Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars
in thousands, unless otherwise indicated)
Note
1. Description of Business
Description
of Business
MusclePharm
Corporation, together with its subsidiaries (the “Company” or “MusclePharm”) is a scientifically-driven, performance
lifestyle company that develops, markets and distributes branded sports nutrition products and nutritional supplements that are manufactured
by the Company’s contract manufacturers. The Company’s portfolio of recognized brands, including MusclePharm, FitMiss and
MP Combat Energy is marketed and sold globally. As of March 31, 2022, the Company had the following wholly-owned subsidiary which did
not have any operations or assets as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2022: MusclePharm Canada Enterprises Corp.
In
2021, the Company announced its entrance into the functional energy space in collaboration with former Rockstar Energy executives. The
Company launched three flavors of MP Combat Energy in September 2021 for domestic distribution and three additional flavors for international
distribution. The Company believes the launch of its new energy products, reductions in operating costs and continued focus on gross
profit and revenue growth will allow it to ultimately achieve sustained profitability. However, the Company can give no assurances that
this will occur, especially with the cost to launch new energy products along with the recent increase in the cost of protein, which
may have a material impact on the Company’s profitability. Additionally, the Company’s profitability may be materially impacted
by the ability of the Company’s contract manufacturers to meet customers’ demands. Although, the Company believes entering
the functional energy space will help to increase sales and gross margin, and reduce exposure to commodity prices, the Company can give
no assurances that this will occur. To manage cash flow, the Company has entered into multiple financing arrangements. The entry into
the Energy Drink business has created a second segment, which is presented in detail in Note 12.
Information
About Our Segments
We
are engaged in global sales of products that fall into two operating segments: Protein Products and Energy Drinks. Information regarding
our operating segments and geographic and product information is contained in Note 12 to these consolidated financial statements.
Going
Concern
The
Company has historically incurred significant losses and experienced negative cash flows since inception. As of March 31, 2022, the Company
had cash of $0.5 million,
a working capital deficit of $36.3
million, a stockholders’ deficit of $38.1
million and an accumulated deficit of $211.8
million resulting from recurring losses from
operations. As a result of a history of losses and financial condition, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability
to continue as a going concern.
The
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon it generating profits in the future and/or obtaining the necessary
financing to meet its obligations and repay liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. The Company is evaluating
different strategies to obtain financing to fund its operations to cover expenses and focus on achieving a level of revenue adequate
to support its current cost structure. Financing strategies may include, but are not limited to, issuances of capital stock, debt
borrowings, partnerships and/or collaborations.
The
Company has been focused on cost containment and improving gross margins by focusing on customers with higher margins, reducing product
discounts and promotional activity, along with reducing the number of SKU’s and negotiating improved pricing for raw materials.
In addition, the Company has worked to negotiate lower production costs with its contract manufacturers. Although these steps improved
gross margins through the first quarter of 2022, with the recent further increases in commodity prices, primarily protein,
the Company’s gross margins have been impacted and will continue to be impacted unless commodity prices return the same levels
that were seen in 2021. The Company expects overall margins to improve as we ramp up energy sales with stronger gross margins
in the energy drink segment.
COVID-19
The
Company’s results of operations are affected by economic conditions, including macroeconomic conditions and levels of business
confidence. There continues to be significant volatility and economic uncertainty in many markets and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic contributes
to that level of volatility and uncertainty and has created economic disruption. The Company is actively managing its business to respond
to the impact. There were no adjustments recorded in the financial statements that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
The
ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s operations is unknown and will depend on future developments, which are
highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak, new information which may
emerge concerning the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, and any additional preventative and protective actions that governments, or
the Company, may direct, which may result in an extended period of continued business disruption, reduced customer traffic and reduced
operations. Any resulting financial impact cannot be reasonably estimated at this time but may have a material impact on the Company’s
business, financial condition and results of operations. Management continues to monitor the business environment for any significant
changes that could impact the Company’s operations. The Company has taken proactive steps to manage costs and discretionary spending,
such as remote working and reducing facility related expense.
Note
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis
of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, these statements do not include all the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial
statements. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The
Company’s management believes the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments of a normal recurring
nature necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position as of March 31, 2022, results of operations and
cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021. The results of operations for the three ended March 31, 2022 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the year ended December 31, 2022.
These
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related
notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as amended for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC
on May 4, 2022.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates include, but
are not limited to, allowance for doubtful accounts, revenue discounts and allowances, the valuation of inventory, the calculation of
the Company’s effective tax rate and deferred tax assets, valuation of stock based compensation, warrants, likelihood and range
of possible losses on contingencies and present value of lease liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Disaggregation
of Revenue
The
following shows the disaggregation of revenue by distribution channel for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands).
Schedule of Disaggregation of Revenue
| |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
% of Total | | |
2021 | | |
% of Total | |
Distribution Channel | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Specialty | |
$ | 3,383 | | |
| 26 | % | |
$ | 6,795 | | |
| 52 | % |
International | |
| 733 | | |
| 6 | % | |
| 3,847 | | |
| 29 | % |
FDM | |
| 8,985 | | |
| 68 | % | |
| 2,479 | | |
| 19 | % |
Total | |
$ | 13,101 | | |
| 100 | % | |
$ | 13,121 | | |
| 100 | % |
Concentrations
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and accounts receivable.
The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution.
The cash balance at times may exceed federally insured limits. Management believes the financial risk associated with these balances
is minimal and has not experienced any losses to date. Significant customers and vendors are those that represent more than 10% of the
Company’s net revenue or accounts receivable for each period presented.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2022, we had three customers who individually accounted for 59%,
13%,
and 12%
of our net revenue, and two customers that individually
accounted for 59%
and 17%
of accounts receivable. During the three
months ended March 31, 2021, we had three customers who individually accounted for 28%,
17%
and 14%
of our net revenue, and two customers that individually
accounted for 32%
and 21%
of accounts receivable.
