
ASC
932 (Unaudited)
|
|
F-49 - F-56
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Articles (1)
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Notice of Articles (1)
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Certificate of Continuation (1)
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Notice of Alteration (1)
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Certificate of Name Change (1)
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Amendment to Articles to Include Special Rights (1)
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Participation Agreement between the Registrant, Retamco Operating,
Inc. and Brownstone Ventures (US) dated July 14, 2006(3)
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between the Registrant, Retamco Operating,
Inc., and Brownstone Ventures (US) Inc. dated June 17, 2008 (4)
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Loan Agreement between DEAL and HEC dated May 15, 2008 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Loan Agreement between the Company and HEC dated August 11, 2008
(5)
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Loan Agreement between the Company and HEC dated June 22, 2009
(5)
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Loan Agreement between
the
Company and Brownstone Ventures (US) Inc. dated June 22, 2009 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between the Registrant
and Pengrowth Corporation dated April 17, 2009 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between the Registrant
and John James Robinson dated June 10, 2009 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between the Registrant
and C.U. YourOilRig Corp. dated June 15, 2009 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between the Registrant
and Woodrush Energy Partners LLC dated July 8, 2009 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between the Registrant
and RockBridge Energy Inc. dated July 31, 2009 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between the Registrant
and HEC dated December 31, 2009 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
Loan Agreement between the Registrant and Toscana
Capital Corporation dated February 19, 2010 (6)
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
Amended Loan Agreement between the Registrant and
Toscana Capital Corporation dated September 1, 2010 (6)
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
Credit Facility Agreement between DEAL and Canadian
Western Bank dated August 3, 2011 (7)
|
|
|
|
4.16
|
|
Credit Facility Renewal Letter between DEAL and Canadian
Western Bank dated December 29, 2011 (7)
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
4.17
|
|
Option Plan (1)
|
|
|
|
4.18
|
|
Option Plan (Sub-Plan) (1)
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries (7)
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)*
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)*
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350*
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350*
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
Consent of BDO Canada LLP*
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
Letter from Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP
(7)
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
Consent Letter from AJM Deloitte, LLP*
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
Consent Letter from Gustavson Associates*
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
Consent Letter from GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd.
(7)
|
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Reserve Estimation and Economic Evaluation of Dejour’s
Canadian Oil and Gas Properties Prepared by AJM Deloitte, Effective December 31, 2011*
|
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
Reserve Estimate and Financial Forecast as to Dejour’s
Interests in the Kokopelli
Field Area, Garfield County, Colorado, and the South
Rangely Field Area, Rio
Blanco County, Colorado Prepared by Gustavson Associates,
Effective January 1, 2012*
|
|
|
|
99.3
|
|
Reserves Assessment and Evaluation of
Dejour’s Canadian Oil and Gas Properties Prepared by GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd., Effective December 31, 2010 (7)
|
|
(1)
|
Incorporated by reference to
the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8, filed
with the commission on February 16, 2012.
|
|
(2)
|
Incorporated by reference to
the Registrant’s annual report on Form 20-F, filed July
14, 2006.
|
|
(3)
|
Incorporated by reference to
the Registrant’s annual report on Form 20-F/A amendment
no. 2, filed December 7, 2007.
|
|
(4)
|
Incorporated by reference to
the Registrant’s annual report on Form 20-F, filed on June
30, 2009.
|
|
(5)
|
Incorporated by reference to
the Registrant’s annual report on Form 20-F, filed on June
30, 2010.
|
|
(6)
|
Incorporated by reference to
the Registrant’s annual report on Form 20-F, filed on June
30, 2011.
|
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it
meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this
annual report on its behalf.
|
Dejour
Energy Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: June 4,
2013
|
/s/ Robert L. Hodgkinson
|
|
Robert L. Hodgkinson
|
|
Chairman & CEO
|
(formerly operating as Dejour Enterprises
Ltd.)
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (AUDITED)
December 31, 2011
|
Tel:
403 266 5608
Fax: 403 233 7833
www.bdo.ca
|
BDO
Canada LLP
620, 903 - 8th Avenue SW
Calgary AB T2P 0P7 Canada
|
Report of Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
To the Shareholders of
Dejour Energy Inc.
We have audited the accompanying
consolidated financial statements of Dejour Energy Inc. (the "Company") and its subsidiaries, which comprise the
consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010 and the consolidated statements of
comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management's Responsibility for the Consolidated
Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the
preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control as management
determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian
generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit
involves
performing
procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements. The
procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the
consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers
internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order
to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the entity's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting
policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have
obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated
financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dejour Energy Inc. and its
subsidiaries as at December 31, 2011, December 31, 2010 and January 1, 2010, and their financial performance and cash flows
for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Emphasis of Matter
Without qualifying our audit opinion, we
draw attention to Note 2 in the consolidated financial statements that indicates that the Company has a working capital
deficiency of $7,756,435 and an accumulated deficit of $76,509,825. These conditions, along with the other matters described
in Note 2, raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plan in regard to
these matters is also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ BDO Canada LLP
Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
Calgary, Canada
March 29, 2012
BDO
Canada LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership, is a member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee,
and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,487,850
|
|
|
|
4,757,525
|
|
|
|
2,732,696
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
887,181
|
|
|
|
688,626
|
|
|
|
724,773
|
|
Share subscription receivable
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
516,246
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Prepaids and deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,848
|
|
|
|
92,738
|
|
|
|
126,266
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,992,125
|
|
|
|
5,538,889
|
|
|
|
3,583,735
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403,764
|
|
|
|
442,261
|
|
|
|
429,402
|
|
Exploration and evaluation assets
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5,282,652
|
|
|
|
10,257,259
|
|
|
|
12,717,545
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
19,759,897
|
|
|
|
14,174,981
|
|
|
|
13,253,389
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,438,438
|
|
|
|
30,413,390
|
|
|
|
29,984,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank line of credit and bridge loan
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5,545,457
|
|
|
|
4,800,000
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
3,957,893
|
|
|
|
2,472,746
|
|
|
|
2,653,483
|
|
Unrealized financial instrument loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
99,894
|
|
Loans from related parties
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
2,345,401
|
|
Warrant liability
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2,245,210
|
|
|
|
1,092,762
|
|
|
|
1,160,858
|
|
Flow-through shares liability
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
187,145
|
|
|
|
271,033
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,748,560
|
|
|
|
8,802,653
|
|
|
|
7,380,669
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decommissioning liability
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1,338,853
|
|
|
|
706,082
|
|
|
|
322,504
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,989
|
|
|
|
31,708
|
|
|
|
39,913
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,131,402
|
|
|
|
9,540,442
|
|
|
|
7,743,086
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
85,075,961
|
|
|
|
79,385,883
|
|
|
|
75,810,350
|
|
Contributed surplus
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
8,133,877
|
|
|
|
7,638,609
|
|
|
|
6,873,166
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76,509,825
|
)
|
|
|
(65,466,543
|
)
|
|
|
(60,342,637
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(392,977
|
)
|
|
|
(685,002
|
)
|
|
|
(99,894
|
)
|
Total Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,307,036
|
|
|
|
20,872,947
|
|
|
|
22,240,985
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,438,438
|
|
|
|
30,413,390
|
|
|
|
29,984,071
|
|
Approved on behalf of the Board:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert Hodgkinson
|
|
/s/ Craig Sturrock
|
|
Robert Hodgkinson – Director
|
|
Craig Sturrock – Director
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
REVENUES AND OTHER INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,824,345
|
|
|
|
8,085,627
|
|
Royalties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,627,881
|
)
|
|
|
(1,311,767
|
)
|
Revenues, net of royalties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,196,464
|
|
|
|
6,773,860
|
|
Financial instrument gain (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,728
|
)
|
|
|
67,922
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,627
|
|
|
|
36,602
|
|
Total Revenues and Other
Income
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
7,171,363
|
|
|
|
6,878,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating and transportation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,499,480
|
|
|
|
2,608,889
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,042,328
|
|
|
|
3,383,266
|
|
Finance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
867,645
|
|
|
|
1,092,092
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
662,338
|
|
|
|
765,443
|
|
Foreign exchange loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,987
|
|
|
|
27,692
|
|
Amortization, depletion and impairment losses
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8,651,632
|
|
|
|
4,684,867
|
|
Change in fair value of warrant liability
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
1,580,380
|
|
|
|
(68,097
|
)
|
Total Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,401,790
|
|
|
|
12,494,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,230,427
|
)
|
|
|
(5,615,768
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax recovery
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
187,145
|
|
|
|
491,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,043,282
|
)
|
|
|
(5,123,905
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292,025
|
|
|
|
(685,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,751,257
|
)
|
|
|
(5,808,907
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(0.092
|
)
|
|
|
(0.051
|
)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Contributed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Surplus
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
AOCI(L)*
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Balance as at January 1, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,180,545
|
|
|
|
79,385,883
|
|
|
|
7,638,609
|
|
|
|
(65,466,543
|
)
|
|
|
(685,002
|
)
|
|
20,872,947
|
|
Shares issued via private placements, net of
issuance costs
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11,010,000
|
|
|
|
2,693,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,693,813
|
|
Issue of shares on exercise of warrants and options
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
5,701,841
|
|
|
|
2,090,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,090,647
|
|
Warrant liability reallocated on exercise of
warrants
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
738,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
738,548
|
|
Contributed surplus reallocated on exercise of
options
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,070
|
|
|
|
(167,070
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
662,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662,338
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,043,282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,043,282
|
)
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292,025
|
|
|
292,025
|
|
Balance as at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,892,386
|
|
|
|
85,075,961
|
|
|
|
8,133,877
|
|
|
|
(76,509,825
|
)
|
|
|
(392,977
|
)
|
|
16,307,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,791,038
|
|
|
|
75,810,350
|
|
|
|
6,873,166
|
|
|
|
(60,342,637
|
)
|
|
|
(99,894
|
)
|
|
22,240,985
|
|
Shares issued via private placements, net of
issuance costs
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
14,389,507
|
|
|
|
3,575,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,575,533
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
765,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
765,443
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,123,905
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,123,905
|
)
|
Realized financial instrument loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,894
|
|
|
99,894
|
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(685,002
|
)
|
|
(685,002
|
)
|
Balance as at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,180,545
|
|
|
|
79,385,883
|
|
|
|
7,638,609
|
|
|
|
(65,466,543
|
)
|
|
|
(685,002
|
)
|
|
20,872,947
|
|
* Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,043,282
|
)
|
|
|
(5,123,905
|
)
|
Adjustment for items not affecting cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization, depletion and impairment losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,651,632
|
|
|
|
4,684,867
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662,338
|
|
|
|
765,443
|
|
Non-cash finance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,512
|
|
|
|
129,834
|
|
Non-cash general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
|
(30,030
|
)
|
Deferred income tax recovery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187,145
|
)
|
|
|
(491,863
|
)
|
Change in fair value of warrant liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,580,380
|
|
|
|
(68,097
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred leasehold inducement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,207
|
)
|
|
|
(8,205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in non-cash operating working capital
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(73,931
|
)
|
|
|
488,024
|
|
Total Cash Flows from
(used in) Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(396,222
|
)
|
|
|
346,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,497
|
|
|
|
(12,855
|
)
|
Exploration and evaluation expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225,379
|
)
|
|
|
(539,233
|
)
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,134,997
|
)
|
|
|
(4,499,478
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
1,603,971
|
|
Changes in non-cash investing working capital
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
888,236
|
|
|
|
(357,424
|
)
|
Total Cash Flows from
(used in) Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,432,405
|
)
|
|
|
(3,805,019
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance (repayment) of line of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,545,457
|
|
|
|
(850,000
|
)
|
Advance (repayment) of bridge loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,800,000
|
)
|
|
|
4,800,000
|
|
Repayment of loans from related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(250,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,208,067
|
)
|
Advance of loan from creditor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,488
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Shares issued on exercise of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,090,647
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Shares issued for cash, net of share issue costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,004,429
|
|
|
|
3,983,508
|
|
Changes in non-cash financing working capital
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(52,069
|
)
|
|
|
(241,661
|
)
|
Total Cash Flows from
(used in) Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,558,952
|
|
|
|
5,483,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,269,675
|
)
|
|
|
2,024,829
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,757,525
|
|
|
|
2,732,696
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,487,850
|
|
|
|
4,757,525
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information - Note 16
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 1 – CORPORATE INFORMATION
Dejour Energy Inc. (the “Company”)
is a public company trading on the New York Stock Exchange AMEX (“NYSE-AMEX”) and the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”),
under the symbol “DEJ.” The Company is in the business of exploring and developing energy projects with a focus on
oil and gas in North America. On March 9, 2011, the Company changed its name from Dejour Enterprises Ltd. to Dejour Energy Inc.
The address of its registered office is 598 – 999 Canada Place, Vancouver, British Columbia.
The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Dejour Energy (USA) Corp. (“Dejour USA”), incorporated
in Nevada, Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd. (“DEAL”), incorporated in Alberta, Wild Horse Energy Ltd. (“Wild Horse”),
incorporated in Alberta and 0855524 B.C. Ltd., incorporated in B.C. All intercompany transactions are eliminated upon consolidation.
The consolidated financial statements
are presented in Canadian dollars, which is also the functional currency of the parent company. These consolidated financial statements
were authorized and approved for issuance by the Board of Directors on March 29, 2012.
NOTE 2 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
AND ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS
|
(a)
|
Statement of compliance
|
The financial statements of the Company
for the year ended December 31, 2011 are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)
as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and interpretations of the International Financial
Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”). These are the Company’s first consolidated annual financial statements
presented in accordance with IFRS.
The preparation of these consolidated
financial statements resulted in changes to the accounting policies as compared with the most recent annual financial statements
prepared under Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The accounting policies set out below have
been applied consistently to all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements. These consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the Company’s 2010 annual financial statements and the explanation of how the transition
to IFRS has affected the reported financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company provided in note 25.
The financial
statements were prepared on a going concern basis. The going concern basis assumes that the Company will continue in operation
for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal
course of business.
The Company has a working capital deficiency of $7,756,435 and accumulated deficit of $76,509,825.
Whether and when the Company can attain profitability is uncertain. These uncertainties cast significant doubt upon the
Company’s ability to continue as going concern.
As described in note 8, in September 2011,
the Company obtained a $7 million revolving operating demand loan (“line of credit”) from a Canadian Bank to refinance
the bridge loan and to provide funds for general corporate purposes. As described in note 13, during the year ended December 31,
2011, the Company raised gross proceeds of $5.4 million on the issue of shares. Subsequent to December 31, 2011, the Company received
$1.2 million from the exercise of options and warrants. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon
attaining profitable operations and obtaining sufficient financing to meet obligations and continue exploration and development
activities. There is no assurance that these activities will be successful. These consolidated annual financial statements do
not reflect the adjustments to the carrying values of assets and liabilities, the reported expenses, and the balance sheet classifications
used that would be necessary if the going concern assumption were not appropriate.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 2 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
AND ADOPTION OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS (continued)
The consolidated annual financial statements
have been prepared on the historical cost basis except for the revaluation of certain financial assets and liabilities to fair
value, including derivative instruments, as explained in the accounting policies in note 3.
|
(d)
|
Use of estimates
and judgments
|
The preparation of consolidated annual
financial statements in compliance with IFRS requires management to make certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires
management to exercise judgment in applying the Company’s accounting policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgment
or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the financial statements are disclosed in note 4.
|
(e)
|
Functional and presentation
currency
|
These consolidated annual financial statements
are presented in Canadian dollars, which is the Company’s presentation currency. Subsidiaries measure items using the currency
of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates with entities having a functional currency different from the
parent company, translated into Canadian dollars.
NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting policies set out below
have been applied consistently to all periods presented in these consolidated annual financial statements and have been applied
consistently by the Company’s entities.
|
(a)
|
Basis of consolidation
|
The consolidated annual financial statements
include the financial statements of the Company and subsidiaries controlled by the Company. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated
from the date of acquisition, being the date on which the Company obtains control, and continue to be consolidated until the date
that such control ceases. All intra-group balances, transactions, income and expenses are eliminated in full on consolidation.
The financial statements of the subsidiaries
are prepared using the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies.
Exploration, development, and production
activities may be conducted jointly with others and accordingly, the Company only reflects its proportionate interest in such
activities from the date that joint control commences until the date that it ceases.
Items included in the financial statements
of each consolidated entity in the group are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity
operates (the “functional currency”). The consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars, which
is the Company’s functional currency.
The financial statements of entities within
the consolidated group that have a functional currency different from that of the Company (“foreign operations”) are
translated into Canadian dollars as follows: assets and liabilities – at the closing rate as at the balance sheet date,
and income and expenses – at the average rate of the period (as this is considered a reasonable approximation to actual
rates). All resulting changes are recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) as cumulative translation differences.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
|
(b)
|
Foreign
currency (continued)
|
When the Company disposes of its entire
interests in a foreign operation, or loses control, joint control, or significant influence over a foreign operation, the foreign
currency gains or losses accumulated in other comprehensive income (loss) related to the foreign operation are recognized in profit
or loss. If an entity disposes of part of an interest in a foreign operation which remains a subsidiary, a proportionate amount
of foreign currency gains or losses accumulated in other comprehensive income related to the subsidiary are reallocated between
controlling and non-controlling interests.
Transactions in foreign currencies are
translated into the functional currency at exchange rates at the date of the transactions. Foreign currency differences arising
on translation are recognized in profit or loss. Foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the functional
currency exchange rate at the balance sheet date. Non- monetary items that are measured at historical cost in a foreign currency
are translated using the exchange rates as at the dates of the initial transactions. Non-monetary items measured at fair value
in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value was determined.
Exchange differences recognized in the
profit or loss statement of the Company’s entities’ separate financial statements on the translation of monetary items
forming part of the Company’s net investment in the foreign operation are reclassified to foreign exchange reserve on consolidation.
|
(c)
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash
and highly liquid investments having maturity dates of three months or less from the date of acquisition that are readily convertible
to cash.
Exploration and evaluation (“E&E”)
costs
Pre-license costs are expensed in the
period in which they are incurred.
E&E costs are initially capitalized
as either tangible or intangible E&E assets according to the nature of the assets acquired. Intangible E&E assets may
include costs of license acquisition, technical services and studies, seismic acquisition, exploration drilling and testing and
directly attributable overhead and administration expenses. The costs are accumulated in cost centers by well, field or exploration
area pending determination of technical feasibility and commercial viability.
E&E assets are assessed for impairment
if sufficient data exists to determine technical feasibility and commercial viability or facts and circumstances suggest that
the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount. For purposes of impairment testing, exploration and evaluation assets are
assessed at the individual asset level. If it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of the individual asset, exploration
and evaluation assets are allocated to cash-generating units (CGU’s). Such CGU’s are not larger than an operating
segment.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
|
(d)
|
Resource properties
(continued)
|
Exploration assets are not depleted and
are carried forward until technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource is considered to be
determinable or sufficient/continued progress is made in assessing the commercial viability of the E&E assets. The technical
feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource is considered to be determinable when proven reserves are
determined to exist. A review of each exploration license or field is carried out, at least annually, to confirm whether the Company
intends further appraisal activity or to otherwise extract value from the property. When this is no longer the case, the costs
are written off. Upon determination of proven reserves, E&E assets attributable to those reserves are first tested for impairment
and then reclassified from E&E assets to oil and natural gas properties.
The Company may occasionally enter into
joint venture arrangements, whereby the Company will transfer part of an oil and gas interest, as consideration, for an agreement
by the transferee to meet certain exploration and evaluation expenditures which would have otherwise been undertaken by the Company.
The Company does not record any expenditures made by the transferee. Any cash consideration received from the agreement is credited
against the costs previously capitalized to the oil and gas interest given up by the Company, with any excess cash accounted for
as a gain on disposal. When a project is deemed to no longer have commercially viable prospects to the Company, exploration and
evaluation expenditures in respect of that project are deemed to be impaired. As a result, those exploration and evaluation expenditure
costs, in excess of estimated recoveries, are written off to the statement of comprehensive income (loss).
Oil and gas properties and other property
and equipment costs
Items of property and equipment, which
include oil and gas development and production assets, are measured at cost less accumulated depletion and depreciation and accumulated
impairment losses.
The initial cost of an asset comprises
its purchase price or construction cost, any costs directly attributable to bringing the asset into operation, the initial estimate
of the decommissioning obligation and, for qualifying assets, borrowing costs. The purchase price or construction cost is the
aggregate amount paid and the fair value of any other consideration given to acquire the asset.
When significant parts of an item of property
and equipment, including oil and natural gas interests, have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items
(major components).
Depletion and Depreciation
Oil and gas development and production
assets are depreciated, by significant component, on a unit-of-production basis over proved and probable reserve volumes, taking
into account estimated future development costs necessary to bring those reserves into production. Future development costs are
estimated by taking into account the level of development required to produce the reserves. These estimates are reviewed by independent
reserve engineers at least annually. Proved and probable reserves are estimated using independent reserve engineer reports and
represent the estimated quantities of oil, natural gas and gas liquids.
Other property and equipment are depreciated
based on a declining balance basis, which approximates the estimated useful lives of the asset, at the following rates:
Office furniture and equipment
|
20%
|
Computer equipment
|
45%
|
Vehicle
|
30%
|
Leasehold improvements
|
term of lease
|
Depreciation methods, useful lives and
residual values are reviewed at each reporting date. Other property and equipment are allocated to each of the Company’s
primary cash-generating units, based on estimated future net revenue, consistent with the recoverable values applied in the most
recent impairment test.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
|
(d)
|
Resource properties
(continued)
|
Derecognition
The carrying amount of an item of property
and equipment is derecognized on disposal, when no beneficial interest is retained, or when no future economic benefits are expected
from its use or disposal. The gain or loss arising from derecognition is included in profit or loss when the item is derecognized
and is measured as the difference between the net disposal proceeds, if any, and the carrying amount of the item. The date of
disposal is the date when the Company is no longer subject to the risks of and is no longer the beneficiary of the rewards of
ownership. Where the asset is derecognized, the date of disposal coincides with the date the revenue from the sale of the asset
is recognized.
On the disposition of an undivided interest
in a property, where an economic benefit remains, the Company recognizes the farm out only on the receipt of consideration by
reducing the carrying amount of the related property with any excess recognized in profit or loss of the period.
Major maintenance and repairs
The costs of day-to-day servicing are
expensed as incurred. These primarily include the costs of labor, consumables and small parts. Material costs of replaced parts,
turnarounds and major inspections are capitalized as it is probable that future economic benefits will be received. The carrying
value of a replaced part is derecognized in accordance with the derecognition principles above.
A provision is recognized if, as a result
of a past event, the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation that can be estimated reliably and it is probable
that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. Provisions are determined by discounting the expected
future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risk specific
to the liability.
Decommissioning liability
A decommissioning liability is recognized
when the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is probable that an outflow of
resources will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate of the amount of obligation can be made. A corresponding
amount equivalent to the provision is also recognized as part of the cost of the related asset. The amount recognized is management’s
estimated cost of decommissioning, discounted to its present value using a risk free rate. Changes in the estimated timing of
decommissioning or decommissioning cost estimates are dealt with prospectively by recording an adjustment to the provision and
a corresponding adjustment to the related asset unless the change arises from production. The unwinding of the discount on the
decommissioning provision is included as a finance cost. Actual costs incurred upon settlement of the decommissioning liability
are charged against the provision to the extent the provision was established.
|
(f)
|
Earnings (loss) per
share
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share figures
have been calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the respective periods.
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share
is calculated by dividing the profit or loss applicable to common shares by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares
issued and outstanding and all additional common shares that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive instruments were
converted. The diluted earnings (loss) per share figure is equal to that of basic earnings (loss) per share since the effects
of options and warrants have been excluded as they are anti-dilutive.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Where equity-settled share options are
awarded to employees, the fair value of the options at the date of grant is charged to profit or loss over the vesting period.
Performance vesting conditions are taken into account by adjusting the number of equity instruments expected to vest at each reporting
date so that, ultimately, the cumulative amount recognized over the vesting period is based on the number of options that will
eventually vest. Where equity instruments are granted to employees, they are recorded at the instruments grant date fair value.
Where the terms and conditions of options
are modified before they vest, the increase in the fair value of the options, measured immediately before and after the modification,
is also charged to profit or loss over the remaining vesting period.
Where equity instruments are granted to
non-employees, they are recorded at the fair value of the goods or services received in profit or loss, unless they are related
to the issuance of shares. Amounts related to the issuance of shares are recorded as a reduction of share capital.
When the value of goods or services received
in exchange for the share-based payment to non-employees cannot be reliably estimated, the fair value of the share-based payment
is measured by use of a valuation model. The expected life used in the model is adjusted, based on management’s best estimate,
for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions, and behavioural considerations.
All equity-settled share based payments
are reflected in contributed surplus, until exercised. Upon exercise, shares are issued from treasury and the amount reflected
in contributed surplus is credited to share capital along with any consideration received.
Where a grant of options is cancelled
or settled during the vesting period, excluding forfeitures when vesting conditions are not satisfied, the Company immediately
accounts for the cancellation as an acceleration of vesting and recognizes the amount that otherwise would have been recognized
for services received over the remainder of the vesting period. Any payment made to the employee on the cancellation is accounted
for as the repurchase of an equity interest except to the extent the payment exceeds the fair value of the equity instrument granted,
measured at the repurchase date. Any such excess is recognized as an expense.
Revenue from the sale of oil and petroleum
products is recognized when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred, which is when title passes to
the customer. This generally occurs when the product is physically transferred into a vessel, pipe or other delivery mechanism.
Revenue is stated after deducting sales taxes, excise duties and similar levies.
Revenue from the production of oil and
natural gas in which the Company has an interest with other producers is recognized based on the Company’s working interest
and the terms of the relevant production sharing contracts.
|
(i)
|
Financial instruments
|
Financial assets
Financial assets are classified as into
one of the following categories. All transactions related to financial instruments are recorded on a trade date basis. The Company's
accounting policy for each category is as follows:
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
|
(i)
|
Financial
instruments (continued)
|
Loans and receivables
These assets are non-derivative financial
assets resulting from the delivery of cash or other assets by a lender to a borrower in return for a promise to repay on a specified
date or dates, or on demand. They are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable
to their acquisition or issue and subsequently carried at amortized cost, using the effective interest rate method, less any impairment
losses. Amortized cost is calculated taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and includes fees that are an
integral part of the effective interest rate and transaction costs. Gains and losses are recognized in the profit or loss when
the loans and receivables are derecognized or impaired, as well as through the amortization process.
Held-to-maturity investments
Held to maturity investments are initially
measured at fair value and are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method, less any impairment
losses. The Company does not currently have any held-to-maturity investments.
Available-for-sale assets
Available-for-sale assets are measured
at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded in other comprehensive income until the asset is realized or impairment
is viewed as other than temporary, at which time they will be recorded in profit or loss. The Company does not currently have
any available-for-sale assets.
Financial assets at fair value through
profit or loss
An instrument is classified at fair value
through profit or loss if it is held for trading or is designated as such upon initial recognition. Financial instruments are
designated at fair value through profit or loss if the Company manages such investments and makes purchase and sale decisions
based on their fair value in accordance with the Company’s risk management or investment strategy. Upon initial recognition,
attributable transaction costs are recognized in profit or loss when incurred. Financial instruments at fair value through profit
or loss are measured at fair value, and changes therein are recognized in profit or loss. The Company does not have any financial
assets at fair value through profit or loss.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities are classified as
either fair value through profit or loss or other financial liabilities, based on the purpose for which the liability was incurred.
The Company’s other financial liabilities
comprise of trade payables and accrued liabilities, loans payable to related parties and bank line of credit. These liabilities
are initially recognized at fair value, net of any transaction costs directly attributable to the issuance of the instrument and
subsequently carried at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method, which ensures that any interest expense over
the period of repayment is at a constant rate on the balance of the liability carried in the balance sheet. Interest expense in
this context includes initial transaction costs and premiums payable on redemption, as well as any interest or coupon payable
while the liability is outstanding.
Trade and other payables represent liabilities
for goods and services provided to the Company prior to the end of the period which are unpaid. Trade payable amounts are unsecured
and are usually paid within 30 days of recognition.
Financial liabilities are classified as
held-for-trading if they are acquired for the purpose of selling in the near term. Derivatives are also categorized as held for
trading unless they are designated as hedges.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
|
(i)
|
Financial
instruments (continued)
|
The Company has derivative financial instruments
in the form of warrants issued in US dollars and contracts entered into to manage its exposure to volatility in commodity prices.
These commodity contracts are not used for trading or other speculative purposes. Such derivative financial instruments are initially
recognized at fair value at the date at which the derivatives are issued and are subsequently re-measured at fair value. These
derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting and changes in fair value are recognized immediately in profit and loss. The Company
does not have any further derivative instruments.
Financial assets
At each reporting date, the Company assesses
whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset is impaired. If such evidence exists, the Company recognizes an impairment
loss, as follows:
Financial assets carried at amortized
cost: The loss is the difference between the amortized cost of the loan or receivable and the present value of the estimated future
cash flows, discounted using the instrument’s original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced
by this amount either directly or indirectly through the use of an allowance account.
Impairment losses on financial assets
carried at amortized cost are reversed in subsequent periods if the amount of the loss decreases and the decrease can be related
objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized.
Non-financial assets
The carrying value of long-term assets
is reviewed at each period for indicators that the carrying value of an asset or a CGU may not be recoverable. The Company uses
geographical proximity, geological similarities, analysis of shared infrastructure, commodity type, assessment of exposure to
market risks and materiality to define its CGUs. If indicators of impairment exist, the recoverable amount of the asset or CGU
is estimated. If the carrying value of the asset or CGU exceeds the recoverable amount, the asset or CGU is written down with
an impairment recognized in profit or loss.
For the purpose of impairment testing,
assets are grouped together in CGUs, which are the smallest group of assets that generates cash inflows from continuing use that
are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets. The recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is
the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. Fair value is determined to be the amount for which the
asset could be sold in an arm’s length transaction. For resource properties, fair value less costs to sell may be determined
by using discounted future net cash flows of proved and probable reserves using forecast prices and costs. Value in use is determined
by estimating the net present value of future net cash flows expected from the continued use of the asset or CGU. Refer to note
3(d) for more details.
