ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Surrey Bancorp (the Company) began operations on May 1, 2003 and was created for the purpose of acquiring all the
outstanding shares of common stock of Surrey Bank & Trust. The Company is subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve.
Surrey Bank & Trust (the Bank) was incorporated on July 15, 1996 as a North Carolina banking corporation and opened for business on July 22, 1996. As such, the Bank operates
under the laws of the State of North Carolina. As a state chartered, nonmember bank, the Bank is subject to regulation, supervision and regular examination by the North Carolina Banking Commission (the Commission) through the North
Carolina Commissioner of Banks (the Commissioner) and its applicable federal regulator is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC). The North Carolina Banking Commission and the FDIC have the power to enforce
compliance with applicable banking statutes and regulations.
The principal business of the Company is to provide
comprehensive individual and corporate financial services through its main and branch offices in Mount Airy, North Carolina and branch offices in Stuart, Virginia and Pilot Mountain, North Carolina. These services include demand and time deposits as
well as commercial, installment, mortgage and other consumer lending services, insurance and investment services.
Competitive Conditions
The principal areas and methods of competition in the banking industry are the services that are offered, the pricing of
those services, the convenience and availability of the services and the degree of expertise and personal manner with which those services are offered. The Company encounters strong competition from other commercial banks, including the largest
North Carolina banks, operating in Mount Airy, North Carolina, and the surrounding area. In the conduct of certain aspects of its business, the Bank also competes with credit unions, insurance companies, money market mutual funds, and other non-bank
financial institutions, some of which are not subject to the same degree of regulation as the Company. Many of these competitors have substantially greater resources and lending abilities than the Company and offer certain services, such as
investment banking, trust, interstate and international banking services, that the Company does not provide.
Material Customers
Deposits are derived from a broad base of customers in the Companys trade area. No material portion of deposits
have been obtained from a single person or a few persons (including Federal, State, and local governments and agencies thereunder), the loss of which would have a materially adverse effect on the business of the Company.
The majority of loans and commitments to extend credit have been granted to customers in the Companys market area. The majority of
such customers are depositors. The Company generally does not extend credit to any single borrower or group of related borrowers in excess of approximately $5,300,000. Although the Company has a reasonably diversified portfolio, it has loan
concentrations relating to customers who are in the following industries: residential real estate, real estate leasing and development, fabricated metal products manufacturing, accommodations, utilities, heavy construction, repairs and maintenance
industries, nursing and residential care facilities, motion picture and sound recording industries, trucking, amusement facilities and various manufacturing industries. Total loans and loan commitments to these industry groups at December 31,
2013 and 2012 are summarized in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and
Commitments
December 31,
|
|
Industry
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Real
Estate
|
|
$
|
20,635,000
|
|
|
$
|
21,511,000
|
|
Fabricated Metal Products Manufacturing
|
|
|
10,622,000
|
|
|
|
11,259,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accommodations
|
|
|
10,401,000
|
|
|
|
8,061,000
|
|
Utilities
|
|
|
7,786,000
|
|
|
|
4,194,000
|
|
Heavy and Civil Engineering
Construction
|
|
|
7,007,000
|
|
|
|
2,952,000
|
|
Repair and Maintenance
Industries
|
|
|
6,839,000
|
|
|
|
6,745,000
|
|
Nursing and Residential Care
Facilities
|
|
|
6,567,000
|
|
|
|
5,976,000
|
|
Motion Picture and Sound Recording
Industries
|
|
|
6,358,000
|
|
|
|
11,116,000
|
|
Truck Transportation
|
|
|
6,352,000
|
|
|
|
6,278,000
|
|
Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation
Industries
|
|
|
5,732,000
|
|
|
|
4,774,000
|
|
Construction of
Buildings
|
|
|
4,570,000
|
|
|
|
3,731,000
|
|
Miscellaneous
Manufacturing
|
|
|
4,556,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wood Product
Manufacturing
|
|
|
4,235,000
|
|
|
|
3,313,000
|
|
Motor Vehicle and Parts
Dealers
|
|
|
4,190,000
|
|
|
|
4,767,000
|
|
Specialty Trade
Contractors
|
|
|
3,159,000
|
|
|
|
2,546,000
|
|
Personal and Laundry
Services
|
|
|
2,518,000
|
|
|
|
2,283,000
|
|
Nonmetallic Mineral Product
Manufacturing
|
|
|
2,461,000
|
|
|
|
2,585,000
|
|
Offices of Physicians
|
|
|
2,254,000
|
|
|
|
2,570,000
|
|
Merchant Wholesalers, Nondurable
Goods
|
|
|
2,231,000
|
|
|
|
1,776,000
|
|
Animal Production
|
|
|
1,942,000
|
|
|
|
2,087,000
|
|
Food Service and Drinking
Places
|
|
|
1,918,000
|
|
|
|
2,267,000
|
|
Rights
No patents, trademarks, licenses, franchises or concessions held are of material significance to the Company.
