Voip Pal Com Inc (QB) (VPLM) News

THAT OLD UGLY LADY SHOULD GET A JOB.SHE IS SOOOOOO BORED WITH HER SELF.SHE IS HERE READING ALL POSTS 24/7.AND TRYING TO EDUCATE THE PROS HOW TO TRADE.LMAO.FOR THE LAST 5 YEARS THIS IS THE ONLY BOARD SHE POSTS ON.THAT SHOULD TELL YOU SOMETHING ABOUT HER LIFE.LOL.

Yeah, one has to admit it does indeed seem that way, but their processing inabilities put a damper on it.

Bless your heart, it must be sad to be so deep in the hole that all you can do is insult your intellectual superiors instead of using what passes for your brain.

Don’t give up the day job.

Oh wow now tuna fish man has resorted to his mature side by calling me a lady. Hey, we'll, I guess if that the best intellect it's has, then that's where it goes to. Sad sad ssd. Hopefully someone will do an intervention and get the poor soul some help from CONSTANTLY talking to itself as if it were actually having a real conversation with someone. And as tho babs is listening to him. Geez at least procure him some meds or something to ease his pain.

Percentages are percentages but, you’re too inept to comprehend that.

IMHO

SAD LADY I AM GOING TO MAKE A LOT OF MONEY THIS TIME AROUND.THEN I SLAP IT ON YOUR UGLY FACE.

Somebody get that fish man some therapy. He's in DIRE need... The poor guy is on the verge of turning into a friggin fish stick. Brain is already 90% blubber. It's almost sad......
almost........but not there yet.

“ Actually it a 15-25% chance of winning an appeal.”

Not when you’ve just lost a case heard in front of the most patent troll friendly judge in the land so badly that he awarded costs to the defendants, it isn’t.

Seems like even Albright agrees with Koh that VPLM’s frivolous suits are a cancer on the IP landscape.

Actually it a 15-25% chance of winning an appeal.

IMHO

You do realize when they appeal it means they lost once already, right? The likelihood of this appeal being overturned is 0% and everyone knows this except you.

LMAO!!!

WTF JOINED ME ON THE BID AT .0079???DAMMIT.I HAVE TO MOVE UP TO .008.STAY AWAY ,MFs.

I AM ON THE BIDS.SELL DAMMIT SELL.

WTF IS GOING ON???SELL DAMMIT SELL.ORCA WANTS SHARES BADLY.

Well, you’re not capable to process what’s going on, to understand.

All filings and responses are always submitted at the last minute. They’ve been doing so for years!

IMHO

“ Any response to a filing (s) and or an appeal, is always submitted at the last minute. They’ve been doing so for years.”

Almost as if VPLM wanted to spin it out as long as possible rather than bring it to a conclusion as fast as possible.

Now, why would that be?

Don’t worry, that’s a rhetorical question.

The appeal was inevitable.

Any response to a filing (s) and or an appeal, is always submitted at the last minute. They’ve been doing so for years.

Now sit back and wait a year to two years for a decision on an appeal!

IMHO

Going to the Appeals Court on the MG patent is good news!
Investors take a look at past arguments, precedents used. We'll review them soon.

f the chicken trio and f the cars.FROM VPLM PROFITS.I WANT A HOME THIS TIME AROUND.ORCA IS GETTING GREEDY
YUP.IT IS HARD TO BELIEVE MY VDRM IS AT .023,AND WE ARE AT .008s???LOL
I KEEP SELLING VDRM AND BUYING VPLM:))YOU GUYS KEEP ON SELLING VPLM:)))ORCA NEEDS A NEW HOME:))

I WAS THE BIDDER AT .0078 FOR 2 MILLION.IT EXPIRED.IF IT WAS FILLED I WOULD BE UP IN THE 11,5 MILLION AREA.
I HAVE TO LOAD ANOTHER 10 MILLION BEFORE IT GOES IN THE .015 AREA.

VPLM
VOIP-PAL COM INC
Canceled
Buy 2,000,000 Limit $0.0078 Day
- $0.0073 $0.0089 $0.0089 $0.0089 3:48 PM 03/27/2025 4:05

I beg to differ, sir. Prior to August, 2024, the share price of VPLM was up on the expectation of a favorable ruling by Judge Albright. At that time there was no talk of a class action, RICO, or antitrust lawsuit.
Many believe that the judge made certain technical and legal errors in arriving at his conclusion of noninfringement. Mr. Hudnell astutely revealed these errors in his motion for reconsideration. However, that motion was denied.
This appeal is Voip-Pal's attempt to rectify what Albright did, by having a panel of independent judges consider Mr. Hudnell's rebuttal of Judge Albright's erroneous (in our opinion) conclusions. To answer your assertion, no, appealing does not in and of itself change what Albright did, however, it does afford Voip-Pal an opportunity to correct what Judge Albright did. This appeal inspires a renewed hope because Voip-Pal is still willing to fight the good fight to defend its rights and monetize its IP. As a result, I would expect to see the share price begin to appreciate back to pre-August, 2024 levels and beyond as word of this appeal gets out.

