Suspension of Trading in Shares
June 29 2009 - 2:30AM
UK Regulatory
TIDMIVS
RNS Number : 6215U
Inveresk PLC
29 June 2009
Inveresk PLC
("Inveresk" or the "Company")
Share Price Suspension
Inveresk announces that it has today requested the AIM team of the London Stock
Exchange to suspend its shares with immediate effect due to the fact that, for
the reasons highlighted below, the Directors are unable at this time to sign off
the Report and Accounts for the year ended 31st December 2008 pending the
outcome of litigation which is material in all respects to the numbers contained
therein.
The chronology of events is as follows:-
Inveresk's Claims against Tullis Russell Papermakers Limited
On 15th February 2008 in the Court of Session in Edinburgh, Lord Drummond Young
handed down a robust judgement in favour of Inveresk in support of an action
brought by Inveresk against Tullis Russell Papermakers Ltd ("TR") who had failed
to pay Additional Consideration due under an Asset Sale Agreement dated 8th June
2005. The payment obligation arose from TR's certification of retained sales
tonnage for the 12 months ending on 8th November 2006. TR had sought to amend
the retained sales tonnage following certification. Lord Drummond Young found
that TR were not entitled to do so under the terms of the contract. The revisals
were not, in any event, accepted by Inveresk.
On 3rd June 2008 in the Court of Appeal (the Inner House) in Edinburgh TR
challenged Lord Drummond Young's judgement and stated (amongst other things)
that they believed that he had gone too far in his judgement. TR then made
changes to its case and this resulted in the case being once again referred to
the Outer House of the Court of Session for a re-hearing.
The re-hearing took place before Lord Glennie in July 2008 and his judgement was
handed down on 29th August 2008. This was similarly robust in its support of
Inveresk's entitlement to Additional Consideration sought by Invereskand also
rejected TR's application for retention of the funds claimed together with
interest in relation to a separate action. This right to retention was claimed
by TR pursuant to their separate case against Inveresk seeking damages for
alleged breach of contract. Inveresk deny that damages are due and a proof
(trial) has been fixed in that action for October.
On 18th and 19th November 2008 the case was once again considered by the Court
of Appeal in Edinburgh but was only part heard in respect of the substantive
issue and could only be concluded in respect of the argument on retention on 4th
- 6th March 2009. Regrettably, almost 4 months later the Court of Appeal has not
yet issued its judgement. Inveresk is disappointed that, bearing in mind the two
robust first instance judgements and the financial obligations which fall upon
TR as a consequence, this delay in reaching a final conclusion effectively
results in retention by default.
Tullis Russell's claims against Inveresk
In parallel to the above TR issued proceedings against Inveresk back in April
2007 alleging breach of contract and claiming damages which Inveresk deny.
The process has been long, complicated and voluminous in terms of documentation.
After a year, having changed much of their original pleadings TR then sought to
rely on a report prepared by an Expert in Economics to justify their claim in
damages. Inveresk consider the damages claim to be both flawed and unfounded. At
the end of March 2009 as a result of evidence obtained from third party
customers Inveresk formed the view that the basis of TR's claims was not merely
erroneous but also totally lacking in substance. This new evidence in Inveresk's
opinion currently renders the report of TR's Expert fundamentally flawed. Unlike
in the English Court system, in Scotland there is no comparable "strike-out"
mechanism. This matter is now before the Court and the outcome of the dispute
will be determined when the case comes to trial in the latter part of October
and early November 2009. The onus to prove this case through evidence lies with
TR.
Reason for Suspension
The Board of Inveresk remains entirely comfortable with its position on both of
the above litigations. There is, however, much frustration with the Court
process and in the time being taken to obtain a judgement against the other
party.
Inveresk has made appropriate arrangements to see this litigation to a
conclusion and has funding in place to support the expense arising from these
cases in the expectation that justice will eventually prevail and that further
Court orders as to costs will be imposed on TR in due course.
Under the new regime of IFRS accounting regulations the outcome of the first
case on Additional Consideration is both material and pivotal to the audited
results as at 31st December 2008 which we are due to report to shareholders and
the market. As a consequence of the delay in reaching a conclusion in the Court
process in respect of Hearings held as long ago as 18th/19th November 2008 and
4th-6th March 2009 the Directors of Inveresk together with their external
auditors are unable to sign-off their Report and Accounts as at 31st December
2008 until such time as the outcome of this litigation becomes known. The
Additional Consideration (plus interest) to which Inveresk is entitled flows
directly to profit. We are unable to comply with the income recognition rules
under IFRS until such time as the outcome of the Appeal is known.
We intend to keep shareholders fully apprised as the above litigation advances
through the Court system and the Directors of Inveresk remain confident that in
the fullness of time this litigation will be resolved in the Company's favour.
For further information please contact:
Inveresk PLC
Alan Walker
Tel: 01353 725856
Mob: 07800 951151
Email:jafw@bedfordhs.co.uk
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
END
SUSSELFIMSUSEEM
Inveresk (LSE:IVS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Inveresk (LSE:IVS)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024