If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
o
The aggregate market
value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common
equity was last sold, or the average bid and ask price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s
most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $14,229,585 as of June 30, 2017, based on the $11.76 closing price per
share of the Company’s common stock on such date.
The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock on March 31, 2018 was 16,211,816.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(DOLLAR
AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
1.
|
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
|
InterCloud Systems,
Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on November 22, 1999 under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Company provides
networking orchestration and automation for IOT (Internet of things), software-defined networking (“SDN”) and network
function virtualization (“NFV”) environments to telecommunication service providers and corporate enterprise markets.
On October 31, 2013, the Company’s common stock and warrants were listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbols "ICLD"
and "ICLDW," respectively. As of October 6, 2016, the Company’s stock and warrants were delisted from the NASDAQ
Capital Market and commenced trading on the OTCQB Venture Market. On February 13, 2018, our stock and warrants commenced trading
on OTC Pink Current Information.
The Company is comprised
of the following operating units:
|
●
|
T N S, Inc.
T N S, Inc. (“T N S”) is a Chicago-based structured cabling company and DAS installer that supports voice, data, video, security and multimedia systems within commercial office buildings, multi-building campus environments, high-rise buildings, data centers and other structures. T N S extends the Company’s geographic reach to the Midwest area and its client reach to end-users, such as multinational corporations, universities, school districts and other large organizations that have significant ongoing next generation network needs.
|
|
●
|
Rives-Monteiro Engineering LLC and Rives-Monteiro Leasing, LLC.
Rives-Monteiro Engineering, LLC (“RM Engineering”) is a cable firm based in Tuscaloosa, Alabama that performs engineering services in the Southeastern United States and internationally, and Rives-Monteiro Leasing, LLC (“RM Leasing”, and together with RM Engineering, “Rives-Monteiro”), is an equipment provider for cable-engineering services firms. RM Engineering provides services to customers located in the United States and Latin America.
|
|
●
|
SDN Systems, LLC.
SDN Systems, LLC (“SDNS”) sells its software solutions under the brand of Netlayer.io. This is an SDN Orchestration platform with various other network capabilities such as analytics, machine learning functions and SD-WAN or Software Defined Wide Area Networking.
|
|
●
|
ADEX Corporation.
ADEX Corporation (“ADEX”), which the Company sold during February 2018, is an Atlanta-based provider of engineering and installation services and staffing solutions and other services to the telecommunications industry. ADEX’s managed solutions diversified the Company’s ability to service its customers domestically and internationally throughout the project lifecycle.
|
2.
|
GOING CONCERN UNCERTAINTY, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND MANAGEMENT’S PLANS
|
The Company’s
management believes that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s
management believes that its available cash balance as of the date of this filing will not be sufficient to fund its anticipated
level of operations for at least the next 12 months. The Company’s ability to continue operations depends on its ability
to sustain and grow revenue and results of operations as well as its ability to access capital markets when necessary to accomplish
the Company’s strategic objectives. The Company’s management believes that the Company will continue to incur losses
for the immediate future. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company generated gross profits from operations but was unable
to achieve positive cash flow from operations. The Company’s management expects to finance future cash needs from the results
of operations and, depending on the results of operations, the Company may need additional equity or debt financing until the
Company can achieve profitability and positive cash flows from operating activities, if ever.
During the years ended
December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company suffered recurring losses from operations, has violated loan covenants and has had events
of default. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had a stockholders’ deficit of $39,203 and $16,043, respectively.
At December 31, 2017, the Company had a working capital deficit of approximately $20,506, as compared to a working capital deficit
of approximately $39,413 at December 31, 2016. The increase of $18,907 in the Company’s working capital from December 31,
2016 to December 31, 2017 was primarily the result of a decrease in outstanding balances of term loans and notes to related parties.
On
or prior to March 31, 2019, the Company has obligations relating to the payment of indebtedness on term loans and notes to related
parties of $11,898 and $75, respectively. The Company anticipates meeting its cash obligations on indebtedness that is payable
on or prior to March 31, 2019 from earnings from operations, the sale of certain operating assets or businesses and from the proceeds
of additional indebtedness or equity raises. If the Company is not successful in obtaining additional financing when required,
the Company expects that it will be able to renegotiate and extend certain of its notes payable as required to enable it to meet
its remaining debt obligations as they become due, although there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to do so.
The
Company’s future capital requirements for its operations will depend on many factors, including the profitability of its
businesses, the number and cash requirements of other acquisition candidates that the Company pursues, and the costs of operations.
The Company’s management has taken several actions to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations,
including the reduction of certain general and administrative expenses, consulting expenses and other professional services fees.
Additionally, if the Company’s actual revenues are less than forecasted, the Company anticipates implementing headcount
reductions to a level that more appropriately matches then-current revenue and expense levels. The Company is evaluating other
measures to further improve its liquidity, including the sale of certain operating assets or businesses, the sale of equity or
debt securities and entering into joint ventures with third parties. Lastly, the Company may elect to reduce certain related-party
and third-party debt by converting such debt into common shares. The Company’s management believes that these actions will
enable the Company to meet its liquidity requirements through March 31, 2019. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful
in any capital-raising efforts that it may undertake to fund operations over the next 12 months.
The
Company plans to generate positive cash flow from its operating subsidiaries. However, to execute the Company’s business
plan, service existing indebtedness and implement its business strategy, the Company anticipates that it will need to obtain additional
financing from time to time and may choose to raise additional funds through public or private equity or debt financings, a bank
line of credit, borrowings from affiliates or other arrangements. The Company cannot be sure that any additional funding, if needed,
will be available on terms favorable to the Company or at all. Furthermore, any additional capital raised through the sale of
equity or equity-linked securities may dilute the Company’s current stockholders’ ownership and could also result
in a decrease in the market price of the Company’s common stock. The terms of any securities issued by the Company in future
capital transactions may be more favorable to new investors and may include the issuance of warrants or other derivative securities,
which may have a further dilutive effect. The Company also may be required to recognize non-cash expenses in connection with certain
securities it issues, such as convertible notes and warrants, which may adversely impact the Company’s financial condition.
Furthermore, any debt financing, if available, may subject the Company to restrictive covenants and significant interest costs.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise additional capital, when needed, to continue operations in their
current form.
3.
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
PRINCIPLES
OF CONSOLIDATION AND ACCOUNTING FOR INVESTMENTS IN AFFILIATE COMPANIES
The accompanying consolidated
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”).
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, which include Tropical
Communications, Inc. (“Tropical”) (since August 2011 – sold in April 2017 in connection with the sale of the
AWS Entities), Rives-Monteiro Leasing, LLC (“RM Leasing”) (since December 2011), ADEX Corporation, ADEX Puerto Rico,
LLC and Highwire (collectively, “ADEX” or “ADEX Entities”) (since September 2012 – Highwire was sold
in January 2017 – refer to Note 5, Acquisitions and Disposals of Subsidiaries, for further detail, and the ADEX Entities
were sold in February 2018 – refer to Note 22, Subsequent events, for further detail), TNS, Inc. (“TNS”) (since
September 2012), AW Solutions, Inc. and AW Solutions Puerto Rico, LLC (collectively, the “AWS Entities”) (since April
2013 – the AWS Entities were sold in April 2017 – refer to Note 5, Acquisitions and Disposals of Subsidiaries, for
further detail), SDN Essentials, LLC (“SDNE”) (since January 2016 – SDNE was sold in May 2017 – refer to
Note 5, Acquisitions and Disposals of Subsidiaries, for further detail), and SDN Systems, LLC (“SDNS”) (since January
2017). The results of operations of the Company’s former subsidiaries, VaultLogix, LLC (“VaultLogix”) (since
October 2014), PCS Holdings LLC (“Axim”) (since December 2014), Integration Partners – NY Corporation (“IPC)
(since January 2014 – the assets were sold in November 2017), and RentVM Inc. (“RentVM”) (since February 2014
– discontinued in November 2017 in connection with the sale of the assets of the IPC subsidiary), have been included as discontinued
operations on the accompanying financial statements. In February 2016, the Company consummated the sale of certain assets of VaultLogix,
in April 2016, the Company consummated the sale of all assets of Axim, and in November 2017, the Company began the process of discontinuing
the IPC business (refer to Note 21, Discontinued Operations, for further information). All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The
Company consolidates all entities in which it has a controlling voting interest and a variable interest in a variable interest
entity (“VIE”) in which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary.
The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of Rives-Montiero Engineering, LLC (“RM Engineering”) (since December 2011), in which
the Company owns an interest of 49%. The Company has the ability to exercise its call option to acquire the remaining 51% of RM
Engineering for a nominal amount and thus makes all significant decisions related to RM Engineering even though it absorbs only
49% of the losses. Additionally, substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf
of the entity by the 51% holder of RM Engineering.
The
consolidation of RM Engineering resulted in increases of $675 in assets and $260 in liabilities in the Company’s consolidated
balance sheet and $2,199 in revenue and $397 in net loss in the consolidated statement of operations as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2017.
The
consolidation of RM Engineering resulted in increases of $1,025 in assets and $213 in liabilities in the Company’s consolidated
balance sheet and $3,080 in revenue and $1 in net income in the consolidated statement of operations as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2016.
On December 17, 2015,
the Company acquired a 13.7% ownership interest in NGNWare, LLC (“NGNWare”) for $800. The Company did not hold a controlling
financial interest but had the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of NGNWare.
As such, the Company accounted for the investment in NGNWare under the equity method of accounting.
The
Company wrote off the investment as of December 31, 2016. As a result, the Company recorded a loss on investment in equity method
investee of $777 on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company also wrote off
the note receivable as it was deemed uncollectible. The Company recorded a loss of $507 on the consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2016.
In June 2016, the Company
made a loan to SDN Systems, LLC (“SDNS”). The loan is convertible into a 90% ownership stake in SDNS. The Company is
the primary source of capital for SDNS. The Company evaluated the investment in SDNS at both December 31, 2017 and 2016. At December
31, 2016, SDNS did not meet the criteria to be included as a VIE, but at December 31, 2017, the criteria for a VIE were met. As
such, the operations of SDNS have been included in the Company’s consolidated statement of accounts.
The consolidation of
SDNS resulted in increases of $9 in assets and $92 in liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet and $354
in net loss in the consolidated statement of operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The
consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of recurring accruals, which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair presentation of such statements. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with GAAP pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial
statements have been presented on a comparative basis. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company disposed of six subsidiaries.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company disposed of two subsidiaries. The results of certain of these subsidiaries
are included within discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company retrospectively updated
the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 to reflect this change.
REVERSE STOCK SPLITS
On July 7, 2017, the
Company filed a Certificate of Amendment of its Certificate of Incorporation that effected a one-for-four reverse split of the
Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, effective as of the open of trading
on July 12, 2017. The Company’s stockholders, at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, had previously authorized the Company’s
Board of Directors to effect a reverse stock split within a range of ratios, including one-for-four, at any time within one year
following such Annual Meeting, as determined by the board.
On February 22, 2018,
the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment of its Certificate of Incorporation that effected a one-for-one hundred reverse split
of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, effective as of the open of
trading on February 23, 2018. The Company’s stockholders, by written consent dated December 5, 2017, had previously authorized
the Company’s Board of Directors to effect a reverse stock split within a range of ratios, including one-for-one hundred,
at any time within one year following the date of such written consent, as determined by the board.
All common share, warrant,
stock option, and per share information in the consolidated financial statements gives retroactive effect to the one-for-four reverse
stock split that was effected on July 12, 2017 and the one-for-one hundred reverse stock split that was effected on February 23,
2018. There was no change to the number of authorized shares of common stock of the Company as a result of the reverse stock split.
The par value of the Company’s common stock was unchanged at $0.0001 per share post-split.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Changes in estimates and assumptions are reflected in reported
results in the period in which they become known. Significant uses of estimates include the following: 1) valuation of derivative
instruments, 2) allowance for doubtful accounts, 3) estimated useful lives of property, equipment and intangible assets, 4) valuation
of contingent consideration, 5) revenue recognition, 6) estimates related to the recovery of deferred tax assets, 7) valuation
of intangible assets, 8) goodwill impairment, 9) recoverability of indefinite lived intangible assets, 10) estimates in connection
with the allocation of the purchase price allocations, 11) stock-based compensation valuation, and 12) inventory reserve. Actual
results could differ from estimates.
SEGMENT INFORMATION
During
2016, the Company consummated the sale of certain assets of its former VaultLogix and Axim subsidiaries. These subsidiaries comprised
the Company’s former cloud services segment. Additionally, during 2017, the Company sold the assets of its IPC subsidiary
and returned its interest in Nottingham. These entities comprised the Company’s former managed services segment. As such,
the Company concluded that it had two reportable segments as of December 31, 2017: applications and infrastructure and professional
services.
The
Company’s reporting units have been aggregated into one of two operating segments due to their similar economic characteristics,
products, or production and distribution methods. The first operating segment is applications and infrastructure, which is comprised
of the components TNS, the AWS Entities (sold by the Company in April 2017), Tropical (sold by the Company in April 2017 in connection
with the sale of the AWS Entities), and RM Engineering. The Company’s second operating segment is professional services,
which consists of the ADEX entities (sold by the Company in February 2018) and SDNE (sold by the Company in May 2017). The operating
segments mentioned above constitute reporting segments.
Refer to Note 20, Segment
Information, for a detailed discussion on the change in reporting segments.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash
consists of checking accounts and money market accounts. The Company considers all highly-liquid investments purchased with a
maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash.
ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
Trade accounts receivable
are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. Management reviews a customer’s credit history before extending
credit. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers
to make required payments. Estimates of uncollectible amounts are reviewed each period, and changes are recorded in the period
in which they become known. Management analyzes the collectability of accounts receivable each period. This review considers the
aging of account balances, historical bad debt experience, changes in customer creditworthiness, current economic trends, customer
payment activity and other relevant factors. Should any of these factors change, the estimate made by management may also change.
Allowance for doubtful accounts was $696 and $412 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
BUSINESS
COMBINATIONS
The Company accounts
for its business combinations under the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805-10,
Business
Combinations
(“ASC 805-10”), which requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business
combinations. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including non-controlling interests, are recorded at the date of acquisition
at their respective fair values. ASC 805-10 also specifies criteria that intangible assets acquired in a business combination
must meet to be recognized and reported apart from goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value
of the tangible net assets and intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Acquisition-related expenses are recognized
separately from the business combinations and are expensed as incurred. If the business combination provides for contingent consideration,
the Company records the contingent consideration at fair value at the acquisition date and any changes in fair value after the
acquisition date are accounted for as measurement-period adjustments if they pertain to additional information about facts and
circumstances that existed at the acquisition date and that the Company obtained during the measurement period. Changes in fair
value of contingent consideration resulting from events after the acquisition date, such as earn-outs, are recognized as follows:
1) if the contingent consideration is classified as equity, the contingent consideration is not re-measured and its subsequent
settlement is accounted for within equity, or 2) if the contingent consideration is classified as a liability, the changes in
fair value are recognized in earnings.
The
estimated fair value of net assets acquired, including the allocation of the fair value to identifiable assets and liabilities,
was determined using Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. The estimated fair value of the intangible assets acquired was
determined using the income approach to valuation based on the discounted cash flow method. Under this method, expected future
cash flows of the business on a stand-alone basis are discounted back to a present value. The estimated fair value of identifiable
intangible assets, consisting of customer relationships, the trade names and non-compete agreements acquired, also were determined
using an income approach to valuation based on excess cash flow, relief of royalty and discounted cash flow methods.
The
discounted cash flow valuation method requires the use of assumptions, the most significant of which include: future revenue growth,
future earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, estimated synergies to be achieved by a market participant
as a result of the business combination, marginal tax rate, terminal value growth rate, weighted average cost of capital and discount
rate.
The
excess earnings method used to value customer relationships requires the use of assumptions, the most significant of which include:
the remaining useful life, expected revenue, survivor curve, earnings before interest and tax margins, marginal tax rate, contributory
asset charges, discount rate and tax amortization benefit.
The
most significant assumptions under the relief of royalty method used to value trade names include: estimated remaining useful
life, expected revenue, royalty rate, tax rate, discount rate and tax amortization benefit. The discounted cash flow method used
to value non-compete agreements includes assumptions such as: expected revenue, term of the non-compete agreements, probability
and ability to compete, operating margin, tax rate and discount rate. Management has developed these assumptions based on historical
knowledge of the business and projected financial information of the Company. These assumptions may vary based on future events,
perceptions of different market participants and other factors outside the control of management, and such variations may be significant
to estimated values.
GOODWILL
AND INDEFINTITE LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
was generated through the acquisitions made by the Company. As the total consideration paid exceeded the value of the net assets
acquired, the Company recorded goodwill for each of the completed acquisitions. At the date of acquisition, the Company performed
a valuation to determine the value of the intangible assets, along with the allocation of assets and liabilities acquired. The
goodwill is attributable to synergies and economies of scale provided to the Company by the acquired entity (refer to Note 5,
Acquisitions and Disposals of Subsidiaries, for further detail).
During
the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company changed the date of its annual impairment test from December 31 to October 1. The change
was made to more closely align the impairment testing date with the Company’s long-range planning and forecasting process.
The Company believes the change in its annual impairment testing date did not delay, accelerate, or avoid an impairment charge.
The Company has determined that this change in accounting principle is preferable under the circumstances and does not result
in adjustments to the Company’s financial statements when applied retrospectively.
The
Company tests its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually (as of October 1) and whenever
events or circumstances change that indicate impairment may have occurred. A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining
if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include, among others: a significant decline in the Company’s
expected future cash flows; a sustained, significant decline in the Company’s stock price and market capitalization; a significant
adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate of its segments; unanticipated competition; and slower growth rates.
Any adverse change in these factors could have a significant impact on the recoverability of goodwill, the indefinite-lived intangible
assets and the Company’s consolidated financial results.
Goodwill has been
assigned to the reporting unit to which the value relates. The Company aggregates its reporting units and tests its goodwill for
impairment at the operating segment level. The Company tests goodwill by estimating the fair value of the reporting unit using
a Discounted Cash Flow (“DCF”) model. The key assumptions used in the DCF model to determine the highest and best
use of estimated future cash flows include revenue growth rates and profit margins based on internal forecasts, terminal value
and an estimate of a market participant’s weighted-average cost of capital used to discount future cash flows to their present
value.
The Company tested
the indefinite-lived intangible assets using a Relief From Royalty Method (“RFRM”) under the Income Approach in conjunction
with a Market Approach Method. The key assumptions used in the RFRM model include revenue growth rates, the terminal value and
the assumed discount rate. The Market Approach Method uses one or more methods that compare the Company to similar businesses,
business ownership interest and securities that have been sold. Certain elements of the Market Approach Method are incorporated
in the RFRM. While the Company uses available information to prepare estimates and to perform impairment evaluations, actual results
could differ significantly from these estimates or related projections, resulting in impairment related to recorded goodwill balances.
Additionally, adverse conditions in the economy and future volatility in the equity and credit markets could impact the valuation
of the Company’s reporting units. The Company can provide no assurances that, if such conditions occur, they will not trigger
impairments of goodwill and other intangible assets in future periods within all segments.
With
regard to other long-lived assets and intangible assets with indefinite-lives, the Company follows a similar impairment assessment.
The Company will assess the quantitative factors to determine if an impairment test of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is
necessary. If the quantitative assessment reveals that it is more likely than not that the asset is impaired, a calculation of
the asset’s fair value is made. Fair value is calculated using many factors, which include the future discounted cash flows
as well as the estimated fair value of the asset in an arm’s-length transaction.
REVENUE
RECOGNITION
The
Company’s revenues are generated from its two reportable segments: applications and infrastructure and professional services.
The Company recognizes revenue on arrangements in accordance with ASC Topic 605-10, “
Revenue Recognition
”.
The Company recognizes revenue only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the
service is performed, and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
The
applications and infrastructure segment is comprised of TNS, the AWS Entities (sold by the Company in April 2017), Tropical (sold
by the Company in April 2017 in connection with the sale of the AWS Entities), and RM Engineering. Applications and infrastructure
service revenue is derived from contracted services to provide technical engineering services along with contracting services
to commercial and governmental customers. The contracts of TNS and RM Engineering provide that payment for the Company’s
services may be based on either (i) direct labor hours at fixed hourly rates or (ii) fixed-price contracts. The services provided
under the contracts are generally provided within one month. Occasionally, the services may be provided over a period of up to
six months.
The
AWS Entities, which was sold by the Company in April 2017, and which included 8760 Enterprises from September 14, 2016 through
December 31, 2016, generally recognized revenue using the percentage of completion method. Revenues and fees under the contracts
of these entities were recognized utilizing the units-of-delivery method, which used measures such as task completion within an
overall contract. The units-of-delivery approach is an output method used in situations where it is more representative of progress
on a contract than an input method, such as the efforts-expended approach. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts,
if any, were made in the period in which such losses were determined. Changes in job performance conditions and final contract
settlements could have resulted in revisions to costs and income, which were recognized in the period in which revisions were
determined.
The
AWS Entities also generated revenue from service contracts with certain customers. These contracts were accounted for under the
proportional performance method. Under this method, revenue was recognized in proportion to the value provided to the customer
for each project as of each reporting date.
The
revenues of the Company’s professional services segment, which was comprised of its ADEX subsidiaries (sold by the Company
in February 2018) and SDNE (sold by the Company in May 2017), were derived from contracted services to provide technical engineering
and management solutions to large voice and data communications providers, as specified by their clients. The contracts provided
that payments made for the Company’s services might have been based on either (i) direct labor hours at fixed hourly rates
or (ii) fixed-price contracts. The services provided under these contracts were generally provided within one month. Occasionally,
the services might have been provided over a period of up to four months. If it was anticipated that the services would span a
period exceeding one month, depending on the contract terms, we provided either progress billing at least once a month or upon
completion of the clients’ specifications. The aggregate amount of unbilled work-in-progress recognized as revenues was
insignificant at December 31, 2017 and 2016.
ADEX’s
former Highwire division (“Highwire”), sold by the Company in February 2017, generated revenue through its telecommunications
engineering group, which contracted with telecommunications infrastructure manufacturers to install the manufacturer’s products
for end users. This division of ADEX recognized revenue using the proportional performance method. Under this method, revenue
was recognized as projects within contracts were completed as of each reporting date.
The
Company’s applications and infrastructure segment sometimes requires customers to provide a deposit prior to beginning work
on a project. When this occurs, the deposit is recorded as deferred revenue and is recognized in revenue when the work is complete.
The Company’s
former IPC subsidiary, which was included in the Company’s managed services segment and sold by the Company during November
2017, was a value-added reseller that generated revenues from the resale of voice, video and data networking hardware and software
contracted services for design, implementation and maintenance services for voice, video, and data networking infrastructure. IPC’s
customers were higher education organizations, governmental agencies and commercial customers. IPC also provided maintenance and
support and professional services. For certain maintenance contracts, IPC assumed responsibility for fulfilling the support to
customers and recognized the associated revenue either on a ratable basis over the life of the contract or, if a customer purchased
a time and materials maintenance program, as maintenance was provided to the customer. Revenue for the sale of third-party
maintenance contracts was recognized net of the related cost of revenue. In a maintenance contract, all services were provided
by the Company’s third-party providers. As a result, the Company concluded that IPC was acting as an agent and IPC recognized
revenue on a net basis at the date of sale with revenue being equal to the gross margin on the transaction. As IPC was under no
obligation to perform additional services, revenue was recognized at the time of sale rather than over the life of the maintenance
agreement.
IPC
also generated revenue through the sale of a subscription-based cloud services to its customers. Revenue related to these customers
was deferred until the services were performed. This revenue was reported in the former managed services segment.
For
multiple-element arrangements, IPC recognized revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 605-25,
Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables
.
The Company allocated revenue for such arrangements based on the relative selling prices of the elements applying the following
hierarchy: first vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), then third-party evidence (“TPE”) of selling
price if VSOE is not available, and finally the Company’s estimate of the selling price if neither VSOE nor TPE is available.
VSOE existed when the Company sold the deliverables separately and represented the actual price charged by the Company for each
deliverable. Estimated selling price reflected the Company’s best estimate of what the selling prices of each deliverable
would be if it were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis taking into consideration the cost structure of the Company’s
business, technical skill required, customer location and other market conditions. Each element that had stand-alone value is
accounted for as a separate unit of accounting. Revenue allocated to each unit of accounting was recognized when the service was
provided or the product was delivered.
IPC revenue has been
included in discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
The
Company’s former VaultLogix subsidiary, which was sold in February 2016, provided cloud-based on-line data backup services
to its customers. Certain customers paid for their services before service began. Revenue for these customers was deferred until
the services were performed. For all services, VaultLogix recognized revenue when services were provided, evidence of an arrangement
existed, fees were fixed or determinable and collection was reasonably assured.
LONG-LIVED
ASSETS, INCLUDING DEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Long-lived
assets, other than goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles, are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable through the estimated undiscounted future
cash flows derived from such assets.
Definite-lived intangible
assets primarily consist of non-compete agreements and customer relationships. For long-lived assets used in operations, impairment
losses are only recorded if the asset’s carrying amount is not recoverable through its undiscounted, probability-weighted
future cash flows. The Company measures the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated
fair value. When an impairment exists, the related assets are written down to fair value.
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
Property
and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Useful lives are:
3-7 years for vehicles; 5-7 years for equipment; 16 years for developed software; and 3 years for computers and office equipment.
Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred and major improvements are capitalized. When assets are sold or retired, the
cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is included in other income.
CONCENTRATIONS OF
RISK
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and trade receivables.
The Company maintains its cash balances with high-credit-quality financial institutions. Deposits held with banks may exceed the
amount of insurance provided on such deposits. These deposits may be withdrawn upon demand and therefore bear minimal risk. The
Company limits the amount of credit exposure through diversification and management regularly monitors the composition of its
investment portfolio.
The
Company provides credit to customers on an uncollateralized basis after evaluating client creditworthiness. For the year ended
December 31, 2017, the Company’s largest customer was Uline. This customer accounted for 17% of consolidated revenues for
the year ended December 31, 2017. In addition, amounts due from this customer represented 4% of trade accounts receivable as of
December 31, 2017. The Company did not have a customer accounting for 10% or greater of consolidated revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2016.
The
Company’s customers in its applications and infrastructure and professional services segments are located within the United
States of America and Puerto Rico. Revenues generated within the United States of America accounted for approximately 98% and
98% of consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Revenues generated from foreign sources
accounted for approximately 2% and 2% of consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
In the normal course
of business, the Company is subject to various contingencies. The Company records a contingency in the consolidated financial
statements when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable, or otherwise
disclosed, in accordance with ASC Topic 450,
Contingencies
(“ASC Topic 450”). Significant judgment is required
in both the determination of probability and the determination as to whether a loss is reasonably estimable. In the event the
Company determines that a loss is not probable, but is reasonably possible, and it becomes possible to develop what the Company
believes to be a reasonable range of possible loss, then the Company will include disclosures related to such matter as appropriate
and in compliance with ASC Topic 450. To the extent there is a reasonable possibility that the losses could exceed the amounts
already accrued, the Company will, when applicable, adjust the accrual in the period in which the determination is made, disclose
an estimate of the additional loss or range of loss, indicate that the estimate is immaterial with respect to its financial statements
as a whole or, if the amount of such adjustment cannot be reasonably estimated, disclose that an estimate cannot be made.
