UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended March 31,
2012
or
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
.
Commission File
000-52983
VGTEL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified
in its charter)
New York
|
4814
|
01-0671426
|
State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation
of Organization
|
Primary Standard
Industrial Code
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
400 Rella Blvd., Suite 174, Suffern, NY
|
|
10901
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
360-836-0368
(Registrant's telephone number, including
area code)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant
is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant
is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant(1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 day.
Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate by check mark if disclosure
of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulations S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form
10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions
of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2
if the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated filer
¨
|
Accelerated filer
¨
|
Non-accelerated filer
¨
|
Smaller reporting company
x
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes
¨
No
x
The aggregate
market value of the 6,938,119 Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant
as of March 31, 2012 (the last business
day of its most recently completed fourth quarter)
based on the average between the bid and asked
price of such common equity, $2,833,065. The Company had 15,833,386 common shares outstanding as of July 12, 2012
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
Page
|
PART I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Business.
|
4
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors.
|
7
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments.
|
12
|
|
Item 2.
|
Properties.
|
12
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal Proceedings.
|
12
|
|
Item 4.
|
Removed and Reserved.
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market For Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters.
|
12
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected Financial Data
|
17
|
|
Item 7.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition or Plan of Operation.
|
17
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
|
21
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
F-1
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
|
21
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
22
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other Information
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
|
24
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive Compensation
|
25
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
|
26
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
|
27
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
|
28
|
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS:
This Annual Report contains forward-looking
statements that relate to future events or our future financial performance. These statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties, and other factors that may cause the actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements of our business
to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Such statements include, in particular,
statements about our plans, strategies, business prospects, changes and trends in our business, and the markets in which we operate
as described in this Annual Report. In some cases, you can identify the forward-looking statements by the use of words
such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “expect,”
“plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “forecast,” “believe,” “estimate,”
“predict,” “propose,” “potential,” “continue” or the negative of these terms or
other comparable terminology. These statements represent our present expectations or beliefs concerning future events. We caution
that such statements are qualified by important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements. Consequently, results actually may differ materially from the expected results included in these statements.
All forward-looking statements in this Annual
Report are made as of the date hereof, based on information available to us as of the date hereof. Although we believe that the
expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we do not guarantee future results, levels of activity,
performance or achievements, and we caution you not to rely on these statements without also considering the risks and uncertainties
associated with these statements and our business that are addressed in this Annual Report.
Among the key factors that may have a direct
bearing on the company's operating results are risks and uncertainties described under “risk factors,” including those
attributable to our lack of operations and concerns about our ability to raise capital.
PART I
A. Corporate History
and Background
We were
(formerly
known as Tribeka Tek, Inc.)
organized on February 5, 2002 under
the laws of the State of New York as Tribeka Tek, Inc., and engaged in the business of providing edgarizing services for publicly
traded companies, including assisting filings through the Edgar system.
On January 18, 2006
we acquired all of the software and intellectual property assets pertaining
to the “VGTel system”, from NYN International, LLC, a technology development company
which developed the ‘GMG system’. These assets were designed to allow us to operate in the ‘voice-over-internet-protocol’
(“VOIP”) sector of the telecommunications industry. Effective February, 2006, we ceased to provide
Edgarizing services and devoted our full attention to the VOIP services.
In January, 2006 we changed our name to VGTel, Inc.
On December 30, 2010, after nearly five years of operating the business relating to the GMG assets with only minimal operations
and continued losses, we determined to cease business operations related to the GMG assets and seek to find a suitable business
to enter into or to acquire a merger candidate.
On December 30,
2010, we entered into a ‘Common Stock Purchase Agreement’ (the “Purchase Agreement ”) by and
among Joseph R. Indovina (the “ Buyer ” and/or “Indovina”), Ron Kallus, Niva Kallus,
Israel Hason and individual shareholders (the “Sellers”), and the Company, which closed on January
10, 2011. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, Indovina acquired 3,999,388.shares, or approximately
27.14%, of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Company from the Sellers with the Sellers receiving, in the aggregate
two hundred sixty five thousand six hundred thirteen dollars ($265,613.00) from Indovina for the purchase. On January
10, 2011, in accordance with the Purchase Agreement, our then current officers and directors resigned and Indovina
was named President, Secretary and Director. Further, pursuant to Purchase Agreement, prior to the Closing, the GMG
intellectual properties, products, assets, the “
VGTel
” name, and business was spun out from Company
to Ron Kallus and Israel Hason in exchange for the cancellation of certain shares issued to them and forgiveness for
loans made to Company by Ron Kallus and forgiveness of certain accrued payables for services provided to the Company
by Ron Kallus and affiliate parties.
On February 24, 2011,
we executed an Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange (“the Exchange Agreement”) with Venture Industries, Inc. (“Venture”),
a company organized under the laws of the state of Nevada, pursuant to which we would acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding
shares of Venture, in exchange for the issuance of 21,238,285 shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001. The shares that we
would issue to the shareholders of Venture would have constituted 65% of our issued and outstanding common stock on a fully-diluted
basis as of and immediately after the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Exchange Agreement and after giving
effect to the Cancellation Agreement canceling a specific number of shares from our Sole Officer who was resigning.
The closing of the transaction was scheduled to take place on March 30, 2011.
On June 30, 2011, the
Company received a letter (the “Letter”) dated July (sic) 29, 2011 from Lawrence Harris as President of Venture, terminating
the Exchange Agreement. The Letter alleged breaches of the Exchange Agreement by us, including the removal of Lawrence Harris as
our President on June 28, 2011. Upon further investigation by our Board of Directors, we determined that issues and
disputes existed as to whether the share exchange transaction had closed. We then determined on July 19, 2011, to accept the termination
of the Exchange Agreement by Venture pursuant to the Letter.
As a result of the
termination prior to closing of the Exchange Agreement, by and among the Company and Venture, the disclosure in our filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to Venture Industries, Inc. or our ongoing operations, share issuances, shell company
status, share ownership or control are not applicable and should no longer be relied upon when analyzing our business, operations
or financial condition. The affected information appears in our Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2011 and our Preliminary
Information Statements filed on April 8, 2011, April 22, 2011 and May 13, 2011.
Consequently, as a
result of the termination of the Exchange Agreement prior to closing, we remained a Shell Company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and had been seeking appropriate business opportunities.
Peter Shafran was brought
on as our new Chief Executive Officer, at the end of August 2011. Mr. Shafran has been practicing law for over 25 years. Serving
as the Executive Producer of River Spirit Music, he produced and promoted concerts in the Hudson Valley region. Peter received
a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology from SUNY Binghamton, and his Juris Doctor from Hofstra University School of Law.
On August 30, 2011,
the Board of Directors voted to change the name of the Company to 360 Entertainment & Productions, Inc. The
name change is subject to shareholder approval and approval from FINRA. In the interim, we registered a Certificate
of Assumed Name with the State of New York. We have been conducting business under the name of VGTel, Inc., dba
360 Entertainment & Productions, Inc.
(b) Narrative Description
of the Business
Over the second half
of the fiscal year, we investigated various potential investments and ventures with the goal of generating revenue including: investing
in a completed independent film, investing in a film in development, involvement in live event production, and various other entertainment
and media projects. While we did not enter into any contracts for any of these projects, we are actively pursuing several of these
projects for possible investment in the coming twelve (12) months.
In addition to the
development of our core media and emerging businesses, we also investigated potential revenue generating projects, and, to that
end, during the last quarter, we entered the internet sweepstakes industry. On March 7, 2012, we executed an agreement with Western
Capital Ventures, Inc. (WCV) to purchase its nationwide Distribution Agreement with Visual Entertainment Systems, LLC (VES), a
manufacturer, for the distribution of its NetStar Internet Kiosks - arcade style sweepstake gaming systems, software and hardware
units. On March 15, 2012, we also completed negiotiations with VES to directly purchase, distribute and install its NetStar Internet
Kiosks into designated locations. The purchase and distribution of the kiosks is expected to establish our entry into one of the
hottest growth industries in the country and enhance our entertainment services line of business. As of the close of this fiscal
year, the Company had not yet received revenues from this segment of the Company’s business.
(c)
Plan of Operation
During the fourth quarter,
the Company had been in negotiation with several large scale internet sweepstakes operators in six states within the Northeast,
Mid-Atlantic and Southeast regions of the US to acquire existing Internet Sweepstakes café locations. One of those groups
operates approximately 250 internet sweepstakes outlets with the desire to triple their reach to more than 750 by the end of this
year. Some of those locations would include racetracks with 200-500 units per location. Another group operates 325 units in 21
locations with plans to expand to more than 1200 units in about 75 locations in 2012. Our goal is to acquire existing locations
and partner with these groups to develop rapid expansion and market penetration. Though we did not enter into any contracts for
any of these projects in the fiscal year, we are actively pursuing several of these projects for possible investment in the coming
twelve (12) months. We are in the formative phase of development. Our plan is to develop a multi-platform entertainment and media
company that will allow us to produce and invest in independent films and stage productions, live concerts and events, online streaming
video content and internet sweepstakes gaming. We are developing a model to include several different companies to complement each
other and provide vertical as well as horizontal reach across media platforms.
We have also been
working with Life Vest Inside, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization,
www.lifevestinside.com
to serve as co-producer of the
organization’s feature-length film and provide advice to help the organization grow. Our CEO, Peter Shafran, has been named
to the organization’s Board of Directors.
We met our goal to
launch our website (
http://360entertainmentandproductions.com
) by March 2012 to create a presence on the Internet and attract
potential investors, partners and customers to inquire about our services. In the coming year, as revenues grow, we will be working
on a more robust web site.
(d) Financing
We will require additional
financing in order to enable us to startup and maintain a business. On March 23, 2012, we entered into a funding agreement
with TW Ruban Group, Inc. which provides an advance of $500,000 in working capital to be paid in over in installments. The funding
agreement is strictly a short-term arrangement to provide working capital while the Company continues to negotiate the funding
of $5.0 million of additional capital.
We will seek to
raise an additional $500,000 over the next 12 months to pay for our ongoing expenses while investigating opportunities. These expenses
include legal, accounting and audit fees as well as general and administrative expenses. These cash requirements are in excess
of our current cash and working capital resources. Accordingly, we will require additional financing in order to continue operations
and to repay our liabilities. There is no assurance that any party will advance additional funds to us in order to enable us to
sustain our plan of operations or to repay our liabilities.
We anticipate continuing
to rely on equity sales of our common stock in order to continue to fund our business operations. Issuances of additional shares
will result in dilution to our existing stockholders. There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of our equity
securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund our planned business activities.
(e) Objectives
We would like to position
ourselves as an active producer and partner in various entertainment vehicles and platforms, including the production of film,
stage, music, and online content and the streaming of events live and online. Capitalizing on our connections to some of the most
seasoned, talented and creative people throughout the entertainment and finance industries, we are fielding an array of potential
offerings with plans to announce a full slate of production projects beginning in 2012.
