Voip Pal Com Inc (QB) (VPLM) Quote

So the price is down and I should explain what? Seems like people are dumping if you want to know. What does buying have to do with my post anyway? I was talking to the unfulfilled prophecies touted by the longs here for the last 12 years as was Skype talking about the doomsday predictions. It goes both ways except no one is better off than they were 12 years ago

I couldn’t have said that better myself. Great post! Everybody needs to just sit back and let them do their job. We will be well rewarded.

one thing ive learned in 58yrs...(yes an old timer.) (yes the days of 12.00 concert tickets..)ones who wish harm upon others will face a scene /scenario i do not want to explain in this forum...be careful..hang tight

then explain the buying guru??

That also goes the same for all unicorns and rainbows predictions that keep not happening. Where is the buyout, the settlements, the licensing agreements, the trials? It is remarkable how they just don't happen.

It is remarkable how all the doomsday predictions keep not happening. Lots of people are eager to own this stock at above a penny in anticipation of what looks to be (relatively speaking) in imminent outcome. GLTA

The fact is, for all of us, we really don't know what is going on. I look at this (as I have said several times before) as a pretty binary situation. The patents either have value or they don't. This is either a grift, or it isn't. The VPLM team is either working to maximize value for VPLM or they aren't. We are being told to have patience because a long term positive plan is being worked, or we are being completely lied to. etc.

In my formal education (a long time ago) the whole concept of market signals was gaining favor and that informed a lot of how I look at business to this day. To me, there are very strong signals that make me feel comfortable owning and holding this stock at around a $.01 average per share basis. Here are some of the signals that give me comfort:

36-0 win/loss record in IPRs and pre-trial motions.
The quality and reputation of our legal representation. Attorneys with impeccable reputations do not risk their reputations on a scam or grift.
The measures that the defendants seem to willing to exert in keeping this out of court.
The discipline and long term buy in of the management team in pushing this along.
The message from management has always been (at least since 2017 for me) and continues to be to "keep the faith and have patience". The team doesn't move the goal posts, although a lot of conjecture on iHub accuses them of such.

Having been involved in complex negotiations in my career; while I hate that fact that we find ourselves as shareholders "out in the cold" from an information standpoint, I understand that maintaining discipline regarding the dissemination of information (especially if negotiations are ongoing and net settled) is often essential in assuring that the desired outcome is achieved. One sure way to kill a deal is to leak sensitive information at the wrong time. Things seem to be getting very interesting and I remain hopeful and optimistic that the signals we have all been privy to will yield positive results in the relatively short term. This is simply my opinion while admitting that neither I nor anyone else who is not in management or on the legal team really understands all that is going on. I have a sense that a multi-dimensional game of chess is going on, while we are still reading the back of the box on how to play checkers. When this is all done, I believe we will all be surprised, to some degree, about how far off our theories actually were. Just keep it strongly in mind NO ONE ON THIS BOARD TRULY KNOWS WHAT IS GOING ON BEHIND THE SCENES. IT IS HARD ENOUGH TO GET ACTIONABLE INTEL ON SOMETHING FORMALLY PROVIDED BY THE COURT, LET ALONE UNDERSTAND WHAT IS BEING DISCUSSED BEHIND CLOSED DOORS. PEOPLE WHO SPEAK WITH BRAGGADOCIOS CERTAINTY ARE THE LAST PEOPLE ANYONE HERE SHOULD BE LISTENING TO in my opinion. GLTA

recent 2 mil share buy>.go figure..hmm

thanx!! volatility has simmered now, rebound/ build next on the way

Clarification: 3 RBR cases
Judge Counts - Two RBR cases vs. VZ and TMUS
Judge Albright - One RBR case vs. AMZN

Thanks Butters. Sometimes, in the absence of a PR, we simply have to do what every good detective does, and that is to read between the lines. The facts are that VP received a favorable ruling from the judge in April, asserting that Huawei failed to invalidate VP's patents on Alice 101 grounds (a side note here is that whenever a company is guilty of infringement, they invariably seek to invalidate the patent instead of denying infringement of the patent). One month later, this case was dismissed with prejudice. Let's think logically now. Would VP agree to a dismissal with prejudice, thereby relinquishing any recourse to retry this case, without first securing a favorable settlement offer? I don't think so. Huawei had just struck out in April and was now facing an immanent jury award with possible treble damages. I assert that Huawei saw the handwriting on the wall, and did the logical thing, which would have been to settle with VP out of court. Where is the proof? The lack of any tangible evidence at this time does not, in and of itself, constitute proof that a settlement did not occur.