New Services
No new services were
added to the Companys operations in 2013.
Supervision and Regulation
Banking is a complex, highly regulated industry. The primary goals of banking regulations are to maintain a safe and sound banking system
and to facilitate the conduct of sound monetary policy. In furtherance of these goals, Congress and the North Carolina General Assembly have created largely autonomous regulatory agencies and enacted numerous laws that govern banks, their holding
companies and the banking industry. The descriptions of and references to the statutes and regulations below are brief summaries and do not purport to be complete. The descriptions are qualified in their entirety by reference to the specific
statutes and regulations discussed.
As a North Carolina bank, Surrey Bank & Trust is subject to regulation,
supervision and regular examination by the Commissioner and the FDIC. The Commissioner and the FDIC have the power to enforce compliance with applicable banking statutes and regulations.
Federal Regulation
As a bank holding company, Surrey Bancorp is subject
to regulation, supervision and regular examinations by the Federal Reserve. The Bank Holding Company Act provides that a bank holding company must obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve for the acquisition of more than five percent of the
voting stock or substantially all the assets of any bank or bank holding company. In addition, the Bank Holding Company Act restricts the extension of credit to any bank holding company by its subsidiary bank. The Bank Holding Company Act also
provides that, with certain exceptions, a bank holding company may not engage in any activities other than those of banking or managing or controlling banks and other authorized subsidiaries or own or control more than five percent of the voting
shares of any company that is not a bank. The Federal Reserve has deemed limited activities to be closely related to banking and therefore permissible for a bank holding company.
As a North Carolina bank, Surrey Bank & Trust is subject to regulation, supervision and regular examination by the FDIC. The
FDIC is required to conduct regular on-site examinations of the operations of the Bank and enforces
federal laws that set specific requirements for bank capital, the payment of dividends, loans to officers and directors, and types and amounts of loans and investments made by commercial banks.
Among other things, the FDIC must approve the establishment of branch offices, conversions, mergers, assumption of deposit liabilities between insured banks and uninsured banks or institutions, and the acquisition or establishment of certain
subsidiary corporations. The FDIC can also prevent capital or surplus diminution in transactions where the deposit accounts of the resulting, continuing or assumed bank are insured by the FDIC.
Transactions with Affiliates
. A bank may not engage in specified transactions (including, for example, loans) with its
affiliates unless the terms and conditions of those transactions are substantially the same or at least as favorable to the bank as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with or involving other nonaffiliated entities. In the
absence of comparable transactions, any transaction between a bank and its affiliates must be on terms and under circumstances, including credit standards, which in good faith would be offered or would apply to nonaffiliated companies. In addition,
transactions referred to as covered transactions between a bank and its affiliates may not exceed 10% of the banks capital and surplus per affiliate and an aggregate of 20% of its capital and surplus for covered transactions with
all affiliates. Certain transactions with affiliates, such as loans, also must be secured by collateral of specific types and amounts. The Bank also is prohibited from purchasing low quality assets from an affiliate. Every company under common
control with the Bank is deemed to be an affiliate of the Bank.