Breach
of Contract Action
In
July 2013, a complaint was filed against the Company in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County,
Florida titled The Farkas Group, Inc., The Atlas Group of Companies, LLC and Michael D. Farkas v. InterCloud Systems, Inc. (Case
No. 502013CA01133XXXMB) for breach of contract and unjust enrichment. In the complaint, the plaintiffs allege that the Company
has breached contractual agreements between the Company and plaintiffs pertaining to certain indebtedness amounting to approximately
$116 allegedly owed by the Company to the plaintiffs and the Company’s agreement to convert such indebtedness into shares
of the Company’s common stock. The plaintiff alleges that they are entitled to receive in the aggregate 5,426 shares of
the Company’s common stock or aggregate damages reflecting the trading value at the high price for the common stock. The
Company has asserted as a defense that such indebtedness, together with any right to convert such indebtedness into shares of
common stock, was cancelled pursuant to the terms of a Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of July 2, 2009 between the Company and
the plaintiffs. The Farkas Group was a control person of the Company during the period that it was a public “shell”
company and facilitated the transfer of control of the Company to its former chief executive officer, Gideon Taylor. This matter
is presently set on the court’s non-jury trial docket. The Company intends to continue to vigorously defend this lawsuit.
On
May 15, 2017, a complaint was filed against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York titled
Grant Thornton LLP v. InterCloud Systems, Inc
., Case No. 652619/2017, for breach of contract, quantum meruit and unjust
enrichment. In the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that the Company breached an agreement with the plaintiff by failing
to pay the fees of the plaintiff of approximately $769 and to reimburse the plaintiff for its related expenses for a proposed
audit of the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company intends to vigorously
defend this action, and has commenced a separate action against Grant Thornton LLP in the Supreme Court of the State of New York,
County of New York titled
InterCloud Systems, Inc. v. Grant Thornton LLP
, Case No. 65424/2017 for breach of contract and
fraudulent inducement relating to the engagement letter between the Company and Grant Thornton LLP and to recover the fees the
Company paid to Grant Thornton LLP, as well as other damages.
Securities
and Exchange Commission Subpoenas
On
May 21, 2014, the Company received a subpoena from the SEC that stated that the staff of the SEC is conducting an investigation
In the Matter of Galena Biopharma, Inc. File No. HO 12356 (now known as “In the Matter of Certain Stock Promotions”)
and that the subpoena was issued to the Company as part of an investigation as to whether certain investor relations firms and
their clients engaged in market manipulation. The subpoena and accompanying letter did not indicate whether the Company is, or
is not, under investigation. Since May 2014, the Company provided testimony to the SEC and produced documents in response to that
subpoena and several additional subpoenas received from the SEC in connection with that matter, including a subpoena issued on
March 1, 2016 requesting information relating to a transaction involving the Company’s Series H preferred shares in December
2013.
In
connection with the SEC investigation, in May 2015, the Company received information from the SEC that it is continuing an investigation
of the Company and certain of its current and former officers, consultants of the Company and others, of “possible violation[s]”
of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Sections 9(a) and 10(b) of the Exchange Act and the rules of the SEC thereunder in
the offer or sale of securities and certain other matters with respect to which the SEC claims it has information, including the
possible market manipulation of the Company’s securities dating back to January 2013. Based upon the Company’s internal
investigations, the Company does not believe either it or any of its current or former officers or directors engaged in any activities
that violated applicable securities laws. The Company intends to continue to work with the staff of the SEC towards a resolution
and to supplement its disclosure regarding the SEC’s investigation accordingly.
On April 2, 2018, the
Company received a notification from the SEC that they were closing the investigation and do not intend to recommend enforcement
action against the Company.
Other
From
time to time, the Company may become a party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary course of its business.
Although the results of such litigation and claims in the ordinary course of business cannot be predicted with certainty, the
Company believes that the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations
or financial condition. Regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on the Company because of defense costs,
diversion of management resources and other factors.
As
of December 31, 2017, no accruals for loss contingencies have been recorded as the outcomes of these cases are neither probable
nor reasonably estimable.
The
Company has obligations contingent on the performance of its subsidiaries. These contingent obligations, payable to the former
owners of the subsidiaries, are based on metrics that contain escalation clauses. The Company believes that the amounts recorded
within the liabilities section of the consolidated balance sheets are indicative of fair value and are also considered the most
likely payout of these obligations. If conditions were to change, these liabilities could potentially impact the Company’s
results of operations, financial condition and future cash flows.
DISTINGUISHMENT
OF LIABILITIES FROM EQUITY
The
Company relies on the guidance provided by ASC Topic 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity
, to classify certain redeemable
and/or convertible instruments. The Company first determines whether a financial instrument should be classified as a liability.
The Company will determine the liability classification if the financial instrument is mandatorily redeemable, or if the financial
instrument, other than outstanding shares, embodies a conditional obligation that the Company must or may settle by issuing a
variable number of its equity shares.
Once
the Company determines that a financial instrument should not be classified as a liability, the Company determines whether the
financial instrument should be presented between the liability section and the equity section of the balance sheet (“temporary
equity”). The Company will determine temporary equity classification if the redemption of the financial instrument is outside
the control of the Company (i.e. at the option of the holder). Otherwise, the Company accounts for the financial instrument as
permanent equity.
Initial
Measurement
The
Company records its financial instruments classified as liability, temporary equity or permanent equity at issuance at the fair
value, or cash received.
Subsequent
Measurement - Financial instruments classified as liabilities
The Company records
the fair value of its financial instruments classified as liabilities at each subsequent measurement date. The changes in fair
value of its financial instruments classified as liabilities are recorded as other expense/income. The Monte Carlo simulation is
used to determine the fair value of derivatives for instruments with embedded conversion features.
Derivative Liabilities
The Company accounts
for derivative instruments in accordance with ASC Topic 815,
Derivatives and Hedging
(“ASC Topic 815”), and
all derivative instruments are reflected as either assets or liabilities at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. The
Company uses estimates of fair value to value its derivative instruments. Fair value is defined as the price to sell an asset or
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between able and willing market participants. In general, the Company’s policy
in estimating fair values is to first look at observable market prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets,
where available. When these are not available, other inputs are used to model fair value such as prices of similar instruments,
yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, default rates and credit spreads, relying first on observable data from active markets.
Depending on the availability of observable inputs and prices, different valuation models could produce materially different fair
value estimates. The values presented may not represent future fair values and may not be realizable. The Company categorizes its
fair value estimates in accordance with ASC 820, based on the hierarchical framework associated with the three levels or price
transparency utilized in measuring financial instruments at fair value as discussed above.
INCOME
TAXES
The
Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. This approach requires the recognition of deferred tax
assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the
tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences
are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets when management estimates, based on
available objective evidence, that it is more likely than not that the benefit will not be realized for the deferred tax assets.
The Company, and its subsidiaries, conduct business, and file income, franchise or net worth tax returns, in thirty nine (39)
states and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The Company determines its filing obligations in a jurisdiction in accordance with
existing statutory and case law.
Significant
management judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, and in particular, any valuation allowance recorded
against the Company’s deferred tax assets. Deferred tax assets are regularly reviewed for recoverability. The Company currently
has significant deferred tax assets resulting from net operating loss carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, which
should reduce taxable income in future periods. The realization of these assets is dependent on generating future taxable income.
The
Company follows the guidance set forth within ASC Topic 740,
Income Taxes
(“ASC Topic 740”), which
prescribes a two-step process for the financial statement recognition and measurement of income tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in an income tax return. The first step evaluates an income tax position in order to determine whether
it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, based on the technical merits of the
position. The second step measures the benefit to be recognized in the financial statements for those income tax positions
that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold. ASC Topic 740 also provides guidance on de-recognition,
classification, recognition and classification of interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition. Penalties and interest, if incurred, would be recorded as a component of current income tax expense. As of
December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company has no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions. The Company
believes that any uncertain tax positions would not have a material impact on its results of operations.
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
The Company accounts
for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718,
Compensation-Stock Compensation
(“ASC Topic 718”).
Under the fair value recognition provisions of this topic, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on
the fair value of the award and is recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, based
on the terms of the awards.
The Company applies
ASC 505-50,
Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees
(“ASC Topic 505”), with respect to options and warrants
issued to non-employees which require the use of option valuation models to measure the fair value of the options and warrants
at the measurement date.
NET
LOSS PER SHARE
The
Company follows ASC Topic 260,
Earnings Per Share
, which requires presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share
(“EPS”) on the face of the income statement for all entities with complex capital structures, and requires a reconciliation
of the numerator and denominator of the basic EPS computation to the numerator and denominator of the diluted EPS computation.
In
the accompanying financial statements, basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.
Diluted
income (loss) per share is computed in a manner similar to the basic income (loss) per share, except the weighted-average number
of shares outstanding is increased to include all common shares, including those with the potential to be issued by virtue of
warrants, options, convertible debt and other such convertible instruments. Diluted loss per share contemplates a complete conversion
to common shares of all convertible instruments only if they are dilutive in nature with regards to earnings per share.
Diluted Earnings per
Share (“Diluted EPS”) gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. The computation
of Diluted EPS does not assume conversion, exercise or contingent exercise of securities that would have an anti-dilutive effect
on losses. As a result, if there is a loss from continuing operations, Diluted EPS is computed in the same manner as Basic EPS.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company’s common stock equivalents included 80,569,943 shares that could be converted based
on certain convertible preferred stock, 13,742,977 shares that could be converted based on outstanding debt, 33,339 shares related
to outstanding warrants, and 417 shares related to outstanding options that were not included in the calculation of earnings per
share for the period then ended. As of December 31, 2016, the Company’s common stock equivalents included 166,262 shares
that could be converted based on outstanding debt, 22,085 shares related to outstanding warrants, and 438 shares related to outstanding
options that were not included in the calculation of earnings per share for the period then ended. Such financial instruments may
become dilutive and would then need to be included in future calculations of Diluted EPS. Potential common shares includable in
the computation of fully-diluted per share results are not presented for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 in the consolidated
financial statements as their effect would be anti-dilutive.
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
ASC Topic 820
Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures
(“ASC Topic 820”) provides a framework for measuring fair value in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles.
ASC
Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes
between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs)
and (2) an entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in
the circumstances (unobservable inputs).
The
fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the
fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820 are described as follows:
|
●
|
Level 1 —
|
Unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Level 2 —
|
Inputs
other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or
liability; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other
means.
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Level 3 —
|
Inputs that are unobservable
for the asset or liability.
|
TREASURY
STOCK
The
Company records treasury stock at the cost to acquire it and includes treasury stock as a component of stockholders’ deficit.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
On May 28, 2014, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“Topic 606”), to update the financial reporting
requirements for revenue recognition. Topic 606 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue
arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance.
The guidance is based on the principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers
in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
The guidance also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising
from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to
fulfill a contract. This guidance became effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018, and entities have the option of
using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach for the adoption of the new standard. The adopted this standard
using the modified retrospective approach on January 1, 2018.
In preparation for
adoption of the standard, the Company evaluated each of the five steps in Topic 606, which are as follows: 1) Identify the contract
with the customer; 2) Identify the performance obligations in the contract; 3) Determine the transaction price; 4) Allocate the
transaction price to the performance obligations; and 5) Recognize revenue when (or as) performance obligations are satisfied.
The Company does not
expect reported revenue to be affected materially in any period due to the adoption of ASC Topic 606 because: (1) the Company expects
to identify similar performance obligations under Topic 606 as compared with deliverables and separate units of account previously
identified; (2) the Company has determined the transaction price to be consistent; and (3) the Company records revenue at the same
point in time, upon delivery of services, under both ASC Topic 605 and Topic 606, as applicable under the terms of the contract
with the customer. Additionally, the Company does not expect the accounting for fulfillment costs or costs incurred to obtain a
contract to be affected materially in any period due to the adoption of Topic 606.
There are also certain
considerations related to accounting policies, business processes and internal control over financial reporting that are associated
with implementing Topic 606. The Company has evaluated its policies, processes, and control framework for revenue recognition,
and identified and implemented the changes needed in response to the new guidance.
Lastly, disclosure
requirements under the new guidance in Topic 606 have been significantly expanded in comparison to the disclosure requirements
under the current guidance, including disclosures related to disaggregation of revenue into appropriate categories, performance
obligations, the judgments made in revenue recognition determinations, adjustments to revenue which relate to activities from
previous quarters or years, any significant reversals of revenue, and costs to obtain or fulfill contracts.
In November 2015, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17,
Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes
(“ASU
2015-17”), which became effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. ASU
2015-17 simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes by requiring that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified
as non-current in the statement of financial position. The Company has elected to early adopt the requirements of ASU 2015-17 and
the results of such adoption are presented within these consolidated financial statements. The adoption did not have a material
effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In February 2016, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842)
(“ASU 2016-02”), which is effective for public entities for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Under ASU 2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize the following
for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: 1) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s
obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis, and 2) a right-of-use asset, which is an
asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The Company
continues to evaluate the effects of ASU 2016-02 and does not expect that the adoption will have a material effect on its consolidated
financial statements and disclosures.
In March 2016, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2016-06,
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments
(“ASU
2016-06”), which became effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. ASU
2016-06 clarifies what steps are required when assessing whether the economic characteristics and risks of call (put) options are
clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of their debt hosts, which is one of the criteria for bifurcating
an embedded derivative. Consequently, when a call (put) option is contingently exercisable, an entity does not have to assess whether
the event that triggers the ability to exercise a call (put) option is related to interest rates or credit risks. The Company adopted
the provisions of ASU 2016-06 effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-06 did not have a material impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
In March 2016, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07,
Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to
the Equity Method of Accounting
(“ASU 2016-07”), which became effective for public entities for annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2016. ASU 2016-07 eliminates the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of
the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust
the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had
been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. ASU 2016-07 requires that the equity method investor
add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor’s previously held
interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting.
Therefore, upon qualifying for the equity method of accounting, no retroactive adjustment of the investment is required. The Company
adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-07 effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-07 did not have a material impact on
the consolidated financial statements.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09,
Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based
Payment Accounting
, (“ASU 2016-09”), which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment
transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification
on the statement of cash flows. The guidance became effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2017. The Company adopted
the provisions of ASU 2016-09 effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
In
May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-11,
Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission
of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016
EITF Meeting
(“ASU 2016-11”). The amendments in ASU 2016-11 rescinds the certain SEC Staff Observer comments that
are codified in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and Topic 932, Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas, effective upon adoption
of Topic 606. Specifically, registrants should not rely on the following SEC Staff Observer comments upon adoption of Topic 606:
(a) Revenue and Expense Recognition for Freight Services in Process (b) Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs, (c)
Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (including Reseller of the Vendor’s Products) (d) Accounting
for Gas-Balancing Arrangements (that is, use of the “entitlements method”). In addition, as a result of the amendments
in Update 2014-16, the SEC staff is rescinding its SEC Staff Announcement, “Determining the Nature of a Host Contract Related
to a Hybrid Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share under Topic 815,” effective concurrently with Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16.
The Company is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2016-11 on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the
FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-15,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of
Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
(“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 eliminates the diversity in practice related
to the classification of certain cash receipts and payments for debt prepayment or extinguishment costs, the maturing of a zero
coupon bond, the settlement of contingent liabilities arising from a business combination, proceeds from insurance settlements,
distributions from certain equity method investees and beneficial interests obtained in a financial asset securitization. ASU
2016-15 designates the appropriate cash flow classification, including requirements to allocate certain components of these cash
receipts and payments among operating, investing and financing activities. The guidance became effective for the Company beginning
after December 15, 2017, although early adoption was permitted. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-15 effective January
1, 2018. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In October 2016, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2016-17,
Consolidation: Interests Held through Related Parties That Are Under Common Control
(“ASU
2016-17”). The amendments in this ASU change how a reporting entity that is the single decision maker of a variable interest
entity should treat indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting
entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that variable interest entity. The ASU became effective for fiscal
years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-17
effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2016-17 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the
FASB issued ASU 2017-01,
Business Combinations (Topic 805) Clarifying the Definition of a Business
(“ASU 2017-01”).
The Amendments in this Update clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with
evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition
of a business affects many areas of accounting, including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. The guidance is
effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. Early adoption
of this standard is permitted. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-01 effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU
2017-01 had no impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04,
Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
(“ASU
2017-04”). This standard will simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment
test. Current guidance requires that companies compute the implied fair value of goodwill under Step 2 by performing procedures
to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities)
following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business
combination. This standard will require companies to perform annual or interim goodwill impairment tests by comparing the fair
value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the
carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount
of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. This standard will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019,
including interim periods within that reporting period, and will be applied prospectively. Early adoption of this standard is permitted.
The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-04 effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2017-04 did not have a material
impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU no. 2017-09,
Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic
718): Scope of Modification Accounting
. The amendments in ASU 2017-09 provide guidance about which changes to the terms
or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. ASU 2017-09 is effective
for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those annual periods. The amendments in
this update will be applied on a prospective basis to an award modified on or after the adoption date. The Company adopted the
provisions of ASU 2017-09 effective January 1, 2018. The Company does not expect ASU 2017-09 to have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
In
July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11,
Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic
480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; II. Replacement
of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception.
Part I of this update addresses the complexity of accounting
for certain financial instruments with down round features. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments
(or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current
accounting guidance creates cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible
instruments) with down round features that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. Part II
of this update addresses the difficulty of navigating Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, because of the existence
of extensive pending content in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This pending content is the result of the indefinite
deferral of accounting requirements about mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain
mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests. The amendments in Part II of this update do not have an accounting effect.
This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company
is currently evaluating the effects of ASU 2017-11 on its consolidated financial statements.
Loans
receivable as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 consisted of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Loans to employees, net of reserves of $924 and $891, respectively, due December 2018
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
Loan to third party, due December 2017
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
345
|
|
Fair value of convertible loan receivable from Spectrum Global Solutions, Inc., due April 2018
|
|
$
|
3,613
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
$
|
3,617
|
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
Loans to employees
bear interest at rates between 2% and 3% per annum. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the value of the collateral was below the
value of the outstanding loans to employees. As a result, the Company recorded a reserve of $924 and 891 on the balance of loans
to employees as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
On April 25, 2017,
the Company sold 80.1% of the assets associated with its AWS Entities subsidiaries (refer to Note 5, Disposals of Subsidiaries,
for further detail). In connection with the sale, the Company received from the buyer a one-year convertible promissory note in
the principal amount of $2,000. This note accrues interest at a rate of 8% per annum. The interest income associated with this
loan receivable during the year ended December 31, 2017 amounted to $69. This note is convertible into shares of common stock of
the buyer at a conversion price per share equal to 75% of the lowest VWAP during the fifteen (15) trading days immediately prior
to the conversion date.
The Company evaluated
the convertible note’s settlement provisions and elected the fair value option afforded in ASC 825, Financial Instruments,
to value this instrument. Under such election, the loan receivable is measured initially and subsequently at fair value, with any
changes in the fair value of the instrument being recorded in the consolidated financial statements as a change in fair value of
derivative instruments. The Company estimates the fair value of this instrument by first estimating the fair value of the straight
debt portion, excluding the embedded conversion option, using a discounted cash flow model. The Company then estimates the fair
value of the embedded conversion option using a Monte Carlo simulation. The sum of these two valuations is the fair value of the
loan receivable. On April 25, 2017, the Company used the discounted cash flow method to value the straight debt portion of the
convertible note and determined the fair value to be $1,057, and used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features
of the convertible note and determined the fair value to be $1,174. The total fair value of $2,231 was recorded in the consolidated
balance sheet.
On December 22, 2017,
the Company assigned $105 of the note receivable to RDW Capital LLC in exchange for cash of $100.
On December 31, 2017,
the Company used the discounted cash flow method to value the straight debt portion of the convertible note and determined the
fair value to be $1,650, and used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the convertible note and determined
the fair value to be $1,963. The total fair value of $3,613 was included in loans receivable on the consolidated balance sheet
as of December 31, 2017. The Company recorded the change in fair value as a gain of $1,718 on the consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2017.
During March 2018,
the Company assigned additional amounts of the notes receivable to RDW Capital LLC (refer to Note 22, Subsequent Events, for further
detail).
The fair value of
the note receivable as of December 31, 2017 was calculated using the discounted cash flow method and a Monte Carlo simulation
with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
Principal amount and guaranteed interest
|
|
$
|
2,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion price per share
|
|
|
*
|
|
Conversion trigger price per share
|
|
|
None
|
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
Life of conversion feature (in years)
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
272
|
%
|
*
|
The conversion price per share is equal to 75% of the lowest VWAP during the fifteen trading days immediately prior to the conversion
date.
|
5.
|
ACQUISITIONS
AND DISPOSALS OF SUBSIDIARIES
|
Disposal of the Highwire of ADEX
On January 31, 2017,
the Company sold the Highwire division of ADEX. This division accounted for approximately $365 and $10,993 in revenues for the
years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Under the terms of the sale, the Company received $4,000 in total proceeds
and an additional working capital adjustment of approximately $400 that was paid in October 2017. The Company used proceeds from
the sale to make payments on term loans (refer to Note 11, Term Loans, for further detail). In connection with the sale, the Company
completed an ASC 350-20 goodwill fair value assignment, which allocated $3,003 from the reporting unit to Highwire.
Per ASC 350-20-40-7,
when a portion of goodwill is allocated to a business to be disposed of, the goodwill remaining in the portion of the reporting
unit to be retained shall be tested for impairment in accordance with paragraphs 350-20-35-3A through 35-19 using its adjusted
carrying amount. As a result of the sale, the Company identified indicators of potential impairment of goodwill and intangible
assets.
Based on the Company’s
analysis, the Company recorded goodwill impairment for ADEX and SDNE of $2,885 and $261, respectively, and intangible asset impairment
for ADEX and SDNE of $637 and $160, respectively, in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
As a result of the
disposal of the Highwire division of ADEX, the Company recorded a gain on disposal of subsidiaries of $695 to the consolidated
statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Disposal of the AWS Entities
On April 25, 2017,
the Company sold 80.1% of the assets associated with its AWS Entities subsidiaries. The AWS Entities accounted for approximately
$3,235 and $11,742 in revenues for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The purchase price paid by buyer for
the assets included the assumption of certain liabilities and contracts associated with the AWS Entities, the issuance to the Company
of a one-year convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $2,000 (refer to Note 4, Loans Receivable, for further detail),
and a potential earn-out after six months in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) three times EBITDA of the AWS Entities for the
six-month period immediately following the closing and (ii) $1,500. In addition, the asset purchase agreement contains a working
capital adjustment. The Company has not yet finalized the numbers for the working capital adjustment. The potential earn-out was
settled on February 16, 2018 (refer to Note 22, Subsequent Events, for further detail).
Based on the Company’s
analysis in accordance with ASC 350-20-40-7, the Company recorded goodwill impairment for TNS and RM Engineering of $596 and $25,
respectively, and intangible asset impairment for TNS and RM Engineering of $123 and $39, respectively, in the consolidated statement
of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017, as a result of the sale of the AWS Entities.
As a result of the
disposal of the AWS Entities, the Company recorded a loss on disposal of subsidiaries of $5,900 to the consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Disposal of SDNE
On May 15, 2017, the
Company sold its SDNE subsidiary. SDNE accounted for approximately $1,671and $4,731 in revenues for the years ended December 31,
2017 and 2016. Under the terms of the sale, the Company was to receive $1,400 in cash and a working capital adjustment of $61 to
be paid within 150 days of closing. The Company received cash proceeds of $1,411, with $50 being held in escrow as of December
31, 2017.
Based on the Company’s
analysis in accordance with ASC 350-20-40-7, the reporting units in the Company’s professional services segment were not
impaired as a result of the SDNE sale.
As a result of the
disposal of SDNE, the Company recorded a gain on disposal of subsidiaries of $585 to the consolidated statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2017.
The Company completed
the below pro forma data for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 to reflect the impact of the sales described above on
the Company’s financial results as though the transactions occurred at the beginning of the reported periods:
|
|
For the year ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
29,249
|
|
|
$
|
31,644
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(30,259
|
)
|
|
|
(19,477
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(31,818
|
)
|
|
|
(25,149
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to InterCloud Systems, Inc. common stockholders
|
|
|
(31,262
|
)
|
|
|
(25,160
|
)
|
Loss per share attributable to InterCloud Systems, Inc. common stockholders, basic and diluted:
|
|
|
(10.26
|
)
|
|
|
(23.96
|
)
|
6.
|
PROPERTY AND
EQUIPMENT, NET
|
At
December 31, 2017 and 2016, property and equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
$
|
646
|
|
|
$
|
748
|
|
Computers and Office Equipment
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
Software
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(957
|
)
|
|
|
(1,764
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
Depreciation
expense for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $76 and $187, respectively.
7.
|
GOODWILL AND
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
Goodwill
The
following table sets forth the changes in the Company's goodwill during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 resulting from
the above-described acquisitions by the Company of its operating segments.
|
|
Applications and Infrastructure
|
|
|
Professional Services
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance December 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
6,906
|
|
|
$
|
9,257
|
|
|
$
|
16,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
1,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
6,906
|
|
|
$
|
10,081
|
|
|
$
|
16,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
(4,979
|
)
|
|
|
(4,016
|
)
|
|
|
(8,995
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment Charge
|
|
|
(1,927
|
)
|
|
|
(6,065
|
)
|
|
|
(7,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Intangible
Assets
The
following table summarizes the Company’s intangible assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
Estimated Useful Life
|
|
Beginning Net Book Value
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amortization Writeoff
|
|
|
Impairment Charge
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
Ending Net Book Value
|
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
Customer relationship and lists
|
|
7-10 yrs
|
|
$
|
4,521
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(456
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,579
|
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,824
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,751
|
|
|
$
|
(4,972
|
)
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
2-3 yrs
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(685
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,224
|
)
|
URL's
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Trade names
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
3,178
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,288
|
)
|
|
|
(982
|
)
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,955
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(483
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,203
|
|
|
$
|
(1,522
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,494
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,659
|
|
|
$
|
(6,196
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Estimated Useful Life
|
|
Beginning Net Book Value
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amortization Writeoff
|
|
|
Impairment Charge
|
|
|
Disposals
|
|
|
Ending Net Book Value
|
|
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
Customer relationship and lists
|
|
7-10 yrs
|
|
$
|
5,224
|
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
(856
|
)
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4,521
|
|
|
$
|
(6,095
|
)
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
2-3 yrs
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
(1,821
|
)
|
URL's
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Trade names
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
3,178
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,178
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,564
|
|
|
$
|
643
|
|
|
$
|
(1,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(124
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,955
|
|
|
$
|
(7,916
|
)
|
During
2016, the Company evaluated the results of its former IPC subsidiary, which was included in the former managed services segment.
The Company determined that actual revenues were not meeting its forecasted revenues. As a result, the Company recorded goodwill
impairment expense of $1,114 and intangible asset impairment expense of $3,459 in loss on discontinued operations for the year
ending December 31, 2016.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company also evaluated the fair value of its reporting units that were not impaired and
determined that the fair value of its professional services segment was in excess of carrying value by $5,742, or 34%, the fair
value of its applications and infrastructure segment was in excess of its carrying value by $2,549 or 20%, and the fair value
of its managed services segment was in excess of carrying value by $1,515 or 28%. The Company believes these fair value amounts
were substantially in excess of carrying value as discussed in ASC 350-2035-4 through 35-19.