We are developing a
special purpose fund for investments in film, stage and other media and entertainment products and will work to raise up to $5,000,000
through a combination Bond Offering and Private Equity Capital infusion. The capital raised will also be utilized to fund film
production tax credits, short-term secured debt in the form of bridge loans with bank guarantees attached. We are targeting a fund
yielding double-digit returns over and above the cost of capital raised and administrative costs associated with the deployment
of said capital. We will also begin to obtain expired film production tax credits from the various film commissions throughout
the US and Canada.
Our principal business
objective for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be to achieve long-term growth potential through starting up a new business
or a combination with a business in addition to immediate, short-term earnings. We will not restrict our potential candidate target
companies to any specific business, industry or geographical location and, thus, may acquire any type of business.
The analysis of new
business opportunities has and will be undertaken by or under the supervision of our officers and directors. We have unrestricted
flexibility in seeking, analyzing and participating in potential business opportunities. In our efforts to analyze potential acquisition
targets, we will consider the following kinds of factors:
|
·
|
Potential for growth, indicated by new technology, anticipated market
expansion or new products;
|
|
·
|
Competitive position as compared to other firms of similar size and
experience within the industry segment as well as within the industry as a whole;
|
|
·
|
Strength and diversity of management, either in place or scheduled for
recruitment;
|
|
·
|
Capital requirements and anticipated availability of required funds,
to be provided by us or from operations, through the sale of additional securities, through joint ventures or similar arrangements
or from other sources;
|
|
·
|
The cost of participation by us as compared to the perceived tangible
and intangible values and potentials;
|
|
·
|
The extent to which the business opportunity can be advanced;
|
|
·
|
The accessibility of required management expertise, personnel, raw materials,
services, professional assistance and other required items; and
|
|
·
|
Other relevant factors.
|
In applying the foregoing criteria, no one
of which will be controlling, we will attempt to analyze all factors and circumstances and make a determination based upon reasonable
investigative measures and available data. Potentially available business opportunities may occur in many different industries,
and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business
opportunities extremely difficult and complex. Due to our limited capital available for investigation, we may not discover or adequately
evaluate adverse facts about the opportunity to be acquired.
(f) Form of Acquisition
The manner in which we participate in an
opportunity will depend upon the nature of the opportunity, the respective needs and desires of us and the promoters of the opportunity,
and our relative negotiating strength with such promoters. It is likely that we will require its participation
in a business opportunity through the issuance of our common stock or other securities. Although the terms of any such transaction
cannot be predicted, it should be noted that in certain circumstances the criteria for determining whether or not an Acquisition is
a so-called "tax free" reorganization under Section 368(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"),
depends upon whether the owners of the acquired business own 80% or more of the voting stock of the surviving entity. If a transaction
were structured to take advantage of these provisions rather than other "tax free" provisions provided under the Code,
all prior stockholders would in such circumstances retain 20% or less of the total issued and outstanding shares. Under other circumstances,
depending upon the relative negotiating strength of the parties, prior stockholders may retain substantially less than 20% of the
total issued and outstanding shares of the surviving entity. This could result in substantial additional dilution to the equity
of those who were our stockholders prior to such reorganization.
Our present stockholders may not be left
with control of a majority of our voting shares following the formation of a new business or a reorganization transaction. As part
of such a transaction, all or a majority of our directors and officers may resign and new directors may be appointed without any
vote by stockholders.
In the case of an acquisition, the transaction
may be accomplished upon our sole determination without any vote or approval by stockholders. In the case of a statutory merger
or consolidation directly involving us, it will likely be necessary to call a stockholders' meeting and obtain the approval of
the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares. The necessity to obtain such stockholder approval may result in delay and
additional expense in the consummation of any proposed transaction and will also give rise to certain appraisal rights to dissenting
stockholders. Most likely, we will seek to structure any such transaction so as not to require stockholder approval.
It is anticipated that the investigation
of specific business opportunities and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and
other instruments will require substantial time and attention and substantial cost for accountants, attorneys and others. If a
decision is made not to participate in a specific business opportunity, the costs theretofore incurred in the related investigation
would not be recoverable. Furthermore, even if an agreement is reached for the participation in a specific business opportunity,
the failure to consummate that transaction may result in the loss to us of the related costs incurred.
We presently have no employees apart from
our management. We have several consultants who currently provide services to us. Some of them are compensated for their
services through the issuance of our shares to them, which may result in further dilution to you. We may hire additional
employees, consultants, and recruit senior executive members as officers and directors, which employees may be instrumental in
forming a new business or we may acquire another business with a full management team already on board.
(g) Reports to Security Holders:
We
are required to file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and our filings are available to the public over the internet at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website
at http://www.sec.gov. The public may read and copy any materials filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the
Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E. Washington D.C. 20549. The public may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-732-0330.
The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and formation statements, and other information regarding
issuers that file electronically with the SEC, at
http://www.sec.gov
.
None of our Officers
or our Directors has had any preliminary contact or discussions with any representative of any other entity regarding a business
combination with us. Any target business that is selected may be a financially unstable company or an entity in its early stages
of development or growth, including entities without established records of sales or earnings. In that event, we will be subject
to numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of financially unstable and early stage or potential emerging growth
companies. In addition, we may effect a business combination with an entity in an industry characterized by a high level of risk,
and, although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, there can be no assurance
that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant risks.
We anticipate that
the selection of a business combination will be complex and extremely risky. Because of general economic conditions, rapid technological
advances being made in some industries and shortages of available capital, our management believes that there are numerous firms
seeking even the limited additional capital that we will have and/or the perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation.
Such perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation include, among other things, facilitating or improving the terms
on which additional equity financing may be obtained, providing liquidity for the principals of and investors in a business, creating
a means for providing incentive stock options or similar benefits to key employees, and offering greater flexibility in structuring
acquisitions, joint ventures and the like through the issuance of stock. Potentially available business combinations may occur
in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation
and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex.
(h) Available Information
The
Company’s web site address is
http://360entertainmentandproductions.com
. The information
contained on the Company’s web site is not included as a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report
on Form 10-K. The Company makes available, free of charge, on its web site its annual reports on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports
on Form 10-Q, its current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company has electronically
filed such material with, or furnished it to, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Set forth below is
a summary of the material risks to an investment in our securities. These risks are not the only ones we face. Additional
risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also have an adverse effect on us. If any of the below
risks actually occur, our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition could suffer, which might cause the
value of our securities to decline.
An investment in our securities is highly speculative in
nature and involves an extremely high degree of risk.
Our business is difficult to evaluate
because we have only begun our operations and currently have no operating history.
As we currently have
only minimal operations, no revenues and only minimal assets, there is a risk that we will be unable to continue as a going
concern and start up a viable business or consummate a business combination. We spun out our previous business which
was not successful. We have only minimal operations, and no revenues or earnings from operations since the spin-off
of our previous business. We have no significant assets or financial resources. We will, in all likelihood, continue to sustain
operating expenses without corresponding revenues, at least until we are successful in either starting up a business or through
the consummation of a business combination. This may result in our incurring a net operating loss that will increase continuously
until we can start up a successful business or consummate a business combination with a profitable business opportunity. We may
never be able to identify a suitable business opportunity and or consummate a business combination.
There is intense competition for business
start ups and private companies suitable for a merger transaction of the type we contemplate.
We are in a highly
competitive market for a small number of business opportunities. A large number of established and well-financed entities, including
small public companies and venture capital firms, are active in mergers and acquisitions of companies that may be desirable target
candidates for us. Nearly all these entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial
capabilities than we do; consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in identifying possible business opportunities
and successfully completing a business combination. This reduces the likelihood of our consummating a successful business combination.
The growth of our business depends on
the successful development and introduction of innovative new products.
Our growth depends
on the success of our entry into the Internet Sweepstakes industry existing products as well as the successful development and
introduction of innovative new products and line extensions, which face the uncertainty of consumer acceptance and reaction from
competitors. In addition, our ability to create new products and line extensions and to sustain existing products is affected
by whether we can successfully:
|
·
|
develop and fund innovations,
|
|
·
|
obtain locations for our kiosks and other gaming units, and
|
|
·
|
anticipate consumer needs and preferences.
|
The failure to develop
and launch successful new products could hinder the growth of our business and any delay in the development or launch of a new
product could result in the Company not being the first to market, which could compromise our competitive position.
Our business is subject to regulation
in the U.S.
Our Internet Sweepstakes
business is subject to extensive regulation in the U.S. Such regulation applies to most aspects of our kiosks and other
gaming units, including their manufacture, labeling, distribution, installation, advertising and operation. State and
local level authorities regulate different aspects of our business.
While it is our
policy and practice to comply with all regulatory requirements applicable to our business, a finding that we are in violation of,
or out of compliance with, applicable laws or regulations could subject us to civil remedies, including fines, damages, injunctions
or criminal sanctions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if a claim is unsuccessful, is without
merit or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding such assertions regarding our products, processes or business
practices could adversely affect our reputation and brand image.
In addition, new or
more stringent regulations, or more restrictive interpretations of existing regulations, could have a material adverse impact on
our business. For example, from time to time, various regulatory authorities in the U.S., have sought to regulate or
license such gaming activities or have issued a moratorium on the opening of internet sweepstakes cafés. As an example,
(subsequent to the end of our fiscal year,) the State of Ohio effected a one-year moratorium on the opening of new Internet sweepstakes
cafes. A similar moratorium or otherwise newly enacted adverse regulation, could have a material adverse impact on our
business.
A failure of a key information technology
system could adversely impact the Company’s ability to conduct business.
The
Company relies extensively on information technology systems, including some which rely on third-party service providers, in order
to conduct its business. These systems include, but are not limited to, programs and processes relating to communicating
within the Company and with other parties, ordering and managing materials from suppliers, shipping products to customers and distributors,
processing transactions, summarizing and reporting results of operations, complying with regulatory legal or tax requirements and
other processes involved in managing the business. Although the Company has network security measures in place, the
systems may be vulnerable to computer viruses,
security breaches and other similar disruptions
from unauthorized users. While the Company has business continuity plans in place, if the systems are damaged or cease
to function properly due to any number of causes, including the poor performance or failure of third-party service providers, catastrophic
events, power outages, security breaches, network outages, failed upgrades or other similar events, and if the business continuity
plans do not effectively resolve such issues on a timely basis, the Company may suffer interruptions in the ability to manage or
conduct business which may adversely impact the Company’s business.
The time and cost of preparing a private
company to become a public reporting company may preclude us from entering into a merger or acquisition with the most attractive
private companies.
Target companies that
fail to comply with SEC reporting requirements may delay or preclude acquisition. Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act require
reporting companies to provide certain information about significant acquisitions, including certified financial statements for
the company acquired, covering one, two, or three years, depending on the relative size of the acquisition. The time and additional
costs that may be incurred by some target entities to prepare these statements may significantly delay or essentially preclude
consummation of an acquisition. Otherwise suitable acquisition prospects that do not have or are unable to obtain the required
audited statements may be inappropriate for acquisition so long as the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act are applicable.
