Prior to publication, the information contained
within this announcement was deemed by the Company to constitute
inside information as stipulated under the UK Market Abuse
Regulation. With the publication of this announcement, this
information is now considered to be in the public
domain.
Zinnwald Lithium plc
/ EPIC: ZNWD.L / Market: AIM / Sector: Mining
6 June 2024
Zinnwald Lithium plc ("Zinnwald Lithium"
or the "Company")
Further update to Mineral Resource
Estimate
221% increase in Measured Resources to
support materially increased production
Zinnwald Lithium Plc (AIM:ZNWD) is pleased to
announce the publication of a further update to its independent
Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE") for its 100% owned Zinnwald
lithium project ("Zinnwald" or the " Project") located in Saxony,
eastern Germany.
A previous update to the Project's MRE,
published on 21 February 2024, indicated that it was the second
largest hard-rock resource in the European Union ("EU"). Following
this, a geometallurgical testwork programme was undertaken to
provide a higher level of confidence in the Mineral Resource within
the mineralised albite granite, which surrounds the
lenses of higher grade greisen mineralisation.
June 2024 MRE
Highlights:
·
Additional 25.0Mt @ 2,090ppm Li (52kt contained lithium
metal) in the Measured category representing an increase of 221% in
tonnes and 133% in contained metal in the Measured category
compared with the February 2024 MRE.
· The
Project now has sufficient material in Measured category alone to
support over 20 years of production. This is a major
milestone as it further de-risks the resource and adds a higher
level of confidence in the detailed mine plan, which is key to
future financing plans.
· The
increase in the Measured category is contained exclusively within
the broad mineralised zone, which comprises mineralised internal
greisen and lower grade mineralised albite granite.
· The
inclusion of the additional Measured category within the
mineralised zone is as a result of Zinnwald Lithium carrying out
metallurgical testwork on 35 variability drill core samples derived
from the 2022 / 2023 drilling campaign. This was a recommendation
by Snowden Optiro following the previous February 2024
MRE.
· The
total Measured category is increased to 36.3Mt @ 2,500ppm Li (91kt
contained lithium metal) while the total Indicated category is now
157.2Mt @ 2,150ppm Li (337kt contained lithium metal) as a result
of the increase in the Measured category. The total Measured
and Indicated category remains unchanged at 193.5Mt @ 2,220ppm Li
(428kt contained lithium metal).
· The
Inferred category remains unchanged at 33.3Mt @ 2,140ppm Li (71kt
contained lithium metal).
Zinnwald
Lithium CEO, Anton du Plessis, commented:
"We are delighted to announce substantially
improved confidence in the Mineral Resource at the Zinnwald Project
with a 3.2x increase in resource tonnes in the Measured category.
The significant size of the measured resource coupled with the
improved continuity underscores the potential for the Project to
support materially increased production rates using large scale bulk
underground mining techniques compared with what was contemplated in
the 2022 Preliminary Economic Assessment."
DETAILS
The Project's previous update to its MRE,
announced on 21 February 2024, showed it was the second largest
hard-rock resource in the EU. The Company undertook a further
geometallurgical testwork programme to provide a higher level of
confidence in the Mineral Resource within the broader
mineralisation zone. This has resulted in an additional 25.0Mt
being included in the Measured category. This represents a 221%
increase in tonnage and a 133% increase in contained lithium within
the Measured category compared to the February 2024 MRE.
The Project now has sufficient material in Measured category
alone to support over 20 years of production. This is a major
milestone as it further de-risks the resource and adds a higher
level of confidence in the detailed mine plan, which is key
to financing plans.
This June 2024 MRE update does not incorporate
any new drilling or sampling data, and as such, the block model
estimate is unchanged. The February 2024 MRE incorporated 26,911m
of new diamond core drilling across 84 drill holes completed since
the previous MRE released in September 2018. The corresponding
drill hole database now consists of 33,933m of drill core and
19,537 samples with lithium analyses since the Project started in
2011.
