27 June 2024
Mercantile Ports &
Logistics Limited
("MPL"
or the "Company")
Full Year
Results
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
Limited (AIM: MPL) which is operating and continuing to develop a
port and logistics facility in Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, is
pleased to announce its preliminary results for the year ended 31
December 2023.
Chairman's Statement
Overview
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
continues to make solid strategic progress, and we have delivered
promising financial performance in the year. The Group operates and
continues to develop a port and logistics facility (the
"Facility") in Navi Mumbai,
Maharashtra, India. On completion, the Facility will be uniquely
positioned to capitalise on the growing levels of commerce in the
Maharashtra region, and will include a container freight station,
cold chain facility, reefer container zone and logistics facility
dedicated to handling perishable commodities.
We are pleased to report financial
performance for the year ended 31 December 2023 (the "period"). The
Company delivered revenues of £ 5.5 million. Statutory loss before
tax was £ 21.26 million, equating to 0.11 pence per
share.
From the below table it is evident
that the Group is delivering increased efficiency within its
operations and the Group has now become EBITDA positive.
|
FY23
|
FY22
|
|
£
000
|
£
000
|
Gross
Margin
|
3,045
|
3,423
|
Admin
Expenses
|
-3,266
|
-3,737
|
Other
Income
|
590
|
|
EBITDA
|
369
|
-314
|
With the signing of new contracts,
the directors are confident of the future prospects of the Group
and business at the facility. The Board
brings together vast experience across the port operations and
logistics sectors. Leveraging this experience, we are focused on
delivering long term shareholder value via organic growth, margin
expansion and cash generation.
Strategic and Operational review
The Group made strong strategic
progress within the year following its first year of uninterrupted
operations for the Facility in 2023. The Group has signed several
new contracts, including a 10-year contract with one of the largest
regional coal traders, which is expected to import volumes of 4.5
million MTs in first three years of operation. Furthermore, the
Company signed a contract with one of the largest cement companies
in India for the retail handling of cement and the development of a
dedicated cement terminal at the Facility for customers.
The Company was proud to support
Tata Daewoo in delivering its section of the Mumbai Trans-Harbour
Link (now named as Atal Setu by the Government of India). Other
significant infrastructure projects taking place in the region,
such as the construction of the Navi Mumbai International Airport
(located 16 km from the Facility) will attract project cargo such
as cement and steel and the Directors expect the Company to be a
beneficiary. Each project reflects positive commercial tailwinds in
the region as the Board aims to increase the utilisation of the
Facility.
In the coming months the Group
will further diversify its commodity mix by increasing handling of
Cargo Containers at the facility. The government permissions allow
the Facility to receive containers directly from JNPA, enabling
customers to avoid lengthy delays in transportation bottlenecks.
The Group successfully undertook trial shipments of containers
during the year.
Debt Refinancing
A key focus of the Board for 2023
was to further enhance the terms of its
debt facility and good progress has been
made. The Board believes that
the Group will benefit strongly from positioning
the Group's debt profile to match the long-term, back-ended cash
flow generation curve that is typical of infrastructure projects
such as the Facility. We are building a Group for the long-term,
and refinancing the Group's debt is vital to achieve our
goals.
We continue to work closely with
our lenders for re-phasement of the loan facility from a seven-year
repayment period to fourteen years including a two-year moratorium
on principal repayments. We expect to announce further information
on the Company's banking arrangements by mid July 2024. While this
process has taken longer than originally envisaged, this is not
inconsistent with the experiences of other customers of state-owned
banks in India. The Company continues to have an excellent
relationship with its banks and remains confident of securing a
facility with much more attractive terms.
Outlook
On behalf of the Board, I would
like to thank our investors for their continued support, including
their participation in the Company's successful equity fundraising
last June, as MPL develops into a successful revenue and
profit-making company.
The fundraising enabled us to
continue to pursue our strategy and I am pleased to report that
2024 has seen us make further progress. In particular, we have
onboarded a large Oil & Gas producer as port user. This company
has started using Karanja Port for its supply vessel operations for
loading and unloading supplies to it offshore oil
assets.
In addition, we are in discussions
with several parties for leasing land for fabrication works for
infrastructure and Oil & Gas sectors.
Finally, I thank all our employees
for their continued dedication and professionalism. Our employees
are essential to the continued success of our Group, and the Board
extends its sincere appreciation for their hard work.
Jeremy Warner Allen
Chairman
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
Limited
27 June 2024
Operational Review
Indian Economy
The directors are pleased to
present their operational review for the year ended 31st
December 2023.
The country's remarkable growth
rate of 8.4% in the third quarter of the FY2023-24
(October-December 2023) surpassed all expectations, and growth is
expected to continue. The directors set out below an operational
update on the performance for the period and expectations for the
future. With a number of strategic new customers and ongoing
economic growth the Company considers itself to be well placed to
capitalise on this growth.
Expectations for the near-term
future remain in line with previous forecasts with a slight change
in the forecast range due to a higher base effect in FY2023-24
(Source: India Economic Outlook | Deloitte Insights). Deloitte
expects GDP growth to be around 6.6% in the next fiscal year
FY2024-25 and 6.75% in the year after FY2025-26, as markets learn
to factor in geopolitical uncertainties in their investment and
consumption decisions.
Indian Economy Resilient
Key highlights:
1. Robust
growth: India's economy continues to show resilience, growing at a
rate of approximately 8.4% in Q3 of FY24, surpassing expectations
(Source: India Economic Pulse | EY - India). This growth is driven
by factors such as strong tax revenue collections, increased
government capital spending, firm domestic demand (including rural
demand), and growth in manufacturing and construction
sectors.
2. Sectoral performance: The manufacturing
sector saw significant growth of 11.6% in Q3 of FY24. Additionally,
infrastructure, real estate, and construction sectors are
experiencing momentum, with key segments like steel and cement
witnessing double-digit growth.
3. Domestic demand: Various indicators
such as automobile sales, passenger traffic, robust GST
collections, rising electricity demand, and growth in household
credit point towards sustained domestic demand.
4. Macroeconomic stability: Stable repo
rates, government bond yields, exchange rates, and healthy foreign
exchange reserves indicate macroeconomic stability.
5. Challenges and concerns: Despite the
overall positive outlook, there are areas of concern. Declining
non-oil merchandise exports, moderated service exports, and reduced
foreign investments highlight challenges in the external sector.
Sluggish private investment, as reflected in stagnant FDI, VC/PE
investments, and credit growth to manufacturing, underscores the
need for acceleration in the private capex cycle.
6. Global economic context: While global
growth is projected at 3.1%, which is below historical averages,
there are signs of resilience with moderating inflation and
positive service/manufacturing PMIs. (Source: India Economic Pulse
| EY - India)
Overall, while India's economy is
performing well amid global challenges, addressing concerns such as
declining exports and sluggish private investment will be crucial
for sustaining growth momentum in the future.
Operations Update
Revenue grew by 8% from £4.9 mn in
2022 to £5.5 mn in 2023. The growth in revenue was adversely
impacted due to (i) the war between Ukraine and Russia and
the latest being the war between Israel and Palestine/Lebanon which
has adversely impacted the shipping business across the world; (ii)
following JSW's acquisition of PNP Maritime Port for captive use,
they decided to sell all the coal lying with them in the hinterland
and this compelled importers to defer coal imports in the region;
and (iii) the delay in restructuring the Group's existing debt
facility consuming significant bandwidth of the
management.
Borrowings:
There were no movements in
Borrowings during the period. However, the interest liability due
for the period March 2023 to December 2023 is being shown under
Financial Liability.
Cash & cash equivalent at the
end of the period 2023 stood at £2.88 mn.
In June 2023, MPL raised gross
proceeds from equity investors of £9.0 mn.
MPL initiated a valuation exercise
and utilized an independent external agency to support in preparing
the value in use calculations assessing the impact of impairment of
the Port asset in its financial projections over the lease period.
Based on the assessment undertaken, there is an impact of £9.85 mn
impairment charge which is recognised in this financial year. A
detailed explanation is provided in Note 2, Significant Accounting
Policies.
From an operations perspective,
2023 was the second full year of uninterrupted operations for the
Port. Karanja Port was able to handle over c1.33 Mn MT of
Cargo.
The facility was able to
demonstrate its ability to be a 24x7 facility with the commencement
of night navigation (berthing / de-berthing of vessels at
night).
With seamless operations
established in 2022, the focus was more on refining the logistics
operations to achieve higher margin efficiency and ironing out
teething issues.
The volume of coal handled grew
approx. 20% from 1.0 mn MT in 2022 to 1.2 mn MT in 2023. However,
this was slightly below expectations due to the below
factors.
The volume of coal handled during
2023, was partly impacted due to:
·
High volatility in Coal prices (that impacted
trading volumes) during the months of Jun'23 and Jul'23
·
India saw a severe monsoon during Jul'23 to
Sep'23
|
|
The Port received positive
feedback from its customers regarding the overall efficiency of
operations and appreciation for the fact that no demurrage was
incurred by any customer over 2023.
Our customer Sanghi Cement was
acquired by a large cement company, marking a significant milestone
in its growth journey. However, this led to suspension of
operations in 2H-2023 through the integration phase of the
acquisition.
Post completion of the
transaction, this large cement company entered into a fresh
contract for use of Karanja Port facilities with much higher volume
visibility with intention to utilize Cement imported through MPL's
facility for use in the construction of the Navi Mumbai
International Airport and one of the largest real estate
redevelopment projects in Mumbai city. The construction of the
International Airport is expected to span a 3-4 year
period. The real estate development call the Dharavi
Project is expected to span a 7-10 year period.
MPL is proud to have onboarded one
of India's largest Oil & Gas company as its port user. This
company after a long and thorough due diligence process commenced
operations at the MPL facility by handling of offshore supply
vessels at the port. To this extent, they have publicly announced
commencement of services from Karanja Port via an official post on
X.
MPL continues to strengthen its
business development and operations team, including on the
container side of the business as it prepares to start handling
containers during the course of 2024, in line with the Group's
strategy to target higher margin container business.
Karanja Port is ideally positioned
as an alternative to road evacuation of containers coming in to the
Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority ("JNPA") region. Currently, 6.43 Mn
TEUs are flowing into JNPA. With the fourth terminal of JNPA
becoming active this year, the number of TEUs flowing into JNPA is
expected to increase to 9.0 - 10.0 mn TEUs in the next 3-4
years.
Karanja Port and JNPA have the
same customs jurisdiction, the Jawaharlal Nehru Customs House
(JNCH).
Karanja Port container Terminal
aspires to be one of the largest container handling facilities in
the state of Maharashtra and one of the few with a
waterfront.
In addition, there are two
important developments (i) Strategic Customer Win (details below);
and (ii) Positioning part of the reclaimed land at Karanja Port as
a storage hub for Perishables (details in Strategic
Report).
MPL has been in discussion with
their lenders to rephase the debt facility from 7 years to 14 years
of repayment. The process was initiated in the February 2023 and is
expected to be completed by mid-July 2024.
Going Concern
In determining the appropriate
basis of preparation of the financial statements for the period
ended 31 December 2023, the Directors are required to consider
whether the Group can continue in operational existence for a
period of at least 12 months from the approval of these financial
statements. The Board has concluded that the Group is a going
concern and the Annual Report and Accounts have been prepared on
that basis, having undertaken a rigorous assessment of the
financial forecasts with specific consideration to the trading
position of the Group.
The financial year 2023 has been a
year engulfed in War between Ukraine and Russia and the latest
being the war between Israel and Palestine/Lebanon which has
adversely impacted the shipping business across the world and
results for the period.
The Board has assessed the Group's
ability to operate as a going concern for the next 18 months from
the date of signing the financial statements to the 31st
December 2023, based on the financial model which was prepared as
part of approving the 2024 budget. This is considered the
appropriate period of assessment, as it is in line with the board
approved budgets and captures the seasonality of cash
flows.
The Group's principal loan
repayments and interest accrued since March 2023 until the period
end remain unpaid, due to the current restructuring proposal being
at an advanced stage with the head office of the Group's lead
banker. A precondition of the proposed plan would be to repay the
overdue monies up to December 2023 prior implementing the
restructuring plan, on the sanctioning of the
restructuring.
However, the operations at the
Karanja Port is in the process of ramp up with the signing of fresh
contracts with a large cement company and ongoing business
with the one of India's largest Oil & Gas company for their
operations at our port, and the Directors are optimistic on the
Group's potential at the Port for FY24 onwards and hence have
considered the cash forecasts 24 months from 1 January 2024 up to
31st December 2025, together with certain assumptions
for revenue and costs, to satisfy on the appropriateness of the
going concern used in preparing the financial
statements.
Regarding financing, the group had
capital of £ 2.88 million cash balance as at 31 December 2023.
While the Indian subsidiary has already submitted the fresh
proposal in February, 2023 for restructuring of the term loan with
its current consortium of lenders, the board is confident of
receiving the sanction by mid-July 2024 with the proposal now in
its final phase of sanction. Payments of principal and interest
have not been made since March 2023 while bank negotiations are
ongoing.
The directors have prepared a base
case scenario, in which sales are forecast to increase
significantly due to the ramp up of operations set out above.
Management have prepared a severe but plausible downside scenario
('severe downside scenario'), where growth expectations are not
achieved, the bank restructuring is not included and all payments
of principal and interest are made, including contractual payments
due by 31st December not yet paid. The severe downside scenario has
a significant adverse impact on sales, gross margin and cash flows
including a 40% reduction in sales for FY24 and FY25 against
Managements' base case scenario.
The severe downside scenario
modelled indicates that there would be a shortfall of cash within
the going concern period. To cope with an eventuality of any
shortfall during the period, an additional line of unsecured credit
limit from KJS Concrete Private Limited (Hunch Ventures group
company) amounting to £ 15 million has been made available to
mitigate funding risk as well as ensuring continuity in
business.
The Directors also took account of
the principal risks and uncertainties facing the business referred
to above, and a sensitivity analysis on the key revenue growth
assumption with effectiveness of available mitigating
actions.
A range of mitigating actions
within the control of management has been assumed, including
managing our regular vendors with bare minimum support and
extension of credit during these critical years and also controlled
expenditure on all non-essential services.
The directors have determined
that, over the period of the going concern assessment, there is not
expected to be a significant impact resulting from climate
change
The Group continues to closely
monitor and manage its liquidity risk. In assessing the Group's
going concern status, the Directors have taken account of the
financial position of the Group, anticipated future utilisation of
available fund, its capital investment plans and forecast of gross
operating margins as the business evolves and ramps up. The Company
has had frequent conversations to date with its longstanding
syndicate and advisers.
Based on the above indicators,
after taking into account the recent fundraising and the
renegotiation on the debt restructuring, and line of credit from
Hunch Ventures that would cover any shortfall in a severe but
plausible downside scenario, the Directors believe that it remains
appropriate to continue to adopt the going concern in preparing the
forecasts.