We may become subject to additional
regulations or rules which would adversely affect our operations or ability to consummate a transaction.
Although we are subject
to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act, we do not expect to become subject to regulation under the Investment Company
Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), since we do not intend to engage in the business of investing
or trading in securities. If we engage in business combinations which result in our holding passive investment interests, we could
be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act. If so, we would be required to register as an investment company and
could be expected to incur significant registration and compliance costs.
Additionally, transactions
between shell companies and private companies have recently received increased negative press and scrutiny from the SEC and securities
exchanges. The SEC and national securities exchanges are considering regulations aimed at reducing fraud in reverse merger transactions
that result in the owners of a previously private company becoming the controlling shareholders of a public company. Any such regulations,
if adopted, have the potential to increase our reporting costs and the costs of a potential transaction with a private operating
company. Additionally, any such regulations may also decrease the attractiveness to a private operating company of engaging in
a transaction with public shell companies such as us.
Any potential acquisition or merger
with a foreign company may subject us to additional risks.
If we enter into a
business combination with a foreign concern, we will be subject to risks inherent in business operations outside of the United
States. These risks include, for example, currency fluctuations, regulatory problems, punitive tariffs, unstable local tax policies,
trade embargoes, risks related to shipment of raw materials and finished goods across national borders and cultural and language
differences. Foreign economies may differ favorably or unfavorably from the United States economy in growth of gross national product,
rate of inflation, market development, rate of savings, and capital investment, resource self-sufficiency and balance of payments
positions, and in other respects.
We may be subject to certain tax consequences
in our business, which may increase our cost of doing business.
We may not be able
to structure our acquisition to result in tax-free treatment for us or our transaction partner or their stockholders, which could
deter third parties from entering into certain business combinations with us or result in being taxed on consideration received
in a transaction. We intend to structure any business combination so as to minimize the federal and state tax consequences to both
us and the target entity; however, we cannot guarantee that the business combination will meet the statutory requirements of a
tax-free reorganization or that the parties will obtain the intended tax-free treatment upon a transfer of stock or assets. A non-qualifying
reorganization could result in the imposition of both federal and state taxes that may have an adverse effect on both parties to
the transaction.
Our business will have no revenues unless
and until we start up a successful company or merge with or acquire an operating business.
We are a development
stage company and currently have had no revenues from operations. We will not realize any revenues unless and until we successfully
start up a successful business or merge with or acquire a successful operating business.
We intend to issue more shares to either
recruit highly talented individuals in our management team or for a merger or acquisition, which will result in substantial
dilution.
Our Certificate of
Incorporation authorizes the issuance of a maximum of 200,000,000 shares of common stock and a maximum of 10,000,000 shares
of preferred stock. Recruitment of highly qualified management personnel suitable for a business start up or a merger
or acquisition effected by us may result in the issuance of additional securities without stockholder approval and may result in
substantial dilution in the percentage of our common stock held by our then existing stockholders. Moreover, the common stock issued
in any merger or acquisition transaction may be valued on an arbitrary or non-arm’s-length basis by our management, resulting
in an additional reduction in the percentage of common stock held by our then existing stockholders. Our Board of Directors has
the power to issue any or all of such authorized but unissued shares without stockholder approval. To the extent that additional
shares of common stock or preferred stock are issued in connection with a business start up or business combination or otherwise,
dilution to the interests of our stockholders will occur and the rights of the holders of common stock might be materially and
adversely affected.
Because we may seek to start up a new
business or complete a business combination through a “reverse merger”, following such a transaction we may not be
able to attract the attention of major brokerage firms.
Additional risks may
exist in starting a new business and/or if we acquire a privately held business in a “reverse merger.” Securities
analysts of major brokerage firms may not provide coverage of us since there is no incentive to brokerage firms to recommend the
purchase of our common stock. Additionally, brokerage firms may not want to conduct any secondary offerings on behalf of our post-merger
company in the future.
Authorization of preferred stock.
Our Certificate of
Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with designations, rights and preferences determined
from time to time by its Board of Directors. Accordingly, our Board of Directors is empowered, without stockholder approval, to
issue preferred stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting, or other rights which could adversely affect the voting power
or other rights of the holders of the common stock. In the event of issuance, the preferred stock could be utilized, under certain
circumstances, as a method of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control. There can be no assurance that we will
not issue such preferred stock in the future.
At times our stock is thinly traded,
you may be unable to sell at or near ask prices or at all if you need to liquidate your shares.
In the past the shares
of our common stock were not traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our
common shares at or near ask prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. This situation is attributable
to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company which is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers,
institutional investors and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even if we came
to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would be reluctant to follow an unproven, early stage company
such as ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares until such time as we became more seasoned and viable. As
a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as
compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales
without an adverse effect on share price. A broader or more active public trading market for our common shares may never
develop or, if developed, be sustained, or even that current trading levels will be sustained. Due to these conditions,
you may not be able to sell your shares at or near ask prices or at all. This risk may increase if more investors attempt to sell
stock over a short time period.
Broker-dealer requirements applicable
to “penny stocks” may affect trading and liquidity.
Section 15(g) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 15g-2 promulgated thereunder by the SEC, require broker-dealers dealing in
penny stocks, such as ours, to provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a
manually signed and dated written receipt of the document before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor’s
account. Potential investors in our common stock are urged to obtain and read such disclosure carefully before purchasing
any shares that are deemed to be “penny stocks.” Moreover, Rule 15g-9 requires broker-dealers in penny stocks to approve
the account of any investor for transactions in such stocks before selling any penny stock to that investor. This procedure
requires the broker-dealer to (i) obtain from the investor information concerning his or her financial situation, investment experience
and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably determine, based on that information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable
for the investor and that the investor has sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks
of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide the investor with a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker-dealer
made the determination in (ii) above; and (iv) receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming
that it accurately reflects the investor’s financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives. Compliance
with these requirements may make it more difficult for holders of our common stock to resell their shares to third parties or to
otherwise dispose of them in the market or otherwise.
The broker or dealer must also deliver,
prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which,
in highlight form, sets forth:
|
·
|
The basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and
|
|
·
|
That the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.
|
Disclosure also has
to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and commissions payable
to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies
available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be
sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny
stocks.
Because of these regulations,
broker-dealers may not wish to engage in the above-referenced necessary paperwork and disclosures and/or may encounter difficulties
in their attempt to sell shares of our common stock, which may affect the ability of selling shareholders or other holders to sell
their shares in any secondary market and have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in any secondary market. These
additional sales practice and disclosure requirements could impede the sale of our common stock, if and when our common stock becomes
publicly traded. In addition, the liquidity for our Common Stock may decrease, with a corresponding decrease in the
price of our common stock.
Our common stock may be volatile, which
substantially increases the risk that you may not be able to sell your shares at or above the price that you may pay for the shares.
Because of the limited
trading market expected to develop for our common stock, and because of the possible price volatility, you may not be able to sell
your shares of common stock when you desire to do so. The inability to sell your shares in a rapidly declining market
may substantially increase your risk of loss because of such illiquidity and because the price for our common stock may suffer
greater declines because of its price volatility.
Additionally, in recent
years the stock market in general, and the over-the-counter markets in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. In
some cases, these fluctuations are unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the underlying company. These
market and industry factors may materially and adversely affect our stock price, regardless of our operating performance. In the
past, class action litigation often has been brought against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of those
companies’ common stock. If we become involved in this type of litigation in the future, it could result in substantial
costs and diversion of management attention and resources, which could have a further negative effect on your investment in our
stock.
If we fail to remain current on our
reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board, which would limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell
our securities and the ability of shareholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.
Companies trading on
the OTC Bulletin Board (OTCBB) must be reporting issuers under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, and must be current in their reports
under Section 13 of the Exchange Act, in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTC Bulletin Board. This Annual Report
on Form 10-K is being filed before the applicable deadline. If we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements, we could
be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board. As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be adversely affected
by limiting the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of shareholders to sell their securities in the
secondary market.
We do not expect to pay dividends and
investors should not buy our common stock expecting to receive dividends.
We have not paid any dividends on our common
stock in the past, and do not anticipate that we will declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. (NOTE:
Subsequent to the close of our fiscal year, we declared a 20% stock dividend to our stockholders). Consequently, you will
only realize an economic gain on your investment in our common stock if the price appreciates. You should not purchase
our common stock expecting to receive cash dividends. Since we do not anticipate paying future dividends, and there may be limited
trading, then you may not have any manner to liquidate or receive any payment on your investment. Therefore our failure
to pay dividends may cause you to not see any return on your investment even if we are successful in our business operations. In
addition, because we do not anticipate paying dividends in the future, we may have trouble raising additional funds which could
affect our ability to expand business operations.
Provisions in our charter documents
and under New York law could discourage a takeover that stockholders may consider favorable.
Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may
have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. These provisions include
the following:
|
·
|
Our board of directors has the right to elect directors to fill a vacancy created by the expansion
of the board of directors or the resignation, death or removal of a director, which prevents stockholders from being able to fill
vacancies on our board of directors.
|
|
·
|
Our certificate of incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors. This
limits the ability of minority stockholders to elect director candidates.
|
|
·
|
Our board of directors may issue, without stockholder approval, shares of undesignated preferred
stock. The ability to issue undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred
stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to acquire us.
|
As
a New
York corporation, we are also subject to certain New York anti-takeover provisions. Under New York law, a corporation may not engage
in a business combination with any holder of 15% or more of its capital stock unless the holder has held the stock for three
years or, among other things, the board of directors has approved the transaction. Our board of directors could rely on New York
law to prevent or delay an acquisition of us.
The concentration of our capital stock
ownership with our founders, executive officers and our directors and their affiliates may limit our stockholders’ ability
to influence corporate matters.
As of March 31,
2012, Bruce Minsky, a director, owned shares of common stock representing 0.7785% of the voting power of our outstanding capital
stock. No other director or officer holds shares of common stock. If we start up a business or enter into a business
combination, we may need to issue a substantial number of shares to newly named executive officers and other highly talented individuals
to be recruited in our management team. The aggregate number of shares held by management may be in excess of 50% of
our outstanding common stock. These individuals in aggregate may have significant influence over management and affairs
and over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions,
such as a merger or other sale of our company or its assets, for the foreseeable future. This concentrated
control limits our stockholders’ ability to influence corporate matters and, as a result, we may take actions that our stockholders
do not view as beneficial. As a result, the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected.
We presently do not
have any arrangements for additional financing, and no potential lines of credit or sources of financing are currently available
for the purpose of proceeding with our plan of operations
.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS:
None.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Our corporate headquarters is located in
leased property at
400 Rella Boulevard, Suite 174, Suffern, NY 10901.
The facility we operate
is well maintained and adequate for the purpose for which they are intended.
We have no policy with respect to investments
or interests in real estate, real estate mortgages or securities of, or interests in, persons primarily engaged in real estate
activities.
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Based on current knowledge, w
e
know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against us, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding
or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial
stockholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.
ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED
None.