The
Company uses a limited number of non-affiliated suppliers for contract manufacturing its products. The Company has quality control and
manufacturing agreements in place with its primary manufacturers to ensure consistency in production and quality. The agreements ensure
products are manufactured to the Company’s specifications and the contract manufacturers will bear the costs of recalled products
due to defective manufacturing. During the three months ended March 31, 2022, the Company had four vendors who individually accounted
for 17%, 12%, 12%, and 11% of net purchases, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2021, the Company had three vendors
who individually accounted for 32%, 21% and 21% of net purchases.
The
Company has a geographic concentration in the United States, with 94% and 71% of revenue from domestic customers during the three months
ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. International customers, primarily in Canada and Asia, comprised 6% and 29% for the three
months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Segments
Historically,
the Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis
for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. As such, the Company has had two reporting segments and operating
unit structures. During the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company introduced a functional energy beverages line under the MusclePharm and
FitMiss brands, so the CODM now reviews financial information and makes resource and opportunity decisions on a disaggregated basis with
the functional energy drink business separate from protein products.
Litigation
Estimates and Accruals
In
the normal course of business or otherwise, the Company may become involved in legal proceedings. The Company will accrue a liability
for such matters when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When only a range
of possible loss can be established, the most probable amount in the range is accrued. If no amount within this range is a better estimate
than any other amount within the range, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. The accrual for a litigation loss contingency might
include, for example, estimates of potential damages, outside legal fees and other directly related costs expected to be incurred. The
Company provides disclosures for material contingencies when there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may
be incurred. In assessing whether a loss is a reasonable possibility, the Company may consider the following factors, among others: the
nature of the litigation, claim or assessment, available information, opinions or views of legal counsel and other advisors, and the
experience gained from similar cases.
Income
Taxes
Income
taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Income tax expense includes the current tax liability from operations and
the change in deferred income taxes during the year. Interest income, interest expense and penalties associated with income taxes are
reflected in (Benefit) provision for income taxes on the consolidated statements of operations. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts
of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences
are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date.
A
valuation allowance is required to be established unless management determines that it is more likely than not that the Company will
ultimately realize the tax benefit associated with a deferred tax asset. The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only
if those positions are more likely than not to be sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that
is greater than 50% likely to be realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment
occurs.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
July 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses
on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”), which requires the measurement of all expected credit losses of financial assets
held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions
and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. In addition, the ASU amends
the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. ASU
2016-13 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2022, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact this ASU may have on its consolidated financial statements.
In
March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform
on Financial Reporting (“ASU 2020-04”). The amendments in this ASU apply only to contracts, hedging relationships, and
other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate that is expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform.
The amendments in this update provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other
transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The expedients and exceptions provided by the amendments
do not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022, except for hedging
relationships existing as of December 31, 2022, that an entity has elected certain optional expedients for and that are retained through
the end of the hedging relationship. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020, through December
31, 2022. The Company has not modified any material contracts due to reference rate reform. The Company will continue to evaluate the
impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements for all future transactions affected by reference rate reform
during the time permitted.
In
August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives
and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40). The ASU eliminates the beneficial conversion and cash conversion
accounting models for convertible instruments. It also amends the accounting for certain contracts in an entity’s own equity that
are currently accounted for as derivatives because of specific settlement provisions. In addition, the new guidance modifies how particular
convertible instruments and certain contracts that may be settled in cash or shares impact the diluted EPS computation. This guidance
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption
is permitted, but not earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
The FASB also specified that an entity should adopt the guidance as of the beginning of its annual fiscal year and is not permitted to
adopt the guidance in an interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this ASU may have on its consolidated financial
statements.
In
May 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-04, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation-Stock
Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40). The ASU addresses
issuer’s accounting for certain modifications or exchanges of freestanding equity-classified written call options. This amendment
is effective for all entities, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
There has not been a significant impact from the adoption of this ASU on the consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statement presentation, including classification
of certain operating expenses.
Note
3. Inventory
Inventory
consists of finished goods and raw materials used to manufacture the Company’s products by one of our contract manufacturers for
the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021. The Company records charges for obsolete and slow-moving inventory based on the age of
the product as determined by the expiration date or otherwise determined to be obsolete. Products within one year of their expiration
dates are considered for write-off purposes. Inventory write-downs, once established, are not reversed as they establish a new cost basis
for the inventory. Historically, the Company has had minimal returns with established customers. The Company accounts for its inventory
on a First-in First-out basis.