(((((VPLM has and will never do anything.)))))THE STOCK WILL RUN WHETHER YOU OR ANYONE ELSE WANTS IT OR NOT.YOU GOT IT???GOOD THAT IS WHAT I THOUGHT.BUT IF YOU DID NOT GET IT.YOU WILL.LOL

Why would the share price go back just for appealing it? Seeing as you already pointed out in your post the share price went down becuase of things done by judge albright. Terminating the infringement lawsuit. Not by VPLM doing anything. Now that VPLM appealed doesn't chnage what albright did. Simple cause and affect baby. VPLM has and will never do anything.

Has anyone spoke with Rich in the last few weeks? Any status on what’s happening with the antitrust Rico lawsuits? Are we in negotiations, have we served anyone yet?

HEY INSIDER SELLERS COME ON DOWN LOWER.I GOT ANOTHER MILLION AT .0075 WAITING.

I ADDED ANOTHER 550,000 TODAY.TOOK OUT THE .0082 AND .0085.HOLDING NOW 9,5 MILLION.HOPING THERE WILL BE NO NEWS FOR ANOTHER THREE WEEKS,THUS I WILL BE UP TO 15 MILLION.POSSIBLY 20 MILLION.IF IT GOES TO PRICES I LIKE.
03/27/2025 Buy
Trade Details
VPLM
VOIP-PAL COM INC
350,000
$0.0084 $3.00 -$2,927.53

Mar-27-2025
Buy 200,000 Shares of VPLM Limit at $0.0082 (Day)
Filled at $0.0082
$1,640.00

IN JULY 9TH 2024.THE HIGH OF THE STOCK WAS .029.ALSO LAST YEAR MARCH 27TH LIKE TODAY THE PPS WAS .0164.WE ARE AT .008=50% DOWN VS A YEAR AGO.ALSO JANUARY 4TH 2023 VPLM HAD A LOW OF .0128.
IN LESS THAN 5 WEEKS FEBRUARY 9TH 2023 IT RUN TO A HIGH OF .1144=A RUN OF AROUND 800% IN 5 WEEKS.
WE WILL SEE THESE PPS AGAIN??I DO NOT SEE IT THIS YEAR.BUT YOUR .029 OF 2024 JULY,COULD HAPPEN IMO.
THE MINI RUN I SEE FOR 2025 IS BETWEEN .016 AND .019.WE WILL SEE WHAT HAPPENS.

4 Jan 2023
0.0128
1,334,500
9 Feb 2023
0.1144
10,593,170

27 Mar 2024
0.0164
980,389

9 Jul 2024

0.029
0.0196
13,834,547

When Judge Albright terminated the infringement lawsuits against T-Mobile and Verizon after finding no infringement, VPLM share price entered a long downtrend to sub-penny which, incidentally, was not reversed by the announcement of the class action, RICO, and antitrust lawsuits.
Now that Voip-Pal has filed a notice of appeal in the aforementioned infringement actions against T-Mobile and Verizon, l look for the stock price to rebound to levels that we saw prior to August, 2024.
I would expect a PR soon announcing these appeals, and believe that the share price will react substantially to this great news. GLTA!

INSIDERS ARE SELLING.COMPANY IS BROKE.LONGS ARE BROKE.AND I AM THE ONLY ONE BUYING.DAILY.LOL.BELIEVERS ARE GONE.SCARRY TIMES AHEAD FOR VPLM.GOOD TIMES FOR ORCA BUYING LOWER AND LOWER:)))

These court dates mean NOTHING. Get back to me when they get financial judgements that are in-line with the "billions and billions of ongoing" infringements that the CEO has spoken about. If not then it's a complete failure and confirmation that the patents aren't worth near as claimed.

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
Texas Western District Court
Judge: Alan D Albright
Case #: 6:21-cv-00672
Nature of Suit 830 Property Rights - Patent
Cause 35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Filed: Jun 25, 2021
Terminated: Aug 15, 2024
Docket
Parties (5)
Opinions (2)
Docket last updated: 5 hours ago
Wednesday, March 26, 2025
235 appeal Notice of Appeal Wed 03/26 7:03 PM
Appeal of Final Judgment196 by VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.. ( Filing fee $ 605 receipt number ATXWDC-19965217) (Hudnell, Lewis)

Thanks for sharing, rapz! The winds are shifting dramatically in our direction!
I think that these shocking new developments bode well for VPLM.