In addition to the high-grade greisen
mineralisation, the focus of the recent 2022 / 2023 drilling was
the lithium mineralisation hosted by the mineralised albite
granite, as well as the internal lenses of higher grade greisen
(termed the mineralised zone). The inclusion of the mineralised
zone allows for a higher production rate and a potential
optimisation of overall project economics.
The following statement of Mineral Resources
has been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian
Securities Administrators ("NI 43-101") by independent consulting
firm Snowden Optiro Ltd ("Datamine International") of Bristol,
United Kingdom.
Table 1.1: Mineral Resource Statement for
Zinnwald Lithium Project, effective 5 June 2024.
Classification
|
Domain
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
Mean grade
|
Contained
metal
|
Li (ppm)
|
Li2O
(%)
|
Li (kt)
|
LCE (kt)
|
Measured
|
External Greisen
(1)
|
11.3
|
3,420
|
0.736
|
39
|
206
|
Mineralised Zone
(2)
|
25.0
|
2,090
|
0.449
|
52
|
277
|
· Internal Greisen
|
1.5
|
3,240
|
0.697
|
5
|
27
|
· Mineralised Granite
|
23.5
|
2,020
|
0.434
|
47
|
250
|
Subtotal (1) and
(2)
|
36.3
|
2,500
|
0.538
|
91
|
483
|
Indicated
|
External Greisen
(1)
|
2.1
|
3,510
|
0.756
|
7
|
40
|
Mineralised Zone
(2)
|
155.1
|
2,130
|
0.459
|
331
|
1,762
|
· Internal Greisen
|
13.2
|
3,330
|
0.717
|
44
|
234
|
· Mineralised Granite
|
141.9
|
2,019
|
0.435
|
287
|
1,528
|
Subtotal (1) and
(2)
|
157.2
|
2,150
|
0.463
|
338
|
1,802
|
Measured + Indicated subtotal
|
193.5
|
2,220
|
0.478
|
429
|
2,285
|
Inferred
|
External Greisen
(1)
|
0.8
|
3,510
|
0.756
|
3
|
15
|
Mineralised Zone
(2)
|
32.5
|
2,110
|
0.454
|
68
|
364
|
· Internal Greisen
|
0.6
|
2,880
|
0.620
|
2
|
9
|
· Mineralised Granite
|
31.9
|
2,090
|
0.450
|
67
|
355
|
Subtotal (1) and
(2)
|
33.3
|
2,140
|
0.461
|
71
|
379
|
Inferred subtotal
|
33.3
|
2,140
|
0.461
|
71
|
379
|
Notes
· Mineral Resource statement has an effective date of [5th June
2024].
· A
Mineral Resource is reported using a cut-off grade of 1,100 ppm Li,
which was calculated using the following assumptions: lithium
hydroxide monohydrate price USD 23,800 /t, operating costs of USD $
121.5/ t ROM; Li recovery of 69%; mining dilution and recovery of
10%.
· The
requirement of a reasonable prospect of eventual economic
extraction is met by having a minimum modelling width for
mineralized zones, a cut-off grade based on reasonable inputs and
an economic binding volume that lends itself to a potential
scenario of underground extraction for undiluted in-situ
resources.
· The
Mineral Resource is reported at a minimum of 20m below historical
underground mine workings (to avoid historic underground workings),
and within Germany only.
· All
tonnages reported are dry metric tonnes.
· Minor
discrepancies may occur due to rounding and use of appropriate
significant figures.
· LCE
(lithium carbonate equivalent) calculation used - 5.323 x Li metal.
LiOH*H2O (lithium hydroxide monohydrate) calculation used - 6.045 x
Li Metal.
· Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a
lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated
Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It
is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral
Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with
continued exploration.
· The
results from the stope optimisation are used solely for the purpose
of testing the "reasonable prospects for economic extraction" by
underground methods and do not represent an attempt to estimate
mineral reserves. There are no mineral reserves reported in this NI
43-101 resource update. The results are used as a guide to assist
in the preparation of a Mineral Resource statement and to select an
appropriate resource reporting cut-off grade. Stope optimisation
does not represent an economic study.
