FluoroPharma Medical, Inc. (OTC BB:FPMI) seeks to develop
breakthrough molecular imaging agents for positron emission
tomography (PET) to fulfill critical medical needs. The company’s
products are designed to improve patient diagnosis and management
by evaluating various forms of cardiac disease at the cellular and
molecular level. Each year, millions of patients undergo
molecular imaging studies in the U.S. The main reason for
these studies is to detect and evaluate ischemic heart disease and
myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with acute and chronic forms
of coronary artery disease (CAD). These images provide
benefit in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected but
unproven CAD, and in those patients in whom a diagnosis of CAD has
been established and information on prognosis or risk is
required.
FluoroPharma's current focus is on three separate cardiac molecular
imaging pharmaceuticals, two of which are in clinical-stage (BFPET,
CardioPET) and recently entered phase II clinical trials. The
third candidate, VasoPET, is still in early development stage with
initial clinical testing still likely to be years away. If
all goes to plan, the first of the three products could be on the
U.S. market within the next three to four years.
FluoroPharma's products are aimed at improving overall patient care
via improved disease detection and are expected to; provide
significantly greater diagnostic accuracy compared to currently
employed nuclear imaging agents and modalities, increase the use of
PET in cardiac imaging, and help reduce the number of unnecessary
diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
In the U.S., there are an estimated 12 million PET imaging
procedures done per year - however, the vast majority of these
scans are for the diagnosis of cancer. While PET is becoming
more established in the cardiac setting, this segment continues to
be dominated by lower cost competing modalities. By all
accounts, this is quickly changing as several factors have led to a
shift in favor of PET for the diagnosis of cardiac disease.
FluoroPharma expects to capitalize on this growth through the
introduction of novel cardiac PET tracing agents, the market for
which is expected to grow by at least 14% annually over the next
four years to approximately $900 million (or more). Aside
from one currently marketed branded cardiac PET tracer (which
suffers from certain issues), the market is largely is wide
open.
Cardiac Imaging Modalities
Within cardiac imaging there are several different modalities
including ultrasound, MRI, PET, computer tomography angiograph (CTA
or CT) and single-photon emission computed tomography
(SPECT). PET and SPECT are nuclear (also called molecular)
imaging modalities which provide the highest level of detail
relative to organic anatomic changes (i.e. - function and
metabolism) in the body while the others primarily only provide
information about the anatomy and structure of the body. CT
and MRI, while sometimes used as an adjunct to PET and SPECT for
cardiac imaging, have not gained widespread acceptance as a
first-line diagnostic for this application and are generally viewed
as complementary to molecular cardiac imaging. This is
especially the case for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) which is
used to determine the volume of blood flow to the heart and the
function of the heart muscle. CT coronary angiography, which
uses a high speed (64-slice) CT camera and drugs to slow the heart,
is a relatively new procedure and provides more functional detail
of the coronary arteries than conventional CT scans. Although
CT coronary angiography is gaining greater acceptance in the
diagnosis of CAD, MPI via nuclear imaging remains the most
definitive non-invasive technique for diagnosing CAD. As PET
and SPECT are considered the gold-standards for high accuracy
cardiac imaging, we confine our discussion solely to these two
imaging modalities.
PET Growing At SPECT's Expense…
Nuclear imaging uses radioactive materials called
radiopharmaceuticals or radiotracers which are injected into the
patient and accumulate in the area of the body to be imaged.
These tracers emit very minute levels of radioactivity which are
detected by a camera (i.e. - PET, SPECT) which can then provide
very detailed molecular images.
PET and SPECT are the two most widely used nuclear imaging
modalities. SPECT has some utility in a number of
applications including neurology and oncology but is primarily used
in cardiology. In cardiac scans, PET has been shown to
provide a better picture of blood flow compared to SPECT which
allows it to better identify those patients that should undergo
revascularization and reduce reliance on coronary angiography as a
definitive diagnostic. Another significant differentiator is
that PET scans are quantifiable, while SPECT scans are not - the
difference is important as approximately 20% of CAD patients have
global ischemia as a result of multi-vessel CAD which can not be
detected by SPECT but can be with PET due to its quantifiable
functionality. PET's superior sensitivity has been documented
in clinical studies and was even more apparent with heavier and
large-breasted patients. PET uses different types of
radiopharmaceuticals compared to SPECT, which contributes to the
greater sensitivity of PET.
