UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark One)
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission
File Number: 0-24635
HYPERTENSION
DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
(Exact
name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
MINNESOTA
|
|
41‑1618036
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
|
|
10501
WAYZATA BOULEVARD SOUTH, SUITE 102, MINNETONKA, MN
|
55305
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
952-545-2457
|
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
|
|
|
(Former
Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
YES
x
NO
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T ( § 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files).
YES
o
NO
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
o
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
Smaller reporting company
x
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell
company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES
o
NO
x
As of May 13, 2013, there were issued and outstanding 52,388,750
shares of the issuer’s common stock and 611,390 shares of the issuer’s Series A
convertible preferred stock.
HYPERTENSION DIAGNOSTICS,INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
|
|
Page No
|
|
|
|
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets – March 31, 2013 (unaudited) and June 30, 2012
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations (unaudited) – Three Months and Nine Months Ended March
31, 2013 and 2012
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) – Nine Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
17
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
22
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
22
|
|
|
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
22
|
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
23
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and use of Proceeds
|
23
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
23
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Mine
Safety Disclosures
|
24
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
24
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
CERTIFICATIONS
|
27
|
HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.
Forward-LookingStatements
This report may
contain “forward-looking” statements, as such term is defined by the Securities
and Exchange Commission’s rules, regulations and releases, which represent the
current beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by and
information currently available to management
,
including but not limited to, statements concerning the operations, economic
performance, financial condition, growth and acquisition strategies,
investments, and future operational plans of Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc.
(referred to as “HDI,” the “Company,” “we,” or “us”).
For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are
not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking
statements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as
“may,” “expect,” “believe,” “expect,” “can,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,”
“could,” “might,” “plan,” “predict” or “continue” or the negative or other
variations thereof or comparable terminology are intended to identify
forward-looking statements.
We caution readers not to place undue
reliance on any forward-looking statements and to recognize that the statements
are not predictions of actual future results.
These
statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties, certain
of which are beyond the Company’s control, and actual results may differ
materially depending on a variety of important factors, including our ability to generate acceptable levels of revenues;
negative effect on our stock price resulting from available securities for
sale; our need for additional capital; significant business risks associated
with the relocation and re-start of the Company’s HDI Plastics, Inc. subsidiary
business; the illiquidity of our securities on the OTC Bulletin Board and the
related restrictions on our securities relating to “penny stocks”; uncertainty
related to acquisitions; governmental regulation; commercial viability of
required raw materials, and any other factors discussed in this and other
filings of the Company with the Securities and Exchange commission.
We
undertake no responsibility to update any forward-looking statement.
These forward‑looking statements are only made as of
the date of this report. The following should be read in conjunction with the
information presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June
30, 2012
, as amended.
HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.
Consolidated BalanceSheets
March31, 2013
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
March 31, 2013
(Unaudited)
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ 5,664
|
|
$ 75,043
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
42,066
|
|
149,156
|
Prepaids and other
current assets
|
|
13,530
|
|
31,304
|
Inventory, net
|
|
140,486
|
|
172,223
|
Note receivable-related
party-CPC
|
|
75,000
|
|
146,319
|
Accrued
royalties receivable from CPC
|
|
-
|
|
2,400
|
Total Current
Assets
|
|
276,746
|
|
576,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment,
net
|
|
731,915
|
|
678,331
|
Debt issuance costs, net
|
|
6,150
|
|
7,380
|
Other assets
|
|
50,128
|
|
43,657
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ 1,064,939
|
|
$ 1,305,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders'
Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ 437,690
|
|
$ 170,832
|
Sale-leaseback
obligation-current portion
|
|
40,481
|
|
35,383
|
Accrued vacation, payroll
and payroll taxes
|
|
102,367
|
|
29,236
|
Payable for equipment
|
|
155,000
|
|
155,000
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
215,080
|
|
246,240
|
Notes
payable-senior debt, net of discounts
|
|
159,677
|
|
-
|
Note
Payable-Asher convertible debt, net of discounts
|
|
24,070
|
|
-
|
Current
liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
-
|
|
18,143
|
Total Current
Liabilities
|
|
1,134,365
|
|
654,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
payable-subordinated debt, net of discounts
|
|
903,184
|
|
610,615
|
Note
Payable-Taylor Economic Development
|
|
140,000
|
|
-
|
Sale-leaseback obligation
|
|
35,502
|
|
66,533
|
Deferred
compensation-discontinued operations
|
|
280,643
|
|
262,500
|
Total
Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
1,359,329
|
|
939,648
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
2,493,694
|
|
1,594,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' Equity
(Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value:
Authorized
shares--5,000,000
Issued and outstanding
shares—611,390
at March 31, 2013
and June 30, 2012. Each share of
preferred stock is
convertible into 12 shares of common
stock at the option
of the holder. (Aggregate
liquidation
preference of $11,642,276 and $10,145,478
at March 31, 2013
and June 30, 2012, respectively.)
|
|
6,114
|
|
6,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par
value:
Authorized
shares--150,000,000
Issued and outstanding
shares—52,388,750
at March 31, 2013
and June 30, 2012.
|
|
523,887
|
|
523,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in
capital
|
|
28,723,460
|
|
28,462,631
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
(30,682,216)
|
|
(29,281,301)
|
Total
Shareholders' Equity (Deficit)
|
|
(1,428,755)
|
|
(288,669)
|
Total
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity (Deficit)
|
|
$ 1,064,939
|
|
$ 1,305,813
|
See accompanying notes.
HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.
ConsolidatedStatements of Operations
March31, 2013 and 2012
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
March 31, 2012
|
|
March 31, 2013
|
|
March 31, 2012
|
Net Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plastics
|
|
$ 821
|
|
$ 1,837,289
|
|
$ 43,480
|
|
$ 3,022,981
|
Royalties
|
|
-
|
|
3,240
|
|
5,400
|
|
16,320
|
Total
revenues
|
|
821
|
|
1,840,529
|
|
48,880
|
|
3,039,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
Sales-Plastics
|
|
184,530
|
|
1,624,477
|
|
588,911
|
|
2,859,479
|
Gross Profit (Loss)
|
|
(183,709)
|
|
216,052
|
|
(540,031)
|
|
179,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
188,237
|
|
566,892
|
|
507,220
|
|
1,021,553
|
(Gain) loss
on disposition of assets
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
79,973
|
|
-
|
Total Expenses
|
|
188,237
|
|
566,892
|
|
587,193
|
|
1,021,553
|
Operating loss
|
|
(371,946)
|
|
(350,840)
|
|
(1,127,224)
|
|
(841,731)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income and
(Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
-
|
|
10,057
|
|
3,681
|
|
18,913
|
Miscellaneous income
|
|
-
|
|
6,500
|
|
-
|
|
6,999
|
Interest expense
|
|
(106,951)
|
|
(69,197)
|
|
(245,548)
|
|
(88,244)
|
Total Other
Income and (Expense)
|
|
(106,951)
|
|
(52,640)
|
|
(241,867)
|
|
(62,332)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before income taxes
|
|
(478,897)
|
|
(403,480)
|
|
(1,369,091)
|
|
(904,063)
|
Income taxes
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Net loss from
continuing operations
|
|
(478,897)
|
|
(403,480)
|
|
(1,369,091)
|
|
(904,063)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
(149,681)
|
|
409,085
|
|
(31,824)
|
|
(192,279)
|
Loss on sale of
discontinued operations
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(123,702)
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued
operations
|
|
(149,681)
|
|
409,085
|
|
(31,824)
|
|
(315,981)
|
Net income
(loss)
|
|
$ (628,578)
|
|
$ 5,605
|
|
$ (1,400,915)
|
|
$ (1,220,044)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per
Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) from continuing
operations per share
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
|
$ (0.03)
|
|
$ (0.02)
|
Diluted income (loss) from continuing
operations per share
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
|
$ (0.03)
|
|
$ (0.02)
|
Net Income
(loss) from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) from discontinued
operations per share
|
|
$ 0.00
|
|
$ 0.01
|
|
$ 0.00
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
Diluted income (loss) from discontinued
operations per share
|
|
$ 0.00
|
|
$ 0.01
|
|
$ 0.00
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
Net Income
(loss) per Common Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
|
$ 0.00
|
|
$ (0.03)
|
|
$ (0.03)
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
|
$ 0.00
|
|
$ (0.03)
|
|
$ (0.03)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Common Shares Outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
52,388,750
|
|
48,305,462
|
|
52,388,750
|
|
44,973,644
|
Diluted
|
|
52,388,750
|
|
55,642,142
|
|
52,388,750
|
|
44,973,644
|
See accompanying notes.
HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.
