PART
I
Item
1. Business
Background
The
Company has only recently emerged from its status as a development-stage company, and it has limited operating history and is
expected to experience losses in the near term. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued a
report stating there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Summary
The
Company operates a deep discount variety retail store under the name “Dollar Green Stores” (“dollar stores”)
in Sacramento and intends to expand throughout California to bring in additional revenue streams from the high demand for such
stores.
In
September 2013, the Company’s management developed plans to open and operate two retail stores in Sacramento, California,
under the named “Dollar Green Stores.”
In February 2014,
the Company
opened its first dollar store in Sacramento, which consists of more than 2,200 square feet of retail store space. The Company
opened its second dollar store in May 2014. In August 2014, the Company was forced to close its original store due to its landlord’s
failure to comply with city building codes. The Company relocated the second store in December 2015 and settled the existing lease
at that time. Therefore, the Company currently operates one retail store.
Additionally,
the Company began trading precious metals in December 2014 with the purchase 100 ounces of silver. The Company has since purchased
gold and is evaluating potentially expanding its ownership of additional precious metals. Though management has limited experience
in the precious metals field they have solicited outside experts contribute to the Company’s investment strategies.
The
Company also has plans to acquire and operate hotels and residential properties in the high demand areas of California such as
Southern California and the Bay Area.
In
January and February 2017, the Company invested in precious metals (silver) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $3,500.
On April 18, 2017 the Company entered into a Letter of Intent to purchase a central California hotel for approximately $7,000,000
and enter escrow by April 28, 2017.
The
Business: Discount Retail Stores
The
Company owns and operates a discount retail store and which it expects to close in the second quarter of 2017.
According
to Deloitte’s general publication
“Dollar Store Strategies for National Brands,” which was published in 2012
as the stigma of dollar store shopping wanes, the dollar store channel has developed into a booming, $55.6 million industry
in the United States. Through its discount retail stores segment, the Company intends to offer a broad selection of merchandise,
including consumable products such as food, paper and cleaning products, bathroom and kitchen cleaners, personal grooming products
such as soap, hair products, as well as pet supplies, and non-consumable products such as seasonal merchandise, home décor
and domestics, and apparel. The Company intends to stock its retail stores with high quality national brands from leading manufacturers,
as well as comparable quality private brand selections with prices at substantial discounts to national brands.
The
Business: Hotel and Residential Properties
The
Company believes the hotel industry accounts for a significant part of the overall economy. The industry is highly segmented with
many different brands targeting a vast range of customer needs at various price points. Businesses in the hotel industry generally
operate under one or more business models, including hotel management, brand franchising and hotel ownership. Hotels are categorized
into three groups: full-service, select-service and limited-service. Full-service hotels typically offer a full range of amenities
and facilities, including food and beverage facilities and meeting facilities. Select-service hotels furnish some of the amenities
offered at full-service hotels but on a smaller scale and generally do not to have meeting facilities. Limited-service hotels
usually offer only lodging, however some provide modest food and beverage facilities such as breakfast buffets or small meeting
rooms.
Lodging
demand growth is generally related to the strength of the overall economy. Additionally, local demand factors may stimulate business
and leisure travel to specific locations. In particular, macroeconomic trends relating to GDP growth, corporate profits, capital
investments and employment growth are some of the primary drivers of lodging demand. As the economy continues to improve, the
ongoing trend of strong transient demand and growing group business will continue to drive demand for hotels and lodging and allow
the industry to achieve increased growth.
The
Market
The
dollar channel is a $55.6 billion industry in the United States. The recent recession and post-recessionary shopping habits have
made dollar stores a frequent channel for more consumers—of all incomes. Dollar stores appeal to primarily low- and fixed-income
consumers; however, a growing segment of shoppers are high-income consumers, as the stigma of dollar stores seems to be waning.
Across consumer segments, dollar-store shopping trips appear to be expanding from merely a fill-in or occasional targeted purchase
to a grocery or mass merchandise substitute. To some extent, the growth of dollar stores—in particular multi-price-point
dollar stores, where the price of most products exceeds one dollar—is at the expense of mass merchandisers and grocery channels.
This
growth in dollar stores is faster than traditional channels, particularly in the sales of personal goods, household goods, food,
and beverages. Dollar stores typically offer more variety in food and beverage (including national brands) and the consumer perception
of store brand quality improves.
The
hotel industry globally and in the United States has improved as the economy has recovered over the past few years. According
to the STR Global Census, October 2013 (adjusted to September 2013), U.S. hotel demand has grown at a compound annual growth (“CAGR”)
rate of 4.9% over the past three years. Hotel supply has lagged at a CAGR of just 0.9%. The Company believes there is ample room
to enter this market and that barriers for entry remain relatively low.
The
Company’s Presence in the Market
The
Company has targeted strategic locations in northern California that are currently underserved by the dollar store channel. It
currently operates one deep discount retail store location in Sacramento, California. The Company plans to grow organically as
a participant in the discount retail store industry. The Company will benefit from further expanding its operations and developing
its economy of scale, expanding its brand recognition and customer loyalty and increasing its knowledge of industry operations,
thereby allowing the Company to optimize its future operations and progressively develop future projects to reach their full potential.
Although
the Company intends to begin trading precious metals and has begun acquiring and evaluating potential positions in the market,
it does not currently have a presence in the trade of such metals. Likewise, the Company currently has no presence in the hotel
or residential property marketplace. It intends to acquire such properties in the near future, thereby establishing a footprint
in the market.
The
Business: Precious Metals
Silver
and other precious metals, may be used as an investment. A traditional way of investing in silver is by buying actual bullion
bars. In some countries, like Switzerland and Liechtenstein, bullion bars can be bought or sold over the counter at major banks.
