Xeriant Inc (QB) (XERI) News

YOU ARE A VERY SORRY LOSER!!!

DEMOTARD!!!

CAN'T EVEN BACKUP WHAT they SAY!!!!

PATHETIC MAMALUKE!!!!

Correct. You didn't post what you cited=Maganut BULLSHIT!

No post=BULLSHIT!!!!!!!

Hey lazy. Go to docket and pull it up.
Go to SEC filings and pull up the 10-K.

You're the chump who cited a "transcript." -- Go ahead, post it. It's your claim.

.

NEAT!!!

POST IT!!!

Huuuuuuuge volume today!

So?

Wow, you seem like a Know it All.

Wrong all the time, but never owns up, and keeps insisting his lies and misdirection.

Just like a SmartyPants2 too.

You didn't claim the AI error, I did.

Then you evaded and didn't discuss (both your standard) the error you had originally twice posted and relied upon to make your false claims and insults.

Right, so when I said, "I read the court filing stating that Auctus sold shares," you still thought it was the audio recording that I read. Neat.

And you didn't read the court-filed Xeriant attorney letter correcting her oral statement.

And when you stated that Xeriant's SEC financials prove no XERI shares were sold by Auctus, you decided to not let us know you were omitting inclusion of SEC filings like the 10-K and K-1s, n all.

Neat.

I pointed out that XTI HAD NOT made CURRENT FILINGS. The 1-K was filed 7-13 2023 for the EOY 12-31 2022. This is BEFORE THE XERI JV was TERMINATED on May 31 2023. The back dated filings by INPX for XTI show the dates that are covered go back to XTI last EOY 12-31-2022



10-K 12-31-2023 filed 4-16-2024
Since the closing of the XTI Merger was subsequent to December 31, 2023, this report includes Inpixon's audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, Inpixon's Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as of and for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 and other historical information relating to the Inpixon board of directors, executive officers and governance arrangements prior to the completion of the XTI Merger. This report also includes certain disclosures concerning our current business, our board of directors and officers currently in office. We will file as an amendment to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 15, 2024 (i) the audited consolidated financial statements of Legacy XTI as of and for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, (ii) Legacy XTI's Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 and (iii) the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information of Inpixon and Legacy XTI as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023, in accordance with Item 9.01 of Form 8-K.
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1529113/000162828024016449/inpx-20231231.htm

LOLOLOLOL....

"BIG" week....OF MORE DILUTION!!!!

It was that court recording. YOU POSTED IT!!!

Did you forget???

Judge asked auctus lawyer. Did auctus sell any xeri shares? Answer: NO!!!

The KNOW IT ALL claims 5% error makes him 100% correct ALL THE TIME. LOLOLOLOL

Let's have a BIG week XERI. Let's GO!!

Wrong! You never posted the "Court transcript" that you said "proves auctus hasn't sold 1 share of xeri!!!"

So, you prove it,

you Marymar auto-bot skank lying MAMALUKE!!

Wrong!

It was ALREADY POSTED!!! MAMALUKE!!!

you EVEN RESPONDED TO IT!!!

More Quester confusion. Or, is it lies?

That's your AI question and AI post, not mine. lol.

Plus, As I stated when you posted it, this AI answer is incorrect. That AI 5% error rate (actually much high percentage) played out.

----

You made it up,

And now you don't seem to understand that XTI issued-to-Xeriant its XTI common shares one year after the JV terminated.

The XTI shares were issued in 2024, never as you claim, issued when the JV terminated a year prior in 2023.

But, you keep demanding your lie is correct. You're crazy.

But KZilla and JohnnyDope maganuts will agree with you. LOL LOL LOL!

_____

You claim the XTI-issued XTI common shares were "reverted back" to XTI. Curious! They actually were issued a year later, fool.

_____

Also, you never answered from where the XTI common shares reverted back from?

From where?... confused Quester crazy-man? From where?

_____

Must be owned, in possession, housed by, Xeriant, after these shares were issued... if... reverted back to XTI.

Reverted back from Xeriant which owned them!

Or... from where if Xeriant never owned them?