Loans to Insiders
. Federal law also
constrains the types and amounts of loans that the Bank may make to its executive officers, directors and principal shareholders. Among other things, these loans are limited in amount, must be approved by the Banks board of directors in
advance, and must be on terms and conditions as favorable to the Bank as those available to an unrelated person.
Regulation of Lending Activities
. Loans made by the Bank are also subject to numerous federal and state laws and
regulations, including the Truth-In-Lending Act, Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and adjustable rate mortgage disclosure requirements. Remedies to the borrower or
consumer and penalties to the Bank are provided if the Bank fails to comply with these laws and regulations. The scope and requirements of these laws and regulations have expanded significantly in recent years.
Branch Banking
. All banks located in North Carolina are authorized to branch statewide. Accordingly, a bank located
anywhere in North Carolina has the ability, subject to regulatory approval, to establish branch facilities near any of our facilities and within our market area. If other banks were to establish branch facilities near our facilities, it is uncertain
whether these branch facilities would have a material adverse effect on our business. Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act), national and state banks may branch within the state
where the head office is located, to the extent permitted by that state. National and state banks may also branch de novo into another state to the same extent a bank headquartered in that state could branch within that state, subject to certain
deposit concentration limits. Federal regulations prohibit an out-of-state bank from using interstate branching authority primarily for the purpose of deposit production. These regulations include guidelines to insure that interstate branches
operated by an out-of-state bank in a host state are reasonably helping to meet the credit needs of the host state communities served by the out-of-state bank.
Reserve Requirements
. Pursuant to regulations of the Federal Reserve, the Bank must
maintain average daily reserves against its transaction accounts. During 2013, no reserves were required to be maintained on the first $12.4 million of transaction accounts, but reserves equal to 3.0% were required to be maintained on the aggregate
balances of those accounts between $12.4 million and $79.5 million, and additional reserves were required to be maintained on aggregate balances in excess of $79.5 million in an amount equal to 10.0% of the excess. These percentages are subject to
annual adjustment by the Federal Reserve, which has advised that for 2014, no reserves will be required to be maintained on the first $13.3 million of transaction accounts, but reserves equal to 3.0% must be maintained on the aggregate balances of
those accounts between $13.3 million and $89.0 million, and additional reserves are required on aggregate balances in excess of $89.0 million in an amount equal to 10.0% of the excess. Because required reserves must be maintained in the form of
vault cash or in an account at a Federal Reserve Bank bearing nominal interest, the effect of the reserve requirement is to reduce the amount of the institutions interest-earning assets and interest income. As of December 31, 2013, the
Bank met its reserve requirements.
Community Reinvestment
. Under the Community Reinvestment Act
(CRA), as implemented by regulations of the federal bank regulatory agencies, an insured bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with its safe and sound operation, to help meet the credit needs of its entire
community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for banks, nor does it limit a banks discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are
best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA. The CRA requires the federal bank regulatory agencies, in connection with their examination of insured banks, to assess the banks records of meeting the credit needs of their
communities, using the ratings of outstanding, satisfactory, needs to improve, or substantial noncompliance, and to take that record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by those
banks. All banks are required to make public disclosure of their CRA performance ratings. The Bank received a satisfactory rating in its most recent CRA examination.
Governmental Monetary Policies
. The commercial banking business is affected not only by general economic conditions
but also by the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve, a federal banking regulatory agency that regulates the money supply in order to mitigate recessionary and inflationary pressures. Among the techniques used to implement these objectives are
open market transactions in United States government securities, changes in the rate paid by banks on bank borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements against bank deposits. These techniques are used in varying combinations to influence overall
growth and distribution of bank loans, investments, and deposits, and their use may also affect interest rates charged on loans or paid for deposits. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve have had a significant effect on the operating results
of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. In view of changing conditions in the national economy and money markets, as well as the effect of actions by monetary and fiscal authorities, no prediction can be
made as to possible future changes in interest rates, deposit levels, loan demand or the business and earnings of the Bank.