Despite the greater accuracy afforded by PET, nuclear imaging is
currently dominated by SPECT, accounting for approximately 90% of
all nuclear scans. In aggregate, molecular imaging is used in
approximately 10 million MPI scans every year in the U.S.
Estimates put the number of SPECT cameras currently in use at about
14k, compared to just 140 dedicated PET systems being used for
cardiac applications. The dominance of SPECT up to now has to
do with its lower cost and, until recently, more favorable
insurance reimbursement. In addition, PET has historically
been limited to only a few PET centers and used primarily for
oncology.
The tides are turning however, with rapid growth in the number of
dedicated PET centers and technological advancements making PET
scanners even more sensitive and providing greater image uniformity
(especially as compared to SPECT). The increased adoption of
PET over SPECT in cardiology has also been facilitated by the
introduction of lower cost PET scanners, coupled with significantly
higher reimbursement compared to SPECT - which makes the economics
of owning a PET scanner much more palatable for imaging facilities
than they might have been previously. An opportunity to
increase PET scanner utilization beyond oncology into applications
such as cardiology is viewed highly attractive to health care
providers which are looking to cover the relatively high fixed cost
of their nuclear scanners (compared to a relatively low per-scan,
variable cost). This, along with a global shortage of
molybdenum-99 (used for SPECT imaging), has helped to significantly
increase the use of PET, especially as a first-line diagnostic for
cardiac procedures. In fact, The American College of
Cardiology Environmental Scanning Report 2011 notes, "A greater use
of PET can be expected for both assessing blood flow quantitatively
and molecular imaging of atherosclerotic plaques and myocardial
disease states." The expected transition away from SPECT to
PET for cardiac imaging is echoed by a May 2011 molecular cardiac
imaging industry report by TriMark Publications
titled Nuclear CardiologyMarkets;Trends, Industry
Participants, Product Overviews and Market Drivers which
notes, "A continued movement towards PET from SPECT will result in
a nearly 50% of the entire cardiac SPECT market transitioning to
PET within the next decade, resulting in a total SPECT decline from
over 90% of the nuclear medicine studies to 68%."
BFPET
BFPET is a novel blood flow imaging agent being developed for
use in conjunction with stress-testing for the detection of
ischemic (reversibly damaged) and infarcted (irreversibly damaged)
tissue within the myocardium in patients with suspected or proven
chronic CAD. BFPET, a Flourine-18 labeled tracer, has
been designed to enter the myocardial cells of the heart muscle in
direct proportion to blood flow and membrane potential - which are
the two most important physiological indicators of adequate blood
supply to the heart. BFPET has been designed to effectively
differentiate among those cells of the myocardium that are
ischemic, infarcted and those that are healthy. Because
ischemic and infarcted cells take up significantly less BFPET than
normal healthy myocardial cells, the signal emitted by BFPET is
inversely proportional to the extent of myocardial
injury. Therefore, as a result of BFPET’s use,
FluoroPharma believes ischemic heart tissue can be more reliably
detected using BFPET. BFPET is expected to primarily be used
in conjunction with stress-testing for patients with suspected or
proven chronic CAD. If approved, BFPET will represent the
first molecular imaging blood flow agent commercialized for use in
the cardiovascular segment of the PET imaging market.
BFPET has completed phase I trials and recently entered phase II
trials to assess its efficacy in CAD subjects. Phase II
trials will compare BFPET to Rb-82 and/or traditional SPECT
agents. Based on current expected timelines, we believe phase
II trials might be completed by sometime in 2013. If all goes
to plan, phase III trials could wrap up and an NDA filed by the end
of 2015. This potentially puts BFPET on the U.S. market by
2016.
Phase I trials (used to assess safety / tolerability, distribution
and dosimetry) consisted of 12 healthy individuals which were
injected with one dose of BFPET while at rest (i.e. - not
stressed-tested). Results, announced in July 2008, showed a
favorable profile on all categories (safety, distribution,
dosimetry) and no adverse events were experienced.
