Motus GI Holdings Inc (CE) (MOTS) Quote

The transition plan has executive order in first 100 days to release

no, he's just allergic to brown people. Perhaps some raw milk could be the cure? That or horse paste, I haven't decided yet..

Yes, a p/e of 15 would be too low. 20-25 is about right, plus whatever premium for the pipeline. 

They would be waking up all their debt trying to become reporting again. They dare not do that.

What other treatment is as effective as safe and at a lower cost than blarcamesine for the treatment of MCI and/or Alzhiemer's???

What makes you think that coming up with the lowest cost MCI or AD drug is AVXL's goal?

Apology accepted, Borat.

Yes. It is all so absolutely WRONG. And for Trump to have hooked up with Musk is just beyond insane.

It won't work for either of them in the end, but it may be too late by then.

Thats just to buy. Then taxes and insurance and maintenance. Capitalize those costs too and ann in upgrades

ToS shows the volume per interval on the chart. For example, setting the chart to a 1 hour interval it shows volume in SMCI of 14,553 in the 8pm to 9pm hour. It's in the lower left hand corner of the chart.

Subluxed,
10%, $10/day, ~3b, ~20% net profit, ~20 PE, ~85m O/S = ~ $141/share

Those are very conservative numbers. Remember, that is for just one indication. 

IMO

Approaching the end of 2024, I see the S&P 500 is up 24%, the QQQ up 26.5%,
Small caps and medium caps are up far less.
Buffett's BRK is up 27%.

Another great year for those who kept their loot in quality stocks

Worse case scenario is reverse split 

And ordinary Australians who are horrified at Trump's win because it increases the chance of it happening here.

Pain, pain, not nearly as much as you, but pain pain and more pain with Trump in the chair.

Watching him crash and burn will bring some satisfaction though

It was an authorized share decrease, not outstanding. And outstanding just went up to over 10b last update. Still have the ability to dilute another 10b.

Waddaya mean Santa doesn't exist?

And none of that has gotten approval, so its AI BS.

What if that guy reads this board and looks up to you and takes your posts as calls to action

What if you'd make more sense?

The benefit of the contract, as with all toxic notes, is completely written to cover the predatory lender.

1. Were these contracts of similar nature to the BEGI previous lenders that were sanctioned by SEC? (The same lenders that you had said, "None were following Rule 144.")

Spoken like an insider

Be careful trying to guess a bottom.

You already determined Xeriant acts fraudently.

"There is NO XERI filing showing they ever received ANY XTIA shares."

Not sure it I'm the smartest one here, but am definitely smarter than you.
I've done well in 30 years of trading.

Start your engines.

You DO need new glasses.