Dividends
. As a bank holding company that does not, as an entity, currently engage in separate business activities of
a material nature, the Companys ability to pay cash dividends depends upon the cash dividends the Company receives from the Bank. The Companys primary source of income is dividends paid by the Bank. The Company must pay all of
its operating expenses from funds it receives from the Bank. North Carolina banking law permits the payment of dividends if the distribution will not reduce the banks capital below applicable capital requirements. Also, under federal
banking law, no cash dividend may be paid if the Bank is undercapitalized or insolvent or if payment of the cash dividend would render the Bank undercapitalized or insolvent and no cash dividend may be paid by the Bank if it is in default of any
deposit insurance assessment due to the FDIC. Therefore, shareholders may receive dividends from the Company only to the extent that funds are available at the holding company or from the Bank. In addition, the Federal Reserve generally
prohibits bank holding companies from paying dividends except out of operating earnings, and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the bank holding companys capital needs, asset quality and overall financial
condition. The Federal Reserve may impose restrictions on the Companys payment of cash dividends since it is required to maintain its own adequate regulatory capital and is expected to serve as a source of financial strength and to commit
resources to the Bank.
Deposit Insurance Assessments
. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act of 2010 permanently raised the basic limit on federal deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor. To obtain this deposit protection, banks must pay assessments to the FDIC. The FDIC assesses insurance
premiums on a banks deposits at a variable rate depending on the probability that the Deposit Insurance Fund will incur a loss with respect to that bank. Banks assigned to higher risk classifications (that is, banks that pose a higher risk of
loss to their respective deposit insurance funds) pay assessments at higher rates than institutions that pose a lower risk. The FDIC determines the deposit insurance assessment rates on the basis of a banks capital classification and
supervisory evaluations. Each of these categories has three subcategories, resulting in nine assessment risk classifications. The three subcategories with respect to capital are well-capitalized, adequately capitalized and
less than adequately capitalized (that would include undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized banks). The three subcategories with respect to supervisory
concerns are healthy, supervisory concern and substantial supervisory concern. A bank is deemed healthy if it is financially sound with only a few minor weaknesses. A bank is deemed subject to
supervisory concern if it has weaknesses that, if not corrected, could result in significant deterioration of the bank and increased risk to the DIF of the FDIC. A bank is deemed subject to substantial supervisory concern if
it poses a substantial probability of loss to the DIF. In addition, the FDIC can impose special assessments in certain instances. Until 2010, a banks assessment base was roughly equal to its total domestic deposits. As required by the
Dodd-Frank Act, however, the FDIC amended its regulations effective April 2011 to define a banks assessment base as its average consolidated total assets minus its average tangible equity. This amendment also revised the insurance assessment
rate schedule for banks. The new schedule charges a rate of from 0.025% to 0.09% at the lowest assessment category up to a maximum assessment of 0.45% on a banks average deposit base. In an effort to encourage banks to limit the FDICs
exposure, the new insurance assessment rate formula also:
|
|
|
Reduces the assessment rate paid by a bank by up to 0.05% based on the amount of unsecured debt held by the institution; and
|
|
|
|
Increases a banks assessment if it is already considered risky and brokered deposits make up more than 10% of the institutions domestic
deposits.
|
The Banks deposit insurance assessments may increase depending upon the risk category and
subcategory, if any, to which it is assigned. Any increase in insurance assessments could have an adverse effect on the Companys earnings.
The Dodd-Frank Act established a statutory minimum reserve ratio of 1.35% of insured deposits for the Deposit Insurance Fund by September 30, 2020. On December 20, 2010, the FDIC increased the
minimum reserve ratio to 2.0%. In order achieve these levels, the FDIC has issued special deposit insurance assessments and raised deposit insurance rates. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the FDIC to make additional special assessments
and, for the first time in its history, charge examination fees.