New 52 week low today. It's amazing to me that this continues lower. Per Deerballs the stock should be $.75 soon.

Sorry but there is no reason to believe anything these people tell us. I have heard great confidence from Emil, Rich, Deerballs and others. Deerballs tells us many times that there are surprises coming. That Rich tells him how wonderful things are. In the 1 1/2 years I have owned this stock there has been 0 positive developments.

I will remind you I was saying several times that this trial would be delayed. I was wrong. The trial was cancelled.

The question should be why hasn't the company released a PR telling us why the trial was cancelled.

And during the entire process insiders have sold millions of dollars of shares.

Not sure but I seem to remember something about approx $40K rcvd in searching the filings back then. Could be wrong.

Hi Dr,

The original case (6:21-cv-01247) was transferred from TXWD to the TXND, which from the filings states:

"On Monday May 13th:
ORDER granting122 Motion to Dismiss. VoIP-Pal's infringement claims for the Asserted Patents relating to any other products or services are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own attorney fees and costs. The clerk will prepare the final Report to the Patent/Trademark or Copyright Office."

I too remember it was WITH Prejudice, but the filings show "Without".

Unfortunately, and many think unbelievably, there was no PR from the company on this settlement and/or any other settlement. Hudnell's policy I guess.

Yeah, right! BS.. How about the pps is lower now than then so shareholders rcvd ZERO.

What a bunch of misdirection and deflection from the truth the fake newsers are always putting out and dummies swallow it.

"As to the actual amount received by VP in that settlement, the best place to find this information would be in VP's next 10-K or 10-Q filing with the SEC."

LIke with the Amazon settlement? (As we know that never appeared in any VPLM SEC filing.)

Great question. Betting no one has an answer. I think the answer lies inside of lord emus pockets?

Dontnosheet, that's a good question. Out of court settlements typically include NDA agreements, which are stipulated by the defendants. As to the actual amount received by VP in that settlement, the best place to find this information would be in VP's next 10-K or 10-Q filing with the SEC.

How much did the shareholders receive from this settlement?

Drhome, it was not cancelled. It was dismissed with prejudice, which is often the case when the litigants settle out of court. Yes, that case was settled, which is why it was dismissed with prejudice.

An obnoxious and persistent ad was blocking full access to the edit page of my last post until my time expired, causing that post to look like gibberish, so I will restate it here in its entirety for the most clarity:

I beg to differ, straightword. What information the company is allowed to put out publicly is a matter that is best determined by the legal team representing VP. It would be irresponsible and reckless for the IR department to divulge details that are being negotiated in private, merely to placate some nervous investor. That kind of manipulation would be more in line with what scam companies do. Therefore, I fail to see how this is somehow a red flag, but a scam? No way. Investing involves risk, and not everyone has the stomach for it. If the reasons that you invested in VP still exist, then ignore all of the noise and remain focused.

Why expect otherwise from a scam?
Almost down to subpenny now. Looks like an ever increasing number of shareholders finally see the truth and are exiting. Most won't admit it, it they see and I see the dive. It's a shame but most wouldn't listen to reason when all the lies and inconsistancies were presented. Then there's the rude crude nasties. They deserve...

This PR from VPLM was in May against Huawei https://finance.yahoo.com/news/voip-pal-receives-favorable-ruling-120000149.html , Have you seen it was cancelled since?

Only Voip-pal! How can a company have a day like Friday with false news and the two trials we were expecting canceled and then have no PR from the company Monday morning? Shareholders continue to get no respect from management. the prophet

I beg to differ, straightword. What information the company is allowed to put out publicly is a matter that is best determined by the legal team representing VP. It would be irresponsible and reckless for the IR department to divulge details that are being negotiated in private, merely to placate some nervous investor. That kind of mamipulation would be more in line with what scam companies do. Therefore, I fail to see how this is somehow a red flag, but a scam? No. Investing involves risk, and not everyone has the stomach for it. If the reasons you invested in VP still exist, t704 292 9736hen ignore all of the noise and remain focused.