Income taxes
Income tax expense comprises current and
deferred tax. Income tax expense is recognized in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to items recognized directly
in equity, in which case it is recognized in equity.
Current tax is the expected tax payable
on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment
to tax payable in respect of previous years.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Deferred tax is recognized for temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation
purposes. Deferred tax is not recognized on temporary differences on the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction
that is not a business combination and affects neither accounting profit nor taxable profit. In addition, deferred tax is not
recognized for taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill. Deferred tax is measured at the tax
rates that are expected to be applied to temporary differences when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on
the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset
if there is a legally enforceable right to offset, and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same
taxable entity, or on different tax entities, when they intend to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or
their tax assets and liabilities will be realized simultaneously.
A deferred tax asset is recognized to
the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilized.
Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related
tax benefit will be realized.
Production taxes
Royalties, resource rent taxes and revenue-based
taxes are accounted for under International Accounting Standards (‘IAS’) 12 when they have characteristics of an income
tax. This is considered to be the case when they are imposed under Government authority and the amount is payable based on taxable
income, rather than based on quantity produced or as a percentage of revenue, after adjustment for temporary differences. For
such arrangements, current and deferred tax is provided on the same basis as described above for other forms of taxation. Obligations
arising from royalty arrangements that do not satisfy these criteria are recognized as current provisions included as a reduction
of revenues.
The Company’s common shares, stock
options, share purchase warrants and flow-through shares are classified as equity instruments only to the extent that they do
not meet the definition of a financial liability or financial asset. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of equity
instruments are shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.
The Company will from time to time, issue
flow-through common shares to finance a significant portion of its exploration program. Pursuant to the terms of the flow-through
share agreements, these shares transfer the tax deductibility of qualifying resource expenditures to investors. On issuance, the
Company separates the flow-through share into i) a flow-through share premium, equal to the estimated premium, if any, investors
pay for the flow-through feature, which is recognized as a liability and; ii) share capital. Upon expenditures being incurred,
the Company derecognizes the liability and recognizes a deferred tax liability for the amount of tax reduction renounced to the
shareholders. The premium is recognized as deferred income tax recovery and the related deferred tax is recognized as a tax provision.
To the extent that the Company has available tax pools for which the benefit has not been previously recognized, that are probable
to be utilized, a deferred income tax recovery is recognized at the time of renunciation of the tax pools. The Company may also
be subject to a Part XII.6 tax on flow-through proceeds renounced under the Look-back Rule, in accordance with Government of Canada
flow-through regulations. When applicable, this tax is accrued as a financial expense until paid.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Borrowing costs directly associated with
the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are capitalized when a substantial period of time is required
to make the asset ready for its intended use. To the extent general borrowings are used for the purpose of obtaining a qualifying
asset, the related costs are capitalized based on the weighted average of the borrowing costs applicable to the total outstanding
borrowings in the period other than those made specifically for the purpose of the acquisition, construction or production of
a qualifying asset. All other borrowing costs are recognized as an expense in the period in which they are incurred.
|
(o)
|
Future
accounting pronouncements
|
Certain pronouncements were issued by
the IASB or the IFRIC that are mandatory for accounting periods beginning after January 1, 2011 or later periods.
The Company has early adopted the amendments
to IFRS 1 which replaces references to a fixed date of ‘1 January 2004’ with ‘the date of transition to IFRS’.
This eliminates the need for the Company to restate derecognition transactions that occurred before the date of transition to
IFRS. The amendment is effective for year-ends beginning on or after July 1, 2011; however, the Company has early adopted the
amendment. The impact of the amendment and early adoption is that the Company only applies IAS 39 derecognition requirements to
transactions that occurred after the date of transition.
The following new standards, amendments
and interpretations, that have not been early adopted in these consolidated annual financial statements. The Company is currently
assessing the impact, if any, of this new guidance on the Company’s future results and financial position:
|
·
|
IFRS
7, Financial
Instruments:
Disclosures,
which requires
disclosure of
both gross and
net information
about financial
instruments eligible
for offset in
the balance sheet
and financial
instruments subject
to master netting
arrangements.
Concurrent with
the amendments
to IFRS 7, the
IASB also amended
IAS 32, Financial
Instruments:
Presentation
to clarify the
existing requirements
for offsetting
financial instruments
in the balance
sheet. The amendments
to IAS 32 are
effective as
of January 1,
2014.
|
|
·
|
IFRS
9 Financial Instruments
is part of the
IASB's wider
project to replace
IAS 39 Financial
Instruments:
Recognition and
Measurement.
IFRS 9 retains
but simplifies
the mixed measurement
model and establishes
two primary measurement
categories for
financial assets:
amortized cost
and fair value.
The basis of
classification
depends on the
entity's business
model and the
contractual cash
flow characteristics
of the financial
asset. The standard
is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2015.
|
|
·
|
IFRS
10 Consolidated
Financial Statements
is the result
of the IASB’s
project to replace
Standing Interpretations
Committee 12,
Consolidation
– Special
Purpose Entities
and the consolidation
requirements
of IAS 27, Consolidated
and Separate
Financial Statements.
The new standard
eliminates the
current risk
and rewards
approach and
establishes
control as the
single basis
for determining
the consolidation
of an entity.
The standard
is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2013.
|
|
·
|
IFRS
11 Joint Arrangements
is the result
of the IASB’s
project to replace
IAS 31, Interests
in Joint Ventures.
The new standard
redefines joint
operations and
joint ventures
and requires
joint operations
to be proportionately
consolidated
and joint ventures
to be equity
accounted. Under
IAS 31, joint
ventures could
be proportionately
consolidated.
The standard
is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2013.
|
|
·
|
IFRS
12 Disclosure
of Interests
in Other Entities
outlines the
required disclosures
for interests
in subsidiaries
and joint arrangements.
The new disclosures
require information
that will assist
financial statement
users to evaluate
the nature, risks
and financial
effects associated
with an entity’s
interests in
subsidiaries
and joint arrangements.
The standard
is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2013.
|
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
|
(o)
|
Future
accounting pronouncements (continued)
|
|
·
|
IFRS
13 Fair Value
Measurement defines
fair value, requires
disclosures about
fair value measurements
and provides
a framework for
measuring fair
value when it
is required or
permitted within
the IFRS standards.
The standard
is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2013.
|
|
·
|
IFRIC
20 Stripping
costs in the
production phase
of a mine, IFRIC
20 clarifies
the requirements
for accounting
for the costs
of the stripping
activity in the
production phase
when two benefits
accrue: (i) unusable
ore that can
be used to produce
inventory and
(ii) improved
access to further
quantities of
material that
will be mined
in future periods.
IFRIC 20 is effective
for annual periods
beginning on
or after January
1, 2013 with
earlier application
permitted and
includes guidance
on transition
for pre-existing
stripping assets.
The Company is
currently evaluating
the impact the
new guidance
is expected to
have on its consolidated
financial statements.
|
The following new standards, amendments
and interpretations that have not been early adopted in these consolidated financial statements, are not expected to have an effect
on the Company’s future results and financial position:
|
·
|
IFRS
1: Severe Hyperinflation
(Effective for
periods beginning
on or after July
1, 2011)
|
|
·
|
IAS
12: Deferred
Tax: Recovery
of Underlying
Assets (Amendments
to IAS 12 (Effective
for periods beginning
on or after January
1, 2012)
|
Note
4 - Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments
The Company makes estimates and assumptions
about the future that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Estimates and judgments are continually evaluated
based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under
the circumstances. In the future, actual experience may differ from these estimates and assumptions.
The effect of a change in an accounting
estimate is recognized prospectively by including it in profit or loss in the period of the change, if the change affects that
period only; or in the period of the change and future periods, if the change affects both.
Information about critical judgments in
applying accounting policies that have the most significant risk of causing material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets
and liabilities recognized in the consolidated annual financial statements within the next financial year are discussed below:
Decommissioning liability
Decommissioning provisions have been recognized
based on the Company’s internal estimates. Assumptions, based on the current economic environment, have been made which
management believes are a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the future liability. These estimates take into account any
material changes to the assumptions that occur when reviewed regularly by management. Estimates are reviewed at least annually
and are based on current regulatory requirements. Significant changes in estimates of contamination, restoration standards and
techniques will result in changes to provisions from period to period. Actual decommissioning costs will ultimately depend on
future market prices for the decommissioning costs which will reflect the market conditions at the time the decommissioning costs
are actually incurred. The final cost of the currently recognized decommissioning provisions may be higher or lower than currently
provided for.
Exploration and evaluation expenditure
The application of the Company’s
accounting policy for exploration and evaluation expenditure requires judgment in determining whether it is likely that future
economic benefits will flow to the Company, which is based on assumptions about future events or circumstances. Estimates and
assumptions made may change if new information becomes available. If, after the expenditure is capitalized, information becomes
available suggesting that the recovery of the expenditure is unlikely, the amount capitalized is written off in profit or loss
in the period the new information becomes available.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
Note
4 - Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments
(continued)
Income taxes
The Company recognizes the net future
tax benefit related to deferred tax assets to the extent that it is probable that the deductible temporary differences will reverse
in the foreseeable future. Assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets requires the Company to make significant estimates
related to expectations of future taxable income. Estimates of future taxable income are based on forecast cash flows from operations
and the application of existing tax laws in each jurisdiction. To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ
significantly from estimates, the ability of the Company to realize the net deferred tax assets recorded at the reporting date
could be impacted. Additionally, future changes in tax laws in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates could limit the
ability of the Company to obtain tax deductions in future periods. All tax filings are subject to audit and potential reassessment.
Accordingly, the actual income tax liability may differ significantly from the estimated and recorded amounts.
Share-based payment transactions
The Company measures the cost of equity-settled
transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. Estimating
fair value for share-based payment transactions requires determining the most appropriate valuation model, which is dependent
on the terms and conditions of the grant. This estimate also requires determining the most appropriate inputs to the valuation
model including the expected life of the share option, volatility and dividend yield.
Impairment
A CGU is defined as the lowest grouping
of integrated assets that generate identifiable cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets
or groups of assets. The allocation of assets into CGUs requires significant judgment and interpretations with respect to the
integration between assets, the existence of active markets, similar exposure to market risks, shared infrastructures, and the
way in which management monitors the operations. The recoverable amounts of CGUs and individual assets have been determined based
on the higher of fair value less costs to sell or value-in-use calculations. The key assumptions the Company uses in estimating
future cash flows for recoverable amounts are anticipated future commodity prices, expected production volumes and future operating
and development costs. Changes to these assumptions will affect the recoverable amounts of CGUs and individual assets and may
then require a material adjustment to their related carrying value.
Derivative financial instruments
When estimating the fair value of derivative
financial instruments, the Company uses third-party models and valuation methodologies that utilize observable market data. In
addition to market information, the Company incorporates transaction specific details that market participants would utilize in
a fair value measurement, including the impact of non-performance risk. However, these fair value estimates may not necessarily
be indicative of the amounts that could be realized or settled in a current market transaction.
Reserves
The estimate of reserves is used in forecasting
the recoverability and economic viability of the Company’s oil and gas properties, and in the depletion and impairment calculations.
The process of estimating reserves is complex and requires significant interpretation and judgment. It is affected by economic
conditions, production, operating and development activities, and is performed using available geological, geophysical, engineering,
and economic data. Reserves are evaluated at least annually by the Company’s independent reserve evaluators and updates
to those reserves, if any, are estimated internally. Future development costs are estimated using assumptions as to the number
of wells required to produce the commercial reserves, the cost of such wells and associated production facilities and other capital
costs.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 5 – EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION (“E&E”)
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uranium
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
533,085
|
|
|
|
915,782
|
|
|
|
29,234,869
|
|
|
|
30,683,736
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
87,457
|
|
|
|
462,172
|
|
|
|
549,629
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(962,179
|
)
|
|
|
(640,995
|
)
|
|
|
(1,603,174
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,555,167
|
)
|
|
|
(1,555,167
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
533,085
|
|
|
|
41,060
|
|
|
|
27,500,879
|
|
|
|
28,075,024
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22,727
|
|
|
|
966,980
|
|
|
|
989,707
|
|
Transfer to property and equipment (Note 6)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,352,620
|
)
|
|
|
(1,352,620
|
)
|
Change in decommissioning provision
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,246
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,246
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,481
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,481
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
657,088
|
|
|
|
657,088
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
533,085
|
|
|
|
71,552
|
|
|
|
27,772,327
|
|
|
|
28,376,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uranium
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(17,966,191
|
)
|
|
|
(17,966,191
|
)
|
Impairment losses (Note 7)
|
|
|
(9,880
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(822,015
|
)
|
|
|
(831,895
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
980,321
|
|
|
|
980,321
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
(9,880
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(17,807,885
|
)
|
|
|
(17,817,765
|
)
|
Impairment losses (Note 7)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,886,261
|
)
|
|
|
(4,886,261
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(390,286
|
)
|
|
|
(390,286
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
(9,880
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(23,084,432
|
)
|
|
|
(23,094,312
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uranium
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Carrying amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2010
|
|
|
533,085
|
|
|
|
915,782
|
|
|
|
11,268,678
|
|
|
|
12,717,545
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
523,205
|
|
|
|
41,060
|
|
|
|
9,692,994
|
|
|
|
10,257,259
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
|
523,205
|
|
|
|
71,552
|
|
|
|
4,687,895
|
|
|
|
5,282,652
|
|
Exploration and evaluation (“E&E”)
assets consist of the Company’s exploration projects which are pending the determination of proven reserves.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 5 – EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION
(“E&E”) ASSETS (continued)
United States Exploration and Evaluation Properties
As at December 31, 2011, the Company holds
approximately 103,000 net acres (December 31, 2010 - 110,000 net acres) of oil and gas leases in the Piceance, Parados and Uinta
Basins in the US Rocky Mountains, of which approximately 99,000 net acres (December 31, 2010 - 107,000 net acres) were classified
as E&E assets.
During the year ended December 31, 2011,
the Company determined certain leases in the Piceance Basin in the US Rocky Mountains were technically feasible and commercially
viable. Accordingly, $1,352,620 of accumulated exploration and evaluation costs were transferred to property and equipment.
During the year ended December 31, 2011,
the Company capitalized $38,257 (December 31, 2010 – $228,443) of general and administrative costs to its US oil and gas
interests.
The E&E asset impairment is $4,886,261
and $822,015 for the year ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The impairment was recognized upon a review
of each exploration license or field, carried out, at least annually, to confirm whether the Company intends further appraisal
activity or to otherwise extract value from the property. The impairment was recognized based on the difference between the carrying
value of the assets and their recoverable amounts. The recoverable amount was the higher of fair value less costs to sell or value
in use. The fair value was estimated based on comparable market prices for which the asset could be sold in an arm’s length
transaction less estimated costs to sell. The recoverable amount was $nil on expired leases.
NOTE 6 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
11,693,001
|
|
|
|
1,445,467
|
|
|
|
273,543
|
|
|
|
13,412,011
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
4,132,386
|
|
|
|
340,150
|
|
|
|
26,945
|
|
|
|
4,499,481
|
|
Change in decommissioning provision
|
|
|
366,410
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
366,410
|
|
Foreign currency translation and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(89,962
|
)
|
|
|
(2,431
|
)
|
|
|
(92,393
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
16,191,797
|
|
|
|
1,695,655
|
|
|
|
298,057
|
|
|
|
18,185,509
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
6,457,404
|
|
|
|
866,097
|
|
|
|
28,867
|
|
|
|
7,352,368
|
|
Transfer from exploration and evaluation (Note 5)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,352,620
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,352,620
|
|
Change in decommissioning provision
|
|
|
500,284
|
|
|
|
121,030
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
621,314
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,407
|
)
|
|
|
(2,407
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
40,372
|
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
|
41,767
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
23,149,485
|
|
|
|
4,075,774
|
|
|
|
325,912
|
|
|
|
27,551,171
|
|
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 6 – PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Accumulated amortization, depletion and impairment losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(158,622
|
)
|
|
|
(158,622
|
)
|
Amortization and depletion (Note 7)
|
|
|
(3,453,777
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(38,927
|
)
|
|
|
(3,492,704
|
)
|
Impairment losses (Note 7)
|
|
|
(360,268
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(360,268
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
(3,814,045
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(196,483
|
)
|
|
|
(4,010,528
|
)
|
Amortization and depletion (Note 7)
|
|
|
(2,366,156
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(37,198
|
)
|
|
|
(2,403,354
|
)
|
Impairment losses (Note 7)
|
|
|
(937,939
|
)
|
|
|
(424,078
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,362,017
|
)
|
Disposals
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
Foreign currency translation and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(15,832
|
)
|
|
|
(712
|
)
|
|
|
(16,544
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
(7,118,140
|
)
|
|
|
(439,910
|
)
|
|
|
(233,224
|
)
|
|
|
(7,791,274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Carrying amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2010
|
|
|
11,693,001
|
|
|
|
1,445,467
|
|
|
|
114,921
|
|
|
|
13,253,389
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
12,377,752
|
|
|
|
1,695,655
|
|
|
|
101,574
|
|
|
|
14,174,981
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
|
16,031,345
|
|
|
|
3,635,864
|
|
|
|
92,688
|
|
|
|
19,759,897
|
|
Canadian Oil and Gas Interests
At December 31, 2011, the Company had
5 property leases held on its behalf by a third party.
Amortization and depletion is computed
using the unit of production method by reference to the total production for the CGU over the estimated net proven reserves of
oil and gas for the CGU determined by independent consultants. The calculation of amortization and depletion for the year ended
December 31, 2011 included estimated future development costs of $Nil (December 31, 2010 - $3,970,000) associated with the development
of proved undeveloped reserves.
During the year ended December 31, 2011,
the Company capitalized $87,424 (December 31, 2010 – $694,628) of general and administrative costs to its Canadian oil and
gas interests.
At December 31, 2011, the Company performed
an impairment test on certain oil and gas interests to assess the recoverable value of these properties when indicators of impairment
were present.
The Developed and Proved (D&P) asset
impairment is $937,939 and $360,268 for the year ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The impairment was
recognized because the carrying value of certain cash generating units exceeded the recoverable amount. The impairment was recognized
based on the difference between the carrying value of cash generating unit and their recoverable amounts. The recoverable amount
was the higher of fair value less costs to sell or value in use. The fair value was estimated based on observable market prices
for which the asset could be sold in a comparable arm’s length transaction, less estimated costs to sell.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 6 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
(continued)
The benchmark prices on which the December
31, 2011 impairment indicators were assessed are as follows:
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
Condensate
|
|
|
Crude oil
|
|
|
|
|
(AECO)
|
|
|
(Edmonton Pentanes Plus)
|
|
|
(Edmonton Par)
|
|
|
|
|
Cdn $ / mmbtu
|
|
|
Cdn $ / bbl
|
|
|
Cdn $ / bbl
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
102.90
|
|
|
|
98.00
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
105.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
107.10
|
|
|
|
102.00
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
5.15
|
|
|
|
109.20
|
|
|
|
104.00
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
5.55
|
|
|
|
111.40
|
|
|
|
106.10
|
|
Each benchmark price increased on average approximately 2% from
2017 and thereafter
|
United States Oil and Gas Interests
During the year ended December 31, 2011,
the Company capitalized $617,090 (December 31, 2010 – $325,510) of general and administrative costs to its US oil and gas
interests. During fiscal 2011 and 2010, the Company did not have any production from its US oil and gas interests and accordingly
did not deplete any of its US oil and gas interests.
The D&P asset impairment is $424,078
and $Nil for the year ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The impairment was recognized upon a review
of each exploration license or field, carried out, at least annually, to confirm whether the Company intends further appraisal
activity or to otherwise extract value from the property. The impairment was recognized based on the difference between the carrying
value of the assets and their recoverable amounts. The recoverable amount was the higher of fair value less costs to sell or value
in use. The fair value was determined based on the amount for which the asset could be sold in a comparable arm’s length
transaction, less estimated costs to sell.
The benchmark prices on which the December
31, 2011 impairment indicators were assessed are as follows:
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
|
(Henry Hub)
|
|
|
|
|
US$ / mmbtu
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
3.17
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
3.53
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
3.61
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
3.86
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
4.68
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
4.95
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
5.22
|
|
2022
|
|
|
|
5.49
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
5.77
|
|
2024 and thereafter
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
* At December 31, 2011, the US$ to CAD$
exchange rate was 1.0170.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 7 – AMORTIZATION, DEPLETION
AND IMPAIRMENT LOSSES
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Exploration and Evaluation Assets ( E & E assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment losses (Note 5)
|
|
|
4,886,261
|
|
|
|
831,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment (D & P assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and depletion (Note 6)
|
|
|
2,403,354
|
|
|
|
3,492,704
|
|
Impairment losses (Note 6)
|
|
|
1,362,017
|
|
|
|
360,268
|
|
|
|
|
8,651,632
|
|
|
|
4,684,867
|
|
NOTE 8 – BANK LINE OF CREDIT AND
BRIDGE LOAN
In March 2010, the Company
negotiated a credit facility for a bridge loan of up to $5,000,000 with a due date of September 22, 2010. This facility was secured
by a first floating charge over all the assets of DEAL, and bore interest at 12% per annum. At December 31, 2011, the Canadian
oil and natural gas interests and properties with a carrying amount of $nil (December 31, 2010 - $12,418,812) were held as collateral
for the loan. By agreement, the due date of the loan was extended to October 31, 2011. Pursuant to the agreement, outstanding
advances were due to be fully repaid no later than October 31, 2011 or, upon the earlier of non-core asset sales of DEAL. During
the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company made total monthly principal payments of $700,000 and repaid the outstanding balance
of $4,100,000 in full. This facility was used to support the development of the Company’s oil and gas properties in the
Drake/Woodrush area.
In September 2011, the Company obtained
a $7 million revolving operating demand loan (“line of credit”), including a letter of credit facility to a maximum
of $700,000 for a maximum one year term, from a Canadian Bank to refinance the bridge loan and to provide operating funds. The
line of credit is at an interest rate of Prime + 1% (total 4% p.a. currently) and collateralized by a $10,000,000 debenture over
all assets of DEAL and a $10,000,000 guarantee from Dejour Energy Inc. In December 2011, the Company renewed the line of credit
with the Canadian Bank. The next review date is scheduled on or before May 1, 2012, but subject to change at the discretion of
the bank. As at December 31, 2011, a total of $5,545,457 of this facility was utilized.
According to the terms of the facility,
DEAL is required to maintain a working capital ratio of greater than 1:1 at all times. The working capital ratio is defined as
the ratio of (i) current assets (including any undrawn and authorized availability under the facility) less unrealized hedging
gains to (ii) current liabilities (excluding current portion of outstanding balances of the facility) less unrealized hedging
losses. As at December 31, 2011, the Company is in compliance with the working capital ratio requirement.
NOTE 9 – LOANS FROM RELATED PARTIES
As at
|
|
Note
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
January 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Hodgkinson Equities Corporation (“HEC”)
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
387,927
|
|
Brownstone Ventures Inc. (“Brownstone”)
|
|
|
b
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,957,474
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
2,345,401
|
|
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 9 – LOANS FROM RELATED PARTIES
(continued)
|
(a)
|
At January 1, 2010, the Company
had a 12% loan with a balance of $387,927 due on January 1,
2011 from HEC. HEC is a private company controlled by the CEO
of the Company. The loan was secured by the assets, equipment,
fixtures and accounts receivable of DEAL. During the year ended
December 31, 2010, a loan repayment of $137,927 was made to
HEC by the Company. As at December 31, 2010, a balance of $250,000
remained outstanding. During the year ended December 31, 2011,
the loan was repaid in full in cash.
|
|
(b)
|
At January 1, 2010, the Company
had a 12% loan with a balance of $1,957,474 due on January
1, 2011 from Brownstone.
Previously,
Brownstone controlled more than 10% of outstanding common shares
of the Company. Effective September 28, 2011, Brownstone ceased
to control more than 10% of outstanding common shares of the
Company.
The loan was collateralized by the assets of
Dejour USA. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the loan
was repaid in full in cash.
|
NOTE
10 – WARRANT liability
Warrants that have their exercise prices
denominated in currencies other than the Company’s functional currency of Canadian dollars are accounted for as derivative
financial liabilities and are recorded at the fair value at each reporting date with the change in fair value for the period recorded
in the statement of comprehensive loss for the period.
|
|
#
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
8,075,000
|
|
|
|
1,160,858
|
|
Change in fair value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(68,096
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
8,075,000
|
|
|
|
1,092,762
|
|
Granted, investor warrants
|
|
|
5,505,002
|
|
|
|
310,616
|
|
Exercise of warrants – value reallocation
|
|
|
(3,460,418
|
)
|
|
|
(738,548
|
)
|
Expired warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Change in fair value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,580,380
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
10,119,584
|
|
|
|
2,245,210
|
|
As described in Note 13, in February 2011,
the Company issued 5,505,002 investor warrants each of which entitles the holder to purchase one common share of the Company at
an exercise price of US$0.35 until February 10, 2012. The fair value of these warrants was estimated using the Hull-White Trinomial
option pricing model under the following weighted average inputs:
As at
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
|
February 11,
2011
|
|
|
December 31,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
US$
|
0.39
|
|
|
US$
|
0.35
|
|
|
US$
|
0.40
|
|
Share price
|
|
US$
|
0.52
|
|
|
US$
|
0.31
|
|
|
US$
|
0.32
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
Expected life
|
|
2.29 years
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
3.98 years
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
During the year ended December 31, 2011,
3,460,418 US$ warrants were exercised. Subsequent to December 31, 2011, an additional 2,419,584 US$ warrants were exercised.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 11 – DECOMMISSIONING LIABILITY
The total decommissioning liabilities
were estimated based on the Company’s net ownership interest in all wells and facilities, the estimated cost to abandon
and reclaim the wells and facilities and the estimated timing of the cost to be incurred in future periods. The Company estimated
the total undiscounted amount of the cash flows required to settle the decommissioning liabilities as at December 31, 2011 to
be approximately $1,634,816 (December 31, 2010 - $990,000). These decommissioning liabilities are expected to be settled over
the next 20 years with the majority of costs incurred between 2018 and 2025.
|
|
Canadian
Oil
and
Gas
Properties
(1)
|
|
|
United
States
Oil
and Gas
Properties
(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
322,504
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
322,504
|
|
Liabilities incurred during the year
|
|
|
331,618
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
331,618
|
|
Change in estimated future cash flows
|
|
|
34,792
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34,792
|
|
Unwinding of discount
|
|
|
17,168
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,168
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
706,082
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
706,082
|
|
Liabilities incurred during the year
|
|
|
231,767
|
|
|
|
118,567
|
|
|
|
350,334
|
|
Change in estimated future cash flows
|
|
|
277,764
|
|
|
|
2,463
|
|
|
|
280,227
|
|
Actual costs incurred
|
|
|
(18,332
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(18,332
|
)
|
Unwinding of discount
|
|
|
19,642
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
20,542
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
1,216,923
|
|
|
|
121,930
|
|
|
|
1,338,853
|
|
(1)
relates to property and
equipment
The present value of the decommissioning
liability was calculated using the following weighted average inputs:
|
|
Canadian Oil
and Gas
Properties
|
|
|
United States
Oil and Gas
Properties
|
|
As at December 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
1.67
|
%
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
Inflation rate
|
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
2.78
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
Inflation rate
|
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 12 – FLOW-THROUGH SHARES
LIABILITY
The following is a continuity schedule
of the liability portion of the flow-through shares issuances:
|
|
Issued in
|
|
|
Issued in
|
|
|
Issued in
|
|
|
Issued in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2009
|
|
|
March 2010
|
|
|
September 2010
|
|
|
December 2010
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
271,033
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
271,033
|
|
Liability incurred on flow-through shares issued
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
130,830
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
187,145
|
|
|
|
407,975
|
|
Settlement of flow-through share liability on incurring expenditures
|
|
|
(271,033
|
)
|
|
|
(130,830
|
)
|
|
|
(90,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(491,863
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
187,145
|
|
|
|
187,145
|
|
Settlement of flow-through share liability on incurring expenditures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(187,145
|
)
|
|
|
(187,145
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
NOTE 13 – SHARE CAPITAL
Authorized
The Company is authorized to issue an
unlimited number of common voting shares, an unlimited number of first preferred shares issuable in series, and an unlimited number
of second preferred shares issuable in series.
No preferred shares have been issued and the terms of preferred shares have
not been defined.
Issued and outstanding
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
|
# of Shares
|
|
|
$ Value of shares
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
95,791,038
|
|
|
|
75,810,350
|
|
- Shares issued via private placements, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
14,389,507
|
|
|
|
3,983,508
|
|
- Flow through share liability
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(407,975
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
110,180,545
|
|
|
|
79,385,883
|
|
- Issue of shares on exercise of warrants and options
|
|
|
4,751,841
|
|
|
|
1,574,401
|
|
- Warrant liability reallocated on exercise of warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
738,548
|
|
- Contributed surplus reallocated on exercise of options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
167,070
|
|
- Shares issued via private placements, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
11,010,000
|
|
|
|
2,693,813
|
|
- Subscriptions receivable on exercise of options
|
|
|
950,000
|
|
|
|
516,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
126,892,386
|
|
|
|
85,075,961
|
|
During the year ended December 31,
2011, the Company completed the following:
At December 31, 2011 the Company had subscriptions
receivable in the amount of $516,246. The subscriptions receivable balance was received in full subsequent to year end.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 13 – SHARE CAPITAL (continued)
In February 2011, the Company completed
a private placement of 11,010,000 units at US$0.30 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one-half of one common
share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to acquire one additional common share of the Company at US$0.35
per common share on or before February 10, 2012. Gross proceeds raised were $3,288,641 (US$3,303,000). In connection with this
private placement, the Company paid finders’ fees of $196,694 (US$199,710) and other related costs of $119,602. The grant
date fair value of the warrants, estimated to be $310,616, has been recognized as a derivative financial liability (Note 10).
Issue costs of $32,084 related to the warrants were expensed. Directors and Officers of the Company purchased 2,000,000 units
of this offering.