The
components of inventory as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 were as follows (in thousands):
Schedule of Inventory
| |
March 31, 2022 | | |
December 31, 2021 | |
Raw Materials | |
$ | 746 | | |
$ | 694 | |
Finished Goods | |
| 229 | | |
| 1,144 | |
Inventory | |
| 975 | | |
| 1,838 | |
Less: inventory writedown | |
| — | | |
| (8 | ) |
Inventory | |
$ | 975 | | |
$ | 1,830 | |
Note
4. Accrued and Other Liabilities
As
of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company’s accrued and other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
Schedule of Accrued and Other Liabilities
| |
March 31, 2022 | | |
December 31, 2021 | |
Accrued professional fees | |
$ | 342 | | |
$ | 236 | |
Accrued interest | |
| 1,151 | | |
| 797 | |
Accrued payroll and bonus | |
| 702 | | |
| 695 | |
Settlements — short term (Nutrablend and 4Excelsior) | |
| 2,102 | | |
| 2,104 | |
Accrued expenses — ThermoLife | |
| 1,364 | | |
| 1,364 | |
Accrued and other short-term liabilities | |
| 993 | | |
| 746 | |
Total accrued and other liabilities | |
$ | 6,654 | | |
$ | 5,942 | |
Note
5. Interest Expense
For
the three months ended March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021, interest expense consisted of the following:
Schedule of Interest Expenses
| |
| | |
| |
| |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Interest expense, related party | |
$ | (313 | ) | |
$ | (120 | ) |
Interest expense, other | |
| (254 | ) | |
| (227 | ) |
Interest expense, secured borrowing arrangement | |
| (71 | ) | |
| (163 | ) |
Amortization of debt issue cost associated with related warrants | |
| (2,615 | ) | |
| - | |
Amortization of debt issue cost - OID | |
| (568 | ) | |
| - | |
Total interest expense | |
$ | (3,821 | ) | |
$ | (510 | ) |
Note
6. Other Long -Term Liabilities
As
of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 the Company’s other long-term liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
Schedule of Other Long-Term Liabilities
| |
As of March 31, 2022 | | |
As of December 31, 2021 | |
Settlements — long term (Nutrablend and 4Excelsior) | |
$ | 1,861 | | |
$ | 2,326 | |
Total other long term liabilities | |
$ | 1,861 | | |
$ | 2,326 | |
Note
7. Debt
As
of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company’s debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
Schedule of Debt
| |
March 31, 2022 | | |
December 31, 2021 | |
Senior notes payable | |
$ | 7,798 | | |
$ | 5,034 | |
Debt issue costs, net | |
| (60 | ) | |
| (479 | ) |
Refinanced convertible note, related party | |
| 5,330 | | |
| 5,330 | |
Revolving line of credit, related party | |
| 2,747 | | |
| - | |
Obligations under secured borrowing arrangement | |
| 6,592 | | |
| 6,446 | |
Total current debt | |
$ | 22,407 | | |
$ | 16,331 | |
Senior
Notes Payable
On
October 13, 2021, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain
institutional investors as purchasers (the “Investors”). Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company sold,
and the Investors purchased, $8.2 million (the “Purchase Price”) in principal amount of senior notes (the “Senior Notes”)
and warrants (the “Warrants”).
The
Senior Notes were issued with an original issue discount of 14%, bear no interest and mature after 6 months, on April 13, 2022. To secure
its obligations thereunder and under the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company has granted a security interest over substantially
all of its assets to the collateral agent for the benefit of the Investors, pursuant to a pledge and security agreement.
The
maturity date of the Senior Notes was extended to May 28, 2022, on April 12, 2022. The maturity date of the Senior Notes also may be
extended under other circumstances specified therein. Subsequent
to the extension, interest accrued from April 13, 2022 at 18% per annum until the Senior Notes are paid in full.
The Company is undertaking various initiatives to improve gross margins to become cash flow positive prior to the maturity of the Senior
Notes. These initiatives include improving cost of goods sold on certain raw materials. There can be no assurance the Company
will be able to successfully implement such initiatives on a timely basis or at all or that it otherwise will meet the conditions required
to extend the Senior Notes. If the Company is unable to extend the Senior Notes or elects not to do so, the Company will be required
to repay the Senior Notes through equity issuances, additional borrowings, cash flows from operations and/or other sources of liquidity.
The
Warrants are exercisable for five (5) years to purchase 18,463,511 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share,
at an exercise price of $0.78, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances described in the Warrants. The Warrants have a face
value of $4.4 million which is recorded in Additional Paid-In Capital.
In
conjunction with the private placement of Senior Notes and Warrants, each of the directors and officers of the Company entered into lock-up
agreements, which prohibited sales of the Common Stock until after April 11, 2022, subject to certain exceptions.
The
issuance of the Senior Notes and Warrants was made in reliance on the exemption provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), for the offer and sale of securities not involving a public offering, and Regulation
D promulgated under the Securities Act. In accordance with ASC 470-20-25-2, proceeds from the sale of a debt instrument with stock purchase
warrants (detachable call options) are allocated to the two elements based on the relative fair values of the debt instrument without
the warrants and of the warrants themselves at time of issuance. The portion of the proceeds so allocated to the warrants shall be accounted
for as additional paid-in capital. The remainder of the proceeds shall be allocated to the debt instrument portion of the transaction.
November
2020 Convertible Note, Related Party
On
November 29, 2020, the Company entered into a refinancing agreement with Mr. Ryan Drexler, (the “November 2020 Refinancing”),
in which the Company issued to Mr. Drexler a convertible secured promissory note (the November 2020 “Convertible Note”) in
the original principal amount of $2.9 million, which amended and restated a convertible secured promissory note dated as of August 21,
2020. The $2.9 million November 2020 Convertible Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum. Unless earlier converted or repaid,
all outstanding principal and any accrued but unpaid interest under the November 2020 Convertible Note shall be due and payable on July
1, 2021, however the Company and Mr. Drexler agreed to an extension on August 13, 2021 until July 14, 2022. Any interest not paid when
due shall be capitalized and added to the principal amount of the November 2020 Convertible Note and bear interest on the applicable
interest payment date along with all other unpaid principal, capitalized interest, and other capitalized obligations.
Mr.
Drexler may, at any time, and from time to time, upon written notice to the Company, convert the outstanding principal and accrued interest
into shares of Common Stock, at a conversion price of $0.23 per share. At the election of the Company, one-sixth of the interest may
be paid in kind (“PIK Interest”) by adding such amount to the principal amount of the note, or through the issuance of shares
of the Company’s common stock to Mr. Drexler. The PIK Interest is convertible to common stock at the closing price per share on
the last business day of each calendar quarter. In no event will the conversion price of such PIK Interest be less than $0.10. The Company
may prepay the Note by giving Mr. Drexler between 15-days’ and 60-days’ notice depending upon the specific circumstances,
subject to Mr. Drexler’s conversion right.