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income
for the Year ended 31 December
2023
|
|
Notes
|
Year ended
31 Dec
23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec
22
£000
|
CONTINUING OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
4
|
5,462
|
4,872
|
Cost of sales
|
5
|
(2,417)
|
(1,449)
|
Gross margin
|
|
3,045
|
3,423
|
Administrative expenses
|
6
|
(3,266)
|
(3,747)
*
|
Other income
|
|
590
|
--
|
Depreciation
|
12a
|
(5,581)
|
(6,231)
*
|
Impairment loss
|
12a
|
(9,853)
|
--
|
OPERATING LOSS
|
|
(15,065)
|
(6,555)
|
Finance income
|
7(a)
|
25
|
38
|
Finance cost
|
7(b)
|
(6,225)
|
(5,543)
|
NET FINANCING COST
|
|
(6,200)
|
(5,505)
|
LOSS BEFORE TAX
|
|
(21,265)
|
(12,060)
|
Tax income /(expense) for the
year
|
8
|
--
|
2,421
|
Loss FOR THE
YEAR
|
|
(21,265)
|
(9,639)
|
Loss for the year attributable to:
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling
interest
|
|
(43)
|
(18)
|
Owners of the parent
|
|
(21,222)
|
(9,621)
|
LOSS FOR THE YEAR
|
|
(21,265)
|
(9,639)
|
Other Comprehensive
(Loss)/income:
|
|
|
|
Items that will not be
reclassified subsequently to profit or (loss)
|
|
|
|
Re-measurement of net defined
benefit liability
|
24
|
27
|
1
|
Items that will be
reclassified subsequently to profit or (loss)
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences on
translating foreign operations
|
|
(5,015)
|
808
|
Other comprehensive expense for the year
|
|
(4,988)
|
809
|
Total comprehensive expense for the year
|
|
(26,253)
|
(8,830)
|
Total comprehensive expense for the year attributable
to:
|
|
|
Non-controlling
interest
|
|
(43)
|
(18)
|
Owners of the parent
|
|
(26,210)
|
(8,812)
|
|
|
(26,253)
|
(8,830)
|
Earnings per share
(consolidated):
|
|
|
|
Basic & Diluted, for the year
attributable to ordinary equity holders
|
10
|
(0.105p)
|
(0.232p)
|
* Depreciation has
been re-grouped from Administrative expenses to present it
separately. This is considered to be a change in accounting policy
from prior year, but is deemed to considered to provide more useful
information on entity performance for the period, due to the
significance of depreciation to the statement of comprehensive
income and clearer understanding of entity trading
performance.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
POSITION
as at 31 December 2023
|
Notes
|
Year ended
31 Dec
23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec
22
£000
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment
|
11(a)
|
105,355
|
127,382
|
Intangible asset
|
11(b)
|
63
|
14
|
Non-current tax assets
|
19
(a)
|
--
|
2,108
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
105,418
|
129,504
|
|
|
|
|
Current tax assets
|
19
(b)
|
2,114
|
--
|
Inventory of traded
goods
|
|
72
|
96
|
Trade and other
receivables
|
12
|
16,339
|
14,110
|
Investments
|
13
|
173
|
--
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
14
|
2,881
|
558
|
Total current assets
|
|
21,579
|
14,764
|
Total assets
|
|
126,997
|
144,268
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Non-current
|
|
|
|
Employee benefit
obligations
|
18
|
35
|
53
|
Borrowings
|
19
|
36,399
|
39,165
|
Lease liabilities
payable
|
20
|
1,457
|
1,611
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
37,891
|
40,829
|
Current
|
|
|
|
Employee benefit
obligations
|
17
|
276
|
529
|
Borrowings
|
18
|
10,672
|
2,307
|
Current tax liabilities
|
19
(c)
|
61
|
17
|
Lease liabilities
payable
|
20
|
335
|
817
|
Trade and other payable
|
20
|
4,131
|
8,388
|
Current liabilities
|
|
15,475
|
12,058
|
Total liabilities
|
|
53,366
|
52,887
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets
|
|
73,631
|
91,381
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Stated Capital
|
16
|
152,354
|
143,851
|
Retained earnings
|
16
|
(47,217)
|
(26,022)
|
Translation Reserve
|
16
|
(31,444)
|
(26,429)
|
Equity attributable to owners of parent
|
|
73,693
|
91,400
|
Non-controlling
Interest
|
|
(62)
|
(19)
|
Total equity
|
|
73,631
|
91,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS
|
for the Year ended 31 December 2023
|
|
Notes
|
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
£000
|
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before tax
|
|
|
(21,265)
|
(12,060)
|
Non cash flow
adjustments
|
22
|
|
21,548
|
11,748
|
Operating (loss) before working
capital changes
|
|
|
283
|
(312)
|
Net changes in working
capital
|
22
|
|
(224)
|
305
|
Taxes paid
|
|
|
(6)
|
(85)
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
53
|
(92)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Used in purchase of property,
plant and equipment (PPE)
|
|
|
(1,651)
|
(1,425)
|
Sale proceeds of PPE
|
|
|
6
|
--
|
Finance Income
|
8
|
|
25
|
38
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(1,620)
|
(1,387)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
From issue of additional
shares
|
|
|
5,640
|
--
|
Fund raise cost
|
|
|
(941)
|
--
|
Subscription money received (from
the previous fund raise)
|
|
|
797
|
2,452
|
Repayment of bank borrowing
principal
|
|
|
(99)
|
(881)
|
Interest paid on
borrowings
|
|
|
(749)
|
(4,217)
|
Principal repayment of lease
liabilities
|
|
|
(737)
|
(138)
|
Interest payment on leasing
liabilities principal
|
|
|
(9)
|
--
|
Net cash from financing activities
|
|
|
3,902
|
(2,784)
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,335
|
(4,262)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of the year
|
|
|
558
|
4,783
|
Exchange difference on cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
(12)
|
37
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year
|
|
|
2,881
|
558
|
Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Equity
for the Year ended 31 December
2023
|
Stated
Capital
|
Translation
Reserve
|
Retained
Earnings
|
Other
Components of
equity
|
Non- controlling
Interest
|
Total
Equity
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
£000
|
£000
|
£000
|
£000
|
Balance at
1
January 2023
|
143,851
|
(26,429)
|
(26,022)
|
--
|
(19)
|
91,381
|
Issue of share capital
|
9,444
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
9,444
|
Share Issue cost
|
(941)
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
(941)
|
Transaction with owners
|
152,354
|
(26,429)
|
(26,022)
|
--
|
(19)
|
99,884
|
Loss for the year
|
--
|
--
|
(21,222)
|
--
|
(43)
|
(21,265)
|
Foreign currency translation
difference for foreign operations
|
--
|
(5,015)
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
(5,015)
|
Re-measurement of net defined
benefit liability
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
27
|
--
|
27
|
Re-measurement of net defined
benefit liability transfer to retained earning
|
--
|
--
|
27
|
(27)
|
--
|
--
|
Total comprehensive income for the
year
|
--
|
(5,015)
|
(21,195)
|
--
|
(43)
|
(26,253)
|
Balance at
31 December 2023
|
152,354
|
(31,444)
|
(47,217)
|
--
|
(62)
|
73,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
1
January 2022
|
143,851
|
(27,237)
|
(16,402)
|
--
|
(1)
|
100,211
|
Transaction with owners
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
Loss for the year
|
--
|
--
|
(9,621)
|
--
|
(18)
|
(9,639)
|
Foreign currency translation
difference for foreign operations
|
--
|
808
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
808
|
Re-measurement of net defined
benefit liability
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
1
|
--
|
1
|
Re-measurement of net defined
benefit liability transfer to retained earning
|
--
|
--
|
1
|
(1)
|
--
|
--
|
Total comprehensive income for the
year
|
--
|
808
|
(9,620)
|
--
|
(18)
|
(8,830)
|
Balance at
31 December 2022
|
143,851
|
(26,429)
|
(26,022)
|
--
|
(19)
|
91,381
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
1. CORPORATE INFORMATION
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
Limited (the "Company") was incorporated in Guernsey under The
Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 with registered number 52321 on 24
August 2010. Its registered office and principal place of business
is 1st Floor, Tudor House, Le Bordage Rd, Guernsey GY1 1DB. It was
listed on the Alternative Investment Market ('AIM') of the London
Stock Exchange on 7 October 2010.
The consolidated financial
statements of the Company comprise of the financial statements of
the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the
"Group"). The consolidated financial statements have been prepared
for the year ended 31 December 2023, and presented in UK Sterling
(£).
The principal activities of the
Group are to develop, own and operate a port and logistics
facilities. As of 31 December 2023, the Group had 45 (Forty-five)
(2022: 44 (Forty-four)) employees.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
a) BASIS OF PREPARATION
The consolidated financial
statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis except
where otherwise stated. The consolidated financial statements of
the Group have been prepared in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") and interpretations as
adopted by the European Union and also to comply with The Companies
(Guernsey) Law, 2008.
Climate Change and its impact on Karanja
Port
Introduction
Climate change poses a significant
threat to global sea ports, which are critical nodes in
international trade and transportation. The rising sea levels,
increased frequency and intensity of storms, and shifting weather
patterns associated with climate change present multifaceted
challenges to port operations and infrastructure.
The company has anticipated
following key impacts of climate change for its operational
activity:
1. Sea Level Rise:
- Inundation of Port
Facilities: Rising sea levels may
inundate low-lying port areas, causing structural damage to port
infrastructure such as berth, open and covered storage yard, storm
water drain and road.
- Increased
Flooding: Higher sea levels
exacerbate the risk of flooding, particularly during high tides and
storm surges, leading to operational disruptions and increased
maintenance costs. This may lead to a significant downtime for
revival and smooth operation.
2. Extreme Weather
Events:
- Storm Surges:
More frequent and severe storms can cause
significant damage to port infrastructure, delay shipping
schedules, and increase the risk of accidents and cargo loss. In
2020, Karanja Port was impacted severely by cyclone named "Nisarga"
which led to financial loss of approximately 0.7 mn (₹7
Crore). Similar natural catastrophic situations can be anticipated
in future with major financial implication.
- High Winds and Heavy
Rainfall: These conditions can
disrupt loading and unloading operations, damage cargo, and pose
safety risks to port employees/workers. However, this is covered in
the Port insurance.
3. Temperature Changes:
- Thermal Expansion: Higher temperatures
cause thermal expansion of sea water, contributing to sea level
rise, leading to additional maintenance cost.
4. Infrastructure Stress:
- Wear and Tear: Increased exposure to
saltwater and extreme weather conditions accelerates the wear and
tear on port infrastructure leading to increase in maintenance cost
and significant stress to capital cost.
- Adaptation and Resilience Costs: Ports
need to invest in resilient infrastructure and adaptive measures,
such as raising berth levels in future and improving drainage
systems.
Karanja Port has adapted following
strategies to mitigate the above anticipated challenges:
1. Infrastructure
Upgrade:
- Elevating Structures: Raising the
height of berth, ground level of open and covered storage yard and
other critical infrastructure can help mitigate the risk of
flooding. This will increase the expected lifespan on the project
and ROI.
- Storm Surge Drainage: Constructing
storm surge drainage can protect Karanja port from water logging or
flood caused due to rising sea levels and storm surges.
2. Operational Changes:
-
Flexible
Scheduling: Emergency management plan for such extreme
climate changes are already in place in Karanja Port for
Implementing flexible scheduling of the operational vessels to
compensate the delays caused by extreme weather and can help the
port to maintain operational efficiency.
- Enhanced Monitoring: The operations
team is already vigilant and has adopted advanced weather
forecasting and sea level monitoring systems to provide early
warnings and improve preparedness for extreme events.
3. Environmental and Regulatory
Measures:
- Adopting and complying to
Environmental Regulations: Karanja
Port is already complying with all the relevant environmental
regulations and international guidelines to ensure that ports
contribute to global climate mitigation efforts.
- Sustainable
Practices: Karanja Port has adopted
sustainable practices, such as waste management, water stewardship,
efficient use of power, optimum vessel and equipment operations to
reduce emissions from port operations to help mitigate the port's
environmental footprint.
4. Collaborative Efforts:
- Stakeholder
Engagement: Karanja Port promotes
involvement of internal and external stakeholders for example
improvement of local community by preferring engagement of local
contractors and candidates for employment. Out of the total staff
strength, the company has employed 34% locals at the port currently
and implementing the policies in the benefit of
employees.
CONCLUSION
Since Karanja Port is on the
frontline of climate change impacts, facing such significant
challenges requires immediate and sustained action. MPL board has
been in serious discussion internally to address this concern
through strategic planning, infrastructure investment, and
collaborative efforts. Karanja Port, can enhance its
resilience to climate change and ensure the continuity of trade and
transportation. Addressing these challenges proactively will be
critical in safeguarding the economic and operational stability of
the port. However, the Management has secured the port with a full
coverage by insuring the asset to mitigate from all risk of
uncertainties and eventualities.
Going Concern
In determining the appropriate
basis of preparation of the financial statements for the period
ended 31 December 2023, the Directors are required to consider
whether the Group can continue in operational existence for a
period of at least 12 months from the approval of these financial
statements. The Board has concluded that the Group is a going
concern and the Annual Report and Accounts have been prepared on
that basis, having undertaken a rigorous assessment of the
financial forecasts with specific consideration to the trading
position of the Group.
The financial year 2023 has been a
year engulfed in War between Ukraine/Russia and the latest being
the war between Israel and Palestine/Lebanon which has adversely
impacted the shipping business across the world and results for the
period.
MPL board has assessed the Group's
ability to operate as a going concern for the next 18 months from
the date of signing the financial statements to the 31st December
2025, based on the financial model which was prepared as part of
approving the 2024 budget. This is considered the appropriate
period of assessment, as it is in line with the board approved
budgets and captures the seasonality of cash flows. The current
principal loan repayments since March 2023 quarter till the balance
sheet date as well as the interest for the period from March 2023
to December 2023 is unpaid, due to the current restructuring
proposal being at an advanced stage with the head office of the
lead banker, the precondition of the proposed sanction would be to
prepay the over dues up to December 2023 prior implementing the
restructuring plan, on sanctioning of the restructuring.
However, the operations at the
Karanja Port are in the process of ramp up with the signing of
fresh contracts with a large cement company and announcement of
ongoing business with one of India's largest Oil & Gas company
for their operations at our port, and the Directors are very
optimistic about the business potentials at the Port for the period
2024 onwards and hence have considered the cash forecasts Twenty
Four months from 1 January 2024 up to 31st December 2025,
together with certain assumptions for revenue and costs, to satisfy
on the appropriateness of the going concern used in preparing the
financial statements.
Regarding financing, the group had
capital of £ 2.88 million cash balance as at 31 December 2023.