Great news, GBC! Thank you for sharing!

Antitrust lawsuit accuses Amazon of harming consumers and small businesses
PBS NewsHour 4.71Min clip

Sep 27, 2023
The Federal Trade Commission and 17 states brought a sweeping lawsuit against Amazon, accusing it of violating antitrust laws. It’s the federal government’s latest suit aimed at curbing the power of Big Tech. The FTC and states allege Amazon illegally built and maintained a monopoly that harms customers and competitors. Geoff Bennett discussed more with John Newman of the FTC Bureau of Competition.

Apple vs DOJ antitrust suit: 3 big ways your iPhone could change
News By Jon Fingas last updated March 23, 2024
https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/iphones/apple-vs-doj-antitrust-lawsuit-could-change-how-you-use-your-iphone-heres-how
Any changes should be mostly positive for users, if any happen at all
The U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit against Apple is arguably the largest technology antitrust case since the battle with Microsoft at the turn of the century. Regulators are effectively challenging Apple’s core business model — the company may have to rework some of its tightly integrated ecosystem.
How much of a difference will this really make? Depending on how the case gets resolved, it could significantly impact how you use your iPhone, though it may not be as big a deal as you might imagine.
More choices for apps, with limits
The DOJ lawsuit mostly revolves around Apple’s control over third-party iPhone apps. Outside of the European Union, where officials have already made Apple loosen its policies through the Digital Markets Act, you’re limited to downloading software through the company’s official App Store. Moreover, Apple sets limits on what third-party apps can do on your iPhone. You can’t use all-in-one “super apps,” certain digital wallets, or third-party SMS texting apps, among other programs.
If successful, the DOJ could require that Apple allow third-party app stores like you find on Android (and soon on the iPhone in the EU). You could have a wider selection of apps, particularly titles that Apple wouldn’t otherwise allow.
No matter where you get your apps, they could also improve in capability. They could perform more tasks in the background, bundle a collection of mini-apps, or offer SMS messaging on top of an online-only chat service. You wouldn’t have to rely as much on Apple’s software, and it might be easier to switch to Android as a result. “Apple will be forced to open up its ecosystem,” says Hanish Bhatia, an associate director at Counterpoint Technology Market Research. “This means higher interoperability across different ecosystems for payments, apps, messaging and devices.”
.....
More powerful messaging and wallet apps
While the DOJ wants to improve third-party iOS apps as a whole, it singles out issues with messaging and wallet apps.
Only Apple’s own Messages app can offer both internet-based and SMS messaging on the iPhone. Without iMessage on Android, you risk missing out on conversations if you leave the iPhone. You also lose media quality and useful features like encryption and typing indicators.
The antitrust case could improve things by allowing third-party apps with SMS, and broader support for iMessage. You wouldn’t have to switch between Apple Messages and your preferred chat app just to stay in touch with friends, and you could stay in touch from Android if iMessage comes to that operating system.
.....
CNET
The US Lawsuit Against Apple Raises Questions About iPhone and Android's Future
https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/the-us-lawsuit-against-apple-raises-questions-about-iphone-and-androids-future/
Commentary: The US government is asking for a more open iPhone just as smartphones themselves could undergo their next fundamental change.
Lisa Eadicicco, March 23, 2024 5:00 a.m. PT
It's a debate as old as the smartphone itself: iPhone or Android? You probably made up your mind a long time ago and never looked back.
Now a landmark antitrust lawsuit wants to change that, claiming that it should be easier to switch between the world's two largest mobile operating systems. The complaint, brought by the US Department of Justice and 16 state and district attorneys general, accuses Apple of locking iPhone users into its ecosystem through monopolistic practices that make it hard to leave.
The 88-page lawsuit argues that Apple's tight grip on its software, hardware and app marketplace makes third-party apps and smartwatches significantly less appealing to iPhone users, therefore stifling innovation and resulting in fewer choices for consumers. Above all else, the complaint alleges these policies entrench iPhone users by imposing barriers when switching to Android.
Anyone who owns a smartphone is probably familiar with the green versus blue bubble conundrum, which has become the exemplar for the discrepancy between iPhone and Android. While a large portion of the complaint focuses on messaging, it extends way beyond that to include allegations related to the App Store, Apple Wallet and the Apple Watch.
That last part is significant because it calls Apple's entire ecosystem approach into question. Regulators and critics have scrutinized the App Store for years, as evidenced by the blockbuster legal battle between Apple and Fortnite maker Epic Games. The Justice Department's antitrust suit goes a step further by pushing for the iPhone to become more open and platform-agnostic on a fundamental level.
=====
Apple's walled garden is crumbling — EU orders iOS to open up to third-party devices
News By Tom Pritchard published March 20, 2025
https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/iphones/eu-is-ordering-apple-to-open-up-ios-even-more-offering-better-access-for-headphones-smartwatches-and-other-accessories

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. (6:21-cv-00674)
District Court, W.D. Texas

Document
Number Date Filed Description Download PDF
307 Mar 26, 2025 VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. (6:21-cv-00674) Notice of Appeal

Why not go slam Mr. Williams ham so you can get us some more fake news, LMAO!!