In January 2011, the Company renounced
$888,940 flow-through funds to investors, using the look-back rule. The flow-through funds had been fully spent by February 28,
2011. As a result of the renunciation, a deferred income tax recovery of $187,145 was recognized on settlement of the flow-through
share liability.
During the year ended December 31,
2010, the Company completed the following:
In December 2010, the Company renounced
$1,767,567 flow-through funds to investors, using the general rule. The flow-through funds had been fully spent by December 31,
2010. As a result of the renunciation, a deferred income tax recovery of $220,830 was recognized on settlement of the flow-through
share liability.
In December 2010, the Company completed
a private placement and issued 2,339,315 flow-through shares at $0.38 per share. Gross proceeds raised were $888,940. In connection
with this private placement, the Company paid finders’ fees of $53,337 and other related costs of $61,862. The Company also
issued 140,359 agent’s warrants, exercisable at $0.38 per share on or before December 23, 2011. The grant date fair values
of the agent’s warrants, estimated to be $4,211, have been included in share capital on a net basis and accordingly have
not been recorded as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Directors and Officers of the Company purchased 513,157
shares of this offering.
In November 2010, the Company completed
a private placement and issued 7,142,858 units at $0.28 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and 0.65 of a common
share purchase warrant. Each whole common share purchase warrant is exercisable into one common share of the Company at $0.40
per share on or before November 17, 2015. Gross proceeds raised were $2,000,000. In connection with this private placement, the
Company paid finders’ fees of $120,000 and other related costs of $123,423. The grant date fair values of the warrants,
estimated to be $381,078, have been included in share capital on a net basis and accordingly have not been recorded as a separate
component of shareholders’ equity.
In September 2010, the Company completed
a private placement and issued 2,000,000 flow-through shares at $0.375 per share. Gross proceeds raised were $750,000. In connection
with this private placement, the Company paid finders’ fees of $37,500 and other related costs of $38,890.
In March 2010, the Company completed a
private placement and issued 2,907,334 flow-through units at $0.35 per unit. Each unit consists of one common share and one-half
of a common share purchase warrant. Each whole common share purchase warrant is exercisable into one common share of the Company
at $0.45 per share on or before March 3, 2011. Gross proceeds raised were $1,017,567. In connection with this private placement,
the Company paid finders’ fees of $54,575 and other related costs of $52,819. The Company also issued 37,423 agent’s
warrants, exercisable at $0.45 per common share on or before March 3, 2011. The grant date fair values of the warrants and agent’s
warrants, estimated to be $45,563 and $2,245 respectively, have been included in share capital on a net basis and accordingly
have not been recorded as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Directors and Officers of the Company purchased
412,500 units of this offering and no finders’ fee was paid on their participation in the offering.
In January 2010, the Company renounced
$1,626,199 flow-through funds to investors, using the look-back rule. The flow-through funds had been fully spent by February
28, 2010. As a result of the renunciation, a deferred income tax recovery of $271,033 was recognized on settlement of the flow-through
share liability.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 14 – STOCK OPTIONS AND SHARE
PURCHASE WARRANTS
The Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”)
is a 10% “rolling” plan pursuant to which the number of common shares reserved for issuance is 10% of the Company’s
issued and outstanding common shares as constituted on the date of any grant of options.
The Plan provides for the grant of options
to purchase common shares to eligible directors, senior officers, employees and consultants of the Company (“Participants”).
The exercise periods and vesting periods of options granted under the Plan are to be determined by the Company with approval from
the Board of Directors. The expiration of any option will be accelerated if the participant’s employment or other relationship
with the Company terminates. The exercise price of an option is to be set by the Company at the time of grant but shall not be
lower than the market price (as defined in the Plan) at the time of grant.
The following table summarizes information
about outstanding stock option transactions:
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
options
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
4,416,682
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
3,573,000
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
Options cancelled (forfeited)
|
|
|
(400,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
Options expired
|
|
|
(643,182
|
)
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
6,946,500
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
3,212,500
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(1,150,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
Options cancelled (forfeited)
|
|
|
(200,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
Options expired
|
|
|
(305,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
8,504,000
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
Details of the outstanding and exercisable
stock options as at December 31, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
|
|
of options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
life (years)
|
|
|
of options
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
life (years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
5,185,500
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
|
3,870,500
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
2.81
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
3,318,500
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
2,012,275
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,504,000
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
2.45
|
|
|
|
5,882,775
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 14 – STOCK OPTIONS AND SHARE
PURCHASE WARRANTS (continued)
(a) Stock Options (continued)
The fair value of the options issued during
the period was estimated using the Black Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average inputs:
For the year ended December 31
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at grant date
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
Share price
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
74.33
|
%
|
|
|
103.48
|
%
|
Expected option life
|
|
|
2.10 years
|
|
|
|
2.04 years
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.65
|
%
|
|
|
1.41
|
%
|
Expected volatility
is based on historical volatility and average weekly stock prices were used to calculate volatility. Management believes that
the annualized weekly average of volatility is the best measure of expected volatility. A weighted average forfeiture rate of
9.92% (2010 – 10.10%) is used when recording stock based compensation. This estimate is adjusted to the actual forfeiture
rate. Stock based compensation of $662,338 (December 31, 2010 - $765,443) was expensed during the year ended December 31, 2011.
|
(b)
|
Share Purchase Warrants
|
The following table summarizes information about warrant transactions:
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
14,736,150
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
Warrants granted
|
|
|
6,274,305
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
21,010,455
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
Warrants granted
|
|
|
5,505,002
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
Warrants exercised
|
|
|
(4,551,841
|
)
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
Warrants expired
|
|
|
(3,540,026
|
)
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
18,423,590
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
Details of the outstanding and exercisable warrants as at December
31, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
|
|
of warrants
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
life (years)
|
|
|
of warrants
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
life (years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
3,642,856
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
3.88
|
|
|
|
3,642,856
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
3.88
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
4,015,151
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
|
|
4,015,151
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
$
|
0.35 US
|
|
|
|
2,419,584
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
2,419,584
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
$
|
0.40 US
|
|
|
|
7,700,000
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
2.98
|
|
|
|
7,700,000
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
2.98
|
|
$
|
0.46
US
|
|
|
|
645,999
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
2.84
|
|
|
|
645,999
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
2.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,423,590
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
|
18,423,590
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 14 – STOCK OPTIONS AND SHARE
PURCHASE WARRANTS (continued)
|
(b)
|
Share Purchase Warrants (continued)
|
Warrants that have their exercise prices
denominated in currencies other than the Company’s functional currency of Canadian dollars are accounted for as derivative
financial liabilities (Note 10).
NOTE 15 – CONTRIBUTED SURPLUS
Contributed
surplus is used to recognize the value of stock option grants and share warrants prior to exercise.
Details
of changes in the Company's contributed surplus balance are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
6,873,166
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
765,443
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
7,638,609
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
662,338
|
|
Exercise of options – value reallocation
|
|
|
(167,070
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
8,133,877
|
|
NOTE 16 – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
|
(a)
|
Changes in operating non-cash working capital
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Changes in non-cash working capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(714,801
|
)
|
|
|
36,147
|
|
Prepaids and deposits
|
|
|
(8,110
|
)
|
|
|
33,528
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,485,147
|
|
|
|
(180,737
|
)
|
|
|
|
762,236
|
|
|
|
(111,062
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
(73,931
|
)
|
|
|
488,024
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
888,236
|
|
|
|
(357,424
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(52,069
|
)
|
|
|
(241,662
|
)
|
|
|
|
762,236
|
|
|
|
(111,062
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
|
439,987
|
|
|
|
576,549
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 16 – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
(continued)
Basic loss per share amounts has been
calculated by dividing the net loss for the year attributable to the shareholders of the Company by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding. The basic and diluted net loss per share is the same as there are no dilutive effects on earnings.
The following table summarizes the common shares used in calculating basic and diluted net loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
120,300,214
|
|
|
|
99,788,625
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
120,300,214
|
|
|
|
99,788,625
|
|
NOTE 17 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Except as disclosed elsewhere, during
the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company entered into the following transactions with related parties:
|
(a)
|
Compensation awarded to key
management included a total of salaries and consulting fees
of $1,771,981 (2010 - $1,215,191) and non-cash stock-based
compensation of $451,071 (2010 - $486,018). Key management
includes the Company’s officers and directors. The salaries
and consulting fees are included in general and administrative
expenses. Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
at December 31, 2011 is $396,618 (December 31, 2010 - $12,000
and January 1, 2010 - $Nil) owing to a company controlled by
an officer of the Company.
|
|
(b)
|
The Company incurred a total
of $2,301 (2010 - $268,440) in finance costs to a company controlled
by an officer of the Company.
|
|
(c)
|
Included in interest and other
income is $30,000 (2010 - $30,000) received from the companies
controlled by officers of the Company for rental income.
|
|
(d)
|
In July 2008, Brownstone Ventures
Inc. (“Brownstone”) became a 28.53% working interest
partner in the US properties. Previously, Brownstone controlled
more than 10% of outstanding common shares of the Company.
Effective September 28, 2011, Brownstone ceased to control
more than 10% of outstanding common shares of the Company.
Included in accounts receivable at December 31, 2011 is $Nil
(December 31, 2010 - $168,771 and January 1, 2010 - $72,752)
owing from Brownstone.
|
|
(e)
|
In December 2009, a company
controlled by the CEO of the Company (“HEC”) became
a 5% working interest partner in the Woodrush property. Included
in accounts receivable at December 31, 2011 is $Nil (December
31, 2010 - $967 and January 1, 2010 - $Nil) owing from HEC.
Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities at December
31, 2011 is $53,668 (December 31, 2010 - $166,139 and January
1, 2010 - $63,679) owing to HEC.
|
|
(f)
|
In December 2011, HEC exercised
250,000 warrants with an exercise price of US$0.35 each that
were issued in February 2011.
|
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 18 –INCOME TAXES
The actual income tax provisions differ
from the expected amounts calculated by applying the Canadian combined federal and provincial corporate income tax rates to the
Company’s loss before income taxes. The components of these differences are as follows:
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(11,230,427
|
)
|
|
|
(5,615,768
|
)
|
Corporate tax rate
|
|
|
33.36
|
%
|
|
|
30.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected tax recovery
|
|
|
(3,746,974
|
)
|
|
|
(1,733,630
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Differences in foreign tax rates and change
in
effective tax rates
|
|
|
(319,388
|
)
|
|
|
89,488
|
|
Impact of foreign exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(219,610
|
)
|
|
|
471,405
|
|
Change in unrecognized deferred tax assets
|
|
|
3,582,881
|
|
|
|
132,578
|
|
Stock based compensation and share issue costs
|
|
|
220,956
|
|
|
|
72,159
|
|
Non deductible amounts
|
|
|
347,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other adjustments
|
|
|
(52,227
|
)
|
|
|
476,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax recovery
|
|
|
(187,145
|
)
|
|
|
(491,863
|
)
|
No deferred tax asset has been recognized in respect of the
following losses and deductable temporary differences as it is not considered probable that the sufficient future taxable profit
will allow the deferred tax assets to be recovered.
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-capital losses available
|
|
|
11,211,431
|
|
|
|
7,747,991
|
|
Capital losses available
|
|
|
1,030,304
|
|
|
|
1,042,668
|
|
Resource tax pools in excess of net book value
|
|
|
6,226,327
|
|
|
|
6,068,919
|
|
Share issue costs and other
|
|
|
228,199
|
|
|
|
253,802
|
|
Unrecognized deferred tax assets
|
|
|
18,696,261
|
|
|
|
15,113,380
|
|
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 18 –INCOME TAXES (continued)
The Company has the approximate amounts of tax pools available
as follows:
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
As at December 31
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and development expenditures
|
|
|
18,439,000
|
|
|
|
16,047,000
|
|
Unamortized share issue costs
|
|
|
913,000
|
|
|
|
1,003,000
|
|
Capital losses
|
|
|
8,242,000
|
|
|
|
8,242,000
|
|
Non-capital losses
|
|
|
18,416,000
|
|
|
|
15,997,000
|
|
|
|
|
46,010,000
|
|
|
|
41,289,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and development expenditures
|
|
|
28,553,000
|
|
|
|
27,146,000
|
|
Non-capital losses
|
|
|
11,883,000
|
|
|
|
10,009,000
|
|
|
|
|
40,436,000
|
|
|
|
37,155,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
86,446,000
|
|
|
|
78,444,000
|
|
The described 2011 US tax pools are
updated for a typographical correction from the amount disclosed in the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements
filed on SEDAR.
The exploration and development expenditures can be carried
forward to reduce future income taxes indefinitely. The non-capital losses for income tax purposes expire as follows:
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$2015
|
|
|
1,729,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,729,000
|
|
2026
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
480,000
|
|
|
|
480,000
|
|
2027
|
|
|
4,151,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,151,000
|
|
2028
|
|
|
4,674,000
|
|
|
|
2,020,000
|
|
|
|
6,694,000
|
|
2029
|
|
|
3,373,000
|
|
|
|
6,397,000
|
|
|
|
9,770,000
|
|
2030
|
|
|
2,081,000
|
|
|
|
1,112,000
|
|
|
|
3,193,000
|
|
2031
|
|
|
2,408,000
|
|
|
|
1,874,000
|
|
|
|
4,282,000
|
|
|
|
|
18,416,000
|
|
|
|
11,883,000
|
|
|
|
30,299,000
|
|
NOTE 19 – COMMITMENTS
In connection with the issuance of flow-through
shares by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company was required to expend $2.7 million of eligible exploration
expenditures by December 31, 2011. $1.8 million was expended by December 31, 2010 and $0.9 million was expended by February 28,
2011.
The Company has entered into a lease agreement
for a vehicle that is used to accelerate the production in the waterflood at Woodrush. Future minimum annual lease payments under
the lease are as follows:
|
|
$
|
|
2012
|
|
|
41,042
|
|
2013
|
|
|
34,202
|
|
|
|
|
75,244
|
|
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 19 – COMMITMENTS (continued)
The Company has entered into lease agreements
on office premises for its various locations. Under the terms of the lease for one of its subsidiaries, the Company has an option
to automatically extend the term for a period of one year. Future minimum annual lease payments under the leases are as follows:
|
|
$
|
|
2012
|
|
|
181,984
|
|
2013
|
|
|
73,051
|
|
2014
|
|
|
48,701
|
|
|
|
|
303,736
|
|
NOTE 20 – PERSONNEL EXPENSES
The aggregate compensation expense of
key management was as follows:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Salaries, benefits and fees
|
|
|
1,771,981
|
|
|
|
1,215,191
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
451,071
|
|
|
|
486,018
|
|
|
|
|
2,223,052
|
|
|
|
1,701,209
|
|
Capitalized portion of salaries and fees
|
|
|
(154,368
|
)
|
|
|
(159,373
|
)
|
|
|
|
2,068,684
|
|
|
|
1,541,836
|
|
NOTE 21 – OPERATING SEGMENTS
Segment information is provided on the
basis of geographic segments as the Company manages its business through two geographic regions – Canada and the United
States. The two geographic segments presented reflect the way in which the Company’s management reviews business performance.
The Company’s revenue and losses of each geographic segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Years ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues and other income
|
|
|
7,171,363
|
|
|
|
6,878,384
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,171,363
|
|
|
|
6,878,384
|
|
Segmented loss
|
|
|
(4,662,246
|
)
|
|
|
(3,506,122
|
)
|
|
|
(6,381,036
|
)
|
|
|
(1,617,783
|
)
|
|
|
(11,043,282
|
)
|
|
|
(5,123,905
|
)
|
Amortization, depletion and impairment losses
|
|
|
3,330,809
|
|
|
|
3,862,852
|
|
|
|
5,320,823
|
|
|
|
822,015
|
|
|
|
8,651,632
|
|
|
|
4,684,867
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
439,771
|
|
|
|
576,549
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
439,987
|
|
|
|
576,549
|
|
Income tax recovery
|
|
|
187,145
|
|
|
|
491,863
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
187,145
|
|
|
|
491,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
|
|
6,480,131
|
|
|
|
4,219,843
|
|
|
|
1,833,077
|
|
|
|
802,322
|
|
|
|
8,313,208
|
|
|
|
5,022,165
|
|
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 22 – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The components of accumulated other comprehensive
loss were as follows:
As at
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
January 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Unrealized financial instrument loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
99,894
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
392,977
|
|
|
|
685,002
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
392,977
|
|
|
|
685,002
|
|
|
|
99,894
|
|
NOTE 23 – DETERMINATION OF FAIR
VALUES
A number of the Company’s accounting
policies and disclosures require the determination of fair value, for financial assets and liabilities. Fair values have been
determined for measurement and/or disclosure purposes based on the following methods. When applicable, further information about
the assumptions made in determining fair values is disclosed in the notes specific to that financial asset or financial liability.
Due to the use of subjective judgments and uncertainties in the determination of these fair values the values should not be interpreted
as being realizable in an immediate settlement of the financial instruments.
The following tables provide fair value
measurement information for financial assets and liabilities as at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The carrying value
of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, bank line of credit, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities included
in the consolidated statement of financial position approximate their fair value due to the short term nature of the instruments
or the indexed rate of interest on the bank debt.
December 31, 2011
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,487,850
|
|
|
|
2,487,850
|
|
|
|
2,487,850
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
887,181
|
|
|
|
887,181
|
|
|
|
887,181
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Subscription receivable
|
|
|
516,246
|
|
|
|
516,246
|
|
|
|
516,246
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
3,957,893
|
|
|
|
3,957,893
|
|
|
|
3,957,893
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Bank line of credit
|
|
|
5,545,457
|
|
|
|
5,545,457
|
|
|
|
5,545,457
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Fair value of commodity contracts
|
|
|
9,800
|
|
|
|
9,800
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,800
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,757,525
|
|
|
|
4,757,525
|
|
|
|
4,757,525
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
688,626
|
|
|
|
688,626
|
|
|
|
688,626
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,472,746
|
|
|
|
2,472,746
|
|
|
|
2,472,746
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Bridge loan
|
|
|
4,800,000
|
|
|
|
4,800,000
|
|
|
|
4,800,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loan from related party
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 23 – DETERMINATION OF FAIR
VALUES (continued)
The Company classifies the fair value
of financial instruments according to the following hierarchy based on the amount of observable inputs used to value the instruments:
|
•
|
Level 1: Values based on
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible
at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
•
|
Level 2: Values based on
quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs
that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially
the full term of the asset or liability.
|
|
•
|
Level 3: Values based on
prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that
are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair
value measurement.
|
NOTE 24 – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The Company’s functional currency
is the Canadian dollar. The Company operates in the United States, giving rise to exposure to market risks from changes in foreign
currency rates. Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.
The Company also has exposure to a number
of risks from its use of financial instruments including: credit risk, liquidity risk, and market risk. This note presents information
about the Company’s exposure to each of these risks and the Company’s objectives, policies and processes for measuring
and managing risk, and the Company’s management of capital.
Credit risk arises from credit exposure
to receivables due from joint venture partners and marketers included in accounts receivable. The maximum exposure to credit risk
is equal to the carrying value of the financial assets.
The Company is exposed to third party
credit risk through its contractual arrangements with its current or future joint venture partners, marketers of its petroleum
and natural gas production and other parties. In the event such entities fail to meet their contractual obligations to the Company,
such failures may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The objective of managing the third party
credit risk is to minimize losses in financial assets. The Company assesses the credit quality of the partners, taking into account
their financial position, past experience, and other factors. The Company mitigates the risk of non-collection of certain amounts
by obtaining the joint venture partners’ share of capital expenditures in advance of a project and by monitoring accounts
receivable on a regular basis. As at December 31, 2011 and 2010, no accounts receivable has been deemed uncollectible or written
off during the year.
As at December 31, 2011, the Company’s
receivables consist of $64,583 (2010 - $195,514) from joint interest partners, $774,100 (2010 - $408,700) from oil and natural
gas marketers and $48,498 (2010 - $84,412) from other trade receivables.
The Company considers all amounts outstanding
for more than 90 days as past due. Currently, there is no indication that amounts are non-collectable; thus an allowance for doubtful
accounts has not been set up. As at December 31, 2011, $5,787 (2010 - $152,056) of accounts receivable are past due, all of which
are considered to be collectable.
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company
will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. The Company’s approach to managing liquidity is to
ensure, as far as possible, that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed
conditions without incurring unacceptable losses or risking harm to the Company’s reputation.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE
24 – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (continued)
(b) Liquidity Risk (continued)
As
the industry in which the Company operates is very capital intensive, the majority of the Company’s spending is related
to its capital programs. The Company prepares annual capital expenditure budgets, which are regularly monitored and updated as
considered necessary. Further, the Company utilizes authorizations for expenditures on both operated and non-operated projects
to further manage capital expenditures. To facilitate the capital expenditure program, the Company has a bank line of credit facility
(note 8). The Company also attempts to match its payment cycle with collection of oil and natural gas revenues on the 25
th
of each month.
Accounts
payable are considered due to suppliers in one year or less while the bridge loan was repaid in full during the year ended December
31, 2011. The bank line of credit, which is scheduled to be reviewed on or before May 1, 2012, is repayable upon demand.
Market
risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, and interest rates will affect
the Company’s net earnings. The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within
acceptable limits, while maximizing returns. The Company utilizes financial derivatives to manage certain market risks. All such
transactions are conducted in accordance with the risk management policy that has been approved by the Board of Directors.
|
(i)
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
|
Foreign
currency exchange rate risk is the risk that the fair value of financial instruments or future cash flows will fluctuate as a
result of changes in foreign exchange rates. Although substantially all of the Company’s oil and natural gas sales are denominated
in Canadian dollars, the underlying market prices in Canada for oil and natural gas are impacted by changes in the exchange rate
between the Canadian and United States dollars. Given that changes in exchange rate have an indirect influence, the impact of
changing exchange rates cannot be accurately quantified. The Company had no forward exchange rate contracts in place as at or
during the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
The Company was exposed to the following foreign currency risk
at December 31:
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Expressed in foreign currencies
|
|
CND$
|
|
|
CND$
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,772,982
|
|
|
|
601,519
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
69,667
|
|
|
|
168,770
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(1,346,564
|
)
|
|
|
(227,531
|
)
|
Balance sheet exposure
|
|
|
496,085
|
|
|
|
542,758
|
|
The following foreign exchange rates applied for the year ended
and as at December 31:
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
YTD average USD to CAD
|
|
1.0170
|
|
|
0.9946
|
|
December 31, reporting date rate
|
|
|
0.9893
|
|
|
|
1.0305
|
|
The Company has performed a sensitivity
analysis on its foreign currency denominated financial instruments. Based on the Company’s foreign currency exposure noted
above and assuming that all other variables remain constant, a 10% appreciation of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar would
result in the decrease of net loss of $49,609 at December 31, 2011 (2010 - $54,276). For a 10% depreciation of the above foreign
currencies against the Canadian dollar, assuming all other variables remain constant, there would be an equal and opposite impact
on net loss.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 24 – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (continued)
Interest
rate risk is the risk that future cash flows will fluctuate as a result of changes in market interest rates. During the year ended
December 31, 2011, interest rate fluctuations on the Company’s credit facility have no significant impact on its net loss
because the Company had no floating rate debt in place at or during the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company had no interest
rate swaps or financial contracts in place at or during the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
(iii)
|
Commodity Price Risk
|
Commodity
price risk is the risk that the fair value of financial instruments or future cash flows will fluctuate as a result of changes
in commodity prices. Commodity prices for oil and natural gas are impacted by world economic events that dictate the levels of
supply and demand. The Company has attempted to mitigate commodity price risk on its future sales of crude oil through the use
of financial derivative sales contracts.
The following table summarizes the Company’s crude oil
risk management positions at December 31, 2011:
Instrument type
|
Contract Month
|
Volume
|
Price per barrel
|
Western Texas Instrument (“WTI”) Sold Futures
|
February 2012
|
4,000 barrels per
month
|
US$98
|
Western Texas Instrument (“WTI”) Sold Futures
|
March 2012
|
4,000 barrels per
month
|
US$98
|
Western Texas Instrument (“WTI”) Sold Futures
|
April 2012
|
4,000 barrels per
month
|
US$98
|
With respect to the commodity contracts
in place at December 31, 2011, an increase of US$10/barrel in the price of oil, assuming all other variables remain constant,
would have positively impacted income before taxes by approximately $120,000 (2010 - $Nil). A similar decline in commodity prices
would be an equal and opposite impact on income before taxes. The Company had no commodity contracts in place at December 31,
2010.
|
(d)
|
Capital Management Strategy
|
The Company’s policy on capital
management is to maintain a prudent capital structure so as to maintain financial flexibility, preserve access to capital markets,
maintain investor, creditor and market confidence, and to allow the Company to fund future developments. The Company considers
its capital structure to include share capital, cash and cash equivalents, bank line of credit, and working capital. In order
to maintain or adjust capital structure, the Company may from time to time issue shares or enter into debt agreements and adjust
its capital spending to manage current and projected operating cash flows and debt levels.
The Company’s current borrowing
capacity is based on the lender’s review of the Company’s oil and gas reserves. The Company is also subject to various
covenants. Compliance with these covenants is monitored on a regular basis and at December 31, 2011, the Company is in compliance
with all covenants (note 8).
The
Company’s share capital is not subject to any external restrictions.
The Company has not paid or declared any dividends,
nor are any contemplated in the foreseeable future. There have been no changes to the Company’s capital management strategy
during the year ended December 31, 2010.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 25 – TRANSITION TO IFRS
As disclosed in note 2, these consolidated
financial statements represent the Company’s first annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with
IFRS. Previously, the Company prepared its consolidated financial statements in accordance with pre-change over Canadian GAAP
(“previous GAAP”).
The accounting policies in note 2 have
been applied in preparing the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the opening IFRS balance sheet on January 1, 2010.
In preparing the opening IFRS consolidated
balance sheet and the consolidated comparative financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company has adjusted
amounts reported previously in financial statements that were prepared in accordance with previous GAAP.
IFRS 1 requires the presentation of comparative
information as at the January 1, 2010 transition date and subsequent comparative periods as well as the consistent and retrospective
application of IFRS accounting policies. To assist with the transition, IFRS 1 permits certain mandatory and optional exemptions
for first-time adopters to alleviate the retrospective application of all IFRSs.
The accompanying reconciliations present
the adjustments made to the Company’s previous GAAP balance sheet and statement of comprehensive loss to comply with IFRS
1. A summary of the significant accounting policy changes and applicable exemptions are discussed following the reconciliations.
The reconciliations presented include the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as at January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010,
consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 2010, and consolidated statement
of comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2010.
First-Time Adoption Exemptions Applied
The IFRS 1 applicable exemptions and exceptions
applied in the conversion from previous GAAP to IFRS are as follows:
|
i.
|
The Company has elected
not to apply IFRS 3 ‘Business Combinations’
retrospectively to business combinations that applied before
the date of transition (January 1, 2010).
|
|
ii.
|
The Company has elected
not to retrospectively apply IFRS 2 to equity instruments
that were granted and had vested before the Transition
Date (January 1, 2010). As a result of applying this exemption,
the Company will apply the provisions of IFRS 2 only to
all outstanding equity instruments that are unvested as
at the Transition Date to IFRS.
|
|
iii.
|
The Company has elected
to apply the transition provisions in IFRIC 19 ‘Extinguishing
Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments’ as
permitted on first time adoption of IFRS.
|
|
iv.
|
The Company has elected
an IFRS 1 exemption whereby, upon transition to IFRS, its
Canadian oil and gas properties were measured as follows:
|
|
(a)
|
Exploration and evaluation
Canadian assets were reclassified from oil and gas properties
as exploration and evaluation assets at the amount that
was recorded under previous GAAP. Exploration and evaluation
assets on transition are those unproved properties excluded
from the full cost pool under previous GAAP; and
|
|
(b)
|
the remaining balance
of the Canadian oil and gas properties included in the
previous GAAP full cost pool was allocated to CGUs and
components pro-rata using proved plus probable reserve
dollar values.
|
On adoption of IFRS 1, the
Canadian exploration and evaluation assets and oil and gas properties were tested for impairment. The impairment tests compared
the carrying value of the assets to their recoverable amounts. The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to
sell or value in use. There was no impairment charge recognized in the opening deficit at January 1, 2010.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 25 – TRANSITION TO IFRS (continued)
|
v.
|
As a result of applying
the IFRS 1 exemption for Canadian oil and gas assets previously
accounted for under the full cost approach under previous
GAAP, the adjustment for the revaluation of the decommissioning
liability was recognized in opening deficit as at January
1, 2010.
|
|
vi.
|
The Company has elected
to apply the transitional provisions of IAS 23, ‘Borrowing
Costs’ which permits prospective capitalization of
borrowing costs on qualifying assets from the Transition
Date.
|
|
vii.
|
The Company has elected
not to retrospectively separate the liability and equity
components of compound instruments for which the liability
component is no longer outstanding at the date of transition
to IFRS.
|
|
viii.
|
The Company has elected
not to retrospectively apply the requirements for cumulative
translation differences that existed at the date of transition
to IFRS. Therefore the cumulative translation differences
for all foreign operations are deemed to be zero at the
date of transition to IFRS.
|
The remaining IFRS 1 exemptions were not
applicable or material to the presentation of the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at the date of transition to IFRS
on January 1, 2010.
Mandatory
Exceptions
|
i.
|
Derecognition of financial
assets and liabilities
|
The Company has applied the
derecognition requirements in IAS 39, ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’, prospectively from the
transition date. As a result, any non-derivative financial assets or non-derivative financial liabilities derecognized prior to
the transition date in accordance with previous GAAP have not been reviewed for compliance with IAS 39.