Changes in Management
. Any depository
institution that has been chartered less than two years, is not in compliance with the minimum capital requirements of its primary federal banking regulator, or is otherwise in a troubled condition must notify its primary federal banking regulator
of the proposed addition of any person to the board of directors or the employment of any person as a senior executive officer of the institution at least 30 days before such addition or employment becomes effective. During this 30-day period, the
applicable federal banking regulatory agency may disapprove of the addition of such director or employment of such officer. The Bank is not subject to any such requirements.
Enforcement Authority
. The federal banking laws also contain civil and criminal penalties available for use by the appropriate regulatory agency against certain
institution-affiliated parties including management, employees and agents of a financial institution, as well as independent contractors such as attorneys and accountants and others who participate in the conduct of the financial
institutions affairs and who caused or are likely to cause more than minimum financial loss to or a significant adverse affect on the institution, who knowingly or recklessly violate a law or regulation, breach a fiduciary duty or engage in
unsafe or unsound practices. These practices can include the failure of an institution to timely file required reports or the submission of inaccurate reports. These laws authorize the appropriate banking agency to issue cease and desist orders that
may, among other things, require affirmative action to correct any harm resulting from a violation or practice, including restitution, reimbursement, indemnification or guarantees against loss. A financial institution may also be ordered to restrict
its growth, dispose of certain assets or take other action as determined by the primary federal banking agency to be appropriate.
Capital Adequacy
. The Federal Reserve has promulgated capital adequacy
regulations for all bank holding companies with assets in excess of $150 million. The Bank is also subject to capital requirements and limits on activities established by the FDIC. The Federal Reserves and the FDICs capital adequacy
regulations are based upon a risk based capital determination, whereby an institutions adequacy is determined in light of the risk, both on- and off-balance sheet, contained in the companys assets. Different categories of assets are
assigned risk weightings and are counted at a percentage of their book value.
The regulations divide capital between Tier 1
capital (core capital) and Tier 2 capital. For a bank holding company, Tier 1 capital consists primarily of common stock, related surplus, noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries and a limited
amount of qualifying cumulative preferred securities. Goodwill and certain other intangibles are excluded from Tier 1 capital. Tier 2 capital consists of an amount equal to the allowance for loan and lease losses up to a maximum of 1.25%
of risk weighted assets, limited other types of preferred stock not included in Tier 1 capital, hybrid capital instruments and term subordinated debt. Investments in and loans to unconsolidated banking and finance subsidiaries that constitute
capital of those subsidiaries are excluded from capital. The sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital constitutes qualifying total capital. The Tier 1 component must comprise at least 50% of qualifying total capital.
Every bank holding company and bank has to achieve and maintain a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 4.0% and a minimum total
capital ratio of at least 8.0%. In addition, banks and bank holding companies are required to maintain a minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to average total consolidated assets (leverage capital ratio) of at least 3.0% for the most
highly-rated, financially sound banks and bank holding companies and a minimum leverage ratio of at least 4.0% for all other banks. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Federal Reserve define Tier 1 capital for banks in the same
manner for both the leverage ratio and the risk-based capital ratio. However, the Federal Reserve defines Tier 1 capital for bank holding companies in a slightly different manner. As of December 31, 2013, the Companys leverage
capital ratio, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio and total risk-based capital ratio were 13.58%, 20.64% and 21.90%, respectively.
The guidelines also provide that banking organizations experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain
strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory level, without significant reliance on intangible assets. The guidelines also indicate that the Federal Reserve will continue to consider a Tangible Tier 1 Leverage
Ratio in evaluating proposals for expansion or new activities. The Tangible Tier 1 Leverage Ratio is the ratio of Tier 1 capital, less intangibles not deducted from Tier 1 capital, to quarterly average total assets. As of
December 31, 2013, the Federal Reserve had not advised the Company of any specific minimum Tangible Tier 1 Leverage Ratio applicable to it.