While the Indian subsidiary has already submitted the fresh
proposal in February, 2023 for restructuring of the term loan with
its current consortium of lenders, the board is confident of
getting the sanction by end of June 2024 and the proposal is in its
final phase of sanction. Payments of principal and interest have
not been made since March 2023 while bank negotiations are
ongoing.
The directors have prepared a base
case scenario, in which sales are forecast to increase
significantly due to the ramp up of operations set out above.
Management have prepared a severe but plausible downside scenario
('severe downside scenario'), where growth expectations are not
achieved, the bank restructuring is not included and all payments
of principal and interest are made, including contractual payments
due by 31st December not yet paid. The severe downside scenario has
a significant adverse impact on sales, gross margin and cash flows
including a 40% reduction in sales for FY24 and FY25 against
Managements' base case scenario.
The severe downside scenario
modelled indicates that there would be a shortfall of cash within
the going concern period. To cope with an eventuality of any
shortfall during the period, an additional line of unsecured credit
limit from KJS Concrete Private Limited (Hunch Ventures Group
Company) amounting to £ 15 million is availed to mitigate funding
risk as well as ensuring continuity in business.
The Directors also took account of
the principal risks and uncertainties facing the business referred
to above, and a sensitivity analysis on the key revenue growth
assumption with effectiveness of available mitigating
actions.
A range of mitigating actions
within the control of management has been assumed, including
managing our regular vendors with bare minimum support and
extension of credit during these critical years and also controlled
expenditure on all non-essential services.
The directors have determined
that, over the period of the going concern assessment, there is not
expected to be a significant impact resulting from climate
change
The Group continues to closely
monitor and manage its liquidity risk. In assessing the Group's
going concern status, the Directors have taken account of the
financial position of the Group, anticipated future utilization of
available fund, its capital investment plans and forecast of gross
operating margins as the business evolves and ramps up. The Company
has had frequent conversations to date with its longstanding
syndicate and advisors.
Based on the above indicators,
after taking into account the recent fundraising and the
renegotiation on the debt restructuring, and line of credit from
Hunch Ventures that would cover any shortfall in a severe but
plausible downside scenario, the Directors believe that it remains
appropriate to continue to adopt the going concern in preparing the
forecasts.
b) BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial
statements incorporate the results of the Company and entities
controlled by the Company (its subsidiaries) up to 31 December
2023. Subsidiaries are entities over which the Company has the
power to control the financial and operating policies. The Company
obtains and exercises control through holding more than half of the
voting rights. The financial statements of the subsidiaries are
prepared for the same period as the Company using consistent
accounting policies. The fiscal year of Karanja Terminal &
Logistics Private Limited (KTPL) ends on March 31 and its accounts
are adjusted for the same period for consolidation.
Amounts reported in the financial
statements of subsidiaries have been adjusted where necessary to
ensure consistency with the accounting policies adopted by the
Group.
Non-controlling interest
Non-controlling interest,
presented as part of equity, represent the portion of a
subsidiary's profit or loss and net assets that is not held by the
Group. The Group attributes total comprehensive income or loss of
subsidiaries between the owners of the parent and the
non-controlling interests based on their respective ownership
interest.
c) LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
Details of the Group's
subsidiaries which are consolidated into the Company's financial
statements are as follows:
Subsidiary
|
Immediate Parent
|
Country of
Incorporation
|
%
Voting Rights
|
% Economic
Interest
|
Karanja Terminal & Logistics
(Cyprus) Ltd
|
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
Limited
|
Cyprus
|
100.00
|
100.00
|
Karanja Terminal & Logistics
Private Limited*
|
Mercantile Ports & Logistics
Limited
|
India
|
8.11
|
8.11
|
Karanja Terminal & Logistics
Private Limited*
|
Karanja Terminal & Logistics
(Cyprus) Ltd.
|
India
|
91.67
|
91.67
|
Karanja Terminal & Logistics
(Cyprus) Ltd is wholly owned subsidiary of Mercantile Ports and
Logistics Limited. Karanja Terminal & Logistics (Cyprus) Ltd
holds 91.67% shares, Mercantile Ports & Logistics Limited holds
8.11% shares in Karanja Terminal & Logistics Private Limited
and the balance 0.22% (50,0000 shares out of 22,968,727) is held by
various other minority shareholders.
* Financial year end for Karanja
Terminal & Logistics Private Limited ("KTLPL") is April to
March, as same is governed by Companies Act 2013, but for preparing
group financials we have considered January to December
period.
d) FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
The consolidated financial
statements are presented in UK Sterling (£), which is the Company's
functional currency. The functional currency for all of the
subsidiaries within the Group is as detailed
below:
·
Karanja Terminal & Logistics (Cyprus) Ltd
("KTLCL") - Euro
·
Karanja Terminal & Logistics Private Limited
("KTLPL") - Indian Rupees
Foreign currency transactions are
translated into the functional currency of the respective Group
entity, using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the
transactions (spot exchange rate). Foreign exchange gains and
losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from
the retranslation of monetary items denominated in foreign currency
at the year-end exchange rates are recognised in the Consolidated
Statement of Comprehensive Income.
Non-monetary items are not
retranslated at year-end and are measured at historical cost
(translated using the exchange rates at the transaction
date).
In the Group's financial
statements, all assets, liabilities and transactions of Group
entities with a functional currency other than GBP are translated
into GBP upon consolidation.
On consolidation, the assets and
liabilities of foreign operations are translated into GBP at the
closing rate at the reporting date. The income and expenses of
foreign operations are translated into GBP at the average exchange
rates over the reporting period. Foreign currency differences are
recognised in other comprehensive income in the translation
reserve. When a foreign operation is disposed of, in part or in
full, the relevant amount in the translation reserves shall be
transferred to the profit or loss in the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income.
e) REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenue mainly consists of
services relating to use of the port by customers and includes
services such as hiring of land, wharf-age, hiring of equipment,
loading/unloading, stevedoring, storage and from value added
activities i.e. trading activities which is incidental to providing
port services.
Revenue is measured based on the
consideration to which the group expects to be entitled in a
contract with a customer and excludes amounts collected on behalf
of third parties. The group recognises revenue when it transfers
control of a product or service to a customer.
Performance obligations are
satisfied on handing over the land and / or equipment to the
customer / lessee, completion of loading/unloading, stevedoring
services, providing storage facilities and shipment of goods on
customers' vehicle.
To determine whether to recognise
revenue, the Group follows a 5-step process:
1. Identifying the
contract with a customer
2. Identifying the
performance obligations
3. Determining the
transaction price
4. Allocating the
transaction price to the performance obligations
5. Recognizing revenue
as and when performance obligation(s) are satisfied.
The total transaction price for a
contract is allocated amongst the various performance obligations
based on their relative standalone selling prices. The transaction
price for a contract excludes any amounts collected on behalf of
third parties.
Revenue is recognised either at a
point in time or over time, when (or as) the Group satisfies
performance obligations by transferring the promised goods or
services to its customers.
Contract asset - The Group's
recognises contract asset i.e. right to consideration in exchange
for goods or services that the Group has transferred to a
customer,
Contract liability - The
Group's obligation to transfer goods and services to a customer for
which the Group has received consideration (or the amount is due)
from the customer.
The Group recognises contract
liabilities for consideration received in respect of unsatisfied
performance obligations and reports these amounts as other
liabilities in the statement of financial position. Similarly, if
the Group satisfies a performance obligation before it receives the
consideration, the Group recognises either a contract asset or a
receivable in its statement of financial position, depending on
whether something other than the passage of time is required before
the consideration is due. Invoicing for services is set out in the
contract.
The group does not believe there
are elements of financing in the contracts. There are no warranties
or guarantees included in the contract.
The specific recognition criteria
described below must also be met before revenue is
recognised.
Port operation and logistics services
Revenue from port operation
services including cargo handling, storage, other ancillary port
and logistics services including the end-to-end value-added
services with respect to coal supply and delivery are measured
based upon cargo handled at rates specified under the contract and
charged on per metric tonne basis.
The performance obligation is
satisfied using the output method; this method recognises revenue
based on the value of services transferred to the customer, for
example, quantity of cargo loaded and unloaded and/or
transported.
Revenue is recognized in the
accounting period in which the services are rendered and completed
till reporting date. Amounts are invoiced based on the estimated
arrival date of the vessel provided by the customer, and revenue
recognised when the service is provided.
Management determines if there are
separate performance obligations from which customer are being able
to benefit from, for example, barging, stevedoring or
transportation.
Performance obligations are
considered on a contract-by-contract basis against the requirements
of IFRS 15. For each service the customer can benefit from the good
or service with "resources that are readily available to the
customer". The nature of the promise to the customer is considered
within the context of the individual customer contract and whether
the promise to transfer a combined item of overall port services,
which can vary on a per customer basis.
Revenue from sale of traded goods
Revenue from sale of traded goods
i.e. coal is recognized on transfer of control to the customers,
which is generally on dispatch of goods to the customer. The
delivery is handled by the customer and therefore control is deemed
to have been transferred to the customer at this point and is
invoiced on delivery.
Sales are stated exclusive of
Goods and Service Tax ("GST").
Income from long term leases
As a part of its business
activity, the Group sub-leases land on a short-term basis to its
customers.
The headlease is not a short-term
lease and thus the sublease must be classified by reference to the
right-of-use asset arising from the head lease, rather than by
reference to the economic useful life of the underlying
asset.
As a part of its business
activity, the Group sub-leases land on a short-term basis to its
customers. It is concluded that the subleases is an operating lease
because none of the indicators for a finance lease in IFRS 16 are
present.
The lease income is recognised
from the sublease on a straight-line basis over the period of lease
/ sub-lease agreement / date of memorandum of understanding takes
effect over lease period and annual lease rentals are recognised on
an accrual basis.
Amounts are invoiced as the
service provided, on either a monthly or ad hoc usage basis
depending on the customer.
Interest income
Interest income is reported on an
accrual basis using the effective interest method.
f) Borrowing cost
Borrowing costs directly
attributable to the construction of a qualifying asset are
capitalised during the period of time that is necessary to complete
and prepare the asset for its intended use. Other borrowing costs
are expensed in the period in which they are incurred and reported
under finance costs.
g) Share based payments
The Group has entered into a
equity-settled share-based arrangement with its service
provider.
All services received in exchange
for the grant of any share-based payment are measured at the fair
value of services received. The service provider is rewarded with
share-based payments, the number of shares issued in exchange for
the services received based on the fair values of
services.
All share-based payments is
recognised as an expense in the Statement of Comprehensive Income
with a corresponding credit to Share Capital up to the nominal
value of the shares issued with any excess being recorded as Share
Premium.
h) EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
i) Defined contribution plan
(Provident Fund)
In accordance with Indian Law, eligible employees receive
benefit from Provident Fund, which is a defined contribution plan.
Both the employee and employer make monthly contributions to the
plan, which is administrated by the government authorities, each
equal to the specific percentage of employee's basic salary. The
Group has no further obligation under the plan beyond its monthly
contributions. Obligation for contributions to the plan is
recognised as an employee benefit expense in the Consolidated
Statement of Comprehensive Income when incurred.
ii) Defined benefit plan
(Gratuity)
In accordance with applicable
Indian Law, the Group provides for gratuity, a defined benefit plan
(the Gratuity Plan) covering eligible employees. The Gratuity Plan
provides a lump sum payment to vested employees, at retirement or
termination of employment, and amount based on respective last
drawn salary and the years of employment with the Group. The
Group's net obligation in respect of the Gratuity Plan is
calculated by estimating the amount of future benefits that the
employees have earned in return for their service in the current
and prior periods; that benefit is discounted to determine its
present value. Any unrecognised past service cost and the fair
value of plan assets are deducted. The discount rate is a yield at
reporting date on risk free government bonds that have maturity
dates approximating the term of the Group's obligation. The
calculation is performed annually by a qualified actuary using the
projected unit credit method. When the calculation results in a
benefit to the Group, the recognised asset is limited to the total
of any unrecognised past service cost and the present value of the
economic benefits available in the form of any future refunds from
the plan or reduction in future contribution to the
plan.
The Group recognises all
re-measurements of net defined benefit liability/asset directly in
other comprehensive income and presents them within
equity.
iii) Short term benefits
Short term employee benefit
obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis and are expensed
as a related service provided. A liability is recognised for the
amount expected to be paid under short term cash bonus or
profit-sharing plans if the Group has a present legal or
constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past
service provided by the employee and the obligation can be
estimated reliably.
i) Leases
As
a lessee
The Company mainly has lease
arrangements for converting the waterfront into reclamation of land
for construction of Port for terminal and logistics operations. The
land thus reclaimed consist of the open space and also offices,
warehouse spaces and equipment.
The Group assesses whether a
contract contains a lease at inception of the contract. The Group
recognises a right-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability
in the statement of financial position for all lease arrangements
where it is the lessee, except for short-term leases with a term of
twelve months or less and leases of low value assets. For these
leases, the Group recognises the lease payments as an operating
expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the
lease.
The lease liability is initially
measured at the present value of the future lease payments from the
commencement date of the lease. The lease payments are discounted
using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if not readily
determinable, the asset and company specific incremental borrowing
rates. Lease liabilities are recognised within borrowings on the
statement of financial position. The lease liability is
subsequently measured by increasing the carrying amount to reflect
interest on the lease liability (using the effective interest
method) and by reducing the carrying amount to reflect the lease
payments made. The Group re-measures the lease liability, with a
corresponding adjustment to the related right-of-use assets,
whenever:
•
The lease term changes or there is a significant
event or change in circumstances resulting in a change in the
assessment of exercise of a purchase option, in which case the
lease liability is re-measured by discounting the revised lease
payments using a revised discount rate;
•
The lease payments change due to the changes in
an index or rate or a change in expected payment under a guaranteed
residual value, in which case the lease liability is re-measured by
discounting the revised lease payments using an unchanged discount
rate;
•
A lease contract is modified, and the lease
modification is not accounted for as a separate lease, in which
case the lease liability is re-measured based on the lease term of
the modified lease by discounting the revised lease payments using
a revised discount rate at the effective date of
modification.
The right-of-use assets are
initially recognised on the SOFP at cost, which comprises the
amount of the initial measurement of the corresponding lease
liability, adjusted for any lease payments made at or prior to the
commencement date of the lease, any lease incentive received and
any initial direct costs incurred, and expected costs for
obligations to dismantle and remove right-of use assets when they
are no longer used. Right-of-use assets are recognised within
property, plant and equipment on the statement of financial
position. Right-of-use assets are depreciated on a straight-line
basis from the commencement date of the lease over the shorter of
the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the end of the lease
term.
The Group enters into lease
arrangements as a lessor with respect to some of its time charter
vessels. Leases for which the Group is an intermediate lessor are
classified as finance or operating leases by reference to the
right-of-use asset arising from the head lease. Income from
operating leases is recognised on a straight-line basis over the
term of the relevant lease. Amounts due from lessee under finance
leases are recognised as receivables at the amount of the Group's
net investment in the leases. Finance lease income is allocated to
accounting periods so as to reflect a constant periodic rate of
return on the Group's net investment outstanding in respect of
these leases.
