PACV Pacific Ventures Group Inc (CE)

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Pacific Ventures Group, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) was incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware on October 3, 1986, under the name AOA Corporation. On November 12, 1991, the Company changed its name to American Eagle Group, Inc. On October 22, 2012, the Company changed its name to “Pacific Ventures Group, Inc.”.

The current structure of the Company resulted from a share exchange with Snöbar Holdings, Inc. (“Snöbar Holdings”), which was treated as a reverse merger for accounting purposes. On August 14, 2015, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with Snöbar Holdings, pursuant to which the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Snöbar Holdings’ Class A and Class B common stock in exchange for 22,500,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, while simultaneously issuing 2,500,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock to certain other persons, including for services provided and to a former officer of the Company (the “Share Exchange”).

As the result of the Share Exchange, Snöbar Holdings became the Company’s wholly owned operating subsidiary and the business of Snöbar Holdings became the Company’s sole business operations and MAS Global Distributors, Inc., a California corporation (“MGD”), became an indirect subsidiary of the Company.

Prior to the Share Exchange, the Company operated as an insurance holding company and through its subsidiaries, which marketed and underwrote specialized property and casualty coverage in the general aviation insurance marketplace. However, in 1997, after selling several of its divisions, the Company’s remaining insurance operations were placed into receivership and the Company ceased operating its insurance business.

Since the Share Exchange represented a change in control of the Company and a change in business operations, the Company’s business operations changed to that of Snöbar Holdings and the discussions of business operations accompanying this filing are solely that of Snöbar Holdings and its affiliates and subsidiaries comprising of Snöbar Trust, International Production Impex Corporation, a California corporation (“IPIC”) , and MGD.

Snöbar Holdings was formed under the laws of the State of Delaware on January 7, 2013. Snöbar Holdings is the trustor and sole beneficiary of Snöbar Trust, a California trust (“Trust”), which was formed in June 1, 2013. The current trustee that holds legal title to the Trust is Clark Rutledge, the father of Shannon Masjedi, the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and majority stockholder. The Trust owns 100% of the shares of IPIC, which was formed on August 2, 2001. IPIC is in the business of selling alcohol-infused ice cream and ice-pops and holds all of the rights to the liquor licenses to sell such products and trade names “Snöbar”. As such, the Trust holds all ownership interest of IPIC and its liquor licenses, permitting IPIC to sell its product to distributors, with all income, expense, gains and losses rolling up to the Trust, of which Snöbar Holdings is the sole beneficiary. Snöbar Holdings also owns 99.9% of the shares of MGD. MGD is in the business of selling and leasing freezers and providing marketing services. As a result of the foregoing, Snöbar Holdings is the primary beneficiary of all assets, liabilities and any income received from the business of the Trust and IPIC through the Trust and is the parent company of MGD.

The Trust and IPIC are considered variable interest entities (“VIEs”) and Snöbar Holdings is identified as the primary beneficiary of the Trust and IPIC. Under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, Snöbar Holdings performs ongoing reassessments of whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. As the assessment of Snöbar Holdings’ management is that Snöbar Holdings has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s activities (it is responsible for establishing and operating IPIC), and the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE and the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE’s economic performance, it was therefore concluded by management that Snöbar Holdings is the primary beneficiary of the Trust and IPIC. As such, the Trust and IPIC were consolidated in the financial statements of Snöbar Holdings since the inception of the Trust, in the case of the Trust, and since the inception of Snöbar Holdings, in the case of IPIC.

On May 1, 2018, Royalty Foods Partners, LLC – a Florida Limited Liability Corporation and a subsidiary of Pacific Ventures Group, Inc. – completed an asset acquisition of San Diego Farmers Outlet, Inc. (SDFO), a California Corporation. San Diego Farmers Outlet was started over thirty-five years ago to provide primarily restaurant customers in southern California’s three largest counties with quality food and produce and does business under the name of Farmers Outlet and San Diego Farmers Outlet.