ConsolidatedStatements of Cash Flows
March31, 2013
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Nine months ended March 31,
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
Operating
Activities:
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
$ (1,400,915)
|
|
$ (1,220,044)
|
Adjustments to
reconcile loss to net
|
|
|
|
Cash used in
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
Loss from
discontinued operations
|
31,824
|
|
192,279
|
Loss on sale
of discontinued operations
|
-
|
|
123,702
|
Net
loss from continuing operations
|
(1,369,091)
|
|
(904,063)
|
Adjustments to reconcile
net income(loss) to net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
|
Loss on
disposition of property and equipment
|
79,973
|
|
-
|
Depreciation
|
116,659
|
|
67,560
|
Stock compensation
expense
|
-
|
|
302,822
|
Amortization of debt
issuance costs
|
1,230
|
|
-
|
Amortization of debt
discount and accreted interest
|
107,145
|
|
14,705
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Accreted
interest on note receivable
|
(3,681)
|
|
(13,467)
|
Accounts receivable
|
107,090
|
|
(1,089,778)
|
Inventory
|
31,737
|
|
(142,534)
|
Prepaids and
other current assets
|
17,774
|
|
(18,847)
|
Other assets
|
(6,471)
|
|
(37,127)
|
Accrued royalties
receivable
|
2,400
|
|
(3,600)
|
Accounts payable
|
266,858
|
|
202,053
|
Accrued vacation,
payroll and payroll taxes
|
73,131
|
|
120,366
|
Deferred rent
|
-
|
|
92,749
|
Other accrued
expenses
|
(31,160)
|
|
60,614
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(606,406)
|
|
(1,348,547)
|
Investing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
Payment
received on notes receivable
|
75,000
|
|
-
|
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(250,216)
|
|
(630,525)
|
Payment
received on note receivable-related party-Minot
|
-
|
|
125,000
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(175,216)
|
|
(505,525)
|
Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from Charter Capital-line of credit
|
-
|
|
630,184
|
Proceeds (payments) on
sale-leaseback obligation
|
(25,933)
|
|
109,813
|
Proceeds from Note
Payable-Taylor Economic Development
|
140,000
|
|
-
|
Proceeds from Note Payable-Asher,
net of issuance cost of $5,000
|
70,000
|
|
-
|
Proceeds from issuance
of senior notes
|
200,000
|
|
-
|
Proceeds from issuance
of subordinated notes
|
360,000
|
|
833,600
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
744,067
|
|
1,573,597
|
Net cash used in continuing operations
|
(37,555)
|
|
(280,475)
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
Operations:
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued
operations
|
(31,824)
|
|
(91,311)
|
Net
increase(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(69,379)
|
|
(371,786)
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at beginning of period
|
75,043
|
|
753,821
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at end of period
|
$ 5,664
|
|
$ 382,035
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
non-cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
Payable for equipment
|
$ -
|
|
$ 155,000
|
Note receivable-related
party from sale of discontinued operations
|
$ -
|
|
$ 127,500
|
Increase in debt
discounts on subordinated notes by issuing stock warrants
|
$ 206,519
|
|
$ 252,393
|
Increase in debt
discounts on Asher note due to beneficial conversion feature
|
$ 54,310
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.
Notes to theConsolidated Financial Statements
March31, 2013
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements of Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company” or “HDI”)
have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not
include all the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting
principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management,
these unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only
of normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the
financial statements. The results of operations for the three and nine months
ended March 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the full year ending June 30, 2013. For further information,
refer to the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, as amended. The
policies described in that report are used for preparing quarterly reports.
On July 14, 2011, the Company formed
HDI Plastics, Inc. (“HDIP” or “Plastics”), as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company. HDIP commenced operations in October 2011. HDIP is the principal
operating business of the Company. HDIP is engaged in the processing of
recycled plastic material including re-processing into pellet-form for sale to
manufacturing customers.
Note 2. Going Concern
The accompanying financial
statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, assuming the Company will
continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction
of liabilities in the normal course of business. For the nine months ended March
31, 2013, we incurred losses from continuing operations of $1,369,091. At March
31, 2013, we had an accumulated deficit of $30,682,216
and negative working capital of $857,619. Our ability to
continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to raise the required
additional capital or debt financing to meet short-term needs to repay certain
liabilities incurred to restart HDIP’s facility, hire production workers, and ramp
up to full operating capacity for our revenue generating activities. On
February 4, 2013, HDIP borrowed $200,000 pursuant to a Secured Promissory Note
(the “Note”) in a principal amount of $200,000 in favor of Mark Schwartz and
Alan Stern, directors of the Company. Under the terms of the Note, HDIP may borrow
an additional $300,000 on the same terms and conditions as those set forth in
the Note. See Note 12 to these financial statements for more information.
If we raise additional funds
through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage
ownership of our current shareholders could be reduced, and such securities
might have rights, preferences or privileges senior to our common stock. Additional
financing may not be available upon acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate
funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be
able to adequately restart our plastics business, which could significantly and
materially restrict our operations.
Note 3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Discontinued Operations- On August
26, 2011 (the “Effective Date”), the Company entered into and closed a
definitive Asset Purchase Agreement (the “August 26, 2011 Agreement”) providing
for the sale of selected assets from our Hypertension Diagnostics Business to
Cohn Prevention Center, LLC (“CPC”), a Minnesota company, controlled by Jay
Cohn, a director and stockholder of HDI as of the Effective Date. See
additional terms of this agreement in Note 4. As a result of the sale of
selected assets of our medical device business, we have reclassified our
previously reported financial results to exclude those operations affected by
the sale. These results are presented on a historical basis as a separate line
in our statements of operations and balance sheets entitled “Discontinued
Operations.” HDI had previously retained rights to its intellectual property
including the rights to royalty payments from CPC. Ongoing royalty income derived
from the Company’s intellectual property is reflected as continuing
operations. All of the information in the financial statements and notes to
the financial statements have been revised to reflect only the results of our
continuing operations from our new recycled plastics process business. On
January 25, 2013, the Company entered into and closed a second definitive Asset
Purchase Agreement (the “January 25, 2013 Agreement”) with CVC-HD, LLC, a
Minnesota limited liability company (“CVC”), controlled by Jay Cohn,
effectively amending the August 26, 2011 Agreement and assigning to CVC the
remaining assets related to the medical device business including intellectual
property assets for an additional purchase price of $75,000. Additionally, at
the time of this second agreement, HDI was still owed $200,000 from the first
sale. In total, $275,000 is owed on these two sales and as of March 31, 2013, $75,000
has been received. The balance of the
$200,000 is to be
paid off in monthly installments with final payment due June 30, 2013. The
royalty provisions of the August 26, 2011 Agreement were eliminated in this January
25, 2013 Agreement.
HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.
Notes to theConsolidated Financial Statements
March31, 2013
Principles of
Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiary (HDI Plastics, Inc.), after elimination of all intercompany
accounts, transactions, and profits.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In July 2012, the FASB issued
ASU No. 2012-02, Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment.
Under this standard, entities testing long-lived intangible assets for
impairment now have an option of performing a qualitative assessment to
determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. If an entity
determines, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of the
indefinite-lived intangible asset is more-likely-than-not less than the
carrying amount, the existing quantitative impairment test is required.
Otherwise, no further impairment testing is required. For HDI, this ASU was
effective beginning January 1, 2013. The adoption of this standard did not
have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or
financial condition.
Note 4. Discontinued Operations
On August 26, 2011, (the “Effective
Date”), the Company entered into and closed a definitive Asset Purchase
Agreement (the “August 26, 2011 Agreement”) providing for the sale of selected
assets of our medical device business to Cohn Prevention Center, LLC, a
Minnesota limited liability company (“CPC”), controlled by Jay Cohn, a director
and stockholder of HDI as of the Effective Date. The terms of the Agreement
provided for the sale of selected operating assets of the Company’s medical
device business (including inventory but excluding cash, accounts receivable,
and intellectual property). The Agreement does not limit the ability of CPC to
sell the purchased inventory to any customer or in any market where they can be
legally sold. Additionally, CPC assumed all warranty and on-going product
support required by regulatory agencies related to such inventory.
In connection with the Agreement,
CPC paid the Company on the Effective Date a cash payment of $125,000 and
issued a secured promissory note (non-interest bearing) to the Company in the
amount of either $150,000 due in 12 months or $200,000 due in 18 months at the
discretion of CPC (See Note 6). We received a letter on July 27, 2012 from CPC
indicating the intent to pay $200,000 on February 26, 2013. Nearly all of the
proceeds received on the Effective Date were allocated to cover severance and
other costs related to the transactions contemplated by the Agreement.
Severance costs included an agreement by the Company to pay to Greg Guettler,
its former Chief Operating Officer, nine months’ salary and health benefits.
The Company paid Mr. Guettler $119,463 to fulfill the agreement on March 1,
2012. Pursuant to the Agreement, CPC agreed to pay to the Company a cash
payment of $1,200 upon the sale of each of the first 50 units of inventory sold
by CPC within 30 days of receipt of cash from such sale. The Company has agreed
to pay Mr. Guettler 10% of the royalty proceeds received by the Company less
applicable transaction expenses related to such sales. The Company has earned
royalty income of $0 and $6,000 less 10% due to Greg Guettler for the three and
nine months ended March 31, 2013, respectively.