The
November 2020 Convertible Note contains customary restrictions on the ability of the Company to, among other things, grant liens or incur
indebtedness other than certain obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business. The restrictions are also subject to certain
additional qualifications and carveouts, as set forth in the November 2020 Convertible Note. The November 2020 Convertible Note is subordinated
to certain other indebtedness of the Company held by Prestige Capital Corporation (“Prestige”) and the Senior Notes.
For
the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, interest expense related to the related party convertible secured promissory note was
$0.085 million and $0.085 million, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2022, no interest was paid in cash to Mr. Drexler;
during the three months ended March 31, 2021 $0.085 million of interest was paid in cash to Mr. Drexler.
August
2021 Convertible Note, Related Party
On
October 15, 2020, the Company entered into a secured revolving promissory note (the “Revolving Note”) with Mr. Ryan Drexler.
Under the terms of the Revolving Note, the Company can borrow up to $3.0 million. The Revolving Note bears interest at the rate of 12%
per annum. The funds were used for the purchase of whey protein and other general corporate purposes. Both the outstanding principal,
if any, and all accrued interest under the Revolving Note were due on March 31, 2021, which was not paid.
On
August 13, 2021, the Company issued to Ryan Drexler (the “Holder”) a convertible secured promissory note (the “August
2021 Convertible Note”) in the original principal amount of $2.5 million, replacing the Revolving Note.
The
August 2021 Convertible Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum. Interest payments are due on the last day of each calendar
quarter. At the Company’s option (as determined by its independent directors), the Company may repay up to one sixth of any interest
payment by either adding such amount to the principal amount of the August 2021 Convertible Note or by converting such interest amount
into an equivalent amount of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”). Any interest
not paid when due shall be capitalized and added to the principal amount of the August 2021 Convertible Note and bear interest on the
applicable interest payment date along with all other unpaid principal, capitalized interest, and other capitalized obligations. Both
the principal and any accrued but unpaid interest under the August 2021 Convertible Note will be due on July 14, 2022, unless converted
or repaid earlier.
The
Holder may, at any time, and from time to time, upon written notice to the Company, convert the outstanding principal and accrued interest
into shares of Common Stock, at a conversion price equal to the closing price of the common stock on October 15, 2021. The Company may
prepay the August 2021 Convertible Note by giving the Holder between 15 and 60 days’ notice depending upon the specific circumstances,
subject to the Holder’s conversion right.
The
August 2021 Convertible Note contains customary events of default, including, among others, the failure by the Company to make a payment
of principal or interest when due. Following an event of default, at the option of the Holder and upon written notice to the Company,
or automatically under certain circumstances, all outstanding principal and accrued interest will become due and payable. The August
2021 Convertible Note also contains customary restrictions on the ability of the Company to, among other things, grant liens or incur
indebtedness other than certain obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business. The restrictions are also subject to certain
additional qualifications and carveouts, as set forth in the August 2021 Convertible Note. The August 2021 Convertible Note is subordinated
to certain other indebtedness of the Company held by Prestige Corporation (“Prestige”) and the Senior Notes.
For
the three months ended March 31, 2022, interest expense related to the related party convertible secured promissory note was $0.122 million
and there was no interest expense related to this note for the three months ended March 31, 2021. During the three months ended March
31, 2022 and 2021 no interest was paid in cash to Mr. Drexler.
Revolving
Line of Credit, Related Party
On
March 8, 2022, the Company entered into an Unsecured Revolving Promissory Note (the “Note”) with the Mr. Ryan Drexler. Under
the terms of the Note, proceeds may be used solely to finance the production of orders from its largest customer or any of its affiliates
or subsidiaries. The Note does not contain a cap on borrowings thereunder. However, further advances under the Note are at the discretion
of the Lender. Outstanding balances under the Note accrue interest at the rate of 18% per annum. Prior to maturity, the Company generally
may pay down principal balances and re-borrow under the Note, subject to the discretion of the Lender to advance funds under the Note.
The Note contains customary events of default and acceleration provisions.
The
Note is subordinate to the 14% Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Notes previously issued by the Company. Under the terms of the
First Amendment to Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2022, between the Company, Ryan Drexler and Empery
Tax Efficient, LP (the “Amendment”), principal but not interest due under the Note generally may be repaid out of payments
received by the Company in respect of accounts receivable financed pursuant to the Note.
The
related party revolving line of credit balance as of March 31, 2022 was $2.7 million and was zero on at March 31, 2021.
For
the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 total related party debt was $8.1 million and $4.6 million, respectively.
For
the three months ended March 31, 2022, interest expense related to the revolving line of credit, related party was $0.106 million.
Obligations
Under Secured Borrowing Arrangement
In
January 2016, the Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Purchase and Sale Agreement”) with Prestige, pursuant
to which the Company agreed to sell and assign, and Prestige agreed to buy and accept, certain accounts receivable owed to the Company
(“Accounts”). Under the terms of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, upon the receipt and acceptance of each assignment of Accounts,
Prestige will pay the Company 80% of the net face amount of the assigned Accounts, up to a maximum total borrowing of $12.5 million subject
to sufficient amounts of accounts receivable to secure the loan. The remaining 20% will be paid to the Company upon collection of the
assigned Accounts, less any chargebacks (including chargebacks for any customer amounts that remain outstanding for over 90 days), disputes,
or other amounts due to Prestige. Prestige’s purchase of the assigned Accounts from the Company will be at a discount fee which
varies from 0.7% to 4%, based on the number of days outstanding from the assignment of Accounts to collection of the assigned Accounts.
In addition, the Company granted Prestige a continuing security interest in and first priority lien upon all accounts receivable, inventory,
fixed assets, general intangibles, and other assets. Prestige will have no recourse against the Company if payments are not made due
to the insolvency of an account debtor within 90 days of invoice date, with the exception of international and certain domestic customers.