During
2017, indicators of potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets were identified by management in the professional services
segment as a result of the sale of ADEX’s Highwire division. Per ASC 350-20-40-7, when a portion of goodwill is allocated
to a business to be disposed of, the goodwill remaining in the portion of the reporting unit to be retained shall be tested for
impairment in accordance with paragraphs 350-20-35-3A through 35-19 using its adjusted carrying amount.
Based
on the Company’s analysis, the Company recorded goodwill impairment for ADEX and SDNE of $2,885 and $261, respectively,
and intangible asset impairment for ADEX and SDNE of $637 and $160, respectively, in the consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2017.
During
2017, indicators of potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets were identified by management in the professional services
segment as a result of the sale of SDNE. Per ASC 350-20-40-7, when a portion of goodwill is allocated to a business to be disposed
of, the goodwill remaining in the portion of the reporting unit to be retained shall be tested for impairment in accordance with
paragraphs 350-20-35-3A through 35-19 using its adjusted carrying amount.
Based
on the Company’s analysis, the reporting units in the Company’s professional services segment were not impaired as
a result of the sale of SDNE.
During
2017, indicators of potential impairment of goodwill and intangible assets were identified by management in the professional services
segment as a result of the sale of the AWS Entities. Per ASC 350-20-40-7, when a portion of goodwill is allocated to a business
to be disposed of, the goodwill remaining in the portion of the reporting unit to be retained shall be tested for impairment in
accordance with paragraphs 350-20-35-3A through 35-19 using its adjusted carrying amount.
Based on the Company’s
analysis, the Company recorded goodwill impairment for TNS and RM Engineering of $596 and $25, respectively, and intangible asset
impairment for TNS and RM Engineering of $123 and $39, respectively, in the consolidated statement of operations for year ended
December 31, 2017.
During 2017, the Company
evaluated the results of the ADEX entities, which are included in the Company’s professional services segment, and recorded
goodwill impairment expense of $2,919 and intangible asset impairment expense of $486 in the consolidated statement of operations
for the year ending December 31, 2017.
During 2017, the Company
evaluated the results of TNS and RM Engineering, which are included in the Company’s applications and infrastructure segment,
and recorded goodwill impairment expense of $1,253 and $53, respectively, and intangible asset impairment expense of $59 and $17,
respectively, in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ending December 31, 2017.
As a result of impairment charges recording
during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company did not have goodwill as of December 31, 2017.
The
Company uses the straight-line method to determine the amortization expense for its definite lived intangible assets. Amortization
expense related to the purchased intangible assets was $483 and $1,140 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The
estimated future amortization expense for the next five years and thereafter is as follows:
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
420
|
|
2019
|
|
|
420
|
|
2020
|
|
|
420
|
|
2021
|
|
|
369
|
|
2022
|
|
|
122
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,751
|
|
As
of December 31, 2017 and 2016, accrued expenses consisted of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
$
|
2,639
|
|
|
$
|
7,170
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,602
|
|
|
|
1,774
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
2,767
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,008
|
|
|
$
|
9,660
|
|
9.
|
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
|
Certain
assets and liabilities of the Company are required to be recorded at fair value either on a recurring or non-recurring basis.
Fair value is determined based on the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction based on market participants. The following section describes the valuation methodologies that the Company used to
measure, for disclosure purposes, its financial instruments at fair value.
Debt
The fair value of
the Company’s debt, which approximated the carrying value of the Company’s debt, as of December 31, 2017 and December
31, 2016 was estimated at $12,034 and $43,729, respectively. Factors that the Company considered when estimating the fair value
of its debt included market conditions, liquidity levels in the private placement market, variability in pricing from multiple
lenders and term of debt. The level of the debt would be considered as Level 2.
Contingent
Consideration
The
fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration payable was based on the Company’s evaluation as to the probability
and amount of any earn-out that could have ultimately been payable. The Company utilizes a third-party valuation firm to assist
in the calculation of the contingent consideration at the acquisition date. The Company evaluates the forecast of the acquired
entity and the probability of earn-out provisions being achieved when it evaluates the contingent consideration recorded at initial
acquisition date and at each subsequent reporting period. The fair value of contingent consideration is measured at each reporting
period and adjusted as necessary. The Company evaluates the terms in contingent consideration arrangements provided to former
owners of acquired companies who become employees of the Company to determine if such amounts are part of the purchase price of
the acquired entity or compensation. As part of the sale of SDNE during May 2017, the contingent consideration was forgiven. The
Company no longer had any contingent consideration to include on its consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017.
Additional
Disclosures Regarding Fair Value Measurements
The
carrying value of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair value due to the short-term maturity of
those items.
Fair
Value of Derivatives
The Company utilizes
a binomial lattice pricing model to determine the fair value of its derivative instruments.
Derivative
Warrant Liabilities and Convertible Features
The
fair value of the derivative liabilities is classified as Level 3 within the Company’s fair value hierarchy. Please refer
to Footnote 12, Derivative Instruments, for a further discussion of the measurement of fair value of the derivatives and their
underlying assumptions.
The
fair value of the Company’s financial instruments carried at fair value at December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date
Using
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current derivative features related to convertible debentures
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3,145
|
|
Current derivative features related to warrant derivatives
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Long-term derivative features related to convertible debentures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
Long-term derivative features related to preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15,990
|
|
Fair value of Series M preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
23,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current derivative features related to convertible debentures
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,749
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
Long-term derivative features related to convertible debentures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3,580
|
|
The
following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial instruments for the years
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
|
|
Amount
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2016
|
|
$
|
17,538
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative features related to convertible debentures
|
|
|
(19,660
|
)
|
Change in fair value of warrant derivative
|
|
|
130
|
|
Fair value of contingent consideration
|
|
|
515
|
|
Fair value of derivative features related to JGB (Cayman) Concord Ltd. term loan
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
Adjustment of derivative liability upon extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
4,778
|
|
Fair value of make whole provision
|
|
|
280
|
|
Adjustment of derivative liability upon conversion of debt
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Adjustment of derivative liability upon modification of debt
|
|
|
(1,552
|
)
|
Fair value of derivative features related to Dominion term loan
|
|
|
242
|
|
Balance December 31, 2016
|
|
|
3,580
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative features related to convertible debentures
|
|
|
(3,139
|
)
|
Change in fair value of warrant derivative
|
|
|
952
|
|
Reclassification of equity warrants to derivative
|
|
|
110
|
|
Fair value of JGB warrant derivative
|
|
|
65
|
|
Adjustment of derivative liability upon extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
2,241
|
|
Adjustment of make-whole provision upon payment
|
|
|
(815
|
)
|
Fair value of derivative features related to MEF I, L.P.
|
|
|
250
|
|
Fair value of derivative features related to Dominion term loan
|
|
|
38
|
|
Fair value of derivative features related to RDW term loan
|
|
|
39
|
|
Cancellation of 8760 warrants
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Settlement of contingent consideration
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
Reclassification of derivative warrants to equity
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Adjustment upon exercise of JGB derivative warrant
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
Fair value of derivative features related to RDW term loan (July)
|
|
|
126
|
|
Fair value of derivative features related to RDW term loan (Sept)
|
|
|
122
|
|
Fair value of derivative features related to extinguishment RDW term loan (Hannibal ext)
|
|
|
911
|
|
Fair value of derivative features related to RDW term loan (Jadevaia)
|
|
|
374
|
|
Fair value of derivative features related to RDW term loan (London Bay exchange)
|
|
|
282
|
|
Fair value of derivative features related to London Bay term loan
|
|
|
600
|
|
Fair value of derivative features related to Westview term loan
|
|
|
282
|
|
Fair value of derivative features related to Series K preferred stock
|
|
|
15,748
|
|
Fair value of derivative features related to Series L preferred stock
|
|
|
1,664
|
|
Change in fair value of preferred stock derivatives
|
|
|
(1,422
|
)
|
Fair value of Series M preferred stock
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
Change in fair value of Series M preferred stock
|
|
|
6
|
|
Adjustment of derivative liability upon conversion of debt
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
Balance December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
23,051
|
|
Treasury
Stock
The
Company records treasury stock at the cost to acquire it and includes treasury stock as a component of stockholders’ deficit.
As
of December 31, 2017 and 2016, bank debt consisted of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Two lines of credit, monthly principal and interest, ranging from $0 to $1, average interest of 14.2%, guaranteed personally by principal shareholders of acquired companies, maturing July 2018
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
Equipment finance agreement, monthly principal of $1, maturing February 2020
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Less: Current portion of bank debt
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
Long-term portion of bank debt
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The
interest expense associated with the bank debt during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 amounted to $16 and $10, respectively.
The weighted average interest rate on bank debt during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was 14.2% and 8.4%, respectively.
There are no financial covenants associated with the bank debt.
At
December 31, 2017 and 2016, term loans consisted of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Former owners of RM Leasing, unsecured, non-interest bearing, due on demand
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory note with company under common ownership by former owner of Tropical, 9.75% interest, monthly payments of interest only of $1, unsecured and personally guaranteed by officer, matured in November 2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
London Bay - VL Holding Company, LLC convertible promissory note, unsecured, 0% and 8.8% interest, respectively, maturing in October 2018
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
7,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WV VL Holding Corp convertible promissory note, unsecured, 0% and 8.8% interest, respectively, maturing in October 2018
|
|
|
2,005
|
|
|
|
7,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8% convertible promissory note, Tim Hannibal, unsecured, matured in October 2017
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% senior convertible note, unsecured, Dominion Capital, matured in January 2017, net of debt discount of $29
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% convertible note, Richard Smithline, unsecured, matured in January 2017, net of debt discount of $0 and $2, respectively
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured convertible debenture, JGB (Cayman) Waltham Ltd., bearing interest of 4.67%, maturing in May 2019, net of debt discount of $0 and $3,136, respectively
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured convertible note, JGB (Cayman) Concord Ltd., bearing interest at 4.67%, maturing in May 2019, net of debt discount of $0 and $1,668, respectively
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured note, JGB (Cayman) Waltham Ltd., bearing interest at 4.67%, maturing in May 2019, net of debt discount of $0 and $234, respectively
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6% senior convertible term promissory note, unsecured, Dominion Capital, matured on January 31, 2018, net of debt discount of $1
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12% senior convertible note, unsecured, Dominion Capital, matured in November 2017, net of debt discount of $0 and $65, respectively
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables Purchase Agreement with Dominion Capital, net of debt discount of $44
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory note issued to Trinity Hall, 3% interest, unsecured, matured in January 2018
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.9% convertible promissory note, RDW Capital LLC. July 14, 2017 Note, maturing on July 14, 2018, net of debt discount of $74
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.9% convertible promissory note, RDW Capital LLC. September 27, 2017 Note, maturing on September 27, 2018, net of debt discount of $91
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.9% convertible promissory note, RDW Capital LLC. October 12, 2017 Note, maturing on October 12, 2018
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.9% convertible promissory note, RDW Capital LLC. December 8, 2017 Note, maturing on December 8, 2018
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC, between 2% and 10% interest, matured on July 1, 2016, unsecured
|
|
|
1,421
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC, 3% interest, matured on January 1, 2018, unsecured
|
|
|
1,752
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC, 6.5% interest, matured on July 1, 2016, unsecured
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory note to Tim Hannibal, 8% interest, matured on January 9, 2018, unsecured
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
12,071
|
|
|
|
23,007
|
|
Less: Current portion of term loans
|
|
|
(11,013
|
)
|
|
|
(21,147
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion term loans, net of debt discount
|
|
$
|
1,058
|
|
|
$
|
1,860
|
|
Future
annual principal payments are as follows:
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
11,179
|
|
2019
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payments
|
|
$
|
12,237
|
|
Future
annual amortization of debt discounts is as follows:
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt discount amortization
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
The interest expense,
including amortization of debt discounts, associated with the term loans payable in the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
amounted to $6,365 and $10,182, respectively.
With
the exception of the notes outstanding to RM Leasing, all term loans are subordinate to the JGB (Cayman) Waltham Ltd. and JGB
(Cayman) Concord Ltd. notes.
Revolving
Line of Credit
On
July 3, 2014, the Company obtained an unsecured $3,000 interim revolving line of credit from the Mark Munro 1996 Charitable Remainder
UniTrust to provide working capital as well as cash to make the Company’s upcoming amortization payments pursuant to the
Company’s Convertible Debentures. The line bore interest at the rate of 1.5% per month on funds drawn and expired on March
31, 2016.
As
of March 31, 2016, there was no amount outstanding under the related party revolving line of credit.
Term
Loan - White Oak Global Advisors, LLC
On
October 9, 2014, the Company’s former wholly-owned subsidiary, VaultLogix, entered into a loan and security agreement with
the lenders party thereto, White Oak Global Advisors, LLC, as Administrative Agent, Data Protection Services, LLC (“DPS”),
U.S. Data Security Acquisition, LLC (“USDSA”) and U.S. Data Security Corporation (“USDSC”) as guarantors,
pursuant to which, VaultLogix received a term loan in an aggregate principal amount of $13,261. Interest on the term loan accrued
at a rate per annum equal to the sum of (a) the greater of (i) the LIBOR Index Rate (as defined), as adjusted as of each Libor
Index Adjustment Date (as defined) and (ii) 1.00% per annum; plus (b) 1100 basis points per annum. The LIBOR Index Rate was 1.0896
as of December 31, 2015; however, this did not exceed the 12% stated rate as defined in item (ii) above.
The
proceeds of the term loan were used to finance the Company’s acquisition of VaultLogix, DPS and USDSA, to repay certain
outstanding indebtedness (including all indebtedness owed by VaultLogix to Hercules Technology II, L.P.) and to pay fees, costs
and expenses.
In
connection with the term loan, the Company entered into (i) a continuing guaranty in favor of the administrative agent, (ii) a
pledge agreement, and (iii) a security agreement, pursuant to which the obligations of the Company in respect of the term loan
were secured by a security interest in substantially all of the assets of VaultLogix, subject to certain customary exceptions.
Principal
of $11,304 remained outstanding as of December 31, 2015.
On
February 17, 2016, the Company entered into a securities exchange agreement whereby the Company and VaultLogix exchanged the White
Oak Global Advisors term loan and assigned the term loan to JGB (Cayman) Concord Ltd. Refer to the JGB (Cayman) Concord Ltd. Senior
Secured Convertible Note section of this note for further explanation. As a result of this assignment, the Company and VaultLogix’s
obligations to White Oak Global Advisors, LLC was satisfied as of December 31, 2016. The Company recorded an $843 loss on
extinguishment of debt in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Term
Loan – 8% Convertible Promissory Notes
Effective
as of October 9, 2014, the Company consummated the acquisition of all of the outstanding membership interests of VaultLogix and
its affiliated entities for an aggregate purchase price of $36,796. The purchase price for the acquisition was payable to the
sellers as follows: (i) $16,385 in cash, (ii) 2,522 shares of the Company’s common stock and (iii) $15,626 in unsecured convertible
promissory notes. The closing payments were subject to customary working capital adjustments.
The promissory notes
accrued interest at a rate of 8% per annum, and all principal and interest accrued under the promissory notes was payable on October
9, 2017. The promissory notes were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $2,548.00
per share.
On July 18, 2017, the
holder of the promissory note in the principal amount of $1,215 assigned the full outstanding amount of the note to a third party,
RDW Capital, LLC (“RDW”) (refer to the “Assignment of Tim Hannibal Note - RDW July 18, 2017 2.5% Convertible
Promissory Note” section of this note for further detail). The promissory note were subsequently cancelled when exchanged
for new promissory notes of the Company.
During November 2017,
the holders of the promissory notes in the principal amounts of $7,408 and $7,003, respectively, converted $5,405 and $4,998 of
principal, respectively, into shares of the Company’s Series K preferred stock (refer to Note 18, Temporary Equity, for further
detail). As a result of this conversion, the original notes were amended, with new principal amounts of $2,003 and $2,005, respectively
(refer to the “London Bay – VL Holding Company LLC November 17, 2017 Amendment” and “WV VL Holding Corp
November 17, 2017 Amendment” sections of this note for further detail).
London Bay – VL Holding Company
LLC November 17, 2017 Amendment
On November 17, 2017,
the Company amended a convertible promissory note originally issued to London Bay – VL Holding Company LLC on October 9,
2014. The amendment extended the maturity date to October 9, 2018. The amended note is in the principal amount of $2,003 and does
not accrue interest. The note is convertible at 95% of the average of the three lowest prices during the 5 days preceding conversion
(refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the derivative features associated with the amended note).
On December 8, 2017,
the holder of the amended note assigned $600 of principal to RDW Capital LLC (refer to the “RDW December 8, 2017 9.9% Convertible
Promissory Note” section of this note for further detail).
During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the investor who holds the amended note did not convert any principal or accrued interest into shares of the
company’s common stock.
WV VL Holding Corp November 17, 2017
Amendment
On November 17, 2017,
the Company amended a convertible promissory note originally issued to WV VL Holding Corp on October 9, 2014. The amendment extended
the maturity date to October 9, 2018. The amended note is in the principal amount of $2,005 and does not accrue interest. The note
is convertible at 95% of the average of the three lowest prices during the 5 days preceding conversion (refer to Note 12, Derivative
Instruments, for further detail on the derivative features associated with the amended note).
During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the investor who holds the amended note did not convert any principal or accrued interest into shares of the
company’s common stock.
Term
Loan – Dominion Capital LLC 12% Promissory Note
The
Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with an investor whereby the Company issued to the investor a demand promissory
note, dated November 17, 2014, in the original principal amount of $1,000, with interest accruing at the rate of 12% per annum.
The note matured on the earlier of: (x) November 10, 2015 or (y) upon demand by the investor, which such demand could be made
any time 150 days following the issuance of the note upon 30 days’ written notice to the Company; provided, that $60 of
interest was guaranteed by the Company regardless of when the note was repaid. The Company could have redeemed the note at any
time prior to the maturity date for an amount equal to (i) 100% of the outstanding principal amount, plus (ii) a redemption premium
equal to an additional 10% of the outstanding principal amount, plus (iii) any accrued and unpaid interest on the note. The redemption
premium could be paid in cash or common stock at the option of the Company. The holder demanded repayment of the demand promissory
note by May 16, 2015 and such note was converted on May 14, 2015 into 871 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company
recorded the conversion as a loss on conversion of debt of $264 on the consolidated statement of operations during the year ended
December 31, 2015.
On
May 14, 2015, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with the investor whereby the Company issued a term promissory
note in the original principal amount of $1,000, with interest accruing at the rate of 12% per annum. The note matured at the
earlier of: (x) May 14, 2016 or (y) upon demand by the investor, which such demand could have been made any time after 170 days
following the issuance of the note upon 10 days’ written notice to the Company; provided, that $60 of interest was guaranteed
by the Company regardless of when the note was repaid. The Company could have redeemed the note at any time prior to the maturity
date for an amount equal to (i) 100% of the outstanding principal amount, plus (ii) a redemption premium equal to an additional
10% of the outstanding principal amount, plus (iii) any accrued and unpaid interest on the note. The redemption premium was payable
in cash or common stock at the option of the Company. If common stock of the Company was used to pay the redemption premium, then
such shares had to be delivered by the third business day following the maturity date, or date of demand, as applicable, at a
mutually agreed upon conversion price by both parties.
On
August 6, 2015, the Company amended the May 14, 2015 term promissory note to increase the principal amount of the note to $1,060
and modify the terms of the promissory note to allow for the investor to convert the note into shares of the Company’s common
stock. The term promissory note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the election of the investor
at a conversion price equal to $800.00 per share, subject to certain adjustments.
During
March 2016, the Company paid $151 in cash related to the principal amount of note outstanding related to the 12% promissory note.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the investor who holds the 12% promissory note converted $606 of principal into shares of the
Company’s common stock. Refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information. As a result of these conversions,
the Company recorded a gain on conversion of debt of $238 in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31,
2016.
Term
Loan – Dominion Capital LLC August 6, 2015 Senior Convertible Note
On August 6, 2015,
the Company entered into a senior convertible note agreement with the investor whereby the Company issued a promissory note in
the original principal amount of $2,105, with interest accruing at the rate of 12% per annum, which matured on January 6, 2017.
At the election of the investor, the note was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price
equal to $800.00 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the agreement. The investor may have elected to have the Company
redeem the senior convertible note upon the occurrence of certain events, including the Company’s completion of a $10,000
underwritten offering of the Company’s common stock. Refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the
derivative features associated with the August 6, 2015 convertible note.
During April 2016,
the Company paid $117 in cash related to the principal amount of the outstanding note related to the August 6, 2015 senior convertible
note.
During the year ended
December 31, 2016, the investor who held the August 6, 2015 senior convertible note converted $1,053 of principal and accrued interest
into shares of the Company’s common stock. Refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information. As a result
of these conversions, the Company recorded a gain on conversion of debt of $197 in the consolidated statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2016.
The
August 6, 2015 senior convertible note matured on January 6, 2017 and was due on demand.
During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the investor who held the August 6, 2015 senior convertible note converted the remaining principal outstanding
of $1,199 into shares of the Company’s common stock (refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information).
As a result of these conversions, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $832 for the year ended December 31,
2017. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the investor who held the August 6, 2015 senior convertible note converted $1,053
of principal and accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock (refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit,
for further information). As a result of these conversions, the Company recorded a gain on conversion of debt of $197 in the consolidated
statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Term
Loan – Dominion Capital LLC November 12, 2015 Senior Convertible Note
On
November 12, 2015, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with an investor whereby the Company issued a
senior convertible note, for cash proceeds of $500, in the original principal amount of $525. The note had a term of one
year, bore interest at the rate of 12% per annum and, at the election of the investor, the note was convertible into shares
of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $700.00 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in
the note. The note amortized in twelve bi-weekly installments beginning on the six month anniversary of the note’s
issuance. Amortization payments were made, at the Company’s option, either in (i) cash, in which case the Company would
also have to issue to the investor a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to 5% of such amortization
payment or (ii) subject to the Company satisfying certain equity conditions, shares of the Company’s common stock,
pursuant to the amortization conversion rate, which was equal to the lower of (x) $700.00 and (y) a 25% discount to lowest
volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock in the prior three trading days.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the investor who held the November 12, 2015 senior convertible note converted $590 of principal
and accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock. Refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further
information.
On
November 12, 2015, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with the investor whereby the Company exchanged a portion of
the senior secured note originally issued by the Company to GPB Life Science Holdings, LLC on December 3, 2014 and subsequently
assigned to the investor, for new senior convertible notes, in three tranches of $500 for a total principal amount of $1,500.
The notes had a term of one year, bore interest at the rate of 12% per annum, and were convertible into shares of the Company’s
common stock at a conversion price equal to $500.00 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the notes. Starting on the
first week anniversary of the issuance of the new senior convertible notes and continuing thereafter, the investor, on a bi-weekly
basis, redeemed one-sixth of the face amount of the senior convertible notes and guaranteed interest. The redemptions were made,
at the Company’s option, either in (i) cash, in which case the Company would also have to issue to the investor a number
of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to 5% of such redemption payment or (ii) subject to the Company satisfying
certain equity conditions, shares of the Company’s common stock, pursuant to the redemption conversion rate, which was equal
to the lower of (x) $500.00 and (y) a 25% discount to lowest volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock
in the prior three trading days.
The
Company issued the three tranches of new senior convertible notes on the following dates:
|
●
|
$500 issued on November
13, 2015 which matured on January 28, 2016 (“Tranche 1”),
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
$500 issued on November
27, 2015 which matured on February 19, 2016 (“Tranche 2”) and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
$500 issued on December
11, 2015 which matured on March 4, 2016 (“Tranche 3”).
|
The
investor who held the promissory note tranches issued on November 13, 2015, November 27, 2015, and December 11, 2015 converted
the debt into shares of the Company’s common stock. Below is a summary of the transactions:
Tranche
1:
|
●
|
During November
2015, the investor converted $83 principal amount of debt into 167 shares of the Company’s common stock.
|
|
●
|
During December
2015, the investor converted $167 principal amount of debt into 334 shares of the Company’s common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During January 2016,
the investor converted $167 principal amount of debt into 334 shares of the Company’s common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On February 3, 2016,
the investor converted the remaining $83 principal amount of debt into 167 shares of the Company’s common stock. Tranche
1 of the promissory note debt was fully amortized as of this date.
|
Tranche
2:
|
●
|
During December
2015, the investor converted $166 principal amount of debt into 334 shares of the Company’s common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During January 2016,
the investor converted $167 principal amount of debt into 334 shares of the Company’s common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During February
2016, the investor converted $167 principal amount of debt into 334 shares of the Company’s common stock. Tranche 2
of the promissory note debt was fully amortized as of February 22, 2016.
|
Tranche
3:
|
●
|
During January 2016,
the investor converted $250 principal amount of debt into 501 shares of the Company’s common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During February
2016, the investor converted $167 principal amount of debt into 334 shares of the Company’s common stock.
|
|
●
|
On March 2, 2016,
the investor converted the remaining $83 principal amount into 167 shares of the Company’s common stock.
|
Term
Loan – Dominion Capital LLC September 15, 2016 Promissory Note and November 4, 2016 Exchange Agreement
On
September 15, 2016, the Company received cash proceeds of $500, from the sale of a term promissory note. The term promissory note
originally had a maturity date of November 4, 2016 and can be paid in either cash or common stock at the option of the lender.
If common stock of the Company is used to make such payment, then the shares shall be delivered by the third business day following
the maturity date and shall equal the total amount including principal and interest, at a conversion price mutually agreed to
by both parties at conversion. Interest at a rate of 12% per annum, is to be accrued until the maturity day. The Company will
pay a minimum of guaranteed interest of $30 and lender legal fees of $5 out of proceeds of the note. The note may be redeemed
at any time prior to maturity at an amount equal to 110% of the outstanding principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest
on the note. The redemption premium (10%) can be paid in cash or common stock at the option of the Company. If the Company’s
common stock is used to make such payment, then such shares shall be delivered by the third business day following the maturity
date, or date of demand, as applicable, at a mutually agreed upon conversion price by both parties.
On
November 4, 2016, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with the holder of the September 15, 2016 term promissory note.
The principal amount was increased by $40 to $540, which included a debt discount of $101, and the note became convertible into
shares of the Company’s common stock. The maturity date of the note was extended from November 4, 2016 to November 4, 2017.
Interest at a rate of 12% per annum is to be accrued until the maturity day. The new note has monthly amortization payments of
$86 beginning on May 4, 2017 and ending on the maturity date. These monthly amortization payments can be offset by monthly conversions.
The note is convertible at the lower of (i) $4.00, or (ii) 75% of the lowest VWAP day for the 15 days prior to the conversion
date. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of $146 in the consolidated statement
of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. Refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the derivative
features associated with the November 4, 2016 convertible note.
During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the holder of the November 4, 2016 promissory note converted $465 of principal into shares of the Company’s
common stock (refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information). As a result of these conversions, the Company
recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $351 in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31,
2017. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the holder of the November 4, 2016 promissory note did not convert any principal
or accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock.
The
note matured on November 4, 2017 and is now due on demand.
Dominion
Capital LLC Receivables Purchase Agreement – November 18, 2016
On
November 18, 2016, the Company entered into a receivables purchase agreement whereby the Company sold approximately $1,000 of
receivables in exchange for $950. The principal amount of the loan was $1,000, which included a debt discount of $50. The proceeds
were used to make amortization payments to the Company’s senior lender and for general working capital purchases.