Another means of buying and trading silver is through silver coins. Silver coins include the one ounce 99.99% pure Canadian Silver
Maple Leaf and the one ounce 99.93% pure American Silver Eagle. Likewise, an increasing popular method of trading in silver and
precious metals is through exchange-traded products, such as exchange-traded funds, exchange-traded notes and closed-end funds
that aim to track the price of silver. Silver exchange-traded products are traded on the major stock exchanges including the London
and New York Stock Exchanges.
The
Company believes that stimulative monetary policies adopted by the United States, the European Union, China and Japan may cause
an increase in inflation. Gold and silver have traditionally served as a hedge against economic uncertainty and high inflation.
At
the present time, the Company does not anticipate or foresee a material effect on this line of its business from existing or probable
governmental regulations.
Services
and Products
The
Company plans to operate discount retail stores in the basic consumer goods market. Such consumable goods include packaged food
comprised of cereals, canned soups, milk, eggs, vegetables, frozen and refrigerated foods, candies, cookies, crackers, salty snacks,
carbonated beverages, over-the-counter medicines and personal care products, such as soap, body wash, shampoo, dental hygiene,
as well as skin, and foot care products. The Company intends to offer additional products including gifts, party goods, toys,
batteries, small electronics, greeting cards, pet supplies, pet food, gardening supplies, durable housewares, kitchen supplies,
cookware, consumables, such as paper, plastics, household chemicals, and other items, including seasonal goods, such as Easter,
Halloween, and Christmas merchandise.
The
Company has begun to establish positions in precious metals and intends to hold as a long term investment. Currently, the Company
has acquired 21,803 ounces of silver and a small amount of gold.
On
April 18, 2017 the Company entered into a Letter of Intent to purchase a central California hotel for approximately $7,000,000
and enter escrow by April 28, 2017.
Pricing
At
the moment, the Company’s business is phasing out of the dollar store retail sector. Most products are priced at 99 cents
or less. However, about 20% of the products offered at the 2,700 square feet store are priced over $1.00 due to customer requests
for specific products.
Competition
The
Company’s discount retail store is part of a highly competitive industry. The basic consumer packaged goods market encompasses
discount stores and many other retailers, including mass merchandise, grocery, drug, convenience, variety and other specialty
stores. The Company’s direct competitors will include retail companies such as ‘Dollar General’, ‘Family
Dollar’, ‘Dollar Tree’, and ‘99 Cent Only Store’ to the extent that these competitors are within
a similar geographic area to the Company’s stores. These competitors may have greater financial and other resources than
does the Company.
The
Company intends to differentiate itself from other forms of discount retail stores by targeting low to middle-class consumers
in strategic locations in northern California currently underserved by the dollar store channel.
If
the Company does enter the hotel and or residential property industry, it will encounter significant competition from other hotel,
residential and resort owners and operators. Primary competitors would include branded and independent hotel operating companies,
national and international hotel brands and ownership companies.
Strategic
Partners and Suppliers
The
Company believes that strategic partnerships will be a major component of the Company’s operating strategy and path to success.
The Company hopes to work with several strategic partners in important areas of its business and operations. However, currently,
the Company has no such strategic partners.
The
Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Dollar Store Services, Inc. in October 2013. The Company worked with Dollar Store
Services, Inc. to develop, design and build out its first retail storefront.
Marketing
Strategy
The
Company has conducted limited advertising and marketing to date as the primary focus of the Company since inception has been to
concentrate on beginning its construction and development efforts. The Company has, however, given substantial attention to constructing
the marketing strategy and plans that it will use once its project enters the marketplace.
Operations
The
Company believes that presentation of the store and customer service are important factors in each customer’s experience.
Therefore, the Company’s personnel regularly check the store to ensure items are appropriately placed and aisles are organized.
The stores are maintained to provide a clean, convenient shopping experience and employees offer friendly, knowledgeable customer
service.
Sales
Strategy
The
Company’s management has handpicked the products in the stores to offer quality products priced at 99 cents or less. Compared
to other dollar stores, the Company offers newer inventory and approximately one and a half times more inventory per square foot
than other dollar stores. The Company also incentivizes larger purchases by offering customers a 10% discount if they spend more
than $50.00 before tax.
Revenues
and Losses
Since
its inception, the Company has focused its efforts on conducting market research and development, and has devoted little attention
or resources to sales and marketing or generating near-term revenues and profits. The Company has limited revenues to date and
has not realized any operating profits as of yet. In order to succeed, the Company needs to develop a viable strategy to market
its Dollar Stores and hotels and residential properties once they have been acquired and developed.
The
Company has posted limited revenues from operations based on customer sales at its discount retail stores. The Company posted
revenues of approximately $54,000 and $69,000 during the years ending December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The
Company has not generated profits and has posted net losses since inception. The Company posted net losses of ($2,636,585) for
the full year 2016 and ($346,763) for the year ending December 31, 2015.
Equipment
Financing
The
Company has no existing equipment financing arrangements.
THE
COMPANY
Employees
Currently,
the Company has eight employees and one consultant. For the year ending December 31, 2016 the Company agreed to pay these individuals
2,340,000 shares of which 1,591,336 shares relate to 2016 services and 748,664 shares relate to 2017 services. In addition the
Company filed Form S-8 on September 1, 2016 to register additional shares under their “Employees, Officers, Directors and
Consultants Stock Plan for the Year 2016” for 1,850,000 shares of which were expensed in the second quarter of 2016. In
total the Company issued 4,190,000 shares of their common stock valued at $6,278,304 for the year ending December 31, 2016. In
2015 had one full time employee that received 120,000 shares of common stock.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
Not
Applicable
Item
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None
Item
2. Properties
The
Company currently uses the residence of Jason C. Chang for its corporate office at no cost to the company. The Company has no
other properties and at this time has no agreements to acquire any properties.