As
a lessor
As a lessor the Group classifies
its leases as either operating or finance leases. The Group
assessed whether it transfers substantially all the risks and
rewards of ownership. Those assets that do not transfer
substantially all the risks and rewards are classified as operating
leases. The Group has currently not entered into any lease that is
classified as finance lease.
Lease income from operating leases
where the Company is a lessor is recognized in income on a
straight-line basis over the lease term unless a systematic basis
more representative of the pattern in which benefit from the use of
the underlying asset is diminished is suitable
j) INCOME TAX
Tax expense recognised in profit
or loss comprises the sum of deferred tax and current tax not
recognised in other comprehensive income or directly in equity.
Current income tax assets and/or liabilities comprise those
obligations to, or claims from, fiscal authorities relating to the
current or prior reporting periods, that are unpaid at the
reporting date. Current tax is payable on taxable profit, which
differs from profit or loss in the financial statements.
Calculation of current tax is based on tax rates and tax laws that
have been substantively enacted by the end of the reporting
period.
Deferred tax
The income tax is being accounted
under the asset and liability method, which requires the
recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected
future tax consequences of events that have been included in the
financial statements. Under this method, we determine deferred tax
assets and liabilities on the basis of the differences between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities by
using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax
rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Deferred tax assets are recognized
to the extent that management believes that these assets are more
probable than not to be realized. In making such a determination,
it considers all available positive and negative evidence,
including future reversals of existing taxable temporary
differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning
strategies, and results of recent operations. If it is determined
that it would be able to realize the deferred tax assets in the
future in excess of the net recorded amount, the necessary
adjustment would be made to the deferred tax asset valuation
allowance, which would reduce the provision for income
tax.
k) FINANCIAL ASSETS
The Financial assets and financial
liabilities are recognised when the Group becomes a party to the
contractual provisions of the financial instrument.
Financial assets are derecognised
when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial
asset expire, or when the financial asset and substantially all the
risks and rewards are transferred. A financial liability is
derecognised when it is extinguished, discharged, cancelled or
expires.
Classification and initial measurement of financial
assets
Except for those trade receivables
that do not contain a significant financing component and are
measured at the transaction price in accordance with IFRS 15, all
financial assets are initially measured at fair value adjusted for
transaction costs (where applicable).
Financial assets, other than those
designated and effective as hedging instruments, are classified
into the following categories:
• amortised cost
• fair
value through profit or loss ("FVTPL")
• fair
value through other comprehensive income ("FVOCI").
In the periods presented, the
corporation does not have any financial assets categorised as FVTPL
or FVOCI.
The classification is determined
by both:
• the
entity's business model for managing the financial asset
• the
contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial
asset.
All income and expenses relating
to financial assets that are recognised in profit or loss are
presented within finance costs, finance income or other financial
items, except for impairment of trade receivables which is
presented within other expenses.
Subsequent measurement of financial assets
Financial assets at amortised cost
Financial assets are measured at
amortised cost if the assets meet the following conditions (and are
not designated as FVTPL):
• they
are held within a business model whose objective is to hold the
financial assets and collect its contractual cash flows
• the
contractual terms of the financial assets give rise to cash flows
that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal
amount outstanding
After initial recognition, these
are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Discounting is omitted where the effect of discounting is
immaterial. The Group's cash and cash equivalents, trade and most
other receivables fall into this category of financial instruments
as well as listed bonds that were previously classified as
held-to-maturity under IFRS 9.
Impairment of financial assets
IFRS 9's impairment requirements
use more forward-looking information to recognise expected credit
losses - the 'expected credit loss (ECL) model'. This replaces IFRS
9's 'incurred loss model'. Instruments within the scope of the new
requirements included loans and other debt-type financial assets
measured at amortised cost and FVOCI, trade receivables, contract
assets recognised and measured under IFRS 15 and loan commitments
and some financial guarantee contracts (for the issuer) that are
not measured at fair value through profit or loss.
l) FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
Classification and measurement of financial
liabilities
As the accounting for financial
liabilities remains largely the same under IFRS 9 , the Group's
financial liabilities were not impacted by the adoption of IFRS 9.
However, for completeness, the accounting policy is disclosed
below.
The Group's financial liabilities
include borrowings, trade and other payables and derivative
financial instruments.
Financial liabilities are
initially measured at fair value, and, where applicable, adjusted
for transaction costs unless the Group designated a financial
liability at fair value through profit or loss.
Subsequently, financial
liabilities are measured at amortised cost using the effective
interest method except for derivatives and financial liabilities
designated at FVTPL, which are carried subsequently at fair value
with gains or losses recognised in profit or loss (other than
derivative financial instruments that are designated and effective
as hedging instruments). In the periods presented, the corporation
does not have any financial liabilities categorised as FVTPL or
FVOCI.
All interest-related charges and,
if applicable, changes in an instrument's fair value that are
reported in profit or loss are included within finance costs or
finance income.
m) PROPERTY, PLANT
AND EQUIPMENT
MPL's balance sheet contains
significant property, plant and equipment, and right-of-use assets
primarily comprising of assets relating to port, office, plant and
machinery, vehicles and other movable assets. Items of property,
plant and equipment are measured at cost less accumulated
depreciation and impairment losses.
All the expenditures directly
attributable in respect of the port and logistics facility under
development are carried at historical cost under Capital Work in
Progress as the Board believes that these expenses will generate
probable future economic benefits. These costs include borrowing
cost, professional fees, construction costs and other direct
expenditure. After capitalisation, management monitors whether the
recognition requirements continue to be met and whether there are
any indicators that capitalised costs may be impaired.
Cost includes expenditures that
are directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset and
income directly related to testing the facility is offset against
the corresponding expenditure. The cost of constructed asset
includes the cost of materials, sub-contractors and any other costs
directly attributable to bringing the asset to a working condition
for its intended use. Purchased software that is integral to the
functionality of the related equipment is capitalised as part of
that equipment.
Parts of the property, plant and
equipment are accounted for as separate items (major components) on
the basis of nature of the assets.
The Indian subsidiary has
constructed and developed the port which is now fully operational.
The basic infrastructure is ready, however, depending on the
specification of the customer and cargo dimension, the ground
improvement etc. will be carried out and made worthy for operation
and once complete will be accordingly transferred from Capital
Work-in-Progress to Property, Plant and Equipment when the assets
deemed ready to use. Hence, the Group has been prudently
transferring the assets to Property, Plant and Equipment on the
basis of utilisation of space for operations.
Gains or losses arising on the
disposal of property, plant and equipment are determined as the
difference between the disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of
the assets are recognised in profit or loss within other income or
other expenses.
Right-of-use assets:
Right-of-use assets, the cost is
equivalent to the present value of the future lease payments
relating the leased assets. This note also details nay additions
and disposals during the year, and shows depreciation, which is an
expense in the income statement to reflect the usage of these
assets.
Right of use assets are initially
measured at cost, which is an amount equal to the corresponding
lease liabilities (present value of future lease payments) adjusted
for any lease payments made at or before the commencement date,
less any lease incentives received. (See note on lease liabilities
accounting policy).
Depreciation is calculated by
estimating how many years the asset is expected to be in use, which
is also known as the useful economic life (UEL) of the asset. The
depreciation charge reduces the initial value of the assets over
the time and spread evenly over their UELs. The value after
deducting accumulated depreciation is known as the net book
value.
No depreciation is charged during
the course of construction on the Port Assets. Depreciation is
calculated for all other assets to write off the cost or valuation,
less residual value, on a straight-line basis over the following
expected UELs:
Useful economic lives
The estimated useful lives for the
current year are as -
Assets
|
Estimated Life of assets
|
Lease hold Land
Development
|
Over the period of Concession
Agreement by Maharashtra Maritime board (MMB).
|
Marine Structure, Dredged
Channel
|
Over the period of Concession
Agreement by Maharashtra Maritime board (MMB).
|
Non-Carpeted Road other than
RCC
|
3 Years
|
Office equipment
|
3-5 Years
|
Computers
|
2-3 Years
|
Computer software
|
5 Years
|
Plant & machinery
|
15 Years
|
Furniture
|
5-10 Years
|
Vehicles
|
5-8 Years
|
Depreciation methods, useful lives
and residual value are reassessed at each reporting
date.
Right-of-use assets depreciated
over the shorter of the lease period and estimated useful
life.
Impairment of Property, Plant and Equipment
Internal and external sources of
information are reviewed at the end of the reporting period to
identify indications that the property, plant and equipment may be
impaired. When impairment indicators exist, Management compares the
carrying value of the property, plant and equipment with the fair
value determined as the higher of fair value less cost of disposal
or value in use, also refer note 3.
For impairment assessment
purposes, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there
are largely independent cash inflows (cash-generating units). As a
result, some assets are tested individually for impairment and some
are tested at cash-generating unit level.
MPL has a sole Cash Generating
Unit (CGU) namely, Karanja Port in India since inception. The Port
Assets are reviewed for evidence of a trigger for potential
impairment at least annually or whenever events or circumstances
indicate that the value on the balance sheet may not be
recoverable. Impairment testing is performed on cash generating
units (CGUs) which is the Port itself, this being the lowest level
of separately identifiable cash flows.
An impairment loss is recognised
as follows:
Description
|
Amount in
£ million
|
Enterprise Value
|
108.72
|
Carrying Value of the
CGU
|
(118.57)
|
Net Enterprise Value
(Impairment)
|
(9.85)
|
From the above, it is evident that
an impairment loss is recognised on the amount by which the asset's
net book value exceeds its recoverable amount, the latter being the
higher of the asset's fair value less cost to dispose and value in
use. Value in use calculation is performed using cash flow
projections, discounted at a post-tax rate, which reflects the
asset specific risks and the time value of money.
Property, plant and equipment is
stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and/or impairment
losses, if any. Based on the impairment review performed the
property, plant and equipment are impaired to the extent of £ 9.85
million.
When an impairment loss
subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the CGU is increased
to the revised estimate of the recoverable amount, but ensuring the
increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that
would have been determined if no impairment loss had been
recognised for the CGU in prior years. A reversal of an impairment
loss is recognised as a credit to the income statement when
recovery of performance is considered reasonably
certain.
n) Trade receivables and payables
Trade receivables are financial
assets at amortised costs, initially measured at the transaction
price, which reflects fair value, and subsequently at amortised
cost less impairment. In measuring the impairment, the Group has
applied the simplified approach to expected credit losses as
permitted by IFRS9. Expected credit losses are assessed by
considering the Group's historical credit loss experience, factors
specific for each receivable, the current economic climate and
expected changes in forecasts of future events. Changes if any in
expected credit losses are recognised in the Statement of
Comprehensive Income.
Trade payables are financial
liabilities at amortised cost, measured initially at fair value and
subsequently at amortised cost using an effective interest rate
method.
o) Advances
Advances paid to the EPC
contractor and suppliers for construction of the facility are
categorised as advances and will be offset against future work
performed by the contractor.
p) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise
cash on hand and bank deposits that can easily be liquidated into
known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant
risk of changes in value.
q) Stated capital and reserves
Shares have 'no par value'. Stated
capital includes any premiums received on issue of share capital.
Any transaction costs associated with the issuing of shares are
deducted from stated capital, net of any related income tax
benefits.
Foreign currency translation
differences are included in the translation reserve. Retained
earnings include all current and prior year retained
profits.
r) New standard and interpretation
There are no accounting
pronouncements, which have become effective from 1 January 2024
that have a significant impact on the Group's consolidated
financial statements.
Standards, amendments and interpretations to existing
standards that are not yet effective and have not been adopted
early by the group
Following new standards or
amendments that are not yet effective and have been issued by the
IASB which are not applicable or have material impact on the
Group.
· Amendments to IAS 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements
relating to Non-current Liabilities with Covenants and
Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current
· Amendments to IFRS 16 - Leases relating to Lease Liability in
a Sale and Leaseback
· Amendments to IAS 7 - Statement of Cash Flows and IFRS 7-
Financial Instruments: Disclosures relating to Supplier Finance
Arrangements
· Amendments to IFRS 7
· IFRS S1 - General Requirements for Disclosure of
Sustainability-related Financial Information
· IFRS S2 - Climate-related Disclosures
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATE
a) Impairment
In line with the accounting
policy, management assessed the value in use of the CGU when
testing for impairment. This requires estimation of the present
value of future cash flows expected to arise from the continuing
operation of the CGU. These estimates require assumptions over
various factors, in particular future sales, future margin
performance and considering the consolidated costs. Each of these
areas are critical in estimating the present value of future cash
flows. Were there to be significant changes in these estimations,
the amount recognised in respect of impairment during the year
could be materially impacted, or impairment charges recognised in
previous years may be reversed.
While the operations at the
Karanja Port is in the process of ramp up with reputed corporates
including one of India's largest Oil & Gas company and a large
cement company for their operations at Karanja Port, the Directors
are very optimistic about the business potential at the Port for
the period 2024 onwards. The capacity utilisation of
the port in essence drives the revenue and the EBITDA generated by
MPL through its CGU. The optimum utilisation of the Port capacity
is the essence and a driving force which ramps up the revenue as
well as the EBITDA margin of the group. The CGU will be cash
positive the moment capacity utilisation crosses the 35-40%
range.
The Management is optimistic of
the business growth and the future prospect on behalf of Karanja
Port. The optimism is supported by recent Traffic study done by
KPMG for demand assessment of ports in Mumbai for Karanja Port
which management consider highlights the opportunities available to
seize upon.
However, while the Karanja Port is
in the process of ramp up of the operations and the Directors
remain optimistic about the business potential at the Port for the
period 2024 onwards, the delays in ramp up of operations post
covid-19 and results against expectations, have identified an
indicator of impairment and an impairment review has been
performed.
Impairment testing is performed on
cash generating units (CGUs) which is the Port itself, this being
the lowest level of separately identifiable cash flows.
An impairment loss is recognised as
follows:
Description
|
Amount in
£ million
|
Enterprise Value
|
108.72
|
Carrying value of CGU
|
(118.57)
|
Net Enterprise Value
(Impairment)
|
(9.85)
|
Value in use calculation is
performed using cash flow projections, discounted at a pre-tax post
IFRS -16 rate, which reflects the asset specific risks and the time
value of money.
The impairment review considers
the VIU of the CGU compared to the carrying value in the first
instance, and subsequently for fair value less cost to dispose if
the VIU is lower than the carrying value. The VIU calculation is
based on the remaining life of the Port assets i.e. the balance
valid lease period using the latest forecast data to adjust the
specific cash flows. The recoverable amounts of the impaired CGU
are based on the VIU.