The estimates previously made
by the Company under previous GAAP were not revised for the application of IFRS except where necessary to reflect any difference
in accounting policy. As a result, the Company has not used hindsight to revise estimates.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 25 – TRANSITION TO IFRS
(continued)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Reconciliation as at January
1, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
to IFRS
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,732,696
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,732,696
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724,773
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
724,773
|
|
Prepaids and deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,266
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
126,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,583,735
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,583,735
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429,402
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
429,402
|
|
Exploration and evaluation assets
|
|
|
a, b
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,717,545
|
|
|
|
12,717,545
|
|
Uranium properties
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
533,085
|
|
|
|
(533,085
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
a,
b
|
|
|
|
41,339,654
|
|
|
|
(28,086,265
|
)
|
|
|
13,253,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,885,876
|
|
|
|
(15,901,805
|
)
|
|
|
29,984,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank line of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,653,483
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,653,483
|
|
Unrealized financial instrument loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,894
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
99,894
|
|
Loans from related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,345,401
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,345,401
|
|
Warrant liability
|
|
|
f
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,160,858
|
|
|
|
1,160,858
|
|
Flow-through shares liability
|
|
|
g
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
271,033
|
|
|
|
271,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,948,778
|
|
|
|
1,431,891
|
|
|
|
7,380,669
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred leasehold inducement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,913
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
39,913
|
|
Decommissioning liability
|
|
|
c
|
|
|
|
208,516
|
|
|
|
113,988
|
|
|
|
322,504
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,197,207
|
|
|
|
1,545,879
|
|
|
|
7,743,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
|
f, g
|
|
|
|
72,559,504
|
|
|
|
3,250,846
|
|
|
|
75,810,350
|
|
Contributed surplus
|
|
|
e
|
|
|
|
6,614,805
|
|
|
|
258,361
|
|
|
|
6,873,166
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,385,746
|
)
|
|
|
(20,956,891
|
)
|
|
|
(60,342,637
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
d
|
|
|
|
(99,894
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(99,894
|
)
|
Total Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,688,669
|
|
|
|
(17,447,684
|
)
|
|
|
22,240,985
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,885,876
|
|
|
|
(15,901,805
|
)
|
|
|
29,984,071
|
|
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 25 – TRANSITION TO IFRS (continued)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Reconciliation as at December
31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
to IFRS
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,757,525
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,757,525
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
688,626
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
688,626
|
|
Prepaids and deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,738
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
92,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,538,889
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,538,889
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442,261
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
442,261
|
|
Exploration and evaluation assets
|
|
|
a, b
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,257,259
|
|
|
|
10,257,259
|
|
Uranium properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
523,205
|
|
|
|
(523,205
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
a,
b
|
|
|
|
39,850,811
|
|
|
|
(25,675,830
|
)
|
|
|
14,174,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,355,166
|
|
|
|
(15,941,776
|
)
|
|
|
30,413,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bridge loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,800,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,800,000
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,472,746
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,472,746
|
|
Loans from related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Warrant liability
|
|
|
f
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,092,762
|
|
|
|
1,092,762
|
|
Flow-through shares liability
|
|
|
g
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
187,145
|
|
|
|
187,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,522,746
|
|
|
|
1,279,907
|
|
|
|
8,802,653
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred leasehold inducement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,708
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
31,708
|
|
Decommissioning liability
|
|
|
c
|
|
|
|
541,218
|
|
|
|
164,864
|
|
|
|
706,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,095,672
|
|
|
|
1,444,771
|
|
|
|
9,540,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
|
|
f, g
|
|
|
|
75,575,012
|
|
|
|
3,810,871
|
|
|
|
79,385,883
|
|
Contributed surplus
|
|
|
e
|
|
|
|
7,235,106
|
|
|
|
403,503
|
|
|
|
7,638,609
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,550,624
|
)
|
|
|
(20,915,919
|
)
|
|
|
(65,466,543
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
d
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(685,002
|
)
|
|
|
(685,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,259,494
|
|
|
|
(17,386,547
|
)
|
|
|
20,872,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,355,166
|
|
|
|
(15,941,776
|
)
|
|
|
30,413,390
|
|
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
|
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
|
|
NOTE 25 – TRANSITION TO IFRS (continued)
Reconciliation of Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Loss for the Year ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
to IFRS
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,085,627
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,085,627
|
|
Royalties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,311,767
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,311,767
|
)
|
Revenues, net of royalties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,773,860
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,773,860
|
|
Financial instrument gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,922
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
67,922
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,602
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36,602
|
|
Total Revenues and Other
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,878,384
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,878,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating and transportation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,604,666
|
|
|
|
4,223
|
|
|
|
2,608,889
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
b
|
|
|
|
3,423,905
|
|
|
|
(40,639
|
)
|
|
|
3,383,266
|
|
Finance costs
|
|
|
c
|
|
|
|
1,107,426
|
|
|
|
(15,334
|
)
|
|
|
1,092,092
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
e
|
|
|
|
620,301
|
|
|
|
145,142
|
|
|
|
765,443
|
|
Foreign exchange loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,692
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27,692
|
|
Amortization, depletion and impairment losses
|
|
|
a
|
|
|
|
5,227,272
|
|
|
|
(542,405
|
)
|
|
|
4,684,867
|
|
Change in fair value of warrant liability
|
|
|
f
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(68,097
|
)
|
|
|
(68,097
|
)
|
Total Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,011,262
|
|
|
|
(517,110
|
)
|
|
|
12,494,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,132,878
|
)
|
|
|
517,110
|
|
|
|
(5,615,768
|
)
|
Deferred income tax recovery
|
|
|
g
|
|
|
|
968,000
|
|
|
|
(476,137
|
)
|
|
|
491,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,164,878
|
)
|
|
|
40,973
|
|
|
|
(5,123,905
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
d
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(685,002
|
)
|
|
|
(685,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,164,878
|
)
|
|
|
(644,029
|
)
|
|
|
(5,808,907
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.052
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.051
|
)
|
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and
2010
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
NOTE 25 – TRANSITION TO IFRS (continued)
Reconciliation of Consolidated Statement
of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Year ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
to IFRS
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Share Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,559,504
|
|
|
|
3,250,846
|
|
|
|
75,810,350
|
|
Common shares issued for cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,983,508
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,983,508
|
|
Flow through shares liability
|
|
|
g
|
|
|
|
(968,000
|
)
|
|
|
560,025
|
|
|
|
(407,975
|
)
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,575,012
|
|
|
|
3,810,871
|
|
|
|
79,385,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed surplus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,614,805
|
|
|
|
258,361
|
|
|
|
6,873,166
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
e
|
|
|
|
620,301
|
|
|
|
145,142
|
|
|
|
765,443
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,235,106
|
|
|
|
403,503
|
|
|
|
7,638,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,385,746
|
)
|
|
|
(20,956,891
|
)
|
|
|
(60,342,637
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,164,878
|
)
|
|
|
40,973
|
|
|
|
(5,123,905
|
)
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,550,624
|
)
|
|
|
(20,915,918
|
)
|
|
|
(65,466,543
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AOCI(L) *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99,894
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(99,894
|
)
|
Realized financial instrument loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,894
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
99,894
|
|
Unrealized financial instrument loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
d
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(685,002
|
)
|
|
|
(685,002
|
)
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(685,002
|
)
|
|
|
(685,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,259,494
|
|
|
|
(17,386,546
|
)
|
|
|
20,872,947
|
|
* Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and
2010
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
NOTE 25 – TRANSITION TO IFRS
(continued)
Explanatory Notes on the Transition to IFRS:
|
(a)
|
IFRS 6 – ‘Exploration for and
Evaluation of Mineral Resources’, IAS 16 –
‘Property and equipment’ and IAS 38 –
‘Intangible Assets’
|
|
i.
|
Exploration and evaluation (“E&E”)
assets and impairment
|
Under previous GAAP, exploration
and evaluation (“E&E”) costs were capitalized as oil and gas properties in accordance with the full cost accounting
guidelines available to oil and gas companies. Under IFRS, the Company capitalizes these costs initially as E&E assets. Once
technical feasibility and commercial viability of an area has been determined, the capitalized costs are transferred to property
and equipment, subject to an impairment assessment at that time. The technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting
a mineral resource is considered to be determinable when proven reserves are determined to exist. Under IFRS, unrecoverable exploration
and evaluation costs associated with an area and costs incurred prior to obtaining the legal rights to explore an area are expensed.
This did not result in a material difference on transition.
During the twelve months ended
December 31, 2010, the Company transferred $Nil of capitalized exploration and evaluation costs to property and equipment and
expensed $Nil of unsuccessful exploration and evaluation assets.
Under previous GAAP, E&E
assets were included in property and equipment whereas under IFRS, E&E assets are disclosed as a separate class of assets.
At January 1, 2010, the Company reclassified undeveloped land and unproved properties of $12,184,460, with a cost of $30,150,651
and accumulated impairment of $17,966,191, from property and equipment to exploration and evaluation assets. In addition, the
uranium properties of $533,085 were reclassified as exploration and evaluation assets on the date of transition. At December 31,
2010, the transfer was $10,257,259, which included reclassification of uranium properties of $523,205 as E&E assets and exploration
and evaluation capital expenditures in 2010 net of dispositions and impairment charge.
Under previous GAAP, the Company
was required to recognize an impairment loss if the carrying amount exceeds the undiscounted cash flows from proved reserves for
the country cost centre. If an impairment loss was to be recognized, it was then measured at the amount the carrying value exceeds
the sum of the fair value of the proved and probable reserves and the costs of unproved properties. Impairments recognized under
previous GAAP cannot be reversed.
Under IFRS, the Company is
required to recognize and measure an impairment loss if the carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount for a cash-generating
unit (“CGU”). Oil & gas assets are grouped into CGUs based on their ability to generate largely independent cash
flows. Under IFRS, the recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less cost to sell and value in use. Impairment losses, other
than goodwill, can be reversed when there is a subsequent increase in the recoverable amount.
Upon adoption of IFRS, the
Company recognized an additional impairment charge of $14,744,690 in the opening deficit at January 1, 2010, relating to certain
E&E assets in the US. Additional impairment charge of $822,015 was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2010. The impairment
charge was based on the difference between the net book value of the assets and the recoverable amount. The recoverable amount
was determined using the fair value less costs to sell based on the amount for which the asset could be sold in an arm’s
length transaction. Under previous GAAP, these assets were included in the US cost centre ceiling test, which also included oil
and gas development and production assets and was not impaired as at December 31, 2009.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and
2010
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
NOTE 25 – TRANSITION TO IFRS (continued)
|
(a)
|
IFRS 6 – ‘Exploration for and
Evaluation of Mineral Resources’, IAS 16 –
‘Property and equipment’ and IAS 38 –
‘Intangible Assets’ (continued)
|
|
ii.
|
Property and equipment and impairment
|
Under previous GAAP, the Company
applied a two part impairment test to the net carrying amount of oil and gas assets, whereby the first step compared the net carrying
value of the asset to the aggregate of estimated undiscounted future net cash flows from production of proved reserves and the
cost of unproved properties less impairment. If the net carrying value of the oil and gas assets exceeded the amount ultimately
recoverable, the amount of impairment was determined through the performance of the second part of the test. The deficit, if any,
of the discounted estimated future cash flows from proved and probable reserves plus the cost of unproved properties, net of impairment
allowances, less the book value of the related assets was recognized as impairment on properties. Impairments recognized under
previous GAAP were not reversed.
Under IFRS, property and equipment
are aggregated into cash-generating units based on their ability to generate largely independent cash flows. If the carrying value
of the cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount, the cash-generating unit is written down with an impairment loss recognized
in profit or loss. Impairments recognized under IFRS are reversed when there has been a subsequent increase in the recoverable
amount. Impairment reversals are recognized in profit or loss and the carrying amount of the cash-generating unit is increased
to its recoverable amount as if no impairment had been recognized in prior periods.
On applying the IFRS 1 election,
property and equipment were tested for impairment. There was no impairment charge recognized in the accumulated deficit at January
1, 2010. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $360,268. The impairment tests compared
the difference between the January 1, 2010 and the December 31, 2010 net book value of the assets and the recoverable amounts.
The recoverable amount was determined using the fair value less costs to sell based on discounted future cash flows of proved
and probable reserves using forecast prices and costs.
|
iii.
|
Amortization and depletion adjustments
|
Property and equipment as
at January 1, 2010 were determined to be $13,253,389, being the remainder of the full cost pool balance under previous GAAP. For
the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company has property and equipment capital expenditures of $4,472,535, decommissioning provision
of $366,410, accumulated depletion and impairment losses of 3,814,045 and a decrease due to foreign currency translation of $103,308.
Consistent with previous GAAP, these costs are capitalized as property and equipment under IFRS. Under previous GAAP, development
and production costs were depleted on a unit-of-production basis for oil and gas properties for each country cost centre, based
on proved reserves. Under IFRS, these costs are depleted using the unit-of-production method that is now applied on a componentized
basis for each CGU, based on proved and probable reserves. Certain components within a CGU have been combined, where appropriate,
as outlined in note 3. The IFRS 1 exemption permitted the Company to allocate its Canadian development and production costs to
the component level using proved and probable reserve dollar values for each area as at January 1, 2010. The Company allocated
its U.S. development and production costs using the amounts capitalized for each area under previous GAAP on the date of transition.
The Company has also adjusted
amortization and depletion expenses for the comparative period to reflect the revised carrying values of property and equipment.
This resulted in a decrease of $1,724,688 in amortization and depletion expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and
2010
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
NOTE 25 – TRANSITION TO IFRS (continued)
Under Canadian GAAP, proceeds
from the sale of oil and gas properties were deducted from the full cost pool without recognition of a gain or loss unless the
deduction resulted in a change to the country cost centre depletion rate of 20 percent or greater, in which case a gain or loss
was recorded.
Under IFRS, gains or losses
are recorded on divestitures and are calculated as the difference between the proceeds and the net book value of the asset disposed.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recognized a $40,639 net gain on divestitures under IFRS compared to Canadian
GAAP results. Accounting for divestitures under IFRS resulted in a decrease of $40,639 to the Company’s Canadian GAAP net
loss for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
(c)
|
Decommissioning liability adjustments
|
Under previous GAAP, the decommissioning
liability was measured as the estimated fair value of the retirement and decommissioning expenditures expected to be incurred.
Liabilities were not re-measured to reflect period end market discount rates.
Under IFRS, the decommissioning
liability is measured as the best estimate of the expenditure to be incurred and requires that the decommissioning liability be
re-measured using period end market discount rates.
In accordance with IFRS and
the IFRS 1 exemption, the Company has adjusted the decommissioning liability in accordance with IAS 37. This resulted in an increase
of $113,988 to the decommissioning liability and the accumulated deficit as at January 1, 2010, an increase of $164,864 to the
decommissioning liability as at December 31, 2010.
As a result of the change in
the discount rate, accretion expense decreased by $15,334 for the year ended December 31, 2010. In addition, under previous GAAP,
the unwinding of the discount was classified with amortization, depletion and accretion. Under IFRS, the accretion is classified
as finance costs as required. This resulted in the reclassification of accretion expense of $17,168 for the year ended December
31, 2010.
|
(d)
|
Foreign exchange translation
|
In accordance with IFRS transitional
provisions, the Company elected to reset the cumulative translation adjustment, which includes gains and losses arising from the
translation of foreign operations, to zero at the date of transition to IFRS. The cumulative translation adjustment reset was
$1,157,115 with an offsetting increase to opening deficit, as a result of the re-translation of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries’
non-monetary assets and liabilities using the rate of exchange at the balance sheet date versus the applicable historical rate.
Under IFRS, the subsidiaries,
with the exception of Dejour USA, have a functional currency that is the same as the Company. Financial statements of the subsidiary
with a functional currency different from that of the Company are translated into Canadian dollars whereby assets and liabilities
are translated at the rate of exchange at the balance sheet date, revenues and expenses are translated at average monthly exchange
rates, and gains and losses in translation are recognized in the shareholders’ equity section as accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss). Under previous GAAP, foreign exchange gains and losses on the translation of the integrated subsidiary’s
operations were recognized in the statement of comprehensive loss. This change in accounting increased the accumulated other comprehensive
loss by $685,002 for the year ended December 31, 2010.
DEJOUR ENERGY INC.
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 and
2010
(Expressed in Canadian dollars)
NOTE 25 – TRANSITION TO IFRS (continued)
|
(d)
|
Foreign exchange translation (continued)
|
This represents a change in
the translation method compared to previous GAAP for Dejour USA whereby monetary assets and liabilities were translated at the
rate of exchange at the balance sheet date, and non-monetary items were translated at the historical rate applicable on the date
of the transaction giving rise to the non-monetary balance. Revenues and expenses were translated at monthly average exchange
rates and gains or losses in translation were recognized in income as they occurred. Exchange differences recognized in the profit
or loss statement of Dejour USA on the translation of monetary items forming part of the Company’s net investment in foreign
operations were reclassified to foreign exchange reserve on consolidation.
Under previous GAAP, the Company
recognized an expense related to share-based payments on a straight-line basis through the date of full vesting and recognized
forfeitures as they occurred. Under IFRS, the Company is required to recognize the expense over the individual vesting periods
for the graded vesting awards and estimate a forfeiture rate on the date of grant. This increased contributed surplus and increased
the deficit by $258,361 at the date of transition and resulted in an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $145,142
for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
(f)
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
The Company has outstanding
warrants which entitle the holder to acquire a fixed number of common shares for a fixed US dollar price per share. In accordance
with IFRS, an obligation to issue shares for a price that is not fixed in the Company’s functional currency, and that does
not qualify as a rights offering, must be classified as a derivative liability and measured at fair value with changes recognized
in profit or loss as they arise. Under previous GAAP, the warrants were classified as equity and changes in fair value were not
recognized. This change in accounting increased liabilities at January 1, 2010 by $1,161,858 ($1,092,762 at December 31, 2010),
decreased share capital by $963,004 ($963,004 at December 31, 2010) and increased the accumulated deficit by $197,855 at January
1, 2010 ($129,759 at December 31, 2010) and decreased the net loss by $68,096 for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The Company provides certain
share subscribers with a flow-through component for tax incentives available on qualifying Canadian exploration expenditures,
which are renounced by the Company. Under IFRS, on issuance of flow-through shares, the Company bifurcates the flow-through share
into i) a flow-through share premium, equal to the estimated premium, if any, investors pay for the flow-through feature, which
is recognized as a liability and; ii) share capital. Upon the resource property expenditures being incurred, the Company derecognizes
the liability and recognizes a deferred tax liability for the amount of the tax reduction renounced to the shareholders. Under
previous GAAP, the deferred tax liabilities resulting from the renunciation of the qualified expenditures by the Company were
recorded as a reduction of share capital on the date of the renouncement filing. This change in accounting increased liabilities
at January 1, 2010 by $271,033 ($187,145 at December 31, 2010), increased share capital at January 1, 2010 by $4,213,850 ($4,773,875
at December 31, 2010) and increased the accumulated deficit by $4,484,883 at January 1, 2010 ($4,961,020 at December 31, 2010)
and increased the net loss by $476,137 for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
(h)
|
Statement of cash
flows
|
The transition to IFRS did
not result in any significant impact to the Company’s operating, investing and financing cash flows for the year ended December
31, 2010.
SUPPLEMENTARY OIL AND GAS RESERVE ESTIMATION
AND DISCLOSURES – ASC 932 (UNAUDITED)
Select supplementary oil and gas reserve
estimation and disclosure are provided in accordance with U.S. disclosure requirements. The standards of the SEC require that
proved reserves be estimated using existing economic conditions (constant pricing). Based on this methodology, the Company’s
results have been calculated utilizing the 12-month average price for each of the years presented within this supplementary disclosure.
The Company’s 2011 and 2010 financial
results were prepared in accordance with IFRS. As the Company’s IFRS transition date was January 1, 2010, 2009
results were prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP.
The Company reports in Canadian currency
and therefore the Reserves Data pertaining to the Company’s reserves in the United States set forth in the tables below
has been converted to Canadian dollars at the prevailing conversion rate at December 31, 2011. The conversion rate used per Bank
of Canada is 1.0170.
|
(a)
|
Net proved oil and
gas reserves
|
As at December 31, 2011, the Company’s
oil and gas reserves are located in both Canada and the United States.
In 2011, Deloitte & Touche LLP (“AJM
Deloitte” or “AJM”) of Calgary, Alberta, independent petroleum engineering consultants based in Calgary, Alberta
were retained by the Company to evaluate the Canadian properties of the Company. Their report, titled “Reserve Estimation
and Economic Evaluation, Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd.”, is dated March 23, 2012 and has an effective date of December 31,
2011.
The report was originally completed on March 23, 2012 and subsequently updated on October 31,
2012.
In 2010, the Company engaged independent qualified reserve evaluators, GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd. (“GLJ”)
to review the Company’s proved developed and undeveloped oil and gas reserves in Canada.
Gustavson Associates (“Gustavson”),
an independent petroleum engineering consultants based in Denver, Colorado were retained by the Company to evaluate the US properties
of the Company. Their report, titled “
Reserves Estimate and Financial Forecast as to Dejour’s
Interest in the Kokopelli Field Area, Garfield County, Colorado, and the South Rangely Field Area, Rio Blanco County, Colorado”
is dated February 15, 2012 and has an effective date of January 1, 2012. The report was originally completed on February
15, 2012 and subsequently updated on April 5, 2013.
In accordance with applicable securities
laws, AJM Deloitte, and Gustavson Associates (“Gustavson”), have used both constant and forecast prices and costs
in estimating the reserves and future net cash flows contained in their reports. Actual future net cash flows will be affected
by other factors, such as actual production levels, supply and demand for oil and natural gas, curtailments or increases in consumption
by oil and natural gas purchasers, changes in governmental regulation or taxation and the impact of inflation on costs.
The tables in this section set forth oil
and gas information prepared by the Company in accordance with U.S. disclosure standards, including Accounting Standards Codification
932 (“ASC 932”). Reserves have been estimated in accordance with the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s
(“SEC”) definitions and guidelines. The changes in our net proved reserve quantities are outlined below.
Net reserves are Dejour royalty and working
interest remaining reserves, less all Crown, freehold, and overriding royalties and interests that are not owned by Dejour.
Proved reserves are those estimated quantities
of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids that can be estimated with a high degree of certainty to be economically recoverable
under existing economic and operating conditions. It is likely that the actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the
estimated proved reserves.
Proved developed reserves are those reserves
that are expected to be recovered from existing wells and installed facilities or, if facilities have not been installed, that
would involve a low expenditure (e.g. when compared to the cost of drilling a well) to put the reserves on production. Developed
reserves may be subdivided into producing and non-producing.
Proved undeveloped reserves are those
reserves that are expected to be recovered from known accumulations where a significant expenditure (e.g. when compared to the
cost of drilling a well) is required to render them capable of production.
The Company cautions users of this information
as the process of estimating crude oil and natural gas reserves is subject to a level of uncertainty. The reserves are based on
economic and operating conditions; therefore, changes can be made to future assessments as a result of a number of factors, which
can include new technology, changing economic conditions and development activity.
|
(a)
|
CONSTANT PRICES AND
COSTS - YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011
|
Net Proved Developed and
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Light and
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barrels of Oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barrels of Oil
|
|
|
Light and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barrels of Oil
|
|
|
|
Medium Oil
|
|
|
Liquids
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Condensate
|
|
|
Liquids
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Medium Oil
|
|
|
Condensate
|
|
|
Liquids
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(MMcf)
|
|
|
(Mboe)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(MMcf)
|
|
|
(Mboe )
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(MMcf)
|
|
|
(Mboe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
45,308
|
|
|
|
7,877
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
46,244
|
|
|
|
8,204
|
|
Discoveries
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
Extensions *
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Infill Drilling *
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Improved Recovery *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Technical Revisions
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
3,770
|
|
|
|
(5,072
|
)
|
|
|
2,885
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
3,770
|
|
|
|
(5,096
|
)
|
|
|
3,071
|
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Economic Factors
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
3,863
|
|
|
|
41,314
|
|
|
|
11,035
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
3,867
|
|
|
|
42,066
|
|
|
|
11,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
41,156
|
|
|
|
10,995
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
41,156
|
|
|
|
10,995
|
|
Total
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
3,863
|
|
|
|
41,314
|
|
|
|
11,035
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
3,867
|
|
|
|
42,066
|
|
|
|
11,481
|
|
|
*
|
The above
change categories correspond to standards
set out in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation
Handbook. For reporting under NI51-101, reserves
additions under Infill Drilling, reserves
additions under Infill Drilling, Improved
Recovery and Extensions should be combined
and reported as “Extensions and Improved
Recovery”
|
|
(1)
|
Canada
– Increase in Total
Proved Oil Reserves of
190 Mbbls and decrease
in Total Proved Natural
Gas Reserves of 24 MMcf:
|
During
the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company received approval from the British Columbia Oil and Gas Commission to implement
a waterflood pressure maintenance system (“waterflood”) at its Woodrush property in northeastern British Columbia,
Canada. Based on this approval and the Company’s commitment to spend approximately $4,000,000 to implement the waterflood,
AJM Deloitte increased, by way of a technical revision, the Company’s total proved oil reserves by 190 Mbbls. There was
no related increase in natural gas reserves as the impact of the waterflood is not expected to increase recoverable natural gas
reserves. Rather, there is expected to be a decrease in natural gas reserves as the influx of water into the reservoir will replace
some of the natural gas reserves-in-place. This decrease of 24 MMcf has been reflected in the above table.
|
(2)
|
United
States – Increase
in Total Proved Natural
Gas Liquids Reserves
of 3,770 Mbbls:
|
During
the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company amended its method of reporting natural gas liquids to separate them from the Company’s
natural gas reserves and show them separately. This resulted in an increase of 3,770 Mbbls of natural gas liquids and a related
decrease of 5,072MMcf of natural gas.
CONSTANT PRICES AND COSTS - YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2010
Net Proved Developed and
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Light and
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barrels of Oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barrels of Oil
|
|
|
Light and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barrels of Oil
|
|
|
|
Medium Oil
|
|
|
Liquids
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Condensate
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Medium Oil
|
|
|
Condensate
|
|
|
Liquids
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(MMcf)
|
|
|
(Mboe)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(MMcf)
|
|
|
(Mboe)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(MMcf)
|
|
|
(Mboe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
60,197
|
|
|
|
10,430
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
60,950
|
|
|
|
10,657
|
|
Discoveries
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Improved Recovery *
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
63
|
|
Technical Revisions
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(14,889
|
)
|
|
|
(2,553
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(14,235
|
)
|
|
|
(2,372
|
)
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Economic Factors
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Production
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(519
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
45,308
|
|
|
|
7,877
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
46,244
|
|
|
|
8,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
Undeveloped
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
45,308
|
|
|
|
7,877
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
45,289
|
|
|
|
7,966
|
|
Total
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
45,308
|
|
|
|
7,877
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
46,244
|
|
|
|
8,204
|
|
|
*
|
The above
change categories correspond to standards
set out in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation
Handbook. For reporting under NI51-101, reserves
additions under Infill Drilling, reserves
additions under Infill Drilling, Improved
Recovery and Extensions should be combined
and reported as “Extensions and Improved
Recovery”
|
|
(1)
|
Canada
– Increase in Total Proved Natural Gas reserves of 654 MMcf:
|
During the year ended December
31, 2010, improved performance of the gas reservoirs resulted in an increase in natural gas reserves of 654 MMcf.
|
(2)
|
United
States – Decrease in Total Proved Natural Gas reserves of 14,889 MMcf:
|
During the year ended December
31, 2010, a major competitor drilled, completed, and tied-in for production a large number of wells immediately surrounding the
Company’s core development property in the Piceance Basin of Colorado. The new production data from the competitors’
wells caused the Company to revise downward its estimate of recoverable reserves from the Company’s inventory of proved,
undeveloped drilling locations.