· The
estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by
environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political,
marketing, or other relevant issues.
· The
Author is not aware of any known mining, processing, metallurgical,
environmental, infrastructure, economic, permitting, legal, title,
taxation, socio-political, or marketing issues, or any other
relevant factors, that could materially affect the current Mineral
Resource Estimate.
Project
Overview
Snowden Optiro was commissioned by Zinnwald
Lithium plc to undertake a re-classification of the MRE of the
Zinnwald Lithium deposit following an update to the MRE in February
2024.
The Zinnwald Lithium project is located in
Saxony, Germany, very close to the German-Czech Republic border
(Figure 1.1). The Zinnwald Lithium deposit is a typical
greisen-hosted deposit and is located within the Central European
Variscan (Hercynican) belt. The primary ore mineral for the
deposit is the type locality for the mica mineral known as
Zinnwaldite, which can contain up to 1.9 wt.% lithium.
Figure 1.1: Zinnwald Lithium project location.
Source: Zinnwald Lithium
Mineral
Resource Estimate
Zinnwald Lithium announced an updated MRE on 21
February 2024. This followed Zinnwald Lithium completing an infill
drilling campaign in 2022 / 2023. This June 2024 update to the MRE
is a re-classification of the 21 February 2024 MRE only. No new
drilling or sampling data has been incorporated into the block
model and no re-estimation has taken place.
May 2024
Geometallurgical Testwork
The February 2024 MRE reviewed all historic
testwork completed on the Zinnwald deposit, which included bench
scale and pilot scale testwork. Whilst the Qualified Person was
satisfied that sufficient bulk metallurgical testing, including a
pilot plant test, has been performed on both the greisen and
mineralised granite domain, sufficient work had not been carried
out to test for geological / mineralogical variation and how these
variabilities affect metallurgical performance. The mineralised
albite granite is mineralogically and geologically more
heterogeneous compared with the greisens and it was determined that
insufficient variability testing had been performed to
date.
Following this review, Snowden Optiro
recommended that Zinnwald Lithium conduct a geo-metallurgical
testwork programme, comprising processing testwork and an
accompanying qualitative and quantitative mineralogical study.
Understanding variability in alteration of the host rock and
zinnwaldite and its potential effect on processing performance was
the direct objective of the testwork programme. The proposed
Zinnwald flowsheet is basic and the primary and only recovery
process is magnetic separation, which relies on the magnetic
susceptibility of the ore mineral (zinnwaldite), and by extension
the iron content of the ore mineral. Any variations in iron content
may affect magnetic susceptibility and recoveries / grade of the
concentrate.
The Qualified Person selected a total of 35
drill core samples for the purposes of the geometallurgical
testwork programme. The testwork programme was designed at bench
scale and incorporated the concentrator portion of the overall
Zinnwald flowsheet. It was deemed that the concentrator flowsheet
and concentrate recoveries were more susceptible to variations in
feed than the pyro / hydro-metallurgical flow sheet.
The objective of the study was to test
geological variability, primarily within the mineralised albite
granite, but also within the internal and external
greisens.
The laboratory scale testwork was conducted by
Metso at the Research Centre in Pori, Finland. This facility has
also been used by Metso for other Zinnwald Lithium testwork
campaigns. The flowsheet was designed to replicate the proposed
full-scale process, as close as reasonably possible. The sample
preparation and the use of a SLon magnet mirrored the 2023 / 2024
pilot scale testwork campaign conducted by Metso.
The main findings from the geometallurgical
testwork were:
·
Variability in lithium recoveries exists in the mineralised
albite granite samples (45.8% - 81.1%), with a mean of
64.5%.
·
Lower variability in lithium recoveries exist in the greisen
samples. No differentiation in recoveries can be determined between
the internal (within the mineralised zone) and external
greisens.