Like I said before, the website is still "Voip-Pal.com". "Voip-palusa.com" also works and they both go to same site but have different names.

HUGE red flag that the company doesn't give updates to investors and that the CEO refuses to do calls so that investors can ask any questions. Just more confirmation of what a scam this all is.

Thanks, rapz. I always enjoy reading your astute and enlightened posts. I agree with you that one reason for this unexpected delay in proceedings revolves around a dispute over the damages being claimed by VP. VP is assessing damages in the $ billions, which came out in the pretrial motions hearings on July 9th. The defendants are also contesting VP's request to substitute a new damage assessment expert. My sentiment has not changed. They are hagling over the amount, not over the fact that they owe VP. This is the important takeaway.

from what ive seen his name has been removed from the website ...correct me if wrong i havent seen it since the new voip-palusa, has been established.no love lost with him

I hope Rich Inza isn't being paid. If he is, he should be fired. We need updates. We own part of the company!!!

God bless, best wishes for your surgery!..I work in cat scan/x-ray..without medical .imaging where would we be ?

as I stated cases weren't dismissed !! just cancelled to a further a date with new suits coming forward..I'm waiting it out...the bozo identified as ""nuuuts"" over at stock twits,started a frenzy for no rhyme or reason...and where is he now??? hmmm

Betcha it isn’t.

Today will tell us which one of us is right, agreed?

find a new hobby..its bouncing back :)

Given that the insiders’ warrants are mostly priced at 0.0025, that will form the floor for most of today’s trading.

Friday’s volume of 25 million will be dwarfed by the insiders dumping their millions of free shares as soon as they can, given that it can’t be long before even the most misled VPLM long realises the jig is up.

When is DB Back?

Apparently denial is not a river in Egypt, but a way of life for VPLM longs, and those insiders posting on this board pretending to be longs.

Here’s the truth about the Huewai case:

“The last defendant to exit from the campaign was Huawei, the most recent suit against which was dismissed with prejudice on May 13, 2024. That dismissal was with prejudice from the Northern District of Texas, shortly after District Judge Brantley Starr—on April 30, 2024—denied a motion to dismiss a complaint asserting two mobile gateway patents (8,630,234; 10,880,721) because the asserted claims are not drawn to eligible subject matter. The court refused to treat claim 1 of the '234 patent as representative of the remaining asserted claims (claims 10-11, 19-22, 24-25, 28, 30-33, 35, 37-40, 43, 45-48, 51, 53-54, 61-62, 64-65, 70, 72, and 75 of the '234 patent and claims 1, 6, 15-16, 20, 25, 34, 38, 39, 43, 45-46, 49-51, 63, 67, 77, 103-104, 109-110, 124, 130, 135-136, and 138-140 of the '721 patent), some of which contain means-plus-function elements.“


https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/patent/1495130/voippalcom-sues-tmobile-and-verizon-over-previously-unasserted-claims-from-previously-asserted-patents

Vplm. Mom said growing old wasn’t for pcats 😊

Most of my shares are long now-so I can afford to follow thru on a tag team of waiting for VPLM too finish their journey and another operation in October..Not looking forward to another aneurism operation. But these shares of Vplm are for my kids and their kids. After all you can’t take it with you. These silly penny plays are my 10 percent of account plays. And 8000 plus hours of flying helicopters in the wild tells me to screw the aneurism and just go for it. GLTA

RBR 606 patent cases against VZ and TMUS were filed quite a while ago.
U.S. District Judge David Counts
200 East Wall, Midland, TX 79701
Totally three RBR cases are pending: AMZN, VZ, TMUS.

TWO MG cases are in progress. Trial dates were canceled, not dismissed as many have already guessed.
Conflicts with damages, expert testimonies, the use of specific infringement models should have been sorted out during or before the pre-trial. A big reason a defendant would back out of a jury trial is the risk of triple damages; or they might have other reasons.

All good news, hopefully it won't take a year to schedule and a settlement would be great!