As at December 31,
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Per IFRS)
|
|
|
(As Restated under IFRS)
|
|
|
(Per US GAAP)
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
23,149,485
|
|
|
$
|
16,191,797
|
|
|
$
|
17,535,742
|
|
Unproved oil and gas properties
|
|
|
71,552
|
|
|
|
41,060
|
|
|
|
9,047,242
|
|
Total capital costs
|
|
|
23,221,037
|
|
|
|
16,232,857
|
|
|
|
26,582,984
|
|
Accumulated depletion and depreciation
|
|
|
(5,819,933
|
)
|
|
|
(3,453,777
|
)
|
|
|
(7,691,609
|
)
|
Impairment
|
|
|
(1,298,207
|
)
|
|
|
(360,268
|
)
|
|
|
(16,016,752
|
)
|
Net capitalized costs
|
|
$
|
16,102,897
|
|
|
$
|
12,418,812
|
|
|
$
|
2,874,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
4,075,774
|
|
|
$
|
1,695,655
|
|
|
$
|
266,048
|
|
Unproved oil and gas properties
|
|
|
27,772,327
|
|
|
|
27,500,879
|
|
|
|
28,350,076
|
|
Total capital costs
|
|
|
31,848,101
|
|
|
|
29,196,534
|
|
|
|
28,616,124
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
(23,524,342
|
)
|
|
|
(17,807,885
|
)
|
|
|
(500,866
|
)
|
Net capitalized costs
|
|
$
|
8,323,759
|
|
|
$
|
11,388,649
|
|
|
$
|
28,115,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
27,225,259
|
|
|
$
|
17,887,452
|
|
|
$
|
17,801,790
|
|
Unproved oil and gas properties
|
|
|
27,843,879
|
|
|
|
27,541,939
|
|
|
|
37,397,318
|
|
Total capital costs
|
|
|
55,069,138
|
|
|
|
45,429,391
|
|
|
|
55,199,108
|
|
Accumulated depletion and depreciation
|
|
|
(5,819,933
|
)
|
|
|
(3,453,777
|
)
|
|
|
(7,691,609
|
)
|
Impairment
|
|
|
(24,822,549
|
)
|
|
|
(18,168,153
|
)
|
|
|
(16,517,618
|
)
|
Net capitalized costs
|
|
$
|
24,426,656
|
|
|
$
|
23,807,461
|
|
|
$
|
30,989,881
|
|
|
Note:
|
Capitalized
costs were disclosed under US GAAP as
of December 31, 2010 and 2009. Effective
January 1, 2011, the Company has adopted
IFRS. Therefore, 2010 figures were restated
under IFRS.
|
For the years ended December 31
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Per IFRS)
|
|
|
(As Restated under IFRS)
|
|
|
(Per US GAAP)
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property acquisition costs (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
47,158
|
|
|
$
|
10,659
|
|
|
$
|
434,434
|
|
Unproved oil and gas properties
|
|
|
8,548
|
|
|
|
26,601
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exploration costs (2)
|
|
|
32,482
|
|
|
|
60,856
|
|
|
|
1,626,120
|
|
Development costs (3)
|
|
|
6,410,244
|
|
|
|
4,121,724
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
$
|
6,498,432
|
|
|
$
|
4,219,840
|
|
|
$
|
2,060,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property acquisition costs (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
40,143
|
|
|
$
|
14,640
|
|
|
$
|
32,122
|
|
Unproved oil and gas properties
|
|
|
146,062
|
|
|
|
220,937
|
|
|
|
161,770
|
|
Exploration costs (2)
|
|
|
38,287
|
|
|
|
556,347
|
|
|
|
19,186
|
|
Development costs (3)
|
|
|
1,608,585
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
313,577
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
$
|
1,833,077
|
|
|
$
|
791,924
|
|
|
$
|
526,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property acquisition costs (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties
|
|
$
|
87,301
|
|
|
$
|
25,299
|
|
|
$
|
466,556
|
|
Unproved oil and gas properties
|
|
|
154,610
|
|
|
|
247,538
|
|
|
|
161,770
|
|
Exploration costs (2)
|
|
|
70,769
|
|
|
|
617,203
|
|
|
|
1,645,306
|
|
Development costs (3)
|
|
|
8,018,829
|
|
|
|
4,121,724
|
|
|
|
313,577
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
$
|
8,331,509
|
|
|
$
|
5,011,764
|
|
|
$
|
2,587,209
|
|
|
(1)
|
Acquisitions are not net of disposition of properties.
|
|
(2)
|
Geological and geophysical capital expenditures and drilling
costs for exploraton wells drilled
|
|
(3)
|
Includes equipping and facilities capital expenditures
|
|
(d)
|
Results of Operations
of Producing Activities
|
For the years ended December 31
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(IFRS)
|
|
|
(IFRS)
|
|
|
(US GAAP)
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas sales, net of royalties and commodity contracts
|
|
$
|
7,196,464
|
|
|
$
|
6,773,860
|
|
|
$
|
6,216,519
|
|
Operating costs and capital taxes
|
|
|
(1,975,294
|
)
|
|
|
(2,101,046
|
)
|
|
|
(2,503,571
|
)
|
Transportation costs
|
|
|
(507,959
|
)
|
|
|
(507,843
|
)
|
|
|
(411,432
|
)
|
Depletion, depreciation and accretion
|
|
|
(2,392,870
|
)
|
|
|
(3,485,186
|
)
|
|
|
(3,673,382
|
)
|
Income taxes (1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Results of operations
|
|
$
|
2,320,341
|
|
|
$
|
679,785
|
|
|
$
|
(371,866
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas sales, net of royalties and commodity contracts
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Operating costs and capital taxes
|
|
|
(16,227
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Transportation costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Depletion, depreciation and accretion
|
|
|
(10,483
|
)
|
|
|
(7,518
|
)
|
|
|
(9,099
|
)
|
Income taxes (1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Results of operations
|
|
$
|
(26,710
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,518
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,099
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas sales, net of royalties and commodity contracts
|
|
$
|
7,196,464
|
|
|
$
|
6,773,860
|
|
|
$
|
6,216,519
|
|
Lease operating costs and capital taxes
|
|
|
(1,991,521
|
)
|
|
|
(2,101,046
|
)
|
|
|
(2,503,571
|
)
|
Transportation costs
|
|
|
(507,959
|
)
|
|
|
(507,843
|
)
|
|
|
(411,432
|
)
|
Depletion, depreciation and accretion
|
|
|
(2,403,353
|
)
|
|
|
(3,492,704
|
)
|
|
|
(3,682,481
|
)
|
Income taxes (1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Results of operations
|
|
$
|
2,293,631
|
|
|
$
|
672,267
|
|
|
$
|
(380,965
|
)
|
|
(1)
|
Dejour
is currently not taxable.
|
|
(e)
|
Standardized Measure
of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows and Changes Therein
|
The standardized measure of discounted
future net cash flows is based on estimates made by AJM Deloitte (2010 by GLJ) and Gustavson of net proved reserves. Future cash
inflows are computed based on the average of the first day constant prices in each of the 12 months for the year ended December
31, 2011 and cost assumptions applied against annual future production from proved crude oil and natural gas reserves. Future
development and production costs are computed based on the average of the first day constant prices in each of the 12 months for
the year ended December 31, 2011 and assume the continuation of existing economic conditions. Future income taxes are calculated
by applying statutory income tax rates. The Company is currently not taxable. The standardized measure of discounted future net
cash flows is computed using a 10 percent discount factor.
The Company cautions users of this information
that the discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves are neither an indication of the fair market
value of our oil and gas properties, nor of the future net cash flows expected to be generated from such properties. The discounted
future cash flows do not include the fair market value of exploratory properties and probable or possible oil and gas reserves,
nor is consideration given to the effect of anticipated future changes in crude oil and natural gas prices, development, asset
retirement and production costs and possible changes to tax and royalty regulations. The prescribed discount rate of 10 percent
is arbitrary and may not appropriately reflect future interest rates.
Standardized Measure of Discounted
Future Net Cash Flows
As at December 31, 2011
(in thousands of Canadian dollars)
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash from revenues after royalties
|
|
$
|
32,005
|
|
|
$
|
298,776
|
|
|
$
|
330,781
|
|
Future production costs
|
|
|
(10,900
|
)
|
|
|
(72,833
|
)
|
|
|
(83,733
|
)
|
Future development costs
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
(88,377
|
)
|
|
|
(88,527
|
)
|
Future income taxes
|
|
|
(931
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(931
|
)
|
Future net cash flows
|
|
|
20,024
|
|
|
|
137,566
|
|
|
|
157,590
|
|
Less: 10% annual discount factor
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
|
(104,104
|
)
|
|
|
(105,669
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flow
|
|
$
|
18,459
|
|
|
$
|
33,462
|
|
|
$
|
51,921
|
|
As at December 31, 2010
(in thousands of Canadian dollars)
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash from revenues after royalties
|
|
$
|
15,777
|
|
|
$
|
228,318
|
|
|
$
|
244,095
|
|
Future production costs
|
|
|
(8,833
|
)
|
|
|
(44,116
|
)
|
|
|
(52,949
|
)
|
Future development costs
|
|
|
(3,172
|
)
|
|
|
(79,711
|
)
|
|
|
(82,883
|
)
|
Future income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(15,982
|
)
|
|
|
(15,982
|
)
|
Future net cash flows
|
|
|
3,772
|
|
|
|
88,509
|
|
|
|
92,281
|
|
Less: 10% annual discount factor
|
|
|
(841
|
)
|
|
|
(62,561
|
)
|
|
|
(63,402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flow
|
|
$
|
2,931
|
|
|
$
|
25,948
|
|
|
$
|
28,879
|
|
|
(f)
|
Changes in Standardized
Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
(in thousands of Canadian dollars)
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Value At 10%, January 1, 2011
|
|
$
|
2,931
|
|
|
$
|
25,948
|
|
|
$
|
28,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs
|
|
|
(4,713
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,713
|
)
|
Net changes in prices, production costs and royalties
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
(25,191
|
)
|
|
|
(22,048
|
)
|
Extensions, discovery, less related costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
840
|
|
Development costs incurred during the period
|
|
|
6,410
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,410
|
|
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net change in income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Changes resuling from technical revisions and others
|
|
|
10,688
|
|
|
|
31,865
|
|
|
|
42,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Value At 10%, December 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
18,459
|
|
|
$
|
33,462
|
|
|
$
|
51,921
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
(in thousands of Canadian dollars)
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Value At 10%, January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,113
|
|
|
$
|
14,272
|
|
|
$
|
16,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs
|
|
|
(4,169
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,169
|
)
|
Net changes in prices, production costs and royalties
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
13,548
|
|
|
|
14,807
|
|
Extensions, discovery, less related costs
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
Development costs incurred during the period
|
|
|
3,179
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,179
|
|
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
|
|
1,565
|
|
|
|
(1,106
|
)
|
|
|
459
|
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Net change in income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,927
|
)
|
|
|
(766
|
)
|
|
|
(2,693
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Value At 10%, December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
2,931
|
|
|
$
|
25,948
|
|
|
$
|
28,879
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Articles (1)
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Notice of Articles (1)
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Certificate of Continuation
(1)
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Notice of Alteration (1)
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Certificate of Name Change (1)
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Amendment to Articles to Include Special Rights
(1)
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Participation Agreement between the Registrant,
Retamco Operating, Inc. and Brownstone Ventures (US) dated July 14, 2006(3)
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between the Registrant,
Retamco Operating, Inc., and Brownstone Ventures (US) Inc. dated June 17, 2008 (4)
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Loan Agreement between DEAL and HEC dated May
15, 2008 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Loan Agreement between the Company and HEC dated
August 11, 2008 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Loan Agreement between the Company and HEC dated
June 22, 2009 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Loan Agreement between
the
Company and Brownstone Ventures (US) Inc. dated June 22, 2009 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between
the Registrant and Pengrowth Corporation dated April 17, 2009 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between
the Registrant and John James Robinson dated June 10, 2009 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between
the Registrant and C.U. YourOilRig Corp. dated June 15, 2009 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between
the Registrant and Woodrush Energy Partners LLC dated July 8, 2009 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between
the Registrant and RockBridge Energy Inc. dated July 31, 2009 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between
the Registrant and HEC dated December 31, 2009 (5)
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
Loan Agreement between the Registrant
and Toscana Capital Corporation dated February 19, 2010 (6)
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
Amended Loan Agreement between
the Registrant and Toscana Capital Corporation dated September 1, 2010 (6)
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
Credit Facility Agreement between
DEAL and Canadian Western Bank dated August 3, 2011 (7)
|
|
|
|
4.16
|
|
Credit Facility Renewal Letter
between DEAL and Canadian Western Bank dated December 29, 2011 (7)
|
|
|
|
4.17
|
|
Option Plan (1)
|
|
|
|
4.18
|
|
Option Plan (Sub-Plan) (1)
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries (7)
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Certification of CEO Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a)*
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a)*
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Certification of CEO
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350*
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
Certification of CFO Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350*
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
Consent of BDO Canada LLP*
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
Letter from Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton
Labonte LLP (7)
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
Consent Letter from AJM Deloitte,
LLP*
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
Consent Letter from Gustavson
Associates*
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
Consent Letter from GLJ Petroleum
Consultants Ltd. (7)
|
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Reserve Estimation and Economic
Evaluation of Dejour’s Canadian Oil and Gas Properties Prepared by AJM Deloitte, Effective December 31, 2011*
|
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
Reserve Estimate and Financial Forecast
as to Dejour’s Interests in the Kokopelli
Field Area, Garfield County, Colorado, and the South
Rangely Field Area, Rio
Blanco County, Colorado Prepared by Gustavson Associates,
Effective January 1, 2012*
|
|
|
|
99.3
|
|
Reserves Assessment and Evaluation
of Dejour’s Canadian Oil and Gas Properties Prepared by GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd., Effective December 31, 2010
(7)
|
|
(1)
|
Incorporated by reference to
the Registrant’s registration statement on Form S-8, filed
with the commission on February 16, 2012.
|
|
(2)
|
Incorporated by reference to
the Registrant’s annual report on Form 20-F, filed July
14, 2006.
|
|
(3)
|
Incorporated by reference to
the Registrant’s annual report on Form 20-F/A amendment
no. 2, filed December 7, 2007.
|
|
(4)
|
Incorporated by reference to
the Registrant’s annual report on Form 20-F, filed on June
30, 2009.
|
|
(5)
|
Incorporated by reference to
the Registrant’s annual report on Form 20-F, filed on June
30, 2010.
|
|
(6)
|
Incorporated by reference to
the Registrant’s annual report on Form 20-F, filed on June
30, 2011.
|
Exhibit 12.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Robert L. Hodgkinson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report
on Form 20-F of Dejour Energy Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The company’s other certifying
officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change
in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s
auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Date: June 4,
2013
|
|
/s/ Robert L. Hodgkinson
|
|
|
Robert
L. Hodgkinson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer
|
Exhibit 12.2
CERTIFICATION
I,
David Matheson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report
on Form 20-F of Dejour Energy Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The company’s other certifying
officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change
in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s
auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Date:
June 4, 2013
|
|
/s/ David Matheson
|
|
|
David Matheson
Chief Financial Officer
Principal Accounting and Financial
Officer
|
Exhibit 13.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
In connection with the annual report of
Dejour Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Hodgkinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in
this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
/s/ Robert Hodgkinson
|
|
Robert Hodgkinson
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
June 4, 2013
|
A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350
and is not being filed as part of the annual report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 13.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
In connection with the annual report
of Dejour Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Matheson, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in
this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
/s/ David
Matheson
|
|
David
Matheson
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Principal Accounting and
Financial Officer
|
|
June 4, 2013
|
A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350
and is not being filed as part of the annual report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 99.1
Dejour Energy
(Alberta) Ltd.
Reserve estimation and
economic evaluation
Executive summary
SEC Compliant
Effective date: December 31, 2011
|
700, 850 – 2 Street SW
|
|
Calgary AB T2P 0R8
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
Tel: 403-267-1700
|
|
Fax: 587-774-5398
|
|
www.deloitte.ca
|
October 31, 2012
Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd.
2600, 144 – 4
th
Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 3N4
Attention: Mr. Harrison (Hal) Blacker
RE:
|
Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd.
|
|
Reserve estimation and economic evaluation
|
At your request and authorization, Deloitte & Touche LLP
(“AJM Deloitte”) has prepared an independent evaluation of certain oil and gas assets of Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd.
(“Dejour Alberta”), effective December 31, 2011.
This report has been prepared for the use of Dejour Energy
(Alberta) Ltd. for corporate reporting purposes and AJM Deloitte hereby gives its consent to the use of its name and to the said
estimates for reporting in the United States. The evaluation was conducted in the months of January and February 2012; field information
obtained subsequent to the effective date was not used in the evaluation.
Pursuant to the requirements of Item 1202 (a) (8) of Regulation
S-K, this report documents the results of the evaluation with the following table summarizing the corporate reserves and value:
|
·
|
Table 1 –
summary of corporate
reserves and value
using constant
prices and costs
(in Canadian dollars).
|
The proportion of the Company’s total reserves represented
by the reserves included in this report is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company net proved reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
Proportion of
|
|
Location of reserves
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Condensate
|
|
|
NGL
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Oil Eq.
|
|
Country
|
|
Area
|
|
(MMcf)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(Mbbl)
|
|
|
(MBoe)
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
Canada
|
|
Alberta/British
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Columbia
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Total Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,482
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Notes:
|
(1)
|
Natural gas is converted to oil equivalent using a factor of
6,000 cubic feet of gas per one barrel of oil equivalent.
|
|
(2)
|
DejourAlberta
has indicated that these totals represent
100% of its Canadian interests as of
December 31, 2011.
|
Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd.
Reserve estimation and economic evaluation
Page 2
The oil and gas reserves calculations and income projections,
upon which this report is based, were estimated in accordance with the SEC’s Regulation S-X Part 210.4-10(a). AJM Deloitte
used all methods and procedures it considered necessary under the circumstances to prepare the report. The Evaluation procedure
section included in this report details the reserves definitions, price and market demand forecasts and general procedure used
by AJM Deloitte in its determination of this evaluation and are appropriate for the purposes served by the report. In accordance
with SEC requirements all prices and costs (capital and operating) were held constant. Constant prices were based on an average
of market prices posted at or near the first of each month from January to December 2011. The extent and character of ownership
and all factual data supplied by Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd. were accepted as presented (see Representation Letter attached within).
A field inspection and environmental/safety assessment of the properties was not made by AJM Deloitte and the consultant makes
no representations and accepts no responsibilities in this regards.
This report contains forward looking statements including expectations
of future production and capital expenditures. Possible changes to the current government regulations may cause volumes of proved
reserves actually recovered to differ significantly from the estimated quantities. Information concerning reserves may also be
deemed to be forward looking as estimates imply that the reserves described can be profitably produced in the future. These statements
are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties, which could cause the actual results to differ
from those anticipated. These risks include, but are not limited to: the underlying risks of the oil and gas industry (i.e. operational
risks in development, exploration and production; potential delays or changes in plans with respect to exploration or development
projects or capital expenditures; the uncertainty of reserves estimates; the uncertainty of estimates and projections relating
to production, costs and expenses, political and environmental factors), and commodity price and exchange rate fluctuation. Present
values for various discount rates documented in this report may not necessarily represent fair market value of the reserves.
A Boe conversion ratio of six (6) Mcf: one (1) barrel has been
used within this report. This conversion ratio is based on an energy equivalency conversion method primarily applicable at the
burner tip and does not represent a value equivalency at the wellhead.
Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd. (“Dejour Alberta”)
is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dejour Energy Inc. (“Dejour” or “the Company”). The Company makes periodic
filings on Form 20-F under the 1934 Exchange Act. Furthermore, the Company has certain registration statements filed with the
SEC under the 1933 Securities Act which any subsequently filed Form 20-F is incorporated by reference. We have consented to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-X of the Company to the reference to our name as well as to
the reference to our third party report for the Company which appears in the December 31, 2011 annual report on Form 20-F of filings
made under the SEC by The Company.
Yours truly,
Original signed by: “Robin G. Bertram”
Robin G. Bertram, P. Eng.
Partner
Deloitte & Touche LLP
/ct
TABLE 1
Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd.
DETAILED ECONOMIC
SUMMARY
AJM Deloitte SEC December 1 2011 Constant
Pricing (CAD)
Effective December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDP
|
|
|
PDNP
|
|
|
PUD
|
|
|
TP
|
|
Light and Medium Oil
|
|
Mbbl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
530.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
530.0
|
|
WI Before Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
WI After Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
Royalty Interest
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Total Net
|
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Oil
|
|
Mbbl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
530.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
530.0
|
|
WI Before Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
WI After Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
Royalty Interest
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Total Net
|
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Gas
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
1,349.1
|
|
|
|
248.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,597.8
|
|
WI Before Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
987.2
|
|
|
|
74.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,061.8
|
|
WI After Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
691.8
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
752.0
|
|
Royalty Interest
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Total Net
|
|
|
|
|
691.8
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
752.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGLs
|
|
Mbbl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
WI Before Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
WI After Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Royalty Interest
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Total Net
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBOE
|
|
Mboe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
758.4
|
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
808.4
|
|
WI Before Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
564.7
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
579.6
|
|
WI After Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
434.7
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
446.3
|
|
Royalty Interest
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Total Net
|
|
|
|
|
434.7
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
446.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Present Values - BTAX
|
|
M$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undiscounted
|
|
|
|
|
20,822.0
|
|
|
|
132.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
20,954.8
|
|
Discounted at 5%
|
|
|
|
|
19,954.8
|
|
|
|
106.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
20,061.2
|
|
Discounted at 10%
|
|
|
|
|
19,161.5
|
|
|
|
85.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
19,246.9
|
|
Discounted at 15%
|
|
|
|
|
18,438.4
|
|
|
|
68.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
18,506.8
|
|
Discounted at 20%
|
|
|
|
|
17,779.8
|
|
|
|
54.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
17,834.4
|
|
Light & Medium Oil includes Shale Oil. Heavy Oil Includes
Ultra Heavy in Alberta and Bitumen. Sales Gas includes Solution gas, Associated and Non- Associated gas, Coalbed Methane, Shale
gas and Hydrates.
© Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
Independent petroleum consultants consent
The undersigned firm of Independent Qualified
Reserves Evaluators and Auditors of Calgary, Alberta, Canada has prepared an independent evaluation of reserves and future net
revenues derived therefrom, of the Petroleum and Natural Gas assets of the interests of Dejour Energy (Alberta) Inc. These reserves
and future net revenues were estimated using prior 12 month average constant prices and costs (before and after income taxes)
according to the requirements of SEC’s Regulation S-X, Part 210.4-10 (a). The effective date of this evaluation is December
31, 2011.
In the course of the evaluation, Dejour
Energy (Alberta) Inc. provided AJM Deloitte personnel with basic information which included land, well and accounting (product
prices and operating costs) information; reservoir and geological studies, estimates of on-stream dates for certain properties,
contract information, budget forecasts and financial data. Other engineering, geological or economic data required to conduct
the evaluation and upon which this report is based, were obtained from public records, other operators and from AJM Deloitte non
confidential files. The extent and character of ownership and accuracy of all factual data supplied for the independent evaluation,
from all sources, has been accepted.
A “Representation Letter”
dated March 21, 2012 and signed by two Directors was received from Dejour Energy (Alberta) Inc. prior to the finalization of this
report. This letter specifically addressed the accuracy, completeness and materiality of all the data and information that was
supplied to us during the course of our evaluation of Dejour Energy (Alberta) Inc.’s reserves and net present values. This
letter is included within.
A field inspection and environmental/safety
assessment of the properties was beyond the scope of the engagement of AJM Deloitte and none was carried out. The “Representation
Letter” received from Dejour Energy (Alberta) Inc. provided assurance that no additional information necessary for the completion
of our assignment would have been obtained by a field inspection.
The accuracy of any reserve and production
estimates is a function of the quality and quantity of available data and of engineering interpretation and judgment. While reserve
and production estimates presented herein are considered reasonable, the estimates should be accepted with the understanding that
reservoir performance subsequent to the date of the estimate may justify revision, either upward or downward.
Revenue projections presented in this
report are subject to uncertainties and may in future differ materially from the forecasts herein. Present values of future net
revenues documented in this report do not necessarily represent the fair market value of the reserves evaluated herein.
PERMIT
TO PRACTICE
|
|
|
|
Deloitte
|
|
Permit Number: P-11444
|
|
|
|
The Association of Professional
Engineers
|
|
and
Geoscientists of Alberta
|
|
Certificate of qualification
I, R. G. Bertram, a Professional Engineer,
of 700, 850 – 2
nd
Street S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada hereby certify that:
|
1.
|
I am an associate partner of
Deloitte & Touche LLP (“AJM Deloitte”), which
did prepare an evaluation of certain oil and gas assets of the
interests of Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd. The effective date
of this evaluation is December 31, 2011.
|
|
2.
|
I do not have, nor do I expect
to receive any direct or indirect interest in the properties
evaluated in this report or in the securities of Dejour Energy
(Alberta) Ltd.
|
|
3.
|
I attended the University of
Alberta and graduated with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Petroleum
Engineering in 1985; that I am a Registered Professional Engineer
in the Province of Alberta; and I have in excess of twenty six
years of engineering experience.
|
|
4.
|
I am a Qualified Reserves Auditor
as defined in the Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook, Volume
1, Section 3.2.
|
|
5.
|
A personal field inspection of
the properties was not made; however, such an inspection was
not considered necessary in view of information available from
the files of the interest owners of the properties and the appropriate
provincial regulatory authorities.
|
|
Original signed by: “R. G. Bertram”
|
|
R. G. Bertram, P. Eng.
|
|
|
|
March 16, 2012
|
|
Date
|
Certificate of qualification
I, L. G. Mitchell, a Professional Engineer, of 700, 850 –
2
nd
Street S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada hereby certify that:
|
1.
|
I am an employee of Deloitte
& Touche LLP (“AJM Deloitte”), which did prepare
an evaluation of certain oil and gas assets of the interests
of Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd. The effective date of this evaluation
is December 31, 2011.
|
|
2.
|
I do not have, nor do I expect
to receive any direct or indirect interest in the properties
evaluated in this report or in the securities of Dejour Energy
(Alberta) Ltd.
|
|
3.
|
I attended the University of
Calgary and graduated with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Chemical
Engineering in 2008; that I am a Registered Professional Engineer
in the Province of Alberta; and I have in excess of four years
of engineering experience.
|
|
4.
|
A personal field inspection of
the properties was not made; however, such an inspection was
not considered necessary in view of information available from
the files of the interest owners of the properties and the appropriate
provincial regulatory authorities.
|
|
Original signed by: “L. G. Mitchell”
|
|
L. G. Mitchell, P. Eng.
|
|
|
|
March 16, 2012
|
|
Date
|
Certificate of qualification
I, I. J. Olsen, a Professional Engineer,
of 700, 850 – 2
nd
Street Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada hereby certify that:
|
1.
|
I am an employee of Deloitte
& Touche LLP (“AJM Deloitte”), which did prepare
an evaluation of certain oil and gas assets of the interests
of Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd. The effective date of this evaluation
is December 31, 2011.
|
|
2.
|
I do not have, nor do I expect
to receive any direct or indirect interest in the properties
evaluated in this report or in the securities of Dejour Energy
(Alberta) Ltd.
|
|
3.
|
I attended the University of
Alberta and graduated with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Chemical
Engineering in 2007; that I am a Registered Professional Engineer
in the Province of Alberta; and I have in excess of four years
of engineering experience.
|
|
4.
|
A personal field inspection of
the properties was not made; however, such an inspection was
not considered necessary in view of information available from
the files of the interest owners of the properties and the appropriate
provincial regulatory authorities.
|
|
Original signed by: “I. J. Olsen”
|
|
I. J. Olsen, P. Eng.
|
|
|
|
March 16, 2012
|
|
Date
|
Certificate of qualification
I, D. E. Yee, a Professional Engineer,
of 700, 850 – 2
nd
Street Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada hereby certify that:
|
1.
|
I am an employee of Deloitte
& Touche LLP (“AJM Deloitte”), which did prepare
an evaluation of certain oil and gas assets of the interests
of Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd. The effective date of this evaluation
is December 31, 2011.
|
|
2.
|
I do not
have, nor do I expect to receive any direct
or indirect interest in the properties evaluated
in this report or in the securities of Dejour
Energy (Alberta) Ltd.
|
|
3.
|
I attended the University of
Calgary and graduated with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical
Engineering in 1992; that I am a Registered Professional Engineer
in the Province of Alberta; and I have in excess of fourteen
years of engineering experience.
|
|
4.
|
A personal field inspection of
the properties was not made; however, such an inspection was
not considered necessary in view of information available from
the files of the interest owners of the properties and the appropriate
provincial regulatory authorities.
|
|
Original signed by: “David E. Yee”
|
|
D. E. Yee, P. Eng.
|
|
|
|
March 16, 2012
|
|
Date
|
Certificate of qualification
I, L. D. Boyd, a Registered Professional Geologist, of 700,
850 – 2
nd
Street S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada hereby certify that:
|
1.
|
I am an employee of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“AJM
Deloitte”), which did prepare an evaluation of certain
oil and gas assets of the interests of Dejour Energy (Alberta)
Ltd. The effective date of this evaluation is December 31, 2011.
|
|
2.
|
I do not have, nor do I expect to receive any direct or indirect
interest in the properties evaluated in this report or in the
securities of Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd.
|
|
3.
|
I attended the University of Calgary and graduated with a
Bachelor of Science Degree in Geology in 1976; that I am a Registered
Professional Geologist in the Province of Alberta; and I have
in excess of thirty five years of geological experience.
|
|
4.
|
A personal field inspection of the properties was not made;
however, such an inspection was not considered necessary in view
of information available from the files of the interest owners
of the properties and the appropriate provincial regulatory authorities.
|
|
Original signed by: “L.
D. Boyd”
|
|
L. D. Boyd, P. Geol.
|
|
|
|
March 16, 2012
|
|
Date
|
Certificate of qualification
I, K. White, a Professional Geologist, of 700, 850 –
2
nd
Street S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada hereby certify that:
|
1.
|
I am an employee of Deloitte
& Touche LLP (“AJM Deloitte”), which company
did prepare an evaluation of certain oil and gas assets of the
interests of Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd. The effective date
of this evaluation is December 31, 2011.
|
|
2.
|
I do not have, nor do I expect
to receive any direct or indirect interest in the properties
evaluated in this report or in the securities of Dejour Energy
(Alberta) Ltd.
|
|
3.
|
I attended the University of
Manitoba and graduated with a Bachelor of Science Degree in Geology
in 1981; that I am a Registered Professional Geologist in the
Province of Alberta; and I have in excess of thirty years of
geological experience.
|
|
4.
|
A personal field inspection of
the properties was not made; however, such an inspection was
not considered necessary in view of information available from
the files of the interest owners of the properties and the appropriate
provincial regulatory authorities.
|
|
Original signed by: “K. White”
|
|
K. White, P. Geol.
|
|
|
|
March 16, 2012
|
|
Date
|
|
Dejour Energy
(Alberta) Ltd.
A subsidiary of Dejour Energy
Inc.
2600,
144 4
th
Avenue SW
Calgary,
AB T2P 3N4
P:
(403) 266-3825
F: (403) 470-7520
|
March
21, 2012
AJM
Deloitte
East
Tower, Fifth Avenue Place
6
th
Floor, 425 – l
st
Street S.W.
Calgary,
Alberta
T2P 3L8
|
Re:
|
Standard Representation
Letter
|
|
|
Corporate Reserve Evaluation
|
Regarding
the evaluation of our Company’s oil and gas reserves and independent appraisal of the economic value of these reserves effective
December 31, 2011 (the “effective date”), we herein confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief as of the effective
date of the reserves evaluation, the following representations and information made to you during the course and conduct of the
evaluation.
|
1.
|
We (the “Client”)
have made available to you (the “Evaluator”) certain
records, information and data relating to the evaluated properties
that we confirm is, with the exception of immaterial items,
complete and accurate as of the effective date of the reserves
evaluation including the following:
|
|
a.
|
accounting, financial and
contractual data
|
|
b.
|
asset ownership and related
encumbrance information
|
|
c.
|
details concerning product
marketing, transportation and processing arrangement
|
|
d.
|
all technical information
including geological, engineering and production and test
data
|
|
e.
|
estimates of future abandonment
and reclamation costs.
|
|
2.
|
We confirm that all financial
and accounting information provided to you is, to the best of
our knowledge, both on an individual entity basis and in total,
entirely consistent with that reported by our Company for public
disclosure and annual audit purposes.
|
|
3.
|
We confirm that our Company
has satisfactory title to all of the assets, whether tangible,
intangible or otherwise, for which accurate and current ownership
information has been provided.
|
|
4.
|
With respect to all information
provided to you regarding product marketing, transportation
and processing arrangements, we confirm that we have disclosed
to you all anticipated changes, terminations and additions to
these arrangements that could reasonably be expected to have
a material impact on the evaluation of our Company’s reserves
and future net revenues.
|
|
5.
|
With the possible exception
of items of an immaterial nature, we confirm as of the effective
date of the evaluation that:
|
|
a.
|
For all operated properties
that you have evaluated, no changes have occurred or are
reasonably expected to occur to the operating conditions
or methods that have been used by our Company over the
past twelve (12) months, except as disclosed to you. In
the case of non-operated properties, we have advised you
of any changes of which we have been made aware.
|
|
b.
|
This letter provides assurance
that no additional information necessary for the completion
of your assignment would have been obtained by a field
inspection.
|
|
Dejour Energy
(Alberta) Ltd.