The
Company entered into a lease agreement in December 2015 for 2,700 square feet of retail shop space to replace their previous location
below. The lease requires combined monthly payments of base rent of $1,950 for six months beginning January 2016 with a one year
option which runs through June 2017.
The
Company entered into a lease agreement on October 30, 2013 for 2,239 square feet of retail shop space for this store of which
has since been rescinded. The lease required combined monthly payments of base rent of $3,733 for thirty six months beginning
February 2014. On April 8, 2014 the Company entered into a sixty-seven month lease agreement for its second retail store. The
lease requires monthly payments of base rent of $4,756, with free rent for months one through four, month seven, month nine and
month eleven. The base rent increases gradually over the term of the lease. This store began operations on May 8, 2014 until December
2015.
On
August 21, 2014, the first store was forced to close due to below code electrical wiring the landlord had provided. Perishable
inventory at this store was relocated to the second store as nonperishables were moved into storage along with fixed assets. Related
rents and associated costs have ceased with a final settlement pending. On January 27, 2015, the Company filed a lawsuit to recover
these costs either through insurance proceeds or landlord settlement and this has been remedied in 2016 for $15,887.
Based
under the current lease term of the agreement are as follows:
●
|
$12,600 over 6
months for 2017
|
Item
3. Legal Proceedings
In
April 2014, the Company received notice that a shareholder had filed a lawsuit against the Company. The Company has settled on
a cost of this lawsuit will be approximately $83,000, and has reflected this amount in accrued litigation on its balance sheet
as of December 31, 2016 up from $55,200 at December 31, 2015.
On
January 27, 2015 the Company filed a lawsuit to recover costs associated with the August 2014 closing of the first store due to
substandard electrical wiring by the landlord. The lawsuit was settled in 2016 for $15,887.
Item
4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not
applicable.
PART
II
Item
5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On
December 9, 2015 the Company began light trading on the NASDAQ bulletin board under the symbol “SSOK”.
At
such time as it qualifies, the Company may choose to apply for quotation of its securities on the OTC Bulletin Board.
The
OTC Bulletin Board is a dealer-driven quotation service. Unlike the Nasdaq Stock Market, companies cannot directly apply to be
quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, only market makers can initiate quotes, and quoted companies do not have to meet any quantitative
financial requirements. Any equity security of a reporting company not listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market or on a national securities
exchange is eligible.
At
such time as it qualifies, the Company may choose to apply for quotation of its securities on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
In
general, there is greater liquidity for traded securities on the Nasdaq Capital Market and less on the OTC Bulletin Board.
As
of December 31, 2016, there are 18,927,638 shares of common stock outstanding of which 12,976,512 shares are owned by officers
and directors of the Company. There are approximately 40 holders of our common stock.
The
shares of common stock held by current shareholders are considered “restricted securities” subject to the limitations
of Rule 144 under the Securities Act. In general, securities may be sold pursuant to Rule 144 after being fully-paid and held
for more than 12 months. While affiliates of the Company are subject to certain limits in the amount of restricted securities
they can sell under Rule 144, there are no such limitations on sales by persons who are not affiliates of the Company. In the
event non-affiliated holders elect to sell such shares in the public market, there is likely to be a negative effect on the market
price of the Company’s securities. There is no dividend policy currently in place.
Item
6. Selected Financial Data.
There
is no selected financial data required to be filed for a smaller reporting company.
Item
7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
You
should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statement and related Notes thereto
included in Part II, Item 8 of this Report before deciding to purchase, hold or sell our common stock.
Sunstock,
Inc., (“Sunstock”) was incorporated on July 23, 2012 under the laws of the State of Delaware to engage in any lawful
corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions.
Management
intends to develop the Company for the acquisition and operation of hotels, discount retail stores, and residential properties
in the high demand areas of California, particularly Southern California and the San Francisco Bay Area. In December 2015, the
Company entered into the investment in precious metals as listed on their Balance sheet of December 31, 2016 of $358,178. In September
2013, management developed plans to open and operate two retail stores in Sacramento, California. On October 30, 2013, the Company
entered into a Purchase Agreement with Dollar Store Services, Inc. to develop, design and build out a retail store which the Company
began operating in February 2014. Additionally, the Company entered into a lease agreement on October 30, 2013 for 2,239 square
feet of retail shop space for this store in Sacramento, California. The lease required monthly payments for rent and maintenance
of $3,733 for thirty six months beginning February 2014.
Management
opened an additional retail store in Sacramento, California in May of 2014 and entered into a retail shop lease for sixty-seven
months beginning May 2014 for approximately 4,756 square feet. The monthly base rent for this location was $4,756, with seven
months of free rent throughout the first eleven months. The base rent gradually increased until the term was to expire in 2019.
This lease terminated in December 2015.
Business
opportunities may be available in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task
of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities difficult and complex.
In
analyzing prospective business opportunities, Sunstock may consider such matters as the available technical, financial and managerial
resources; working capital and other financial requirements; history of operations, if any; prospects for the future; nature of
present and expected competition; the quality and experience of management services which may be available and the depth of that
management; the potential for further research, development, or exploration; specific risk factors not now foreseeable but which
may be anticipated; the potential for growth or expansion; the potential for profit; the perceived public recognition or acceptance
of products, services, or trades; name identification; and other relevant factors. This discussion of the proposed criteria is
not meant to be restrictive of the virtually unlimited discretion of Sunstock to search for and enter into potential business
opportunities.
As
of December 31, 2016, The Company has not posted operating income since inception. It has an accumulated deficit of ($7,046,262)
since inception. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s
continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet its obligations,
which it has not been able to accomplish to date, and /or obtain additional financing from its stockholders and/or other third
parties.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States. The preparation of these financial statements requires making estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The estimates are
based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis of making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Inventories:
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost or market value. We regularly monitor potential excess, or obsolete, inventory by analyzing the
usage for parts on hand and comparing the market value to cost. When necessary, we reduce the carrying amount of our inventory
to its market value.