On April 10, 2019, the Company and Prestige amended the terms of the agreement. The agreement was extended until April 1, 2020 and automatically
renews for one (1) year periods unless either party receives written notice of cancellation from the other, at minimum, thirty (30) days
prior to the expiration date thereafter.
On
June 14, 2021, Prestige advanced the Company $1.0 million with a six-month term, 15% interest rate and 2% accommodation fee.
On
July 26, 2021, Prestige advanced the Company $1.0 million with a six-month term and a 15% interest rate. In addition, there was an accommodation
fee equal to 1% of the amount advanced plus 18,750 stock options.
On
October 12, 2021, the June 14, 2021 and July 26, 2021 the total Prestige advance $2.0 million was extended to the date of the termination
of the senior secured note offering, which is in April 2022, and was extended to May 28 2022.
For
the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company assigned Prestige accounts with an aggregate face amount of approximately
$6.3
million and $11.4
million, respectively. For the three months
ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company made payments to Prestige in the amounts of $6.1
million and $13.8
million, respectively, in cash. As of March
31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, we had outstanding borrowings of approximately $6.6
million and $6.4
million, respectively.
Paycheck
Protection Program Loan
Due
to economic uncertainty as a result of the ongoing pandemic (“COVID-19”), on May 14, 2020, the Company received an aggregate
principal amount of $964,910 pursuant to the borrowing arrangement (“Note”) with Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC (“HSBF”)
and agreed to pay the principal amount plus interest at a 1% fixed interest rate per year, on the unpaid principal balance. The Note
includes forgiveness provisions in accordance with the requirements of the Paycheck Protection Program, Section 1106 of the CARES Act.
The
Note was expected to mature on May 16, 2025. Payments were due by November 16, 2020 (the “Deferment Period”) and interest
was accrued during the Deferment Period. However, the Flexibility Act, which was signed into law on June 5, 2020, extended the Deferment
Period to the date that the forgiven amount is remitted by the United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”) to HSBF.
On
October 25, 2021, the Company received a letter from HSBF indicating the Company’s SBA PPP loan has been forgiven in full by HSBF
and was recorded as a $964,910 gain on forgiveness of debt located in other income-loan forgiveness.
Note
8. Commitments and Contingencies
Contingencies
In
the normal course of business or otherwise, the Company may become involved in legal proceedings. The Company will accrue a liability
for such matters when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When only a range
of possible loss can be established, the most probable amount in the range is accrued. If no amount within this range is a better estimate
than any other amount within the range, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. The accrual for a litigation loss contingency might
include, for example, estimates of potential damages, outside legal fees and other directly related costs expected to be incurred. The
Company provides disclosures for material contingencies when there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may
be incurred. In assessing whether a loss is a reasonable possibility, the Company may consider the following factors, among others: the
nature of the litigation, claim or assessment, available information, opinions or views of legal counsel and other advisors, and the
experience gained from similar cases. As of December 31, 2021, the Company was involved in the following material legal proceedings described
below:
White
Winston Select Asset Fund Series MP-18, LLC et al., v MusclePharm Corp., et al., (Nev. Dist. Ct.; Cal. Superior Court; Colorado Dist.
Ct.; Mass. Super. Ct.)
On
August 21, 2018, White Winston Select Asset Fund Series MP-18, LLC and White Winston Select Asset Fund, LLC (together “White Winston”)
initiated a derivative action against the Company and its directors (the “director defendants”). White Winston alleges that
the director defendants breached their fiduciary duties by improperly approving the refinancing of three promissory notes issued by the
Company to Mr. Drexler (the “Amended Note”) in exchange for $18.0 million in loans. White Winston alleges that this refinancing
improperly diluted their economic and voting power and constituted an improper distribution in violation of Nevada law. In its complaint,
White Winston sought the appointment of a receiver over the Company, a permanent injunction against the exercise of Mr. Drexler’s
conversion right under the Amended Note, and other unspecified monetary damages. On September 13, 2018, White Winston filed an amended
complaint, which added a former executive of the Company, as a plaintiff (together with White Winston, the “White Winston Plaintiffs”).
On December 9, 2019, the White Winston Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint, in which they added allegations relating to the resignation
of the Company’s auditor, Plante & Moran PLLC (“Plante Moran”). the Company has moved to dismiss the Second Amended
Complaint. That motion has not yet been fully briefed.
Along
with its complaint, White Winston also filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and preliminary injunction
enjoining the exercise of Mr. Drexler’s conversion right under the Amended Note. On August 23, 2018, the Nevada district court
issued an ex parte TRO. On September 14, 2018, the court let the TRO expire and denied White Winston’s request for a preliminary
injunction, finding, among other things, that White Winston did not show a likelihood of success on the merits of the underlying action
and failed to establish irreparable harm. Following the court’s decision, the Company filed a motion seeking to recoup the legal
fees and costs it incurred in responding to the preliminary injunction motion. On October 31, 2019, the court awarded the Company $56,000
in fees and costs.
Due
to the uncertainty associated with determining our liability, if any, and due to our inability to ascertain with any reasonable degree
of likelihood, as of the date of this report, the outcome of the trial, the Company has not recorded an estimate for its potential liability.
On
June 17, 2019, White Winston moved for the appointment of a temporary receiver over the Company, citing Plante Moran’s resignation.
The court granted White Winston’s request to hold an evidentiary hearing on the motion, but subsequently stayed the action pending
the parties’ attempts to resolve their dispute. Although the parties have been unable to reach a resolution, the litigation has
not yet resumed. On July 30, 2019, White Winston filed an action in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County
of Los Angeles, seeking access to the Company’s books and records and requesting the appointment of an independent auditor for
the Company. On February 25, 2021, the court ordered the Company to produce certain documents, denied White Winston’s request for
an auditor, and ordered the Company to pay a $1,500 penalty. On July 20, 2021 the California court awarded White Winston $93,000 in attorneys’
fees and cost relating to the books-and-records action. The Company paid the amounts due on July 30, 2021, and on August 4, 2021 White
Winston submitted a filing acknowledging that the California court’s judgment has been fully satisfied.