On December 17, 2019, the Company completed an asset acquisition of Seaport Meat Company, (Seaport Meat), a California Corporation with over thirty (30) years in business servicing restaurant and retail, and institutional customers in Southern California and Arizona. Seaport Meat is a USDA meat processing plant that supplies quality meats, seafood, dry goods, dairy and produce. Seaport Meat Company built a state-of-the-art food distribution and manufacturing facility in Spring Valley, California. Seaport operates out of a 17,000 square foot facility is HACCP-compliant and is a USDA Licensed processing facility with on-site daily inspections. HACCP is a management system in which food safety is addressed through the analysis and control of biological, chemical, and physical hazards from raw material production, procurement and handling, to manufacturing, distribution and consumption of the finished product. Having a USDA certified facility allows consumers to be confident that the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), the public health agency in the USDA, ensured that meat and poultry products are safe, wholesome, and correctly labeled and packaged.

The Company’s customers range from a wide variety of restaurants, including many well known in Southern CA, to institutions, schools (UCSD, SDSU, etc.) and re-distributors such as US Foods and Sysco as well as to local distributors. They supply wholesale food and restaurant supplies to San Diego, Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside and offer same day service. In addition, they have clients in Arizona and Colorado that come to their facility to pick up their orders.

Due to the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic had on our customers, particularly our larger customers have been forced to close. Some of these accounts remain closed such as Petco Park the Major League ballpark “Padre Stadium” and the LA, San Diego, and Del Mar County Fairs. Despite these cutomer closures Seaport Meat Company has expanded its customer base and maintained at or above the same revenue as 2019 for the same quarter.

Because Seaport Meat Company can efficiently add new product lines, they can easily expand the distribution of Pacific Ventures’ San Diego Farmers Outlet and SnoBar product line, thereby accelerating Pacific Ventures’ revenue growth. The combination of a distribution and product company is unique in the San Diego area and will position the company for rapid growth.

They manufacture and wholesale custom processed beef, pork, chicken, lamb, veal and seafood. In addition, they are redistributors of a wide variety of dry goods, frozen foods, disposables and janitorial products. Their sales, distribution and finance processes are very efficient and can be expanded to add new product lines, including fresh produce and dairy

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, Snöbar Holdings and its subsidiaries, in which Snöbar Holdings has a controlling voting interest and entities consolidated under the variable interest entities (“VIE”) provisions of ASC 810, “Consolidation” (“ASC 810”). Inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

The Company applies the provisions of ASC 810 which provides a framework for identifying VIEs and determining when a company should include the assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests and results of activities of a VIE in its consolidated financial statements.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the Company, Snöbar Holdings, San Diego Farmers Outlet, MGD, IPIC and the Trust, which was established to hold IPIC, which in turn holds liquor licenses. All inter-company accounts have been eliminated during consolidation. See the discussion in Note 1 above for variable interest entity treatment of the Trust and IPIC.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which requires that five basic steps be followed to recognize revenue: (1) a legally enforceable contract that meets criteria standards as to composition and substance is identified; (2) performance obligations relating to provision of goods or services to the customer are identified; (3) the transaction price, with consideration given to any variable, noncash, or other relevant consideration, is determined; (4) the transaction price is allocated to the performance obligations; and (5) revenue is recognized when control of goods or services is transferred to the customer with consideration given, whether that control happens over time or not. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on our management’s judgments regarding the fixed nature of the selling prices of the products and services delivered and the collectability of those amounts. The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a change to the accounting for any of the in-scope revenue streams; as such, no cumulative effect adjustment was recorded.

Unearned Revenue

Certain amounts are received pursuant to agreements or contracts and may only be used in the conduct of specified transactions or the related services are yet to be performed. These amounts are recorded as unearned or deferred revenue and are recognized as revenue in the year/period the related expenses are incurred, or services are performed. As of September 30, 2020, the Company has $0 in deferred revenue. As of December 31, 2019, the Company also had $0 deferred revenue.