Stock-Based
Compensation:
All
share-based payments are recognized in the consolidated financial statements based upon their fair values.
The
Company’s accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services
follows ASC Topic 505. The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of
(i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant
or vendor’s performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity
instrument is primarily recognized over the term of the consulting agreement. In accordance with FASB guidance, an asset acquired
in exchange for the issuance of fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments should not be presented or classified as an offset
to equity on the grantor’s balance sheet once the equity instrument is granted for accounting purposes.
2016
Year-End Analysis Results of Operations
Comparison
of the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
As
of December 31, 2016, Sunstock has generated revenues of $54,036 on cost of revenue and operating expenses of $40,619 with limited
cash flows from operations since inception. For the year ended December 31, 2016, Sunstock had sustained a net loss of ($6,338,792),
and had accumulated a deficit of ($7,046,262).
Gross
profit for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $13,417 under $35,044 for 2015.
Operating
expenses were up to $6,398,280 as compared to $189,687 for the year ended December 31, 2016 over year end 2015. Stock based compensation
was the main part of that during the current year at approximately $6,278,000.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As
of December 31, 2016, the Company had $16,601 in cash, $1,000 in other receivables, $362,859 in inventories and $31,770 in prepaid
expenses and services. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company raised $40,126 in cash from stock sales.
Item
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The
financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 are attached hereto.
Item
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item
9A. Controls and Procedures
Pursuant
to Rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules. This evaluation was done as of
the end of the fiscal year under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer
(who is also the principal financial officer). There have been no significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation. Based upon that evaluation, he believes
that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective in gathering, analyzing and disclosing information
needed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in its periodic reports is recorded, summarized
and processed timely. The principal executive officer is directly involved in the day-to-day operations of the Company.
Management’s
Report of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The
Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting in accordance with
the Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s officer, its president, conducted an evaluation of
the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. Based on this evaluation,
management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2016,
based on those criteria. A control system can provide only reasonably, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control
system are met and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues have been detected.
Material
Weaknesses
:
A
material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there
is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not
be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
The
material weaknesses identified are:
1.
Inadequate number of personnel that could accurately and timely record and report the Company’s financial statements in
accordance with GAAP;
2.
We did not employ an adequate number of people to ensure a control environment that would allow for the accurate and timely reporting
of the financial statements.
3.
Ineffective controls to ensure that the accounting for transactions are recorded in accordance with GAAP financial statements.
4.
We have not performed a risk assessment and mapped our processes to control objectives.
Notwithstanding
the existence of these material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, we believe that the financial statements
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Further, we do not believe the material weaknesses identified had an impact on prior financial
statements.
Remediation:
As
part of our ongoing remedial efforts, we have and will continue to, among other things:
1.
Expanded our accounting policy and controls organization by recently hiring qualified accounting and finance personnel;
2.
Increase our efforts to educate both our existing and expanded accounting policy and control organization on the application of
the internal control structure;
3.
Emphasize with management the importance of our internal control structure;
4.
Seek outside consulting services where our existing accounting policy and control organization believes the complexity of the
existing exceeds our internal capabilities.
5.
Plan to implement improved accounting systems.
We
believe that the foregoing actions will improve our internal control over financial reporting, as well as our disclosure controls
and procedures. We intend to perform such procedures and commit such resources as necessary to continue to allow us to overcome
or mitigate these material weaknesses such that we can make timely and accurate quarterly and annual financial filings until such
time as those material weaknesses are fully addressed and remediated.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during its fourth fiscal quarter that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.
Item
9B. Other information
Not
applicable.
PART
III
Item
10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
The
Directors and Officers of the Company are as follows:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Positions
and Offices Held
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jason C. Chang
|
|
44
|
|
President, Secretary, Director
|
Dr. Ramnik S. Clair
|
|
66
|
|
Vice President, Director
|
Management
of Sunstock
Sunstock
has no eight employees and one consultant. Jason C. Chang and Dr. Ramnik S. Clair are the officers and directors of Sunstock and
shareholders. Mr. Chang, as president of Sunstock, and Mr. Clair as vice president, have allocated time to the activities of Sunstock
without compensation.
There
are no agreements or understandings for the officer or director to resign at the request of another person and the above- named
officer and director is not acting on behalf of nor will act at the direction of any other person.
Set
forth below are the names of the directors and officers of the Company, all positions and offices with the Company held, the period
during which they have served as such, and the business experience during at least the last five years:
Jason
C. Chang, serves as a director, Chief Executive Officer and President of Sunstock. Mr. Chang began his career in the hospitality
industry as a child and continuing as an adult working in the family business operating several hotels throughout California.
Mr. Chang has now had over 20 years of hospitality management experience. In addition, as an entrepreneur, Mr. Chang has helped
fund numerous startup companies, primarily related to the technology sector.
Dr.
Ramnik Clair serves as a director and Senior Vice President of Sunstock. Dr. Clair received his medical degree in India and immigrated
to the United States in 1983. He completed his medical residency in New York and has subsequently served in his medical practice
as a solo practitioner. Dr. Clair intends to assist the Company in building long term relationships with its client base.
Conflicts
of Interest
Messrs.
Chang and Clair are not directors of, or sole beneficial shareholders of any other companies which have filed registration statements
on Form 10 for the registration of their common stock pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act.
There
are no binding guidelines or procedures for resolving potential conflicts of interest. Failure by management to resolve conflicts
of interest in favor of the Company could result in liability of management to the Company. However, any attempt by shareholders
to enforce a liability of management to the Company would most likely be prohibitively expensive and time consuming.