The
Company and its Chief Executive Officer have been named as defendants in a new lawsuit filed on February 8, 2022 by White Winston Select
Asset Funds, LLC and White Winston Select Asset Fund Series Fund MP-18, LLC (collectively, “White Winston”) in the Superior
Court of Suffolk County Massachusetts. White Winston is bringing claims alleging unfair trade practices, abuse of process, malicious
prosecution, breach of duty of loyalty and, in the alternative, for breach of the settlement agreement relating to the prior action filed
by White Winston in Nevada. The Company has not yet responded to complaint and at this time cannot reasonably estimate any loss that
may arise from this matter.
Bakery
Barn, LLC v. MusclePharm Corporation
On
January 24, 2022, Bakery Barn (“Bakery Barn”) filed suit against Company in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania court. Company
received the Complaint on February 16, 2022. Bakery Barn alleges that the Company owes Bakery Barn over $1.9 million dollars for breach
of contract. Parties operated on an open account basis with payment terms established by mutual verbal agreement, custom and usage. Beginning
in late 2020, Bakery Barn resumed production for Company and operated under a verbal agreement until August 2021. Bakery Barn contends
that Company is required to reimburse Bakery Barn for foil wraps ordered by Bakery Barn in the amount of $77,800, specific ingredients
totaling $42,400, and products manufactured under purchase order Invoice no. 59192 delivered to Company in the amount of $1,816,017.
On
February 24, 2022, Flaherty Fardo Rogel & Amick, LLC (“Company Counsel”) filed a Praecipe for Appearance on behalf of
the Company. On February 28, 2022, Company Counsel filed Preliminary Objections to Complaint and Brief In Support Thereof. Bakery Barn
filed an Amended Complaint in Civil Action on March 14, 2022. Company Counsel is in the process of filing Preliminary Objections to this
Amended Complaint. The Company intends to continue to vigorously litigate the matter.
Bar
Bakers, LLC v. CFC/Flavor Producers, LLC. Vs MusclePharm
On
March 18, 2022, the Company retained Barnes & Thornburg to represent it in connection with a Cross-Complaint filed in the
Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-2019-01073098-CU-BC-CJC in the matter Bar Bakers LLC v. Creative Flavor Concepts,
Inc. et al.. According to the pleadings, the matter arises from an agreement between the plaintiffs and defendants in which the plaintiff
agreed to manufacturer energy bars and sell them to the defendants. The defendants then sold the energy bars to various retailers, including
the Company. On May 29, 2019, the plaintiff sued the defendants alleging that the defendants were responsible for unpaid invoices –
nine for bars manufactured and delivered to the Company and one invoice for raw materials. According to the pleadings, the unpaid
invoices total $885,163.72.
The invoice for the raw materials is allegedly $4,658,593.02.
On January 31, 2022, one of the defendants, Flavor Producers LLC, filed and served a cross claim against the Company alleging that it
was partially responsible for any damages that may befall on it. Specifically, Flavor Producers is asking the Court to award it $389,989.60
in compensatory damages. On March 25, 2022, the
Company filed an answer to that cross claim denying the factual allegations and Flavor Producers’ assertion that it is entitled
to any damages, including but not limited to, compensatory damages.
ThermoLife
International
In
January 2016, ThermoLife International LLC (“ThermoLife”), a supplier of nitrates to the Company, filed a complaint against
the Company in Arizona state court. ThermoLife alleged that the Company failed to meet minimum purchase requirements contained in the
parties’ supply agreement. The court held a bench trial on the issue of damages in October 2019, and on December 4, 2019, the court
entered judgment in favor of ThermoLife and against the Company in the amount of $1.6 million, comprised of $0.9 million in damages,
interest in the amount of $0.3 million and attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $0.4 million. The Company recorded $1.6 million
in accrued expenses in 2018. The Company has filed an appeal and posted bonds in the total amount of $0.6 million in order to stay execution
on the judgment pending appeal. Of the $0.6 million, $0.25 million (including fees) was paid by Mr. Drexler on behalf of the Company.
See “Note 7. Debt” for additional information. The balance of $0.35 million was secured by a personal guaranty from Mr. Drexler,
the associated fees of $12,500 and $2,500 have been paid by the Company. On April 27, 2021, the appellate court issued a decision largely
affirming the trial court judgement, except vacating the judgement’s $0.3 million prejudgment interest award and remanding for
a recalculation of prejudgment interest. On May 18, 2021, ThermoLife filed a motion asking the trial court to increase the Company’s
appeal bond to the full amount of the judgment, or $1.9 million, which the Court denied on June 2, 2021.
As
of March 31, 2022, the total amount accrued, including interest, was $1.9 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021,
interest expense recognized on the awarded damages was $0.022 million and $0.022 million, respectfully.
On
May 4, 2022, the Arizona Supreme Court denied the Company’s petition for review of the decision of the appellate court and granted
ThermoLife’s request for attorney’s fees.
Settlements
Manchester
City Football Group
The
Company was engaged in a dispute with City Football Group Limited (“CFG”), the owner of Manchester City Football Group, concerning
amounts allegedly owed by the Company under a sponsorship agreement with CFG (the “Sponsorship Agreement”). .
On
July 28, 2017, the Company approved a Settlement Agreement (the “CFG Settlement Agreement”) with CFG effective July 7, 2017.