Leases

ASC 842, Leases, was required to be adopted for all financial years beginning after December 15, 2018 and requires long term leases (longer than 12 month) to be capitalized with a corresponding liability for the term of the lease and expensed over that term. Currently the Company has 2 long-term leases SDFO & Seaport Meat Company.

Shipping and Handling Costs

The Company’s shipping costs are all recorded as operating expenses for all periods presented.

Disputed Liabilities

The Company is involved in a variety of disputes, claims, and proceedings concerning its business operations and certain liabilities. We determine whether an estimated loss from a contingency should be accrued by assessing whether a loss is deemed probable and can be reasonably estimated. We assess our potential liability by analyzing our litigation and regulatory matters using available information. We develop our views on estimated losses in consultation with outside counsel handling our defense in these matters, which involves an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. Should developments in any of these matters cause a change in our determination as to an unfavorable outcome and result in the need to recognize a material accrual, or should any of these matters result in a final adverse judgment or be settled for significant amounts, they could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position in the period or periods in which such change in determination, judgment or settlement occurs.

In August 2019, Seaport Group Enterprises, LLC (“SGE”) agreed to acquire Seaport Meat Company, a wholesale meat distribution and processing company that manufactures and supplies various restaurants and food service institutions, from PNC, Inc., Peter Camarda and Nancy Camarda (collectively, “PNC”). In furtherance of this agreement, the parties entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement on or about August 15, 2019, whereby SGE agreed to purchase certain assets, properties, and rights belonging to PNC. In connection with the closing of the transactions contemplated by the asset purchase acquisition, as part of the consideration for the asset purchase, Seaport Group Enterprises LLC entered into a secured promissory note with PNC INC. in the amount of $850,000 due in three payments over 18 months

On or about May 13, 2020, SGE filed a lawsuit against PNC in Los Angeles Superior Court, based on PNC’s material breaches of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Consulting and Covenant Not to Compete Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”), as well material misrepresentations that PNC made to SGE. SGE’s complaint alleges causes of action against PNC for including but not limited to fraud.

As of the date of this report, the note to PNC is past due as the amounts due, if any, are in dispute within the above referenced action brought by SGE. The Company and SGE intend to vigorously pursue its rights and remedies against PNC as well as defend the allegations set forth in the counter complaint. Management does not believe that an adverse ruling would have a material effect on the operations of the Company.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers highly liquid instruments with original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2020, the Company has an overdraft cash balance of $34,861 in cash and cash equivalents, compared to $315,957 at December 31, 2019.

Accounts Receivable

As of Septmeber 30, 2020, Accounts Receivable are stated at net realizable value of $1,399,237. This value includes an appropriate allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts. The allowance is calculated based upon the level of past due accounts and the relationship with and financial status of our customers. As of December 31, 2019, the Company wrote off $323 of bad debt expense. The Company wrote off $6,152 of bad debts during the nine (9) months ended September 30, 2020, and thus has not set an allowance for doubtful accounts.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost has been determined using the first-in, first-out method. Inventory quantities on-hand are regularly reviewed, and where necessary, reserves for excess and unusable inventories are recorded. Inventory consists of finished goods and includes ice cream, popsicles and the related packaging materials. As of September 30, 2020, the Company had total inventory assets of $1,703,162 consisting of San Diego Farmers Outlet, Inc.’s inventory assets of fresh produce and food products and of Seaport Meat Company’s inventory assets of fresh and frozen proteins and seafood and all other restaurants supply items.

Income Taxes

Deferred taxes are provided on an asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the difference between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

Net Income/(Loss) Per Common Share

Income/(loss) per share of common stock is calculated by dividing the net income/(loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The Company has no potentially dilutive securities. Accordingly, basic and dilutive income/(loss) per common share are the same.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and includes expenditures that substantially increase the useful lives of existing property and equipment. Maintenance, repairs, and minor renovations are expensed as incurred. Upon sale or retirement of property and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the respective accounts and the resulting gain or loss is included in the results of operations. The Company provides for depreciation of property and equipment using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives or the term of the lease, as appropriate. The estimated useful lives are as follows: vehicles, five years; office furniture and equipment, three to fifteen years; equipment, three years.