The Company and CPC also entered
into a Sublicense Agreement on the Effective Date (the “Sublicense Agreement”),
pursuant to which the Company granted to CPC a limited license to use the
Company’s intellectual property, technology, and technical know-how related to
the Company’s arterial elasticity measurement technology exclusively in CPC
clinics and research related exclusively to CPC clinics. All other
applications of the Company’s intellectual property, technology and technical
know-how will be retained by the Company for the benefit of the Company. The
Sublicense Agreement also provides that any development of a next generation
arterial measurement device, however, would be limited exclusively to use and
sale within the CPC network of clinics and to research exclusively related to
CPC clinics.
CPC and the Company also entered
into a Sublease Agreement as of the Effective Date, which permits CPC to lease
the Waters II Suite 108, Eagan, Minnesota facility of the Company during the
remaining term of the Company’s lease, which expires October 31, 2014, on the
same pass-through economic terms as the underlying lease with HDI which remains
as an obligation of the Company.
The Company recorded a loss on the
sale transaction in the amount of $123,702 in the quarter ended September 30,
2011.
HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.
Notes to theConsolidated Financial Statements
March31, 2013
On January
25, 2013, (the “Effective Date”), the Company entered into and closed a second definitive
Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) modifying the August 26, 2011
Agreement, by selling the remaining medical device business assets to CVC-HD,
LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“CVC”), controlled by Jay Cohn, for
$75,000. This amount is in addition to the $200,000 owed to the Company by CPC
as set forth above, which payment terms were modified as set forth below. The
Company has not recorded the revenue from this additional sale due to the
collectability is not reasonably assured at this time, since the original
$150,000 note from the first sale has not been paid following its original
terms. The aggregate $275,000 consists of a cash payment in the amount of
$37,500 due on the Effective Date which was received, and a promissory note in
the amount of $237,500 payable in installments with the first payment of
$37,500 due February 2013 and $50,000 due each subsequent month with the final
payment due in June 2013. As of March 31, 2013, a total of $75,000 has been
received on this note.
The Company has not included the
results of operations of our former medical device business in the results from
continuing operations. The income (loss) from discontinued operations for the three
and nine months ended March 31, 2013, and 2012 consists of the following:
Income from
Discontinued Operations
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
Nine months ended March 31,
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
Revenue, net
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ 248,923
|
Cost of Goods
Sold
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
10,557
|
Gross Profit
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
238,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
(miscellaneous)
|
13,687
|
|
(15,335)
|
|
31,824
|
|
265,645
|
Deferred compensation
expense (benefit)
|
135,994
|
|
(393,750)
|
|
-
|
|
165,000
|
Income (loss)
from discontinued operations
|
(149,681)
|
|
409,085
|
|
(31,824)
|
|
(192,279)
|
Gain (loss) on
sale of selected assets to CPC
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(123,702)
|
Net income
(loss) from discontinued operations
|
$ (149,681)
|
|
$ 409,085
|
|
$ (31,824)
|
|
$ (315,981)
|
The Company does not have any
existing assets of discontinued operations at March 31, 2013. The only
remaining liabilities of discontinued operations as of March 31, 2013 pertain
to the deferred compensation of the former CEO. (See Note 9)
Note 5. Inventory
Inventory consisted of the following:
|
March 31,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
Raw materials
|
$ 128,375
|
|
$ 96,142
|
Finished goods
|
12,111
|
|
76,081
|
Total inventory
|
$ 140,486
|
|
$ 172,223
|
Note 6. Notes Receivable – Related Parties
In connection with the Asset
Purchase Agreement between HDI and CPC on August 26, 2011, CPC paid HDI on the
Effective Date a cash payment of $125,000 and issued a non-interest bearing
secured promissory note due to HDI in the amount of either $150,000 due in 12
months or $200,000 due in 18 months, at the discretion of CPC. The promissory
note was reflected at an imputed discount rate of 15% based upon the amount due
12 months following the Effective Date, and was originally recorded as a net
note receivable of $127,500. The Company received a letter from CPC on July
27, 2012 indicating CPC’s intent to pay the $200,000 due February 26, 2013
instead of the original $150,000. The Company has elected to not recognize the
additional income forthcoming on this Note until the cash is collected in the
future.
On January 25, 2013, the Company
sold the remaining intellectual property for an additional $75,000 (See Note 4).
The Company received $37,500 in cash on January 25, 2013 which was applied to
the original note, and a promissory note in the amount of $237,500 that
replaces the existing note issued by CPC listed above. The Company has not
recorded the revenue from this additional sale due to the collectability is not
reasonably assured at this time, since the original
$150,000
note from the first sale has not been paid following its original terms. The
new note is payable in installments with the first payment due February 2013
for $37,500, which was received in March 2013, and $50,000 due per month
beginning in March 2013, which was not received, with the final payment due
June 2013. As of March 31, 2013 $75,000 has been received on the note. A subsequent
payment of $25,000 on the note was received in April 2013.
HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.
Notes to theConsolidated Financial Statements
March31, 2013
Note 7. Property and
Equipment
Property and
Equipment is as follows:
|
March 31,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
Equipment
|
$ 707,413
|
|
$ 672,383
|
Leasehold improvements
|
213,103
|
|
93,235
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
9,006
|
|
7,923
|
Vehicles
|
11,984
|
|
11,984
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
(209,591)
|
|
(107,194)
|
Total equipment
|
$ 731,915
|
|
$ 678,331
|
Depreciation expense was $44,670
and $37,603 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
For the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, depreciation expense was $116,659
and $67,560, respectively.
The Company recognized a net loss
of $79,973 from the sale of equipment in the nine month period ended March 31,
2013 related to the abandonment of leasehold improvements associated with the
property at 5330 Fleming Court, Austin, TX due to the termination of the lease
and surrender of the property.
Note 8. Litigation
The Company is involved in various
legal actions in the ordinary course of its business.
On March 28, 2012,
HDIP received a Notice of Violation related to its former processing facility
located at 5330 Fleming Court, Austin, Texas, from the City of Austin Code
Compliance Department. The Notice of Violation alleges violations of Austin’s
City Code and failures to obtain required permits and a Certificate of
Occupancy based upon the current use of the processing facility. The violation
primarily relates to the electrical design and capacity of the building. The
Notice of Violation required HDIP to vacate the processing facility until such
alleged violations are cured. HDIP unsuccessfully attempted to negotiate
temporary permits allowing it to continue operations while it addresses the
alleged violations identified in the Notice of Violation. On March 29, 2012,
HDIP ceased processing operations at the processing facility. On April 2,
2012, HDIP notified approximately 70 of its employees working at the facility
of their termination and they were paid their outstanding vacation pay,
however, no severance was paid. At this time, the Company has not been assessed
any fines or penalties by the City of Austin, but no assurances can be made
that they will not do so in the future.
Because the City of
Austin required HDIP to vacate the property at 5330 Fleming Court, the
landlord, Flemtex Properties (“Flemtex”) denied access to the premises;
therefore, the Company did not pay rent and utilities for April and May 2012.
On May 30, 2012, the Company received a Notice of Termination of Lease from
Flemtex, for failure to pay rent and reimbursable costs. The letter stated that
the Lease was terminated effective May 31, 2012, and that HDI was to quit and
surrender the Leased Premises to the landlord in accordance with the
requirements of the Lease on May 31, 2012, and to remove all of the Tenant’s
personal property from the Leased Premises. The Company has accrued as of March
31, 2013, the utility and rent payments due for April and May 2012 totaling
$139,493.
On July
12, 2012, a representative from the Travis County, (Texas) Attorney Office,
Texas Parks and Wildlife, and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
(TEEQ) searched the Company’s Austin offices pursuant to an affidavit signed by
a representative of Texas Parks and Wildlife seeking evidence that the Company
committed the offense of intentional or knowing unauthorized discharge of a
pollutant under Section 7.145 of the Texas Water Code. No charge of illegal
discharge has been made against the Company. The Company has not been contacted
further relative to alleged discharge and strongly denies any such discharge
occurred. As of October 31, 2012, the removal and disposal of the waste water
at the Company’s former facility in Austin was completed.
HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.
Notes to theConsolidated Financial Statements
March31, 2013
On December 14, 2012, Flemtex Properties filed a lawsuit
alleging breach of the commercial lease at the Fleming Court location. The
lawsuit seeks damages totaling $412,711 as of November 16, 2012 and future
obligations due under the lease which extends to December 2017. The Company
intends to vigorously defend itself and may seek compensation for losses
resulting from the willful and malicious interference into its Fleming Court
operations by the landlord and its agent.
Due to the uncertainty
regarding the outcome of this matter, the Company does not believe that it is
probable that they will owe all of the damages claimed by Flemtex and have only
accrued for the costs of the lease up until Flemtex terminated the lease on May
31, 2012, as noted above.
Note 9. Deferred Compensation Liability
The Company is a party to a
Deferred Equity Compensation Agreement with its former CEO, Mark N. Schwartz
(the “Agreement”), whereby the Company previously granted phantom shares of its
common stock to Mr. Schwartz for every month of employment over the years of
his employment. Mr. Schwartz resigned as the Company’s CEO effective September
22, 2011 and as a result, agreed as of October 1, 2011 that no additional
phantom shares will be granted to him under the Agreement. Under the Agreement,
a cash payment will be made equal to the price per share of the Company’s
common stock times the number of phantom shares accrued at the earliest of
certain events to occur.