During
November and December 2016, the Company received and remitted $1,000 of the receivables sold in payment of the loan.
Dominion
Capital LLC Receivables Purchase Agreement – December 30, 2016
On
December 30, 2016, the Company entered into a receivables purchase agreement whereby the Company sold approximately $474 of receivables
in exchange for $430. The principal amount of the loan is $474, which includes a debt discount of $44.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company did not remit any receivables for this loan.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company received and remitted $474 of the receivables sold.
Term Loan - Dominion Capital LLC January
31, 2017 Senior Convertible Promissory Note
On January 31, 2017,
the Company entered into a senior convertible promissory note with Dominion Capital, LLC in the original principal amount of $70,
with interest accruing at the rate of 6% per annum, which matures on January 31, 2018. The note is convertible at 70% of the lowest
VWAP in the 15 trading days prior to the conversion date. Refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the derivative
features associated with the January 31, 2017 convertible note.
During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the holder of the January 31, 2017 promissory note did not convert any principal or accrued interest into shares
of the Company’s common stock.
Richard
Smithline Senior Convertible Note
On
August 6, 2015, the Company issued to Richard Smithline a senior convertible note in the principal amount of $526, with interest
accruing at the rate of 12% per annum, which matured on January 11, 2017. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s
common stock at a conversion price equal to the lesser of $125.00 or 75% of the average daily VWAP for the five (5) trading days
prior to the conversion date. Refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the derivative features associated
with the Richard Smithline Senior Convertible Note.
Pursuant
to the Smithline senior convertible note, the Company was required to meet current public information requirements under Rule
144 of the Securities Act of 1933, which it had failed to do prior to June 30, 2016. Thus, on July 20, 2016, the Company agreed
to add $55 to the principal amount of the Smithline senior convertible note as of July 1, 2016 and the investor waived its right
to call an event of default under the note with respect to the Company’s failure to meet the public information requirement
for the period ending June 30, 2016. On September 1, 2016, the Company agreed to add $97 to the principal amount of the Smithline
senior convertible note as of the date of its last monthly amortization to compensate the investor for certain damages relating
to noncompliance with certain provisions of the senior convertible note. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company recorded
a loss on extinguishment of debt of $167 during the year ended December 31, 2016.
The
Smithline senior convertible note matured on January 11, 2017 and is now due on demand.
During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the investor who holds the Smithline senior convertible note converted the remaining principal outstanding
of $363 into shares of the Company’s common stock (refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information).
As a result of these conversions, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $328 in the consolidated statement
of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the investor who holds the Smithline
senior convertible note converted $372 of principal and accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock (refer
to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information).
Principal
of $363 remained outstanding as of December 31, 2016.
JGB
(Cayman) Waltham Ltd. Senior Secured Convertible Debenture
On
December 29, 2015, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with JGB (Cayman) Waltham Ltd. (“JGB Waltham”)
whereby the Company issued to JGB Waltham, for gross proceeds of $7,500, a $500 original issue discount senior secured convertible
debenture in the principal amount of $7,500. The debenture had a maturity date of June 30, 2017, bore interest at 10% per annum,
and was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $532.00 per share, subject
to adjustment as set forth in the debenture. The Company was required to pay interest to JGB Waltham on the aggregate unconverted
and then outstanding principal amount of the debenture in arrears each calendar month and on the maturity date in cash, or, at
the Company’s option and subject to the Company satisfying certain equity conditions, in shares of the Company’s common
stock. In addition, December 29, 2016 was an interest payment date on which the Company was to pay to JGB Waltham a fixed amount,
as additional interest under the debenture an amount equal to $350 in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination
thereof. Commencing on February 29, 2016, JGB Waltham had the right, at its option, to require the Company to redeem up to $350
of the outstanding principal amount of the debenture per calendar month, which redemption could have been made in cash or, at
the Company’s option and subject to satisfying certain equity conditions, in shares of the Company’s common stock.
The debenture was guaranteed by the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and was secured by all assets of the Company. The
total cash received by the Company as a result of this agreement was $3,730.
On
May 17, 2016, the Company entered into a Forbearance and Amendment Agreement (the “Debenture Forbearance Agreement”)
with JGB Waltham pursuant to which JGB Waltham agreed to forbear action with respect to certain existing defaults in accordance
with the terms of the Debenture Forbearance Agreement. The defaults, which were not monetary in nature, related to the Company’s
inability to timely file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.
In
connection with the execution of the Debenture Forbearance Agreement, the Company issued to JGB Waltham an amended and restated
senior secured convertible debenture (the “Amended and Restated Debenture”), which amended the original 10% senior
secured convertible debenture issued to JGB Waltham on December 29, 2015 by: (i) reducing the conversion price at which the original
debenture converts into shares of the Company’s common stock; and (ii) eliminating the provisions that provided for (A)
the issuance of common stock at a discount to the market price of the common stock and (B) certain anti-dilution protections.
The
Amended and Restated Debenture was issued in the principal amount of $7,500, has a maturity date of May 31, 2019, bears interest
at 0.67% per annum, and is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed conversion price equal to $320.00
per share, subject to equitable adjustments as set forth in the Amended and Restated Debenture. The Company shall pay interest
to JGB Waltham on the aggregate unconverted and then outstanding principal amount of the Amended and Restated Debenture, payable
monthly in arrears as of the last trading day of each calendar month and on May 31, 2019, in cash. In addition, the Company shall
pay JGB Waltham an additional amount equal to 7.5% of the outstanding principal amount on the Amended and Restated Debenture on
each of May 31, 2018 and May 31, 2019, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Amended and Restated Debenture. JGB Waltham
has the right, at its option, to require the Company to redeem up to $169 of the outstanding principal amount of the Amended and
Restated Debenture plus the then-accrued and unpaid interest thereon each calendar month, in cash. The Amended and Restated Debenture
contains standard events of default.
In
connection with the execution of the Debenture Forbearance Agreement, the Company issued to JGB Waltham a senior secured note
(the “2.7 Note”), dated May 17, 2016, in the principal amount of $2,745 that matures on May 31, 2019, bears interest
at 0.67% per annum and contains standard events of default.
The
Company accounted for the Debenture Forbearance Agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50,
the Company extinguished the December 29, 2015 senior secured convertible debenture in the then-current principal amount of $6,100
and recorded a new senior secured convertible debenture at its new fair value of $3,529 on the consolidated balance sheet as of
May 17, 2016. As a result of the extinguishment, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1,457 on the consolidated
statement of operations as of May 17, 2016. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features associated with the December
29, 2015 senior secured convertible debenture. Refer to Note 8, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction.
On
May 23, 2016, the Company entered into an amended agreement with JGB Concord, JGB Waltham, VaultLogix, and the Guarantors thereto
(the “Amended Agreement”) pursuant to which (i) JGB Concord permitted the Company to withdraw $172 from the Blocked
Account (as defined in the original debenture), and (ii) JGB Concord permitted the Company to withdraw $328 from the Deposit Account
(as defined in the original note) and, in exchange for the foregoing, (i) VaultLogix guaranteed the obligations of, and provide
security for, the Amended and Restated Debenture and the 2.7 Note, (ii) the Company’s subsidiaries guaranteed all indebtedness
due to JGB Concord under the Amended and Restated Note and 5.2 Note, and (iii) the Company and its subsidiaries pledged their
assets as security for all obligations owed to JGB Concord under the Amended and Restated Note and the 5.2 Note in accordance
with the terms of an Additional Debtor Joinder, dated May 23, 2016, pursuant to which the Company and each additional party thereto
agreed to be bound by the terms of that certain Security Agreement, dated as of February 18, 2016, made by VaultLogix in favor
of the secured party thereto (the “February Security Agreement”). In addition, the interest rates on the Amended and
Restated Note and the 5.2 Note were amended from 0.67% per annum to 1.67% per annum.
The
Company accounted for this Amended Agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company
accounted for the Amended Agreement as a debt modification and adjusted the fair value of the associated derivative liabilities
to its fair value as of May 23, 2016. Refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction.
On
June 23, 2016, the Company entered into an amendment agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham pursuant to which, (i) JGB
Waltham and JGB Concord released to the Company an aggregate of $1,500 from the Deposit Account (as defined in the original
note). Upon the release of the funds (i) the JGB Waltham senior secured convertible debenture (the “December
Debenture”) was amended to increase the Applicable Interest Rate (as defined in the original note) by 3.0% effective on
July 1, 2016; (ii) the December Debenture was amended to increase the annual rate of interest by 3.0% effective on July 1,
2016; (iii) the JGB Concord senior secured convertible note (the “February Convertible Note”) was amended to
increase the Applicable Interest Rate (as defined in the original February Convertible Note) by 3.0%, effective on July 1,
2016; and (iv) the February Note was amended to increase the annual rate of interest by 3.0%, effective on July 1, 2016.
After giving effect to the foregoing annual rate of interest on each December Debenture and February Convertible Note as of
July 1, 2016, was 4.67%. As additional consideration for the release of the funds, the Company issued 2,250 shares of the
Company’s common stock on June 23, 2016 to JGB Concord.
The
Company accounted for the June 23, 2016 amendment agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic
470-50, the Company extinguished the May 17, 2016 Debenture Forbearance Agreement in the principal amount of $6,100 and recorded
on the balance sheet as of June 23, 2016 a new senior secured convertible debenture at its new fair value of $4,094. As a result
of the extinguishment, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $483 on the consolidated statement of operations
as of June 23, 2016. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features associated with the May 17, 2016 Debenture Forbearance
Agreement. Refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction.
On
September 1, 2016, the Company entered into an Amendment Agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham pursuant to which, JGB Waltham
and JGB Concord (i) waived certain covenant violations and defaults, (ii) agreed to a specified application of the Cash Collateral
(as defined in the Amendment Agreement) in partial satisfaction of the obligations owed under the December Debenture, the 2.7
Note, and the February Convertible Note, and in full satisfaction of the 5.2 Note, and (iii) certain provisions of the December
Debenture, the 2.7 Note, and the February Convertible Note be amended.
The Company also (i)
issued warrants, with an expiration date of December 31, 2017, to purchase 2,500 shares of the Company’s common stock at
an exercise price of $4.00 per share, (ii) issued warrants, with an expiration date of December 31, 2017, to purchase 8,750 shares
of common stock at an exercise price of $40.00 per share ((i) and (ii), the “JGB Warrants”). The Company determined
that the fair value of the JGB Warrants was $972, which is included in common stock warrants within the stockholders’ deficit
section on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016. As of March 31, 2017, these warrants were reclassified to a
liability account (refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for further detail).
In
connection with the execution of the September 1, 2016 Amendment Agreement, the Company issued to JGB Waltham the Third Amended
and Restated Senior Secured Convertible Debenture (the “Amended and Restated Debenture”), in order to, among other
things, amend the December Debenture to (i) provide that the Company may prepay such debenture upon prior notice at a 10% premium,
(ii) modify the conversion price at which such debenture converts into common stock from a fixed price of $320.00 to the lowest
of (a) $81.72 per share, (b) 80% of the average VWAPs (as defined in the Amended and Restated Debenture) for each of the five
consecutive trading days immediately prior to the applicable conversion, and (c) 85% of the VWAP (as defined in the Amended and
Restated Debenture) for the trading day immediately preceding the applicable conversion (the “Conversion Price”),
and (iii) eliminate three additional 7.5% payments due to JGB Waltham in 2017, 2018 and 2019, as per such debenture. Further,
in connection with the execution of the Amendment Agreement, the Company executed the Amended and Restated Senior Secured Note
(the “Amended and Restated 2.7 Note”), in order to, among other things, amend the 2.7 Note to provide that JGB Waltham
may convert such note into shares of common stock at the applicable Conversion Price at any time and from time to time. Refer
to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the Company’s accounting for the Amended and Restated 2.7 Note.
The
Company accounted for the September 1, 2016 amendment agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. Because of the extinguishment,
the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $274 on the consolidated statement of operations as of September 1, 2016.
In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features. Refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for additional information
on this transaction.
On
February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a consent agreement with JGB Waltham and JGB Concord in order to, among other things,
(i) obtain the consent of JGB Waltham and JGB Concord to the Highwire Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”); (ii) amend
the conversion price of the JGB Waltham Debenture, JGB Waltham 2.7 Note, and the JGB Concord Debenture to the lower of (a) $16.00
per share and (b) 80% of the lowest daily VWAP (as defined in the Debenture) for the 30 consecutive trading days immediately prior
to the applicable conversion; (iii) apply $3,625 of the purchase price received in connection with the APA to payments to JGB
Waltham and JGB Concord in respect of the convertible note, as more particularly set forth in the consent.
The
Company accounted for the amended conversion price in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. Because of the extinguishment, the Company
recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt related to the JGB Waltham debenture and the JGB Waltham 2.7 Note of $389 and $35, respectively,
on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative
features (refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction).
On
March 9, 2017, JGB Waltham, the Company, and a third-party investor effectuated a two-part exchange with respect to a portion
of the Amended and Restated Debenture in which JGB Waltham assigned a portion of its interest in the Amended and Restated Debenture
(the “Assigned Debt”) to MEF I, L.P. pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2017.
Simultaneously therewith, the Company, entered into an Exchange Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2017 (the “Exchange Agreement”),
pursuant to which the Company issued to MEF I, L.P. a 4.67% Convertible Promissory Note, dated as of March 9, 2017, in the principal
amount of $550 (the “Exchange Note”) (refer to MEF I, L.P. section below for additional details).
The
Company accounted for the assignment of debt in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. Because of the extinguishment, the Company recorded
a loss on extinguishment of debt of $676 on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017. In
addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features (refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for additional information
on this transaction).
During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the Company made cash payments for principal and interest on the JGB Waltham December Debenture of $932 and
$224, respectively. Of the $224 of interest paid, $18 was from proceeds of the sale of the Company’s Highwire division.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company made cash payments for principal and interest on the JGB Waltham December
Debenture of $536 and $24, respectively. The cash paid for principal was from proceeds of the November 18, 2016 and December 30,
2016 Receivables Purchase Agreements.
During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the Company made cash payments for principal and interest on the JGB Waltham 2.7 Note of $298 and $20, respectively.
Of the $20 of interest paid, $2 was from proceeds of the sale of the Company’s Highwire division. During the year ended
December 31, 2016, the Company made cash payments for principal and interest on the JGB Waltham 2.7 Note of $2,000 and $25, respectively.
The cash paid for principal was applied from the Company’s restricted cash balance.
During the year
ended December 31, 2017, JGB Waltham converted $511 of principal and accrued interest into shares of the Company’s
common stock (refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information). As a result of these conversions, the
Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $636 in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2016, JGB Waltham converted $384 of principal and accrued interest into
shares of the Company’s common stock (refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information).
Principal of $3,091
and $5,034 related to the JGB Waltham December Debenture remained outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Principal of $294 and $592 related to the JGB Waltham 2.7 Note remained outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
JGB
(Cayman) Concord Ltd. Senior Secured Convertible Note
On
February 17, 2016, the Company entered into a securities exchange agreement with VaultLogix and JGB (Cayman) Concord Ltd. (“JGB
Concord”), whereby the Company exchanged the White Oak Global Advisors, LLC promissory note and subsequently assigned to
JGB Concord a new 8.25% senior secured convertible note dated February 18, 2016 in the principal amount of $11,601. As a result
of the assignment, the obligations of the Company and VaultLogix to White Oak Global Advisors, LLC were satisfied.
The
note issued to JGB Concord had a maturity date of February 18, 2019, bore interest at 8.25% per annum, and was convertible into
shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to the lowest of: (a) $800.00 per share, (b) 80% of the
average of the volume weighted average prices for each of the five consecutive trading days immediately prior to the applicable
conversion date, and (c) 85% of the volume weighted average price for the trading day immediately preceding the applicable conversion
date, subject to adjustment as set forth in the note. Interest on the senior secured convertible note was due in arrears each
calendar month in cash, or, at the Company’s option and subject to stockholder approval, in shares of the Company’s
common stock. Commencing on the stockholder approval date, JGB Concord had the right, at its option, to convert the senior secured
convertible note, in whole or in part, into shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to certain beneficial ownership
limitations. The senior secured convertible note was secured by all assets of VaultLogix as well as a cash collateral blocked
deposit account.
On
May 17, 2016, the Company entered into a forbearance and amendment agreement (the “Note Forbearance Agreement”) with
VaultLogix and JGB Concord, pursuant to which JGB Concord agreed to forbear action with respect to certain existing defaults in
accordance with the terms of the Note Forbearance Agreement. The defaults, which were not monetary in nature, related to the Company’s
inability to timely file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.
In
connection with the execution of the Note Forbearance Agreement, the Company issued to JGB Concord an amended and restated senior
secured convertible note (the “Amended and Restated Note”) in order to amend the original note to JGB Concord by:
(i) reducing the conversion price at which the note converts into shares of the Company’s common; and (ii) eliminating provisions
that provided for (A) the issuance of common stock at a discount to the market price of the common stock and (B) certain anti-dilution
protections.
The
Amended and Restated Note was issued in the aggregate principal amount of $11,601, has a maturity date of May 31, 2019, bears
interest at 0.67% per annum, and is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a fixed conversion price of
$320.00 per share, subject to equitable adjustments as set forth in the Amended and Restated Note. The Company and VaultLogix
shall pay interest to JGB Concord on the aggregate unconverted and then outstanding principal amount of the Amended and Restated
Note, payable monthly in arrears as of the last trading day of each calendar month and on May 31, 2019, in cash. In addition,
the Company shall pay to JGB Concord an additional amount equal to 7.5% of the outstanding principal amount on the Amended and
Restated Note on each of May 31, 2018, and May 31, 2019, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Amended and Restated Note.
JGB Concord has the right, at its option, to require the Company to redeem up to $322 of the outstanding principal amount of the
Amended and Restated Note plus the then accrued and unpaid interest thereon each calendar month in cash. The Amended and Restated
Note contains standard events of default.
The
Company accounted for the Note Forbearance Agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50,
the Company extinguished the February 17, 2016 senior secured convertible note in the principal amount of $11,601 and recorded
a new senior secured convertible debenture at its new fair value of $6,711 on the consolidated balance sheet as of May 17, 2016.
As a result of the extinguishment, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $2,772 on the consolidated statement
of operations as of May 17, 2016. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features associated with the February 17,
2016 senior secured convertible note. Refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction.
In
connection with the execution of the Note Forbearance Agreement, the Company issued to JGB Concord a senior secured note (the
“5.2 Note”), dated May 17, 2016, in the principal amount of $5,220 that matures on May 31, 2019, bears interest at
0.67% per annum, and contains standard events of default.
On
May 23, 2016, the Company entered into an amended agreement with JGB Concord, JGB Waltham, VaultLogix, and the Guarantors thereto
(the “Amended Agreement”) pursuant to which (i) JGB Concord permitted the Company to withdraw $172 from the Blocked
Account (as defined in the original debenture), and (ii) JGB Concord permitted the Company to withdraw $328 from the Deposit Account
(as defined in the original note) and, in exchange for the foregoing, (i) VaultLogix guaranteed the obligations of, and provide
security for, the Amended and Restated Debenture and the 2.7 Note, (ii) the Company’s subsidiaries guaranteed all indebtedness
due to JGB Concord under the Amended and Restated Note and 5.2 Note, and (iii) the Company and its subsidiaries pledged their
assets as security for all obligations owed to JGB Concord under the Amended and Restated Note and the 5.2 Note in accordance
with the terms of an Additional Debtor Joinder, dated May 23, 2016, pursuant to which the Company and each additional party thereto
agreed to be bound by the terms of that certain Security Agreement, dated as of February 18, 2016, made by VaultLogix in favor
of the secured party thereto (the “February Security Agreement”). In addition, the interest rates on the Amended and
Restated Note and the 5.2 Note were amended from 0.67% to 1.67%.
The
Company accounted for this Amended Agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company
accounted for the Amended Agreement as a debt modification and adjusted the fair value of the associated derivative liabilities
to its fair value as of May 23, 2016. Refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction.
On June 23, 2016, the
Company entered into an amendment agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham pursuant to which, (i) JGB Waltham and JGB Concord
released to the Company an aggregate of $1,500 from the Deposit Account (as defined in the original note). Upon the release of
the funds (i) the JGB Waltham senior secured convertible debenture (the “December Debenture”) was amended to increase
the Applicable Interest Rate (as defined in the original note) by 3.0% to take effect on July 1, 2016; (ii) the December Debenture
was amended to increase the annual rate of interest by 3.0% to take effect on July 1, 2016; (iii) the JGB Concord senior secured
convertible note (the “February Convertible Note”) was amended to increase the Applicable Interest Rate (as defined
in the original February Convertible Note) by 3.0%, to take effect on July 1, 2016; and (iv) the February Note was amended to increase
the annual rate of interest by 3.0%, to take effect on July 1, 2016. After giving effect to the foregoing annual rate of interest
on each December Debenture and February Convertible Note as of July 1, 2016, was 4.67%. As additional consideration for the release
of the funds, the Company issued 2,250 shares of the Company’s common stock on June 23, 2016 to JGB Concord, and agreed to
a make-whole provision whereby the Company would pay JGB Concord in cash the difference between $376.00 per share of the Company’s
common stock and the average volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock sixty days after the shares of the
Company’s common stock were freely tradable. Refer to Note 9, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the Company’s
accounting for the JGB Concord make-whole provision.
The
Company accounted for the June 23, 2016 amendment agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic
470-50, the Company extinguished the May 17, 2016 Debenture Forbearance Note in the principal amount of $11,601 and recorded a
new senior secured convertible note at its new fair value of $7,786 on the consolidated balance sheet as of June 23, 2016. As
a result of the extinguishment, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1,150 on the consolidated statement
of operations as of June 23, 2016. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features associated with the May 17, 2016
Debenture Forbearance Note. Refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for additional information on this transaction.
In
connection with the execution of the September 1, 2016 Amendment Agreement, the Company executed the Second Amended and Restated
Senior Secured Convertible Note (the “Amended and Restated Convertible Note”), in order to, among other things, amend
the Convertible Note to (i) increase the interest rate payable thereon from 0.67% to 4.67%, (ii) provide that the Company may
prepay the Amended and Restated Convertible Note upon prior notice at a 10% premium, (iii) provide that the Holder Affiliate may
convert its interest in the Amended and Restated Convertible Note into shares of Common Stock at the applicable Conversion Price,
and (iv) eliminate three additional 7.5% payments due to the Holder Affiliate in 2017, 2018, and 2019, as per the Convertible
Note.
The
Company accounted for the September 1, 2016 amendment agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. Because of the extinguishment,
the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1,187 on the consolidated statement of operations as of September 1,
2016. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features. Refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for additional information
on this transaction.
On
February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a consent agreement with JGB Waltham and JGB Concord in order to, among other things,
(i) obtain the consent of JGB Waltham and JGB Concord to the Highwire Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”); (ii) amend
the conversion price of the JGB Waltham Debenture, JGB Waltham 2.7 Note, and the JGB Concord Debenture to the lower of (a) $16.00
per share and (b) 80% of the lowest daily VWAP (as defined in the Debenture) for the thirty consecutive trading days immediately
prior to the applicable conversion; (iii) apply $3,625 of the purchase price received in connection with the APA to payments to
JGB Waltham and JGB Concord in respect of the convertible note, as more particularly set forth in the consent.
The
Company accounted for the amended conversion price in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. Because of the extinguishment, the Company
recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt related to the JGB Concord debenture of $71 on the consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2017. In addition, the Company re-valued the derivative features (refer to Note 12, Derivative
Instruments, for additional information on this transaction).
During
the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company made cash payments for principal and interest on the JGB Concord February Debenture
of $2,688 and $31, respectively. Proceeds from the sale of the Company’s Highwire division were used to pay principal and
interest of $2,526 and $12, respectively, along with an early payment penalty of $253. During the year ended December 31, 2016,
the Company made cash payments for principal and interest on the JGB Concord February Debenture of $391 and $73, respectively.
The cash paid for principal was from proceeds of the November 18, 2016 Receivables Purchase Agreement. $31 of the cash paid for
interest was from proceeds of the December 30, 2016 Receivables Purchase Agreement.
During
the year ended December 31, 2017, JGB Concord converted $1,053 of principal and accrued interest into shares of the
Company’s common stock (refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information). As a result of these
conversions, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1,279 to the consolidated statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2017. During the year ending December 31, 2016, JGB Concord converted $860 of principal and
accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock (refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further
information).
Principal
of $11 and $3,748 related to the JGB Concord February Debenture remained outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
MEF
I, L.P. Exchange Note
On
March 9, 2017, JGB Waltham, the Company, and a third-party investor effectuated a two-part exchange with respect to a portion
of the Amended and Restated Debenture in which JGB Waltham assigned a portion of its interest in the Amended and Restated Debenture
(the “Assigned Debt”) to MEF I, L.P. pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2017.
Simultaneously therewith, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2017 (the “Exchange Agreement”),
pursuant to which the Company issued to MEF I, L.P. a 4.67% convertible promissory note, dated as of March 9, 2017, in the aggregate
principal amount of $550 (the “Exchange Note”). The Exchange Note is convertible at the lower of (i) $16.00 or (ii)
80% of the lowest VWAP in the 30 trading days prior to the conversion date (refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for further
detail on the derivative features associated with the Exchange Note).
During
the year ended December 31, 2017, the investor who held the Exchange Note converted $575 of principal and related interest into
shares of the Company’s common stock (refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information). As a result
of these conversions, the outstanding principal balance as of December 31, 2017 was $0. The Company recorded a loss on extinguishment
of debt of $150 to the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Trinity
Hall Promissory Note
On December 30, 2016,
the Company issued to Trinity Hall a promissory note in the principal amount of $500, with interest accruing at the rate of 3%
per annum, which matured on January 1, 2018. This note was assigned from certain related party notes payable to Mark Munro (see
Note 19, Related Parties, for further detail).
RDW
April 3, 2017 2.5 % Convertible Promissory Note
On
April 3, 2017, Scott Davis, a former officer of the Company assigned $100 of his promissory note in the original principal amount
of $250, reduced to $225 based on a $25 conversion into common stock, to RDW. As consideration for the assignment, RDW paid Scott
Davis $40. The note was convertible at a price of $888.00 and was due on demand. As of April 3, 2017, the outstanding amount of
principal and accrued interest for the note was $225 and $57, respectively. Subsequent to the assignment of $100 principal amount
of the note to RDW, the remainder of the note was forgiven. The original note was included within notes payable, related parties
on the consolidated balance sheets. Per ASC 470-50-40-2, debt extinguishment transactions between related parties are in essence
a capital contribution from a related party. As a result, rather than recording a gain or loss on extinguishment of debt, the
Company recorded $182 to additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheet.
RDW
subsequently exchanged this original note for a new 2.5% convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $100 due April
3, 2018. The conversion price of the new note was equal to 75% of the average of the five lowest VWAPS over the seven trading
days prior to the date of conversion (refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the derivative features
associated with the RDW April 3, 2017 2.5% convertible note). The Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $14 for
the year ended December 31, 2017, which includes all extinguishment accounting for the period in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50.