PART II
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET FOR COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Our common stock is
quoted on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB). The table below sets forth the high and low prices for our common
stock for each full quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years. Quotations reflect inter-dealer prices,
without retail mark-up, mark-down commission, and may not represent actual transactions. Before February 14, 2011, our
common stock traded sporadically, if at all. We do not expect to declare dividends in the foreseeable future because
we intend to utilize earnings, if any, to finance future growth.
Period
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
Qtr. Ended March 31, 2012
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Qtr. Ended December 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
Qtr. Ended September 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
5.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
Qtr. Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
14.00
|
|
|
$
|
2.25
|
|
Qtr. Ended March 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
Qtr. Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
Qtr. Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
Qtr. Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
As of March 31, 2012,
we had approximately 78 shareholders, excluding shareholders whose shares are held at brokerage firms through the DTC system.
Description of Securities
The following is a
summary description of the Company’s capital stock and certain provisions of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation
and By-laws:
|
·
|
The Company’s authorized capital stock consists of 200,000,000
shares of common stock, par value $.0001 per share and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.0001 per share.
|
|
·
|
The Company currently has 15,833,386 common shares outstanding.
|
Common Stock
Voting Rights. Each
outstanding share of the common stock is entitled to one vote in person or by proxy in all matters that may be voted upon by shareholders
of the Company.
The Company’s
Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws do not provide for cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. Accordingly,
holders of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote in any election of directors may elect all of the directors
standing for election.
Preemptive Rights.
The
holders of common stock have no preemptive or other preferential rights to purchase additional shares of any class of the Company's
capital stock in subsequent stock offerings.
Liquidation Rights.
In the
event of the liquidation or dissolution of the Company, the holders of common stock are entitled to receive, on a pro rata basis,
all assets of the Company remaining after the satisfaction of all liabilities.
Conversion and Redemption.
Shares
of common stock have no conversion rights and are not subject to redemption.
Dividends.
Holders of common stock
are entitled to receive ratably such dividends as may be declared by the Board out of funds legally available therefor.
Preferred Shares
.
The designations
and the powers, preferences and rights, and the qualifications or restrictions of the preferred shares are as follows:
The shares of preferred
stock are authorized to be issued from time to time in one or more series, the shares of each series to have such voting powers,
full or limited, or no voting powers, and such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special
rights and qualifications, limitations or restrictions as are specified in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of
Directors providing for the issue thereof. Such preferred stock may be convertible into, or exchangeable for, at the
option of either the holder or the Company or upon the happening of a specified event, shares of any other class or classes or
any other series of the same or any other class or classes of capital stock of the Company at such price or prices or at such rate
or rates of exchange and with such adjustments as shall be stated and expressed in the Certificate of Incorporation or any amendment
thereto or in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors providing for the issue thereof.
Majority Written Consent.
The
Certificate of Incorporation permits the shareholders to act, in lieu of a shareholders’ meeting, by written consent of not
less than the minimum percentage of the total vote required by statute, the Certificate of Incorporation, or the By-laws, provided
that prompt notice is given to all shareholders of the taking of such action is given to all shareholders.
Indemnification of Directors and Officers
. Article XI
of the Company’s By-laws provides that the Company shall indemnify each of its directors, officers, and employees whether
or not then in service as such (and his or her executor, administrator, and heirs), against all reasonable expenses actually and
necessarily incurred by him or her in connection with the defense of any litigation to which the individual may have been made
a party because he or she is or was a director, officer, or employee of the Company. The individual shall have no right
to reimbursement, however, in relation to matters as to which he or she has been adjudged liable to the Company for negligence
or misconduct in the performance of his or her duties, or was derelict in the performance of his or her duty as director, officer
or employee by reason of willful misconduct, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties of his or her office
or employment. The right to indemnity for expenses shall also apply to the expenses of suits which are compromised or
settled if the court having jurisdiction of the matter shall approve such settlement. This right of indemnification
is in addition to all rights to which such director, officer or employee may be entitled.
On March 30, 2011,
the Company purchased a directors and officers indemnification insurance policy written by Berkeley Insurance Company. The
annual premium was $70,000 for a policy period that expires March 29, 2012. The policy provides indemnification benefits
and the payment of expenses in actions instituted against any director or officer of the Company for claimed liability arising
out of his or her conduct in such capacities. Due to a lack of funds, the policy was canceled.
2011 Equity Incentive Plan
In the previous fiscal
year, the Board of Directors voted to authorize the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan. No grants or awards have been made pursuant
to the plan as of March 31, 2012.
The Plan reserves
10,000,000
shares of common stock for issuance in accordance with the Plan’s terms. With the exception of
the employment agreement with Peter Shafran as Chief Executive Officer, the Company has made no other plans for granting of any
awards under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and no other employment agreement exists as yet which include granting of awards under
the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan. Consequently, with the exception of the employment agreement with Peter Shafran, neither
weighted average exercise price, nor payment of benefits to any other Executive Officers or others is as yet determinable.
The purpose of the
Plan is to enable us to offer our employees, officers, directors and consultants whose past, present and/or potential contributions
to us and our subsidiaries have been, are or will be important to our success, an opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest
in the Company. The various types of long-term incentive awards that may be provided under the Plan are intended to enable us to
respond to changes in practices, tax laws, accounting regulations and the size and diversity of our business.
A summary of the principal
features of the Plan was provided in the Form 10-K filed for the previous fiscal year, but is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the full text of the Plan, which was attached to that Form 10-K. The capitalized terms, if not defined in this Form
10-K, are defined as in the Plan.
Administration
The Plan is administered
by the Plan committee (“Committee”) which shall consist of either (i) the Board of Directors of the Company or
(ii) or a Committee of the Board of Directors designated to administer the Plan which is comprised solely of two or more outside
directors all of whom are “outside directors” within the meaning of the regulations issued under Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”).
Subject to the provisions
of the Plan, the Committee determines, among other things, the persons to whom from time to time awards may be granted, the specific
type of awards to be granted, the number of shares subject to each award, share prices, any restrictions or limitations on the
awards, and any vesting, exchange, deferral, surrender, cancellation, acceleration, termination, exercise or forfeiture provisions
related to the awards.
Stock Subject to the Plan
If any share are subject
to an award that is forfeited, settled in cash, or expires, any unissued shares covered by such award will be available for issuance
under the Plan. If a holder pays the exercise price of a stock option by surrendering any previously owned shares or
arranges to have the appropriate number of shares otherwise issuable upon exercise withheld to cover the withholding tax liability
associated with the stock option exercise, then, in the Committee’s discretion, the number of shares available under the
Plan may be increased by the lesser of (i) the number of shares surrendered and shares used to pay taxes and (ii) the number of
shares purchased under the stock option.
Under the Plan, on
a change in the number of shares of common stock as a result of a dividend on shares of common stock payable in shares of common
stock, common stock forward split or reverse split, combination or exchange of shares of common stock or other extraordinary or
unusual event that results in a change in the shares of common stock as a whole, the Committee shall determine, in its sole discretion,
whether the terms of the outstanding award require adjustment.
Eligibility
Awards may be granted
under the Plan to officers, directors employees and consultants who are deemed to have rendered, or to be able to render significant
services to us or our subsidiaries and who are deemed to have contributed, or to have the potential to contribute, to our success.
Types of Awards
Options
. The
Plan provides both for “incentive” stock options as defined in Section 422 of the Code, and for options not qualifying
as incentive options, both of which may be granted with any other award under the Plan. The Committee determines the exercise price
per share of common stock purchasable under an incentive or non-qualified stock option, which may not be less than 100% of the
fair market value on the day of the grant or, if greater, the par value of a share of common stock. However, the exercise price
of an incentive stock option granted to a person possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of
stock may not be less than 110% of the fair market value on the date of grant. The aggregate fair market value of all shares of
common stock with respect to which incentive stock options are exercisable by a participant for the first time during any calendar
year (under all of our Plans), measured at the date of the grant, may not exceed $100,000 or such other amount as may be subsequently
specified under the Code or the regulations thereunder.
An incentive stock
option may only be granted within a ten-year period beginning January 1, 2011 and may only be exercised within ten years from the
date of the grant, or within five years in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a person who, at the time of the grant,
owns common stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock. Subject to any limitations
or conditions the Committee may impose, stock options may be exercised, in whole or in part, at any time during the term of the
stock option by giving written notice of exercise to us specifying the number of shares of common stock to be purchased. The notice
must be accompanied by payment in full of the purchase price, either in cash or, if provided in the agreement, in our securities
or in combination of the two or such other means which the committee determines are consistent with the Plan’s purpose and
applicable law.
Generally, stock options
granted under the Plan may not be transferred other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution and all stock options
are exercisable during the holder’s lifetime, or in the event of legal incapacity or incompetency, the holder’s guardian
or legal representative. However, a holder, with the approval of the Committee, may transfer a non-qualified stock option by gift,
for no consideration, to a family member of the holder, by domestic relations order to a family member of the holder or by transfer
to an entity in which more than 50% of the voting interests are owned by family members of the holder or the holder, in exchange
for an interest in that entity.
Generally, if the holder
is an employee, no stock options granted under the Plan may be exercised by the holder unless he or she is employed by us or our
subsidiaries at the time of the exercise and has been so employed continuously from the time the stock options were granted. However,
in the event the holder’s employment is terminated due to disability, the holder may still exercise his or her vested stock
options for a period of one year or such other greater or lesser period as the Committee may determine, from the date of termination
or until the expiration of the stated term of the stock option, whichever period is shorter. Similarly, should a holder die
while employed by us or one of our subsidiaries, his or her legal representative or legatee under his or her will may exercise
the decedent holder’s vested stock options for a period of one year from the date of his or her death, or such other greater
or lesser period as the Committee may determine or until the expiration of the stated term of the stock option, whichever period
is shorter. If the holder’s employment is terminated due to normal retirement, the holder may still exercise his or her vested
stock options for a period of one year from the date of termination or until the expiration of the stated term of the stock option,
whichever period is shorter. If the holder’s employment is terminated for any reason other than death, disability or normal
retirement, the stock option will automatically terminate, except that if the holder’s employment is terminated without cause,
then the portion of any stock option that is vested on the date of termination may be exercised for the lesser of three months
after termination of employment, or such other greater or lesser period as the Committee may determine but not beyond the balance
of the stock option’s term.
The Committee may at
any time, in its sole discretion, offer to repurchase a stock option previously granted, based upon such terms and conditions as
the Committee shall establish and communicate to the holder at the time that such offer is made.
Stock Appreciation
Rights
. Under the Plan, stock appreciation rights may be granted to participants who have been, or are being, granted
stock options under the Plan as a means of allowing the participants to exercise their stock options without the need to pay the
exercise price in cash. In conjunction with non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights may be granted either at or
after the time of the grant of the non-qualified stock options. In conjunction with incentive stock options, stock appreciation
rights may be granted only at the time of the grant of the incentive stock options. A stock appreciation right entitles the holder
to receive a number of shares of common stock having a fair market value equal to the excess fair market value of one share of
common stock over the exercise price of the related stock option, multiplied by the number of shares subject to the stock appreciation
rights. The granting of a stock appreciation right will not affect the number of shares of common stock available for awards under
the Plan. The number of shares available for awards under the Plan will, however, be reduced by the number of shares of common
stock acquirable upon exercise of the stock option to which the stock appreciation right relates.