The growth rate and operating
margins used in the estimate cash flows are based on the current
contracts on hand as well as advanced negotiations with the current
clients on their expansion of activities at Karanja port as
follows:
1) Esquire Contract
(Existing Customer):
a. Increase in the
estimated imports of coal for 2024 from 1.5 million MT to 2-2.5
million MT;
b. Import of Silica
Sand /Gypsum
c. Import of Steel /
TMT bars
2) One of India's
largest Oil & Gas company :
a. Increasing the
number of OSV vessels to at least 25 vessels per month per
berth;
b. Increase the number
of dedicated berth from 1 to 3 by 2026;
c. Discussions
underway for use of Karanja Port facilities for Rig repair and
maintenance;
d. Use of Karanja Port
facilities by 3rd party vendors/ partners/contractors/
associates for Oil & Gas sector operations;
e. Storage and supply
of consumables to OSVs;
f. Supply of
bunkers and Water supply to OSVs;
g. Other allied
services.
3) Existing customer,
had paused operations, restarted in 2024
a. They are intending
to do full scale operation of berthing cements and also on the
verge of creating Silos at the Port for their uninterrupted supply
to their plant.
4) Rudra Marine
(onboarded with plan to executed in 2024)
a. They will set up 3
tanks to facilitate storage for Base Oil, Edible Oil and
Bitumen.
5) Lucky Marine:
(onboarded with plan to executed in 2024)
a. Container
operations are expected to commence operation and ramp up during
2024.
b. Contract
signed
6) Project Cargo (new
customer)
a. The Indian
subsidiary is also in advanced negotiations with Afcons
infrastructure for the similar space which was earlier assigned to
Tata Daewoo JV, for constructing the new bridge from Uran to Revas
Bridge for a period of 24- 30 months.
The key assumptions used in the
VIU calculation are;
-
A post-tax
discount rate of 13.5% (2022:
13.4%) was calculated using the weighted average cost of capital
(WACC). An assessment was made of the risks associated with
the cashflows based on the forecast assumptions and a risk
adjustment included in the WACC.
-
Port utilisation estimated to peak at 75% by 2030
(driven by bulk and container cargo). It is important to note that
this is a conservative assumption. Generally, Ports operate at much
higher capacity utilisation levels even beyond 100 percent. In the
current case, we have remained conservative and assumed peak
capacity utilisation around 75%.
-
The forecast assumes that port utilization will
be 26% in 2024, 31% in 2025, 41% in 2026 and 50% in 2027. The
expected sales growth as a result of increase in port utilisation
with a CAGR ranging between from 50% to 60% to 2028 with steady
growth of 0-1% per annum thereafter.
Based on the impairment review
carried out, the group recognised a net impairment of £9.85 million
for the year.
In the VIU calculations, no
specific impact has been included in respect of climate change as
it is not expected to be materially different to the forecast
assumptions during the forecast period. Certain movable assets are
expected to be replaced at the end of their UEL by those that have
a lower impact on the environment. Cash outflows that are directly
associated with CGUs have been included in the discounted cash flow
modelling.
Sensitivities in the
impairment modelling
The impairment model is prepared
on very conservative assumptions. Generally, Ports operate at
100-110% of the installed capacity as peak capacity utilisation. In
addition, ramp up in capacity utilisation is steep preponing cash
flows at higher or peak capacity utilisation.
In case of MPL, not only the ramp
up in capacity utilisation is assumed to be gradual, but also the
peak capacity utilisation is taken at 77% instead of 110% in the
impairment model. To add to the conservative assumptions, the
tariff revenue on handling per MT of cargo is also assumed to be
constant while G&A expenses are assumed to see a steady incline
year on year.
However, the below sensitivity
analysis reflects a reasonably plausible alternative scenario for
impairment evaluation.
Sensitivity Adjustment
|
Net Impairment Impact £ in
mn
|
Decrease in port utilisation by
2%
|
Additional Charge
|
-£8.25
|
Increase in port utilisation by
2%
|
Additional Release
|
£8.25
|
EBITDA decreased by 2%
|
Additional Charge
|
-£1.88
|
EBITDA increased by 2%
|
Additional Release
|
£1.88
|
G&A increased by 5%
|
Additional Charge
|
-£2.22
|
G&A decreased by 5%
|
Additional Release
|
£2.22
|
WACC increased by 50
bps
|
Additional Charge
|
-£5.37
|
WACC decreased by 50
bps
|
Additional Release
|
£5.79
|
The management exercised a sensitivity analysis on the
financial model for the immediate future to ascertain the impact of
increase/ decrease under various heads in the
model:
i. Port Capacity
utilization:
Increase:
Catalyst drivers for Revenues are majorly the
Bulk Cargo and Container Cargo. Any increase in traffic at the Port
will enhance the Port utilization, which will contribute to the
improvement of business performance and thus release the charge on
the impaired asset.
Decrease:
Decrease in the Port Utilization capacity due to
climate conditions, deferment of operations may adversely impact
and thus increase the charge of impairment on the asset.
ii. General &
Administration Expense:
Increase:
Major Cost contributing to G&A are the Cost
of Personnel, Insurance, Professional Fees and Travel. The increase
is cost depends on the economic situation and changes considering
the inflation, beyond the assumed rate. This would further impair
the asset proportionately.
Decrease:
Any reduction due to better negotiations on the
Insurance, Professional fees, Travel rates, would reduce the impact
of impairment on the asset.
iii. EBITDA:
Increase:
Revenue generated from land rentals, which is
100% margin business, will directly reduce & release the charge
on the impairment of the asset and improve the EBITDA
margin.
Decrease:
Increase in cost of operations such as equipment
hire, stevedoring etc cost, if hiked, then would adversely impact
the EBITDA margin and would contribute and increase the impairment
of asset.
iv. Weighted Average Cost of Capital
(WACC):
Increase:
Increase in the WACC by 50 basis point will also
contribute to additional charge on the impaired asset. This may
occur if the Reserve Bank increases the REPO rate which will have
direct impact on the rate of interest on the term debt.
Decrease:
a decrease in the WACC by 50 basis point will
release and reduce the charge on the impaired asset. This again
depends solely on the market condition and Reserve bank
policy.
b) Recognition of income tax assets in respect of
tax
MPL group's Indian subsidiary had
filed a writ petition in Hon'ble High court for seeking relief
against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
(ITAT) for the two assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13, which was
decided in favour of the group's Indian subsidiary. Therefore, the
major portion of the tax pertains to the amounts paid under protest
for the Assessment Year (AY) 2011-2012 (£0.45 Mn) and AY 2012-13
(£1.47 Mn). These amounts were deposited as a precondition for
filing appeals with the Income-tax authorities for these
years.
The Principal Commissioner of
Income Tax (Appeals) vide its order dated 20th March, 2023, issued
an order in favour of the Group's subsidiary for the assessment
years 2011-12 and 2012-13. As such, as a result of a tax previous
paid in respect of 2011-12 and 2012-13 is expected to be returned
to the Indian subsidiary and as such an asset has been recognised
of £2.1m.
The Indian subsidiary has received
the refund order u/s. 264 read with section 260 of the Income Tax
Act for the assessment year 2011-12 as well as 2023-23 vide the
order dated 20th June, 2023 totalling to £2.97 Million (₹.31.52
crores).
Since the Income tax department
has preferred an appeal in Supreme Court and in light of the
uncertainty of the final outcome, there remains a risk over the
amount recognised. However, the chances of appeal are considered
remote and as such, on the basis of highly probable an asset was
recognised in respect of the amount receivable.
As per these orders, the matter
was sent back to the files of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) for re-adjudication following the ITAT orders for
assessment years 2013-14 to 2015-16. The status of open litigations
for AY 2013-14 to AY 2015-16 remain unchanged during FY 2022-23
i.e., the matter is yet to be adjudicated and the outcome of appeal
before Hon'ble Bombay High Court is pending.
3. SEGMENTAL REPORTING
Operating segments are reported in
a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the
chief operating decision maker. The Board of Directors of are
identified as the Chief operating decision maker. The Group has
only one operating and geographic segment, being the project on
hand in India and hence no separate segmental report
presented.
4. REVENUE FROM OPERATION
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
|
|
|
Sale of goods
|
1,456
|
561
|
Cargo handling income
|
1,683
|
1,968
|
Lease income
|
1,188
|
1,728
|
Other operating income
|
1,135
|
615
|
|
5,462
|
4,872
|
Revenue from Sale of goods is
"Point in time" and other revenue heads are "Over the time". Other
operating income relates to income from dredging, coal handling and
distribution income and wharfage.
Certain portions of the port have
been designated for leasing portions. The lease has been classified
as operating lease because it does not transfer substantially all
the risks and rewards incident to ownership and it does not fulfil
other conditions mentioned in IFRS 16 applicable to be classified
as finance lease.
The major customer for sale of
goods is Radha Krishna Trading Company, followed by Mahakali Fuel
Pvt. Ltd. The major customer for Cargo Handling Income is Esquire
Shipping & Trading Pvt Ltd. The major customer for Lease income
is Daewoo-TPL JV and for Other Operating Income the major customer
is Daewoo-TPL JV, followed by Esquire Shipping & Trading Pvt
Ltd.
The total future minimum lease
rentals receivable at the SOFP date is as under:
Payments falling due
|
As on
31 Dec 23
INR in
million
|
As on
31 Dec 23
£ million
|
2024
|
9.60
|
0.09
|
2025
|
9.60
|
0.09
|
2026
|
9.60
|
0.09
|
2027
|
9.60
|
0.09
|
Fifth year and above
|
38.40
|
0.37
|
Total
|
76.80
|
0.73
|
5. COST OF SALES
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
|
|
|
Wharf-age expense
|
479
|
411
|
Other operating expense
|
1,919
|
1,134
|
Changes in inventory
|
19
|
(96)
|
|
2,417
|
1,449
|
6. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
Employee costs
|
556
|
635
|
Directors' remuneration and
fees
|
281
|
476
|
Operating lease rentals
|
--
|
9
|
Foreign exchange loss
|
(3)
|
68
|
Other administration
costs
|
2,432
|
2,559
|
|
3,266
|
3,747
|
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
|
|
|
Interest on bank
deposits
|
25
|
38
|
7. (a) FINANCE INCOME
Management has tested the OTR for
debt modification under IFRS 9. The revised cash out flow
discounted at original EIR 13.45% resulted in net gain of £5.41
million and was effected accordingly in 2021. The recognized gain
is spread over the remaining term of the modified debt using the
effective interest method, and therefore has been considered in the
2023 financials.
7. (b) FINANCE EXPENSES
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
|
|
|
Interest on term loan
|
4,398
|
4,726
|
Interest others
|
1,827
|
817
|
|
6,225
|
5,543
|
With regard to interest on term
loan of £ 4.40
million, the actual interest paid during the period is
£ 1.54 million. The
unpaid portion is primarily due to the proposal submitted for
restructuring of loan in February 2023 for considering re-phasement
of debt facility from 7 years to 14 years of repayment with cut-off
date as 1 April 2023, under consideration. The interest on term
loan also proposes a moratorium period of 2 years viz. April 2023
to March 2025 (interest considered in the financial statements for
the period January 2023 to December 2023).
8. INCOME TAX
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
Loss Before Tax
|
(21,265)
|
(12,060)
|
Applicable tax rate in
India*
|
26.00%
|
26.00%
|
Expected tax credit
|
(5,529)
|
(3,136)
|
Reconciling items
Non-deductible losses of MPL and
Cyprus entities
|
378
|
320
|
Un-recognised deferred tax asset
on tax losses
|
5,151
|
2,025
|
Non-deductible expenses
|
--
|
791
|
Reversal of outstanding tax
liability and interest thereon pertaining to earlier
years
|
--
|
2,421
|
|
--
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
* Considering that the Group's operations are presently based
in India, the effective tax rate of the Group of 26% (prior year
26%) has been computed based on the current tax rates prevailing in
India. In India, income earned from all sources (including interest
income) are taxable at the prevailing tax rate unless exempted.
However, administrative expenses are treated as non-deductible
expenses until commencement of operations.
MPL group's Indian subsidiary had
filed a writ petition in Hon'ble High court for seeking relief
against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
(ITAT) for the two assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13, which was
decided in favour of the group's Indian subsidiary. Therefore, the
major portion of the tax pertains to the amounts paid under protest
for the Assessment Year (AY) 2011-2012 (£0.45 Mn) and AY 2012-13
(£1.47 Mn). These amounts were deposited as a precondition for
filing appeals with the Income-tax authorities for these
years.
The Principal Commissioner of
Income Tax (Appeals) vide its order dated 20th March, 2023, issued
an order in favour of the Group's subsidiary for the assessment
years 2011-12 and 2012-13. As such, as a result of a tax previous
paid in respect of 2011-12 and 2012-13 is expected to be returned
to the Indian subsidiary and as such an asset has been recognised
of £2.1m. Since the Income tax department has preferred an appeal
in Supreme Court and in light of the uncertainty of the final
outcome, there remains a risk over the amount recognised and as
such there was judgement taken that the amount was expected to be
recovered.
As per these orders, the matter
was sent back to the files of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) for re-adjudication following the ITAT orders for
assessment years 2013-14 to 2015-16. The status of open litigations
for AY 2013-14 to AY 2015-16 remain unchanged during FY 2022-23
i.e., the matter is yet to be adjudicated and the outcome of appeal
before Hon'ble Bombay High Court is pending. As such a contingent
liability continues to be recognised in respect of amounts
potentially due.
The Indian Subsidiary has received
the refund order u/s. 264 read with section 260 of the Income Tax
Act for the assessment year 2011-12 as well as 2023-23 vide the
order dated 20 June 2023 totalling to £2.97 Million (₹.31.52
crores).
Since the Income tax department
has preferred an appeal in Supreme Court and in light of the
uncertainty of the final outcome, the Group has disclosed the same
under the head of contingent liability in note no 25.
The Company is incorporated in
Guernsey under The Companies (Guernsey) Law 2008, as amended. The
Guernsey tax rate for companies is 0%. The rate of withholding tax
on dividend payments to non-residents by companies within the 0%
corporate income tax regime is also 0%. Accordingly, the Company
will have no liability to Guernsey income tax on its income and
there will be no requirement to deduct withholding tax from
payments of dividends to non-resident shareholders.
In Cyprus, the tax rate for
companies is 12.5% with effect from 1 January 2014. There is no tax
expense in Cyprus.
As at 31st December 2023 due to
uncertainty that Indian entity will generate sufficient future
taxable income to offset business losses incurred to realise
deferred tax assets, the management has not recognised the Deferred
Tax Asset amounting to (£ 5.43mn) (Gross tax losses: £ 20.9mn)
(2022- (£ 6.4 mn). (Gross tax losses: £
24.6mn).
|
Year ended
|
Year ended
|
|
2023
|
2022
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
(1,886)
|
(362)
|
Offset against deferred tax
assets
|
1,886
|
362
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
--
|
--
|
As a result of amendments to IAS
12 'Deferred Tax related to Assets and Liabilities arising from a
Single Transaction' deferred tax has been recognised in respect of
IFRS 16 leases. In applying the standard at the
beginning of the earliest comparative period presented, a deferred
tax asset has been recognised to the extent that it is probable
that taxable profit will be available against which
the deductible temporary
difference can be utilised
resulting in an amendment to the amounts recognised at
31st December 2022.