During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the investor who held the April 3, 2017 2.5% promissory note converted $100 of principal into shares of the
Company’s common stock (refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information). As a result of these conversions,
the outstanding principal balance as of December 31, 2017 was $0. The Company recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $34
to the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
RDW
July 14, 2017 9.9% Convertible Promissory Note
On
July 14, 2017, the Company issued a convertible promissory note to RDW in the principal amount of $155, which accrues interest
at the rate of 9.9% per annum, and matures on July 14, 2018. The note is convertible at the lower of (i) $4.00 or (ii) 75% of
the lowest five VWAPS over the seven trading days prior to the date of conversion (refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for
further detail on the derivative features associated with the RDW July 14, 2017 9.9% convertible note).
During
the year ended December 31, 2017, the investor who holds the 9.9% promissory note did not convert any principal or accrued interest
into shares of the Company’s common stock.
Assignment
of Tim Hannibal Note - RDW July 18, 2017 2.5% Convertible Promissory Note
On July 18, 2017, Tim
Hannibal assigned 100% of his 8% convertible promissory note in the original principal amount of $1,215, due October 9, 2017, to
RDW. This note was convertible into the Company’s common stock at a price of $2,548.00 per share. RDW then exchanged this
original note for a new 2.5% convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $1,215, which an original maturity date of
July 18, 2018. The conversion price of such note was equal to the lower of (i) $4.00 or (ii) 75% of the lowest five VWAPS over
the seven trading days prior to the date of conversion (refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the derivative
features associated with the RDW July 18, 2017 2.5% convertible note). In addition, Tim Hannibal forgave all outstanding interest
relating to the original note. The Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $297 on the consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2017.
During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the investor who held the July 18, 2017 2.5% promissory note converted $1,215 of principal into shares of the
Company’s common stock (refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information). As a result of these conversions,
the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $286 to the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December
31, 2017.
RDW
September 27, 2017 9.9% Convertible Promissory Note
On
September 27, 2017, the Company issued a convertible promissory note to RDW in the principal amount of $155, that bears interest
at the rate of 9.9% per annum, and matures on September 27, 2018. The note is convertible at the lower of (i) $4.00 or (ii) 75%
of the lowest five VWAPS over the twenty trading days prior to the date of conversion (refer to Note 12, Derivative Instruments,
for further detail on the derivative features associated with the RDW September 27, 2017 9.9% convertible note).
During
the year ended December 31, 2017, the investor who holds the 9.9% promissory note did not convert any principal or accrued interest
into shares of the Company’s common stock.
RDW October 12, 2017 9.9% Convertible
Promissory Note
On October 12, 2017,
Frank Jadevaia, former owner of IPC, assigned $400 of his outstanding promissory notes to RDW. The new note is in the principal
amount of $400, bears interest at the rate of 9.9% per annum, and matures on September 27, 2018. The note is convertible at the
lower of (i) $4.00 or (ii) 75% of the lowest VWAP over the twenty trading days prior to the date of conversion (refer to Note 12,
Derivative Instruments, for further detail on the derivative features associated with the RDW October 12. 2017 9.9% convertible
note).
During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the investor who holds the October 12, 2017 9.9% promissory note converted $267 of principal into shares of
the Company’s common stock (refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information). As a result of these
conversions, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $114 to the consolidated statement of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2017.
RDW December 8, 2017 9.9% Convertible
Promissory Note
On December 8, 2017,
London Bay – VL Holding Company LLC assigned $600 of an outstanding promissory note to RDW. The new note is in the principal
amount of $600, bears interest at the rate of 9.9% per annum, and matures on December 8, 2018. The note is convertible at the lower
of (i) $4.00 or (ii) 65% of the lowest VWAP over the twenty trading days prior to the date of conversion (refer to Note 12, Derivative
Instruments, for further detail on the derivative features associated with the RDW December 8. 2017 9.9% convertible note).
During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the investor who holds the December 8, 2017 9.9% promissory note converted $120 of principal into shares of
the Company’s common stock (refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information). As a result of these
conversions, the Company recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $203 to the consolidated statement of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2017.
Restructuring
of Forward Investments, LLC Promissory Notes and Working Capital Loan
On
March 4, 2015, the Company restructured the terms of certain promissory notes issued by it to a related party investor, Forward
Investments, LLC, in order to extend the maturity dates thereof, reduce the seniority and reduce the interest rate accruing thereon.
The following notes were restructured as follows:
|
●
|
notes issued to
Forward Investments, LLC in the aggregate principal amount of $3,650 that bear interest at the rate of 10% per annum, had
the maturity date extended from June 30, 2015 to July 1, 2016. These notes matured on July 1, 2016;
|
|
●
|
notes issued to
Forward Investments, LLC in the principal amount of $2,825 that bear interest at the rate of 2% per annum, had the maturity
date extended from June 30, 2015 to July 1, 2016. These notes matured on July 1, 2016; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
notes issued to
Forward Investments, LLC in the aggregate principal amount of $2,645 were converted from senior notes to junior notes, had
the interest rate reduced from 18% to 3% per annum, had the maturity date extended by approximately three years to January
1, 2018, and originally were convertible at a conversion price of $2,544.00 per share until the Convertible Debentures were
repaid in full and thereafter $940.00 per share, subject to further adjustment as set forth therein.
|
In connection with
such restructuring, Forward Investments, LLC agreed to lend to the Company an amount substantially similar to the accrued interest
the Company owed to Forward Investments, LLC on the restructured notes. In consideration for such restructuring and additional
payments made by Forward Investments, LLC to the Company, the Company issued to Forward Investments, LLC an additional convertible
note in the original principal amount of $1,730 with an interest rate of 3% per annum, which matured on January 1, 2018, and had
an initial conversion price of $2,544.00 per share until the Convertible Debentures were repaid in full and thereafter $940.00
per share, subject to further adjustment as set forth therein, and provided Forward Investments, LLC the option to lend the Company
an additional $8,000 in the form of convertible notes similar to the existing convertible notes of the Company issued to Forward
Investments, LLC. The convertible note was issued to Forward Investments, LLC as an incentive to restructure the above-mentioned
notes and resulted in the Company recording a loss on modification of debt of $1,508 on the unaudited condensed consolidated statement
of operations as of March 31, 2015.
As
part of the restructuring, Forward Investments, LLC agreed to convert $390 of accrued interest on the above-mentioned loans to
a new note bearing interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum that matured on July 1, 2016.
In
conjunction with the extension of the 2% and 10% convertible notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC, the Company recorded an
additional $1,916 of debt discount at the date of the restructuring.
The Company has entered
into an agreement with Forward Investments, LLC permitting Forward Investments, LLC to convert its debt into the Company’s
common stock at a 5% discount to the daily market price. During the year ended December 31, 2017, Forward Investments, LLC converted
$5,435 aggregate principal amount of promissory notes into an aggregate of 2,900,103 shares of the Company’s common
stock. Refer to Note 16, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further information. As a result of these conversions, the Company recorded
a loss on extinguishment of debt of $530 to the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
During
July 2017, the Company determined that Forward Investments was not a related party and reclassified debt owed to Forward Investments
from related party debt to term loans. The effective date of the reclassification was January 1, 2017.
Convertible
Promissory Note to Frank Jadevaia, Former Owner of IPC
On January 1, 2014, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of IPC. As part of the purchase
price for the acquisition, the Company issued a convertible promissory note to Frank Jadevaia, then President of the Company, in
the original principal amount of $6,255. The convertible promissory note accrued interest at the rate of 8% per annum, and all
principal and interest accruing thereunder was originally due and payable on December 31, 2014. At the election of Mr. Jadevaia,
the convertible promissory note was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $6,796.00
per share (subject to equitable adjustments for stock dividends, stock splits, recapitalizations and other similar events). The
Company could have elected to force the conversion of the convertible promissory note if the Company’s common stock was trading
at a price greater than or equal to $6,796.00 for ten consecutive trading days. This note was subordinated until the Senior Secured
Convertible Notes issued to the JGB entities are paid in full.
On
December 31, 2014, the Company and Mr. Jadevaia agreed to a modification of the convertible promissory note. The term of the convertible
promissory note was extended to May 30, 2016 and, in consideration for this modification, the Company issued to Mr. Jadevaia 25,000
shares of common stock.
On May 19, 2015, Mr.
Jadevaia assigned $500 of principal related to the convertible promissory note and the assignees converted all $500 principal
amount of such note into 581 shares of the Company’s common stock with a fair value of $1,352.00 per common share.
On
May 30, 2016, the note matured and was due on demand.
On
November 4, 2016, Mr. Jadevaia resigned from his role as the Company’s President. During July 2017, the Company determined
that Frank Jadevaia was no longer a related party and reclassified his note from related party debt to term loans. The effective
date of the reclassification was January 1, 2017.
On October 12, 2017,
Mr. Jadevaia agreed to exchange $5,430 held in promissory notes into shares of the Company’s Series L preferred stock and
assigned promissory notes in the principal amount of $400 to RDW Capital LLC.
Promissory
Note to Former Owner of Tropical
In
August 2011, in connection with the Company’s acquisition of Tropical, the Company assumed a promissory note in the principal
amount of $106. On April 25, 2017, the holder of the note forgave the remaining balance of principal and interest and cancelled
the promissory note. As of April 25, 2017, the note had accrued interest of $25. As a result of the cancellation of the note,
the Company recognized a gain on fair value of extinguishment of $131 in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2017.
Tim Hannibal 8% Promissory Note
On November 9, 2017,
the Company issued an unsecured promissory note to Tim Hannibal in the principal amount of $300, which bears interest at the rate
of 8% per annum, and matured on January 9, 2018.
12.
|
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
|
The Company evaluates
and accounts for derivatives conversion options embedded in its convertible and freestanding instruments in accordance with ASC
Topic 815,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(“ASC Topic 815”).
MidMarket
Warrants
The
Company issued warrants to lenders under the MidMarket Loan Agreement in 2012. These warrants were outstanding at December 31,
2017 and 2016.
The
terms of the warrants issued in September 2012 originally provided, among other things, that the number of shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of such warrants amounted to 11.5% of the Company’s fully-diluted outstanding common stock and common
stock equivalents, whether the common stock equivalents were fully vested and exercisable or not, and that the initial exercise
price of such warrants was $2,000.00 per share of common stock, subject to adjustment. Pursuant to an amendment to the loan agreement,
on March 22, 2013, the number of shares for which the warrants are exercisable was fixed at 586 shares. On September 17, 2012,
when the warrants were issued, the Company recorded a derivative liability in the amount of $194. The amount was recorded as a
debt discount and was being amortized over the original life of the related loans. The amount of the derivative liability was
computed by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which is not materially different from a binomial lattice valuation
methodology, to determine the value of the warrants issued. In accordance with ASC Topic 480, the warrants are classified as liabilities
because there is a put feature that requires the Company to repurchase any shares of common stock issued upon exercise of the
warrants. The derivative liability associated with this debt is revalued each reporting period and the increase or decrease is
recorded to the consolidated statement of operations under the caption “change in fair value of derivative instruments.”
At each reporting date, the Company performs an analysis of the fair value of the warrants using the binomial lattice pricing
model and adjusts the fair value accordingly.
On
September 17, 2016, the fourth anniversary date of the warrants, the Company failed to meet the minimum adjusted earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization provisions set forth within the original warrant agreement. As such, the expiration
date of the warrants was extended to September 17, 2018.
On December 31, 2017
and 2016, the Company used a binomial pricing model to determine the fair value of the warrants on those dates and determined
the fair value was $0. The Company recorded the change in the fair value of the derivative liability as a gain on fair value of
derivative liability on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 of $21.
The
fair value of the warrant derivative liability as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was calculated using a binomial lattice pricing
model with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of Company’s common stock
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
12.00
|
|
Volatility (closing prices of 3-4 comparable public companies, including the Company’s historical volatility)
|
|
|
215
|
%
|
|
|
120
|
%
|
Exercise price per share
|
|
$
|
1,600.00 - $2,000.00
|
|
|
$
|
1,600.00 - $2,000.00
|
|
Estimated life
|
|
|
0.7 years
|
|
|
|
1.7 years
|
|
Risk free interest rate (based on 1-year treasury rate)
|
|
|
1.65
|
%
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
Forward
Investments, LLC Convertible Feature
On
February 4, 2014 and March 28, 2014, Forward Investments, LLC made convertible loans to the Company for working capital purposes
in the amounts of $1,800 and $1,200, respectively. Such loans are evidenced by convertible promissory notes that bear interest
at the rate of 2% and 10% per annum, were to mature on June 30, 2015 and originally were convertible into shares of the Company’s
common stock at an initial conversion price of $2,544.00 per share.
The
fair value of the embedded conversion feature at the date of issuance was $8,860. The Company recorded a debt discount of $6,475
and a loss on debt discount of $2,385. The debt discount is being amortized over the life of the loans. The Company used a Monte
Carlo simulation on the date of issuance to determine the fair value of the embedded conversion feature.
On
October 22, 2014, the two convertible promissory notes were modified to reduce the initial conversion price of $2,544.00 to $1,572.00.
As a result, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to determine the fair value on the date of modification. The Company recorded
the change in the fair value of the derivative liability as a loss on fair value of derivative instruments of $310.
On
March 4, 2015, the Company and Forward Investments, LLC restructured the two promissory notes in order to extend the maturity
dates thereof, reduce the seniority and reduce the interest rate accruing thereon (refer to Note 19, Related Parties, for further
detail). The Company accounted for this restructuring of the promissory notes as a debt modification under ASC Topic 470-50. As
part of the modification, the Company analyzed the embedded conversion feature and recorded a loss on fair value of derivative
instruments of $2,600 on the consolidated statement of operations.
In
conjunction with the issuance of the 6.5% and 3% convertible notes issued on March 4, 2015, the Company recorded an additional
derivative liability as a debt discount in the amount of $260 and $1,970, respectively, on the date of the issuance of the notes.
The
debt discounts are being amortized over the life of the loans. The Company used a Monte Carlo simulation on the date of issuance
to determine the fair value of the embedded conversion features.
On
August 3, 2015, the Company and Forward Investments, LLC agreed to reset the conversion price of the convertible notes to $632.00
per share of the Company’s common stock. As a result, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to determine the fair value
of the conversion features on the date of the agreement. On the date of the transaction, the fair value of the Forward Investments
convertible notes conversion feature did not change and as such, no change in fair value of derivative instruments was recorded
on the consolidated statement of operations.
On
October 26, 2015, the ratchet-down feature within the original agreement was triggered and the conversion price of the convertible
notes was reset to $500.00 per share of the Company’s common stock. Prior to the triggering of the ratchet-down feature,
the Company revalued the derivative and recorded a gain on fair value of derivative liabilities of $120 on the consolidated statement
of operations. The Company then reduced the existing derivative liability related to the reset provision and recorded the change
of $2,310 in the derivative liability value as a loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments on the consolidated statement
of operations.
On
December 29, 2015, the ratchet-down feature within the original agreement was triggered and the conversion price of the convertible
notes was reset to $312.00 per share of the Company’s common stock. Prior to the triggering of the ratchet-down feature,
the Company revalued the derivative and recorded a gain on fair value of derivative liabilities of $3,380 on the consolidated
statement of operations. The Company then reduced the existing derivative liability related to the reset provision and recorded
the change of $4,140 in the derivative liability value as a loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments on the consolidated
statement of operations.
On December 31, 2017
and 2016, the fair value of the conversion feature of the Forward Investments, LLC convertible notes was $348 and $791, respectively,
which is included in derivative financial instruments on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company recorded the change in the
fair value of the derivative liability on the consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
as a gain of $443 and $12,743, respectively.
The
fair value of the Forward Investments, LLC convertible notes derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte
Carlo simulation with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
Principal and interest amount
|
|
$
|
1,810
|
|
|
$
|
582
|
|
|
$
|
1,270
|
|
|
$
|
2,438
|
|
|
$
|
3,210
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
$
|
1,025
|
|
|
$
|
4,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion price per share
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
$
|
312.00
|
|
|
$
|
312.00
|
|
|
$
|
312.00
|
|
|
$
|
312.00
|
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
|
|
2.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
|
|
0.51
|
%
|
|
|
0.85
|
%
|
Life of conversion feature (in years)
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
142
|
%
|
|
|
142
|
%
|
|
|
195
|
%
|
|
|
195
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
135
|
%
|
|
|
120
|
%
|
* The conversion price per share is equal to the lesser of $7.80 or 95% of VWAP on the conversion date.
Dominion
Capital LLC August 6, 2015 Demand Promissory Note – Senior Convertible Note Embedded Features
On
August 6, 2015, the Company entered into a senior convertible note agreement with an investor whereby the Company issued a
promissory note in the original principal amount of $2,105, with interest accruing at the rate of 12% per annum, which
matured on January 6, 2017. The Company evaluated the senior convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined
that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded
derivatives as set forth in ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging
and ASC 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities from
Equity
. On August 6, 2015, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features and ascribed a
value of $524 related to the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses and recorded these items on the
consolidated balance sheets as a debt discount and related derivative liability. The debt discounts were being amortized over
the life of the loan.
On
December 31, 2016, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the senior convertible note and
determined the fair value to be $176. As a result of the conversion of the outstanding principal balance during 2017 (refer to
Note 11, Term Loans, for further detail), the fair value of the corresponding derivative liability was $0 as of December 31, 2017.
The Company recorded a gain on fair value of derivative instruments of $176 on the consolidated statement of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2017. The Company recorded a gain of $163 on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2016.
The
fair value of the demand promissory note derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with
the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Principal amount
|
|
$
|
1,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion price per share
|
|
$
|
500.00
|
|
Conversion trigger price per share
|
|
|
None
|
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
0.44
|
%
|
Life of conversion feature (in years)
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
135
|
%
|
November
12, 2015 Demand Promissory Note – Senior Convertible Note Embedded Features
On
November 12, 2015, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with an investor whereby the Company issued a senior
convertible note, for cash proceeds of $500, in the original principal amount of $525. The Company evaluated the senior convertible
note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met
the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging
and ASC 480,
Distinguishing
Liabilities from Equity
. On November 12, 2015, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features
and ascribed a value of $149 related to the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses and recorded these
items on the consolidated balance sheets as a debt discount and related derivative liability. The debt discounts are being amortized
over the life of the loan.
As a result of the
conversion of the outstanding principal balance (see Note 11, Term Loans, for further detail), the fair value of the corresponding
derivative liability was $0 as of December 31, 2016. The Company recorded a gain of $155 on the consolidated statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2016.
November
12, 2015 Exchange Agreement Tranches – Senior Convertible Note Embedded Features
On
November 12, 2015, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with an investor whereby the Company exchanged a portion of
the senior secured note originally issued by the Company to GPB Life Science Holdings, LLC on December 3, 2014 and subsequently
assigned to the investor, for new senior convertible notes issued in three tranches of $500 for a total principal amount of $1,500.
The notes had a term of one year, bore interest at 12% per annum, and were convertible into shares of the Company’s common
stock at a conversion price equal to $1.25 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the notes.
On
November 13, 2015, the Company issued to the investor the first tranche of senior secured notes in the principal amount of $500.
The Company evaluated the senior convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature
and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815,
Derivatives
and Hedging
and ASC 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity
. On November 13, 2015, the Company used a Monte Carlo
simulation to value the settlement features and ascribed a value of $164 related to the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental
transaction clauses and recorded these items on the consolidated balance sheets as a debt discount and related derivative liability.
The debt discounts are being amortized over the life of the loan.
On
November 27, 2015, the Company issued to the investor the second tranche of senior secured notes in the principal amount of $500.
The Company evaluated the senior convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature
and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815,
Derivatives
and Hedging
and ASC 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity
. On November 27, 2015, the Company used a Monte Carlo
simulation to value the settlement features and ascribed a value of $205 related to the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental
transaction clauses and recorded these items on the consolidated balance sheets as a debt discount and related derivative liability.
The debt discounts are being amortized over the life of the loan.
On
December 11, 2015, the Company issued to the investor the third tranche of senior secured notes in the principal amount of $500.
The Company evaluated the senior convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature
and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815,
Derivatives
and Hedging
and ASC 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity
. On December 11, 2015, the Company used a Monte Carlo
simulation to value the settlement features and ascribed a value of $109 related to the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental
transaction clauses and recorded these items on the consolidated balance sheets as a debt discount and related derivative liability.
The debt discounts are being amortized over the life of the loan.
On
December 31, 2015, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the three tranches of senior
convertible notes and determined the fair value to be $57 related to tranche one, $78 related to tranche two, and $118 related
to tranche three. The Company recorded gains on fair value of derivative instruments of $107 related to tranche one and $127 related
to tranche two, and a loss on fair value of derivative instruments of $9 related to tranche three on the consolidated statement
of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the three tranches of senior convertible
notes were converted into shares of the Company’s common stock (see Note 11, Term Loans, for further detail). The Company
recorded the change in fair value of the derivative liability as a gain of $253 in the consolidated statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2016.
Dominion
Capital LLC November 4, 2016 Exchange Agreement – Senior Convertible Debt Features
On
November 4, 2016, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with the holder of the September 15, 2016 term promissory note.
The principal amount was increased by $40, and the note became convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock. The
note is convertible at the lower of (i) $40.00, or (ii) 75% of the lowest VWAP day for the 15 days prior to the conversion date
(for additional detail refer to Note 11, Term Loans). The Company evaluated the senior convertible note’s settlement provisions
and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as
embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On
November 4, 2016, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features. The Company ascribed a value of
$242 related to the conversion feature and recorded this item on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability.
On December 31, 2017
and 2016, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the senior convertible note and determined
the fair value to be $59 and $78, respectively. The Company recorded the change in the fair value of the derivative liability
on the consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 as a gain of $19 and $164, respectively.
The
fair value of the senior convertible note derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with
the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Principal amount and guaranteed interest
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
$
|
605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion price per share
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
$
|
40.00
|
|
Conversion trigger price per share
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
Life of conversion feature (in years)
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
195
|
%
|
|
|
120
|
%
|
* The conversion price per share is equal to the lesser of $10.00 or 75% of average daily VWAP for the fifteen trading days
prior to the conversion date.
Dominion
Capital LLC January 31, 2017 – Senior Convertible Debt Features
On January 31, 2017,
the Company entered into a senior convertible promissory note with Dominion Capital, LLC in the original principal amount of $70,
with interest accruing at the rate of 6% per annum, which matured on January 31, 2018. The note is convertible at the lower of
(i) $40.00 or (ii) 75% of the lowest VWAP in the 15 trading days prior to the conversion date (for additional detail refer to Note
11, Term Loans). The Company evaluated the senior convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary
conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in
ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On January 31, 2017, the Company used a Monte
Carlo simulation to value the settlement features. The Company ascribed a value of $38 related to the conversion feature and recorded
this item on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability.
On December 31, 2017,
the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the senior convertible note and determined the fair
value to be $81. The Company recorded a loss of $43 on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31,
2017.
The
fair value of the senior convertible note derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with
the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
Principal amount and guaranteed interest
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion price per share
|
|
|
*
|
|
Conversion trigger price per share
|
|
|
None
|
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
1.28
|
%
|
Life of conversion feature (in years)
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
310
|
%
|
* The conversion price per share is equal to 70% of average daily VWAP for the fifteen trading days prior to the conversion
date.
Smithline
Senior Convertible Note Embedded Features
On
August 6, 2015, the Company issued to Smithline a senior convertible note in the principal amount of $526, with interest accruing
at the rate of 12% per annum, which matures on January 11, 2017. The Company evaluated the senior convertible note’s settlement
provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified
as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging
and ASC 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities from
Equity
. On August 6, 2015, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features and ascribed a value
of $131 related to the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses and recorded these items on the consolidated
balance sheets as a debt discount and related derivative liability. The debt discounts are being amortized over the life of the
loan.
On
July 20, 2016 and September 1, 2016, principal of $55 and $97, respectively, was added to the Smithline senior convertible note
(refer to Note 11, Term Loans, for additional detail).
The Smithline senior
convertible note matured on January 11, 2017 and was due on demand.
During the year ended
December 31, 2017, Smithline converted the outstanding principal balance into shares of the Company’s common stock (refer
to Note 11, Term Loans, for further detail).
On December 31, 2016,
the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the senior convertible notes and determined the
fair value to be $0. The Company recorded the change in the fair value of the derivative liability for the year December 31, 2016
as a gain in the consolidated statements of operations of $85.
JGB
(Cayman) Waltham Ltd. Senior Secured Convertible Debenture Features
On
December 29, 2015, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with JGB Waltham whereby the Company issued to JGB
Waltham, for gross proceeds of $7,500, a 10% original issue discount senior secured convertible debenture in the aggregate principal
amount of $7,500. The Company evaluated the senior convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary
conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth
in ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging
and ASC 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity
. On December 29, 2015, the
Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features and ascribed a value of $1,479 related to the voluntary
conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses and recorded these items on the consolidated balance sheets as a debt discount
and related derivative liability. The debt discounts are being amortized over the life of the loan.
On
May 17, 2016, the Company entered into the Debenture Forbearance Agreement with JGB Waltham pursuant to which JGB Waltham agreed
to forbear action with respect to certain existing defaults in accordance with the terms of the Debenture Forbearance Agreement
(Refer to Note 11, Term Loans, for further details). The Company evaluated the Debenture Forbearance Agreement and accounted for
the transaction as a debt extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company
used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with the Debenture Forbearance Agreement. The Company
recorded the change in the settlement features as a loss to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $1,154 to its consolidated
statement of operations on May 17, 2016.
On
May 23, 2016, the Company entered into the Amended Agreement with JGB Concord, JGB Waltham, VaultLogix, and the Guarantors. The
Company accounted for this Amended Agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company
accounted for the Amended Agreement as a debt modification and utilized a Monte Carlo simulation to determine the fair value of
the settlement features. The Company recorded a loss on the fair value of the settlement features to change in fair value of derivative
instruments of $41 on the consolidated statement of operations as of May 23, 2016.
On
June 23, 2016, the Company entered into an amended agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 11, Term Loans, for
further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement as a debt extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50.
In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with
the Amended Agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a loss to change in fair value of derivative
instruments of $486 to its consolidated statement of operations on June 23, 2016.
On
September 1, 2016, the Company entered into an amended agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 11, Term Loans,
for further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement in regards to the December Debenture as a debt modification
in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue
the settlement features associated with the Amended Agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a
gain to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $1,552 to its consolidated statement of operations on September 1, 2016.
On
February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a consent agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 11, Term Loans,
for further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement in regards to the JGB Waltham debenture as a debt extinguishment
in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue
the settlement features associated with the agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a loss to
change in fair value of derivative instruments of $1,752 to its consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December
31, 2017.
On
March 9, 2017, JGB (Cayman) Waltham entered into an Assignment and Assumption agreement with MEF I, LP (refer to Note 11, Term
Loans, for further detail). The Company accounted for the assumption agreement in regards to the JGB Waltham debenture as a debt
extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation
to revalue the settlement features associated with the agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as
a loss to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $349 to its consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2017.
On December 31, 2017
and 2016, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the senior convertible notes issued to
JGB Waltham and determined the fair value to be $1,827 and $533, respectively. The Company recorded the change in the fair value
of the derivative liability for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 as a gain of $814 and $3,173, respectively, which includes
all extinguishment and conversion accounting for the periods in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. These changes were recorded
in the consolidated statements of operations.