Identifiable Intangible Assets

As of September 30, 2020, the Company’s Identifiable Intangible Assets are as follows:

Intangible Assets

Identifiable Intangible Assets

Trade Name (San Diego Farmers Outlet) $193,000

Trade Name (Seaport Meat) $449,000

Wholesale Customer Relationships (San Diego Farmers Outlet) $266,000

Wholesale Customer Relationships (Seaport Meat) $2,334,239

Total Identifiable Intangible Assets $3,242,239

Goodwill

Assembled Workforce $21,000

Unidentified Intangible Value $470,000

Total Goodwill $491,000

Amortization Expense $205,742

Total Intangible Assets $3,527,497

Management does not believe that there is an impairment as of 2020.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, which include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses are representative of their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and accounts receivable. The Company maintains cash balances at financial institutions within the United States which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to limits of approximately $250,000. The Company has not experienced any losses with regard to its bank accounts and believes it is not exposed to any risk of loss on its cash bank accounts.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company considers revenue recognition and the valuation of accounts receivable, allowance for doubtful accounts, and inventory and reserves as its significant accounting policies. Some of these policies require management to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts in the Company’s financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB established the Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification” or “ASC”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of GAAP for SEC registrants. Existing GAAP was not intended to be changed as a result of the Codification, and accordingly the change did not impact our financial statements. The ASC does change the way the guidance is organized and presented.

In April 2015, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-03, “Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”, to simplify presentation of debt issuance costs by requiring that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The ASU does not affect the recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs. For public companies, the ASU is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted.

In April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-04, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Practical Expedient for the Measurement Date of an Employer’s Defined Benefit Obligation and Plan Assets”, which permits the entity to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the month-end that is closest to the entity’s fiscal year-end and apply that practical expedient consistently from year to year. The ASU is effective for public business entities for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted.

In April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement”, which provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If such includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If the arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for it as a service contract. For public business entities, the ASU is effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early application is permitted. We are currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU to determine if there will be any impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In April 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-06, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260): Effects on Historical Earnings per Unit of Master Limited Partnership Dropdown Transactions”, which specifies that, for purposes of calculating historical earnings per unit under the two-class method, the earnings (losses) of a transferred business before the date of a drop down transaction should be allocated entirely to the general partner. In that circumstance, the previously reported earnings per unit of the limited partners (which is typically the earnings per unit measure presented in the financial statements) would not change as a result of the dropdown transaction. Qualitative disclosures about how the rights to the earnings (losses) differ before and after the dropdown transaction occurs for purposes of computing earnings per unit under the two-class method also are required. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted.

In June 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation”. The update removes all incremental financial reporting requirements from GAAP for development stage entities, including the removal of Topic 915 from the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. In addition, the update adds an example disclosure in Risks and Uncertainties (Topic 275) to illustrate one way that an entity that has not begun planned principal operations could provide information about the risks and uncertainties related to the company’s current activities. Furthermore, the update removes an exception provided to development stage entities in Consolidations (Topic 810) for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity-which may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a company that has an interest in a company in the development stage. The update is effective for the annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, including interim periods therein. Early application is permitted with the first annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued (Public business entities) or made available for issuance (other entities). Our company adopted this pronouncement.

In June 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718); Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period”. The amendments in this ASU apply to all reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Topic 718 as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. For all entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this ASU either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. If retrospective transition is adopted, the cumulative effect of applying this Update as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements should be recognized as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance at that date. Additionally, if retrospective transition is adopted, an entity may use hindsight in measuring and recognizing the compensation cost. This updated guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15 on “Presentation of Financial Statements Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. Currently, there is no guidance in GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this Update provide that guidance. In doing so, the amendments are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued).