The Company has accrued a total
deferred compensation liability of $280,643 at March 31, 2013, which is the
fair market value of 13,125,000 phantom shares outstanding as of March 31, 2013,
$262,500 plus $18,143 of accrued payroll taxes and vacation pay related to the
agreement. Due to the fluctuations in the price of the Company’s common stock
during the nine months ended March 31, 2013, the Company recorded a net
compensation expense of $135,994 and $0 for the three and nine months ended March
31, 2013, respectively. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012, the
Company recorded a net compensation expense (benefit) of ($393,750) and $165,000,
respectively. An increase in the Company’s common stock price would cause an
increase in the deferred compensation liability, while a decrease in the
Company’s stock price would cause a decrease in the deferred compensation
liability. Expenses related to the Deferred Compensation arrangement with its
former CEO are accounted for as part of Discontinued Operations.
Under the original terms of Mr.
Schwartz’s deferred equity compensation agreement, payment of the deferred
compensation benefit would occur upon one of the following events: i) execution
of a definitive agreement resulting in a change of control of the Company’s
common stock; ii) termination of employment; iii) death of the CEO; or iv) no
later than January 1, 2012. Upon one of these events, a cash payment over 24
months was to be made to the CEO equal to the trading price per share of the
Company’s common stock times the number of phantom stock shares accrued to
date. Mr. Schwartz and the Company modified the original Agreement on March
31, 2012, whereby Mr. Schwartz agreed to eliminate the requirement for a cash
payment as of a date certain pursuant to the Agreement. This deferred
compensation is classified as a long-term liability with no definitive payout
date specified. The Company and Mr. Schwartz are negotiating a permanent
settlement to satisfy both parties.
Note 10. Factoring Line
of Credit
On October 10, 2011, HDI Plastics,
Inc. entered into an Accounts Receivable Discount line facility with Charter
Capital Holdings, L.P. (“Charter”). Under the terms of the full-recourse
financing agreement, which is guaranteed by HDI, Charter advances to HDIP an
amount equal to 80% of eligible pledged receivables up to a total advance of $1
million. Charter retains a priority and perfected security interest in all
accounts receivable and inventory of HDI Plastics, Inc. The financing cost
under the agreement is 0.59% for each 10-day period or an approximate
annualized interest cost of approximately 21.25%. HDIP began borrowing under
this facility in November 2011. The outstanding balance as of March 31, 2013
is $0 and $0 as of June 30, 2012. As of the date of this filing, the outstanding
balance is $63,383.
Note 11. Notes Payable-short
term
Asher-Convertible Debt
On January 2, 2013, HDI closed on a
Securities Purchase Agreement entered into December 3, 2012 with Asher
Enterprises, Inc., pursuant to which we issued to Asher an 8% Convertible
Promissory Note in the original principal amount of $42,500 (the “Note”). The
Note has a maturity date of September 12, 2013 and is convertible into our
common stock at the Variable Conversion Price of 58% multiplied by the Market
Price (representing a discount rate of 42%). “Market Price” means the average
of the lowest three (3) Trading Prices for the Common Stock during the ten (10)
Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the
Conversion Date. Asher has the right to convert 180 days after the initial
advance date. The shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Note are
not registered shares
under the Securities Act of
1933. The Company has the right to prepay the outstanding Note for an amount
equal to 115%, multiplied by the sum of the then outstanding principal amount
of this Note plus accrued and unpaid interest on the unpaid principal amount of
this Note.
HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.
Notes to theConsolidated Financial Statements
March31, 2013
On March 1, 2013, HDI closed on a
second Securities Purchase Agreement with Asher, pursuant to which we issued to
Asher an 8% Convertible Promissory Note in the original principal amount of
$32,500 with a maturity date of December 15, 2013.
Due to the discounted conversion
price on the date of issuance of the notes, the Company recorded a discount to
the notes in the amount of $54,310 for the beneficial conversion future. The
discount is being amortized over the term of the debt using the effective
interest method. Additionally, Asher held back $5,000 of the proceeds to cover its
legal expenses.
HDI closed on a third Note dated
April 8, 2013 in the amount of $32,500 that matures on January 15, 2014. The
other terms of the notes are the same as the note described above.
The following table summarizes the
Asher – Convertible Debt at March 31, 2013:
Net proceeds received
|
$ 70,000
|
Less value assigned to beneficial conversion feature
|
(54,310)
|
|
15,690
|
Add: amortization of debt discount
|
8,380
|
Total Asher – convertible debt outstanding, net
|
$ 24,070
|
Senior Debt
On February 4, 2013, HDI Plastics,
Inc. executed a Secured Promissory Note (the “Note”) in a principal amount of
$200,000 in favor of Mark Schwartz and Alan Stern, directors of the Company.
The Note bears interest at an annual rate of 18%, payable monthly, and is
guaranteed by the Company. The Note matures on February 1, 2014, at which time
all principal and accrued and unpaid interest on the Note is due. The Note is
secured by certain equipment of HDI Plastics. In connection with the issuance
of the Note, the Company issued to each of Messrs. Schwartz and Stern a warrant
to purchase 3,333,333 shares of common stock of the Company for an exercise
price of $0.03 per share, subject to appropriate adjustment for stock splits,
combinations and similar recapitalization events. The warrants expire on
February 4, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the Note and Security Agreement, HDI
Plastics may borrow an additional $300,000 on the same terms and conditions as
those set forth in the Note, Security Agreement and Warrants. The accrued
interest on the Notes was $3,000 as of March 31, 2013.
The total estimated value of the
warrants using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, with a volatility of
209%, had an estimated fair value of $0.01 per warrant. After calculating
the relative fair value of the debt and warrants, $48,388 was recorded as a
debt discount to the debt for the warrants. This discount is being
amortized over the term of the debt using the effective interest method.
The following table summarizes the
Senior Debt at March 31, 2013:
Cash proceeds received
|
$ 200,000
|
Less value assigned to warrants
|
(48,388)
|
|
151,612
|
Add: amortization of debt discount
|
8,065
|
Total senior debt outstanding, net
|
$ 159,677
|
Note 12. Notes Payable-long
term
Taylor
Economic Development
On December 24, 2012, HDIP entered
into a Letter of Agreement with the Taylor Economic Development Corporation (“TEDCO”).
Under the terms of the TEDCO Agreement, TEDCO agreed to advance up to $140,000
for
improvements and upgrades to the Company’s new
facility located in Taylor, Texas. The advances are in the form of a forgivable
loan which will convert to a grant in 10 years provided among other conditions,
HDIP continues to operate in Taylor and maintain at least 50 full-time jobs at
the Taylor facility. Should HDIP default under its agreement with TEDCO, the
Company may be required to repay the advances with interest at the prime rate
plus 3%. As of March 31, 2013, $140,000 had been advanced under the TEDCO
Agreement.
HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.
Notes to theConsolidated Financial Statements
March31, 2013
Subordinated Debt
In December 2011, the Company
commenced a private placement offering of 14.5% Five Year Subordinated Notes (the
“Notes”) with Warrants to its existing preferred shareholders, directors of the
Company and certain other accredited investors. Interest is payable monthly in
cash. The offering was completed February 10, 2012 and resulted in the issuance
of $833,600 in notes and five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of
11,908,572 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.07
per share. The notes are due
five years from the closing date at 105% of
face value. The total estimated value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes
Option Pricing Model, with a volatility rate of 153%, had an estimated fair value
of $0.03 per warrant. After calculating the relative fair value of the debt and
warrants, $252,393 was recorded as a debt discount to the notes for the
warrants. The discount is being amortized over the term of the debt using the
effective interest method.
The Notes may be prepaid by the
Company in accordance with the following schedule below at the redemption
prices (expressed in percentages of principal amount to be repaid), plus unpaid
accrued interest to the date of payment:
Loan
Year
|
Redemption
Price
|
1
|
125%
|
2
|
120%
|
3
|
115%
|
4
|
110%
|
Maturity
|
105%
|
In August 2012, the Company
initiated a second private placement of Subordinated Notes due October 31, 2014
(Series II Subordinated Notes) with terms otherwise similar to the offering in December
2011. Terms for the Series II Subordinated Notes also include the issuance of
five-year warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock with an
exercise price of $0.035 per share. As of March 31, 2013, the Company had
issued to directors and other accredited investors of the Company, $360,000 in
Series II Subordinated Notes which included warrants to purchase 10,285,714
shares of Company stock. The notes are due
two years from the closing
date at 105% of face value. The total estimated value of the warrants using the
Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, with a volatility rate of 178%, had an
estimated fair value from $0.01 to $0.05 per warrant. After calculating the
relative fair value of the debt and warrants, $158,131 was recorded as a debt
discount to the notes for the warrants. The discount is being amortized over
the term of the debt using the effective interest method. Subsequent to March
31, 2013, on April 22, 2013, the Company received an additional $54,000 for
private placement Series II Subordinated Notes.