The
fair value of the JGB (Cayman) Waltham Ltd. derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation
with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Principal amount
|
|
$
|
3,091
|
|
|
$
|
5,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion price per share
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
$
|
80.00
|
|
Conversion trigger price per share
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
800.00
|
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
1.76
|
%
|
|
|
1.31
|
%
|
Life of conversion feature (in years)
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
201
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
* The conversion price per share is equal to the lesser of $4.00 or 80% of VWAP on the conversion date.
JGB
(Cayman) Waltham Ltd. 2.7 Note Convertible Debenture Features
On
September 1, 2016, the Company entered into an amended agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 11, Term Loans,
for further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement in regards to the 2.7 Note as a debt extinguishment in accordance
with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement
features associated with the Amended Agreement and determined that the fair value of the features was $1,200 as of September 1,
2016 and recorded these items on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability. The debt discounts are being amortized
over the life of the loan.
On
February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a consent agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 11, Term Loans,
for further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement in regards to the JGB Waltham 2.7 Note as a debt extinguishment
in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue
the settlement features associated with the agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a loss to
change in fair value of derivative instruments of $141 to its consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December
31, 2017.
On December 31, 2017
and 2016, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement feature of the 2.7 Note and determined the fair value
to be $120 and $119, respectively. The Company recorded the change in the fair value of the derivative liability as a gain of
$140 and $1,081 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which includes all extinguishment accounting for
the periods in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. These changes were recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.
The fair value of the JGB Waltham derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo
simulation with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Principal amount
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
|
$
|
593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion price per share
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
$
|
80.00
|
|
Conversion trigger price per share
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
800.00
|
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
|
0.62
|
%
|
Life of conversion feature (in years)
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
195
|
%
|
|
|
130
|
%
|
* The conversion price per share is equal to the lesser of $4.00 or 80% of VWAP on the conversion date.
JGB
(Cayman) Concord Ltd. Senior Secured Convertible Note
On
February 17, 2016, the Company entered into a securities exchange agreement by and among the Company, VaultLogix, and JGB Concord,
whereby the Company exchanged the White Oak Global Advisors, LLC promissory note and subsequently assigned to the lender party
a new 8.25% senior secured convertible note dated February 18, 2016 in the aggregate principal amount of $11,601 (refer to Note
11, Term Loans, for further details).
The
Company evaluated the senior secured convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the conversion feature
and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815,
Derivatives
and Hedging
and ASC 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity
. On February 18, 2016, the Company used a
Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features and ascribed a value of $1,350 related to the conversion feature and fundamental
transaction clauses and recorded these items on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability. The debt discounts
are being amortized over the life of the loan.
On
May 17, 2016, the Company entered into the Note Forbearance Agreement with JGB Concord pursuant to which JGB Concord agreed to
forbear action with respect to certain existing defaults in accordance with the terms of the Note Forbearance Agreement (Refer
to Note 11, Term Loans, for further details). The Company evaluated the Note Forbearance Agreement and accounted for the transaction
as a debt extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo
simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with the Note Forbearance Agreement. The Company recorded the change
in the settlement features as a loss to change in fair value of derivative instruments of $2,196 to its consolidated statement
of operations on May 17, 2016.
On
May 23, 2016, the Company entered into the Amended Agreement with JGB Concord, JGB Waltham, VaultLogix, and the Guarantors. The
Company accounted for this Amended Agreement in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company
accounted for the Amended Agreement as a debt modification and utilized a Monte Carlo simulation to determine the fair value of
the settlement features. The Company recorded a loss on the fair value of the settlement features to change in fair value of derivative
instruments of $79 on the consolidated statement of operations as of May 23, 2016.
On
June 23, 2016, the Company entered into an amended agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 11, Term Loans, for
further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement as a debt extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50.
In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with
the Amended Agreement to determine the fair value. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a loss to change
in fair value of derivative instruments of $924 to its consolidated statement of operations on June 23, 2016.
As part of the June
23, 2016 amended agreement with JGB Concord, the Company issued 2,250 shares of the Company’s common stock on June 23, 2016
to JGB Concord (Refer to Note 11, Stockholders’ Deficit, for further detail), and agreed to a make-whole provision whereby
the Company would pay JGB Concord in cash the difference between $376.00 per share of the Company’s common stock and the
average volume weighted average price per share of the Company’s common stock sixty days after shares of the Company’s
common stock were freely tradable. The Company accounted for the make-whole provision within the June 23, 2016 amendment agreement
as a derivative liability and utilized a binomial lattice model to ascribe a value of $280, which was recorded as a derivative
liability on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet and as a loss on extinguishment of debt on the Company’s consolidated
statement of operations on June 23, 2016.
On
September 1, 2016, the Company entered into an amended agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 11, Term Loans,
for further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement as a debt extinguishment in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50.
In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue the settlement features associated with
the Amended Agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a gain to change in fair value of derivative
instruments of $1,308 to its consolidated statement of operations on September 1, 2016.
On
February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a consent agreement with JGB Concord and JGB Waltham (refer to Note 11, Term Loans,
for further detail). The Company accounted for the amended agreement in regards to the JGB Concord Debenture as a debt extinguishment
in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. In accordance with ASC Topic 470-50, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to revalue
the settlement features associated with the agreement. The Company recorded the change in the settlement features as a gain to
change in fair value of derivative instruments of $2 to its consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31,
2017.
On December 31, 2017
and 2016, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the senior secured convertible notes and
determined the fair value to be $7and $397, respectively. The Company recorded the change in fair value of derivative instruments
for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 as a gain of $388 and 397, respectively, which includes all extinguishment accounting
for the periods in accordance with ASC Topic 470-50. These changes were recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.
The
fair value of the JGB (Cayman) Concord Ltd. derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation
with the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Principal amount
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
3,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion price per share
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
$
|
80.00
|
|
Conversion trigger price per share
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
800.00
|
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
1.76
|
%
|
|
|
1.31
|
%
|
Life of conversion feature (in years)
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
201
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
* The conversion price per share is equal to the lesser of $4.00 or 80% of VWAP on the conversion date.
JGB
Concord Make-Whole Provision
On December 31, 2016,
the Company used a binomial lattice model to value the make-whole provision and determined the fair value to be $819. Proceeds
from the January 31, 2017 sale of the Company’s Highwire subsidiary were used to pay the remaining balance of the make-whole
provision. On February 28, 2017, the Company used a binomial lattice model to value the make-whole provision and determined the
fair value to be $814. The Company recorded a gain on change in fair value of derivative instruments of $5 for the year ended
December 31, 2017 on the consolidated statement of operations.
The
fair value of the JGB Concord make-whole provision at the measurement date was calculated using a binomial lattice model with
the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Fair value of Company's common stock
|
|
$
|
12.00
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
120
|
%
|
Exercise price
|
|
|
376.00
|
|
Estimated life
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
Risk free interest rate (based on 1-year treasury rate)
|
|
|
0.48
|
%
|
February
28, 2017 JGB Waltham Warrant
On
February 28, 2017, the Company entered into a securities exchange agreement with JGB Waltham whereby the Company issued a warrant
giving JGB Waltham the right to purchase from the Company shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of up to $1,000.
The warrant expires on November 28, 2018 and contains a cashless exercise feature. The warrants have an exercise price of $16.00
until May 29, 2017 and the lower of (a) $16.00 and (b) 80% of the lowest VWAP of our common stock for the prior 30 days thereafter.
On February 28, 2017, the Company used a binomial lattice calculation to value the warrants. The Company ascribed a value of $65
related to the warrants and recorded this item on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability.
During the year ended
December 31, 2017, JGB Waltham exercised the full available $1,000. As a result of these exercises, the Company recorded
a loss on change in fair value of derivative instruments of $933 for the year ended December 31, 2017 on the consolidated statement
of operations.
MEF
I, L.P. Assignment and Assumption Agreement
On
March 9, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with MEF I, L.P. pursuant to an assignment and assumption
agreement (refer to Note 11, Term Loans, for additional detail on the assignment). The note is convertible at the lower of (i)
$16.00 or (ii) 80% of the lowest VWAP in the 30 trading days prior to the conversion date. The Company evaluated the convertible
note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met
the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing
Liabilities from Equity. On March 9, 2017, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features. The Company
ascribed a value of $250 related to the conversion feature and recorded this item on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative
liability.
As a result of the
conversion of the outstanding principal balance during the year ended December 31, 2017 (refer to Note 11, Term Loans, for further
detail), the fair value of the corresponding derivative liability was $0 as of December 31, 2017. The Company recorded the change
in fair value of the derivative liability as a gain of $250 on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December
31, 2017.
SRFF Warrant and Derivative
On
September 8, 2016, the Company issued a warrant to purchase up to a total of 6,250 shares of common stock at any time on or prior
to April 1, 2017. The exercise price of the warrant is $0.40. The warrant was issued in consideration for the outstanding accounts
payable to the holder of the warrant. Based on the agreement, the proceeds from the eventual sale of the common stock based on
the exercise of all or a portion of the warrant will be applied towards unpaid invoices for services previously rendered to the
Company. The Company determined that the fair value of the warrants was $460, which was included in common stock warrants within
the stockholders’ deficit section on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016.
During
the three months ended December 31, 2016, the warrant value became less than the accounts payable owed. As a result, a derivative
had to be recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 in accordance with ASC 480.
As
of December 31, 2017, the Company did not have sufficient authorized shares for the remaining equity warrants to qualify as equity.
Per ASC 815-40-35-9, the Company reclassified these warrants to a derivative liability at their fair value as of March 31, 2017.
Based on a warrant to purchase up to a total of 6,250 shares of common stock and an underlying price of $12.00 per share, the
Company recorded these warrants at fair value of $75 on the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2017.
On December 31, 2017
and 2016, the Company used a binomial lattice model to value the warrant derivative and determined the fair value to be $234 and
$152, respectively. The Company recorded a loss on fair value of derivative instruments of $23 for the year ended December 31,
2017 on the consolidated statement of operations.
On
September 30, 2017, the expiration date was extended until March 31, 2018.
The
fair value of the warrant derivative as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was calculated using a binomial lattice pricing model with
the following factors, assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Fair value of Company's common stock
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
12.00
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
201
|
%
|
|
|
120
|
%
|
Exercise price
|
|
|
0.400
|
|
|
|
0.400
|
|
Estimated life
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
Risk free interest rate (based on 1-year treasury rate)
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
|
0.57
|
%
|
Reclassification
of Equity Warrants
As
of March 31, 2017, the Company did not have sufficient authorized shares for the existing equity warrants to qualify as equity.
Per ASC 815-40-35-9, the Company reclassified these warrants to derivative liabilities at their fair value as of March 31, 2017.
These warrants are outstanding to GPB Life Science Holdings, LLC, 8760 Enterprises, Inc., and the JGB entities.
The
Company determined the fair value of these warrants as of March 31, 2017 to be as follows:
|
●
|
De minimis for GPB
Warrant-1, GPB Warrant-2, and GPB Warrant-3;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
$2 for the 8760
Enterprises, Inc. warrant; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
$33 for the JGB
warrant.
|
On
June 27, 2017, the 8760 Enterprises, Inc. warrant was cancelled. The Company used a binomial lattice pricing model to value the
settlement features of this equity warrant as of June 27, 2017 and determined the fair value to be $0. The Company recorded the
change in fair value in the consolidated statement of operations as a gain of $2.
On July 12, 2017, as
a result of the one-for-four reverse split of the Company’s common stock, the Company had sufficient authorized shares for
the existing equity warrants to qualify as equity. The Company reclassified these warrants to equity at their fair value as of
July 12, 2017.
On July 12, 2017, the
Company used a binomial lattice pricing model to value the settlement features of the remaining equity warrants and determined
the fair value to be as follows:
|
●
|
De minimis for GPB
Warrant-1, GPB Warrant-2, and GPB Warrant-3;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
$7 for the JGB warrant.
|
The
Company recorded the change in fair value of the JGB Warrant in the consolidated statement of operations as a gain of $27 for
the year ended December 31, 2017.
The
fair value of these warrants as of July 12, 2017 was calculated using a binomial lattice pricing model with the following factors,
assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
GPB Warrant-1
|
|
|
GPB Warrant-2
|
|
|
GPB Warrant-3
|
|
|
JGB Exchange Warrants
|
|
|
|
July 12,
2017
|
|
|
July 12,
2017
|
|
|
July 12,
2017
|
|
|
July 12,
2017
|
|
|
July 12,
2017
|
|
Fair value of Company's common stock
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
141
|
%
|
|
|
141
|
%
|
|
|
141
|
%
|
|
|
210
|
%
|
|
|
210
|
%
|
Exercise price
|
|
|
700.00
|
|
|
|
700.00
|
|
|
|
700.00
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
Estimated life
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
1.84
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
Risk free interest rate (based on 1-year treasury rate)
|
|
|
1.28
|
%
|
|
|
1.28
|
%
|
|
|
1.28
|
%
|
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
RDW
April 3, 2017 2.5% Convertible Promissory Note
On
April 3, 2017, Scott Davis assigned 100% of his promissory note in the original principal amount of $250, reduced to $225 based
on a $25 conversion into common stock, to RDW. This note was convertible at a price of $888.00 per share and was due on demand.
As consideration for the assignment RDW paid Scott Davis $40. RDW then exchanged this original note for a new 2.5% convertible
promissory note in the principal amount of $100 due April 3, 2018. This conversion price of the new note is equal to 75% of the
average of the five lowest VWAPS over the seven trading days prior to the date of conversion. The Company evaluated the convertible
note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met
the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing
Liabilities from Equity. On April 25, 2017, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features. The Company
ascribed a value of $39 related to the conversion feature and recorded this item on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative
liability.
As
a result of the conversion of the outstanding principal balance during the year ended December 31, 2017 (refer to Note 11, Term
Loans, for further detail), the fair value of the corresponding derivative liability was $0 as of December 31, 2017. The Company
recorded a gain of $39 on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
RDW
July 14, 2017 9.9% Convertible Promissory Note
On
July 14, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with RDW in the principal amount of $155, which bears interest
at the rate of 9.9% per annum, and matures on July 14, 2018. The note is convertible at the lower of (i) $4.00 or (ii) 75% of
the average of the lowest five VWAPS over the seven trading days prior to the date of conversion. The Company evaluated the convertible
note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met
the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing
Liabilities from Equity. On July 14, 2017, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features. The Company
ascribed a value of $126 related to the conversion feature and recorded this item on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative
liability.
On December 31, 2017,
the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the convertible note and determined the fair value
to be $64. The Company recorded a gain on fair value of derivative instruments of $62 for the year ended December 31, 2017 on
the consolidated statement of operations.
The
fair value of the convertible note derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the
following factors, assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
Principal amount and guaranteed interest
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion price per share
|
|
|
*
|
|
Conversion trigger price per share
|
|
|
None
|
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
1.53
|
%
|
Life of conversion feature (in years)
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
198
|
%
|
* The conversion price per share is equal to the lesser of $4.00 or 75% of the average of the lowest 5 prices during the 7
days preceding the conversion date.
Assignment
of Tim Hannibal Note - RDW July 18, 2017 2.5% Convertible Promissory Note
On
July 18, 2017, Tim Hannibal assigned 100% of his 8% convertible promissory note in the original principal amount of $1,215, due
October 9, 2017, to RDW. This note was convertible into the Company’s common stock at a price of $2,548.00 per share. RDW
then exchanged this original note for a new 2.5% convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $1,215 due July 18, 2018.
The conversion price of the new note is equal to the lower of (i) $4.00 or (ii) 75% of the average of the lowest five VWAPS over
the seven trading days prior to the date of conversion. The Company evaluated the convertible note’s settlement provisions
and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as
embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On
July 18, 2017, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features. The Company ascribed a value of $911
related to the conversion feature and recorded this item on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability.
During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the holder of the July 18, 2017 convertible promissory note converted the outstanding principal balance into
shares of the Company’s common stock (refer to Note 11, Term Loans, for further detail). As a result of the conversions,
the fair value of the derivative liability was $0 at December 31, 2017. The Company recorded a gain on fair value of derivative
instruments of $911 for the year ended December 31, 2017 on the consolidated statement of operations.
RDW
September 27, 2017 9.9% Convertible Promissory Note
On
September 27, 2017, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with RDW in the principal amount of $155, which bears
interest at the rate of 9.9% per annum, and matures on September 27, 2018. The note is convertible at the lower of (i) $4.00 or
(ii) 75% of the average of the lowest five VWAPS over the twenty trading days prior to the date of conversion. The Company evaluated
the convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction
clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On September 27, 2017, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement
features. The Company ascribed a value of $122 related to the conversion feature and recorded this item on the consolidated balance
sheets as a derivative liability.
On December 31, 2017,
the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the convertible note and determined the fair value
to be $108. The Company recorded a gain on fair value of derivative instruments of $14 for the year ended December 31, 2017 on
the consolidated statement of operations.
The
fair value of the convertible note derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the
following factors, assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
Principal amount and guaranteed interest
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion price per share
|
|
|
*
|
|
Conversion trigger price per share
|
|
|
None
|
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
1.53
|
%
|
Life of conversion feature (in years)
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
187
|
%
|
* The conversion price per share is equal to the lesser of $4.00 or 75% of the average of the lowest 5 prices during the 20
days preceding the conversion date.
RDW October 12, 2017 9.9% Convertible
Promissory Note
On October 12, 2017,
Frank Jadevaia, former owner of IPC, assigned $400 of his outstanding promissory notes to RDW. The new note is in the principal
amount of $400, bears interest at the rate of 9.9% per annum, and matures on September 27, 2018. The note is convertible at the
lower of (i) $4.00 or (ii) 75% of the lowest VWAP over the twenty trading days prior to the date of conversion. The Company evaluated
the convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction
clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On October 12, 2017, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement
features. The Company ascribed a value of $374 related to the conversion feature and recorded this item on the consolidated balance
sheets as a derivative liability.
On December 31, 2017,
the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the convertible note and determined the fair value
to be $121. The Company recorded a gain on fair value of derivative instruments of $253 for the year ended December 31, 2017 on
the consolidated statement of operations.
The fair value of the
convertible note derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the following factors,
assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
Principal amount and guaranteed interest
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion price per share
|
|
|
*
|
|
Conversion trigger price per share
|
|
|
None
|
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
1.73
|
%
|
Life of conversion feature (in years)
|
|
|
0.78
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
191
|
%
|
* The conversion price per share is equal to the lesser of $4.00 or 75% of the lowest VWAP over the twenty trading days prior to the date of conversion
RDW December 8, 2017 9.9% Convertible
Promissory Note
On December 8, 2017,
London Bay – VL Holding Company LLC assigned $600 of an outstanding promissory note to RDW. The new note is in the principal
amount of $600, bears interest at the rate of 9.9% per annum, and matures on December 8, 2018. The note is convertible at the lower
of (i) $4.00 or (ii) 65% of the lowest VWAP over the twenty trading days prior to the date of conversion. The Company evaluated
the convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction
clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On December 8, 2017, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement
features. The Company ascribed a value of $600 related to the conversion feature and recorded this item on the consolidated balance
sheets as a derivative liability.
On December 31, 2017,
the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the convertible note and determined the fair value
to be $617. The Company recorded a loss on fair value of derivative instruments of $17 for the year ended December 31, 2017 on
the consolidated statement of operations.
The fair value of the
convertible note derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the following factors,
assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
Principal amount and guaranteed interest
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion price per share
|
|
|
*
|
|
Conversion trigger price per share
|
|
|
None
|
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
1.76
|
%
|
Life of conversion feature (in years)
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
225
|
%
|
* The conversion price per share is equal to the lesser of $4.00 or 65% of the lowest VWAP over the twenty trading days prior to the date of conversion
London Bay – VL Holding Company
LLC November 17, 2017 Amendment
On November 17, 2017, the Company amended a convertible promissory note originally issued to London Bay
– VL Holding Company LLC on October 9, 2014. The amendment extended the maturity date to October 9, 2018. The amended note
is in the principal amount of $2,003 and does not accrue interest. The note is convertible at 95% of the average of the three lowest
prices during the 5 days preceding conversion. The Company evaluated the convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined
that the voluntary conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives
as set forth in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On November 17, 2017, the
Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features. The Company ascribed a value of $282 related to the conversion
feature and recorded this item on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability.
On December 31, 2017,
the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the convertible note and determined the fair value
to be $190. The Company recorded a gain on fair value of derivative instruments of $92 for the year ended December 31, 2017 on
the consolidated statement of operations.
The fair value of the
convertible note derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the following factors,
assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
Principal amount and guaranteed interest
|
|
$
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion price per share
|
|
|
*
|
|
Conversion trigger price per share
|
|
|
None
|
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
1.76
|
%
|
Life of conversion feature (in years)
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
204
|
%
|
* The conversion price per share is equal to 95% of the average of the three lowest prices during the 5 days preceding conversion
WV VL Holding Corp November 17, 2017
Amendment
On November 17, 2017, the Company amended a convertible promissory note originally issued to WV VL Holding
Corp on October 9, 2014. The amendment extended the maturity date to October 9, 2018. The amended note is in the principal amount
of $2,005 and does not accrue interest. The note is convertible at 95% of the average of the three lowest prices during the 5 days
preceding conversion. The Company evaluated the convertible note’s settlement provisions and determined that the voluntary
conversion feature and fundamental transaction clauses met the criteria to be classified as embedded derivatives as set forth in
ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. On November 17, 2017, the Company used a
Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features. The Company ascribed a value of $282 related to the conversion feature
and recorded this item on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability.
On December 31, 2017,
the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the convertible note and determined the fair value
to be $271. The Company recorded a gain on fair value of derivative instruments of $11 for the year ended December 31, 2017 on
the consolidated statement of operations.
The fair value of the
convertible note derivative at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the following factors,
assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
Principal amount and guaranteed interest
|
|
$
|
2,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion price per share
|
|
|
*
|
|
Conversion trigger price per share
|
|
|
None
|
|
Risk free rate
|
|
|
1.76
|
%
|
Life of conversion feature (in years)
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
204
|
%
|
* The conversion price per share is equal to 95% of the average
of the three lowest prices during the 5 days preceding conversion
Series K, L, and M Preferred Stock Embedded
Conversion Features
On October 12, 2017,
the Company issued 227 shares of the Company’s Series L preferred stock pursuant to an exchange of promissory notes (refer
to Note 18, Preferred Stock, for further detail). The Series L preferred stock is convertible into common stock of the Company
at 105% of the weighted average trading price for the five days prior to conversion
On November 10, 2017,
the Company issued 1,512 shares of the Company’s Series K preferred stock pursuant to an exchange of promissory notes (refer
to Note 18, Preferred Stock, for further detail). The Series K preferred stock is convertible into common stock of the Company
at the lower of $3.00 or 95% of the weighted average trading price for the five days prior to conversion.
On December 1, 2017,
the Company issued 386 shares of the Company’s Series M preferred stock pursuant to an exchange of warrants (refer to Note
18, Preferred Stock, for further detail). The Series M preferred stock is convertible into common stock of the Company at 105%
of the weighted average trading price for the five days prior to conversion. In accordance with ASC 480,
Distinguishing Liabilities
from Equity
, the Company has classified the Series M preferred stock as a liability.
The Company evaluated
the embedded conversion features of the Series K and L preferred stock and concluded that they needed to be bifurcated. The Series
M preferred stock was also recorded at its fair value. At the issuance dates, the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value
the settlement features. The Company ascribed values of $15,748 and $1,664 related to the conversion features of the Series K and
L preferred stock, respectively, and recorded these items on the consolidated balance sheets as a derivative liability. The
Series M preferred stock was ascribed a value of $3,015 and recorded as a liability.
On December 31, 2017,
the Company used a Monte Carlo simulation to value the settlement features of the Series K, L, and M preferred stock and determined
the fair values to be $14,247, $1,743, and $3,021, respectively. The Company recorded a gain on fair value of derivative instruments
of $1,501 for the year ended December 31, 2017 on the consolidated statement of operations for the settlement features of the Series
K preferred stock. The Company recorded a loss on fair value of derivative instruments of $79 for the year ended December 31, 2017
on the consolidated statement of operations for the settlement features of the Series L preferred stock. The Company also recorded
a loss on fair value of the Series M preferred stock liability of $6 for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The fair value of the embedded conversion features of the Series K and L preferred stock, as well as the
fair value of the Series M preferred stock, at the measurement date was calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation with the following
factors, assumptions and methodologies:
|
|
Series K Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Series L Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Series M Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
Fair value of Company's common stock
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
160
|
%
|
|
|
160
|
%
|
|
|
159
|
%
|
Exercise price
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
Estimated life
|
|
|
4.86
|
|
|
|
4.78
|
|
|
|
4.92
|
|
Risk free interest rate (based on 1-year treasury rate)
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
|
|
2.26
|
%
|
The
Company’s pre-tax loss for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 consisted of the following:
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
(35,923
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,678
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(8,082
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
Pre-tax Loss
|
|
$
|
(44,005
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,593
|
)
|
The
provision for (benefit from) income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
State
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Total current
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(690
|
)
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
State
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
(784
|
)
|
|
|
113
|
|
Total provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
$
|
(672
|
)
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
The
Company’s income taxes were calculated on the basis of $277 of foreign net income.
The
Company’s effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 differed from the U.S. federal statutory rate
as follows:
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
Federal tax benefit at statutory rate
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
47.6
|
|
|
|
120.4
|
|
State tax benefit, net of Federal benefits
|
|
|
(14.6
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Effect of foreign income taxed in rates other than the U.S. Federal statutory rate
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Net change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
(83.4
|
)
|
Foreign tax credits
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Benefit
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
The
Company has not provided for United States federal income and foreign withholding taxes on any undistributed earnings from non-United
States operations because such earnings are intended to be reinvested indefinitely outside of the United States. If these earnings
were distributed, foreign tax credits may become available under current law to reduce or eliminate the resulting United States
income tax liability. As of December 31, 2017, there was $1,196 in cumulative foreign earnings upon which United States income
taxes had not been provided.
The
tax effects of temporary differences and carryforwards that gave rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities
were as follows:
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Net operating loss carry forwards
|
|
$
|
19,396
|
|
|
$
|
6,582
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
Accruals and reserves
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
721
|
|
Capital loss carry forwards
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Credits
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
3,882
|
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
24,919
|
|
|
|
10,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debt
|
|
|
(1,264
|
)
|
|
|
(1,264
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
(2,116
|
)
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
(1,503
|
)
|
|
|
(3,380
|
)
|
Less: Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(23,655
|
)
|
|
|
(8,450
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(239
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,002
|
)
|
As
of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards (“NOL’s”) of approximately
$24,242 and $11,428, respectively, and state NOL’s of approximately $48,241 and $35,534, respectively, that will be available
to reduce future taxable income, if any. These NOL’s begin to expire in 2025. In addition, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016,
the Company had federal tax credit carryforwards of $3 and $3, respectively, available to reduce future taxes. These credits begin
to expire in 2022. As of December 31, 2017, the Company also had a foreign net operating loss carryforward of $120, which will
expire in 2025.
On December 22, 2017,
the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cut and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”).
The Tax Act establishes new tax laws that affect 2018 and future years, including a reduction in the U.S. federal corporate income
tax rate to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. For certain deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, we have recorded a provisional
decrease of $96, with a corresponding adjustment to valuation allowance of $96 as of December 31, 2017.