BFPET Pre-Phase II Study Results Very
Encouraging…
In late July 2012 FlouroPharma announced that quality of the
initial images using BFPET in a 20-patient (with coronary artery
disease) investigator-led stress perfusion imaging study conducted
at a hospital in Beijing China were "spectacular" and
"superb". This study is similar in the design of the phase II
study where BFPET will be compared to Rb-82 and/or traditional
SPECT agents such as sestamibi which suffer from certain drawbacks
such as high cost or comparably (relative to BFPET) lower image
quality.
Alan Fishman, principal investigator of the BFPET phase I trial,
notes in the press release relative to the current study that
"initial results are impressive. Image quality obtained using
PET is superb. BFPET shows clear diagnostic qualities as well as
increased resolution, inherent in PET. The initial images
look spectacular and we are confident that when all the patients
are imaged, the data will further support clinical development of
the agent." His confidence was further bolstered when
additional data was available in November 2012, noting "We saw a
high level of agreement between the angiography, the SPECT and the
BFPET images. These additional images demonstrate that BFPET shows
clear diagnostic qualities as well as the increased resolution,
inherent in PET."
In early January 2013 FPMI announced that phase II trials of BFPET
are being conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital. The
specific trial design will be announced prior to the commencement
- until then we estimate BFPET enrollment will also be
approximately 50 patients.
BFPET market is huge…
BFPET will be used to measure cardiovascular blood flow in MPI
exams. Approximately 10 million perfusion imaging exams are
performed in the U.S. every year. SPECT currently dominates
this market although, as noted, SPECT suffers in image quality
compared to PET. PET MPI exams use the tracer Rb-82 which, as
noted, is relatively expensive which has limited its use.
FluoroPharma expects to capitalize on the deficiencies of SPECT and
Rb-82 by positioning their Flourine-18 labeled BFPET tracer as a
high accuracy, relatively safe agent for MPI.
BFPET will be used with PET in combination with stress testing for
the identification of ischemic and infarcted tissue in patients
with chronic CAD (approximately 85% of CAD is considered chronic as
opposed to acute) as well as in combination with FDG (or CardioPET)
in patients with acute CAD that are undergoing CVA.
The potential market for BFPET is huge - essentially encompassing
the entire MPI procedural population. However, as the vast
majority of MPI procedures are done using a modality other than
PET, the proportion of this market that BFPET would realistically
be able to initially attain would likely be relatively low.
But, due to the rapidly growing acceptance of PET in cardiac
diagnostics along with the advantages of BFPET compared to Rb-82,
deeper penetration within MPI could come fairly swiftly.
FluoroPharma estimates that PET will account for approximately 5%
of the U.S. molecular imaging market by 2015 and 25% share within
five years after BFPET makes its commercial launch (both of which
are very conservative relative to the estimates cited in the
aforementioned market study). They also believe BFPET could
eventually capture approximately 65% share of the evaluable
cardiovascular PET market.
Based on these assumptions, FluoroPharma estimates that BFPET could
capture about 1% - 3% of the total market for MPI
radiopharmaceuticals in the first full year after launch (i.e. -
possibly ~2016/2017) and will account for about 20% - 30% of
the market five years following launch (i.e. - possibly ~
2021/2022) - which, depending on the selling price that the company
is able to achieve, could mean revenue to FluoroPharma from sales
of BFPET as high as $50 million in the first full year after launch
and ~ $700 million five years after launch.
CardioPET
CardioPET is a novel molecular imaging agent (also labeled with
Flourine-18) in development for the assessment of myocardial
metabolism. FluoroPharma intends to develop CardioPET for use
in the following areas: (a) detection of ischemic and infarcted
tissue in patients with suspected or proven forms of acute and
chronic CAD, including those that cannot undergo stress-testing;
and (b) Cardiac Viability Assessment (CVA), for the prediction of
functional improvement prior to, or following revascularization in
patients with acute CAD, including myocardial infarction.
FluoroPharma believes that CardioPET may be ideal for CVA through
its ability to specifically identify jeopardized but viable
myocardium - that is, heart tissue that has suffered an acute
episode of ischemia, but is still viable. Identifying viable
myocardium, also referred to as hibernating or stunned myocardium,
from non-viable scar tissue is crucial because it is well
documented that revascularization in patients with substantial
viable myocardium results in improved left ventricular dysfunction
and survival. The company believes that CardioPET, if
approved, may have several significant advantages for assessing
cardiac viability using PET, and would represent the first imaging
agent available in the U.S. for use in patients with acute and
chronic CAD that cannot undergo stress-testing. CardioPET is
designed to provide the metabolic component for CVA.