A subsidiary of Dejour Energy
Inc.
2600,
144 4
th
Avenue SW
Calgary,
AB T2P 3N4
P:
(403) 266-3825
F: (403) 470-7520
|
|
c.
|
All regulatory approvals,
permits and licenses required to allow continuity of future
operations and production from the evaluated properties
are in place and, except as disclosed to you, there are
no directives, orders, penalties or regulatory rulings
in effect or expected to come into effect relating to the
evaluated properties.
|
|
d.
|
Except as disclosed to
you, the producing trend and status of each evaluated well
or entity in effect throughout the three month period preceding
the effective date of the evaluation are consistent with
those that existed for the same well or entity immediately
prior to this period.
|
|
e.
|
Except as disclosed to
you, we have no plans or intentions related to the ownership,
development or operation of the evaluated properties that
could reasonably be expected to materially affect the production
levels or recovery of reserves from the evaluated properties.
|
|
f.
|
If material changes of
an adverse nature occur in the Company’s operating
performance subsequent to the effective date and prior
to the report date, we will undertake to inform you of
such material changes prior to requesting your approval
for any public disclosure of reserves information.
|
|
g.
|
Between
the effective date of the report and the date of this letter,
nothing has come to our attention that has materially affected
or could materially affect our reserves and the economic
value of these reserves that has not been disclosed to
you.
|
Yours truly,
/s/
Harrison F. Blacker
|
|
/s/
Mathew Wong
|
Harrison
F. Blacker
|
|
Mathew
Wong
|
Director
|
|
Director
|
Table of contents
Executive summary
|
|
|
|
·
Property
location map
|
|
·
AJM
Deloitte SEC December 1, 2011 Constant pricing (CAD)
|
|
·
Corporate
summary
|
|
·
Property
summary tables
|
|
|
|
Economics
|
|
|
|
·
AJM
Deloitte SEC December 1, 2011 constant price (CAD)
|
|
|
|
Evaluation procedure
|
|
|
|
Effective date: December 31, 2011
|
|
© Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities.
Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd.
DETAILED ECONOMIC SUMMARY
AJM Deloitte SEC December 1 2011 Constant
Pricing (CAD)
Effective December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDP
|
|
|
|
PDNP
|
|
|
|
PUD
|
|
|
|
TP
|
|
Light and Medium Oil
|
|
Mbbl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
530.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
530.0
|
|
WI Before Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
WI After Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
Royalty Interest
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Total Net
|
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Oil
|
|
Mbbl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
530.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
530.0
|
|
WI Before Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
WI After Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
Royalty Interest
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Total Net
|
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Gas
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
1,349.1
|
|
|
|
248.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,597.8
|
|
WI Before Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
987.2
|
|
|
|
74.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,061.8
|
|
WI After Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
691.8
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
752.0
|
|
Royalty Interest
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Total Net
|
|
|
|
|
691.8
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
752.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGLs
|
|
Mbbl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
WI Before Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
WI After Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Royalty Interest
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Total Net
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBOE
|
|
Mboe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
758.4
|
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
808.4
|
|
WI Before Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
564.7
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
579.6
|
|
WI After Royalty
|
|
|
|
|
434.7
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
446.3
|
|
Royalty Interest
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Total Net
|
|
|
|
|
434.7
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
446.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Present Values - BTAX
|
|
M$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undiscounted
|
|
|
|
|
20,822.0
|
|
|
|
132.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
20,954.8
|
|
Discounted at 5%
|
|
|
|
|
19,954.8
|
|
|
|
106.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
20,061.2
|
|
Discounted at 10%
|
|
|
|
|
19,161.5
|
|
|
|
85.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
19,246.9
|
|
Discounted at 15%
|
|
|
|
|
18,438.4
|
|
|
|
68.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
18,506.8
|
|
Discounted at 20%
|
|
|
|
|
17,779.8
|
|
|
|
54.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
17,834.4
|
|
Light & Medium Oil includes Shale Oil. Heavy Oil Includes
Ultra Heavy in Alberta and Bitumen. Sales Gas includes Solution gas, Associated and Non- Associated gas, Coalbed Methane, Shale
gas and Hydrates.
© Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd.
DETAILED RESERVES AND PRESENT VALUE
AJM Deloitte SEC December 1 2011 Constant
Pricing (CAD)
Canada
Effective December
31, 2011
|
|
Proved
Developed Producing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
Sales
Gas
|
|
|
NGL
|
|
|
BOE
|
|
|
Present
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Int Category
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
15%
|
|
Location
|
|
Formation
|
|
%
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alberta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abandonments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-517.9
|
|
|
|
-390.0
|
|
|
|
-300.3
|
|
Alberta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-517.9
|
|
|
|
-390.0
|
|
|
|
-300.3
|
|
British
Columbia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drake/Woodrush
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
987.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
691.8
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
564.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
434.7
|
|
|
|
20,472.8
|
|
|
|
19,551.6
|
|
|
|
18,738.8
|
|
British
Columbia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
987.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
691.8
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
564.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
434.7
|
|
|
|
20,472.8
|
|
|
|
19,551.6
|
|
|
|
18,738.8
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
987.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
691.8
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
564.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
434.7
|
|
|
|
19,954.8
|
|
|
|
19,161.5
|
|
|
|
18,438.4
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
987.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
691.8
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
564.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
434.7
|
|
|
|
19,954.8
|
|
|
|
19,161.5
|
|
|
|
18,438.4
|
|
© Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd.
DETAILED RESERVES AND PRESENT VALUE
AJM Deloitte SEC December 1 2011 Constant
Pricing (CAD)
Canada
Effective December
31, 2011
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
Sales
Gas
|
|
|
NGL
|
|
|
BOE
|
|
|
Present
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Int Category
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
5%
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
15%
|
|
Location
|
|
Formation
|
|
%
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
Mstb
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alberta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abandonments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-517.9
|
|
|
|
-390.0
|
|
|
|
-300.3
|
|
Saddle Hills
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
74.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
106.4
|
|
|
|
85.3
|
|
|
|
68.4
|
|
Alberta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
74.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
-411.6
|
|
|
|
-304.7
|
|
|
|
-231.9
|
|
British
Columbia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drake/Woodrush
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
987.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
691.8
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
564.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
434.7
|
|
|
|
20,472.8
|
|
|
|
19,551.6
|
|
|
|
18,738.8
|
|
British
Columbia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
987.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
691.8
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
564.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
434.7
|
|
|
|
20,472.8
|
|
|
|
19,551.6
|
|
|
|
18,738.8
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
1,061.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
752.0
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
579.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
446.3
|
|
|
|
20,061.2
|
|
|
|
19,246.9
|
|
|
|
18,506.8
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
317.4
|
|
|
|
1,061.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
752.0
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
579.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
446.3
|
|
|
|
20,061.2
|
|
|
|
19,246.9
|
|
|
|
18,506.8
|
|
© Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd.
PRODUCTION AND REVENUE FORECAST
Company Share
AJM Deloitte SEC December 1 2011 Constant
Pricing (CAD)
2012
Effective December
31, 2011
|
|
Proved
Developed Producing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Crown
|
|
|
FH &
|
|
|
Oper
|
|
|
Aband
|
|
|
Min Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil &
NGL
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
ORR
|
|
|
Exp
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
& SCC
|
|
|
Invest
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
Location
|
|
Formation
|
|
Category
|
|
Mbbl
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
British
Columbia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drake/Woodrush
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
22,447.7
|
|
|
|
5,054.0
|
|
|
|
75.9
|
|
|
|
3,822.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13,495.6
|
|
British
Columbia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
22,447.7
|
|
|
|
5,054.0
|
|
|
|
75.9
|
|
|
|
3,822.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13,495.6
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
22,447.7
|
|
|
|
5,054.0
|
|
|
|
75.9
|
|
|
|
3,822.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13,495.6
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
22,447.7
|
|
|
|
5,054.0
|
|
|
|
75.9
|
|
|
|
3,822.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13,495.6
|
|
© Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
Dejour Energy (Alberta) Ltd.
PRODUCTION AND REVENUE FORECAST
Company Share
AJM Deloitte SEC December 1 2011 Constant
Pricing (CAD)
2012
Effective December
31, 2011
|
|
Proved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Crown
|
|
|
FH &
|
|
|
Oper
|
|
|
Aband
|
|
|
Min Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil &
NGL
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
ORR
|
|
|
Exp
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
& SCC
|
|
|
Invest
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
Location
|
|
Formation
|
|
Category
|
|
Mbbl
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alberta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saddle Hills
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
|
-150.0
|
|
Alberta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
|
-150.0
|
|
British
Columbia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drake/Woodrush
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
22,447.7
|
|
|
|
5,054.0
|
|
|
|
75.9
|
|
|
|
3,822.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13,495.6
|
|
British
Columbia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
22,447.7
|
|
|
|
5,054.0
|
|
|
|
75.9
|
|
|
|
3,822.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13,495.6
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
22,447.7
|
|
|
|
5,054.0
|
|
|
|
75.9
|
|
|
|
3,822.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
|
13,345.6
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
22,447.7
|
|
|
|
5,054.0
|
|
|
|
75.9
|
|
|
|
3,822.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
|
13,345.6
|
|
© Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
Dejour Energy
(Alberta) Ltd.
CASH FLOW TAX
POOL
AJM Deloitte SEC
December 1 2011 Constant Pricing (CAD)
Selection :
Canada
|
|
Effective December 31, 2011
|
Total Proved Developed Producing Reserves
|
|
|
OIL, GAS & SULPHUR SUMMARY
|
|
|
|
COMPANY OIL
|
|
|
COMPANY SALES GAS
|
|
|
SULPHUR
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co. Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
Co. Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
|
Wells
|
|
|
bbl/d
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
$/bbl
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
Wells
|
|
|
Mcf/d
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
$/Mcf
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
lt
|
|
|
$/lt
|
|
|
boe/d
|
|
|
boe/d
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
|
|
307,961.2
|
|
|
|
230,970.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
90.15
|
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
548.0
|
|
|
|
402.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
817
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
117,009.4
|
|
|
|
87,757.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
90.15
|
|
|
|
7,911
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
308.9
|
|
|
|
226.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
2014
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
57,404.1
|
|
|
|
43,053.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
90.15
|
|
|
|
3,881
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
203.2
|
|
|
|
148.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
2015
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
28,818.2
|
|
|
|
21,613.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
90.15
|
|
|
|
1,948
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
140.1
|
|
|
|
102.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
2016
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
18,792.8
|
|
|
|
14,094.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
90.15
|
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
98.0
|
|
|
|
71.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
2017
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
|
|
|
33.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
2018
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2019
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
2020
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
2021
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529,985.8
|
|
|
|
397,489.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
90.15
|
|
|
|
35,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,349.1
|
|
|
|
987.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
3,773
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529,985.8
|
|
|
|
397,489.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
90.15
|
|
|
|
35,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,349.1
|
|
|
|
987.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
3,773
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGL SUMMARY
|
|
CONDENSATE
|
|
|
ETHANE
|
|
|
PROPANE
|
|
|
BUTANE
|
|
|
TOTAL NGL
|
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co. Share
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co. Share
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co. Share
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co. Share
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
CS Net
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
$/bbl
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
$/bbl
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
$/bbl
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
$/bbl
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
2012
|
|
|
990.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
89.01
|
|
|
|
88.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
990.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
731.0
|
|
2013
|
|
|
626.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
89.01
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
626.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
463.7
|
|
2014
|
|
|
415.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
89.01
|
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
415.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
307.8
|
|
2015
|
|
|
289.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
89.01
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
289.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
212.7
|
|
2016
|
|
|
202.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
89.01
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
202.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
148.1
|
|
2017
|
|
|
97.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
89.01
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
97.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
74.4
|
|
2018
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
89.01
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
2019
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
2020
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
2021
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
2,630.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
89.01
|
|
|
|
234.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,630.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,944.7
|
|
Rem
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,630.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
89.01
|
|
|
|
234.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,630.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,944.7
|
|
CASH FLOW BTAX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net Rev
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sask
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Abandon
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
|
|
|
CUM
|
|
|
Disc Cash
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Crown
|
|
|
Freehold
|
|
|
ORR
|
|
|
Mineral
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Corp
|
|
|
Oper
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Cost &
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Burden
|
|
|
Royalties
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Cap Tax
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Salvage
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
|
(10%)
|
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
2012
|
|
|
22,448
|
|
|
|
5,054.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
75.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
17,318
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
897.8
|
|
|
|
2,924.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,822.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13,496
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13,496
|
|
|
|
13,496
|
|
|
|
12,895
|
|
2013
|
|
|
8,831
|
|
|
|
1,814.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
45.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
6,971
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
880.6
|
|
|
|
1,266.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,146.7
|
|
|
|
74.2
|
|
|
|
4,750
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
4,750
|
|
|
|
18,246
|
|
|
|
4,148
|
|
2014
|
|
|
4,486
|
|
|
|
775.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3,679
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
871.8
|
|
|
|
688.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,560.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
|
|
20,364
|
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2,365
|
|
|
|
275.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
871.8
|
|
|
|
395.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,267.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
21,164
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
2016
|
|
|
1,562
|
|
|
|
130.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
871.8
|
|
|
|
266.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,138.3
|
|
|
|
56.2
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
21,383
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
2017
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
60.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
101.1
|
|
|
|
56.2
|
|
|
|
-44
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-44
|
|
|
|
21,339
|
|
|
|
-26
|
|
2018
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
56.2
|
|
|
|
-56
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-56
|
|
|
|
21,283
|
|
|
|
-30
|
|
2019
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
461.2
|
|
|
|
-461
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-461
|
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
-226
|
|
2020
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
2021
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
39,841
|
|
|
|
8,070.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
196.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
31,573
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
4,439.6
|
|
|
|
5,607.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10,047.0
|
|
|
|
704.2
|
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
19,162
|
|
Rem
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total
|
|
|
39,841
|
|
|
|
8,070.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
196.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
31,573
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
4,439.6
|
|
|
|
5,607.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10,047.0
|
|
|
|
704.2
|
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
19,162
|
|
CO. SHARE RESERVES LIFE (years)
Reserves Half Life
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
RLI (Principal Product)
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Reserves Life
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
RLI (BOE)
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
TOTAL RESERVES - SALES
|
|
GROSS
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
CO SH
|
|
|
NET
|
|
Oil (bbl)
|
|
|
529,986
|
|
|
|
397,489
|
|
|
|
397,489
|
|
|
|
317,415
|
|
Gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
Gas (boe)
|
|
|
224,857
|
|
|
|
164,536
|
|
|
|
164,536
|
|
|
|
115,294
|
|
*NGL (bbl)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Cond (bbl)
|
|
|
3,602
|
|
|
|
2,630
|
|
|
|
2,630
|
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
Total (boe)
|
|
|
758,445
|
|
|
|
564,655
|
|
|
|
564,655
|
|
|
|
434,654
|
|
*This NGL Value includes only Ethane, Propane and Butane. Condensate
and Field Condensate are included in the Condensate line.
NET PRESENT VALUES BEFORE TAX
Discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Op Income
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
|
NPV/BOE
|
|
%
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
$/BOE
|
|
0
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
36.88
|
|
5
|
|
|
19,955
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
19,955
|
|
|
|
35.34
|
|
10
|
|
|
19,162
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
19,162
|
|
|
|
33.93
|
|
12
|
|
|
18,864
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
18,864
|
|
|
|
33.41
|
|
15
|
|
|
18,438
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
18,438
|
|
|
|
32.65
|
|
20
|
|
|
17,780
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
17,780
|
|
|
|
31.49
|
|
CAPITAL (undisc)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrisked
|
|
|
Risked
|
|
Cost Of Prod.
|
|
|
$/BOEPD
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Cost Of Reserves
|
|
|
$/BOE
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Prob Of Success
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
Chance Of
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
ECONOMIC INDICATORS
|
|
|
|
|
BTAX
|
|
|
ATAX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrisked
|
|
|
Risked
|
|
|
Unrisked
|
|
|
Risked
|
|
Discount Rate
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
(Yrs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Discounted Payout
|
|
|
(Yrs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
DCF Rate of Return
|
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
200.0
|
|
NPV/Undisc Invest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
NPV/Disc Invest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
NPV/DIS Cap Exposure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
NPV/BOEPD
|
|
|
(M$/boepd)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
FIRST 12 MONTHS AVG. PERFORMANCE (undisc)
|
|
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
Co. Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrisked
|
|
|
Risked
|
|
|
Unrisked
|
|
|
Risked
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(BOEPD)
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
Price
|
|
|
($/BOE)
|
|
|
|
75.06
|
|
|
|
75.06
|
|
|
|
75.06
|
|
|
|
75.06
|
|
Royalties
|
|
|
($/BOE)
|
|
|
|
17.15
|
|
|
|
17.15
|
|
|
|
17.15
|
|
|
|
17.15
|
|
Operating Costs
|
|
|
($/BOE)
|
|
|
|
12.78
|
|
|
|
12.78
|
|
|
|
12.78
|
|
|
|
12.78
|
|
NetBack
|
|
|
($/BOE)
|
|
|
|
45.12
|
|
|
|
45.12
|
|
|
|
45.12
|
|
|
|
45.12
|
|
Recycle Ratio
|
|
|
(ratio)
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
© Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
Dejour Energy
(Alberta) Ltd.
CASH FLOW TAX
POOL
AJM Deloitte SEC
December 1 2011 Constant Pricing (CAD)
Selection :
Canada
|
|
Effective December 31, 2011
|
Total Proved Developed Producing Reserves
|
|
|
CASH FLOW ATAX
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
Attributed
|
|
|
Provincial
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Provincial
|
|
|
Provincial
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CUM
|
|
|
Disc Cash
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
Tax Loss
|
|
|
Tax Loss
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
M&P Tax
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
Invest Tax
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
Provincial
|
|
|
M&P Tax
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
BTAX
|
|
|
ATAX
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
|
|
Tax Loss
|
|
|
Generated
|
|
|
Claim
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Surtax
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
|
(10%)
|
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
2012
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13,496
|
|
|
|
13,496
|
|
|
|
13,496
|
|
|
|
12,895
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,851.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,851.9
|
|
|
|
427.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
427.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,851.9
|
|
|
|
285.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
285.2
|
|
|
|
713.0
|
|
|
|
4,750
|
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
|
|
17,533
|
|
|
|
3,532
|
|
2014
|
|
|
756.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
756.5
|
|
|
|
113.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
113.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
756.5
|
|
|
|
75.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
75.7
|
|
|
|
189.1
|
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
|
|
19,462
|
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
2015
|
|
|
-204.9
|
|
|
|
204.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
20,262
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
2016
|
|
|
-521.6
|
|
|
|
521.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
20,481
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
2017
|
|
|
-591.8
|
|
|
|
591.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-44
|
|
|
|
-44
|
|
|
|
20,437
|
|
|
|
-26
|
|
2018
|
|
|
-461.0
|
|
|
|
461.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-56
|
|
|
|
-56
|
|
|
|
20,381
|
|
|
|
-30
|
|
2019
|
|
|
-761.0
|
|
|
|
761.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-461
|
|
|
|
-461
|
|
|
|
19,920
|
|
|
|
-226
|
|
2020
|
|
|
-222.1
|
|
|
|
222.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
19,920
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
2021
|
|
|
-164.7
|
|
|
|
164.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
19,920
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
681.4
|
|
|
|
2,927.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,608.4
|
|
|
|
541.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
541.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,608.4
|
|
|
|
360.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
360.8
|
|
|
|
902.1
|
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
19,920
|
|
|
|
19,920
|
|
|
|
18,397
|
|
Rem
|
|
|
-481.3
|
|
|
|
481.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
19,920
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total
|
|
|
200.1
|
|
|
|
3,408.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,608.4
|
|
|
|
541.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
541.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,608.4
|
|
|
|
360.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
360.8
|
|
|
|
902.1
|
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
19,920
|
|
|
|
19,920
|
|
|
|
18,397
|
|
TAXABLE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net Resource
|
|
|
Net Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
Deduct
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
CCA
|
|
|
Overhead
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
COGPE
|
|
|
CDE
|
|
|
CEE
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
2012
|
|
|
22,448
|
|
|
|
5,054.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,822.3
|
|
|
|
1,792.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-75.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
717.0
|
|
|
|
10,982.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
2013
|
|
|
8,831
|
|
|
|
1,814.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,221.0
|
|
|
|
1,344.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-45.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
501.9
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,851.9
|
|
2014
|
|
|
4,486
|
|
|
|
775.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,560.4
|
|
|
|
1,008.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-30.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
351.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
756.5
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2,365
|
|
|
|
275.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,267.3
|
|
|
|
756.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-22.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
245.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-204.9
|
|
2016
|
|
|
1,562
|
|
|
|
130.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,194.5
|
|
|
|
567.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-17.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
172.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-521.6
|
|
2017
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
157.4
|
|
|
|
425.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-4.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
120.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-591.8
|
|
2018
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
67.2
|
|
|
|
319.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
84.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-461.0
|
|
2019
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
461.2
|
|
|
|
239.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-761.0
|
|
2020
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
179.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-222.1
|
|
2021
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
134.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-164.7
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
39,841
|
|
|
|
8,070.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10,751.2
|
|
|
|
6,767.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-196.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
2,322.5
|
|
|
|
11,032.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
681.4
|
|
Rem
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
403.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
67.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-481.3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
39,841
|
|
|
|
8,070.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10,751.2
|
|
|
|
7,171.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-196.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
2,390.0
|
|
|
|
11,032.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
200.1
|
|
TAX LOSS POOL
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M&P
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing
|
|
|
Class 41
|
|
|
Processing
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Class 1
|
|
|
Class 2
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
Overhead
|
|
|
Overhead
|
|
|
COGPE
|
|
|
CDE
|
|
|
CEE
|
|
|
Depletion
|
|
|
Acri
|
|
|
Tax Loss
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
CCA
|
|
|
Overhead
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
CCA
|
|
|
CCA
|
|
|
Overhead
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
to CEE
|
|
|
to CDE
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
2012
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
1,673.0
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
2013
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
1,171.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
2014
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
819.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
2015
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
573.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
204.9
|
|
2016
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
401.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
726.5
|
|
2017
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
281.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,318.3
|
|
2018
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
196.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,779.3
|
|
2019
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
137.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,540.2
|
|
2020
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
96.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,762.3
|
|
2021
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
67.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,927.0
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
67.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,927.0
|
|
Rem
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,408.3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,408.3
|
|
NET PRESENT VALUES AFTER TAX
Discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Op Income
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
|
NPV/BOE
|
|
%
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
$/BOE
|
|
0
|
|
|
19,920
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
19,920
|
|
|
|
35.28
|
|
5
|
|
|
19,126
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
19,126
|
|
|
|
33.87
|
|
10
|
|
|
18,397
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
18,397
|
|
|
|
32.58
|
|
12
|
|
|
18,123
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
18,123
|
|
|
|
32.10
|
|
15
|
|
|
17,731
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
17,731
|
|
|
|
31.40
|
|
20
|
|
|
17,122
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
17,122
|
|
|
|
30.32
|
|
CORPORATE OPENING TAX POOLS (M$)
Class 1 Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Class 2 Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Class 6 Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Class 8 Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Class 10 Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Class 12 Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Class 41 Pool
|
|
|
7,171.00
|
|
Class 43 Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Declining Balance Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Declining Balance Rate
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Straight Line Decline Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Straight Line Decline
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
COGPE Pool
|
|
|
29.00
|
|
CDE Pool
|
|
|
2,390.00
|
|
CEE Pool
|
|
|
11,032.00
|
|
Depletion Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
ACRI Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Tax Loss Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
© Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
Dejour Energy
(Alberta) Ltd.
CASH FLOW TAX
POOL
AJM Deloitte SEC
December 1 2011 Constant Pricing (CAD)
Selection :
Canada
|
|
Effective December 31, 2011
|
Total Proved Reserves
|
|
|
OIL, GAS & SULPHUR SUMMARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPANY OIL
|
|
|
COMPANY SALES GAS
|
|
|
SULPHUR
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co. Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
Co. Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
|
Wells
|
|
|
bbl/d
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
$/bbl
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
Wells
|
|
|
Mcf/d
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
MMcf
|
|
|
$/Mcf
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
lt
|
|
|
$/lt
|
|
|
boe/d
|
|
|
boe/d
|
|
2012
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
|
|
307,961.2
|
|
|
|
230,970.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
90.15
|
|
|
|
20,822
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
548.0
|
|
|
|
402.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.82
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
817
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
117,009.4
|
|
|
|
87,757.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
90.15
|
|
|
|
7,911
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
404.5
|
|
|
|
254.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
2014
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
57,404.1
|
|
|
|
43,053.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
90.15
|
|
|
|
3,881
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
263.7
|
|
|
|
166.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
2015
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
28,818.2
|
|
|
|
21,613.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
90.15
|
|
|
|
1,948
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
180.5
|
|
|
|
114.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
2016
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
18,792.8
|
|
|
|
14,094.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
90.15
|
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
126.3
|
|
|
|
79.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
2017
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
67.2
|
|
|
|
39.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.85
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
2018
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
2019
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
2020
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
2021
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529,985.8
|
|
|
|
397,489.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
90.15
|
|
|
|
35,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,597.8
|
|
|
|
1,061.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
|
|
4,072
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529,985.8
|
|
|
|
397,489.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
90.15
|
|
|
|
35,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,597.8
|
|
|
|
1,061.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
|
|
4,072
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGL SUMMARY
|
|
CONDENSATE
|
|
|
ETHANE
|
|
|
PROPANE
|
|
|
BUTANE
|
|
|
TOTAL NGL
|
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co. Share
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co. Share
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co. Share
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
|
|
|
Co. Share
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
RI
|
|
|
CS Net
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
$/bbl
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
$/bbl
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
$/bbl
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
$/bbl
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
|
bbl
|
|
2012
|
|
|
990.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
89.01
|
|
|
|
88.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
990.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
731.0
|
|
2013
|
|
|
975.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
91.88
|
|
|
|
89.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
341.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
48.43
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
289.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
77.58
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
1,606.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,255.3
|
|
2014
|
|
|
637.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
91.79
|
|
|
|
58.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
215.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
48.43
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
183.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
77.58
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
1,035.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
645.3
|
|
2015
|
|
|
436.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
91.72
|
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
144.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
48.43
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
122.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
77.58
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
703.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
438.4
|
|
2016
|
|
|
305.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
91.72
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
101.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
48.43
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
85.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
77.58
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
492.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
306.0
|
|
2017
|
|
|
172.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
92.48
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
72.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
48.43
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
61.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
77.58
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
306.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
188.3
|
|
2018
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
93.75
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
48.43
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
77.58
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
45.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
2019
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
2020
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
2021
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
3,540.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
91.07
|
|
|
|
322.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
887.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
48.43
|
|
|
|
43.0
|
|
|
|
753.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
77.58
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
|
|
5,181.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,591.1
|
|
Rem
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,540.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
91.07
|
|
|
|
322.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
887.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
48.43
|
|
|
|
43.0
|
|
|
|
753.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
77.58
|
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
|
|
5,181.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,591.1
|
|
CASH FLOW BTAX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Net Rev
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sask
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Abandon
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
|
|
|
CUM
|
|
|
Disc Cash
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Crown
|
|
|
Freehold
|
|
|
ORR
|
|
|
Mineral
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Corp
|
|
|
Oper
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Cost &
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Burden
|
|
|
Royalties
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Cap Tax
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Salvage
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
|
(10%)
|
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
2012
|
|
|
22,448
|
|
|
|
5,054.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
75.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
17,318
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
897.8
|
|
|
|
2,924.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,822.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13,496
|
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
|
13,346
|
|
|
|
13,346
|
|
|
|
12,758
|
|
2013
|
|
|
9,019
|
|
|
|
1,823.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
59.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
7,136
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
896.3
|
|
|
|
1,292.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,188.3
|
|
|
|
74.2
|
|
|
|
4,874
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
4,874
|
|
|
|
18,219
|
|
|
|
4,256
|
|
2014
|
|
|
4,604
|
|
|
|
787.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3,779
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
887.5
|
|
|
|
704.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,592.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
20,405
|
|
|
|
1,738
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2,444
|
|
|
|
281.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
2,137
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
887.5
|
|
|
|
406.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,293.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
21,248
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
2016
|
|
|
1,617
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
887.5
|
|
|
|
274.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,161.7
|
|
|
|
56.2
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
21,496
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
2017
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
56.4
|
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
122.4
|
|
|
|
56.2
|
|
|
|
-27
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-27
|
|
|
|
21,469
|
|
|
|
-16
|
|
2018
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
56.2
|
|
|
|
-53
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-53
|
|
|
|
21,416
|
|
|
|
-29
|
|
2019
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
461.2
|
|
|
|
-461
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-461
|
|
|
|
20,955
|
|
|
|
-226
|
|
2020
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
20,955
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
2021
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
20,955
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
40,330
|
|
|
|
8,100.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
223.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
32,005
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
4,521.8
|
|
|
|
5,674.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10,196.2
|
|
|
|
704.2
|
|
|
|
21,105
|
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
|
20,955
|
|
|
|
20,955
|
|
|
|
19,247
|
|
Rem
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
20,955
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total
|
|
|
40,330
|
|
|
|
8,100.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
223.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
32,005
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
4,521.8
|
|
|
|
5,674.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10,196.2
|
|
|
|
704.2
|
|
|
|
21,105
|
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
|
20,955
|
|
|
|
20,955
|
|
|
|
19,247
|
|
CO. SHARE RESERVES LIFE (years)
Reserves Half Life
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
RLI (Principal Product)
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Reserves Life
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
RLI (BOE)
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
TOTAL RESERVES - SALES
|
|
GROSS
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
CO SH
|
|
|
NET
|
|
Oil (bbl)
|
|
|
529,986
|
|
|
|
397,489
|
|
|
|
397,489
|
|
|
|
317,415
|
|
Gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
Gas (boe)
|
|
|
266,297
|
|
|
|
176,968
|
|
|
|
176,968
|
|
|
|
125,338
|
|
*NGL (bbl)
|
|
|
5,470
|
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
Cond (bbl)
|
|
|
6,635
|
|
|
|
3,540
|
|
|
|
3,540
|
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
Total (boe)
|
|
|
808,388
|
|
|
|
579,638
|
|
|
|
579,638
|
|
|
|
446,344
|
|
*This NGL Value includes only Ethane, Propane and Butane. Condensate
and Field Condensate are included in the Condensate line.