Sections
382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, provide for annual limitations on the utilization of net operating
loss, capital loss and credit carryforwards if the Company were to undergo an ownership change, as defined in Section 382 of the
Code. In general, an ownership change occurs whenever the percentage of the shares of a corporation owned, directly or indirectly,
by 5-percent shareholders, as defined in Section 382 of the Code, increases by more than 50 percentage points over the lowest
percentage of the shares of such corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by such 5-percent shareholders at any time over the
preceding three years. In the event such ownership change occurs, the annual limitation may result in the expiration of net operating
losses capital losses and credits prior to full utilization.
Following
its Initial Public Offering (IPO), the Company conducted an analysis of whether an ownership change had occurred. The Company
takes these limitations into account in determining its available NOL’s.
The
Company has not completed a study to assess whether another ownership change has occurred or whether there have been multiple
ownership changes since the Company’s IPO. However, in 2016, as a result of the issuance of common shares upon debt conversions,
the Company believes an ownership change under Sec. 382 may have occurred. As a result of this ownership change certain of the
Company’s net operating loss, capital loss and credit carryforwards will expire prior to full utilization. The Company has
reduced its carryforwards by those amounts in the disclosures herein.
The
Company performs an analysis each year to determine whether the expected future income will more likely than not be sufficient
to realize the deferred tax assets. The Company's recent operating results and projections of future income weighed heavily in
the Company's overall assessment. Prior to 2012, there were no provisions (or benefits) for income taxes because the Company had
sustained cumulative losses since the commencement of operations.
The
Company’s continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters as a component of
income tax expense. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there was no accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
The
Company is subject to U.S. federal income taxes and to income taxes in various states in the United States. Tax regulations within
each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to
apply. Due to the Company's net operating loss carryforwards all years remain open to examination by the major domestic taxing
jurisdictions to which the Company is subject. In addition, all of the net operating loss and credit carryforwards that may be
used in future years are still subject to adjustment. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has completed its examination of the
Company’s 2013 Corporation Income tax Return. The Company has agreed to certain adjustments proposed by the IRS and is appealing
others. Separately, the IRS has questioned the Company’s classification of certain individuals as independent contractors
rather than employees. The Company estimates its potential liability to be $165 but the liability, if any, upon final disposition
of these matters is uncertain.
14.
|
CONCENTRATIONS
OF CREDIT RISK
|
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist of cash in financial institutions. The
Company maintains deposits in federally-insured financial institutions. Cash held with financial institutions may exceed the amount
of insurance provided on such deposits; however, management believes the Company is not exposed to significant credit risk due
to the financial position of the financial institutions in which those deposits are held.
The Company grants
credit under normal payment terms, generally without collateral, to its customers. These customers primarily consist of telephone
companies, cable television multiple system operators and electric and gas utilities. With respect to a portion of the services
provided to these customers, the Company has certain statutory lien rights that may in certain circumstances enhance the Company’s
collection efforts. Adverse changes in overall business and economic factors may impact the Company’s customers and increase
credit risks. These risks may be heightened as a result of the current economic developments and market volatility. In the past,
some of the Company’s customers have experienced significant financial difficulties and likewise, some may experience financial
difficulties in the future. These difficulties expose the Company to increased risks related to the collectability of amounts due
for services performed. The Company believes that none of its significant customers were experiencing financial difficulties that
would impact the collectability of the Company’s trade accounts receivable as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
For
the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had three customers accounting for 10% or greater of consolidated revenues. The
Company did not have a customer accounting for 10% or greater of consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016. As
of, and for the year ended, December 31, 2017, concentrations of significant customers within the applications and infrastructure
and professional services segments were as follows:
2017
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Uline
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Ericsson, Inc
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
AT&T Inc.
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Geographic
Concentration Risk
Substantially
all of the Company’s customers are located within the United States and Puerto Rico.
15.
|
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
|
The
Company leases certain of its properties under leases that expire on various dates through 2020. Some of these agreements include
escalation clauses and provide for renewal options ranging from one to five years.
Rent
expense incurred under the Company’s operating leases amounted to $441 and $692 during the years ended December 31, 2017
and 2016, respectively.
The
future minimum obligation during each year through 2020 under the leases with non-cancelable terms in excess of one year is as
follows:
Years
Ending December 31,
|
|
Future
Minimum Lease Payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
2019
|
|
|
97
|
|
2020
|
|
|
57
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
16.
|
STOCKHOLDERS’
DEFICIT
|
Preferred
Stock:
Designation
of Series J Preferred Stock
On
July 20, 2017, the Board of Directors designated 1,000 shares of the Company’s authorized preferred stock, with a par value
of $0.0001 per share, as Series J preferred stock. The Series J preferred stock has a stated value of $4,916 per share, is not
redeemable and, except as otherwise required by law, shall be voted together with the Company’s common stock and any other
series of preferred stock then outstanding, and not as a separate class, at any meeting of the stockholders of the Company upon
any matter upon which the holders of common stock have the right to vote, except that the aggregate voting power of the Series
J preferred stock shall be equal to 51% of the total voting power of the Company. The holders of Series J preferred stock also
have a liquidation preference in the amount of $4,916 per share that is senior to the distributions, if any, to be paid to the
holders of common stock.
Exchange
of related party debt for preferred stock
On
July 25, 2017, Mark Munro, CEO, and Mark Durfee, Board Member, exchanged their outstanding related party debt for the Company’s
Series J preferred stock with special voting rights. Mark Munro converted principal and interest of $1,709 and $195, respectively.
Mark Durfee converted principal and interest of $2,550 and $464, respectively. As a result of the exchange, Mark Munro and Mark
Durfee received 387 and 613 shares, respectively, of the Company’s Series J preferred stock (Refer to Note 13, Related Parties,
for further detail). The fair value of the Series J Preferred Stock on date of issuance was $1,753. The difference between the
fair value of the preferred stock and the debt converted was included in additional paid in capital.
Common
Stock:
Public
Offering
On
November 5, 2013, the Company completed an offering of its common stock in which the Company sold 3,125 shares of common stock
at a price of $1,600.00 per share. In connection with the offering, 1,563 warrants to purchase 1,563 shares of common stock were
also sold at $4.00 per warrant. The net proceeds to the Company from the offering after underwriting discounts and expenses was
$4,550. Of the 1,563 warrants sold, 278 were exercised as of December 31, 2017.
Basis
for determining fair value of shares issued
The
Company determines the value at which to record common stock issued in connection with acquisitions, debt conversions and settlements,
loan modifications and employee and non-employee compensation arrangements, using the market price of the common stock on the
date of issuance.
Issuance
of shares of common stock to non-employees for services
During
February 2016, the Company issued 453 shares of its common stock to consultants in exchange for consulting services relating to
corporate matters. The shares were valued at fair value at $208.00 per share and were immediately vested. The Company recorded
$9 to salaries and wages expense as $85 was accrued as of December 31, 2015.
During
March 2016, the Company issued 228 shares of its common stock to consultants in exchange for consulting services relating to corporate
matters. The shares were valued at fair value at $272.00 per share and were immediately vested. The Company recorded $62 to salaries
and wages expense.
During
July 2016, the Company issued 706 shares of common stock to consultants in exchange for consulting services relating to corporate
matters. Of the shares issued, 143 were immediately vested and valued at fair value of $232.00. The Company recorded $33 to salaries
and wages expense. The remaining 563 shares vest on varying schedules through December 31, 2018.
During
January 2017, the Company issued 1,250 shares of its common stock to an investor relations firm for services provided to the Company.
The shares were valued at fair value at $10.00 per share and were immediately vested. The Company recorded $12 to salaries and
wages expense on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Issuance of shares of common stock to
employees for services
During January 2017,
the Company issued 13,000 shares of its common stock to employees and directors for services performed. The shares were valued
at fair value of $7.00 per share and vest on varying schedules through January 26, 2020. The Company recorded $1 to salaries and
wages expense on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to acquisition of assets of SDN Essentials, LLC
In
January 2016, the Company issued 2,500 shares of common stock valued at $400.00 per share in connection with the acquisition of
assets of SDNE. In addition to the shares, the Company paid $50 in cash and an earn out provision of $515, subject to SDNE meeting
certain revenue targets.
During
July 2016, the Company issued a pool of 125 shares of the Company’s common stock, which was allocated among employees of
SDNE.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to Dominion Capital LLC promissory notes
In
January 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,167 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes
payable aggregating $583. The shares were issued at $500.00 per share, per the terms of the notes payable.
In
February 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,623 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes
payable and accrued interest aggregating $590. The shares were issued at $500.00 per share, per the terms of the notes payable.
In
March 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,007 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes payable
aggregating $289. The shares were issued at $500.00 per share, per the terms of the notes payable.
In
June 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 712 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes payable
and accrued interest aggregating $156. The shares were issued at $220.00 per share, per the terms of the notes payable.
In
July 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 1472 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes payable
and accrued interest aggregating $283. The shares were issued at average fair value of $184.00 per share, per the terms of the
agreements.
In
August 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,509 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes
payable and accrued interest aggregating $207. The shares were issued at average fair value of $140.00 per share, per the terms
of the agreements.
In
September 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,162 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes
payable and accrued interest aggregating $287. The shares were issued at average fair value of $60.00 per share, per the terms
of the agreements.
In
October 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 7,756 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes
payable and accrued interest aggregating $196. The shares were issued at average fair value of $24.00 per share, per the terms
of the agreements.
In
November 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 16,670 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes
payable and accrued interest aggregating $224. The shares were issued at average fair value of $12.00 per share, per the terms
of the agreements.
In
December 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 41,241 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes
payable and accrued interest aggregating $268. The shares were issued at average fair value of $8.00 per share, per the terms
of the agreements.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to Dominion Capital LLC August 6, 2015 promissory note
During
January 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 56,276 shares of common stock to Dominion Capital LLC upon the conversion of
$333 of principal and accrued interest of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at $600.00 per share, per the terms of the
notes payable.
During
February 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 67,502 shares of common stock to Dominion Capital LLC upon the conversion of
$357 of principal and accrued interest of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at $5.00 per share, per the terms of the
notes payable.
During
March 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 133,323 shares of common stock to Dominion Capital LLC upon the conversion of $528
of principal and accrued interest of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at $4.00 per share, per the terms of the notes
payable.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to Dominion Capital LLC November 4, 2016 promissory note
During
July 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 178,119 shares of common stock to Dominion Capital LLC upon the conversion of $509
of principal and accrued interest of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $3.00 per share, per the terms
of the notes payable.
During
October 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 63,691 shares of common stock to Dominion Capital LLC upon the conversion of
$20 of principal and accrued interest of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $0.31 per share, per the
terms of the notes payable.
During
November 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 212,718 shares of common stock to Dominion Capital LLC upon the conversion of
$57 of principal and accrued interest of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $0.27 per share, per the
terms of the notes payable.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to Smithline senior convertible promissory note
In
February 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 499 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes
payable and accrued interest aggregating $75. The shares were issued at $152.00 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
In
March 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 265 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes payable
aggregating $49. The shares were issued at $184.00 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
In
April 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 185 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes payable
and accrued interest aggregating $48. The shares were issued at $260.00 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
In
May 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 222 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes payable
and accrued interest aggregating $48. The shares were issued at $216.00 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
In
June 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 171 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes payable
and accrued interest aggregating $47. The shares were issued at $276.00 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
In
July 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 246 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes payable
and accrued interest aggregating $47. The shares were issued at $192.00 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
In
August 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 377 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes payable
and accrued interest aggregating $57. The shares were issued at $152.00 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
February 2017, the Company issued 4,577 shares of its common stock to Smithline upon the conversion of $23 of principal of a note
outstanding. The shares were issued at $5.00 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
March 2017, the Company issued 53,952 shares of its common stock to Smithline upon the conversion of $223 of principal of a note
outstanding. The shares were issued at $4.00 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
August 2017, the Company issued 49,415 shares of its common stock to Smithline upon the conversion of $117 of principal amount
and $18 of accrued interest of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $2.70 per share, per the terms of the
note payable.
During
October 2017, the Company issued 25,792 shares of its common stock to Smithline upon the conversion of $19 of principal amount
and $1 of accrued interest of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $0.75 per share, per the terms of the
note payable.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to Bridge Financing Provision
In
January 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,250 shares of common stock to a third-party lender in satisfaction of notes
payable aggregating $320. The shares were valued at fair value at $256.00 per share.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to acquisition of assets of 8760 Enterprises, Inc.
In
September 2016, the Company issued 2,250 shares of common stock valued at $60.00 per share in connection with the acquisition
of assets of 8760 Enterprises. In addition to the shares, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 1,875 shares of common stock,
at an exercise price of $800.00 per share, with a term of four years. The Company determined that the fair value of the warrants
was $36, which is included in common stock warrants within the stockholders’ deficit section on the condensed consolidated
balance sheet as of September 30, 2016. In addition to the shares, the Company recorded contingent common stock of $16 along with
contingent consideration of $334, subject to 8760 Enterprises meeting certain targets.
Issuance
of shares to JGB Concord and JGB Waltham
In
June 2016, the Company issued 2,250 shares of common stock valued at $368.00 per share as a concession for restructuring certain
debt agreements. The Company recorded these shares as a loss on fair value of debt extinguishment of $828 on the consolidated
statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.
In
September 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 11,483 shares of common stock to JGB Concord and JGB Waltham in satisfaction
of notes payable and accrued interest aggregating $586. The shares were issued at average fair value of $52.00 per share, per
the terms of the agreements.
In
October 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,014 shares of common stock to JGB Concord and JGB Waltham in satisfaction of
notes payable and accrued interest aggregating $226. The shares were issued at average fair value of $24.00 per share, per the
terms of the agreements.
In
November 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 18,878 shares of common stock to JGB Concord and JGB Waltham in satisfaction
of notes payable and accrued interest aggregating $301. The shares were issued at average fair value of $16.00 per share, per
the terms of the agreements.
In
December 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 14,400 shares of common stock to JGB Concord and JGB Waltham in satisfaction
of notes payable and accrued interest aggregating $191. The shares were issued at average fair value of $12.00 per share, per
the terms of the agreements.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to JGB Concord senior secured convertible debenture
During
January 2017, the Company issued 42,863 shares of common stock to JGB Concord pursuant to conversion of $290 principal amount
and $1 of accrued interest related to the outstanding February 2016 senior secured convertible debenture. The shares were issued
at $7.00 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
February 2017, the Company issued 7,797 shares of common stock to JGB Concord pursuant to conversion of $45 principal amount and
$1 of accrued interest related to the outstanding February 2016 senior secured convertible debenture. The shares were issued at
$6.00 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
March 2017, the Company issued 163,663 shares of common stock to JGB Concord pursuant to conversion of $615 principal amount and
$1 of accrued interest related to the outstanding February 2016 senior secured convertible debenture. The shares were issued at
$4.00 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
July 2017, the Company issued 106,556 shares of common stock to JGB Concord pursuant to conversion of $100 principal amount related
to the outstanding February 2016 senior secured convertible debenture. The shares were issued at an average of $0.50 per share,
per the terms of the note payable.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to JGB Waltham senior secured convertible debenture
During
July 2017, the Company issued 373,438 shares of common stock to JGB Waltham pursuant to conversion of $350 principal amount and
$1 of accrued interest related to the outstanding February 2016 senior secured convertible debenture. The shares were issued at
an average of $0.90 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
August 2017, the Company issued 106,425 shares of common stock to JGB Waltham pursuant to conversion of $100 principal amount
related to the outstanding February 2016 senior secured convertible debenture. The shares were issued at an average of $0.90 per
share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
November 2017, the Company issued 63,282 shares of common stock to JGB Waltham pursuant to conversion of $20 principal amount
related to the outstanding February 2016 senior secured convertible debenture. The shares were issued at an average of $0.32 per
share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
December 2017, the Company issued 224,747 shares of common stock to JGB Waltham pursuant to conversion of $40 principal amount
related to the outstanding February 2016 senior secured convertible debenture. The shares were issued at an average of $0.18 per
share, per the terms of the note payable.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to Forward Investments, LLC promissory notes
In
July 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,984 shares of common stock to a related-party lender in satisfaction of notes
payable aggregating $446. The shares were issued at average fair value of $220.00 per share, per the terms of the agreements.
In
August 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,318 shares of common stock to a related-party lender in satisfaction of notes
payable aggregating $396. The shares were issued at average fair value of $176.00 per share, per the terms of the agreements.
In
September 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,911 shares of common stock to a related-party lender in satisfaction of notes
payable aggregating $620. The shares were issued at average fair value of $60.00 per share, per the terms of the agreements.
In
October 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,633 shares of common stock to a related-party lender in satisfaction of notes
payable aggregating $156. The shares were issued at average fair value of $28.00 per share, per the terms of the agreements.
In
November 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 9,973 shares of common stock to a related-party lender in satisfaction of notes
payable aggregating $182. The shares were issued at average fair value of $20.00 per share, per the terms of the agreements.
In
December 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 31,809 shares of common stock to a related-party lender in satisfaction of notes
payable aggregating $439. The shares were issued at average fair value of $12.00 per share, per the terms of the agreements.
During
January 2017, the Company issued 78,490 shares of its common stock to Forward Investments, LLC upon conversion of $582 principal
amount of promissory notes outstanding. The shares were issued at $7.00 per share, per the terms of the notes payable.
During
February 2017, the Company issued 118,814 shares of its common stock to Forward Investments, LLC upon conversion of $867 principal
amount of promissory notes outstanding. The shares were issued at $7.00 per share, per the terms of the notes payable.
During
March 2017, the Company issued 207,599 shares of its common stock to Forward Investments, LLC upon conversion of $1,365 principal
amount of promissory notes outstanding. The shares were issued at $7.00 per share, per the terms of the notes payable.
During
July 2017, the Company issued 446,412 shares of its common stock to Forward Investments, LLC upon conversion of $1,172 principal
amount of promissory notes outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $2.60 per share, per the terms of the notes
payable.
During
August 2017, the Company issued 601,354 shares of its common stock to Forward Investments, LLC upon conversion of $790 principal
amount of promissory notes outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $1.30 per share, per the terms of the notes
payable.
During
October 2017, the Company issued 529,959 shares of its common stock to Forward Investments, LLC upon conversion of $331 principal
amount of promissory notes outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $0.62 per share, per the terms of the notes
payable.
During
November 2017, the Company issued 917,475 shares of its common stock to Forward Investments, LLC upon conversion of $327 principal
amount of promissory notes outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $0.36 per share, per the terms of the notes
payable.
Issuance
of shares to related parties
During
July 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 625 shares of common stock to related party lenders in satisfaction of notes payables
aggregating to $200. The shares were valued at fair value at $320.00 per share, per the terms of the notes payables.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to MEF I, L.P. convertible promissory note
During
March 2017, the Company issued 5,000 shares of its common stock to MEF I, L.P. upon the conversion of $18 principal amount and
$1 of accrued interest of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at $4.00 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
July 2017, the Company issued 206,145 shares of its common stock to MEF I, L.P. upon the conversion of $441 principal amount and
$20 of accrued interest of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $2.20 per share, per the terms of the note
payable.
During
August 2017, the Company issued 65,785 shares of its common stock to MEF I, L.P. upon the conversion of $91 principal amount and
$4 of accrued interest of a note outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $1.50 per share, per the terms of the note
payable.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to RDW April 3, 2017 convertible promissory note
During
July 2017, the Company issued 17,452 shares of its common stock to RDW upon the conversion of $100 principal amount of a note
outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $5.70 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to RDW July 18, 2017 convertible promissory note
During
July 2017, the Company issued 125,471 shares of its common stock to RDW upon the conversion of $253 principal amount of a note
outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $2.00 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
August 2017, the Company issued 297,933 shares of its common stock to RDW upon the conversion of $355 principal amount of a note
outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $1.20 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
September 2017, the Company issued 123,457 shares of its common stock to RDW upon the conversion of $100 principal amount of a
note outstanding. The shares were issued at $0.80 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
October 2017, the Company issued 129,840 shares of its common stock to RDW upon the conversion of $103 principal amount of a note
outstanding. The shares were issued at $0.79 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
November 2017, the Company issued 1,285,559 shares of its common stock to RDW upon the conversion of $354 principal amount of
a note outstanding. The shares were issued at $0.28 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
December 2017, the Company issued 255,141 shares of its common stock to RDW upon the conversion of $51 principal amount of a note
outstanding. The shares were issued at $0.20 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to RDW October 12, 2017 convertible promissory note
During
October 2017, the Company issued 289,322 shares of its common stock to RDW upon the conversion of $133 principal amount of a note
outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $0.46 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
During
November 2017, the Company issued 334,671 shares of its common stock to RDW upon the conversion of $133 principal amount of a
note outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $0.40 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to RDW December 8, 2017 convertible promissory note
During
December 2017, the Company issued 781,513 shares of its common stock to RDW upon the conversion of $120 principal amount of a
note outstanding. The shares were issued at an average of $0.15 per share, per the terms of the note payable.
Issuance
of shares pursuant to JGB Waltham warrant exercises
During
August 2017, the Company issued 62,261 shares of its common stock to JGB Waltham upon the cashless exercise of $250 of an outstanding
warrant. The shares were issued at an exercise price of $0.90 per share.
During
September 2017, the Company issued 76,165 shares of its common stock to JGB Waltham upon the cashless exercise of $250 of an outstanding
warrant. The shares were issued at an exercise price of $0.90 per share.
During
October 2017, the Company issued 172,552 shares of its common stock to JGB Waltham upon the cashless exercise of $500 of an outstanding
warrant. The shares were issued at an exercise price of $0.66 per share.
Issuance
of shares due to rounding differences resulting from reverse stock split
During
July 2017, the Company issued 126 additional shares based on rounding differences resulting from the one-for-four reverse stock
split which was effective as of the open of trading on July 12, 2017.
Purchase
of treasury shares
During
March 2016, the Company repurchased 5 shares from the Ian Gist Cancer Research Fund. The shares were valued at fair value at $216.00
per share.
During
March 2016, the Company repurchased 354 shares at par value of $0.0001 per share from twenty employees who terminated employment.
During
June 2016, the Company repurchased 138 shares at par value of $0.0001 per share from twelve employees who terminated employment.
During
November 2016, the Company repurchased 250 shares at par value of $.0001 per share from a third party who terminated their consulting
agreement.
During
December 2016, the Company repurchased 1,250 shares at par value of $.0001 per share from an employee who terminated employment.
During
January 2017, the Company repurchased 817 shares of its common stock at par value of $0.0001 per share from employees who terminated
employment.
During
April 2017, the Company repurchased 104 shares of its common stock at par value of $0.0001 per share from employees who terminated
employment.
Cancellation
of shares
During
March 2017, 16,944 shares of the Company’s common stock issued to Dominion Capital LLC during 2016 were cancelled.
During
September 2017, 3,069 shares of the Company’s common stock issued to former employees were cancelled.
17.
|
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
|
The
Company adopted formal stock option plans in 2012 and 2015. The Company issued options prior to the adoption of this plan, but
the amount was not material. Historically, the Company has awarded stock grants to certain of its employees and consultants that
did not contain any performance or service conditions. Compensation expense included in the Company’s consolidated statement
of operations includes the fair value of the awards at the time of issuance. When common stock was issued, it was valued at the
trading price on the date of issuance and was expensed as it was issued. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company
granted an aggregate of 5,141 shares under the 2015 performance incentive plan, of which 669 shares were subject to a 3-year vesting
term, 2,448 shares were subject to 6-month vesting, 250 shares were scheduled to vest on January 1, 2017, 1,032 shares were scheduled
to vest on June 30, 2017, 188 shares were scheduled to vest on December 31, 2017, and 554 shares had no vesting terms. During
the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company granted an aggregate of 1,250 shares under the 2015 performance incentive plan,
all of which were subject to a 3-year vesting term.
2012
Performance Incentive Plan, Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and 2015 Performance Incentive Plan
On
November 16, 2012, the Company adopted its 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Equity Incentive Plan") and its Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (the "Stock Purchase Plan"). Both plans were established to attract, motivate, retain and reward
selected employees and other eligible persons. For the Equity Incentive Plan, employees, officers, directors and consultants who
provide services to the Company or one of the Company’s subsidiaries may be selected to receive awards. A total of 5,813
shares of the Company’s common stock was authorized for issuance with respect to awards granted under the Equity Incentive
Plan. On January 1, 2015, pursuant to the terms of the Equity Incentive Plan, an additional 1,250 shares of the Company’s
common stock were made available for issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan. From the inception of the Equity Incentive Plan
through the year ended December 31, 2017, an aggregate of 7,213 shares were granted under the Equity Incentive Plan, and 373 shares
authorized under the Equity Incentive Plan remain available for award purposes. In connection with the Company’s adoption
of the Company’s 2015 Performance Incentive Plan, which is discussed below, the Company agreed that no additional grants
of awards will be made under the Equity Incentive Plan.
The
Stock Purchase Plan is designed to allow the Company’s eligible employees and the eligible employees of the Company’s
participating subsidiaries to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, at semi-annual intervals, with their accumulated
payroll deductions. A total of 1,250 shares of the Company’s common stock was initially available for issuance under the
Stock Purchase Plan. The share limit will automatically increase on the first trading day in January of each year (commencing
with January 2014) by an amount equal to lesser of (i) 1% of the total number of outstanding shares of the Company’s common
stock on the last trading day in December in the prior year, (ii) 1,250 shares, or (iii) such lesser number as determined by the
Company’s board of directors. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, no shares had been purchased under the Stock Purchase Plan
and, at December 31, 2017, 2,190 shares were authorized for issuance under the Stock Purchase Plan.
On June 26, 2015,
the Company adopted, and on September 21, 2015, the Company’s stockholders approved, the Company’s 2015 Performance
Incentive Plan (the “Performance Incentive Plan”). The plan was established to provide a means through the grant of
awards to attract, motivate, retain, and reward selected employees and other eligible persons. For the Performance Incentive Plan,
employees, officers, directors and consultants who provide services to the Company or one of the Company’s subsidiaries
may be selected to receive awards. A total of 710,791 shares of the Company’s common stock is authorized for issuance with
respect to awards granted under the Performance Incentive Plan. In addition, the share reserve under the Performance Incentive
Plan will be increased to include shares subject to outstanding awards under the Equity Incentive Plan that are forfeited, cancelled
or otherwise settled under the Equity Incentive Plan without the issuance of shares of common stock. The number of authorized
shares under the Performance Incentive Plan will automatically increase on the first trading day in January of each year (commencing
with January 2016) by an amount equal to lesser of (i) 7.5% of the total number of outstanding shares of the Company’s common
stock on the last trading day in December in the prior year, and (ii) such lesser number as determined by the Company’s
board of directors. Any shares subject to awards that are not paid, delivered or exercised before they expire or are canceled
or terminated, or fail to vest, as well as shares used to pay the purchase or exercise price of awards or related tax withholding
obligations, will become available for other award grants under the Performance Incentive Plan. During the year ended December
31, 2017, the Company repurchased 3,115 shares previously granted. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, 13,000 and
6,390 shares, respectively, were granted under the Performance Incentive Plan, and at December 31, 2017 and 2016, 14,906 and 3,634
shares, respectively, authorized under the Performance Incentive Plan remained available for award purposes.
Restricted
Stock
The
following table summarizes the Company’s restricted stock unit activity for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
5,058
|
|
|
$
|
1,400.00
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
5,835
|
|
|
$
|
236.00
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(1,681
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,664.00
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(1,991
|
)
|
|
$
|
460.00
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
7,221
|
|
|
$
|
657.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.91
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
$
|
231.00
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(3,115
|
)
|
|
$
|
619.21
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
16,856
|
|
|
$
|
169.00
|
|
For
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred $13 and $85, respectively, in stock compensation expense from
the issuance of common stock to employees and consultants.