·
Variation in recoveries appears to be associated with
chlorite / sericite alteration (and to a lesser extent
kaolinisation) of the albite granite, with the former potentially
associated with zinnwaldite alteration. Conversely unaltered and
haematised albite granite exhibits lower variability in
recoveries.
Subsequent modelling of the alteration zones
within the deposit demonstrate that alteration is not common and
that it is often constrained to narrow joints and fault structures.
Distribution is often disparate but occasionally forms broad zones
that centre around major faults and continuous greisens / joints.
Interrogation of the models confirms that approximately 20% of the
mineralised albite granite domain is altered, inferring that
approximately 20% of the mineralised albite granite will exhibit
variable processing performance, due to host rock kaolinisation and
host mineral alteration.
February 2024
Mineral Resource estimate
This Mineral Resource estimate required a
reinterpretation and an updated geological model in order to
represent the geological and mineralogical domains that have been
defined by the most recent drilling campaign undertaken by Zinnwald
Lithium during 2022 and 2023. The geological model includes
mineralisation domains that are represented by the higher grade
greisens "external", as well as a broader zone of lithium
mineralisation contained within a mineralised albite lithium mica
granite and "internal" higher grade greisens. The higher-grade
external greisens are narrow in places but can reach up to 40m in
true thickness and outcrop above the mineralised zone of granite
and internal greisens with a typical separation but variable
distance of approximately 10m. The broader mineralised zone has an
average true thickness of approximately 80m and contains lenses of
greisen that locally exhibit higher grades of lithium
mineralisation. Both the mineralisation zone and the greisens
mirror the strike and dip of the host rock intrusion- the albite
granite, as is typical of many greisen related roof zone
deposits.
Lithium mineralisation within all geological
domains is hosted exclusively by polylithionite micas, or better
known as "zinnwaldite" type micas.
Lithium has been estimated using ordinary
kriging methods, and density using simple kriging methods.
Estimation has honoured the hard boundaries of the external
greisens, internal greisens and mineralised granite domains, as
well as using a dynamic anisotropic search method to honour the
varying dip and dip directions of all estimation domains (Figure
1.2, Figure 1.3 and Figure 1.4).
Figure 1.2: 3D view looking north west. Mineral
Resource block model showing distribution of lithium metal (Li_ppm)
grades.
Block model showing lithium (Li_ppm) grade
distribution.
Figure 1.3: N-S long section through the
resource block model.
Block model showing lithium (Li_ppm) grade
distribution, red line denotes reportable limit as defined by a 20m
safety pillar below historical mine workings, black line denotes
topography.
Figure 1.4: W-E cross section through the
resource block model.
Block model showing lithium (Li_ppm) grade
distribution, red line denotes reportable limit as defined by a 20m
safety pillar below historical mine workings, black line denotes
topography.
Classification
Snowden Optiro has taken multiple factors into
account when considering classification:
·
Drillhole spacing
·
Geological model confidence
·
Mineralisation continuity
·
Metallurgical confidence
·
Estimation pass
·
Mineralisation thickness
The classification criteria for the resource
are as follows:
Measured:
·
External greisen units, below the 20m safety buffer, showing
consistently mineralised zones supported by several drilling
intersections at a spacing of approximately 80m. This corresponds
to parts of the model where the geo-metallurgical behaviour is well
understood, and the mineralisation shows suitable continuity.
The classification does not include any extrapolated material
beyond appropriately spaced drillholes and must be estimated in the
first search pass.
·
Mineralised zone, below the 20m safety buffer, showing
consistently mineralised zones supported by several drilling
intersections at a spacing of approximately 80m. This corresponds
to parts of the model where the geo-metallurgical behaviour is well
understood, and the mineralisation shows suitable continuity. Only
zones of modelled unaltered granite have been included in the
Measured category. The classification does not include any
extrapolated material beyond appropriately spaced drillholes and
must be estimated in the first search pass.
Indicated:
·
External greisen units, below the 20m safety buffer,
supported by drilling intersections on a spacing of 80-120m.