Accordingly, it may be used with either BFPET or other blood flow
agents in performing CVA.
In the acute setting, CardioPET could potentially play a critically
important role in emergency rooms, helping to better assess the
risk of patients presenting with signs of acute coronary
syndrome. Patients coming into emergency departments that
show signs of ACS are initially triaged based on a review of their
medical history and through some gate-keeper type of tests such as
a chest x-ray, EKG and certain biomarker tests such as
Troponin. While these tests are generally good for providing
information relative to whether someone has recently suffered a
cardiac event such as a heart attack, they have certain
shortcomings. EKG's have shown to be highly accurate in the
confirmation of ACS but suffer from high false positives - which
means many low-risk patients may be inaccurately diagnosed as
high-risk. Troponin and other biomarker tests, used to detect
elevated levels of certain proteins released following a heart
attack, are accurate in determining whether a cardiac event
occurred but the accuracy of the tests is highly dependent on when
they are administered as these biomarkers peak in the body ~8 to 24
hours after the onset of a heart attack. This means triage
decisions may be delayed, potentially putting a patient at greater
risk.
While these gate-keeper tests are generally valuable for triaging
patients to a high-risk group (which should be admitted to the
hospital immediately), they provide less guidance for intermediate
and low risk groups. This often results in either over- or
under-diagnosis and inappropriate follow-on testing and treatment
for intermediate and lower risk patients. CardioPET could be
ideal adjunctive test for this patient population, which accounts
for ~85% of the patients emergency departments see every year with
signs of ACS. CardioPET could allow emergency room physicians
to better diagnose these patients determine the next course of
action - whether it be release and outpatient follow-up or admit to
the hospital and treatment.
CardioPET completed phase I trials and in March 2012 FluoroPharma
announced the initiation of the phase II trial design. The
company signed a letter of intent with SGS Life Sciences to provide
clinical research services for phase II trials of CardioPET - this
agreement was consummated in September 2012 when the companies
signed a Clinical Research Agreement. The Belgian-based trial
will be open label and designed to assess safety and performance of
compared to stress echocardiography, myocardial perfusion imaging
(MPI) and angiography. The trial will be conducted at two
sites in Belgium. Enrollment is expected to consist of
between 30 and 100 patients with known stable chronic coronary
artery disease that can not undergo stress testing.
Phase I trials (used to assess safety / tolerability) consisted of
6 patients with diagnosed CAD and 15 normal healthy volunteers
(i.e. - control group). Phase I testing completed in April
2007 and demonstrated CardioPET was safe with no patients
experiencing any adverse events.
On 2/28/2013 FPMI announced that the initial images from phase II
trials "show high resolution in the heart and provides extremely
clear image quality". In the press release announcing the
results of the most recent images, Dr. Roland Hustinx, one of the
investigators in the study, notes, "The (phase II) images obtained
from CardioPET are high quality and agree with previous
findings."
We view this news as an obvious and significant positive for FPMI
and their CardioPET candidate and our outlook remains highly
positive on FPMI. If all goes to plan phase II will wrap up
in 2013 and phase III completed and an NDA filing potentially
happening by the end of 2015. U.S. launch could potentially
happen by 2016.
CardioPET for cardiac viability…
CardioPET's chief clinical uses are expected to be to identify
patients with jeopardized but viable myocardium that will benefit
from PCI and in the evaluation of CAD in patients that can not
exercise. PET imaging using CardioPET will be positioned as
an alternative to exercise stress-testing. CardioPET's target
markets will be the approximately 4 million patients with chronic
CAD that can not undergo exercise stress testing, the 1.6 million
people that could benefit from cardiac viable assessment, and a
portion of the 12 million MPI procedures. As there are no
directly competing tracer products in the non-stress testing
indication, FluoroPharma expects to be able to capture a
significant portion of this segment shortly after launch.