NET PRESENT VALUES BEFORE TAX
Discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Op Income
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
|
NPV/BOE
|
|
%
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
$/BOE
|
|
0
|
|
|
21,105
|
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
|
20,955
|
|
|
|
36.15
|
|
5
|
|
|
20,204
|
|
|
|
143.1
|
|
|
|
20,061
|
|
|
|
34.61
|
|
10
|
|
|
19,384
|
|
|
|
136.9
|
|
|
|
19,247
|
|
|
|
33.20
|
|
12
|
|
|
19,077
|
|
|
|
134.6
|
|
|
|
18,942
|
|
|
|
32.68
|
|
15
|
|
|
18,638
|
|
|
|
131.2
|
|
|
|
18,507
|
|
|
|
31.93
|
|
20
|
|
|
17,960
|
|
|
|
126.0
|
|
|
|
17,834
|
|
|
|
30.77
|
|
CAPITAL (undisc)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrisked
|
|
|
Risked
|
|
Cost Of Prod.
|
|
|
$/BOEPD
|
|
|
|
183.19
|
|
|
|
183.19
|
|
Cost Of Reserves
|
|
|
$/BOE
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
Prob Of Success
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
Chance Of
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
ECONOMIC INDICATORS
|
|
|
|
BTAX
|
|
|
ATAX
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrisked
|
|
|
Risked
|
|
|
Unrisked
|
|
|
Risked
|
|
Discount Rate
|
|
(%)
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Payout
|
|
(Yrs)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Discounted Payout
|
|
(Yrs)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
DCF Rate of Return
|
|
(%)
|
|
>
|
200.0
|
|
|
>
|
200.0
|
|
|
>
|
200.0
|
|
|
>
|
200.0
|
|
NPV/Undisc Invest
|
|
|
|
|
128.3
|
|
|
|
128.3
|
|
|
|
123.1
|
|
|
|
96.4
|
|
NPV/Disc Invest
|
|
|
|
|
140.6
|
|
|
|
140.6
|
|
|
|
134.8
|
|
|
|
105.6
|
|
NPV/DIS Cap Exposure
|
|
|
|
|
140.6
|
|
|
|
140.6
|
|
|
|
134.8
|
|
|
|
105.6
|
|
NPV/BOEPD
|
|
(M$/boepd)
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
FIRST 12 MONTHS AVG. PERFORMANCE (undisc)
|
|
|
|
|
WI
|
|
|
Co. Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrisked
|
|
|
Risked
|
|
|
Unrisked
|
|
|
Risked
|
|
Production
|
|
|
(BOEPD)
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
Price
|
|
|
($/BOE)
|
|
|
|
75.06
|
|
|
|
75.06
|
|
|
|
75.06
|
|
|
|
75.06
|
|
Royalties
|
|
|
($/BOE)
|
|
|
|
17.15
|
|
|
|
17.15
|
|
|
|
17.15
|
|
|
|
17.15
|
|
Operating Costs
|
|
|
($/BOE)
|
|
|
|
12.78
|
|
|
|
12.78
|
|
|
|
12.78
|
|
|
|
12.78
|
|
NetBack
|
|
|
($/BOE)
|
|
|
|
45.12
|
|
|
|
45.12
|
|
|
|
45.12
|
|
|
|
45.12
|
|
Recycle Ratio
|
|
|
(ratio)
|
|
|
|
174.37
|
|
|
|
174.37
|
|
|
|
174.37
|
|
|
|
174.37
|
|
© Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
Dejour Energy
(Alberta) Ltd.
CASH FLOW TAX
POOL
AJM Deloitte SEC
December 1 2011 Constant Pricing (CAD)
Selection :
Canada
|
|
Effective December 31, 2011
|
Total Proved Reserves
|
|
|
CASH FLOW ATAX
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
Attributed
|
|
|
Provincial
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Provincial
|
|
|
Provincial
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CUM
|
|
|
Disc Cash
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
Tax Loss
|
|
|
Tax Loss
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
M&P Tax
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
Invest Tax
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
Provincial
|
|
|
M&P Tax
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
BTAX
|
|
|
ATAX
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
|
|
Tax Loss
|
|
|
Generated
|
|
|
Claim
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Surtax
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
|
(10%)
|
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
2012
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13,346
|
|
|
|
13,346
|
|
|
|
13,346
|
|
|
|
12,758
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,923.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,923.9
|
|
|
|
438.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
438.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,923.9
|
|
|
|
292.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
292.4
|
|
|
|
731.0
|
|
|
|
4,874
|
|
|
|
4,143
|
|
|
|
17,488
|
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
2014
|
|
|
799.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
799.5
|
|
|
|
119.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
119.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
799.5
|
|
|
|
79.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
79.9
|
|
|
|
199.9
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
19,475
|
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
2015
|
|
|
-180.0
|
|
|
|
180.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
20,317
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
2016
|
|
|
-507.3
|
|
|
|
507.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
20,565
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
2017
|
|
|
-584.5
|
|
|
|
584.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-27
|
|
|
|
-27
|
|
|
|
20,539
|
|
|
|
-16
|
|
2018
|
|
|
-466.2
|
|
|
|
466.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-53
|
|
|
|
-53
|
|
|
|
20,485
|
|
|
|
-29
|
|
2019
|
|
|
-766.8
|
|
|
|
766.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-461
|
|
|
|
-461
|
|
|
|
20,024
|
|
|
|
-226
|
|
2020
|
|
|
-226.4
|
|
|
|
226.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
20,024
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
2021
|
|
|
-168.0
|
|
|
|
168.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
20,024
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
824.1
|
|
|
|
2,899.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,723.4
|
|
|
|
558.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
558.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,723.4
|
|
|
|
372.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
372.3
|
|
|
|
930.8
|
|
|
|
20,955
|
|
|
|
20,024
|
|
|
|
20,024
|
|
|
|
18,459
|
|
Rem
|
|
|
-491.2
|
|
|
|
491.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
20,024
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Total
|
|
|
332.9
|
|
|
|
3,390.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,723.4
|
|
|
|
558.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
558.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,723.4
|
|
|
|
372.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
372.3
|
|
|
|
930.8
|
|
|
|
20,955
|
|
|
|
20,024
|
|
|
|
20,024
|
|
|
|
18,459
|
|
TAXABLE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net Resource
|
|
|
Net Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
Deduct
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
CCA
|
|
|
Overhead
|
|
|
Royalty
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
COGPE
|
|
|
CDE
|
|
|
CEE
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
2012
|
|
|
22,448
|
|
|
|
5,054.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,822.3
|
|
|
|
1,811.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-75.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
717.0
|
|
|
|
10,964.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
2013
|
|
|
9,019
|
|
|
|
1,823.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,262.5
|
|
|
|
1,377.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-59.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
501.9
|
|
|
|
67.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,923.9
|
|
2014
|
|
|
4,604
|
|
|
|
787.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,592.4
|
|
|
|
1,033.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-37.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
351.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
799.5
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2,444
|
|
|
|
281.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,293.9
|
|
|
|
774.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-26.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
245.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-180.0
|
|
2016
|
|
|
1,617
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,217.9
|
|
|
|
581.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-18.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
172.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-507.3
|
|
2017
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
178.6
|
|
|
|
435.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-5.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
120.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-584.5
|
|
2018
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
71.5
|
|
|
|
326.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
84.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-466.2
|
|
2019
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
461.2
|
|
|
|
245.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-766.8
|
|
2020
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
183.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-226.4
|
|
2021
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
137.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-168.0
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
40,330
|
|
|
|
8,100.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10,900.5
|
|
|
|
6,907.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-223.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
2,322.5
|
|
|
|
11,032.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
824.1
|
|
Rem
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
413.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
67.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-491.2
|
|
Total
|
|
|
40,330
|
|
|
|
8,100.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10,900.5
|
|
|
|
7,321.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-223.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
2,390.0
|
|
|
|
11,032.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
332.9
|
|
TAX LOSS POOL
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M&P
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing
|
|
|
Class 41
|
|
|
Processing
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Class 1
|
|
|
Class 2
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
Overhead
|
|
|
Overhead
|
|
|
COGPE
|
|
|
CDE
|
|
|
CEE
|
|
|
Depletion
|
|
|
Acri
|
|
|
Tax Loss
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
CCA
|
|
|
Overhead
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
CCA
|
|
|
CCA
|
|
|
Overhead
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
to CEE
|
|
|
to CDE
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
Pool
|
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
2012
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
1,673.0
|
|
|
|
67.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
2013
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
1,171.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
2014
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
819.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
2015
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
573.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
180.0
|
|
2016
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
401.7
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
687.3
|
|
2017
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
281.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,271.8
|
|
2018
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
196.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
1,738.0
|
|
2019
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
137.8
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,504.9
|
|
2020
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
96.4
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,731.3
|
|
2021
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
67.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,899.2
|
|
Sub
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
140.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
67.5
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,899.2
|
|
Rem
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,390.4
|
|
Total
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
3,390.4
|
|
NET PRESENT VALUES AFTER TAX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Op Income
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Cash Flow
|
|
|
NPV/BOE
|
|
%
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
$/BOE
|
|
0
|
|
|
20,174
|
|
|
|
150.0
|
|
|
|
20,024
|
|
|
|
34.55
|
|
5
|
|
|
19,350
|
|
|
|
143.1
|
|
|
|
19,207
|
|
|
|
33.14
|
|
10
|
|
|
18,596
|
|
|
|
136.9
|
|
|
|
18,459
|
|
|
|
31.85
|
|
12
|
|
|
18,313
|
|
|
|
134.6
|
|
|
|
18,178
|
|
|
|
31.36
|
|
15
|
|
|
17,908
|
|
|
|
131.2
|
|
|
|
17,777
|
|
|
|
30.67
|
|
20
|
|
|
17,282
|
|
|
|
126.0
|
|
|
|
17,156
|
|
|
|
29.60
|
|
CORPORATE OPENING TAX POOLS (M$)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class 1 Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Class 2 Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Class 6 Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Class 8 Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Class 10 Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Class 12 Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Class 41 Pool
|
|
|
7,171.00
|
|
Class 43 Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Declining Balance Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Declining Balance Rate
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Straight Line Decline Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Straight Line Decline
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
COGPE Pool
|
|
|
29.00
|
|
CDE Pool
|
|
|
2,390.00
|
|
CEE Pool
|
|
|
11,032.00
|
|
Depletion Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
ACRI Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
Tax Loss Pool
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
© Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities.
Evaluation procedure
Definitions and methodology
Effective as of December 2011
© Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities.
Table of Contents
Definitions
|
|
|
|
·
Procedure
|
|
·
Reserve
evaluation
|
|
·
Reserve
classification
|
|
|
|
Reserve estimation methodology
|
|
|
|
Production forecasts
|
|
|
|
Land schedules and maps
|
|
|
|
Geology
|
|
|
|
Royalties and taxes
|
|
|
|
Capital and operating considerations
|
|
|
|
Pricing overview
|
|
© Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities.
Procedure
AJM Deloitte has prepared estimates of
reserves in accordance with the SEC Regulation S-K, 229.1202 and Regulation S-X, 210.4-10.
Reserve evaluation
A “Reserves evaluation” is
the process whereby a qualified reserves evaluator estimates the quantities and values of oil and gas reserves by interpreting
and assessing all available pertinent data. The value of an oil and gas asset is a function of the ability or potential ability
of that asset to generate future net revenue, and it is measured using a set of forward-looking assumptions regarding reserves,
production, prices, and costs. Evaluations of oil and gas reserves, include a discounted cash flow analysis of estimated future
net revenue.
Reserve classification
Reserves are classified by AJM Deloitte
in accordance with the definitions that are described in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X Part
210.4-10(a).
© Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities.
Reserve estimation methodology
AJM Deloitte has assigned all reserves
via deterministic methods.
Production forecasts
Production forecasts are based on historical
trends or by comparison with other wells in the immediate area producing from analogous reservoirs. Non-producing gas reserves
were forecast to come on-stream within the first two years from the effective date under direct sales pricing and deliverability
assumptions, if a tie-in point to an existing gathering system was in close proximity (approximately two miles). If the tie-in
point was of a greater distance (and dependent on the reserve volume and risk) the reserves were forecast to come on-stream in
years three or four from the effective date. These on-stream dates were used when the company could not provide specific on-stream
date information.
© Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities.
Land schedule and maps
The Company provided schedules of land
ownership which included lessor and lessee royalty burdens. The land data was accepted as factual and no investigation of title
by AJM Deloitte was made to verify the records.
Well maps included within this report
represent all of the Company’s interests that were evaluated in the specified area.
Geology
An initial review of each property is
undertaken to establish the produced maturity of the reservoir being evaluated. Where extensive production history exists a geologic
analysis is not conducted since the remaining hydrocarbons can be determined by productivity analysis.
For properties that are not of a mature
production nature a geologic review is conducted. This work consists of:
|
·
|
developing
a
regional
understanding
of
the
play,
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
assessing
reservoir
parameters
from
the
nearest
analogous
production,
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
analysis
of
all
relevant
well
data
including
logs,
cores,
and
tests
to
measure
net
formation
thickness
(pay),
porosity,
and
initial
water
saturation,
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
auditing
of client
mapping or
developing
maps to meet
AJM Deloitte’s
need to establish
volumetric
hydrocarbons-in-place.
|
Procedures specific to the individual
properties are discussed in the body of the property report.
© Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities.
Royalties and taxes
All royalties and taxes, including the
lessor and overriding royalties, are based on government regulations, negotiated leases or farmout agreements, that were in effect
as of the evaluation effective date. If regulations change, the net after royalty recoverable reserve volumes may differ materially.
AJM Deloitte utilizes a variety of reserves
and valuation products in determining the result sets.
Capital and operating considerations
Reserves estimated to meet the standards
for constant prices and costs, are based on Regulation S-X 210.4-10(a).
Capital costs were provided by the Company
and reviewed by AJM Deloitte for reasonableness.
Operating costs were determined from historical
data on the property as provided by the evaluated Company.
© Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities.
Pricing overview
The following table contains the constant
dollar evaluation of the Company. Prices were calculated in accordance with the definition (22)(v) of Regulation S-X, 210.4-10(a)
and were determined by taking the un-weighted average of the prices on the first day of the month for the preceding 12 months.
The effects of derivative instruments
designated as price hedges of oil and gas quantities if any, are not reflected in AJM Deloitte’s individual property evaluations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
|
Benchmark price
|
|
realized report price
|
|
|
Benchmark
|
|
($CAD)
|
|
($CAD)
|
Oil
|
|
NYMEX WTI @ Cushing
|
|
$96.27/bbl
|
|
$90.15/bbl
|
Gas
|
|
NYMEX Henry Hub LA
|
|
$4.15/MMbtu
|
|
$3.84/Mcf
|
Condensate
|
|
Condensate US
|
|
$96.27/bbl
|
|
$91.07/bbl
|
© Deloitte LLP and affiliated entities.
Exhibit 99.2
April 5, 2013
Mr. Harrison Blacker
President
Dejour Energy (USA) Corp.
1401 17th Street, Suite 300
Denver, CO 80202
Subject:
|
Reserve Estimate and Financial
Forecast as to Dejour’s Interests in the Kokopelli Field Area, Garfield County, Colorado, and the South Rangely Field
Area, Rio Blanco County, Colorado-
Amended in Response to SEC Comments
|
Dear Hal:
As you requested, Gustavson Associates has completed reserves
and economics as to Dejour Energy’s interests in future oil and gas production associated with the Kokopelli Field Area
located in Garfield County, Colorado and the South Rangely Field Area, Rio Blanco County, Colorado. Reserves have been estimated
based on analysis of analogous well production data. Estimates and projections have been made as of January 1, 2012. Reserves
have been estimated in accordance with the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) definitions and guidelines, and
was prepared for the purpose of inclusion as an exhibit in a filing made with the SEC. This report was completed on February 15,
2012, with revisions in response to SEC comments completed on the date of this letter, April 5, 2013.
In general, Proved Developed Non Producing
(PDNP) reserves have been assigned to the South Rangely Federal 36-24A well, and Proved Undeveloped (PUD) reserves have been assigned
to 77 total well locations. Of the PUD locations, 72 well locations are in the Kokopelli Field Area and five well locations are
in the South Rangely Field Area. Gustavson is of the opinion that no current regulations, and no anticipated changes to regulations,
would inhibit the ability of Dejour to recover the estimated reserves in the manner projected herein. It is our understanding
that the reserves estimated herein represent all of Dejour’s US reserves.
The estimated net reserves volumes and
associated net cash flow estimates are summarized below.
5757 Central Ave.
|
Suite D
|
Boulder, Co. 80301 USA
|
1-303-443-2209
|
FAX 1-303-443-3156
|
http://www.gustavson.com
|
Mr. Harrison Blacker
April 5, 2013
Page 2
Summary of Net Reserves and Projected
Before Tax Cash Flow
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Present
Value,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensa
|
|
|
Heavy
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
thousands
of US$
|
|
|
|
Net
Gas
|
|
|
te
|
|
|
NGL
|
|
|
Ethane
|
|
|
Discounted
at
|
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves
Category
|
|
(MMCF)
|
|
|
(MBO)
|
|
|
(MBO)
|
|
|
(MBO)
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
15%
|
|
Proved Developed Non- Producing, Flat
Pricing
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved Undeveloped, Flat Pricing
|
|
|
41,156
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
1,617
|
|
|
|
2,232
|
|
|
|
134,689
|
|
|
|
32,621
|
|
|
|
17,151
|
|
Total Proved, Flat Pricing
|
|
|
41,314
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
|
|
2,240
|
|
|
|
135,266
|
|
|
|
32,903
|
|
|
|
17,369
|
|
The proportion of the Company’s total reserves represented
by the reserves included in this report is shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
Company Net Proved Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
|
|
|
Proportion of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Condensate
|
|
|
NGL
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Oil Eq.
|
|
Country
|
|
Area
|
|
|
(MMCF)
|
|
|
(MBBL)
|
|
|
(MBBL)
|
|
|
(MBOE)
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Colorado
|
|
|
|
41,314
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
3,863
|
|
|
|
11,036
|
|
|
|
96
|
%
|
Total Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,482
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Note: Natural gas is converted to oil equivalent using a factor
of 6,000 cubic feet of gas per one barrel of oil equivalent.
Kokopelli Field Area Assumptions, Garfield County, Colorado
Proved Undeveloped (PUD) reserves have
been assigned to locations within the area delineated by successful wells and logged net pay, limited to the number of wells in
Dejour’s five-year plan, comprising 72 locations with a drilling schedule starting with 8 wells drilled in the 4
th
quarter of 2012, and 16 wells per year in 2013 through 2016. Significant upside to this amount includes an additional 21
locations that could be considered PUD but for the requirement in the latest SEC guidelines for commitment to drill within five
years. The estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) for each location was based on the average performance of 65 wells in the immediate
area. Many of these wells were completed in multiple zones, including Williams Fork, Rollins, Cozette, and Corcoran. The average
EUR was based on the average composite performance of the total well production from each well, 978 MMCF.
This model includes production and revenue
generated from natural gas liquids (NGLs). We have evaluated the gas sample report you provided. We have accounted for gas shrinkage
and lower BTU after processing: all gas reserves volumes tabulated in this report are after shrinkage. We have also forecast NGL
production as a ratio of gas production based on the liquids content displayed in the gas sample report, including 95% of the
ethane and 100% of all heavier hydrocarbons.
Mr. Harrison Blacker
April 5, 2013
Page 3
Drilling was assumed to begin in May 2012,
with expected drilling and completion costs of $1,637M per well. Initially, four wells are assumed to be drilled per month for
two months in the 4
th
quarter of 2012, coming on line two months after drilling. This program is followed by the drilling
of 16 wells per year in 2013 through 2016.
Operating costs are estimated at $2,000
per well per month based on our experience with similar wells in the area. Abandonment costs of $10,000 were assumed. State and
local production taxes are estimated at 7% of revenue. Oil prices were based on the average of the West Texas Intermediate (WTI)
pricing from the first day of each month of 2011, adjusted each month by the average differential between Colorado pricing
1
and WTI. Similarly, gas prices were calculated for the posted gas prices at Henry Hub, adjusted for gas processing, transportation,
and the differential to Colorado Interstate Gas (CIG) mainline pricing. Cost and prices were held flat. The price for ethane of
$0.72/gallon was provided by the client and checked against public data sources. Heavier NGL prices were assumed to be 78.7% of
the oil price based on the five year average NGL to crude price ratio reported by Bentek and the fraction of NGL’s indicated
on the gas analysis. Heavier NGL prices were also adjusted by a $0.14/gallon NGL processing fee. Prices are summarized below.
Product
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Condensate
|
|
$
|
89.19/bbl
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
$
|
3.14/MSCF
|
|
Ethane
|
|
$
|
30.24/bbl
|
|
Heavier NGLs
|
|
$
|
43.18/bbl
|
|
Weighted average total NGLs
|
|
$
|
35.68/bbl
|
|
Dejour’s interests in the Kokopelli
Field Area are reported to be 71.43% working interest with a 20% royalty burden for net revenue interest of 57.14%.
The estimated net reserves volumes and
associated net cash flow estimates for the Kokopelli Field Area are summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Present Value,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
thousands of US$
|
|
|
|
Net Gas
|
|
|
Net Oil
|
|
|
NGL
|
|
|
Ethane
|
|
|
Discounted at
|
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves Category
|
|
(MMCF)
|
|
|
(MBO)
|
|
|
(MBO)
|
|
|
(MBO)
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
15%
|
|
Proved Undeveloped, Flat Pricing
|
|
|
40,235
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
132,304
|
|
|
|
32,077
|
|
|
|
16,926
|
|
1
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_dfp1_k_m.htm
Mr. Harrison Blacker
April 5, 2013
Page 4
South Rangely Field Area Assumptions, Rio Blanco County,
Colorado
The South Rangely 36-24A well was drilled
and completed in late December 2011. Colorado wildlife restrictions prevent oil and gas activity until spring of 2012. Dejour
anticipates that the production equipment, pipeline infrastructure and hook-up will be completed in May 2012. We have assumed
that the well will start producing in June 2012. We have assigned Proved Developed Non Producing (PDNP) reserves to the South
Rangely Federal 36-24A well. We have also assigned Proved Undeveloped reserves to 5 well locations that are direct offsets to
the South Rangely 36-24A well.
The estimated ultimate recovery (EUR)
for the South Rangely Federal 36-24A and each of the undeveloped well locations was based on the average decline parameters from
28 wells in the immediate area, 460 MMCF. All of the analog wells are producing from the Mancos B formation and are located within
three miles of the South Rangely Federal 36-24A. The EUR was based on the average decline curve parameters for each well and the
average composite performance of the production from each well.
This evaluation includes production and
revenue generated from natural gas liquids (NGLs). We have evaluated the gas sample report provided by the client. We have accounted
for gas shrinkage and lower BTU after processing: all gas reserves volumes tabulated in this report are after shrinkage. We have
also forecast heavy NGL and ethane production as a ratio of gas production based on the liquids content displayed in the gas sample
report.
It was assumed that the South Rangely
Federal 36-24A well will start producing in June 2012. At your request we have included a capital cost of $175,000 for the pipeline
infrastructure and production equipment. The economics presented for the South Rangely 36-24A well, represent cash flows from
the effective date, and so include Dejour’s share of completion and equipment costs but not drilling costs. It was assumed
that one undeveloped well location would be drilled in April 2013, coming on line two months after drilling. Expected drilling
and completion costs of $800M per well were assumed. That would be followed by the drilling of two wells in April 2014 and two
wells in April 2015. Operating costs are estimated at $1,200 per well per month as provided by the client and supported by our
experience with similar wells in the area.
Abandonment costs of $10,000 were assumed.
State and local production taxes are estimated at 7% of revenue. Oil prices were based on the average of the West Texas Intermediate
(WTI) pricing from the first day of each month of 2011, adjusted each month by the average differential between Colorado pricing
2
and WTI. Similarly, gas prices were calculated for the posted gas prices at Henry Hub, adjusted for gas processing, transportation,
and CIG differential. Cost and prices were held flat. The price for ethane of $0.72/gallon was provided by the client and checked
against public data sources. Heavier NGL prices were assumed to be 73.9% of the oil price based on the five year average NGL to
crude price ratio reported by Bentek and the fraction of NGL’s indicated on the gas analysis. Heavier NGL prices were also
adjusted by a $0.14/gallon NGL processing fee. Prices are summarized below.
2
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_dfp1_k_m.htm
Mr. Harrison Blacker
April 5, 2013
Page 5
Product
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Condensate
|
|
$
|
89.19/bbl
|
|
Natural Gas
|
|
$
|
3.14/MSCF
|
|
Ethane
|
|
$
|
30.24/bbl
|
|
Heavier NGLs
|
|
$
|
60.01/bbl
|
|
Weighted average total NGLs
|
|
$
|
42.84/bbl
|
|
We understand that for the South Rangely
Federal 36-24A well Dejour Energy had a before drilling and completion interest of 50.0%. This includes a carry agreement with
Robert L. Bayless Producer LLC. Dejour’s interests in the South Rangely Federal 36-24A after drilling and completion are
reported to be 42.5% working interest with a 20% royalty burden for net revenue interest of 34.4%. It is our understanding that
the carry agreement only applies to the South Rangely Federal 36-24A well and Dejour’s interests in the South Rangely Field
Area are reported to be 42.5% working interest with a 20% royalty burden for net revenue interest of 34.4%.
The estimated net reserves volumes and
associated net cash flow estimates for the South Rangely Field Area are summarized below.
A summary cash flow for each pricing scenario
is included in Tables 1 through 4. Note that ethane and heavier NGLs are summed in these tables, and the NGL prices shown are
average for the entire NGL stream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Heavy
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net Present Value,
|
|
|
|
Net Gas
|
|
|
Net Oil
|
|
|
NGL
|
|
|
Ethane
|
|
|
thousands of US$
|
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Discounted at
|
|
Reserves Category
|
|
(MMCF)
|
|
|
(MBO)
|
|
|
(MBO)
|
|
|
(MBO)
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
15%
|
|
Proved Developed Non- Producing, Flat Pricing
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved Undeveloped, Flat Pricing
|
|
|
921
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
2,385
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
Total, Flat Pricing
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
2,962
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
Limiting Conditions and Disclaimers
The accuracy of any reserve report or
resource evaluation is a function of available data and of engineering and geologic interpretation and judgment. While the evaluation
presented herein is believed to be reasonable, it should be viewed with the understanding that subsequent reservoir performance
or changes in pricing structure, market demand, or other economic parameters may justify its revision. The assumptions, data,
methods, and procedures used are appropriate for the purpose served by the report. Gustavson has used all methods and procedures
as we considered necessary under the circumstances to prepare the report.
Mr. Harrison Blacker
April 5, 2013
Page 6
Gustavson Associates, LLC, holds neither
direct nor indirect financial interest in the subject property, the company operating the subject acreage, or in any other affiliated
companies.
All data and work files utilized in the
preparation of this report are available for examination in our offices. Please contact us if we can be of assistance. We appreciate
the opportunity to be of service and look forward to further serving Dejour Energy (USA) Corp.
Sincerely,
GUSTAVSON ASSOCIATES, LLC
Letha C. Lencioni, P.E.