It's your crazy@man claim.

Explain it!

Prove it!

_____

But, you'll only provide Crickets without any logical or real explanation, along with your barking, your additional false claims and accusations.


chirp.... chirp...

__________


Your stories are funny!

You don't post it. Remember, you're the lazy one.

I was just agreeing with the AI assessment that you provided.
did issued XTI shares REVERT back to XTI when the JV TERMINATED






Why did XTI cover what happened with the JV until the merger. Filings were NOT update when the JV terminated in May 2023???? Just LAME BS FROM YOU. Like your claim the REDACTED part was shown prior to the end of the 1 year



The Agreement was effective on June 4, 2021, with an initial deposit of $1 million into the JV. Xeriant’ financial commitment is $10 million, contributed over a period of less than one year, as required an aircraft development timeline and budget.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1481504/000147793221003919/xeri_8k.htm

POST IT OR JUST MORE LIES!!!

"Except I do know because I read the court filing stating that Auctus sold shares"

Auctus attorney stated on court recording "SOLD ZERO SHARES"

Quester, you also lied when you stated XTI shares were issued to Xeriant and returned to XTI when the Xeriant//XTI JV terminated.

Problem with that, in our reality, clearly not your reality, is that the XTI shares were issued a year after the Xeriant//XTI JV terminated.

Why'd XTI wait so long for a year?

Why would and why did XTI deliver its owed XTI shares so late, a year after the Xeriant//XTI JV terminated, and issued only when XTI was acquired/merged with Inpixon? It didn't!

But you say it did, so it must be true anyway.

"Is that in the Court filing?"

And from where were XTI shares returned? "Is that in the Court filing?"

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175920645

.

Except I do know because I read the court filing stating that Auctus sold shares.

I also read the Xeriant SEC filing that shows Auctus sold shares.

Like Quester, and the Pres, seems you, is it all the maganuts?, you/they make it up and demand by insult they are right. Then they gaslight and blame those who provide countering facts with reality.

You're probably a Flat Earther, also duped by Billionnaire funded disinformation campaigns. The swamp is rife with them.

He doesn't read the court filings. He only reads the docket. From the docket's listed title of each court filing he comes to his 'clarity' with erroneous claims. He then demands his erroneous facts in conclusions that are plain wrong. It's weird.

Another Example: When his webpage showing the case docket had no more listings in March, he claimed that the XTI / Auctus case had been dismissed. Eventually I showed him the recorded oral hearing that occurred seven months later.

Your fantasy is falling apart though. You're 'running' the legal case now and how it should go and be argued, yet, you won't read the actual damn XTI Notice of Default that all this is about. You're an idiot.

Your buddies JohnnyDope n KZilla think you're wrong too.


Those XTI Notice of Default claims that are ridiculous, which I discussed previously too.

The delay is not for the sake of delaying as you paranoid think, it is a request because Xeriant's attorney wanted more time to complete an appropriate thorough reply to the ridiculous number of ridiculous complaints and claims by XTI in it's ridiculous Notice of Default.

I tried to discuss this with you, but you were a __________, with your lack of response with your chirp... chirp... crickets.

You're all about being negative, and issuing insults, and having everyone tell you how great you are.

just like I said from the very start about you. you're a country punk.

It is standard case procedure to request additional time to file an answer, hence readily approved by the judge. You're a paranoid, and so as you keep making things up you think standard court procedure is something it is not.

.

neat! did XTI claim breach-of-contract due to Arbitration Clause violation? No. Why not?

Did your kids file a lawsuit against you for being fraudulent about the Santa Clause? That breach shows you lie, and are fraudulent.

.

Once again, your "legal analysis" is laughable. There are any number of perfectly valid reasons why XERI may have asked for more time to address XTI's counterclaim! In fact, the more legal holes there are in the counterclaim, the more time XERI's lawyers may need to address them all. But why not wait for the details to be made public before you jump to another conclusion?