The following table summarizes the
entire subordinated debt balance at March 31, 2013:
Schedule of Subordinated Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series I
|
|
Series II
|
|
Total
|
Gross proceeds received
|
$ 833,600
|
|
$ 360,000
|
|
$ 1,193,600
|
Less value assigned to warrants
|
(252,393)
|
|
(158,131)
|
|
(410,524)
|
|
581,207
|
|
201,869
|
|
783,076
|
Add: amortization of debt
discount
|
63,100
|
|
41,981
|
|
105,081
|
Interest accreted to
redemption price
|
10,420
|
|
4,607
|
|
15,027
|
Subordinated Debt outstanding
|
654,727
|
|
248,457
|
|
903,184
|
Less current maturities
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Total Subordinated Debt
|
$ 654,727
|
|
$ 248,457
|
|
$ 903,184
|
On January 1, 2013, the Company’s
board of directors approved a 4-month “Payment-in-Kind” or “PIK” interest
plan on the Company’s currently outstanding Subordinated Debt Notes. The
plan suspended the monthly cash payments of
interest
to the note holders for four months through April 1, 2013. The monthly interest
will be added to the principal of the notes. We currently plan to resume
monthly cash interest payments on such notes commencing May 1, 2013. As
of March 31, 2013, the accrued interest payable for the Notes was $56,913.
HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.
Notes to theConsolidated Financial Statements
March31, 2013
Note 13. Related Party Transactions
On February 4, 2013, HDI Plastics,
Inc. executed a Secured Promissory Note (the “Note”) in a principal amount of
$200,000 in favor of Mark Schwartz and Alan Stern, directors of the Company.
The Note bears interest at an annual rate of 18%, payable monthly, and is
guaranteed by the Company. The Note matures on February 1, 2014, at which time
all principal and accrued and unpaid interest on the Note is due. The Note is
secured by certain equipment of HDI Plastics. In connection with the issuance
of the Note, the Company issued to each of Messrs. Schwartz and Stern a warrant
to purchase 3,333,333 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the
Company for an exercise price of $0.03 per share, subject to appropriate
adjustment for stock splits, combinations and similar recapitalization events.
The warrants expire on February 4, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the Note and
Security Agreement, HDI Plastics may borrow an additional $300,000 on the same
terms and conditions as those set forth in the Note, Security Agreement and
Warrants. The accrued interest on the notes was $3,000 as of March 31, 2013.
The total estimated value of the
warrants using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, with a volatility of 209%,
had an estimated fair value of $0.01 per warrant. After calculating the
relative fair value of the debt and warrants, $48,388 was recorded as a debt
discount to the debt for the warrants. This discount is being amortized
over the term of the debt using the effective interest method. See Note 11 for
more information.
As of March 31, 2013, the Company has
issued the following Subordinated Notes to the following directors of the
Company, subject to the terms set forth in Note 12:
Kenneth Brimmer
|
$ 60,000
|
Mark Schwartz
|
$ 175,000
|
Larry Leitner
|
$ 150,000
|
Alan Stern
|
$ 185,000
|
|
|
On April 22, 2013, the Company
received an additional $54,000 from Kenneth Brimmer, the Company’s CEO as part
of the private placement of Series II Subordinated Notes (See Note 12).
The Company has agreed to pay $500
per month for executive office space from STEN Corporation. Mr. Brimmer is also
CEO of STEN Corporation. As of March 31, 2013, $4,500 is unpaid under the
arrangement.
Note 14. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic net income (loss) per share
is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during each period. Diluted net income (loss) per share includes the dilutive
effect of common shares potentially issuable upon the exercise of stock
options, warrants, or the conversion of preferred stock and convertible debt.
HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.
Notes to theConsolidated Financial Statements
March31, 2013
The following table provides a
reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in calculating basic and
diluted earnings (loss) per share at March 31, 2013 and 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31
|
|
Nine months ended March 31,
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
Basic
earnings (loss) per share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from
continuing operations to common shareholders
|
|
$ (478,897)
|
|
$ (403,480)
|
|
$ (1,369,091)
|
|
$ (904,063)
|
Net income (loss) from
discontinued operations to common shareholders
|
|
(149,681)
|
|
409,085
|
|
(31,824)
|
|
(315,981)
|
Net income (loss) to common
shareholders
|
|
$ (628,578)
|
|
$ 5,605
|
|
$ (1,400,915)
|
|
$ (1,220,044)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of common shares
outstanding
|
|
52,388,750
|
|
48,305,462
|
|
52,388,750
|
|
44,973,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings (loss) from
continuing operations
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
|
$ (0.03)
|
|
$ (0.02)
|
Basic net earnings (loss) from
discontinued operations
|
|
$ 0.00
|
|
$ 0.01
|
|
$ 0.00
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
Basic net earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
|
$ 0.00
|
|
$ (0.03)
|
|
$ (0.03)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings (loss) per share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing
operations to common shareholders
|
|
$ (478,897)
|
|
$ (403,480)
|
|
$ (1,369,091)
|
|
$ (904,063)
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued
operations to common shareholders.
|
|
(149,681)
|
|
409,085
|
|
(31,824)
|
|
(315,981)
|
Net income
(loss) to common shareholders
|
|
$ (628,578)
|
|
$ 5,605
|
|
$ (1,400,915)
|
|
$ (1,220,044)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
of common shares outstanding
|
|
52,388,750
|
|
48,305,462
|
|
52,388,750
|
|
44,973,644
|
Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock
|
[1]
|
-
|
|
7,336,680
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Stock
Options
|
[2]
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Warrants
|
[3]
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
52,388,750
|
|
55,642,142
|
|
52,388,750
|
|
44,973,644
|
Diluted net earnings (loss) from
continuing operations
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
|
$ (0.03)
|
|
$ (0.02)
|
Diluted net earnings (loss) from
discontinued operations
|
|
$ 0.00
|
|
$ 0.01
|
|
$ (0.00)
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
Diluted net
earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$ (0.01)
|
|
$ (0.00)
|
|
$ (0.03)
|
|
$ (0.03)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]
|
At March 31, 2013 and 2012,
there were 611,390 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding.
Using the preferred stock conversion ratio of 12:1, the common stock
equivalents attributable to these preferred shares are 7,336,680 at March 31,
2013 and 2012.
|
[2]
|
At March 31, 2013, there
were common stock equivalents attributable to outstanding stock options of 4,299,105
common shares and 8,352,914 common shares at March 31, 2012. All of the
remaining stock options are anti-dilutive at March 31, 2013 and 2012, due to
the loss from continuing operations, and therefore have been excluded from
diluted earnings (loss) per share.
|
[3]
|
At March 31, 2013 and 2012,
there were common stock equivalents of 28,860,952 and 30,407,208 common
shares attributable to warrants, respectively. The warrants would not be common
stock equivalents at March 31, 2013 and 2012 due to the loss from continuing
operations and therefore have been excluded from diluted earnings (loss) per
share.
|
HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.
Notes to theConsolidated Financial Statements
March31, 2013
Note 15. Operating Lease
On December 28, 2012, as part of the
Company’s plan to relocate its plastic recycling business and resume operations,
HDIP entered into a four-year lease and purchase option agreement with Southern
Mattress Company of Texas, Inc. for approximately 65,000 square feet of main
building space, including an additional approximate 15,000 square feet of
storage space in Taylor, Texas (“Taylor Lease”). The Taylor Lease calls for
minimum monthly rents as follows:
Period
|
Minimum
Monthly Rent
|
12/28/12 - 2/9/2013
|
$3,000
|
3/1/2013 - 2/28/2015
|
$8,500
|
3/1/2015 - 2/28/16
|
$12,750
|
3/1/2016 - 2/29/17
|
$20,625
|
In addition to rent, HDIP shall pay
for insurance and property taxes effective March 1, 2013. HDIP has the right
to purchase the property for $700,000 at any time after February 28, 2016.
Note 16. Subsequent Events
On April 15, 2013, HDI closed on a third
note disbursement of the Securities Purchase Agreement entered into December 3,
2012 with Asher Enterprises, Inc., pursuant to which we sold to Asher an 8%
Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $32,500 (the “Note”). The Note has
a maturity date of January 15, 2014 and is convertible into our common stock at
the Variable Conversion Price of 58% multiplied by the Market Price
(representing a discount rate of 42%). “Market Price” means the average of the
lowest three (3) Trading Prices for the Common Stock during the ten (10)
Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the
Conversion Date. The shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the
Note are not registered shares under the Securities Act of 1933. The Company
has the right to prepay the outstanding Note for an amount equal to 115%,
multiplied by the sum of the then outstanding principal amount of this Note
plus accrued and unpaid interest on the unpaid principal amount of this Note.
On April 22, 2013 the Company
received an additional $54,000 from an entity controlled by Kenneth Brimmer as
part of the private placement of Series II Subordinate Notes with the terms as
stated in Note 12.
Beginning April 26, 2013, as the
Company recommenced operations and started invoicing customers again, HDIP
began borrowing under the terms of the full-recourse financing agreement with
Charter Capital (See Note 10). As of the date of this filing, Charter has
advanced the Company $63,383.