Code
of Ethics. The Company has not at this time adopted a Code of Ethics pursuant to rules described in Regulation S-K. The Company
has two persons who are the only shareholders and who serve as the directors and officers. The Company has no operations or business
and does not receive any revenues or investment capital. The adoption of an Ethical Code at this time would not serve the primary
purpose of such a code to provide a manner of conduct as the development, execution and enforcement of such a code would be by
the same persons and only persons to whom such code applied. Furthermore, because the Company does not have any activities, there
are activities or transactions which would be subject to this code. At the time the Company enters into a business combination
or other corporate transaction, the current officers and directors will recommend to any new management that such a code be adopted.
The Company does not maintain an Internet website on which to post a code of ethics.
Corporate
Governance.
For
reasons similar to those described above, the Company does not have a nominating compensation nor audit committee of the board
of directors. At this time, the Company consists of two shareholders who serve as the corporate directors and officers. The Company
has no activities, and receives no revenues. At such time that the Company enters into a business combination and/or has additional
shareholders and a larger board of directors and commences activities, the Company will propose creating committees of its board
of directors, including both a nominating and an audit committee. Because there are only two shareholders of the Company, there
is no established process by which shareholders to the Company can nominate members to the Company’s board of directors.
Similarly, however, at such time as the Company has more shareholders and an expanded board of directors, the new management of
the Company may review and implement, as necessary, procedures for shareholder nomination of members to the Company’s board
of directors.
To
the Company’s review that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 all Section 16(a)
filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than 10 percent beneficial owners were complied with.
.
Item
11. Executive Compensation
The
Company’s officers and directors receive minimal cash compensation for services rendered to the Company. The officers and
directors are not accruing any compensation pursuant to any agreement with the Company. For the year ending December 31, 2015
the Company did not record compensation. For the year ending December 31, 2016 the Company recorded the following:
●
|
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company’s chief executive officer was granted 1,200,000 shares of common stock
for services relating to the period May 10, 2016 to May 9, 2017. Based on the estimated fair value of the common shares, the
Company recorded approximately $129,931 of compensation expense to the officer; as such shares were considered compensatory
for services provided through December 31, 2016.
|
No
retirement, pension, profit sharing, stock option or insurance programs or other similar programs have been adopted by the Company
for the benefit of its employees.
The
Company currently does not compensate its directors.
Item
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The
following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2016, each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of five percent
or more of the Company’s common stock and the director and officer of the Company. The Company does not have any compensation
plans and has not authorized any securities for future issuance. Except as noted, the holder thereof has sole voting and investment
power with respect to the shares shown.
|
|
Amount
of
|
|
|
Percent
of
|
|
Name and Address
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
of
Beneficial Owner
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Stock
(1)
|
|
Jason C. Chang
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 Vista Creek Circle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sacramento, CA 92835
|
|
|
10,976,012
|
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Ramnik C Clair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 Vista Creek Circle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sacramento, CA 92835
|
|
|
2,000,500
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Executive officers and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors as a Group (2 Persons)
|
|
|
12,976,512
|
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
(1)
Based upon 18,927,638 Shares outstanding as of the date of December 31, 2016.
Item
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
In
July 2012, Sunstock issued a total of 20,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for a total
of $2,000 in cash. Of these shares, 19,500,000 were redeemed on July 18, 2013 for an aggregate amount of $1,950.
On
July 19, 2013, Sunstock issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to Jason C. Chang, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer
and a director, for an aggregate amount of $100.
On
October 18, 2013, Sunstock issued 4,200,000 shares of common stock to Jason C. Chang, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer
and a director, in exchange for $96,244 of loans Mr. Chang made to the Company. On February 1, 2014 the Company issued 1,846,012
common shares to the Company’s president, who is also a director and majority shareholder of the Company, at a price of
$0.01 per share for an aggregate price of $18,460. Mr. Chang is a 76% shareholder of Sunstock as of December 31, 2014.
On
October 21, 2013, Sunstock issued 240,000 shares of common stock to Dr. Ramnik C. Clair, The Company’s vice president and
a director, for an aggregate amount of $60,000. On March 15, 2014, the Company issued 30,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock to a director, who is also a Senior Vice President, for a price of $3,000, or $0.10 per share for service rendered. Dr.
Clair is a 3% shareholder of Sunstock.
The
Company maintains a line of credit with a shareholder as a consultant and holder of approximately 120,000 shares, there was an
outstanding balance of $30,000 as of December 31.
The
combined parents to Jason C. Chang, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and a director, worked for a combined total of
1,450,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for the year ending December 31, 2016 and 2015.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded compensation to its CEO for the following.
|
●
|
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company’s chief executive officer was granted 1,200,000 shares of common stock
for services relating to the period May 10, 2016 to May 9, 2017. Based on the estimated fair value of the common shares, the
Company recorded approximately $129,931 of compensation expense to the officer; as such shares were considered compensatory
for services provided through December 31, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company’s chief executive officer was granted 1,846,012 shares of common stock
for the conversion of $18,460 of amounts due. Based on the estimated fair value of the common shares, the Company recorded
approximately $166,000 of compensation expense to the officer; as such shares were considered compensatory for services provided.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
August 2014, the Company entered into a note receivable agreement of approximately $33,000 with the Company’s CEO and
chairman of the board of directors. At September 30, 2014, the entire balance was due. In November 2014, such amount was reclassified
to compensation expense. Effective July 30, 2002, Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 amended the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 to prohibit U.S. and foreign companies with securities traded in the United States of America from making, or
arranging for third parties to make, nearly any type of personal loan to their directors and executive officers. Violations
of the Sarbanes-Oxley loan prohibition are subject to the civil and criminal penalties applicable to violations of the Exchange
Act.
|
Sunstock
is not currently required to maintain an independent director as defined by Rule 4200 of the Nasdaq Capital Market nor does it
anticipate that it will be applying for listing of its securities on an exchange in which an independent directorship is required.