I have also been saying from the START that XERI breached the contract by not following the Mediation and Arbitration clause when Duffy filed the lawsuit. Which by the way has nothing to do with XTI shares being awarded to XERI. Still there are multiple reasons to DISMISS this case.



is it a breach of contract to file lawsuit if contract had a Mediation /Arbitration clause

that's all your source told you? -- lol -- that's funny. - maybe just go to the source and read it.

Read the Notice of Default.

Better than guessing and claiming right when you're not.

"Let someone PROVE that this notice of DEFAULT isn't over this fact of the failure of XERI to complete the INITIAL down payment like I have claimed from the start."

Uhhh, I told you to read the fkin' thing. But you said you were too lazy to read it, sayin' something idiotic like you didn't have to read it to know what it says.

ok, buddy.

it's not what you said it's about

I wouldn't expect a MAMALUKE like you to know...

XERI is going to lose both lawsuits because they are managed by losers and all they have done for 4 years is lose. That's all they know how to do. The only one that could help them is Donnie because all he does is WIN BABY WIN!!!









Queue the TDS!!!!!!

Looks like XERI are the ones scrambling for time. Why did they ask for Extension of Time to Answer XTI's MOTION to Dismiss Defendant's AMENDED ANSWER with COUNTERCLAIM . Why delay if YOUR CLAIM "XTI's baseless "default" counterclaim has been totally taken apart by XERI's lawyers." Is TRUE?????
Just like the NoD wasn't about XERI NOT making the INITIAL $1 mil DP from the start.
CAN XERI produce this imaginary letter that BOTH parties agreed to MODIFICATIONS of the BUDGET SCHEDULED that was REDACTED so investors were denied that important information.
NOW WOULD BE A GREAT TIME TO INTRO THAT LETTER TO THE COURT. You would have thought that's what they would have led with. LOLOLOLOLOL

XTI's baseless "default" counterclaim has been totally taken apart by XERI's lawyers. It's almost hard to believe they even went there.

Auctus works through third-parties like Citadel.

Been saying from the beginning that XERI DEFAULTED on the XTI JV by not making the $1 mil down payment. Now after XTI has filed a Letter of Notice of Default with the court I still hear BS that this is NOT what the DEFAULT was about.
Let someone PROVE that this notice of DEFAULT isn't over this fact of the failure of XERI to complete the INITIAL down payment like I have claimed from the start.

Confirmation of Default Claims
A source confirms that the Notice of Default indeed states that Xeriant defaulted on its obligations under the JV Agreement due to non-payment. The specific allegation is centered around not meeting the initial funding requirement stipulated in their agreement.Did XERI default on the XTI JV

Did XERI default on the XTI JV


https://iask.ai/?mode=question&q=Did+XERI+default+on+the+XTI+JV

Another week with nothing to offer picked up another 225k shares can't wait to dump these again at any sign of a run. A few thousand here a few thousand there It's too easy rinse and repeat while other idiots sit back and cry.

Xeriant dilution is not Xeriant/Duffy dumping shares, as you proclaim.

Haven't you been paying attention?

.

Wrong!

WTF DO you THINK DILUTION IS???

MAMALUKE!!!

MORE LIES!!! Court transcript proves auctus hasn't sold 1 share of xeri!!!

MAMALUKE!!!

It's right there in the court filings from XERI and the SEC citing Auctus' dumping of borrowers' shares.

50/50 chance DISMISSED. You keep playing the end-game odds as you lie and fabricate getting there.

Exactly like SmartyPants2.

.

Duffy/Xeriant hasn't dumped anything. You're always wrong!

Then you know, neither is Duffy.

Aaawwwhhh, your crazy buddy needed help n u steppt in to cuddle, so sweet.

funny the maganuts who claim they made money on Xeriant are the biggest complainers about the company.

Quester may be right, Xeriant's a scam, but is near always making it up and wrong about how and why.

And lost little boy johnnydope.

NOT ACCORDING TO THE FINANCIALS!!!

PATHETIC SHILL!!!

And what happens when XERI's lawsuits go forward? Your whole theory goes up in smoke!

You're confusing Auctus with XERI. XERI has been victimized by Auctus' dumping of its shares! It's standard operating procedure of toxic lenders, as per the SEC's legal action against them!