Restricted Stock
. Under
the Plan, shares of restricted stock may be awarded either alone or in addition to other awards granted under the Plan. The Committee
determines the persons to whom grants of restricted stock are made, the number of shares to be awarded, the price if any to be
paid for the restricted stock by the person receiving the stock from us, the time or times within which awards of restricted stock
may be subject to forfeiture, the vesting schedule and rights to acceleration thereof, and all other terms and conditions of the
restricted stock awards.
Restricted stock awarded
under the Plan may not be sold, exchanged, assigned, transferred, pledged, encumbered or otherwise disposed of, other than to us,
during the applicable restriction period. In order to enforce these restrictions, the Plan requires that all shares of restricted
stock awarded to the holder remain in our physical custody until the restrictions have terminated and all vesting requirements
with respect to the restricted stock have been fulfilled. We will retain custody of all dividends and distributions made or declared
with respect to the restricted stock during the restriction period. A breach of any restriction regarding the restricted stock
will cause a forfeiture of the restricted stock and any retained distributions. Except for the foregoing restrictions, the holder
will, even during the restriction period, have all of the rights of a shareholder, including the right to vote the shares.
Other Stock-Based
Awards
. Under the Plan, other stock-based awards may be granted, subject to limitations under applicable law that
are denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, or related to, shares of common
stock, as deemed by the Committee to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan. These other stock-based awards may be in the
form of purchase rights, shares of common stock awarded that are not subject to any restrictions or conditions, convertible or
exchangeable debentures or other rights convertible into shares of common stock and awards valued by reference to the value of
securities of, or the performance of, one of our subsidiaries. These other stock-based awards may include performance shares or
options, whose award is tied to specific performance criteria. These other stock-based awards may be awarded either alone, in addition
to, or in tandem with any other awards under the Plan or any of our other plans.
Accelerated Vesting and Exercisability
If any one person,
or more than one person acting as a group, acquires the ownership of stock of the company that, together with the stock held by
such person or group, constitutes more than 50% of the total fair market value or combined voting power of the stock of our company,
and our board of directors does not authorize or otherwise approve such acquisition, then the vesting periods of any and all stock
options and other awards granted and outstanding under the Plan shall be accelerated and all such stock options and awards will
immediately and entirely vest, and the respective holders thereof will have the immediate right to purchase and/or receive any
and all common stock subject to such stock options and awards on the terms set forth in the Plan and the respective agreements
respecting such stock options and awards. An increase in the percentage of stock owned by any one person, or persons acting as
a group, as a result of a transaction in which we acquire our stock in exchange for property is not treated as an acquisition of
stock for the foregoing purposes.
The Committee may,
in the event of an acquisition by any one person, or more than one person acting as a group, together with acquisitions during
the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons, of assets from us that have a
total gross fair market value equal to or more than 50% of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets of our company
immediately before such acquisition or acquisitions, or if any one person, or more than one person acting as a group, acquires
the ownership of stock of our company that, together with the stock held by such person or group, constitutes more than 50% of
the total fair market value or combined voting power of the stock of our company, which has been approved by our board of directors,
(i) accelerate the vesting of any and all stock options and other awards granted and outstanding under the Plan, or (ii) require
a holder of any award granted under the Plan to relinquish such award to us upon the tender by us to the holder of cash in an amount
equal to the repurchase value of such award. For this purpose, gross fair market value means the value our assets, or the value
of the assets being disposed of, determined without regard to any liabilities associated with such assets.
Notwithstanding any
provisions of the Plan or any award granted thereunder to the contrary, no acceleration shall occur with respect to any award to
the extent such acceleration would cause the Plan or an award granted thereunder to fail to comply with Section 409A of the Code.
Other Limitations
The Committee may not
modify or amend any outstanding option or stock appreciation right to reduce the exercise price of such option or stock appreciation
right, as applicable, below the exercise price as of the date of grant of such option or stock appreciation right. In addition,
no option or stock appreciation right may be granted in exchange for, or in connection with, the cancellation or surrender of an
option or stock appreciation right or other award having a higher exercise price.
Withholding Taxes
Upon the exercise of
any award granted under the Plan, the holder may be required to remit to Company an amount sufficient to satisfy all federal, state
and local withholding tax requirements prior to delivery of any certificate or certificates for shares of Common Stock.
Amendments
Subject to the approval
of the Board, where required, the Committee may at any time, and from time to time, amend the Plan, provided that no amendment
will be made that would impair the rights of a holder under any agreement entered into pursuant to the Plan without the holder’s
consent (except to the extent necessary to comply with Section 409A of the Code). In addition, the Committee may not increase
the shares available under the Plan, increase the individual limits on awards, allow for an exercise price below fair market value,
permit the repricing of options or stock appreciation rights, or adopt any other amendment that would require shareholder approval.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
The material U.S. Federal
Income Tax consequences of awards under the Plan, based on the current provisions of the Code and the regulations thereunder, with
respect to employees who are subject to U.S. income tax are as follows:
|
(a)
|
The grant of an option to an employee will have no tax consequences to the employee or to the Company
or its subsidiaries or affiliates. In general, upon the exercise of an incentive stock option (“ISO”), the employee
will not recognize income, and the employer will not be entitled to a tax deduction. However, the excess of the acquired
shares’ fair market value on the exercise date over the exercise price is included in the employee’s income for purposes
of the alternative minimum tax. When an employee disposes of ISO shares, the difference between the exercise price and
the amount realized by the employee will, in general, constitute capital gain or loss, as the case may be. However,
if the employee fails to hold the ISO shares for more than one year after exercising the ISO and for more than two years after
the grant of the ISO: (i) the portion of any gain realized by the employee upon the disposition of the shares that does
not exceed the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date over the exercise price generally will be treated
as ordinary income, (ii) the balance of any gain or any loss will be treated as a capital gain or loss, and (iii) the employer
generally will be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the employee. If
an employee exercises an ISO more than three months after his termination of employment with the Company and any subsidiary in
which the Company owns at least 50% of the voting power (or one year after his termination of employment if the reason for the
termination is disability), the option will be treated for tax purposes as a non-qualified stock option, as described below.
|
|
(b)
|
In general, upon the exercise of a non-qualified stock option, the employee will recognize ordinary
income equal to the excess of the acquired shares’ fair market value on the exercise date over the exercise price, and the
employer generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount.
|
|
(c)
|
With respect to other awards that are settled either in cash or in shares that are transferable
or are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the employee will recognize ordinary income equal to the excess of (a)
the cash or the fair market value of any shares received (determined as of the date of settlement) over (b) the amount, if any,
paid for the shares by the employee, and the employer generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount.
|
In the case of an award
to an employee that is settled in shares that are nontransferable and subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the employee
generally will recognize ordinary income equal to the excess of (a) the fair market value of the shares received (determined
as of the date on which the shares become transferable or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, whichever occurs first)
over (b) the amount, if any, paid for the shares by the employee, and the employer generally will be entitled to a tax deduction
in the same amount.
An employee whose shares
are both nontransferable and subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture may elect under Section 83(b) of the Code to recognize
income when the shares are received, rather than upon the expiration of the transfer. A participant may make a Section 83(b)
election, within 30 days of the transfer of the restricted stock. If a participant makes an election and thereafter
forfeits the shares, no ordinary loss deduction will be allowed. The forfeiture will be treated as a sale or exchange upon which
there is realized loss equal to the excess, if any, of the consideration paid for the shares over the amount realized on such forfeiture. The
loss will be a capital loss if the shares are capital assets. If a participant makes an election under Section 83(b),
the holding period will commence on the day after the date of transfer and the tax basis will equal the fair market value of shares,
as determined without regard to the restrictions, on the date of transfer.
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
As a “smaller reporting company”,
we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
Executive Overview and Outlook
History of the Company’s operations.
Since February 2006, the Company's operations
were based on the GMG messaging system designed for mass distribution of messages. The Company was successful
in recruiting only one customer, Platin, who was a related party. We depended on customer Platin for our total revenues. The
revenues we generated from Platin were not sufficient to cover our general and administrative expenses consequently we relied
on shareholders loans to meet our expenses. On December 30, 2010, after nearly five years of operating the business relating
to the GMG assets with only minimal operations and continued losses, we determined to cease its business operations related
to the GMG assets and seek to find a suitable business to enter into or to acquire a merger candidate.
On December 30,
2010, we entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement ”) by and among Joseph
R. Indovina (the “ Buyer ” and/or “Indovina”), Ron Kallus, Niva Kallus, Israel Hason
and individual shareholders (the “Sellers”), and the Company which closed on January 10, 2011. Pursuant
to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, Indovina acquired 3,999,388.shares, or approximately 27.14%, of the issued and
outstanding shares of our common stock from the Sellers with the Sellers receiving, in the aggregate, two hundred sixty five thousand
six hundred thirteen dollars ($265,613.00) from Indovina for the purchase. On January 10, 2011, in accordance with
the Purchase Agreement, Ron Kallus, Niva Kallus, Israel Hason, our then current officers and directors resigned and
Indovina was named President, Secretary and Director.
Pursuant to the Stock
Purchase Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date, the GMG intellectual properties, products, assets, the “
VGTel
”
name, and business was spun out from us to Ron Kallus and Israel Hason in exchange for the following:
|
1.
|
Canceling 1,495,200 of our common shares owned by Ron Kallus and Israel Hason.
|
|
2.
|
Transferring all of our accounts receivable and accounts payable to NYN International.
|
|
3.
|
Forgiveness of Officer’s Loan to the Company amounting to $31,323.
|
|
4.
|
Forgiveness of $6,250 in accrued expenses owed to Yoav Kallus for development.
|
|
5.
|
Forgiveness of $6,480 accrued expenses owed to NYN International, a company owned by Ron Kallus.
|
Consequently, as a result of the spin-out
of the GMG intellectual property assets, we became a Shell Company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, with the focus on seeking appropriate business opportunities.
Changes in Operations
and Strategy.
In
the second half of our fiscal year, we searched for new businesses to start and found that the internet gaming industry was one
of the
hottest growth industries in the country and could enhance our entertainment services line of business. In
March
2012, we acquired from
Western Capital Ventures, Inc. (WCV)
the
nationwide Distribution
Agreement with Visual Entertainment Systems, LLC (VES), a manufacturer, for the distribution of its NetStar Internet Kiosks
- arcade style sweepstake gaming systems, software and hardware units. Also, in March 2012, we completed negiotiations with VES
to directly purchase, distribute and install its NetStar Internet Kiosks into designated locations. The purchase and distribution
of the kiosks is expected to establish our entry into the internet gaming industry. While the Company had not yet received revenues
from this segment of the Company’s business as of the close of this fiscal year, we anticipate revenues beginning within
the next two quarters.