Within five years of launch FPMI believes that they can attain as
much as 80% share for the myocardium viability indication, 30% of
the CAD diagnosis at rest indication, and 7% of the MPI
indication. Based on these assumptions, the company believes
that within the third year of launch, CardioPET could be used in
approximately 700k procedures, growing to 1 million+ procedures in
year five post-launch. This could equal a potential revenue
opportunity to FluoroPharma of approximately $400 million in the
third year (i.e. - ~2019/2020) and $600+ million in the fifth year
(i.e. - ~2021/2022) after launch.
VasoPET
FluoroPharma is developing VasoPET as a novel molecular imaging
agent for the detection of vulnerable coronary artery plaque in
patients with CAD. VasoPET, if approved, would represent the
first PET cardiac product to reliably image inflamed plaque and
therefore may differentiate between vulnerable and stable coronary
artery plaque.
The rupture of atherosclerotic plaques and the subsequent formation
of thrombi are currently recognized as the primary mechanisms of
myocardial and cerebral infarctions. Therefore, the detection
of vulnerable plaque in atherosclerotic lesions is a desirable
goal—and to date remains both a significant unmet clinical
objective and a large unaddressed market opportunity.
Coronary artery plaques grow over time and progressively narrow the
lumen (i.e. - opening) of the coronary artery until blood flow to
the heart diminishes to a critical level. The decrease in
blood flow causes symptoms of chest pain (angina), at first during
exercise and then progressively during rest. Rupture of the
plaque and/or clot formation overlying the plaque may then result
in myocardial ischemia and/or myocardial infarction. Coronary
artery plaque that is vulnerable is differentiated from its stable
form by a large lipid-rich atheromatous core, a thin fibrous cap,
and infiltration by inflammatory cells such as macrophages. The
risk factor for rupture (and subsequent heart attack) is currently
thought to be independent of plaque size and arterial narrowing,
but rather is thought to correlate more with the presence of
inflammation.
VasoPET has completed preclinical testing and preparation for an
investigational new drug (IND) application is currently
ongoing. Based on current expected timelines, an IND could be
filed and phase I trials started towards the back half of
2014. Eventual FDA approval and subsequent launch is likely
to be at least four years away (~ 2017+).
VasoPET for identification of vulnerable
plaques…
VasoPET is expected to be able to identify the presence of
inflammation and vulnerable plaques, the rupture of which could
increase the risk of heart attack or stroke. The target
market for VasoPET is expected to be those patients that have been
diagnosed with ischemia through conventional exercise stress
testing and specifically those that have already experienced an
acute cardiac event such as a heart attack or stroke. VasoPET
could be ideal in helping determine effective treatment to this
patient population including appropriate medication and
dosage. This target market represents approximately 30% of
the total CAD patient population, or about 4 million people.
VasoPET could also have utility as a first line diagnostic for
atherosclerosis, which would expand its potential target market to
an additional ~ 50 million people. Another potential use is
for determining a patient's response to statins (such as
simvastatin, Lipitor, and Crestor), commonly used drugs to combat
high cholesterol - FPMI pegs this indication at a potential market
size of about 4 million. Based on estimated penetration rates
of these target markets (0.6% of the atherosclerosis market and 10%
of all the other potential indications,fiive years after launch),
FluoroPharma believes that VasoPET could be used in approximately
30k PET scans in the first full year of launch, growing to 450k and
700k scans in the third and fifth year (post-launch),
respectively. Assuming a ~$600 cost per dose,
This implies a potential revenue opportunity of ~$18 million in
year 1 (2017/2018), $270 million in year 3, and $420 million in
year 5 (2022/2023).
Q1 2013 10-Q Filed
FluoroPharma filed their 10-Q for the first quarter ending March
31, 2013 on May 15th. Results continue to be in-line with our
estimates both in terms of expenses and cash burn. In
addition development progress remains closely tracking our
expectations.
Importantly, we see FPMI's fundamentals improving as time passes,
not necessarily because of positive divergence from our
expectations relative to product development but more to do with
how the overall market for PET is developing and ever-improving
expectations for growth of PET and, in particular growth of PET for
cardiac diagnosis. While it's been no secret that PET has,
and was expected to, make significant gains in terms of growth of
installed systems and in the number of cardiac scans performed,
largely at the expense of SPECT, as new estimates (several sources
offer estimates) are published relative to these expectations, the
general theme is that cardiac PET may accelerate even faster than
was thought just a few years ago. This trend, along with an
aging and fattening population (i.e. - more heart disease), offers
a very attractive opportunity for FPMI. See our
full report which includes a discussion on fundamental
trends that we see favoring FPMI.