It is likely that neither Mr. Chang nor Dr. Clair would not be considered independent directors if it were to do so.
Item
14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Audit
Fees
The
aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed for each of the last two years for professional services rendered by the independent
registered public accounting firm for the audits of the Company’s annual financial statements and review of financial statements
included in the Company’s Form 10-K and Form 10-Q reports and services normally provided in connection with statutory and
regulatory filings or engagements were as follows:
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hartley
Moore Accountancy Corporation
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
21,000
|
|
Hall & Company
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
39,000
|
|
AUDIT-RELATED
FEES
Hall
and Company charged us $4,925 in connnection with the issuance of consents for registration statements.
TAX
FEES
None.
ALL
OTHER FEES
None.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The
Company does not currently have an audit committee serving and as a result its board of directors performs the duties of an audit
committee. The board of directors will evaluate and approve in advance, the scope and cost of the engagement of an auditor before
the auditor renders audit and non-audit services. The Company does not rely on pre- approval policies and procedures.
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
1 NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
NATURE
OF OPERATIONS
Sunstock,
Inc. (“Sunstock” or “the Company”) was incorporated on July 23, 2012 under the laws of the State of Delaware
to engage in any lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions. Sunstock may
attempt to locate and negotiate with a business entity for the combination of that target company with Sunstock. The combination
will normally take the form of a merger, stock-for-stock exchange or stock-for-assets exchange. In most instances the target company
will wish to structure the business combination to be within the definition of a tax-free reorganization under Section 351 or
Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. No assurances can be given that Sunstock will be successful in locating
or negotiating with any target company. Sunstock has been formed to provide a method for a foreign or domestic private company
to become a reporting company with a class of securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
On
July 18, 2013, the Company has changed its name from Sandgate Acquisition Corporation to Sunstock, Inc.
On
July 18, 2013, Jason Chang and Dr. Ramnik S. Clair were named as the directors of the Company.
On
October 30, 2013, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Dollar Store Services, Inc. to develop, design and build
out a retail store which the Company opened in February 2014. The Company opened its second retail store in May 2014. On August
21, 2014 the first store was forced to close due to below code electrical wiring the landlord had provided. Perishable inventory
at this store was relocated to the second store as nonperishables were moved into storage along with fixed assets. The Company’s
second and currently only store was relocated in December of 2015 under lease running through June 2017. The Company plans to
continue purchasing more precious metals in silver and currently has a Letter of Intent for the purchase of a central California
Hotel which is anticipated to enter escrow by April 28, 2017
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
The
summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding the Company’s financial
statements. Such financial statements and accompanying notes are the representations of the Company’s management, who are
responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America (“GAAP”) in all material respects, and have been consistently applied in preparing
the accompanying financial statements.
USE
OF ESTIMATES
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements,
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates made by the Company’s management include realizability of inventories and value of stock-based transactions.
CONCENTRATION
OF RISK
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash. The Company places
its cash with high quality banking institutions. The Company did not have cash balances in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation limit as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.
INVENTORIES
Inventories
consist of merchandise for sale and are stated at the lower of cost or market determined on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
When a purchase contains multiple copies of the same item, they are stated at average cost.
Inventories
– silver consists primarily of silver and small amounts of gold held for sale and are stated at fair value. Currently, the
Company anticipates holding its precious metals as a long term investment. Depending on market conditions, the Company anticipates
holding its silver holdings until the market price exceeds $50. Likewise, the Company does not plan to sell its gold holdings
unless the market price exceeds $2,500.
At
each balance sheet date, the Company evaluates its ending inventory quantities on hand and on order and records a provision for
excess quantities and obsolescence. Among other factors, the Company considers historical demand and forecasted demand in relation
to the inventory on hand, competitiveness of product offerings, market conditions and product life cycles when determining obsolescence
and net realizable value. In addition, the Company considers changes in the market value of components in determining the net
realizable value of its inventory. Provisions are made to reduce excess or obsolete inventories to their estimated net realizable
values. Once established, write-downs are considered permanent adjustments to the cost basis of the excess or obsolete inventories.
PRECIOUS
METALS
Inventory
– silver: principally includes bullion and bullion coins and are acquired and initially recorded at fair market value. The
fair market value of the bullion and bullion coins is comprised of two components: 1) published market values attributable to
the costs of the raw precious metal, and 2) a published premium paid at acquisition of the metal. The premium is attributable
to the additional value of the product in its finished goods form and the market value attributable solely to the premium may
be readily determined, as it is published by multiple reputable sources. The Company’s inventory - silver are subsequently
recorded at their fair market values on a quarterly basis. The fair value of the inventory is determined using pricing and data
derived from the markets on which the underlying commodities are traded. Precious metals commodities inventory are classified
in Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.
The
change in fair value of the precious metals was included in the financial statements herein as recorded on the Company’s
Statements of Operations as an Unrealized gain on investments on precious metals of $41,825 at December 31, 2016.
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
Property
and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of 3
to 5 years. Any leasehold improvements are depreciated at the lesser of the useful life of the asset or the lease term.
LONG-LIVED
ASSETS
The
Company reviews the carrying values of its long-lived assets for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the expected future cash flow from the use of the asset and its eventual
disposition is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized and measured using the fair value
of the related asset. No impairment charges were incurred during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. There can be no assurance,
however, that market conditions will not change or demand for the Company’s services will continue, which could result in
impairment of long-lived assets in the future.
REVENUE
RECOGNITION
The
Company recognizes revenues in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ASC Topic 605. Accordingly, the
Company recognizes revenues when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, product delivery and acceptance have
occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability of the transaction is assured.