Our principal business
objective for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be to achieve long-term growth potential through continuing our penetration
into the Internet gaming industry. Looking forward, we expect the conditions to compete within the Internet gaming industry conditions
to be highly challenging. While the national marketplace in which we operate is highly competitive, the Company continues
to experience heightened competitive activity in certain markets from other larger manufacturers and distributors, many, if not
all, of which have greater resources than we do. Such activities have included more aggressive product claims and marketing
challenges, as well as increased promotional spending. While the Company has taken, and will continue to take, measures to
mitigate the effect of these conditions, should they persist, they could adversely affect the Company’s future results.
The Company believes
it is well prepared to meet the challenges ahead due to its experience operating in challenging environments and continued focus
on the Company’s recently updated strategic initiatives: engaging to build our brands; market penetration; innovation for
growth; effectiveness and efficiency; and leading to win. This focus should position the Company well to increase shareholder value
over the long term.
Alternative Plans.
In the event our entry
into the internet gaming industry is not successful, we will achieve long-term growth potential through starting up a new business
or a combination with a business rather than immediate, short-term earnings. We will not restrict our potential candidate target
companies to any specific business, industry or geographical location and, thus, may acquire any type of business.
The analysis of new
business opportunities has and will be undertaken by or under the supervision of our officers and directors. We have unrestricted
flexibility in seeking, analyzing and participating in potential business opportunities. In our efforts to analyze potential acquisition
targets, we will consider the following kinds of factors:
|
a.
|
Potential for growth, indicated by new technology, anticipated market expansion or new products;
|
|
b.
|
Competitive position as compared to other firms of similar size and experience within the industry
segment as well as within the industry as a whole;
|
|
c.
|
Strength and diversity of management, either in place or scheduled for recruitment;
|
|
d.
|
Capital requirements and anticipated availability of required funds, to be provided by us or from
operations, through the sale of additional securities, through joint ventures or similar arrangements or from other sources;
|
|
e.
|
The cost of participation by us as compared to the perceived tangible and intangible values and
potentials;
|
|
f.
|
The extent to which the business opportunity can be advanced;
|
|
g.
|
The accessibility of required management expertise, personnel, raw materials, services, professional
assistance and other required items; and
|
|
h.
|
Other relevant factors.
|
In applying the foregoing
criteria, no one of which will be controlling, we will attempt to analyze all factors and circumstances and make a determination
based upon reasonable investigative measures and available data. Potentially available business opportunities may occur in many
different industries, and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis
of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex. Due to our limited capital available for investigation, we may
not discover or adequately evaluate adverse facts about the opportunity to be acquired.
We do not currently
engage in any business activities that provide cash flow. The costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations for the
next 12 months and beyond such time will be paid with money in our treasury.
During the next 12
months we anticipate incurring costs related to:
|
(i)
|
Filing of Exchange Act reports, and
|
|
(ii)
|
Costs relating to growing our internet gaming business as it relates to licensing and/or revenue participation agreements.
|
None of our officers
or directors has had any preliminary contact or discussions with any representative of any other entity regarding a business combination
with us. Any target business that is selected may be a financially unstable company or an entity in its early stages of development
or growth, including entities without established records of sales or earnings. In that event, we will be subject to numerous risks
inherent in the business and operations of financially unstable and early stage or potential emerging growth companies. In addition,
we may effect a business combination with an entity in an industry characterized by a high level of risk, and, although our management
will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, there can be no assurance that we will properly ascertain
or assess all significant risks.
We anticipate that
the selection of a business combination will be complex and extremely risky. Because of general economic conditions, rapid technological
advances being made in some industries and shortages of available capital, our management believes that there are numerous firms
seeking even the limited additional capital that we will have and/or the perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation.
Such perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation include, among other things, facilitating or improving the terms
on which additional equity financing may be obtained, providing liquidity for the principals of and investors in a business, creating
a means for providing incentive stock options or similar benefits to key employees, and offering greater flexibility in structuring
acquisitions, joint ventures and the like through the issuance of stock. Potentially available business combinations may occur
in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation
and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex.
Future Financings
We will require additional
financing in order to enable us to startup and maintain a business. On February 14, 2012, we entered into a funding
agreement with TW Ruban Group, Inc. which provides an advance of $500,000 in working capital to be paid in over in installments.
The funding agreement is strictly a short-term arrangement to provide working capital while the Company continues to negotiate
the funding of $5.0 million of additional capital. As of March 23, 2012, $92,595 has been funded. [A subsequent funding of $50,300.00
is scheduled for the next quarter.]
We will seek to
raise an additional a minimum of $500,000 over the next 12 months to pay for our ongoing expenses while investigating opportunities.
These expenses include legal, accounting and audit fees as well as general and administrative expenses. These cash requirements
are in excess of our current cash and working capital resources. Accordingly, we will require additional financing in order to
continue operations and to repay our liabilities. There is no assurance that any party will advance additional funds to us in order
to enable us to sustain our plan of operations or to repay our liabilities.
We anticipate continuing
to rely on equity sales of our common stock in order to continue to fund our business operations. Issuances of additional shares
will result in dilution to our existing stockholders. There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of our equity
securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund our planned business activities.
We presently do not
have any arrangements for additional financing, and no potential lines of credit or sources of financing are currently available
for the purpose of proceeding with our plan of operations
.
Results of Operations:
Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011
Revenues
Revenues for the fiscal
year ending March 31, 2012 was $0 compared to $9,000 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011. The decrease in revenues resulted
from the failed merger with Venture Industries (as more fully described in Item 1.A. above), a change of management and the search
for new business opportunities.
Expenses
Total operating expenses
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 was $1,772,688 as compared to $388,251 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011,
an increase in expenses of 456%. The increase was attributed to stock compensation for services consultants
for an aggregate of $900,001 for the period ended March 31, 2012 as compared to $291,666 for the period ending March 31, 2011. Expenses
included General and Administrative expenses of $70,932 for the period ended March 31, 2012 as compared to $6,002 for fiscal year
ending March 31, 2011. Officers Compensation & Rent amounted to $942,393 during the fiscal year ended March 31,
2012 as compared to $42,000 during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011. Depreciation and Amortization was $0 for the period
ending March 31, 2012 as compared to $4,350 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011.
Research and development
expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 decreased to $0 as compared to $8,120 for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2011.
Net loss
The Company reported a net loss for the
twelve month period ending March 31, 2012 of $1,772,688 as compared to a net loss of $504,280 for the fiscal year
period ending March 31, 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources:
For the Fiscal Years Ended March 31, 2012 and March
31, 2011.
As of March 31, 2012 the Company had $714
in cash as compared to $2,859 as of March 31, 2011.
Net cash used by operating activities for the fiscal year
period ended March 31, 2012 was $25,145 as compared to $9,986 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011.
Net cash used by investing activities during fiscal year ending
March 31, 2012 was $35,000 as compared to $1,445 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011.
Net cash provided by financing activities during fiscal year
ending March 31, 2012 was $58,000 as compared to $12,959 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011.
The business pertaining to the foregoing operations has ceased
since December 30, 2010. Said operations are now discontinued.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance
sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in
financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is
material to stockholders.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company does
not expect any recent account pronouncements to have a significant impact on its financial position or results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements
requires management to use judgment and make estimates. The level of uncertainty in estimates and assumptions increases with the
length of time until the underlying transactions are completed. Actual results could ultimately differ from those estimates. The
accounting policies that are most critical in the preparation of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are those
that are both important to the presentation of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and require significant
or complex judgments and estimates on the part of management. The Company’s critical accounting policies are reviewed periodically
with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
In certain instances, accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America allow for the selection of alternative accounting methods.
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share
We compute net income
(loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings per Share”. ASC 260 requires presentation of both
basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed
by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding
(denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during
the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing
diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the
exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excluded all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.
Use of estimates
The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenditures during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report
on Form 10-K may contain forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 or by the SEC in its rules, regulations and releases. Such statements may relate, for example, to sales or volume growth,
financial goals, tax rates, new product introductions or commercial investment levels, among other matters. These statements are
made on the basis of the Company’s views and assumptions as of this time and the Company undertakes no obligation to update
these statements. Moreover, the Company does not, nor does any other person, assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness
of those statements. The Company cautions investors that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance
and that actual events or results may differ materially from those statements. Actual events or results may differ materially because
of factors that affect businesses and economic conditions, as well as matters specific to us and the markets we serve, including
increased competition and evolving competitive practices, changes in domestic laws or regulations or their interpretation, and
political, legislative and fiscal developments. For information about these and other factors that could impact our business and
cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements, refer to Item 1A, “Risk Factors”.
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
As a “smaller
reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
See “F-1”.
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
On July 27, 2011, we
dismissed EisnerAmper, LLP (“EisnerAmper”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, effective
July 27, 2011. The decision to dismiss EisnerAmper as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm
was approved by written consent of the Company’s Board of Directors on July 27, 2011. EisnerAmper had been the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since March 28, 2011.
EisnerAmper has not
prepared any audited financial statements on behalf of the Company. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 and
the subsequent interim period up through July 27, 2011, there were no (i) disagreements between the Company and EisnerAmper on
any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements,
if not resolved to its satisfaction, would have caused EisnerAmper to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreements
in connection with its report, or (ii) “reportable events,” as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
On July 27, 2011, the
Company engaged the services of MaloneBailey, LLP (“MaloneBailey”) as the independent registered public accounting
firm of the Company. Malone Bailey was the auditor for the Company for the year ended March 31, 2010, and was dismissed
on March 28, 2011. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted
MaloneBailey with respect to any accounting or auditing issues involving the Company. There was no discussion between
MaloneBailey and the Company regarding the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, the type of audit opinion
that might be rendered on the financial statements, or any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement, as described in
Item 304 of Regulation S-K, with MaloneBailey, or a “reportable event” as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation
S-K.
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
. Under the supervision of our sole executive officer who is also the principal financial officer, we have
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such
term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”),
as of the end of the period covered by this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”).
Based on that evaluation, our principal
executive officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because of certain deficiencies involving
internal controls which constituted a material weakness as discussed below. The material weakness identified did not result in
the restatement of any previously reported financial statements or any other related financial disclosures, nor does management
believe that it had any effect on the accuracy of our financial statements for the current reporting period. We have identified
the following material weakness of our internal controls:
|
-
|
There is a lack of sufficient staff due to the size of the Company which results in a lack of segregation
of duties necessary for a good system of internal control.
|
|
-
|
There is a lack of control processes which provide for multiple levels of supervision and review.
|
Management’s Annual Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining “internal control
over financial reporting,” as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our internal control
over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only a reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
Under the supervision of our sole officer
who is also the principal financial officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework. Based on its evaluation, our principal executive officer who is also our principal financial officer concluded that
our controls are not effective and there is a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness
is a deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable
possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely
basis.
The material weakness
relates to the monitoring and review of work performed by our limited accounting staff in the preparation of financial statements,
footnotes and financial data provided to our independent registered public accounting firm in connection with the annual audit.