All other newly issued accounting pronouncements which are not yet effective have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.

We reviewed all other recently issued accounting pronouncements and determined these have no current applicability to the Company or their effect on the financial statements would not have been significant.

3. GOING CONCERN

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred a net loss of $3,896,531 for the nine (9) months ended September 30, 2020 and has an accumulated deficit of $13,936,898 as of September 30, 2020.

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. The Company is significantly dependent upon its ability, and will continue to attempt, to secure equity and/or additional debt financing. There are no assurances that the Company will be successful and without sufficient financing it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern.

The unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise from this uncertainty.

4. INVENTORIES

As of September 30, 2020, the Company had inventory assets for a total of $1,703,162. The Company had inventory assets of $830,504 as of December 31, 2019.

Depreciation and Amortization expenses for the nine (9) months ended September 30, 2020 was $505,969 compared to $18,231 for the same period of September 30, 2019.

6. ACCRUED EXPENSE

As of September 30, 2020, the Company had accrued expenses of $1,202,372 compared to $714,962, for the year-end December 31, 2019.

7. INCOME TAX

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.

The following description represent note payable-related party transaction pre-Share Exchange that were assumed by the Company as a condition to the Share Exchange:

In January 2011, MGD, which is now a majority owned subsidiary of Snöbar Holdings, entered into an unsecured promissory note with Mrs. Masjedi, who is now the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, director and majority stockholder. The note had a principal balance of $150,000 with an interest rate of 3% and has a maturity date of December 31, 2022. The balance of the note at September 30, 2020 was $75,567.

On February 21, 2012, Snöbar Holdings entered into an unsecured promissory note with Mr. Shenkman, who is Chairman of the Board of Directors and a shareholder of the Company. The note had a principal balance of $10,000 with an interest rate of 5% and is due on demand. The note’s maturity date has subsequently been extended to December 31, 2022. Interest against the note was extinguished in a subsequent extension of the term. The note had a principal balance of $10,000 as of September 30, 2020.

On February 23, 2012, Snöbar Holdings entered into a promissory note with Mr. Shenkman for $10,000, maturing in one year at an interest of 8%. The note has subsequently been extended to December 31, 2022. Interest under the note was extinguished in a subsequent extension of the term. The note had an outstanding balance of $10,000 as of September 30, 2020.

On March 14, 2013, Snöbar Holdings entered into an unsecured promissory note with a Mr. Shenkman, the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors. The note had a principal balance of $10,000 with an interest rate of 5% and an original maturity date of March 14, 2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2022 with a lower interest rate of 2%/year. Mr. Shenkman also agreed to make all interest retroactive and deferred. The note had an outstanding balance of $6,000 as of September 30, 2020.

On June 1, 2013, Snöbar Holdings entered into a promissory note with Azizollah Masjedi, father-in-law to Shannon Masjedi who’s the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, director and majority stockholder, in an amount of $500,000 to purchase all the shares and interests of IPIC. The note matured on June 31, 2017. As of September 30, 2020, the outstanding balance under this note was $358,282, which includes interest and penalty charges.

On September 9, 2014, Snobar Holdings entered into a second unsecured promissory note with Mr. Shenkman, through his affiliate company Entrust Group for a total amount of $6,000 and a third unsecured promissory note for a total amount of $10,000, both at an annual interest rate of 2%. No term was provided for in each note, but Mr. Shenkman has agreed to a maturity date of December 31, 2022 and the accrual of interest rates and deferral to maturity. The notes had an aggregate outstanding balance of $16,000 as of September 30, 2020.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had total short-term notes payable of $1,362,605 and long-term notes payable of $8,669,129. As of September 30, 2020, the Company had total short-term notes payable of $1,907,971 and long-term notes payable of $10,588,942.