The classification does not include any extrapolated material
beyond appropriately spaced drillholes and must be estimated in the
first search pass.
·
Mineralised zone, below the 20m safety buffer, supported by
drilling intersections on a spacing of 80-120m or at approximately
80m in zones of the domain that have been modelled as exhibiting
alteration (kaolinisation / zinnwaldite alteration). The
classification does not include any extrapolated material beyond
appropriately spaced drillholes and must be estimated in the first
search pass.
Inferred:
·
External greisen units and the mineralisation zone, below the
20m safety buffer, supported by wider-spaced drilling. This
corresponds to less certainty in geological / mineralisation
continuity and consists of material estimated in the first and
second pass and extrapolated beyond drillholes at the periphery of
the model up to half drillhole spacing.
Snowden Optiro has recommended to Zinnwald
Lithium that a further geometallurgical testwork programme be
undertaken within the modelled alteration zones of the mineralised
granite in order to provide a higher level of confidence in the
Mineral Resource within the broader mineralisation zone. This is as
a result of the 2024 geometallurgical testwork demonstrating a high
variability in processing performance within the altered zones of
the mineralised granite.
Reasonable
Prospects for Eventual Economic Extraction
NI 43-101 defines a mineral resource as that
portion of the mineral inventory that has reasonable prospects for
economic extraction (RPEEE). CIM Best Practice Guidelines for
estimating mineral resources require the factors significant to
project economics be current, reasonably developed and based on
generally accepted industry practice and experience. In
establishing the cut-off grade, it must realistically reflect the
location, deposit scale, continuity, assumed mining method,
metallurgical processes, costs and reasonable long-term metal
prices appropriate for the deposit.
Key assumptions have been provided to Snowden
Optiro by Zinnwald Lithium for this MRE; these have been adjusted
in accordance with the Company's understanding of costs associated
with a higher production rate expected when mining a greater volume
of material at a lower grade. This includes metallurgical
recoveries and mineral processing costs based on the results of
ongoing metallurgical testwork.
The grade-tonnage curve in Figure 1.5
demonstrates the robustness of the estimation to changes in cut-off
grade around the 1,100 ppm Li grade.
Figure 1.5: Grade-tonnage curve for the Zinnwald Lithium
deposit, Measured and Indicated only.
Comparison
with Previous Estimates
The most recent MRE for the deposit was
completed on the 20 February 2024 by Snowden Optiro and was
prepared and reported in accordance with National Instrument 43-101
- Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101"). The
June 2024 MRE is an update to the February 2024 MRE and does not
include a re-estimate, with the only material difference being a
re-classification. A direct comparison is provided in Table
1.3.
Table 1.3: Comparison of the Snowden Optiro Feb
2024 MRE with the updated Snowden Optiro June 2024 MRE
Model
|
Classification
|
Type
|
Tonnes
|
Mean Grade
|
Contained Metal
|
(Mt)
|
Li (ppm)
|
Li (kt)
|
Snowden Optiro (Feb
2024)
|
Measured
|
External
Greisen (1)
|
11.3
|
3,420
|
39
|
|
|
Mineralised Zone (2)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Indicated
|
External
Greisen (1)
|
2.1
|
3,510
|
7
|
|
|
Mineralised Zone (2)
|
180.0
|
2,120
|
383
|
|
Measured
+ Indicated
|
|
193.5
|
2,220
|
429
|
|
Inferred
|
External
Greisen (1)
|
0.8
|
3,510
|
3
|
|
|
Mineralised Zone (2)
|
32.5
|
2,110
|
68
|
Snowden Optiro (June
2024)
|
Measured
|
External
Greisen (1)
|
11.3
|
3,420
|
39
|
|
|
Mineralised Zone (2)
|
25.0
|
2,090
|
52
|
|
Indicated
|
External
Greisen (1)
|
2.1
|
3,510
|
7
|
|
|
Mineralised Zone (2)
|
155.1
|
2,130
|
331
|
|
Measured
+ Indicated
|
|
193.5
|
2,220
|
429
|
|
Inferred
|
External
Greisen (1)
|
0.8
|
3,510
|
3
|
|
|
Mineralised Zone (2)
|
32.5
|
2,110
|
68
|
Cut-off grade used for the Feb and June 2024
MRE was 1,100ppm.