More specifically, the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting is due to the fact that:
|
·
|
The Company lacks proper segregation of duties. We believe that the
lack of proper segregation of duties is due to our limited resources.
|
|
·
|
The Company does not have a comprehensive and formalized accounting
and procedures manual.
|
Management has concluded
that until we have sufficient financial resources to supplement our accounting personnel, this material weakness will continue.
This annual report
does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant
to temporary rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
This report shall not
be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section,
and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of
any general incorporation language in such filing.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
There were no changes
in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
None.
PART III
The following table sets forth, as of March
31, 2012 the names and ages of all of our directors and executive officers; and all positions and offices held. The director will
hold such office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his or her successor has been elected and qualified.
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS, AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16A OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
|
The following sets
forth our directors, executive officers, promoters and control persons, their ages, and all offices and positions held as of March
31, 2012. Additional directors were appointed to our board on June 28, 2011, as disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on July 5, 2011. With the exception of Bruce Minsky, all of the directors appointed to our board on June 28, 2011, subsequently
resigned on August 26, 2011.
Directors are elected
for a period of two years and thereafter serve until their successor is duly elected by the shareholders. Officers and other employees
serve at the will of the Board of Directors.
Peter Shafran, Age 54,
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Director.
Peter Shafran was appointed as Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director on August 26, 2011.
Peter Shafran
400 Rella Blvd., Suite 174
Suffern, NY 10901
|
Age – 54
|
Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer,
Director
|
Peter Shafran
was brought on as Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director on August 26, 2011. Mr. Shafran has been practicing
law for over 27 years. In 1990, he founded the Law Offices of Peter W. Shafran, LLC, where he has practiced law with an emphasis
on
real estate matters; transactional arrangements; lending representation; and business acquisitions.
The firm has offices in Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, and Florida.
Mr. Shafran is a member of the
Bar of the States of New York and New Jersey, and admitted in the U.S. District Court of the States of New York and New Jersey.
Since
2010, Mr. Shafran has also been the Executive Producer of River Spirit Music, producing, promoting and presenting musical
shows for venues in the Lower Hudson Valley region. Mr. Shafran received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology from SUNY
Binghamton, and his Juris Doctor from Hofstra University School of Law.
Based on his professional experience,
Mr. Shafran
is qualified to serve as
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer and as a director.
Bruce Minsky, Age 47,
Director.
Bruce Minsky,
Age 47, was appointed as Director on June 28, 2011.
Bruce Minsky
112 Brick Church Road
New Hempstead, NY 10977
|
Age – 48
|
Director
|
Since May 2004,
Mr. Minsky has been engaged in the private practice of law at Law Offices of Bruce W. Minsky, P.C. in New Hempstead, New York,
specializing in corporate organization, governance, operational, compliance and regulatory scenarios; real estate matters; transactional
arrangements; commercial lending representation; and, business/portfolio acquisitions. From July 1991 through April 2004,
Mr. Minsky was employed by Banco Popular North America, New York NY, the U.S. banking subsidiary of Popular, Inc, a full-service
international financial services provider [NASD – BPOP], for which he served as Vice President and In-House Counsel.
Mr. Minsky is a member of the Bar of the States of California, Connecticut and New York, and admitted in the U.S. District Court
of the State of New York, Southern and Eastern Districts, as well as the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Mr. Minsky
received a Bachelor of Arts degree from Boston University in 1985. In 1988, he received a Juris Doctor degree from Southwestern
University School of Law. He received a Master of Laws degree in American Banking Law from Boston University in 1989. Based
on his professional experience Mr. Minsky is qualified to serve as a director.
Code of Ethics
We have not adopted a code of ethics applicable
to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing
similar functions. Additionally, we do not currently have an “audit committee financial expert”. We believe that based
on our limited resources and small number of directors and officers, the cost of taking such actions outweighs potential benefits
to stockholders.
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RELATED INFORMATION
|
Stock Options/SAR Grants
. On
February 24, 2011, our Board of Directors adopted the VGTel 2011 Equity Incentive Plan. No grants of stock options
or stock appreciation rights have been made as of the year ended March 31, 2012.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal
Year-end.
As of the year ended March 31, 2012, the following named executive officer had the following unexercised options,
stock that has not vested, and equity incentive plan awards:
None.
Summary Compensation Table.
The
table set forth below summarizes the annual and long-term compensation for services in all capacities to us payable to our principal
executive officer during the years ending March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012:
Name and
Principal
Position
|
|
Year
Ended
March
31
|
|
|
Salary
$
|
|
|
Bonus
$
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
$
|
|
|
Option
Awards
$
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
$
|
|
|
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
$
|
|
|
All
Other
Compensation
$
|
|
|
Total
$
|
|
Peter Shafran
|
|
2012
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
²
|
|
None
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
Joseph Indovina
|
|
2011
|
¹
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
¹Joseph Indovina resigned as Chief
Executive Officer, President and Treasurer effective August 26, 2011. Peter Shafran assumed the positions of Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer on such date.
² This amount represents such officer's
compensation incurred, but not paid out for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2012.
Long-Term Incentive Plans
.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Director Compensation.
Our directors
received the following compensation for their service as directors during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012:
Name
|
|
|
Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
|
|
|
Stock Awards
$
|
|
|
Option
Awards
$
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
$
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
$
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
$
|
|
|
Total
$
|
|
Peter Shafran
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
Bruce Minsky
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
120,000 shares @$1.50/share
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Joseph Indovina
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
240,000 shares @$1.50/share
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
300,001
|
|
Frank Queally
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
120,000 shares @$1.50/share
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Lori Dente
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
120,000 shares @$1.50/share
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Colin Mitchell
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
120,000 shares @$1.50/share
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Nominations to the Board of Directors
The Company’s
directors take a critical role in guiding the Company’s strategic direction and oversee the management of the Company. Board
of Director candidates are considered based upon various criteria, such as their broad-based business and professional skills and
experiences, a global business and social perspective, concern for the long-term interests of the stockholders, diversity, and
personal integrity and judgment. Accordingly, we seek to attract and retain highly qualified directors.
In carrying out its
responsibilities, the Board of Directors will consider candidates suggested by stockholders. If a stockholder wishes
to formally place a candidate's name in nomination, however, such stockholder must do so in accordance with the provisions of the
Company's Bylaws.
Employment Agreements
On August 26, 2011,
the Board of Directors executed an employment agreement with Peter Shafran. The Agreement provides a one-year term,
and an annual base salary of $60,000, of which the first three payments were deferred for ninety days.
Outstanding Equity Awards
None.
Bonuses and Deferred Compensation
The Company does not
have any bonus, deferred compensation or retirement plan. Decisions regarding compensation will be determined by our compensation
committee once established; our compensation committee will consist of our three independent directors effective until the expiration
of the ten day period following the mailing of the Schedule 14f-1 to the Company’s shareholders.
Compensation of Directors
Our directors have
received no compensation for their service on the Board of Directors. We plan to implement a compensation program for our directors,
as and when they are appointed, which we anticipate will include such elements as an annual retainer, meeting attendance fees and/or
stock options. There are no other arrangements, standard or otherwise, with any director or officer wherein the director or officer
is compensated other than as stated above.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation
We do not have a Compensation
Committee. All compensation matters are approved by the full Board.
Board Leadership Structure and Role
on Risk Oversight
As of March 31, 2012,
Peter Shafran held the positions as Chief Executive Officer and Director.
At present, we have
determined this leadership structure is appropriate for the Company due to the Company’s small size and limited operations
and resources. As a result, no policy exists requiring the combination or separation of leadership roles and the Company’s
governing documents do not mandate a particular structure. This has allowed the Company’s Board of Directors the flexibility
to establish the most appropriate structure for the Company at any given time.
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING
COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the
Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers, and stockholders holding more than 10% of our outstanding Common Stock
to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in beneficial ownership of our Common Stock. Executive
officers, directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our Common Stock are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies
of all Section 16(a) reports they file.
Based solely upon a
review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 delivered to us as filed with the SEC during our most recent fiscal year, none of our executive officers
and directors failed to timely file the reports required pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
|
The following table
sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of the Company's Common Stock as of March 31, 2012 by (1)
all directors and executive officers of the Company, individually and collectively as a group, and (2) all stockholders known to
the Company to be beneficial owners of more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding Common Stock;
Name and Address
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of
|
|
|
|
|
of Beneficial Owner
|
|
|
Office
|
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
|
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
Percentage of Class
|
|
Joseph R. Indovina
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
3,408,499
|
|
|
|
22.11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Minsky
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
0.7785
|
%
|
Officers and Directors Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
0.7785
|
%
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
None.
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
(a) Audit Fees. During
the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, fees billed by the Company's auditors, MaloneBailey LLP for services
rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and estimated fees for the audit of our financial statements was $21,000
and $7,000, respectively.
(b) Audit-Related Fees.
During years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, no audit-related services were performed other than as set forth in paragraph
(a) above.
(c) Tax Fees. Our auditors
performed no services related to preparing and filing the Tax returns for 2012-2011.
PART IV
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
TO
ANNUAL REPORT
ON FORM 10-K
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Incorporated by Reference to:
|
|
Filed
Herewith
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Peter Shafran, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
X
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Peter Shafran, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
X
|
TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
VGTEL, INC.
INDEX
|
PAGE
|
|
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
F-2
|
|
|
BALANCE SHEETS
|
F-3
|
|
|
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
F-4
|
|
|
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
F-5
|
|
|
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
F-6
|
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
F-7 – 9
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
VGTel, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Suffern, New York
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of VGTel, Inc.
(a development stage company) (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of operations,
shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have,
nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances,
but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of VGTel, Inc. as of March 31, 2012 and 2011 and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming
that VGTel, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, VGTel, Inc. suffered losses
from operations and has a working capital deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management’s plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP
www.malone-bailey.com
Houston, Texas
July 12, 2012
VGTEL, INC.
Balance Sheets
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
714
|
|
|
$
|
2,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
2,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $0
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
35,714
|
|
|
$
|
2,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
746,116
|
|
|
$
|
35,920
|
|
Accounts payable to related parties
|
|
|
102,751
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Short term debt
|
|
|
92,595
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
941,462
|
|
|
|
35,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, $.001 par value,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 10,000,000 shares, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Common stock, $ .0001 par value ,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 200,000,000 shares, Issued &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding 15,413,387 and 14,693,387 as of March 31, 2012 and 2011
|
|
|
1,541
|
|
|
|
1,469
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
1,789,762
|
|
|
|
892,814
|
|
Subscriptions Receivable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,981
|
)
|
Deficit accumulated since re-entering the development stage on April 1, 2011
|
|
|
(1,772,688
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Retained Deficit
|
|
|
(924,363
|
)
|
|
|
(924,363
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
(905,748
|
)
|
|
|
(33,061
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
|
$
|
35,714
|
|
|
$
|
2,859
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements.
VGTel, Inc.