The following description represent unrelated notes payable transactions pre-reverse merger between Snöbar and the Company that were assumed by the Company as a condition to the Share Exchange Agreement:

In February 2012, MGD entered into an unsecured promissory note with a certain unrelated party, now a shareholder of the Company for a principal balance of $30,000 at in interest rate of 8% per year and maturity date of August 1, 2014. The note’s maturity date has been extended to December 31, 2020 and the interest rate under the extinguished as part of the extension. The note had an outstanding balance of $25,000 as of September 30, 2020.

On March 14, 2013, Snöbar Holdings entered into an unsecured promissory note with a certain unrelated third party, now a shareholder of the Company. The note had a principal balance of $86,821 with an interest rate of 5% and had a maturity date of March 14, 2014. The note’s maturity date has subsequently been extended to February 1, 2020. The entire balance is owed and outstanding as of September 30, 2020.

On July 22, 2013, Snöbar Holdings entered into an unsecured promissory note with a certain unrelated third party. The note had a principal balance of $15,000 with an original interest rate of 5%. Maturity date has been extended to December 31, 2018, and interest rate has been reduced to 2%, and lender agreed to make all interest retroactive and deferred. The balance of the note was $15,000 as of September 30, 2020.

The following description represents unrelated note payable transactions post-merger between Snöbar and the Company:

Effective September 30, 2017, the Company entered into amended promissory notes with BNA/TRA an unrelated third party in an amount of $372,500, one for $172,500, and four others for $50,000 each. On Septmeber 25, 2020 Pacific Ventures Group entered into a settlement agreement with BNA/TRA for a combined amount of $400,000 to be in monthly cash installmentsto be paid as follows. On or before October 10, 2020, PACVwill pay the sum of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000); On or before November 1st, 2020, PACV will pay the sum of thirty thousand ($30,000); On or before December 1, 2020, and continuing through and including May 1st 2023, PACV shall pay twenty-nine (29) consecutive monthly payments of eleven thousand five hundred($11,500); On or before June 1st, 2023, PACV will pay the sum of six thousand five hundred($6,500);

On July 12, 2017, the issued a Convertible Promissory Note to JSJ Investments Inc. for total gross proceeds of $75,000. The company entered into a mutually agreed upon settlement agreement that called out for monthly payments of $3,359.90. All payments are current and the balance on the note as of September 30, 2020 was $30,239. There is no conversion feature to this settlement and only cash payment.

Over the past year Classic Beverage has periodically issued loans to the Company. The Company has agreed to pay interest 10% per year and has agreed on penalty fees if late on payments. The note is due on demand. The current balance is $348,269, including capitalized interest and penalty fees.

On May 1, 2018, Pacific Ventures Group entered into a secured promissory note with TCA Global Master Fund. The note was secured by interests in tangible and intangible property of Pacific Ventures Group. The effective interest rate on the note is 16%. The outstanding balance of the notes with TCA Global Fund for San Diego Farmers Outlet is $2,871,397 as of September 30, 2020.

On December 17, 2019 Pacific Ventures Group entered into a secured promissory note with TCA Special Situations Credit Strategies ICAV. The note was secured by interests in tangible and intangible property of Pacific Ventures Group. The effective interest rate is 16%. The total outstanding balance of the two (2) notes for Seaport Meat is $5,954,446 as of Sepember 30, 2020.

In September 2020, Seaport Group Enterprises LLC entered into a revenue based factoring agreement and received an aggregate of $500,000 (less origination fees of $15,000) in exchange for $650,000 of future receipts relating to monies collected from customers or other third party payors. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company is required to make daily payments equal to $21,500 for 30 weeks. The Company received net proceeds of $485,000.

On May 20, 2020, The Company entered into a SBA PPP note in the amount of $395,000 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The note is current and the Company believes that this not will be forgiven by the SBA. The standards set forth for forgivness have been met and exceeded to order to obtain forgiveness by the SBA. The Company’s forgiveness application is pending.

On July 20,2020, Seaport Group Enterprises LLC entered into a note in the amount of $64,678.00 for a new piece of machinery in order to upgrade the processing line. The note is payable monthly in installment payments of $1500.00. As of September 30, 2020 the note is current.