Vice-President, Petroleum Engineering
Registered Professional Engineer, State of Colorado, # 29506
Table
1 Summary Cash Flow Forecast, Proved Developed Non-Producing Reserves, Flat Pricing
PROVED
DEVELOPED NON-PRODUCING RESERVES
|
DATE
|
:
|
2/15/2012
|
TO THE
INTEREST OF DEJOUR ENERGY (USA) CORP
|
TIME
|
:
|
10:40:00
|
|
DBS
|
:
|
Dejour1-12
|
|
SETTINGS
|
:
|
Dejour
|
|
SCENARIO
|
:
|
Dejour
flat
|
RESERVES
AND ECONOMICS
AS
OF DATE: 01/2012
END
|
|
GROSS OIL
|
|
|
GROSS GAS
|
|
|
GROSS NGL
|
|
|
OIL TO NET
|
|
|
GAS TO NET
|
|
|
NGL TO NET
|
|
|
GROSS PRICES
|
|
|
REVENUE TO
|
|
|
NET OPER
|
|
|
NET TOTAL
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
CUMULATIVE
|
|
|
CUM DISC
|
|
MO-YEAR
|
|
PRODUCTION
|
|
|
PRODUCTION
|
|
|
PRODUCTION
|
|
|
INTEREST
|
|
|
INTEREST
|
|
|
INTEREST
|
|
|
OIL
|
|
|
GAS
|
|
|
NGL
|
|
|
INTEREST
|
|
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
INVESTMENT
|
|
|
BEFORE FIT
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
MMF
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
MMF
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
$/B
|
|
|
$/M
|
|
|
$/B
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-2012
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
47.306
|
|
|
|
35.167
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
16.261
|
|
|
|
1.395
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
110.825
|
|
|
|
11.328
|
|
|
|
175.000
|
|
|
|
-75.502
|
|
|
|
-75.502
|
|
|
|
-73.319
|
|
12-2013
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
55.813
|
|
|
|
270.587
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
19.186
|
|
|
|
1.646
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
130.756
|
|
|
|
15.273
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
115.483
|
|
|
|
39.980
|
|
|
|
26.779
|
|
12-2014
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
39.609
|
|
|
|
412.413
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
13.616
|
|
|
|
1.168
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
92.793
|
|
|
|
12.616
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
80.178
|
|
|
|
120.158
|
|
|
|
89.959
|
|
12-2015
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
30.685
|
|
|
|
508.459
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
10.548
|
|
|
|
0.905
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
71.886
|
|
|
|
11.152
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
60.734
|
|
|
|
180.893
|
|
|
|
133.466
|
|
12-2016
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
25.030
|
|
|
|
583.565
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
8.604
|
|
|
|
0.738
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
58.640
|
|
|
|
10.225
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
48.415
|
|
|
|
229.308
|
|
|
|
164.995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-2017
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
21.127
|
|
|
|
498.610
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
7.262
|
|
|
|
0.623
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
49.494
|
|
|
|
9.585
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
39.910
|
|
|
|
269.217
|
|
|
|
188.622
|
|
12-2018
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
18.270
|
|
|
|
349.965
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
6.280
|
|
|
|
0.539
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
42.802
|
|
|
|
9.116
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
33.686
|
|
|
|
302.903
|
|
|
|
206.752
|
|
12-2019
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
16.090
|
|
|
|
284.615
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
5.531
|
|
|
|
0.475
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
37.694
|
|
|
|
8.759
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
28.935
|
|
|
|
331.839
|
|
|
|
220.910
|
|
12-2020
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
14.371
|
|
|
|
244.023
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
4.940
|
|
|
|
0.424
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
33.667
|
|
|
|
8.477
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
25.190
|
|
|
|
357.029
|
|
|
|
232.114
|
|
12-2021
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
12.981
|
|
|
|
215.539
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
4.462
|
|
|
|
0.383
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
30.412
|
|
|
|
8.249
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
22.163
|
|
|
|
379.192
|
|
|
|
241.076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-2022
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
11.835
|
|
|
|
194.141
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
4.068
|
|
|
|
0.349
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
27.727
|
|
|
|
8.061
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
19.666
|
|
|
|
398.858
|
|
|
|
248.305
|
|
12-2023
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
10.873
|
|
|
|
177.334
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
3.738
|
|
|
|
0.321
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
25.473
|
|
|
|
7.903
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
17.570
|
|
|
|
416.428
|
|
|
|
254.177
|
|
12-2024
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
10.055
|
|
|
|
163.704
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
3.456
|
|
|
|
0.297
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
23.556
|
|
|
|
7.769
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
15.787
|
|
|
|
432.215
|
|
|
|
258.973
|
|
12-2025
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
9.350
|
|
|
|
152.381
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
3.214
|
|
|
|
0.276
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
21.905
|
|
|
|
7.653
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
14.252
|
|
|
|
446.467
|
|
|
|
262.909
|
|
12-2026
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
8.737
|
|
|
|
142.796
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
3.003
|
|
|
|
0.258
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
20.469
|
|
|
|
7.553
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
12.916
|
|
|
|
459.383
|
|
|
|
266.152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S TOT
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
332.132
|
|
|
|
4233.299
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
114.171
|
|
|
|
9.797
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
778.100
|
|
|
|
143.717
|
|
|
|
175.000
|
|
|
|
459.383
|
|
|
|
459.383
|
|
|
|
266.152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFTER
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
127.388
|
|
|
|
2340.660
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
43.789
|
|
|
|
3.757
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
298.436
|
|
|
|
176.441
|
|
|
|
4.250
|
|
|
|
117.745
|
|
|
|
577.128
|
|
|
|
281.808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
459.520
|
|
|
|
6573.959
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
157.960
|
|
|
|
13.554
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
1076.536
|
|
|
|
320.158
|
|
|
|
179.250
|
|
|
|
577.128
|
|
|
|
577.128
|
|
|
|
281.808
|
|
|
|
OIL
|
|
|
GAS
|
|
GROSS WELLS
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
GROSS ULT., MB & MMF
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
459.52
|
|
GROSS CUM., MB & MMF
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
GROSS RES., MB & MMF
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
459.52
|
|
NET RES., MB & MMF
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
157.96
|
|
NET REVENUE, M$
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
495.995
|
|
INITIAL PRICE, $
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
INITIAL N.I., PCT.
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
34.375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.W. %
|
|
|
P.W., M$
|
|
LIFE, YRS.
|
|
|
40.42
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
384.558
|
|
DISCOUNT %
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
281.808
|
|
UNDISCOUNTED PAYOUT, YRS.
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
217.899
|
|
DISCOUNTED PAYOUT, YRS.
|
|
|
1.73
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
174.017
|
|
UNDISCOUNTED NET/INVEST.
|
|
|
4.22
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
141.868
|
|
DISCOUNTED NET/INVEST.
|
|
|
2.67
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
117.24
|
|
RATE-OF-RETURN, PCT.
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
81.96
|
|
INITIAL W.I., PCT.
|
|
|
42.5
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
40.657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
17.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
3.303
|
|
Table
2 Summary Cash Flow Forecast, All Proved Undeveloped, Flat Pricing
PROVED
UNDEVELOPED RESERVES
|
DATE
|
:
|
2/15/2012
|
TO THE INTEREST
OF DEJOUR ENERGY (USA) CORP
|
TIME
|
:
|
10:39:59
|
|
DBS
|
:
|
Dejour1-12
|
|
SETTINGS
|
:
|
Dejour
|
|
SCENARIO
|
:
|
Dejour flat
|
RESERVES
AND ECONOMICS
AS
OF DATE: 01/2012
END
|
|
GROSS OIL
|
|
|
GROSS GAS
|
|
|
GROSS NGL
|
|
|
OIL TO NET
|
|
|
GAS TO NET
|
|
|
NGL TO NET
|
|
|
GROSS PRICES
|
|
|
REVENUE TO
|
|
|
NET OPER
|
|
|
NET TOTAL
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
CUMULATIVE
|
|
|
CUM DISC
|
|
MO-YEAR
|
|
PRODUCTION
|
|
|
PRODUCTION
|
|
|
PRODUCTION
|
|
|
INTEREST
|
|
|
INTEREST
|
|
|
INTEREST
|
|
|
OIL
|
|
|
GAS
|
|
|
NGL
|
|
|
INTEREST
|
|
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
INVESTMENT
|
|
|
BEFORE FIT
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
MMF
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
MMF
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
$/B
|
|
|
$/M
|
|
|
$/B
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-2012
|
|
|
2.688
|
|
|
|
376.686
|
|
|
|
35.169
|
|
|
|
1.536
|
|
|
|
215.238
|
|
|
|
20.165
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
1532.264
|
|
|
|
124.402
|
|
|
|
9354.472
|
|
|
|
-7946.609
|
|
|
|
-7946.609
|
|
|
|
-7401.508
|
|
12-2013
|
|
|
20.678
|
|
|
|
2945.619
|
|
|
|
274.657
|
|
|
|
11.816
|
|
|
|
1672.358
|
|
|
|
156.554
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.74
|
|
|
|
11900.443
|
|
|
|
1076.606
|
|
|
|
19048.943
|
|
|
|
-8225.105
|
|
|
|
-16171.715
|
|
|
|
-14607.286
|
|
12-2014
|
|
|
31.517
|
|
|
|
4567.871
|
|
|
|
425.336
|
|
|
|
18.009
|
|
|
|
2575.838
|
|
|
|
240.922
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.81
|
|
|
|
18321.482
|
|
|
|
1810.059
|
|
|
|
19388.943
|
|
|
|
-2877.523
|
|
|
|
-19049.238
|
|
|
|
-16950.635
|
|
12-2015
|
|
|
38.857
|
|
|
|
5692.066
|
|
|
|
529.575
|
|
|
|
22.203
|
|
|
|
3209.938
|
|
|
|
299.966
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.88
|
|
|
|
22821.543
|
|
|
|
2414.653
|
|
|
|
19680.145
|
|
|
|
726.749
|
|
|
|
-18322.488
|
|
|
|
-16504.059
|
|
12-2016
|
|
|
44.596
|
|
|
|
6472.222
|
|
|
|
602.597
|
|
|
|
25.482
|
|
|
|
3663.674
|
|
|
|
342.525
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.84
|
|
|
|
26053.461
|
|
|
|
2922.461
|
|
|
|
18708.943
|
|
|
|
4422.062
|
|
|
|
-13900.426
|
|
|
|
-13676.339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-2017
|
|
|
38.104
|
|
|
|
5506.346
|
|
|
|
512.842
|
|
|
|
21.773
|
|
|
|
3119.891
|
|
|
|
291.765
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.82
|
|
|
|
22189.555
|
|
|
|
2823.419
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
19366.139
|
|
|
|
5465.712
|
|
|
|
-2211.102
|
|
12-2018
|
|
|
26.744
|
|
|
|
3881.116
|
|
|
|
361.353
|
|
|
|
15.282
|
|
|
|
2196.222
|
|
|
|
205.336
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.84
|
|
|
|
15618.249
|
|
|
|
2363.430
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
13254.815
|
|
|
|
18720.527
|
|
|
|
4922.705
|
|
12-2019
|
|
|
21.750
|
|
|
|
3159.164
|
|
|
|
294.116
|
|
|
|
12.428
|
|
|
|
1787.094
|
|
|
|
167.078
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.84
|
|
|
|
12708.468
|
|
|
|
2159.745
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
10548.724
|
|
|
|
29269.252
|
|
|
|
10083.953
|
|
12-2020
|
|
|
18.648
|
|
|
|
2708.670
|
|
|
|
252.175
|
|
|
|
10.656
|
|
|
|
1532.145
|
|
|
|
143.241
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.84
|
|
|
|
10895.488
|
|
|
|
2032.836
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
8862.653
|
|
|
|
38131.902
|
|
|
|
14026.036
|
|
12-2021
|
|
|
16.472
|
|
|
|
2391.774
|
|
|
|
222.677
|
|
|
|
9.412
|
|
|
|
1352.942
|
|
|
|
126.491
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.84
|
|
|
|
9621.235
|
|
|
|
1943.639
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
7677.595
|
|
|
|
45809.500
|
|
|
|
17130.557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-2022
|
|
|
14.836
|
|
|
|
2153.393
|
|
|
|
200.491
|
|
|
|
8.477
|
|
|
|
1218.203
|
|
|
|
113.898
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.84
|
|
|
|
8663.178
|
|
|
|
1876.574
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
6786.603
|
|
|
|
52596.105
|
|
|
|
19625.318
|
|
12-2023
|
|
|
13.552
|
|
|
|
1966.002
|
|
|
|
183.050
|
|
|
|
7.744
|
|
|
|
1112.315
|
|
|
|
103.999
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.84
|
|
|
|
7910.292
|
|
|
|
1823.872
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
6086.415
|
|
|
|
58682.520
|
|
|
|
21659.295
|
|
12-2024
|
|
|
12.510
|
|
|
|
1813.975
|
|
|
|
168.902
|
|
|
|
7.148
|
|
|
|
1026.425
|
|
|
|
95.973
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.83
|
|
|
|
7299.602
|
|
|
|
1781.125
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
5518.474
|
|
|
|
64200.992
|
|
|
|
23335.820
|
|
12-2025
|
|
|
11.645
|
|
|
|
1687.662
|
|
|
|
157.147
|
|
|
|
6.654
|
|
|
|
955.069
|
|
|
|
89.304
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.83
|
|
|
|
6792.248
|
|
|
|
1745.610
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
5046.641
|
|
|
|
69247.633
|
|
|
|
24729.621
|
|
12-2026
|
|
|
10.912
|
|
|
|
1580.722
|
|
|
|
147.196
|
|
|
|
6.235
|
|
|
|
894.661
|
|
|
|
83.659
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.83
|
|
|
|
6362.736
|
|
|
|
1715.544
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
4647.193
|
|
|
|
73894.820
|
|
|
|
25896.422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S TOT
|
|
|
323.510
|
|
|
|
46903.285
|
|
|
|
4367.283
|
|
|
|
184.854
|
|
|
|
26532.010
|
|
|
|
2480.876
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.83
|
|
|
|
188690.219
|
|
|
|
28613.975
|
|
|
|
86181.445
|
|
|
|
73894.820
|
|
|
|
73894.820
|
|
|
|
25896.422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFTER
|
|
|
178.874
|
|
|
|
25809.479
|
|
|
|
2404.093
|
|
|
|
102.209
|
|
|
|
14623.746
|
|
|
|
1367.750
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.81
|
|
|
|
104014.812
|
|
|
|
42681.457
|
|
|
|
539.186
|
|
|
|
60794.172
|
|
|
|
134689.047
|
|
|
|
32621.184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
502.384
|
|
|
|
72712.758
|
|
|
|
6771.376
|
|
|
|
287.062
|
|
|
|
41155.758
|
|
|
|
3848.626
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.82
|
|
|
|
292705.031
|
|
|
|
71295.430
|
|
|
|
86720.633
|
|
|
|
134688.984
|
|
|
|
134689.047
|
|
|
|
32621.184
|
|
|
|
OIL
|
|
|
GAS
|
|
GROSS WELLS
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
GROSS ULT., MB & MMF
|
|
|
502.384
|
|
|
|
72712.75
|
|
GROSS CUM., MB & MMF
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
GROSS RES., MB & MMF
|
|
|
502.384
|
|
|
|
72712.75
|
|
NET RES., MB & MMF
|
|
|
287.062
|
|
|
|
41155.766
|
|
NET REVENUE, M$
|
|
|
25603.068
|
|
|
|
129229.172
|
|
INITIAL PRICE, $
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
INITIAL N.I., PCT.
|
|
|
56.85
|
|
|
|
56.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.W. %
|
|
|
P.W., M$
|
|
LIFE, YRS.
|
|
|
44.92
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
62787.066
|
|
DISCOUNT %
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
32621.184
|
|
UNDISCOUNTED PAYOUT, YRS.
|
|
|
5.72
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
17150.938
|
|
DISCOUNTED PAYOUT, YRS.
|
|
|
6.31
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
8204.233
|
|
UNDISCOUNTED NET/INVEST.
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
2644.614
|
|
DISCOUNTED NET/INVEST.
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
-966.989
|
|
RATE-OF-RETURN, PCT.
|
|
|
28.66
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
-5016.071
|
|
INITIAL W.I., PCT.
|
|
|
71.07
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
-7748.250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
-8119.618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
-7835.503
|
|
Table
3 Summary Cash Flow Forecast, Proved Undeveloped, Kokopelli Field Area, Flat Pricing
PROVED
UNDEVELOPED RESERVES
|
DATE
|
:
|
2/10/2012
|
TO THE INTEREST
OF DEJOUR ENERGY (USA) CORP
|
DATE
|
:
|
2/10/2012
|
KOKOPELLI FIELD
AREA
|
TIME
|
:
|
15:32:21
|
|
DBS
|
:
|
Dejour1-12
|
|
SETTINGS
|
:
|
SETDATA
|
RESERVES
AND ECONOMICS
AS
OF DATE: 01/2012
END
|
|
GROSS OIL
|
|
|
GROSS GAS
|
|
|
GROSS NGL
|
|
|
OIL TO NET
|
|
|
GAS TO NET
|
|
|
NGL TO NET
|
|
|
GROSS PRICES
|
|
|
REVENUE TO
|
|
|
NET OPER
|
|
|
NET TOTAL
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
CUMULATIVE
|
|
|
CUM DISC
|
|
MO-YEAR
|
|
PRODUCTION
|
|
|
PRODUCTION
|
|
|
PRODUCTION
|
|
|
INTEREST
|
|
|
INTEREST
|
|
|
PRODUCTION
|
|
|
OIL
|
|
|
GAS
|
|
|
NGL
|
|
|
INTEREST
|
|
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
INVESTMENT
|
|
|
BEFORE FIT
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
MMF
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
MMF
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
$/B
|
|
|
$/M
|
|
|
$/B
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-2012
|
|
|
2.688
|
|
|
|
376.686
|
|
|
|
35.169
|
|
|
|
1.536
|
|
|
|
215.238
|
|
|
|
20.165
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
1532.264
|
|
|
|
124.402
|
|
|
|
9354.472
|
|
|
|
-7946.609
|
|
|
|
-7946.609
|
|
|
|
-7401.508
|
|
12-2013
|
|
|
20.678
|
|
|
|
2898.314
|
|
|
|
270.598
|
|
|
|
11.816
|
|
|
|
1656.097
|
|
|
|
155.159
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
11789.618
|
|
|
|
1065.278
|
|
|
|
18708.943
|
|
|
|
-7984.603
|
|
|
|
-15931.212
|
|
|
|
-14391.715
|
|
12-2014
|
|
|
31.517
|
|
|
|
4417.446
|
|
|
|
412.430
|
|
|
|
18.009
|
|
|
|
2524.129
|
|
|
|
236.485
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
17969.078
|
|
|
|
1772.131
|
|
|
|
18708.943
|
|
|
|
-2512.001
|
|
|
|
-18443.215
|
|
|
|
-16434.115
|
|
12-2015
|
|
|
38.857
|
|
|
|
5446.219
|
|
|
|
508.481
|
|
|
|
22.203
|
|
|
|
3111.969
|
|
|
|
291.560
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
22153.863
|
|
|
|
2339.357
|
|
|
|
18708.943
|
|
|
|
1105.565
|
|
|
|
-17337.648
|
|
|
|
-15699.398
|
|
12-2016
|
|
|
44.596
|
|
|
|
6250.693
|
|
|
|
583.590
|
|
|
|
25.482
|
|
|
|
3571.644
|
|
|
|
334.629
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
25426.256
|
|
|
|
2842.715
|
|
|
|
18708.943
|
|
|
|
3874.603
|
|
|
|
-13463.045
|
|
|
|
-13228.198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-2017
|
|
|
38.104
|
|
|
|
5340.729
|
|
|
|
498.632
|
|
|
|
21.773
|
|
|
|
3051.691
|
|
|
|
285.913
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
21724.756
|
|
|
|
2755.042
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
18969.715
|
|
|
|
5506.669
|
|
|
|
-1997.652
|
|
12-2018
|
|
|
26.744
|
|
|
|
3748.559
|
|
|
|
349.980
|
|
|
|
15.282
|
|
|
|
2141.926
|
|
|
|
200.677
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
15248.208
|
|
|
|
2301.685
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
12946.518
|
|
|
|
18453.188
|
|
|
|
4970.227
|
|
12-2019
|
|
|
21.750
|
|
|
|
3048.580
|
|
|
|
284.628
|
|
|
|
12.428
|
|
|
|
1741.959
|
|
|
|
163.205
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
12400.867
|
|
|
|
2102.371
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
10298.496
|
|
|
|
28751.684
|
|
|
|
10009.044
|
|
12-2020
|
|
|
18.648
|
|
|
|
2613.787
|
|
|
|
244.034
|
|
|
|
10.656
|
|
|
|
1493.518
|
|
|
|
139.927
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
10632.238
|
|
|
|
1978.567
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
8653.671
|
|
|
|
37405.355
|
|
|
|
13858.174
|
|
12-2021
|
|
|
16.472
|
|
|
|
2308.683
|
|
|
|
215.548
|
|
|
|
9.412
|
|
|
|
1319.181
|
|
|
|
123.594
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
9391.151
|
|
|
|
1891.691
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
7499.458
|
|
|
|
44904.816
|
|
|
|
16890.664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-2022
|
|
|
14.836
|
|
|
|
2079.490
|
|
|
|
194.150
|
|
|
|
8.477
|
|
|
|
1188.221
|
|
|
|
111.326
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
8458.848
|
|
|
|
1826.430
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
6632.417
|
|
|
|
51537.230
|
|
|
|
19328.748
|
|
12-2023
|
|
|
13.552
|
|
|
|
1899.463
|
|
|
|
177.341
|
|
|
|
7.744
|
|
|
|
1085.353
|
|
|
|
101.686
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
7726.542
|
|
|
|
1775.168
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
5951.370
|
|
|
|
57488.602
|
|
|
|
21317.594
|
|
12-2024
|
|
|
12.510
|
|
|
|
1753.469
|
|
|
|
163.711
|
|
|
|
7.148
|
|
|
|
1001.932
|
|
|
|
93.872
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
7132.682
|
|
|
|
1733.598
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
5399.080
|
|
|
|
62887.680
|
|
|
|
22957.848
|
|
12-2025
|
|
|
11.645
|
|
|
|
1632.190
|
|
|
|
152.388
|
|
|
|
6.654
|
|
|
|
932.633
|
|
|
|
87.379
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
6639.345
|
|
|
|
1699.065
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
4940.282
|
|
|
|
67827.961
|
|
|
|
24322.275
|
|
12-2026
|
|
|
10.912
|
|
|
|
1529.515
|
|
|
|
142.802
|
|
|
|
6.235
|
|
|
|
873.965
|
|
|
|
81.883
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
6221.689
|
|
|
|
1669.829
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4551.861
|
|
|
|
72379.82
|
|
|
|
25465.141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S TOT
|
|
|
323.510
|
|
|
|
45343.824
|
|
|
|
4233.482
|
|
|
|
184.854
|
|
|
|
25909.455
|
|
|
|
2427.460
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
184447.422
|
|
|
|
27877.332
|
|
|
|
84190.250
|
|
|
|
72379.820
|
|
|
|
72379.820
|
|
|
|
25465.141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFTER
|
|
|
178.874
|
|
|
|
25071.340
|
|
|
|
2340.761
|
|
|
|
102.209
|
|
|
|
14325.764
|
|
|
|
1342.183
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
101983.992
|
|
|
|
41545.281
|
|
|
|
514.296
|
|
|
|
59924.426
|
|
|
|
132304.250
|
|
|
|
32076.682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
502.384
|
|
|
|
70415.172
|
|
|
|
6574.243
|
|
|
|
287.062
|
|
|
|
40235.219
|
|
|
|
3769.643
|
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
35.68
|
|
|
|
286431.438
|
|
|
|
69422.609
|
|
|
|
84704.547
|
|
|
|
132304.25
|
|
|
|
132304.25
|
|
|
|
32076.682
|
|
|
|
OIL
|
|
|
GAS
|
|
GROSS WELLS
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
GROSS ULT., MB & MMF
|
|
|
502.384
|
|
|
|
70415.172
|
|
GROSS CUM., MB & MMF
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
GROSS RES., MB & MMF
|
|
|
502.384
|
|
|
|
70415.172
|
|
NET RES., MB & MMF
|
|
|
287.062
|
|
|
|
40235.23
|
|
NET REVENUE, M$
|
|
|
25603.068
|
|
|
|
126338.68
|
|
INITIAL PRICE, $
|
|
|
89.19
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
INITIAL N.I., PCT.
|
|
|
57.14
|
|
|
|
57.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.W. %
|
|
|
P.W., M$
|
|
LIFE, YRS.
|
|
|
44.92
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
61651.262
|
|
DISCOUNT %
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
32076.684
|
|
UNDISCOUNTED PAYOUT, YRS.
|
|
|
5.71
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
16926.072
|
|
DISCOUNTED PAYOUT, YRS.
|
|
|
6.29
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
8166.321
|
|
UNDISCOUNTED NET/INVEST.
|
|
|
2.56
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
2721.069
|
|
DISCOUNTED NET/INVEST.
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
-819.025
|
|
RATE-OF-RETURN, PCT.
|
|
|
28.84
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
-4795.549
|
|
INITIAL W.I., PCT.
|
|
|
71.43
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
-7499.122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
-7887.855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
-7629.401
|
|
Table
4 Summary Cash Flow Forecast, Proved Undeveloped, South Rangely Field Area, Flat Pricing
PROVED
UNDEVELOPED RESERVES
|
DATE
|
:
|
2/15/2012
|
TO THE INTEREST
OF DEJOUR ENERGY (USA) CORP
|
TIME
|
:
|
15:32:17
|
SOUTH RANGELY
FIELD AREA
|
DBS
|
:
|
Dejour1-12
|
|
SETTINGS
|
:
|
Dejour
|
|
SCENARIO
|
:
|
Dejour flat
|
RESERVES
AND ECONOMICS
AS
OF DATE: 01/2012
END
|
|
GROSS OIL
|
|
|
GROSS GAS
|
|
|
GROSS NGL
|
|
|
OIL TO NET
|
|
|
GAS TO NET
|
|
|
NGL TO NET
|
|
|
GROSS PRICES
|
|
|
REVENUE TO
|
|
|
NET OPER
|
|
|
NET TOTAL
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
CUMULATIVE
|
|
|
CUM DISC
|
|
MO-YEAR
|
|
PRODUCTION
|
|
|
PRODUCTION
|
|
|
PRODUCTION
|
|
|
INTEREST
|
|
|
INTEREST
|
|
|
INTEREST
|
|
|
OIL
|
|
|
GAS
|
|
|
NGL
|
|
|
INTEREST
|
|
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
INVESTMENT
|
|
|
BEFORE FIT
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
MMF
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
MMF
|
|
|
MB
|
|
|
$/B
|
|
|
$/M
|
|
|
$/B
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
M$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-2012
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
12-2013
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
47.306
|
|
|
|
4.059
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
16.261
|
|
|
|
1.395
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
110.825
|
|
|
|
11.328
|
|
|
|
340.000
|
|
|
|
-240.502
|
|
|
|
-240.502
|
|
|
|
-215.570
|
|
12-2014
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
150.425
|
|
|
|
12.906
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
51.709
|
|
|
|
4.437
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
352.407
|
|
|
|
37.928
|
|
|
|
680.000
|
|
|
|
-365.522
|
|
|
|
-606.024
|
|
|
|
-516.517
|
|
12-2015
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
245.847
|
|
|
|
21.094
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
97.968
|
|
|
|
8.406
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
667.679
|
|
|
|
75.295
|
|
|
|
971.200
|
|
|
|
-378.816
|
|
|
|
-984.841
|
|
|
|
-804.659
|
|
12-2016
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
221.529
|
|
|
|
19.007
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
92.029
|
|
|
|
7.896
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
627.203
|
|
|
|
79.746
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
547.458
|
|
|
|
-437.383
|
|
|
|
-448.139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-2017
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
165.618
|
|
|
|
14.210
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
68.200
|
|
|
|
5.852
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
464.798
|
|
|
|
68.377
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
396.421
|
|
|
|
-40.962
|
|
|
|
-213.448
|
|
12-2018
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
132.557
|
|
|
|
11.373
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
54.296
|
|
|
|
4.659
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
370.042
|
|
|
|
61.745
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
308.298
|
|
|
|
267.335
|
|
|
|
-47.521
|
|
12-2019
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
110.584
|
|
|
|
9.488
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
45.134
|
|
|
|
3.873
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
307.602
|
|
|
|
57.374
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
250.228
|
|
|
|
517.564
|
|
|
|
74.910
|
|
12-2020
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
94.883
|
|
|
|
8.141
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
38.627
|
|
|
|
3.314
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
263.250
|
|
|
|
54.269
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
208.981
|
|
|
|
726.545
|
|
|
|
167.865
|
|
12-2021
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
83.090
|
|
|
|
7.129
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
33.760
|
|
|
|
2.897
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
230.084
|
|
|
|
51.947
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
178.137
|
|
|
|
904.682
|
|
|
|
239.896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-2022
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
73.902
|
|
|
|
6.341
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
29.981
|
|
|
|
2.572
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
204.331
|
|
|
|
50.145
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
154.186
|
|
|
|
1058.868
|
|
|
|
296.575
|
|
12-2023
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
66.540
|
|
|
|
5.709
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
26.962
|
|
|
|
2.313
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
183.749
|
|
|
|
48.704
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
135.045
|
|
|
|
1193.913
|
|
|
|
341.705
|
|
12-2024
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
60.506
|
|
|
|
5.191
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
24.492
|
|
|
|
2.101
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
166.921
|
|
|
|
47.526
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
119.395
|
|
|
|
1313.308
|
|
|
|
377.977
|
|
12-2025
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
55.472
|
|
|
|
4.759
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
22.435
|
|
|
|
1.925
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
152.903
|
|
|
|
46.545
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
106.358
|
|
|
|
1419.666
|
|
|
|
407.352
|
|
12-2026
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
51.207
|
|
|
|
4.394
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
20.696
|
|
|
|
1.776
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
141.047
|
|
|
|
45.715
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
95.332
|
|
|
|
1514.998
|
|
|
|
431.287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S TOT
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
1559.467
|
|
|
|
133.801
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
622.552
|
|
|
|
53.416
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
4242.842
|
|
|
|
736.644
|
|
|
|
1991.200
|
|
|
|
1514.998
|
|
|
|
1514.998
|
|
|
|
431.287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFTER
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
738.134
|
|
|
|
63.332
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
297.982
|
|
|
|
25.567
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
2030.817
|
|
|
|
1136.176
|
|
|
|
24.890
|
|
|
|
869.751
|
|
|
|
2384.749
|
|
|
|
544.499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
2297.600
|
|
|
|
197.133
|
|
|
|
0.000
|
|
|
|
920.534
|
|
|
|
78.983
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
|
|
42.84
|
|
|
|
6273.659
|
|
|
|
1872.820
|
|
|
|
2016.090
|
|
|
|
2384.749
|
|
|
|
2384.749
|
|
|
|
544.499
|
|
|
|
OIL
|
|
|
GAS
|
|
GROSS WELLS
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
GROSS ULT., MB & MMF
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2297.601
|
|
GROSS CUM., MB & MMF
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
GROSS RES., MB & MMF
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2297.601
|
|
NET RES., MB & MMF
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
920.533
|
|
NET REVENUE, M$
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2890.476
|
|
INITIAL PRICE, $
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
INITIAL N.I., PCT.
|
|
|
40.065
|
|
|
|
40.065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.W. %
|
|
|
P.W., M$
|
|
LIFE, YRS.
|
|
|
43.42
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1135.811
|
|
DISCOUNT %
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
544.499
|
|
UNDISCOUNTED PAYOUT, YRS.
|
|
|
6.13
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
224.87
|
|
DISCOUNTED PAYOUT, YRS.
|
|
|
7.39
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
37.912
|
|
UNDISCOUNTED NET/INVEST.
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
-76.455
|
|
DISCOUNTED NET/INVEST.
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
-147.964
|
|
RATE-OF-RETURN, PCT.
|
|
|
21.66
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
-220.523
|
|
INITIAL W.I., PCT.
|
|
|
49.78
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
-249.129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
-231.762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
-206.103
|
|
DXI Capital (CE) (USOTC:DXIEF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
DXI Capital (CE) (USOTC:DXIEF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024