The CFG Settlement Agreement represents a full and final settlement of all litigation between the parties. Under the terms of the agreement,
the Company agreed to pay CFG a sum of $3 million, which was recorded as accrued expenses in 2017. The settlement consists of a $1.0
million payment that was advanced by a related party on July 7, 2017, a $1.0 million installment paid on July 7, 2018 and a subsequent
$1.0 million installment payment to paid by July 7, 2019. Of this amount, the Company has remitted $0.3 million.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company recorded a charge of $0.018 million and $0.018 million, respectively. This
charge, representing imputed interest, is included in “Interest expense” in the Company’s consolidated statements of
operations.
Nutrablend
Matter
On
February 27, 2020, Nutrablend, a manufacturer of MusclePharm products, filed an action against the Company in the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of California, claiming approximately $3.1 million in allegedly unpaid invoices. These invoices relate
to the third and fourth quarter of 2019, and a liability has been recorded for the related periods.
On
September 25, 2020, the parties successfully mediated the case to a settlement (the “Nutrablend Agreement”) and the Company
agreed to (i) pay approximately $3.1 million (“Owed Amount”) in monthly payments (“Monthly Payments”) from September
1, 2020 through June 30, 2023 and (ii) issue monthly purchase orders (“Purchase Orders”) at minimum amounts accepted by Nutrablend.
The
Company agreed to issue Purchase Orders in a combined total amount of at least (i) $1.5 million from September 1, 2020 through November
30, 2020; (ii) $1.8 million from December 1, 2020 through February 28, 2021; (iii) $2.1 million from March 31, 2021 through May 31, 2021;
(iv) $2.1 million from June 1, 2021 through August 31, 2021; and (v) $1.4 million from September 1, 2021 through October 30, 2021. Beginning
on November 1, 2021, the Company will be required to issue monthly Purchase Orders to Nutrablend in a minimum amount of $0.7 million
until the Owed Amount is paid in full to Nutrablend. In the event that the Company pays the Owed Amount in full before September 1, 2021,
it’s entitled to a rebate on all completed Purchase Orders. Further, once the monthly payments, and any additional payments that
the Company has made on the Owed Amount, reduce the outstanding balance of the Owed Amount to below $2.0 million, the Company is eligible
for an extension of a line of credit from Nutrablend in an amount of up to $3.0 million.
On
July 7, 2021, the Company commenced an action against Nutrablend in the Central District of California, seeking (i) a declaration that
the Nutrablend Agreement purchase order provisions have been terminated due to Nutrablend’s failure to provide the Company with
reasonable assurances of its ability to fulfill its purchase orders; (ii) a declaration that approximately $2.0 million in purchase orders
that the Company placed in July and August 2020 were intended to and do count towards the minimums set forth in the Nutrablend Agreement;
and (iii) damages based on Nutrablend’s failure to fulfill purchase orders. The case is ongoing.
As
of March 31, 2022, the Company determined that approximately $0.998 million of the owed amount was due within a year, and this amount
was recorded in “Accrued and other liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The present value of the remaining Owed
Amount that was due after a year was $0.250 million, and the amount was recorded in “Other long-term liabilities” in the
consolidated balance sheets. The Company made payments of $0.303 million and $0.189 million during the three months ended March 31, 2022
and 2021, respectively.
On
September 23, 2021, the Company entered into an Amendment to a Settlement Agreement that was originally entered into on September 25,
2020. Pursuant to the Amended Agreement, the Company is no longer obligated to issue Purchase Orders to Nutrablend as stated in the Settlement
Agreement, which, as stated in the Form 8-K dated September 25, 2020, consisted of at least (i) $1.5 million from September 1, 2020 through
November 30, 2020; (ii) $1.8 million from December 1, 2020 through February 28, 2021; (iii) $2.0 million from March 1, 2021 through May
31, 2021; (iv) $2.1 million from June 1, 2021 through August 31, 2021; and (v) $1.4 million from September 1, 2021 through October 30,
2021. The Monthly Payments provision of the Settlement Agreement remains unchanged.
4Excelsior
Matter
On
March 18, 2019, Excelsior Nutrition, Inc. (“4Excelsior”), a manufacturer of MusclePharm products, filed an action against
the Company in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, claiming approximately $6.2 million in damages
relating to allegedly unpaid invoices, as well as approximately $7.8 million in consequential damages.
On
December 16, 2020, the Company and 4Excelsior entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (“the Agreement”), pursuant
to which the parties resolved and settled the civil action pending in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of
Los Angeles (the “Litigation”). The parties agreed to a mutual general release of claims and to jointly file within 10 business
days of the effective date of the Agreement a stipulation and proposed order of dismissal, dismissing with prejudice all claims and counterclaims
asserted in the Litigation. The Company agreed to pay $4.75 million (the “Settlement Amount”) in four monthly payments of
$70,000, beginning January 5, 2021, and thereafter in monthly payments of $100,000 until the Settlement Amount is fully paid. The Company
may prepay all or any portion of the Settlement Amount at any time without penalty or premium. The Agreement provides that, in the event
of a Default (as defined in the Agreement) by the Company, the entire outstanding balance of the Settlement Amount will become immediately
due and payable, plus accrued interest at a rate of 18% per annum, commencing from the date of default.
The
Company determined that approximately $1.1 million of the Settlement Amount was due within a year, and this amount was recorded in “Accrued
and other liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The present value of the remaining Settlement Amount that was due after
a year was $1.6 million, and the amount was recorded in “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company made payments of $0.3 million and $0.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
The
table below summarizes accrued expenses and interest expense incurred in for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands):
Schedule of Accrued Expenses and Interest Expense
Cases | |
Accrued Amount as of
March 31, 2022 | | |
Accrued Amount as of
December 31, 2021 | | |
Interest Expense for Period Ending
March 31, 2022 | | |
Interest Expense for Period Ending
March 31, 2021 | |
Manchester City Football Group | |
$ | 730 | | |
$ | 730 | | |
$ | ) | |
$ | ) |
Nutrablend Matter | |
| 1,248 | | |
| 2,318 | | |
| (55 | ) | |
| (64 | ) |
4Excelsior Matter | |
| 2,715 | | |
| 3,597 | | |
| (77 | ) | |
| (98 | ) |
ThermoLife International | |
| 1,364 | | |
| 1,364 | | |
| (22 | ) | |
| (22 | ) |
Total | |
$ | 6,057 | | |
$ | 8,009 | | |
$ | (172 | ) | |
$ | (202 | ) |
Note
9. Stock-Based Compensation
The
Company’s stock-based compensation for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 consisted primarily of stock option awards,
and there was no activity other than vesting for the three months ended March 31, 2022.