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Overview
We were previously engaged in the
design, development, manufacture and marketing of proprietary devices. In
August 2011, we sold our medical device inventory, subleased our office and
manufacturing facility, and entered into a limited license agreement with a
company controlled by Jay Cohn, a founder and at that time, a director of the
Company. In September 2011, we formed HDI Plastics Inc. (“HDIP”), a wholly
owned-subsidiary, leased a facility for warehouse and processing of recycled
plastic, purchased selected manufacturing assets and began engaging in the
business of plastics reprocessing in Austin, TX. On March 29, 2012, we ceased
operations at the Austin facility and we began working to relocate the
processing facility to a new location. In September 2012, we began disposing of
the waste water stored in tanks located at 5330 Fleming, Austin. The water was
transported by tanker truck to a location where contaminants were removed and
it was disposed of into the city sewer system in compliance with local
regulations. As of March 31, 2013, we have relocated our operations to a
facility in Taylor, Texas and have recently resumed limited operations. We plan
to resume production to full capacity by May 2013, assuming adequate capital is
obtained to do so. We cannot guarantee that we will not encounter delays in
resuming production to full capacity which may extend the date. Demand for
reprocessed plastic is growing, and we believe HDIP has the systems and
infrastructure for cost effectively collecting and processing post-consumer and
post-industrial plastic waste into pellets to be resold to domestic
manufacturing companies.
Critical Accounting Policies
The financial statements are
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
U.S., which requires us to make estimates and assumptions in certain
circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying financial
statements and related footnotes. In preparing these financial statements,
management has made its best estimates and judgments of certain amounts included
in the financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. We do
not believe there is a great likelihood that materially different amounts would
be reported related to the accounting policies described below. However,
application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment and
use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results
could differ from these estimates.
Principles of Consolidation
.
The Company files consolidated financial statements that include its
wholly-owned subsidiary HDI Plastics, Inc. All material intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Revenue Recognition
.
Beginning October 2011, HDI Plastics began operations to sell finished goods to
manufacturers in the form of pelletized resin and clean shredded and ground plastics
material. These sales are recorded as revenue at the time the product is
shipped and invoiced to the customer. The Company also engages in “toll”
processing of customer-owned material for a service fee. These service fees are
recorded as plastic processing revenue at the time the product is shipped back to
the customer. In addition, the Company engages in brokerage transactions of
plastic material where goods are delivered to a customer without HDIP ever
taking physical possession of the product although HDIP does assume legal
ownership of the material. The net profit from “brokerage” transactions is
recorded as revenue at the time it is shipped to the customer and invoiced.
Brokered sales are recorded as revenue net of the cost of the brokered
material.
Inventories and Related Reserve
for Obsolete Inventory
. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost based
upon the average cost of raw material purchased during the month including an
allocation of manufacturing overhead, or market. Typically, the Company holds
material for less than 45 days. The nature of the Company’s inventory does not
result in obsolescence of either processed or unprocessed material. Inventory
on hand at the end of the period is reviewed to determine the need for a
reserve for possible write-off and dispose of any material which is not useable.
The need for a reserve is based on management’s review of inventories on hand
compared to estimated future usage and sales. As of March 31, 2013 and June
30, 2012, there was no reserve for obsolete inventory.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2012, the FASB issued
ASU No. 2012-02, Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for
Impairment. Under this standard, entities testing long-lived intangible assets
for impairment now have an option of performing a qualitative assessment to
determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. If an entity
determines, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the
fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is more-likely-than-not
less than the carrying amount, the existing quantitative impairment test is
required. Otherwise, no further impairment testing is required. For HDI, this
ASU was effective beginning January 1, 2013. The adoption of this standard
did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations
or financial condition.
Results of Operations
As of March 31, 2013, we had an
accumulated deficit of $
30,682,216
. Until we
are able to generate significant revenue from our reopened plastics recycling
business, we expect to continue to incur operating losses. As of March 31,
2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of $5,664. Following the end of the
quarter, we raised a net $30,000 with a Securities Purchase Agreement with
Asher Enterprises, (see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and
received an additional $54,000 in private placement subordinated notes. The
cash was needed in order to continue our efforts to get the new facility in
Taylor completely operational. Our ability to continue as a going concern is
dependent on our ability to raise the required additional capital or debt
financing to meet short-term needs to restart our plastics processing
operations which would include hiring additional production workers. There is
no guarantee that we will be able to raise such capital or that such capital
will be available on terms satisfactory to us, if at all.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 Compared to Three
Months Ended March 31, 2012
Revenue
-
The Company earned $821 and $1,840,529 in revenue from continuing operations in
the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The $821 was received
from the limited operations of the plastics processing business. For the
quarter ended March 31, 2013, our plastics production facility had just begun
operations in our new facility in Taylor, TX. For the three months ended March
31, 2012 revenue consisted of $3,240 in royalty revenue and $1,837,289 in
plastic processing revenue while HDIP was in full operation in its former
facility in Austin, TX. We anticipate our revenue in the quarter ending June 30,
2013 will show positive progress and we anticipate our operations will be at
approximately 67% compared to our operations of last year at the same time.
Net revenues from our plastics recycling
business were comprised of the following:
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 31
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales – Non-toll
|
$ 566
|
|
$ 1,604,942
|
|
Sales – Toll Processing
|
-
|
|
197,610
|
|
Prepaid discounts
|
-
|
|
(1,408)
|
|
Net processing revenue
|
566
|
|
1,801,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales - Brokered
|
255
|
|
248,735
|
|
Less Brokered Purchases
and Freight
|
-
|
|
(212,590)
|
|
Net Brokered Revenue
|
255
|
|
36,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
revenue-Plastics
|
$821
|
|
$1,837,289
|
|
Cost of Sales
– Cost of
sales were $184,530 and $1,624,477 for the three months ended March 31, 2013
and 2012, respectively. The following is a summary of the cost of sales:
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 31
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Material
|
$ 154
|
|
$ 689,959
|
|
Labor
|
69,028
|
|
358,686
|
|
Depreciation
|
43,263
|
|
36,535
|
|
Equipment rental
|
1,104
|
|
14,135
|
|
Tractor trailer rental
|
12,777
|
|
33,374
|
|
Facility and overhead
|
30,997
|
|
242,143
|
|
Other
costs
|
21,862
|
|
162,068
|
|
Rent
|
5,345
|
|
87,577
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
$184,530
|
|
$1,624,477
|
|
The significant decrease in the cost of
sales for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2012 related to the shut-down of our plastic processing
facility. The current costs are mostly related to our re-start efforts for the
new facility in Taylor.
Expenses
- Total selling, general and administrative
expenses for continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013
were $188,237 compared to $566,892 for the three months ended March 31, 2012.
The following is a summary of the major categories included in selling, general
and administrative expenses:
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
March 31
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
Legal and accounting
|
$ 26,633
|
|
$ 46,659
|
Payroll and related taxes
|
106,788
|
|
435,608
|
Rent and Utilities
|
15,061
|
|
15,647
|
Insurance
|
13,054
|
|
15,368
|
Travel & meals and
entertainment
|
2,728
|
|
10,219
|
Other G & A Expenses
|
23,973
|
|
43,391
|
Total selling, general and administrative
expenses
|
$ 188,237
|
|
$ 566,892
|
Wages, related
expenses and benefits decreased from $435,608 to $106,788 for the three months
ended March 31, 2012 and 2013, due to
the lay-off of
sales and office employees during the shut-down beginning March 28, 2012, and
HDIP conducting little or no operations for the three months ended March 31,
2013. The 2013 wages, expenses, and benefits included in SG&A are for the
corporate office and one management employee in the plastics processing
business.
Legal and
accounting fees decreased from $46,659 to $26,633 for the three months ended March
31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. Legal fees for the three months ended March
31, 2013 and 2012 related to the shutdown of operations in our facility in
Austin, Texas and locating our new facilities in Taylor, Texas.
Interest expense increased from $69,197
to $106,951 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
The increase in the interest expense is related to the significant new debt agreements
the Company has obtained over the last year.
Our net loss from continuing
operations was $478,897 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to
net loss from continuing operations of $403,480 for the three months ended March
31, 2012. The increase in the loss was due to HDIP’s operations being shut
down along with the costs being incurred to re-start operations and the
continuation of general overhead expenses. For the three months ended March 31,
2013, basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations was $(0.01),
based on weighted average common shares outstanding of 52,388,750. For the three
months ended March 31, 2012, basic and diluted net loss per share per
continuing operations was $(0.01) based on weighted average common shares
outstanding of 48,305,462.
Nine Months Ended March 31, 2013 Compared to Nine Months
Ended March 31, 2012
Revenue
-
The Company earned $48,880 and $3,039,301 in revenue from continuing operations
in the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The revenue
consisted of $5,400 of royalty income and $43,480 of plastic processing income
from HDIP in the nine months ended March 31, 2013 compared to $16,320 of
royalty income and $3,022,981 in plastic processing income in the nine months
ended March 31, 2012. As previously noted, we were not operational during the nine
months ended March 31, 2013.