The
Company recorded an additional $1,160 and $3,384 in stock compensation expense on shares subject to vesting terms in previous
periods during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Issuance
of shares of common stock to employees, directors, and officers
During
July 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,111 shares of its common stock to various employees and officers for services
rendered. The shares were valued between $232.00 and $272.00 per share. The Company recorded the expense to salaries and wages
expense.
During
January 2017, the Company issued 13,000 shares of its common stock to employees and directors for services performed. The shares
were valued at fair value of $7.00 per share and vest on varying schedules through January 26, 2020. The Company recorded the
expense to salaries and wages expense.
Issuance
of shares of common stock to employees for incentive earned
During March 2016,
the Company issued an aggregate of 184 shares to an employee in settlement of incentives earned. The shares were valued at $272.00
per share. The Company had accrued for $50 of the expense in 2015.
During
July 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 163 shares to two employees in settlement of incentives earned subject to a six-month
vesting schedule. The Company recorded the expense to salaries and wages expense.
The
following table summarizes the amount of stock compensation expense to be recognized for vesting shares.
Years
Ending December 31,
|
|
Future
Stock Compensation Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
2019
|
|
|
30
|
|
2020
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
Options
The
following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity and related information for the years ended December 31,
2017 and 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Underlying Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Remaining Contractual Term
(in years)
|
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2016
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
$
|
1,488.00
|
|
|
|
6.29
|
|
|
$
|
476
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Forfeited and expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
$
|
1,488.00
|
|
|
|
5.29
|
|
|
$
|
646
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
$
|
1,488.00
|
|
|
|
5.29
|
|
|
$
|
615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Forfeited and expired
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,488.00
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
$
|
1,488.00
|
|
|
|
4.29
|
|
|
$
|
620
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
$
|
1,488.00
|
|
|
|
4.29
|
|
|
$
|
620
|
|
The
aggregate intrinsic value for outstanding options is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying
awards and the quoted price of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 of $0.27 and $12.00, respectively.
Designation of Series J Preferred Stock
On July 20, 2017, the
Board of Directors designated 1,000 shares of the Company’s authorized preferred stock, with a par value of $0.0001 per share,
as Series J preferred stock. The Series J preferred stock has a stated value of $4,916 per share, is not redeemable and, except
as otherwise required by law, shall be voted together with the Company’s common stock and any other series of preferred stock
then outstanding, and not as a separate class, at any meeting of the stockholders of the Company upon any matter upon which the
holders of common stock have the right to vote, except that the aggregate voting power of the Series J preferred stock shall be
equal to 51% of the total voting power of the Company. The holders of Series J preferred stock also have a liquidation preference
in the amount of $4,916 per share that is senior to the distributions, if any, to be paid to the holders of common stock.
Designation of Series K
Preferred Stock
On November 10, 2017,
the Board of Directors designated 3,000 shares of the Company’s authorized preferred stock, with a par value of $0.0001 per
share, as Series K preferred stock. The Series K preferred stock has a stated value of $10,000 per share. The Series K preferred
stock is convertible into common stock of the Company at the lower of $3.00 or 95% of the weighted average trading price for the
five days prior to conversion. The Series K preferred stock has a liquidation preference equal to $10,000 per share. There are
no dividends on the Series K preferred stock. 1,512 shares of the Series K preferred stock were issued and outstanding as of December
31, 2017.
Designation of Series L Preferred Stock
On October 12, 2017,
the Board of Directors designated 1,000 shares of the Company’s authorized preferred stock, with a par value of $0.0001 per
share, as Series L preferred stock. The Series L preferred stock has a stated value of $10,000 per share. The Series L preferred
stock is convertible into common stock of the Company at 105% of the weighted average trading price for the five days prior to
conversion. The Series L preferred stock has a liquidation preference equal to $10,000 per share. There are no dividends on the
Series L preferred stock. 227 shares of the Series L preferred stock were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017.
Designation of Series M Preferred Stock
On December 1, 2017,
the Board of Directors designated 500 shares of the Company’s authorized preferred stock, with a par value of $0.0001 per
share, as Series M preferred stock. The Series M preferred stock has a stated value of $10,000 per share. The Series M preferred
stock is convertible into common stock of the Company at 105% of the weighted average trading price for the five days prior to
conversion. The Series M preferred stock has a liquidation preference equal to $10,000 per share. There are no dividends on the
Series M preferred stock. 386 shares of the Series M preferred stock were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017.
Exchange of related party debt for preferred
stock
On July 25, 2017, Mark
Munro, CEO, and Mark Durfee, Board Member, exchanged their outstanding related party debt for the Company’s Series J preferred
stock with special voting rights. Mark Munro converted principal and interest of $1,709 and $195, respectively. Mark Durfee converted
principal and interest of $2,550 and $464, respectively. As a result of the exchange, Mark Munro and Mark Durfee received 387 and
613 shares, respectively, of the Company’s Series J preferred stock (Refer to Note 13, Related Parties, for further detail).
The fair value of the Series J Preferred Stock on date of issuance was $1,753. The difference between the fair value of the preferred
stock and the debt converted was included in additional paid in capital.
Exchange of term loan Debt and Employee
Warrants for Preferred Stock
On October 12, 2017,
a note holder agreed to exchange $5,430 held in promissory notes into 227 shares of the Company’s Series L preferred stock.
On November 10, 2017, two note holders converted $15,128 of principal and accrued interest into 1,512
shares of the Company’s Series K preferred stock
On December 1, 2017,
two employees exchanged warrants to purchase 382,300 shares of the Company’s common stock for 386 shares of the Company’s
Series M preferred stock.
Temporary Equity
The Company evaluated and concluded that it’s Series K and L Preferred Stock did not meet the criteria
in ASC 480-10 and thus were not considered liabilities. The Company evaluated and concluded that the embedded conversion feature
in Preferred Series K and L and determined that the embedded conversion feature needs to be bifurcated (refer to Note 12, Derivative
Instruments, for further information regarding the embedded conversions features of the Series K and L preferred stock). In accordance
with ASR 268 these equity securities are required to be classified outside of permanent equity since they are redeemable for cash.
These shares are not currently redeemable and are not probable of being redeemed and thus have been recorded based on their fair
value at the time of issuance. If redemption becomes probable, or the shares will become redeemable, they will be recorded
to redemption value.
A summary of the transactions
related to the Company’s Series K, and L preferred stock classified as temporary equity during the year ended December 31,
2017 is as follows:
|
|
Series K Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Series L Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Dollar Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Dollar Amount
|
|
Issuance of shares in settlement of debt obligations
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Issuance of shares in settlement of debt obligations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
At
December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had outstanding the following notes payable to related parties:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory note issued to CamaPlan FBO Mark Munro IRA, 3% interest, matured on January 1, 2018, unsecured, net of debt discount of $38
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
658
|
|
Promissory note issued to 1112 Third Avenue Corp, 3% interest, matured on January 1, 2018, unsecured, net of debt discount of $36
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
Promissory note issued to Mark Munro, 3% interest, matured on January 1, 2018, unsecured, net of debt discount of $62
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
Promissory note issued to Pascack Road, LLC, 3% interest, matured on January 1, 2018, unsecured, net of debt discount of $152
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,398
|
|
Promissory notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC, between 2% and 10% interest, matured on July 1, 2016, unsecured
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,235
|
|
Promissory notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC, 3% interest, matured on January 1, 2018, unsecured, net of debt discount of $860
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,513
|
|
Promissory notes issued to Forward Investments, LLC, 6.5% interest, matured on July 1, 2016, unsecured
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
Former owner of IPC, unsecured, 8% interest, matured on May 30, 2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,755
|
|
Former owner of IPC, unsecured, 15% interest
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Former owner of Nottingham, unsecured, 8% interest, matured on May 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
Promissory note issued to Pascack Road, LLC, unsecured, due on demand
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
18,163
|
|
Less: current portion of debt
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(9,531
|
)
|
Long-term portion of notes payable, related parties
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
8,632
|
|
Future
maturities of related party debt are as follows:
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payments
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
The
interest expense, including amortization of debt discounts, associated with the related-party notes payable in the years ended
December 31, 2017 and 2016 amounted to $220 and $3,515, respectively.
All
notes payable to related parties are subordinate to the JGB (Cayman) Waltham Ltd. and JGB (Cayman) Concord Ltd. term loan notes.
Related
Party Promissory Notes to Mark Munro, CamaPlan FBO Mark Munro IRA, 1112 Third Avenue Corp, and Pascack Road, LLC
On
July 25, 2017, Mark Munro, CEO, and Mark Durfee, Board Member, exchanged their outstanding related party debt for the Company’s
Series J preferred stock with special voting rights. Mark Munro converted principal and interest of $1,709 and $195, respectively.
Mark Durfee converted principal and interest of $2,550 and $464, respectively. As a result of the exchange, Mark Munro and Mark
Durfee received 387 and 613 shares, respectively, of the Company’s Series J preferred stock (Refer to Note 16, Stockholders’
Deficit, for further detail).
Convertible
Promissory Note to Scott Davis, Former Owner of Nottingham
On
July 1, 2014, the Company issued an unsecured $250 convertible promissory note to Scott Davis, who was a related party. The note
bore interest at the rate of 8% per annum, originally matured on January 1, 2015 and was convertible into shares of the Company’s
common stock at an initial conversion price of $2,636.00. The Company evaluated the convertible feature and determined that the
value was de minimis and as such, the Company did not bifurcate the convertible feature.
On
March 25, 2015, the Company and Mr. Davis agreed to a modification of the convertible promissory note. The term of the note was
extended to May 30, 2016, the initial conversion price was amended to $888.00 per share of the Company’s common stock and,
in consideration for this modification, the Company issued to Mr. Davis 56 shares of common stock with a fair value of $864.00
per share.
On
May 31, 2015, Mr. Davis converted $25 of principal amount of the note into 29 shares of common stock, with a fair value of $1,412.00
per share and the Company recorded a loss on debt conversion of $13 on the consolidated statement of operations.
On
May 30, 2016, the note matured and was due on demand.
On
April 3, 2017, Scott Davis assigned the full outstanding principal amount of the note to a third party (refer to Note 11, Term
Loans, for additional detail).
Related
Party Promissory Note to Pascack Road, LLC
On December 28, 2017,
Pascack Road, LLC advanced $75 to the Company in return for a promissory note. The note did not accrue interest and was due on
demand. Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the note was converted into an accounts receivable loan (refer to Note 22, Subsequent
Events, for further detail).
Payments
to Owners of NGNWare
The
Company was a minority owner of 13.7% of NGNWare, LLC from December 17, 2015 to December 31, 2016, when the Company wrote off
the note from NGNWare as it was deemed uncollectible.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company paid the owners of 86.3% of NGNWare a salary of $6 and paid health insurance premiums
on their behalf of $16. The owners of NGNWare could not procure health insurance on their own, so the Company added them to its
health insurance plan. The amounts paid for salary and health insurance were included in the amount the Company invested in NGNWare.
Loans
to Employees
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued loans to employees totaling $928. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had
outstanding loans to four employees with total principal of $928. These loans are collateralized by shares of the Company’s
common stock held by the employees. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the value of the collateral was below the principal value.
As a result, the Company recorded a reserve for the balance of $924 and $891 on the consolidated balance sheet as of December
31, 2017 and 2016, respectively (refer to Note 4, Loans Receivable, for further detail).
The
Company has acquired three material companies since January 1, 2014. With each acquisition, the Company evaluated the newly-acquired
company’s sources of revenues and costs of revenues. Due to continued expansion, the Company evaluated its recent acquisitions
and their impact upon the existing segment structure. As of December 31, 2014, the Company operated within four operating segments
that were aggregated into three reportable segments. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company determined that its
activities within the cloud services operating segment were of a material nature to the Company as a whole and had different margins
than the other components of the managed services segment. As such, the Company determined that the cloud services and managed
services segments should be presented separately within the consolidated financial statements. During the year ended December
31, 2016, the Company sold VaultLogix and Axim, which had constituted a majority of the Company’s cloud services segment.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company sold the assets of its IPC subsidiary and returned its interest in Nottingham.
These entities had constituted the Company’s managed services segment. As of December 31, 2017, the Company determined that
it has two reportable segments: applications and infrastructure and professional services. The results of VaultLogix and
Axim, the former cloud services segment, and IPC and Nottingham, the former managed services segment, are included in discontinued
operations on the consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
The
Company identified its operating segments based on the services provided by its various operations and the financial information
used by its chief operating decision maker to make decisions regarding the allocation of resources to and the financial performance
of the operating segments. The reporting segments represent an aggregation of individual operating segments with similar economic
characteristics. The applications and infrastructure operating segment is an aggregation of the component operations of TNS, the
AWS Entities (sold by the Company in April 2017), Tropical (sold by the Company in April 2017 in connection with the sale of the
AWS entities), RM Leasing, and RM Engineering. The professional services operating segment is an aggregation of the operations
of the ADEX Entities (sold by the Company in February 2018) and SDNE (sold by the Company in May 2017). The managed services operating
segment is primarily comprised of the operations of IPC and RentVM.
In
addition to the operating segments, the Company has determined that certain costs related to the general operations of the Company
cannot be reasonably allocated to each individual segment. These costs are not part of the factors that the chief operating decision
maker uses to calculate gross margin. As such, the Company has chosen to present those costs within a general “Corporate”
line item for presentation purposes. The Company’s former VaultLogix and Axim subsidiaries, which were included in the Company’s
former cloud services segment, and the IPC subsidiary and Nottingham, which were included in the Company’s former managed
services segment, were reclassified as “discontinued operations” to conform to classifications used in the current
period related to the sale of VaultLogix, VaultLogix’s subsidiaries, Axim, and IPC and the return of the Company’s
interest in Nottingham. The segment information as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 has been retrospectively updated
to reflect this change.
Segment
information relating to the Company's results of continuing operations was as follows:
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications and infrastructure
|
|
$
|
12,009
|
|
|
$
|
22,173
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
22,511
|
|
|
|
36,937
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
34,520
|
|
|
$
|
59,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit by Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications and infrastructure
|
|
$
|
3,411
|
|
|
$
|
3,633
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
|
|
10,475
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,028
|
|
|
$
|
14,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) by Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications and infrastructure
|
|
$
|
(1,697
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,755
|
)
|
Professional services
|
|
|
(7,971
|
)
|
|
|
1,991
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(6,755
|
)
|
|
|
(12,753
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(16,423
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,517
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense by Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications and infrastructure
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
7,032
|
|
|
|
13,733
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,050
|
|
|
$
|
13,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets by Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications and infrastructure
|
|
$
|
3,807
|
|
|
$
|
16,177
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
7,244
|
|
|
|
21,334
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
5,364
|
|
|
|
1,669
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
15,389
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
16,456
|
|
|
$
|
54,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill by Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications and infrastructure
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,906
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,081
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
16,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization Expense by Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications and infrastructure
|
|
$
|
271
|
|
|
$
|
789
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
559
|
|
|
$
|
1,326
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues by Segment by Geographic Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications and infrastructure
|
|
$
|
11,415
|
|
|
$
|
594
|
|
|
$
|
12,009
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
22,281
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
22,511
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
33,696
|
|
|
$
|
824
|
|
|
$
|
34,520
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Revenues by Segment by Geographic Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications and infrastructure
|
|
$
|
21,254
|
|
|
$
|
919
|
|
|
$
|
22,173
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
36,582
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
36,937
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
57,836
|
|
|
$
|
1,274
|
|
|
$
|
59,110
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Gross Profit by Segment by Geographic Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications and infrastructure
|
|
$
|
3,114
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
3,411
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
3,617
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,679
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
$
|
7,028
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Gross Profit by Segment by Geographic Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications and infrastructure
|
|
$
|
3,428
|
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
3,633
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
10,418
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
10,475
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13,846
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
14,108
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) by Segment by Geographic Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications and infrastructure
|
|
$
|
(1,948
|
)
|
|
$
|
251
|
|
|
$
|
(1,697
|
)
|
Professional services
|
|
|
(8,024
|
)
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
(7,971
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(6,755
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6,755
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(16,727
|
)
|
|
$
|
304
|
|
|
$
|
(16,423
|
)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Operating Income (Loss) by Segment by Geographic Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications and infrastructure
|
|
$
|
(1,854
|
)
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
(1,755
|
)
|
Professional services
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
1,991
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(12,753
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12,753
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(12,663
|
)
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
(12,517
|
)
|
For
the year ended December 31, 2016, revenues from the largest customer of the applications and infrastructure and professional services
segments were $5,718 and $3,731, respectively, which represented 17% and 11%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated
revenue.
For
the year ended December 31, 2016, revenues from the largest customer of the applications and infrastructure and professional services
segments were $5,761 and $4,929, respectively, which represented 7% and 6%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated
revenue.
21.
|
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS
|
On
February 17, 2016, the Company consummated the sale of certain assets of its former wholly-owned subsidiary, VaultLogix, and its
subsidiaries, pursuant to the terms of an asset purchase agreement, dated as of February 17, 2016 among the Company, VaultLogix
and its subsidiaries and KeepItSafe, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The cash purchase price paid to the Company for the assets
was $24,000, which was paid to the Company as follows: (i) $22,000 paid in cash on the closing date and (ii) $2,000 deposited
in an escrow account to secure the performance of the obligations of the Company and VaultLogix, including any potential indemnification
claims, under the asset purchase agreement, to be released on February 17, 2017. The closing payments were subject to customary
working capital adjustments. On November 4, 2016, the Company, VaultLogix and its subsidiaries and KeepItSafe, Inc, executed a
settlement agreement, whereby for certain consideration, the Company received $150 of the escrow and KeepitSafe Inc. received
$1,850. The settlement agreement released all claims among the parties and eliminated any obligations subsequent to that date.
The
results of operations of VaultLogix and its subsidiaries have been included within the line-item labelled net loss on discontinued
operations, net of tax within the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company recorded
a gain on the disposal of these assets of $2,637 for the year ended December 31, 2016.
On
April 29, 2016, the Company consummated the disposal of certain assets of its former wholly-owned subsidiary, Axim, for the following
future consideration: in the event that the purchaser of Axim undertakes a sale or disposition of assets related to Axim, the
purchaser of Axim shall pay to the Company an amount equal to the lesser of (i) 50% of the gross proceeds of such sale or disposition
or (ii) $1,500.
The
results of operations of Axim have been included within the line-item labelled net loss on discontinued operations, net of tax
within the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company recorded a loss on the disposal
of these assets of $1,063 for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Effective
April 1, 2017, the Company returned its interest in Nottingham, a former VIE of the Company.
The
assets and liabilities of Nottingham have been included within the consolidated balance sheets as current assets and long term
assets and current liabilities of discontinued operations as of December 31, 2016. The results of operations of Nottingham have
been included within the line-item labelled net loss on discontinued operations, net of tax within the consolidated statement
of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company recorded a loss on the disposal of $464 for the year
ended December 31, 2017.
On
November 6, 2017, the Company consummated the disposal of certain assets and liabilities of its former wholly-owned
subsidiary, IPC. The assets and liabilities of IPC have been included within the consolidated balance sheets as current
assets and long term assets of discontinued operations and current liabilities of discontinued operations as of December 31,
2016. The results of operations of IPC have been included within the line-item labelled net loss on discontinued operations,
net of tax within the consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company
recorded a loss on disposal of these assets of $8,026 for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The
following table shows the major classes of the Company’s discontinued operations as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
4,096
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
Current assets of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
4,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,381
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,068
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Long-term assets of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued trade payables
|
|
$
|
3,011
|
|
|
$
|
4,447
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
3,339
|
|
|
$
|
6,620
|
|
|
|
For the year ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
7,409
|
|
|
$
|
20,267
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
5,461
|
|
|
|
13,467
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,948
|
|
|
|
6,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
Salaries and wages
|
|
|
1,574
|
|
|
|
5,049
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
2,767
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
Intangible asset impairment charge
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,459
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
|
|
13,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax loss from operations
|
|
|
(1,513
|
)
|
|
|
(6,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
Other expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on disposal of subsidiary
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
1,574
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax loss on discontinued operations
|
|
|
(1,559
|
)
|
|
|
(5,672
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
(1,559
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,672
|
)
|
1112 Third Avenue Corp Receivables Purchase
Agreement – January 3, 2018
On January 3, 2018,
the Company entered into a receivables purchase agreement whereby the Company sold $275 of receivables to 1112 Third Avenue Corp
in exchange for $275 in cash. The sale was unconditional, irrevocable, and without recourse to the Company.
Pascack Road, LLC Receivables Purchase
Agreement – January 3, 2018
On January 3, 2018,
the Company entered into a receivables purchase agreement whereby the Company sold $275 of receivables to Pascack Road, LLC in
exchange for $200 in cash and the conversion of a $75 promissory note outstanding as of December 31, 2017. The sale was unconditional,
irrevocable, and without recourse to the Company.
OTC Pink Current Information
Effective February
13, 2018, the Company’s common stock and warrants commenced trading on OTC Pink Current Information. Prior to February 13,
2018, the Company’s common stock and warrants were trading on the OTCQB Venture Market.
Sale of 19.9% of AWS in Exchange for
Warrant
On February 14, 2018,
the Company sold its remaining 19.9% share of AWS to Spectrum Global Solutions, Inc. (“Spectrum”) in exchange for a
warrant to purchase shares equal to 4% of the outstanding shares of Spectrum on the date the exercise notice is delivered, at an
exercise price of $0.0001 per share. The warrant expires on February 14, 2021.
Settlement of Earn-out From the Sale
of the AWS Entities
On February 16, 2018,
the Company settled the potential earn-out with the buyer of the AWS Entities, Spectrum. The Company received from Spectrum a convertible
promissory note in the principal amount of $794. The convertible promissory note accrues interest at a rate of 1% per annum and
is due on August 16, 2019. The note is convertible into shares of common stock of the buyer at a conversion price per share equal
to 80% of the lowest VWAP over the five (5) trading days immediately prior to, but not including, the conversion date.
Reverse Stock Split
On February 22, 2018,
the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment of its Certificate of Incorporation that effected a one-for-one hundred reverse split
of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, effective as of the open of
trading on February 23, 2018. The Company’s stockholders, by written consent dated December 5, 2017, had previously authorized
the Company’s Board of Directors to effect a reverse stock split within a range of ratios, including one-for-one hundred,
at any time within one year following the date of such written consent, as determined by the board.
Pryor Cashman LLP Warrant
On February 23, 2018,
the Company issued a warrant to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of its common stock to Pryor Cashman LLP. The warrant expirers
on May 23, 2019 and is exercisable at a per share price of the lower of (i) $0.075 and (ii) 25% of the closing price of the Company’s
common stock on the trading day immediately preceding the date of exercise.
Sale of ADEX
On February 27, 2018,
the Company sold the ADEX Entities for $3,000 in cash plus a one-year convertible promissory note in the aggregate principal amount
of $2,000. $2,500 in cash was received at closing, with $500 to be retained by the buyer for 90 days, of which $250 has been received.
$1,000 of the $2,500 in cash received at closing was applied to the repayment of our indebtedness to JGB Concord, with an additional
$900 in cash placed in an escrow account controlled by JGB Concord, to be released to the Company if certain conditions are met.
The convertible promissory
note accrues interest at a rate of 6% per annum and is due on March 27, 2019. The note is convertible into shares of common stock
of the buyer at a conversion price per share equal to 75% of the lowest VWAP during the fifteen (15) trading days immediately prior
to the conversion date. The conversion price has a floor of $0.005 per share.
SCS, LLC 12% Convertible Promissory
Note
On February 27, 2018,
the Company issued a convertible promissory note to SCS, LLC. The note has a principal amount of $150, accrues interest at the
rate of 12% per annum, and is due on February 27, 2019. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock
at a conversion price per share equal to 80% of the average of the three (3) lowest VWAPs over the five (5) trading days prior
to the conversion date.
Mantra Convertible Note Assignments
to RDW Capital LLC
On March 2, 2018, the
Company assigned $105 of the note receivable to RDW Capital LLC in exchange for cash of $100.
On March 9, 2018, the
Company assigned $105 of the note receivable to RDW Capital LLC in exchange for cash of $100.
Form S-8 Registration Statement
On March 13, 2018,
the Company filed a Form S-8 registration statement with the SEC. The registration statement registered an aggregate of 5,096,103
shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, that have been or may be issued and sold from time to
time under letter agreements that the Company has entered into with each of Dealy Silberstein & Braverman, LLP, Sichenzia Ross
Ference Kesner LLP, Pryor Cashman LLP and Kevin Clune CPA relating to the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock
to each of the foregoing consultants in satisfaction of fees owed to each of the foregoing consultants for services rendered to
the Company.
Shares issued to Pryor Cashman LLP
On March 15, 2018,
the Company issued 100,000 shares of its common stock to Pryor Cashman LLP in connection with the Company’s Form S-8 Registration
Statement filed with the SEC on March 13, 2018. The shares were issued with a cost basis of $0.16 per share.
Shares issued to Dealy Silberstein &
Braverman, LLP
On March 20, 2018,
the Company issued 200,000 shares of its common stock to Dealy Silberstein & Braverman LLP in connection with the Company’s
Form S-8 Registration Statement filed with the SEC on March 13, 2018. The shares were issued with a cost basis of $0.15 per share.
Shares issued to Sichenzia Ross Ference
Kesner LLP
On March 20, 2018,
the Company issued 681,818 shares of its common stock to Sichenzia Ross Ference Kesner LLP in connection with the Company’s
Form S-8 Registration Statement filed with the SEC on March 13, 2018. The shares were issued with a cost basis of $0.15 per share.
Dominion November 4, 2016 Exchange Agreement
Conversions
During March 2017,
the Company issued an aggregate of 317,932 shares of its common stock to Dominion Capital LLC upon the conversion of $30 of principal
and accrued interest of a note outstanding.
Dominion January 31, 2017 Promissory
Note Conversions
During March 2017,
the Company issued an aggregate of 498.474 shares of its common stock to Dominion Capital LLC upon the conversion of $78 of principal
and accrued interest of a note outstanding.
JGB Waltham Promissory Note Conversions
During January 2017,
the Company issued an aggregate of 154,489 shares of its common stock to JGB Waltham upon the conversion of $78 of principal and
accrued interest of a note outstanding.
During February 2017,
the Company issued an aggregate of 298.470 shares of its common stock to JGB Waltham upon the conversion of $78 of principal and
accrued interest of a note outstanding.
During March 2017,
the Company issued an aggregate of 1,619,132 shares of its common stock to JGB Waltham upon the conversion of $78 of principal
and accrued interest of a note outstanding.
RDW July 14, 2017 Promissory Note Conversions
During February 2017,
the Company issued an aggregate of 428,572 shares of its common stock to RDW upon the conversion of $55 of principal of a note
outstanding.
During March 2017,
the Company issued an aggregate of 1,063,829 shares of its common stock to RDW upon the conversion of $100 of principal of a note
outstanding.
RDW December 8, 2017 Promissory Note
Conversions
During January 2017,
the Company issued an aggregate of 321,429 shares of its common stock to RDW upon the conversion of $45 of principal of a note
outstanding.
During February 2017,
the Company issued an aggregate of 1,189,723 shares of its common stock to RDW upon the conversion of $105 of principal of a note
outstanding.
F-89