9. AUDITORS' REMUNERATION
The following are the details of
fees paid to the auditors, Grant Thornton UK LLP and Indian
auditors, in various capacities for the year:
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
Audit Fees
|
|
|
Audit fees payable to Grant
Thornton UK LLP for the Group accounts audit *
|
184
|
162
|
Audit fees payable to auditors of
subsidiary companies
Non-audit service:
|
7
|
9
|
Interim Financial Statement
Review
|
5
|
10
|
Fees payable to grant Thornton UK
LLP in respect of advisory work on the equity placing
|
--
|
110
|
|
196
|
291
|
* This includes the additional
fees charged during the year in respect of the prior year audit
aggregating to £ 30,000 (2022: £ 12,500).
10. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Both basic and diluted earnings
per share for the year ended 31 December 2023 have been calculated
using the loss attributable to equity holders of the Group of
£18.40 million (prior year loss of £9.621 million).
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
|
Loss attributable to equity
holders of the parent
|
£
(21,221,801)
|
£
(9,621,000)
|
Weighted average number of shares
used in basic and diluted earnings per share
|
201,581,972
|
41,499,699
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted earnings per
share
|
(0.105p)
|
(0.
232p)
|
The group has successfully
completed fund raise by private placement of 301,479,660 and
13,333,333 new Ordinary Shares on 28 June 2023 and 31 July 2023
respectively at a price of 0.03 pence per
share.
All other immovable and movable
property with a carrying value of £ 105,268,233 (2022:
£127,172,000) is under hypothecation in favour of the "Term
lenders".
The Port facility being developed
in India has been hypothecated by the Indian subsidiary as security
for the bank borrowings (revised outstanding as at 31st
December 2023 as against the borrowing limit sanctioned in 2021 as
per OTR is INR 460 crore £43.36 million (2022: INR 462 crore
(£46.32 million)) for part financing the build out of the
facility.
The Indian subsidiary has
estimated the total project cost of INR 1,404 crore (£138.10
million) towards construction of the port facility. Out of the
aforesaid project cost, the contract signed with the major
contractor is INR 1,049 crores (£105.21 million). As of
31 December 2023, the contractual amount (net of advances) of
INR 48.03 crores (£4.82 million) work is unexecuted. There were no
other material contractual commitments.
11 (b). Intangible Asset
|
Intangible Asset
-
Asset
Software
|
Software
|
|
£000
|
aGross carrying amount
|
|
Balance 1 Jan 2023
|
33
|
Exchange Difference
|
(1)
|
Additions
|
--
|
Transfers from CWIP ^
|
64
|
Disposals
|
--
|
Balance 31 Dec 2023
|
96
|
Depreciation
|
|
Balance 1 Jan 2023
|
(19)
|
Exchange Difference
|
1
|
Charge for the year
|
(15)
|
Disposals
|
--
|
Balance 31 Dec 2023
|
(33)
|
Carrying amount 31 Dec 2023
|
63
|
|
Intangible Asset
-
Asset
Software
|
Software
|
|
£000
|
Gross carrying amount
|
|
Balance 1 Jan 2022
|
14
|
Exchange Difference
|
--
|
Additions
|
19
|
Disposals
|
--
|
Balance 31 Dec 2022
|
33
|
Depreciation
|
|
Balance 1 Jan 2022
|
(10)
|
Exchange Difference
|
--
|
Charge for the year
|
(9)
|
Disposals
|
--
|
Balance 31 Dec 2022
|
(19)
|
Carrying amount 31 Dec 2022
|
14
|
12. TRADE AND OTHER
RECEIVABLES
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
Deposits
|
1,043
|
1,442
|
Advances
|
|
|
- Related Party
|
4,113
|
1,160
|
- Others
|
9,297
|
10,483
|
|
|
|
Accrued Interest of fixed
deposits
|
3
|
3
|
Accrued Income
|
--
|
126
|
Debtors
|
|
|
- Related Party
|
--
|
107
|
- Prepayment
|
95
|
102
|
- Trade Debtors
|
1,788
|
687
|
|
16,339
|
14,110
|
Advances include payment to EPC
contractor of £ 6.16 million (2022: £ 7.29 million) towards
mobilisation advances and quarry development. These advances will
either be recovered as a deduction from the invoices being raised
by the contractor over the contract period or refunded.
'Advances to Related Party'
include receivables towards share application money of £ 4.11
million (Dec 2022: £ 1.16 million).
'Break down of Trade
Debtors:
£ 1.32 million (2022: £ 0.64
million) receivable from the single major customer, which includes
£ 0.02 million (2022: £ 0.00 million) which is past due for 30
days' management estimate that amount is fully realisable hence no
provision for expected credit loss is made for the same
amount.
The Group applies the IFRS 9
simplified approach to measuring expected credit losses using a
lifetime expected credit loss provision for trade receivable. To
measure expected credit losses on a collective basis, trade and
other receivables are grouped based on similar credit risk and
aging. The assets have similar risk characteristics to the trade
receivables for similar types of contracts.
The expected loss rates are based
on the Group's historical credit losses experienced. The historical
loss rates are then adjusted to reflect current and forward-looking
information, any known legal and specific economic factors,
including the credit worthiness and ability of the customer to
settle the receivables.
The Group renegotiations or
modifications of contractual cash flows of a financial asset, which
results in de-recognition, the revised instruments are treated as a
new or else the group recalculates the gross carrying amount of the
financial asset.
13. INVESTMENTS
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
Deposits*
|
173
|
--
|
|
173
|
--
|
*Deposits are placed under lien
against Bank Guarantees issued by bank on behalf of the group to
various Government Authorities and the Debt Service Reserve (DSR)
as per the loan agreement with lenders.
14. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
Cash at bank and in
hand
|
2,881
|
389
|
Deposits*
|
--
|
169
|
|
2,881
|
558
|
Cash at bank earns interest at
floating rates based on bank deposit rates. The fair value of cash
and short-term deposits is £ 3.05 million (2022: £0.56
million).
Included in cash and cash
equivalents is £0.71 million (2022: £0.00 million) that is within a
bank account in the name of Hunch Ventures (Karanja), as a result
of the 2018 and 2021 share sale. The Company is the
beneficiary of the account. During the year, we have been
able to draw money out of this account to cover working capital
throughout the year.
*Deposits are placed under lien
against Bank Guarantees issued by bank on behalf of the group to
various Government Authorities and the Debt Service Reserve (DSR)
as per the loan agreement with lenders.
15. RISK MANAGEMENT AND FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
Risk Management
The Group's activities expose it
to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency
risk and interest rate risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The
Board of Directors carries out risk management.
(a)Market Risk
(i)Translation risk
Foreign currency risk is the risk
that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument
will fluctuate because of changes in market foreign exchange rates.
The Company's functional and presentation currency is the UK
Sterling (£). The functional currency of its subsidiary Karanja
Terminal & Logistics Private Limited (KTLPL) is INR and
functional currency of Karanja Terminal & Logistics (Cyprus)
Ltd.
The exchange difference arising
due to variances on translating a foreign operation into the
presentation currency results in a translation risk. These exchange
differences are recognised in other comprehensive income. As a
result, the profit, assets and liabilities of this entity must be
converted to GBP in order to bring the results into the
consolidated financial statements. The exchange differences
resulting from converting the profit and loss account at average
rate and the assets and liabilities at closing rate are transferred
to the translation reserve.
While consolidating the Indian
subsidiary accounts the group has taken closing rate of GBP 1: INR
106.1053 for SOFP items and for profit and loss item GBP 1: INR
102.7267.
This balance is cumulatively a
£31.44m loss to equity (2022: £26.43m loss). This is primarily due
to a movement from approximately 1:70 to 1:100 between 2010 to 2013
and the translation reserve reaching a loss of £21.6m at 31
December 2013 and further increase in translation reserve from
£21.6m to £31.44m due to appreciation of GBP against INR during the
period 2018 to 2023. The closing rate at 31 December 2023 was GBP1:
INR 106.1053, hence as compared to the translation loss reported
between 2018-19, the same is insignificant in 2023. With the
majority of funding now in India this risk is further mitigated.
During 2023, the average and year-end spot rate used for INR to GBP
were 102.7267 and 106.1053 respectively (2022: 97.0625 and
99.7436).
Translation risk sensitivity
The foreign currency risk
management are referring to is the translation of the Indian
subsidiary from INR to GBP, which impacts on the translation
reserve through OCI. As such this is not considered relevant to the
disclosure requirements of IFRS 7.
The amounts included in KTPL are
all denominated in INR (including the loan) which is disclosed as
the functional currency and the amounts in MPL parent in GBP which
is disclosed. As such there isn't considered to be any material
foreign currency risk.
(ii) Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk
that the future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate
because of changes in market interest rates. The Group's exposure
to the risk of changes in market interest rates relates primarily
to the Group's long-term debt obligations with floating interest
rates.
The base rate set by the bank may
be changed periodically as per the discretion of the bank in line
with Reserve Bank of India (RBI) guidelines. Based on the current
economic outlook and RBI Guidance, management expects the Indian
economy to enter a lower interest rate regime as moderating
inflation will enable RBI and the banks to lower the base rate in
the near future.
Interest rate sensitivity
At 31 December 2023, the Group is
exposed to changes in market interest rates through bank borrowings
at variable interest rates. The exposure to interest rates for the
Group's money market funds is considered immaterial.
The following table illustrates
the sensitivity of profit to a reasonably possible change in
interest rates of +/- 1% (2022: +/- 1%). These changes are
considered to be reasonably possible based on observation of
current market conditions. The calculations are based on a change
in the average market interest rate for each period, and the
financial instruments held at each reporting date that are
sensitive to changes in interest rates. All other variables are
held constant.
Year
|
Profit for the Year
£000
|
Equity, net of tax
£000
|
|
+1%
|
-1%
|
+1%
|
-1%
|
31 December 2023
|
(574)
|
574
|
(425)
|
425
|
(b) Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that a
counterparty fails to discharge an obligation to the Group. The
Group's maximum exposure (£ 9.16 million (2022: £ 2.81 million)) to
credit risk is limited to the carrying amount of financial assets
recognised at the reporting date.
The Group determines credit risk
by checking a company's creditworthiness and financial strength
both before commencing trade and during the business relationship
at initial recognition and subsequently. Customer credit risk is
managed by the Company's established policy, procedures and control
relating to customer credit risk management. Credit quality of a
customer is assessed based on an extensive evaluation and
individual credit limits are defined in accordance with this
assessment.
The Group's policy is to deal only
with creditworthy counterparties. The Group has no significant
concentrations of credit risk.
The Group considers default to be
when there is a breach of any of the terms of agreement.
The Group writes off a financial
asset when there is no realistic prospect of recovery and all
attempts to recover the balance have been exhausted. An indication
that all credit control activities have been exhausted and where
the asset due is greater than 365 days old or where there are
insolvency issues relating to the trade and other
receivables.
The Group does not concentrate any
of its deposits in one bank. This is seen as being prudent and
credit risk is managed by the management having conducted its own
due diligence. The balances held with banks are on a short-term
basis. Management reviews quarterly bank counter-party risk on an
on-going basis.
(c) Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that
the Group might be unable to meet its financial obligations.
Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient
cash and marketable securities, the availability of funding through
an adequate amount of committed credit facilities.
The Indian subsidiary which is
currently availing the term loan facility has again approached the
current consortium of lenders for a re-phasement of current Term
Loan, Funded Interest Term Loan (FITL) and Guaranteed Emergency
Credit Line (GECL) for 14 years including 2 years moratorium on the
consolidated term debt due to the cascading impact on the business
of the Indian subsidiary due to the relapse of Covid 19
pandemic.
The Group is in an advanced stage
of negotiation with the current consortium of lenders and is
confident of obtaining a favourable response from the lenders
shortly.
The Group's objective is to
maintain cash and demand deposits to meet its liquidity
requirements for 30-day periods at a minimum. This objective was
met for the reporting periods. Funding for build out of the port
facility is secured by sufficient equity, sanctioned credit
facilities from lenders and the ability to raise additional funds
due to headroom in the capital structure.
The Group manages its liquidity
needs by monitoring scheduled contractual payments for build out of
the port facility as well as forecast cash inflows and outflows due
in day-to-day business. Liquidity needs are monitored and reviewed
by the management on a regular basis. Net cash requirements are
compared to available borrowing facilities in order to determine
headroom or any shortfalls. This analysis shows that available
borrowing facilities are expected to be sufficient over the lookout
period.
Comparative working of the Group's
non-derivative financial liabilities have contractual maturities
(and interest payments) as summarized below:
As at 31 December 2023:
Payment falling due
|
Principal
payments
|
Interest
payments
|
INR in
Crore
|
£000
|
INR in
Crore
|
£000
|
Within 1 year
|
70
|
6,584
|
76
|
7,186
|
1 to 5 years
|
316
|
29,794
|
99
|
9,370
|
After 5 years
|
37
|
3,512
|
4
|
338
|
Total
|
423
|
39,890
|
179
|
16,894
|
The above table represents the
current loan which is active and does not include the impact of the
re-structuring proposal under consideration.
The present composite rate of
interest ranges from 7.95% to 10.55% and closing exchange rate has
been considered for the above analysis.
In addition, the Group's liquidity
management policy involves considering the level of liquid assets
necessary to meet the funding requirement; monitoring SOFP
liquidity ratio against internal requirements and maintaining debt
financing plans. The current debt equity ratio with the lenders is
0.64:1.
As a part of monitoring SOFP
liquidity ratio, management monitors the debt-to-equity ratio and
has specified optimal level for debt-to-equity ratio of
1:1.
As at 31 December 2022:
Payment falling due
|
Principal
payments
|
Interest
payments
|
INR in
Crore
|
£000
|
INR in
Crore
|
£000
|
Within 1 year
|
23
|
2,307
|
43
|
4,339
|
1 to 5 years
|
316
|
31,681
|
132
|
13,212
|
After 5 years
|
75
|
7,484
|
2
|
182
|
Total
|
414
|
41,472
|
177
|
17,733
|
The present composite rate of
interest ranges from 7.95% to 10.55% and closing exchange rate has
been considered for the above analysis.
In addition, the Group's liquidity
management policy involves considering the level of liquid assets
necessary to meet the funding requirement; monitoring SOFP
liquidity ratio against internal requirements and maintaining debt
financing plans. The current debt equity ratio with the lenders is
0.64 : 1.
As a part of monitoring SOFP
liquidity ratio, management monitors the debt-to-equity ratio and
has specified optimal level for debt-to-equity ratio of
1:1.