INCOME
TAXES
The
Company accounts for income taxes and the related accounts under the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the income tax bases of assets and liabilities.
A valuation allowance is applied against any net deferred tax asset if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not
that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Therefore, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance
against the net deferred tax assets. The Company’s income tax provision consists of state minimum taxes.
The
Company recognizes any uncertain income tax positions on income tax returns at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not
to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has
less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained.
The
total unrecognized tax benefit resulting in an increase in deferred tax assets and corresponding increase in the valuation allowance
at December 31, 2016 is $869,000. There are no unrecognized tax benefits included in the balance sheet that would, if recognized,
affect the effective tax rate.
The
Company’s policy is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The Company
had $0 accrued for interest and penalties on each of the Company’s balance sheets at December 31, 2016 and 2015.
The
Company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and the state of California jurisdictions. The Company’s tax years for 2013 and
forward for federal and state purposes are subject to examination by the U.S. and state of California tax authorities due to the
carry-forward of unutilized net operating losses. The Company does not foresee material changes to its gross uncertain income
tax position liability within the next twelve months.
EARNINGS
(LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Basic
earnings (loss) per share represent income (loss) available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects additional common shares that would have been
outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income (loss) that would result
from the assumed issuance. The potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate to outstanding stock options and
have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because they would reduce the reported loss per share
and therefore have an anti-dilutive effect.
For
the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 there were no potentially dilutive shares that were excluded from the diluted earnings
(loss) per share as their effect would have been antidilutive for the year then ended.
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The
Company measures the fair value of certain of its financial assets on a recurring basis. A fair value hierarchy is used to rank
the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair
value will be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level
1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level
2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as unadjusted quoted prices for similar
assets and liabilities, unadjusted quoted prices in the markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can
be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and
Level
3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of
the assets or liabilities.
At
December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s financial instruments include cash, marketable securities, accounts payable, and
accrued litigation. The carrying amount of cash, accounts payable, and accrued litigation approximates fair value due to the short-term
maturities of these instruments.
NOTE
2 - GOING CONCERN
The
Company has not posted operating income since inception. It has an accumulated deficit of approximately $7,046,262 as of December
31, 2016. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s
continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet its obligations,
which it has not been able to accomplish to date, and /or obtain additional financing from its stockholders and/or other third
parties.
These
financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to meet its obligations
and continue its operations for the next fiscal year. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon financial
support from its stockholders, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, successfully
locating and negotiate with a business entity for the combination of that target company with the Company.
There
is no assurance that the Company will ever be profitable. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the
possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that
may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
NOTE
3 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 amends the guidance for revenue recognition to replace numerous, industry-specific
requirements and converges areas under this topic with those of the International Financial Reporting Standards. The ASU implements
a five-step process for customer contract revenue recognition that focuses on transfer of control, as opposed to transfer of risk
and rewards. The amendment also requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenues
and cash flows from contracts with customers. Other major provisions include the capitalization and amortization of certain contract
costs, ensuring the time value of money is considered in the transaction price, and allowing estimates of variable consideration
to be recognized before contingencies are resolved in certain circumstances. The amendments in this ASU are effective for reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is prohibited. Entities can transition to the standard either retrospectively
or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. Management is currently assessing the impact the adoption of
ASU 2014-09 will have on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
In
August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern.” The amendments
in this update provide guidance in U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibilities to evaluate whether there is substantial
doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The main provision
of the amendments are for an entity’s management, in connection with the preparation of financial statements, to evaluate
whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability
to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. Management’s evaluation
should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known or reasonably knowable at the date the consolidated financial
statements are issued. When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability
to continue as a going concern, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the consolidated financial statements
to understand all of the following: (1) principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s
ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management’s plans); (2) management’s evaluation of
the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations; and (3) management’s
plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or management’s
plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to
continue as a going concern. The amendments in this update are effective for interim and annual reporting periods after December
15, 2016 and early application is permitted. The Company is currently assessing this guidance for future implementation.
NOTE
4 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property
and equipment consists of the following as of:
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
Furniture
and equipment
|
|
$
|
9,792
|
|
|
$
|
8,875
|
|
Less – accumulated
depreciation
|
|
|
(4,701
|
)
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
5,091
|
|
|
$
|
7,729
|
|
Depreciation
expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $3,555 and $2,084, respectively.
NOTE
5 - RELATED PARTY BALANCES
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 3,860,000 shares of restricted common stock to certain employees
for future services. The unearned restricted shares have been excluded from the loss per share calculation. The Company also received
proceeds of $2,010 related to such issuances. The total fair value of the shares of restricted common stock issued of $5,005,800
was based on the market price of the restricted stock on date of grant to be amortized to stock-based compensation expense over
the term of the requisite service period. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company expensed $2,507,603 related to
the vested portion of the shares issued.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued its president 2,800,000 shares of common stock for services rendered. The
fair value of the shares was $3.370.000 on the measurement date. The amount was expensed, less cash received of $2,800.
The
Company has not incurred any salaries and related expenses during 2016 and 2015. The parents of the Company’s officer have
contributed their time without compensation, nor any amounts due. They assist with operating the Company’s store (two stores
through August 2014). In addition, the Company receives consulting services from a shareholder without any compensation, nor any
amounts due. The Company approximates the annual expense would total $75,000 to hire and pay for comparable services. No such
amounts have been recorded for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. See note 7 Shareholders Equity.
During
the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company was provided a non-interest bearing, non-secured line of credit by a shareholder.
The line is due on demand. During the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had net borrowings of approximately $30,000
and $6,000 respectively, which are due and payable at December 31, 2016 and 2015 of which is included in accounts payable in the
accompanying balance sheet.