Prompt Corrective Action
. Banks are subject to restrictions on their activities depending on their level of capital. Federal prompt corrective action regulations divide
banks into five different categories, depending on their level of capital. Under these regulations, a bank is deemed to be well capitalized if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or more, a core capital ratio of 6% or more and
a leverage ratio of 5% or more, and if the bank is not subject to an order or capital directive to meet and maintain a certain capital level. Under these regulations, a bank is deemed to be adequately capitalized if it has a total
risk-based capital ratio of 8% or more, a core capital ratio of 4% or more and a leverage ratio of 4% or more (unless it receives the highest composite rating at its most recent examination and is not experiencing or anticipating significant growth,
in which instance it must maintain a leverage ratio of 3% or more). Under these regulations, a bank is deemed to be undercapitalized if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8%, a core capital ratio of less than 4% or a
leverage ratio of less than 3%. Under these regulations, a bank is deemed to be significantly undercapitalized if it has a risk-based capital ratio of less than 6%, a core capital ratio of less than 3% and a leverage ratio of less than
3%. Under such regulations, a bank is deemed to be critically undercapitalized if it has a leverage ratio of less than or equal to 2%. In addition, the applicable federal banking agency has the ability to downgrade a banks
classification (but not to critically undercapitalized) based on other considerations even if the bank meets the capital guidelines.
If a bank is classified as undercapitalized, the bank is required to submit a capital restoration plan to the FDIC and the FDIC may also take certain actions to correct the capital position of the bank.
An undercapitalized bank is
prohibited from increasing its assets, engaging in a new line of business, acquiring any interest in any company or insured depository institution, or opening or acquiring a new branch office,
except under certain circumstances, including the acceptance by the FDIC of a capital restoration plan for the bank.
If a
state bank is classified as significantly undercapitalized, the FDIC would be required to take one or more prompt corrective actions. These actions would include, among other things, requiring sales of new securities to bolster capital, changes in
management, limits on interest rates paid, prohibitions on transactions with affiliates, termination of certain risky activities and restrictions on compensation paid to executive officers. If a bank is classified as critically undercapitalized, the
bank must be placed into conservatorship or receivership within 90 days, unless the FDIC determines otherwise.
The capital
classification of a bank affects the frequency of regulatory examinations of the bank and impacts the ability of the bank to engage in certain activities and affects the deposit insurance premiums paid by the bank. The FDIC is required to conduct a
full-scope, on-site examination of every bank on a periodic basis.
Banks also may be restricted in their ability to accept
brokered deposits, depending on their capital classification. Well capitalized banks are permitted to accept brokered deposits, but all banks that are not well capitalized are not permitted to accept such deposits. The FDIC may, on a
case-by-case basis, permit banks that are adequately capitalized to accept brokered deposits if the FDIC determines that acceptance of such deposits would not constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice with respect to the bank.
State Regulation
As a
North Carolina-chartered bank, the Bank is also subject to extensive supervision and regulation by the Commissioner. Effective October 1, 2012, the North Carolina banking laws were rewritten and recodified. Under the revised banking laws, the
Commissioner continues to enforce specific requirements for bank capital, the payment of dividends, loans to officers and directors, record keeping, and types and amounts of loans and investments made by commercial banks. Among other things, the
approval of the Commissioner is generally required before a North Carolina-chartered commercial bank may establish branch offices, merge with another financial institution, or liquidate or sell substantially all of its assets.
Change of control
. North Carolina banking laws provide that no person may directly or indirectly purchase or acquire
voting stock of the Bank that would result in the change in control of the Bank unless the Commissioner has approved the acquisition. A person will be deemed to have acquired control of the Bank if that person directly or indirectly
(i) owns, controls or has power to vote 10% or more of the voting stock of the Bank, or (ii) otherwise possesses the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policy of the Bank.