Financial Instruments
Fair Values
The different levels per the IFRS
13: Fair Value Measurement fair value hierarchy have been defined
as follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices
(unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities;
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted
prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or
liability, either
directly (that is, as prices) or
indirectly (that is, derived from prices);
Level 3: Inputs for the asset or
liability that are not based on observable market data (that is,
unobservable inputs)
Set out below is a comparison by
category of carrying amounts and fair values of the entire Group's
financial instruments that are carried in the financial
statements.
|
Note
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Restated Year
ended
31 Dec 22
|
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
Financial Assets at Amortised Cost
|
2
|
|
|
Trade and other
receivables
|
13
|
6,102
|
2,252
|
Investments
|
14
|
173
|
--
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
15
|
2,881
|
558
|
|
|
9,156
|
2,810
|
Financial Liability at Amortised Cost
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
19
|
47,071
|
41,472
|
Trade and other
payables
|
20
|
4,131
|
8,388
|
Lease liabilities
|
20
|
1,792
|
2,428
|
|
|
52,994
|
52,288
|
The carrying amount of financial
assets and financial liabilities have been disclosed in accordance
with IFRS 7. However, the prior year did not included lease
liabilities, and note that employee liabilities were incorrectly
included. As such the prior year comparative has been
restated.
All the financial assets and
financial liabilities are considered to be level 1, except for
borrowings which are level 2.
The fair value of the Group's
financial assets and financial liabilities significantly
approximate their carrying amount as at the reporting
date.
The carrying amount of financial
assets and financial liabilities are measured at amortised cost in
the financial statements are a reasonable approximation of their
fair values since the Group does not anticipate that the carrying
amounts would be significantly different from the values that would
eventually be received or settled.
Maturity profile of financial liabilities
The table below presents the
maturity profile of the Group's financial liabilities using the
contractual undiscounted cash flows.
|
Within 1
year
£ 000
|
1-2 years
£ 000
|
2-5 years
£ 000
|
More than 5
years
£ 000
|
Total
|
As at 31 December 2023
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
10,672
|
5,419
|
27,886
|
3,094
|
47,071
|
Interest on borrowings
|
7,186
|
3,419
|
5,951
|
338
|
16,894
|
Trade and other
payables
|
4,131
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
4,131
|
Lease
liabilities (including
vehicle
loan)
|
507
|
232
|
527
|
5,060
|
6,326
|
As at 31 December 2022
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
2,307
|
10,543
|
28,622
|
--
|
41,472
|
Interest on borrowings
|
4,393
|
4,113
|
8,746
|
1,623
|
18,875
|
Trade and other
payables
|
8,388
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
8,388
|
Lease
liabilities (including
vehicle loan)
|
1,006
|
245
|
637
|
5,593
|
7,481
|
16. EQUITY
16.1 Issued Capital
The share capital of MPL consists
only of fully paid ordinary shares of no-par value. The total
number of issued and fully paid-up shares of the Company as on each
reporting date is summarised as follows:
Particulars
|
Year ended
31 December 23
|
Year ended
31 December 22
|
No of shares
|
£000
|
No of shares
|
£000
|
Shares issues and fully
paid:
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year
|
41,499,699
|
143,851
|
41,499,699
|
143,851
|
Addition in the year#
|
314,812,993
|
9,444
|
--
|
--
|
Share issue cost
|
--
|
(941)
|
--
|
--
|
Closing number of shares
|
356,312,692
|
152,354
|
41,499,699
|
143,851
|
The stated capital amounts to
£152.35 million (2022: £143.85 million) after reduction of share
issue costs. Holders of the ordinary shares are entitled to receive
dividends and other distributions and to attend and vote at any
general meeting. During the year the Company has allotted 314.81
million (2022: Nil) equity shares to various institutional and
private investors, by way of a rights issue.
The Company has recognized the
services received in a share-based payment transaction when the
services are received in accordance with IFRS 2 - Share-based
payment.
# Shares issued during the year
includes 13,359,166 for value shares £ 400,775 issued to Cavendish
Financial PLC (erstwhile known as Cenkos Securities PLC) as the
consideration for the fair value of services rendered pertaining to
private placement of shares.
The transaction costs are
incremental costs directly attributable to the equity transaction
that otherwise would have
been avoided and have therefore
been accounted for as a deduction from equity.
16.2 Other Components of Equity
Retained Earnings
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
£000
|
Opening Balance
|
(26,022)
|
(16,402)
|
Addition during the
year
|
(21,222)
|
(9,621)
|
Re-measurement of net defined
benefit liability
|
27
|
1
|
Closing balance
|
(47,217)
|
(26,022)
|
Accumulated losses of £ 47.54
million (2022: £ 26.02 million) include all current year retained
profits.
Translation Reserve
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
£000
|
Opening Balance
|
(26,429)
|
(27,237)
|
Addition during the
year
|
(5,015)
|
808
|
Closing balance
|
(31,444)
|
(26,429)
|
The translation reserve of £ 31.22
million (2022: £ 26.43 million) is on account of exchange
differences relating to the translation of the net assets of the
Group's foreign operations which relate to subsidiaries, from their
functional currency into the Group's presentational currency being
Sterling.
17. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
Non- Current
|
|
|
Pensions - defined benefit
plans
|
35
|
53
|
|
35
|
53
|
Current
|
|
|
Wages, salaries
|
267
|
523
|
Pensions - defined benefit
plans
|
9
|
6
|
|
276
|
529
|
18. BORROWINGS
Borrowings consist of the
following:
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
Non-Current
|
|
|
Bank loan (refer note
26)
|
33,305
|
39,165
|
Loan from others *
|
3,094
|
--
|
|
36,399
|
39,165
|
Current
|
|
|
Bank loan (refer note
26)
|
6,584
|
2,307
|
Interest payable
|
4,088
|
--
|
|
10,672
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
Borrowing
The term loan facility currently
is as per existing sanction which was issued on 10 June 2021
against which the quarterly principal repayments for the entire
2023 is overdue, and the interest on these facilities is overdue
from March 2023 till December 2023. The interest rate on term loan
is 9.55%, on FITL is 10.55% and GECL is 8%.
The Indian subsidiary which is
currently availing the term loan facility has approached the
current consortium of lenders for a re-phasement of current term
loan under Resolution framework for re-structuring of the current
debt for a period of 14 years instead of 7 years (including
moratorium of 2 years) and Funded Interest Term Loan (FITL) of 2
years, repayable in 5 years from the second quarter of 2025
onwards.
The proposal is at the Head office
level of the Lead banker and is expected to be sanctioned shortly,
which will enable the group to manage its cash flow and focus more
on operational stability and growth.
*
Loan from others: This amount
pertains to unsecured loan from Grevek Investments & Finance
Pvt. Ltd.
19 (a). NON-CURRENT tax
ASSETS
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
£000
|
Income tax *
|
--
|
2,108
|
Non-current tax assets
|
--
|
2,108
|
19 (b). CURRENT tax
ASSETS
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
£000
|
Income tax *
|
2,114
|
--
|
Current tax assets
|
2,114
|
--
|
* The income tax
pertains to self -assessment tax as well as withholding taxes paid
for the assessment years 2011-12 to 2024-25.
The Indian subsidiary has received
the refund order for the Assessment years 2011-12 as well as
2012-13 and is expected to be transferred to the bank account
within one year.
(Refer Note 25 for disclosure of
Contingent liabilities in respect of these
matters)
19 (c). current tax
liabilities
Current tax liabilities consist of
the following:
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
£000
|
Duties & taxes
|
61
|
17
|
Current tax liabilities
|
61
|
17
|
The carrying amounts and the
movements in the Provision for Income Tax account are as
follows:
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
£000
|
Carrying amount 1
January
|
--
|
2,342
|
Interest provision on outstanding
tax liability
|
--
|
--
|
Less: Reversal of tax liability
and interest provision
|
--
|
(2,354)
|
Exchange difference
|
--
|
12
|
Carrying amount 31 December
|
--
|
--
|
Income tax paid (net of
provision)
|
--
|
--
|
|
--
|
--
|
The Group recognises liabilities
for anticipated tax issues based on assessment of whether
additional taxes will be due, and whether it is probable that the
relevant authority will accept each tax treatment, or group of tax
treatments, that it used or plans to use in its income tax
filing.
Where the outcome of assessment by
the Income Tax department on these matters is different from the
amounts that were initially recorded, such differences will impact
the income tax provisions in the period in which such determination
is made. The Group discharges the tax liability based on income tax
assessment.
Based on the judgements passed by
Income Tax Tribunal in favour of the Indian Subsidiary for the
assessment years 2013-14 to 2015-16, the Commissioner of Income Tax
- CIT-(A) has relied upon the ITAT judgement and issued order in
favour of the Indian subsidiary for the assessment years 2011-12
and 2012-13 as well.
20. TRADE AND OTHER
PAYABLES
Trade and other payables
consist of the following:
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
Non-Current
|
|
|
Lease liability (refer note
26)
|
1,457
|
1,611
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Lease Liability - (refer note
26)
|
335
|
817
|
|
|
|
Sundry creditors
|
4,131
|
8,400
|
Interest (prepaid)
|
--
|
(12)
|
|
4,131
|
8,388
|
Future minimum lease payments at
31 December 2023 were as follows -
|
Minimum lease payments
due
|
|
Within
1 year
|
1 - 2
Year
|
2 - 3
Year
|
3 - 4
Year
|
4 - 5
Year
|
After 5
Year
|
Total
|
Lease payments
|
507
|
232
|
190
|
176
|
161
|
5,060
|
6,326
|
Finance charges
|
(172)
|
(165)
|
(161)
|
(158)
|
(157)
|
(3,721)
|
(4,534)
|
Net present values
|
335
|
67
|
29
|
18
|
4
|
1,339
|
1,792
|
Future minimum lease payments at
31 December 2022 were as follows -
|
Minimum lease payments
due
|
|
Within
1 year
|
1 - 2
Year
|
2 - 3
Year
|
3 - 4
Year
|
4 - 5
Year
|
After 5
Year
|
Total
|
Lease payments
|
1,006
|
245
|
247
|
202
|
188
|
5,593
|
7,481
|
Finance charges
|
(189)
|
(183)
|
(175)
|
(171)
|
(167)
|
(4,127)
|
(5,012)
|
Net present values
|
817
|
62
|
72
|
31
|
21
|
1,466
|
2,469
|
21. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The consolidated financial
statements include the financial statements of the Company and the
subsidiaries listed in the following table:
Name
|
Country of
Incorporation
|
Field Activity
|
Ownership
Interest
|
Type of
share Held
|
HELD BY The Company
(MPL):
Karanja Terminal & Logistics
(Cyprus) Ltd.
Karanja Terminal & Logistics
Private Ltd.
|
Cyprus
India
|
Holding Company
Operating company -Terminal
Project
|
100%
8.11%
|
Ordinary
Ordinary
|
|
HELD BY Karanja Terminal
& Logistics (Cyprus) Ltd:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Karanja Terminal & Logistics
Private Ltd.
|
India
|
Operating company -Terminal
Project
|
91.67%
|
Ordinary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Group has the following
related parties with whom it has entered into transactions with
during the year.
a) Shareholders having significant
influence
The following shareholders of the
Group have had a significant influence during the year under
review:
•
SKIL Global Ports & Logistics Limited, which
is 100% owned by Mr. Nikhil Gandhi, holds 0.28% of issued share
capital as at 31 December 2023 (as at 31 December 2022 - 2.37%) of
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Limited.
•
Lord Howard Flight holds 0.18% of issued share
capital as on 31 December 2023 (as on 31 December 2022 - 0.56%) of
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Limited at the year
end.
•
Jay Mehta holds 0.99% of issued share capital as
on 31 December 2023 (as on 31 December 2022 - 0.50%) of Mercantile
Ports & Logistics Limited at the year end.
•
John Fitzgerald holds 0.18% of issued share
capital as on 31 December 2023 (as on 31 December 2022 - 0.14%) of
Mercantile Ports & Logistics Limited at the year
end.
•
Jeremy Warner Allen holds 1.08% of issued share capital as on 31 December 2023
(as on 31 December 2022 - 1.25 %) of Mercantile Ports &
Logistics Limited at the year end.
•
Karanpal Singh via Hunch Ventures and Investments
Private Limited holds 38.40% of issued
share capital as on 31 December 2023 (as on 31 December 2022 -
28.48%) of Mercantile Ports & Logistics Limited at the year
end.
b) Key Managerial Personnel of the
parent
Non-executive Directors
-
Lord Howard Flight - Resigned w.e.f. 24 November
2023
-
Mr. John Fitzgerald
-
Jeremy Warner Allen
-
Karanpal Singh
-
Amit Dutta
-
Dmitri Tsvetkov
-
Nikhil Gandhi
Executive Directors
-
Mr. Jay Mehta (Managing Director)
c) Key Managerial Personnel of the
subsidiaries
Directors of KTLPL (India)
-
Mr. Jay Mehta
-
Mr. Rakesh Bajaj
Directors of Karanja Terminal & Logistics (Cyprus)
Ltd - KTLCL (Cyprus)
-
Ms. Andria Andreou
-
Ms. Chrystalla Stavrou
Others
-
Mr. Pavan Bakshi
d) Other related party disclosure
Entities that are controlled,
jointly controlled or significantly influenced by, or for which
significant voting power in such entity resides with, directly or
indirectly, any individual or close family member of such
individual referred above.
-
SKIL Infrastructure Limited
-
Grevek Investment & Finance Private
Limited
-
Athos Hq Group Bus. Ser. Cy Ltd
-
John Fitzgerald Limited
-
KJS Concrete Private Limited
-
Himangini Singh
-
Fiona Gupta
e) Transaction with related parties
The following transactions took
place between the Group and related parties during the year ended
31 December 2023
|
Nature of transaction
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
£000
|
|
|
|
|
Athos Hq Group Bus. Ser. Cy
Ltd
|
Administrative fees
|
10
|
13
|
|
|
10
|
13
|
The following table provides the
total amount outstanding with related parties as at year ended 31
December 2023:
Transactions with Key Managerial Personnel of the
subsidiaries
See Key Managerial Personnel
Compensation details as provided below -
Advisory services fee
None
Compensation to Key Managerial Personnel of the
parent
Fees paid to persons or entities
considered Key Managerial Personnel of the Group
include:
|
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
£000
|
|
Non-Executive Directors fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Lord
Flight
|
36
|
40
|
|
- John Fitzgerald
|
45
|
45
|
|
- Jeremy Warner Allen
|
40
|
40
|
|
- Peter Mills
|
--
|
3
|
|
- Amit Dutta
-
|
35
|
33
|
|
- Dmitri Tsvetkov
-
|
45*
|
42
|
|
|
201
|
203
|
|
Executive Directors Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Jay Mehta
|
88
|
93
|
|
- Nikhil Gandhi
|
--
|
188
|
|
|
88
|
281
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
|
- Pavan Bakshi #
|
175
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation paid to Key Managerial
Personnel
|
464
|
659
|
|
|
| |
* Includes £ 10,000 (2022:
Nil) paid as sitting fees to Dmitri Tsvekov for attending Audit
Committee meetings.