The June 2024 MRE shows a 25Mt increase in the
Measured category compared with the February 2024 MRE. This is as a
result of better understanding processing performance variability
and the relationship with variability of the deposit. Resultant
alteration modelling within the mineralised granite has helped
guide classification of Measured in regions of unaltered
mineralised albite granite only. A drop in the Indicated category
is as a result of the increase in the Measured category. No changes
were made to the Inferred category.
Snowden Optiro has recommended to Zinnwald
Lithium that further geometallurgical testing of alteration zones
of the mineralised albite granite be undertaken in order to convert
parts of the Resource currently defined as Indicated.
Qualified
Persons
Laurie Hassall, Senior Consultant, MSci FIMMM
'689775' FGS '1044219', of Snowden Optiro is the main author of the
Technical Report, is responsible for the technical part of this
announcement and is a Qualified Person under the terms of NI
43-101.
The technical disclosure in this announcement
has been approved by Qualified Person EurGeol (#641) Christian
Masurenko of Zinnwald Lithium, Dipl. Geo., Member EFG, Fellow
SEG
*ENDS*
For further information visit
www.zinnwaldlithium.com or contact:
Anton du Plessis
Cherif Rifaat
|
Zinnwald Lithium plc
|
info@zinnwaldlithium.com
|
David Hart
Dan Dearden-Williams
|
Allenby Capital
(Nominated Adviser)
|
+44 (0) 20 3328 5656
|
Michael Seabrook
Adam Pollock
|
Oberon Capital Ltd
(Joint Broker)
|
+44 (0) 20 3179 5300
|
Richard Greenfield
Charles Bendon
|
Tamesis Partner LLP
(Joint Broker)
|
+44 (0) 20 3882 2868
|
Isabel de Salis
Paul Dulieu
|
St Brides Partners
(Financial PR)
|
zinnwald@stbridespartners.co.uk
|
Notes
AIM quoted Zinnwald Lithium plc (EPIC: ZNWD.L)
is focused on becoming an important supplier of lithium hydroxide
to Europe's fast-growing battery sector. The Company owns 100% of
the Zinnwald Lithium Project in Germany, which has an approved
mining licence, is located in the heart of Europe's chemical and
automotive industries and has the potential to be one of Europe's
more advanced battery grade lithium projects.
Glossary and definition of
terms
Title
|
Explanation
|
Cut-off
grade
|
The lowest grade or quality of mineralized
material that qualifies as economically mineable and available in a
given deposit. May be defined on the basis of economic evaluation
or on physical or chemical attributes that define an acceptable
product specification.
|
Indicated
Mineral Resource
|
That part of a Mineral Resource for which
tonnage, densities, shape, physical characteristics, grade and
mineral content can be estimated with a reasonable level of
confidence. It is based sampling and testing information
gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as
outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes. The locations
are too widely or inappropriately spaced to confirm geological
and/or grade continuity but are spaced closely enough for
continuity to be assumed.
|
Inferred
Mineral Resource
|
That part of a Mineral Resource for which
tonnage, densities, shape, physical characteristics, grade and
mineral content can be estimated with a low level of
confidence. It is inferred from geological evidence and
assumed but not verified geological and/or grade continuity.
It is based on information gathered through appropriate techniques
from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill
holes that may be limited or of uncertain quality and
reliability.
|
Measured
Mineral Resource
|
That part of a Mineral Resource for which
tonnage, densities, shape, physical characteristics, grade and
mineral content can be estimated with a high level of
confidence. It is based on detailed and reliable exploration,
sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate
techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits,
workings and drill holes. The locations are spaced closely
enough to confirm geological and grade continuity.
|