That is music to my ears, Butters. To recap, the trial dates have been cancelled but the cases have NOT been dismissed. A huge distinction! New trial dates can always be assigned. On top of that, two brand new complaints have just been filed against T-Mobile by Hudnell Law Group P.C, and a judge has not yet been assigned for those. Because of some rule changes, there is no guarantee that these new cases will be assigned to Judge Albright. In these new claims, only the '606 patent is asserted. Through the IPR re-examination process, VP's patents have been strengthened, and are considered to be "Alice proof", plus new patent claims have been added to VP's suite of enforceable patents.
So folks, this ain't over yet, by a long shot. Stay tuned, the pps may fluctuate as investors figure this out, but I see the stock rebounding over time. JMHO.

Regarding Huwuai, VP won the Alice 101 ruling against MG and then immediately settled. that case is closed.

The cases that are open, are the RBR against Amazon, which mysteriously hasn't budged in almost 8 months, V and Tmob, which were recently filed. Remember the RBR patent has won an exparte re-examination from the PTAB (IMO, is basically and should be the same as an Alice 101 win) and is now stronger with 8 additional claims.

Regarding the MG V and Tmob cases, to my knowledge at this point, all that has happened is that the TRIAL DATES have been cancelled, but the cases are still active. The cases have NOT been dismissed and are NOT terminated. Hoping for more clarifying information to come out soon on why the cancellation is needed, but IMO VP needs to continue that effort and in an escalated manner.

“ I saw in May Huwuai had asked for Summary Judgment, and the Judge denied the motion. Nothing further since that PR so I'm assuming that case is proceeding.”

Your assumption is incorrect:

The last defendant to exit from the campaign was Huawei, the most recent suit against which was dismissed with prejudice on May 13, 2024. That dismissal was with prejudice from the Northern District of Texas, shortly after District Judge Brantley Starr—on April 30, 2024—denied a motion to dismiss a complaint asserting two mobile gateway patents (8,630,234; 10,880,721) because the asserted claims are not drawn to eligible subject matter. The court refused to treat claim 1 of the '234 patent as representative of the remaining asserted claims (claims 10-11, 19-22, 24-25, 28, 30-33, 35, 37-40, 43, 45-48, 51, 53-54, 61-62, 64-65, 70, 72, and 75 of the '234 patent and claims 1, 6, 15-16, 20, 25, 34, 38, 39, 43, 45-46, 49-51, 63, 67, 77, 103-104, 109-110, 124, 130, 135-136, and 138-140 of the '721 patent), some of which contain means-plus-function elements.“

https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/patent/1495130/voippalcom-sues-tmobile-and-verizon-over-previously-unasserted-claims-from-previously-asserted-patents

I saw in May Huwuai had asked for Summary Judgment, and the Judge denied the motion. Nothing further since that PR so I'm assuming that case is proceeding. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/voip-pal-receives-favorable-ruling-120000149.html

Please rephrase the question. You lost me.

Have you read it in illegal document or just some fool that’s out there spreading stuff. just answer that question for me.

I didn’t say it was true.

That poster was referencing a so called decision that was to have happened on July 9th. I wouldn’t imagine there would be more filings, since then, if that were true.

If you can find he’s email, the best bet would be to contact that law clerk that was named in that post. Good luck finding it.

IMHO

If it comes from Vplm, it automatically is fake news, as that is their MO and their ultimate legacy. If it comes from the avg self styled, self proclaimed "true long", it's fake news and/or ignorance. Most of the anti Vplm speak the truth or give somewhat supported opinion. There are a couple, well known, some stupidly revered, who, if their lips are moving or they can still fog a mirror, they are not only lying but get compensated for doing so. Disgusting Bastard(s).

Myself.....anti Vplm, long for close to 15 yrs, always tell the truth, have done much DD, have opinions and theories that I've supported and backed up with logic, critical thinking and by connective dotology. Most if not all of my calls and predictions and explanations have been proven true again and again over time, except for the ones you might see from time to time, not from me, but from a small number who fabricate and tell out and out lies, who gaslight, and who attribute things to me that were never said or twist what was said to their own decrepid agenda and therefore are never backed up with proof and that is how pure scoundrels and rats operate.

Almost everything Vplm has put out in the past is a downright lie or distortion of the truth and has been designed to support what vplm truly is.....which is a fiat share printing, share selling, self enrichment scheme with an insider ATM to boot. They even were found guilty of "unjust self enrichment" AND "breach of Fiduciary duty" BY A JURY OF THEIR PEERS and with lord emu of eGipped at the top of the list.

so what nuuut on stock twits posted is true? yes or no