# Pavan Bakshi has been
instrumental in playing a key management role by providing pivotal
support to the board and hence he is added as a Key Management
Personnel.
Compensation to Key Managerial Personnel of the
subsidiaries
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
£000
|
Directors' fees
|
|
|
KTLCL - Cyprus
|
3
|
3
|
|
3
|
3
|
Transactions with shareholders / entity having significant
influence
|
Nature of transaction
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
£000
|
Provision created for doubtful
advances for advance given to SKIL Infrastructure Ltd.
|
Provision for doubtful
advances
|
107
|
--
|
Shares issued to Hunch Ventures
and Investment Limited
|
Share subscription
|
3,750
|
--
|
Shares issued to Jay
Mehta
|
Share subscription
|
100
|
--
|
Sundry Creditors
As at 31 December 2023, the Group
had £3.09 million (2023: £3.29 million) as sundry creditors with
related parties.
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
£000
|
Grevek Investment & Finance
Private Ltd.
|
3,094
|
3,292
|
|
3,094
|
3,292
|
Receivable from the shareholders having significant
influence
|
Nature of transaction
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
£000
|
SKIL Global Ports & Logistics
Limited
|
Debtors
|
Advances
|
107
|
107
|
Less: Provision for doubtful
advances
|
|
(107)
|
--
|
Hunch Ventures and Investment
Limited*
|
|
|
|
Advances recoverable in cash or in
kind
|
Advances
|
4,113
|
1,110
|
|
|
4,113
|
1,217
|
* At the
time of the placing and subscription in August 2021, the Company
intended for the proceeds of the fundraising to be held in the
Company's bank account in Guernsey. The subscription monies from
Hunch Ventures required Reserve Bank of India ("RBI") approval in
order to be remitted to Guernsey. However, at the time of the
Company's General Meeting on 9th September 2021, the Company
confirmed that it had directed Hunch Ventures to transfer the
subscription monies to one of the Company's Indian bank accounts
and that was done.
Subsequently, the Board resolved
that it did wish the funds to be transferred to Guernsey and, as a
result, requested that Hunch Ventures pursue the "RBI approval"
route once more. In pursuing this, Hunch Venture's bank required
the subscription monies to be transferred to Hunch Venture's
account so that application could be made for the funds to be moved
to Guernsey.
The Company is able to rely on the
support documentation to the RBI process, put in place at the time
of Hunch Ventures' original investment in 2018. It should be noted
that the Company continues to have access to the Subscription
monies and, since the period end, has accessed these
funds.
Given the time being taken to
receive RBI approval, the Company and Hunch Ventures have received
advice on an alternative structure to achieve the Company's desired
treasury requirements, without the requirement to receive RBI
approval.
Ultimate controlling party
The Directors do not consider
there to be an ultimate controlling party.
22. CASH FLOW ADJUSTMENTS AND CHANGES IN
WORKING CAPITAL
The following non-cash flow
adjustments and adjustments for changes in working capital have
been made to profit before tax to arrive at operating cash
flow:
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
|
|
£000
|
£000
|
Non-cash flow adjustments
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
5,581
|
6,231
|
Impairment loss
|
9,853
|
--
|
Finance Income
|
(25)
|
(38)
|
Finance cost
|
6,225
|
5,543
|
Re-measurement of net defined
benefit liability
|
(27)
|
(1)
|
Provision for Gratuity
|
17
|
13
|
Loss on disposal of PPE
|
7
|
--
|
Balances written back
|
(190)
|
--
|
Provision for doubtful
advances
|
107
|
--
|
|
21,548
|
11,748
|
Increase/(Decrease) in trade and
other payables
|
49
|
247
|
Decrease/(Increase) in trade and
other receivables
|
*(124)
|
154
|
Current investments (deposits with
bank)
|
(173)
|
--
|
Increase in inventory
|
24
|
(96)
|
|
(224)
|
305
|
* Excludes £ 3.8 million
receivable towards share application money.
23. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND
PROCEDURE
The Group's capital management
objectives are:
• To
ensure the Group's ability to continue as a going
concern
• To
provide an adequate return to shareholders
Capital
The Company's capital includes
share premium (reduced by share issue costs), retained earnings and
translation reserve which are reflected on the face of the
Statement of Financial Position and in Note 16.
24. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS
a. Defined Contribution Plan:
The
following amount recognized as an expense in statement of profit
and loss on account of provident fund and other funds. There are no
other obligations other than the contribution payable to the
respective authorities.
|
Year ended
31 Dec 23
£000
|
Year ended
31 Dec 22
£000
|
Contribution to Provident
Fund
|
22
|
12
|
Contribution to ESIC
|
2
|
2
|
|
24
|
14
|
b. Defined Benefit Plan:
The
Company has an unfunded defined benefit gratuity plan. The gratuity
plan is governed by the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Under the
Act, employee who has completed five years of service is entitled
to specific benefit. The level of benefits provided depends on the
member's tenure of service and salary at retirement age.
Every employee who has completed five years or more of service gets
a gratuity on departure at 15 days' salary (last drawn salary) for
each completed year of service as per the provision of the Payment
of Gratuity Act, 1972 with total ceiling on gratuity of INR 20 Mn.
with effect from 20 Feb 2020.
The
significant actuarial assumptions for the determination of the
defined benefit obligation are the discount rate, the salary growth
rate and the average life expectancy. These assumptions were
developed by management with the assistance of independent
actuaries. Discount factors are determined close to each period-end
by reference to market yields of high-quality corporate bonds that
are denominated in the currency in which the benefits will be paid
and that have terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the
related pension obligation. Other assumptions are based on current
actuarial benchmarks and management's historical experience. The
assumptions used for the valuation of the defined benefit
obligation are as follows:
Key
Assumptions
|
Particulars
|
31 Dec 23
|
31 Dec 22
|
Discount rate
|
7.40% p
.a.
|
7.46%
p.a.
|
|
|
|
Salary growth rate
|
6.00%
p.a.
|
6.00%
p.a.
|
Withdrawal rate
|
2.00%
p.a at younger ages reducing to 7.00% p.a% at older ages
|
2.00%
p.a at younger ages reducing to 7.00% p.a% at older ages
|
The following tables summaries the
components of net benefit expense recognised in the Consolidated
Statement of Comprehensive Income and the funded status and amounts
recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position for
the gratuity plan:
Particulars
|
As at
31 Dec 23
£000
|
As at
31 Dec 22
£000
|
Statement of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
Net employee benefit expense recognised in the employee
cost
|
|
|
Current service cost
|
12
|
11
|
Interest cost on defined benefit
obligation
|
4
|
3
|
Total expense charged to loss for the
period
|
16
|
14
|
Amount recorded in Other Comprehensive Income
(OCI)
|
|
|
Opening amount recognised in OCI
|
|
|
Re-measurement during the period due to:
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain) arising from
change in financial assumptions
|
--
|
(4)
|
Actuarial (gain) / loss arising on
account of experience changes
|
(27)
|
3
|
Amount recognised in OCI
|
(27)
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
Closing amount recognised in OCI
|
(27)
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net liability / asset
|
|
|
Opening defined benefit
liability
|
56
|
46
|
Expense charged to profit or loss
account
|
15
|
14
|
Amount recognised in Other
Comprehensive (Income)
|
(27)
|
(1)
|
Closing net defined benefit liability
|
44
|
59
|
Movement in benefit obligation and Consolidated Statement of
Financial Position
A
reconciliation of the benefit obligation during the inter-valuation
period:
Particulars
|
As at
31 Dec 23
£000
|
As at
31 Dec 22
£000
|
Opening defined benefit
obligation
|
59
|
46
|
Current service cost
|
10
|
11
|
Interest on defined benefit
obligation
|
4
|
3
|
|
|
|
Re-measurement during the period due to:
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain) arising on
account of experience changes
|
--
|
(4)
|
Actuarial loss / (gain) arising
from change in financial assumptions
|
(27)
|
3
|
Benefits paid
|
(2)
|
--
|
Closing defined benefit obligation liability recognised in
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
|
44
|
59
|
Particulars
|
As at
31 Dec 23
£000
|
As at
31 Dec 22
£000
|
Net liability is bifurcated as follows:
|
|
|
Current
|
9
|
6
|
Non-current
|
35
|
53
|
Net liability
|
44
|
59
|
The present value of the DBO was
measured using the Projected Unit Credit (PUC) method.
The weighted average duration of
the defined benefit obligation at 31 December 2023 is 10.67 years
(2022: 7.7 years).
25. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Particulars
|
As at
31 Dec 23
£000
|
As at
31 Dec 22
£000
|
Bank guarantee issued to
Maharashtra Pollution Control Board towards issuing the consent to
operate the Port
|
30
|
30
|
The Commissioner Of Customs -
Jawaharlal Nehru Custom House towards the collateral for acting as
a custodian of the Cargo handled at the Port
|
100
|
100
|
There is an ongoing arbitration
proceeding initiated by the Indian subsidiary with the dredging
sub-contractor for claiming damages for non-performance under
dredging contract to the tune of ₹214 crores (£21.5 Mn) and a
counter claim made by the sub-contractor for ₹76.75 crores (£7.69
Mn).
The matter is under arbitration
act in the jurisdiction of Mumbai. Based on the legal opinion
obtained, management is confident that the outcome will be in
favour of the Company.
The counter claim made by the
sub-contractor on the Company is considered as a contingent
liability.
As of the Balance sheet date the
cross examination of the witnesses of the Claimant is
underway.
|
7,695
|
7,695
|
The Income tax liability to the
tune of ₹48.12 crores (£4.54 Mn) (exclusive of any interest or
penalties) for the Assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15 and
2015-16.
MPL group's Indian subsidiary had
filed a writ petition in Hon'ble High court for seeking relief
against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
(ITAT) for the two assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13, which was
decided in favour of the group's Indian subsidiary.
The Indian subsidiary has received
the refund order u/s. 264 read with section 260 of the Income Tax
Act for the assessment year 2011-12 as well as 2012-2013 and as
such the amount in respect of these two years is no longer
considered a contingent liability.
As per these orders, the matter
was sent back to the files of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) for re-adjudication following the ITAT orders for
assessment years 2013-14 to 2015-16. The status of open litigations
for AY 2013-14 to AY 2015-16 remain unchanged during FY 2023-24
i.e., the matter is yet to be adjudicated and the outcome of appeal
before Hon'ble Bombay High Court is pending.
Cash outflows, if any, is
determinable on receipt of judgments pending at respective
authorities.
|
4,535
|
6,822
|
26. CAPITAL COMMITMENTS
Particulars
|
As at
31 Dec 23
£000
|
As at
31 Dec 22
£000
|
Estimated value of contracts in
capital account in relation to property, plant and equipment
remaining to be executed and not provided
for (net of advances)
|
4,815
|
4,815
|
27. RECONCILIATION OF LIABILITIES ARISING FROM
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
The changes in the Group's
liabilities arising from financing activities can be classified as
follows:
Particulars
|
Long-term
borrowing
£000
|
Current maturity of
long-term borrowing
£000
|
Leased
liabilities
£000
|
Total
£000
|
1
January 2023
|
39,165
|
2,295
|
2,428
|
43,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-flows:
|
|
|
|
|
-
Repayment
|
--
|
(99)
|
(737)
|
(836)
|
-
Repayment of principal
|
--
|
(749)
|
(9)
|
(758)
|
Non-cash:
|
|
|
|
|
-
Exchange difference
|
(2,382)
|
(267)
|
(129)
|
(2,778)
|
-
Accrued during the period
|
--
|
4,981
|
239
|
5,220
|
|
-
Interest on term loan EIR adjustment
|
1,033
|
--
|
--
|
1,033
|
-
Reclassification
|
(1,417)
*
|
4,511
|
--
|
3,094
|
31 December 2023
|
36,399
|
10,672
|
1,792
|
48,863
|
* The amount is net of
re-classification of Loan from Others £ 3.09 million from Trade
Payables in the previous year to non-current borrowings in the
current year. The £3.1m was advanced as financial assistance during
the port construction due to the delay in disbursement from
lenders. As a result of the cash constraint on account of Covid-19
an agreement was signed 31st May 2023 that the advances
will not be called until the company becomes adequately cashflow
surplus or 3 years, whichever is earlier.
Particulars
|
Long-term
borrowing
£000
|
Current maturity of
long-term borrowing
£000
|
Interest on long term
borrowing
£000
|
Leased
liabilities
£000
|
Total
£000
|
1
January 2022
|
39,932
|
1,037
|
(3)
|
2,357
|
43,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Repayment
|
--
|
(881)
|
--
|
(138)
|
(1,019)
|
-
Accrued during period
|
--
|
--
|
5,372
|
171
|
5,543
|
-
Paid during the year
|
--
|
--
|
(4,217)
|
--
|
(4,217)
|
Non-cash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Exchange difference
|
239
|
--
|
(19)
|
38
|
258
|
-
Interest on term loan converted to
FITL
-
Interest on term loan EIR adjustment
|
517
628
|
--
--
|
(517)
(628)
|
--
--
|
--
--
|
-
Reclassification*
|
(2,151)
|
2,151
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
31 December 2022
|
39,165
|
2,307
|
(12)
|
2,428
|
43,888
|
28. EVENTS OCCURRING AFTER REPORTING
PERIOD
a. New projects / contracts:
The Indian subsidiary has
commenced a business relationship with a large Oil and Gas Company.
The MPL facility is currently handling Offshore vessels for this
customer and is looking to widen its scope of activities in the
offshore sector to include heavy fabrication works and other
logistics. Business with the offshore sector is expected to become
a significant contributor to revenue growth going
forward.
The Indian subsidiary has also
successfully signed the contract with a large cement company for
the cement cargo for an initial period of 1 year, which will be
extended on an annual basis.
b. Status of the re-structuring
proposal:
Update of the proposal with the
existing lenders for restructuring of the current debt on the
following terms:
i. Rephasement of existing term
repayment from 7 years to 12-14 years;
ii.
Deferment of principal term loan repayment for a period of 24
months;
iii.
Interest moratorium for a period of 24 months.
c. New unsecured credit limit
Unsecured credit limit from KJS
Concrete Private Limited (Hunch Ventures group company) amounting
to £ 15 million.
29. AUTHORISATION OF FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The consolidated financial
statements for the year ended 31 December 2023 were approved and
authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 26 June
2024.
For further information, please
visit www.mercpl.com or
contact:
MPL
|
c/o SEC Newgate
+44 (0) 20 3757 6880
|
Cavendish Capital Markets Limited
(Nomad and Broker)
|
Stephen Keys
+44 (0) 207 220 0500
|
SEC Newgate
(Financial
Communications)
|
Elisabeth Cowell/ Bob
Huxford
+44 (0) 20 3757 6880
mpl@newgatecomms.com
|