Loans.
In its lending activities, the Bank is subject to North Carolina usury laws which generally limit or restrict
the rates of interest, fees and charges and other terms and conditions in connection with various types of loans. North Carolina banking law also limits the amount that may be loaned to any one borrower.
Dividends
. The ability of the Bank to pay dividends is restricted under applicable law and regulations. North Carolina
banking law permits the payment of dividends if the distribution will not reduce the banks capital below applicable capital requirements.
Holding companies
. North Carolina banking law requires that bank holding companies register with the Commissioner and maintain that registration annually. The Commissioner must also
approve any acquisition of control of a state-chartered bank by a bank holding company.
Recent Legislation
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010
The Dodd-Frank Act has had and will continue to have a broad impact on the financial services industry, including significant regulatory and compliance changes as such, including, among other things,
(i) enhanced resolution authority of troubled and failing banks and their holding companies; (ii) increased capital and liquidity requirements; (iii) increased regulatory examination fees; (iv) changes to assessments to be paid
to the FDIC for federal deposit insurance; and (v) numerous other provisions designed to improve supervision and oversight of, and strengthening safety and soundness for, the financial services sector. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act
established a new framework for systemic risk oversight within the financial system to be distributed among new and existing federal regulatory agencies, including the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency, and the FDIC. A summary of certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that are expected to have an effect on the Company is set forth below.
|
|
|
Increased Capital Standards and Enhanced Supervision.
In July 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System announced its approval
of a final rule to implement the Basel III regulatory capital reforms, among other changes required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The rule requires banking organizations to hold more and higher quality capital to
act as a financial cushion to absorb losses, taking into account the impact of risk. The rule includes a new minimum ratio of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.5% as well as a common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer
of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets. The rule also raises the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4% to 6% and includes a minimum leverage ratio of 4% for all banking institutions. In terms of quality of capital, the rule
emphasizes common equity Tier 1 capital and implements strict eligibility criteria for regulatory capital instruments. It also improves the methodology for calculating risk-weighted assets to enhance risk sensitivity. The phase-in for smaller
banking organizations, such as the Company and the Bank, will not begin until January 2015, while the phase-in period for larger banks starts in January 2014. Increases in capital requirements could result in a material impact on the Company and the
Bank.
|
|
|
|
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Bureau).
The Dodd-Frank Act created the Bureau within the Federal Reserve. The Bureau is
tasked with establishing and implementing rules and regulations under certain federal consumer protection laws with respect to the conduct of providers of certain consumer financial products and services. The Bureau has rulemaking authority over
many of the statutes governing products and services offered to bank consumers, and is expected to standardize certain consumer products and to require banks to provide expanded access to account, transaction and fee information. In addition, the
Dodd-Frank Act permits states to adopt consumer protection laws and regulations that are more stringent than those regulations promulgated by the Bureau and state attorneys general are permitted to enforce consumer protection rules adopted by the
Bureau against state-chartered institutions.
|
|
|
|
Deposit Insurance.
The Dodd-Frank Act makes permanent the $250,000 deposit insurance limit for insured deposits. Amendments to the Federal
Deposit Insurance Act also revise the assessment base against which an insured depository institutions deposit insurance premiums paid to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be calculated. Under the amendments, the assessment
base will no longer be the institutions deposit base, but rather its average consolidated total assets less its average tangible equity during the assessment period. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act makes changes to the minimum designated
reserve ratio of the DIF, increasing the minimum from 1.15 percent to 1.35 percent of the estimated amount of total insured deposits and eliminating the requirement that the FDIC pay dividends to depository institutions when the reserve ratio
exceeds certain thresholds. The Dodd- Frank Act also allows depository institutions to pay interest on demand deposits.
|
|
|
|
Transactions with Affiliates.