Cost of Sales
– Cost of
sales were $588,911 and $2,859,479 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and
2012, respectively. The following is a summary of cost of sales:
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Material
|
$ 37,182
|
|
$ 1,040,620
|
|
Labor
|
141,050
|
|
657,691
|
|
Depreciation
|
112,476
|
|
66,185
|
|
Equipment rental
|
40,395
|
|
17,881
|
|
Tractor trailer rental
|
49,853
|
|
78,991
|
|
Facility and overhead
|
77,021
|
|
508,802
|
|
Other costs
|
125,589
|
|
294,703
|
|
Rent
|
5,345
|
|
194,606
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
$588,911
|
|
$2,859,479
|
|
The significant decrease in the cost
of sales for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the nine months
ended March 31, 2012 relates to the shut-down of our plastic processing
facility during the current fiscal year. The increase in depreciation relates
to the full nine months ended March 31, 2013 and due to additional equipment
purchases. Operations for our processing facility began in October 2011,
therefore depreciation in the nine months ended March 31, 2012 related to
depreciation in the second and third quarter. During the period of shutdown,
the Company continued to incur overhead costs for removing waste water and
setting up operations at the new facility in Taylor, TX.
Expenses
- Total
selling, general and administrative expenses for continuing operations for the nine
months ended March 31, 2013 were $
507,220
compared
to $
1,021,553
for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. The following is
a summary of the major categories included in selling, general and
administrative expenses:
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2013
|
|
2012
|
Legal
|
$ 63,816
|
|
$ 48,502
|
Accounting
|
17,713
|
|
56,935
|
Payroll and
related taxes
|
286,060
|
|
646,529
|
Travel &
Meals and Entertainment
|
10,118
|
|
15,698
|
Rent
|
19,377
|
|
31,340
|
Utilities
|
17,837
|
|
21,967
|
Insurance
|
41,236
|
|
35,105
|
Stock Option
Expense
|
-
|
|
87,125
|
Office Supplies
|
7,781
|
|
12,162
|
Other G & A
Expenses
|
43,282
|
|
66,190
|
Total selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
$ 507,220
|
|
$ 1,021,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wages, related
expenses and benefits decreased from $646,529 to $286,060 for the nine months
ended March 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
The 2013
wages, related expenses, and benefits included in SG&A are for the
corporate office and one management employee in the plastics processing
business. The Company has significantly reduced their overhead expenses during
the period the plant was shut down.
Legal and
audit/accounting fees decreased from $105,437 to $81,529 for the nine months
ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Legal fees increased from $48,502
in the nine months ended March 31, 2012 to $63,816 for the nine months ended March
31, 2013 due to the various issues relating to the shutdown of operations at
HDIP and the process of locating new facilities. Auditing fees decreased from $56,935
to $17,713 in the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively due
to the timing of the work for the June 30, 2011 and 2012 financial statement
audits.
Stock option
expense was $0 and $87,125 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012,
respectively. This expense is based on the grant date fair value related to
stock options that vested during the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and March
31, 2012. There have been no new options granted in the last year and all
options have been previously expensed.
The
Company recorded $245,548 in interest expense in the nine months ended March 31,
2013 related to the various debt agreements, including the sale/leaseback
transaction, and the Charter Capital line of credit. Comparably, there was $88,244
in interest expense in the nine months ended March 31, 2012. The significant
increase in interest expense is due to a significant amount of new debt that
has been added since December 2011 to help fund the Company’s restart efforts.
Our net loss from continuing
operations was $1,369,091 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, compared to
net loss from continuing operations of $904,063 for the nine months ended March
31, 2012. The increase in the loss was due to operations being shut down and
the continuation of expenses including moving expenses and the removal and
disposal of waste water from the Austin, Texas location. For the nine months
ended March 31, 2013, basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing
operations was $(0.03), based on weighted average common shares outstanding of 52,388,750.
For the nine months ended March 31, 2012, basic and diluted net loss per share per
continuing operations was $(0.02) based on weighted average common shares
outstanding of 44,973,644.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash
equivalents had a net decrease of $69,379 and $371,786 for the nine months
ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively. The significant
elements of these changes were as follows:
|
|
Six months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2012
|
Net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities
:
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from
continuing operations
|
|
$ (1,369,091)
|
|
$ (904,063)
|
Non-cash depreciation
|
|
$ 116,659
|
|
$ 67,560
|
Non-cash amortization
of debt discount
|
|
$ 107,145
|
|
$ 14,705
|
Non-cash stock option
expense
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ 302,822
|
(Increase) decrease in
inventory related to the recycled
|
|
|
|
|
plastics
processing business.
|
|
$ 31,737
|
|
$ (142,534)
|
(Increase) decrease in accounts
receivable
|
|
|
|
|
plastics processing
business.
|
|
$ 107,090
|
|
$ (1,089,778)
|
Increase in accounts payable
that relate to continuing
|
|
|
|
|
operations
|
|
$ 266,858
|
|
$ 202,053
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses relating
to continuing operations
|
|
$ 41,971
|
|
$ 180,980
|
Net cash provided by
(used in) Investing activities
:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of equipment
and other fixed assets in setting
|
|
|
|
|
up HDIP for
operations
|
|
$ (250,216)
|
|
$ (630,525)
|
Payment received on
notes receivable
|
|
$ 75,000
|
|
$ 125,000
|
Net cash provided by
financing activities
:
|
|
|
|
|
Factoring line of
credit agreement with Charter Capital
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ 630,184
|
Proceeds from
subordinated debt offering
|
|
$ 360,000
|
|
$ 833,600
|
Proceeds from Taylor
Economic Development Corp
|
|
$ 140,000
|
|
$ -
|
Proceeds from senior
debt offering
|
|
$ 200,000
|
|
|
Proceeds from Asher
Enterprises
|
|
$ 70,000
|
|
|
Proceeds (payments) for
sale/leaseback obligation
|
|
$ (25,933)
|
|
$ 109,813
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
Activity related to
discontinued operations
|
|
$ (31,824)
|
|
$ (91,311)
|
As of March 31, 2013, we had cash
and cash equivalents of $5,664. The Company has a negative working capital
position of $857,619 at March 31, 2013. We expect the cash anticipated to be received
from the plastics revenue generated in the next quarter, the payments to be received
from the promissory note from CVC, and potential debt borrowings will be enough
to continue our operations for the next few months.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet
arrangements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk
Our exposure to market risks is
limited to changes in interest rates. We do not use derivative financial
instruments as part of an overall strategy to manage risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
.
(a)
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Kenneth W. Brimmer, and Marilee
Douda, our Secretary and Manager of Finance and Accounting, we have evaluated
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon
that review, our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer
(CFO) and Manager of Finance and Accounting have concluded that, as of the
evaluation date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not operating
effectively for gathering, analyzing and disclosing the information that we are
required to disclose in the reports we file under the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules, and that such
information is not accumulated and communicated to our management, including
our CEO and CFO in a manner that allows for timely decisions regarding timely
disclosures.
As reported in
our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of June 30, 2012, included in “Item 9A. Controls and Procedures”
of Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012, as amended, the following material
weaknesses existed:
-
Management did not maintain effective
internal controls relating to the quarter-end closing and financial
reporting process in adequately preparing account reconciliations
pertaining to stock transactions and complicated debt instruments;
-
The Company has insufficient internal
personnel resources and technical accounting and reporting expertise
within the Company’s financial closing and reporting functions; and
-
A more robust inventory costing system
needs to be designed to ensure accurate inventory costing each reporting
period.
No remediation of these internal control weaknesses have
been done at this time due to the limited discretionary funds the Company has
at this time.
(b)
Changes in Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting
There have been no significant changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March
31, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in various
legal actions in the ordinary course of its business.
On March 28, 2012,
HDIP received a Notice of Violation related to its sole processing facility located
at 5330 Fleming Court, Austin, Texas, from the City of Austin Code Compliance
Department. The Notice of Violation alleges violations of Austin’s City Code
and failures to obtain required permits and a Certificate of Occupancy based
upon the current use of the processing facility. The violation primarily
relates to the electrical design and capacity of the building. The Notice of
Violation required HDIP to vacate the processing facility until such alleged
violations are cured. HDIP unsuccessfully attempted to negotiate temporary
permits allowing it to continue operations while it addresses the alleged
violations identified in the Notice of Violation. On March 29, 2012, HDIP
ceased processing operations at the processing facility. On April 2, 2012, HDIP
notified approximately 70 of its employees working at
the
facility of their termination and they were paid their outstanding vacation
pay, however, no severance was paid. The violations have not been satisfied and
the Company has vacated the Austin property and has moved their operations to a
new location in Taylor, TX. At this time, the Company has not been assessed any
fines or penalties by the City of Austin, but no assurances can be made that
they will not do so in the future. At the time of this filing, the Company still
had limited operations at its new facility in Taylor, TX.