On August 7, 2020, Pacific Ventures Group entered into a convertible promissory note in the amount of $168,500.00. The note matures one year from the issuance and if not prepaid it is convertible into common stock. As of September the principal balance of the note is $168,500.00 and the Company is within the prepayment period.

On April 1, 2020, The Company entered into a SBA note in the amount of $274,000.00 There are not payment due for 12 months. As of September 30, 2020, the note is current. The monthly payments are estimated to be $1500.00 per month.

In August 2019, Seaport Group Enterprises, LLC (“SGE”) agreed to acquire Seaport Meat Company, a wholesale meat distribution and processing company that manufactures and supplies various restaurants and food service institutions, from PNC, Inc., Peter Camarda and Nancy Camarda (collectively, “PNC”). In furtherance of this agreement, the parties entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement on or about August 15, 2019, whereby SGE agreed to purchase certain assets, properties, and rights belonging to PNC. In connection with the closing of the transactions contemplated by the asset purchase acquisition, as part of the consideration for the asset purchase, Seaport Group Enterprises LLC entered into a secured promissory note with PNC INC. in the amount of $850,000 due in three payments over 18 months.

On or about May 13, 2020, SGE filed a lawsuit against PNC in Los Angeles Superior Court, based on PNC’s material breaches of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Consulting and Covenant Not to Compete Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”), as well material misrepresentations that PNC made to SGE. SGE’s complaint alleges causes of action against PNC for including but not limited to fraud.

As of the date of this report, the note to PNC is past due as the amounts due, if any, are in dispute within the above referenced action brought by SGE. The Company and SGE intend to vigorously pursue its rights and remedies against PNC as well as defend the allegations set forth in the counter complaint. Management does not believe that an adverse ruling would have a material effect on the operations of the Company.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company had short-term notes payable of $1,362,605 and long-term notes payable of $8,669,129.

As of September 30, 2020, the Company had short-term notes payable of $1,907,971 and long-term notes payable of $10,588,942.

10. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Share Exchange

On August 14, 2015, Snöbar Holdings entered into the Share Exchange Agreement with the Company and Snöbar Holdings’ shareholders (the “Snöbar Shareholders”) who held of record (i) at least 99% and up to 100% of the total issued and outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock and (ii) 100% of the total issued and outstanding shares of Class B Common Stock, of Snöbar Holding. In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Share Exchange Agreement, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Snöbar Holdings’ Class A and Class B Common Stock from Snöbar Shareholders, with Snöbar Holdings becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, in exchange for the issuance to the Snöbar Shareholders of 22,500,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company and the issuance of 2,500,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock to certain other persons (as set forth below).

There was 0 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock issued during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2020.

Common Stock and Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of its preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share. The Company designated 6,000,000 shares of preferred stock as Series E Preferred Stock (the “Series E Preferred Stock”). Under the rights, preferences and privileges of the Series E Preferred Stock, for every share of Series E Preferred Stock held, the holder thereof has the voting rights equal to 10 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2019, there were 6,000,000 shares of Series E Preferred Stock issued and outstanding. Additionally, Company has designated 10,000 shares of Series F Preferred Stock and 10,000 shares of the Series F Preferred Stock are issued and outstanding. Each share of Series F Preferred Stock is convertible into 0.1% of the issued and outstanding stock at the time of conversion.

From January 1, 2020 through September 30, 2020, the Company issued 0 shares of its common stock.

The Company is authorized to issue up to 900,000,000 shares of its common stock, $0.001 par value per share. Holders of common stock have one vote per share. As of September 30, 2019, and the same period in 2020, there were 477,226,000 and 6,871,351 shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding, respectively. The September 30, 2020 common stock issued and outstanding shares reflect the 1-for-500 reverse stock split that occurred on April 13, 2020.

On April 13, 2020 the Company effected a 500 for 1 reverse split of its common stock. The number of authorized common shares remained 900,000,000.

11. COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND UNCERTAINTIES

Operating Lease

The Company is currently obligated under two operating leases for office spaces and associated building expenses. Both leases are on a month-to-month basis at a monthly rate of $450 and $330, respectively.

SDFO operations are located at 10407 Friars Rd, San Diego, CA 92110, where they occupy an aggregate of approximately 10,000 square feet pursuant to leases. The 5-year leases are on an annual basis at a monthly rate of $6,000 per month.

Seaport Group Enterprise LLC is located at 2533 Folex Way, Spring Valley CA 91978, where they occupy an aggregate of approximately 17,000 square feet pursuant to the lease. The 5-year leases are on an annual basis starting at a monthly rate of $14,750.00 per month.

San Diego Farmers Outlet and Seaport Meat Company Operating Leases

The Company in May 1, 2018 assumed a lease agreement for a facility site and entered into a lease agreement for office space for San Diego Farmers Outlet. The lease has a term of five years expiring on April 30, 2023.

Future minimum lease payments, as set forth in the lease, are below:

The Company on December 1, 2019 entered into a lease agreement for a facility site for office space for Seaport Meat Company. The lease has a term of five years expiring on November 30, 2024.

Future minimum lease payments, as set forth in the lease, are below:

12. RECENT EVENTS

In March 2020, the World Health Organization characterized a novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19”) as a pandemic amidst a rising number of confirmed cases and thousands of deaths worldwide. As of December 28, 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic had not had a significant impact on our business. However, since mid-March 2020, our business has been significantly impacted. Beginning in mid-March 2020, many countries, including the United States, took steps to restrict travel, temporarily close or enforce capacity restrictions in businesses, schools and other public gathering spaces. Restrictions on public gatherings and attendance at retail or other establishments, including restaurants, and recreational, sporting and other similar venues, continue to evolve and are expected to continue to remain in effect in some capacity for the near-term. It remains unclear when and to what extent the COVID-19 pandemic will fully abate. Since mid-March 2020, the operations of our restaurant, hospitality and education customers (and our operations that are dependent upon these customers) have been significantly disrupted by the spread of COVID-19 and the corresponding sudden and significant decline in consumer demand for food prepared away from home.

13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

ASC 855-16-50-4 establishes accounting and disclosure requirements for subsequent events. ASC 855 details the period after the balance sheet date during which we should evaluate events or transactions that occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which we should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and the required disclosures for such events.

On April 13, 2020 the Company effected a 500 for 1 reverse split of its common stock. The number of authorized common shares remained 900,000,000.

In August 2019, Seaport Group Enterprises, LLC (“SGE”) agreed to acquire Seaport Meat Company, a wholesale meat distribution and processing company that manufactures and supplies various restaurants and food service institutions, from PNC, Inc., Peter Camarda and Nancy Camarda (collectively, “PNC”). In furtherance of this agreement, the parties entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement on or about August 15, 2019, whereby SGE agreed to purchase certain assets, properties, and rights belonging to PNC. In connection with the closing of the transactions contemplated by the asset purchase acquisition, as part of the consideration for the asset purchase, Seaport Group Enterprises LLC entered into a secured promissory note with PNC INC. in the amount of $850,000 due in three payments over 18 months

On or about May 13, 2020, SGE filed a lawsuit against PNC in Los Angeles Superior Court, based on PNC’s material breaches of the Asset Purchase Agreement and the Consulting and Covenant Not to Compete Agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”), as well material misrepresentations that PNC made to SGE. SGE’s complaint alleges causes of action against PNC for including but not limited to fraud. On or about October 19, 2020, PNC filed a Cross-Complaint alleging among other matters breach of the secured promissory note and fraud.

As of the date of this report, the note to PNC is past due as the amounts due, if any, are in dispute within the above referenced action brought by SGE. The Company and SGE intend to vigorously pursue its rights and remedies against PNC as well as defend the allegations set forth in the counter complaint. Management does not believe that an adverse ruling would have a material effect on the operations of the Company.