The Dodd-Frank Act enhances the requirements for certain transactions with affiliates under Section 23A and
23B of the Federal Reserve Act, including an expansion of the definition of covered transactions and increasing the amount of time for which collateral requirements regarding covered transactions must be maintained.
|
|
|
|
Transactions with Insiders.
Insider transaction limitations are expanded through the strengthening of loan restrictions to insiders and the
expansion of the types of transactions subject to the various limits, including derivative transactions, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending or borrowing transactions. Restrictions are also placed on certain
asset sales to and from an insider to an institution, including requirements that such sales be on market terms and, in certain circumstances, approved by the institutions board of directors.
|
|
|
|
Enhanced Lending Limits.
The Dodd-Frank Act strengthens the existing limits on a depository institutions credit exposure to one borrower.
Current banking law limits a depository institutions ability to extend credit to one person (or group of related persons) in an amount exceeding certain thresholds. The Dodd-Frank Act expands the scope of these restrictions to include credit
exposure arising from derivative transactions, repurchase agreements, and securities lending and borrowing transactions.
|
|
|
|
Compensation Practices
. The Dodd-Frank Act provides that the appropriate federal regulators must establish standards prohibiting as an unsafe
and unsound practice any compensation plan of a bank holding company or other covered financial institution that provides an insider or other employee with excessive compensation or could lead to a material financial loss to
such firm. The Company does not believe the Dodd-Frank Act will materially impact the current compensation policies at the Company and Bank.
|
|
|
|
Holding Company Capital Levels
. The Dodd-Frank Act requires bank regulators to establish minimum capital levels for holding companies that are
at least of the same nature as those applicable to financial institutions. All trust preferred securities, or TRUPs, issued by bank or thrift holding companies after May 19, 2010 will be counted as Tier II Capital (with an exception for certain
small bank holding companies). TRUPs issued prior to May 19, 2010 by bank holding companies with less than $15 billion in assets as of December 31, 2009, such as the Company, are exempt from these capital deductions.
|
|
|
|
De Novo Interstate Branching.
The Dodd-Frank Act removes restrictions on interstate branching and allows banks to establish branch offices in
any state if the laws of that state permit a bank chartered in that state to establish the branch office. This provision may increase competition with the Bank by out-of-state financial institutions.
|
|
|
|
Shareholder Voting.
The Dodd-Frank Act requires, at least once every three years, a non-binding shareholder vote on executive compensation.
Shareholders must also be given a non-binding vote on the frequency of such say-on-pay votes. If shareholders are asked to vote on a merger transaction, they must also be permitted a non-binding vote on any compensation paid to the
companys named executive officers in connection with the transaction. The Act also prohibits brokers from voting on any of these proposals without customer instructions.
|
While approximately two thirds of the required regulations have been adopted, drafting the rules called for in the Dodd-Frank Act remains
in process and the associated rule-making process will likely take place over the course of several more years. Given the uncertainty associated with the manner in which the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will be implemented by the various
regulatory agencies, the full extent of the impact such regulations will have on the operations of financial institutions generally and the Company, specifically, is unclear. The changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act may impact the profitability
of the Companys business activities, require changes to certain of the Companys business practices, impose upon the Company and Bank more stringent capital, liquidity
and leverage ratio requirements or otherwise adversely affect the Companys business. These changes may also require the Company to invest significant management attention and resources to
evaluate and make necessary changes in order to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements.
Future Legislation and Regulations
The Company cannot predict what new legislation might be enacted or what regulations might be adopted or amended, or if
enacted, adopted or amended, their effect on its operations. Any change in applicable law or regulation, state or federal, may have a material adverse effect on its business.
Environmental Laws
Compliance with federal, state, or local provisions
regulating the discharge of materials into the environment has not had, nor is it expected to have in the future, a material effect upon the Banks capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.
Employees
All
employees of the Company are compensated by the Companys subsidiary, the Bank. The Bank had ten (10) officers, fifty-nine (59) full-time employees (including the officers), and thirteen (13) part-time employees as of
December 31, 2013.