Because the City of
Austin required HDIP to vacate the property at 5330 Fleming Court, the
landlord, Flemtex Properties denied access to the premises; therefore, the
Company did not pay rent and utilities for April and May 2012. On May 30, 2012,
the Company received a Notice of Termination of Lease from Flemtex, for failure
to pay rent and reimbursable costs. The letter stated that the Lease was
terminated effective May 31, 2012, and that HDI was to quit and surrender the
Leased Premises to the Landlord in accordance with the requirements of the
Lease on May 31, 2012, and to remove all of the Tenant’s personal property from
the Leased Premises. The Company is in the process of negotiating a final
Termination Agreement related to its Austin lease. The Company has been
informed that the landlord is withholding a final release of all obligations of
the Company related to the lease until all of the discharge water is removed
from the property, which was completed as of October 31, 2012.
On
July 12, 2012, a representative of the Travis County, (Texas) Attorney Office,
Texas Parks and Wildlife, and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
(TEEQ) searched the Company’s Austin offices pursuant to an affidavit signed by
a representative of Texas Parks and Wildlife seeking evidence that the Company
committed the offense of intentional or knowing unauthorized discharge of a
pollutant under Section 7.145 of the Texas Water Code. No charge of illegal
discharge has been made against the Company. The Company has not been contacted
further relative to alleged discharge and strongly denies any such discharge
occurred. As of October 31, 2012 the removal and disposal of the wastewater at the
Company’s former facility was completed.
On
December 14, 2012, Flemtex Properties filed a lawsuit alleging breach of the
commercial lease at the Fleming Court location. The lawsuit seeks damages
totaling $412,711as of November 16, 2012 and future obligations due under the
lease through December 2017. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself
and may seek compensation for losses resulting from the willful and malicious
interference into its Fleming Court operations by the landlord and its agent.
Due
to the uncertainty regarding the outcome of this matter, the Company does not
believe that it is probable that they will owe all of the damages claimed by
Flemtex and have only accrued for the costs of the lease up until Flemtex
terminated the lease on May 31, 2012, as noted above.
Item 1A.
Risk
Factors
The risk
factors set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2012 filed with the SEC on September 28, 2012, as amended
on September 28, 2012 and October 26, 2012, contain important factors that
could cause our actual business and financial results to differ materially from
those contained in forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q or elsewhere by management from time to time. Investors are
encouraged to review and read such risk factors in relation to the statements
herein.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of
Equity Securities and use of Proceeds
On
January 2, 2013, HDI closed on a Securities Purchase Agreement entered into
December 3, 2012 with Asher Enterprises, Inc., pursuant to which we issued to
Asher an 8% Convertible Promissory Note in the original principal amount of
$42,500 (the “Note”). The Note has a maturity date of September 12, 2013 and is
convertible into our common stock at the Variable Conversion Price of 58%
multiplied by the Market Price (representing a discount rate of 42%). “Market
Price” means the average of the lowest three (3) Trading Prices for the Common
Stock during the ten (10) Trading Day period ending on the latest complete
Trading Day prior to the Conversion Date. Asher has the right to convert 180
days after the initial advance date. The shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of the Note are not registered shares under the Securities Act of
1933. The Company has the right to prepay the outstanding Note for an amount
equal to 115%, multiplied by the sum of the then outstanding principal amount
of this Note plus accrued and unpaid interest on the unpaid principal amount of
this Note.
On March 1, 2013, HDI closed on a
second Securities Purchase Agreement with Asher, pursuant to which we issued to
Asher an 8% Convertible Promissory Note in the original principal amount of
$32,500 with a maturity date of December 15, 2013. HDI closed on a third Note
dated April 8, 2013 in the amount of $32,500 that matures on January 15, 2014.
The other terms of the notes are the same as the note described above. The
Company issued these notes in reliance upon representations and warranties made
by Asher that it qualified as an accredited investor under Regulation D of the Securities
Act of 1933.
On
February 4, 2013, HDI Plastics, Inc. executed a Secured Promissory Note (the
“Note”) in a principal amount of $200,000 in favor of Mark Schwartz and Alan
Stern, directors of the Company. The Note bears interest at an annual rate of
18%, payable monthly, and is guaranteed by the Company. The Note matures on
February 1, 2014, at which time all principal and accrued and unpaid interest
on the Note is due. The Note is secured by certain equipment of HDI Plastics.
In connection with the issuance of the Note, the Company issued to each of
Messrs. Schwartz and Stern a warrant to purchase 3,333,333 shares of common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company for an exercise price of $0.03
per share, subject to appropriate adjustment for stock splits, combinations and
similar recapitalization events. The warrants expire on February 4, 2018.
Pursuant to the terms of the Note and Security Agreement, HDI Plastics may
raise an additional $300,000 on the same terms and conditions as those set
forth in the Note, Security Agreement and Warrants. The accrued interest on the
notes was $3,000 as of March 31, 2013. The Company issued these notes in
reliance upon Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 given the director’s
qualification as accredited investors of the Company.
On April 22, 2013, the Company
received an additional $54,000 from an entity controlled by Kenneth Brimmer,
the Company’s CEO in a private placement of a Subordinated Note. Terms for the
Subordinated Note include the issuance of five-year warrants to purchase 1,542,857
shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $.035 per share.
The note is due
two years from the closing date at 105% of face value. The
issuance of the Subordinated Note and warrant occurred in reliance upon
Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 given the Mr. Brimmer’s status as
Chief Executive Officer and qualification as an accredited investor of the
Company.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior
Securities
On
January 1, 2013, the Company’s board of directors approved a 4-month
“Payment-in-Kind” or “PIK” interest plan on the Company’s currently
outstanding Subordinated Debt Notes. The plan suspended the monthly cash
payments of interest to the note holders for four months through April 1, 2013,
which is a default under the terms of such notes. The monthly interest will be
added to the principal of the note. We currently plan to resume monthly cash
interest payments on such notes commencing May 1, 2013. As of March 31,
2013 the accrued interest payable for the loans was $56,913.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
On December 24, 2012, HDIP entered
into a Letter of Agreement with the Taylor Economic Development Corporation (“TEDCO”).
Under the terms of the TEDCO Agreement, TEDCO agreed to advance up to $140,000
for improvements and upgrades to the HDIP’s new facility located in Taylor,
Texas. The advances are in the form of a forgivable loan which will convert to
a grant in 10 years provided among other conditions, HDIP continues to operate
in Taylor and maintain at least 50 full-time jobs at the Taylor facility.
Should HDIP default under its agreement with TEDCO it may be required repay the
advances with interest at the prime rate plus 3%. As of March 31, 2013, $140,000
had been advanced under the TEDCO Agreement.
On December 28, 2012, as part of the
Company’s plan to relocate HDIP’s business and resume operations, HDIP entered into
a four-year lease and purchase option agreement with Southern Mattress Company
of Texas, Inc. for approximately 65,000 square feet of main building space,
including an additional approximate 15,000 square feet of storage space in
Taylor, Texas (“Taylor Lease”). The Taylor Lease calls for minimum monthly
rents as follows:
Period
|
Minimum
Monthly Rent
|
12/28/12 - 2/9/2013
|
$3,000
|
3/1/2013 - 2/28/2015
|
$8,500
|
3/1/2015 - 2/28/16
|
$12,750
|
3/1/2016 - 2/29/17
|
$20,625
|
In addition to rent, HDIP shall pay
for insurance and property taxes effective March 1, 2013. HDIP will have the
right to purchase the property for $700,000 at any time after February 28,
2016.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) The
following Exhibits are furnished pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K:
2.1 Asset Purchase Agreement dated August 24, 2011 by
and between HDI and Cohn Prevention Centers, LLC
(incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
August 31, 2011).
2.2 Tri-Party Sale Agreement dated September 23, 2011
by and among HDI Plastics, Inc., Compass Bank and Cycled Plastics, Ltd.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 26, 2011).
2.3* Asset
Purchase Agreement dated January 25, 2013 by and between HDI and CVC-HD, LLC
3.1 Articles of Incorporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-53025) filed on May 19,
1998).
3.2 Bylaws
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form
SB-2 (File No. 333-53025) filed on May 19, 1998).
3.3 Articles of Amendment of Incorporation
(
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s
Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-53025) filed on May 19, 1998)
.
10.1
Securities
Purchase Agreement dated December 3, 2012, by and between Hypertension
Diagnostics, Inc. and Asher Enterprises
(incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January
3, 2013).
.
10.2
Convertible
Promissory Note dated December 3, 2012 by and between Hypertension Diagnostics,
Inc. and Asher Enterprises
(incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January
3, 2013)
10.3 Lease Agreement dated December 28, 2012 by and
between HDI Plastics, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of HDI, and Southern
Mattress Company of Texas, Inc.
10.4 Letter of Agreement dated December 24, 2012 by and
between HDI Plastics and Taylor Economic Development Corporation.
31.1* Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1* Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS* XBRL
Instance Document**
101.CAL* XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document**
101.DEF* XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document**
101.LAB* XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document**
101.PRE* XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document**
101.SCH* XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Schema Document**
* Filed
herewith
** In
accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information deemed not
“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the Registrant has caused duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
HYPERTENSION DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
By
/s/ Kenneth W.
Brimmer
Kenneth W. Brimmer
Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 15, 2013
Hypertension Diagnositc (CE) (USOTC:HDII)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2024 to Dec 2024
Hypertension Diagnositc (CE) (USOTC:HDII)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2023 to Dec 2024