I JUST ADDED ANOTHER 250K AT .008.I WAS GOING TO HIT THE .0085.BUT I KNEW THESE IDIOTS WILL COME DOWN,SO I BOUGHT CHEAPER:))I SAVED MYSELF $125.00:))WILL BUY ME 4 DINNERS AT CARABAS:))
03/26/2025 Buy
Trade Details
VPLM
VOIP-PAL COM INC
250,000
$0.008 $3.00 -$2,003.00

CDEL SELL DAMMIT SELL.PLENTY OF BIDS BRO.SELL.

I AM PLANNING TO MAKE A HOME FROM PROFITS THIS TIME AROUND WITH VPLM.F THE CARS.AND CHICKEN TRIOS.I AM GETTING GREEDY.MY OTHER V STOCK IS ROCKING BIGLY .023.I HOPE IT GOES TO .03S.SO I CAN MAKE MORE MONEY,AND BUY MORE VPLM.SELL A COUPLE MILLION BRO.SO I CAN GO OVER 10 MILLION SHARES.

orca its about a pr and thats it!! news bro !! news bro..thats when it will move one way or the other .be F&&&ing patient. day trade something else ..or maybe vacume the crib

ANOTHER WEEK WITH ZERO INTEREST.SO MUCH ABOUT BEEN AN INTERESTING WEEK.LMAO.SELL BARB SELL DAMMIT.AND SALVAGE WHAT EVER YOU CAN BEFORE WE GO TO NO BID BARB.LOL

Looks like Rich Inza - a man of multiple (ahem) roles - is having a prolonged break, extending his long weekend into Wednesday.

I do hope he's all right and that wearing too many hats isn't tiring him out.

Not to the players it isn't. They make good money for many yrs. I did too.

HEY CDELOLOGY,BRING THAT 466 K DOWN IN THE .007S LION.

I ADDED ANOTHER 200K TODAY AT .008.IF IT GOES TO .007 AND .006.I WILL LOAD ANOTHER 5 MILLION.
03/25/2025 Buy
Trade Details
VPLM
VOIP-PAL COM INC
100,000
$0.008 $3.00 -$802.00
03/25/2025 Buy
Trade Details
VPLM
VOIP-PAL COM INC
100,000
$0.008 $3.00 -$803.00

Ever notice how nothing ever comes of these? VPLM is a complete joke!!

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
Texas Western District Court
Judge: Alan D Albright
Case #: 6:21-cv-00672
Nature of Suit 830 Property Rights - Patent
Cause 35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Filed: Jun 25, 2021
Terminated: Aug 15, 2024
Docket
Parties (5)
Opinions (2)
Docket last updated: 9 hours ago
Monday, March 24, 2025
233 misc Response Mon 03/24 4:57 PM
RESPONSE in Opposition to225 Sealed Motion Verizon Supplemental Submission in Support of Its Motion for Attorneys Fees by Verizon Business Network Services, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc., Verizon Services Corp. by VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.. (Hudnell, Lewis)
232 transcript Transcript Filed Mon 03/24 4:23 AM
Transcript filed of Proceedings held on 3-5-25, Proceedings Transcribed: Motion Hearing. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristie Davis (kmdaviscsr@yahoo.com), Telephone number: 2546660904. Parties are notified of their duty to review the transcript to ensure compliance with the FRCP 5.2(a)/FRCrP 49.1(a). A copy may be purchased from the court reporter or viewed at the clerk's office public terminal. If redaction is necessary, a Notice of Redaction Request must be filed within 21 days. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made available via PACER without redaction after 90 calendar days. The clerk will mail a copy of this notice to parties not electronically noticed Redaction Request due 4/14/2025, Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/24/2025, Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/23/2025, (kd)

CDEL YOU ARE NOT GETTING .0085 FOR THE 500K.COME ON DOWN AND FILL THE BIDS.DIRT BAG.

SELL DAMMIT SELL.

GOOD THING MY VDRM KEEPS GOING UP.AND SELLING THERE TO BUY HERE:)))THE GUYS THINK ORCA IS OUT OVER THERE?LMAOOOOOOOO.THIS WAS A HUGE PROFIT.NOW I AM USING THE PROFIT TO BUY VPLM.COME ON BOYS.HIT THE BIDS.
03/24/2025 Sell
Trade Details
VDRM
VIADERMA INC
273,000
$0.02 $11.45 $5,448.55