Statements of Operations
Years Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Accumulated
From
Inception
April 1, 2011
to March 31,
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
70,932
|
|
|
|
6,002
|
|
|
|
70,932
|
|
Research & Development
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,120
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Officers' compensation & Rent
|
|
|
942,393
|
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
942,393
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,350
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Legal Services
|
|
|
240,982
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
240,982
|
|
Professional Services- Consulting
|
|
|
518,381
|
|
|
|
327,779
|
|
|
|
518,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,772,688
|
|
|
|
388,251
|
|
|
|
1,772,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on Warrant Exercise
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
124,024
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
NET LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
|
|
$
|
(1,772,688
|
)
|
|
$
|
(504,280
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,772,688
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
|
|
15,114,371
|
|
|
|
9,383,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements
VGTel, Inc.
Statement of Shareholders Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Deficit -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
(Accumulated
|
|
|
Subscriptions
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit)
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
Balances - March 31, 2010
|
|
|
7,720,680
|
|
|
$
|
772
|
|
|
$
|
367,924
|
|
|
$
|
(420,083
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(51,387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officers' compensation & rent charged for the year
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imputed Interest for Ron Kallus
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
Sale of assets to related party
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
43,952
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,952
|
|
Shares cancelled by R Kallus
|
|
|
(1,495,200
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Shares cancelled Hyman & Ethel Schwartz
|
|
|
(1,260,092
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Warrants Exercised
|
|
|
8,328,000
|
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
6,107
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,981
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,959
|
|
Warrant Exercise Price valuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,024
|
|
Contributed Capital - The Hyett Ltd. Loan write-off
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
Shares issued for services rendered
|
|
|
1,399,999
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
291,526
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,666
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(504,280
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(504,280
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances - March 31, 2011
|
|
|
14,693,387
|
|
|
|
1,469
|
|
|
|
892,814
|
|
|
|
(924,363
|
)
|
|
|
(2,981
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,061
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment of deficit prior to inception
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
924,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(924,363
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for services rendered
|
|
|
720,000
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
899,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscriptions receivable reclassed to APIC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,981
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,772,688
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,772,688
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances - March 31, 2012
|
|
|
15,413,387
|
|
|
$
|
1,541
|
|
|
$
|
1,789,762
|
|
|
$
|
(1,772,688
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(924,363
|
)
|
|
$
|
(905,748
|
)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements
VGTel, Inc.
Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011
|
|
March 31,
2012
|
|
|
March 31,
2011
|
|
|
Accumulated
from Inception
April 1, 2011 to
March 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(1,772,688
|
)
|
|
|
(504,280
|
)
|
|
|
(1,772,688
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant exercise repricing
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
124,024
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Depreciation Expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,350
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Inputed Officer's Compensation & Rent
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Inputed interest for due to Ron Kallus
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issuance for common stock for services rendered
|
|
|
900,001
|
|
|
|
291,666
|
|
|
|
900,001
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
744,791
|
|
|
|
31,275
|
|
|
|
744,791
|
|
Accounts payable – related party
|
|
|
102,751
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
102,751
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(25,145
|
)
|
|
|
(9,986
|
)
|
|
|
(25,145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of Intellectual Property
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,445
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cash paid for purchase of fixed assets
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,445
|
)
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,959
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from shareholder- related party
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from debt
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
|
12,959
|
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease ) in cash
|
|
|
(2,145
|
)
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
(2,145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
2,859
|
|
|
|
1,331
|
|
|
|
2,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
2,859
|
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest and income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder loan exchanged for intellectual property
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
45,521
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Shareholder loan converted to equity
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Reclassification of subscription receivable to APIC
|
|
|
2,981
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,981
|
|
Reclassification of AP to debt
|
|
|
34,595
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34,595
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements
VGTel, Inc.
Notes to Financial
Statements
March 31, 2012
NOTE 1 –
GENERAL ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
VGTel Inc. (the
“Company”) was organized on February 5, 2002 in New York. On January 18, 2006, the Company purchased the GMG System,
a telemarketing campaigning product and was operating in the telemarketing sector of the telecommunications industry up until January
2011.
On January 10,
2011, the Company’s controlling shareholders sold a majority of their stock amounting to 27.4% of total outstanding Company
stock to Joseph Indovina. As part of this transaction, $44,053 in officer and related party debt was canceled, 2,755,412
shares were canceled and the Company’s telemarketing business was transferred to two of the controlling shareholders. A
net $44,752 contribution to capital was recorded from this transaction.
On February 24, 2011, we executed an Exchange
Agreement with Venture Industries, Inc. (“Venture”), a company organized in Nevada, pursuant to which we would acquire
100% of Venture, in exchange for 21,238,285 common shares or 65% of our outstanding common stock on a fully-diluted basis immediately
after this transaction. The closing of the transaction was scheduled to have occurred on March 30, 2011, but did not
happen.
On June 30, 2011, Venture terminated the
Exchange Agreement.
On March 7, 2012, we executed an agreement
with Western Capital Ventures, Inc. (WCV) to purchase its nationwide Distribution Agreement with Visual Entertainment Systems,
LLC (VES), a manufacturer, for the distribution of its NetStar Internet Kiosks - arcade style sweepstake gaming systems, software
and hardware units. On March 15, 2012, we also completed negotiations with VES to directly purchase, distribute and install its
NetStar Internet Kiosks into designated locations. The purchase and distribution of the kiosks is expected to establish our
entry into one of the hottest growth industries in the country and enhance our entertainment services line of business. As of the
close of this fiscal year, the Company had not yet received revenues from this segment of the Company’s business. As of July
12, 2012, neither transaction has closed.
NOTE 2 –
GOING CONCERN
As a result of the termination of the Exchange
Agreement prior to closing, we remained a Shell Company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and had been seeking appropriate business opportunities. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has had recurring net losses and a working capital deficit
as of March 31, 2012 and 2011. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as
a going concern. Without realization of additional capital, it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from this uncertainty.
The Company’s
activities to date have been supported by equity financing and shareholder loans. Management plans to seek funding
from its shareholders and other qualified investors to pursue its business plan. In the alternative, the Company
may be amenable to a sale, merger or other acquisition in the event such transaction is deemed by management to be in the
best interests of the shareholders.
NOTE 3 –
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
For the purpose
of the statements of cash flows, cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with maturity of three months or less.
Property and
Equipment
Property and equipment are carried at the cost of acquisition
or construction and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Costs associated with repair and maintenance are
expensed as incurred. Costs associated with improvements which extend the life, increase the capacity or improve the efficiency
of our property and equipment are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining life of the related asset. Gains and losses on
dispositions of equipment are reflected in operations. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of 5 years. Equipment of $35,000 was acquired in late March 2012 and so no depreciation was recorded for the year
ended March 31, 2012.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable through the estimated undiscounted
cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets. Whenever any such impairment exists, an impairment
loss will be recognized for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. During 2012 and 2011, there was no impairment
of long-lived assets due to the minimal value of such assets.
Stock Based
Compensation
Under ASC 718,
the Company measures the compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based on the grant-date fair value and recognize
the costs in the financial statements over the respective vesting periods of the option grant.
Income Taxes
The Company provides
for income taxes under ASC 740 “Accounting for Income Taxes”. ASC 740 requires the use of an asset
and liability approach in accounting for income taxes.
ASC 740 requires
the reduction of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely
than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. No provision for income taxes is included
in the financial statements due to its immaterial amount.
Use of Estimates
The preparation
of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net Income
(Loss) per Common Share
Net income (loss)
per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents, if
not anti-dilutive. The Company has not issued any potentially dilutive securities.
Revenue and
Cost Recognition
The Company recognizes
revenue on arrangements in accordance with ASC 605. In all cases, revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed
or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed and collectibility is reasonably assured.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
The Company does
not expect any recent account pronouncements to have a significant impact on its financial position or results of operations.
NOTE 4 –
OFFICERS’ COMPENSATION
The Chief Executive
Officer has taken no actual compensation since inception. Officer's compensation has been charged $35,833 and $37,500 during the
years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 respectively and credited to accounts payable and additional paid in capital.
NOTE 5 –
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company recognized
$35,833 of compensation expense for services performed by the Chief Executive Officer. There is a $25,000 related party payable
owed to the Officer as of March 31, 2012.
The Company recognized
$41,831 of compensation expenses for services performed by a Director. There is a $77,751 related party payable owed to the Director
as of March 31, 2012.
NOTE 6 –
NOTE PAYABLE
During the year
ended March 31, 2012, the Company borrowed $58,000 and converted $34,595 of AP into note payables under one 8% Convertible Promissory
Note from a third party that will mature on March 22, 2013. The note is convertible at 51% of the average of the lowest three trading
prices for the Common Stock of the Company during the ten Trading Day periods ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to
the Conversion Date after 180 days. The Company analyzed the conversion option for derivative accounting consideration under ASC
815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that the instrument will be classified as a liability once the conversion
option become effective after 180 days due to there being no explicit limit on the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement
of the conversion option.
NOTE 7 –
INCOME TAXES
The total net
operating loss as of March 31, 2012 was $974,575, which expires in the years 2027 - 2032. The Company has recorded
a full valuation allowance for its deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2012 and 2011. Deferred taxes are calculated at a 34% rate:
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating losses
|
|
$
|
331,356
|
|
|
$
|
52,100
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(331,356
|
)
|
|
|
(52,100
|
)
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
NOTE 8 –
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company sublets
space for its present office location. The Company charged $7,000 and $4,500 to paid-in capital for rent for the years ended
March 31, 2012 and 2011 respectively.
NOTE 9 –
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
During the twelve
months ended March 31, 2012, a total of 720,000 shares valued at $900,001 were issued to five individuals for services provided.
The entire fair value was recorded to expense during the twelve months ended March 31, 2012.
No preferred shares
have been issued. It is within the discretion of the Board of Directors to determine the preferences of the preferred stock. The
Company has not yet determined the preferences of the preferred stock.
The Company returned
to development stage status as of April 1, 2011. This resulted in a reclassification of all accumulated deficit as of March 31,
2012 to be reclassified into Accumulated Deficit – Discontinued Operations. The Accumulated Deficit balance will reflect
the net loss incurred by the Company since inception of April 1, 2011.
NOTE 10 –
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
In January 2011,
the Company adopted a stock incentive plan and reserved for issuance 10,000,000 common shares.
NOTE 11 –
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On May 15, 2012,
a 20% stock dividend was paid to shareholders. All share amounts in these financials have been revised to reflect this dividend.
In May 2012, 350,000
shares (420,000 shares after the dividend) were issued for services rendered.
VGTEL, INC. SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements
of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
VGTel, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: July 12, 2012
|
By:
|
/s/ Peter Shafran
|
|
|
Peter Shafran
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
VGTel, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: July 12, 2012
|
By:
|
/s/ Peter Shafran
|
|
|
Peter Shafran
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
VGTel, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: July 12, 2012
|
By:
|
/s/ Peter Shafran
|
|
|
Peter Shafran
|
|
|
Principal Accounting Officer
|
VGTel (CE) (USOTC:VGTL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
VGTel (CE) (USOTC:VGTL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024