For
the three months ended March 31, 2022, the Company recorded approximately $0.4 million of stock-based compensation expense related to
stock options. The Company did not record stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2021.
Note
10. Net Income (Loss) per Share
The
following table sets forth the computation of the Company’s basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the years presented
(in thousands, except share and per share data):
Schedule of Basic and Diluted Net Income (loss) Per Share
| |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Net Income (loss) | |
$ | (6,301 | ) | |
$ | 94 | |
Weighted average common shares used in computing net income (loss) per share, basic | |
| 33,386,200 | | |
| 33,119,549 | |
Potentially diluted securities | |
| -- | | |
| 12,373,071 | |
Weighted average common shares used in computing net income (loss) per share, diluted | |
| 33,386,200 | | |
| 45,492,620 | |
Net income (loss) per share, basic | |
$ | (0.19 | ) | |
$ | 0.00 | |
Net income (loss) per share, diluted | |
$ | (0.19 | ) | |
$ | 0.00 | |
Basic
net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common
stock outstanding during each period.
Diluted
net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common
stock, common stock equivalents and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during each period. The Company uses the treasury stock
method to determine whether there is a dilutive effect of outstanding potentially dilutive securities, and the if-converted method to
assess the dilutive effect of the convertible notes.
As of March 31, 2022, there were fully
vested stock options of 1,651,884
that would have been dilutive had the Company had net income.
The
following securities were excluded from the computations of the diluted net income (loss) per share, for the three months ended March
31, 2022 and 2021 as the effect of the securities would be anti-dilutive:
Schedule of Outstanding Potentially Dilutive Securities
| |
| | |
| |
| |
As of March 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Stock options | |
| 5,399,441 | | |
| 171,703 | |
Warrants | |
| 18,463,511 | | |
| - | |
Convertible notes | |
| 16,473,549 | | |
| 12,373,071 | |
Total common stock equivalents | |
| 40,336,501 | | |
| 12,544,774 | |
The
average exercise price of the stock options and warrants as of March 31, 2022 is $0.77.
Note
11. Income Taxes
The
Company’s tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 was zero.
Income
taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the consolidated financial statements and consist of taxes currently
due. Deferred taxes relate to differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting which will
be either taxable or deductible when the assets or liabilities are recovered or settled. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax
assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be
realized. The ultimate realization of deferred income tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the
periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.
Management
considers the scheduled reversal of deferred income tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in
making this assessment. Based on consideration of these items, management has determined that enough uncertainty exists relative to the
realization of the deferred income tax asset balances to warrant the application of a full valuation allowance as of March 31, 2022.
Note
12. Segment Information and Geographic Data
Historically,
the Company’s chief operating decision maker reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating
resources and evaluating financial performance. As such, the Company has had a single reporting segment and operating unit structure.
During the third quarter of 2021, the Company introduced a functional energy beverages line under the MusclePharm and FitMiss brands,
at which time, the CODM commenced reviewing financial information on a disaggregated basis with the functional energy drink business
separate from base business of protein products. During 2021, revenues for the functional energy drink segment were not material, but
it is anticipated to become a more significant segment of the Company’s business going forward. (All amounts below are in thousands):
Schedule
of Significant Segment Business Going Forward
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
| |
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Revenue, net | |
| | | |
| | |
Protein products | |
$ | 12,000 | | |
$ | 13,121 | |
Energy drinks | |
| 1,101 | | |
| — | |
Total revenue, net | |
$ | 13,101 | | |
$ | 13,121 | |
Schedule
of Business Revenue and Profits
| |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 | |
| |
Revenue | | |
Cost of Revenue | | |
Gross Profit | |
Protein products | |
$ | 12,000 | | |
$ | 10,875 | | |
$ | 1,125 | |
Energy drinks | |
| 1,101 | | |
| 717 | | |
| 384 | |
Total | |
$ | 13,101 | | |
$ | 11,592 | | |
$ | 1,509 | |
As
the Company’s products are made through contract manufacturers’, there were no capital expenditures related to either segment
during the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021. Energy segment assets were not material as of March 31, 2022.
All of the Company’s assets are located
in the United States.
Geographic
Information:
Revenue,
classified by the major geographic areas in which our customers are located is as follows:
Schedule
of Revenue, Major Geographical Areas
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
| |
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
United States | |
| 94 | % | |
| 71 | % |
Other Countries | |
| 6 | % | |
| 29 | % |
Total revenue | |
| 100 | % | |
| 100 | % |
No
other country accounted for more than 5% of revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021. Geographically, sales to other
countries are diverse – spanning every continent except Antarctica.
Schedule
of Revenue, Net by Geographic Area
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
| |
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
Revenue, net | |
| | | |
| | |
Protein products | |
| | | |
| | |
United States | |
$ | 11,297 | | |
$ | 9,274 | |
International | |
| 703 | | |
| 3,847 | |
Total Protein Products | |
$ | 12,000 | | |
$ | 13,121 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Energy drinks | |
| | | |
| | |
United States | |
| 1,070 | | |
| - | |
International | |
| 31 | | |
| - | |
Total energy drinks | |
$ | 1,101 | | |
$ | - | |
Total revenue, net | |
$ | 13,101 | | |
$ | 13,121 | |