Q1 operating expenses were $1.1 million, down from $1.4 million in
Q4 and below our $1.5 million estimate. We reiterate that
management has done an impressive job keeping expenses down and
cash burn to a minimum despite meaningful progress with development
of the pipeline (including recently moving both CardioPET and BFPET
into phase II trials, with initial images already coming from these
studies) as well as with awareness-building and capital raising
efforts.
Q1 net loss and EPS were $1.0MM and $0.04, better than our $1.6MM
and $0.07 estimates. Cash used in operating activities was
$672k, which was below the ~$825k average quarterly burn in
2012. FPMI exited Q1 with $631k in cash and equivalents,
compared to $1.3MM at the end of 2012.
Recent highlights in product development include two separate
rounds of high quality images from a BFPET study being conducted in
China and high quality initial images from the CardioPET phase II
trial. Relative to increasing visibility and awareness to
industry leaders, FPMI's products were highlighted at two major
scientific forums during Q3 2012; the high quality BFPET images
were presented in Baltimore at the Annual Scientific Session of the
American Society of Nuclear Cardiology in a lecture titled,
"Nuclear Cardiology in 2012 and Beyond: Can We Meet the Challenges"
and earlier that week in Dublin, Ireland two abstracts describing
FPMI's products were presented as posters at the World Molecular
Imaging Congress.
FPMI also presented at Taglich Brothers Small Cap Conference
earlier this month.
We have made no material changes to our financial projections
following the close of Q1. We think 2016 or 2017 could
potentially be initial launch year of FPMI's first commercialized
product. We are maintaining our $2.35/share price target
(validated with our DCF valuation) and Outperform rating.
FPMI Attractive Valuation
Assigning valuation of FluoroPharma is somewhat tricky given that
the first commercial product launch is still at least several years
away. There are also no publicly available acquisition
transactions in the radiopharmaceutical space involving a target
company similar to FluoroPharma that could be used to value the
company.
As a result, we believe an appropriate valuation methodology is to
use price/sales ratio based on an estimate of revenue two to three
years after when the first product may launch. Based on
management's assumptions relative to demand for their products and
growth of the respective markets, estimated revenue in 2019 could
be as much as $1.7 billion. We have significantly haircut
these estimates as we think these may be more of a best-case
scenario. We use a 2.5x price/sales multiple to our estimated
(i.e. - ballparked) 2019 revenue of $155 million and discount this
back to the present at a fairly lofty 25%/year. We feel this
discount rate is appropriate given that product development is
still at an early enough stage where there is not insignificant
risk of failure to hit expected milestones, including eventual FDA
approval and commercialization. These inputs result in a
current valuation of approximately $52 million, or about $2.35 /
share.
We have also built a DCF model through 2022 which also supports a
valuation of approximately $2.35. Key inputs to our DCF model
are meaningful revenue commencing in 2017 and growing to around
$340 million in 2022 and a ~19% cash flow discount rate (which
again, reflects inherent risks of a FPMI's development-stage
status). Our DCF model calculates a valuation of $2.43.
Depending on the progression, success and timeliness of product
development and related likelihood of ultimate FDA approval /
commercialization, it may be appropriate to adjust the discount
rates used in both valuation methodologies. Similarly,
depending on how certain other factors evolve over the next few
years such as the reimbursement environment for
radiopharmaceuticals, growth of PET for cardiac applications, and
the competitive landscape for novel PET cardiac tracers, it may
prompt modifications (up or down) to our forecasted revenue and
cash flow estimates. As it is now we value FPMI at
$2.35/share. Based on the current share price of $0.80, we
feel the stock remains undervalued and are maintaining our
Outperform rating.
See below for a link to our full 22-page report on FPMI.
Please visit SCR.Zacks.com for
additional information on our research and coverage universe,
and Subscribe to receive our articles
and reports emailed directly to you each morning.
FLUOROPHARMA MD (FPMI): Get Free Report
To read this article on Zacks.com click here.
Zacks Investment Research
FluoroPharma Medical (CE) (USOTC:FPMI)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2024 to Dec 2024
FluoroPharma Medical (CE) (USOTC:FPMI)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2023 to Dec 2024