During
the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company was provided a $30,000 non-interest bearing, non-secured line of credit
by a shareholder. The line is due on demand. During the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had net borrowings
of approximately $20,000 and $17,000 respectively, which are due and payable at December 31, 2015 and 2014 of which is included
in accounts payable in the accompanying balance sheets. The line expires in June 2016.
In
January 2015, the Company’s CEO has provided the Company with a revolving line of credit up to $120,000. All principal and
interest (5%) shall be due and payable in January 2016. There were no borrowings under the revolving line during the year ended
December 31, 2015. This expired in February 2016 and was not renewed.
NOTE
6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The
Company entered into a lease agreement in December 2015 for 2,700 square feet of retail shop space to replace their previous location
below. The lease requires combined monthly payments of base rent of $1,950 for six months beginning January 2015 with an option
for an additional one year running through June of 2017.
LITIGATION
In
December 2013, the Company issued 75,000 shares of common stock to a third party (the “Shareholder”) for consideration
of $16,000. Such consideration was received directly by Jason Chang, CEO, and was not deposited into the Company’s bank
account. As the funds had not been received by the Company, such amounts have been recorded as compensation to Mr. Chang as of
December 31, 2014 (see Note 5). In April 2014, the Company received notice from the Shareholder that he had filed a lawsuit against
the Company and its CEO relating to the delay in the complainants’ stock reaching public listing services. The Company had
made efforts to settle this issue, without an agreement being reached. As such, the Company has recorded a loss contingency based
on its best estimate of all costs to be incurred for the ultimate settlement of this matter. The Company has settled on the amount
$82,660 up from the December 31,2015 accrued amount of $55,200 and has reflected these amounts in accrued litigation on the accompanying
balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. Repayment of which is anticipated in 2017.
INDEMNITIES
AND GUARANTEES
The
Company has made certain indemnities and guarantees, under which it may be required to make payments to a guaranteed or indemnified
party, in relation to certain actions or transactions. The Company indemnifies its directors, officers, employees and agents,
as permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware. In connection with its facility leases, the Company has agreed to indemnify
its lessors for certain claims arising from the use of the facilities. The duration of the guarantees and indemnities varies,
and is generally tied to the life of the agreement. These guarantees and indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the
maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, the Company has not been obligated nor
incurred any payments for these obligations and, therefore, no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities and guarantees
in the accompanying balance sheets.
NOTE
7 - STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY (DEFICIT)
The
Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock.
During
2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 330,000 shares of fully vested non-forfeitable shares of common stock to certain consultants
of the Company to be earned over a one-year period. The Company also received proceeds of $720. The shares were valued
at $403,500 (based on the closing market price on the measurement date) and have been recorded as prepaid consulting in the accompanying
condensed balance sheet. The Company has amortized $376,330 of such expense during the year ended December 31, 2016.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 6,660,000 shares of restricted common stock to certain employees
for future services (see Note 5).
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company received an aggregate of $39,847 (including $5,530 that was received with shares
issued for services noted above) from the issuance of 1,455,535 shares of common stock.
The
following table summarizes the restricted stock activity during the year ended December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting
Life
|
|
|
Per
Share Fair
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,860,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December
31, 2016
|
|
|
3,860,000
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested, end of
period
|
|
|
1,728,563
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
Awards
of restricted stock vest ratably over the term of the respective employment agreements.
As
of December 31, 2016, the total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements was
$2,809,125 and the weighted average period of years expected to recognize those costs was 0.49 years.
NOTE
8 - INCOME TAXES
The
Company is subject to taxation in the United States of America and the state of California. The provision for income taxes for
the year ended December 31, 2016 is summarized below:
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
State
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
Total current
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
2,308,380
|
|
|
|
59,885
|
|
State
|
|
|
480,923
|
|
|
|
9,897
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,789,303
|
)
|
|
|
(69,783
|
)
|
Total deferred
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Income tax provision(benefit)
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
A
reconciliation of income taxes computed by applying the statutory U.S. income tax rate to the Company’s loss before income
taxes to the income provision is as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
U.S. federal statutory tax rate
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
State tax benefit, net
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)%
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
(30.80
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.69
|
)%
|
Other
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(3.20
|
)%
|
|
|
(29.64
|
)%
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
(0.40
|
)%
|
NOTE
8 - INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred
tax assets are as follows:
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
|
December
31, 2015
|
|
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOL’s
|
|
$
|
299,698
|
|
|
$
|
201,361
|
|
State
taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Inventory
and other reserves
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
830.00
|
|
NQ
stock option expense
|
|
|
4,658,597
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
deferred tax assets
|
|
|
4,958,295
|
|
|
|
202,191
|
|
Valuation
allowance
|
|
|
(4,958,295
|
)
|
|
|
(202,191
|
)
|
Net
deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Realization
of deferred tax assets is dependent upon future earnings, if any, the timing and amount of which are uncertain. Accordingly, the
net deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance. The valuation allowance increased by approximately $2,308,380
for the year ending December 31, 2016.
As
of December 31, 2016, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $839,000
which expire beginning in the year 2032. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for state income
tax purposes of approximately $839,000 which expire beginning in the year 2032.
Utilization
of the net operating losses may be subject to substantial annual limitation due to federal and state ownership change limitations
provided by the Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions. Such annual limitations could result in the expiration of
the net operating losses ad credits before their utilization. The Company has not performed an analysis to determine the limitation
of the net operating loss carryforwards.
NOTE
9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In
January and February 2017, the Company invested in precious metals (silver) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $3,500.
On April 18, 2017 the Company entered into a Letter of Intent to purchase a central California hotel for approximately $7,000,000.
In
February and March 2017 the Company issued 11,926,000 shares in return for $306,000 as stock subscriptions receivable and services
valued $6,000.